Russell Brand is joined by Whitney Webb to discuss the Epstein scandal, Tony Blair being chased through the streets of London by legacy media and why the world is on the brink of a permanent war in Yemen. And NATO's Jens Stoltenberg says that there will not be endless war as long as there is a "peaceful" way to end it all, if we want to get to the end of the world as we have been told it's going to happen. Plus, a new video on the alarming 8% increase in child deaths in the UK and potentially across the world, and why we should all be worried about it. Stay free with Russell Brand and What a Day It Is! - The Dark Side Of - This podcast is brought to you by Awakened Wonder, a globalist propaganda machine. To find a list of our sponsors and show-related promo codes, go to gimlet.fm/OurAdvertisers and use the promo code: "ELISSA" for 10% off your first pack of 10 or more in our ad-free version of our new mobile friendly version of the podcast, available in Kindle, iBook, Paperback, Hardcover and Hardcover, and also on Audible. If you don't have a Kindle, you can get a free eReader edition of The Dark Lord's newest novel, The Good Omens by clicking here. The Good Lord and The Bad Lord, by clicking HERE. Thanks for listening and sharing the podcast with your fellow book recommendation! We'll be looking out for your comments, reviews, questions and thoughts on the podcast and suggestions, too! Love Ghosting it? 5 stars? 6 stars is much appreciated! 7 stars is all over the internet? 8 stars is recommended! 9 stars is a discount code for the podcast? 10 stars is good enough! 11 stars is also good enough for a chance to win a free place on the next episode. 12 stars is better than the next one? 13 stars is not good enough, I'm sending you'll be getting a discount on our next freebie? 15 stars is even better than that? 16 stars is more than you can vouch for me and I'll be helping me out on the show? 17 stars is getting a freebie, so I'm looking forward to hearing from you, too? 18 stars is enough, you'll get a discount promo code?
00:00:00.000I'm going to go ahead and get the rest of the food.
00:02:06.000Oh In this video, you're going to see the future.
00:02:22.000Alright you Awakening Wonders, thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand and what a day it is!
00:02:26.000If you're watching us on YouTube right now, we appreciate you and we love you, you Awakened Wonder, but there's no way we can use this platform to bring you a conversation from Whitney Webb, that savantish portal to truth, that early adapter of the Epstein Theory.
00:02:42.000Why, back when Bill Gates was still thinking he was little more than a travel agent with Panache, Whitney Webb was going, I want to watch this Epstein dude!
00:02:52.000We are talking to Whitney Webb later on the show.
00:02:54.000It's like going to the university where conspiracy theories become conspiracy facts.
00:03:00.000She takes some of the most extreme information.
00:03:02.000The kind of information that shows you that the outliers, the people that have been reported on for years as being nutjobs, crackpots and lunatics, are actually a lot closer to giving us the truth than the likes of the legacy media, the trusted news initiative groups, those supporters of the pharmaceutical industry, those monsters and propagandists are demonstrably lying and Whitney Webb has bought receipts.
00:03:28.000It's like getting a fantastic education and on that note, The BBC have been reporting on Disease X and we've got a wonderful dive into that.
00:03:36.000Also we'll be talking about Davos because it's globalist Christmas up there in the Alps.
00:03:42.000Klaus Schwab is generating more saliva than usual.
00:03:48.000I think the only people that enjoy Davos more than Klaus Schwab are potentially Rebel News, they love it!
00:03:54.000And we've got a fantastic bit of content of Tony Blair, one of the globalist kings, being pursued through the streets, actually by a legacy media reporter, because there's a sort of scandal in this country to do with their post office, which is one of those kind of scandals that people can sort of handle.
00:04:08.00020 years ago rather than the stuff that's going on right now that's frankly much, much worse that we're reporting on today.
00:04:14.000So if you're watching this on YouTube, download the Rumble app if your phone will allow you to do such a thing.
00:04:20.000And if you're over on Rumble, consider becoming AwakendWonder, a member of our community.
00:04:24.000We've just finished doing a meditation and we make one exclusive video a week.
00:04:28.000This week's video on the sudden and extraordinary 8% increase in child deaths In the UK certainly and potentially across the world.
00:04:36.000We've got a video on that that's just available for our locals members and you can get it on a new monthly plan that's about six bucks a month.
00:04:45.000We'll post a link in the description for you guys both on YouTube and on Rumble now so you can join us if you want to.
00:05:42.000And to give you further evidence that we are on the precipice of the forever war, a kind of literal Orwellian nightmare where we're told that The continuation of war is the aim.
00:06:36.000...is that if we want that to happen, a peaceful, just end to this war, the way to get there are more or is more weapons to Ukraine.
00:06:45.000So the more credible we are in our military support, the more likely it is that the diplomats will succeed.
00:06:51.000So you see, because you probably aren't clever enough, you don't understand how giving more and more weapons to Ukraine to perpetuate a war with a country with a nuclear armory, in this instance Russia, That leads to peace.
00:07:36.000Because you're an awakening wonder, and if you want to support our work, consider joining us on locals, because like you, we've had enough.
00:07:41.000Like you, we're ready for a new system.
00:07:43.000Like you, we're just about at the point where we're ready to die for this stuff.
00:07:48.000Oh yeah, well yeah, there is one who's not ready to die for the cause, but other than that we're solid.
00:07:51.000If you can name that film, we will send you a mug, if you can guess what that reference was.
00:07:56.000First person to get that reference, we'll send you a delightful Stay Free Crow mug.
00:08:01.000And if that wasn't enough good news for one day, remember if you're watching this on YouTube, we've got Whitney Webb coming up, who will take you through Conspiracy Theory University, help you to understand the true nature of Epstein's crimes it's kind of sort of worse than you think it is in some ways because it's so sort of financial and deep and there's no way that if you you know you'd sort of have to know man if you were involved with that stuff oh buddhist christianity life of brian yeah send us your details we'll send you a mug if you stay free team if you can catch that holy grail plinky plonk no no mug for you the good news is
00:08:34.000That, thankfully, you know how it's highly likely that the Wuhan virus, and I'm being careful what I say here on YouTube because the WHO, remember, provide the community guidelines over on YouTube, and of course YouTube respond when the government say demonetized, YouTube say how high or how low I suppose, because demonetized is a low thing I suppose.
00:08:51.000Anyway, the good news is this, China have been experimenting with a mutant coronavirus strain that has, don't worry, it has got a 100% fatality rate in mouses.
00:09:02.000Chinese scientists are experimenting with a mutant... When I hear Chinese scientists, I don't think... Hooray!
00:09:08.000That'd be a good name for a band, actually.
00:09:17.000Um, this lady, I think, before you all get into it, I think she's got maybe alopecia or something, so be compassionate and kind.
00:09:25.000Also, why not look unusual and beautiful and striking in a variety of ways?
00:09:28.000What's important is this is going to be a report about, like, I mean, when you listen to the symptoms these mouses have got, Tell me, which precedent does it remind you of?
00:09:39.000COVID-19 strain that reportedly has a 100% kill streak in mice.
00:09:45.000The new strain is called GXP2V and it attacks the brains of mice engineered to reflect similar genetic makeup to humans.
00:09:54.000With most mice living just eight days after being infected with this virus, researchers report the mice lost weight, became sluggish, adopted a hunched Sluggish, hunched, posture with their eyes turning completely white the day before they died.
00:10:09.000And this experiment, of course, brings back haunting memories from the 2020 pandemic.
00:10:37.000If you've been following globalism and the ascent of globalist elites for some time now, for example, from the Iraq war period where things started to go dreadfully wrong for everybody, particularly when it came to invading Middle Eastern companies for nefarious reasons and normally motivated by deception, Tony Blair will be a name you're familiar with.
00:10:54.000Similarly, he was elected on a tidal wave of optimism.
00:11:01.000We found out eventually what Tony Blair was was a kind of globalist, a new kind of politician whose alliances and affiliations were to an establishment that's difficult to discern if you follow politics at the level of nations and oh the water board and who's paying for electricity but when you start to Look at geopolitics from an entirely different lens.
00:11:20.000You see that Tony Blair seems to have a hell of a lot of influence.
00:11:23.000He's being pursued through Davos by a news reporter and it's really amazing, particularly for British viewers, because eventually he runs into Gordon Brown who, like in sort of UK politics, it was kind of funny because the two of them had a pact who was going to be the leader of the Labour Party when they turned the Labour Party from a kind of party that was interested In supporting people to a corporatist party.
00:12:16.000What that report is talking about is a scandal where a bit of software went wrong and it meant that a bunch of people that worked at the mail service in the UK, the post office, were thought to have acted corruptly, incorrectly.
00:12:30.000Many of them were, like, sort of sued.
00:12:49.000But of course the scandal happened ages ago.
00:12:52.000I think the head of the Post Office got an MBE, which is something you get off the King or the Queen or whichever one's nominally in charge now.
00:12:57.000So the whole thing is a sort of a big storm of publicity and nonsense and balderdash but how can anyone trust Tony Blair ever again after he said there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq after we found out they were sexying up a dossier.
00:13:10.000There used to be anti-establishment attacks on figures like this and now everyone's just falling into lineman and heroes of companies like Pfizer.
00:13:29.000The main thing I like about Davos is this sort of stuff.
00:13:31.000People in positions of power being pursued through snowy streets, clip-clopping around in what I imagine are relatively slippery brogues, really anxious that they're going to slip over either verbally or literally.
00:13:43.000And you've got to give a shout out to Rebel News for pioneering this sort of technique of the long doorstep, just like Ezra Levant, just for ages, standing next to the head of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation going, hey, were you friends with Bill?
00:14:43.000You know, the kind of things that were talked about when they were trying to push the vaccine passport idea before it stopped making sense because there was no evidence, because there was no trialing that the vaccines prevented transmission.
00:14:54.000Then it sort of didn't make sense to track who had vaccines and who didn't and it sort of fell apart for a moment but they'll be back.
00:15:00.000In your country, the United States of America, they had a program and project to create, and this was an Obama, Barack Obama idea, a kind of driver's license for the internet.
00:15:09.000Whitney Webb, our guest, we'll be talking about that later.
00:15:12.000Get ready to get educated on globalism from an academic perspective by our journalist who's legit and has bought receipts.
00:15:19.000After you've watched Whitney Webb, you are going to feel more intelligent, particularly if, like me, you take NMNs from Excuse me.
00:15:25.000Black Forest. Are we still given a 25% discount on these things? How many have I had today? Am I
00:15:29.000taking too many of these? You know I've got addiction issues, I have to be careful. But
00:15:31.000I've got to have my M&Ms baby! They're like a head trip to listen to because they're only giving you
00:15:35.000things you joke about with your friends inside your living room. Not M&Ms. I don't want to get
00:15:39.000into Vivek territory here. Excuse me. Let's look at Tony Blair around the streets of Davos.
00:15:51.000Peter Mendelsohn, Mr Blair, was worried about upsetting Fujitsu.
00:16:24.000And like Tony Blair was one of them kind of like, you know how you had Bill Clinton?
00:16:29.000With a saxophone, Tony Blair, he was always, you know, jerking around on the guitar and stuff, whereas Gordon Brown was sort of like, just groaning on about numbers and stuff, and sometimes I think those are the kind of politicians you want.
00:16:39.000They're all these charismatic lunatics we've yielded to, appear to have odd ends.
00:16:47.000Gordon Brown spoke to us about this yesterday, Mr Blair, will you?
00:18:14.000Here's the head of... Here's the president of the World Economic Forum openly discussing the new world order.
00:18:20.000Don't you think they should stop saying stuff like new world order isn't it aren't these sort of tainted brands now they're going to literally do the eat the bugs thing again we are on the way to a new order so we are between orders
00:18:33.000Do you agree with that or are there ways of what are we able to keep on the positive side from the old order to bring into a new world order?
00:18:48.000That brand has been very poorly tainted and for those of you, because I know loads of you like to look for signs and stuff, You'll be looking at the World Economic Foreign Sign.
00:18:58.000You'll see it's bifurcated by a semicircle, meaning that there's a literal 666.
00:19:03.000Given that they're like sort of a globalist organization, don't they need to check their branding and their messaging?
00:19:09.000I mean, they're meant to be sort of a communication propagandist machine where the most powerful interests in the world come together to push a globalist agenda.
00:19:17.000And they keep saying things like New World Order, and their logo demonstrates actual Satan.
00:19:23.000How can we avoid that that new world order becomes like jungle growing back and we rather have order based on international... The guy he's talking to is your President Joe Biden's national security advisor, so no worries there then.
00:19:40.000The President of the United States national security advisor is talking to someone who's openly saying we need a new world order, which takes the best things!
00:19:47.000Out of the old world order, like the centralised authoritarianism, the impecunious, impoverishing modalities, the militarism, the forever wars.
00:19:56.000But we're going to need to introduce more tech and motion control.
00:19:59.000How's it a satanic symbol says, actually Utah.
00:21:12.000We have the capacity to shape what that looks like and at the heart of it will be many of the core principles and core institutions of the existing order.
00:21:23.000Adapted for the challenges that we face today, and that's a lot of what I tried to lay out in my remarks.
00:21:30.000Some of that goes to geopolitics and how we build or update the international economic order in ways that address the needs of working people, address the climate crisis.
00:21:42.000Because the new world order has to do that peculiar balancing act of appearing to be reverential to ethnic cultures and minority cultures, but without ever engaging in cultural re-appropriation.
