Vivek Ramaswamy has left the legacy media, which has triggered a total media meltdown. Russell Brand explains why and why not, and why we should care about freedom of speech. Plus, a look at why Bernie Sanders should have been allowed to speak on the campaign trail in 2016, and how the media's reaction to Donald Trump's historic victory in the Iowa Caucuses shows the deep state's obsession with a single man who could have easily beat them in a primary election. Stay Free with Russell Brand wherever you get your news and information, and don't forget to SUBSCRIBE to stay up to date with Russell's newest podcast, Stay Free With Russell Brand: Stay Free! Stay Free, Russell Brand Subscribe to Stay Free on iTunes and leave us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts and Podchaser. You can also join our FB group, and join the conversation by using the hashtag , and find us on Insta-Friendship, . We post polls, questions and thoughts on all socials, and topics related to the show, and we'll be posting them on both socials and the results are featured on the next episode of Stay Free on Tuesday s of the show. Subscribe, tweet us your thoughts and your thoughts on the show! Timestamps! Send us your responses to this episode! and other stories you think we should know about this episode and our thoughts on it! Thanks for listening and your feedback! Love, Russell and Ralden - The Rambling! - Rambling - Raving - Rachit Parikh - Thank you, Russell - Tim - - Thank you for listening to this podcast? - Your support is so much more! - Raldee - Raffy - R. - R.A. & the R.B. - Rachel Maddow & R.D. - RYAN M. ( ) - Timestop Thanks, R.K. ( ( ) - (R.M. ( ) . . (A. , R. is not even saying his name is enough? ) ( ) . - I don t care about your own people are slightly different? (and I don't care about the other people are? ) - TALK TO ME?
00:02:19.000I know how difficult it is to be in this world.
00:02:22.000You may yet be elated for amidst the blizzard, Trump did ascend.
00:02:27.000Many of you will have expected, of course, that Trump would have succeeded in Iowa, but it was a total success and it has, of course, preceded a total legacy media Meltdown.
00:02:39.000We're going to be talking about both those things.
00:02:40.000We're going to be talking about Vivek's departure.
00:02:43.000We will be covering in some detail, and I'm going to let you know this if you're watching us on YouTube, because you know Dr. John Campbell's content's been taken down.
00:02:57.000Why are we being prepped for disease X?
00:02:59.000And is it more likely that the laboratories that are currently working on solutions for disease X will come up with a solution or cause a lab leak?
00:03:11.000I'm talking to those of you in the rumble chat and you awakened wonders that continually support our content that are part of this movement and as a result get access to one additional and exclusive Video a week as well as early access to much of our content and I'm looking now at Trucker Hershey, I'm looking now at Scott Blight and all of you saying that the research will lead to a further lab leak and who can condemn that kind of skepticism and cynicism living in a world that we currently live in
00:03:39.000Where escalating war is being normalized, whether it's the conflict in the Yemen, where there is ongoing propaganda and a refusal by the legacy media to accept their own culpability in the increasing popularity of Donald Trump.
00:03:53.000And let me know, has his popularity ever been higher?
00:03:58.000No Republican has ever won a contested caucus by more than 12.8%.
00:04:03.000Trump broke the record and won by 30%, winning all 99 counties.
00:04:15.000They've misspelt Vivek Ramaswamy and what a departure that is.
00:04:18.000Now, have any of you seen the legacy media reporting on this subject?
00:04:25.000They refused to show Trump's victory speech and we did a poll actually asking, is that because Trump's victory speech might be so dangerous?
00:04:34.000That, uh, you know, this could be such dangerous misinformation that to broadcast it would be irresponsible.
00:04:39.000I mean, maybe we're being irresponsible right now, even discussing Donald Trump.
00:04:43.000Maybe, maybe if you had some institutions that people respected, if you had a deep state that cared about American people rather than Continually creating opportunities to bring them down.
00:04:55.000If you didn't have a military-industrial complex forever provoking and advocating for new war, if you didn't have a legacy media that amplified and conveyed nothing but the interests of the powerful while censoring and surveilling ordinary people and opposing and dissenting voices, maybe We wouldn't all be in the thrall of a man who knows how to stand behind a microphone.
00:05:16.000Here's the Legacy Media's analysis in the form of Rachel Maddow.
00:06:58.000I am Steve Reno, said that on the Rumble chat.
00:07:01.000I'm saying hello to Firegirl2020 and MaximumTitus444 and all of our supporters over there on Locals, our awakened wonders who get early access to much of our content and exclusive access To some of it, let's have a look at the rest of Rachel Maddow's analysis of misinformation, disinformation, and their peculiar refusal to show Trump's speech.
00:07:21.000It was the sweetest thing I've ever seen.
00:07:24.000We will keep an eye on that as it happens.
00:07:27.000We will let you know if there's any news made in that speech, if there's anything noteworthy, something substantive and important.
00:07:33.000The reason I'm saying this is, of course, there is a reason that we and other news organizations have generally stopped giving an unfiltered live platform.
00:07:42.000And that's because when people watch that stuff, people kind of like him and it's Very difficult when we have as our own candidate for the ongoing presidency a waxen, cadaverous zombie who looks like he's been scooped up from the tomb, shoved from the sepulchre, and into the polling booths.
00:08:02.000This is all the more extraordinary because of the candidate we're being invited to vote for, because of the lack of acknowledgement and admission of the failings of the establishment, the institution, the historic Democrat Party, the failings of Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, 2008, none of that stuff ever analysed or questioned with the level of scrutiny that they'll apply to every syllable and metaphor uttered by Donald Trump and it's not working and they cannot stand it.
00:08:30.000...to remarks by former President Trump.
00:08:35.000It is a decision that we regularly revisit.
00:08:39.000And honestly, earnestly, it is not an easy decision.
00:08:43.000But there is a cost to us as a news organization of knowingly broadcasting untrue things.
00:08:49.000Right, who among you... I'm talking to you if you're watching this on YouTube right now.
00:08:52.000I'm talking to you if you're watching this on Locals.
00:08:54.000I'm talking to you if you're watching it on Rumble or wherever we have proliferated our content in order to grow this movement.
00:09:01.000When you hear a member of the MSNBC Legacy Media State Amplification Propagandist Unit saying, we cannot convey misinformation, do you not see the sudden phantom of Rachel Maddow saying, if you take this thing, it stops.
00:09:25.000But put in there, Rachel Maddow, vaccine, and what will come up is Rachel Maddow telling you that the vaccine is effective against transmission, that it's effective against hospitalisation, that it's effective... These are all things that we know are not true.
00:10:14.000It's the right name for them, isn't it?
00:10:15.000Because I didn't know who they were about three hours ago.
00:10:19.000But now the Houthis, I'm supposed to get it up!
00:10:22.000For another war against some poor people somewhere?
00:10:25.000This will not be adequately or eloquently covered by the legacy media.
00:10:29.000They will simply continue to advocate for their masters in the war machine and then wonder why someone with a jot of charisma can be elevated to landslide status in the Iowa caucus.
00:10:43.000That is a fundamental truth of our business and who we are and so his remarks tonight will not Also, they make him sound more and more powerful.
00:11:26.000Let's have a look at our friends Michael Schellenberger from Public and Max Blumenthal from Greyzone who have both been posting on this.
00:11:34.000The only thing funnier than MSNBC refusing to cover an election winner is Russiagate hoaxer Rachel Maddow condemning the practice of knowingly broadcasting untrue things.
00:11:46.000Both CNN and MSNBC carried the entirety of the speech by DeSantis after openly refusing to carry the speech by Trump Even though Trump won a landslide with 51% against the Sanders' 21%, you know these numbers by now, it's madness.
00:11:58.000CNN and MSNBC are flagrantly embracing their role as propagandists.
00:12:03.000And this speech, this terrifying speech, do you want to see it?
00:12:14.000Get ready for the sweet melodies, so refined and divine they could be coming from a Gaelic harp or the pipe of Lord Krishna himself, for this is a vibrational frequency that will take you to another dimension.
00:12:31.000Get ready, if you're watching on YouTube, hang on to your hats, put your fingers in your ears, lock up your chickens and every bit of livestock you've got, because here comes a person offering a polite speech.
00:13:24.000Whether it's Republican or Democrat or Liberal or Conservative, it would be so nice if we could come together and straighten out the world.
00:13:41.000Look at this guy, he's just a kind of man with his sons flanking him saying, it's time you come together, Democrats, Republicans.
00:13:48.000It's the sweetest, politest thing, more statesmanly.
00:13:52.000And when you think of the alternative, remember...
00:13:54.000I think the whole system and this whole establishment needs radical alteration, decentralisation and that power should be close to you.
00:14:00.000That your individual sovereignty, your freedom to become who you are is more important than any of the atrophying systems of corruption that dominate global politics.
00:14:09.000But I do not think the solution that they're so vociferously advocating for, Joe Biden staring out baffled from his own face like a chick emerging from a cracked egg, is a viable alternative to this.
00:14:25.000Straighten out the problems and straighten out all of the death and destruction that we're witnessing that's practically never been like this.
00:14:32.000It's just so important and I want to make that a very big part of our message.
00:14:59.000Remember, if you're watching this on YouTube, we'll be available for about another eight, nine minutes or so, then we'll be exclusively on the free stream itself, the stream that is Rumble.
00:15:07.000If you're not an Awakened Wonder yet, become an Awakened Wonder, you get exclusive access to one in-depth video per week, early access to much of our content, including our interviews with Brilliant, real, legit journalists.
00:15:17.000People like Glenn Greenwald, Matt Taibbi, Whitney Webb.
00:15:20.000We're recording I think tomorrow or the next day and we're going to be asking a lot of questions.
00:15:41.000Think of that compared to the pomposity and piety available to you on MSNBC.
00:15:46.000Thought about this long and hard and we, you know, we can't show Donald Trump in case he does some news.
00:15:52.000He might do some news at you and even worse than that he could do some fake news and I'm not talking about fake news like the vaccines are effective and work.
00:16:00.000I'm not talking about facts and news like fake news like he's peeing all over hookers.
00:16:04.000I'm talking about Fake news like the system is corrupt and you do genuinely need to galvanize and organize against this kind of banalized bureaucratic tyranny that is being advocated for and amplified by the legacy media.
00:16:18.000And I think they both actually did very well.
00:16:43.000And I also want to congratulate Vivek, because he did a hell of a job.
00:16:50.000He came from zero, and he's got a big percent, probably 8%, almost 8%, and that's an amazing... The idea that the legacy media think that you would not be able to watch Watch that.
