Stay Free - Russel Brand - October 03, 2023


This Is END GAME! Canada’s AUTHORITARIAN CRACKDOWN On Dissent!- Stay Free #215


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 14 minutes

Words per Minute

157.40242

Word Count

11,695

Sentence Count

659

Misogynist Sentences

10

Hate Speech Sentences

18


Summary

Julian Assange's wife Stella, who knows a thing or two about freedom and incarceration, joins Russell Brand to discuss the possibility of her husband being released from prison. Russell also talks about Lindsey Graham's attack on Donald Trump's pro-Russia stance on Ukraine and Afghanistan, and why he should be worried about what s going on in Washington, D.C. Russell Brand is an American comedian, actor, writer, podcaster, and podcaster. He is the host of the podcast Stay Free With Russell Brand, and is a regular contributor to the New York Times, CNN, NPR, and other media outlets. He's also a frequent contributor to The Huffington Post, and has been featured in Rolling Stone, The Daily Beast, and The New Republic, among other publications. He is married to the beautiful Stella, and they have a son, a daughter, a son-in-law, and a daughter-to-be, and two step-children, all of whom have been named after famous people in the media and political circles. Russell Brand's new book, Stay Free with Russell Brand: How to Live Free in the 21st Century, is out now, and it's out on all of the social medias, if you search for it, you'll find it. It's available for purchase on Amazon Prime, wherever you get your favourite streaming service. If you don't already have a device, you can get a copy of the book, and watch it here. You can also get it for free on Audible, iTunes, Podcoin, or wherever else you re listening to it's available, and get 20% off the service, too! You'll get 10% off for free, they'll get 15% off your first month, plus free shipping, plus shipping is free for the rest of the month, and you'll get an ad-free version of the ad is available for free for a year, plus a year from Audible starting next month, too. You'll have access to all of that, plus I'm giving you a 20% discount when you sign up for $99.99, and I'll get a maximum of $99, plus an ad discount, plus two other places get $99 gets you get $50, plus they get $5, plus you get an extra $10,000 shipping and shipping starts starting at $50 gets you an ad is free, plus she gets an ad on my site gets a discount, and she'll get my ad is also gets a free shipping policy.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 So, we're going to go ahead and start the video. So, this is the first time I've ever seen a bird. I'm going to go
00:00:07.000 ahead and start the video.
00:00:07.000 So, this is the first time I've ever seen a bird. I'm going to go ahead and start the video.
00:01:04.000 In this video, you're going to see the future.
00:01:13.000 Spudgy, Spudgy.
00:01:14.000 Spudgy.
00:01:25.000 Hello there, you freedom-loving awakening wonder.
00:01:27.000 Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:01:31.000 How we appreciate your loyalty, your fealty, your ability to see past deception and towards truth.
00:01:37.000 And that's exactly what we're covering today.
00:01:40.000 We're looking at Canada.
00:01:42.000 Has Canada set itself up as some sort of dystopic authoritarian nightmare where academics are punished and penalised, where clerics are flung in jail, where protesters are demonetised?
00:01:55.000 What's going on under the auspices of democracy, under the admittedly fantastic coiffured hair of Justin Trudeau?
00:02:03.000 We're looking at that in detail.
00:02:05.000 We're going to be speaking to Stella Assange, activist and wife of Julian, who knows a thing or two about Freedom and incarceration.
00:02:14.000 She's just been to see Julian and we'll be talking today about the possibility of Julian being released and what it means when a man is incarcerated, jailed, without trial, without conviction.
00:02:26.000 What does it mean for justice?
00:02:27.000 What does it mean about the principles themselves?
00:02:29.000 Are there any principles at Oh, now we need you to follow us on Rumble.
00:02:34.000 That's how we plan to survive, thrive and move forward.
00:02:38.000 Like and subscribe to our channel there and press the red awaken button to join our locals community and to support us directly if that's something that's within your means.
00:02:47.000 If not, your presence is so much more valuable than your money.
00:02:51.000 I can't tell you how much we value you.
00:02:53.000 Lindsey Graham has been sending messages to Trump, essentially a pro-war message.
00:02:59.000 The war between Ukraine and Russia continues to escalate.
00:03:02.000 People continue to die.
00:03:04.000 Peace is still not permitted to even be discussed.
00:03:09.000 And Graham has a message for Donald Trump, who, curiously, extraordinarily, is the only significant political figure advocating for peace.
00:03:17.000 Just wrap your head around that now.
00:03:21.000 That Trump is the lone voice advocating for peace and he's perhaps the most vilified figure on the planet.
00:03:27.000 Let's have a look at Lindsey Graham offering a curse to Trump.
00:03:32.000 Have you asked Donald Trump, your friend, to come out and publicly support more aid to Ukraine and to push some of these sceptical members of the Republican conference?
00:03:41.000 I'll leave it up to him to what to do, but he wanted to get out of Afghanistan.
00:03:45.000 Vladimir Putin has been praising him for his comments about Russia and Ukraine.
00:03:47.000 Here's what I'll say about President Trump.
00:03:49.000 He did not pull the plug on Afghanistan, even though he wanted to.
00:03:53.000 The biggest mistake we've made since the war on terror is withdrawing from Afghanistan.
00:03:57.000 To President Trump and anybody else, if we pull the plug on Ukraine, that's ten times worse than Afghanistan.
00:04:04.000 There goes Taiwan.
00:04:05.000 To stop funding Ukraine is a death sentence for Taiwan.
00:04:08.000 Putin will keep going.
00:04:10.000 You missed all of World War II, if you don't know how this movie ends.
00:04:14.000 To the Republicans who say Ukraine doesn't matter to us, you're wrong.
00:04:18.000 Respectfully, you're wrong.
00:04:20.000 The war gets bigger, not smaller.
00:04:22.000 There goes Taiwan.
00:04:23.000 Well, it's a terrifying, mad prediction.
00:04:25.000 There goes Taiwan.
00:04:26.000 Taiwan will be next.
00:04:27.000 That's ten Afghanistans.
00:04:29.000 I'll give you ten Afghanistans for the price of a Ukraine.
00:04:32.000 Terrible, terrible auctioneer Lindsey Graham is.
00:04:36.000 And do you see how we're sort of gridlocked into perpetual war?
00:04:39.000 It's the worst thing since the War of Terror.
00:04:40.000 So it was a mistake to get into the War of Terror, but the Afghanistan war is sort of part of that ongoing hellish narrative, and there's no way out of it.
00:04:48.000 Let's see who else has been addressing Donald Trump.
00:04:50.000 You may have already seen this.
00:04:52.000 Chris Christie is not a man who should be trying to come up with catchphrases and nicknames.
00:04:57.000 He don't have that ability.
00:05:00.000 ...in Washington, D.C.
00:05:01.000 also.
00:05:02.000 And Donald Trump should be here to answer for that, but he's not.
00:05:04.000 And I want to look at that camera right now and tell you, Donald, I know you're watching.
00:05:08.000 You can't help yourself.
00:05:09.000 I know you're watching.
00:05:10.000 Okay?
00:05:11.000 And you're not here tonight, not because of polls, and not because of your indictments.
00:05:16.000 You're not here tonight because you're afraid of being on this stage and defending your record.
00:05:21.000 You're ducking these things.
00:05:23.000 And let me tell you what's going to happen.
00:05:25.000 You keep doing that, no one up here is going to call you Donald Trump anymore.
00:05:28.000 We're going to call you Donald Duck.
00:05:30.000 I'd say that's a lot of pipe.
00:05:32.000 There was a lot of exposition required to get there.
00:05:35.000 Okay, but I'm gonna do this down the camera.
00:05:37.000 Now, wait, you're not here not because you're not, well, it's not because of the indictments, but,
00:05:41.000 and also it's not because of the pose, so, you are ducking, okay, therefore I'm gonna call you,
00:05:46.000 wait for it, and all the while you're thinking, this isn't gonna be Donald Duck, is it?
00:05:50.000 It's not going to be, like, we've almost sort of forgotten that Donald Duck and Donald Trump have the same name because it's too glaringly obvious.
00:05:56.000 It's too much in our face as a reference to warrant being comedically utilised.
00:06:01.000 But Chris Christie there, he's giving it a bloody good go.
00:06:05.000 And so to Kamala Harris.
00:06:07.000 I get no joy from criticizing high-profile political figures.
00:06:10.000 My belief is that as we continue to awaken, as we continue to access the depths of our being, as we see plainly that these systems are incapable of delivering anything other than hypocrisy and corruption, they appear to get worse whether it's Dear old cadaverous Joe Biden, who's in a plain state of atrophy.
00:06:27.000 Or Kamala Harris, who's meant to be the safety net in the event that dear Joe Biden inevitably tumbles.
00:06:34.000 She appears to be worse than him, using metaphorical systems and rhetorical devices that don't make sense in any language.
00:06:41.000 Although I'm not actually qualified to say, because I only speak this one.
00:06:44.000 So let me know if there is another language You know that old story about the two frogs and the pots of water?
00:06:47.000 You're a good storyteller, I'm going to tell you a good story.
00:06:49.000 So, two frogs and two pots of water.
00:06:50.000 but then you'll have to click the link in the description to support us, to support free speech, to support freedom
00:06:55.000 more broadly.
00:06:56.000 Let's have a look at what Kamala Harris is saying.
00:06:58.000 You know that old story about the two frogs and the pots of water? Okay, so here you're a good storyteller.
00:07:04.000 I'm gonna tell you a good story. So two frogs and two pots of water.
00:07:08.000 So in one pot of water...
00:07:11.000 Firstly, this is not an old story. It...
00:07:14.000 It's an apocryphal tale.
00:07:15.000 I think where Kamala Harris is going is that frogs don't notice that the temperature is gradually increasing to ultimately their boiling point.
00:07:24.000 I think that's what it is.
00:07:25.000 But I don't think there are two separate pots of water.
00:07:28.000 And it's not like sort of a folky tale that's told to kids.
00:07:32.000 It's like just an odd way of illustrating the idea that you don't notice incremental change.
00:07:37.000 And it's not true.
00:07:38.000 And it's not real.
00:07:39.000 But already I'm confused by it.
00:07:41.000 You drop the frog in, and you slowly turn up the heat.
00:07:45.000 And that frog will be like, oh, it's getting a little warm in here.
00:07:47.000 And then that water starts to boil, and that frog perishes.
00:07:53.000 In the other pot of water, you turn up the heat to the point it's boiling.
00:07:57.000 You drop the frog in it, it'll jump right out.
00:08:01.000 Let's not be that first frog.
00:08:03.000 No, let's not be that first frog.
00:08:04.000 Could there be a more inspiring message as your fuel bills soar, as your food bills become unmanageable, as your country falls apart before your very eyes, as sacred principles just fall away to leave nihilism and a kind of moral morass and an empty hollowness, a facade.
00:08:23.000 Let's just remember that our way through this is just don't be that first frog.
00:08:28.000 That's what I will say in this situation.
00:08:31.000 Uh, Kamala Harris sometimes seems to defy description, but people had a go at it with one of those word clouds.
00:08:36.000 Let's have a look at how they described her.
00:08:39.000 Variety of words that were used.
00:08:41.000 Useless.
00:08:41.000 Strong.
00:08:42.000 Incompetent.
00:08:42.000 Idiot.
00:08:43.000 Horrible.
00:08:44.000 Worthless.
00:08:44.000 Oh my god.
00:08:45.000 Some of it's actually a bit unkind.
00:08:47.000 Clueless.
00:08:48.000 Puppet.
00:08:48.000 Unsure.
00:08:49.000 Lovely.
00:08:49.000 Democrat.
00:08:50.000 Cop.
00:08:51.000 Pathetic woman!
00:08:51.000 Meh!
00:08:52.000 Them word clouds bring out some extraordinary reactions.
00:08:56.000 And so now we go to another extraordinary emergent facet of authoritarianism.
00:09:01.000 This phenomena, I believe, is perhaps the most important thing happening on the world stage right now.
00:09:05.000 Liberalism, safety, security and kindness are being presented to us as a way towards
00:09:10.000 a progression in society, a better and more evolved society.
00:09:15.000 But when you actually look at the legislation that accompanies the rhetoric around helping
00:09:20.000 people and supporting one another, you will note that often it seems to benefit elite
00:09:26.000 establishments and penalise ordinary people.
00:09:29.000 And that could be no more obvious.
00:09:32.000 Hey Lord! The very gods themselves come out in support of us.
00:09:36.000 Then in this extraordinary story where a Calgary pastor was sentenced to 60 days in jail for his role in protest against Covid-19 public health measures.
00:09:46.000 If you ever want to question whether you're on the right side, have a look at a pastor being arrested by masked men and flung in jail for simply following his religious beliefs and standing with his community.
00:10:00.000 Here's the news.
00:10:01.000 No, here's the effing news.
00:10:05.000 No, here's the fucking news!
00:10:10.000 Trudeau's Liberal Canada jail a pastor for giving a speech at a blockade while celebrating actual Nazis and calling non-Nazis Nazis.
00:10:19.000 Yay Canada?
00:10:22.000 Plainly, truth is coming out.
00:10:25.000 Plainly, new revelations are being made.
00:10:27.000 Plainly, we are at some sort of biblical apocalyptic time where pastors are put in prison by the Canadian government and neo-Nazis, well not neo-Nazis actually, Original Nazis are celebrated literally in Canadian Parliament.
00:10:42.000 So where is the truth?
00:10:43.000 Where is the justice?
00:10:44.000 Can you trust the system?
00:10:45.000 Let's get into it.
00:10:47.000 And isn't it curious how those that claim to be representing people that are suffering, the vulnerable, appear Considered to be the most authoritarian, dictatorial, deceptive and deceitful of them all.
00:10:57.000 Let's look at this story in Canada and see if it can be applied to other global situations that we're experiencing.
00:11:03.000 Remember, we need you to follow us now.
00:11:05.000 That's how you do it.
00:11:06.000 There's the details.
00:11:07.000 And if you can support us, we need your support.
00:11:09.000 And I can't promise your bank account won't be frozen.
00:11:12.000 I wish I could.
00:11:13.000 If you're in Canada, it probably will be.
00:11:15.000 Let's get into this story.
00:11:16.000 Calgary pastor Artur Polowski has been sentenced to 60 days in jail.
00:11:21.000 Nothing like a pastor being arrested in the middle of the road by policemen wearing masks to tell you that democracy and the system are thoroughly healthy.
00:11:30.000 For his role in protests against COVID-19, public health measures.
00:11:34.000 Polowski was found guilty of mischief and breaching a release order.
00:11:39.000 Isn't that like what Bart Simpson and Dennis the Menace and adorable scamps throughout time have done?
00:11:46.000 No mischief!
00:11:46.000 No vulgarity!
00:11:47.000 No politics!
00:11:49.000 This is for the spirit of play.
00:11:51.000 For questioning the difference between right and wrong.
00:11:53.000 And for standing up for what you believe in.
00:11:56.000 20 years.
00:11:57.000 This is the key, by the way.
00:11:59.000 Back in May, in connection to the demonstrations which blocked Alberta's main Canada-U.S.
00:12:05.000 border crossing at Cootes.
00:12:06.000 During the trial, prosecutors said Palowski's impassioned speech...
00:12:12.000 How dare you use passion!
00:12:12.000 How dare you!
00:12:14.000 This is Canada!
00:12:15.000 Oh, sorry.
00:12:16.000 Let me neuter that right down.
00:12:19.000 Palowski's impassioned speech to truckers fanned the flames of unrest and convinced them to stay longer.
00:12:27.000 We're at a curious point, aren't we, where now, a few years down the line, it seems that many of the questions around coronavirus and the way that it was handled, particularly by authoritative and, I would say, proactive or interventionist governments, is up for inquiry.
00:12:42.000 Did Lockdown Did lockdowns work?
00:12:43.000 Did masks work?
00:12:45.000 How effective were vaccines?
00:12:47.000 These are all just questions that you might, if you're not in Canada, think about in the privacy of your own home, for now.
00:12:52.000 Because it looks like what the Canadians are actually looking to introduce is sort of thought crime laws.
00:12:58.000 Like, don't think aboot that.
00:13:00.000 Sorry for the cheap aboot joke, but you know, it is Canada and I'm not there at the moment, so... I always said to the government officials, leave me alone.
00:13:08.000 Please leave me alone.
00:13:10.000 Let me do what I'm good at, which is feeding the poor, preaching the gospel, and just being a church.
00:13:14.000 Preaching the gospel, feeding the poor, and going to church.
00:13:18.000 There's that key!
00:13:19.000 You don't have to come and listen to me.
00:13:22.000 However, let me do my job.
00:13:25.000 And that's what I did in the past three years.
00:13:27.000 I did my job.
00:13:28.000 I am a shepherd.
00:13:30.000 I stood by hurting people.
00:13:32.000 I did my best.
00:13:34.000 You don't have to like it.
00:13:35.000 You actually do have to like it.
00:13:36.000 It's a new law.
00:13:37.000 It's now the law in Canada that you have to like it.
00:13:39.000 What an extraordinary situation where someone who dedicates their lives to spirituality, to truth, to the exploration of meaning, to support in a community, standing up for their own rights.
00:13:49.000 And remember, we now know that on average Canadian truckers were more vaccinated than the average Canadian population member per capita.
00:13:57.000 You know, there's data on that.
00:13:59.000 You know, follow the science, as they say.
00:14:00.000 So we know that it's not that they were particularly anti-vaccine.
00:14:03.000 They were just particularly pro-freedom.
00:14:04.000 Now, one of the macro arguments we are making to you on our channel right now is that ideas around safety and convenience and security are being mobilized to shut down your liberty.
00:14:16.000 That what was once regarded as the ordinary right of the average citizen is become like privacy or private money, all these things.
00:14:23.000 They're going.
00:14:24.000 I think going fast, the ability to communicate, the ability to question, all of these things are being shut down radically.
00:14:29.000 I'm almost glad of a situation where street preachers are being banged up in Canadian knicks.
00:14:35.000 60 days that dude got and they wanted him to have 10 months.
00:14:38.000 They wanted him to have 10 months.
00:14:39.000 And just bear in mind that this is taking place in the same sort of time frame as a Nazi being applauded in Parliament.
00:14:45.000 You might think, oh that was just a spurious error.
00:14:48.000 No it wasn't.
00:14:49.000 They are so keen to live in a projected reality that actual reality doesn't matter.
00:14:53.000 There is the conjured medium maelstrom of reality, then there is actual reality.
00:14:58.000 That is why we have to find a deep connection within ourselves to a kind of absolute truth, to absolute values, to absolute principles, because they ain't got any!
00:15:08.000 Back in May, Pawlowski was found guilty of mischief and breaching a release order.
00:15:13.000 I can't get past that mischief.
00:15:15.000 Is it like, that's a crime now?
00:15:17.000 When is all this laws being introduced?
00:15:19.000 We've had quite enough of your evil mischief.
00:15:21.000 Mischief, skullduggery, tomfoolery, and hijinks.
00:15:25.000 20 years.
00:15:27.000 Bart, the record of your mischief is staggering!
00:15:33.000 I wouldn't have your hand up at that angle.
00:15:35.000 If I were you, I'd give it a speech, mate.
00:15:37.000 You might get all of Parliament applauding you.
00:15:39.000 Convince the protesters to stay longer and to quote, hold the line.
00:15:44.000 Like I said, I should never be arrested, I should never be charged with an offence.
00:15:48.000 Martin Luther King was a preacher, Malcolm X was essentially a sort of imam.
00:15:53.000 People that have strong religious conviction will apply their religious conviction to social situations because they've not been individualised.
00:16:00.000 Materialized, bought low, reduced, told there's no hope and there's no way.
00:16:04.000 Because this person's a man of God and sees spirituality as being more valuable than sort of the set of values that a culture just comes up with off the top of his head and then makes the actual law.
00:16:14.000 These people, people like you, people like me, that have actual values, that believe in redemption, salvation, believe in change, believe in changing the system, believe in changing the self, believe in moving forward, believe in beauty and grace and truth, they are a threat!
00:16:28.000 You are a threat.
00:16:29.000 Your freedom is their problem.
00:16:31.000 Plainly.
00:16:31.000 Look!
00:16:32.000 I was there in the capacity of a pastor.
00:16:34.000 For Bridge City News, I'm Micah Quinn.
00:16:39.000 Let's have a look though at what else is going on in Canada just to make sure that the imprisonment of a pastor isn't some anomalous outlier.
00:16:46.000 We first became interested in what was going on in Canada because in spite of his appearances and, let's face it, lovely haircut, Justin Trudeau doesn't appear to be that interested in freedom.
00:16:55.000 The rhetoric of freedom, yes, but the sort of authoritarianism and emergency law revoking kind of capacities of people that are more traditionally associated with tyranny.
00:17:05.000 Tyranny in Canada is not always bad, even the worst example of tyranny in human history.
00:17:10.000 The Nazis.
00:17:11.000 Last week the Canadian House of Commons Speaker Antony Rota invited a 98-year-old man named Yaroslav Hunkar to attend a speech by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
00:17:20.000 Rota called Hunkar a Canadian hero and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau cheered for Hunkar alongside lawmakers.
00:17:26.000 They were willing to do that just because they just didn't understand the facts and they hadn't looked into them properly.
00:17:31.000 In a spiritually evolved society, the possibility of redemption and absolution for a Nazi would be something you'd consider.
00:17:37.000 If you read, for example, Viktor Frankl's seminal work on his experiences in concentration camps, Man and His Search for Meaning, then you'd be aware that the travesty and murders and genocide of the Second World War oddly provided an opportunity for change.
00:17:51.000 But that's not the culture that's being evoked or invited in Canada, a culture of like where we really try to understand reality, morality, truth, spirituality.
00:18:00.000 What they want is just to mobilise and utilise particular narratives that can legitimise authoritarianism in control.
00:18:07.000 You'll never see them advocating for a story where it's like, oh yes, I suppose actually we should just let people do what they want and why don't we give people a vote on whether they want that or not and maybe for the next, if there's going to be another lockdown, people can vote on it and maybe we can let the truckers decide.
00:18:18.000 They're never going to come to those conclusions.
00:18:20.000 It's always going to be, you know that pastor?
00:18:22.000 Put him in prison.
00:18:23.000 Because that is control.
00:18:25.000 Bear in mind, learn to observe, learn to watch.
00:18:25.000 Control.
00:18:27.000 I know that you're doing it because I read the comments, I read the chat.
00:18:30.000 I know that you're further along than me, many of you.
00:18:32.000 Let's ensure that we keep doing that together, eh?
00:18:34.000 In response, Rota took full responsibility for the incident and Trudeau called it deeply embarrassing.
00:18:39.000 Trudeau then warned against Russian propaganda and Russian disinformation.
00:18:42.000 Because he's just saying stuff now.
00:18:44.000 Yeah, you know, we applauded some Nazis because of Russian disinformation, actually.
00:18:50.000 Is it not Canadian disinformation to celebrate a Nazi?
00:18:53.000 You could say that.
00:18:53.000 Are you Russian?
00:18:54.000 Trudeau's non-apology and dismissal of criticism as Russian disinformation is especially hypocritical given his repeated denunciation of the Canadian Freedom Convoy as a Nazi-linked movement.
00:19:05.000 Because the truckers' grievances were legitimate, and over the years seem increasingly legitimate, and because the actions against them were pretty draconian and extreme, emergency laws, freezing bank accounts, not allowing people to fund them, frying people in prison that gave speeches, you have to find a way to legitimise that.
00:19:20.000 You have to reverse engineer it.
00:19:22.000 What would make it legitimate to do that?
00:19:24.000 If they were Nazis?
00:19:25.000 Yeah, but they're...
00:19:28.000 Yeah.
00:19:29.000 Anyway, we've got this guy over from Ukraine who you're all going to love.
00:19:31.000 Hooray!
00:19:32.000 What did he do in the war again?
00:19:33.000 I don't know, but apparently he got a lot done.
00:19:36.000 Hooray!
00:19:37.000 About the truckers, Trudeau said, we are seeing activity that is a threat to our democracy.
00:19:41.000 It's a threat to your democracy.
00:19:43.000 Your democracy is not a democracy.
00:19:44.000 And it's undermining the public's trust in our institutions.
00:19:47.000 Quite rightly.
00:19:48.000 Trudeau one day later compared the truckers to Nazis and American racial segregationists.
00:19:53.000 That's so disgusting, isn't it?
00:19:54.000 Like, what the hell does it have to do with racial ideology, the freedom of movement, the rights for workers to unite?
00:20:02.000 How is that even connected?
00:20:04.000 Isn't it more likely, here's a hypothesis, that it's got nothing to do with that, and they retrospectively apply that in order to disempower that movement?
00:20:11.000 What do you think's more likely, looking at the facts?
00:20:13.000 Conservative party members can stand with people who wave swastikas, he said.
00:20:18.000 They can stand with people who wave the confederate flag.
00:20:20.000 I prefer to just out and out applaud Nazis.
00:20:23.000 Bring them in from the cold and clap at them up in the gallery.
00:20:26.000 Straight for it.
00:20:27.000 Not their signs or their monikers, the Nazis themselves.
00:20:30.000 It should not have to be said, but it does.
00:20:32.000 Trudeau had zero evidence then, and none today, that the truckers were racist or Nazis.
00:20:38.000 Zero evidence.
00:20:39.000 The swastikas printed on flags at the convoy were not hate symbols.
00:20:43.000 They were intended as criticism of the government's overreach for a comparison to Nazi Germany.
00:20:47.000 Yet Trudeau condemned a Jewish member of parliament for being sympathetic to the convoy and for supporting people who wave swastikas.
00:20:53.000 Trudeau's colleagues participated in his conspiracy theory.
00:20:56.000 One Liberal MP said that Trucker's Honk Honk slogan was a coded message for Heil Hitler.
00:21:02.000 There was never any evidence for this then or now.
00:21:04.000 Isn't it more likely that at a trucker protest, where there's likely to be trucks, and you're on a road, and people have got horns, that it might mean honk your horn in support of the truckers?
00:21:15.000 That well-established form of showing solidarity?
00:21:18.000 But I suppose that's not Nazi enough, is it?
00:21:20.000 So if we could just, oh, H H Hail Hitler!
00:21:23.000 Yes!
00:21:24.000 Yes!
00:21:24.000 We could undermine their entire campaign with this!
00:21:27.000 And meanwhile, let's get this guy over from Ukraine.
00:21:30.000 Good work, good work.
00:21:30.000 He was very busy.
00:21:31.000 Apparently in the 30s and 40s he got a lot done.
00:21:34.000 As such, Trudeau was spreading disinformation.
00:21:36.000 Naturally, Trudeau has for the last three years been accusing others of spreading disinformation and demanding that social media companies like Facebook and Twitter censor the people he disagrees with.
00:21:44.000 The problem with you, Zlot, is you celebrate misinformation.
00:21:47.000 And you also celebrate Nazis.
00:21:49.000 But what about you with that Nazi?
00:21:51.000 That is Russian disinformation!
00:21:54.000 Canada's political troubles may seem trivial and unimportant.
00:21:57.000 The country is not a significant military power.
00:21:59.000 It has fewer people than California.
00:22:01.000 Its economy is the ninth in the world.
00:22:02.000 California is the fourth.
00:22:04.000 Trudeau has just been engaging in the usual progressive rhetoric of accusing his opponents of being Nazi, something both sides do, as the controversy over last Friday's applauding showed.
00:22:13.000 But Trudeau is important, and what he's doing in Canada should terrify everyone in the Western world who cares about being free from government tyranny, censorship and disinformation.
00:22:22.000 That's because Trudeau is pioneering a new way for governments to take control over the
00:22:25.000 information environment, spreading disinformation and demanding censorship that is similar but
00:22:29.000 different to efforts we are seeing in places like California, Australia and New Zealand.
00:22:34.000 Former and current colonial powers appear to have relationships with some of the nations
00:22:38.000 they helped to establish, i.e. the countries listed just then, where piloting ideas that
00:22:44.000 would seem likely to engender resistance in countries like the United States or the UK
00:22:49.000 or seem more pronounced and more dangerous, appear to be able to be practised there.
00:22:53.000 Notice that during the coronavirus period Australia set up, I think I'm right in saying,
00:22:58.000 internment camps.
00:22:59.000 Notice that Canada is very assertive and progressive with authoritarianism, with the disinformation being described in this article.
00:23:06.000 It seems to me that because these countries, because of a shared tongue with significantly your country, the United States of America, are being used to normalize ideas and to introduce ideas that elsewise we might be reluctant to accept.
00:23:17.000 Let me know if you agree with that.
00:23:18.000 Let me know if you think that Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Maybe even the UK to a degree, we're no longer a superpower, we're essentially ancillary to the United States of America, are being used to pilot ideas, normal ideas, so that they can become ubiquitous.
00:23:29.000 Let me know in the chat in the comments if you agree with that.
00:23:31.000 People across the Western world were rightly alarmed when Trudeau last year invoked for the first time in Canadian history the Emergency Measures Act and froze bank accounts of people who had simply donated to the truckers cause.
00:23:42.000 It was brazen thuggery that Trudeau justified by calling ordinary Canadians Nazis and racist.
00:23:48.000 If you call someone a Nazi or a racist, whatever you do is permissible.
00:23:52.000 It seems to me that's how this particular play works.
00:23:56.000 Trudeau's crackdown on the Freedom Convoy protesters was followed by efforts to regulate and control the internet.
00:24:02.000 His online streaming act and online news act gave the government expansive new powers to regulate what happens and what you see online.
00:24:08.000 It's all about control, isn't it?
00:24:09.000 Like the online UK safety bill here in the UK.
00:24:13.000 Do they want to protect you?
00:24:14.000 Or do they want to control you?
00:24:15.000 Do they want to help you?
00:24:16.000 Or do they want to control the access to information that you receive?
00:24:19.000 Just have a look and decide for yourself.
00:24:21.000 You'll be able to work it out.
00:24:22.000 Are there any global trends?
00:24:23.000 Do there seem to be laws being passed all over the world?
00:24:25.000 Does there seem to be a process of vilification, shutting down of dissent, shutting down of dissidents, vilifying people that disobey and stand up in opposal for it?
00:24:32.000 You can observe all of that for yourself.
00:24:34.000 You don't need me or anyone else to tell you.
00:24:37.000 You let me know in the chat.
00:24:38.000 The atmosphere created by Trudeau and his party is completely upending Canadian society, leading to the persecution of his detractors and limiting speech and expression.
00:24:46.000 Earlier this month, a Liberal judge in Calgary sentenced a Christian pastor to two months in jail for what he said during a 20-minute speech to the Truckers Freedom Convoy.
00:24:54.000 We can't keep bringing you inspiring, groundbreaking, anti-authoritarian, anti-totalitarian content like we do without our partners and sponsors.
00:25:04.000 And this week, once again, we've teamed up with, you guessed it, Stickermule to create this limited edition sticker pack.
00:25:11.000 Look at these delicious stickers.
00:25:13.000 There are six stunning designs, including this guy.
00:25:16.000 They're only available in this pack, and they're all made with Sticker Mule's magic touch.
00:25:20.000 Sticker Mule has 10,000 of these packs.
00:25:22.000 That's right, 10,000.
00:25:24.000 Ready to deliver to you absolutely free.
00:25:26.000 Just go to StickerMule.com forward slash Russell and fill out the forms.
00:25:30.000 Perfectly easy!
00:25:31.000 StickerMule.com forward slash Russell, fill out a form, then you're just gonna have some stickers, alright?
00:25:37.000 And isn't that better than where you were prior to the... Yes, it is better!
00:25:40.000 And this is how we're able to continue to bring you radical content that challenges the system, like we're doing right now.
00:25:47.000 Get over there, StickerMule.com forward slash Russell, fill out the form.
00:25:50.000 Get on with it.
00:25:51.000 Right.
00:25:51.000 The College of Psychologists of Ontario recently ordered conservative psychologist Jordan Peterson to undergo social media training because they believed his tweets and opinions were problematic.
00:26:00.000 And Ontario court then upheld the college's decision.
00:26:04.000 So it began in academia.
00:26:05.000 It began as a cultural phenomena.
00:26:07.000 And it's ended up in the judiciary.
00:26:09.000 The judiciary imposing measures on Jordan Peterson.
00:26:12.000 You have the right to agree with or disagree with Jordan Peterson.
00:26:14.000 You know I have a friendship with Jordan Peterson.
00:26:16.000 He's my friend.
00:26:17.000 And I disagree with him as I'm sure he disagrees with me on many issues.
00:26:20.000 What I don't disagree with is his right to freely communicate and essentially have a set of values that seem to me to be based in pretty thorough research.
00:26:27.000 And I've had arguments with Jordan Peterson about some of the matters where I disagree with him and it seems that that's not actually affected our friendship.
00:26:33.000 But what is clear is what's going on in Canada is anything but dull.
00:26:36.000 It's terrifying.
00:26:36.000 In looking to defend minorities and promote culture, Trudeau's liberals are everything they once feared.
00:26:42.000 They are authoritarian, anti-democratic and illiberal.
00:26:45.000 I think what happens is inept politicians that are kind of like Pop star poster boy politicians that kind of look nice or sort of seem appropriate are kind of groomed and ushered through the system and they don't actually, this is my view, my personal view, understand politics that well and they're able to be manipulated by people who understand things a lot better than they do.
00:27:03.000 They don't notice that all of a sudden they're saying things like that.
00:27:05.000 I admire China.
00:27:06.000 Yeah, we should shut down their bank accounts.
00:27:07.000 Yeah, let's invoke the Emergency Act.
00:27:09.000 Those truckers are Nazis because they're not grounded in the kind of ideals that, for example, that pastor is, who's like, I'm willing to get arrested for what I believe in.
00:27:15.000 I'm willing to die for what I believe in.
00:27:17.000 Those kind of values, even that kind of mindset, having a community that you care about, having people that you love, having values and principles that go beyond materialism, is being eroded because Well, you know, why?
00:27:25.000 Because we're living in sort of cellular atomic little realities where the best we can hope for is just some sort of quick hit of purchase.
00:27:32.000 We're being distracted and disconnected from God.
00:27:34.000 And you have to wonder whether Jordan Peterson is a problem not because of his views on identity and identity politics or because he has a deep reverence for meaning and passion and standing up for what you believe in.
00:27:46.000 What do you think, based on what you're learning about Canada here, think is more of a threat to the Canadian system?
00:27:51.000 Do you think it's like they're fretting in all day, oh no we really want to help people on their
00:27:55.000 identity issues or do you think they want control? Because look at the legislation that's been
00:27:59.000 introduced. What does it seem to be augured and directed towards? And what's happening in
00:28:04.000 Canada is not separate from what's happening in the US, the UK, Europe and Brazil but intimately connected
00:28:09.000 to those nations. That's what globalism There is a kind of a global tide rising.
00:28:14.000 There is authoritarianism, centralism.
00:28:16.000 There are connections between laws in the countries just listed there that sort of don't make sense.
00:28:21.000 Where are they coming from?
00:28:22.000 Whose ideas are they?
00:28:23.000 What happened during the pandemic?
00:28:25.000 Where did those decisions get made?
00:28:27.000 What happened in anomalous nations like Sweden that took a different path?
00:28:30.000 Did they have a lot more deaths?
00:28:32.000 Oh no, less deaths.
00:28:33.000 This is extraordinary.
00:28:34.000 Where do these edicts come from?
00:28:35.000 If they're not grounded in data, in real verifiable facts, Then it's an agenda.
00:28:40.000 Then it's an ideology.
00:28:41.000 Then it's globalism.
00:28:42.000 According to Justin Trudeau and his Liberal Party supporters, he and their party are the party of compassion for vulnerable people, freedom and Canadian culture.
00:28:50.000 Liberals care in their view, while Conservatives don't care.
00:28:53.000 Trudeau has proclaimed his loyalty to the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
00:28:59.000 And when the Liberals introduced their social media reform legislation, they said the goal was to promote Canadian culture, ensure the sustainability of the news industry, and guarantee we heard from marginalized voices.
00:29:10.000 But a government cannot claim to care about the vulnerable or about freedom while freezing the bank accounts of a single mother working a minimum wage job as Trudeau's government did.
00:29:18.000 Nor can the government claim to care about the vulnerable or freedom while trying to regulate the internet to prevent further protests and challenges to Trudeau's government.
00:29:25.000 The main way Trudeau and the Liberal Party are trying to do this is by subsidising news media and punishing smaller media outlets.
00:29:31.000 This is similar to what governments are doing all around the world.
00:29:34.000 Hmm.
00:29:34.000 The government defends the crackdown on expression and speech by appealing to Canadians' innate sense of kindness.
00:29:40.000 Our leaders tell us we must protect our culture, protect the vulnerable and care for our communities.
00:29:44.000 They argue that limiting expression and criminalising dissent is a means to that end.
00:29:49.000 But censorship has always been used to hurt and marginalise minorities and has never helped them.
00:29:53.000 Rights were won for African Americans, gays and lesbians by ensuring they had the ability to express themselves freely.
00:29:59.000 Trudeau's actions aren't about social progress, they're about power and control.
00:30:03.000 Trudeau embodies many of the traits of left-wing authoritarians.
00:30:07.000 All authoritarians support censorship and submission.
00:30:10.000 They tend to believe this is necessary because in their minds the population is naive and cannot be trusted.
00:30:15.000 Can there be a clearer marker of authoritarianism than the belief that the population are inferior to those that
00:30:22.000 govern?
00:30:22.000 I think for a long time we've sensed that that is the mindset.
00:30:25.000 They think they're better than us.
00:30:27.000 They think we can't run our own lives.
00:30:29.000 They think our relationship with them is like a relationship with a parent who can dock your pay in the
00:30:34.000 form of taxes and dock your freedom in form of censorship and now in new,
00:30:38.000 previously inconceivable ways, control your movement, control your ability to communicate,
00:30:43.000 control your ability to participate in the technological public sphere.
00:30:47.000 This no longer seems to me to be about kindness.
00:30:50.000 I think we're going to have to check our value systems.
00:30:53.000 What is the liberal left about?
00:30:56.000 What is Justin Trudeau trying to achieve?
00:30:59.000 If your real end was to help people, to protect vulnerable people, wouldn't there be more evidence of it?
00:31:04.000 Wouldn't there be less and less globalist measures, like curtailing freedom, freezing bank accounts, etc?
00:31:10.000 Wouldn't you see the promotion of open conversation, the promotion of freedom, and a good faith relationship with the population?
00:31:16.000 Wouldn't you see the promotion of smaller media outlets and the diminishing of larger ones, rather than the subsidisation of larger ones, which is what's actually happening?
00:31:25.000 Authoritarianism is predicated on this idea.
00:31:28.000 You should not be allowed to control your own life.
00:31:31.000 You don't know what you're doing.
00:31:32.000 You need to be controlled.
00:31:34.000 And they are going to control you.
00:31:36.000 It's as simple as that.
00:31:37.000 Trudeau constantly splits the population into liberal angels and conservative devils.
00:31:41.000 You either believe in liberal climate policy or are a climate denier, according to Trudeau.
00:31:46.000 You either mask up and vax up or are putting lives at risk.
00:31:50.000 You either support the radical demands of trans activists or you hate sexual minorities.
00:31:55.000 There is also something deeply antisocial about Trudeau's behaviours.
00:31:58.000 To falsely accuse your opponents of Nazism and racism, to cut off the bank accounts of people who criticise you, these are cruel and callous behaviours.
00:32:07.000 Few Canadians believe that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau meant to undermine democracy or stand with Nazis last Friday when his main Liberal Party ally led the House of Commons in applauding a former Nazi.
00:32:16.000 But that's the whole point.
00:32:17.000 Trudeau no more meant to undermine democracy or stand with Nazis than Canadian truckers meant to undermine democracy or stand with Nazis.
00:32:23.000 And yet Trudeau accused them of precisely that.
00:32:26.000 Few Canadians see either Trudeau or Canadian truckers as Nazis.
00:32:30.000 What we need to change now is for more of us to get angry when we see our leaders label our fellow citizens as such.
00:32:36.000 It seems that we live in a time where treasured and hard-won principles such as justice, such as freedom of speech, such as innocent until proven guilty, are just being casually discarded all in the name of kindness and safety and security.
00:32:52.000 But if you see a pastor being arrested by masked police and put in prison with a claim that he ought serve 10 months when what he was actually doing was standing up for what he believed in, Meanwhile, Nazis are being applauded in Parliament, which, as this writer says, was obviously an error.
00:33:07.000 You have to question how much you can trust this system.
00:33:10.000 Are countries like Canada and Australia and even the UK being used to pilot a new form of authoritarianism?
00:33:17.000 Authoritarianism not based on militarism, although militarism is always one of the ends and certainly where the money comes from, but a kind of totalitarianism that's based on helping others and protecting others and protecting you from yourself.
00:33:31.000 I believe it is.
00:33:32.000 I believe that authoritarianism is based primarily on the idea that they know more than you.
00:33:37.000 That you are not capable of running your own life.
00:33:39.000 That if you defy them, if you dissent against them, you could be shut down, depersoned and even imprisoned.
00:33:46.000 And I believe we have to stand strongly against that together.
00:33:50.000 But that's just what I think.
00:33:51.000 Let me know what you think in the chat.
00:33:53.000 see you in a second.
00:33:53.000 Keep chatting, baby.
00:34:15.000 It increasingly looks like dissident voices are silenced in order to maintain centralized control.
00:34:23.000 And on that note, what a fantastic guest I'm about to Introduce.
00:34:27.000 If you're watching us anywhere else, we're going to be exclusively available on Rumble now, so click the link in your description.
00:34:33.000 And if it's within your means, please press the red button and become an Awakened Wonder to support us.
00:34:38.000 We need your support now more than ever.
00:34:41.000 But if it's not within your means, you stay with us.
00:34:44.000 You, your attention, your consciousness, and your life are far more important to us than your money, let me tell you that.
00:34:51.000 Joining me now is Stella Assange, human rights lawyer, activist, and of course, wife of Julian Assange.
00:34:57.000 Stella, thank you so much for joining us today.
00:34:59.000 Hi, Russell.
00:35:00.000 I'm happy to be here.
00:35:02.000 Yeah, it's lovely to see you, mate.
00:35:04.000 You went to see Julian pretty recently.
00:35:07.000 Tell me, how did that visit go and who was with you?
00:35:11.000 Well, on Saturday I went to Belmarsh Prison to see Julian, like I do once or twice a week.
00:35:19.000 But this time it was with the kids and Roger Waters and Yanis Varoufakis.
00:35:25.000 So it was a really special visit.
00:35:29.000 What is it like?
00:35:31.000 What are the conditions of the visit like?
00:35:36.000 Well, we were able to go in without any issues.
00:35:43.000 And actually we were able to film outside Belmarsh.
00:35:47.000 I think they turned a blind eye because Roger was there and they didn't want to cause a scene.
00:35:52.000 So thankfully we were able to do a video outside with Janice and Roger and I think it's had 1.5 million views on Twitter already.
00:36:02.000 And it was lovely.
00:36:03.000 I mean, you know, we only get two visits a week so we have to That's all I get and the kids get with Julian.
00:36:13.000 Sometimes I'm traveling so sometimes he's able to also see friends while I'm away or when I'm here and this time he was able to see Roger Waters who of course has been an incredible advocate for Julian.
00:36:26.000 He has a free Julian Assange massive image as part of his show that he's been touring around the world with And of course, also Yanis Varoufakis, who was the former Minister of Economy for Greece and a global commentator and an old friend of Julian's.
00:36:47.000 He would visit Julian in the embassy regularly.
00:36:51.000 So it was really nice for Julian to see his old friend, Yanis, and his new friend, Roger, who he had never met in person, but of course knows all the advocacy and amazing support that Roger has been I understand that there is some more optimism around the campaign for Julian, in particular because of the 60 Australian MPs that have urged the US to release Julian.
00:37:18.000 Does this feel like public opinion and even significant political support is beginning to increase?
00:37:26.000 Absolutely.
00:37:27.000 What Julian has is a global campaign, the likes of which we have never seen before.
00:37:33.000 Every single day there is some action somewhere around the world, from Sri Lanka to the UN General Assembly.
00:37:42.000 The UN General Assembly, I bring it up because Lula, the president of Brazil, had his address to the General Assembly.
00:37:52.000 This is the meeting that takes place every year in September, where all the heads of state of the world come together to New York, to the UN building, and then they speak, they give an address, and Lula was one of the first ones to speak and he brought Julian up in his speech and what happened there was a completely rare for the UN General Assembly which was that there was a spontaneous applause in the hall and that's because Julian's case is so important and symbolic
00:38:27.000 of our times, of an abuse of the legal system, an abuse, a geopolitical kind of show of force in which the person who has exposed the most the excesses of the global Superpowers in situations of war, interfering in the legal systems of not only their small states, but also their big allies like Germany and Italy and Spain.
00:38:59.000 So Julian has had such an important role.
00:39:03.000 in exposing the true kind of anatomy of power globally, that this has become a reference point for our times and is of geopolitical importance.
00:39:13.000 So you have that kind of big picture political significance of the case, you have the legal significance of the case where you have all the major human rights groups, All the major press freedom groups who are saying this is an aberration, this case is the biggest threat to press freedom globally, not only because it's an attack on the First Amendment in the United States, it's the first time the Espionage Act is being used against a publisher, it will be able to be used against the rest of the press, not just the press, you know, not just the ones with the press credentials, but anyone else really who dares publish true information about criminality, about the most powerful people,
00:39:54.000 in the country, in the United States.
00:39:56.000 But then you have a different dimension, which is that Julian is Australian, and he wasn't even in the United States, right?
00:40:03.000 So the US is using its espionage laws extraterritorially to apply to the rest of the world, to basically muzzle the rest of the world, to restrict freedom of speech in the rest of the world, in other countries, in the UK where he was, in Europe, where he was publishing from, and so on.
00:40:23.000 And then you have another aspect, which has developed over the last 10, 12, 13 years, which is the surveillance on the Internet and the means through which they can actually censor speech.
00:40:37.000 And we've seen this, of course, in the last four or five years, where social media companies have been instrumental in interfering with people's ability to emit, transmit their voice online.
00:40:56.000 And so that has come about because the tools with which speech can be suppressed are proliferating.
00:41:05.000 There is not just a market for censorship, there's also a market for tools to censor.
00:41:17.000 This is so... This is so...
00:41:22.000 tempting for the powerful.
00:41:23.000 If the tools exist, of course they will be deployed.
00:41:27.000 And at the same time, there's a weakening of the protections, of free speech protections, of human rights in general, of citizenship rights in general.
00:41:42.000 And so you have this, on the one hand, states and corporations having greater means of coercion, And at the same time, citizens becoming less and less able to resist, less and less able to speak out, less and less able to push back.
00:42:00.000 And this is a very terrible trend.
00:42:02.000 So Julian's case exists in this greater context.
00:42:06.000 And I think the whole world knows the significance and how Julian's case connects with all these issues.
00:42:15.000 One of the other shifts that appears to have taken place within the framework of Julian's incarceration is that authoritarianism has peculiarly drifted and acquired a new aesthetic Just prior to our conversation we were talking about events in Canada and their ability to imprison individuals on the basis of protest, their new online bills that of course as you've just outlined permit censorship.
00:42:52.000 We've been talking about how comparable bills have been introduced in the UK and indeed across the world and a significant part of Julian's revelations detailed where we were Gosh, 20 years ago or whenever it was that those revelations were made and of course, as you've explained, the situation has gotten worse and the power to censor control and the desire to legitimise authoritarian control has increased since then.
00:43:15.000 One of the things that I continue to be surprised by, Stella, is the posture of liberalism whilst endorsing and practising tyranny.
00:43:28.000 Do you think that there was something pivotal in Julian's revelations around, for example, the Hillary Clinton emails and other revelations about the Democrat Party that have somehow contributed to this extraordinary shift where parties that present themselves as liberal, pro-minority, pro-protecting vulnerable people are oddly the most willing to shut down dissenting voices?
00:43:54.000 The most authoritarian.
00:43:56.000 Has it sort of been a case that has shown us the transition of liberalism into authoritarianism?
00:44:07.000 Well, I think, look, you have to look at this from a long perspective.
00:44:12.000 Liberalism was pretty well defined, I think one could say, during the Cold War.
00:44:19.000 You had the virtue of liberalism kind of held against, one could say, the virtues of the other bloc.
00:44:27.000 So the other bloc was talking about social and economic rights.
00:44:30.000 It also had obviously a very dark side to it.
00:44:35.000 And then the West upheld civil liberties, freedom of speech, etc.
00:44:42.000 And what has happened since is that freedom of speech over time as the internet has become a generalized means of communications globally, freedom of speech has been recast as a danger.
00:45:00.000 Information has been cast as a threat.
00:45:03.000 It can be misused.
00:45:06.000 You know, it's basically cast in a conflict and war And then at the same time, well, how can they do that?
00:45:17.000 How can they go from a self-definition that privileges civil liberties and this self-image of freedom of conscience and freedom of speech to where we are now.
00:45:33.000 Well, they've kind of instrumentalized this sense of protection, of safety, and of determining areas in which they, as the The paternal figure will come and look after us, the poor public that cannot discern what they should know or what they should say and so on, because you don't know what the consequences might be.
00:46:04.000 It's of course a very cynical shift.
00:46:06.000 This is all bullshit.
00:46:10.000 It is just the temptation of authoritarianism has been too strong.
00:46:14.000 The means through which they can exert authoritarianism have become so available that they keep on keeping up this rhetoric, this liberal rhetoric, but don't believe in it.
00:46:31.000 And don't practice it and don't set any expectation of practicing it.
00:46:35.000 Because the excessive force through which governments have used their powers to shut down freedom of speech over the last five years have become really obvious to everyone.
00:46:52.000 And so, for example, the people who donated to the Canadian truckers now understand that they are in a different world where even their
00:47:05.000 What used to be protected expression of freedom of speech to support whatever cause they wish to support has been shut down and there are consequences for you personally as a result of that and you know who knows what kind of list they've been put on through the banks and the banks are now a An extension of that control network through which freedom of speech is being suppressed.
00:47:38.000 Yeah, it does seem to be happening.
00:47:40.000 It seems that while still maintaining the guise of the values that you rightly pointed out preceded, particularly in opposition to a sort of a Cold War opponent where the authoritarianism and the Stasi and the KGB and the Executions and the Poisoned Umbrellas were all sort of very lurid and vivid and Cold War and Ian LaFrennais, is it Ian LaFrennais?
00:48:06.000 I mean the guy that wrote James Bond.
00:48:08.000 It was all sort of very pronounced and clear and it appears now that we've drifted into a point sort of, in particular it seems to me Stella, I know you've been observing this more closely than I have, but in the last couple of years, five years, ten years, you're much more likely to get support for actual liberty, whether that's freedom of speech, freedom
00:48:28.000 to publish, freedom of press, and principles like judiciary and the assumption of
00:48:32.000 innocence until proven guilty. Those kind of principles are being discarded curiously in the name of
00:48:38.000 this parentalism that you've just described.
00:48:41.000 And have you found that you're more likely to get allies that are on what you might once have
00:48:46.000 regarded as the conservative right? Or do you think that part of what's happening is that those
00:48:51.000 labels and models are starting to break down?
00:48:53.000 Vivek Ramaswamy for example publicly said he would free Julian obviously and I wonder if you feel that There's now a shift where the authoritarian and more tyrannical and censorial and incarcerating and espionage act utilizing government are the ones that present themselves as like the friendly face of progress.
00:49:18.000 Well, I find that Julian has allies across the spectrum, and I think that's partly because the attack against him is so outrageous that the only people you really find defending his incarceration, his extradition, are somehow implicated in the crimes and corruption that he exposed.
00:49:47.000 You know, be it I study them on Twitter and so on.
00:49:53.000 You get this person who says something outrageous about him remaining in prison, and they're usually in Virginia or used to work in Guantanamo Bay as a prison guard.
00:50:06.000 And then it's like, of course.
00:50:08.000 But it's rare to find people nowadays saying that Julian's imprisonment is is okay.
00:50:18.000 And that's a good development.
00:50:21.000 And I think we've made fairly good progress in the mainstream for that to happen.
00:50:29.000 But I think there's something else going on here as well, which is that In the very center, you have a very constrained position.
00:50:43.000 There's no free thinking.
00:50:45.000 It's more about associations.
00:50:49.000 What is the right position to take?
00:50:51.000 That's why you have, you know, the major parties are virtually indistinguishable, because there is no expression within the system for for opposition.
00:51:05.000 And that is negative in a way, but it also means that outside of the center, there is a dynamic and interesting development where people from different sides of politics, you know, have different views on the role of the state and immigration and all sorts of things also come to agree about a few things.
00:51:29.000 And I think the central one there that I hope everyone can converge on is freedom of speech.
00:51:39.000 Freedom of speech is really kind of the central pillar for a democracy.
00:51:47.000 And if you start undermining freedom of speech, then all the other rights you have basically melt away.
00:51:57.000 And so I think there is a growing awareness that freedom of speech is the one in which we need to agree in order to progress as a society.
00:52:11.000 And of course, Julian has been a freedom of speech advocate for decades, and the whole WikiLeaks project is about not just the integrity of the historical record and, you know, the ability to put evidence of wrongdoing onto the public record, but also of the ability to transmit information.
00:52:37.000 And if you look at the United Nations declaration, the UN declaration, sorry, If you look at the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which was formulated in 1948, it's kind of the basic document to which the international order was formed after the Second World War, so there was a lot of
00:53:08.000 I find it to be a very virtuous document and article 19 talks about freedom of speech and it is the freedom to seek, receive and transmit information regardless of means and across frontiers and this is such a revolutionary this is such a An amazing article when you think about it, if it were actually able to be preserved and enforced, which is obviously what we're trying to do through Julian's case.
00:53:42.000 This is something that everyone signed up to, to seek, receive and transmit information.
00:53:51.000 Across frontiers and through whichever means.
00:53:54.000 And that is what is being attacked right now, because if people are able to speak to each other, then a lot... If information is free, then power is challenged.
00:54:19.000 That is a natural dynamic.
00:54:22.000 Stella, though, what I'm experiencing, and I don't know if this is because of the kind of cultural space that I'm occupying, I don't believe it is, because what I think is that I have consistently remained anti-authoritarian and once was associated with the left in a conventional way, in the way that, broadly speaking, any celebrity or public figure has that kind of champagne socialist veneer or air about them, although Personally and actually my background had always included activism and because of being a drug addict had always meant that I'd lived on the margins both economically and indeed criminally due to the sort of status of controlled substances.
00:55:09.000 What I feel is happening though now is that free speech has become a right-wing talking point.
00:55:17.000 I don't see the same appetite to do that on the right.
00:55:20.000 States and also Australia and also the United Kingdom are introducing bills that control,
00:55:27.000 limit, curb, dilute free speech under the auspices of misinformation and disinformation.
00:55:34.000 I don't see the same appetite to do that on the right. I don't know why this point of
00:55:38.000 difference has emerged or occurred, but there are times when I think that it is particular
00:55:46.000 to Julian Assange in fact, specifically because of revelations around the Clinton emails,
00:55:55.000 because of the discrediting of the Democrat party.
00:55:58.000 I feel that this issue is a sort of a centrepiece within that.
00:56:04.000 And I believe, and I'm obviously in the case of Julian Assange bears this out, that if your free speech is a challenge to the establishment, they will find a way to delegitimize your free speech by saying that you are A particular case where free speech shouldn't apply because of some egregious act or some crime or as in the case in Canada, oh well those truckers are Nazis and you can't give Nazis free speech so we're going to have to shut that down and close down their bank accounts.
00:56:39.000 So whilst I acknowledge that support for Julian Assange and the atrocity of his imprisonment can come from across the board, I have a sense that When it comes to significant movement, you're more likely, and this is a question not a statement, do you think it's more likely that a Republican president would pardon Julian Assange than a Democrat president?
00:57:03.000 because I do think that's the case, even though of course Trump, who apparently
00:57:09.000 considered releasing Julian, ultimately did not.
00:57:13.000 Well, look, the support for free speech at the political level is...
00:57:23.000 basically absent.
00:57:25.000 And that's because, as I said, the means through which they can shut down control and control not only your speech, but the narrative is much more accessible now than it was years ago.
00:57:43.000 And that is tempting, especially not just tempting, but it's basically required Because they have defined the information sphere as a threat model.
00:58:00.000 And there is no significant pushback in that respect.
00:58:03.000 And of course you have this whole NGO economy and researchers and think tanks and so on that have suddenly seen the enormous pot of money that is being made available through public funds and so on to be able to fight information that is dangerous.
00:58:22.000 And so there's a huge constituency that is keeping this illusion alive.
00:58:32.000 And then you have the people who just want to, who are not part of that.
00:58:38.000 And it's There are a lot of interests.
00:58:44.000 I mean, if right now maybe it's the right who is more sensitive to it because they are being more censored, then it's just a matter of time before the others realize what kind of monster they have created.
00:59:02.000 And so I don't think we're there yet where there is a general realization that we all have to converge on the principle of freedom of speech.
00:59:12.000 But I hope that we can reach that point.
00:59:16.000 And in terms of Julian receiving a pardon, I certainly hope that whether it's a Democrat or a Republican, they will come to their senses.
00:59:30.000 Of course, the Obama administration decided not to even prosecute Julian because they said, he's a publisher, not a hacker.
00:59:36.000 And if we do, then we're going to set a precedent that can be used against everyone else.
00:59:40.000 So we're not going to do that.
00:59:42.000 And then Trump went ahead and initiated this unprecedented prosecution.
00:59:46.000 And now Biden has continued it.
00:59:49.000 Because it's convenient, isn't it?
00:59:50.000 It's convenient to have the most high-profile publisher who has exposed U.S.
00:59:56.000 war crimes, corruption, and wrongdoing in a prison cell in the U.K.
01:00:01.000 and they can say, well, it's not even us, it's the U.K.
01:00:04.000 who is keeping him in prison.
01:00:06.000 And of course, the U.K.
01:00:07.000 also plays this game and says, well, we're just keeping him for the United
01:00:12.000 States. They want to extradite him, we're not charging him with
01:00:15.000 anything. And so it's just a matter of this. It's comfortable
01:00:21.000 for them right now to keep Julian rotting in prison where he's been for four and a half years. But of course, the
01:00:27.000 case is now progressing to its final stage. And Julian could be
01:00:32.000 extradited within, you know, by Christmas.
01:00:36.000 Wow. As well as, as well as I think, providing us a lens for
01:00:43.000 how political categorisation is altered, particularly the categories of left and right, exposing how what we have is
01:00:51.000 centralist authoritarianism, and ultimately, different degrees of
01:00:55.000 neoliberalism.
01:00:57.000 Another pivotal aspect of this case and the way that Julian is subsequently being handled, in my view, is the seismic change in the ability to communicate and
01:01:09.000 control information.
01:01:11.000 That, in a way, what Julian did was the first time, most pronounced and evident time, that
01:01:18.000 anybody demonstrated the ability to convey information differently, and potentially and
01:01:23.000 specifically, and I assume this is why the response has been so draconian and terrifying,
01:01:31.000 show that enormous numbers of people could almost instantaneously deprive the establishment
01:01:38.000 of credibility, withdraw their support for existing systems of government, and for prevailing
01:01:44.000 and previously unchallengeable modes of geopolitics, i.e.
01:01:50.000 the ongoing military-industrial complex, the necessity for wars, the requirement, therefore, for
01:01:56.000 unjust wars, because the wars are not legitimate in the ways that are claimed, they are just
01:02:00.000 economically necessary wars, both for resources, capital, unipolar objectives.
01:02:07.000 Because of the technological capacity, as well as Julian's moral willingness to expose
01:02:14.000 that information, What I feel we've seen, and in fact what the response to me demonstrates, is that this is about power.
01:02:22.000 This is about preventing what could potentially happen if enough people were willing to dissent and disobey and tell the truth and communicate and form new alliances.
01:02:34.000 It could be an end to these types of systems.
01:02:38.000 If people were well informed, If people understood that what lies behind clandestine documentation is not just information that would be harmful were it to fall into the hands of our enemies, but information that is harmful if it falls into the hands of the public.
01:02:54.000 And that's why I believe that we see this case endure.
01:02:58.000 And that is why, whether it's in the purported left or right, there are It's been very slow to have vocal, clear advocates come out.
01:03:07.000 I'm just speaking personally as well.
01:03:09.000 You know, I've been aware of Julian Assange.
01:03:11.000 I've visited Julian when he was in the Ecuadorian embassy.
01:03:14.000 I've been aware of this story for a long time.
01:03:16.000 I'm just too scared to talk about it.
01:03:18.000 Just like, oh no man, you can't talk about that because that's what happens.
01:03:23.000 That is what happens.
01:03:24.000 If you are willing to talk openly about systemic corruption, if you're willing to openly talk
01:03:30.000 about how the media now does not hold the government to account, they simply convey
01:03:35.000 the messaging of the state, you are going to get in some serious, serious trouble.
01:03:40.000 And obviously what Julian Assange did was unprecedented as a result of available technology
01:03:45.000 and his own personal moral position, as I've stated.
01:03:49.000 And since then, there's not been anything that significant.
01:03:53.000 And I think the reason is, is because the media works for the state, the corporate state, both in terms of where they get their advertising dollars and where they, ultimately, where their interests converge.
01:04:02.000 So, in a way, there can be no more significant victory than the release of Julian.
01:04:12.000 Well, that's right.
01:04:13.000 I think there's a, I think that's why the movement to free Julian is global and because it's tapped into a greater understanding of what his imprisonment actually means.
01:04:29.000 It's a show of force where the killers have put the truth teller in prison and You know, have enormous resources to try to complexify and obscure that that's what's actually going on.
01:05:00.000 But that's what it is.
01:05:01.000 It is putting him in the most kind of brutal and basic way of shutting him in a cell for years on end, silencing him and threatening to keep him in prison for the rest of his life.
01:05:24.000 And I think the average person, when they see Julian's situation, they realize that they have a sense of natural justice and they understand that really it is Julian's political speech that is the reason why he is in prison.
01:05:45.000 He is being silenced and censored because he made The world know about crimes and assassinations and torture that was not just committed but also impugned ongoingly to this day.
01:06:01.000 Nothing has been done to put anyone in prison for the literal war crimes, assassinations of children, you know, of toddlers that are recorded in these publications and nothing has happened.
01:06:17.000 There's always been a cover-up and as part of this cover-up they put Julian in prison so that he can no longer speak and so that he can't say, well, he cannot continue to expose crimes and expose corruption.
01:06:33.000 So it's a show of force.
01:06:34.000 It's a show of brutality.
01:06:39.000 To send a message to everyone else that the powerful are untouchable and if you try to do the right thing you will be hounded and that just cannot stand.
01:06:52.000 That's why Julian's freedom is connected to everyone else's freedom because his imprisonment started a trend, his persecution started a trend Which is where we are, you know, 13 years down the line.
01:07:05.000 And I was just reading an interview that he gave a French magazine called Philosophie.
01:07:14.000 In 2013, and the question was, what do you think will be your situation in 10 years time?
01:07:21.000 And he says, well, it really doesn't depend on me.
01:07:24.000 It depends on which way the world goes.
01:07:26.000 If the world continues to, or if the world realizes to uphold, if the trend is that that transparency and holding governments and exposing corruption is a good thing, then I will be free and WikiLeaks' legacy will be upheld as an example.
01:07:57.000 But if the world goes in the opposite direction, in a direction in which Control and surveillance and authoritarianism increases, then I will probably be in prison somewhere.
01:08:13.000 Those are his words from 2013.
01:08:16.000 And plainly that is the way that it's gone, obviously and demonstrably.
01:08:19.000 And to my earlier point, that is why the political parties that previously were organised, at least rhetorically, around the language of civil liberties and the rights of the individual and the significance of free speech have shifted so enormously to authoritarianism, censorship, surveillance,
01:08:42.000 alliance with global corporatism, geopolitical unipolar goals, the depleting of the capacity
01:08:49.000 of other superpowers like Russia and China legitimizing as humanitarian resource-based
01:08:56.000 and politically motivated wars, understanding ever more sophist ways of legitimizing wars
01:09:04.000 that are plainly about an agenda that's been present forever.
01:09:08.000 One of Julian's quotes that I refer to a lot is the function of government is to funnel
01:09:15.000 public money into private hands.
01:09:17.000 Once you realize that the Afghanistan war is not about winning it but prolonging it,
01:09:20.000 you will understand it differently.
01:09:21.000 And I think that's something you can apply almost beyond war and to almost every aspect
01:09:27.000 of the relationship between the government, the public, and the deep state and corporations.
01:09:33.000 It's sort of an interesting, I would call it, equation for understanding power and the
01:09:40.000 way that power operates.
01:09:43.000 Stella, I understand you're making a documentary.
01:09:46.000 Can you tell me about this documentary?
01:09:49.000 I understand that you're publicly funding it and stuff, or at least it's being publicly funded.
01:09:52.000 Can you tell me a little more about that?
01:09:55.000 Well, there are a few documentaries.
01:09:58.000 The one that I was actively involved in that was produced by Julian's brother, Gabriel Shipton, is called Ithaca and it was just touring in Brazil and it's toured in the US and it's I think still on ITV in the UK and there's a new documentary called The Trust Fall and it is
01:10:26.000 being crowdfunded.
01:10:29.000 I've seen parts of it and I think it's a very good explanation of Julian's case.
01:10:38.000 It has very good interviews.
01:10:39.000 It has a very heartbreaking animation of Julian in court and the kind of difficulties that were The kind of difficulties that he faced when he was in court.
01:10:54.000 Of course now he's not even allowed to go to court because he follows hearings from Belmarsh Prison.
01:11:01.000 Maybe that will be different in the next hearing.
01:11:06.000 But yes, it's called The Trust Fall and do watch the trailer for that and you get a good sense of what it's about.
01:11:13.000 And then Julian is, of course, nearing what could be the final hearing here in the UK.
01:11:20.000 It's really the end game for Julian, because the High Court just incredibly decided that it would not allow Julian permission to appeal.
01:11:30.000 I mean, think about it, when you have all the major human rights organizations, press freedom organizations in the world Saying that this case is of the highest importance.
01:11:40.000 It's a greatest threat to press freedom.
01:11:43.000 It's absolutely outrageous news about Mike Pompeo ordering the CIA to draw up plans to kidnap and assassinate Julian.
01:11:53.000 And then the High Court said, well, we are not going to grant him permission to Appeal to even present his arguments before the High Court.
01:12:01.000 So that's where we're at.
01:12:02.000 He has one final recourse, which is he has gone to a panel of two judges to review the decision and there will be a public hearing.
01:12:13.000 So the good news is that there will be a public hearing and we are calling on everyone Who can come to come on that day in front of the High Court, in front of the Royal Courts of Justice in central London.
01:12:26.000 We're calling it Day X because we don't have a date for it yet.
01:12:30.000 We're waiting for the court to actually announce it.
01:12:33.000 But we expect it to be within a matter of weeks, really.
01:12:37.000 And this is, you know, if you have never Actually come to a protest or support Julian but haven't expressed it.
01:12:47.000 This is the moment to really express it by showing support for him on that day and to come in from the royal courts and I'll address the people who come as well and there will be press.
01:13:00.000 So it's important to show Julian's support.
01:13:03.000 Thank you, Stella.
01:13:04.000 We will ensure that we publicise that event in any way that we can.
01:13:09.000 Thank you very much for joining us.
01:13:12.000 It's always an incredible pleasure to speak with you and to see your ongoing courage and optimism.
01:13:19.000 Thank you.
01:13:20.000 Thanks, Russell.
01:13:21.000 You can keep up to date with Stella's campaign to free Julian Assange by following her on X at Stella underscore Assange.
01:13:28.000 We'll post all that in the chat, of course.
01:13:30.000 We've got some other fantastic guests coming up this week.
01:13:32.000 Tim Pool's joining us.
01:13:33.000 Kim Iverson's joining us.
01:13:34.000 Scott Adams is joining us.
01:13:36.000 If you want access to additional content and if you want to support our channel and our voice as this movement gains momentum, as it becomes necessarily global, as we take a stand against authoritarianism, As we campaign to free, let's not let him become a martyr, but heroes like Julian Assange, then press the red button and become an awakened wonder and join us.
01:13:57.000 We'll meditate together, we'll read together, we will be tight, and we will fight together, like NotInMyName and FightTyranny.
01:14:05.000 These are new members.
01:14:06.000 Madison Taylor One joined us, Sarah Bear 2007, Bazia Kenton, Katie Cash.
01:14:10.000 Thank you all very much for joining us.
01:14:12.000 I'll see you again tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
01:14:16.000 Until then, if you can, stay free.