00:21:54.000They have to do a difficult job because fundamentally what's behind it is generate profit, Ensure that ordinary people are punished and controlled when it comes to subjects like climate change.
00:22:06.000Ensure that there's no ability to challenge establishment and dominator culture narratives.
00:22:14.000And then they've sort of got to soft sell it as being like, we care about the people.
00:22:19.000And the way they do that is by getting sort of like native folk and indigenous people to perform their ceremonies.
00:22:24.000And that's the sort of thing that I'm sort of down with as a matter of fact.
00:22:27.000I'm really into Shamanism, I'm into like, you know, though I've never take drugs, I'm in recovery, but like ayahuasca ceremonies sound pretty interesting and exciting.
00:22:36.000I have to do it the hard way myself as a meditator and a lover of the Lord and the light and all that kind of stuff.
00:22:41.000I can't get into, you know, drugs, frankly, but, and I'm not suggesting that this is about drugs, but this is an interesting bit of appropriation of indigenous culture and proper just like they don't care about it what i think is they don't really care about this stuff and we're not in like central or latin america they're in switzerland i mean what is this thing that they're doing right here
00:23:08.000You better wash your hands after that.
00:23:53.000Now we're going to be taking your rainforest for Black Rock.
00:23:56.000One of the stories that Whitney Webb will be describing to you is how Black Rock are creating a new category called Natural Assets, where literally everything on the planet, like a Bill Hicks joke, can be monetized.
00:25:18.000Apparently the thing they're most scared of at Davos, the two individuals they fear most are Elon Musk and Donald Trump.
00:25:27.000Figures that are outspoken, whether you are into those figures or not, that's up to you.
00:25:32.000I'm into myself and establishment figures that believe in decentralization, respecting the sovereignty of the individual and respecting the rights of all communities for self-determination through democratic and representative Do we have any answer on what's on Donald Trump's... Donald Trump has... his hands are bleeding.
00:27:57.000Hey, you might want to consider becoming an Awakened Wonder.
00:28:00.000Join our community where we create more content every single week exclusively for you, as well as doing meditations, as well as doing, like, so I spontaneously come on and stream in the middle of the day.
00:28:12.000It's a good little operation, plus you'll be supporting our work As we galvanise, organise and get ready to oppose because 2024 is going to be a big year.
00:28:21.000Are we going to be coming to your country to report on the election?
00:28:24.000Are you going to be coming to our country to report on what we call an election?
00:28:27.000Or are we looking for ways to get beyond these ludicrous elections and towards something resembling democracy right now?
00:28:35.000Something Represent it, something more akin to representation.
00:28:40.000Hey listen, so we're going to, before Whitney Webb, which is going to be pretty exciting, we've got a wonderful story for you where we just break down a piece of state media publicly funded propaganda on the subject of disease X. Now you'll be familiar that at the WEF they're talking about Disease X. The WHO are talking about Disease X. Of course they are, because they've just proposed a treaty that has to be signed up to by May, which will give the WHO the ability to take 5% of your nation's health budget and impose legislation including lockdowns and mandated vaccines.
00:29:54.000Disease X may be on its way, but we've got great news.
00:29:58.000Porton Down, a secret facility that works on bioweapons, has got a solution on its way.
00:30:03.000Hopefully they don't leave any windows open, especially not those biochemical weapons in there.
00:30:10.000What's the future gonna look like when a state broadcaster just casually tells you that at Porton Down they're working on new vaccines for disease X?
00:30:18.000They also make chemical weapons there.
00:30:20.000Have we learned nothing about mRNA technology?
00:30:22.000The risks of clinical trials in these areas?
00:30:33.000Let me know in the chat and the comments.
00:30:34.000Let's have a look at how the legacy media propaganda machine is supporting on this subject and telling you there's nothing to worry about and everything to be grateful for.
00:31:10.000Shouldn't we wait to the end of the COVID inquiry to see how this problem began, whether the response was appropriate, how effective the medicines were?
00:31:18.000Are you not concerned that the COVID inquiry has been indefinitely delayed, even though it's cost £145 million already?
00:31:25.000Are you not concerned that these inquiries are not being correctly undertaken and this sort of research is still happening?
00:31:56.000Probably he was keeping his social distance.
00:31:58.000Although actually that was arbitrary as well, wasn't it?
00:32:00.000The delicate task of protecting the nation's health.
00:32:05.000This is one of the laboratories at Porton Down where scientists are analysing current threats, new variants of Covid for example, and trying to identify new ones.
00:32:20.000Have you ever looked into the measures of safety that are deployed?
00:32:24.000That there's BSL 2 and BSL 3 and BSL 4.
00:32:27.000And sometimes in BSL 3, that's the penultimate level of safety, there are frequent lab leaks.
00:32:32.000Do you not think that given the potential origin of the last pandemic, it's possible that this type of research should be regulated a lot more stringently, that it should be extracted entirely from the possibility of profit, particularly if it's at any point publicly funded?
00:32:46.000Do you think it's a possible problem that it's somehow become allied and connected to chemical warfare?
00:32:52.000All of these things present you with a bunch of questions and do you think that you should be involved in that conversation or are you just too stupid and potentially misinformation might baffle you?
00:33:23.000And potentially, when you watch this video, a pop-up.
00:33:25.000Be careful, there's misinformation in this video.
00:33:27.000Whereas on the BBC that you pay for, a journalist can just soberly say, they're doing this to keep us safe.
00:33:33.000Don't you think it should be mandatory at that point to say, although the COVID-19 pandemic could have begun in a laboratory, in fact that seems the most likely point of origin for this virus, how can they possibly claim to be the protectors of pure information when conveying propaganda continually?
00:33:48.000And of course, I know how we're reported on and how we're talked about.
00:33:51.000I don't think that science is, like, ridiculous or absurd or oughtn't be undertaken.
00:33:55.000I'm saying that science, when connected to a profit motive, when regulations continually support the interests of the powerful, we, the public, ought be continually inquiring.
00:34:03.000I think that these people are probably fantastic and brilliant and capable of doing wonderful work, but humanised mice being infected with MERS, which is currently happening, I believe, in China, is the The kind of research that oughtn't be undertaken.
00:34:14.000You want absolute transparency, absolute clarity of communication, and if you're funding it, you want to know about it.
00:34:19.000And if it's connected to weaponry, I think it's already becoming quite suspicious.
00:34:24.000We've got in many respects the toughest job in the world, which is to protect health against infectious diseases and environmental hazards.
00:34:31.000And it is tough because we know that the risks of new and emerging infections, including those of pandemic potential, is increasing.
00:34:40.000For decades, scientists at Porton Down have been involved in medical research, as well as the work on chemical and biological warfare, for which the centre is perhaps better known.
