Stay Free - Russel Brand - They Lied About COVID Now the Truth Is Emerging… is Fauci DONE? - SF735

00:00:07.000 Ladies and gentlemen, Russell Brand, controversial conspiracy theorist. 0.91

00:00:12.000 Trying to bring real journalism to the American people.

00:00:17.000 Hello there, you awakening wonders.

00:00:18.000 Thanks for joining me today on Stay Free with Russell Brand for a very important conversation with Sonia Elijah.

00:00:23.000 After Tulsi Gabbard released all that information that showed how corrupt Anthony Fauci is and has been, we got Sonia Elijah on the show who wrote about the pandemic.

00:00:34.000 Her book is called Viral Takeover 311.

00:00:38.000 Viral Takeover is what it's called.

00:00:40.000 And she sees the pandemic as the sequel to 9 11, i.e., an event that was used to create control.

00:00:48.000 She describes not only the origins and the lies of the proximal origin theory paper that the advent of the pandemic was used to shut down people, saying, Did this thing come from a laboratory?

00:01:00.000 All the way to the excess deaths, the corruption in the United States, in the United Kingdom, globally, Bill Gates' involvement.

00:01:07.000 She's done a brilliant piece of investigative journalism.

00:01:10.000 That really helps you understand, even though now we're all concerned about other stuff, that the pandemic was a significant moment in our history.

00:01:18.000 It was the moment where they advanced a new project, where they took it to a new level of control.

00:01:24.000 The pandemic, in and of itself, is important enough.

00:01:27.000 But when it comes to understanding the future, it is the key event.

00:01:31.000 It might even be key when understanding the past, because now, when you look at the, I don't know, whether it's the First World War or the Second World War or even the American Civil War, you have to know this about power.

00:01:40.000 Whatever it is they're telling you, That probably isn't the truth.

00:01:44.000 And if they're telling you, we're doing this because we love you so much and we want to help you, that definitely isn't true.

00:01:52.000 Whether they're talking about protecting children through digital ID, whether they're talking about you taking vaccines to protect your children, whether they're talking about funding some war, whatever it is they're saying, it ain't true.

00:02:06.000 Unless they come out and say, we're doing this because we want total control over you.

00:02:09.000 You'll have a better understanding when you watch this brilliant conversation with Sonia Elijah and click the link in the description and get her book.

00:02:16.000 Also, why not get this book, Forbidden Facts, by the great Gavin DeBecker?

00:02:20.000 Also, why not get this book by Ole Russ, which in a sense tells you the one thing that you yourself could do?

00:02:26.000 Instead of inoculating yourself with some weird experimental gene therapy that's going to mess you up and likely give you a, not likely, possibly give you a turbo cancer, inoculate yourself from this fallen world in Christ.

00:02:39.000 Sometimes my relationship with him changes so far so rapidly that I wish there was a different word, but that's the name he was given Jesus Christ, the name above all names.

00:02:47.000 Is not what you think it is if you've been involved in institutional religion.

00:02:52.000 It's about, well, freeing yourself from the slavery of this world.

00:02:57.000 Who controls this world?

00:02:59.000 And evil controls this world, just to let you know what not only my reflections are, but what is scripturally verified.

00:03:07.000 Evil is in control of this world.

00:03:09.000 And if you doubt that now, you won't doubt it after this interview, after it's explained to you what happened during the pandemic.

00:03:16.000 If you haven't got Rumble Premium yet, get Rumble Premium now.

00:03:20.000 Before we speak to Sonia, here's a brief video explaining her work.

00:03:24.000 Sonia Elijah is an independent investigative journalist and former BBC researcher whose work focuses on pharmaceutical regulation, public health policy, and government transparency.

00:03:35.000 Over the past five years, she's conducted extensive investigations into the COVID 19 response, examining regulatory documents, freedom of information disclosures, vaccine safety data, and the decisions made by governments and public health agencies.

00:03:50.000 Her new book, 311 Viral. Takeover brings together years of research into a single account of the pandemic and its political, scientific, and social consequences.

00:04:00.000 How much control have you got over your money right now in this second?

00:04:03.000 I wonder where all my money is, and I wonder right now.

00:04:03.000 None.

00:04:05.000 It's being controlled by the monarchy and the Rothschilds. 0.98

00:04:09.000 Technology has changed everything now. 0.99

00:04:11.000 Technology!

00:04:12.000 And it's changing how money works.

00:04:13.000 Crypto started as niche, but now it's going mainstream.

00:04:15.000 Faster payments, more control.

00:04:17.000 For you middlemen, this ain't hype.

00:04:18.000 This is where it's going.

00:04:19.000 And getting started today is easier than you think.

00:04:21.000 That's where Rumble Wallet comes in.

00:04:22.000 With Rumble Wallet, you can buy Bitcoin, hold dollar back, stable coins, even digital gold backed by real gold, all in one place.

00:04:27.000 Setup is simple it connects with MoonPay.

00:04:30.000 I'm the moon.

00:04:31.000 So you can use your debit card, credit card, or bank account.

00:04:34.000 And be up and running in minutes.

00:04:36.000 Start small $10, $50, $100.

00:04:38.000 It's not about the amount, it's about getting early and understanding what's coming next.

00:04:41.000 And once you set up, you can even tip your fumble.

00:04:43.000 Tip your fumble.

00:04:44.000 Fumblereaters.

00:04:45.000 I'm sorry, we're going to have to leave that as it is.

00:04:47.000 Like me, directly.

00:04:48.000 Do this now.

00:04:49.000 Scan the QR code, click the link in the description, download Rumble Wallet.

00:04:52.000 From there, you can save your wallet, tap buy, and you're in the game.

00:04:54.000 Take control of your money and get started with Rumble Wallet today.

00:04:58.000 Okay, here's Sonia Elijah.

00:05:02.000 Sonia Elijah, thanks for joining me today on Stay Free with Russell Brand.

00:05:07.000 Thank you, Russell, for having me on your show.

00:05:10.000 Sonia, we're here to primarily talk about your book, 311 Viral Takeover, a comprehensive look at the many facets of the pandemic.

00:05:22.000 Firstly, where did the coronavirus outbreak begin?

00:05:27.000 What is the provenance of that virus?

00:05:31.000 Is it, as it seems to be increasingly clear, the result of irresponsible.

00:05:37.000 Bio research likely funded by the very people who were charged with remedying a situation that, with delicious and vicious irony, they created the social and political responses, who benefited socially and politically, how it was used to expedite further authoritarianism, who the heroes were, who the villains were, and what the motives were behind it.

00:06:04.000 What's different, I suppose, about your work as compared to.

00:06:08.000 My own interest as a sort of a human being that was profoundly affected by the pandemic is that you've done research and that there are close to a thousand citations in your book.

00:06:19.000 Can you firstly give our audience an overview of the scope and scale of your task?

00:06:24.000 Because the truth is, while there have been government inquiries in the United States and a truncated and rather facile one in the United Kingdom, it seems that any real work that's done when it comes to understanding the pandemic and its connotations, as I just described, is going to have To be done by investigative and independent journalists.

00:06:43.000 You've done that work.

00:06:44.000 So tell us, firstly, broadly, the purview of your book.

00:06:47.000 Yeah, absolutely.

00:06:49.000 So it's an evidence based examination that completely dismantles the official narrative of the COVID pandemic that reshaped society.

00:06:58.000 It shows how unelected and conflict of interest ridden scientists, pharma linked philanthropies, and intelligence linked networks coordinated a narrative that.

00:07:11.000 Basically, overrode ethics, science, and our basic human freedoms.

00:07:17.000 Wow.

00:07:18.000 So, when you say that, I think of like Anthony Fauci in the United States.

00:07:23.000 I think of Chris Witte in the UK.

00:07:26.000 I think of Matt Hancock.

00:07:28.000 And in both the US and the UK, and, you know, of course, Australia and Canada were profoundly affected.

00:07:35.000 The whole world was affected.

00:07:36.000 That's the nature of a pandemic.

00:07:37.000 But some of the most egregious incidents, apart from the general.

00:07:44.000 The disaster that we all encountered were the internment camps in Australia, the trucker protests in Canada, the deception, the global deception.

00:07:55.000 So, to help us narrativize it, and because you've done the responsible investigative work, can you tell us what are some of the kind of flashpoints and who are some of the real villains?

00:08:04.000 You know, because you talked about the ethics of it, the ethics that were overridden.

00:08:08.000 Who are some of the sort of figures that stand out?

00:08:13.000 Yeah.

00:08:13.000 So, I mean, I mentioned this sort of, you know, the conflict of interest ridden scientists.

00:08:18.000 So, essentially, the beginning of the book looks at the origins of the virus.

00:08:25.000 And it sort of pivots around three pillar papers published in prestigious journals, Russell, that basically lock in the natural origin theory, right?

00:08:34.000 This is a theory they pushed onto the public.

00:08:37.000 Um, but amongst themselves, I'm talking about Anthony Fauci.

00:08:41.000 I'm talking about Sir Jeremy Farrar, who was heading up the Wellcome Trust at the time.

00:08:46.000 I'm talking about, um, the evolutionary biologists like Christian Anderson and Andrew Rambout and also, you know, Sir Patrick Valance in the UK as well.

00:08:56.000 All sort of, you, they've got these massive emails and I look and a lot of my book is based on Freedom of Information Act release documents, these emails that they didn't want the public to see, right?

00:09:08.000 So in private, they're completely believing that it's highly plausible that this virus basically leaked from a lab, right?

00:09:17.000 This is, they're discussing it amongst themselves.

00:09:20.000 Um, but in the, in public, they all, they all sort of lock in, they come together and they agree on this official narrative, which is to completely dismiss dispel, smear, anyone that suggests that the virus came from a lab, right?

00:09:37.000 So the, I would say the most influential paper, and it is the most sort of, I think in history, the most sort of, uh, uh, influential paper in the scientific literature.

00:09:48.000 This is the proximal origin paper that was published in Nature Medicine.

00:09:53.000 This is early on in 2020.

00:09:56.000 And it was, uh, authored by Christian Anderson and Andrew Rambat, Robert Gary, Uh, Ian Limpkin, um, some renowned actually gain of function scientists.

00:10:07.000 Now, on the surface, they, they, they, they conclude Russell.

00:10:11.000 They actually say, we do not believe that any type of laboratory based scenario is plausible, which completely contradicts their discussions.

00:10:22.000 You've got Anderson basically saying in a, one of his private Slack messages.

00:10:27.000 He's the key, key author of the paper.

00:10:30.000 This virus, when you look closely at this virus, it looks engineered.

00:10:35.000 And then you've got the other author saying that given the shitshow that's going to be unleashed, it's best for us to say that this virus is not engineered.

00:10:47.000 So, this is amongst themselves.

00:10:49.000 You also have, you know, sort of that shadowy hand at play.

00:10:54.000 You have the Fauci characters, Francis Collins, Sir Jeremy Farrar.

00:10:59.000 Now, it's very interesting that one of these leaked, one of these disclosed emails, You actually have Farrar as the official editor of this paper.

00:11:10.000 Even though his name is not listed as an author, he's actually saying to the, the, the writers, could you please change this word?

00:11:18.000 So sorry to micro edit.

00:11:20.000 Instead of saying the word unlikely, can you write implausible?

00:11:24.000 So he's literally, you know, editing the paper.

00:11:27.000 But even going back before that, you have a very, um, infamous teleconference call that takes place on Saturday, February 1st, Russell.

00:11:37.000 And leading up to this teleconference call, you have these emails where they're really in a panic about what to do because this virus looks engineered.

00:11:46.000 But after the conference, there's a lot of backslapping that goes on, and they're really relieved because they all basically are going to, you know, dismiss as a conspiracy theory the lab origin.

00:11:58.000 So this proximal origin paper comes out of that teleconference call.

00:12:03.000 26, and then prior to that, you have a joint statement in The Lancet.

00:12:09.000 This is the second key piece of literature that pushes to the natural origin, where 26 of the 27 scientists, Russell, are linked to.

00:12:20.000 The Wuhan Institute of Virology and its funders.

00:12:23.000 Um, you've got major conflicts of interest at play.

00:12:26.000 You've got also two key authors.

00:12:28.000 This is Christian Anderson and Andrew Rambout, who wrote the proximal origin paper, who have, you know, they've, they've received funds from the Wellcome Trust and Fauci's NIH.

00:12:41.000 So it's just, it screams of conflict of interest.

00:12:45.000 And I, I start from there, Russell, because I, I want to dismantle every lie.

00:12:51.000 I want to go for every untruth, what they pushed on the public, and how every dissenting voices were censored.

00:12:59.000 Because the day the paper comes out, you have the editor in chief of Nature Medicine, where the paper is published, tweeting on this is pre Musk's X, this is when it was Twitter, saying, oh, this paper puts all the, let's put conspiracy theories to rest and stop spreading misinformation.

00:13:24.000 Well done, Christian Anderson.

00:13:25.000 And he sort of re, re quotes the paper.

00:13:28.000 So you, you have this coordinated push for just locking in this natural origin theory, which is a complete, it's a complete lie.

00:13:38.000 We know that the CIA linked USAID agency, their predict program, which was actually interesting, quietly disbanded in September 2019.

00:13:51.000 But prior to that, they've, they funded a eco health alliance.

00:13:55.000 So, this is Peter Dazak's charity, New York based charity, that was doing gain of function work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China, with the infamous Batwoman, Dr. Shi Zheng Li, if you remember her.

00:14:12.000 So, you have this funding these scientists, funding these papers, and characters like Ralph Barrick from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

00:14:29.000 A lot of his papers funded by, um, the CIA linked USAID, their PREDICT program.

00:14:36.000 And, uh, this, yeah, this was going, and CIA covered it all up.

00:14:39.000 So, um, just recently we've got, you know, these emails being disclosed going viral on X, right?

00:14:46.000 Uh, stating all of this.

00:14:48.000 And, um, yeah, so the lies started from the very beginning, but my book even goes before I do an extensive timeline looking at what was running up to the 311.

00:15:00.000 I'm obviously the book title 311.

00:15:02.000 It's March the 11th.

00:15:03.000 2020, that's when the World Health Organization declared the pandemic.

00:15:09.000 But running up to that, you have all these pandemic simulation exercises going on.

00:15:15.000 I'm sure you've heard of the event, Event 201, right?

00:15:19.000 So a lot of recommendations came out of that event where they are saying you've got to do something about misinformation.

00:15:27.000 Governments and private sector need to come together to, in real time, combat misinformation and What do we have going on now in the UK, Russell?

00:15:37.000 We've got the government coming out saying social media needs to only promote trusted news sources like the BBC.

00:15:46.000 That is straight out of the playbook from Event 201, which I really kind of go into and dissect.

00:15:52.000 So this has been, you know, it never was an organic response to a health event.

00:16:00.000 It was a profound psychological operation.

00:16:03.000 Excellent.

00:16:04.000 So the proximal origin paper, the function of which was to thwart the.

00:16:11.000 Inverted commas conspiracy theories itself is a primary artifact in demonstrating that the conspiracy theorists were 100% accurate, eerily accurate, alarmingly accurate.

00:16:26.000 Some people like Jay Bhattacharya, Robert Malone, Peter McCulloch, doctors and medical professionals that spoke out at the time, specifically and explicitly for the Barrington Declaration in the case of Bhattacharya, were.

00:16:41.000 On point, that the response was inappropriate.

00:16:44.000 Now, a few of the details from your excellent research that struck me as fascinating were 26 of the 27 authors were financially connected to the Wuhan Institute of Virology or its funders in one way or another.

00:16:57.000 Of course, familiar names keep coming up Peter Dazak and Eco Health Alliance, a name you hear consistently.

00:17:07.000 I was fascinated just by the process.

00:17:09.000 I think you said that that was Jeremy Farrow.

00:17:13.000 Editing like small editorial changes, words like unlikely to implausible.

00:17:18.000 This is a kind of a level of manipulation that is difficult to track.

00:17:22.000 Now, the challenge that we have now is maintaining people's interest in something that is fascinating and provides, in a sense, a map for how our contemporary global imperial reality operates.

00:17:37.000 That these various institutions that might seem to be, and perhaps in a limited way, are separate, function in concord.

00:17:46.000 Where relevant.

00:17:47.000 As George Carlin said, where interests converge, no conspiracy is necessary.

00:17:54.000 Because I've not had the chance to read your book, it's quite a tome.

00:17:58.000 I wonder if you had a chance to investigate when it comes to our country, the United Kingdom, the intervention, for example, of the 77th Brigade, Logically AI, and CRISPR, some of the groups that were charged and paid, not only by Moderna, but by the British government, therefore the taxpayer, you and I, to limit.

00:18:20.000 Misinformation and take down vaccine misinformation spreaders.

00:18:25.000 Can you tell me just particularly about some of the media control?

00:18:28.000 Yeah, absolutely.

00:18:29.000 Because a lot of chapters of the book are dedicated to the machinery of censorship, Russell, which was at play.

00:18:37.000 And obviously, the blueprint was set with this recommendations coming out of Event 201 to combat what they deem as misinformation.

00:18:46.000 And essentially, it's anything that deviates from their official.

00:18:50.000 Sort of narrative.

00:18:51.000 You've got, yeah, so the 77th Brigade, very interesting that you bring up.

00:18:57.000 That's a unit of the British Army.

00:19:00.000 It's dedicated to informational operations.

00:19:06.000 And we know, I write about this, how they had the British public under surveillance.

00:19:12.000 This is the 77th Brigade.

00:19:15.000 You had professors like Carl Hennigan being under surveillance, and you have them looking at his.

00:19:23.000 Tweets, what he was doing when he was criticizing the rule of six.

00:19:27.000 This is to do with when we had lockdowns.

00:19:30.000 So you have them essentially spying on the British public.

00:19:33.000 This is the British army.

00:19:35.000 It's really insidious.

00:19:36.000 It's very disturbing.

00:19:38.000 Um, so I look at that and there are a lot of, um, facets to this.

00:19:43.000 You've got a lot of NGOs, these non-governmental organizations like the CCDH.

00:19:49.000 Have you heard of them?

00:19:50.000 The Center for Countering Digital Hate.

00:19:53.000 So this is Imran Ahmed's outlet.

00:19:56.000 It's a American and British NGO charity where essentially it provides the blueprint.

00:20:04.000 It's the ideological engine for mass Suppression for mass censorship.

00:20:10.000 And we know when we looked at the, um, so in 2021, the CCDH, they released a document called the Disinformation Dozen Report.

00:20:19.000 And they claim that 12 people, including Robert, uh, RFK Jr., uh, is responsible for 65% of all the anti-vax sentiment online.

00:20:33.000 So they highlight these people and they go after them, right?

00:20:36.000 They get deplatformed.

00:20:38.000 They get, when we, when, Do you remember the Twitter files that got disclosed not so long ago?

00:20:44.000 And you have like memos, like internal memos from Facebook, and they're kind of boasting how they're sort of, you know, de platforming these individuals.

00:20:54.000 And yeah, I mean, it's just we know that the Biden administration worked with big tech companies to silence any dissenting voices.

00:21:06.000 And that happened also in the UK, right?

00:21:10.000 It wasn't just a US thing, but actually.

00:21:12.000 The CCDH spurred this whole on and they're, they, they are a UK centric, uh, organization.

00:21:19.000 Um, and then you have them actually, there were some leaked files.

00:21:22.000 These are the, um, where you have them saying their top annual priority is to kill, uh, Musk's Twitter.

00:21:30.000 So this is, and my book has got loads of screenshots of all this evidence, all these exhibits.

00:21:36.000 Um, so, um, and, and a way of, uh, of killing Musk's Twitter is to do all these advertising boycotts and things like that, because they're literally, you know, Afraid of the truth, right?

00:21:49.000 They want to silence people, deplatform.

00:21:52.000 But I mean, yes, the scientists got a lot.

00:21:55.000 A chapter is just literally censoring of the science, where I look at all these scientists, how they were treated, any papers that raise the risk of these gene based shots, right?

00:22:08.000 This mRNA technology being retracted or not being able to get published, being smeared.

00:22:15.000 But not only that, you had the injured.

00:22:17.000 These are the vaccine injured and how they were treated.

00:22:21.000 Uh, there's a section in my book where how you have the BBC involved in this.

00:22:26.000 So you have them boasting they have a, they, they put forward an article where they are bragging that, uh, these anti-vax groups on Facebook, these are what they're calling the vaccine injured, have anti-vax groups are using carrot emojis to circumvent the censors, right?

00:22:44.000 And they're bragging how they, they took, you know, they, they alerted Facebook and they got those accounts taken down.

00:22:50.000 We know that the BBC helm The trusted news initiative.

00:22:55.000 This was set up in September 2019.

00:22:59.000 And what was that?

00:23:00.000 That was essentially a cross platform censorship network, right?

00:23:06.000 Again, going after any dissenting voices in real time.

00:23:10.000 Okay.

00:23:11.000 And this is what we're seeing play out.

00:23:12.000 So we saw this unprecedented use of censorship coming out of 311.

00:23:19.000 And that's why I'm really, I kind of hark on with the date because it's sort of like we enter this new era.

00:23:25.000 And I see 311 Russell as a biological sequel to 9 11.

00:23:31.000 So, 9 11, what did we see come out of that?

00:23:33.000 We saw this rise of mass surveillance.

00:23:35.000 We saw endless wars.

00:23:37.000 We saw the Patriot Act.

00:23:39.000 Um, but with not with 311, we're what we're seeing.

00:23:43.000 We're seeing, uh, this, uh, rise of biosecurity.

00:23:47.000 Okay.

00:23:48.000 And this, uh, compliance, this citizen compliance with the state.

00:23:54.000 I mean, don't you remember in lockdown how so many people, obviously being so scared, just obeyed.

00:24:00.000 They followed the rules.

00:24:02.000 They stayed home.

00:24:02.000 They locked down.

00:24:03.000 They died in their homes, right?

00:24:05.000 Not of COVID, but of other like, Heart attacks and other, other ailments and diseases.

00:24:11.000 So, um, it's, it's, uh, yeah, it's, it's just really, I mean, if you think of, I mean, my mind still boggles what went on and how they weaponized fear.

00:24:22.000 We must not forget this was a major psychological operation because early on, they knew that it, that the infection fatality ratio was like 0.1%, which is comparable to a severe flu season.

00:24:39.000 Okay.

00:24:40.000 They knew that early on.

00:24:41.000 But what did they do?

00:24:43.000 They scared the public, like, you know, where they died in their homes.

00:24:46.000 They didn't go out.

00:24:48.000 And, um, they forced, coerced these novel shots on everyone.

00:24:53.000 Right.

00:24:54.000 And I go deep into that.

00:24:56.000 I look at the rise of, of Moderna and I look at it's the, the, it mRNA technology is a DARPA technology.

00:25:05.000 And DARPA is the, obviously, as you know, the military, uh, research, uh, arm of, you know, the Pentagon.

00:25:11.000 And we know that they were really Desperate to bring out this mRNA technology.

00:25:17.000 BioNTech and Moderna had failed to bring any mRNA product to market prior to 311.

00:25:25.000 So it takes this disruptive event, right?

00:25:29.000 Uh, this health crisis to usher in this new novel technology.

00:25:33.000 And I believe the lockdowns were a psyop.

00:25:37.000 So people were so desperate to get the shot so they could literally, you know, they would like, you know, uh, uh, the economy could go back to normal.

00:25:46.000 They could have a normal life.

00:25:47.000 They could travel.

00:25:48.000 All of these things, it was, yeah, it was just to coerce the public.

00:25:53.000 And I believe it was, you know, the greatest crime against humanity.

00:25:57.000 We can't make this content without the support of our partners.

00:25:59.000 Here's a quick message from one now.

00:26:01.000 This episode is sponsored by Enhanced.

00:26:04.000 You've heard of the Enhanced games, the team rewriting what the human body is capable of.

00:26:08.000 This is their consumer line, not hormones, not prescriptions, the daily stimulant free supplements built to the same standard.

00:26:14.000 You train hard, you work hard, and by 3 p.m. most days, you're running on whatever's left.

00:26:18.000 In the tank.

00:26:19.000 Enhanced makes a daily formula called Stronger.

00:26:22.000 Doctor formulated, clinically dosed, no proprietary blends.

00:26:25.000 One scoop, five grams of creatine, eight grams of pure L-ciliatrine, beta-alanine, essential amino acids, and peak ATP.

00:26:33.000 Designed to support strength, blood flow, steady energy, and recovery.

00:26:37.000 And zero caffeine, so there's no crash.

00:26:39.000 It's the extra set in the gym and something still left when you walk in the door at night.

00:26:43.000 And if you're playing the long game, Enhanced makes longer.

00:26:46.000 Their doctor formulated daily longevity formula, one scoop replaces six to eight bottles, a thousand milligrams of.

00:26:52.000 Urolithin A and NMN to support your NAD levels, and Glynac designed to support healthy aging at the cellular level.

00:26:59.000 Age better, not just older.

00:27:01.000 Docked, formulated, and built direct by the team behind the Enhanced Games.

00:27:05.000 No middleman, no markup.

00:27:06.000 Go to enhance.com and get 50% off your first order.

00:27:10.000 That's enhance.com to get 50% off your first order.

00:27:15.000 Good.

00:27:16.000 I'm feeling very angry now.

00:27:18.000 It's reminded me of the depth of it and the tenacity of the event and the severity of.

00:27:26.000 The deception on a number of layers, and also when you start to list the institutions and groups involved the BBC, the British government, DARPA it's so far reaching, so ridiculous, and also they are such pompous, pious, haughty organizations that approach the public.

00:27:48.000 And actually, you know, obviously, this is personal to me like independent media and me, actual me.

00:27:55.000 You know, there's no sort of actual, like actual me.

00:27:58.000 I feel like I've actually been directly.

00:28:01.000 And quite significantly and severely impacted by these events.

00:28:06.000 And it's inspired me a kind of a righteous indignation that I know that I'm going to need.

00:28:13.000 Because, in a way, significant though these events are on their own, and I enjoy your framing, Sonia, of the events of 311 as a sequel to 9 11, a biological sequel.

00:28:27.000 That's a very good idea and smart branding for your own.

00:28:32.000 Book and accurate because these events, whether they are engineered or not, and it can sometimes be difficult to corroborate such outlandish notions.

00:28:47.000 But if we, through the with the advantage of the passage of time, look at the results of those events, we're able to perhaps discern what the intention of those events might have been were they orchestrated, and even if they weren't.

00:29:04.000 Orchestrated.

00:29:05.000 It's curious how these global events seem to inadvertently benefit the most powerful interests in the world.

00:29:12.000 And one of the moments that I started to like, the common sense started to kick in quite hard with me is when I recognized that the motivation of preserving life and the sanctity of life is not in evidence in global policy elsewhere.

00:29:30.000 So if you're being told, well, the reason that we need you to take these injections, the reason we need you to remain in your home is because we love you.

00:29:38.000 And we love life so much and we want to protect you.

00:29:42.000 You can detect whether or not that's consistent with the values they deploy elsewhere.

00:29:49.000 And so, once you've undertaken that quick exercise and quickly concluded that that's a total lie, you can then look at what they say about migration.

00:29:59.000 We have to help people because we love people and we care about people.

00:30:02.000 So, that's why.

00:30:03.000 So, what this is different from saying what the ethics and morality.

00:30:09.000 Of migration and our treatment of refugees and people suffering.

00:30:13.000 That's a different conversation.

00:30:15.000 It's an important one, but it's a separate one.

00:30:17.000 What we can definitely deduce is that they do not care about protecting migrants or refugees.

00:30:26.000 You can detect quite quickly that they do not care about the sovereignty of Ukraine, that they do not care about people, whichever side they are of the Israel or Gaza argument, whatever it is they're saying.

00:30:40.000 And when I say they, I'm talking about this.

00:30:42.000 Collection.

00:30:43.000 And the reason they have this sort of viable deniability because it is when you look at the work you've done, look at how diffuse and molecular it becomes.

00:30:54.000 One person in one place is saying, don't use the word unlikely, use the word implausible.

00:31:00.000 DARPA are experimenting in China with new biotechnology.

00:31:06.000 Moderna, at the point when it has, I don't know, five employees, is getting investment from a hedge fund that the eventual chancellor and then prime minister of the United. Kingdom Rishi Sunak's invested in, then that guy just disappears from the scene.

00:31:22.000 No one interrogates it.

00:31:24.000 No one investigates the relationship between Moderna and the contracts that Moderna subsequently got.

00:31:29.000 And of course, the media shaming and the attacks.

00:31:34.000 I saw something in the Times where it said that the 77th Brigade had been specifically tasked with taking down and taking out Vax misinformation propagators in the UK.

00:31:48.000 Well, At the time of the pandemic, Sonia, not to make everything about me, but I do notice I have that habit.

00:31:55.000 I was like, there was not a person that was more saying, Hey, you want to be careful of these vaccines.

00:32:02.000 And I don't trust the government, and I don't trust Big Pharma, and I don't trust the media.

00:32:06.000 There was no one doing that more in the UK than me.

00:32:11.000 And around that time, I experienced some pretty negative publicity and some pretty serious attacks.

00:32:18.000 And as soon as they happened, As soon as they happened, the head of the Department of Media and Social Media and Culture, Dame Caroline Dynage, contacted X, YouTube, Meta, Rumble, etc., and said Russell Brown should be demonetized.

00:32:36.000 This is interesting, one, because it's government intervention in a private matter.

00:32:40.000 At that point, I hadn't even been charged with anything.

00:32:43.000 It's also interesting because she's married to Mark Lancaster, who runs the 77th Brigade.

00:32:48.000 So, you know, it's a big club and you ain't in it.

00:32:51.000 And what I. Beginning to appreciate and understand is as long as they've got plausible denial.

00:32:57.000 Oh, do you really think that Moderna were spending money here on logically AI and the British government was spending here and the 77th Brigade were doing this?

00:33:06.000 You know, as long as they can sort of find ways to continue to advance control, you know, they'll do it.

00:33:14.000 And like we're in our country right now, there's sort of political upheaval and distraction and all of that.

00:33:20.000 But generally speaking, the train is still on tracks on you.

00:33:24.000 So, like.

00:33:26.000 When you were undertaking this significant and diligent task, can you tell us some of the moments where you felt the most visceral and personal outrage at demonstrable corruption?

00:33:41.000 For understandable reasons, we can't keep streaming on YouTube.

00:33:44.000 YouTube are part of the trusted news initiative that Sonia Elijah talks about, a network of media organizations that agree on narratives and agree to censor and control information together.

00:33:55.000 Basically, what they do.

00:33:57.000 Look it up for yourself.

00:33:58.000 Why would I lie?

00:33:59.000 What have I got to win or lose?

00:34:00.000 See you later, YouTube baby.

00:34:02.000 Join us over on Rumble.

00:34:04.000 Oh, yeah, absolutely.

00:34:06.000 I mean, we know that the Wellcome Trust is funded by its portfolio, its investment portfolio.

00:34:12.000 And that is a heavily pharmaceutical linked investment portfolio.

00:34:16.000 What is the Wellcome Trust?

00:34:18.000 The Wellcome Trust is this charitable organization that funds research, scientific research, that was led at the time of the pandemic, was led by Sir Jeremy Farrar.

00:34:28.000 If you remember.

00:34:29.000 So we know that, that they, they made about 10 billion during the pandemic, right?

00:34:35.000 Because of their portfolio, because they were heavily invested in pharmaceutical companies.

00:34:41.000 And, um, I mean, for example, one of the companies was, which wasn't pharmaceutical was DoorDash, which is an online food delivery service.

00:34:50.000 And what do you think, you know, I mean, how, yeah, and, and Jeremy from our was instrumental in pushing down, pushing for lockdowns, right?

00:34:59.000 Um, so, But my book goes into the, um, this heavily flawed paper.

00:35:05.000 This is, uh, the Professor Neil Ferguson's Report Nine, right?

00:35:10.000 Coming out of Imperial College London, which happens to also be heavily funded by the Gates Foundation.

00:35:18.000 And Professor Neil Ferguson, it was his paper that essentially was used to justify locking down almost the world, right?

00:35:26.000 We know that Deborah Burks, she was on the US vaccine task force.

00:35:32.000 She cited that paper when she was asked by reporters, why is this sudden need to lock down?

00:35:38.000 Because I know, you know, remember, Trump didn't want to lock down, just like Boris Johnson at the time.

00:35:43.000 didn't want to lock down.

00:35:44.000 And she cites this paper, this paper coming out of London, this explosive paper.

00:35:48.000 So he predicted his catastrophic predictions of like, if we don't lock down in the US, you'll see two and a half million deaths by that summer.

00:35:56.000 In the UK, you'll see half a million deaths.

00:35:59.000 We know that he has a history of catastrophic prediction, all based on his modeling, right?

00:36:06.000 This modeling.

00:36:07.000 And we know that paper was based on a computer code that was never peer reviewed, it was never publicly disclosed.

00:36:14.000 We know it was based.

00:36:16.000 On an exponential growth of the virus, which was flawed.

00:36:21.000 And this is the paper that everyone locked down on.

00:36:25.000 So, the same can be said with the PCR testing.

00:36:29.000 So, I really delved into the whole PCR tests and all the essentially scams with that.

00:36:35.000 And the conflicts of interest, again, you know, I look at Professor Christian Drosden, the German virologist.

00:36:42.000 So, his paper is adopted by the World Health Organization as a gold standard.

00:36:48.000 For diagnosing this novel virus, SARS CoV 2, three, like literally like the three days after the genomic virus, the sequence gets uploaded to vrological.org, which is January the 10th, January 13th of 2020.

00:37:05.000 The PCR test is formally approved by the World Health Organization.

00:37:10.000 So you have to look at the timeline.

00:37:13.000 My book, because it was very hard to write, you know, obviously I've been doing this for many years, but to pull a book together where it flows, where There's a direction to it.

00:37:23.000 I use the timeline as my skeleton.

00:37:26.000 And if you look at the timeline, there are so many anomalies that jump out to do with the dates.

00:37:31.000 So we know this was not an organic response to a health event based on these dates.

00:37:37.000 We know that, for example, Moderna and the NIH, their vaccine research center, again, like three days after the virus is uploaded, the sequence, they've decided on the genetic sequence for their vaccine.

00:37:52.000 A lot of these things.

00:37:54.000 Um, but the PCR test, one big scam.

00:37:56.000 I look at the, the rapid antigen tests as well.

00:37:59.000 Um, this is with Innova.

00:38:01.000 So this is a test, Russell.

00:38:02.000 Do you remember those NHS testing kits that were given out like candy?

00:38:08.000 These were these, uh, rapid antigen tests.

00:38:10.000 They work a bit like a pregnancy test to see if you've got the virus or not.

00:38:15.000 The government spent, the UK government spent four billion of taxpayers' money on these tests that the FDA said they should be thrown in the trash.

00:38:24.000 But the UK government.

00:38:25.000 I know.

00:38:26.000 And it's so interesting because I was writing this report because a lot of my writings, you know, from, you know, 2021, I was writing on all of this when it was going on.

00:38:37.000 And I happened to come across this Innova and I was writing on it.

00:38:41.000 And then when my part two of my report came out, suddenly the FDA announced this, this, you know, messaging alert you've got to throw away these garbage, these tests.

00:38:52.000 But again, the conflicts of interest, this VIP lane, the scandal of, How, I mean, people made so much money.

00:38:59.000 There was a massive transfer of wealth during this time.

00:39:03.000 And of course, at the end of the day, unprecedented control.

00:39:08.000 My book ends with the final chapters look at this rise of digital authoritarianism that we are seeing across the West.

00:39:17.000 You have to look at things like the Online Safety Act.

00:39:20.000 Did you know that the CCDH, this is the organization I was talking about before, they were instrumental in the Online Safety Act?

00:39:28.000 They were advising the UK government, they were also advising the EU on the Digital Services Act.

00:39:36.000 The OSA, the Online Safety Act, is the most sweeping, uh, digital control legislation ever across, you know, is seen across the West.

00:39:46.000 And, and we are seeing this play out now.

00:39:47.000 We're seeing now them banning, um, social media for under 16s.

00:39:53.000 Um, but this is all to usher in digital IDs, Russell.

00:39:57.000 Okay.

00:39:58.000 So I believe the vaccine passports that we saw play out during COVID was the proof of concept.

00:40:05.000 Okay.

00:40:06.000 That was the test to see that will people comply? with a government digital, I, you know, kind of form of credential to access their basic freedoms, like travel, going to a restaurant, going to the theater.

00:40:21.000 And people did.

00:40:22.000 I mean, this is, I mean, we're laughing, but people took the shot to travel.

00:40:27.000 That, that's a fact.

00:40:28.000 And, um, so when you asked me back to your original question, what, what grieved you the most?

00:40:34.000 I was one of the early journalists.

00:40:36.000 This is going back, um, 2021 looking at the Pfizer, Data done.

00:40:41.000 These are the Pfizer papers that were released by the FDA, all the documents that they relied on to green light the Pfizer BioNTech shot.

00:40:51.000 So I looked at those.

00:40:52.000 I did a really big deep dive at that.

00:40:55.000 I was one of the early first journalists, I would say, to report and break the story of the Pfizer's lactation and pregnancy review document.

00:41:03.000 Unprecedented harms to the unborn.

00:41:07.000 And they, I mean, this is Pfizer's own document where they say, Oh, exposure to the vaccine through the placenta.

00:41:16.000 And remember the lie they told everyone was that the shot would just stay in your arm, but it didn't.

00:41:22.000 I mean, looking through all these documents, it goes everywhere, especially the lipid nanoparticles, which are essentially the vehicle for the modified mRNA and the synthetic mRNA.

00:41:36.000 But I look at the DNA contamination scandal in the shots, and essentially the shots that were rolled out to the public, Russell.

00:41:44.000 I don't know if you're aware of this.

00:41:46.000 They were made by a completely different manufacturing process to what was used in the clinical trials.

00:41:52.000 This is the Pfizer, uh, product.

00:41:55.000 Okay.

00:41:55.000 So really the product that went out to the public was completely untested.

00:42:00.000 It never even went through a clinical trial because they used a completely different manufacturing process because with a biological product, the process is the product and these are biologicals.

00:42:12.000 So Um, we have massive DNA contamination because in the pro, the process they used for the commercial batches, the one rolled out to the public, they used plasmid DNA from E. coli.

00:42:25.000 Okay.

00:42:26.000 And that never got cleaned out properly and mass produced.

00:42:30.000 So that's why we have this DNA content.

00:42:33.000 I've interviewed the scientists that uncovered this.

00:42:36.000 Kevin McKernan, his early research is at his independent lab.

00:42:41.000 And this was verified by other scientists globally.

00:42:44.000 Okay.

00:42:45.000 And this is a huge scandal that hasn't really kind of, you know, people aren't really aware of because we know that DNA, when that's injected, you know, it can go to the nucleus.

00:42:56.000 It has oncogenic potential, means cancer inducing potential.

00:43:01.000 And what are we seeing?

00:43:02.000 We're seeing these skyrocketing cancer rates across the world.

00:43:07.000 We're seeing excess deaths.

00:43:08.000 That's completely been swept under the carpet.

00:43:11.000 And I went really, you know, we've got the UK Health Security Agency refusing to give the data that links excess deaths with these novel shots, right?

00:43:24.000 And they're citing the reason that if they did, it would cause, it would trigger misinformation and it would make the bereaved families unstable.

00:43:36.000 It's making me very angry.

00:43:37.000 I'm just having a look at old Imran Ahmed.

00:43:40.000 You know, yeah, you can tell a lot.

00:43:43.000 So, hey, Sonia, we need to.

00:43:46.000 This is what I'd like to focus on.

00:43:49.000 See what you just said about that information that's been withheld.

00:43:52.000 I think that's an important area to understand.

00:43:54.000 Like, what kind of Freedom of Information Act request is warranted to get hold of that information?

00:44:04.000 Secondly, I think we need.

00:44:06.000 Do you know who funds the CCDH?

00:44:10.000 Where does it get its funding?

00:44:11.000 Um, they don't, it's quite secretive, it's funding, but we know it's like these sort of you know, these charitable trust foundations.

00:44:19.000 I mean, yeah, it's usually a lot of dark money, right?

00:44:24.000 That funds the CCDH, dark money.

00:44:27.000 There's going to be a revolutionary moment in the next few years.

00:44:30.000 You're aware, of course, of like Project 2030, which I think is linked to some of the events that are prior to Agenda, yes, yeah.

00:44:40.000 So, Agenda 2030.

00:44:43.000 Yes.

00:44:44.000 So, in a way, the events that you outline and chronicle excellently in your book are a way like a sort of a cross section of a strata.

00:44:55.000 It's like taking a cell sample, forgive the illusion, like a smear test of not only what precedes it, but what's going to occur next.

00:45:05.000 Yes.

00:45:06.000 And I think what's really important now is to be able to locate the fronts.

00:45:14.000 Where they're most vulnerable.

00:45:16.000 And I think that having listened to you as carefully as I can manage today, one of the areas is where we just got to the withholding of that information about excess deaths.

00:45:27.000 All of us, much closer to the pandemic period, became aware of, you know, there was those extraordinary, all those morticians when they were embalming bodies, finding all that weird, peculiar white matter.

00:45:42.000 It's incredibly audacious what they did.

00:45:45.000 But what I want to try to Is that as many people as possible read your book and that you and I, going forward collaboratively, are able to identify where they are most vulnerable?

00:46:03.000 If you think of Secretary Kennedy's book, The Real Anthony Fauci, of course it was very, very successful at the time.

00:46:08.000 It was banned, it was censored.

00:46:10.000 And now, you know, the man that wrote that book, a man that was at a risk to have him on a podcast, is now the head of the HHS and the American government's pretty far from perfect.

00:46:20.000 But I can see that some great work's being done.

00:46:23.000 In that area in particular, and he at least is a great man, I haven't a doubt about that.

00:46:27.000 And what I'm interested in is in our country, it's smaller and it's got very deep power, the UK, very deep power.

00:46:38.000 And if you get near it, it's really, really dangerous and really frightening.

00:46:43.000 But this has been such a far reaching project, and it's obviously transcendent of British sovereignty.

00:46:49.000 So there are unique vulnerabilities if you fight it domestically.

00:46:54.000 If you fight it domestically, There are going to be fissures and flaws.

00:46:57.000 They're going to be vulnerable.

00:46:59.000 They're not strong enough, smart enough or clear enough.

00:47:01.000 Just look at some of that little rogues gallery of Dominic Cummings or Matt Hancock or Chris Witte, because it's a bit like the same as in Canada, it yielded the trucker protesters as they tried to shut down localised protests against pandemic related matters. 0.63

00:47:23.000 It created a storm.

00:47:25.000 The UK haven't had that because, in a sense, our country is so fixated on migration issues because of Europe.

00:47:34.000 Wide challenges in that area that people aren't able to focus on.

00:47:39.000 And, you know, one of the problems of the very technology that affords us the ability to communicate at this rate and gather this information together and communicate it presents the problem of people aren't able to pay attention.

00:47:51.000 And they require impactful communication and they require, I think, clearly iterated resolution.

00:48:00.000 So, in a sense, what you've done, in the same way as one might say that with the rape gangs, Rupert Lowe's done an inquiry that's sort of brought together.

00:48:08.000 A bunch of data, and I've not, you know, read it, but I can see that it's got information in it that's going to be pretty incendiary.

00:48:14.000 The work you've done is going to be very useful in getting the British government on the hook.

00:48:23.000 I mean, of course, since then, there's been about 19 prime ministers, so, and probably that's not a coincidence either, by the way, so that they can obfuscate.

00:48:31.000 Well, that was 10 dominoes ago.

00:48:33.000 Who are we going to, you know, there's no one left that we can blame for that in government, but that's why, you know, if we don't, you don't.

00:48:39.000 fixate on who they trot out next, Keir Starmer, Rishi Sunak, David Cameron, the new guy, Andy Burnham.

00:48:46.000 It doesn't matter.

00:48:47.000 What we're interested in is these institutions and these departments and how they're funded and how they operate.

00:48:53.000 And I think that probably based on some of your research with some support, which I think I might be able to direct you towards, we might be able to come up with some real interesting lines of attack, Sonia.

00:49:07.000 So where do you sense, yeah, it is necessary, where do you sense there might Be some vulnerability yourself?

00:49:17.000 Where do you sort of, what would you most like?

00:49:20.000 What bit of information would you most like access to?

00:49:24.000 Yeah, I mean, it's very difficult.

00:49:27.000 For example, it's sort of they, you know, the Freedom of Information Act, the whole process, that's amazing, of course.

00:49:36.000 But when they refuse to disclose that, for example, I asked the DCIT, the Department of Science, Innovation and Technology, all their emails, memos, minutes of their meetings.

00:49:48.000 To see how NATO was involved with the UK vaccine misinformation policy.

00:49:55.000 Okay.

00:49:56.000 And they said they have it.

00:49:58.000 They say, yeah, essentially NATO was involved, but we refused to give it to you.

00:50:03.000 So I had to go through like, okay, I want it as a review.

00:50:06.000 I had to do a review, go back and forth, back and forth.

00:50:09.000 I'm still waiting on like, you know, the outcome.

00:50:12.000 Essentially, I'll have to probably go to a tribunal about it to get this data, but that's so telling, isn't it?

00:50:18.000 That we have NATO's involvement in this whole thing as well.

00:50:22.000 Which is again very insidious.

00:50:24.000 And but what you say that the weaknesses, I think their hubris, their pride, their pride is the weakness of their weakness, isn't it?

00:50:33.000 You know, I mean, because they think they've just gotten away with it, right?

00:50:38.000 So it's their pride.

00:50:39.000 And I think that's their greatest weakness.

00:50:42.000 The involvement of the military is certainly interesting.

00:50:45.000 And there are numerous examples of that.

00:50:46.000 We've already touched upon the 77th Brigade.

00:50:49.000 But it's the collaboration of these various apparently.

00:50:52.000 Distinct groups, whether it's the BBC, you brought up the Trusted News Initiative, which is a coalition of media alliances where they have a kind of an agreement to report on the stories in the same way and an explicit agreement that they're not competing with one another, but that they are focused on trying to bring down independent media.

00:51:10.000 There's that media component, there's the military component.

00:51:14.000 In the United States, much of the pandemic planning was deferred to and organized by military organizations.

00:51:22.000 Even the funding for the vaccine research is.

00:51:26.000 Primarily military, isn't it? 1.00

00:51:27.000 And came out of some Amphrax stuff. 0.82

00:51:31.000 So I look into that, Russell, just so you mentioned Anthrax.

00:51:34.000 So I look back at what was going on with the Anthrax letter attacks.

00:51:39.000 And I look at the Project BioShield that came out of there.

00:51:43.000 And the key player in that is Lieutenant Colonel Robert Cadleck.

00:51:48.000 And this is really interesting.

00:51:50.000 And I want to read this epigraph.

00:51:52.000 So this is coming from Robert Cadleck, who was a key instrumental in this rise.

00:51:57.000 of the biodefense industrial complex that we see come out of that.

00:52:01.000 And that started two decades before.

00:52:04.000 Okay.

00:52:05.000 Coming out of 9 11 after the anthrax letter attacks.

00:52:08.000 That again was in 2001.

00:52:10.000 This is what he writes in 1998.

00:52:14.000 Using biological weapons under the cover of an endemic or natural disease occurrence provides an attacker the potential for plausible denial.

00:52:25.000 Biological warfare's potential to create significant economic loss.

00:52:30.000 And subsequent political instability, coupled with plausible denial, exceeds the possibilities of any other human weapon.

00:52:40.000 Isn't that interesting?

00:52:41.000 What he wrote in 1998 very prescient work.

00:52:45.000 Yes, and it's interesting too that really, when you one steps back, and this is where I'm very grateful to you for your work because, you know, I'm very interested in the big picture and I'm very interested in how this is working through time.

00:53:05.000 And how it is, in a sense, is a kind of an imprature and fingerprint of the movement of power.

00:53:10.000 And the example you just gave is perfect.

00:53:13.000 But to have this conversation at the level that's required, everything must be corroborated and demonstrable at every phase.

00:53:24.000 There are lots of ways of preventing that from happening.

00:53:26.000 Of course, literally, censorship and the control of information and not cooperating with well intentioned journalists is one of the methods.

00:53:37.000 Second one is a kind of a state of continual hysteria, a general trend towards not, even though no one trusts government anymore and no one trusts media.

00:53:48.000 There are kind of deeper spiritual problems when it comes to obedience and compliance, which, as you suggested, might have been piloted during that period.

00:54:00.000 Like, to what degree will people comply?

00:54:05.000 I think that what came out of that.

00:54:07.000 Pandemic period, and Mickey Willis, who made the film Plandemic, agrees that in a sense they weren't able to mitigate the intervention of independent media because independent media can have a diffuse and disproportionate impact.

00:54:26.000 That's why this has been allied with censorship and misinformation from the beginning because they require not only the ability to reach everyone through this immersive technology, but To ensure that we don't use the same technology to provide counter arguments.

00:54:42.000 I was really struck by in the sort of immediate aftermath of the pandemic, Sonia, when there was that North Stream pipeline story where the first wave was, oh, Russia have done this.

00:54:54.000 And then people were like, just people sort of using common sense were like, why would Russia do it? 0.60

00:54:58.000 Isn't that sort of like their primary income stream?

00:55:00.000 Don't they require it?

00:55:01.000 And then, you know, people on independent media, like we had like sort of former Navy SEALs on, and like, well, does that seem like a kind of the sort of thing Navy SEALs would have done?

00:55:10.000 And they were like, yeah, it does.

00:55:11.000 And then Seymour, what was his name?

00:55:14.000 I can't remember the dude's name, but it was like a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist came on, it might have been called Seymour Hoffman, I think.

00:55:19.000 He came on like a bunch of shows and wrote for a relatively prestigious sort of weekly magazine and said, This story, this pipeline story.

00:55:30.000 So, like, now, like, the process that would have taken a long while previously, even though this is like the pandemic's now, you know, five, six years ago, the way that we can aggregate and disseminate information is pretty rapid.

00:55:45.000 So, it won't work.

00:55:47.000 Their model doesn't work unless they're able to.

00:55:50.000 Shut down dissent is what it amounts to.

00:55:53.000 And control the internet, right?

00:55:55.000 Control online media, the internet, social media.

00:55:59.000 This is why we're seeing all this like, oh, we're banning under 16s because it's for the children, it's for their safety. 1.00

00:56:05.000 You know, they're using always under the guise of safety that they bring in all of this, right? 1.00

00:56:10.000 Safety, convenience.

00:56:12.000 And also, like, you can see if you can pay attention and remain unemotional, see, was it Seymour Hirsch?

00:56:18.000 Yeah, Seymour Hirsch, sorry, was the reference to the journalist.

00:56:19.000 Thanks, Jake.

00:56:21.000 Always under the guise of protecting us.

00:56:23.000 But if you like pay attention now, it's you can see how it's reverse engineered.

00:56:29.000 Like, what is the desired result?

00:56:30.000 The desired result is control of the internet.

00:56:33.000 Why would people grant us control over the internet when they don't trust us?

00:56:37.000 Child protection, or like you know, that's when it starts to get really evil, they prey upon where we are vulnerable, our sweetness.

00:56:48.000 This is where it becomes for me, Sonia, and I don't know how interested you are other than your surname in this territory of where it becomes.

00:56:57.000 Spiritual battle that we are engaging with, I would say, evil.

00:57:02.000 And this is how, what does evil look like in 2026?

00:57:06.000 It doesn't look like demonic in the way that we've been trained from a sort of a medieval perspective to understand evil.

00:57:14.000 It looks banal, to use Hannah Arendt's phrase.

00:57:18.000 And it looks bureaucratic, managerial.

00:57:21.000 But the thing about bureaucracy is it is dehumanizing.

00:57:25.000 That's what we don't like about bureaucracy.

00:57:28.000 Even on an interpersonal level, while you're waiting on the phone, now press four, now press five.

00:57:32.000 Sorry, we're unable to do that.

00:57:34.000 That's what we don't like about it, is that you can't, as one human being to another, go, hold on, I require this solution.

00:57:41.000 Can you help me, human to human?

00:57:43.000 Now, why I'm energized, why I'm deeply energized, is because I can see that their advancing desire for control is creating the front upon which this battle is going to be fought.

00:58:01.000 Because.

00:58:02.000 As yet, we can still communicate openly.

00:58:06.000 Now, of course, what they'll do, as they've always done, they'll assassinate either literally or via character people that are willing to step into the fray.

00:58:14.000 But they won't be able to do that quickly enough.

00:58:17.000 The technology will always be the frontier because it's the unmanifest made manifest.

00:58:27.000 So it's by its nature the spearhead.

00:58:30.000 And this technology that we have now allows total centralized authoritarianism, but it also permits total decentralization, real democracy, transparency, total communication.

00:58:42.000 In our country, the United Kingdom, they're advocating for total technological control, a kind of technological feudalism where they have absolute control over information, absolute control, a kind of Foucaultian biopolitics where they can actually control what's happening in your mind.

00:58:57.000 But the problem they have and the problem that they encountered and witnessed in real time during the pandemic.

00:59:03.000 Is that we can use the same technology in the same way.

00:59:06.000 So, I guess, like in all wars against tyrants, and in all wars, we're in one because that's why the military was so heavily involved.

00:59:12.000 It was an act of war against everybody.

00:59:16.000 We have to fight like guerrilla style.

00:59:18.000 We've got to fight underground.

00:59:20.000 There will be, you know, acts of a kind of, I don't know, virtual terror.

00:59:24.000 And the great leaders of the last century demonstrate to us, as also and somewhat significantly, I would have to concede, Christ, that it must be peaceful.

00:59:36.000 That as soon as you violate, they've got you.

00:59:39.000 They can do what they want to bring people down.

00:59:41.000 They can change the past.

00:59:43.000 They can create stories.

00:59:45.000 They can move around the tiles in reality to create collages using the systems that ultimately work for them the legal system, the media system, the political system.

00:59:56.000 These are all their tools.

00:59:57.000 These tools aren't there to, even though we pay for these tools, they're not there to help us.

01:00:01.000 If they were there to help us, we'd be able to operate them.

01:00:04.000 They would be more responsive.

01:00:05.000 No, the function is how do they work, walk that.

01:00:08.000 Delicate line of getting us to believe, well, this is all for us and we're paying for this and they're helping us and not break out into like, yeah, what I'm aware of myself here, Sonia, in this conversation is careful, Russell, because I feel it.

01:00:22.000 I feel the energy coming, the energy that you need when you believe in something.

01:00:27.000 But I notice that that energy can be very difficult to hold.

01:00:32.000 It's difficult to hold, is what I would say about it.

01:00:35.000 So I need to, yeah, we need to really help one another.

01:00:38.000 Yeah, absolutely.

01:00:40.000 I mean, you've raised so many excellent points there, Russell.

01:00:43.000 And I mean, I, I close in the book, you know, the answer to this, right?

01:00:48.000 It's, uh, to their control and all of this is, is knowledge and truth is the antidote to it.

01:00:55.000 Um, that's what I believe, knowledge and truth.

01:00:58.000 And this is why I wrote the book.

01:00:59.000 It was to arm people with knowledge.

01:01:02.000 It's to, um, and I do believe there is an awakening that is going on.

01:01:05.000 People are more aware.

01:01:07.000 And, um, but I essentially chronicle it that all of these sort of what went on, So, because they're going to try and do it again.

01:01:15.000 We know they're going to, you know, another pandemic.

01:01:17.000 We know the UK has already pledged, I think, a billion pounds on pandemic preparedness and all of that.

01:01:23.000 So, uh, it's for people to be, yeah, not afraid.

01:01:27.000 Yeah.

01:01:27.000 No fear.

01:01:28.000 Okay.

01:01:29.000 Because fear arrests your critical thinking skills.

01:01:33.000 And that's what they did.

01:01:34.000 That's what they achieved.

01:01:35.000 That's why they had to use fear.

01:01:36.000 It's a major psychological tool that, you know, the UK government spent hundreds of millions in government messaging, scaring the public.

01:01:45.000 I have screenshots of white papers.

01:01:47.000 These are early meetings with SAGE.

01:01:49.000 This is the scientific advisory group on emergencies that advised the government, SAGE, where they actually list, it actually states in this paper there's a screenshot, we need to use media to increase the sense of threat, of fear.

01:02:05.000 We need to use coercion.

01:02:07.000 All of this, it's part of their playbook.

01:02:13.000 Well, thank you, Sonia.

01:02:15.000 Fear.

01:02:16.000 Shame.

01:02:17.000 Like, in the end, you can see the distillation into very personal and spiritual humors. 0.99

01:02:27.000 That if you can shame people, if you can frighten people, if you can create, I mean, even as you said, the incentivization, the kind of ridiculous stick and carrot of if you are an anti vaxxer, you are shameful.

01:02:39.000 Whereas if you get a vaccine, you're a good person and you can go on holiday and you can go to a bar and you can go to a concert.

01:02:49.000 The enlisting of celebrities that you why I am fascinated by the pandemic is it showed us everything, it showed us everything, it's all out there now.

01:03:01.000 But, uh, but the challenge is to respond.

01:03:06.000 You know, you said truth, didn't you?

01:03:07.000 And knowledge, and I feel like, um, wisdom, you know, truth and wisdom, these are aspects of Christ, these are aspects of God.

01:03:15.000 You know, truth is fundamental.

01:03:16.000 If you don't have truth, you cannot proceed.

01:03:19.000 Wisdom is how do you operate.

01:03:21.000 On this terrain, like I'm thinking of Solomon's discernment in the Tower of the Harlots, is how, like, what an idea that creates truth from it.

01:03:33.000 Like, you can't, when he says, Well, let's cut the baby in half, then, and you can have half the baby each. 0.80

01:03:42.000 The true mother, even if that's not the woman that gave birth, the true mother is the one, Oh, no, don't do it.

01:03:49.000 Like, it's like that's that wisdom. 0.99

01:03:52.000 Is that the capacity to cut through?

01:03:54.000 And I mean, yeah, this has been so, this has been such an astonishing time.

01:03:59.000 I'm really grateful to you for this work.

01:04:00.000 There's some people I want to introduce you to.

01:04:03.000 And we can talk more offline, Sonia.

01:04:06.000 Yeah, great.

01:04:08.000 That would be great.

01:04:08.000 Thank you.

01:04:09.000 Thank you, Russell.

01:04:10.000 Really appreciate it.

01:04:11.000 Thank you so much.

01:04:12.000 So, yeah, let's do it.

01:04:14.000 Is there anything else you want to say before we go?

01:04:17.000 Oh, no, just, you know, I just want to thank you for all what you've done, Russell, right?

01:04:22.000 Because you were early on.

01:04:24.000 Like I said, raising the red flags with all of this.

01:04:28.000 And you were kind of like on your own almost.

01:04:31.000 I mean, you know, obviously you had that platform, but it's you stuck your neck above the parapet.

01:04:36.000 And so I just, you know, commend you for that.

01:04:39.000 Thank you for your bravery.

01:04:40.000 Thank you very much.

01:04:41.000 Thank you.

01:04:42.000 If I wasn't such a show off, I probably wouldn't have done it.

01:04:45.000 So, 311 Viral Takeover is out now.

01:04:49.000 There's a link in the description.

01:04:51.000 Arm yourself with the facts so that you can have these conversations.

01:04:55.000 And because it's not just about the pandemic.

01:04:58.000 It's a playbook for how power operates in the modern age.

01:05:01.000 And once you understand their playbook, then you know how to counterattack.

01:05:05.000 We are going to be playing counterattack because they've got the guns, but we've got the numbers, as Jim Morrison used to say before he died in the bath.

01:05:13.000 You know, drug addicts, the way they all go out.

01:05:16.000 Thanks so much, Sonia.

01:05:18.000 That was amazing.

01:05:22.000 Okay, thank you very much for joining us for this conversation with Sonia Elijah.

01:05:27.000 I hope you enjoyed it.

01:05:28.000 Please buy her book and support her work.

01:05:31.000 And remember exactly what happened during that time.

01:05:35.000 Don't get caught in tribalism.

01:05:37.000 Don't get distracted by commerce.

01:05:39.000 Don't lose your mind here.

01:05:41.000 Please, I pray for you.

01:05:42.000 Gain the world, gain the insight.

01:05:44.000 Be encouraged.

01:05:45.000 There's a holy war for us to participate in.

01:05:47.000 More important than any of that, no, not more important than the holy war, but important for you to be a participant in it.

01:05:53.000 Stay free.

Stay Free - Russel Brand - June 26, 2026

They Lied About COVID Now the Truth Is Emerging… is Fauci DONE? - SF735

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript