Stay Free - Russel Brand - March 15, 2024


Trump Was LIED To About The Covid Vaccine!” Charlie Kirk on Trump, Vaccines, RFK and War #326


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 17 minutes

Words per Minute

180.78558

Word Count

14,038

Sentence Count

739

Misogynist Sentences

6

Hate Speech Sentences

15


Summary

Charlie Kirk is a New York Times best-selling author, founder and CEO of Turning Point USA and Turning Point Action, and author of the new book, Right Wing Revolution. He's also the host of the Charlie Kirk Podcast and co-host of the national radio show, The Charlie Kirk Show. In this episode, Russell talks to Charlie about why he believes in Donald Trump and why he thinks it's a good idea to have a conversation with someone who does. He also talks about why the right is finding common ground with the anti-establishment left and why they should be working together to create a radical alternative to the status quo. And, of course, there's a whole lot more to it than that! Stay tuned next week for our conversation with Neil Oliver, where we talk about martial law in New York City and why you should be worried about the possibility of martial law being introduced in the United States. Stay tuned for our next episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand! Stay woke! Subscribe to Stay Free! and send in your real estate listings so that we can make this thing physical! Send in your listings so we can talk about how to make this podcast a reality! Thanks to our sponsor, Awaken Wonder! and stay tuned for a chance to win a FREE place on the next batch of tickets to our upcoming show, Stay Free With Russell Brand: Stay Free, Red-Pilled! Stay tuned! -RUMBLEWired. -The Best of the Best Podcasts of the Week, featuring Russell Brand and the crew at Awakened Wonder Podcasts! Stay free, RedPodcasts, Red Pilled, Redeeped, and more! -Rumble! . . . - . - Stay free! , , stay tuned, stay woke, stay free, redpilled, and stay woke! . , right wing revolution, stay tuned! . . , stay woke? : stay free! , stay free. , and keep up with us on social media? , we re not just yet? - stay tuned in to the real estate listing, and more? . , , let us know what you ve got it? ... ...and more coming soon, , can t wait to see the future, right wing revolutions? ? & so much more! & more! , .


Transcript

00:00:00.000 unless they could not understand that I'm a veteran and I could never be a veteran
00:00:05.000 on this earth, I'm a soldier I brought a war deal
00:00:09.000 so I'm looking for the CEO In this video, you're going to see the future.
00:00:18.000 Hello there you awakening wonders.
00:00:28.000 Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:00:30.000 We've got an extraordinary show for you.
00:00:32.000 The first 15 minutes will be broadly available.
00:00:35.000 You might be watching it somewhere else.
00:00:36.000 You're like a peeping Tom, peering over a fence at somebody else's private business.
00:00:42.000 Because after the first 15, we will be exclusively available in that sweet stream that we know as Rumble.
00:00:47.000 Why?
00:00:48.000 Because free speech is our ethos and our edict.
00:00:51.000 And if you're speaking to Charlie Kirk, You gotta speak freely because I'm asking him why does he believe in Trump?
00:00:57.000 Have the right taken Trump to task when it comes to subjects like vaccines, Christianity and indeed what Trump's second term would look like as well as faith and Christianity.
00:01:09.000 Remember 25% off this little item this week you can get all manner of extraordinary merchandise while also learning a little bit more About what the hell is going on in New York City?
00:01:23.000 Armed military are on the streets or more specifically the subways and that's exactly what's going on right now.
00:01:29.000 We'll be talking about that a little later in our item.
00:01:34.000 Is New York City being used to pilot martial law?
00:01:39.000 If you are not yet a member of our Awaken Wonder community, you should consider it because this week there is an additional video on Kate Middleton, not to mention our Great Displacement or Replacement Theory.
00:01:50.000 I'd never know what to call that damn theory.
00:01:52.000 As well as being able to join us next week for our conversation on With Neil Oliver and send in your real estate listings!
00:01:59.000 Send in your real estate listings so that we can talk about how to make this thing physical.
00:02:04.000 Okay, time now for us to talk to Charlie Kirk.
00:02:06.000 He's the host, of course, of the Charlie Kirk podcast and national radio show, founder and CEO of Turning Point USA and Turning Point Action.
00:02:13.000 He's a New York Times best-selling author and he's just announced his new book, Right wing revolution.
00:02:20.000 So what happens when a right wing revolutionary talks to someone who believes that radical transitions beyond terminologies are required?
00:02:29.000 Let's have a look right now.
00:02:32.000 Hello, Charlie.
00:02:33.000 Thank you so much for joining us today.
00:02:34.000 Honored to be here, Russell.
00:02:37.000 Thank you.
00:02:38.000 This is yet another one of those unthinkable conversations that once would have easily occurred within legacy media spaces, but now it's left to us in independent media, people who it would have been assumed that five or ten years ago are living in entirely different cultural spaces and political spaces, now finding more and more common ground, I suppose generally, with our opposition to the establishment.
00:03:01.000 Do you think that's a fair assessment, Charlie?
00:03:02.000 And if so, what do you think's happened?
00:03:06.000 Yeah, I think there's a realignment.
00:03:08.000 I think there's a spiritual realignment, a philosophical one, a political one, and we see it where the people that love the truth are starting to become friends and build partnerships and do things together and go on each other's shows and say things that are similar.
00:03:22.000 And we might have different politics, we might have different approaches on certain issues,
00:03:25.000 but there is this idea that you're either part of the regime
00:03:28.000 which is this kind of Western government collusion that's gonna keep the failed project of neoliberalism
00:03:34.000 going through brute force.
00:03:37.000 And then there's just kind of this group, I think the majority of people that are seeking the truth,
00:03:44.000 that love the truth, you could call it seeking enlightenment,
00:03:47.000 I don't love that term, but we want to try to get answers
00:03:53.000 and a restoration of the form and the structure of government that we once enjoyed.
00:03:58.000 We might not have enjoyed it totally in our lifetime, but we know it's possible.
00:04:02.000 And so we want, we want to reset and not the great reset.
00:04:05.000 We want to reset around the promises of kind of Western constitutional order, where the people are the sovereign, where we have the rule of law checks and balances, where our leaders don't just, they're not able to lie with us with total impunity.
00:04:19.000 And so I think it's really exciting.
00:04:20.000 I mean, I'm talking to people that five years ago we would have considered on the other side of the aisle, and we see things far more similarly than we ever have.
00:04:29.000 It's been a fascinating and intriguing odyssey for me, which I know that many of the people that have always existed in, shall we call it, the conservative, libertarian, Christian spaces that I imagine you are more native to, always regard as a kind of Red-pilling.
00:04:29.000 Yeah, it's curious.
00:04:48.000 For me, I'm Russell Brand, red-pilled by this, you know, they say.
00:04:51.000 But I feel that I've always been pretty vehemently anti-establishment.
00:04:55.000 I've always been very pro-individual sovereignty.
00:04:58.000 I've always been anti-corruption.
00:05:00.000 But I suppose culturally, I was, for example, moving through Hollywood, being in movies, participating in the world that is governed by The kind of metropolitan media values, and of course, as you perhaps are aware, I'm a recovering addict, so certainly when it comes to hedonism and the kind of ideas you might associate with that, I've certainly lived in the kind of spaces that are defined by that.
00:05:27.000 Charlie, can we first of all look at a couple of contemporary stories?
00:05:30.000 Like this Boeing, we're talking about John Barnett's self, death by his own hand or whatever you want to call it.
00:05:37.000 It's very convenient for Boeing that a man who consistently testified against their safety from a position of some experience and authority is now unable to testify further.
00:05:47.000 When you see a story like that, what's your assessment of it, Charlie?
00:05:53.000 Well, you can't help but think, is there foul play involved?
00:05:56.000 Again, I don't know.
00:05:57.000 I know none of the details.
00:05:58.000 I know nothing and I don't want to speculate beyond that.
00:06:01.000 But you know, those of us that love the truth and those of us that are kind of combining
00:06:04.000 forces we see a pattern and I believe God made us in a way to recognize pattern and
00:06:09.000 patterns and pattern recognition is important, which is when you see kind of unusual glitches
00:06:15.000 and how things should operate.
00:06:16.000 For example, I mean when you see whistleblowers at the origination of the spread of covid
00:06:21.000 just disappear in mainland China, we're just told about just fine, you know happens all
00:06:25.000 the time that scientists just kind of just disappear or when Epstein quote unquote kill
00:06:28.000 themself in a prison cell all the and again, I don't know anything about this.
00:06:32.000 It could just be that this guy was dealing with mental health issues and the pressure
00:06:36.000 was too much.
00:06:37.000 I know nothing about the details there, but it smells.
00:06:40.000 And by the way, the same thing with Mitch McConnell's sister-in-law that's connected to the Chinese Communist Party shipping company.
00:06:49.000 I don't know if you saw that story in Texas.
00:06:51.000 No.
00:06:53.000 I think something chow where she just, I suppose, got into her Tesla and went backwards into a lake.
00:07:01.000 And suspicious.
00:07:03.000 It's being investigated as a criminal matter in Texas.
00:07:06.000 Again, I don't know if foul play was involved there, but we're starting to see where I think people now have the courage to put one and one, two and two together and say, Are there other clandestine subterranean forces that are
00:07:21.000 trying to remove truth tellers, whistleblowers, or threats to their current power structure?
00:07:28.000 And or do they just want to try to go back to this idea that, you know, dead men are
00:07:33.000 dead men tell no lies or dead men are not able to testify.
00:07:36.000 So I don't know what to make of it, Russell, except for the fact that in the new kind of
00:07:41.000 the new normal, when I see a story like this, I immediately start to suspect foul play more
00:07:47.000 than just the narrative that we're being fed.
00:07:50.000 And that is largely because we have been routinely manipulated by the mainstream apparatus, by the establishment, which is the term that I love that you used.
00:07:59.000 And again, it could be that the normal explanation is the normal explanation, but if anything, if there's any lesson out of the last four years, after 15 days, the soda spread, it's that there's almost always more to the story than what the establishment is telling us.
00:08:13.000 When there are paradoxes embedded even within that story, I wonder what we can learn from then.
00:08:20.000 I understand that you, my guess is that you're sort of a pretty pro-Trump person, and I know in the media space that I operate in, Trump is regarded just generally as a hero.
00:08:33.000 My own political allegiances lie more in the diversification and decentralization of power wherever possible in order that the sovereignty of the individual is regarded as sacred.
00:08:45.000 I mean that literally as well as in a way that is politically useful.
00:08:49.000 And so my support of anyone that claims from within this system that they could make significant change is always, always tentative.
00:08:58.000 But probably I'd be more pro-Bobby Kennedy than Trump.
00:09:01.000 I'd love to know what our audience think.
00:09:02.000 I know that most of our audience are pretty pro-Trump.
00:09:05.000 But when it comes to, like, you've brought up the pandemic and what an incredible journey of learning it afforded all of us.
00:09:11.000 See how Trump maintains a degree of credit for the efficacy of warp speed, while clearly courting the many Americans that now are furious about what happened in the pandemic period, who might loosely be corralled under the term anti-vax.
00:09:27.000 How do you see that contradiction playing out for Trump?
00:09:31.000 Taking credit for the success of the vaccine, courting the support of anti-vaxxers?
00:09:38.000 Yeah, it's a very fair and important question, Russell.
00:09:40.000 So let me just state my opinion.
00:09:42.000 And I was against the lockdowns, the masks very early, never took the MRNA gene altering shot called the vaccine.
00:09:48.000 I think it was a huge mistake.
00:09:50.000 I believe we were lied to by Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna, Johnson and Johnson.
00:09:54.000 And so I see that that's my opinion.
00:09:56.000 I think, you know, the audience would largely agree with me on there.
00:09:59.000 And As far as with President Trump's record, I do want to just
00:10:02.000 make it clear, he never forced the vaccine.
00:10:04.000 He never was going to have any sort of punitive sort of measures. He also very early, his instincts
00:10:10.000 were right. And I wish he would have trusted his instincts more. He was on hydroxychloroquine and
00:10:14.000 how we can't lock down the country. Unfortunately, he was almost enveloped and he was suffocated by
00:10:22.000 the medical bureaucrats around him. And so it was this kind of slow squeeze. It was the boa
00:10:30.000 constrictor of the CDC and FDA here in the States and the NHS would be the equivalent in your
00:10:36.000 country. So the, I don't know, I don't know.
00:10:39.000 As far as how President Trump navigates it, I did an entire podcast episode, Russell, a couple days ago where I cautioned President Trump as a friend and a supporter.
00:10:47.000 He has to be very careful politically taking credit for the vaccine because there are millions of people that are sympathetic towards Trump But the vaccine is a personal issue.
00:10:57.000 They lost their job.
00:10:58.000 They got kicked out of the military.
00:11:00.000 They had a loved one suddenly drop dead.
00:11:02.000 They know people with pericarditis and myocarditis and heart rate abnormalities, or they have other issues associated with the forced vaccination, or even just that they were told a lie.
00:11:15.000 Hey, get one shot, so on and so forth.
00:11:17.000 So my advice for President Trump is to say, hey, my instincts were to go for early treatments, and I was lied to by the pharmaceutical company.
00:11:25.000 I think it is a perfect opportunity. And President Trump is not a stranger to that kind of an
00:11:31.000 argument. Think about it. How many times did he say that the FBI came after me, you know,
00:11:35.000 the intel agencies came after me? It is a continuation of a narrative. And I know you
00:11:40.000 want to get in here. Just last thing I'll say really quick is that if President Trump says
00:11:44.000 that these pharmaceutical companies came into the White House and told me one thing and we saw
00:11:50.000 And as president, I will do a criminal investigation into the big four, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson.
00:11:57.000 I think he could break out of this potential political problem, especially with RFK running, who is nipping at his bud right now in regards to the vaccine issue.
00:12:09.000 I'll tell you what, I'm excited about this conversation that you and I are having already because it's a legitimate conversation where I don't feel like I'm just trying to frame questions in order to establish a position but I am genuinely interested and in that spirit, if Trump I love your suggestion.
00:12:29.000 There should be an investigation into the activities of those companies rather than continually redacted documents and further support and further deals in our country.
00:12:37.000 AstraZeneca have just done a 650 million pound deal with the government to build more factories.
00:12:42.000 You know there's a revolving door between Pfizer and the FDA, Moderna and the FDA and comparable agencies in our country.
00:12:49.000 One question though.
00:12:50.000 If indeed Trump's defense for what happened in that rather unique and difficult period is to be that it was establishment mandarins and bureaucrats that strangled his authority.
00:13:00.000 How can he claim that in a second term he will be able to impose authority in a distinct and different way and Will he, if he were to say that he was going to, would he not risk further accusations that what he was planning to bring to America was a form of dictatorship which is precisely what his detractors on the neoliberal left are continually saying whilst I recognise and consider, just to let you know my position, I consider the biggest threat to our freedom to be the new
00:13:30.000 That is the tyranny that we have to fear.
00:13:38.000 No question about it.
00:13:39.000 But how would Trump do things differently this time without playing into the hands of those who say he's going to slash bureaucracy and all that?
00:13:47.000 Yes, so two things.
00:13:48.000 Number one, you're right.
00:13:49.000 The new authoritarianism, though, looks different than just a czar, a Caesar, or a king.
00:13:54.000 The new authoritarianism is by committee.
00:13:57.000 It's by oligarchy.
00:13:58.000 It is by bureaucracy.
00:14:00.000 It is by the secret society of intelligentsia that sit around and they agree that, you know, the Fauci's, the Burke's, they are largely the faceless, nameless, unidentified power structure within the Leviathan.
00:14:14.000 So when people think of authoritarianism, they just think of Putin when the new authoritarianism rests within the credentialed class, the managerial revolution that we've lived through through the West.
00:14:25.000 I'm happy to explore that, but I just wanted to expound on that.
00:14:28.000 The second part, though, is this is why my recommendation for President Trump is He should say that, hey, as president, I'm going to put RFK in charge of a committee going after vaccine safety and the vaccine adverse event reporting system, which we call VAERS in the States.
00:14:43.000 And personnel is policy.
00:14:44.000 And the best answer I have to that, Russell, is the way that he can try and calm the anxiety and the nerves that some people have towards the kind of Let's just say, deep state machinations of the bureaucracy, the administrative state is another term that I like to use for these group of vultures that run our country, is that I'm going to have specific people that will dedicate their life 24-7 to try to reign in the beast.
00:15:13.000 And so when it comes to the CDC or the FDA, First of all, politically, it'd be a huge winner, and I don't know what RFK would really do with that if President Trump came out and said, hey, I'm going to make RFK in charge of the special committee.
00:15:25.000 For example, by the way, committees are not nothing.
00:15:27.000 We had the Church and Pike committee before.
00:15:27.000 I want you to think about it.
00:15:29.000 There's been like 9-11 commissions.
00:15:32.000 And the 9-11 commission was largely flawed and not exactly great, but it had a lot of attention, a lot of funding.
00:15:38.000 There was a Warren commission with the JFK assassination, which was a joke.
00:15:41.000 But at times, some of these commissions and some of these, you actually learn something, the Church and Pike Committee being the best congressional example.
00:15:48.000 I think we need a retro, a retroactive looking back at the crimes committed during COVID with the same sort of urgency that we would if there was a domestic terror attack.
00:16:00.000 Like, oh wow, you know, how did these hijackers get in the country?
00:16:03.000 You know, Again, that was the spirit that triggered the 9-11
00:16:05.000 Commission. Again, it was a very lackluster report and it was missing a lot of stuff.
00:16:09.000 However, the spirit that launched the investigation was a good one because people wanted
00:16:13.000 answers. Where is that now, Russell? Why don't we get answers from these intel agencies? Why don't
00:16:18.000 we get answers from, did we know that Anthony Fauci was potentially on a take from these pharma
00:16:23.000 companies?
00:16:24.000 So I'm not dodging the question.
00:16:25.000 I'm saying President Trump has a couple challenges facing his second term as politically and then actually from a policy perspective, if he becomes president, the first of which is he has to convince certain voters that the personnel will be different.
00:16:39.000 This is why my advice is name the names, the people that you're going to put in your government that have earned the trust.
00:16:43.000 And secondly, his first month in office.
00:16:47.000 I hope we see a lot of firings and a lot of Lot of turnover in the deep state administrative state.
00:16:55.000 Now, the keen-eyed or eared among you will have noticed that we had to censor a couple of words there.
00:16:59.000 That was only for those of you that are watching it on YouTube, on Rumble.
00:17:03.000 You would have heard Charlie Kirk's words in full.
00:17:05.000 So, take the opportunity and click the link in the description right now and join us for the rest of this conversation on Rumble.
00:17:11.000 And if you're watching very carefully, you'll notice that at an almost indiscernible point in our conversation, bruises appeared on my face when I nipped out of the room, did a little bit of Brazilian jiu-jitsu and came back.
00:17:22.000 Let's get back to our conversation with Charlie Kirk.
00:17:25.000 Great.
00:17:26.000 When you do content, as I'm sure you must, on the degree of propaganda that was practiced upon us during that period around, in particular, the mandated, at your right to query their name, vaccines, for example, the talk show carnivals, the songs, the various attempts to Hit every demographic with an appropriate music artist or actor, the censorship, the inability to openly communicate, the loss of bodily autonomy.
00:17:58.000 When you look back at that content now, it's already eerie.
00:18:01.000 It's already identifiable as a practice that could only have been Successful in a time of hysteria.
00:18:09.000 So it's plain something.
00:18:11.000 There was significant malpractice and your suggestion of a thorough investigation, although like you, I would hope for a better outcome than some of the, for example, the 9-11 committee.
00:18:21.000 It's important.
00:18:22.000 When you look back to the 2016 debates, as we just were, and see Clinton and Trump discussing the Clinton Foundation, and in particular the Clinton's relationship To the nation of Haiti.
00:18:34.000 It's pretty clear that the neoliberal project and its imperialist agenda can easily be exposed as, as you say, authoritarian and corrupt.
00:18:46.000 I feel that if not in political rhetoric and in public discourse We didn't get a clear understanding of what new authoritarianism would look like.
00:18:55.000 We are unable to look beyond military-style dictatorships of the previous century.
00:19:00.000 But in literature, Charlie, if you look at the writing of Kafka, in particular, The Trial, you know, someone must have been telling lies about Joseph K., because one day they came and arrested him, and they didn't tell him what it was for.
00:19:12.000 No one would tell him what he'd done wrong, just that he was under arrest.
00:19:14.000 Or if you look at the writing of Aldous Huxley, the English writer, you can see that what people- Brave New World.
00:19:20.000 Precisely.
00:19:21.000 People are talking about a sort of a pristine and banalized form of authoritarianism, where
00:19:26.000 bureaucracies in order to protect you and induce a kind of slovenly state of happiness,
00:19:32.000 detached from any kind of spiritual imperative, would be the type of authoritarianism that
00:19:39.000 we'd be confronted with.
00:19:40.000 One of the things, though, I would say is like sometimes I wonder, and I say you're
00:19:44.000 a good person to ask this question, if the people that broadly support Trump, which is
00:19:49.000 evidently a large, huge, potentially, it looks likely, an election-winning demographic, are
00:19:55.000 unwilling to hold him to account, perhaps in the area of vaccine, we've looked at already,
00:20:01.000 possibly in some moral and ethical areas, and maybe even some spiritual areas, and significantly
00:20:06.000 perhaps when it comes to economics.
00:20:09.000 After all, is Donald Trump not ultimately a free market capitalist who ultimately wants to empower the interests of an elite class just of a slightly different distinction?
00:20:21.000 Do you really feel that Donald Trump is about the empowerment of blue-collar ordinary Americans Yeah, let me take him one at a time.
00:20:35.000 First of all, I love, I love the Huxley reference and I love it because he, he was able to paint a picture of dystopia that was centered around an entrance into almost a comatose pleasure focused dictatorship.
00:20:49.000 You know, everybody belongs to everybody.
00:20:51.000 There's no such, there's no idea of personal privacy.
00:20:54.000 And everyone takes a drug that makes you feel amazing.
00:20:56.000 It's called Soma in the book Brave New World.
00:20:59.000 And in fact, there are five writers, and you'll appreciate this, I think almost all of them, four out of five were British, that were all contemporaries.
00:21:07.000 Lewis, Churchill, Orwell, Huxley, and Arthur Kessler, who I believe was Hungarian, who all wrote about totalitarianism and dictatorship differently.
00:21:07.000 C.S.
00:21:17.000 And I encourage everyone to read that picture because it's a constellation of five different approaches is. And they were dealing with this question though,
00:21:24.000 Russell, and I will get to the, the, the, the, the Trump aspect. I don't, I don't want to dodge
00:21:29.000 that, which is how does technology and tyranny work together? That was the question that all
00:21:35.000 five were wrestling with, which is a fascinating, fascinating question.
00:21:40.000 Orwell and Huxley flirted with that more than anybody else.
00:21:43.000 I encourage everyone to read, though, Darkness at Noon by Arthur Kessler, which is exactly what Donald Trump is experiencing.
00:21:50.000 It was all about the Moscow show trials.
00:21:52.000 It was about what happens when you forego due process.
00:21:55.000 It's brilliant.
00:21:56.000 They all lived in that late 1940s, 1950s and published some of the most important works that are instructed what we go today.
00:22:02.000 Everyone goes immediately Russell in 1984, but 1984 is just one piece of kind of the Let's say the genre of warning against the new totalitarianism of the 21st century.
00:22:15.000 Okay, so to Trump, to answer your question, yes.
00:22:18.000 Do I agree with everything that President Trump does?
00:22:19.000 Of course not.
00:22:20.000 But it is a fact though, Russell, that when he was president, we experienced a blue-collar boom.
00:22:24.000 That people that work at their hands, the muscular class, people that shower before work and after work, saw the greatest increase in wages and in their income levels.
00:22:33.000 Were there times when he was doing too much for big corporations?
00:22:37.000 Maybe, but I will say I'm more free market than not.
00:22:40.000 We can have that discussion, Russell.
00:22:42.000 I do believe that one of the great fruits of Western society is the ability to trade and to have commerce and entrepreneurship with proper guardrails and, of course, a steadfast commitment to the rule of law equally applied to all people regardless of socioeconomic status.
00:22:57.000 That is a bedrock principle of of what we would call Western civilization,
00:23:01.000 which comes out of course of Blackstone from your country.
00:23:05.000 Again, thank you for all the wonderful things that the United Kingdom has given the world.
00:23:09.000 But the rule of law, due process, common custom, all one of these wonderful things.
00:23:13.000 But look, I will say this, that President Trump, the number one thing, Russell, that he would do
00:23:19.000 to restore the American middle class is his stance on immigration.
00:23:22.000 Neil, the neoliberal project is based on three things, two of which can be easily said as invade the world,
00:23:29.000 Invite the world.
00:23:30.000 Invade the world, invite the world.
00:23:32.000 So President Trump, to his credit, no new wars.
00:23:36.000 He was winding down the Afghanistan conflict.
00:23:39.000 You know, he never would have allowed this Ukraine-Russian thing to go on.
00:23:42.000 He criticized NATO.
00:23:43.000 His instincts were right in that regard.
00:23:45.000 Secondly, he had the border completely under control.
00:23:49.000 He wants to try to put blue-collar, middle-class workers first from an immigration-type policy mindset.
00:23:55.000 So to answer your question is, yes, I do believe that President Trump's policies are critical of this kind of embedded Believe system that is yet to be challenged in the post World War two rules based order, which really is just a permanent soft oligarchy that runs from Brussels to San Francisco.
00:24:15.000 That's effectively what we lived through, right?
00:24:18.000 Where the top 5% do super well, and the rest of the rest of the West has to kind of struggle in barely owning property renting perpetually.
00:24:29.000 I think President Trump In the best case scenario, we'll be able to permanently, philosophically, and politically change the default setting of neoliberalism in the West.
00:24:40.000 And in even a pretty good win, he'll be able to close the border, fix the immigration policies in the West, end the Ukraine war, which would be a moral good for everybody involved, including the United States.
00:24:52.000 And then finally, I think that from his economic policies, he wants to put tariffs on China and wants to protect American jobs manufacturing, which corporations hate and is a boon and is a terrific stimulus for what I call the muscular class, which you do not have a country if you do not have a muscular class.
00:25:11.000 Firstly, I suppose one of the areas where you and I are likely to agree most vehemently is in the support of what you would call the muscular class or commonly referred to as blue-collar Americans and here in our nation commonly referred to as the working class.
00:25:26.000 Ordinary people, working, lower middle and even middle class have to have their values, their culture, their lives, their jobs protected.
00:25:33.000 One area that I reckon we might need to drill into is the automatic and unconscious enshrinement of economics as the apex of our culture and its obvious and evident impact on spiritual values, i.e.
00:25:51.000 You are ceding the ground to rationalist materialism.
00:25:55.000 And I recognize that materialism and rationalism and logistics, when it comes to operations, must be paramount.
00:26:02.000 If you're running a country, if you're organizing society, if you're interested in federalism, if you're interested in decentralizing power, small governments, not large government, small government, but maximum people power, then you have to understand rationalism and materialism.
00:26:16.000 But when we accept the language of economics as the language that we use, then in a sense we're ceding
00:26:23.000 philosophical territory to those that believe that our true values are determined on a
00:26:29.000 material spectrum rather than a spiritual one.
00:26:32.000 I love your points about technology and tyranny and precisely what we're confronted by now is the
00:26:37.000 ability of those two resources to entwine and create a kind of impenetrable helix of power.
00:26:45.000 I suppose that many of our economic ideas on the left and right are concocted in reaction
00:26:52.000 to the advent of industrialism and...
00:26:55.000 And industrialism now, in terms of particularly the location of manufacturers, you've indicated, and indeed it was one of the writers that you listed, George Orwell, that pointed out that England, or Britain's working class, is now in India.
00:27:07.000 And I suppose that this is another idea that we've bequeathed to you, the outsourcing of labour and the impact that that had.
00:27:13.000 In our country, on the textile industry, coal industry, the list goes on.
00:27:13.000 That's correct.
00:27:18.000 I love your point about invade the world, invite the world.
00:27:22.000 And I wonder if you believe, as I do, that if you are to be a nativist, if you are to be about your nation's interests and everyone in that nation, regardless of their race, regardless of their creed, regardless of their religion, even though I'm sure all of us have our preferences when it comes to religion and culture, etc.
00:27:40.000 That at some point, if it is decreed by referendum, then control of borders is something that has to be accepted.
00:27:49.000 But would you say that if invade the world, invite the world is the problem, is the solution stop invading the world, stop inviting the world, and you can't have one without the other?
00:28:03.000 Yes, I think that in the current setting, absolutely.
00:28:06.000 I think that the current life source of the imperial capital, which we call Washington DC, is every nine months they need another country where they're dropping bombs or another regime change type of effort.
00:28:24.000 And President Trump, again, I don't want to make this too much about Trump, but I will say, to his credit, there were no new wars and he resisted interventions in Venezuela, Iran, many other places.
00:28:33.000 And so why is that?
00:28:35.000 I mean, it is a hallmark characteristic of a dying regime to care far more about abstractions abroad than the immediate concerns of your citizens.
00:28:45.000 And then in a way that might be economically beneficial to the American ruling class, or it might be politically useful, not only do they want to go break stuff and really kill hundreds of thousands of people in far off distant lands, but then as a way, I think it makes themselves feel better than they want to bring them back to the country That they're supposed to govern.
00:29:08.000 And that is bad for everyone involved.
00:29:09.000 And I'll just use one example of a lesser reported.
00:29:13.000 In America, we all know the movie Black Hawk Down, maybe you know it or not, is all about the failed evacuation efforts in Mogadishu, Somalia under Bill Clinton.
00:29:24.000 And a helicopter goes down and there was a huge firefight.
00:29:27.000 And so we were involved in Somalia.
00:29:29.000 It wasn't a war, but it was another kind of one of our half wars, right? Similar to like Gaddafi in Libya, we're kind
00:29:35.000 of like half in half out, which I never liked that because like being half
00:29:38.000 pregnant, it's either you go to war or you don't, right? That kind of spectrum has
00:29:42.000 always been puzzling to me. But then we get really involved there and next thing
00:29:46.000 you know we start importing tens of thousands, soon to be hundreds of
00:29:50.000 thousands, of Somalians into our country and they have not assimilated well.
00:29:55.000 And one of the most repulsive members of our government is Ilhan Omar, who never says a nice thing about the United States of America.
00:30:04.000 And she's a radical left wing.
00:30:06.000 I don't even mean that.
00:30:07.000 I don't want to make it too political in that sense.
00:30:09.000 She's just like a revolutionary type where she wants mass immigration, And she is not, in my personal opinion, loyal to the United States.
00:30:17.000 But that's the project, is that you invade, you get involved in certain disputes, and then you invite the people that you might have unsettled or that you have displaced.
00:30:30.000 And not just in that area.
00:30:31.000 We have over 120 countries coming across our southern border right now.
00:30:35.000 In America, we have 15,000 people a day marching into our country.
00:30:39.000 We don't know where they're from, but we have some idea where they're from.
00:30:41.000 We don't know their background.
00:30:42.000 We don't know their connected, who they're connected to. That point on
00:30:46.000 technology and tyranny, Russell, if I may, I want to make one other point, and it's a great,
00:30:49.000 a great anecdote. Churchill talks about the first time he saw the machine gun and what
00:30:56.000 that did to him. And I don't remember, I think it was the Darvishes, I could have this
00:31:01.000 wrong, but it was some sort of an African proxy conflict. And it was the... Yeah, okay,
00:31:08.000 the Boer War, thank you.
00:31:09.000 Thank you.
00:31:10.000 So you know this anecdote, and I don't need to- No, do it, do it!
00:31:15.000 So essentially, there were these incredibly courageous warriors of the indigenous people of the country they were fighting in, and they hyped themselves up, And they went through all of their pre-battle rituals and ceremonies, and they charge into battle, and England or the United Kingdom just turns on the machine gun and mows them down.
00:31:40.000 And Churchill writes in his private diaries that was the first time where valor, courage, heroism meant far less than technology and sophistication.
00:31:50.000 And it bothered him for basically the rest of his life.
00:31:52.000 He wrote about this all the time where he's like, war has completely changed.
00:31:56.000 It's not about how bad you want it.
00:31:58.000 It's not about, you know, are you willing, like the whole Braveheart scene, right?
00:32:02.000 Where, you know, one Scott can take on, you know, 10 soldiers of the English army.
00:32:07.000 No, it's just about, Who has the more sophisticated weaponry?
00:32:11.000 And then he talked about what does that mean then for the state and how that could potentially destroy people's freedoms.
00:32:17.000 And so that's one of my favorite topics to explore because we're really now at the intersection of technology and tyranny, a mass surveillance state.
00:32:26.000 Overly medicating the people.
00:32:29.000 We are the most medicated population in the history of the planet in the West, the most suicidal, the most anxious, the most depressed, the least happy.
00:32:38.000 And I think a lot of these things are connected, which is, have these technologies actually made us better versions of ourselves?
00:32:45.000 Are we flourishing?
00:32:46.000 And I'm more in the direction of no.
00:32:49.000 I actually think these technologies that were supposed to liberate us are actually the handcuffs Yeah, I generally agree with that.
00:32:59.000 If you, like me, feel that there is a necessity for minimal intervention from any authoritative force, whether that's a state force or some kind of corporate power that acts as its proxy, whether directly through the imposition of legislature or just through the sheer scale of its influence, the kind of soft power that
00:33:22.000 can be exerted through the globalist corporations that ultimately I consider to be
00:33:29.000 using the veil of America to conduct their globalist projects.
00:33:34.000 How would you, if you do believe in small government, be able to reduce the impact of,
00:33:40.000 for example, the pharmaceutical industry, mentioning as you just did, the health crisis
00:33:46.000 that they've facilitated, induced.
00:33:48.000 What would you be able to do about Big Food's ability to ensure that people live on diets, essentially giving them heart disease, diabetes, and cancer, without an interventionist state?
00:33:59.000 How do you control the power of major corporations and their negative impact on the American population and the world population?
00:34:08.000 Boy, that's a huge topic.
00:34:09.000 Well, first of all, I think it needs to start with the people and shows like this.
00:34:13.000 We need to talk openly about the benefits of eating clean and rejecting high fructose corn syrup and not eating foods that are highly ultra processed and eating whole foods.
00:34:25.000 I think that we need to continue to talk about that from a bottom-up cultural perspective.
00:34:29.000 But as far as the government, And I say this, in America we have this very bizarre allowance for pharmaceutical companies to advertise.
00:34:37.000 I say this as a small government guy, it should not be allowed.
00:34:41.000 Pharmaceutical companies should not be able to run endless advertisements and be able to buy our news company, media companies.
00:34:47.000 That needs to be ended.
00:34:48.000 And you saw, I'm sure, the video brought to you by Pfizer, brought to you by Pfizer.
00:34:52.000 I mean, they literally purchase airtime on the mainstream networks.
00:34:56.000 And then as far as from a government perspective, I think that we need to, and this is interesting
00:35:01.000 because it's actually a restoration of a small government principle.
00:35:05.000 And I think you'll like this.
00:35:06.000 Ronald Reagan made a massive mistake.
00:35:09.000 Ronald Reagan effectively indemnified the vaccine manufacturers in America
00:35:15.000 that said they were not allowed to be held criminally or civilly liable for the injuries that vaccines do
00:35:23.000 to children or to adults.
00:35:25.000 And so effectively what happened, and that's how it works in the States, and I don't know if it's similar in the United Kingdom, Where, let's say that you get a measles, mumps, and rubella shot and you go into a seizure, which happens more than people ever want to acknowledge.
00:35:39.000 I'm not anti-vax, I'm just saying this is a fact, okay?
00:35:43.000 The way it works is then you fill out a form, it's called the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, and all the claims are funded by the taxpayer.
00:35:52.000 So the vaccine companies never have to touch it.
00:35:55.000 So they have no liability.
00:35:57.000 So I want you to imagine that you're a multi-billion, multi-hundred billion dollar enterprise, and you have no check and balance from the consumer.
00:36:06.000 We wouldn't tolerate this with airlines, with banks, with credit card companies.
00:36:12.000 Again, there's a little bit of moral hazard.
00:36:14.000 We bail out those companies far too often, but Just from a small government perspective, we have created a big government protection racket of the biggest companies that never have to answer for their products potentially harming the consumers.
00:36:31.000 Now, the reason they passed it, Russell, was they, well, we need to increase our vaccination rates and we need to protect these companies.
00:36:37.000 And my answer is, but if the product itself is truly safe and effective, then you shouldn't be afraid of the claims that are coming after you in court.
00:36:45.000 Then fine.
00:36:47.000 Little Johnny's in a wheelchair.
00:36:49.000 Did your vaccine do that or did it not do that?
00:36:53.000 And pay the claim or fight it in court.
00:36:55.000 And so there's this protection racket that nobody wants to touch, which is basically immunity for the four big manufacturers.
00:37:02.000 The two biggest in America are Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson.
00:37:06.000 They basically run the American Pharmaceutical Project.
00:37:10.000 And if right now I went and got a COVID shot, And all of a sudden I drop dead, or if I had, you know, lasting health effects, I cannot see Pfizer in court at this moment.
00:37:21.000 Now, there's a little workarounds that people like Del Bigtree and others are trying to be able to finally get them to be able to held accountable.
00:37:29.000 But so to answer your question, Russ, what would I do?
00:37:31.000 The first thing I would do is I would say, you no longer get special taxpayer funded protection as a pharmaceutical company.
00:37:38.000 Yeah, that's a good move.
00:37:40.000 I agree with you on so many issues.
00:37:43.000 I feel I just want to briefly mention, because I, in I think attempting to try to create conviviality, congeniality and the necessary solidarity that I believe voices from the periphery have to achieve in order to meaningfully challenge the establishment, fail to mention the significant fact that it was Trump that Pushed for prosecution of Julian Assange under the Espionage Act and did not pardon Assange when he left office and it's like these kind of omissions that Trouble me even though it is plain to see for anybody that the establishment whether you mean the leg whether you mean the legacy media the
00:38:27.000 Big Pharma, the military-industrial complex and of course the neoliberalist establishment itself do not want that man in power in the same way that they are terrified and loathe Elon Musk and for me that's how alliances must be formed on that old adage, my enemy's enemy is my friend.
00:38:49.000 No, I was 0 for 3 on my pardon attempts at the end of the administration.
00:38:54.000 I publicly wanted Assange, Snowden, and Ulbricht.
00:38:58.000 Ulbricht was the guy who started Silk Road and they had the book thrown at him.
00:39:01.000 So I'm there with you, with Russell.
00:39:03.000 So I failed when I was trying to get at least clemency or at least a dropping of charges for all three of those.
00:39:11.000 Yeah, so there's so many areas in which we agree, and I'm sure we would be able to find areas where we don't agree, but they would probably come down to a sort of culture and various things that I consider to be personal, certainly not the business of the state, and indeed have to be autonomous, have to be regionalized, have to be community-oriented to work at all.
00:39:30.000 We are, one would imagine, evolved to live in relatively small autonomous communities And centralization is a gift that we might use in order to achieve various goals that are impossible when truly balkanized.
00:39:44.000 But the maximum amount of freedom means opposition to all centralized forces, whether they're corporate or state.
00:39:51.000 But I know you and I, I think, have deeply in common, as well as like, you should just see two books that are on the desk right now.
00:39:58.000 This is Winston Churchill's Thoughts and Adventures.
00:40:01.000 This is C.S.
00:40:02.000 Lewis's the problem of paint by C.S. Lewis.
00:40:05.000 So there are many areas in which we are clearly aligned.
00:40:08.000 And I know that you wanted to talk somewhat about Christianity,
00:40:12.000 and I sometimes wonder when, 10, 20 years ago, when the Republicans were in the ascendancy,
00:40:18.000 when the occupation and war that concerned most people was the Iraq war,
00:40:23.000 When the warmongering leaders had the name Cheney but the first name Dick.
00:40:29.000 When it was a bush in the White House.
00:40:32.000 When it was Halliburton rather than Pfizer.
00:40:35.000 That was their sort of corporate entity that caused consternation.
00:40:40.000 The assumption was that Christianity was leveraged to legitimize American expansionism and now it's a sort of an extraordinary kind of Anti-Christianity that is used to, I don't know, as a kind of spearhead for nihilism, for materialism, for abandonment of all real values.
00:41:03.000 So I just wonder where you think Christianity becomes significant when forming a political opinion and how that relates to fundamental principles like peace, non-interventionism, compassion, love, the simple rules of Christ, love thy neighbor as you love thyself, love God with all thy heart.
00:41:19.000 Pretty basic and profound principles.
00:41:21.000 How do you think that those ideas inform politics?
00:41:26.000 I mean, I think it is the biggest ingredient that informs our politics.
00:41:31.000 And Russell, I watch a fair amount of your stuff.
00:41:32.000 I love your curiosity towards Christianity.
00:41:35.000 I think it's awesome.
00:41:37.000 And I don't want to speak for you out of turn, but I'm a serious Christian and I believe it is the way, the truth, and the life.
00:41:45.000 Happy to talk more about that.
00:41:46.000 But from the political side, look, the two things you mentioned, you know, Jesus Christ, our Lord, said that all the laws of the prophets are upon these two things, which is Leviticus 19 and Deuteronomy 6, 3 through 5, which is love your neighbor as yourself, and then love the Lord your God with all their heart, soul, strength, and mind.
00:42:05.000 And so let's just take Leviticus 19, which, by the way, is an amazing, not very quoted or studied piece of the scriptures.
00:42:13.000 In that very same chapter, by the way, is also that you shall not favor a rich man or a poor man in a court of law.
00:42:20.000 That is right there where we get the idea of Western blind justice.
00:42:24.000 That you don't give the Wall Street banker a break just because he bankrupted our economy in 2008 because he works for Goldman Sachs.
00:42:34.000 That biblical principle we have forgotten in the last decade and a half.
00:42:39.000 We have one set of rules for the oligarchy and another set of rules for the commoner.
00:42:45.000 But look, we're entering this kind of era of new paganism in the West.
00:42:50.000 This idea of atheism or not believing in anything is rubbish.
00:42:56.000 Everybody believes in something.
00:42:58.000 Everybody has gods.
00:42:59.000 Everybody has something they worship or something they prioritize.
00:43:04.000 The new religion basically is some manifestation of pleasure first, The trans agenda, anti-racism, you could call it a hyper-environmental earth-worshipping agenda, and I'm nothing against environmentalism, but when it gets to the point of where the worship of the earth is above humanity, I have some big moral problems with that.
00:43:26.000 And Christianity stands against these false gods.
00:43:30.000 In Genesis 1-11, the order and separation that we have enjoyed in the West were detailed.
00:43:36.000 The separation between man and woman, good and evil, holy and profane, man and nature.
00:43:42.000 And that established order is necessary for human beings to flourish.
00:43:46.000 In my personal opinion, the establishment is doing a very good job of destroying both that order and separation that we're living through.
00:43:55.000 I believe there's a spiritual element to this.
00:43:57.000 I believe it comes from the demonic, where they do not want you to have the distinctions of male and female recognizable anymore, the distinctions of good and evil recognizable anymore, the distinctions of nations anymore.
00:44:12.000 And dare I say, if you do not have distinctions, then you have this very confusing oneness.
00:44:19.000 And distinctions, I think, are what makes life exciting.
00:44:22.000 In fact, isn't that what they're always telling us?
00:44:24.000 Diversity is our strength?
00:44:25.000 They don't believe in that.
00:44:27.000 They do not believe in things that must be separate must be separate, and so in Christianity we believe that all of life points you towards a recognition that you are born a sinner, that you are not perfect, that you're far from perfect from the glory of God, and that God in the incarnation took human flesh, and that we must accept Christ our Lord in that moment you are born new and transform permanently
00:44:55.000 and eventually enter into eternal life. That ethic, that kind of normative Christian theology,
00:45:00.000 is what largely built the West, which I am daily involved in trying to keep the West from
00:45:07.000 committing suicide, and I hope we can have a restoration of those values, those ethics, and those
00:45:13.000 principles, because I believe it is the truth.
00:45:15.000 That's very, there's some things in there which I strongly agree, and I wonder sometimes about how
00:45:21.000 ideas like, you know, render unto God what is God's and unto Caesar what is Caesar's, are utilized to
00:45:27.000 facilitate the kind of aspects of imperialism, Charlie, which are not great.
00:45:33.000 You know, like Western civilization, many of its philosophies, its art, the Renaissance, there are so many things that are incredibly beautiful, certainly in theory, but there is no question that it has led us here.
00:45:47.000 I'm honored to be here Russell, thank you.
00:45:48.000 Because of its inclusion of Christian values, but because it has disavowed them, legitimized them, metastasized and metabolized them in order to create false idols, which were evident in the 1980s, the 1970s, the 1960s, and they're yet more evident now.
00:46:05.000 In fact, I would see us as being on a kind of continuum rather than the last 10 years representing a particular aberration.
00:46:14.000 So that's one thing that I feel You know, we could address if we had time, but I'd love to, I know that you've got a show in a minute mate, your team has told us, and I'd love to just for a moment cover exactly what you feel, what your personal connection to Christ is.
00:46:35.000 Oh, I mean, I'm nothing without Jesus.
00:46:38.000 I'm a sinner.
00:46:38.000 I fall incredibly short of the glory of God.
00:46:41.000 We all do.
00:46:42.000 I gave my life to the Lord in fifth grade, and it's the most important decision I've ever made.
00:46:48.000 Everything I do incorporates Jesus Christ.
00:46:50.000 He is the living God.
00:46:52.000 And I know for some people it might sound goofy or wacky, but what makes Christianity different, and I respect all different views, but Christianity is not like all the religions, as I mentioned.
00:47:02.000 It's the idea of the divine and the Logos becoming flesh.
00:47:07.000 And in John 3, Jesus says you must go through another birth.
00:47:12.000 He's talking to Nicodemus at this time, that you must be born again.
00:47:15.000 So when you accept Christ, the Greek word is metamorphosis, basically, you completely change.
00:47:22.000 And I could tell you, Russell, even if I'm having a bad day, I still have the joy of Christ.
00:47:27.000 Even if I'm having, you know, a difficult time, I'm born new.
00:47:32.000 And, you know, the scriptures tell us that this is the greatest love story ever.
00:47:38.000 Because the only explanation for why the eternal would come down to the temporal, to the broken, to the flawed, and to the dirty, is out of love.
00:47:48.000 And the word love in English is incomplete.
00:47:51.000 The Greeks had many words for love.
00:47:54.000 For example, phileo, brotherly love, eros, romantic love, storge, love between a mother and a child or a father and a child.
00:48:04.000 But the word love for Christ in John 3, 16 is that agape.
00:48:09.000 It is sacrificial love.
00:48:10.000 It is the love of one that would die for you.
00:48:13.000 And so Christ our Lord came down, lived a perfect life, died a brutal death, defeated death on the cross
00:48:21.000 and in the grave to live against that we might have life eternal.
00:48:25.000 And I have a joy that doesn't get muted.
00:48:30.000 That keeps me going.
00:48:31.000 It is my why, and I hope I can bring that light to as many people as possible.
00:48:37.000 And it is the most important component of my existence, and I'm blown away just to be able to say that God loved me enough to send himself, his son, to die for us so that I might live.
00:48:50.000 Let's go out on John 3, starting from 5.
00:48:55.000 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God.
00:49:01.000 That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.
00:49:05.000 Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.
00:49:08.000 The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but cannot tell whence it came.
00:49:14.000 Charlie, that's a great way for us to wrap up our conversation.
00:49:16.000 that is born of the Spirit. Then over the page 16, verse 16, that you cited,
00:49:21.000 for God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever
00:49:24.000 believeth in him should not perish but have everlast in life.
00:49:28.000 Charlie, that's a great way for us to wrap up our conversation.
00:49:32.000 It's good for us to focus on the many areas that we agree and find new ways that we might form new confederacies to
00:49:38.000 oppose this neo- liberal establishment power that tyrannizes us all.
00:49:43.000 Would love to have covered that, some of that demonic stuff you touched upon, but surely we will speak again and me again.
00:49:49.000 Charlie, thank you for your support and thank you for this conversation.
00:49:52.000 God bless you too, man.
00:49:53.000 Thank you.
00:49:55.000 I hope you enjoyed that conversation with Charlie Kirk.
00:49:57.000 Remember, you can pre-order his upcoming book, Right-Wing Revolution, by clicking the link in the description.
00:50:02.000 Remember, this is 25% off.
00:50:04.000 I wish I'd kept it on to cover some of my facial wounds.
00:50:07.000 Time now for here's the news.
00:50:09.000 No, here's the effing news.
00:50:11.000 Alex Jones has warned about the dangers of Democrats testing martial law In New York City, do you think that this is the legitimate deployment of the National Guard in order to ensure the safety of citizens, or is the military being ushered in in order to acclimatize us to new levels of law and order?
00:50:33.000 And before you dismiss that as a conspiracy theory, not that you would of course, you open-minded awakened wonder, yeah?
00:50:39.000 Consider But protest laws are becoming more extreme.
00:50:43.000 In my country, the United Kingdom, the word extremism is being redefined.
00:50:48.000 In Ireland, the word hate is being redefined.
00:50:52.000 There are online safety laws or censorship laws of different varieties being passed across the world in our state of perpetual war.
00:51:00.000 So is it possible that New York City, like Canada appeared to be during the pandemic period, like Australia to a degree appeared to be during the pandemic period, being piloted for a new level of military interventionism against the true enemy of the state, you and me.
00:51:17.000 Here's the news.
00:51:18.000 No, here's the effing news.
00:51:19.000 New York City are deploying the National Guard, effectively militarizing their streets and especially their
00:51:31.000 subways.
00:51:32.000 So is this about citizen safety or is it, as Alex Jones warns, the piloting of martial law?
00:51:41.000 You will be aware now that New York City, that most liberal of metropolises, has militarized its law forces by putting the National Guard on the subway.
00:51:51.000 Now, New York City is no doubt in a time of crisis, evidently and apparently connected to the issue of migration.
00:51:57.000 But is this sudden appearance of military personnel on the New York subways really about protecting the citizenry, or is it more insidious than that?
00:52:06.000 Are we beginning to experience The piloting and grooming of a population to get us ready for militarized streets.
00:52:14.000 For many years now, we've seen anti-protest laws, militarization of the police, police cars that used to be like, Nino, Nino, Skyletrics, Dukes of Hazzard, good old-fashioned fun, have become like tanks now.
00:52:25.000 Why has that happened?
00:52:26.000 When did that become necessary?
00:52:28.000 Is it necessary in your neighborhood?
00:52:30.000 And if rising crime is a problem in your neighborhood, What exactly is causing it?
00:52:36.000 Do you trust the people that have the power behind the barrel of the gun or not?
00:52:41.000 Let's have a look at Alex Jones's perspective.
00:52:43.000 You'll be well aware that Alex Jones's perspective will be around centralised authoritarianism, global conspiracies and piloting, but having just lived through the last five years, It does seem that we have been subject, whether it was some of the events around the pandemic or recent censorship laws across the world, to the piloting of ideas in certain territories in order to normalise them.
00:53:03.000 I'm talking about the freezing of bank balances, closing down of people's social media, using government proxies to censor, dissenting voices, lockdowns, internment camps, arresting people for things they've said on the internet, imprisoning people for things they've said on the internet.
00:53:18.000 And while the time that we're talking about Donald Trump and how bad he is for democracy, is democracy, even under the auspices of actual Democrat rule, becoming more and more authoritarian?
00:53:28.000 Let's start with Alex Jones, then we'll get into what we think is happening together.
00:53:31.000 Tonight, a new approach to keep subway riders safe.
00:53:35.000 Guns!
00:53:36.000 Guns aiming at your face.
00:53:37.000 The new way.
00:53:38.000 The army threatening to kill you if you step out of line.
00:53:41.000 Look how compliant the news always is.
00:53:44.000 Look, don't say that this is terrifying.
00:53:46.000 Don't start saying the military are on the subway now.
00:53:49.000 That's a clear indication that whatever your political perspective, things have gone terribly wrong.
00:53:53.000 Say instead, new way to keep you safe.
00:53:55.000 New way to help you go to sleep at night.
00:53:58.000 A firm punch right in the jaw.
00:54:01.000 Bag checks and beefed up security with members of the National Guard.
00:54:04.000 Beefed up?
00:54:05.000 Like it's nutritious?
00:54:06.000 It's like a bone broth made out of a gun pointed at you by the state.
00:54:10.000 Night night!
00:54:11.000 As CBS 2's Naveen Dhaliwal reports, the plan comes on the same day as another attack on a conductor.
00:54:17.000 So, you know, attacks on conductors.
00:54:19.000 Gotta bring in the army, so... With riders on edge, the governor is putting a plan in place that includes cameras in conductor cabs and more cops on the platforms.
00:54:31.000 At Grand Central Terminal Wednesday evening, bag checks were underway.
00:54:35.000 It seems to me that in order to protect the legitimizing, raising authority, Indeed, there's such a sort of raging debate in your country about guns and gun ownership and gun laws, and all it seems to amount to, really, is not whether or not there are guns, but who's allowed to have them.
00:54:49.000 And we now know that the state doesn't want to discuss their guns.
00:54:52.000 What about the dangers and threats of those guns?
00:54:54.000 What about the many people that are killed in friendly fires, in wars?
00:54:57.000 Perhaps all we're talking about in politics is who has the right to kill.
00:55:00.000 As tackling subway safety is now at the top of the list for city and state officials, these brazen, heinous attacks On our subway system.
00:55:10.000 On our democracy.
00:55:12.000 By me.
00:55:12.000 What?
00:55:12.000 No, sorry, I mean on our subway.
00:55:14.000 By someone who's not me.
00:55:16.000 Have got to be met by.
00:55:18.000 Everyone's got guns now that works for me.
00:55:20.000 You don't work for me?
00:55:21.000 You work for me?
00:55:21.000 No guns.
00:55:22.000 Guns.
00:55:23.000 Simple.
00:55:23.000 Really?
00:55:24.000 Huh?
00:55:24.000 Will not be tolerated.
00:55:26.000 This was a stern message from the governor.
00:55:28.000 It is a stern message.
00:55:29.000 It's a stern, very aggressive message.
00:55:30.000 It's an authoritarian message.
00:55:31.000 It's not stern, it's authoritarian.
00:55:33.000 It will not be tolerated.
00:55:35.000 I don't care about your past.
00:55:36.000 I don't care about your social conditions.
00:55:37.000 I don't care about your mental health.
00:55:38.000 I don't care if there's been a fentanyl crisis.
00:55:40.000 I don't care if America's breaking down.
00:55:41.000 I don't care if you're delirious with doubt and you can't feel God in your heart anymore because you're surrounded by lies and treachery.
00:55:48.000 All I care about is do as you are told or we'll kill you.
00:55:50.000 I mean, what is the message?
00:55:52.000 After several attacks in the transit system in the past week, these attacks prompting the governor to deploy a thousand members of the National Guard.
00:56:00.000 Look, that's the news doing the job of propaganda.
00:56:02.000 These attacks prompting the governor.
00:56:05.000 I don't know.
00:56:05.000 I bet if you had the time to look at the data, you'd go, how many attacks are there each year since 1970 in New York on staff members?
00:56:13.000 And then you'd have to look at a variety of factors.
00:56:15.000 Poverty, inequality of wealth, mental illness, some government support.
00:56:20.000 There's so many vital components.
00:56:22.000 When the solution is always, we're going to take some more power because of this, there's a really nasty cuff going around.
00:56:28.000 In conclusion, we're going to take a lot more power.
00:56:31.000 There's a really nasty Putin going around.
00:56:34.000 So in conclusion, we're going to take a lot more power.
00:56:36.000 There's some really nasty truckers going around.
00:56:38.000 So in conclusion, we're going to take a lot more power.
00:56:41.000 Is the answer always going to be, you're going to take a lot more power?
00:56:44.000 There's a lot of people saying on the internet that we're taking too much power.
00:56:48.000 So we're going to be taking a lot more power and censoring those people.
00:56:51.000 Okay, and the threat is Donald Trump, how?
00:56:55.000 And police to subway systems across New York City.
00:56:58.000 What they're doing, checking bags to make sure explosive or illegal weapons aren't entering our subway system.
00:57:03.000 I think it's rather offensive to all of us as human beings that Eric Adams, being a person of color, will be framed and celebrated here, or that the news
00:57:12.000 reporter is a person of colour. I think both of those things are great. How fantastic. Let's have a
00:57:16.000 diverse and representative, but above all else, fair and equal and truly representative society where
00:57:22.000 you don't centralise authority.
00:57:24.000 I'm getting rather tired of the idea that equality and fairness means highlighting programs of
00:57:30.000 representation in order to mask increasing authoritarianism.
00:57:34.000 I agree with equality and particularly when it comes to matters around gender and sex but above all wealth and power.
00:57:41.000 City officials say each week NYPD bag screening teams will be at 136 stations.
00:57:48.000 That's about a third of the stations in the system.
00:57:51.000 New York City Civil Liberties Union calling it heavy-handed.
00:57:55.000 But heavy-handed really means like Oh no, boss!
00:57:59.000 There's another person was wrote to a bus conductor!
00:58:04.000 Heavy-handed means that you're not even actually in control of the weight of your power.
00:58:08.000 And isn't that the perfect description of how globalist, elitist power masquerading as American patriotic power, whether it's in foreign wars or on the most beautiful city in America, some would argue, New York City and the imposition of authority, all in order, as usual, to help people.
00:58:24.000 Like, stop and frisk, ripping a page straight out of a Giuliani playbook.
00:58:29.000 We had to, really, because the pages were stuck together.
00:58:31.000 I'd like to take a note, every time a demon of the liberal elites have their ideas borrowed and utilized by those same liberal elites, Donald Trump is the worst thing that could ever happen.
00:58:41.000 That's why that wall he's building that we mocked him for is still being...
00:58:44.000 That's why those cages that we condemned him for are still there and were in fact actually put there by Barack Obama.
00:58:51.000 Giuliani, that pervert, lunatic, maniac son of a bitch, actually had some pretty good ideas when it came to protecting train conductors, which is now something we care about now that we can have armed military on the street.
00:59:04.000 I didn't used to care about Giuliani when he was just being in Borat, but now his ideas can really be used to control ordinary people.
00:59:11.000 I like that guy!
00:59:12.000 In addition to the bag checks, the governor's plan includes amending state law to ban repeat offenders.
00:59:18.000 Every single one of these bullet points will amount to more power for the state, a greater ability to arrest and control.
00:59:24.000 Installing cameras in each conductor's cabin.
00:59:27.000 Mental health, Adriana, you get the idea.
00:59:30.000 Mental health.
00:59:30.000 You know, we'll put something on Instagram.
00:59:32.000 There'll be a hashtag.
00:59:33.000 Everyone's going to feel a whole lot better.
00:59:34.000 And if they don't...
00:59:36.000 Now, a perspective from the other side of the aisle, to put it mildly, Alex Jones.
00:59:40.000 Alex Jones has been a guest on our show and Alex Jones will be a guest on our show again.
00:59:44.000 As you know, I consider Alex Jones to be a kind of shamanic force in politics.
00:59:48.000 Of course, he occasionally says things that are pretty crazy.
00:59:51.000 Hey, who doesn't?
00:59:53.000 But when it comes to the issue of piloting authoritarian measures and perhaps even martial law, Alex Jones is a voice that's perhaps important.
01:00:00.000 Let's have a look at what he's saying on this subject.
01:00:01.000 When I was cutting my teeth 29 years ago on air, Bill Clinton had just been in office for a year or so and it was confirmed, the military was warning, it was coming out, they were leaking classified documents that now are all basically admitted and have been publicly rolled out against the public to
01:00:25.000 Incrementally bring in martial law.
01:00:28.000 So they went from this being secret under Clinton, and then with Bush, yeah, it's mainly for Al Qaeda, but it's also for domestic groups.
01:00:36.000 And then you're asking, well, what's this really all about?
01:00:39.000 And then you start to realize it's part of a long-term process of just getting the military, the police, the public ready for this.
01:00:47.000 So here's what's happening.
01:00:49.000 We're not going to have UN troops one day, or Russian troops like Red Dawn, and you're in Colorado and all of a sudden parachutes come down and you've got Russian troops shooting at you.
01:00:58.000 It'll be our own troops, but they'll be made up of people that have been tested for decades, going through the training, going along with attacking their own people.
01:01:06.000 And now the troops are being deployed and searching everyone's bags.
01:01:11.000 Like how can you not be affected by that image?
01:01:14.000 That's armed military personnel on the subway being normalized.
01:01:19.000 I am quite sympathetic to this perspective given what I've witnessed and experienced in the last few years and indeed Jones showing he's working out an incremental increase in these
01:01:31.000 tactics and techniques over several administrations isn't that indeed the domestic
01:01:36.000 heart of what globalism means that regardless of who you vote for you've
01:01:40.000 got deep state interests that have an agenda that spans various administrations
01:01:43.000 and those administrations will focus on hot-button cultural topics
01:01:47.000 meanwhile the projects of war and social control will continue and even beyond the
01:01:51.000 physical representation of military presence on the street which is
01:01:55.000 terrifying we know and often discuss how techniques designed to track and
01:01:59.000 control dissidents abroad specifically literally groups like Isis are now
01:02:04.000 deployed once you've seen armed military personnel conducting bag checks on a
01:02:10.000 subway in New York City when there isn't a war happening or anything remotely like
01:02:16.000 it domestically across America then you have to acknowledge that that is
01:02:18.000 something that is significant and quite a lot of power and time and
01:02:21.000 propaganda has to be invested in saying that someone like Alex Jones is hysteric
01:02:25.000 and due to his let's call it his presentational style he does make that
01:02:29.000 kind of analysis in some circles quite credible but let's not forget what we're
01:02:35.000 looking at We're looking at armed troops on the subway in New York.
01:02:39.000 There's not been a terror attack.
01:02:40.000 There's not been a terror attack.
01:02:41.000 We're not in the middle of COVID.
01:02:43.000 It's just being normalized.
01:02:44.000 Without a warrant, all these decades of preparation for martial law, and that's what this is, is here.
01:02:50.000 It's interesting.
01:02:51.000 Bags being searched without a warrant by troops is a pretty significant step to normalise, particularly in a city like New York.
01:02:57.000 Often when I talk about piloting, I mean Australia, internment camps, trucker protests, and the evocation of the Emergencies Act in Canada, the freezing of bank accounts in Canada and Ukraine.
01:03:07.000 New York City, that's a bold move.
01:03:09.000 But I suppose the fact is, is broadly, compliance has become allied to opposition to Trump.
01:03:15.000 That's what it means.
01:03:16.000 Like, if you are opposed to liberal democracy, and liberal democracy now means war in Gaza, it means war against Russia, it means being compliant when it comes to medical suggestions that come from the state, all ideas that in the 60s, when the heroes were people like Malcolm X, Excellent!
01:03:32.000 You wouldn't have thought.
01:03:33.000 One thing you want to be is obedient when Pfizer says jump you say how high and oh I'm not sure I'll be able to because my heart hurts.
01:03:39.000 Now authoritarianism has become somehow allied to liberalism and the idea that military force and military intelligence is turned against a domestic population has become normalized.
01:03:51.000 We know from personal experience now that That agencies, deep state agencies and proxies funded by the state that were used as intelligence assets to oppose terrorists, as they were then called, perhaps understandably, in various Middle Eastern wars and subsequent disputes, are now deployed against domestic populations.
01:04:07.000 That's a fact in your country, in mine, across the world.
01:04:11.000 So, in essence, what we're witnessing is we, the domestic population of these nations, are regarded as the enemy.
01:04:17.000 And that doesn't take brilliant analysis, actually, because just watch the Oscars.
01:04:21.000 You know, Trump, he's in there.
01:04:23.000 That's 50% of the population.
01:04:24.000 That's 50% of the population.
01:04:25.000 And that includes black people, Hispanics, significant numbers of women.
01:04:28.000 It's not just mega.
01:04:30.000 You know, it's not that.
01:04:31.000 It isn't that.
01:04:32.000 And by the way, you're allowed to be that if that's what you are.
01:04:35.000 All of you have the right to be who you are.
01:04:37.000 But they have to create the climate first for martial law and civil emergency to sell us on it.
01:04:43.000 The angrier world that Klaus Schwab talks about.
01:04:46.000 Yeah, it's an important point that the occupying force are there as protectors.
01:04:50.000 And actually, that's not a new idea.
01:04:52.000 The English or British occupation of Northern Ireland begins as we're here to protect, I think, initially, forgive me, Catholics in Northern Ireland.
01:05:01.000 It just became normalised.
01:05:02.000 I know there's a long and complex history between our two separate nations, but often the introduction of the military is portrayed as for safety and security and protection.
01:05:12.000 And I think that probably happens in the sort of Balkan wars, Middle Eastern campaigns, peacekeeping force actually.
01:05:17.000 If that piece of language was introduced when I was a little older and a little better educated, I'd have gone, peacekeeping force?
01:05:25.000 That doesn't seem like the way you get peace.
01:05:27.000 I say the whole world must learn of our peaceful ways by force.
01:05:32.000 This is not a right-wing piece of writing, by the way.
01:05:35.000 In this journalism, Donald Trump is criticised for his attempts to deploy the National Guard during the uprisings that came from George Floyd's murder.
01:05:45.000 So this is not apolitical, this is political, but it's political from the side that you would not have expected.
01:05:51.000 That, for me, increases its validity and is precisely the type of discourse that we must engage in.
01:05:56.000 If you find yourself over the side of that line, you're being controlled.
01:05:59.000 Thank the Lord we can bring you this content because of the support of our sponsors.
01:06:03.000 Support them if you can.
01:06:04.000 Today I want to talk to you about Fielder Greens.
01:06:06.000 It's the healthiest thing I do every day.
01:06:08.000 And I want you on this journey with me, side by side.
01:06:11.000 It's literally one scoop a day.
01:06:12.000 It tastes great.
01:06:13.000 My favorite is the original flavor and it's completely improved my life.
01:06:17.000 This is nutrition the way that nature intended, in a scoop.
01:06:20.000 Here's what I noticed since I started taking Fielder Greens.
01:06:22.000 Way more energy over the course of the day.
01:06:25.000 Sleeping better at night, like a baby.
01:06:27.000 As you know, they're truculent and difficult at nighttime, so I sleep better than one.
01:06:30.000 Healthier hair and skin.
01:06:32.000 It helps with my digestion.
01:06:33.000 My stomach feels better.
01:06:34.000 I feel better overall, and I think healthier and stronger.
01:06:37.000 Fielder Greens is radically different.
01:06:39.000 Each organic fruit and vegetable was medically chosen to support the heart and vital organ health.
01:06:43.000 I trust Fielder Greens to keep me healthy.
01:06:45.000 I promise you're gonna love this product, but if for any reason you don't, they'll give you 100% money back guarantee.
01:06:50.000 Now listen, I've got you 15% off your first order.
01:06:53.000 Plus free rush shipping.
01:06:55.000 Visit BrickHouseRussell.com and use promo code brand.
01:06:58.000 That's promo code brand at BrickHouseRussell.com.
01:07:02.000 They'll know I sent you.
01:07:03.000 Okay, let's get back to the story.
01:07:04.000 The mobilization of 2000 city and state police and National Guard troops in New York City on the pretext of fighting crime in the vast subway system is a demonstration of the reactionary character of the Democratic Party.
01:07:16.000 Last month, New York City's Democratic Mayor Eric Adams announced he would deploy 1,000 New York Police Department cops in the subway system after a law and order campaign by the city's tabloids sensationalizing a handful of violent attacks against subway riders and transit workers, which, knowing what I know now about how the media operates, were possibly written in conjunction with the people that introduced this law.
01:07:38.000 It will be here.
01:07:38.000 We got these stories.
01:07:39.000 We got these stories.
01:07:40.000 We'll give you access to this story.
01:07:41.000 We'll give you this interview.
01:07:42.000 We'll give you this access.
01:07:43.000 We'll give you this tax break.
01:07:44.000 We'll give you this.
01:07:45.000 We now know that that's the relationship between the media and the state.
01:07:48.000 Do you think that the X-Files was the first time deep state were embedded within a media organization?
01:07:53.000 Let me know in the chat.
01:07:54.000 On Wednesday, New York Governor Kathy Hochul, also a Democrat, announced she was redeploying 750 National Guard troops already in New York City, as well as 250 state troopers and police of the Metropolitan Transport Authority.
01:08:07.000 MTA, the state agency that runs the subways to increase the number of uniformed personnel patrolling subway stations and riding trains.
01:08:13.000 I remember when I was a kid, I used to hear people talk about, you know, you want to see more bobbies.
01:08:17.000 That's the word in our country.
01:08:18.000 Bobbies on the street.
01:08:19.000 But the image there is a sort of a member of the police force on a bicycle.
01:08:22.000 And again, this might just be where I am in my own personal evolution.
01:08:25.000 It seems like a rather pleasant idea.
01:08:27.000 A member of the police force.
01:08:28.000 Again, that word, that is Working for the community.
01:08:31.000 But now just think about how it feels to you as a person when you're on the subway and you see people with machine gun.
01:08:37.000 Do you feel?
01:08:38.000 Do you feel inside yourself?
01:08:39.000 That's good.
01:08:40.000 That's good that that's happening.
01:08:41.000 I feel more safe.
01:08:42.000 Now I don't know what else might make you feel unsafe.
01:08:44.000 I don't know who you are or where you're from or how you've been coached and trained.
01:08:47.000 Maybe a group of young people with their hoods up makes you feel bad.
01:08:49.000 Maybe a group of drunk Men in suits makes you feel bad.
01:08:52.000 Maybe people wearing religious attire of some denomination makes you feel bad.
01:08:56.000 But one thing I can say with some certainty is granting further and further authority to a group invested in war and control will not be good for any of us, regardless of our outward accoutrements.
01:09:08.000 The troops are currently operating out of Fort Hamilton in Brooklyn as part of Joint Task Force Empire Shield.
01:09:15.000 I mean, that's not good, is it?
01:09:17.000 Join Tarsus Empire Shield.
01:09:19.000 I mean, they're telling you what they're up to.
01:09:20.000 What are you doing?
01:09:21.000 We're shielding the Empire.
01:09:22.000 And what if I don't agree with the Empire?
01:09:24.000 Well, I mean, I could put it in a number of ways, but how about, well, I don't know.
01:09:29.000 Okay, so that event increased authority, increased spying, increased surveillance, increased war, and we all agreed it was a good thing to do, didn't we?
01:09:44.000 It's over the millions of people who marched against that war against Iraq, which, by the way, happened anyway, of course.
01:09:49.000 We all agreed that it was necessary because we were under threat.
01:09:53.000 So what's happening now?
01:09:54.000 We are under threat, right?
01:09:55.000 From MAGA Trump on one side or immigrants on the other side, so we'd better get the Military on the streets.
01:10:00.000 They regularly patrol in the Grand Central Station, the Port Authority and a few other transportation hubs wearing camouflaged uniforms and equipped with automatic rifles, but not engaging with the population.
01:10:09.000 Now the soldiers will take on the role of supplement in the NYPD, helping with random searches of bags and backpacks and other police activity.
01:10:16.000 They will also move deeper into the subway system and Appearing at more of its 472 stations and riding trains.
01:10:23.000 Like this is not CBGB's, New York Dolls, Ramones, Bowie, Warhol, Blondie, New York City.
01:10:31.000 Let's get on it.
01:10:32.000 Yeah, we're free.
01:10:33.000 If I lived in New York right now, I'd be, I'd be frightened.
01:10:37.000 I've lived in New York before.
01:10:38.000 If I lived in New York and they militarized the underground, I'd think it's time to get out.
01:10:42.000 And we'll be seeing this, I predict, and actually Alex Jones has predicted already, with a good degree more experience and research than we're able to deploy, that we're going to be seeing this more often.
01:10:51.000 And the good thing about it is we'll know, won't we?
01:10:53.000 Because they won't just suddenly do it and say it's to pick up sweet wrappers, although God, you know, maybe they do that in Singapore.
01:10:59.000 They will say it's to protect you.
01:11:01.000 So watch out for that.
01:11:02.000 Now you know what to watch out for.
01:11:04.000 HOKL announced other oppressive measures, including the installation of cameras in every subway car and in the cabs used by drives and conductors.
01:11:11.000 The Democrats in the state legislature will introduce a bill to bar anyone convicted of a crime of violence on the subways from using the transit system for three years, effectively barring them from living and working in the city, where only the wealthy and upper middle class can go about their daily lives without riding the subway.
01:11:26.000 Again, this is like hate law stuff, isn't it?
01:11:28.000 Well, you can't blame us.
01:11:29.000 If someone's committed a violent crime in a subway, then it's sensible to ban them.
01:11:34.000 If you commit a crime against one of our workers, one of our personnel, we have a duty to protect them and we cannot let you ride the subway.
01:11:40.000 Except what if they didn't?
01:11:42.000 And what was the provocation?
01:11:43.000 And under whose authority?
01:11:44.000 And who trusts the judiciary now anyway?
01:11:46.000 And who trusts the military?
01:11:47.000 And who trusts the police force?
01:11:48.000 Even the military.
01:11:49.000 Don't trust the military.
01:11:50.000 They're setting themselves on fire.
01:11:51.000 They're living on the brink of poverty while still serving.
01:11:54.000 There are 40,000 of them homeless right now.
01:11:57.000 If I see someone in a military uniform, I don't know whether I let them check my bag or flip them a buck.
01:12:02.000 The terms hate and terror are being more widely used.
01:12:06.000 To appropriately categorise groups in ways that means that they can be penalised, controlled, criminalised or shut down.
01:12:13.000 You've all seen videos of a mentally ill kid being dragged out by the police for saying something off-key in public.
01:12:19.000 You know, wasn't that long ago?
01:12:20.000 Oh, Tourette's, they've got Tourette's, oh yeah.
01:12:23.000 They're using this authority in whatever way is convenient.
01:12:27.000 A terrorist now and for some time has been someone that the centralised authority has a problem with.
01:12:32.000 An individual or group whose intentions are adversarial to the state.
01:12:36.000 Now the problem is all of our intentions ought be adversarial to the state because the state Facilitates globalist corporatism primarily domestic order in order to continue to facilitate that secondarily and other than actually I don't know putting on things like the Oscar I don't know what the other role is.
01:12:54.000 January 6th protesters are terrorists.
01:12:56.000 Good because I you know that was terrible that was an insurrection.
01:12:59.000 And pro-Palestine protesters are terrorists.
01:13:01.000 Well good because you know those people they're not like us.
01:13:05.000 Oh, so are you not noticing the crucial fact that wherever you might feel, on the political spectrum our culture offers us, you can be regarded as a terrorist if you're a nuisance?
01:13:15.000 Statistics collected in recent years show that the campaign to whip up fears of violence on the subways has no basis in fact... Oh good, right.
01:13:23.000 I mentioned earlier that there'd probably be information available on the amount of attacks that take place.
01:13:27.000 Here's some information.
01:13:28.000 So, get ready.
01:13:29.000 NYPD figures showed a 2.6% decrease in subway crime in 2023 compared to 2022, although there was a jump in January 2024 compared to the same month last year.
01:13:39.000 Probably because they registered statistics differently because they knew they were about to introduce these laws, a cynic might assert, in conjunction with a spate of stories released in high profile and compliant media outlets.
01:13:51.000 Hey, let me know in the chat if you agree.
01:13:52.000 According to a separate analysis by the MTA and the New York Times, oh right, yeah, that vast template of opinion, The New York Times, violent crimes occur array of between one and two per million subway rides.
01:14:03.000 Quick!
01:14:03.000 Get the army down here!
01:14:04.000 Once every million or two subway rides, there could be a crime!
01:14:08.000 Well, are there any areas in culture where there's continual crime?
01:14:11.000 There are.
01:14:11.000 Do you wanna...
01:14:12.000 Just to hold that out, but a few violent incidents, the knifing of a subway driver, the shooting of a passenger in Brooklyn, have been sensationalised by the media and capitalist politicians of both parties.
01:14:22.000 Hochul did not conceal the political motives behind her announcement of the troop redeployment.
01:14:27.000 I'm also going to demonstrate that Democrats fight crime as well, she told MSNBC on Thursday.
01:14:32.000 This narrative that Republicans have said and hijacked the story that we're soft on crime, that we defund the police.
01:14:37.000 No.
01:14:38.000 Not only do we defund the police, we defund and yet still use the military on the subway.
01:14:43.000 There you go.
01:14:44.000 Get down there and search bags.
01:14:45.000 And when you've finished your tour, there's a sleeping bag for you.
01:14:47.000 Go sleep down there.
01:14:49.000 The New York Civil Liberties Union said, Instead, a sweeping surveillance state was being established.
01:14:53.000 One of the key episodes in Trump's preparation of his attempted political coup on January 6, 2021.
01:14:57.000 Do with, remember Aaron Bushnall, just a little while ago scrubbed from the internet.
01:15:01.000 Instead, a sweeping surveillance state was being established.
01:15:04.000 One of the key episodes in Trump's preparation of his attempted political coup on January 6,
01:15:08.000 2021, you can let me know whether or not you agree that that's what that was,
01:15:11.000 was his threat to invoke the Insurrection Act during the summer of 2020 and send the military
01:15:15.000 into major American cities to suppress popular demonstrations against police violence sparked
01:15:19.000 by the murder of George Floyd.
01:15:21.000 Now a Democratic governor is deploying troops in the largest American city on an equally bogus pretext.
01:15:26.000 Doesn't matter whether you are at a Black Lives Matter protest or a pro-Trump MAGA protest.
01:15:31.000 In the end, if you get in their way, you're a terrorist.
01:15:33.000 You have more in common with one another than you have in common with the media or political systems that are attempting continually to divide you.
01:15:41.000 It is impossible for the US ruling elite to carry out this policy democratically.
01:15:44.000 It requires a frontal assault on the democratic rights of the working class and the build-up of the repressive forces over the capitalist state.
01:15:50.000 So by the time that new measures are introduced that are unpopular, whether it's the increase of war or the increase of authoritarianism, the sight of the military on the streets and transport facilities of major metropolises will be normal and accepted.
01:16:05.000 Look at the people already just breezing past armed guards on a subway as if it ain't no thing.
01:16:11.000 Perhaps thinking to themselves, this will protect me from immigrants.
01:16:14.000 Perhaps thinking to themselves, this will protect me from BLM protesters.
01:16:17.000 Perhaps thinking to themselves, this will protect me from January 6th insurrectionists.
01:16:21.000 Whatever they need to put in your mind to make you more compliant, they're willing to put there.
01:16:26.000 That's why we are very determined, most determined, to put into your heart a spirit of real individual sovereignty and collective representation so that we may oppose this Thanks very much for joining us today.
01:16:48.000 Join us next week for another spate of fantastic shows.
01:16:51.000 If you want to become an AwakendWonder and get different, distinct and exclusive content like our video on Kate Middleton or our video on Replacement Theory and next week I'm doing Chemtrails.
01:17:01.000 I'm really being led by you guys.
01:17:03.000 Then press the red button and become an Awakened Wonder.
01:17:05.000 We do additional readings as well as looking for real-life spaces where we might live together.
01:17:10.000 You get to join us.
01:17:11.000 You also get to join us when we do live interviews and even pose your own questions.
01:17:16.000 I'd like to welcome our new members like Mola2, Leech1311, Wheezy Wonders, U812 and more.
01:17:22.000 That's just one person's name by the way, and Cinzi.
01:17:25.000 Join us next week, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
01:17:27.000 Until then, if you can, stay free.
01:17:30.000 Switch on.
01:17:30.000 Switch off.
01:17:31.000 Many switches.
01:17:32.000 Switch on.
01:17:33.000 Switch off.
01:17:33.000 Many switches.
01:17:34.000 Switch on.
01:17:35.000 Switch off.
01:17:37.000 Many switches.
01:17:38.000 Switch on.