00:35:09.000So they're not just heroes then, are they?
00:35:11.000Admittedly, they're involved in the development of tools that could be utilised, or in the wrong hands, or if terrorists were to get hold of those weapons.
00:35:18.000What about governments having those weapons?
00:35:20.000What about wars being waged across the world in your name using those weapons?
00:35:24.000You happy about the Ukraine-Russia war?
00:35:25.000You happy about what's going on in Gaza?
00:35:27.000You happy about what's going on in Yemen?
00:35:30.000During the pandemic, laboratories like this one played an absolutely vital role in assessing how effective the vaccines were in combating the coronavirus.
00:35:38.000Okay, well luckily the COVID inquiry has been curtailed because it seems that there's still some room for debate about how effective those those medications were, what the adverse events were, the
00:35:47.000cause of myocarditis, the sudden increase in cancers previously thought to be quite novel.
00:35:53.000So whatever research they were doing into the efficacy and safety of vaccines, we might want to
00:36:16.000You may not know how the BBC is regarded.
00:36:19.000They were a treasured institution, the arbiter of truth, a connection to ordinary people, one of the great gifts of the immediate post-war era that celebrated and demonstrated the togetherness of a nation.
00:36:32.000I have to say now that the BBC has become a conveyor and purveyor of propaganda.
00:36:39.000One of those is Crimean Congo Hemorrhagic Fever.
00:36:49.000We can't continue to bring you this content without your support and love, and without the love and support of our fantastic partners, particularly at a time when the New World Order, and they're getting stronger by the day, are poisoning your food, Your water, and now we've found out, even your skincare.
00:37:05.000Did you know, according to the FDA, companies in the US are allowed to market skincare products as non-toxic, while they still contain up to 49% toxic ingredients.
00:37:16.000These ingredients are illegal in Europe and other countries.
00:37:19.000These toxic ingredients and plastics could penetrate your skin and immediately enter your bloodstream, disrupt your hormones, become embedded in your organs, and may eventually give you, I'm sorry to tell you this, I'm not a doctor, terminal illness.
00:37:32.000Well, Sharlene Bollinger, former model, current wife and mother, founder of The Truth About Cancer and Vaccines, has thankfully created a solution.
00:37:40.000Her work has been so effective that the Biden White House has put them on the disinformation dozen just for telling the truth.
00:37:47.000I'm telling you all of this because Sharlene has developed the most luxurious, toxic-free, anti-aging skincare line on the planet.
00:37:55.000Charlize is second to none, so you will look great and feel great.
00:37:58.000Their packaging is in, well, look at this.
00:38:01.000This is high vibrational Italian glass, never plastic, to preserve the quality and efficacy of these ingredients.
00:38:09.000Stop supporting companies that are slowly killing you with poison.
00:38:12.000Go to charlize.beauty today and use the promo code brand to purchase this toxic free luxury skincare line that have been supporting us beautifully.
00:38:20.000That's charlize.beauty or click the link in the description below and use the promo code brand for 25% off your purchase today.
00:38:38.000It's more likely to be climate change than a lab leak that causes us to lock you in your homes next time, but we'll never know because the COVID inquiry is not happening till summer of 2026.
00:38:47.000God knows how hot it'll be by then because of you and your recycling!
00:38:50.000I mean, viruses like this one could find a way to the UK.
00:38:55.000Why are you not saying that there might have been a lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology?
00:39:00.000Why are you not saying that indeed this type of research itself could be the problem?
00:39:05.000Do you understand the extent of the research that's being done?
00:39:08.000Do you understand how possible, likely, plausible and common lab leaks are?
00:39:14.000Any idea how much it appears that establishment interests benefit from pandemics?
00:39:18.000I am not suggesting for a second that the entire thing was a dastardly plan.
00:39:23.000I will however point out that the institutions that benefited most from the pandemic are the state, globalist interests, big pharma, ability to regulate, ability to profit, ability to surveil, ability to censor, all increasing during that period.
00:39:36.000This version of reality, we're just beavering away here with these little mites that are being caused because you have not done the recycling, It's your fault and we're stepping in to help you.
00:39:45.000The entire characterisation of the relationship is bogus.
00:40:15.000You know we're on the very precipice of signing a treaty with the WHO that will mean that they will demand 5% of the health budget of every member country and will be able to impose legislation on every member nation without any kind of consultation, referenda or opining from you as an individual.
00:40:30.000Your freedom is being limited by this kind of propagandist measure, this kind of
00:40:35.000perspective. And the people have got warnings under them are us. Look at the warning right
00:41:34.000OK, so do you think that in the event that there was another pandemic and there was a vaccine, even though we are funding the research, they might potentially profit from it?
00:41:42.000Is that why 10-year deals were done with Moderna?
00:41:45.000Is that why Pfizer made sure that there was a 75-year period before we could gain access to some of the clinical trial data?
00:41:52.000Well, this all seems incredibly transparent.
00:41:54.000You better delay that COVID inquiry because you don't want people thinking too hard because they might think they're way out of obedience.
00:42:00.000What would you say is the most important lesson that was learned from the pandemic?
00:42:03.000People will do whatever you tell them to if you terrify them enough.
00:42:07.000So I think I was going to say partnership was the immediate work that comes to mind.
00:42:28.000Weapons manufacturers partnering with big pharma in order to create preemptive vaccines after we've just had a pandemic possibly caused by research into preemptive vaccines?
00:42:39.000Seems like the sort of area where if you actually lived in a democracy people might get a little referendum, a little consultation, a little conversation rather than a puff piece telling you that this is good for everything from equality to the climate to recycling without any legitimate questions being asked.
00:42:55.000Don't you think that a question that you might like to hear answered is, look, some people are concerned that actually this pandemic was caused by research of this nature.
00:43:03.000Can you allay the fears of our viewers by telling us that this is extremely safe and assure us that the biggest risk to our future is emergent natural origin viruses rather than these kind of Frankenstein gain-of-function terrifying for-profit endeavours that potentially caused the last one?
00:43:17.000And it is that continuing work which we are planning to continue going forward so that we are ready working together as soon as a pathogen appears and actually obviously beforehand so we're prepping as fast as we can.
00:43:30.000There is that target of being able to deploy hopefully a vaccine within 100 days of the threat being identified.
00:43:37.000Why are we normalising the next pandemic?
00:43:56.000There's gonna be a worse one, get ready, get primed.
00:43:59.000Do you think that it's simply the function of the media to prime you and prepare you to be continually compliant?
00:44:04.000Is the function of the culture to limit your horizons, limit your optimism, limit your freedom, whether it's at the level of entertainment, certainly at the level of propagandist news institutions like the one we're just witnessing, To prevent you from going, hang on a minute, I've got a lot of questions about the last pandemic, and who made money from it, and how it disrupted infrastructure, and how it destroyed individual lives, and how it's used to normalise the impediment of human freedom, before we go marching gleefully into the sequel like it's Iron Man 3.
