Stay Free - Russel Brand - Trump’s BOMBSHELL Colorado Ruling - Are We Heading To Civil War?! - Stay Free #271

00:00:00.000 I'm going to go ahead and do that.

00:02:26.000 In this video, you're going to see the future.

00:02:37.000 We're getting some breaking news.

00:02:39.000 We've got a live shot there.

00:02:45.000 Hello there you awakening wonders, you glorious children of the light and the Lord, you fire walkers, you insurrectionists.

00:02:52.000 Don't you do no insurrection now!

00:02:54.000 You could be doing an insurrection at any moment.

00:02:58.000 We are of course talking about the historic ruling in Colorado that prevents Donald Trump from running for president.

00:03:07.000 It'll be Better if it was a little less meandering and I would say they were less sophistry.

00:03:14.000 What I mean by that is, you know how it works?

00:03:16.000 It's like they're saying, right, January the 6th was an insurrection.

00:03:21.000 Wait a minute, I've got some questions.

00:03:22.000 Donald Trump caused that insurrection.

00:03:24.000 Wait a minute, I've got some questions.

00:03:26.000 And he's been convicted of insurrection.

00:03:29.000 Wait a minute, I've got some questions.

00:03:31.000 And he's and this even the law actually in Colorado that's being utilized doesn't Actually extend to presidency.

00:03:39.000 The presidencies.

00:03:40.000 We'll be unpacking it in more detail over the course of the show.

00:03:44.000 But, wow, in a world that requires insurrections, maybe insurrectionism oughtn't be a crime.

00:03:48.000 We've got a lot more to talk to you about.

00:03:50.000 It's clear now that this event has created fissures and fractures that reveal to you the true nature of American cultural life and maybe global political and cultural life.

00:04:00.000 That we're no longer talking about Republicans versus Democrats.

00:04:03.000 We're talking about authoritarianism versus the periphery.

00:04:06.000 We're talking the center against decentralized but unified opposition.

00:04:12.000 For example, RFK has come straight out and said, have we got that tweet?

00:04:17.000 Let's have a look at RFK's tweet.

00:04:18.000 RFK came straight out and said that all Americans, and maybe did he say all the world should be concerned?

00:04:23.000 Yes, every American should be troubled by the Colorado Supreme Court's decision

00:04:27.000 to remove President Trump from the ballot.

00:04:31.000 Also, Vivek's been pretty outspoken about it.

00:04:34.000 You like the jacket?

00:04:35.000 Wake up for 83 says cool jacket.

00:04:37.000 I'm talking to our friends in the.

00:04:39.000 Hello, all of you.

00:04:42.000 Those of you that are watching us on YouTube, we love you, you Awakened Wonders.

00:04:45.000 You are vital to us.

00:04:47.000 You are vital to this movement.

00:04:48.000 We need you.

00:04:49.000 We need every single one of you.

00:04:51.000 But as you know, the WHO provides Community guidelines on that platform.

00:04:55.000 As you know, the British government demanded that YouTube demonetize and censor our content some time ago.

00:05:02.000 So, if possible, if it's within your means, we'd love you to join us over on Rumble.

00:05:07.000 There's a link in the description.

00:05:08.000 We're gonna be there.

00:05:10.000 For about 15 minutes, you're going to see us talking about some important stuff.

00:05:13.000 That's right.

00:05:14.000 We're all soldiers for the Lord now.

00:05:16.000 We're all insurrectionists now.

00:05:18.000 We're all rising up together now.

00:05:21.000 So if you're watching us on YouTube, we'll be there for a minute.

00:05:24.000 And in the Awakened Wonder chat, Ignates Miles says, has Russell taken over a small Latin American country?

00:05:32.000 It's so small.

00:05:33.000 It's a sub molecular nation full of Latin Americans. 1.00

00:05:38.000 And I am its commandant.

00:05:40.000 So, let's have a look at some of this stuff around Trump and Colorado, as well as, later on, talking about the world versus Elon Musk.

00:05:49.000 Again, another story that shows you that the true dynamic, the dynamic that matters now, you awakened wonders, is establishment versus the periphery.

00:05:58.000 Now, I'm not claiming that Elon Musk, as one of the world's richest people, is a sort of a renegade, but when it comes to free speech absolutism, when it comes to challenging establishment power, Yeah, he's on the right side, you'd have to say, wouldn't you?

00:06:10.000 You'd have to say.

00:06:12.000 What we have now is a dynamic where the authoritarian establishment will use any means, any language required to shut down dissent.

00:06:21.000 We showed you yesterday Barack Obama saying that you can't... Why is there a lightning bolt?

00:06:27.000 That's the lightning bolt of the Lord!

00:06:28.000 That's the sweet lightning of the truth raining down upon us, providing us the energy that we require, guys.

00:06:34.000 Like how Barack Obama said that independent media must be censored because it muddies the waters, that people are losing trust in in the establishment.

00:06:44.000 But of course we know there are complex reasons for people losing trust in the establishment.

00:06:48.000 Is this a still that we've got here?

00:06:50.000 Let's have a look.

00:06:51.000 Good evening everyone, welcome to the readout.

00:06:55.000 Sorry about that, guys.

00:06:56.000 We've got the Legacy Media reporting on the Trump-Colorado matter.

00:07:00.000 Can you bring the audio up in the studio for me a little bit, guys?

00:07:03.000 I'm going to play that in again.

00:07:04.000 Thanks.

00:07:05.000 Good evening, everyone.

00:07:06.000 Welcome to The Readout.

00:07:07.000 And we begin tonight with major breaking news.

00:07:10.000 A bombshell ruling from the Colorado Supreme Court in just the last hour states that Donald Trump is disqualified from holding the office of president.

00:07:21.000 And from appearing on the Republican primary ballot in that state.

00:07:24.000 In a more than 200-page ruling, the court found that Trump is ineligible for the White House under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the U.S.

00:07:33.000 Constitution.

00:07:34.000 The court found that the district court was correct in its early ruling calling the January 6th attack on the Capitol an insurrection, and that Trump, quote, engaged in that insurrection through his personal actions.

00:07:48.000 This, frankly, A lot of people saying there are DDOS attacks going on on Rumble right now, that the stream is freezing, but we're going to keep transmitting.

00:07:57.000 We're going to keep streaming.

00:07:58.000 If you're watching us on YouTube, we'll be there for another 10 minutes.

00:08:01.000 You might want to consider becoming an Awakened Wonder.

00:08:03.000 Join in the chat over there with the likes of Sensitive Hearts and Blessed Old Bird and Mama Brew.

00:08:08.000 Or you might want to be, you might want to revel in the freedom of the Rumble chat.

00:08:14.000 There's some incredible conversation going on right now.

00:08:19.000 One of the things we want to draw your attention to with regard to the Trump-Colorado matter

00:08:25.000 is Jonathan Turley, the legal scholar, who slams this decision saying,

00:08:31.000 this court just handed partisans on both sides the ultimate tool to try to shortcut elections

00:08:36.000 and it's very, very dangerous. I mean, this country is a powder keg

00:08:40.000 and this court is just throwing matches at us.

00:08:42.000 Turley's a professor of law.

00:08:44.000 He added that he believes the ruling endangers American democracy.

00:08:47.000 January 6th, he said, was many things.

00:08:49.000 Most of it not good.

00:08:51.000 He said it, but in my view, he said it was not an insurrection.

00:08:54.000 It was a riot.

00:08:55.000 So what was January the 6th?

00:08:57.000 Let me know in the chat.

00:08:59.000 Was it an insurrection or was it a riot?

00:09:01.000 If you think it was an insurrection, put I. If you think it was a riot, put R. If you think it was a protest, put P. Let me know, guys, if you think that that has been accurately assessed.

00:09:12.000 Of course, Trump has addressed this ruling himself, and it's going to be one of your favourite Trumps, I think, because it's Christmas Trump.

00:09:20.000 Let's have a look at Christmas Trump and have a look at the... There are literally Trump baubles on the Christmas tree.

00:09:26.000 It's no wonder crooked Joe Biden and the far-left lunatics are desperate to stop us by any means necessary. 0.94

00:09:31.000 They are willing to violate the U.S. 0.95

00:09:34.000 Constitution at levels never seen before in order to win this election.

00:09:38.000 Joe Biden is a threat to democracy.

00:09:41.000 It's a threat.

00:09:43.000 I wonder where this is going to lead the United States of America.

00:09:45.000 We've already spelt out that the division is no longer Republican-Democrat.

00:09:48.000 That's why you've got support from RFK.

00:09:50.000 You've got support from Vivec.

00:09:52.000 But you know that Nikki Haley... Yeah, protest. 0.99

00:09:55.000 Just protest.

00:09:55.000 All of you.

00:09:56.000 PPPPP.

00:09:57.000 It's streams of PP in the chat.

00:09:59.000 Just streams of PP.

00:10:00.000 Nikki Haley, you can bet that she'll be happy about this decision, right?

00:10:04.000 The establishment centre, the legacy media.

00:10:06.000 They'll be happy about this decision.

00:10:08.000 But listen to this.

00:10:11.000 The 14th amendment that's been used to legitimise this decision doesn't actually define an insurrection or spell out what it means to engage in an insurrection.

00:10:20.000 So again, this is another of those stories where the language isn't clear.

00:10:24.000 Remember when we were talking about hate speech?