00:17:14.000Curiously, the Vivek story is one of the interesting aspects of this, because it's just a couple of days ago that, what did Donald Trump say?
00:17:22.000Kind of took Vivek away at the knees there for a moment, when I figure, and let me know in the chat what you guys think, that he was working out, hang on, what Vivek Ramaswamy is doing He's recognising that the Republican Party establishment is backing Nikki Haley, or maybe Ron DeSantis, and if Trump isn't on the ballot because of the endless flurry of indictments, then I will inherit the mantle, I mean this is pretty obvious analysis I suppose, isn't it, of the anti-establishment Republican candidate.
00:17:53.000But Donald Trump didn't like that, did he?
00:17:54.000And he sort of went, very sly, it's sly.
00:17:57.000And it's something about, you know, Donald Trump's use of language.
00:18:17.000And to all of the people standing behind me and all of the people in this room and so many great politicians and great dignitaries and friends, I just want to thank you all.
00:18:27.000This is a very special night and this is the first Because the big night is going to be in November, when we take back our country, and truly, we do make our country great again.
00:20:10.000And I'm also making the decision that this has to be an America First candidate in that White House.
00:20:17.000As I've said since the beginning, there are two America First candidates in this race.
00:20:23.000And earlier tonight, I called Donald Trump to tell him that I congratulated him on his victory.
00:20:29.000And now, going forward, he will have my full endorsement for the presidency, and I think we're going to do the right thing for this country.
00:20:38.000Hey, Vivek's been on the show a couple of times, and we've enjoyed talking to him a great deal.
00:20:44.000Certainly, he's a modern politician who understands the modern dynamics and how to communicate.
00:20:49.000MSNBC are not treating Vivek with Very much respect at all.
00:20:54.000If you're watching this over on YouTube, we're going to be available for another couple of minutes, then we'll be exclusively available on Rumble advocating for your individual sovereignty and freedom and community democracy and the dismantling of centralized establishment interests and institutions across the world and across the nation.
00:21:11.000Let's have a look at MSNBC criticizing Vivek with a lot of supercilious haughtiness.
00:21:16.000We have had the field shrink yet again tonight.
00:21:21.000Vivek Ramaswamy will never again grace our television screens as a presidential candidate.
00:21:26.000David Plouffe, are you shocked with the Trump endorsement that apparently went along with his bowing out?
00:21:49.000Just remember in this orgy of self-congratulatory commentary that Joe Biden is cancelling primaries wherever they are possible, refusing to debate RFK, who's having to run as an independent now, would have loved to have run as a Democrat.
00:22:11.000Again, while they glory in the inconsistencies and perceived inadequacies of their opponents, they will not analyse or even acknowledge their own inferiorities failings and flaws and that's what makes them impossible to believe impossible to embrace identifiable as a mouthpiece an amplification project for the globalist establishment other than that i can't see what they're doing cast in it yeah yeah he's gonna have
00:22:46.000I know a lot of you have been reached by his criticism of the reporting around Jan 6th, some of the risks he took around 9-11, and he's indeed, he's passionate and willing to confront people on the stand.
00:22:58.000Can people like, I'm saying, Nikki Haley.
00:23:01.000Should we have a look at, let's have a look at Nikki Haley saying that it's a two-horse race, but she, she wasn't second, was she?
00:23:30.000Let's have a look at Trump commenting on Joe Biden.
00:23:34.000And again, always try to hold in your mind, like a mandala, the near specter, the almost ghostly apparition of Joe Biden.
00:23:45.000A person who it's difficult to believe has the stones or the juice for the next five years to carry the mantle of the most powerful person in the world to navigate the complex territories that will surely emerge in diplomatic and indeed militaristic relationships with China.
00:24:01.000Russia, the constant economic crisis, disease X. Think of the global challenges that we're likely to confront and whether or not Joe Biden is fit to handle them.
00:24:18.000I'm talking to you, SueBiz22, Synchronicity525.
00:24:22.000Shole, fella, Steph, all of you lot in our Awake and Wonder chat, and ChatterX, and AmericaSun, and TZ76, Patriot, and Mooseman18, let me know.
00:24:34.000He did have a little bit of the old school Trump asser-dity, I mean, asser-bick-ness, rather, as opposed to the sort of conciliatory tone we saw elsewhere.
00:24:44.000This definitely is, I would say, Trump is observing the emergent and rising popularity of RFK and I feel like we're seeing a new more statesmanly Trump except on the subject of Biden.
00:26:12.000When an anti-establishment candidate gains more and more popularity, the more that he is condemned, even through the judiciary.
00:26:20.000Even as the accumulating condemnation threatens to swamp and indeed would ensnare any other candidate, Trump's potency appears to rise.
00:26:32.000I think fueled by the justified loathing of the establishment.
00:26:37.000Fueled by our shared mistrust of these institutions.
00:26:41.000But this is one piece of analysis that I do agree with.
00:26:45.000The big picture takeaway from that, and I don't mean to be, again, too dark as you said on this, but it is not... If we are worried about the rise of authoritarianism in this country, we are worried about potential rise of fascism in this country.
00:26:57.000We're worried about our democracy falling to an authoritarian and potential...
00:27:02.000See, when we talk about fascism and authoritarianism and democracy, when a candidate won't run in any primaries, when you have pervasive surveillance and a censorship industrial complex threatening to shut down free speech, when you've just had a pandemic where true, open, honest, sincere, scientifically verifiable information was shut down and censored, when you've had the Hunter Biden laptop story where they admitted, the CIA admitted that we censored that information or advocated for its censorship at least, Because we thought it might affect the results of the election.
00:27:33.000When you have disease X lingering like a future fart held in an old man's bowel as a new threat on the horizon, knowing that it will ultimately be used to legitimise more expenditure, more authoritarianism, where is the authoritarianism now?
00:27:52.000What does dictatorship look like in 2024?
00:27:55.000Of course they always use the sort of strongman argument.
00:27:58.000They still live in the kind of echo of ideas of military leaders such as Mussolini or Hitler or Pol Pot continually claiming that Trump is part of that lineage as the brilliant writer Martin Gurry pointed out.
00:28:12.000You can't have military dictators of that style unless they have some kind of control over a paramilitary organization or a significant wing of the American military or the army.
00:28:24.000Donald Trump does not have paramilitaries at Mar-a-Lago.
00:28:31.000They're having little drinks with umbrellas in them and playing golf, I suspect.
00:28:35.000So this kind of hysteria is, I think, unwarranted and It's in a sense the only game they have left.
00:28:45.000All they have is the continual amplification of that condemnation because they're never going to say, we're going to offer you a viable alternative because we're not owned by the donor class, we're not corrupt globalists, we are here to represent American people.
00:28:58.000They can never say that because it's not true and it's unlikely ever to be true again.
00:29:01.000Potentially fascist form of government.
00:29:03.000The leader who is trying to do that is part of that equation.
00:29:10.000To see the rest of this and that, start the countdown right now.
00:29:13.000We've got some fantastic stuff coming up.
00:29:15.000We've got Dr. Joseph Lepardo, him out of Florida, right, talking about disease X and its likely escalation, or more importantly, its utilization, because we don't know what disease X is yet.
00:29:24.000But we do know that there's some extraordinary planning going on.
00:29:27.000And we're going to continue this analysis of legacy media coverage There's a countdown on the screen now.
00:29:34.000If you're watching us on YouTube click the link in the description and join us.
00:29:57.000Let's get on with Rachel Maddow and Cruz's supercilious condemnation of, yes, Donald Trump, but actually democracy itself, because all that's happened is a bunch of people in Iowa have gone out in the snow to vote for someone they appear to like very much indeed.
00:30:14.000And the American electorate is made up of two major parties.
00:30:18.000One of those parties has been flirting with extremism on the ultra-right for a very long time.
00:30:24.000They've brought them in in a way that they haven't been central to Republican electoral politics ever before, and I know because I've been studying this.
00:30:49.000And it's a man saying, I'd like to thank the fellow candidates.
00:30:52.000But once you have radicalized one major party so that those are the preferences of the people who adhere to your party, the leader is interchangeable.
00:31:00.000And yes, Trumpism is sometimes what we call it.
00:31:02.000MAGA movement is probably a better way to do it.
00:31:05.000But there is an authoritarian movement inside Republican politics.
00:31:08.000But what about the authoritarianism within the Democrat party, a party that would rather lose to Trump than win with Bernie Sanders, that keeps offering us Joe Biden?
00:31:17.000Have you seen that dude in the bicycle shop yet?
00:31:23.000But like, when you see poor dear Joe Biden staggering around, poor fella staring out of his own face like it's saline, what do you guys call it, cellophane?
00:31:32.000Like he's just staring out at the world, peeping through the mystery of life.
00:31:37.000How can this be offered to you as the alternative?
00:31:44.000They are pushing Trump to get more and more extreme because the more extreme things he says, the more they adhere to him.
00:31:52.000And that is coming from a very large proportion of the American right that adheres to the Republican Party.
00:31:58.000And that's why this is a Republican Party problem more than it is the problem of one man and his leader.
00:32:07.000Hey, remember that conspiracy theory that foreign DNA could poten- that the vaccines could mysteriously, excuse me, and curiously alter your genetics?
00:32:19.000That was one of the ones, like, you know me, I'm an open-minded guy.
00:32:23.000Don't be so open-minded that your brain falls right out of your head.
00:32:28.000I'm open because I know that we are deceived so endlessly, because I know how this machine works, because I've seen the inside of certain aspects of this machine.
00:32:39.000But when you hear, like, Alex Jones, who I consider, you know, he's been on the show, I consider Alex Jones to be sort of a contemporary shaman who dabbles in mysticism, who goes into various and varying states and conveys factual information, but also extemporises and riffs on it.
00:32:55.000I think it would be fair to say that about Alex.
00:32:57.000And when you hear him say something like it's meddling with your DNA, you think, oh, come on, Alex.
00:33:03.000It can't be that the vaccine, if you take it, is a sort of a weird genetic medicine that gets in there and dabbles with the fundaments of your material being, but it turns out that it does do that, and Alex Jones is completely correct, and he is like the sort of medical general, isn't he?
00:33:19.000Like Joseph Lupardo, isn't he sort of like the Florida...
00:34:36.000Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have always played it fast and loose with COVID-19 vaccine safety.
00:34:43.000But their failure to test for DNA integration with the human genome, as their own guidelines dictate, when the vaccines are known to be contaminated with foreign DNA, is intolerable.
00:36:07.000I remember seeing him over the pandemic period down there in Florida, who are widely understood to have handled the pandemic extremely well under Ron DeSantis.
00:36:16.000But I think it's very interesting with the emergence of disease X that we are still dealing with disease Y. Why are we all locked in our homes?
00:36:25.000Why are we granting indemnity to the makers of these vaccines?
00:36:30.000Why are we recommending masks and social distances?
00:36:33.000Why would we continue to trust these people?
00:36:36.000And as world leaders and the WHO meet in, of all places, Davos to discuss disease X, a future pandemic that could cause, you know, fingers crossed, 20 times more fatalities than COVID-19.
00:36:48.000Is that fatalities with disease X or from disease X?
00:36:52.000The debate around this chicken and egg question is being postponed.
00:36:56.000COVID-19 inquiry in our country is being booted off right into the future, even with the slim, slender and diluted questions they were willing to put in front of the politicians that they're basically allowed to go, oh no, my phone factory reset.
00:37:11.000I've lost all the WhatsApp messages from that period.
00:37:14.000So we're looking at disease X, how it will be handled.
00:37:17.000And whether or not you're concerned about ongoing gain-of-function research, which in our country, the UK, is continuing in a mysterious facility that also manages and makes and manufactures chemical weapons.
00:37:51.000A whole new pandemic for a whole new year.
00:37:54.000Luckily, our friends at Davos, the WHO and world leaders are discussing a response.
00:37:59.000But are you not concerned that disease X could be caused by a lab leak when it's possible that the previous pandemic was caused by a lab leak?
00:38:08.000Well, hopefully they're not doing crazy stuff with mouses all over the world right now.
00:38:16.000Thanks for joining me on our voyage to truth and freedom.
00:38:19.000As we continue to awaken together, we do need to form a resistance, a counterpunch to the attack on our freedom.
00:38:26.000As the WHO Treaty means that your nation will be disempowered and you will be further disempowered as an individual, we need to organize together, become an Awakened Wonder, join our community if it's within your means.
00:38:38.000For surely, disease, The British government has unveiled a new vaccine research facility where scientists are working to prevent future pandemics.
00:38:44.000that the laboratory that's investigating vaccines are also developing chemical weapons.
00:38:51.000The British government has unveiled a new vaccine research facility
00:38:54.000where scientists are working to prevent future pandemics.
00:38:57.000It's located at Porton Down, a high security research facility
00:39:00.000best known for its work on chemical warfare.
00:39:02.000Okay, now those of you that are world-versed in this territory will be familiar
00:39:07.000with some of the ideas and theories about the evolution of certain medications,
00:39:11.000the funding for certain vaccines, the idea of dual-use facilities and dual-use research,
00:39:16.000and indeed, the possibility that gain-of-function research itself.
00:39:38.000There's certainly some interesting patent information available that suggests the chronology is peculiar.
00:39:43.000In any event, the solution will be provided by world leaders at Davos.
00:39:48.000Davos is beginning this week and members of the WHO, whose treaty will further empower them and disempower your government, are talking with world leaders who have possibly passed through WEF-type schemes about what the solutions for the next pandemic will be.
00:40:03.000The last pandemic was preceded by exercises of preparation known as Event 201.
00:40:08.000As well as being someone that's interested in the potential nefarious undergirding of globalism, I do, in spite of what it might say under this video, in spite of the pop-ups that you might see while watching this video, care very deeply indeed about truth.
00:40:24.000And of course, What will rationally be said is there's just been a pandemic.
00:40:28.000Of course, we're preparing for other eventualities and future pandemics.
00:40:32.000And people make all sorts of curious arguments about why there are more pandemics.
00:40:36.000Oh, as rainforests are depleted, we're exposed to more creatures and more viruses and more diseases.
00:40:41.000People seem very reluctant to say, as we do more gain and function research, as we develop more bioweapons, it's possible that there are more and more lab leaks.
00:40:49.000People are even less keen on saying, as we seek to impose control at Unprecedented levels.
00:40:55.000It's more and more likely that the legitimization of measures of control will be seen in the form of future pandemics.
00:41:00.000That's the kind of thing that you simply cannot say out loud.
00:41:03.000I know that many of you are pondering and inquiring into exactly those kind of ideas.
00:41:07.000Let me know in the chat and the comments.
00:41:09.000But it seems to me that we at least have to remain open to the following possibilities.
00:41:13.000Gain-of-function research and biochemical activity is leading to new outbreaks and new viruses and that we oughtn't be handing over more control to organisations like the WHO or indeed the WAF or perhaps even our own national government in the wake of what happened in the last pandemic.
00:41:29.000Whether that's something as simple as the revelations in Fauci's behind-closed-doors inquiry that Social distancing rules were basically made up, that masks essentially don't work, that lockdowns could have caused many more problems, certainly economically and maybe even socially and psychologically, than they caused.
00:41:45.000And there is, of course, the phenomenon of excess deaths, the looming phantom, the spectre, the unanswerable question that won't come up in any COVID inquiry in your country, the United States, or mine.
00:41:56.000And we've just heard, of course, as you have, that the COVID inquiry is being delayed conveniently for a few months. It was due to start
00:42:03.000looking at vaccinations and medications in the summer. That's all been delayed. So there are a lot
00:42:07.000of questions before we start handing over our trust when it comes to disease X, whatever it may
00:42:50.000This is the World Economic Forum site as far as I can derive.
00:42:55.000Why I like John Campbell is he's pretty straightforward, he's dry, he's trustworthy, he's not a person who's hysterical or hyperbolic, not evangelical, but you can tell he's extremely committed to telling the truth.
00:43:09.000The fact that he's someone that's subject to bans and strikes and attacks tells you that it is indeed telling the truth that's the problem, not misinformation.
00:43:18.000Disease X, this is how we should prepare for the next big virus.
00:43:23.000Global collaboration and adequate funding are needed to improve pandemic preparedness and ensure fast action to keep a viral outbreak at bay.
00:43:35.000It says you can get a long way being able to produce something, not quite sure what's being produced, but you can produce something or other, something or other, that will target a novel virus before that virus even emerges.
00:43:49.000Isn't it interesting how opaque and vague the language is?
00:43:53.000That means some sort of vaccine product comparable to the current raft of vaccines for the previous pandemic, whether it's the AstraZeneca one, where there are a lot of questions.
00:44:03.000Johnson & Johnson, a lot of questions.
00:44:04.000Moderna, a lot of questions about efficacy at very least.
00:44:07.000Pfizer, a lot of questions about profit and efficacy.
00:44:10.000Can't just sort of plough on as if, well, that was an unmitigated success.
00:44:27.000But anyway, they're going to produce something.
00:44:31.000Can't read too much into that, all they say is something.
00:44:34.000Could even mean a vaccine, I don't know, whatever they mean there.
00:44:39.000Anyway, that will target a novel virus before that virus even emerges.
00:44:43.000It's interesting because I suppose what's indicated there, and what Dr John Campbell is very deft at communicating, is how do you know that something is going to emerge?
00:44:52.000Because, let's face it, what we're discussing, let's have it right, I know many of you range in views from this whole thing was deliberate, it was deliberately leaked, to it was accidentally leaked, to, you know, presumably some of you still believe it could be natural origin.
00:45:04.000I know there are many people that think, oh, they tried their best with the vaccines.
00:45:07.000Other people think the most nefarious, malfeasant schemes imaginable have taken place.
00:45:12.000But when we hear that the WAF are discussing a future pandemic, gain-of-function research that's even more dangerous than the research that led to the last pandemic is continuing, Weapons manufacturers are involved in making vaccines.
00:45:24.000It starts to seem extraordinary, particularly when you couple that with the general climate of our planet now, where there's complete mistrust for institutions and a sense that measures that afford control and generate compliance are favourable to the powerful.
00:45:39.000I'm not saying anything about how the pandemic came about.
00:46:23.000What you've just witnessed there is the great power of censorship.
00:46:26.000In the end, content creators begin to censor themselves in order, as Dr. John said, to live to fight another day.
00:46:33.000We've seen the video that Dr. John is referring to, and he talks about the potential gain-of-function origins of certain recent medical global When someone's censoring themselves, it shows you how far down the line we are.
00:46:46.000That it's acceptable that gain-of-function research continues after we've all begun to understand that it's likely and possible that it's gain-of-function research that led to that event.
00:46:57.000But someone saying that is controlled and curtailed.
00:47:00.000Can you see that even where regulation is being applied appears to be in the service of the powerful?
00:47:06.000No one's applying regulation to gain the function research, which was banned and then reinstated.
00:47:10.000No one's regulating dual function research, chemical weapons and vaccines simultaneously being created and experimented on.
00:47:16.000These are the kind of things that should be regulated and controlled, not the free speech of people that want to have an open conversation.
00:47:23.000The kind of open conversations that if they were being had at the beginning of the pandemic, it's Almost certain now that we can say less people might have died.
00:47:31.000Lockdowns might have been challenged, medical measures might have been challenged, and therefore potentially less people taking their own lives, less deaths from cancer and heart disease, just because people would have been able to get their treatment is all I'm saying at this stage.
00:47:44.000So look at how power is being exercised by, in this case, YouTube, who use the WHO's community guidelines to censor content.
00:47:51.000We've been censored, John Campbell's Clearly alluding to censorship.
00:47:54.000Fortunately, on the platform we're on now, where we stream every day, we are not censored.
00:47:59.000If you want to support us, click the link in the description to become a supporter of our community.
00:48:04.000Examining a particular virus that was experimentally used to infect mice caused a disease of the brain and at the end of the study, none of the mice at the end of the study were alive anymore.
00:49:15.000It could be my birthday and Christmas present!
00:49:17.000Thanks as always to Dr John for his tireless and intrepid work.
00:49:20.000World leaders meeting in Davos for the World Economic Forum this week are set to discuss concerns about the potential for a future pandemic that could cause 20 times more fatalities than Covid-19.
00:49:30.000Is that with disease X or from disease X?
00:49:33.000Known by the placeholder name of Disease X, the term is used to refer to planning for a hypothetical future international epidemic caused by a pathogen as yet unknown to cause human disease, according to the World Health Organization.
00:49:45.000We can't continue to bring you this awakening and hopefully enjoyable content without the support of our partners.
00:49:52.000That's why I've got to ask you, and I'm glad to ask you, are you struggling with back taxes or unfiled returns?
00:49:57.000The IRS is escalating collections, adding, get this, 20,000 new agents and sending over 5 million collection letters to kick off 2024 to spend on things that you probably don't agree with, like wars and measures and a total lack of infrastructure.
00:50:11.000In these challenging times, your best defense is Tax Network USA.
00:50:16.000Don't let the IRS take advantage of you.
00:50:18.000With over 14 years of experience, Tax Network USA have saved their clients over $1 billion in back taxes.
00:50:25.000No matter the size of your tax issue, their expertise is your advantage.
00:50:29.000They specialize in negotiating with the IRS, aiming to significantly reduce your debt.
00:50:33.000Tax Network USA doesn't just negotiate, they also protect your assets from IRS seizures and manage your yearly returns for ongoing compliance.
00:50:41.000Importantly, they are licensed to help you with all state tax issues, regardless of where you live in the United States.
00:51:07.000Turn to Tax Network USA and find your path to financial peace of mind.
00:51:12.000Right, let's get back to this content.
00:51:14.000In a session entitled Preparing for Disease X, a panel led by the WHO chief Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus will talk about novel efforts needed to prepare healthcare systems for the multiple challenges ahead if we are to be ready for a much more deadly pandemic, the WEF said.
00:51:39.000Worldwide, the number of potential pathogens is very large, while the resources for disease research and development, R&D, is limited, the WHO had previously said in a statement.
00:51:47.000So, world governments, how about a little bit of that moolah?
00:51:50.000Wouldn't like to be getting a nasty little disease now, would ya?
00:51:54.000Can I just show you what it's done to these mouses?
00:51:57.000Yeah, gonna need 5% of your health budgets this year.
00:52:01.000British scientists have said that a vaccine for a new virus with pandemic potential could be developed in as little as 100 days.
00:52:07.000In August last year, researchers from the University of Oxford announced that they're examining how to adapt the vaccine it created for COVID-19 for disease X. Because that went so well.
00:52:18.000Don't you think it would be worth investigating and understanding the impact, effects, and failures, most significantly, of the last pandemic before blazing ahead in a disease X as if it's from the people that bought you the response to COVID-19?
00:52:40.000Of course, the COVID inquiry in our country, which wouldn't be happening without independent media, which wouldn't be happening without your curiosity, and even when it is happening, it's happening within sort of pretty slim guardrails, I would say, is being delayed right before it gets to vaccine efficacy, let alone excess deaths.
00:53:06.000Because we're probably going to have an election, try and get another centralist stooge in office, and then we'll be able to blame the last lot when we eventually hold a heavily diluted inquiry in which no significant truth will be able to emerge.
00:53:17.000Because if you told people the truth, this is the conclusion they would reach.
00:53:24.000Hearings for the fourth module of the official inquiry were set to begin this summer but have been rescheduled.
00:53:28.000Baroness Heather Hallett, chair of the investigation said, I know the postponement of these hearings will be disappointing for some, people interested in justice, but not so disappointing for the global establishment who want this plainly hushed up.
00:53:40.000I want to ensure our hearings in 2024 are as effective as possible, and I recognise the increasing pressure on organisations to respond to requests and provide information to the inquiry.
00:53:49.000I wish to reassure you that we will hold these hearings as soon as possible.
00:53:52.000That's what happens if you have the establishment accountable to the establishment, doing deals with the establishment, people leaving government to go and work for Moderna, and leaving Moderna to work for the government, and leaving the government to go and work for META.
00:54:04.000A set of individual and collective interests that have much more in common with one another than they do with you.
00:54:10.000And similarly, we have a lot more in common with one another than we do with them.
00:54:15.000That's why inquiries like these never go anywhere because essentially it's not the blind leading the blind, it's the corrupt inquiring into the activities of the corrupt.
00:54:22.000I recognise the increasing pressure on organisations to respond to requests and provide information to the inquiry.
00:54:54.000Pressure's exactly what they should be feeling.
00:54:56.000Dozens of families are suing AstraZeneca over allegations they were harmed by the firm's jab, which was rolled out widely in January 2021, nine months after the nation was plunged into its first lockdown.
00:55:06.000Many were struck down by vaccine-induced thrombosis topenia.
00:55:09.000Baroness Hallett vowed to ensure the inquiry, which is thought to have cost taxpayers in the area of ÂŁ145 million already.
00:56:20.000You try that with your relationship with the state.
00:56:22.000You try that with your relationship with power.
00:56:24.000Oh, can we deal with that at a later date?
00:56:26.000Yes, because you're going to have a lot of dates behind bars to think about it.
00:56:30.000Especially when I consider, and I invite you to consider, that the very scientists that are suspected of potentially causing the Wuhan lab leak are now engaged in similar research with a MERS-like virus.
00:56:44.000Doesn't that seem like the sort of thing that should be regulated rather than Dr. John Campbell going through documents with a pen like the world's loveliest deputy headmaster saying, well, I'm a bit concerned about that.
00:56:58.000Scientists linked to Wuhan bat researchers have been accused of performing dangerous experiments on a MERS-like virus that could spark a pandemic.
00:57:06.000A team from the University of North Carolina published a paper in Science Advances detailing how they'd synthesized a MERS-like bat virus and used it to infect human cells and humanized mice.
00:57:16.000As you know, I'm against humanized mice.
00:57:26.000The team includes Professor Ralph Baric and Trevor Scobie, who worked with Professor Shi Zhengli of the Wuhan Institute of Virology before the pandemic, creating chimeric viruses by inserting spike proteins from bat viruses into the original SARS virus.
00:57:38.000Turns out now that that might have been such a fantastic idea.
00:57:42.000In hindsight, hindsight is 2020, and 2024, that's disease X!
00:57:46.000The new experiment used a reverse genetics technique to create a MERS-like bat virus called BtCoV422, which was collected by Shi Zhengli's team in China What is the gain?
00:57:57.000Well, pretty good if you're BioNTech or Moderna or Pfizer or Big Tech or part of the global establishment.
00:58:14.000Well, pretty good if you're BioNTech or Moderna or Pfizer or Big Tech or part of the global establishment.
00:58:20.000Yeah, but what about all these mouses?
00:58:22.000I mean, it's not looking good for them.
00:58:23.000Their brains are coming out of their ears.
00:58:24.000Anton van der Meur, professor of molecular immunology at Oxford University, told The Telegraph,
00:58:29.000because coronaviruses evolve rapidly, these experiments carry the risk of generating variants
00:58:34.000which are better able to infect human cells, and therefore humans.
00:58:37.000Infection and equipment error means that infection of those performing the experiment is a risk and the infected individual could then spread the infection outside the laboratory and initiate a pandemic.
00:58:47.000The consequences would be potentially devastating and it's not clear to me what the benefits are.
00:58:52.000There's no prospect of using such work to develop a vaccine or antiviral drug since these can only be tested in humans during an actual pandemic.
00:59:00.000Huh, but surely they wouldn't do that, right kids?
00:59:03.000It seems to me this experiment is simply not justified.
00:59:06.000Incredible, but what does he know, that crackpot professor of molecular immunology at Oxford University?
00:59:14.000Professor Barak developed the reverse genetics technique, which not only enables a virus
00:59:18.000to be brought to life from its genetic code, but allows scientists to mix and match parts
00:59:22.000from other viruses. However, experts said that the same experiments could have been
00:59:26.000carried out by inserting the spike protein of BtCoV422 into a harmless pseudovirus. But
00:59:31.000where's the fun in that? Pseudovirus experiments should have been the first things they did
00:59:35.000before making this live virus, one scientist who chose to remain anonymous said.
00:59:39.000They went straight to testing the live virus in human cell culture, and they performed experiments in humanised mice, which presents a higher risk of escape than just cell culture.
00:59:48.000If I'd seen these sorts of results for pseudovirus, I would have said that it should stop there.
01:00:02.000So the reason that they perhaps are suspicious that disease X could be around the corner is because they know what they're doing in laboratories.
01:00:07.000It's not like, oh, the erosion of bloody forests and you not doing your recycling.
01:00:13.000No, it's because they know in laboratories around the world you're funding this kind of crackpot stuff that even experts within the scientific field are saying is risky with no clear benefits, unless it was highly profitable and allowed you to terrify people into total compliance.
01:00:25.000I suppose that would be useful, but it's not some sort of sci-fi dystopia we're living in, right?
01:00:29.000Experts also warned that the experiments were performed at bio-safety level, BSL-3 level, rather than the highest BSL-4 safety level.
01:00:37.000Accidental releases from BSL labs are unfortunately quite common, added Professor Vandermeer.
01:00:43.000Right, firstly, what's going on at BSL Safety Level 1 and 2?
01:01:00.000Experiments on potentially pandemic organisms should only be performed if there are clear benefits to humanity and should be performed at the very highest level of containment.
01:01:09.000Doesn't it make you think you've got a disparate and broken system where you have no means of control over experimentation?
01:01:15.000that's plainly deleterious to our chances of survival as a species, where you have open communication continually censored on public platforms in order to control debate, where you have dissenting voices continually criticized, where you have people openly discussing there's going to be another disease X and none of us having the ability to oppose it, when you have a WHO treaty that's going to impair democracy even further Any nation that signs up to that treaty will have to give over 5% of their budget and will have to comply to any measures that the treaty suggests.
01:01:46.000And that is all undergirded by this kind of lunacy.
01:01:49.000Even if they know something we don't and we're all dumb and they know a bunch of rational things that we can't understand, we should still be invited to participate democratically in whether or not these experiments take place.
01:01:59.000Because after the last pandemic, I'm not quite ready for another one.
01:05:14.000That's one of my favorite phrases, mouse milk.
01:05:16.000Like, he's pursuing him through Davos, really bugging him out, like, going, uh, Mice, Mice, um, hi, John, don't you think it's a bit stupid that you come here on a private jet, isn't it?
01:06:12.000Let's have a look at Mitchell Maddow freaking out about Donald Trump.
01:06:16.000The degree to which he has loosed himself from the shackles of that entirely means that there is no moment on the trail where some reporter or a person gets up in a town hall and literally says, what would you be doing in Gaza?
01:06:37.000He's running against the whole idea that a Congress does a thing in a country that has a strong man leader.
01:06:42.000He's running for A situation in which he is the leader, there is no government, there isn't a policy process, because there's just what he feels like on a day.
01:06:52.000Apparently that's what's being harnessed, that kind of anti-establishment sentiment that is all pervasive because of the failings of the establishment.
01:07:01.000But he has been in the White House for four years before and, you know, Still Congress, still Senate, still institutions, still Supreme Court.
01:07:12.000And that is the form of government that he's offering and that is, I think, what his most enthusiastic supporters like about him.
01:07:20.000We got Whitney Webb coming on the show on Friday.
01:09:11.000Then we're going to be talking about the tenets of Buddhism and the Ten Commandments.
01:09:15.000We are combining scripture, radicalism, anti-establishmentism, personal awakening and community values and why it's all at a price that's right.