00:44:30.000How close are you to that particular target, to making that realistic?
00:45:13.000But I do think it is possible for many and the more we think about it in advance the more likely we are to achieve it and that's what the purpose So there you are.
00:45:25.000Disease X is on its way, but fear not, because the chemical weapons industry are already preparing a solution and state media are already normalising that endeavour.
00:45:34.000And the Covid inquiry has just been abandoned and booted off into the faraway future.
00:45:47.000Let me know what you think in the comments and chat.
00:45:49.000Well if that made you lose your faith in the system, get ready because Whitney Webb is our guest today.
00:46:02.000Whitney Webb has become something of an expert on Jeffrey Epstein and his relationship with deep state agencies and but she as you are about to discover if you're not familiar with her work is a lot more than that and has a lot more to offer.
00:46:17.000In a sense, Whitney Webb is able to provide the cartilage between the types of theories and ideas that peripherally exist and the even darker reality of what's happening globally Right now.
00:46:32.000So we talk about Epstein but what Epstein significantly represents when it comes to financial crime in addition to the more salacious stuff that we're familiar with and additionally we talk about the limitations of populist politicians and the false dichotomies that exist i.e.
00:46:48.000we're often offered alternatives but they don't mount to alternatives at all and just how close we are To entering a dystopia.
00:46:57.000In fact the conversation ends with basically learn how to garden.
00:47:01.000But it's the way that we get there that's significant.
00:47:03.000Whitney is of course a contributing editor at Unlimited Hangout and the author of the book One Nation Under Blackmail.
00:47:09.000You can find her work at unlimitedhangout.com and support her at unlimitedhangout.com forward slash join.
00:47:16.000All of that's posted in the chat and I recommend you support Whitney's incredible work.
00:47:20.000Whitney, hello and thank you for joining us.
00:47:22.000You must be very popular this time of year.
00:47:25.000Um I don't know exactly what you mean by that but yeah I have gotten a lot of interview requests because Epstein stuff has happened recently and so yeah I tend to get more interview requests when when things happen there.
00:47:37.000Because yes yes I suppose if like uh if something happens in the world of botany or biology David Attenborough might get a call if something happens on Epstein Island it's to Whitney Webb That we turn to understand what's been going on, because I suppose it's one of those news stories that used to exist primarily as a peripheral and indeed conspiratorial subject.
00:48:05.000This is, I suppose, one of the trends of the post-independent media world, is subjects
00:48:11.000that were regarded as conspiracy theories, like, you know, there are islands where famous
00:48:18.000and influential people go and have illicit and indeed illegal criminal sexual encounters
00:48:26.000and they're being blackmailed as a result of it.
00:48:28.000That, when I was, you know, 25, that was stuff that, oh, that's Alex Jones, that's David
00:48:40.000So that must be, as nearly one of the primary independent journalists writing on this subject, and given that you're I would guess somewhat younger than I am, has this always been something that you've understood to be true or have you similarly gone through sort of gradients of shock and disbelief while covering this story and learning about it?
00:48:59.000Yeah, so I think definitely prior to 2019 there were efforts to sort of obfuscate what was going on with Epstein because he's obviously been sort of known since 2007 and to sort of attempt to join it together with other ideas that make it sound crazy.
00:49:15.000You know, I think that was one of the functionalities of a movement.
00:49:18.000Uh, QAnon, for example, that took, you know, aspects of truth about stuff, you know, for example, Jeffrey Epstein was doing and then sort of adding things that are not true or, or, you know, unable to be ever corroborated in order for people to more easily dismiss it, you know, or just dismiss the aspects of it that are true.
00:49:37.000And I think, you know, there's been efforts to try and manipulate, um, this scandal in particular.
00:49:42.000Um, and also, you know, I think another major problem.
00:49:45.000Within the world of Epstein reporting for the mainstream and also the independent media is a tendency to focus on the most salacious bits of the story, which sort of distract from other aspects of the criminality of someone like Jeffrey Epstein, who was not just a sex trafficker, but was involved in a lot of financial crimes, has a lot of very extensive ties to Wall Street giants like JP Morgan.
00:50:08.000To some of the biggest names in Silicon Valley, for example, a lot of this doesn't get scrutinized properly because of the extreme focus on, you know, certain figures who have been known to have been Epstein associates for some time.
00:50:19.000So people like Bill Clinton, accusations against people like Alan Dershowitz, for example, Prince Andrew, you know, these are the names that just get circulated over and over again.
00:50:28.000And a lot of stuff that, you know, you know, has been known about Epstein for years, sort of
00:50:32.000periodically gets rehashed, I guess, or, you know, slight details get added to it, but
00:50:37.000it tends to overly focus on as much like salacious stuff as possible. I think in
00:50:43.000order to attempt to control the narrative and sort of paint Epstein just as a sort of like
00:50:48.000a sex trafficker and a sex blackmailer when he was actually involved in a lot of other
00:50:53.000stuff and to keep the focus on particular names that are useful to the whole divide and
00:50:58.000conquer attempts in the United States.
00:51:01.000So having it be Clinton versus Trump and things like that.
00:51:04.000I mean, I think we still see that all the time.
00:51:07.000And some other important names in the case, like Thomas Pritzker, for example, who's not sort of a guy that's very behind the scenes, but very powerful in the US don't get talked about very often.
00:51:18.000Yes, I suppose which individuals you focus on might be part of the bias.
00:51:25.000The fact that the salaciousness and a bias towards thinking about those things, there's all sorts of psychological and indeed biological reasons why that might be the case.
00:51:36.000I wonder sometimes, Whitney, because I don't know that much about it, but when I sometimes see very extensive reported lists of people that might have gone to that island, that Would it have been that it was like parties full of really really attractive women or is it who to some degree were not there voluntarily or is it actually like people were kidnapped people they were under age they were coerced there was involuntary sexual activity taking place is there a whole range because when you're sort of seeing people that seem like pretty
00:52:07.000I don't know, from the outside, vanilla celebrities.
00:52:09.000Is it that what they would have experienced is... In fact, isn't there a famous piece of public content with someone talking about it and just going, I went to this island and it was amazing and there were all these parties and there was attractive women there and it didn't... at least it appears from that person's perspective, like, I was participating in this criminal, pedophilic evil, you know, like, is it so, like, what's actually happening when the people go there?
00:52:34.000Um, yeah, so as far as I understand it, the girls that were there, it was a mix of girls that were sort of there voluntarily because they'd been promised certain things by Epstein and Maxwell, like help with a modeling career, for example, or promised, you know, help with paying for university, things of that nature.
00:52:52.000And then some women who were there more or less involuntarily, like their passports had been seized by Maxwell, for example.
00:53:00.000You know, there's examples of that where, like, they were forced into a much more exploitative relationship.
00:53:05.000In my opinion, you know, it's both really exploitative because you're, you know, promising something that you're most likely not going to deliver on to these girls in order to get them to do stuff.
00:53:15.000Or you're, you know, seizing their passport and, you know, going that much farther.
00:53:19.000So there was different, you know, degrees of exploitative behavior.
00:53:23.000To get these girls there, which I'm sure manifested in different, you know, behavior.
00:53:27.000But I think the idea that Epstein wanted to project at these parties was sort of a, you know, an ambiance to have, you know, people he was targeting for the purpose of sexual blackmail.
00:53:37.000Obviously, you want those targets to be at ease so that they're more likely to engage in the type of behavior you want to catch them in.
00:53:45.000So I'm sure there was an effort to make it seem like a billionaire playboy Uh, you know, type of environment, but ultimately the girls that were there, uh, were there because of these, you know, uh, exploitative mechanisms, um, of various types that Maxwell and Epstein used on their targets.
00:54:13.000But it seems like some people that were continually there.
00:54:15.000And also, I suppose what you say is there are some things that are difficult to prove or corroborate, but it's difficult to know how exploitative, how criminal You know, even though any exploitation is obviously wrong, it's difficult to know how dark it could have got.
00:54:31.000And also I suppose, but like you, I'm more interested, even though I'm interested in that stuff because I'm a human being, I'm interested in where it intersects with power, where it intersects with deep state agencies, and where it's being used to, in a sense, orchestrate powerful people and significant events and it does appear that what Jeffrey Epstein is is a sort of a visible facet of systemic corruption that's financial as well as sexual and international and elitist.
00:55:10.000There's definitely efforts to keep certain names out of the press.
00:55:13.000So, for example, the JP Morgan case with Epstein that was, you know, eventually settled, so it didn't end up going to court.
00:55:20.000Some of the names that were subpoenaed were the two co-founders of Google, and one of the cool co-founders of Google, Larry Page, completely disappeared and was never served that subpoena.
00:55:31.000That's very significant, especially when you consider that You know, Google was essentially created with CIA assistance and money and has collaborated, you know, relatively closely with the NSA and also like the military in the years since.
00:55:47.000And these guys had some sort of shady dealings, apparently, at least the USVI felt so, but with Epstein and JP Morgan.
00:55:55.000And of course, the head of JP Morgan, Jamie Dimon, has a lot of connections to sort of the Wexner, the Leslie Wexner circle in Ohio.
00:56:03.000Of course, Epstein being a key, you know, part of Wexner's network with, you know, Wexner's one of his most well-known benefactors.
00:56:11.000And of course, Leslie Wexner is a person that, despite the insane amount of connections and, you know, financing he gave Epstein, properties, Complete control over his assets, essentially.
00:56:23.000He hasn't been the target of any lawsuits, really, or scrutinized very much by the mainstream press, and it's because he's an extremely powerful individual, worth several billion dollars still.
00:56:35.000So I suppose it seems like when you mention powerful institutions that have curious origins, notably Google founders and the way that Google was founded, I suppose it seems like the way that this story is being covered is to kind of keep you, to keep it buoyant at the level of Oh Bill Clinton he was president like 30 years ago that's pretty crazy but the story could be this shows you the intersection of all kinds of forms of power and in a sense what the limitations are of the sphere of reality that most of us operate in and do you feel that that's something that's increasingly happening?
00:57:17.000I mean I know this isn't actually your particular area of expertise I'm in a way a bit foolish to but you've got so many you've reported on so many things but I just get a sense now, Whitney, while we're reporting on Davos, for example, and you can see figures from the WHO talking about disease X, and you can hear Bill Gates, another, you know, purported client and friend of Epstein's, of course, talking about more vaccines and more vaccines.
00:57:40.000Meanwhile, there are a lot of Conversations now about excess deaths.
00:57:45.000There's a recent report that suggests there's been an increase of 8% in child death in this country and possibly beyond that.
00:57:53.000And I'm wondering how you feel as an independent journalist that operates in all these spaces, that 2024, for all of the kind of fear and trepidation that there is this year, there's an election in the United States, an election in the United Kingdom, is also like a sense of An avalanche of information about even the pandemic period, added to which, you know, the sort of Epstein story and ancillary stories that one might ponder as a result of it, the nature of power and the intersection between those different types of power.
00:58:23.000Do you feel like it might be a point where it's difficult to maintain a cohesive, homogenized version of this is what reality is when you have so much inquiry, so much revelation, so many counter narratives?
00:58:40.000Yeah, so I think what you're talking about is one of the main reasons why there's an increased push towards censorship from, you know, the US, the UK and the EU, major efforts to regulate the Internet in general and also AI.
00:58:57.000You know, essentially, the blueprint for how to do this was written and I believe 2021 by Henry Kissinger and Eric Schmidt, the former Google CEO, basically talking about that we need to move to an internet model, essentially, where most information people are consuming for, you know, to form their political opinions is produced by generative AI.
00:59:17.000And that also we put AI in charge of censoring the narratives that we shouldn't have sorted.
00:59:22.000So I mean, they definitely Are looking to move towards unprecedented models of narrative control, and it's precisely because, you know, independent media has had a lot of successes, but I think at the same time, there's a lot of efforts to sort of muddy the waters with independent media to try and blunt its impact that it's been having, you know, not just the censorship drive, but I think, you know, going forward, especially as we get closer to the elections, every
00:59:49.000Particularly in the UK and the US, I think there's going to be a lot more efforts to censor the ability of counter narratives to, you know, get out there and reach people.
00:59:58.000And you have a lot of these efforts in the UK, right, with the online safety bill, for example, and some of these other, you know, legislative initiatives that are trying to You know, again, regulate the Internet, essentially, and where this is going long term is about having some sort of government issued I. D. Tied to everything you do online through your Internet service provider in the U. S. They call it the driver.
01:00:22.000They tried to do it in the Obama administration.
01:00:24.000It was called the driver's license for the Internet.
01:00:27.000More modern era, the goal is to have the digital ID that's being implemented in various countries around the world, have that be tied to what you're doing online, so they know not just what you're posting, but what you're reading and consuming, so that they can more effectively manage that with the artificial intelligence algorithms they want to put in charge, essentially, of managing all content online.
01:00:48.000Race against time, when you describe it like that.
01:00:51.000That there are these emergent technologies that can be used by censorship.
01:00:54.000I'm astonished to hear the name Henry Kissinger mentioned in association with something so avant-garde.
01:01:03.000And that while that's happening, that like most of us or many of us have access to and to a degree the ability to corroborate Information that seems more and more likely to make you disobedient and deeply cynical about the state and the establishment, if I could just use a simple term, than ever before.
01:01:30.000I saw a speech recently by Barack Obama, I think he was at Stanford University in fact, and he was saying that, you know, we need more control.
01:01:37.000So something like a version, but of course an advocate version, Where he convivially conveyed the importance of being able to censor and control misinformation precisely because it muddies the water.
01:01:52.000But I was struck when I was watching this significant figure of the establishment, this elder statesman of the establishment saying that independent media muddies the water, that that is precisely what The establishment indeed has to do to create enough doubt, enough uncertainty for us to sort of broadly be compliant, to broadly say, well, I will restrict my democratic choice to one of these two broadly similar parties.
01:02:21.000And I suppose a significant outlier does come in the form of Donald Trump, he does seem to be the kind of an anti-establishment
01:02:31.000avatar in so much as whatever you think of him or his policies, it's pretty
01:02:35.000plain the establishment are infuriated by him, unless there's more layers to this than I can
01:02:41.000And it's interesting that the more he's indicted, the more he's in court, the more popular he
01:02:48.000It seems that that would be an outlier.
01:02:51.000And indeed, we've seen sort of like populist movements across Europe, and many of them do appear to have a sort of an ethno-national component.
01:02:58.000or a nationalist component or a patriotic component. I don't know really where I land anymore. I've
01:03:02.000sort of had to go on such a wild and carooming journey. But what broadly seems to be in place
01:03:07.000is anti-globalism, anti-politics, anti-establishment. And if forces emerge that are able to harness and
01:03:13.000direct that, it is going to be very difficult, I would think, to maintain control without
01:03:18.000constant crisis and new measures for asserting that control, likely technological, likely around
01:03:25.000And I wonder how you feel what will happen as populism and anti-establishmentism continues to rise and top technology and authoritarianism simultaneously arise.
01:03:36.000What do you predict will be things we'll see in the news cycle or indeed what things you're aware of because you're reporting on them already?
01:03:41.000They're going to define this space, this fissure, this line for the next year or so.
01:03:47.000Yeah, so unfortunately, I think a lot of some of these more anti-establishment politicians that are being put out in front of us are not really, they're more of a controlled anti-establishment than anything that's organically anti-establishment.
01:04:00.000And I think sort of, you know, in Trump's case, the political persecution of Trump sort of reinforces his anti-establishment credentials among his base.
01:04:09.000And it's important to keep in mind that a lot of that credibility, that anti-establishment credibility he The reason he had lost that with his base is because of things like his continued assertion that Operation Warp Speed was a good thing and how he was responsible for that and the vaccine and a lot of other things that he did when he was in office that were very against his campaign rhetoric.
01:04:36.000And what I think people, frankly, should do is pay a lot more attention to a politician's actions, particularly when they're in power, than just their campaign rhetoric, because oftentimes there's a big gap there.
01:04:49.000So like in the case of Trump, for example, you know, when he was in office, he put people like John Bolton in charge, you know, as a national security advisor, who's a notorious war hawk, even though previously he had campaigned on being anti-war and against the neocons and the Iraq war and all of that.
01:05:05.000But John Bolton is one of the most notorious neocons of all.
01:05:09.000Um, and, uh, you know, other things, uh, happened during his term that are not good at all from an individual liberty standpoint.
01:05:17.000For example, his attorney general, William Barr, legalized pre-crime in the United States, which is the exact, uh, some of, uh, that, that exact program really has been used to go after people that were present on January 6th, but didn't necessarily engage in anything that can traditionally be deemed illegal.
01:05:33.000Um, you know, that framework was produced during the Trump administration.
01:05:37.000And I think for a long time, Americans and also elsewhere have sort of been pushed into choosing between the lesser of two evils and things like that, but ultimately that doesn't lead to good.
01:05:48.000You're just getting, you know, one that's slightly better maybe than the other guy, but a lot of that, you know, these differences at the end of the day, Um, are about political rhetoric more than actual action when these people are in office.
01:06:00.000And, um, there's definitely been, you know, an effort, um, to oscillate between left and right.
01:06:06.000And, uh, you know, for decades to keep sort of, you know, the left, right paradigm going, which, which is one of the main ways that sort of these more global agendas, um, are able to advance.
01:06:16.000Um, and people get frustrated with one and then switch to the other.
01:06:18.000So, you know, there's a, an effort right now to frame.
01:06:22.000Sort of these right-leaning figures as anti-establishment, not just with Trump, but people in Argentina, like Javier Mele, for example, or Bolsonaro in Brazil, for example, right?
01:06:32.000A lot was said about Javier Mele's, you know, rise to power, that he was anti-establishment and all of this, and that he was going to depose the political elite in Argentina, and had a lot of campaign rhetoric similar to Trump.
01:06:46.000But when Javier Mele came into power, he put a lot of career Wall Street people from JP Morgan, from Deutsche Bank, the Epstein banks, essentially, in charge of key parts of the economy.
01:06:56.000He's not going to shut down the central bank.
01:06:58.000He's not actually going to dollarize, which he campaigned on, and, you know, several other things there.
01:07:03.000And at his recent WEF address, he was essentially framing the solution to the world's problems, more or less, as moving it away from government controlling things to corporations controlling things.
01:07:16.000And, you know, essentially what we have as seen through groups like the World Economic Forum is that ultimately it's all about public-private partnership, and the governments and the corporations essentially are controlled by the, you know, it's really the same group at the end of the day.
01:07:30.000I mean, if you think about the U.S., for example, the government, the politicians are owned by corporate America, so hand over More direct power to the private sector, the most powerful multinational corporations, or hand it to the government.
01:07:42.000It's really the same people ultimately making decisions, and it's the decisions that benefit the 1%, not regular people.
01:07:50.000And so my concern is that people are going to, again, focus rather myopically on the campaign rhetoric and not on the actions of people when they've been in power.
01:07:59.000And, you know, hold them to account and instead, you know, sort of get in this space where people become sort of apologists for these politicians at times when they start doing things that go against their campaign rhetoric and promises, probably because they don't want to be wrong or don't want to admit that maybe they've been had or something like that.
01:08:18.000But I think it's definitely, you know, groups like the World Economic Forum and these other entities have supporters both on the left and the right.
01:08:26.000And I think there's a renewed effort to sort of reframe the current opposition in the U.S.
01:08:33.000really anywhere as being more like against unpopular initiatives.
01:08:36.000So in the U.S., for example, you know, you have Trump speaking out against CBDCs, people like Ron DeSantis as well.
01:08:42.000But I've done some recent reports recently that the plan in the U.S.
01:08:45.000was never to have A direct-issued CBDC, the model instead is to have a synthetic CBDC, which is a U.S.
01:08:52.000dollar-denominated stablecoin that may not be a CBDC in name, but is just as available and programmable as a CBDC is, or can be.
01:09:01.000So the same dangers of a CBDC would be true for a, you know, a synthetic CBDC, which is basically, you know, A CBDC instead of being issued by the Federal Reserve or the Central Bank would be issued by Wall Street.
01:09:16.000Having Wall Street and Jamie Dimon and Bank of America program and surveil your money than it would be than having Jerome Powell, head of the Fed right now, do it?
01:09:24.000I mean, not really, but this is The kind of, you know, bait and switch that I'm talking about here.
01:09:30.000So you have Ron DeSantis and Trump say, you know, no to a CBDC.
01:09:35.000But, you know, for example, Trump and Jared Kushner, who played a very prominent role in his cabinet was, you know, privately promoting the idea of having this, you know, dollar denominated stable coin, why Trump was in office.
01:09:48.000And there's been a lot of moves towards that on the part of the Fed, which in the US is owned by Wall Street.
01:09:53.000So, You know, again, I think that this might be celebrated as some sort of win, you know, see no CBDCs in the US, it's a victory for freedom.
01:10:02.000But if you're having, you know, the most corrupt people in the banking industry programming and surveilling your money, instead of the Federal Reserve, which is owned by Wall Street, anyway, in the US, it's not really a victory at all, but it's going to be framed as that.
01:10:32.000We've laid out a set of various false dichotomies that we are offered, whether it's between a kind of centralised globalism predicated on state power, or centralised globalism predicated on corporate power, but the WEF wants partnerships between those entities anyway.
01:10:51.000And then you talked about with the currencies, oh, does it make any difference whether it's the Federal Reserve that's owned by Wall Street or Wall Street itself?
01:10:58.000That's not what we were being offered.
01:11:00.000And what does, and hello and welcome to all of our community members right now that are joining us live.
01:11:06.000And I'll be passing on your questions to Whitney.
01:11:08.000And indeed, if you're watching this on Rumble right now, remember you could watch this content live if you become a member of our community.
01:11:15.000And this, I think, is an important question because I think the reason that the rhetoric of anti-establishmentism is becoming so successful is because that's precisely what people want.
01:11:24.000Now, am I also correct, Whitney, because I'm assuming I'm correct about that bit, in assuming that what we're experiencing is now the availability and possibility, because of technology, because of decentral, you know, because of the different types of cryptocurrencies, for example, because of the immediacy and democratic potential of the type of technology that we now harness, The decentralization and the disempowerment of these various occupants of these paradigms that you've outlined, whether it's corporate global power, state global power, you could now actually have
01:12:00.000You could have communities that are self-governing, maximum amount of individual sovereignty.
01:12:04.000And I ask you all of this because for them to work as hard as they currently are to censor and control, to introduce measures such as you've already explained to us, artificial intelligence, censoring...
01:12:16.000It must mean that the inverse is true and when you, you know, one by one break down these apparent anti-establishment populist figures and say that in a sense they do exist within the framing of the establishment and, you know, you give clear examples of appointments made by people that campaigned as populist but governed as somewhat centralist.
01:12:37.000What does represent anti-establishmentism now?
01:12:41.000What political figures or movements or ideas are there Yeah, so I think the whole purpose of these controlled anti-establishment figures is precisely so people look to them and don't actually do anything themselves, presuming that these politicians are going to save the day, sort of as political saviors.
01:13:07.000What I think were the real hope for anti-establishmentism lies is with regular people building alternatives to the establishment.
01:13:17.000So really the only way to get out of this mess with where the establishment, you know, global power is taking us really comes down to people building alternative systems and divesting from the establishment as much as possible so that we're not dependent on these systems they're trying to force us into.
01:13:35.000And the only way to really do that is to build something at the local level and actually actively create something new.
01:13:41.000And I think the powers that be are hoping that we will remain dependent on them and dependent on the political figures they provide for us instead of taking any sort of, you know, individual responsibility or accountability and, you know, community building ourselves because the government Um, the corporations, you know, we don't need them, they need us, and they are essentially creating systems, whether it's digital ID, CBDC, or equivalents, um, that are all about controlling the population at mass, and part of this is tied up with speech and all of that, and I, as I see it, really the only way is to
01:14:18.000Uh, start doing something, you know, us little people, you know, actually creating something decentralized.
01:14:23.000We're not depending on these people at all, depending on, you know, the new money they want us to use or the new ID system they want us to use, which is, you know, basically going to lead us to a.
01:14:34.000A system where everything is surveilled and also where everything in the world is a financial product.
01:14:39.000I mean, there's these efforts right now by Wall Street to turn parts of the natural world that have never been included in the economy to monetize them and securitize them through this model, this vehicle called Natural Asset Corporations.
01:14:51.000Larry Flink of BlackRock was just talking about how they plan to tokenize everything.
01:14:57.000Including like human relationships, you know, calling it social capital, human capital, all of this stuff.
01:15:07.000I mean, they literally want to turn everything into a financial product that they can put on the blockchain and trade and surveil you at the same time, decide what you can and can't do.
01:15:20.000The only way to not let that happen is to build something else so that you can say, no, I'm not going to participate in this crap authoritarian system.
01:15:28.000I'm going to participate in this system instead.
01:15:48.000Wherever you are dependent on this system, you are owned by this system.
01:15:52.000That slavery is being replaced by dependency.
01:15:56.000And if we are dependent on devices or new forms of currency, or we cannot control our food, and increasingly the control of food seems to be an issue, and more and more vital resources, and there are attempts to control energy.
01:16:11.000It seems like that And I became sort of a little befuddled when you said that human relationships and children's dreams and sunsets, autumn, are going to become, like, all being tokenized.
01:16:28.000How could that even, how could that work?
01:16:31.000I mean, I suppose it's only one step on from Monsanto patenting seeds and Bill Gates's magnificent work across Africa and in India.
01:16:39.000In measures for controlling agriculture, what is this natural assets coup that BlackRock are up to?
01:16:46.000The rest of our conversation, and it's really worth it, will be available for our supporters now, immediately.
01:16:53.000If you want to see the rest of that conversation, join us over on Locals now.
01:16:59.000The reason we need your support is because of what Whitney Webb is describing.
01:17:03.000There is a necessity to organize and create a movement, and we are dedicated to that.
01:17:09.000We are participating in that with you.
01:17:11.000We're not pledging to be Leaders are superior because what this requires is a new modality and a new mentality of decentralization and empowerment of the individual and you'll learn a lot more by jumping into what we talk about in the latter part of our conversation.
01:17:26.000Support Whitney's work as I said before at unlimitedhangout.com.
01:17:30.000There's a link in the description for how you can support her work.