Stay Free - Russel Brand - Trump’s LANDSLIDE Iowa Win - MSNBC FREAK OUT!- Stay Free #285

00:00:00.000 so so

00:01:52.000 video is

00:02:12.000 Hello there, you Awakening Wonders.

00:02:13.000 Thanks for joining me today on Stay Free with Russell Brand.

00:02:17.000 Well done for waking up.

00:02:19.000 I know how difficult it is to be in this world.

00:02:22.000 You may yet be elated for amidst the blizzard, Trump did ascend.

00:02:27.000 Many of you will have expected, of course, that Trump would have succeeded in Iowa, but it was a total success and it has, of course, preceded a total legacy media Meltdown.

00:02:39.000 We're going to be talking about both those things.

00:02:40.000 We're going to be talking about Vivek's departure.

00:02:43.000 We will be covering in some detail, and I'm going to let you know this if you're watching us on YouTube, because you know Dr. John Campbell's content's been taken down.

00:02:51.000 We'll be looking at Disease X.

00:02:53.000 What is disease X?

00:02:55.000 What is the plan for disease X?

00:02:57.000 Why are we being prepped for disease X?

00:02:59.000 And is it more likely that the laboratories that are currently working on solutions for disease X will come up with a solution or cause a lab leak?

00:03:08.000 One for solution, two for lab leak.

00:03:11.000 I'm talking to those of you in the rumble chat and you awakened wonders that continually support our content that are part of this movement and as a result get access to one additional and exclusive Video a week as well as early access to much of our content and I'm looking now at Trucker Hershey, I'm looking now at Scott Blight and all of you saying that the research will lead to a further lab leak and who can condemn that kind of skepticism and cynicism living in a world that we currently live in

00:03:39.000 Where escalating war is being normalized, whether it's the conflict in the Yemen, where there is ongoing propaganda and a refusal by the legacy media to accept their own culpability in the increasing popularity of Donald Trump.

00:03:53.000 And let me know, has his popularity ever been higher?

00:03:58.000 No Republican has ever won a contested caucus by more than 12.8%.

00:04:03.000 Trump broke the record and won by 30%, winning all 99 counties.

00:04:07.000 We've got, what does that look like?

00:04:09.000 They are Trump 51%, Haley 98%.

00:04:11.000 I think they... Yeah, that's the order.

00:04:13.000 DeSantis came second in the end.

00:04:15.000 They've misspelt Vivek Ramaswamy and what a departure that is.

00:04:18.000 Now, have any of you seen the legacy media reporting on this subject?

00:04:25.000 They refused to show Trump's victory speech and we did a poll actually asking, is that because Trump's victory speech might be so dangerous?

00:04:34.000 That, uh, you know, this could be such dangerous misinformation that to broadcast it would be irresponsible.

00:04:39.000 I mean, maybe we're being irresponsible right now, even discussing Donald Trump.

00:04:43.000 Maybe, maybe if you had some institutions that people respected, if you had a deep state that cared about American people rather than Continually creating opportunities to bring them down.

00:04:55.000 If you didn't have a military-industrial complex forever provoking and advocating for new war, if you didn't have a legacy media that amplified and conveyed nothing but the interests of the powerful while censoring and surveilling ordinary people and opposing and dissenting voices, maybe We wouldn't all be in the thrall of a man who knows how to stand behind a microphone.

00:05:16.000 Here's the Legacy Media's analysis in the form of Rachel Maddow.

00:05:20.000 Let's take a look.

00:05:21.000 I'm sorry, I just have to do a little bit of business just for a second.

00:05:24.000 At this point in the evening, the projected winner of the Iowa caucuses has just started giving his victory speech.

00:05:32.000 Like, it's Donald Trump.

00:05:33.000 Can you not say his name?

00:05:35.000 The projected winner.

00:05:36.000 He that cannot be named.

00:05:38.000 It's not Voldemort.

00:05:40.000 He's not a Lord of Darkness.

00:05:42.000 That's just the utterance of the word Trump on MSNBC.

00:05:45.000 Suddenly, liberals are putting down their coffee cups and they're putting down their comfortable views.

00:05:50.000 They're embracing the idea of emergent populism.

00:05:53.000 Now, this level of hysteria is extraordinary, particularly when you look at The preceding administration, i.e.

00:06:00.000 Obama preceded Trump, Biden followed Trump.

00:06:04.000 Remember the cages and the condemnation.

00:06:06.000 These children are being placed in cages on the border.

00:06:09.000 Who built those cages?

00:06:10.000 Who built those cages?

00:06:11.000 Obama.

00:06:12.000 Remember the condemnation of a wall.

00:06:13.000 He wants to build a wall.

00:06:15.000 Donald Trump wants to build a wall.

00:06:16.000 Who's continuing to build that wall?

00:06:19.000 Biden.

00:06:19.000 So is this hysteria justified?

00:06:23.000 Is it justified not even saying his name?

00:06:26.000 Not even allowing him to speak?

00:06:28.000 This is a free speech platform.

00:06:30.000 The reason that we're on Rumble is because we believe in free speech.

00:06:32.000 And what is the point of free speech?

00:06:34.000 It's to unite us.

00:06:35.000 It's to elevate us.

00:06:36.000 It's to create the possibility of genuine opposition.

00:06:40.000 Decentralized but unified against the establishment.

00:06:43.000 Not hate speech.

00:06:44.000 Oh, people are slightly different.

00:06:45.000 I don't care.

00:06:47.000 You don't care.

00:06:48.000 You don't care about other people's freedom.

00:06:49.000 You care about your own freedom.

00:06:50.000 If you're granted your freedom, allow people to live however they want.

00:06:54.000 Is that what they want on the legacy media?

00:06:57.000 Who built the cages, Joe?

00:06:58.000 I am Steve Reno, said that on the Rumble chat.

00:07:01.000 I'm saying hello to Firegirl2020 and MaximumTitus444 and all of our supporters over there on Locals, our awakened wonders who get early access to much of our content and exclusive access To some of it, let's have a look at the rest of Rachel Maddow's analysis of misinformation, disinformation, and their peculiar refusal to show Trump's speech.

00:07:20.000 Did any of you see it?

00:07:21.000 It was the sweetest thing I've ever seen.

00:07:24.000 We will keep an eye on that as it happens.

00:07:27.000 We will let you know if there's any news made in that speech, if there's anything noteworthy, something substantive and important.

00:07:33.000 The reason I'm saying this is, of course, there is a reason that we and other news organizations have generally stopped giving an unfiltered live platform.

00:07:42.000 And that's because when people watch that stuff, people kind of like him and it's Very difficult when we have as our own candidate for the ongoing presidency a waxen, cadaverous zombie who looks like he's been scooped up from the tomb, shoved from the sepulchre, and into the polling booths.

00:08:02.000 This is all the more extraordinary because of the candidate we're being invited to vote for, because of the lack of acknowledgement and admission of the failings of the establishment, the institution, the historic Democrat Party, the failings of Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, 2008, none of that stuff ever analysed or questioned with the level of scrutiny that they'll apply to every syllable and metaphor uttered by Donald Trump and it's not working and they cannot stand it.

00:08:30.000 ...to remarks by former President Trump.

00:08:31.000 It is not out of spite.

00:08:32.000 It is not a decision that we relish.

00:08:35.000 It is a decision that we regularly revisit.

00:08:39.000 And honestly, earnestly, it is not an easy decision.

00:08:43.000 But there is a cost to us as a news organization of knowingly broadcasting untrue things.

00:08:49.000 Right, who among you... I'm talking to you if you're watching this on YouTube right now.

00:08:52.000 I'm talking to you if you're watching this on Locals.

00:08:54.000 I'm talking to you if you're watching it on Rumble or wherever we have proliferated our content in order to grow this movement.

00:09:01.000 When you hear a member of the MSNBC Legacy Media State Amplification Propagandist Unit saying, we cannot convey misinformation, do you not see the sudden phantom of Rachel Maddow saying, if you take this thing, it stops.

00:09:17.000 The virus stops.

00:09:18.000 You can watch that now on anti-misinformation platform YouTube right now.

00:09:23.000 Google it.

00:09:23.000 No, don't.

00:09:24.000 Stay watching us.

00:09:25.000 But put in there, Rachel Maddow, vaccine, and what will come up is Rachel Maddow telling you that the vaccine is effective against transmission, that it's effective against hospitalisation, that it's effective... These are all things that we know are not true.

00:09:38.000 What about Russiagate?

00:09:39.000 This is extraordinary.

00:09:40.000 It's not an absolute condemnation of misinformation.

00:09:43.000 It's a condemnation of information that may lead to you losing trust in the establishment.

00:09:49.000 And later on you will hear Rachel Maddow's fears about authoritarianism.

00:09:53.000 But it's not authoritarianism, full stop.

00:09:56.000 It's authoritarianism that is in opposition to the agenda of the globalist establishment.

00:10:00.000 Because authoritarianism, when it comes to censoring your speech, that's Fine.

00:10:05.000 Authoritarianism when it comes to surveilling you, taxing you, using your money to go to war right now in the Yemen against the Houthi.

00:10:12.000 There, you better believe the Houthi. 0.87

00:10:14.000 It's the right name for them, isn't it?

00:10:15.000 Because I didn't know who they were about three hours ago.

00:10:19.000 But now the Houthis, I'm supposed to get it up! 1.00

00:10:22.000 For another war against some poor people somewhere?

00:10:25.000 This will not be adequately or eloquently covered by the legacy media.

00:10:29.000 They will simply continue to advocate for their masters in the war machine and then wonder why someone with a jot of charisma can be elevated to landslide status in the Iowa caucus.

00:10:43.000 That is a fundamental truth of our business and who we are and so his remarks tonight will not Also, they make him sound more and more powerful.

00:10:57.000 He might make some news.

00:10:58.000 He might make some.

00:11:00.000 Look at that sort of... Like he sings it into existence.

00:11:04.000 Like some vibrating orb of pure consciousness.

00:11:07.000 Creating reality from the prakriti prima materia of reality.

00:11:13.000 Consciousness itself preceding material reality.

00:11:16.000 All of the objects in apparent separation emanating from a singular unitary source.

00:11:22.000 We can't show him!

00:11:23.000 There's just too much truth!

00:11:26.000 Let's have a look at our friends Michael Schellenberger from Public and Max Blumenthal from Greyzone who have both been posting on this.

00:11:34.000 The only thing funnier than MSNBC refusing to cover an election winner is Russiagate hoaxer Rachel Maddow condemning the practice of knowingly broadcasting untrue things.

00:11:43.000 Our friend Shelley, Shelley, Shelley, Shelley Schellenberger.

00:11:46.000 Both CNN and MSNBC carried the entirety of the speech by DeSantis after openly refusing to carry the speech by Trump Even though Trump won a landslide with 51% against the Sanders' 21%, you know these numbers by now, it's madness.

00:11:58.000 CNN and MSNBC are flagrantly embracing their role as propagandists.

00:12:03.000 And this speech, this terrifying speech, do you want to see it?

00:12:07.000 Do you think you're ready?

00:12:08.000 Do you think you can handle the truth?

00:12:10.000 Get ready for the elixir of language.

00:12:14.000 Get ready for the sweet melodies, so refined and divine they could be coming from a Gaelic harp or the pipe of Lord Krishna himself, for this is a vibrational frequency that will take you to another dimension.

00:12:30.000 Ah, here it comes!

00:12:31.000 Get ready, if you're watching on YouTube, hang on to your hats, put your fingers in your ears, lock up your chickens and every bit of livestock you've got, because here comes a person offering a polite speech.

00:12:44.000 Well, I want to thank everybody.

00:12:45.000 This has been some period of time, and most importantly, we want to thank the great people of Iowa.

00:12:52.000 Thank you.

00:12:53.000 We love you all.

00:12:54.000 Ah!

00:12:54.000 You're thanking the people of Iowa!

00:12:56.000 Oh no!

00:12:57.000 Oh no!

00:12:58.000 Armed rebellion!

00:12:59.000 Armed rebellion!

00:13:00.000 A man politely thanking the electorate.

00:13:04.000 What a turnout.

00:13:05.000 What a crowd.

00:13:06.000 And I really think this is time now for everybody Our country to come together.

00:13:12.000 We want to come together.

00:13:13.000 He's asking people to come together!

00:13:13.000 Ah!

00:13:15.000 Oh no!

00:13:16.000 It's nearly a John Lennon lyric!

00:13:18.000 Come together!

00:13:18.000 If he says right now, over me, I'm out baby!

00:13:22.000 I'm out!

00:13:24.000 Whether it's Republican or Democrat or Liberal or Conservative, it would be so nice if we could come together and straighten out the world.

00:13:32.000 Oh! 0.60

00:13:33.000 Don't straighten out the world!

00:13:34.000 I want a war in Yemen! 1.00

00:13:35.000 I want a war in Ukraine! 1.00

00:13:36.000 I want a war in China! 1.00

00:13:38.000 And Iran again! 0.95

00:13:39.000 Woah, woah, woah! 0.99

00:13:40.000 More, more, more!

00:13:41.000 Look at this guy, he's just a kind of man with his sons flanking him saying, it's time you come together, Democrats, Republicans.

00:13:48.000 It's the sweetest, politest thing, more statesmanly.

00:13:52.000 And when you think of the alternative, remember...

00:13:54.000 I think the whole system and this whole establishment needs radical alteration, decentralisation and that power should be close to you.

00:14:00.000 That your individual sovereignty, your freedom to become who you are is more important than any of the atrophying systems of corruption that dominate global politics.

00:14:07.000 That's my particular position.

00:14:09.000 But I do not think the solution that they're so vociferously advocating for, Joe Biden staring out baffled from his own face like a chick emerging from a cracked egg, is a viable alternative to this.

00:14:23.000 Terrifying speech!

00:14:25.000 Straighten out the problems and straighten out all of the death and destruction that we're witnessing that's practically never been like this.

00:14:32.000 It's just so important and I want to make that a very big part of our message.

00:14:36.000 We're going to come together.

00:14:37.000 It's going to happen soon too.

00:14:38.000 It's going to happen soon.

00:14:41.000 Coming together.

00:14:42.000 Oh, that's good.

00:14:43.000 That'd be nice.

00:14:45.000 I want to congratulate Ron and Nikki for having... Oh, he's not going to thank the other candidates, is he?

00:14:53.000 Where's the button?

00:14:54.000 Where's the drop switch?

00:14:55.000 Get this thing off the air right now! 1.00

00:14:59.000 Remember, if you're watching this on YouTube, we'll be available for about another eight, nine minutes or so, then we'll be exclusively on the free stream itself, the stream that is Rumble.

00:15:07.000 If you're not an Awakened Wonder yet, become an Awakened Wonder, you get exclusive access to one in-depth video per week, early access to much of our content, including our interviews with Brilliant, real, legit journalists.

00:15:17.000 People like Glenn Greenwald, Matt Taibbi, Whitney Webb.

00:15:20.000 We're recording I think tomorrow or the next day and we're going to be asking a lot of questions.

00:15:25.000 A lot of questions about the island.

00:15:26.000 A good time together.

00:15:28.000 We're all having a good time together.

00:15:31.000 They're having a good time together at a caucus where people came out in the snow and voted for various candidates.

00:15:38.000 Now listen, it is with regret.

00:15:41.000 Think of that compared to the pomposity and piety available to you on MSNBC.

00:15:46.000 Thought about this long and hard and we, you know, we can't show Donald Trump in case he does some news.

00:15:52.000 He might do some news at you and even worse than that he could do some fake news and I'm not talking about fake news like the vaccines are effective and work. 0.94

00:16:00.000 I'm not talking about facts and news like fake news like he's peeing all over hookers.

00:16:04.000 I'm talking about Fake news like the system is corrupt and you do genuinely need to galvanize and organize against this kind of banalized bureaucratic tyranny that is being advocated for and amplified by the legacy media.

00:16:18.000 And I think they both actually did very well.

00:16:21.000 I really do.

00:16:22.000 I think they both did very well.

00:16:23.000 We don't even know what the outcome of second place is.

00:16:27.000 And I see Kerry Lake.

00:16:29.000 That wasn't even a joke, was it?

00:16:30.000 It was just being nice.

00:16:31.000 Congratulations, Kerry.

00:16:33.000 Very good.

00:16:34.000 I spotted her, I have to announce, because she's terrific. 0.55

00:16:37.000 She's going to be a senator, a great senator, I predict, right?

00:16:41.000 Going to be a great senator.

00:16:43.000 And I also want to congratulate Vivek, because he did a hell of a job.

00:16:50.000 He came from zero, and he's got a big percent, probably 8%, almost 8%, and that's an amazing... The idea that the legacy media think that you would not be able to watch Watch that.

00:17:03.000 I mean, it's astonishing, isn't it?

00:17:04.000 It's just, what could anybody say?

00:17:07.000 The problem is, is that they've lost you.

00:17:09.000 They've lost you forever.

00:17:11.000 You cannot trust them.

00:17:12.000 You don't trust them.

00:17:12.000 You'll never trust them again.

00:17:14.000 Curiously, the Vivek story is one of the interesting aspects of this, because it's just a couple of days ago that, what did Donald Trump say?

00:17:20.000 Very sly.

00:17:21.000 Very sly.

00:17:22.000 Kind of took Vivek away at the knees there for a moment, when I figure, and let me know in the chat what you guys think, that he was working out, hang on, what Vivek Ramaswamy is doing He's recognising that the Republican Party establishment is backing Nikki Haley, or maybe Ron DeSantis, and if Trump isn't on the ballot because of the endless flurry of indictments, then I will inherit the mantle, I mean this is pretty obvious analysis I suppose, isn't it, of the anti-establishment Republican candidate.

00:17:53.000 But Donald Trump didn't like that, did he?

00:17:54.000 And he sort of went, very sly, it's sly.

00:17:57.000 And it's something about, you know, Donald Trump's use of language.

00:17:59.000 He's very efficient, isn't he?

00:18:00.000 He does just, he sort of knows where to land that bullet.

00:18:04.000 And now Vivek is out of the race and he likes him again now.

00:18:08.000 It's interesting.

00:18:09.000 It's very, very interesting.

00:18:11.000 Amazing job.

00:18:12.000 They're all very smart, very smart people, very capable people.

00:18:12.000 They all did.

00:18:17.000 And to all of the people standing behind me and all of the people in this room and so many great politicians and great dignitaries and friends, I just want to thank you all.

00:18:27.000 This is a very special night and this is the first Because the big night is going to be in November, when we take back our country, and truly, we do make our country great again.

00:18:40.000 Thank you very much, everybody.

00:18:42.000 Great honor.

00:18:42.000 Thank you very much.

00:18:44.000 Thank you.

00:18:56.000 Motown!

00:18:57.000 Oh no!

00:18:57.000 What are we going to do?

00:18:58.000 Help! 0.98

00:18:59.000 So listen, we did a poll earlier.

00:19:01.000 Let's have a look at that.

00:19:02.000 Why are MSNBC not broadcasting Trump?

00:19:05.000 Is it danger of misinformation or is it danger of Trump becoming more popular?

00:19:11.000 An astonishing 96% of you thought it was the latter.

00:19:15.000 Missing it a lot.

00:19:15.000 Here are some of your comments.

00:19:16.000 This is over on YouTube where I hope you guys will join us in a second.

00:19:20.000 Salt and Light Seeker, is Russell a Freemason?

00:19:22.000 No, I'm not a Freemason.