00:10:26.000 The other day in Ireland and the new laws that enable the Garda, the police there, to raid Irish folks' homes, take their computers.

00:10:34.000 If they're suspected of hate speech it doesn't define what hate speech is.

00:10:39.000 Presumably to grant legitimacy to a wide range of decisions.

00:10:44.000 Presumably to weaponise that piece of legislation Against whatever section of the population they want to criminalise that day.

00:10:54.000 And this tendency to criminalise ordinary citizens, to criminalise the public, to criminalise language, to criminalise protest, to criminalise freedom, to criminalise free thought, is one of the techniques that the establishment is continually engaging as they unleash warfare Lawfare on all of their opponents.

00:11:14.000 If they can't get you in war, they'll get you with the law.

00:11:17.000 Going into this story in a little more detail, Section 3 of the 14th Amendment says, oath-breaking insurrectionists can't serve as senators, representatives, or presidential electors, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States or under any state, but it doesn't mention the presidency.

00:11:35.000 In a sense, it seems like this is weaponization of legislation.

00:11:39.000 Do you think that is this the law or is this weaponization of the law?

00:11:45.000 Put a W for weaponization and if you think this is legitimate legality, let us know.

00:11:51.000 Or is it a shimmering distraction like a Trump bauble on a Trump Christmas tree?

00:12:01.000 They're weaponising law enforcement for high-level election interference because we're beating them so badly in the polls.

00:12:08.000 Hmm, interesting stuff.

00:12:10.000 Now, predictably, Rachel Maddow and the Legacy Media have a very particular position on this, but what I would like to draw your attention to is how...

00:12:18.000 Is the United States of America ever going to be unified again?

00:12:22.000 Doesn't it seem increasingly likely that we're moving to a place of dissolution?

00:12:28.000 A place of even civil war?

00:12:31.000 Is that kind of incendiary rhetoric?

00:12:33.000 Is that unnecessary?

00:12:34.000 Are we going too far?

00:12:35.000 How can you ever have an election in your country again?

00:12:39.000 Where post the election the other side isn't saying the election was stolen or there was Russian hacking or whatever it is.

00:12:45.000 It's extraordinary isn't it?

00:12:47.000 There's a seriously pronounced sense of division.

00:12:50.000 No longer I would argue left and right but authoritarianism versus peripheral dissenting anti-establishment voices.

00:12:57.000 Here is the message of the establishment who got nearly 16,000 of you Watching us on Rumble right now.

00:13:04.000 We've got to hit that 30,000 if we're ever going to get the Brand Gino, Dan Bongino, Russell Brand mashup that we are working so hard to create.

00:13:13.000 That's going to be happening in January, but we've got... I don't want to be coming to Dan Bongino with like, oh Dan, we've got 150 people tuning in.

00:13:23.000 That's why I'm wearing this jacket, to give yourself some legitimacy.

00:13:26.000 Let's have a look at Rachel Maddow. 0.98

00:13:28.000 And yeah, let me know what you think about this.

00:13:30.000 This is not a crazy thing for a democracy to do.

00:13:34.000 This is something that was a hallmark of post-war Germany after World War II.

00:13:38.000 This is something that happened at Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil quite recently.

00:13:41.000 This is something that our own Congress did in 1868, after our own civil war, specifically to preclude anybody from holding office in this country who had engaged in insurrection against this country.

00:13:53.000 And so it's not unheard of, but it would be an incredible wild card.

00:14:00.000 Precipitous, perspicacious and potentially deadly to suggest that this might be the kind of events that precede civil war.

00:14:10.000 One justice concluded that a candidate shouldn't be disqualified under the 14th amendment if they haven't been convicted of insurrection, which is a federal crime.

00:14:19.000 Trump is facing other felony charges but not insurrection in his federal election subversion case.

00:14:26.000 So okay, so insurrection isn't even one of the charges.

00:14:29.000 So it doesn't define what insurrection is.

00:14:30.000 It doesn't define what engaging is.

00:14:33.000 He's not even charged with insurrection.

00:14:36.000 Now, you know me.

00:14:37.000 I believe in decentralization.

00:14:39.000 I believe in radical institutional change.

00:14:41.000 I believe that we have to end the donor culture.

00:14:43.000 I think we have to end the practice of people in Congress Investing in stocks and shares that they are themselves involved in the regulation of.

00:14:51.000 I think we need radical change, radical decentralisation, federalism, democracy and sovereignty as close to the individual and the community as possible.

00:15:00.000 The ability to control, govern and rule our own lives.

00:15:02.000 It simply isn't natural to have centralised forces, whether they are national, international, let alone global, controlling Your lives, because we've already seen the way that that's heading.

00:15:14.000 In a sense, what we're witnessing now is true resistance to those forces of corporate globalism.

00:15:20.000 Let me know where you guys stand on that.

00:15:22.000 Again, we're seeing the weaponization of the law and the weaponization of language, it seems, in order to prevent an anti-establishment candidate from being able to challenge centralist authoritarian interests.

00:15:34.000 Yes, Vivek has come out in favour, like RFK.

00:15:38.000 These kind of independent media, emergent figures that are vocally anti-establishment are of course, well not necessarily supporting Trump, Vivek is explicitly supporting Trump, but RFK is saying that the decision is appalling.

00:15:53.000 So can you see that there are new Discourse is taking place now that just would have been impossible in the old legacy media model.

00:16:01.000 That stuff would have been shut right down.

00:16:03.000 Sure you guys have seen Vivek.

00:16:05.000 Let me know what kind of vehicle you think Vivek's in.

00:16:07.000 Here's Vivek supporting Trump saying he himself won't go on the ballot and that Ron DeSantis shouldn't be on the ballot and Nikki Haley shouldn't be on the ballot.

00:16:16.000 What kind of vehicle is Vivek in?

00:16:18.000 Vivek's vehicle.

00:16:19.000 They have just tried to bar President Trump from the Colorado ballot using an unconstitutional maneuver that is a bastardization of the 14th Amendment to our U.S.

00:16:28.000 Constitution.

00:16:29.000 This was a provision, Section 3, that was designed to bar Confederate members, people who switched to the Confederacy, from actually being able to serve.

00:16:37.000 That's very different than what's at issue here, to say the least.

00:16:42.000 Greg One Love in the chat says that Whitney Webb, friend of the show, great guest, she's coming on again soon, said that there will be a DDoS attack that will prevent the election taking place.

00:16:55.000 Let's watch out, that's a great prediction if it comes true and we've got it on record now were it to be the case.

00:17:04.000 A lot of people saying it's taking place on an RV.

00:17:13.000 A lot of people saying it might be taking place on a private jet.

00:17:19.000 In a minute you see it sort of wobble.

00:17:20.000 I think it might be an RV.

00:17:22.000 What's interesting is the strategic positioning of various political voices, allies and opponents.

00:17:29.000 RFK coming out on side of anti-establishment.

00:17:32.000 Coming out on the side of anti-authoritarianism, anti-establishmentism.

00:17:36.000 Legacy Media and Rachel Maddow predictably, of course, endorsing this decision and saying that there's a precedent, but we know that they are interested in destabilizing and delegitimizing Trump's campaign.

00:17:48.000 There's an ongoing media campaign to suggest that Trump's candidacy and eventual election would bring about old-school military dictatorship.

00:18:00.000 Whereas what we are advancing is that we are already in a kind of technological dictatorship where people are just removed from ballots for rational reasons.

00:18:12.000 Rationally and mobilizing the constitution, we simply have to remove this person from the ballot.

00:18:18.000 In a sense, If you look at this, as it were, from 30,000 feet, like Vivec, if indeed he is on a jet, I still think RV.

00:18:25.000 If you look at this from 30,000 feet, I suppose if you know what the brand is of that thing that's behind his head, you'd know.

00:18:30.000 So it seems to say, is that Prius?

00:18:32.000 I don't know, there's a T on the end of it.

00:18:34.000 Like, if you look at this from 30,000 feet, do you think that what's happened is, oh my god, there's been an insurrection, we have to get the leader of the insurrection and shut him down?

00:18:46.000 Or is it more like, how do we delegitimize, destabilize, and remove Donald Trump as a candidate?

00:18:54.000 Right, well there's this 14th amendment thing that says that no insurrectionist should be able to take office.

00:18:59.000 It seems, doesn't it, Like, like sophistry is the word that we use, a kind of sophisticated, a sophisticated manipulative argument where the objective is decided and then how do you get to the objective.

00:19:14.000 I know a little bit about this because if you are a dissenting voice, what they generally determine, whether it's Elon Musk or Donald Trump or even me, and I'm certainly not including myself in the same stratosphere as those guys, but if they decide, aha, this is an anti-establishment voice, we've got to find a way to remove this voice, Um, okay, well, Elon Musk, I suppose what we could say is that X is not a legitimate platform.

00:19:38.000 What we could say, like, because if you wait to our deep dive article a little later in this show, you'll love it.

00:19:43.000 The way that the Biden administration is trying to shut Elon Musk down, they are throwing the kitchen sink at that guy.

00:19:48.000 Remember when he arrived at Twitter, as it then was, X now, with a kitchen sink, they're throwing everything at him.

00:19:54.000 Like, they're saying, oh, like, you know, the aerospace division, tax division, labor divisions, everything.

00:19:59.000 They're really, really Utilising bureaucracy to shut down dissent and opposition.

00:20:06.000 And this is what I think dictatorship looks like these days.

