Stay Free - Russel Brand - November 12, 2025


Trump takes on BBC while Britain burns - SF649


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 2 minutes

Words per Minute

166.57173

Word Count

10,333

Sentence Count

749

Misogynist Sentences

17

Hate Speech Sentences

28


Summary

When a media company can change the words of a president for their own convenience, who s really endangering democracy? Trump, or those claiming to defend it? The BBC have been caught editing a Trump speech to make it seem he incited the Capitol riot.


Transcript

00:00:09.000 Ladies and gentlemen, Russell Fran actor Russell Russell Francis trying to bring real journalism to the American people.
00:00:19.000 Hello there you awakening wonders today we've got a fantastic show.
00:00:22.000 We are taking a deep dive into two extremely important and significant subjects.
00:00:26.000 One, my native UK has been immersed in crime and some high profile people are talking out about it.
00:00:32.000 And two, the BBC have been caught editing content, editing content to manage the message of Donald Trump.
00:00:39.000 When a media company can change the words of a president for their own convenience, you know how powers operate.
00:00:45.000 You knew that already when Trump got kicked off of Twitter.
00:00:47.000 And by the way, you can say this stuff without being an advocate for Trump or believing that Trump is the solution to all the world's problems.
00:00:53.000 I don't believe Trump is the solution to all the world's problems.
00:00:55.000 I believe Christ is the solution to all the world's problems and that you can have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ as I do.
00:01:02.000 Nevertheless, a global imperialist state that wants to replace God is a big, big problem.
00:01:07.000 Both of these stories illustrate that tendency.
00:01:11.000 You are going to love it.
00:01:12.000 If you're not a member of Rumble Premium yet, become a member of Rumble Premium now.
00:01:16.000 Let's get into our first story.
00:01:20.000 When it was revealed that the BBC had doctored a Trump speech to make it seem he incited the Capitol riot, it exposed more than bias.
00:01:28.000 It exposed belief.
00:01:29.000 The belief that deceiving the public is justified if it defeats the enemy.
00:01:34.000 But when truth itself becomes negotiable, who's really endangering democracy?
00:01:39.000 Trump or those claiming to defend it?
00:01:42.000 Like the BBC.
00:01:48.000 Hello there, you Awakening Wonders.
00:01:50.000 Well there you have it.
00:01:51.000 The BBC tell lies.
00:01:53.000 The mainstream media tell lies.
00:01:55.000 The mainstream media are invested in destroying independent media.
00:01:59.000 You cannot trust them.
00:02:01.000 You never could.
00:02:02.000 Now it's interesting to talk about this now because Mam Dani, a socialist Muslim mayor, is in charge in New York City.
00:02:10.000 And I'll be interested to see how right-wing media exaggerates, amplifies, detracts from, attacks Mamdani.
00:02:17.000 It'll be just interesting because what matters really and where we want to get to is information.
00:02:22.000 You can't trust the media, you can't trust the government.
00:02:24.000 So now just try to assess information.
00:02:27.000 And the idea that there's no objective information, that everything's subjective, that's bullshit.
00:02:32.000 That's why you need God.
00:02:33.000 You need to know that justice is real, truth is real, being a good person is real.
00:02:38.000 Oh, it depends.
00:02:39.000 It depends on the perspective.
00:02:40.000 There's some perspective where it's okay to have a rape gang.
00:02:43.000 There is no perspective where it's okay to have a rape gang.
00:02:46.000 So let's have a look at those people we've charged with telling the truth.
00:02:50.000 Remember, the word media just meant to be a channel via which information reaches you.
00:02:54.000 It shouldn't get lacquered up, diluted, polluted, and intoxicated with ideology.
00:03:00.000 And yet it seems to.
00:03:01.000 It's been revealed that Trump edited a Trump speech in order to convey a certain story.
00:03:07.000 Let's analyse that and then look at how it applies across the political spectrum and how, as always, what we need is direct control ourselves.
00:03:15.000 We have the means of production.
00:03:17.000 Why are we fucking around?
00:03:18.000 They played the following clip.
00:03:21.000 We're going to walk down to the Capitol and I'll be there with you.
00:03:26.000 And we fight.
00:03:28.000 We fight like hell.
00:03:30.000 But Trump didn't in fact say this at all.
00:03:33.000 The BBC spliced together two clips that took place 54 minutes apart.
00:03:39.000 It's amazing that the Telegraph have chosen.
00:03:42.000 Right, okay, we need to get the coolest person on the team here at the Telegraph to explain this to a modern, funky audience.
00:03:50.000 Now what they've done is they've spliced together two clips using the old splicer.
00:03:56.000 Yeah, what film you talk about?
00:03:58.000 The Keystone cops.
00:03:59.000 That's just an aside.
00:04:01.000 The central and functional information is, of course, the BBC presented something to you as truth that was heavily narrativized.
00:04:09.000 You'll all be familiar with this clip from The Simpsons, where someone's past was used to make them look like a rapist.
00:04:15.000 Hey, why does this seem familiar to me?
00:04:21.000 Precious Venus.
00:04:28.000 Thank you!
00:04:30.000 Then I noticed she was sitting on the gummy Venus, so I grabbed an offer.
00:04:34.000 Oh, just thinking about that sweet, sweet candy.
00:04:41.000 I just wish I had another one right now.
00:04:45.000 Aw, crap.
00:04:47.000 Somebody had to take the babysitter home.
00:04:49.000 Then I noticed she was sitting on her sweet can.
00:04:51.000 I grabbed her.
00:04:52.000 Sweet can.
00:04:53.000 Oh, just thinking about her can.
00:04:56.000 I just wish I had grabbed her.
00:04:57.000 Sweet.
00:04:57.000 Sweet.
00:04:58.000 Sweet can.
00:04:59.000 Sweet can.
00:05:01.000 Sweet, sweet can.
00:05:02.000 Shagger of the year.
00:05:04.000 Inkle ball bag.
00:05:06.000 So, Mr. Simpson, you admit you grabbed her can.
00:05:09.000 What do you have to say in your defense?
00:05:12.000 Mr. Simpson, your silence will only incriminate you further.
00:05:16.000 No, Mr. Simpson, don't take your anger out on me.
00:05:18.000 Get back, get back.
00:05:20.000 Mr. Simpson, no!
00:05:21.000 Capitization may not have happened.
00:05:23.000 We all know that's how the media functions, so what does it reveal about the media's intention?
00:05:28.000 Now we know they have an intention.
00:05:30.000 What is it?
00:05:31.000 So let's go through it again.
00:05:35.000 We're gonna walk down to the Capitol, and I'll be there with you.
00:05:40.000 Now, see there, between Capitol and and, that's a cut.
00:05:45.000 Oh my god, you know what's terrifying about watching this is that this is made for an audience of I suppose boomers and Generation X's and people my age.
00:05:52.000 And look at the level of hand-holding they need to understand this stuff.
00:05:57.000 I suppose I've worked in media all of my life and been involved in content creation for a long while.
00:06:02.000 I'm like, yeah, if there's a cutaway, that means that there's an edit.
00:06:06.000 And that means that they're using something else.
00:06:07.000 Right, Massey?
00:06:08.000 Oh no!
00:06:09.000 Wait, what?
00:06:10.000 No, it's bloody obvious.
00:06:11.000 Mike grabbed.
00:06:12.000 Sweet can.
00:06:14.000 These things are obvious to people that understand media.
00:06:17.000 And what's equally obvious to me, given that now we know, my God, that this is the margin, this is the chasm that we're crossing, the BBC did that for a reason.
00:06:25.000 And the reason the BBC did that is whether you like Trump or not, and whether you agree with him ideologically on what you think he thinks about race or immigration or any of the subjects that can be used to stimulate you back into your numb, dumb ignorance, Donald Trump, whatever he is and isn't, isn't...
00:06:40.000 is a problem to the kind of institutional and establishment interests that plainly have total control over the BBC.
00:06:47.000 Here's what Trump actually said.
00:06:49.000 We're going to walk down to the Capitol and we're going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women.
00:07:01.000 It's different.
00:07:02.000 It's completely different.
00:07:03.000 Now, here's a prediction.
00:07:04.000 What will happen now is they'll say, oh, one person made that decision and we'll find the one person that made that decision and we'll get rid of the one person that made that decision.
00:07:12.000 But that decision was a reflection of values that are deep within the BBC.