00:19:24.000 I think you have to wear a little apron and stuff.

00:19:26.000 No disrespect if you are Freemasons.

00:19:28.000 I hope you're having a great time with that.

00:19:30.000 Misinformation.

00:19:31.000 We will tell you what information you get instead of being able to make decisions for yourself.

00:19:36.000 Sydney Ferret Pie.

00:19:37.000 He's already won it, and they know it.

00:19:39.000 They don't broadcast him, but they cover him 24-7, says someone.

00:19:42.000 You see what they did to Vivek?

00:19:43.000 Started mocking him and belittling him just because he dropped out.

00:19:46.000 Five of their hosts in a panel making fun of him, saying he'll maybe have a Fox show soon.

00:19:50.000 MSNBC is just a low-grade podcast.

00:19:52.000 Wow.

00:19:53.000 That's an interesting comment on the state of the media right there.

00:19:57.000 Let's have a look at Vivek's announcement.

00:20:00.000 The entire campaign is about speaking the truth.

00:20:01.000 We did not achieve our goal tonight.

00:20:03.000 We need an America First candidate.

00:20:04.000 Donald Trump and I will do everything we can to support him.

00:20:06.000 I'm enormously proud of the team and the country.

00:20:08.000 Shall we have a look at a bit of his speech?

00:20:09.000 Do you want to see that?

00:20:10.000 And I'm also making the decision that this has to be an America First candidate in that White House.

00:20:17.000 As I've said since the beginning, there are two America First candidates in this race.

00:20:23.000 And earlier tonight, I called Donald Trump to tell him that I congratulated him on his victory.

00:20:29.000 And now, going forward, he will have my full endorsement for the presidency, and I think we're going to do the right thing for this country.

00:20:37.000 Oh, there he goes.

00:20:38.000 Hey, Vivek's been on the show a couple of times, and we've enjoyed talking to him a great deal.

00:20:44.000 Certainly, he's a modern politician who understands the modern dynamics and how to communicate.

00:20:49.000 MSNBC are not treating Vivek with Very much respect at all.

00:20:54.000 If you're watching this over on YouTube, we're going to be available for another couple of minutes, then we'll be exclusively available on Rumble advocating for your individual sovereignty and freedom and community democracy and the dismantling of centralized establishment interests and institutions across the world and across the nation.

00:21:11.000 Let's have a look at MSNBC criticizing Vivek with a lot of supercilious haughtiness.

00:21:16.000 We have had the field shrink yet again tonight.

00:21:21.000 Vivek Ramaswamy will never again grace our television screens as a presidential candidate.

00:21:26.000 David Plouffe, are you shocked with the Trump endorsement that apparently went along with his bowing out?

00:21:33.000 Yeah, well we'll see.

00:21:37.000 His total number of votes must have been, what, 8, 10,000?

00:21:40.000 Something like that.

00:21:41.000 Think about that.

00:21:42.000 All that time, going to all the counties twice, all the money.

00:21:46.000 Remarkable.

00:21:47.000 Yeah, but the podcast.

00:21:49.000 Just remember in this orgy of self-congratulatory commentary that Joe Biden is cancelling primaries wherever they are possible, refusing to debate RFK, who's having to run as an independent now, would have loved to have run as a Democrat.

00:22:04.000 Impossible.

00:22:05.000 Refusing to debate, Marianne Williamson.

00:22:08.000 Refusing to stand.

00:22:11.000 Again, while they glory in the inconsistencies and perceived inadequacies of their opponents, they will not analyse or even acknowledge their own inferiorities failings and flaws and that's what makes them impossible to believe impossible to embrace identifiable as a mouthpiece an amplification project for the globalist establishment other than that i can't see what they're doing cast in it yeah yeah he's gonna have

00:22:41.000 Oh, he does have a podcast.

00:22:42.000 There's a podcast, I think.

00:22:43.000 He might have a Fox show.

00:22:46.000 I know a lot of you have been reached by his criticism of the reporting around Jan 6th, some of the risks he took around 9-11, and he's indeed, he's passionate and willing to confront people on the stand.

00:22:58.000 Can people like, I'm saying, Nikki Haley.

00:23:01.000 Should we have a look at, let's have a look at Nikki Haley saying that it's a two-horse race, but she, she wasn't second, was she? 0.96

00:23:08.000 She was third.

00:23:10.000 Don't say it's a two-horse race if you're third because, I mean, where are you?

00:23:13.000 Which horse are you exactly?

00:23:16.000 I can safely say tonight Iowa made this Republican primary a two-person race.

00:23:26.000 What?

00:23:27.000 How?

00:23:28.000 But you want one of the two people?

00:23:30.000 Let's have a look at Trump commenting on Joe Biden.

00:23:34.000 And again, always try to hold in your mind, like a mandala, the near specter, the almost ghostly apparition of Joe Biden.

00:23:45.000 A person who it's difficult to believe has the stones or the juice for the next five years to carry the mantle of the most powerful person in the world to navigate the complex territories that will surely emerge in diplomatic and indeed militaristic relationships with China.

00:24:01.000 Russia, the constant economic crisis, disease X. Think of the global challenges that we're likely to confront and whether or not Joe Biden is fit to handle them.

00:24:14.000 If he is, type Y in the chat.

00:24:16.000 If not, type N in the chat.

00:24:18.000 I'm talking to you, SueBiz22, Synchronicity525.

00:24:22.000 Shole, fella, Steph, all of you lot in our Awake and Wonder chat, and ChatterX, and AmericaSun, and TZ76, Patriot, and Mooseman18, let me know.

00:24:31.000 Here's Trump on Biden in his speech.

00:24:34.000 He did have a little bit of the old school Trump asser-dity, I mean, asser-bick-ness, rather, as opposed to the sort of conciliatory tone we saw elsewhere.

00:24:44.000 This definitely is, I would say, Trump is observing the emergent and rising popularity of RFK and I feel like we're seeing a new more statesmanly Trump except on the subject of Biden.

00:24:57.000 Check this.

00:24:58.000 So I don't want to be overly rough on the president.

00:25:03.000 But I have to say that he is the worst president that we've had in the history of our country.

00:25:09.000 Difficult.

00:25:10.000 I don't want to be rough, but he's the worst in the history of the country.

00:25:14.000 What could you say that's worse than that?

00:25:16.000 Destroying our country.

00:25:19.000 Amazing.

00:25:20.000 Astonishing.

00:25:21.000 Incredible.

00:25:22.000 Now again, one of the areas that we are fascinated by is the constant maintenance of the idea

00:25:27.000 that it is emergent MAGA populism that represents the greatest threat to your freedom

00:25:33.000 in the United States of America, that poses the greatest threat to world peace.

00:25:37.000 In spite of the fact that we've already had Trump as the president for four years

00:25:40.000 and there were no additional wars, and indeed many economic and social factors

00:25:46.000 were pretty consistent with the preceding administration and not a great deal has changed subsequently.

00:25:51.000 Certainly many of you think things have deteriorated and yet it is extremism that defines

00:25:56.000 much of the legacy media reporting on this subject.

00:26:00.000 Let's have a look at, this is interesting.

00:26:03.000 This is where I do agree with Rachel Maddow.

00:26:05.000 In fact, she says that Trump is running against politics.

00:26:09.000 Essentially, running against the establishment.

00:26:11.000 But what does that tell you?

00:26:12.000 When an anti-establishment candidate gains more and more popularity, the more that he is condemned, even through the judiciary.

00:26:20.000 Even as the accumulating condemnation threatens to swamp and indeed would ensnare any other candidate, Trump's potency appears to rise.

00:26:32.000 I think fueled by the justified loathing of the establishment.

00:26:37.000 Fueled by our shared mistrust of these institutions.

00:26:41.000 But this is one piece of analysis that I do agree with.

00:26:45.000 The big picture takeaway from that, and I don't mean to be, again, too dark as you said on this, but it is not... If we are worried about the rise of authoritarianism in this country, we are worried about potential rise of fascism in this country.

00:26:57.000 We're worried about our democracy falling to an authoritarian and potential...

00:27:02.000 See, when we talk about fascism and authoritarianism and democracy, when a candidate won't run in any primaries, when you have pervasive surveillance and a censorship industrial complex threatening to shut down free speech, when you've just had a pandemic where true, open, honest, sincere, scientifically verifiable information was shut down and censored, when you've had the Hunter Biden laptop story where they admitted, the CIA admitted that we censored that information or advocated for its censorship at least, Because we thought it might affect the results of the election.

00:27:32.000 You saw that, right?

00:27:32.000 We all saw that here.

00:27:33.000 When you have disease X lingering like a future fart held in an old man's bowel as a new threat on the horizon, knowing that it will ultimately be used to legitimise more expenditure, more authoritarianism, where is the authoritarianism now?

00:27:52.000 What does dictatorship look like in 2024?

00:27:55.000 Of course they always use the sort of strongman argument.

00:27:58.000 They still live in the kind of echo of ideas of military leaders such as Mussolini or Hitler or Pol Pot continually claiming that Trump is part of that lineage as the brilliant writer Martin Gurry pointed out.

00:28:12.000 You can't have military dictators of that style unless they have some kind of control over a paramilitary organization or a significant wing of the American military or the army.

00:28:24.000 Donald Trump does not have paramilitaries at Mar-a-Lago.

00:28:28.000 That's not what they're doing there.

00:28:29.000 They are not armed and dangerous.

00:28:31.000 They're having little drinks with umbrellas in them and playing golf, I suspect.

00:28:35.000 So this kind of hysteria is, I think, unwarranted and It's in a sense the only game they have left.

00:28:45.000 All they have is the continual amplification of that condemnation because they're never going to say, we're going to offer you a viable alternative because we're not owned by the donor class, we're not corrupt globalists, we are here to represent American people.

00:28:58.000 They can never say that because it's not true and it's unlikely ever to be true again.