00:20:10.000 Although I might be dressed like an old school dictator.

00:20:12.000 And someone in the chat says that this lightning bolt is a sign of Satanism.

00:20:16.000 And let me tell you, I do not worship Satan.

00:20:18.000 I'll tell you that.

00:20:20.000 The type of dictatorship we have to fear now is a kind of technological bureaucratic dictatorship that will use administration and bureaucracy to shut down dissent or dissenting voices.

00:20:31.000 The Elon Musk story we've got later really demonstrates that.

00:20:35.000 You've got the EU with arch-bureaucrats like Thierry Breton saying we're gonna shut down fine and rack it out of town, Elon Musk and his free speech platform and their crew.

00:20:47.000 and the Biden administration. Again, all these people that are advocating for liberty and

00:20:51.000 protecting the vulnerable, shutting down dissent wherever possible, using rational language.

00:20:57.000 Okay, so I think we're pretty convinced that our man Vivek is in a pre-Frost RV. Let's have a look

00:21:04.000 at the end of his statement while I placate my dog. I'm making a pledge today that I will withdraw,

00:21:10.000 I pledge to withdraw from the Colorado GOP primary ballot unless and until Trump's name is restored.

00:21:18.000 for the rest of the year.

00:21:19.000 And I demand that Ron DeSantis and Chris Christie and Nikki Haley do the same thing or else these Republicans are simply complicit in this unconstitutional attack on the way we conduct our constitutional republic.

00:21:33.000 You know what, that's a good move, innit?

00:21:36.000 I suppose with this, with Vivek, Either Trump runs and Vivek is seen as a natural ally, lay down you, lay down, lay down, or Trump doesn't run and Vivek is seen as the natural, what do I want to say, the inheritor of Trump's mantle.

00:21:57.000 What do you think Ron Hassanis and Nikki Haley are going to do?

00:22:01.000 Do you think they will withdraw or do you think they'll stay on the ballot?

00:22:04.000 for withdraw, S for stay on the ballot. Just let me know in the chat, I'm really interested

00:22:08.000 in what you guys think. And also, this is our perspective though. The problem is, is

00:22:15.000 that systemic centralised democracy is in so much trouble because it is occupied by

00:22:22.000 careerist politicians that are out of touch with ordinary people, that don't speak the

00:22:30.000 language that ordinary people speak, that don't understand the interests and concerns

00:22:35.000 or even the spirit of democracy.

00:22:37.000 Of ordinary people.

00:22:38.000 Because of this, we're all open to different types of language, different types of alternatives.

00:22:44.000 Have a listen to Kamala Harris now saying that 2024 is going to be the most election of our lifetime.

00:22:52.000 There's no adjective there.

00:22:55.000 None.

00:22:55.000 Just the most election.

00:22:57.000 The electioneist election?

00:23:00.000 The insurrectioneist election?

00:23:03.000 What does Kamala Harris mean today?

00:23:05.000 You know, every election cycle we talk about this is the most election of our lifetime.

00:23:10.000 Lawrence, this one is.

00:23:11.000 This one is.

00:23:14.000 We are literally talking about.

00:23:17.000 People who are attempting to divide our country in the most crude, frankly, and profound way.

00:23:27.000 We are talking about... A lot of people are saying that both Nikki Haley will stay on the ballot.

00:23:34.000 And this is the point I'm making.

00:23:36.000 Crosses party lines.

00:23:37.000 There are people in the, obviously, in the Democrat establishment party that will say that this is a legitimate means to remove Trump from the ballot.

00:23:45.000 There'll be people within the Republican party that say it's a legitimate method to remove Trump from the ballot.

00:23:51.000 And then there will be people peripherally saying this is an exploitation and manipulation of the Constitution.

00:23:57.000 left and right don't exist anymore.

00:23:57.000 I.e.

00:24:00.000 Republican and Democrat doesn't exist anymore.

00:24:03.000 Of course those words and those categories are still present in the discourse.

00:24:07.000 There are still legacy media outlets and even independent media outlets that are making appeals to a base that are typically affiliated with one of those movements.

00:24:15.000 But in actuality, what is trying to emerge, do you agree with me here, is something that is decentralized.

00:24:22.000 A world where you can accommodate other cultures, other belief systems, other systems of government, as long as you are left alone.

00:24:31.000 Your personal sovereignty, your community's sovereignty, your ability to control your own food, your ability to communicate, your ability to run your own life.

00:24:41.000 What do we care how other people live as long as we're allowed to live how I want to live?

00:24:45.000 It's basically what I'm saying to you.

00:24:47.000 Let's see where Kamala's going now. 1.00

00:24:50.000 How about those?

00:24:51.000 Who are intent and purposeful to attack fundamental freedoms.

00:24:58.000 Be it the freedom to make a decision about your own body.

00:25:00.000 The freedom to love who you love openly and with pride.

00:25:03.000 The freedom to be free from fear of violence and hate.

00:25:09.000 The freedom to just be.

00:25:12.000 The freedom to just be.

00:25:14.000 Okay, it doesn't make a great deal of sense.

00:25:16.000 Extraordinary.

00:25:17.000 What I would say is, is that the Democrat Party created these conditions where politicians had to be orators and entertainers and media savvy and articulate on camera and able to communicate on demand and then populated their leadership with extraordinary figures like Kamala Harris and Joe Biden that are appalling communicators.

00:25:36.000 Check out this lot of language.

00:25:38.000 I've been fortunate and blessed to, during the course of being vice president, have many situations where... This doesn't even make sense.

00:25:45.000 And by the way, when they're talking about freedom, how about the freedom to vote for Donald Trump?

00:25:49.000 How about the freedom to have debates within the Democrat party?

00:25:52.000 How about the freedom to have, in Florida, a primary, a presidential primary?

00:25:58.000 All of these anti-democratic measures are just sort of lost in this extraordinary language.

00:26:03.000 And we're talking of extraordinary language.

00:26:06.000 Czech, It becomes clear to me that there are, you know, people of every age and gender, by the way, who see something about being the first that lets them know they don't need to be limited by other people's limited understanding of who can do what.

00:26:26.000 I don't know what that means anymore.

00:26:29.000 Back to Vivek and where was Vivek?

00:26:31.000 Yes, Provost Motor Coach.

00:26:33.000 There's an image of one there.

00:26:34.000 Can we put that in the stream?

00:26:35.000 There's a sort of an image so people can see.

00:26:38.000 Hans Fischer asking me, is that a revolutionary outfit you're wearing?

00:26:42.000 I've got to tell you, whatever I'm wearing is a revolutionary outfit these days.

00:26:47.000 And I'm in the Lord's army, says Eternally Free.

00:26:50.000 Now, what I am concerned about, and I want to know if you're concerned about this, is does this sense of division and escalate in tension mean that there is a genuine risk of Armed confrontation?

00:27:04.000 Is that realistic?

00:27:05.000 Do you think that's a possibility in your nation?

00:27:08.000 Is America becoming increasingly divided?

00:27:10.000 Can there ever be free and fair elections again?

00:27:13.000 Is it possible that after the next election, the side that is victorious will say, well done, well done winning that election.

00:27:20.000 Now let's govern America for everyone.

00:27:23.000 Or have they exacerbated and amplified the polemicism to such a degree that there's almost no way back?

00:27:31.000 Certainly there's that film out now that posits that, you know, a civil war in America could be a real thing.

00:27:38.000 Let's have a little look at the trailer for that thing. 0.82

00:27:42.000 It's made by the people that made 28 Days Later.

00:27:44.000 Let's check it out.

00:27:46.000 Nineteen states have seceded.

00:27:47.000 The United States Army ramps up activity.

00:27:49.000 The White House issued warnings to the Western forces as well as the Florida Alliance.

00:27:53.000 The three-term president assures the uprising will be dealt with swiftly.

00:27:57.000 Let me know if you want to try anything.

00:27:59.000 I'm just aware there's like a pretty huge civil war going on all across America.

00:28:04.000 We just try to stay.

00:28:05.000 The cyber war is taking place even now. I'm seeing on both the locals chat and in the rumble chat

00:28:11.000 that there's a lot of buffering happening. Stay with us guys. This movie is apparently out in 2024

00:28:16.000 and is a sort of like a supposed dystopic prediction of what may happen.

00:28:20.000 With what we see on the news seems like it's for the best.

00:28:30.000 Citizens of America, the so-called western forces of Texas and California

00:28:36.000 have suffered a very great defeat at the hands of the United States military.

00:28:45.000 Mr. President, do you regret the use of airstrikes against American citizens?

00:28:53.000 They're moving to D.C.

00:28:54.000 today.

00:28:55.000 We need to go down there.

00:28:56.000 They shoot journalists on sight in the capital. 0.68

00:28:59.000 Every instinct in me says this is death.

00:29:04.000 Every time I survived the war zone, I thought I was sending a warning.

00:29:08.000 Pretty.

00:29:08.000 Depressing.

00:29:09.000 Depressing.

00:29:10.000 Pretty.

00:29:10.000 Brutal.

00:29:11.000 Gosh.

00:29:12.000 I hope that's, uh, I hope that's not the direction that we're heading in.

00:29:16.000 This is, yeah, there's some people in the chat asking whether or not, like, you know, what my religious perspective is.

00:29:20.000 What I believe in, let me tell you this, is sovereignty.

00:29:22.000 Individual freedom.