00:07:17.000 All right, let me just ask you, who did the BBC want to win that election?
00:07:20.000 Donald Trump?
00:07:21.000 Yes or no?
00:07:21.000 How do they want you to view Donald Trump, positively or negatively?
00:07:24.000 So whenever they tell stories about anyone, think about what do they want you to think about that person and why would that be?
00:07:32.000 It wasn't until nearly an hour later that he then said the second part of the BBC's version.
00:07:38.000 We're going to walk down to the Capitol.
00:07:45.000 And we fight.
00:07:46.000 We fight like hell.
00:07:48.000 Telegraph revealed that the BBC had doctored a Donald Trump speech for its Panorama program, editing it to make it appear though it had encouraged a Capitol riot.
00:07:56.000 It confirmed what many people suspected.
00:07:57.000 The so-called impartial establishment media are no longer chroniclers of truth, but active participants in a psychological war for narrative control.
00:08:05.000 Look, man, it's hard for me to talk about something like this because I have been in a personal battle as a member of independent media with establishment media for a long time.
00:08:16.000 Way before the very damaging allegations, which ultimately generated charges down the line, because none of the people involved in that documentary pursued anything criminal, there were a lot of headlines that were attacking me in a variety of other ways.
00:08:29.000 So of course, I'm not impartial when it comes to the corruption of the media and the way that the media present information in order to bring down their opponents.
00:08:37.000 And their chiefest opponents are independent media, because independent media inevitably leads to independent politics.
00:08:43.000 If you start to follow independent media creators like me, forget me, who cares about me, or anyone, people that you barely even have heard of, then their audience share is divided.
00:08:54.000 As well as hearing a lot of crazy stuff, you'll also get access to ideas that ultimately prevent you from being cuddled, curtailed and controlled by their interests.
00:09:02.000 You'll start to recognize you don't need brokerage and mitigation in every area of your life.
00:09:08.000 You don't need a layer of bureaucracy wrapped around you.
00:09:10.000 Some people do want it and like it.
00:09:13.000 Remember, during the pandemic period, some people did what they were told, some people didn't.
00:09:17.000 Those people that do what they're told, why don't they live in a democracy that's a little bit more restrictive?
00:09:22.000 Because you can, if you want, by the way, take as many vaccines as you like all day long, vaccine yourself to within an inch of your life.
00:09:29.000 Then another group might not want to have vaccines.
00:09:32.000 So what makes more sense?
00:09:33.000 What makes more sense?
00:09:35.000 Penalise the people that don't want to get vaccinated for not wanting to get vaccinated or simply acknowledge that you can have different types of people that want to take different types of medication or eat different types of food, that we can accommodate all of that.
00:09:48.000 You don't need to assert and exert centralized control over every aspect of our lives.
00:09:52.000 The scandal was not just a journalistic failure, it was a moral one.
00:09:55.000 For years, legacy outlets have portrayed Trump not as a flawed political figure, but as a modern day Hitler, an existential evil against which any manipulation, any distortion becomes justified.
00:10:04.000 In the process, they've done more than just reshape how politics is covered.
00:10:08.000 They've helped reshape what politics is.
00:10:10.000 Not a contest of ideas, but a holy war between the righteous and the damned.
00:10:15.000 This kind of moral absolutism does not arise in a vacuum.
00:10:17.000 It thrives in a system that depends on the creation and destruction of villains to sustain itself.
00:10:22.000 The establishment always needs a monster, someone whose existence can justify its moral authority.
00:10:27.000 Consider Dick Cheney, the former vice president, once reviled as the architect of America's bloodiest misadventures.
00:10:33.000 For years, he was the liberal media's embodiment of evil, a corrupt war profiteer, the dark lord of the Bush administration.
00:10:40.000 Yet in death, Cheney has been reimagined as a tragic hero, a principled conservative whose sole virtue, denouncing Trump, was enough to redeem a career once condemned.
00:10:50.000 The same rehabilitation was extended to George W. Bush, a president whose wars killed hundreds of thousands, but who now appears on talk shows as a genial grandfather figure, embraced by the same networks that once painted him as a tyrant.
00:11:02.000 The message is clear.
00:11:04.000 You are only as monstrous as your usefulness to the narrative allows.
00:11:08.000 If you can hold on to these two ideas, you won't go far wrong.
00:11:10.000 One, technology now is so immersive that it can give us the kind of power of gods.
00:11:15.000 And two, the state wants absolute control of that technology.
00:11:19.000 You can see that they want to be God because they are using edicts and principles that only God might deploy.
00:11:24.000 One, they want us to be like children, dependent on them for information and even in some cases, welfare.
00:11:30.000 Two, in this instance, they are claiming the right of canonization, that they can wash away a lifetime of sin, that they can posthumously turn Dick Cheney, one of their worst monsters, into a totem of sanctification.
00:11:43.000 At the heart of the transformation lies a media industry that no longer sees its role as holding power to account, but rather as defining which power deserves to be held.
00:11:52.000 Impartiality has been replaced by moral theatre.
00:11:55.000 The doctored panorama clip wasn't an isolated lapse.
00:11:58.000 It was a symptom of a larger condition.
00:12:00.000 From CNN's obsessive moralization of the basket of deplorables moment to MSNBC's relentless portrayal of half the country as domestic extremists to President Biden's battle for the soul of the nation speech with its red-lit staging and rhetoric of semi-fascism, the narrative has been weaponized.
00:12:17.000 Political disagreement is no longer framed as difference.
00:12:19.000 It's framed as danger.
00:12:21.000 We must be honest with each other and with ourselves.
00:12:26.000 Too much of what's happening in our country today is not normal.
00:12:32.000 Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic.
00:12:41.000 Now I want to be very clear.
00:12:43.000 Very clear up front.
00:12:47.000 Not every Republican, not even the majority of Republicans are MAGA Republicans.
00:12:52.000 Not every Republican embraces their extreme ideology.
00:12:56.000 I know, because I've been able to work with these mainstream Republicans.
00:13:01.000 But there's no question that the Republican Party today is dominated, driven, and intimidated.
00:13:10.000 We can't make this content without the support of our partners.
00:13:12.000 Here's a message from one now.
00:13:13.000 The wellness company, Peter McCulloch's brainchild.
00:13:17.000 Now, I don't like the term brain child.
00:13:19.000 It makes me think of a child who's sort of made out of brain material, all slimy and slobbery and covered in a network of neurological interconnections and syntactic sinew.
00:13:29.000 Every day we are exposed to nanoplastics, the dirty bastards, infiltrating our food, water, testicles, clitori, and they're now being detected in the human body.
00:13:39.000 A study in the New England Journal of Medicine found nanoplastics embedded in artery plaque and people with those particles at a high risk of heart attack and stroke over the next three years.
00:13:48.000 The Wellness Company's medical board is dedicated to understanding root cause issues and created PlazDetox as a natural solution.
00:13:54.000 PlasDetox is your daily defense that targets internal plastic buildup with a superior blend of ingredients.
00:14:00.000 It includes cracked cell wall cholera.
00:14:02.000 Right.
00:14:02.000 Chlorella.
00:14:03.000 Can you say that, Joe?
00:14:04.000 Do you know that one?
00:14:04.000 Do you know it?
00:14:05.000 What's that?
00:14:06.000 Chloera.
00:14:08.000 Cracked cell wall chlolera.
00:14:11.000 Never ever.
00:14:12.000 Chlora.
00:14:13.000 You ain't heard of that.
00:14:15.000 Chlorella say chlorella.
00:14:17.000 It removes toxins.
00:14:18.000 It takes the toxins right out of there.
00:14:21.000 Yeah, like green stuff.
00:14:22.000 Chlorella.
00:14:23.000 Chlorette, that's it.
00:14:24.000 Calcium deglyerate to support phase two liver detox and the elimination of endocrine disruptors such as BPA, polystyrene, tomato extract to provide antioxidant protection and detox probiotic blend to reinforce the gut barrier and help clear nanoplastic byproducts.
00:14:40.000 Use PlasDetox daily to reduce toxin burden and to support healthy liver detox, all in a clean daily formula for long-term use.
00:14:47.000 Go to twc.health forward slash brand and use the code brand to get 10% off plus free shipping.
00:14:52.000 Again, that's TWC.health forward slash brand and use the code brand to get 10% off.
00:14:57.000 10% off with the code brand.
00:14:59.000 TWC.health forward slash brand.
00:15:01.000 See you over there.
00:15:02.000 Get them filthy nanoplastics out of your nut bag, tit sack, mouth, and whole body.
00:15:10.000 This is not new.
00:15:11.000 History is leared with examples of how propaganda, fear, and selective truth-telling have been used to manufacture consent and crush dissent.
00:15:18.000 The weapons of mass destruction saga remains a defining lesson in media complicity.
00:15:23.000 Tony Blair's 2003 claim that Saddam Hussein could deploy WMDs within 45 minutes.
00:15:28.000 George W. Bush's mission accomplished banner, the echo chamber that amplified the lies until they became justification for the war.
00:15:35.000 Ladies and gentlemen, the President of the United States.
00:15:56.000 Can you see me, please?
00:15:59.000 Yeah!
00:16:23.000 Thank you all very much, Admiral Kelly, Captain Card, officers and sailors of the USS Abraham Lincoln, my fellow Americans.
00:16:34.000 Major combat operations in Iraq have ended.
00:16:38.000 in the battle of iraq the united states and our allies have prevailed and now our coalition is engaged in securing and reconstructing that country
00:17:05.000 In this battle, we have fought for the cause of liberty and for the peace of the world.
00:17:13.000 Our nation and our coalition are proud of this accomplishment.
00:17:17.000 Yet it is you, the members of the United States military, who achieved it.
00:17:25.000 Your courage, your willingness to face danger for your country and for each other made this day possible.
00:17:33.000 In the McCarthy era, communists filled the same role that fascists and MAGR extremists now occupy, a manufactured enemy so terrifying that reason and evidence could be suspended in the name of safety.
00:17:44.000 Today we are engaged in a final all-out battle between communistic atheism and Christianity.
00:17:55.000 The modern champions of communism have selected this as the time.
00:18:04.000 And ladies and gentlemen, the chips are down.
00:18:09.000 They are truly down.
00:18:12.000 If there be any doubt, the time has been chosen.
00:18:16.000 Let us go directly to the leader of communism today, Joseph Stalin.
00:18:22.000 Here is what he said, not back in 1928, not before the war, not during the war, but two years after the last war was ended.
00:18:32.000 As one of our outstanding historical figures once said, when a great democracy is destroyed, it will not be from enemies from without, but rather because of enemies from within.
00:18:47.000 When Trump entered the political stage, he became the ultimate vessel for this tradition.
00:18:51.000 His populism, often crude, always combative, made him an easy caricature, a perfect foil for a political class that needed a devil.
00:18:58.000 But Trump's own instinct for division also poured fuel on the fire.
00:19:02.000 His willingness to mock, insult, and polarize made it simple for his opponents to cast him as uniquely dangerous.
00:19:07.000 Yet his supporters saw something else, not a savior, but a weapon against the elites who had long sneered at them.
00:19:13.000 Last, the dynamic fed itself.
00:19:15.000 Each side's fury justified the other, and the media, ever the opportunists, reaped the reward of outrage.
00:19:20.000 But when the moral absolutism becomes the default lens, truth becomes irrelevant.
00:19:24.000 The fine people on both sides controversy remains a textbook case.
00:19:28.000 Trump's four comments where he explicitly condemned white supremacists were edited to make it appear that he sympathized with them.
00:19:34.000 The clip went viral, the myth became permanent, and the division deepened.
00:19:39.000 And that's when we heard the words of the President of the United States that stunned the world and shocked the conscience of this nation.
00:19:47.000 He said there were, quote, some very fine people on both sides.
00:19:52.000 Very fine people on both sides.
00:19:55.000 Charlottesville lie.
00:19:57.000 Very fine people on both sides.
00:20:00.000 Except that isn't all he said.
00:20:02.000 And they knew it then.
00:20:03.000 And they know it now.
00:20:04.000 Watch this.
00:20:06.000 But you also had people that were very fine people on both sides.
00:20:12.000 You had people in that group.
00:20:13.000 Excuse me.
00:20:14.000 Excuse me.
00:20:15.000 I saw the same pictures as you did.
00:20:17.000 You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name.
00:20:30.000 George Washington was a slave owner.
00:20:33.000 Was George Washington a slave owner?
00:20:35.000 So will George Washington now lose his status?
00:20:38.000 Are we going to take down?
00:20:39.000 Excuse me.
00:20:40.000 Are we going to take down?
00:20:42.000 Are we going to take down statues to George Washington?
00:20:45.000 How about Thomas Jefferson?
00:20:46.000 What do you think of Thomas Jefferson?
00:20:48.000 You like him?
00:20:48.000 I do.
00:20:49.000 Okay, good.
00:20:50.000 Are we going to take down the statue?
00:20:51.000 Because he was a major slave owner.
00:20:53.000 Now we're going to take down his statue.
00:20:55.000 So you know what?
00:20:56.000 It's fine.
00:20:57.000 You're changing history.
00:20:58.000 You're changing about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists because they should be condemned totally.
00:21:04.000 But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay?
00:21:10.000 And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.
00:21:14.000 Now, in the other group also, you had some fine people, but you also had troublemakers.
00:21:20.000 And you see them come with the black outfits and with the helmets and with the baseball bats.
00:21:28.000 You had a lot of bad people in the other group too.
00:21:31.000 I'm sorry.
00:21:31.000 I didn't understand what you were saying.
00:21:32.000 You were saying the press has treated white nationalists unfairly?
00:21:35.000 I just didn't understand what you were saying.
00:21:36.000 There were people in that rally, and I looked the night before.
00:21:39.000 If you look, they were people protesting very quietly the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee.
00:21:50.000 I'm sure in that group there were some bad ones.
00:21:52.000 The following day it looked like they had some rough, bad people.
00:21:56.000 Neo-Nazis, white nationalists, whatever you want to call them.
00:22:01.000 But you had a lot of people in that group that were there to innocently protest and very legally protest because I don't know if you know, they had a permit.
00:22:09.000 The other group didn't have a permit.
00:22:12.000 So I only tell you this.
00:22:14.000 There are two sides to a story.
00:22:16.000 I thought what took place was a horrible moment for our country.
00:22:21.000 A horrible moment.
00:22:23.000 But there are two sides of the country.
00:22:24.000 Does anybody have a final?
00:22:26.000 Does anybody have?
00:22:27.000 You have an infrastructure.
00:22:28.000 What makes you think?
00:22:30.000 This might be today the first time the news networks played those full remarks in their context.
00:22:36.000 Very fine people on both sides.
00:22:39.000 The same playbook repeated itself after the Capitol riot.
00:22:42.000 Selective editing, loaded commentary, and censorship in the name of safety.
00:22:47.000 As the Twitter files later revealed, government agencies like the FBI and DHS were quietly coordinating with social media giants to suppress dissenting voices under the pretext of fighting domestic extremism.
00:22:58.000 A new kind of orthodoxy was being born.
00:23:00.000 Not state propaganda in the old Soviet sense, but something more subtle and pervasive.
00:23:04.000 A fusion of government, tech, and media power, all aligned in service of one moral narrative.
00:23:09.000 Meanwhile, the language of dehumanization became normalized.
00:23:12.000 When Nancy Pelosi calls Trump a vile creature and the worst thing on the face of the earth, she's not merely insulting a rival.
00:23:18.000 She's reinforcing a worldview in which political opposition is no longer legitimate.
00:23:21.000 He's just a vile creature.
00:23:24.000 The worst thing on the face of the earth.
00:23:26.000 But anyway.
00:23:27.000 You think he's the worst thing on the face of the earth?
00:23:29.000 I do.
00:23:29.000 Yeah.
00:23:30.000 I do.
00:23:31.000 Why is that?
00:23:32.000 Because he's the President of the United States and he does not honor the Constitution of the United States.
00:23:38.000 In fact, he's turned the Supreme Court into a rogue court.
00:23:42.000 He's abolished the House of Representatives.
00:23:45.000 This rhetorical escalation is not harmless.
00:23:47.000 When every opponent is a monster, violence becomes plausible, necessary, and even inevitable.
00:23:53.000 When every election is the end of democracy, compromise becomes treason.
00:23:57.000 And when one side controls both the moral script and the media megaphone, what follows is not democracy but managed hysteria.
00:24:04.000 The assassination of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk, whatever one's politics, must be viewed in this context.
00:24:09.000 A culture that normalizes violent rhetoric can't be shocked when it metastasizes into actual violence.
00:24:15.000 Words shape worlds.
00:24:17.000 And America's political class, aided by a complicit press, has spent years shaping a world where annihilation feels like justice.
00:24:23.000 So, how do we step back from the brink?
00:24:25.000 Can a nation rediscover dialogue when its institutions profit from division, when its journalists have become activists, and its public broadcasters behave like political operatives?
00:24:34.000 Can a society that once prided itself on the marketplace of ideas survive when truth itself is treated as a partisan property?
00:24:41.000 Perhaps the most urgent question is this: if the media, the government, and the cultural elite are willing to distort, censor, and dehumanize in the name of morality, what happens when morality itself becomes the mask for control?
00:24:52.000 The Doctor's BBC clip is not just a story about a speech, it's a story about the decay of trust, the weaponization of information, and the peril of turning politics into theology.
00:25:02.000 When every opponent is Hitler, every election becomes Armageddon, and when outrage replaces truth as the currency of public life, there are no victors, only believers and heretics.
00:25:12.000 If the goal was to save democracy, then perhaps the establishment should ask what kind of democracy can survive when its storytellers have become priests.
00:25:19.000 If you want to read that article in full, you can do on Substack.
00:25:22.000 This small clip shows you enough to never trust them again.
00:25:27.000 You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables.
00:25:41.000 Right?
00:25:44.000 So racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic, you name it.
00:25:53.000 And unfortunately, there are people like that.
00:25:58.000 And he has lifted them up.
00:26:00.000 He has given voice to their websites that used to only have 11,000 people.
00:26:06.000 Now I have 11 million.
00:26:08.000 He tweets and retweets.
00:26:12.000 They're offensive, hateful, mean-spirited, rhetoric.
00:26:18.000 Now, some of those, oops, they are irredeemable, but thankfully, they are not America.
00:26:25.000 But the other basket, the other basket, and I know because I look at this crowd, I see friends from all over America here.
00:26:33.000 I see friends from Florida and Georgia and South Carolina and Texas and as well as, you know, New York and California.
00:26:48.000 But that other basket of people are people who feel the government has let them down.
00:26:54.000 The economy has let them down.
00:26:57.000 Nobody cares about them.
00:27:00.000 Nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures.
00:27:04.000 And they're just desperate for change.
00:27:07.000 It doesn't really even matter where it comes from.
00:27:11.000 They don't buy everything he says, but he seems to hold out some hope that their lives will be different.
00:27:19.000 That they won't wake up and see their jobs disappear.
00:27:26.000 Lose a kid to heroin.
00:27:30.000 I feel like you're at a dead end.
00:27:33.000 Those are people we have to understand and empathize with as well.
00:27:39.000 In a way, that clip's not a big deal.
00:27:41.000 We all know that they lie.
00:27:42.000 We all know they exaggerate.
00:27:43.000 We certainly know that they edit.
00:27:45.000 What's fascinating is that the technology now exists to hold the powerful to account.
00:27:50.000 As the brilliant book Revolt of the Public excellently describes, the old elites no longer have control and the new elites haven't been fully incarnated.
00:27:59.000 In this liminal space, there is an opportunity for power to change in ways that are radical and interesting.
00:28:05.000 Remember, we can't rely on political ideas that emerged from the industrial age.
00:28:10.000 Fascism, communism.
00:28:12.000 We now have to move to political ideas that reflect our technology.
00:28:16.000 And by God's holy grace, these technologies grant systems that are spiritually beneficial and authentic.
00:28:22.000 Individual sovereignty, community democracy.
00:28:24.000 It's now not possible for Hillary Clinton to just say basket of deplorables and not be held to account.
00:28:30.000 You can't say that the North Stream pipeline was blown up by Putin and not be held to account.
00:28:34.000 You can't say that Donald Trump incited a riot and not be held to account.
00:28:39.000 You can't accuse people of things and not be held to account.
00:28:42.000 Media is now in the hands of people.
00:28:45.000 As Marshall McLuhan said, the medium is the message.
00:28:48.000 And the message is this: media is decentralized.
00:28:51.000 Power should be decentralized too.
00:28:53.000 Power belongs to God and God only.
00:28:56.000 Minimize the power of centralized government.
00:28:58.000 Maximize democracy.
00:29:00.000 These principles will change the world much more than changing the colouring of the flags and livery of whatever centralized organization you have in charge of your life.
00:29:09.000 Whether it's Facebook or Columbia, whether it's the BBC or the Republican Party, you no longer require the degree of centralization that was once beneficial for municipal organization.
00:29:21.000 Now what is possible is mass subsidiarity.
00:29:25.000 Some people will call it anarcho-syndicalism.
00:29:27.000 Some people will call it tribalism.
00:29:29.000 But what people in positions of centralized power will always call it is dangerous because that modality ends their control.
00:29:36.000 As much as Hillary Clinton may hate Donald Trump, there's no one she hates more than she hates you.
00:29:41.000 As much as the BBC might hate Donald Trump, there's no one that they hate as much as they hate you, your freedom, your ability to change, and access information from outside of their narrow purview.
00:29:52.000 But that's just why I think.
00:29:53.000 Tell me what you think in the comments and the chat.
00:29:57.000 We can't make this content without the support of our partners.
00:29:59.000 Here's a message from one now.
00:30:01.000 Do you want to support me?
00:30:02.000 No, I don't.
00:30:03.000 Yes, you do.
00:30:04.000 Support me and support Rumble Premium.
00:30:06.000 You won't only be supporting me, you'll get additional access to Mug Club, that's Crowder's gig, Tim Cast, that's Tim Paul's racket, and Glenn Greenwald's additional content.
00:30:14.000 Join us on Rumble Premium.
00:30:16.000 We make content every single week through Rumble because Rumble supports free speech.
00:30:20.000 When I was under attack from the British government and the British media, Rumble stood firm.
00:30:24.000 Yes, of course, there's crazy people on Rumble.
00:30:26.000 There's crazy people everywhere.
00:30:28.000 There's a crazy person living under this hat.
00:30:30.000 That doesn't mean we shouldn't have the right to speak freely together.
00:30:33.000 By supporting Rumble Premium, you're supporting me and content creators like me.
00:30:37.000 You get additional content, and what I will say even more, drink down deep on the delicious irony in this one.
00:30:42.000 You get an ad-free experience.
00:30:44.000 If you want an ad-free experience of Rumble, get Rumble Premium.
00:30:48.000 In the meantime, stay free.
00:30:51.000 The rest of this show will not be on YouTube, The Globalist Swines.
00:30:55.000 Click the link in the description and join us over on Rumble.
00:31:00.000 Is Britain becoming a violent hellhole, or should it be a violent heck hole?
00:31:04.000 Or are we exaggerating in order to exert control?
00:31:09.000 Is Britain becoming more violent or has Britain always been violent?
00:31:12.000 Are things falling apart or is medium is there's a lot of questions here actually?
00:31:17.000 I mean, there's a lot of questions.
00:31:18.000 There's a lot of questions.
00:31:19.000 There's so many questions.
00:31:20.000 There's so many questions.
00:31:22.000 Let's get into it.
00:31:27.000 Hello there, you awakening wonders.
00:31:28.000 Thanks for joining us today.
00:31:29.000 We're talking about crime in the UK.
00:31:31.000 In the aftermath of the Huntingdon train stabbing, Britain once again finds itself gripped by fear and uncertainty.
00:31:38.000 Headlines scream of chaos, social media teems with outrage and politicians urge vigilance, as if violence has become the new normal.
00:31:47.000 But beneath the noise lies a deeper question, is Britain truly growing more dangerous, or are we being taught to live in fear?
00:31:55.000 Let me know what you think in the comments think.
00:31:58.000 Let me know what you think, because you're you know that's how that word works.
00:32:00.000 Let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
00:32:03.000 Yeah, let me know what you think in the comments and chat.
00:32:06.000 In the aftermath of the Huntingdon train stabbing, Britain finds itself once again in the grip of inner inquiry.
00:32:14.000 Is violence escalating?
00:32:16.000 Is Britain becoming more violent?
00:32:17.000 Certainly, my sister-in-law, Kirsty Gallagher, got kicked in the back.
00:32:21.000 She described it as like a football, and I wonder if that's just because anything you kick, by definition, is like a football and.
00:32:29.000 But the truth is man, that's terrible.
00:32:30.000 She's just walking down the street, a woman getting kicked right up the back.
00:32:34.000 What's, going on in the Uk?
00:32:35.000 Let's analyse it.
00:32:36.000 Let's look at how media use it.
00:32:38.000 Let's note too, how powerful interests exploit anything that happens ultimately to their ends.
00:32:44.000 That's why you've got to stay switched on, you poor sods.
00:32:46.000 Right, let's have a look at it.
00:32:47.000 So the defense secretary says British public should be more vigilant, more vigilant.
00:32:52.000 People are terrified.
00:32:54.000 How can they be any more vigilant?
00:32:55.000 Be aware, be awake, be conscious vigilant, vigilant infers, if I may say, do you know a word that comes from vigilant vigilante, and what that means is you'll become so watchful and you'll start to recognize the government and institutions you're dependent upon are incapable of doing their jobs, and you have to do it yourself and, in a way, you do have to do it yourself.
00:33:16.000 That's the truth of the matter.
00:33:18.000 You can't have an intercedary force, particularly not a government, that's ultimately there to control you and exploit you and to broker, as you know, relationships between other powerful interests, while making it look like it's helping you.
00:33:31.000 The government of the Uk, in particular, is not there to help you.
00:33:33.000 It's there to broker deals with more powerful interests, both corporate and commercial, and bureaucratic.
00:33:39.000 You know that I mean by bureaucratic, larger bodies, whether it's the EU, the the Brexit didn't really really truly happen, did it.
00:33:47.000 And commercially, you know what I mean, setting up deals, for example, like the Moderna one that Rishi Sunak did while in government.
00:33:55.000 That I don't imagine Kiir Starma has reneged on or undone or negated, even in spite of us being aware now that the vaccines weren't what they promised to be, that Rishi Sunak had an unusual relationship with Modern he was part of the hedge fund that set it up.
00:34:10.000 So what I mean to say is, why would you trust the government?
00:34:13.000 If you would become super vigilant, you would start to notice that the real criminals are not just lunatics stabbing people on a train, even though that's obviously plainly a crime, but the people that facilitate and expedite endless crime through their corruption that benefit from us being terrified.
00:34:29.000 But anyway, let's look at a quote.
00:34:30.000 The British public is pretty tough and will carry on after train stabbings, but should be more vigilant.
00:34:36.000 The defence secretary has said John Healy told SKY NEWS on sunday with Trevor Phillips.
00:34:40.000 Well, for me, the British public are pretty tough, pretty resilient.
00:34:42.000 We have to be with you lot in charge.
00:34:44.000 If you're going to be governed by a mug like Starma, you better toughen up quick sharp double quick.
00:34:50.000 Otherwise you're going to struggle to survive out there.
00:34:52.000 Britain is changing quickly.
00:34:54.000 The most likely outcome is some amalgam of Nigel Farage's reform and the Conservative Party will win whenever the next election is.
00:35:02.000 But will that resolve the problem?
00:35:04.000 Are we not experiencing deep systemic problems?
00:35:07.000 Look at what's happening everywhere in fact.
00:35:09.000 In New York, Mamdani, people lurching, lunging leftward.
00:35:15.000 My God, I could talk about anything for 10 years.
00:35:17.000 Let's use another asset.
00:35:19.000 Liam Gallagher criticises Sadiq Khan over the rise in London knife crime.
00:35:23.000 Now Sadiq Khan, another Muslim mayor, is regarded as compassionate.
00:35:28.000 I've got a degree of respect for Sadiq Khan.
00:35:29.000 Two reasons really.
00:35:30.000 One is his dad was like a bus conductor.
00:35:33.000 So whatever he's got, it ain't because he went to the right school.
00:35:38.000 So let's respect that about Sadiq Khan.
00:35:41.000 And frankly, it don't matter if someone's a Muslim or not.
00:35:44.000 If they believe in God and they follow the precepts of Muslim, my prayer would be that that would make them peace-loving.
00:35:51.000 I'm a Christian.
00:35:52.000 I worship Jesus Christ.
00:35:54.000 And I believe that London, England, the United States of America would be better aligned if they were governed and ruled in a total alignment with Christian principles.
00:36:04.000 That's what I believe.
00:36:05.000 But my beliefs can't be imposed on an entire planet.
00:36:09.000 I find it hard enough to impose them on myself.
00:36:12.000 I'm not surprised that Liam Gallagher, he's always been confident publicly, is willing to publicly criticise Sadiq Khan.
00:36:19.000 Other celebrities from the 90s, is that what we know, Ricky Gervais and Liam Gallagher, they're not just from the 90s, they're mainly from the 90s, are criticising Sadiq Khan because, because in the case of Ricky Gervais, he's never going to stand for censorship.
00:36:34.000 And Liam Gallagher, probably everyone's just sensing we've got a shared cultural obligation to have the conversations that are necessary as a country falls apart, right?
00:36:42.000 I imagine it's that.
00:36:43.000 Let's have a look.
00:36:44.000 Let's have a look at the next asset.
00:36:46.000 Ricky Gervais, welcome to London.
00:36:48.000 Don't forget your Stab Fest.
00:36:49.000 Brilliant marketing campaign for Ricky Gervais.
00:36:51.000 Everyone's talking about it.
00:36:52.000 It's generating a lot of interest and a lot of intrigue.
00:36:57.000 But the truth that lies behind it, of course, is that London is being badly run.
00:37:02.000 Do you know that I was thinking about running for mayor myself just about 25 seconds before there was an inundation of total immersive attacks across London?
00:37:13.000 Obviously, I'm not going to be doing anything like that, not when I'm facing trial in June in London for the charges that you'll be very familiar with by now.
00:37:21.000 But it's clear that the UK is falling apart fast and requires radical change quickly.
00:37:27.000 My personal belief is that change does not come from within existing institutions and systems because if you think about it just for a second, just for a second, those institutions and systems are the very essence, the skeletal structure that requires rigidity.
00:37:43.000 It's only by changing them that you'll get anything like the kind of change you're yearning for, craving, and that these various celebrities are expressing in ways that are ultimately probably filtered through self-interest.
00:37:55.000 No different from me.
00:37:56.000 No different from me in that instance.
00:37:58.000 Now, Ed Miliband or Dave Miliband or one of them milly people said that Elon Musk should get out of British politics.
00:38:05.000 I remember seeing him being all confident, get out of British politics.
00:38:08.000 They all talk a bit like that, or is that just I don't have enough variety when it comes to comic voices?
00:38:13.000 Get out!
00:38:13.000 No, it's mys.
00:38:14.000 Get out!
00:38:15.000 Get out of British politics!
00:38:18.000 Get your fingers out of my butt, Greg.
00:38:21.000 Right, well, what I felt actually when I was watching Ed Miliband telling Elon Musk to get out of British politics is what do you mean really by British politics?
00:38:29.000 Who does British politics belong to?
00:38:31.000 The obvious answer would be the British people.
00:38:34.000 Well, let's go down that rabbit hole.
00:38:36.000 Here's Elon Musk on Joe Rogan talking about the impact of British governance on British small towns.
00:38:43.000 These like lovely sort of small towns in England, Scotland, Ireland.
00:38:47.000 They've been like sort of living their lives quietly.
00:38:51.000 They're like hobbits, frankly.
00:38:54.000 In fact, J.R. Tolkien.
00:38:56.000 That's fucking offensive.
00:38:57.000 We're not like hobbits.
00:38:58.000 I'm not like a fucking hobbit.
00:39:00.000 We ain't like hobbits.
00:39:01.000 Then British towns.
00:39:02.000 Especially something like Elon Musk saying they're like, Hobbits, mate, you try wandering around like... Tolkien was writing about the Midlands, I think is what he's about to say.
00:39:11.000 But if you go wandering around any northern town or town in the Midlands around Tolkien, about which Tolkien was talking, and go, you're like Hobbits, you're like Hobbits, they will cyber-truck you right up.
00:39:24.000 J.R. Tolkien based the hobbits on people he knew in small-town England.
00:39:32.000 Because they were just like lovely people who like to, you know, smoke their pipe and have nice meals.
00:39:39.000 It's an interesting characterization, but the British are also the people of the Second World War.
00:39:42.000 The British are also the people of Dunkirk and the Normandy landings.
00:39:45.000 The British are powerful people.
00:39:47.000 That's not to say that we haven't been bureaucratized into crazy submission.
00:39:50.000 And I know that Elon Musk is being supportive, not criticising Elon Musk.
00:39:53.000 Who's got time for that?
00:39:55.000 You know, Jesus.
00:39:55.000 Anyway, my point is this: that the British people are potent, robust Ireland people invaded throughout their history, so ossified and accreted power is in them.
00:40:08.000 Vikings, Romans, Celts, it's all just pounded into you like a kind of inuring.
00:40:14.000 There's no question that we've been kind of oddly sidelined into this new tyrannical version of social democracy that appears to benefit from mass migration that's not being well managed.
00:40:27.000 And perhaps the British people don't want migration.
00:40:29.000 And if they don't want migration, have a referendum on it and then stop it.
00:40:33.000 Because if you live in a democracy, that's what you're supposed to do.
00:40:37.000 But I suppose I don't like the idea of describing us like hobbits.
00:40:40.000 It's offended me.
00:40:42.000 And have nice meals and everything's pleasant.
00:40:45.000 The hobbits in the shire.
00:40:46.000 So he was talking about, you know, places like Hertfordshire.
00:40:50.000 Like the Shire is around in the greater London area, Oxfordshire type of thing.
00:40:55.000 But the reason they've been able to enjoy the Shire is because hard men have protected them from the dangers of the world.
00:41:03.000 But since they have almost no exposure to the dangers of the world, they don't realize that they're there.
00:41:10.000 Until one day, you know, a thousand people show up in your village of 500 out of nowhere and start raping the kids.
00:41:18.000 This has now happened God knows how many times in Britain.
00:41:22.000 Yeah, I don't want to see a version where the orcs turn up and start raping Bilbo Baggins.
00:41:26.000 That'll be a massive downer.
00:41:27.000 Don't watch the DVD extras is what I would say.
00:41:30.000 Britain is on the verge of introducing ID cards or certainly digital ID.
00:41:35.000 Can I see your ID card?
00:41:36.000 Yes, I'm a member of a Pakistani rape gang.
00:41:38.000 Come on in.
00:41:39.000 Can I see your ID card?
00:41:40.000 I'm a Muslim mayor.
00:41:41.000 Come on in.
00:41:42.000 Hello.
00:41:43.000 Can I see your ID card?
00:41:44.000 I'm not vaccinated.
00:41:45.000 Get the fuck out of here.
00:41:49.000 Here's The Guardian, a purportedly left-wing but ultimately establishment newspaper talking about, you know, violent crime.
00:41:56.000 London has turned into something, is into something crazy.
00:41:59.000 Is the city in the grip of a crime wave?
00:42:03.000 Perception of runaway crime, partly blamed for driving away the super rich, but in reality some high-profile offences such as watch theft are falling.
00:42:11.000 Woohoo!
00:42:12.000 Watches are not being stolen.
00:42:14.000 Brilliant.
00:42:15.000 The fact is there's an existential crisis.
00:42:17.000 Britain is falling apart.
00:42:18.000 There's total despair everywhere.
00:42:20.000 No faith in our leadership.
00:42:21.000 No ideology, no clear identity.
00:42:24.000 But you can hang on to your kettle.
00:42:26.000 No one's after your watch.
00:42:27.000 You're all right here, son.
00:42:28.000 Great news.
00:42:29.000 Possibly also people don't wear watches anymore.
00:42:31.000 That might be impacting that particular statistic.
00:42:34.000 With violent crime dropping dramatically over the past two decades, crime in London is up.
00:42:37.000 Recorded crime has increased by 31% in the past decade in the area that the Metropolitan Police covers with violent crime up by 40%.
00:42:45.000 Now, is the increase in crime as a result of migration?
00:42:50.000 Let me know in the comments and chat what you think.
00:42:52.000 Here's Enoch Powell, a firebrand politician from the 1970s, 60s, 70s, and even 80s, who was, they say, the best prime minister England never had, who I once famously referenced when I called Nigel Farage a pound shop Enoch Powell.
00:43:09.000 Look, if you fly into Gatwick, you'll see lots of green spaces.
00:43:13.000 That is certainly true.
00:43:15.000 However, if you have a country in which the population goes up as a direct result of immigration, what you find is not a shortage of green fields, if that's where you wanted to build houses.
00:43:26.000 You find a shortage of primary school places.
00:43:29.000 You find a shortage of GP surgeries.
00:43:31.000 You know, we have fewer GPs per head than any other country in Europe today.
00:43:36.000 You find congestion, whether it's on the roads or the London Underground or wherever you go.
00:43:42.000 And what you find is that actually you're constantly playing catch-up and really the general quality of life for the massive population has gone down.
00:43:52.000 So I think those comments today were wholly irresponsible.
00:43:56.000 And what we've seen, I mean, it's quite interesting to think that, you know, in 1990, the population of this country was 55 million.
00:44:04.000 It is now between 62 and 63 million.
00:44:06.000 That is a massive, massive increase.
00:44:09.000 And I think ordinary folk going about their lives are feeling it.
00:44:13.000 And I think, you know, having a proper immigration policy, controlling the numbers, doing what nearly 200 countries in the world do, namely controlling the numbers that come and the type of people that come, is the answer.
00:44:28.000 Russell Brown.
00:44:35.000 I sometimes feel worried about you, Nigel Farage.
00:44:40.000 The reason I feel worried is because I know a lot of people are frightened in our country.
00:44:45.000 I know a lot of people are feeling afraid and frustrated.
00:44:49.000 And there is a sense that there is a corrupt group in our country using our resources, taking away our jobs, taking away our housing, not paying taxes, exploiting us.
00:45:03.000 And there is.
00:45:04.000 There is an economic elite that this man's party is funded by, that this man comes from background working in the city.
00:45:11.000 Let me tell you something.
00:45:13.000 There was an economic crash and a lot of money was lost.
00:45:16.000 His mates in the city farted.
00:45:18.000 Nigel Farage is pointing at immigrants and the disabled and holding his nose.
00:45:22.000 Immigrants are not causing the economic problems and suffering we're experiencing.
00:45:36.000 As much as any of us, I enjoy seeing Nigel Farage in a boozer with a pint and a fag, laughing off his latest scandals about breastfeeding or whatever.
00:45:46.000 I enjoy it.
00:45:47.000 But this man is not a cartoon character.
00:45:51.000 He ain't Delboy.
00:45:52.000 He ain't Arthur Daly.
00:45:54.000 He is a pound shop Enoch Powell and we've got to watch him.
00:46:00.000 Here is the real deal premier brand politician that was Enoch Powell.
00:46:05.000 I, of course, as a person that believes in a universal brotherhood, do not like to see division along racial or even cultural lines.
00:46:15.000 But it's pretty clear that the UK right now is in crisis.
00:46:20.000 And I believe that the underlying cause of that crisis is people feeling disempowered.
00:46:25.000 And until there is individual empowerment, individual sovereignty, and community democracy, this will continue.
00:46:31.000 And by the way, if that sounds sort of like Airy Fairy to you, what do you mean, the individual sovereignty and community democracy?
00:46:36.000 It's not ephemeral and abstract.
00:46:38.000 What I mean by that is communities could vote on whether or not they want to take any migrants in.
00:46:43.000 Like saying Epping, it's unlikely that people are going to have migrant communities.
00:46:47.000 But based on what I read about high-profile and affluent celebrities' views on migration, many of them want to have migrants in their community.
00:46:56.000 Me, I believe that charity begins at home.
00:46:59.000 That means not only is my first priority to take care of my family, but that I am personally responsible for helping other people.
00:47:07.000 And if I can get myself into the state where I would say, I want a refugee family to come and live with me and I want to take responsibility for them, I believe I'd be doing God's work there.
00:47:16.000 But I don't think anyone should be imposing that on me.
00:47:18.000 Here's Enoch Powell's defining speech, the famous rivers of blood speech.
00:47:23.000 In this country, in 15 or 20 years time, the black man will have the whip hand over the white man.
00:47:39.000 I sort of just like the way people talk to them.
00:47:42.000 The black man, the black chap, will have the whip hand over the white man.
00:47:46.000 That's no good, is it?
00:47:47.000 The white man is meant to have the whip hand over the black man.
00:47:51.000 We also are 12 years a slave.
00:47:53.000 We all enjoyed it.
00:47:54.000 Well, imagine how awful it would be if somehow the English black actor, Chetinoir, I can never say that name.
00:48:00.000 I'm the better Enoch Powell, got the whip and he was whipping, I don't know, Orlando Bloom, who won the white ones.
00:48:06.000 No one wants that.
00:48:08.000 None of us.
00:48:11.000 Also, it's actually Muslim men, not black men, so they're sort of beige-ish, brown-ish Pakistani men.
00:48:16.000 So I can already hear.
00:48:19.000 And it's not a whip.
00:48:21.000 It's a dick.
00:48:22.000 And it's not a white man.
00:48:24.000 It's usually a 12-year-old kid.
00:48:27.000 And it's not their back.
00:48:28.000 It's normally their vagina or anus.
00:48:30.000 The chorus of execration.
00:48:34.000 How dare I say such a horrible thing?
00:48:39.000 How dare I stir up trouble and inflame feelings by repeating such a conversation?
00:48:49.000 My answer is that I do not have the right not to do here.
00:48:55.000 At least you can say that Enoch Powell isn't an idealist and he is true and faithful to his own principles.
00:49:03.000 You don't get many politicians like that these days.
00:49:05.000 My personal feeling is that the UK is now a multicultural society.
00:49:11.000 My personal feeling is that Britain ought to become a Christian country, you would have to democratically and electorally instantiate a Christian government and better even than that, Christian principles at every level of government.
00:49:28.000 Firstly, self-governance, then family governance, then community government, then the government of the entire nation.
00:49:36.000 But not every town in Britain would probably vote that way.
00:49:39.000 Some of them might vote Muslim and I'd live with that to get my community Christian.
00:49:43.000 Some of them might want to be atheist and I'd live with that to get my community Christian.
00:49:48.000 Some of them might want to be LGBTQ plus.
00:49:51.000 They might want to have their community built around their sexual identity or who knows a thousand different ways to be a human being.
00:49:57.000 I believe that God and Christ want us to be free.
00:50:00.000 To do so.
00:50:07.000 Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad.
00:50:16.000 We must be mad.
00:50:19.000 Literally mad as a nation to be permitted the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependents who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant descended population.
00:50:38.000 It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pile.
00:50:47.000 There's no point listening to me moralizing.
00:50:49.000 I'm not Tony Blair.
00:50:50.000 Let's listen to Tony Blair moralizing.
00:50:52.000 Let's note this significant moment in the ascent of Tony Blair when Tony Blair did what Tony Blair does best.
00:50:58.000 Comes up with piffy little maxims and slogans without actually governing in accordance with them.
00:51:04.000 Here is his famous tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime, which is a good slogan, but what is it like in practice?
00:51:12.000 Same way people go, communism works in principle.
00:51:15.000 Communism works in principle.
00:51:17.000 But all government works in principle.
00:51:19.000 The problem is no one in government has any principles.
00:51:22.000 We need to tackle this problem in a concerted way.
00:51:25.000 Tough on crime and tough on the causes of crime.
00:51:28.000 Tough on cunt, tough on the causes of cunt.
00:51:31.000 Here's David Cameron on the same subject.
00:51:32.000 These are sickening scenes.
00:51:35.000 Scenes of people looting, vandalising, thieving, robbing.
00:51:40.000 Scenes of people attacking police officers and even attacking fire crews as they're trying to put out fires.
00:51:49.000 This is criminality, pure and simple, and it has to be confronted and defeated.
00:51:55.000 How do we have someone in government in that period, like only about eight years ago, that said, put out out that the way he said out there is such an indicator of elitism.
00:52:06.000 You might as well be wearing a golden hat and have a golden penis.
00:52:10.000 No one talks like that unless they've never been anything other than stinking filthy rich their entire lives.
00:52:16.000 I suppose what the Tony Blair clip and the Enoch Powell clip and the David Cameron clip demonstrate is that people have always had concerns about crime and the way that crime is reported on is significant.
00:52:25.000 With all media reporting, ask yourself the question, as Cicero said, qui bono.
00:52:31.000 Who benefits?
00:52:31.000 Who benefits?
00:52:32.000 Every single news story that you read or encounter, learn to think continually while you're watching it.
00:52:39.000 Who benefits?
00:52:39.000 So if you're watching Bill Gates saying everyone should get vaccines, qui bono, Bill Gates benefits.
00:52:45.000 If you watch Bill Gates saying, oh, agriculture, we should patent seeds now, qui bono, Bill Gates benefits.
00:52:50.000 If you watch Bill Gates saying, oh, there's no such thing as climate change anymore because it doesn't suit me, qui bono, Bill Gates benefits.
00:52:56.000 In fact, if you see Bill Gates, Bill Gates is just talking about Bill Gates and our to benefit Bill Gates all the time.
00:53:01.000 It's actually very easy to use him as an example.
00:53:03.000 When news broke of a stabbing aboard a train in Huntingdon, the government's first response, be vigilant, felt grimly familiar.
00:53:10.000 Another tragedy, another warning.
00:53:12.000 The attack joined a string of recent high-profile incidents, the Uxbridge triple stabbing in October, the Southport killings of three young girls in 2024, and a surge of viral footage showing fights, robberies and assaults across British towns.
00:53:24.000 Public unease has deepened to the point where comedians and musicians now echo it.
00:53:28.000 Ricky Gervasi's band, Welcome to London, Don't Forget Your Stab Vest poster, and Liam Gallagher's comment that London is open for knife crime capture a mood of cynicism and fear.
00:53:38.000 Britain feels unsafe.
00:53:40.000 Is it becoming more violent or simply more anxious?
00:53:42.000 The question has been sharpened by comments from figures such as Elon Musk who told Joe Rogan that small British towns were being breached by waves of migrants, conjuring Tolkien-esque images of the Shire under siege.
00:53:52.000 Nigel Varage too cited disputed data to claim that Afghan males are vastly more likely to be convicted of rape than those born in the UK.
00:54:02.000 Well baby, don't ask me.
00:54:04.000 I don't know what them Afghanis were doing 25 years ago, 26 years ago, when I was making top-class content.
00:54:11.000 I guess that's just statistical.
00:54:12.000 You could look at migrant populations in every country.
00:54:16.000 You could say, well, what are white migrants in Egypt doing?
00:54:21.000 You know, I don't think it's nice to make claims that certain ideologies are more inclined towards rape, the worst of the crimes.
00:54:30.000 But I think what you can say is that if a culture skews towards denigration of the value of human life, then that's going to be a problem.
00:54:40.000 And in a way, any culture that's spiritual, whether it's Christian or Muslim, ought so enshrine the sanctity of human sovereignty and dignity that violent and particularly sexually violent crimes ought be anathema.
00:54:53.000 You ought never hear of them.
00:54:55.000 Those claims feed a growing narrative that immigration and rising crime are intertwined.
00:55:00.000 That violence in once peaceful communities is the inevitable consequence of unchecked borders.
00:55:05.000 Yet data paints a more complex picture.
00:55:07.000 While The Guardian reports that recorded violent crime in London has risen by 40% over the past decade across England and Wales, it has dramatically fallen over the past 20 years.
00:55:16.000 The truth may depend less on the numbers than where one lives, what one reads and what one fears.
00:55:20.000 The idea that sex crimes may occur outside of the domain of your birth is interesting.
00:55:26.000 Consider the sex tourism industry.
00:55:29.000 Consider how many people holiday in Pap Pong Bangkok in order to exploit sexual opportunity there.
00:55:35.000 Wasn't Gary Glitter ultimately arrested in Thailand as a result of having sex with underage girls?
00:55:41.000 I remember when I was a kid, I went to Thailand and I saw like older guys walking around hand in hand with what you could see were basically children.
00:55:49.000 So be careful before making a claim like sexual ignominy belongs to one cultural or certainly racial group.
00:55:57.000 But in the UK there is little doubt that there is a correlative between certain Pakistani populations, grooming and rape gangs.
00:56:08.000 The information, the data exists.
00:56:10.000 The problem that Britain has is it cannot have that conversation openly.
00:56:13.000 So many people in power have a deep and duplicitous creed because they are hiding stuff, often personal stuff about their own sexuality.
00:56:20.000 And even if they're not, they're usually compromised politically or financially.
00:56:25.000 Whether it's something like Rushi Sunak with obviously corrupt financial connections or the deeper and more ubiquitous corruption that exists when you have people going through the Oxbridge system and the Etonian school system and ending up in government.
00:56:38.000 It's a more diffuse type of corruption, but it's a compromise nevertheless.
00:56:42.000 History offers clear warnings about how such anxieties can be amplified and exploited.
00:56:47.000 In 1968, Enoch Powell's infamous Rivers of Blood speech turned public unease about immigration into national panic, fueling decades of division.
00:56:55.000 Where of course people will look at that Enoch Powell speech and say that it was perspicacious.
00:56:59.000 Tony Blair's 1990s mantra, tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime, similarly channeled public fear into a political weapon, projecting authority through moral urgency.
00:57:08.000 And after the 2011 London riots, David Cameron declared criminality pure and simple, invoking broken Britain and pledging moral renewal.
00:57:17.000 Fear has long been the language through which power asserts itself.
00:57:20.000 The post-9-11 war on terror made this global, with governments deploying internal threats to justify surveillance, policing and the erosion of civil liberties.
00:57:28.000 What began as a fight against terrorism often ended as a lesson in control.
00:57:33.000 Today the conversation about violence and migration risks following that same path, there are indeed horrific crimes involving migrants and ignoring them would be dishonest, but treating individual atrocities as evidence of a national pan may transform legitimate concern into a moral panic, one that governments, tabloids and demagogues can easily weaponise.
00:57:50.000 Sociologists of the 90s and 2000s documented similar cycles, hysteria over youth hoodie culture, the demonisation of video games and heavy metal after school shootings and the tabloid scapegoat-in that often obscured similar systemic failures.
00:58:05.000 Later revelations from the Hillsborough disaster cover-up to the Jimmy Saville scandal showed how institutions sometimes gaslight the public, breeding the cynicism that endures to this day.
00:58:14.000 When Jimmy Saville died, who we now know has necrophilia and paedophilia among his, let's call them hobbies, he was given the send-off of an emperor or a king.
00:58:22.000 And he was actually friends with a king, King Charles, King of England, right now.
00:58:26.000 Have a look at this.
00:58:27.000 One of the country's best-known broadcasters, Sir Jimmy Saville, has died at the age of 84.
00:58:33.000 With a career that spanned 40 years, he was famous for his show Jim Will Fix It and for being the first and last presenter of Top of the Pops.
00:58:41.000 Sir Jimmy was also well known for his charity work, raising more than £40 million.
00:58:46.000 Well, many tributes have been paid tonight, and Prince Charles said he was saddened by the news.
00:58:51.000 Nick Hyam looks back at his life.
00:58:57.000 Jimmy Saville loved the limelight and crowds loved him.
00:59:00.000 But underneath the flamboyant showman, he was a profound enigma.
00:59:04.000 He'd become a disc jockey, one of the very first, after a stint as a wrestler.
00:59:09.000 He became famous for his catchphrases, dyed hair and eccentric clothes.
00:59:14.000 How's your life as well at home?
00:59:16.000 He was an outrageous self-publicist, but he also put his celebrity to use, raising money for charity.
00:59:22.000 He ran marathons, raised £20 million for the Spinal Injuries Centre at Stoke Manderville, and at Leeds Infirmary, worked regularly as a porter.
00:59:31.000 All my life, I was governed by a fun.
00:59:34.000 Single fella, no expenses.
00:59:38.000 Every day's Christmas Day.
00:59:39.000 Every night's New Year's Eve.
00:59:42.000 It's all fun.
00:59:43.000 It was fun when I started, and it's fun today, and there's nothing wrong with the bit of fun.
00:59:49.000 The danger then is twofold.
00:59:50.000 On one side lies complacency, the refusal to acknowledge that crime, gang violence, and social dislocation are real and worsening in some areas.
00:59:57.000 On the other lies hysteria, the rush that attribute every act of violence to outsiders, feeding an us versus them worldview.
01:00:04.000 Both distort the truth and in between stands a public losing faith not only in the safety in their streets, but in the honesty of their institutions.
01:00:12.000 Each new be vigilant warning from the government feels less like reassurance and more like abdication, as though citizens, not the state, are now responsible for their own protection.
01:00:20.000 In the end, Britain's crisis may be less about crime itself and more about trust.
01:00:24.000 Trust in statistics, trust in leaders, trust in the idea that fear is not being manufactured or manipulated for power.
01:00:31.000 The moral panic may not just be in the headlines, it may be in the hearts of those who feel abandoned and unheard and unsafe.
01:00:38.000 Whether Britain is truly more violent or simply more frightened, the atmosphere of dread has become real enough to shape the nation's psyche.
01:00:45.000 And that perhaps is the most dangerous reality of all.
01:00:48.000 Anything that travels through the lens of media, in particular social media, is subject to a degree of amplification and hysteria.
01:00:55.000 But what cannot be ignored is that there's a democratic crisis in the UK that needs to be addressed.
01:01:00.000 And democratic crises are an expression of several things.
01:01:03.000 One is corruption.
01:01:04.000 Two is a lack of clear principles by which we can govern.
01:01:07.000 The same thing's happening in the United States.
01:01:09.000 It's in a different part of the cycle.
01:01:11.000 It's happening everywhere.
01:01:12.000 And the reason is simple.
01:01:14.000 Technology would now permit a different level of democracy, direct democracy, personal investment and involvement in the way that your community is run from every individual.
01:01:25.000 And assuming that those individuals have a good relationship with God, and that's our job to ensure that they do, then these democracies or new institutions or new systems might prosper.
01:01:34.000 The current institutions and systems are so corrupt, they will always lead to more violence, more corruption, and an inability to openly and transparently to discuss the root causes of those problems because the roots of those problems are not problems to the people in power.
01:01:49.000 They are of enormous benefit.
01:01:51.000 But that's just why I think.
01:01:52.000 Let me know what you think in the comments and chat.
01:01:56.000 Right.
01:01:57.000 Well, that's the end of today's show.
01:01:59.000 I hope you've enjoyed us.
01:02:00.000 We will be back next time.
01:02:01.000 Not with more of the same, but with more of the different.