00:29:01.000 Potentially fascist form of government.

00:29:03.000 The leader who is trying to do that is part of that equation.

00:29:07.000 Mm-hmm.

00:29:07.000 But people wanting that.

00:29:08.000 Correct.

00:29:09.000 It's a much bigger part of that equation.

00:29:10.000 That's right.

00:29:10.000 To see the rest of this and that, start the countdown right now.

00:29:13.000 We've got some fantastic stuff coming up.

00:29:15.000 We've got Dr. Joseph Lepardo, him out of Florida, right, talking about disease X and its likely escalation, or more importantly, its utilization, because we don't know what disease X is yet.

00:29:24.000 But we do know that there's some extraordinary planning going on.

00:29:27.000 And we're going to continue this analysis of legacy media coverage There's a countdown on the screen now.

00:29:34.000 If you're watching us on YouTube click the link in the description and join us.

00:29:38.000 We want you in our movement.

00:29:39.000 We welcome you in our movement.

00:29:41.000 We must join together.

00:29:43.000 Stay free but get over to Rumble and join us right now.

00:29:46.000 I want to say hello to Fugman and D-Day 99 over in the Awakened Wonder community and Turtle Mountain and Apologetic Pest.

00:29:54.000 All of you guys, thank you for supporting us.

00:29:56.000 Thank you for joining us.

00:29:57.000 Let's get on with Rachel Maddow and Cruz's supercilious condemnation of, yes, Donald Trump, but actually democracy itself, because all that's happened is a bunch of people in Iowa have gone out in the snow to vote for someone they appear to like very much indeed.

00:30:14.000 And the American electorate is made up of two major parties.

00:30:18.000 One of those parties has been flirting with extremism on the ultra-right for a very long time.

00:30:24.000 They've brought them in in a way that they haven't been central to Republican electoral politics ever before, and I know because I've been studying this.

00:30:31.000 I've studied it.

00:30:32.000 I've studied it.

00:30:32.000 I know what words like extreme right mean.

00:30:35.000 These are the only categories and taxonomies that are absolute.

00:30:39.000 Categories like male and female, these can migrate and move and metastasize and amorphize endlessly.

00:30:47.000 But far right, I know what that is.

00:30:49.000 And it's a man saying, I'd like to thank the fellow candidates.

00:30:52.000 But once you have radicalized one major party so that those are the preferences of the people who adhere to your party, the leader is interchangeable.

00:31:00.000 And yes, Trumpism is sometimes what we call it.

00:31:02.000 MAGA movement is probably a better way to do it. 0.57

00:31:05.000 But there is an authoritarian movement inside Republican politics.

00:31:08.000 But what about the authoritarianism within the Democrat party, a party that would rather lose to Trump than win with Bernie Sanders, that keeps offering us Joe Biden?

00:31:17.000 Have you seen that dude in the bicycle shop yet?

00:31:20.000 I'm fixated on that clip.

00:31:22.000 Maybe we'll do it tomorrow.

00:31:23.000 But like, when you see poor dear Joe Biden staggering around, poor fella staring out of his own face like it's saline, what do you guys call it, cellophane?

00:31:32.000 Like he's just staring out at the world, peeping through the mystery of life.

00:31:37.000 How can this be offered to you as the alternative?

00:31:42.000 That isn't being bamboozled by Trump.

00:31:44.000 They are pushing Trump to get more and more extreme because the more extreme things he says, the more they adhere to him.

00:31:52.000 And that is coming from a very large proportion of the American right that adheres to the Republican Party.

00:31:58.000 And that's why this is a Republican Party problem more than it is the problem of one man and his leader.

00:32:07.000 Hey, remember that conspiracy theory that foreign DNA could poten- that the vaccines could mysteriously, excuse me, and curiously alter your genetics?

00:32:19.000 Remember that?

00:32:19.000 That was one of the ones, like, you know me, I'm an open-minded guy.

00:32:23.000 Don't be so open-minded that your brain falls right out of your head.

00:32:28.000 I'm open because I know that we are deceived so endlessly, because I know how this machine works, because I've seen the inside of certain aspects of this machine.

00:32:37.000 I know that they cannot be trusted.

00:32:39.000 But when you hear, like, Alex Jones, who I consider, you know, he's been on the show, I consider Alex Jones to be sort of a contemporary shaman who dabbles in mysticism, who goes into various and varying states and conveys factual information, but also extemporises and riffs on it.

00:32:55.000 I think it would be fair to say that about Alex.

00:32:57.000 And when you hear him say something like it's meddling with your DNA, you think, oh, come on, Alex.

00:33:01.000 It can't be doing that.

00:33:03.000 It can't be that the vaccine, if you take it, is a sort of a weird genetic medicine that gets in there and dabbles with the fundaments of your material being, but it turns out that it does do that, and Alex Jones is completely correct, and he is like the sort of medical general, isn't he?

00:33:19.000 Like Joseph Lupardo, isn't he sort of like the Florida...

00:33:23.000 Surgeon General.

00:33:24.000 So, like, it's not some crackpot, is it? 0.85

00:33:27.000 It's not some lunatic.

00:33:28.000 It's not like, oh no, quick, shut down this dude's free speech.

00:33:30.000 Quick, smart.

00:33:31.000 This is a medical professional.

00:33:33.000 Well, let's hear him out.

00:33:34.000 Very few public health officials in this country seem very interested in public health, in case you haven't noticed.

00:33:39.000 The Surgeon General of Florida, Dr. Joseph Latipo, is an exception to that.

00:33:45.000 And so he has now called on doctors to immediately stop giving the mRNA.

00:33:50.000 Someone in the chat is talking about Gonzalo Lira, the murdered American journalist, presumably murdered, in custody in Ukraine.

00:33:56.000 We're covering that on the show tomorrow, so you need not worry.

00:34:00.000 We care about Julian Assange and his ongoing incarceration and justice.

00:34:04.000 Demand his release and exoneration, and we'll be covering Gonzalo Lira tomorrow.

00:34:07.000 Don't you worry about that.

00:34:09.000 Thank you for bringing it to our attention in the chat, but try and be a little more optimistic next time.

00:34:14.000 Don't just start with, shame on you!

00:34:16.000 Maybe go, are you interested in the story?

00:34:18.000 Just a suggestion.

00:34:19.000 You know, we'll do it either way.

00:34:20.000 I believe in your free speech more than I believe in protecting my feelings, baby.

00:34:23.000 Let's get back to Tucker.

00:34:24.000 COVID vax to their patients.

00:34:26.000 And for a very interesting reason that you should know about, here's his statement.

00:34:30.000 We're quoting.

00:34:31.000 I'm calling for a halt to the use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

00:34:36.000 The U.S.

00:34:36.000 Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have always played it fast and loose with COVID-19 vaccine safety.

00:34:43.000 But their failure to test for DNA integration with the human genome, as their own guidelines dictate, when the vaccines are known to be contaminated with foreign DNA, is intolerable.

00:34:55.000 Think about that.

00:34:57.000 It's one thing if it gives you a heart attack.

00:34:59.000 If it tampers with your DNA in some way, now we have a real problem.

00:35:02.000 I'll take a heart attack.

00:35:03.000 I'll take a seizure.

00:35:04.000 But when you start messing with my DNA, you didn't do clinical trials on enough mouses.

00:35:10.000 How many mouses did you take?

00:35:12.000 We only did about five mouses.

00:35:14.000 That's the only number of mouses that we could manage. 0.98

00:35:16.000 You needed to do more tests on more mouses, you lunatics. 0.99

00:35:20.000 Considering a billion people got it. 0.69

00:35:22.000 So in a recent interview about the MRA vaccines, The Surgeon General of Florida described them this way.

00:35:28.000 These vaccines have DNA in them. Everyone knows what DNA is.

00:35:32.000 They're contaminated with DNA, and that's not necessarily a big deal. But it's a problem

00:35:37.000 with these vaccines because the DNA hangs on with the mRNA and goes into people's cells. So

00:35:44.000 this is a completely different risk analysis than other products that have had DNA. These

00:35:49.000 vaccines are honestly, they're...

00:35:51.000 Someone in the chat goes, whose DNA is it?

00:35:53.000 Is it Bill Gates' DNA?

00:35:55.000 Is it Voucher's DNA?

00:35:57.000 Are they going to turn us into mini-themes?

00:36:02.000 Well, listen, that is the Florida Surgeon General.

00:36:06.000 That's his official title.

00:36:07.000 I remember seeing him over the pandemic period down there in Florida, who are widely understood to have handled the pandemic extremely well under Ron DeSantis.

00:36:16.000 But I think it's very interesting with the emergence of disease X that we are still dealing with disease Y. Why are we all locked in our homes?

00:36:25.000 Why are we granting indemnity to the makers of these vaccines?

00:36:30.000 Why are we recommending masks and social distances?

00:36:33.000 Why would we continue to trust these people?

00:36:36.000 And as world leaders and the WHO meet in, of all places, Davos to discuss disease X, a future pandemic that could cause, you know, fingers crossed, 20 times more fatalities than COVID-19.

00:36:48.000 Is that fatalities with disease X or from disease X?

00:36:52.000 The debate around this chicken and egg question is being postponed.

00:36:56.000 COVID-19 inquiry in our country is being booted off right into the future, even with the slim, slender and diluted questions they were willing to put in front of the politicians that they're basically allowed to go, oh no, my phone factory reset.

00:37:11.000 I've lost all the WhatsApp messages from that period.

00:37:14.000 So we're looking at disease X, how it will be handled.

00:37:17.000 And whether or not you're concerned about ongoing gain-of-function research, which in our country, the UK, is continuing in a mysterious facility that also manages and makes and manufactures chemical weapons.

00:37:31.000 Dual use, anyone?

00:37:32.000 Gain-of-function research, anyone?

00:37:34.000 Making the same mistakes as before, everybody?

00:37:38.000 Here's the news.

00:37:39.000 No, here's the effing news.

00:37:40.000 Stay with us.

00:37:40.000 We've got so much more to come.

00:37:42.000 Thank you for choosing Fox News.

00:37:44.000 Good day.

00:37:45.000 No. 1.00

00:37:46.000 Here's the fucking news. 1.00

00:37:48.000 Disease X is imminent, they say. 0.99

00:37:51.000 A whole new pandemic for a whole new year.

00:37:54.000 Luckily, our friends at Davos, the WHO and world leaders are discussing a response.

00:37:59.000 But are you not concerned that disease X could be caused by a lab leak when it's possible that the previous pandemic was caused by a lab leak?

00:38:08.000 Well, hopefully they're not doing crazy stuff with mouses all over the world right now. 1.00

00:38:12.000 They are!

00:38:15.000 Hello there, you Awakening Wonders!

00:38:16.000 Thanks for joining me on our voyage to truth and freedom.

00:38:19.000 As we continue to awaken together, we do need to form a resistance, a counterpunch to the attack on our freedom.

00:38:26.000 As the WHO Treaty means that your nation will be disempowered and you will be further disempowered as an individual, we need to organize together, become an Awakened Wonder, join our community if it's within your means.

00:38:38.000 For surely, disease, The British government has unveiled a new vaccine research facility where scientists are working to prevent future pandemics.

00:38:44.000 that the laboratory that's investigating vaccines are also developing chemical weapons.

00:38:51.000 The British government has unveiled a new vaccine research facility

00:38:54.000 where scientists are working to prevent future pandemics.

00:38:57.000 It's located at Porton Down, a high security research facility

00:39:00.000 best known for its work on chemical warfare.

00:39:02.000 Okay, now those of you that are world-versed in this territory will be familiar

00:39:07.000 with some of the ideas and theories about the evolution of certain medications,

00:39:11.000 the funding for certain vaccines, the idea of dual-use facilities and dual-use research,

00:39:16.000 and indeed, the possibility that gain-of-function research itself.

00:39:20.000 ...led to the pandemic.

00:39:22.000 It's the age-old chicken-and-egg question.

00:39:25.000 What came first, the solution to the disease or the disease itself?

00:39:31.000 And is it possible that that disease was caused by research into diseases of that nature?

00:39:37.000 Extraordinary.

00:39:38.000 There's certainly some interesting patent information available that suggests the chronology is peculiar.

00:39:43.000 In any event, the solution will be provided by world leaders at Davos.

00:39:48.000 Davos is beginning this week and members of the WHO, whose treaty will further empower them and disempower your government, are talking with world leaders who have possibly passed through WEF-type schemes about what the solutions for the next pandemic will be.

00:40:03.000 The last pandemic was preceded by exercises of preparation known as Event 201.

00:40:08.000 As well as being someone that's interested in the potential nefarious undergirding of globalism, I do, in spite of what it might say under this video, in spite of the pop-ups that you might see while watching this video, care very deeply indeed about truth.

00:40:24.000 And of course, What will rationally be said is there's just been a pandemic.

00:40:28.000 Of course, we're preparing for other eventualities and future pandemics.

00:40:32.000 And people make all sorts of curious arguments about why there are more pandemics.

00:40:36.000 Oh, as rainforests are depleted, we're exposed to more creatures and more viruses and more diseases.

00:40:41.000 People seem very reluctant to say, as we do more gain and function research, as we develop more bioweapons, it's possible that there are more and more lab leaks.

00:40:49.000 People are even less keen on saying, as we seek to impose control at Unprecedented levels.

00:40:55.000 It's more and more likely that the legitimization of measures of control will be seen in the form of future pandemics.

00:41:00.000 That's the kind of thing that you simply cannot say out loud.

00:41:03.000 I know that many of you are pondering and inquiring into exactly those kind of ideas.

00:41:07.000 Let me know in the chat and the comments.

00:41:09.000 But it seems to me that we at least have to remain open to the following possibilities.

00:41:13.000 Gain-of-function research and biochemical activity is leading to new outbreaks and new viruses and that we oughtn't be handing over more control to organisations like the WHO or indeed the WAF or perhaps even our own national government in the wake of what happened in the last pandemic.

00:41:29.000 Whether that's something as simple as the revelations in Fauci's behind-closed-doors inquiry that Social distancing rules were basically made up, that masks essentially don't work, that lockdowns could have caused many more problems, certainly economically and maybe even socially and psychologically, than they caused.

00:41:45.000 And there is, of course, the phenomenon of excess deaths, the looming phantom, the spectre, the unanswerable question that won't come up in any COVID inquiry in your country, the United States, or mine.

00:41:56.000 And we've just heard, of course, as you have, that the COVID inquiry is being delayed conveniently for a few months. It was due to start

00:42:03.000 looking at vaccinations and medications in the summer. That's all been delayed. So there are a lot

00:42:07.000 of questions before we start handing over our trust when it comes to disease X, whatever it may

00:42:12.000 be and wherever it might lead us.

00:42:14.000 Experts are preparing for what is known as disease X or the next pandemic virus.

00:42:19.000 One of the most reliable voices during the pandemic period was Dr. John Campbell, who began

00:42:26.000 as an advocate for vaccines and still advocates for many medications that are what we would call

00:42:31.000 conventional or traditional vaccines, but has become over the course of the pandemic an extremely

00:42:36.000 outspoken critic of the government's and pharmaceutical establishment during the

00:42:40.000 pandemic period.

00:42:41.000 Here he is talking about disease X. Now, I want to talk now about disease X.

00:42:47.000 Which is on this website here.

00:42:50.000 This is the World Economic Forum site as far as I can derive.

00:42:55.000 Why I like John Campbell is he's pretty straightforward, he's dry, he's trustworthy, he's not a person who's hysterical or hyperbolic, not evangelical, but you can tell he's extremely committed to telling the truth.

00:43:08.000 He uses academic information.

00:43:09.000 The fact that he's someone that's subject to bans and strikes and attacks tells you that it is indeed telling the truth that's the problem, not misinformation.

00:43:18.000 Disease X, this is how we should prepare for the next big virus.

00:43:23.000 Global collaboration and adequate funding are needed to improve pandemic preparedness and ensure fast action to keep a viral outbreak at bay.

00:43:35.000 It says you can get a long way being able to produce something, not quite sure what's being produced, but you can produce something or other, something or other, that will target a novel virus before that virus even emerges.

00:43:49.000 Isn't it interesting how opaque and vague the language is?

00:43:52.000 You could produce something.

00:43:53.000 That means some sort of vaccine product comparable to the current raft of vaccines for the previous pandemic, whether it's the AstraZeneca one, where there are a lot of questions.

00:44:03.000 Johnson & Johnson, a lot of questions.

00:44:04.000 Moderna, a lot of questions about efficacy at very least.

00:44:07.000 Pfizer, a lot of questions about profit and efficacy.

00:44:10.000 Can't just sort of plough on as if, well, that was an unmitigated success.

00:44:13.000 Let's get ready for the next round.

00:44:15.000 I assume here they're referring to repurposed drugs.

00:44:18.000 which could be rolled out very quickly and very cheaply and may be efficacious against a range of conditions.

00:44:25.000 Maybe that's what they mean.

00:44:27.000 But anyway, they're going to produce something.

00:44:31.000 Can't read too much into that, all they say is something.

00:44:34.000 Could even mean a vaccine, I don't know, whatever they mean there.

00:44:39.000 Anyway, that will target a novel virus before that virus even emerges. 0.93

00:44:43.000 It's interesting because I suppose what's indicated there, and what Dr John Campbell is very deft at communicating, is how do you know that something is going to emerge?

00:44:52.000 Because, let's face it, what we're discussing, let's have it right, I know many of you range in views from this whole thing was deliberate, it was deliberately leaked, to it was accidentally leaked, to, you know, presumably some of you still believe it could be natural origin.

00:45:04.000 I know there are many people that think, oh, they tried their best with the vaccines.

00:45:07.000 Other people think the most nefarious, malfeasant schemes imaginable have taken place.

00:45:12.000 But when we hear that the WAF are discussing a future pandemic, gain-of-function research that's even more dangerous than the research that led to the last pandemic is continuing, Weapons manufacturers are involved in making vaccines. 0.52

00:45:24.000 It starts to seem extraordinary, particularly when you couple that with the general climate of our planet now, where there's complete mistrust for institutions and a sense that measures that afford control and generate compliance are favourable to the powerful.

00:45:39.000 I'm not saying anything about how the pandemic came about.

00:45:41.000 Who benefited from it, though?

00:45:42.000 Well, the most powerful financial interests in the world benefited, would you say?

00:45:46.000 Yes.

00:45:46.000 Did the state, the government, benefit?

00:45:47.000 Yes.

00:45:48.000 Did Bill Gates benefit?

00:45:49.000 It's extraordinary, isn't it?

00:45:49.000 Yes.

00:45:50.000 The people that benefited are the people that are telling us, there's going to be another pandemic any minute.

00:45:54.000 Hang on to your hat.

00:45:55.000 Oh, I bet there's another one.

00:45:56.000 You did so well out of the last one.

00:45:58.000 It's a virus we don't know yet, but we do know it's out there.

00:46:02.000 Do we?

00:46:03.000 But we do know it's out there.

00:46:05.000 Now, unfortunately, Much to my annoyance and your annoyance, I felt compelled to delete yesterday's video.

00:46:16.000 My apologies.

00:46:19.000 The trick is to live to fight another day.

00:46:22.000 That's what we aim for.

00:46:23.000 What you've just witnessed there is the great power of censorship.

00:46:26.000 In the end, content creators begin to censor themselves in order, as Dr. John said, to live to fight another day.