00:29:24.000 Your individual freedom to worship how you want to worship.

00:29:27.000 Your individual freedom to run your community how you want to run your community without intervention from the state and without corporatist globalism, providing parameters on every side, providing restrictions from every direction.

00:29:41.000 I believe in all of our collective freedom to become who we are.

00:29:46.000 Without the assent of corporate globalists providing regulation in all manner of insidious backdoor ways, whether it's the WHO with their new treaty, the WEF, constantly campaigning for measures that ultimately lead to less individual freedom.

00:30:03.000 Yeah, that's what I believe in.

00:30:05.000 And I feel like now more than ever, when what we're facing is a kind of a deep polarisation that we have to be willing to afford other people the ability to live their lives how they want to, In exchange for the same from them.

00:30:19.000 This is what I believe in.

00:30:20.000 Decentralized communities.

00:30:22.000 That's what I'm exploring.

00:30:23.000 That's what I'm interested in.

00:30:24.000 And I don't see how we'll get there without individual personal awakening.

00:30:29.000 People that made that movie did a kind of Civil War map.

00:30:31.000 Shall we have a look at that map?

00:30:33.000 Look at that.

00:30:34.000 That's the way they envisaged the world dividing up.

00:30:36.000 I saw a brilliant book on the history of the United States of America prior to your revolution there.

00:30:42.000 And it showed how sort of like the regions were regarded differently then, like that Appalachia was a region and there were sort of different sets of political alliances.

00:30:50.000 Can't imagine a world where the Republic of California and the Second Republic of Texas team up.

00:30:56.000 There seem to be some ideological fissures there that might be difficult to overcome.

00:31:02.000 Now we've got a brilliant I mean, we've got a conversation now.

00:31:07.000 Oxford University, one of the key academic establishments in our nation, perhaps in the world, they are platforming Albert Baller as he talks about his new moonshot.

00:31:20.000 Albert Baller, of course, the CEO of Pfizer, who you'll remember in the last three years

00:31:24.000 has not faced a single difficult question. You've seen that guy all over legacy media

00:31:30.000 being gushed all over. Oh, is it 98% effective? And as more and more information was revealed,

00:31:37.000 Still, no complex questions came to the forefront.

00:31:41.000 Albert Baller, you can put the timer on actually guys, Albert Baller has been at Oxford University talking about his new moonshot.

00:31:50.000 Now it's extraordinary what he's talking about.

00:31:52.000 And what's also extraordinary is that at Oxford University, one of their universities had statues of Rhodes, who was a colonial figure in the UK.

00:32:01.000 They took down those statues because they didn't want to be affiliated with a colonialist like Cecil Rhodes.

00:32:08.000 But when it comes to Pfizer money, they'll take it.

00:32:11.000 Join us over on Rumble.

00:32:12.000 If you're watching us on YouTube, click the link in the description to see this, as well as the Epstein list.

00:32:17.000 Join us!

00:32:19.000 Okay guys, let's have a little look at this conversation between Albert Baller and someone at Oxford University.

00:32:25.000 You won't believe what they're talking about here as the new moonshot.

00:32:29.000 Lastly, what is Pfizer's next moonshot and how do you expect to get there?

00:32:38.000 First of all, you never know because you may think that you will be successful in one direction and you can fail there and be successful in another. But where we put

00:32:47.000 all our efforts, because again, based on the discussion of effort strategy, we think we

00:32:52.000 have the capabilities to make a difference and there is a huge need from the world to see a difference,

00:33:02.000 is cancer. It's all about oncology.

00:33:05.000 Do you know where we're going to make a lot of money?

00:33:07.000 Cancer!

00:33:11.000 Oh man, couldn't you just tell from the tombra tone of this conversation that when they're talking about cancer and oncology and who among us hasn't been affected by that disease at some point in our lives, whether personally or someone that we love, To hear it spoken of in purely economic terms like that shows you, doesn't it, that that's why there is a requirement for fundamental change.

00:33:35.000 That's why I consider it to be in part spiritual change.

00:33:38.000 That's why I consider it important for us to scrutinise and examine the already existing technocratic, technological dictatorship that uses bureaucracy and administration to ensure centralised power and a total lack of freedom.

00:33:54.000 Because how can it be normal To talk about cancer, a disease that's likely caused by the stressful, near-zoological conditions that we live within.

00:34:04.000 And when I say zoological, I don't mean... I mean that we live in a kind of zoo.

00:34:07.000 How can that be normal?

00:34:09.000 Particularly if you think of, you know, what was the impact of the pandemic on cancer patients?

00:34:09.000 How can it be normal?

00:34:13.000 You know, people couldn't get their radiotherapy, people couldn't attend regular appointments.

00:34:19.000 Extraordinary.

00:34:19.000 Proportionally we are investing capital over there and disproportionately we are organising the whole organisation to make sure that this area is well, well equipped to be successful.

00:34:37.000 Cancer.

00:34:38.000 Less than humans.

00:34:40.000 We're all gonna be rich!

00:34:40.000 Cancer!

00:34:43.000 Sign me up!

00:34:44.000 Extraordinary, really.

00:34:46.000 Now, it's odd for me to see Oxford University, academia, affiliated so closely with Pfizer, and of course, the cultural establishment is aligned with Pfizer, whether it's media... No, go back, go back.

00:34:59.000 Go back to where you were on the teleprompter, please, thanks.

00:35:01.000 To see the media establishment openly funded by Pfizer.

00:35:07.000 Astonishing.

00:35:08.000 Absolutely astonishing to see how various institutions are willing to work together in order to create narratives and a public sphere that's impenetrable and impervious to dissent.

00:35:22.000 Now, we talked to you yesterday about the 170 names on Epstein's list.

00:35:27.000 We're going to get Whitney Webb on this show as soon as we can because there's no one else who's done more work, as far as I can recall or understand, to help us frame the significance of the Epstein story.

00:35:39.000 The legacy media now are reporting on the Epstein names.

00:35:44.000 Is it still or is it a video?

00:35:46.000 Let's have a look at that.

00:35:47.000 And you guys in the chat can do some guesses.

00:35:50.000 Who are we going to see?

00:35:51.000 Who are we going to see on the Epstein names?

00:35:52.000 And how are the legacy media framing this story?

00:35:55.000 Well, in just over 10 days, 10 days, the names of dozens of people associated with disgraced financial tycoon Jeffrey Epstein will be released.

00:36:05.000 A judge ruling on that on Tuesday that many of these names are already public for others named in court documents.

00:36:11.000 The judge says they're not salacious and should not be kept sealed.

00:36:15.000 Our Dre Clark is live in New York City this morning with more on this ruling.

00:36:18.000 Dre.

00:36:20.000 Yeah, good morning.

00:36:21.000 We're here outside the federal courthouse here in Lower Manhattan, and this is where Judge Loretta Preska has ordered that January 1st release date of more than 170 names associated with a civil lawsuit that was settled some time ago here, but many of those names that will be released.

00:36:37.000 A lot of people saying it's gonna be redacted, Ravenite in particular.

00:36:40.000 A lot of you, yeah, are going with the BCs and the BGs, right?

00:36:45.000 What we're interested in, I suppose, is powerful people, right?

00:36:49.000 That's who we're interested in.

00:36:50.000 Like, people with influence and power, because there's, presumably, there's people on that list that had enough power to, I mean, I don't know, unless Jeffrey Epstein put that necktie on himself, Some pretty powerful people were involved in this.

00:37:05.000 We'll pick up on this.

00:37:07.000 Whitney Webb, by the way, she's coming on the show on January the 19th.

00:37:11.000 So get your questions ready for that.

00:37:13.000 We've got some brilliant, brilliant shows coming out over the festival season to ensure that you remain informed and entertained as best as we can manage in constant symbiosis and mutual awakening with you.

00:37:23.000 We'll come back to this Epstein story after we tell you a little more about how Things are shaping up now.

00:37:31.000 Remember, this is one of the narratives that we want to explore with you.

00:37:35.000 We don't believe it's left and right anymore.

00:37:37.000 We don't believe that the global cultures need to be at war with one another.

00:37:42.000 Even the culture war itself, I believe, is part of the problem, part of the way that people are kept divided.

00:37:48.000 Let me demonstrate to you what I mean by that.

00:37:51.000 The EU, they're the governing body of Europe, they are taking legal action against X, Right?

00:37:58.000 And it's gangster, the way they're talking.

00:37:59.000 We will shut you down. 0.94

00:38:00.000 I know it's French. 0.95

00:38:01.000 We will shut you down.

00:38:02.000 This guy that looks like a grandma or Colonel Sanders talking like Alphonse Capone.

00:38:07.000 Remember him?

00:38:08.000 The nice guy, scar on his face.

00:38:11.000 Talking like that.

00:38:12.000 And the Biden administration is using every piece of bureaucratic power it can to shut down Elon Musk.

00:38:17.000 Why is this?

00:38:18.000 Why has Elon Musk suddenly become persona non grata?

00:38:22.000 What has Elon Musk done that has made him fall from favour?

00:38:27.000 A billionaire, an innovator that used to be highly valued because of the power of Starlink, because of the electric vehicles.

00:38:35.000 Now it seems like the Biden administration and the EU, indeed all of the globalists, are turning on Elon Musk.

00:38:42.000 What's it about?

00:38:43.000 Is it about freedom of speech?

00:38:45.000 Is it about dissent?

00:38:46.000 Is it about the possibility of a financially resourceful and powerful individual opposing globalist narratives?

00:38:55.000 Let's have a look at the forces that are against Elon Musk right now, and right after we'll go back to the Epstein story, plus we've got some other stuff.

00:39:05.000 We'll have a look at Vivek doing some push-ups.

00:39:07.000 We'll have a look at some... We've got a whole host of interesting anti-globalist information for you.

00:39:13.000 But for now, let's have a look at the establishment versus Elon Musk.

00:39:16.000 Here's the news... No.

00:39:18.000 Here's the effing news. 1.00

00:39:23.000 Here's the fucking news! 1.00

00:39:25.000 Wait a minute. 0.99

00:39:25.000 The EU is attacking Elon Musk and Joe Biden is attacking Elon Musk and even inviting journalists to start attacking Elon Musk. 0.99

00:39:33.000 So Elon Musk must be really bad, right?

00:39:36.000 Or could there be something else going on?

00:39:40.000 In the public space now, you have confident dissenting voices, and perhaps the most powerful one, you could say Tucker, you could say Joe Rogan, you could say Elon Musk, but certainly Elon Musk is taking his turn in the barrel.

00:39:53.000 The EU are coming for X because of, well I'll get into teary breath on, the gangster assassin of the EU's verdict, oh transparency, illicit material, you probably stuff you could find on Any number of social media sites and yet Musk is being targeted and Biden wants to withdraw subsidies.

00:40:10.000 So is Elon Musk finally facing an attack from the establishment?

00:40:15.000 And when you first hear that, let me know about this in the chat in the comments.

00:40:17.000 Do you think that Elon Musk guy, he must be against my individual freedom?

00:40:21.000 Or do you think, ah, the establishment are clearly trying to destroy this person?

00:40:25.000 Let me know in the comments.

00:40:25.000 Let me know in the chat.

00:40:26.000 Let's get into this story.

00:40:28.000 Elon Musk is taking his turn in the barrel.

00:40:30.000 Whose side are you going to be on?

00:40:31.000 The EU is investigating Elon Musk's ex, formerly known as Twitter, while the bloc's regulator is probing the social media platform for its suspected failure to counter illicit content and disinformation, a lack of advertising transparency, and what it calls a suspected deceptive design of the user interface.

00:40:49.000 We suspect it's deceptive.

00:40:50.000 Now, Thierry Breton is an EU bureaucrat.

00:40:53.000 He may look like a cross between your grandma and Colonel Sanders, but let me tell you, he talks like a gangster.

00:41:00.000 We are coming for Elon Musk.

00:41:01.000 We will shut him down. 1.00

00:41:02.000 We will destroy him. 1.00

00:41:04.000 Simple as that. 0.99

00:41:04.000 They will respect the law or they will not be able to continue to operate in Europe. 0.99

00:41:09.000 The EU's not meant to be like the mafia.

00:41:12.000 They're meant to be just like, we're here to help facilitate stuff and to organize things.

00:41:15.000 That's not how they talk. 1.00

00:41:16.000 Have you noticed that the government talk about you like you're an idiot or a child? 1.00

00:41:20.000 For example, they want to control the information you get access to because you're too stupid to be able to determine truth from fiction yourself. 1.00

00:41:27.000 And notice that they use increasingly aggressive language. 0.98

00:41:30.000 We'll get into this a little further.

00:41:31.000 It's the first move in the EU's landmark Digital Services Act.

00:41:34.000 So what the EU is going to do is they're going to do an investigation.

00:41:38.000 This man may look like a Botox Captain Kirk, but he's giving us the truth.

00:41:43.000 I mean, they're going to find something.

00:41:45.000 You bet they'll find something.

00:41:46.000 Sometimes when people turn against you, they will keep investigating and investigating until they find something, even if it means almost traveling through all of time.

00:41:54.000 That seems pretty, pretty certain.

00:41:57.000 And then the question is, what happens after that?

00:41:59.000 The objective is to shut down dissenting voices.

00:42:01.000 You can't just come out and go, hey, we don't like that dissenting voice.

00:42:04.000 Well, what would legitimize shutting down that dissenting voice?

00:42:07.000 Well, if they did something that we all agree was bad.

00:42:09.000 Yeah, but they haven't done that.

00:42:10.000 Let's start looking.

00:42:12.000 We'll find something.

00:42:13.000 They can fine the company, um, and their, the losses, they can fine it for up to 6% of its annual revenue.

00:42:20.000 Uh, given that X seems to be in pretty bad shape right now, that would be sizable, so...

00:42:26.000 Now, we've seen Elon Musk say, -"F the advertisers." -$&% yourself.

00:42:31.000 He's come out swinging, right?

00:42:33.000 This guy is taking a position and taking a stance.

00:42:35.000 This is a time where you have to look at who your friends are and who your allies are.

00:42:39.000 You can't go, oh, this person seems like they might be too conservative or a bit too right-wing or too social justice.

00:42:44.000 It doesn't matter anymore.

00:42:45.000 There's this powerful establishment that's trying to centralise all control, create a

00:42:48.000 censorship industrial complex so that information can be controlled, so dissenter movements

00:42:52.000 and opposition movements can't get any grassroots growth and can't organise because we've seen

00:42:57.000 it happen and get shut down in the last ten years from the Arab Spring, Podemos, Syriza,

00:43:01.000 even something like Napster shows you that the online space creates dynamics that were

00:43:06.000 impossible a little while ago.

00:43:07.000 Now what we're seeing is a machine gathering momentum to shut that stuff down.

00:43:11.000 I've even told you about how groups like Google are starting to purchase actual real estate

00:43:15.000 and actual space.

00:43:16.000 You're seeing how a tech billionaire like Bill Gates is involved in medicines and agriculture.

00:43:21.000 Do you see what this is?

00:43:22.000 This is the centralisation of resources and the centralisation of resources about the

00:43:26.000 control of power.

00:43:27.000 Now Elon Musk is of course a billionaire himself but he seems to be on a different track, doesn't

00:43:31.000 he?

00:43:32.000 I mean he's saying some pretty unusual stuff, he's housing free speech voices, he's willing

00:43:35.000 to put himself on the line sticking up for people, he came out in defence of me when

00:43:39.000 I was under attack, but that's not what's relevant here.

00:43:41.000 What's relevant here is that the establishment are trying to destroy him.

00:43:45.000 When the establishment try to destroy someone, you have a decision to make.

00:43:48.000 Are the establishment trying to destroy that person because they're trying to protect me, or are they trying to protect themselves from me?

00:43:54.000 This is the Thierry Breton tweet from the EU.

00:43:57.000 Remember, this guy's just a bureaucrat.

00:43:59.000 Today we open formal infringement proceedings against at X. Ooh, you're hard.

00:44:04.000 Ooh, you're hard.

00:44:05.000 Showing off.

00:44:06.000 Suspected breach of obligations to counter illegal content.

00:44:09.000 And they've had to use that little emoji, by the way, to do that.

00:44:11.000 Hashtag disinformation.

00:44:13.000 What are you, 12?

00:44:15.000 Suspected breach of hashtag transparency obligations.

00:44:18.000 Suspected deceptive design of user interface.

00:44:21.000 If you, like, agree with Thierry Breton, what you're essentially saying is, I don't want to decide what's true for myself, I'd like you to decide what's true for me.

00:44:29.000 And I can see why people might choose that.

00:44:31.000 Say if you are of a liberal, or sort of leftist is the word people used to use, persuasion, you might think, oh, at the moment, this machine seems to be in support of my cultural views.

00:44:41.000 But guess what?

00:44:42.000 It won't be one day, it won't be one day, and then it'll be too late.

00:44:45.000 When they came for the communists, when they came for the Jews, when they came for... We remember that, right? 0.98

00:44:50.000 Do we remember that?

00:44:51.000 The best thing is use X and Twitter because it's obviously a threat to them.

00:44:55.000 They wouldn't want to shut it down or go after Elon if it wasn't working.

00:44:58.000 The greatest hope we have in 2024 is we have a sliver of the public square back that we didn't have in 20.

00:45:04.000 And that's why they're going to try to either indict Elon or they're just going to try to crash Twitter through a DDoS attack or some sort of foreign threat.

00:45:10.000 They're going to try to take Twitter down by the summer.

00:45:13.000 You might see that and think, well that's a right-wing group, it's turning point, it's America first, it's sort of libertarian, it's conservative right-wing, you might have all sorts of impressions about that space.

00:45:29.000 But this is what values and principles are.

00:45:31.000 Values and principles are you You believe in an idea and then you don't care really what your personal position is.

00:45:35.000 You just care about the principle.

00:45:36.000 Hold on, do I believe in free speech?

00:45:38.000 Yes, I do.

00:45:39.000 Yes, I do.

00:45:39.000 Oh, but that means people might use free speech against me.

00:45:42.000 I'll make that deal.

00:45:42.000 It's okay.

00:45:43.000 I'll make that deal because free speech has to be enshrined.

00:45:46.000 Now, you're going to find yourself in new situations with new alliances and new perspectives, or you're going to find yourself Utterly controlled by globalist bureaucracies.

00:45:54.000 That's my prediction, but we're going to need new allies.

00:45:57.000 Our great ally is Glenn Greenwald, co-host over on Rumble.

00:46:02.000 Pulitzer Prize winning journalist who broke the Snowden story.

00:46:04.000 Perhaps one of the most important stories in the last 20, 30 years.

00:46:08.000 Probably one of the great changes in journalism.

00:46:11.000 Probably the moment when the left went, Uh oh! 1.00

00:46:13.000 Fuck those guys! 1.00

00:46:14.000 He's been censored on TikTok himself. 1.00

00:46:17.000 So, like us, he got skin in the game.

00:46:19.000 So talking about Breton, he says, this is how his censorship industrial regime works.

00:46:23.000 They seize on every alleged crisis to justify new censorship.

00:46:26.000 Russiagate, COVID, Jan 6, war in Ukraine.

00:46:28.000 We all know that, don't we? We know that now.

00:46:29.000 Ever since October the 7th, they've been accusing X of allowing disinformation about Israel to attract right-wing

00:46:35.000 support.

00:46:35.000 This is how Europe is attacking X and Musk and trying to shut down a free speech space.

00:46:41.000 But how is the United States of America handling it?

00:46:44.000 How the Biden administration attacking Musk?

00:46:46.000 Because then we'll see this is a global conspiracy.

00:46:49.000 Let's get into this story and look at how Biden is attacking Musk.

00:46:52.000 Mr. President, do you think Elon Musk is a threat to U.S.

00:46:55.000 national security?

00:46:56.000 And should the U.S., and with the tools you have, investigate his joint acquisition of Twitter with foreign governments, which include the Saudis?

00:47:05.000 I mean, how can you even ask Joe Biden a question about the Saudis and then not look at his obvious and evident hypocrisy around exactly that subject?

00:47:11.000 The extent to which Saudi Arabia In that question is enough to show you what misinformation really looks like, to show you what corruption really looks like, to show you that they're not actually interested in.

00:47:19.000 You know what?

00:47:19.000 Biden explicitly said on the campaign trial that Trump doing the deals that he did with

00:47:23.000 Saudi Arabia was disgusting, he then did bigger deals with Saudi Arabia.

00:47:27.000 In that question is enough to show you what misinformation really looks like, to show 0.81

00:47:31.000 you what corruption really looks like, to show you that they're not actually interested

00:47:35.000 in.

00:47:36.000 Do you know what, Elon Musk could tell people stuff that would confuse them.

00:47:39.000 We better shut that down.

00:47:40.000 No.

00:47:41.000 might tell people stuff that will awaken them.

00:47:44.000 But do you see now, that's the problem.

00:47:45.000 If someone is being attacked by the establishment, it's not because they're bad, it's because they're a threat.

00:47:50.000 I think that Elon Musk's... 0.99

00:47:55.000 Oh, come on, Harry, I'll get on with it for fuck's sake. 0.99

00:48:01.000 Cooperation and or... 0.99

00:48:04.000 technical relationships.

00:48:10.000 I slightly bore you today. I'll be...

00:48:11.000 I actually can't remember what we're talking about.

00:48:18.000 I'm so bored.

00:48:21.000 Yeah, that's how he won the election, isn't it?

00:48:22.000 This guy's so boring that we'll be able to galvanise against Trump and people won't even know what Joe Biden is. 0.82

00:48:27.000 He's just sort of like a fog or a ghost or a fart in a jar. 0.60

00:48:30.000 No one really knows.

00:48:31.000 You can't fight that.

00:48:36.000 I'm not suggesting that.

00:48:37.000 I'm suggesting that it's worth being looked at.

00:48:45.000 Also, by the way, you know that he utilized the CIA to create misinformation around the Hunter Biden laptop story prior to that story breaking.

00:48:52.000 So the legacy media were primed to report on that like it was misinformation and disinformation, which it bloody well wasn't, we all now know.

00:49:01.000 But that's all I'll say.

00:49:02.000 How?

00:49:03.000 Someone just say how.

00:49:05.000 There's a lot of ways.

00:49:07.000 Remember the last time you saw Biden in that weird, boring, menacing mood was when he was talking about the Nord Stream Pipeline.

00:49:12.000 How would you get rid of the Nord Stream Pipeline?

00:49:14.000 We've got ways.

00:49:15.000 All of a sudden, Nord Stream Pipeline mysteriously blew up.

00:49:18.000 How will you do that?

00:49:20.000 I promise you we'll be able to do it.

00:49:21.000 So here are some of the ways that the Biden administration and the United States of America can shut down and control Elon Musk, which you've got to assume is part of the plan now.

00:49:31.000 Even as President Biden accuses Donald Trump of threatening our democracy, he's employing agencies of the federal government to harass and punish Elon Musk, whom he seems to consider a political opponent.

00:49:41.000 Why?

00:49:41.000 Because the mercurial entrepreneur has the temerity to criticise Biden and champion free speech.

00:49:46.000 In addition, Musk released the infamous Twitter files which showed the White House conspiring to censor communications on platforms like Facebook, And Twitter.

00:49:53.000 Now, thank God Julian Assange has a hearing coming up, and I pray that that will be a success.

00:49:58.000 But Julian Assange is in prison awaiting extradition under the Espionage Act.

00:50:03.000 The Espionage Act is like, you know, Barack Obama deployed it more than anybody else, but it essentially means you're a threat to American security.

00:50:09.000 But are you really a threat to American security if you reveal the malpractice in foreign affairs?

00:50:13.000 Or are you a threat to the establishment?

00:50:15.000 And is Elon Musk really a threat to, like, people and, like, you and me and everyone?

00:50:20.000 Or is he a threat to the interests of the powerful?

00:50:22.000 Let me know in the chat.

00:50:23.000 Let me know what you think they care about, you or themselves.

00:50:26.000 And then have a look at where they spend their money and what they're invested in in Congress

00:50:30.000 and who they accept money from.

00:50:31.000 And then get back to me and say, they care about themselves.

00:50:33.000 It's obvious.

00:50:34.000 A judge last summer described the administration's efforts to control information about COVID-19 vaccines

00:50:39.000 on social media as an almost dystopian scenario.

00:50:42.000 He further said, during the COVID-19 pandemic, a period perhaps best characterized

00:50:47.000 by widespread doubt and uncertainty, The United States government seems to have assumed a role

00:50:51.000 similar to an Orwellian Ministry The White House was not pleased and is getting even by attacking Musk's business empire.

00:50:58.000 So does that seem to you to be the way things go down?

00:51:01.000 Say if you're part of the donor class, where Joe Biden when campaigning went, nothing will change fundamentally.

00:51:05.000 He said that to all of the financial district donors.

00:51:07.000 You know, if you donate money, you're cool.

00:51:10.000 If you start affecting their ability to control public opinion, you're not cool.

00:51:14.000 Do you think they would engage in a vendetta?

00:51:16.000 Let me know in the chat.

00:51:17.000 Biden is throwing everything it can find at Musk, hoping that the endless barrage of regulatory, reputational, and legal attacks will cause the world's wealthiest man to kneel before its authority.

00:51:26.000 The viciousness of the investigations being conducted by the Department of Justice and the Federal Aviation Administration, the Federal Trade Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the National Labor Relations Board, the U.S.

00:51:37.000 Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and the U.S.

00:51:40.000 Fish and Wildlife Service against a successful American business leader is unprecedented.

00:51:45.000 The fish and wildlife, what's he done to them?

00:51:47.000 All the others you can sort of track, oh yeah that's because he does them rockets, oh yeah

00:51:50.000 he's got computers and all that, what's he doing to fish? 0.99

00:51:54.000 Also you bastard, the stuff you've done to those trout and salmon is unforgivable. 0.98

00:51:58.000 Now you see when Elon Musk is like an entrepreneur and he's just making stuff and I'm working 0.99

00:52:02.000 on a rocket ship, I'm doing electric cars, there's a moment where he's like, oh he's

00:52:05.000 a real life Iron Man.

00:52:06.000 We like him.

00:52:07.000 Similarly, when I was like, oh, I'm a celebrity.

00:52:09.000 Hi.

00:52:09.000 Oh, this guy's fun.

00:52:10.000 But if you start mouthing off, and obviously, Elon Musk's capacity to impact the world is beyond anybody else's, I would say, you will be attacked, not only by the National Labor Relations Board, but when the old Fish and Wildlife Services have to get involved to think, is this a conspiracy?

00:52:26.000 That salmon was given so much misinformation that it tried to swim upstream.

00:52:30.000 Well, apparently they do do that.

00:52:32.000 That's actually misinformation!

00:52:33.000 They've got to U2!

00:52:34.000 Send the fisheries after him! 0.99

00:52:36.000 It says much more about the vindictive nature of Joe Biden than it does about the founder of Tesla, SpaceX, and the Boring Company.

00:52:43.000 Especially considering that Musk has been an asset to Biden's presidency.

00:52:46.000 He made electric vehicles the cornerstone of Biden's green dream, cornerstone of Biden's green dream in reality, and provided Ukraine, the White House's wartime dependent, with internet capabilities critical to staving off a Russian victory.

00:52:58.000 And SpaceX is almost single-handedly keeping the US in the space race.

00:53:02.000 Notwithstanding Musk's contributions, the White House appears determined to drag down Tesla and SpaceX.

00:53:07.000 Just recently, Tesla announced it would recall 2 million cars because the government has alleged that its autopilot system is unsafe.

00:53:14.000 Your autopilot system's not safe.

00:53:16.000 You'd better call back all those cars.

00:53:18.000 The claim stems from investigations by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration into accidents purportedly caused by Tesla's automatic features and covers nearly all cars sold in the U.S.

00:53:28.000 Tesla maintains its devices make cars safer, an assertion that even Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg allowed could be true.

00:53:34.000 So even the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration have turned on him now.

00:53:38.000 The whole bureaucracy can turn against you.

00:53:40.000 Do you see how government is maybe like a facilitator of ease, but if they unperson you, if you step out against them, all of it just sort of mutates into a hideous monster of destruction.

00:53:52.000 Even stuff that's just meant to regulate fish. 1.00

00:53:54.000 Hey, put a mask on you little bastard! 1.00

00:53:56.000 It appears many of the collisions that the NHTSA has investigated involve drivers not paying attention. 1.00

00:54:01.000 One was searching the floor of his car for his phone.

00:54:03.000 That's Elon's fault!

00:54:04.000 Or not heeding the system's warnings.

00:54:07.000 In the first such lawsuit to be brought, a California jury two months ago determined that the autopilot feature was not to blame for a car crash that killed a Tesla driver who had alcohol in his system.

00:54:15.000 That guy's drunk!

00:54:16.000 Elon's fault!

00:54:17.000 The win for the automaker was a relief, but other lawsuits will doubtless follow, armed with the government's accusations of flaws in the Tesla system.

00:54:24.000 A term I've heard recently is lawfare, where you get tied up in lawsuits that cost a load of money, take up loads of time, dishonor you, and disgrace you, and just an exhausting method that they now use to un-person, discredit, and destroy people.

00:54:37.000 And Elon Musk is the biggest threat on the contemporary landscape, I suppose.

00:54:40.000 The software fix to Tesla's autopilot system can reportedly be accomplished remotely and will not be expensive, but that's not the point.

00:54:46.000 The win for the Biden White House shows up in the New York Times' write-up, which begins, Tesla's reputation for making technologically advanced cars suffered a blow on Tuesday when the company, under pressure from regulators, recalled more than two million vehicles.

00:54:58.000 The legacy media towing the line, spouting government propaganda to bring someone down?

00:54:58.000 What?

00:55:03.000 I won't hear of that.

00:55:04.000 As new competitors launch rival models and seek to dethrone America's number one electric vehicle producer, doubts about Tesla's engineering could prove expensive.

00:55:13.000 The Times glides effortlessly from referencing officials' claims that Tesla has not done enough to ensure that drivers remain attentive to recent public statements by Elon Musk have been widely interpreted as anti-Semitic.

00:55:24.000 Interpreted.

00:55:25.000 That's an interesting word, isn't it?

00:55:27.000 Because you can interpret things sort of however you want to.

00:55:30.000 Elsewhere, the government has just announced that Starlink, Musk's satellite internet provider, is ineligible for $885 million in subsidies designated to help expand rural broadband coverage to 643,000 homes and businesses in 35 states.

00:55:44.000 The Federal Communications Commission, another one, All these bureaucracies, they can just all be weaponised in an instant.

00:55:49.000 He explained his decision by saying that Starlink failed to demonstrate that it could deliver the promised service.

00:55:54.000 Wow.

00:55:55.000 It becomes subjective.

00:55:56.000 You think of all these things, all these badges, FBI, CIA, the fisheries one, as somehow legitimate because there's a badge.

00:56:02.000 But in a way, all of the legislation around them are like magical spells that have just gone piff-paff-poof.

00:56:07.000 This is a reality now.

00:56:09.000 And of course there is great legitimacy in institutions like Harvard and Stanford and I'm sure the heritage of the government, the constitution itself, all originated in ingenuity passed through the consciousness of individual humans with a dream, with a vision.

00:56:21.000 But it's certainly quite malleable, isn't it?

00:56:23.000 If you turn against the government or if you speak out against their interests, suddenly the whole thing can be instantly metastasized into a weapon of destruction.

00:56:31.000 Onyx, darling, claims it is available on all seven continents, in over 60 countries and many more markets, connecting 2 million plus active customers and count in with high-speed internet.

00:56:40.000 The firm provides high-speed service in Guam and the northern Mariana Islands, in Benin, in Costa Rica, in the Maldives and, crucially, in Ukraine.

00:56:47.000 Do we seriously believe the company would not be able to provide service to underserved rural communities in the US?

00:56:53.000 Of course we don't believe that.

00:56:54.000 What we're witnessing is gangster government. 0.94

00:56:56.000 You don't do what we tell you, we will crush you.

00:56:59.000 This is, I suppose, as I've said to you before, the way that the Godfather movies operate.

00:57:03.000 You see that on one level it's criminality and then it sort of melts into government and you're not really sure where the line is.

00:57:08.000 You give people a badge, you give people a suit, you give people a rubber stamp and the authority of an office and they're suddenly allowed to enact violence.

00:57:15.000 They're allowed to shut down your business interests.

00:57:16.000 Just look at what happened to ordinary people in the pandemic period.

00:57:19.000 We were just locked down.

00:57:20.000 If that That was done by an illegitimate government.

00:57:22.000 That would just be pure terrorism.

00:57:24.000 Everyone shut down.

00:57:25.000 You're not going to funerals.

00:57:26.000 You're not going to football.

00:57:27.000 Take this medicine.

00:57:28.000 What is that but tyranny?

00:57:30.000 What we have to learn, I believe, is to reframe the way we regard reality and just sort of step back to 30,000 feet for a moment and go, what relationship do you want to have with the government?

00:57:39.000 Oh, I don't know, really.

00:57:40.000 Not much of one.

00:57:41.000 I don't like the sound of that idea.

00:57:43.000 Let me know in the chat what happens when you start talking about those things online.

00:57:45.000 The FCC's decision reeks of political favoritism and is consistent with other attacks on Elon Musk by the Biden White House.

00:57:51.000 At a press conference last year, asked if he thought Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter, backed by some foreign governments, was a threat to national security, President Biden told reporters that Elon Musk is worth being looked at.

00:58:02.000 His government, quite obviously, took him at his word.

00:58:04.000 So who's the threat to democracy and what is the function of democracy?

00:58:07.000 What is the function of government?

00:58:08.000 Of course, purportedly, what government does is serves the people and allows the people to express themselves democratically.

00:58:13.000 But in experience, what the government does is services the interests of very powerful elites using deep state mechanisms that are inaccessible and hidden from the conduits available to us through democracy.

00:58:23.000 And they'll use Here's Barack Obama, who to look at and to listen to you would just think is the very vision, the epitome of a modern statesman.

00:58:36.000 Listen to what he's saying, he makes some points that sound good, until you recognize he's only representing one side of the argument.

00:58:42.000 He doesn't talk about government corruption.

00:58:43.000 He doesn't talk about legacy media bias.

00:58:45.000 He doesn't talk about the censoring of true information.

00:58:47.000 Of course he doesn't, because he's advocating for more centralised power.

00:58:50.000 But you need to be tuned in to spot that.

00:58:52.000 What they're trying to do is bring down Elon Musk, any other dissent in voice, even much smaller ones like me, by utilising the power of the state and the media, and if necessary, the Fish Commission.

00:59:01.000 Understand, it's not necessary for people to believe this information.

00:59:06.000 In order to weaken democratic institutions.

00:59:09.000 That's an interesting point because you know you sometimes say, well why can't we decipher ourselves if we believe something's true?

00:59:13.000 What Obama's planting there is the idea, even if you don't believe it, somehow it's having an effect because it muddies the waters.

00:59:19.000 Like it muddies the waters and stops you trusting anyone.

00:59:21.000 But is there another reason that you don't trust the government?

00:59:24.000 Is there another reason that you don't trust legacy media?

00:59:26.000 Is there another reason why you don't trust big corporations and the state?

00:59:28.000 Yeah, in every single one of those examples, the media lie to us, the state exploit us, none of them are very honest, they're all profiteering, they're all connected to one another.

00:59:36.000 Address that.

00:59:37.000 Address that.

00:59:38.000 You just have to flood a country's public square. 0.99

00:59:42.000 Any information that the state don't agree with is shit, according to Barack Obama. 1.00

00:59:47.000 It's shit. 1.00

00:59:47.000 That's what he's saying. 1.00

00:59:48.000 It's not even treated shit. 0.97

00:59:49.000 Now, I would say that amidst what he is dismissing as fecal matter have been some extremely legitimate points of inquiry. 0.97

00:59:56.000 He stands there at a pulpit at Stanford.

00:59:59.000 It's indeed a Stanford professor, Jay Bhattacharya, who proposed the Barrington Declaration that raised serious questions at the height of the pandemic about how it should be handled.

01:00:06.000 Those people were discredited and attacked by the very forces that Barack Obama is now advocating for.

01:00:12.000 Jay Bhattacharya is in that pool of raw sewage, drowning and trying to tell you the truth.

01:00:17.000 You just have to raise enough questions, spread enough dirt, plant enough conspiracy theorizing, That citizens no longer know what to believe.

01:00:32.000 Once they lose trust in their leaders, in mainstream media, in political institutions, in each other, in the possibility of truth, The game's won.

01:00:49.000 Wouldn't this be a wonderful opportunity for Barack Obama to say, one of the other things that potentially creates mistrust in institutions is when there's a financial crash like there is in 2008, and you've been elected on a tidal wave of optimism and hope and unity, and when that crash happens, instead of protecting ordinary people and their homes, you bail out the banks, you create new legislation, quantity of eating, that maybe stops people trusting the government.

01:01:13.000 When you drone more innocent civilians than George W. Bush, who preceded you in office, who was characterized as a warmonger, and you presented yourself as the new face of a united America, the new face of progressivism, that decreases trust in the administration.

01:01:28.000 What they continually do is avoid any culpability for the creation of conditions, and then use those conditions to create moral authority regulation and legislation.

01:01:37.000 That is why you can never trust them. 0.99

01:01:38.000 I think it's true that there is stupid stuff on the internet.

01:01:41.000 It's true that we've said things that we've later had to go, But what this is fundamentally about is your individual liberty and your freedom, your consciousness being a free space, my ability to communicate with you. 0.90

01:01:51.000 And critically, do you think that when they attack and try to destroy someone, it's because they're trying to protect you and help you, or because they're trying to protect and help themselves?

01:01:58.000 And all you have to do is have a little look at their bank balances, have a look at their trading history, look at where they get donations from, and that's it.

01:02:03.000 That's where you don't need any rhetorical voice, or any advocate, or any demagogue, or populist, or online orator.

01:02:10.000 You just need the facts.

01:02:12.000 Who's paying for all this?

01:02:13.000 Whose interests do you really represent?

01:02:14.000 What money do you take from Big Pharma?

01:02:16.000 How is Big Pharma regulated?

01:02:17.000 Does anyone in Congress own stocks and shares in Big Pharma?

01:02:19.000 What about Big Tech?

01:02:20.000 What about Military Industrial Complex?

01:02:22.000 There it is.

01:02:23.000 So there you go.

01:02:23.000 We're out.

01:02:24.000 Elon Musk is being attacked.

01:02:26.000 Is Elon Musk being attacked because Elon Musk is a threat to you?

01:02:29.000 Or is Elon Musk being attacked because he's a threat to them?

01:02:31.000 Do you trust them?

01:02:33.000 Or would you rather make these decisions for yourself?

01:02:36.000 I would rather be free and decide for myself what's true.

01:02:39.000 But that's just what I think.

01:02:40.000 Let me know what you think in the chat.

01:02:41.000 See you in a second!

01:02:41.000 Welcome back you glorious and awakened wonders you!

01:02:51.000 Alibi4D says, Russell, can you talk about mental health a bit more?

01:02:54.000 We've got to find some optimism.

01:02:55.000 Yes, you're right.

01:02:56.000 We must work together to create an atmosphere of love, inclusion and acceptance while continuing to talk about difficult subjects that appear sometimes to suggest there's no way back to freedom for any of us.

01:03:10.000 I remain optimistic.

01:03:13.000 I remain connected.

01:03:14.000 I remain certain that between one another, connected to one another, we can create a better, more elevated, and more connected world.

01:03:24.000 Let's have a look at some of your comments that I asked for.

01:03:27.000 Missy1719992000, they don't like where Elon has helped empower people.

01:03:27.000 You delivered.

01:03:33.000 Leah chasing rabbits.

01:03:34.000 Establishment attacks someone.

01:03:36.000 I know I need to hear their message.

01:03:39.000 Well done, son, said Elon. 1.00

01:03:40.000 Don't give a shit. 1.00

01:03:42.000 Krista1974. 1.00

01:03:42.000 Elon ain't bowing to shit. 1.00

01:03:45.000 Elon doesn't want to commit suicide. 0.99

01:03:46.000 Worth mentioning right now.

01:03:48.000 Janice Patrice Hart.

01:03:49.000 Elon is upset in the apple cart with his free speech views.

01:03:52.000 Liquor giant.

01:03:52.000 Elon has somehow awakened to what Alex Jones was saying decades ago.

01:03:57.000 Do you have acid reflux, Russell, says Hataya.

01:04:00.000 Sometimes, yeah, sometimes.

01:04:02.000 So, in a sense, I suppose that Elon Musk is a powerful global voice who you are unlikely to continually agree with, but if you agree with the principle of free speech, you have to ask do you think his position is legitimate and that he's using his platform In order to facilitate that, I feel like he is.

01:04:20.000 Let me know what you guys, continue to let me know what you think.

01:04:22.000 Should we watch the rest of this Epstein story?

01:04:26.000 We talked about that yesterday and I think the legacy media are getting closer towards the names and I suppose really what we're really interested in is any illegal, nefarious activity And whether or not the interests of the powerful are being protected, because presumably the mysterious circumstances around Epstein's death is an indication that he had some pretty important information.

01:04:48.000 Many of you, I suppose, might have heard that it's a kind of a method of control.

01:04:54.000 Have you heard those kind of stories that when people are in the ascendancy and moving into positions of political power, they're given these access to Potentially incendiary opportunities that if it gets out, it makes them vulnerable.

01:05:10.000 You guys have heard that.

01:05:12.000 Simply press play and let's have a look at the rest of this legacy media reporting on the Epstein list.

01:05:17.000 are Jeffrey Epstein's close friends, associates, and some of his victims. Now the judge is also

01:05:22.000 allowing those individuals who would like to keep their names concealed or redacted to file an

01:05:28.000 appeal to make their case before the release. All right, so they will let some get redacted, okay.

01:05:32.000 Of those names in less than two weeks. Now many of those names that will come out certainly are known

01:05:38.000 and notable, including former presidents, but they are all part of a now settled civil lawsuit

01:05:43.000 against Ghislaine Maxwell brought by Virginia Giuffre. Now Giuffre accused Maxwell of helping

01:05:49.000 Epstein abuse her by arranging travel plans along with setting up 0.84

01:05:54.000 Meeting times and places around the world to facilitate her sexual abuse.

01:05:58.000 Maxwell is now serving 20 years in a federal prison after she was convicted in 2021 for her role in a scheme to sexually exploit and abuse multiple teenage girls with Epstein over a 10-year period. 0.85

01:06:12.000 Now, Epstein died by suicide in a Manhattan federal jail Okay.

01:06:17.000 In 2019, while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges.

01:06:21.000 The judge also noting in her order that some of the names that will be released have already

01:06:26.000 been revealed because some of those individuals have spoken publicly about their relationship

01:06:31.000 with Jeffrey Epstein.

01:06:32.000 Meanwhile, at least 11 names will not be released, including eight people who have been identified

01:06:38.000 as minor victims of sexual abuse.

01:06:41.000 Last night on Banfield, criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Josh Schiffer talked about why some people are desperately fighting to have their names redacted.

01:06:52.000 So there's a lot of reasons someone wouldn't want... This guy's pretty upbeat about it all.

01:06:57.000 Shall we?

01:06:58.000 Why don't we cheer ourselves up with a little look at Vivek Ramaswamy's physical fitness to have some decency and health and optimism on the show.

01:07:10.000 You know, like, you know, RFK and I are going to do that pull-up competition.

01:07:13.000 Tell you the truth, I'm glad that got postponed.

01:07:16.000 RFK is coming on the show next year and I'm looking forward to that.

01:07:20.000 Here's Vivek.

01:07:22.000 He's moving to the upper echelons of personal fitness.

01:07:25.000 Have a look at him doing these push-ups.

01:07:26.000 He gets the 30.

01:07:28.000 Have a look at the mid-body from the 20 onward point.

01:07:32.000 But nevertheless, it's a real achievement, I would say.

01:07:36.000 Let's go, brother.

01:07:38.000 Let's go brother, 30.

01:07:40.000 Four, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18,

01:07:55.000 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30.

01:08:05.000 The simple wholesome story of a man doing push-ups there.

01:08:15.000 Just get away from Epstein Island and the constant, constant misery and malfeasance of it all. 0.69

01:08:23.000 Now listen, we've got a fantastic week coming up.

01:08:24.000 We've got Jonathan Pajot coming on for our Exma special, talking about the revelations of the pandemic period, how it showed how Power systems converge and generate control.

01:08:35.000 We also talk about a kind of bereft and corrupted Hollywood, as well as analyzing the depth and mythology behind some extraordinary folktales.

01:08:45.000 So for those of you that enjoy some of the more mythic, psychological, Jungian stuff, you're going to go on an interesting journey with me and Jonathan Pageau.

01:08:45.000 You'll love it.

01:08:54.000 If you want to be a member of our Awakened Wonder community, press the red button and you can join some of these conversations live and ask questions to our guests today.

01:09:01.000 For example, I spoke to Vandana Shiva.

01:09:03.000 We've still got Tucker Carlson in the camp.

01:09:04.000 Can't release it till I get over there and go on Tucker's new show.

01:09:08.000 But we do extraordinary interviews regularly and we discuss the advance of this movement together.

01:09:13.000 Join us.

01:09:14.000 You can get an annual subscription for someone as a gift for Christmas or maybe one of these delightful mugs.

01:09:20.000 There's a link in the description telling you how to do that and I'd love to welcome some of our new members like Depunia, N8marine, Pepe1, Georgieboy and Being Difficult.

01:09:28.000 Thanks for joining us.

01:09:29.000 We have a fantastic show tomorrow.

01:09:32.000 Join us, be there on time and I will try my level best to be there on time with you.

01:09:37.000 Join us tomorrow, not for more of the same but for more of the different.

01:09:39.000 Until then, if you can, stay free.

Stay Free - Russel Brand - December 20, 2023

Trump’s BOMBSHELL Colorado Ruling - Are We Heading To Civil War?! - Stay Free #271

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript