In this episode, we take a look at how the media normalises the agenda of the powerful, and normalises it through the use of fear and propaganda. We also look at why the media is so obsessed with demonetisation and demonisation, and why we should be worried about it. And finally, we have a new segment where we discuss what Chrystia Freeland, Nazi Granddaughter, is saying to Hillary Clinton and her husband, Bill Clinton, about the Ukraine crisis, and whether or not it has anything to do with the Ukraine. If you like what you hear here, please HIT SUBSCRIBE and become a supporter of our movement. We need your support now more than ever, your support undergirds, legitimises and powers this movement, and without your support, we are nothing. The first part of the show is available everywhere, then we re going to be on Rumble. Then we ve got a special bonus episode available on Rumble, where we re covering some of our favourite tech dystopias. We ve already told you about that, so make sure to check out the description and join us there. We ve got the details of that coming soon! Stay tuned for the second part of our show on Rumble where we will be covering the latest in tech dystopia, The Rise of the 21st Century, and how it s going to change the world. . Timestamps: 3:00 - What is a dystopia? 4:00 5: What does China need to be deterred from? 6:30 - Is China a threat to the world? 8: What is the point of China? 9:40 - What does the West need to deterred by China? 11:00:00 | What is China s role in the world by China s rise? 16:20 - Is it a threat by the West s response to China? 17:30 | What are we getting out of it? 18:40 | What s China s point of view? 19:50 - What do we need to do to stop China? 21:20 | What do you need to learn from China? 22:30 25:00 Is China s a threat? 26:40 27: What are you going to do about it? 30:00 What s the role of the world s role? 35:00 Does China need deterred? 36:00 Do you need a message of deterrence?
00:02:31.000We need you to click the link on the description and join us there.
00:02:34.000Let's see what the legacy media are telling you.
00:02:37.000During the Liberal Convention in Ottawa, Chrystia Freeland, Nazi granddaughter, and Hillary Clinton need No explanation have been telling us that Ukrainians are dying right now, not for humanitarian reasons or can't remember what they told us last week, but it's so that NATO can send a message to China.
00:03:48.000Where is the empirical evidence that China are expansionist beyond their geographical region and their own History and trajectory and rights to have their own attitudes that maybe isn't the rest of the world's business and do you imagine that that's what America is doing right now?
00:04:06.000Are China circling America now with military bases or are America circling China right now with military bases?
00:04:15.000Just check the answer to that question and then you perhaps will be in a better position to see whether or not there's any legitimacy to what Chrystia Freeland, Nazi granddaughter, is saying there to Hillary Clinton.
00:07:59.000Can we do something about the forever wars?
00:08:01.000Can we do something about the incremental increasing surveillance Can we do something about these censorship laws that are being normalized and introduced?
00:08:08.000Can we do something about the culture wars?
00:08:09.000Can we let people have some hope, meaning, and God in their lives?
00:08:14.000Sorry, did you say you want a plastic ice cream or not?
00:09:07.000However, the scientists involved made sure to emphasize that the ice cream is still a research project and not yet ready for human consumption.
00:09:22.000Just because something's digestible doesn't mean you should eat it.
00:09:25.000The news is digestible, but you shouldn't be consuming it.
00:09:29.000Next on the Dystopia cavalcade, WorldCoin.
00:09:32.000We told you about WorldCoin, how they've found some country poor enough to tolerate the introduction of chrome spheres, sucking data out of your eyes, stealing all your biometrics under the auspices of helping you, as usual.
00:09:43.000Safety and convenience, safety and convenience, all the way to the cell and to the boneyard.
00:09:49.000Here, the claim is made that this technology could be used for social welfare.
00:09:53.000Let's see how the legacy media are going to normalise this piece of propaganda.
00:09:58.000In cities around the world, big metallic orbs are scanning people's eyeballs and handing out a new cryptocurrency as a reward.
00:10:05.000Well, actually, I'm not happy about that.
00:10:07.000I'm still getting used to the idea that you don't have like a milkman come to your house and deliver milk every day, that you don't have a paperboy There you go, sir!
00:10:18.000I'm adjusting to the dehumanization, turning everything into data and information, stripping away community and connection.
00:10:25.000I'm not ready yet for the Chrome Orb, sucking information out of my eyes, spying on me, and introducing a currency that could be switched off if I'm not an obedient little prisoner of the state.
00:10:36.000Notice how the news, the news, which is Never forget, just the TV show Amplifying the Agenda of the Powerful tells you now that this is somehow going to help you.
00:10:47.000From New York to Tokyo, these scanning stations look like a scene out of a sci-fi movie.
00:11:11.000A horrific Warning about the hubris of humankind and what happens if we detach absolutely from simple, easy-to-understand values like kindness, service, justice, unity, love, tolerance, which to these people are just words and ways of sucking information out of your eye with a chrome bull.
00:13:40.000In one of the more than 20 countries where the orbs are currently operational.
00:13:44.000We told you last time they pilot it in a poor country, they'll bring it to rich countries.
00:13:48.000It turns out we, stroke you, stroke we, were right about that.
00:13:53.000Let's have a look at some other facts.
00:13:54.000According to Reuters, WorldCoin has said it will allow companies and governments to use its ID system.
00:13:58.000Oh, so part of the convenience and safety will be that your information will be given to companies for advertising and governments for control.
00:14:08.000One of the envisaged applications of WorldCoin is to create a public infrastructure that will serve as proof of personhood.
00:14:13.000Who doesn't want to prove that they're a person?
00:14:15.000That's the only thing that's happening.
00:14:16.000It's not that it's going to create a vast database of facts about you.
00:14:21.000Without citing sources or methodology allowing it to arrive at this conclusion, a post on WorldCoin's website claims that India managed to save more than half a billion dollars worth of social welfare and subsidies by using a biometric data-based anti-fraud system.
00:14:35.000Social welfare, I feel, is the lubrication that will ultimately become social
00:14:39.000credit scores. But let me know in the chat and the comments what you think. And remember, if it's
00:14:45.000within your means, press the red button, join us, become part of this movement. We need you if we're
00:15:06.000The problem arising for creators of independent journalism is that you stand alone.
00:15:12.000You should seriously consider creating a collective of some sort so you can stay free and bring us news that leaves space for free thinking, reasoning, and deduction.
00:16:20.000We're gonna build a memorial to the War on Terror.
00:16:22.000Let's have a look at the War on Terror.
00:16:25.000What it means, what it meant, why it happened, why a memorial is being built and why the legacy media simply amplifies the propaganda of the corporate state rather than interrogating it and questioning it.
00:16:49.000Or commemorate it with a new memorial.
00:16:51.000Luckily the mainstream media will interrogate the veracity of this endeavor and ensure that this isn't used to facilitate ongoing wars.
00:17:00.000Or will they just make it seem normal and kind of cute?
00:17:05.000There is a new memorial being planned to celebrate, commemorate the war on terror.
00:17:11.000Those of you old enough to actually remember it will not want a memorial because you will remember it as a travesty and a tragedy that caused the deaths of millions of people all over the world.
00:17:20.0004.5 million is a rough estimate, created problems that we're still living with, geopolitical
00:17:26.000disasters across the Middle East and in a sense facilitated the new military-industrial
00:17:32.000complex that continues to perpetuate its agenda to this day.
00:17:36.000It's also the issue that defines our time. When people tell the truth about war, the motives
00:17:42.000for war, the fiasco that is war, whether it's in Afghanistan, Iraq or the current
00:17:46.000conflict between Ukraine and Russia, those people are silenced and shut down.
00:17:51.000This is a time where war is perhaps more important than ever because there is a war against the individual, the war against domestic population and numerous planned wars against other superpowers, presumably to facilitate a unipolar global dystopia where none of us have any individual freedom and it seems that they're doing surprisingly well.
00:18:09.000Let's have a look at this memorial To dread, death, tragedy, travesty and dishonour.
00:18:51.000You know, like, there's different degrees of propaganda, but it's all propaganda, and this propaganda is fantastic.
00:18:57.000It's the cozy familiarity of news media that those of us that are around my kind of age lean into for comfort, as if we're watching Cheers or the Golden Girls, a time when television was your kind of friend, or at least you felt that it was.
00:19:11.000There was a kind of a warmth and a reaching out in good faith.
00:19:15.000Not the just ongoing, agenda-led, propagandizing, disempowering, lying filth presented to you over a hot steaming mug of Morning Joe.
00:19:31.000As we celebrate the holidays, we're also remembering those who served our nation, including service members who fought in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria.
00:19:39.000We're not gonna remember them too hard, though.
00:19:41.000Otherwise, we'll be forced to remember that their lives were squandered and wasted in an attempt to steal resources in a conflict that was not at all connected to the war on terror that it was claimed they were fighting.
00:19:53.000They may as well have just bombed Finland, except there's no oil in Finland.
00:19:58.000So it's presented to you as if it's like part of Christmas or something, wasn't it?
00:21:25.000Next time you're looking at mainstream news, I don't reckon you should do it.
00:21:27.000Notice, are they normalising the agenda of the powerful now?
00:21:30.000This is essentially an advert for big tech.
00:21:32.000Is this introducing a piece of authoritarian surveillance technology that is gonna next time I say oh yeah yeah I saw that on the news like you're just seeing the Kellogg's Rooster and just put it in your mouth about thinking hang on a minute would it be just as nutritious to eat the goddamn box?
00:21:47.000There's now a bipartisan push on Capitol Hill to build a memorial on the National Mall to honor their sacrifice.
00:22:42.000So the idea that you're going to somehow solidify it as a monolith or an object just shows you the propagandizing mentality of the state to
00:23:17.000And three sites on the National Mall have been proposed, allowing the remembrance of our longest war to share hallowed ground with memorials to our founding fathers, World War II, Korea, and Vietnam.
00:24:14.000Iowa Senator Joni Ernst, a Republican, and New Hampshire Democrat Maggie Hassan are leading a bipartisan effort to mandate the Global War on Terror memorial be built on the Mall.
00:24:23.000It's amazing that what we're presented is a full argument between two parties who are funded in the exact same way, who have basically the same agenda.
00:24:31.000They're occasionally brought together either to fund a war or to build a monolith to an unnecessary and illegal war.
00:26:51.000Did anyone believe at this point that if the war on terror had not happened, actual Americans in America would be any worse off than they are today?
00:26:59.000That the world would be any worse off than it is today?
00:27:02.000I've not heard any convincing arguments.
00:27:47.000We're gonna have to put reality back together.
00:27:49.000Nothing less than a total revolution beginning with your individual consciousness but ending with the replacement of all of our existing systems will be sufficient to amend the horror that they have wreaked upon our planet.
00:28:00.000We want to make sure that we're able to honour those that have participated in our nation's most recent war while they are still with us.
00:28:08.000They're presenting this as honouring and commemorating brave dead service people, but what they're actually doing is normalising a corporate, commercial, colonial, imperialist endeavour that was based on a lie and remains a lie.
00:29:26.000The one we're building this statue to and a great big new one that some people think will become an actual hot boots on the ground war any day now.
00:29:35.000And there is some indication that troops are being sent to Ukraine in spite the president saying that would never happen.
00:29:55.000If you need to know anything else that might happen beyond a duck, you can rely on us for other near-duck related information.
00:30:02.000If, however, you require integrity, insight, transparency, and potentially holding the powerful to account, which I don't think that is related to ducks, you probably should watch something Right back there, by the end of the decade.
00:30:19.000Chris, a generation of men and women in their service and as so many said in that piece, you don't want that slap in the face at this point.
00:30:29.000No one likes the metaphorical slap in the face of not building an unnecessary statue but I bet they like even less the actual physical bullets in the guts of an unnecessary war where a foreign territory was invaded under false pretenses.
00:30:42.000Also don't you think that what the statue should actually just be the face of an American service person being slapped by a handful of money held by Jules W Bush or Joe Biden, don't matter, they both agreed that it should happen.
00:30:56.000You may not know that there's a memorial planned for the global war on terror.
00:31:00.000President Donald Trump signed legislation approving the memorial back in 2017.
00:31:04.000The bill created an exception to the commemorative works act of 1986 which requires the passage of at least 10 years after the official end of a war before a memorial to it can be constructed in Washington DC.
00:31:14.000That was obviously unworkable regarding the global war on terror because it's still happening.
00:31:19.000I think I need to remember something that's still happening.
00:31:22.000And now a statue for the increasing centralization of power, surveillance, and ongoing lies.
00:32:09.000You have to get the Sackler family to drug you so that your consciousness is below reality now.
00:32:14.000Because if you're awake, you'll look at the statue and go, Hang on a minute, what I feel is hypocrisy, anger, rage, disgust.
00:32:20.000That there needs to be an entirely new system.
00:32:23.000That we need to form our own militias and oppose the people behind this statue and the war on terror and ensure that we are able to run our own communities.
00:32:34.000You'll note that none of the options are emotions such as rage-fueled sorrow or the urge to prosecute war criminals.
00:32:40.000Given this, you may not be surprised to learn that the honorary chair of the foundation is George W. Bush, who happens to be the president who birthed the global war on terror with the invasions of Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003.
00:32:51.000The foundation's funders include 7-Eleven, Oh my god.
00:33:19.000A recent estimate by the Costs of War Project at Brown University found that over 4.5 million people have died thanks to the direct and indirect effects of conflict in post-911 war zones.
00:33:30.000Of these, about 10,000 are Americans, including those who died on September 11, 2001, or during the Afghanistan and Iraq wars.
00:33:38.000The Costs of War Project has also calculated that the price of the global war on terror has been about $6 trillion so far, And we'll have to spend another $2 trillion on care for veterans in the future for an eventual total cost of $8 trillion.
00:33:52.000Some of this money was essentially set on fire and has disappeared.
00:33:56.000But a lot of it is still here in the US, in particular in the lovely suburbs surrounding the Defense Department in Northern Virginia.
00:34:02.000Since the Global War and Terror Memorial is going to be right by Arlington Memorial Bridge, there could be complimentary bus trips across the Potomac, allowing visitors to gape at all the mansions, $108,000 Range Rovers and more recently luxury Pickleball Courts they purchased for defence contractors.
00:34:19.000The mainstream media simply amplifies the propaganda of the state and the military-industrial complex, whereas we want to interrogate and investigate the facts so that we can bring you truth, so that we can mutually awaken together, which frankly is impossible for us to do without our commercial partners and sponsors, and by God are they loyal.
00:35:16.000Let's get some stickers out of this thing.
00:35:18.000Let's go back to the egregious, awful propaganda of the mainstream media that like to pretend that what they're doing is actual news, when what they're doing is the amplification of propaganda without inquiry and question.
00:35:30.000Remember when George W Bush CIA briefers gave him a presentation on August 6th 2001 titled Bin Laden determined to strike in the US?
00:35:39.000And part of it warned that the FBI had information that indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings.
00:35:46.000And other warnings his administration received were titled Bin Laden attacks may be imminent and Bin Laden planning high-profile attacks.
00:35:52.000And how Vice President Dick Cheney asked the CIA whether Al Qaeda might be pretending to be about to attack America just to fool us into expending resources in response.
00:36:01.000This is just the tip of a 9-11 iceberg that I know many of you are familiar with when it comes to the potential for deep state involvement that you can investigate for yourself, although we have discussed it elsewhere in some depth.
00:36:14.000Back in 2004, at the White House Correspondents Association dinner, Bush joshed about looking for Iraq's weapons of mass destruction in the Oval Office, since they hadn't turned up anywhere else.
00:36:23.000Those weapons of mass destruction gotta be somewhere.
00:37:02.000Again, the joke here is that Obama murdered American citizens with drones and according to a 2013 book told aides that I'm really good at killing people.
00:37:10.000It's not really the legacy of Barack Obama that we're encouraged to consider, is it?
00:37:15.000That, you know, he participated in murder and was good at murder.
00:37:20.000Maybe these two videos could play continuously at the Global War and Terror Memorial so everyone will realize there's no reason we can't have some fun with this whole thing.
00:37:26.000So what we'd like to draw your attention to is the way that the mainstream media doesn't investigate this story at all, just amplifies an existing message, the way it's presented as a bipartisan endeavor of unity, the brushing over of the true causes of the war on terror and the true consequences of the war on terror, and an attempt to make any anti-war sentiment unpatriotic or adversarial to the people who gave their lives, when it is in fact That is how narrativization works.
00:37:54.000You associate someone with a legitimate sense of inquiry and investigation with something negative.
00:37:59.000Oh, if you don't like this memorial and therefore the war on terror, which was illegal and based on lies, then you are not supportive of the troops.
00:38:07.000I am supportive of the troops, so much so that I'd like them not to pointlessly die in order to create opportunities for profit for the military-industrial complex.
00:38:16.000And to create further oppositions for unipolar exploitation of the planet and the needless perpetuation of war that continues to this day.
00:38:23.000You don't need a memorial to the war on terror.
00:38:27.000So our other wars and the wars that we are in are increasing in their tenacity, if not their efficacy.
00:38:33.000What's required here is a news media that asks valid questions.
00:38:38.000What's required is a Congress where people do not unite for photo ops and propaganda, but interrogate the politics of America, both domestically and internationally.
00:38:47.000A suitable memorial for the war on terror is your awakening, your investigation of facts, your rejection of legacy media, your rejection of systemic corrupt politics that's funded by a donor class and sets of interests that are transcendent of democracy.
00:39:17.000So there you are, commemorating a war that's still happening.
00:39:21.000The war on terror, a stain on our culture, an example how the media normalizes and amplifies the messages of the powerful instead of interrogating and investigating.
00:39:32.000Unless, of course, they are investigations that are designed to bring down dissent and dissidents and stop open conversation.
00:39:40.000If you're watching us anywhere else, you're going to have to click the link in the description and support us.
00:39:45.000And to support independent media, Yet further, you can click the red button and become a member of our Awakened Wonder community and you are going to want to because Dr. John Campbell, great denizen and cenotaph, living memorial of truth on YouTube, but I feel perhaps may end up elsewhere one day, is joining us.
00:40:05.000So click the link and join us for this conversation.
00:40:07.000Dr. John, thanks for joining us today.
00:40:10.000If only all those things were true, Russell.
00:40:14.000There is certainly a degree of truth in the fact that I believe that you are a man who believes in transparency, openness, communication and genuine science and throughout the pandemic period you were certainly one of the voices that I leant into.
00:40:28.000Mate, so let's just start off broadly.
00:40:31.000We've got a lot of subjects to cover in our conversation and I'm reminded continually now that the point of what we do is to ensure that the agenda of the establishment and the legacy media does not go unchallenged.
00:40:44.000That is the function of what we're doing.
00:40:46.000Of course, you came to prominence during the pandemic period and during that time the public trust in various government institutions, in particular in the United States, you might say that the CDC, FDA, but in our country too and across the world, trust in media and trust in government institutions is failing and falling apart.
00:41:08.000I wonder what you think about the latest round of COVID vaccines in the US, and I wonder what you think about the management and manipulation of that myocarditis information between males, the sort of use of those studies.
00:41:21.000So perhaps you can start with a couple of examples there.
00:41:24.000The new monetization and charges for the Pfizer and Moderna shots.
00:41:27.000So I wonder what you feel about that, Doc.
00:41:29.000Yeah, so I think the new shots are going to be, I think it's $120 each, Russell, per shot or slightly more.
00:41:38.000And yet the advice in the United States is still to vaccinate with the updated vaccines everyone that's over the age of six months.
00:41:47.000And that's really concerning because, you know, the risk-benefit analyses that are often quoted are those from really early on in the pandemic when Covid was.
00:41:56.000You know, still a dangerous disease to some people, but now the situation's really changed quite dramatically.
00:42:03.000You know, vaccines can have some effect, did have some effect early in the pandemic.
00:42:08.000Now, everyone's been exposed to COVID multiple times, and we have this wonderful thing called the immune system, and it learns to recognize these infections.
00:42:21.000And for the vast majority of people now, the vast majority, Covid is a very mild irritation.
00:42:27.000I guess pretty well everyone watching who's bothered to test will have had Covid in the last year or two or have a partner or a child or someone who's had Covid in the last year or two, and they found it to be a somewhat irritating but pretty mild disease, which is for the vast majority of people.
00:42:45.000So quite why there's this discrepancy between the vaccination protocols in the United States, everyone over six months of age, and the United Kingdom, where it's just I think it's over 65 and people with high risk.
00:43:00.000I mean, you know, this is like a 64 and a half year difference in the recommendations.
00:43:08.000And, you know, if both of these authorizing bodies are working on the same data, why are they coming to such different conclusions?
00:43:17.000It really is quite hard to explain where the evidence is coming from.
00:43:22.000Yeah, it is, and it makes you wonder if the evidence can be interpreted so differently.
00:43:29.000What type of evidence is it, and what kind of agenda is ultimately driving it?
00:43:35.000Increasingly as well, many of the And again, one needn't be conspiratorial to inquire about these things, nor assume mendacity where ineptitude will do.
00:43:51.000But it seems that social distancing, surface cleaning, face covering, there wasn't a great deal of evidence for much of that.
00:44:00.000It makes me obviously wonder what on earth was motivating all of that conduct.
00:44:05.000Those things, it doesn't cost too much to wash your hands when you come in the house, and if that didn't do any good, it's not such a big deal.
00:44:11.000But this includes the non-pharmaceutical interventions.
00:44:16.000And of course, that includes lockdowns.
00:44:19.000That includes quarantine hotels, isolation.
00:44:25.000That includes the, remember this term we had, the pingdemic, when people were pinged on their phones and couldn't couldn't do things.
00:44:32.000It includes all of these things, but particularly the lockdown strategies.
00:44:36.000And we've actually had data just published a week or so ago by the UK Health Security Agency.
00:44:42.000And to be fair here, the UK Health Security Agency are going through what they did really quite systematically.
00:44:50.000And what they're doing is they're looking at thousands of pieces of literature to try and work out what the evidence base is for what they did.
00:44:58.000But this latest publication from the UK Health Security Agency had 151 studies.
00:45:04.000So they narrowed it down to that, looking at studies where there was only one thing being studied at a time.
00:45:10.000And they reviewed 151 studies, and they plotted what they call an evidence gap map.
00:45:18.000And you can download this as a spreadsheet, and there's loads of places where the evidence is limited.
00:46:17.000Science is not someone sitting on a computer thinking, oh, I wonder what would happen if.
00:46:22.000You know, science is what happens in the real world.
00:46:25.000And to their credit, I just want to give you a couple of quotes actually, Russell, here.
00:46:29.000To the credit, the UK Health Security Agency have said, the evidence available for this category is therefore likely to be weak.
00:46:36.000This is evidence to reduce infections, both in terms of study design and potential bias.
00:46:44.000Studies reporting on travel and border restrictions, they say, a weak evidence base in terms of study design.
00:46:50.000Overall, they say, the body of evidence available on effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions in the UK provides weak evidence in terms of study design.
00:47:02.000So they have acknowledged this, which is good to see, because if you acknowledge the mistakes, the public are pretty forgiven.
00:47:10.000We didn't know quite what was going on for a while.
00:47:13.000But they now acknowledge that it was weak and they do say if there is a future pandemic, which there will be, I won't go into that one at the moment, but they say that there should be a method for collecting feedback empirically as we go along, which is certainly true.
00:47:34.000But looking back, you know, were these huge lockdowns, this massive financial cost, this social cost, this psychiatric cost, Looking back, it was based primarily on mathematical models.
00:47:47.000And people understand those better than me, but they're not the best way to conduct national policy.
00:47:53.000In addition to this, if not pseudoscience, then modelling that you have explained is flawed, plainly is flawed, based on the emergent evidence.
00:48:03.000And you're right, it is to the credit of that agency that they're at least willing to communicate that.
00:48:08.000Plainly there was a degree of hysteria and it's sort of harder to speculate on the impact of something as abstract as fear and the use of fear and the use of hysteria and certainly it's encouraging to hear that in the event of a let's call it inevitable future pandemic the data would be compiled as the event unfolded.
00:48:33.000What my concern is, and this is again sort of rather more difficult to talk about, particularly with someone as committed to using evidence as you are, which is perhaps one of the most laudable aspects of the work that you do, is the potential that in a way we were, and I'm not suggesting this was deliberate, primed for authoritarian measures that prior to the pandemic would have been unacceptable.
00:48:58.000The idea that you could shut down the economy.
00:49:00.000I remember when I first heard that football was being cancelled, thinking, what?
00:49:08.000And the normalisation of individual incarceration, the normalisation of massive medical programmes that are mandated or near mandated, and we've touched already on the questions that that's left in its wake.
00:49:21.000Suggest to me that with forthcoming potential issues of scale, you know, and you can pick your issue really, whether it's climate change, food shortages, water shortages, necessity to regulate agriculture as a result of fertilizers, the need to shut down individual farming practices, there are so many issues and ideas that appear to be Being defined by a top-down ideology, i.e.
00:49:52.000you hear from the WEF or the WHO or some sort of unelected but somehow publicly funded, as well as privately funded in the case of the WHO entity, coming up with some ideas that sort of find their way into government.
00:50:06.000Increasingly this seems common and like an event of the scale of the pandemic, doesn't it leave us open to the possibility that a kind of If not social engineering, a sort of piloting may have taken place.
00:50:18.000I don't mean that from a conspiracy theory perspective per se, Doctor.
00:50:22.000I just mean a convergence of interest that led to those measures that evidently were not scientifically undergirded could be repeated in other circumstances.
00:50:30.000I mean, there was certainly a lot of fear going on, wasn't there?
00:50:34.000And I think the reason that people were compliant because there was fear, and to be fair, there was genuine unknowns, although I think Facts became available much earlier than they were often shared with the hoi polloi like you and me.
00:50:49.000And I think we can rest assured, Russell, that people that are interested in organizing, interested in administration, interested in controlling populations, will have taken a fairly thick set of notes from the pandemic.
00:51:09.000They will have noticed what works, what doesn't work.
00:51:13.000And I think they'll have learned a lot of control.
00:51:16.000Control of social media being one example.
00:51:20.000That started on pretty early in the pandemic.
00:51:27.000The influence of regulatory bodies and the way that they interact with political bodies.
00:51:34.000Vested interest that would like to control populations in a more detailed way, I think, will have learned one heck of a lot from what worked and what didn't work in the pandemic.
00:51:48.000Now, the UK Health Security Agency are rightly trying to take that knowledge to apply it to improving health in the future, which of course everyone would applaud.
00:51:59.000But, you know, have people who have slightly questionable motives and throughout history people with questionable motives have arisen in the past?
00:52:09.000I think we can assume that they've learned quite a lot from this as well.
00:52:15.000Yes, and perhaps again less tangentially, the recent, relatively recent, or proposed WHO pandemic treaty that could grant legislative powers to a non-sovereign transnational body.
00:52:32.000I see that it's been, you know, I don't know, in Canada there's some opposition to it, but it feels like the sort of thing that Could happen and it certainly seems like there's an like during the pandemic period the WHO were granted incredible authority.
00:52:46.000The platform that we've been recently demonetized, I'll speak for myself, like you know YouTube still uses WHO guidelines to govern its own community or to form its own community for guidelines.
00:52:58.000I wonder what your views are or if you have concerns about a potential WHO pandemic treaty and how that could become biased or exploited?
00:53:07.000Yeah, so this is based on the amendment of the, I'm pretty sure it was 2005, International Health Regulations.
00:53:15.000So health regulations were put in in 2005, updating previous regulations.
00:53:24.000They said things like, I'm not giving direct quotes here, but quite often they said this will not be mandatory in nation states, it will be advisory.
00:53:34.000But if you read these international health regulations amendments, very often in a sentence all they've done is taken out one word like not.
00:53:43.000So if you go from, these will not be mandatory, and you take out the word not, what are you left with?
00:53:57.000I have read through them all and they really are quite concerning.
00:54:02.000My interpretation of it is, is that the World Health Organization can define in the future when these are probably going to be adopted, and we haven't got much time to reject these.
00:54:13.000Because what seems to be happening is that these are going to be accepted unless the head of state of a country, unless Mr. Sunak actually writes to the WHO invoking a particular section and saying, no, this won't apply to the UK.
00:54:27.000So if Mr. Sunak's watching, I would ask him to do that or to certainly consider that.
00:54:33.000But it's almost that these are just going to click into place.
00:54:37.000And my understanding is that the World Health Organization can define a public health emergency, which could be a pandemic, or it could be a nuclear leak, or it could be a food shortage.
00:54:51.000Or it could be, basically, however they want to define it.
00:54:56.000They can then make rules passing these down to the member states.
00:55:00.000But my concern is that these would then have the power of law in the member states.
00:55:06.000So I have made videos about these IHRs in the past and people say, well, I'm not going to do that.
00:55:58.000But why did it necessitate a public petition for that?
00:56:03.000You know, you would hope that the Civil servants and things will be saying to the Prime Minister, oh by the way Prime Minister, you know you've only got so long if you want to reject this.
00:56:13.000It seemed like this process was just sort of carrying on inevitably, which was concerning.
00:56:21.000And as well as that, another slightly encouraging thing on debates is Andrew Bridgen has been awarded a adjournment debate on the 20th of October to debate excess deaths.
00:56:34.000Now, when we say debate, I would imagine there's probably going to be as many people in the chamber as there were for this last statement on vaccine dangers, which was, I think, about two MPs stayed, I think.
00:56:45.000But the Minister has to give a response.
00:56:47.000But the point is, once you've got the debate, once it's an official government debate, whether it's on the international health regulations, which we'll get, or whether it's on excess deaths, that means it's in Hansard.
00:56:58.000And once it's officially documented, maybe that will encourage others to take more action on this, because people won't be able to say, well, we didn't know about that.
00:57:11.000Well, yeah, you do kind of, because it's in Hansard.
00:57:14.000It's actually possible to see the ghost of democracy inhabiting its institutions.
00:57:21.000The momentum inertia, as you suggest, of power is continually carrying us towards centralised, unelected, globalised power, often supported by billionaires under the guise of philanthropy.
00:57:36.000But in our echoey, dusty old chambers of democracy, like a mouse fart, you can almost just detect Oh, you have to have a debate on that, you know, that a couple of people might go to or attend.
00:57:50.000Oh, if you get 100,000 signatures on a petition, they will have to consider that.
00:57:56.000It's almost like the institutions themselves and the principles themselves already exist.
00:58:03.000And I suppose for you, someone who's like dedicated their life to public service prior
00:58:07.000to this incarnation as an online truth teller, you must have a great connection to when something
00:58:13.000like the National Health Service, how publicly funded, formally at least, a health service
00:58:17.000in the country of the UK was sort of a proud monument to unity and togetherness.
00:58:23.000And God, it went through the various slurs and slams of, oh, it's a waste of money and
00:58:28.000everything should be privatised and slowly sort of vampired from the outside to sort
00:58:33.000of piece by piece, it's ultimately privatised.
00:58:37.000I wonder sometimes, John, how you feel about the potential of meeting these poly-crises, like that, you know, like one minute it's like the WHO are just about to pass this bill, we've only got a minute, this new online legislation has just been passed that means that platforms that host people that dissent will be able to be, have their, you know, their owners arrested, you know, like I've been talking to, you know, Rumble, about this.
00:59:07.000Rumble is something that could become illegalized, and of course they'll say hate speech is the problem, but when it comes, it's sort of comparable to the claim that Ukraine is a humanitarian war.
00:59:19.000What about the US imperialist projects in North Africa and the Middle East have led you to believe that when they get involved in a conflict it's with a humanitarian motivation?
00:59:31.000How do you feel, John, about the small victories, like a debate being held in front of a couple of people or some signatories, when there are these poly-crises of legislature simultaneously passing all around the world, and what appears to be a mass centralising of power and the introduction of new means and measures, whether they are legislative or technological, that appear to be about, as you said earlier, the induction of control?
00:59:59.000It does all seem to be in one direction, doesn't it?
01:00:02.000It does seem to be more towards centralised control.
01:00:07.000One of the things that just really grieves me is all the things that we're missing out on.
01:00:12.000We could talk about the administrative things and the political things, but if you just take some things as simple as, you know, talking about pharmacy, talking about therapeutic molecules, You know, things that actually do you good.
01:00:25.000So if you go to your doctor, he can prescribe something as long as it's in this book.
01:00:30.000Well, the electronic version of it now, the British National Formula.
01:00:35.000And it seems to me that this only represents a very small subset of the therapeutic molecules that are potentially available.
01:00:44.000I want to give you just a couple of examples, if you don't mind.
01:01:34.000You know, for 40 years I taught nerve cells do not regenerate.
01:01:39.000Well, it appears they may be stimulated to be generating, but of course that's a natural molecule, so it'd probably be different to patent.
01:02:02.000Moulds make them to protect themselves against bacterial infection.
01:02:05.000And ivermectin, even ignoring the most recent debate, has just revolutionized the treatment of parasitic diseases around the world.
01:02:13.000Pretty well eradicated river blindness and elephantiasis in Africa.
01:02:18.000And that comes, the bacteria actually make that to protect themselves against other things in the environment.
01:02:24.000So how many of these molecules are we missing out on?
01:02:26.000And isn't that just so sad that people could be dying of things, that molecules are selected for their ability to go through a trial process to make money rather than go through some form of evidence-gathering process in order to help people.
01:02:43.000It just seems so sad to me that this is happening.
01:02:46.000And this is because it's facilitated because we have this centralised authorities and you can understand that doctors uh... nurse practitioners whatever are afraid to go against
01:03:01.000if they do when something goes wrong you know the first question the judge is going to ask is
01:03:06.000what did you follow the guidelines did you follow the national guidelines
01:03:10.000that people are trying to go outside the guidelines and then this is a whole
01:03:12.000other issue that could be a revolution in psychiatry about the uh... the mushrooms that we can't use because
01:03:18.000they are illegal the psilocybin type mushrooms
01:03:21.000But trials going on those now, for example with micro-dosing, is remarkably promising for various forms of mental distress, such as anxiety and depression.
01:03:29.000And for those of us that have had anxiety and depression, it's awful!
01:03:35.000You know, we're missing out on alleviations of this.
01:03:39.000It's just very, very sad that all these molecules have been provided.
01:03:44.000We're only allowed a very small subset of these molecules.
01:03:50.000Yes, and it seems that it's carefully curated what is permissive and it appears, as you've said, that profitability and control continue to be important criteria in which avenues of research are conducted and which are left unignored.
01:04:07.000I suppose there's an optimism in that that I often find in the kind of jaws of this deadly apocalypse that Even when talking about recently the likelihood that were a Republican candidate to win in 2024 they would immediately shift their focus from exacerbating conditions and tensions between Russia to provoking China and I'm just struck that there isn't a presidential candidate or a political movement that says we won't have a war
01:04:36.000I mean, of course, there is Bobby Kennedy and Cornel West and there are, you know, sort of blessedly great independents.
01:04:42.000But when you talk about institutional thinking, whether it's in the field of medicine, whether it's in the field of administration of medicine and the sort of terrifying WHO treaty that we just mentioned, geopolitics, there's always a kind of a systemic unconsciousness.
01:04:56.000And I suppose systems have to be unconscious by their nature, because they require sets of decisions that are Not going to be able to respond to plasticity and mutability.
01:05:07.000What it makes me continue to think, John, is that decentralization is an absolute necessity and I know that some areas of concerns that you and I share are around ecology and agriculture and the potential that these areas are being mishandled and that even something like climate change, which one might imagine is a significant conversation for all of us, is being utilised to generate systems of control.
01:05:44.000I started looking at it and I'm actually concerned.
01:05:48.000I mean, we've talked about the problems with control and vested interest in pharmacy and drugs, which is tragic, but I'm actually quite concerned about agriculture and food supply.
01:06:00.000And quite a few things come into this.
01:06:02.000So we hear a lot of emphasis at the moment about fossil fuel burning, global warming, and you know that there is good science behind that.
01:06:14.000But what people just seem to ignore, that I've just checked out recently, is the amount of carbon in the soil now, on the surface of the Earth, is greater than all of the carbon in the atmosphere.
01:06:28.000and greater than all the carbon in all the organisms.
01:06:31.000That's all the trees and the bushes and the cabbages and the human beings on the surface of the planet.
01:06:41.000And as well as that, when you add nitrogen-based fertilizers to the soil, if there's too much nitrogen-based fertilizer in the soil, that produces a substance called nitrous oxide.
01:06:55.000Now, if you've ever been to Glastonbury in the past ten years, you may have heard of nitrous oxide.
01:07:21.000But if you put in huge amounts of expensive nitrogen-based fertilizers on the soil, Then you're not putting enough organic matter in.
01:07:30.000Now, if you put in plenty of organic matter, the bugs, the bacteria, will feed on the organic matter and you'll greatly improve the quality of the microbiome of the soil.
01:08:23.000But you don't hear anything about this and it just makes you wonder if, you know, because fertilizers are purchased, they have to be bought, they're paid for, you know, often made by pretty big scale companies that people just don't want to talk about this, this greenhouse gas.
01:08:38.000And the nitric oxide also reduces high up stratospheric ozone as well.
01:08:45.000So why don't we put in more carbon into the soil, reducing the amount of carbon in the atmosphere, reducing the greenhouse gases, preventing... we've got more carbon in the soil so it needs less nitrogen-based fertilizers, that means less nitric oxide.
01:09:02.000And again, herbicides and pesticides, huge amounts of these are used.
01:09:08.000And again, these are all marketed products.
01:09:15.000You know, let's control things that are for the good of the ecology and the future of the human race rather than people making money in a relatively short-term period of time.
01:09:25.000Again, it just seems so sad that these common-sense ecological things that are well-known aren't adequately practiced or talked about.
01:09:32.000It seems like a curious anomaly of our time that during war, military industrial complex benefit from that type of crisis.
01:09:42.000During an energy crisis, energy companies benefit from that type of crisis.
01:09:47.000During a health pandemic, Pharmacological company benefit from that crisis.
01:09:54.000That if you have a strata of society that benefit from crisis,
01:09:59.000it's likely that you find yourself in a state of perpetual crisis because
01:10:03.000for what is crisis for people that are not powerful is opportunity for the most powerful interests in the world.
01:10:12.000And when you mention and describe the problem with carbon and nitrous oxide in the soil, what comes to mind is that even something as immersive, prominent and well-publicized as climate change and anthropomorphic climate change, etc.
01:10:33.000It seems that the information that we're given is selective.
01:10:37.000And this total lack of institutions is something that I think exploded during the pandemic because there was this new capacity for control.
01:10:47.000There was this new imposition of control and it seems that many of the claims that were made were not legitimate and this was exposed due to independent media in particular.
01:10:57.000This is where that conversation moved forward.
01:11:00.000There were people, as you are well aware because you were one of them, The very advent of the pandemic had one perspective and we're watching the information as it changed and we're able with a degree of objectivity and certainly in good faith to chart what was happening.
01:11:14.000There were people like Robert Malone right at the beginning saying well I don't think you should be vaccinating at the height of a pandemic.
01:11:20.000All sorts of information that was available was shut down and I feel that we have now A total crisis of trust.
01:11:28.000I don't think that many people actually, and thank God they don't, trust the legacy media.
01:11:33.000A significant number of people do not trust the media.
01:11:36.000A significant number of people think that whoever they vote for they're going to end up with a political party that ultimately works for a set of financial interests that Preclude meaningful democratic change.
01:11:48.000I think that extends to the judiciary in some course, medicine, doctors, I mean the name what you know any sort of instance the institutions of our planet are rightly regarded with considerable mistrust and when you were earlier on talking about oh the you know the possibility that they could somehow be mobilized again Into utility, into service, into principles that are actually sort of rather old-fashioned than quite so simple I blush to mention them.
01:12:15.000It appears to me, John, and I think about it a lot, that independent media has to become politicized.
01:12:22.000It can no longer just be, oh here we go, have you noticed this?
01:12:25.000In the end, even if you didn't have an intention to be political, you are politicized.
01:12:29.000You'll get strikes, you'll get bans, you'll get attacks, The more traction you get, the more likely those attacks are to come.
01:12:36.000And the extent of those attacks, as far as I can see, has the capacity to be almost limitless.
01:12:43.000Governments getting involved in demonetizing channels that they are opposed to.
01:12:50.000It makes me wonder, John, how you feel this may unfold for you personally and what you see your role as a communicator like, how you see that evolving and whether you feel like it will become politicised or if indeed it already has been.
01:13:08.000Yeah, I think we have to distinguish between party politics and politics.
01:13:15.000I would like to steer clear from from party politics, but inevitably, if you're talking about things like land use, if you're talking about things like reducing food miles, if you're talking about things like reducing pollution, reducing nitrates, reducing greenhouse gases, then I think inevitably it does become political.
01:13:38.000I mean, I've got a friend who's been campaigning against incineration.
01:13:44.000And one of the things he's pointed out is that, incinerating plastics particularly, you get release of a certain amount of dioxins.
01:13:55.000Now, you're far too young to remember, Russell, and I can just about remember the substance in Vietnam called Agent Orange that a certain world government sprayed on another country.
01:14:09.000And I've actually worked in Cambodia and seen birth defects related to that after all those decades.
01:14:22.000They stay in the soil for long periods of time.
01:14:25.000So if we have legitimate concerns that we want to stop incineration to reduce dioxins, we can put forward the science of that.
01:14:34.000But to actually get these decisions changed and to actually influence these decisions, I guess that does become political.
01:14:42.000So, you know, I would like to provide evidence as much as I can.
01:14:48.000And what I do more and more these days, because I'm increasingly out of my depth in a lot of these fields, for some strange reason, leading experts, absolutely leading experts from around the world have come on my channel And they've shared their expertise in ways that people can understand, which we're very grateful for.
01:15:08.000So the expertise is there, we can put it together, we can put this into forms that people can understand.
01:15:15.000But it is difficult, and I've only mentioned this once or twice, but I've had personal threats that are really quite significant.
01:15:26.000I've had the police round twice with threats to my life, basically, that are incredible.
01:15:36.000These were kicked up to an intelligence unit who couldn't work out where they came from.
01:15:42.000They probably didn't have to look very far.
01:15:49.000Apparently it went up to, I won't mention which intelligence agency it was, but it went quite high up and they couldn't work out where the threat came from.
01:15:56.000In other words, it was done quite a sophisticated way.
01:15:59.000So it's quite difficult, but there are genuine threats.
01:16:07.000I'm not saying I'm in the same category as someone like RFK, but he says he gets up in the morning and thinks, well, how can I behave ethically today?
01:16:21.000If we do see the threat, there's an Old Testament account of the watchman.
01:16:29.000And it says if the watchman sees the sword coming against the city, and cries the alarm, and the people get out the way, then that's fine.
01:16:38.000But if the watchman says the sword is coming against the city, and the people do nothing, if they ignore the watchman, then their blood is on their own heads.
01:16:49.000So it's the role of the watchman to say, look, this danger is coming.
01:17:13.000And likewise now, Not saying it's the same situation, but I'm not comparing it in any way, but we have leading scientists from around the world who are telling me things that concern them.
01:17:27.000Leading analysts, people that do really significant analysis around the world, telling me they have concerns.
01:17:35.000And if we've got these world-leading analysts, often professors, often doctors, People that do this really quite seriously.
01:17:44.000If we don't at least say, well, just a minute, you've raised the question there.
01:18:06.000I mean, I also think you're right, and even with my personal situation, which I can't go into too much depth about for reasons that will be obvious to anyone who understands such matters, it's apparent to me that I've just found myself in a position, not entirely inadvertently, because I've been very deliberate about sort of attacking what I believe to be establishment interests, and I've been deliberately provocative. But what I have seen in
01:18:38.000terms of the coordination and ability of power, you know, we had a conversation with a
01:18:44.000guy called Dr. Robert Epstein, who you'd enjoy actually, John, he's, he does, he uses
01:18:50.000monitoring systems to observe the way that Google behaves and relays information,
01:18:55.000particularly news media, and by his reckoning are able to create almost impenetrable spheres of data.
01:19:03.000And when it's pointed out to them, they alter it.
01:19:21.000And when you talk about, you know, the impending crises, whether they're of an ecological, ideological, military, pharmacological, I mean, like, there's so many ways now that it seems that what AI, my God, you know, technologization, it's very difficult to envisage a world where I'm at what this is what I sort of feel broadly this
01:19:45.000conversation I wouldn't say this to everybody I feel like that is a type of, because of what you were alluding
01:19:50.000to, I suppose is fascism and I feel like our template of fascism, our manner of
01:19:57.000recognizing it, our swatch of the livery pageantry and paraphernalia of fascism is based on
01:21:19.000To me a fascist says, you will think as I think, you will do as I do, or I will punish you.
01:21:28.000That to me is what fascism is, it's control.
01:21:32.000Now, does it make too much difference whether that's on the point of a bayonet Or at the risk of losing your livelihood, losing your occupation.
01:21:46.000The end result is that the person doing the controlling has people controlled as he wants them controlled.
01:21:55.000And the modality of that probably doesn't matter too much.
01:21:59.000If you'd said to previous fascists, maybe Genghis Khan for example, are you happy to rule the world and have absolute authority and absolute power everywhere just by using persuasion.
01:22:16.000I'm sure if that was quick enough, he'd say, well, yeah, that's okay.
01:22:20.000You know, it's just the warfare was quicker.
01:22:25.000The modality through which the control is achieved is perhaps less important.
01:23:19.000Most people just maybe want to go to work and come home and have the tea and have a nice family life, or go to the football on a Saturday, or go walking on the hills on a Sunday afternoon.
01:23:30.000But you do get some people, for some strange reason that I don't understand, and yet I do witness that this is true, are interested in controlling other people.
01:23:41.000You see it in psychiatric hospitals where you get People with particular conditions, particular personality disorders, and they just want to control other people because that's the way that they are wired up.
01:23:56.000I don't understand it because it doesn't affect me, but it is a problem.
01:24:00.000And when these people get into power, they have to be seen for what they are and hopefully identified at an earlier stage, as early a stage as is possible.
01:24:13.000Because once power becomes entrenched, it often becomes self-perpetuating.
01:24:18.000I mean, I just can't believe that the North Korean situation is still going on since I was a child.
01:24:25.000You know, that self-perpetuating, evil, idolatrous country.
01:24:33.000The power is somehow perpetuated down through the generations.
01:24:39.000Let's just take that as a warning for how badly wrong things can go, that a people can be so oppressed in that way for so long is possible.
01:24:50.000We've been raised in a pretty good time.
01:26:22.000You can watch Dr John Campbell over on his YouTube channel for now.
01:26:26.000If he can earn a single penny out of it, the mad old fleece-wearing radical, please support Dr John and his Necessary and important voice and his fleet of grand dogs.
01:26:39.000We've got Dave DeCamp coming on the show talking about potential ubiquitous Armageddon.
01:26:44.000Each party has its own superpower war lined up.
01:26:47.000Michael Schellenberg, a friend of the show, friend of truth, will be on here talking about freedom of speech and legacy media and its ridiculous power.
01:26:55.000Kim Iverson, fellow Rumble host, truth teller and charming human being, will be on the show as well.
01:27:02.000And I'd like to thank those of you that have supported us, thank you. It's more important now
01:27:07.000than ever. When the government asks Big Tech to shut you down and Big Tech comply, you
01:27:11.000know you need a movement, you know you need a collective awakening and I'm so grateful to you
01:27:16.000for being part of it. People like Kevin Eich and Paul McMurray, Sarah Penelope, Lagbag Brian Fennell,
01:27:23.000And if you want to awaken with us, press the red button.
01:27:25.000You get access to all sorts of extra content, live Q&As with me, guided meditations, readings, and more important than any of that, we get to cultivate this new space together.