00:46:33.000 We've seen the video that Dr. John is referring to, and he talks about the potential gain-of-function origins of certain recent medical global When someone's censoring themselves, it shows you how far down the line we are.

00:46:46.000 That it's acceptable that gain-of-function research continues after we've all begun to understand that it's likely and possible that it's gain-of-function research that led to that event.

00:46:57.000 But someone saying that is controlled and curtailed.

00:47:00.000 Can you see that even where regulation is being applied appears to be in the service of the powerful?

00:47:06.000 No one's applying regulation to gain the function research, which was banned and then reinstated.

00:47:10.000 No one's regulating dual function research, chemical weapons and vaccines simultaneously being created and experimented on.

00:47:16.000 These are the kind of things that should be regulated and controlled, not the free speech of people that want to have an open conversation.

00:47:23.000 The kind of open conversations that if they were being had at the beginning of the pandemic, it's Almost certain now that we can say less people might have died.

00:47:31.000 Lockdowns might have been challenged, medical measures might have been challenged, and therefore potentially less people taking their own lives, less deaths from cancer and heart disease, just because people would have been able to get their treatment is all I'm saying at this stage.

00:47:44.000 So look at how power is being exercised by, in this case, YouTube, who use the WHO's community guidelines to censor content.

00:47:51.000 We've been censored, John Campbell's Clearly alluding to censorship.

00:47:54.000 Fortunately, on the platform we're on now, where we stream every day, we are not censored.

00:47:58.000 That's why we're there.

00:47:59.000 If you want to support us, click the link in the description to become a supporter of our community.

00:48:04.000 Examining a particular virus that was experimentally used to infect mice caused a disease of the brain and at the end of the study, none of the mice at the end of the study were alive anymore.

00:48:18.000 None of them are alive anymore. 0.98

00:48:20.000 How many mouses have got to die before these people start showing some damn respect? 0.90

00:48:25.000 Because a certain event had happened to them that made them not alive. 0.95

00:48:29.000 We don't know what's made these mouses not be alive, but it was something to do with this disease X. Well, Jesus Christ, shut that window!

00:48:37.000 No, no, leave the window open.

00:48:38.000 I think I've just had another brilliant idea.

00:48:41.000 Oh, my brain's hurting.

00:48:42.000 What is it?

00:48:43.000 Ow! 1.00

00:48:43.000 Carrying out research, And, oh, and vaccine development. 1.00

00:48:47.000 Carrying out research on vaccine development for known viral families.

00:48:52.000 Oh yeah, I suppose we could make vaccines.

00:48:54.000 Who do we get to do that?

00:48:55.000 Who's that on line one?

00:48:56.000 Hello, Bill!

00:48:58.000 Would give humanity a decided advantage over the next disease, X.

00:49:05.000 So who knows, maybe the World Economic Forum will be good enough to develop a vaccine for us Great Unwashed, so it's all ready for us. 0.96

00:49:13.000 Please, please, please!

00:49:15.000 It could be my birthday and Christmas present!

00:49:17.000 Thanks as always to Dr John for his tireless and intrepid work.

00:49:20.000 World leaders meeting in Davos for the World Economic Forum this week are set to discuss concerns about the potential for a future pandemic that could cause 20 times more fatalities than Covid-19.

00:49:30.000 Is that with disease X or from disease X?

00:49:33.000 Known by the placeholder name of Disease X, the term is used to refer to planning for a hypothetical future international epidemic caused by a pathogen as yet unknown to cause human disease, according to the World Health Organization.

00:49:45.000 We can't continue to bring you this awakening and hopefully enjoyable content without the support of our partners.

00:49:52.000 That's why I've got to ask you, and I'm glad to ask you, are you struggling with back taxes or unfiled returns?

00:49:57.000 The IRS is escalating collections, adding, get this, 20,000 new agents and sending over 5 million collection letters to kick off 2024 to spend on things that you probably don't agree with, like wars and measures and a total lack of infrastructure.

00:50:11.000 In these challenging times, your best defense is Tax Network USA.

00:50:16.000 Don't let the IRS take advantage of you.

00:50:18.000 With over 14 years of experience, Tax Network USA have saved their clients over $1 billion in back taxes.

00:50:25.000 No matter the size of your tax issue, their expertise is your advantage.

00:50:29.000 They specialize in negotiating with the IRS, aiming to significantly reduce your debt.

00:50:33.000 Tax Network USA doesn't just negotiate, they also protect your assets from IRS seizures and manage your yearly returns for ongoing compliance.

00:50:41.000 Importantly, they are licensed to help you with all state tax issues, regardless of where you live in the United States.

00:50:47.000 The clock is ticking.

00:50:48.000 Don't wait as the IRS steps up its game.

00:50:51.000 Seize control of your financial future now.

00:50:53.000 Contact Tax Network USA for immediate relief and expert guidance.

00:50:57.000 Call 1-800-245-6000 or visit taxnetworkusa.com forward slash brand.

00:51:05.000 Don't let tax issues overpower you.

00:51:07.000 Turn to Tax Network USA and find your path to financial peace of mind.

00:51:12.000 Right, let's get back to this content.

00:51:14.000 In a session entitled Preparing for Disease X, a panel led by the WHO chief Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus will talk about novel efforts needed to prepare healthcare systems for the multiple challenges ahead if we are to be ready for a much more deadly pandemic, the WEF said.

00:51:30.000 It's like Jaws 3.

00:51:31.000 They've tried the idea, we've all been completely beguiled and enchanted, but you've just got to keep the box office going.

00:51:38.000 You're gonna need a bigger boat.

00:51:39.000 Worldwide, the number of potential pathogens is very large, while the resources for disease research and development, R&D, is limited, the WHO had previously said in a statement.

00:51:47.000 So, world governments, how about a little bit of that moolah?

00:51:50.000 Wouldn't like to be getting a nasty little disease now, would ya? 0.71

00:51:54.000 Can I just show you what it's done to these mouses?

00:51:56.000 Oh, God!

00:51:56.000 Oh, that's terrible!

00:51:57.000 Yeah, gonna need 5% of your health budgets this year.

00:52:01.000 British scientists have said that a vaccine for a new virus with pandemic potential could be developed in as little as 100 days.

00:52:07.000 In August last year, researchers from the University of Oxford announced that they're examining how to adapt the vaccine it created for COVID-19 for disease X. Because that went so well.

00:52:16.000 A few little tweaks here and there.

00:52:18.000 Don't you think it would be worth investigating and understanding the impact, effects, and failures, most significantly, of the last pandemic before blazing ahead in a disease X as if it's from the people that bought you the response to COVID-19?

00:52:31.000 It's X!

00:52:33.000 Ballers! 0.61

00:52:34.000 Schwab!

00:52:35.000 Fauci, let's go again, like the Beatles of diseases.

00:52:35.000 Gates!

00:52:40.000 Of course, the COVID inquiry in our country, which wouldn't be happening without independent media, which wouldn't be happening without your curiosity, and even when it is happening, it's happening within sort of pretty slim guardrails, I would say, is being delayed right before it gets to vaccine efficacy, let alone excess deaths.

00:52:55.000 It's being boxed.

00:52:56.000 Meanwhile, in the UK, a long-awaited probe into the development of COVID vaccines and drugs was today postponed indefinitely.

00:53:03.000 When are you going to do it?

00:53:04.000 We cannot be definitive about that.

00:53:05.000 Why is that?

00:53:06.000 Because we're probably going to have an election, try and get another centralist stooge in office, and then we'll be able to blame the last lot when we eventually hold a heavily diluted inquiry in which no significant truth will be able to emerge.

00:53:17.000 Because if you told people the truth, this is the conclusion they would reach.

00:53:19.000 Don't trust the media.

00:53:20.000 Don't trust the government.

00:53:21.000 Don't trust big business.

00:53:22.000 Demand real democracy now.

00:53:24.000 Hearings for the fourth module of the official inquiry were set to begin this summer but have been rescheduled.

00:53:28.000 Baroness Heather Hallett, chair of the investigation said, I know the postponement of these hearings will be disappointing for some, people interested in justice, but not so disappointing for the global establishment who want this plainly hushed up.

00:53:40.000 I want to ensure our hearings in 2024 are as effective as possible, and I recognise the increasing pressure on organisations to respond to requests and provide information to the inquiry.

00:53:49.000 I wish to reassure you that we will hold these hearings as soon as possible.

00:53:52.000 That's what happens if you have the establishment accountable to the establishment, doing deals with the establishment, people leaving government to go and work for Moderna, and leaving Moderna to work for the government, and leaving the government to go and work for META.

00:54:04.000 A set of individual and collective interests that have much more in common with one another than they do with you.

00:54:10.000 And similarly, we have a lot more in common with one another than we do with them.

00:54:15.000 That's why inquiries like these never go anywhere because essentially it's not the blind leading the blind, it's the corrupt inquiring into the activities of the corrupt.

00:54:22.000 I recognise the increasing pressure on organisations to respond to requests and provide information to the inquiry.

00:54:27.000 Which organisations?

00:54:28.000 Presumably that means vaccine manufacturers, because at least it's public record now that AstraZeneca's vaccines caused death.

00:54:34.000 We know that Johnson & Johnson's vaccine caused blood clots.

00:54:36.000 We know that there are a lot more adverse reactions reported than are being widely shared.

00:54:40.000 We certainly have excess deaths to look into.

00:54:42.000 But the people that the inquiry are worried about pressurising are vaccine manufacturers.

00:54:46.000 Why?

00:54:46.000 Because they might get a job there one day.

00:54:48.000 Because they receive funding from them.

00:54:48.000 Why?

00:54:50.000 Why?

00:54:50.000 Because it's essentially the same establishment.

00:54:52.000 They should be under some pressure.

00:54:54.000 Pressure's exactly what they should be feeling.

00:54:56.000 Dozens of families are suing AstraZeneca over allegations they were harmed by the firm's jab, which was rolled out widely in January 2021, nine months after the nation was plunged into its first lockdown.

00:55:06.000 Many were struck down by vaccine-induced thrombosis topenia.

00:55:09.000 Baroness Hallett vowed to ensure the inquiry, which is thought to have cost taxpayers in the area of £145 million already.

00:55:17.000 Oh, my God. 0.95

00:55:18.000 You monsters, you animals, you're paying for that. 0.99

00:55:21.000 You paid for the vaccine. 0.93

00:55:22.000 You'll probably pay for the payouts when people are able to prove that they were injurious.

00:55:27.000 What an extraordinary system.

00:55:29.000 Meanwhile, we don't want to put any pressure on those vaccine... It must be so exhausting.

00:55:33.000 How many mouses have you maimed this morning?

00:55:35.000 Well, five.

00:55:36.000 shattering stuff. What happened once is fairly...

00:55:38.000 We've got a disease that's got so many syllables in it, it's gonna take the rest of me life to learn how to say it, 1.00

00:55:43.000 Fuck off. 1.00

00:55:43.000 mum! 1.00

00:55:44.000 Baroness Hallett vowed to ensure the inquiry, which is thought to have cost taxpayers in the area of £145

00:55:50.000 million already, doesn't run beyond summer 2026.

00:55:54.000 Look, it doesn't run beyond the summer 2026.

00:55:57.000 It's called COVID-19!

00:55:58.000 It's seven years!

00:56:01.000 What the hell was that that just went on?

00:56:03.000 Well, I think what happened was, is there was an event that legitimized authoritarianism and generated huge profits.

00:56:08.000 So, should we put that in the inquiry?

00:56:10.000 No, don't put that in the inquiry.

00:56:11.000 Just say something about these mouses.

00:56:13.000 God knows what happened to them.

00:56:15.000 According to a statement on the inquiry website, the hearings will now take place at a later date.

00:56:18.000 You try that with your taxis.

00:56:20.000 You try that with your relationship with the state.

00:56:22.000 You try that with your relationship with power.

00:56:24.000 Oh, can we deal with that at a later date?

00:56:26.000 Yes, because you're going to have a lot of dates behind bars to think about it.

00:56:30.000 Especially when I consider, and I invite you to consider, that the very scientists that are suspected of potentially causing the Wuhan lab leak are now engaged in similar research with a MERS-like virus.

00:56:43.000 Doesn't that seem preposterous?

00:56:44.000 Doesn't that seem like the sort of thing that should be regulated rather than Dr. John Campbell going through documents with a pen like the world's loveliest deputy headmaster saying, well, I'm a bit concerned about that.

00:56:55.000 Could you try a bit harder in PE?

00:56:56.000 I am trying!

00:56:58.000 Scientists linked to Wuhan bat researchers have been accused of performing dangerous experiments on a MERS-like virus that could spark a pandemic.

00:57:06.000 A team from the University of North Carolina published a paper in Science Advances detailing how they'd synthesized a MERS-like bat virus and used it to infect human cells and humanized mice.

00:57:16.000 As you know, I'm against humanized mice.

00:57:18.000 Why do that to mouses? 0.93

00:57:20.000 MERS is one of the deadliest viruses, killing around 35% of people that it infects.

00:57:25.000 Good news, everyone.

00:57:26.000 The team includes Professor Ralph Baric and Trevor Scobie, who worked with Professor Shi Zhengli of the Wuhan Institute of Virology before the pandemic, creating chimeric viruses by inserting spike proteins from bat viruses into the original SARS virus.

00:57:38.000 Turns out now that that might have been such a fantastic idea.

00:57:42.000 In hindsight, hindsight is 2020, and 2024, that's disease X!

00:57:46.000 The new experiment used a reverse genetics technique to create a MERS-like bat virus called BtCoV422, which was collected by Shi Zhengli's team in China What is the gain? 0.94

00:57:57.000 Well, pretty good if you're BioNTech or Moderna or Pfizer or Big Tech or part of the global establishment.

00:58:02.000 I'm going to stay indoors.

00:58:04.000 The scientists said they had performed the latest study to test whether antivirals would work against an infection.

00:58:10.000 But experts warned the experiments were needlessly risky for little gain.

00:58:13.000 What is the gain?

00:58:14.000 Well, pretty good if you're BioNTech or Moderna or Pfizer or Big Tech or part of the global establishment.

00:58:20.000 Yeah, but what about all these mouses?

00:58:22.000 I mean, it's not looking good for them.

00:58:23.000 Their brains are coming out of their ears.

00:58:24.000 Anton van der Meur, professor of molecular immunology at Oxford University, told The Telegraph,

00:58:29.000 because coronaviruses evolve rapidly, these experiments carry the risk of generating variants

00:58:34.000 which are better able to infect human cells, and therefore humans.

00:58:37.000 Infection and equipment error means that infection of those performing the experiment is a risk and the infected individual could then spread the infection outside the laboratory and initiate a pandemic.

00:58:47.000 The consequences would be potentially devastating and it's not clear to me what the benefits are.

00:58:52.000 There's no prospect of using such work to develop a vaccine or antiviral drug since these can only be tested in humans during an actual pandemic.

00:59:00.000 Huh, but surely they wouldn't do that, right kids?

00:59:03.000 It seems to me this experiment is simply not justified.

00:59:06.000 Incredible, but what does he know, that crackpot professor of molecular immunology at Oxford University?

00:59:13.000 Info Wars!

00:59:13.000 for wars.

00:59:14.000 Professor Barak developed the reverse genetics technique, which not only enables a virus

00:59:18.000 to be brought to life from its genetic code, but allows scientists to mix and match parts

00:59:22.000 from other viruses. However, experts said that the same experiments could have been

00:59:26.000 carried out by inserting the spike protein of BtCoV422 into a harmless pseudovirus. But

00:59:31.000 where's the fun in that? Pseudovirus experiments should have been the first things they did 0.82

00:59:35.000 before making this live virus, one scientist who chose to remain anonymous said.

00:59:39.000 They went straight to testing the live virus in human cell culture, and they performed experiments in humanised mice, which presents a higher risk of escape than just cell culture.

00:59:48.000 If I'd seen these sorts of results for pseudovirus, I would have said that it should stop there.

00:59:52.000 The virus is a potential threat.

00:59:53.000 Don't proceed to using a live virus.

00:59:55.000 They went straight to the bit that this guy would say never ever do.

00:59:58.000 They've already done that bit.

01:00:00.000 The bit that he said, don't do that.

01:00:01.000 They've done that already.

01:00:02.000 So the reason that they perhaps are suspicious that disease X could be around the corner is because they know what they're doing in laboratories.

01:00:07.000 It's not like, oh, the erosion of bloody forests and you not doing your recycling.

01:00:11.000 That's what's caused all of this.

01:00:13.000 No, it's because they know in laboratories around the world you're funding this kind of crackpot stuff that even experts within the scientific field are saying is risky with no clear benefits, unless it was highly profitable and allowed you to terrify people into total compliance.

01:00:25.000 I suppose that would be useful, but it's not some sort of sci-fi dystopia we're living in, right?

01:00:29.000 Experts also warned that the experiments were performed at bio-safety level, BSL-3 level, rather than the highest BSL-4 safety level.

01:00:37.000 Accidental releases from BSL labs are unfortunately quite common, added Professor Vandermeer.

01:00:43.000 Right, firstly, what's going on at BSL Safety Level 1 and 2?

01:00:46.000 Just scrap them.

01:00:47.000 You should even let kids do Play-Doh at that level.

01:00:50.000 3 isn't safe enough.

01:00:51.000 I'm gonna put some music on, have a couple of drinks, maybe a little bit of the other, and now it's time for some experimenting, baby!

01:00:58.000 BSL4!

01:00:59.000 Bare minimum!

01:01:00.000 Experiments on potentially pandemic organisms should only be performed if there are clear benefits to humanity and should be performed at the very highest level of containment.

01:01:09.000 Doesn't it make you think you've got a disparate and broken system where you have no means of control over experimentation?

01:01:15.000 that's plainly deleterious to our chances of survival as a species, where you have open communication continually censored on public platforms in order to control debate, where you have dissenting voices continually criticized, where you have people openly discussing there's going to be another disease X and none of us having the ability to oppose it, when you have a WHO treaty that's going to impair democracy even further Any nation that signs up to that treaty will have to give over 5% of their budget and will have to comply to any measures that the treaty suggests.

01:01:46.000 And that is all undergirded by this kind of lunacy.

01:01:49.000 Even if they know something we don't and we're all dumb and they know a bunch of rational things that we can't understand, we should still be invited to participate democratically in whether or not these experiments take place.

01:01:59.000 Because after the last pandemic, I'm not quite ready for another one.

01:02:03.000 But that's just what I think.

01:02:04.000 Let me know what you think in the chat.

01:02:05.000 See you in a second.

01:02:06.000 Thank you for choosing Fox News.

01:02:08.000 Good day.

01:02:09.000 No. 1.00

01:02:09.000 Here's the fucking news. 1.00

01:02:11.000 Roxanne says, Does Putin have a spouse? 1.00

01:02:16.000 Does Putin have a spouse?

01:02:18.000 I want to know about that guy's private business.

01:02:20.000 Putin, do you even have a spouse?

01:02:22.000 Critical thought, please consider... Oh no, you need the also one, the two of them. 0.95

01:02:27.000 You need the collective thing for it to make sense, you soppy sausage.

01:02:32.000 Blue Nose Bob calls it gain of Fauci. 0.99

01:02:35.000 Liquor giant, go back into it again, don't be so silly. 0.99

01:02:39.000 Blue Nose Bob. 0.96

01:02:40.000 Gain of Fauci research, he's calling it.

01:02:42.000 Liquor Giant.

01:02:43.000 New viruses are coming from their labs.

01:02:45.000 I don't feel super confident about what's going on in those monster mash labs.

01:02:48.000 It was a graveyard smash!

01:02:51.000 WNPLM.

01:02:52.000 I've had 37 jabs, but I still need 12 boosters.

01:02:55.000 It might be time for you to get another hobby.

01:02:57.000 Liquor Giant.

01:02:58.000 Viruses are normally one every several generations.

01:03:00.000 Not constant.

01:03:01.000 This is natural.

01:03:04.000 Uh, this is not natural.

01:03:05.000 Did I say it's natural?

01:03:06.000 This is not, yeah, that's the opposite of the news.

01:03:08.000 Disease X for Gen X is second tri- Ah, and then Ben Manning UK123.

01:03:13.000 Sorry I was so rude earlier, Russ.

01:03:15.000 I didn't think you'd see it anyway.

01:03:17.000 I have real faith that you care about Gonzalo Lira.

01:03:19.000 Good on you and it's fantastic you're covering it.

01:03:21.000 Apologies.

01:03:22.000 You sweet...

01:03:23.000 Lovely, beautiful people.

01:03:26.000 I am determined and faithful that we will elevate these chats.

01:03:30.000 People will come in here in the future and they'll think that they're in Paris in 1920.

01:03:35.000 They'll think that this is a symposium in ancient Greece.

01:03:39.000 Athenian principles, a great and great debate will be abound.

01:03:43.000 Paul the String says, Russell Brand, did you look into Fort Detrick?

01:03:46.000 Yeah, Liam, who works here on the show, said that It's the equivalent of what they have in England.

01:03:51.000 Our one's called Pork Town.

01:03:56.000 There's nothing going on here except we're developing chemical weapons, you know. 0.91

01:04:00.000 So yeah, we did look into it, mate.

01:04:01.000 We know exactly what's going on.

01:04:03.000 It's a lot of skullduggery.

01:04:04.000 Putin, DrJ43 says, Putin has X kids.

01:04:08.000 Does that mean 10 kids?

01:04:09.000 Or they used to be kids, and then it became something else.

01:04:12.000 Russell Milk, have you seen this thing?

01:04:13.000 This comes from our Awakened Wonder chat, where there's really good big Lebowski etching being posted by, I think, is it Ellen Sophia?

01:04:20.000 Or are you commenting on Ellen?

01:04:22.000 Someone's posted an image.

01:04:24.000 Of, uh, me on a baby milk bottle.

01:04:27.000 I don't know how I feel about that.

01:04:29.000 It's a genie in a bottle.

01:04:30.000 You gotta rub it the right way.

01:04:32.000 Uh, replying to atmo5237, mice not mouses, please consider letting go of pedantry in favor of humor.

01:04:41.000 Favorite critical thought.

01:04:43.000 Anyway, I think it is officially mouses.

01:04:47.000 What would this, if you had multiple ones of them, what would you call them?

01:04:50.000 Yeah, would you go?

01:04:51.000 It's mouses.

01:04:52.000 Little lovely mouses.

01:04:53.000 How many mouses are gonna die? 0.99

01:04:55.000 Um, hey, so we were talking about, uh, Maddow, weren't we?

01:04:58.000 And Maddow saying that Trump is anti-politics.

01:05:02.000 Let's get back into that.

01:05:04.000 Plus, we've got to see Rebel News, like that dude, Arvey, pursuing John Kerry through Davos.

01:05:10.000 And John Kerry sort of trying to mouse his milk. 0.96

01:05:13.000 Apologetic pest. 0.95

01:05:14.000 I like that.

01:05:14.000 That's one of my favorite phrases, mouse milk.

01:05:16.000 Like, he's pursuing him through Davos, really bugging him out, like, going, uh, Mice, Mice, um, hi, John, don't you think it's a bit stupid that you come here on a private jet, isn't it? 0.98

01:05:26.000 I've done a lot for the planet! 0.87

01:05:28.000 He's, like, really outraged, and you can see it.

01:05:30.000 You can see what's happening.

01:05:32.000 It's all sort of I've never even seen a private jet.

01:05:33.000 I'm sure John Kerry's trying his best on that private jet.

01:05:36.000 Like, do you remember that one we did?

01:05:37.000 Did you ever see the video we did where it's him in like an ingressional hearing?

01:05:41.000 Where he goes, I don't, I've never even seen a private jet.

01:05:45.000 I don't know what a private jet is.

01:05:46.000 Well, it says here that your wife owns a private jet and you were on it.

01:05:50.000 Oh, you know, I remember that now.

01:05:53.000 I just thought that was a flying tube.

01:05:56.000 I didn't know what that was.

01:05:57.000 I was wondering how I was getting from A to B at such an astounding pace.

01:06:02.000 Where are all the other passengers?

01:06:04.000 I can watch what movie I want to watch.

01:06:04.000 This is amazing.

01:06:06.000 And look, I don't have to wear a seatbelt.

01:06:08.000 It's extraordinary up here.

01:06:10.000 We'll show you that in a second.

01:06:12.000 Let's have a look at Mitchell Maddow freaking out about Donald Trump.

01:06:16.000 The degree to which he has loosed himself from the shackles of that entirely means that there is no moment on the trail where some reporter or a person gets up in a town hall and literally says, what would you be doing in Gaza?

01:06:28.000 It's the most obvious question.

01:06:29.000 It's because the basis of his candidacy is he's running against politics.

01:06:34.000 He's running against politicians.

01:06:35.000 He's running against policy.

01:06:37.000 He's running against the whole idea that a Congress does a thing in a country that has a strong man leader.

01:06:42.000 He's running for A situation in which he is the leader, there is no government, there isn't a policy process, because there's just what he feels like on a day.

01:06:52.000 Apparently that's what's being harnessed, that kind of anti-establishment sentiment that is all pervasive because of the failings of the establishment.

01:07:01.000 But he has been in the White House for four years before and, you know, Still Congress, still Senate, still institutions, still Supreme Court.

01:07:12.000 And that is the form of government that he's offering and that is, I think, what his most enthusiastic supporters like about him.

01:07:20.000 We got Whitney Webb coming on the show on Friday. 1.00

01:07:20.000 Hey, listen! 1.00

01:07:23.000 Why don't you join us live?

01:07:24.000 If you're an Awakened Wonder, you can go over, become an Awakened Wonder right now.

01:07:28.000 You can support our content.

01:07:30.000 You can join us live with Whitney Webb.

01:07:31.000 We'll be talking about Davos.

01:07:32.000 We'll be talking about Jeffrey Epstein.

01:07:34.000 In addition to that, you get one additional video a week.

01:07:37.000 You know the videos that we make?

01:07:38.000 There's Deep Dive, Here's the News videos.

01:07:40.000 You get an exclusive one every single week, plus you get early access.

01:07:44.000 To other content.

01:07:45.000 Whitney Webb, for example, you can join at 3pm GMT.

01:07:48.000 And what's the other times?

01:07:50.000 10am ET.

01:07:51.000 And if you're in Brazil, like Glenn Greenwald, I happen to know, it's two hours earlier than that.

01:07:56.000 Glenn will be coming on the show soon.

01:07:57.000 Jordan Peterson will be coming on the show soon.

01:07:59.000 I'm reaching out to JP.

01:08:01.000 You know, JP Sears.

01:08:02.000 I love JP, don't you?

01:08:04.000 All these people will be joining us.

01:08:06.000 I'm in touch with our man Crowder.

01:08:08.000 We are, we're trying to create Brand Gino.

01:08:10.000 We're doing a lot of work.

01:08:12.000 We're working very hard on Brand Gino and I want to welcome and get ready for their names coming across the screen right now.

01:08:17.000 Put up, can you put my monitor on so I can see it?

01:08:19.000 If, you know, not as a trick.

01:08:20.000 I just love, look at this.

01:08:21.000 Look, Ski Milk U, Citizen Smithy, Knight's Crutch, Maristar333, Seri.

01:08:25.000 Look at all these people supporting us become.

01:08:28.000 One of us.

01:08:29.000 One of us.

01:08:30.000 Make them one of us.

01:08:31.000 Yeah, get Michael Malice on the show.

01:08:32.000 We've got to reach out to Michael Malice.

01:08:33.000 That's a good one.

01:08:34.000 That is a very good one.

01:08:35.000 Okay, you glorious awakened wonders, join me on Locals for more content right now.

01:08:40.000 Is it possible that the legacy media have got a cameraman hero?

01:08:44.000 Well, deliberately showing the truth.

01:08:46.000 We've got a great January 6th meme, and we've got the Rebel News interview with John Kerry we were chatting about earlier.

01:08:52.000 I came here on a bicycle!

01:08:53.000 I snycled through the snow!

01:08:55.000 I used my own toenails as a kind of sail!

01:08:58.000 I created one of those winged Fandango machines!

01:09:02.000 So, hey, join us.

01:09:03.000 We're going to be available right now on local.

01:09:05.000 Synchronicity, Elfin Sophia, Mr. Oscar, True Chimera, Fire Girl 2020.

01:09:10.000 We're joining you now.

01:09:11.000 Then we're going to be talking about the tenets of Buddhism and the Ten Commandments.

01:09:15.000 We are combining scripture, radicalism, anti-establishmentism, personal awakening and community values and why it's all at a price that's right.

01:09:25.000 Join us tomorrow if you're a rumbler.

01:09:27.000 Get over to Locals if you want to be in Awake and Wonder with us right now.

01:09:31.000 Not for more of the same tomorrow, but for more different.

01:09:33.000 Remember, we're talking about our man, that poor journalist that was murdered.

01:09:36.000 We're talking about Biden in a bike shop this time.

01:09:39.000 I know it's serious.

01:09:41.000 Stay free!

Stay Free - Russel Brand - January 16, 2024

Trump’s LANDSLIDE Iowa Win - MSNBC FREAK OUT!- Stay Free #285

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript