Stay Free - Russel Brand - Tucker Interview GONE VIRAL!! - My Reaction - #164

00:00:00.000 **birds chirping** **music**

00:00:28.000 Brought to you by Pfizer **music**

00:00:36.000 In this video, you're going to see the future.

00:00:38.000 **music** In this video, you're going to see the future.

00:00:48.000 Hello there, you awakened wonders.

00:00:50.000 Thanks for joining me on Stay Free with Russell Brand.

00:00:53.000 Welcome to our new viewers.

00:00:55.000 What a fantastic week it was last week with Tucker.

00:00:58.000 I'm going to be reflecting on that conversation, its significance, what it tells us about independent media and mainstream media.

00:01:04.000 Although, of course, you know that independent media now has to align with independent politics because mainstream media and centralist politics are aligned.

00:01:13.000 But that's what I think.

00:01:14.000 Let me know what you think in the chat.

00:01:16.000 If you're watching this now on Rumble, why don't you press the red button

00:01:18.000 and join us on Locals like so many already have, like Chef411 telling me simply

00:01:23.000 that they're drinking coffee right now.

00:01:26.000 "'Tucker touched on architecture and I fully agreed,' says Rational Anarchy."

00:01:29.000 It was a chroming and wonderful conversation.

00:01:32.000 It's being covered everywhere, but it happened here on Stay Free,

00:01:35.000 and we've got many more conversations like it to come.

00:01:37.000 Ron DeSantis coming up later this week, and we're reaching out to political figures,

00:01:42.000 pundits, and thinkers from across the political spectrum.

00:01:45.000 Let us know who you want to see come on here, because based on what happened here last week, we can get these guests if you want them enough.

00:01:52.000 Here to help me cover stories like Biden's cluster bombs is Gareth Roy, my on-screen assistant.

00:01:58.000 Hello, Gareth.

00:01:59.000 How are you all?

00:02:00.000 I am.

00:02:00.000 I can even feel Tucker's charisma rising up from that seat into your body.

00:02:05.000 That's why I've worn a jacket today.

00:02:07.000 You are a bit more like Tucker.

00:02:08.000 And I can see your feet are nude a la Tucker as well.

00:02:08.000 A little more.

00:02:12.000 That's how he likes to do stuff.

00:02:14.000 One of the stories that we're going to be covering in some detail is the cluster bomb story.

00:02:18.000 The Biden administration has agreed to provide Ukraine with cluster bombs, even though last year they said that if Russia used cluster bombs, That would be a crime.

00:02:26.000 When is a cluster bomb not a cluster bomb?

00:02:29.000 You know, when they need it not to be?

00:02:32.000 It makes you wonder, what are the ethics and ideals behind this conflict?

00:02:37.000 Of course, later in Here's the News, we'll be showing you some stuff about Tucker that we couldn't show you before, or didn't show you before.

00:02:42.000 And when we're exclusively on Rumble, if you're watching us on YouTube or listening to us on Twitter, wherever you're receiving this, the majority of the show can only happen on Rumble.

00:02:50.000 Not because of hate speech, but because of free speech.

00:02:52.000 We've got no time for hatred.

00:02:53.000 We don't have time as individuals.

00:02:55.000 We don't have time as a movement.

00:02:56.000 We don't have time as a species.

00:02:57.000 This is a time for alliance.

00:02:59.000 We're going to be talking about how your government wants to continue to censor you in spite of a federal judgment that says they should simply stop.

00:03:07.000 You will not believe the propaganda that we're going to show you.

00:03:10.000 We're going to show you a clip from CNN that if it was happening in a country that you already were predisposed to

00:03:15.000 dislike like for example Russia or perhaps a nation in the United Arab Emirates

00:03:21.000 You'd go. Oh look at this propaganda look at this propaganda, but it's actually happening in America

00:03:26.000 And what astonishes me is I don't think anyone's actually telling them to do it. I think they're voluntarily just

00:03:30.000 censoring themselves or Propagandizing themselves let me know in the chat in the

00:03:34.000 comments press the red button if you want to join us on Locals, but as an Englishman I am proud to welcome to our

00:03:40.000 noble mighty country Joe Biden President of the United States

00:03:46.000 We're going to be showing you a poll later where we asked you, who are you happiest being in charge of this current conflict?

00:03:53.000 Is it Joe Biden?

00:03:53.000 Would you like Trump in charge?

00:03:55.000 Would you like next week's guest on the show, Ron DeSantis?

00:03:57.000 Who was the other one?

00:03:58.000 I can't remember.

00:03:58.000 There's someone else.

00:03:59.000 He's on a poll.

00:04:00.000 I'll show you the answers in a minute.

00:04:01.000 But first, let's have a look at Biden.

00:04:04.000 Arriving in Downing Street, where he will meet the man that some people are calling a WEF stooge, Rishi Sunak.

00:04:12.000 Sorry, I forgot the name of our actual Prime Minister.

00:04:14.000 Just like Joe Biden did.

00:04:15.000 Joe Biden forgot, I forgot, he's a pretty forgettable guy.

00:04:18.000 His wife though, I remember her, she's got all sorts of hookups in the WEF.

00:04:22.000 Plus billions.

00:04:23.000 Allegedly.

00:04:25.000 Well, they're not alleged.

00:04:26.000 No, they're real.

00:04:27.000 You can see the money.

00:04:28.000 She paid her tax bill, yeah?

00:04:30.000 No, she won't pay it.

00:04:31.000 She won't pay.

00:04:31.000 Let's have a look at Biden arriving in Downing Street, our seat of power.

00:04:36.000 Journalists are in place, and I think here he comes.

00:04:38.000 Speaking of the president, he has now left the car and two of them.

00:04:46.000 He was that bothered, did he?

00:04:47.000 No.

00:04:48.000 It's like a very low-key arrival.

00:04:49.000 People are just looking around.

00:04:50.000 Have a look at some of the faces in the background.

00:04:52.000 No one cares.

00:04:53.000 There's the handshake.

00:04:55.000 And that's it.

00:05:06.000 That's the news.

00:05:06.000 That's it.

00:05:08.000 Here is the news.

00:05:09.000 We want to talk to you, though, about a rather more significant story.

00:05:12.000 Cluster bombs.

00:05:14.000 Is it right to cluster bomb the people of Russia and Ukraine?

00:05:18.000 Because the problem with cluster bombs is, of course, that they lie around for absolute ages.

00:05:23.000 The first clip that I would like to show you is the... Oh no, that's in the censorship one, is it?

00:05:30.000 Great news.

00:05:31.000 Just introducing the concept of cluster bombs.

00:05:33.000 Can we have a look at the poll result first and see who our viewers most would like?

00:05:38.000 Oh look, I mean that's hardly surprising.

00:05:41.000 With the USA sending cluster bombs to the Ukraine, who would you trust to bring this war to a conclusion?

00:05:45.000 Biden, that's just 2% of you.

00:05:47.000 Trump, 71% of you.

00:05:49.000 RFK, 23% of you.

00:05:51.000 We're going to have to tell Ron that when he comes in next week when I say you're going to have to work harder to win over the trust of the public because it's still It's still the big man, and I don't mean Joe Biden.

00:05:51.000 And dissent is 4%.

00:06:03.000 I don't like when I say that.

00:06:04.000 Let's have a look at how ABC brought you the news of these cluster bombs.

00:06:10.000 Tonight, the United States commits to supplying Ukraine with perhaps the most controversial weapon of this war so far.

00:06:16.000 It was a very difficult decision on my part.

00:06:21.000 Cluster munitions.

00:06:22.000 It's a difficult decision.

00:06:24.000 Does not mitigate children in the future having their legs blown off because of a shoddy choice in the past, does it?

00:06:32.000 Cluster bombs.

00:06:33.000 They spoke about Russia using cluster bombs last year.

00:06:36.000 Have we got that clip actually?

00:06:39.000 When America talks about the use of cluster bombs last year, it's because Russia were using them and they said it was reprehensible and in fact a war crime.

00:06:48.000 Yeah, Jen Psaki, who was press secretary at the time, she said that the use of cluster bombs by Russia constitutes a war crime.

00:06:56.000 NATO Secretary Jen Stoltenberg said we have seen the use of cluster bombs which will be in violation of international law.

00:07:03.000 I see here that over a hundred nations, in fact 120 nations I think it is, have banned the use of cluster bombs because...

00:07:12.000 Because they're dangerous.

00:07:13.000 What I suppose this makes me feel is that this conflict is continuing to escalate.

00:07:18.000 More and more escalatory measures are being taken, and by the same rationale that you can justify using cluster bombs.

00:07:26.000 Have you got the guy saying why they're using them?

00:07:28.000 Saying, look, we've got to use cluster bombs because in the event of a Russian advance, the situation will be worse.

00:07:33.000 Do we have that clip of that dude saying that?

00:07:38.000 By that rationale, you could justify using Anything at all?

00:07:43.000 What's next?

00:07:45.000 Nuclear weapons?

00:07:46.000 Let me know in the chat.

00:07:48.000 Do you think this could seriously become a nuclear conflict?

00:07:51.000 Do you trust the people that are in charge of this war right now to steer us away from the apocalypse?

00:07:57.000 I think one of the things that Tucker was most ardent about was that this war is a significant issue.

00:08:03.000 He called it a red line on the show.

00:08:05.000 He said that Trump's record on war is primarily what attracts him to I think he said he loves Trump didn't he said he loves Trump Well, what do you feel you guys join us over on locals press the red button?

00:08:15.000 Let us know in the chat If you want a leader that is going to bring you away from the precipice of an escalating war It's becoming clear that there's an agenda to annihilate Russia to destabilize Russia.

00:08:29.000 But the problem is History tells us, demonstrates to us plainly, Russia is not for the annihilating.

00:08:35.000 They are a serious, powerful nation.

00:08:39.000 Napoleon found that out.

00:08:40.000 Hitler found that out.

00:08:42.000 Is Joe Biden about to find that out?

00:08:44.000 Let me know in the comments.

00:08:45.000 Let me know in the chat if you think that checks are being written that the buck can't cash.

00:08:50.000 To put it plainly.

00:08:51.000 So this comes right after the Human Rights Watch issued a report that said Ukraine has killed its own citizens using cluster munitions.

00:08:59.000 So it's, you know, this is affecting Ukrainian citizens and I think that's one of the things that people have been talking about, especially when it comes to, as you say, children.

00:09:07.000 Yeah, is it like, you know like how the word cluster is usually used as a prefix for another phrase, like it's a cluster and then F word?

00:09:18.000 I won't use it here, because swearing is not allowed on YouTube.

00:09:21.000 Another thing I like about Rumble, as a matter of fact, is you can just freely use expletives, which sometimes seems necessary when critiquing the current administration.

00:09:29.000 Is it strange that I thought of Kellogg's Honey Nut Crusters?

00:09:33.000 Yes, it is, mate.

00:09:34.000 Because I was talking about cluster F words.

00:09:35.000 I wasn't talking about delicious breakfast cereals.

00:09:37.000 They were delicious.

00:09:38.000 But they were lovely.

00:09:39.000 Bound together with honey, little bits of rice crispy, little bits of frosty, a little bit of nut.

00:09:44.000 All delicious.

00:09:45.000 From that maniac Kellogg who thought he could build a better future without alcohol simply using cornflakes.

00:09:51.000 People are always thinking that in them days.

00:09:53.000 You simply can't do it.

00:09:54.000 Cluster bombs or cluster F words or delicious honey nut clusters.

00:09:57.000 The whole thing is coming together in a seemingly despicable way.

00:10:01.000 But to get back to the seriousness of it, obviously Biden was saying there, you know, I thought long and hard about it, this is not an easy decision for me.

00:10:08.000 The United States has killed more people with cluster munitions than any other country.

00:10:11.000 During the Vietnam War, the US dropped millions of cluster bombs in Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos, and each country is still dealing with them to this day.

00:10:20.000 Also, it seems like a pretty easy decision to make because it's a decision that they've simply made.

00:10:28.000 This country, I don't think of it as your country anymore because it's a country that's been co-opted.

00:10:32.000 It's a country that's being run, I would say, by deep state and corporate interests rather than a republic or a democracy, whatever term you prefer.

00:10:39.000 I know you guys are very particular about that stuff.

00:10:42.000 In any event, it seems that it's something that's become completely cut off from the will of the people and possibly that's because it's a propagandist state.

00:10:50.000 I want to show you now how CNN have reported on that federal judgment that the government have to stop interfering in social media.

00:11:01.000 I want to show you how that if this was broadcast anywhere else in the world, if these people happen to be wearing some kind of traditional dress, you would regard it as absolutely outlandish.

00:11:11.000 You would identify and recognize it for what it is, propaganda.

00:11:15.000 The state are pushing back through the Department of Justice on the recent judgment that they've got to stop interfering in social media posts.

00:11:25.000 Unless it's criminal activity or matters of national security.

00:11:30.000 They're pushing back on that.

00:11:31.000 Look at how CNN report on this subject and tell me how this differs from propaganda.

00:11:36.000 Have a look.

00:11:37.000 Just reading the words in this injunction, a quote, massive effort by the defendants to suppress speech based on content, those are the judge's words, calling the present case quote, arguably involves the most massive attack against free speech in the United States history, Ellie.

00:11:55.000 It's a dramatic decision by this judge, if you read through it.

00:11:58.000 He's citing to literature and George Washington and Ben Franklin.

00:12:01.000 Here's what... Those are pretty significant names in American history, particularly when it comes to constitutional and legislative rights for Americans.

00:12:08.000 Like, why wouldn't you cite those names?

00:12:10.000 It really is astonishing to me.

00:12:13.000 This is a conservative ideology that clearly comes through in this decision.

00:12:19.000 It's a conservative political ideology, right?

00:12:21.000 We saw some of the Is it a conservative political ideology, free speech?

00:12:25.000 When I grew up, free speech was transcendent of party politics.

00:12:30.000 Everyone believed in free speech.

00:12:32.000 Free speech was not on the table as an issue we were discussing.

00:12:36.000 When did free speech become a right-wing issue?

00:12:38.000 When did us being on Rumble become a... Oh, because Rumble, that's That's for far-right hate speech.

00:12:45.000 I don't have no time for hatred.

00:12:47.000 I don't believe in either political party.

00:12:49.000 I believe in your right to run your own life and to run your own community.

00:12:53.000 And I believe in democracy.

00:12:54.000 And I believe that what might be right for me might not be right for you.

00:12:57.000 And what might be right for the communities that I see myself affiliated with might not be right for your communities.

00:13:02.000 And we're going to have different views because we've had different experiences.

00:13:04.000 And if you shut down free speech, you shut down the possibility for conversation, you can't have democracy because you can't have debate and you can't have consensus.

00:13:12.000 What's more, it's pretty plain that many of the issues that were censored were censored incorrectly and illegally.

00:13:18.000 That there's evidence that your rights to free speech, your First Amendment rights, have already been breached.

00:13:24.000 How can CNN report on this matter as if the judgment itself is the problem?

00:13:30.000 Yeah, I mean, I just don't know how you can argue against something that the injunction issued barred government agencies from talking to social media companies for the purpose of, these are things, urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech.

00:13:49.000 That doesn't, to me, sound like a crazy, right-wing, Trump-appointed, mad decision to have made.

00:13:56.000 Can you come up with an argument for us?

00:13:57.000 Are we missing something?

00:13:58.000 Tell me.

00:13:59.000 I can see the argument they're making but it doesn't make sense.

00:14:01.000 Let me know in the comments and the chat what it is they're trying to say.

00:14:04.000 What is it that they believe in?

00:14:06.000 Is this just pure propaganda now?

00:14:07.000 Have a look.

00:14:16.000 Obviously, we're on YouTube right now.

00:14:18.000 When we're over the road in a second, click the link in the description, we'll get into that stuff in a little more detail.

00:14:23.000 But that's not a political issue.

00:14:25.000 It wouldn't be a political issue.

00:14:27.000 Autonomy, freedom over your own anatomy, freedom over the kind of choices you make.

00:14:33.000 How has these things become politicized?

00:14:35.000 How are some issues becoming amplified?

00:14:37.000 And how are they becoming The ruling itself is the opposite of judicial conservatism.

00:14:49.000 This is one of the most aggressive, far-reaching rulings you'll ever see.

00:14:52.000 What this judge is purporting to do is to micromanage, really, the day-to-day interactions between essentially the entire executive branch, all these agencies that are listed as defendants, and the leading social media companies.

00:15:04.000 Can't micromanage the government when they're micromanaging you?

00:15:10.000 When they're controlling your free speech?

00:15:12.000 When they're controlling and manipulating your free speech?

00:15:16.000 How can they use the term micromanage when they're talking about the government micromanaging your conversation?

00:15:23.000 And as a further irony, there are certain things that I cannot say right now because This censorship is real and it's ongoing.

00:15:32.000 Why is it happening?

00:15:33.000 What do you think is the future for platforms that make a commitment for free speech without your support?

00:15:37.000 That's why what you do and the decisions you make are integral, fundamental, vital.

00:15:41.000 That's why it's important that you join us in a minute when we come off this platform.

00:15:45.000 For micromanaging anyone, it would be to micromanage what the government can do, if anything.

00:15:49.000 To be honest, what we've learned the last few years, it would be, yeah, we should micromanage the government.

00:15:54.000 There's not a point where it's like, you've done so well in the last couple of years, we're gonna take the shackles off.

00:15:58.000 This is not a time to run free!

00:16:00.000 You did such a good job of shutting down debate, of censoring authentic voices, of closing down legitimate science.

00:16:06.000 You've done so well, just have fun with it now.

00:16:09.000 It's not like that, is it?

00:16:10.000 Express yourself.

00:16:11.000 Spring break!

00:16:12.000 Censor whatever you want to censor!

00:16:14.000 Shut down whatever you want to censor!

00:16:15.000 Shut down some things that are true!

00:16:16.000 Shut down things that you know to be true!

00:16:18.000 Yeah, and for the, you know, media, for the press to be saying, essentially, the government, your government, who have the ability to do all sorts of things, should be left to it, shouldn't be under any kind of microscope, should not be micromanaged in any way by the public.

00:16:32.000 It's incredible that you get that on a mainstream news outlet.

00:16:36.000 What type of relationship do you want with your government?

00:16:39.000 Do you see it as parental or do you see it as service?

00:16:42.000 I've thought that public officials are meant to be in your service, whether that's legislative, bureaucratic, it's in the service of the people that fund them.

00:16:50.000 It can't be that we are an authoritative structure that controls you like a parent.

00:16:56.000 To believe in censorship, you have to believe that you yourself or that others are incapable of discerning truth from fiction, making decisions that you believe are valid, or you are inclined towards authoritarianism and want the ability to shut down opposition.

00:17:14.000 That is not democracy.

00:17:16.000 That is not freedom.

00:17:18.000 That is repackaged tyranny.

00:17:20.000 What that smacks off to me is that the lessons of the last century have been learned in so much as the aesthetics of totalitarianism have altered.

00:17:29.000 No more jackboots, no more flags.

00:17:31.000 But the ability to control is being veiled.

00:17:35.000 It is being, I would say, sprinkled in saccharine, lubricated with sophistry and fine words.

00:17:42.000 Yeah, and once again, CNN, the mouthpiece of the state, is doing what a lot of its critics say it does, and it's doing exactly that here.

00:17:49.000 CNN, bundling your data more than pornography would.

00:17:53.000 Selling it more than pornography would.

00:17:55.000 So next time you're making a decision, CNN or the saucy stuff, now you know!

00:18:00.000 In the actual temporary injunction, the judge basically says, you're not allowed, administration, to talk to these social media companies about any protected free speech except for cyber security threats, national security threats, criminal threats.

00:18:15.000 But where's the line?

00:18:17.000 Oh yeah, that's the line!

00:18:18.000 Except for national security and criminality.

00:18:22.000 That's a perfectly good line.

00:18:23.000 Let me know in the comments in the chat if you think that there's a problem with that line, if there's anything wrong with it.

00:18:28.000 You're gonna love this now.

00:18:29.000 This is Karine Jean-Pierre we're gonna have a look at now.

00:18:32.000 I feel for her as a matter of fact because I presume that people that get into this line of work are idealists, that believe in change, believe in politics and now like Jen Psaki before every single day she finds herself on the TV having to say this is why cluster bombs are good now this is why censorship is good now no young idealist who believes in politics wants to be a mouthpiece for a government that's blowing up children and controlling conversation have a look at this and I think the only you know the only thing that gets Jen Psaki and maybe

00:19:04.000 carrying Jean-Pierre through difficult times like this, I reckon, is the jobs they're

00:19:09.000 going to end up having afterwards. But let's have a look at her now justifying

00:19:12.000 what is it cluster bombs? This is her saying why cluster bombs with the

00:19:16.000 right accent are okay. Have a look.

00:19:21.000 Some Democrats have said that giving cluster munitions to Ukraine undermines America's reputation as a human rights

00:19:27.000 defender around the world.

00:19:28.000 What's the White House response?

00:19:30.000 We don't believe that it undermines our reputation of being human rights offenders.

00:19:37.000 It really sounds like she says human rights offenders there.

00:19:40.000 I think she's meant to be saying defenders, because that was in the question, but it really is one of those Freudian moments again.

00:19:46.000 Have I accidentally said we're a human rights offender?

00:19:49.000 Because of the cluster bombing, yes.

00:19:51.000 We say all the time, right, when it comes to human rights, when it comes to having those conversations with either our partners or other heads of state, we certainly, the president never shies away from having those conversations.

00:20:04.000 Difficult, that's difficult stuff.

00:20:06.000 Have a look at the number of people that have held that position, that have gone on to have highly paid media positions.

00:20:12.000 And this is a bipartisan issue, as it often is.

00:20:14.000 Under Joe Biden, Jen Psaki, former press secretary, she's now working at MSNBC.

00:20:18.000 You can see under Trump, all these guys that did that job have found their way onto Fox.

00:20:22.000 And under Barack Obama, those characters got high paid jobs in media as well.

00:20:26.000 And Corinne Jean-Pierre is a former analyst for MSNBC and NBC.

00:20:30.000 So it's like a revolving door, in a sense, like it was famously observed by Chomsky, and I know what you're going to say about him in the comments now.

00:20:39.000 It was said that by the time you're in that chair, doing that job, you have been pre-selected.

00:20:45.000 These interlocking systems of education, of state, of media, of finance, of corporatism, are so porous That by the time you enter one you have been pre-schooled, pre-chewed by other institutions and your agreement and compliance has already been assured.

00:21:04.000 A great quote by Julia Rock at The Lever, she says, uh, press secretaries aren't just speaking for the president, they're also auditioning for their future corporate employers.

00:21:12.000 But the Democrats purport to be looking out for the interests of working people, and are oftentimes torn between policies that are popular among the base, but would upset corporate donors.

00:21:20.000 And that's the situation these press secretaries find themselves in, is that they ultimately know, I'm gonna be going and working for MSNBC, I'm gonna have a plum job there.

00:21:28.000 That they can't get to a point of doing anti-establishment messaging when they're speaking for the president, but also speaking for their future corporate employees.

00:21:37.000 Wow, that's so incredible.

00:21:38.000 You have to think about the job you're doing at the moment.

00:21:40.000 OK, I have to make it sound that it's OK to cluster bomb children.

00:21:44.000 But also, this has got to go well with a Pfizer commercial.

00:21:47.000 There's a lot of balls to keep in the air.

00:21:50.000 So respect to him for that.

00:21:51.000 Now, if you're watching us on YouTube, we're going to have to say goodbye because we are going to be talking about January the 6th and how MSNBC have reported on it.

00:22:00.000 And it gets tricky.

00:22:01.000 There's some other stuff I want to talk about with Tucker as well.

00:22:03.000 So if you're watching us on YouTube, click the link in the description.

00:22:07.000 Join us over on Rumble where we can speak freely.

00:22:10.000 And if you're watching us on Rumble right now, press the red button, join our locals community, a diverse and beautiful community that speak openly to one another, that regulate themselves freely and beautifully.

00:22:23.000 So what's this story about January the 6th that we're talking about?

00:22:26.000 Alright, so yeah, this is another piece, a bit like the CNN one, but this is MSNBC, and this guy's basically talking about how there couldn't possibly have been collusion between the FBI and social media companies around January 6th because of the events of January 6th.

00:22:45.000 That's the evidence.

00:22:46.000 Because if the state were colluding with social media companies, January 6th wouldn't have happened.

00:22:51.000 They'd have been able to stop it.

00:22:53.000 Except a lot of people believe that deep state agencies were potentially responsible for exacerbating, if not causing, those events.

00:23:02.000 Of course, we've had the FBI whistleblowers on the show in the past.

00:23:06.000 Stephen Friend, is it?

00:23:07.000 It's not Paul O'Grady, it's Garrett O'Grady.

00:23:09.000 It's Garrett O'Boyle.

00:23:11.000 I didn't say one single part of his name right, but what I can tell you is that there's not a member of the Friend family that has not got a stick figure of me tattooed on their reproductive organ, which is something we're going to be offering.

00:23:23.000 You know, if you're joining me for the community festival this weekend, where Wim Hof is coming, Vandana Shiva, many great freedom fighters, we're offering free tattoos to anyone who wants to even get, stay free, a stick figure of me, or that crow that we have as our logo.

00:23:36.000 Does it all have to be on the genitals?

00:23:39.000 I'm afraid there is a small charge if it's not on your reproductive organs.

00:23:45.000 I might skip that one then.

00:23:47.000 Come on, it's free!

00:23:50.000 How much incentive do you need?

00:23:51.000 Yeah, I love this clip.

00:23:53.000 It's brilliant, this.

00:23:54.000 So remember, Gareth just explained to you He says there can't have been collaboration between the state and social media agencies regarding January the 6th, otherwise January 6th wouldn't have happened.

00:24:05.000 Let us know, Rumblers, by giving us a good hard rumble in where it hurts, what you think about that while you watch this clip.

00:24:12.000 The argument, especially in the wake of January 6th, that the FBI was too synced up with Twitter or Facebook or any of these social media companies just sort of flies in the face of reality because obviously we saw what happened on January 6th itself.

00:24:26.000 You know, the COVID misinformation stuff is a little bit more complicated.

00:24:30.000 Yeah, that's it.

00:24:31.000 That's all we'll give.

00:24:32.000 The COVID misinformation stuff, that's just complicated.

00:24:34.000 We won't get into that.

00:24:35.000 What was complicated about it?

00:24:36.000 Was it that you censored true information?

00:24:39.000 Was it that legitimate voices of experts were shut down?

00:24:42.000 That people that invented vaccines were called anti-vaxxers?

00:24:45.000 People that had had vaccines but were concerned about certain demographics being offered them, like children?

00:24:50.000 Oh yeah, I'm on Rumble.

00:24:51.000 Exactly that.

00:24:51.000 supporting them for children for which there was very little evidence that it was going to be of

00:24:55.000 any benefit at all. It is absolutely outrageous. The conversation around myocarditis, the impact

00:25:01.000 it's had on people that missed their regular treatment, the depression, all of this was just

00:25:06.000 covered by... it's complicated. Yeah, exactly that. So MSNBC's position on this ruling about free

00:25:13.000 speech is January 6th, there can't have been collusion because of the events of January 6th

00:25:18.000 when as we know according to Michael Schellenberger and who's written about it and of course the

00:25:23.000 whistleblowers, 100 to 200 Secret Service agents alone at the Capitol before the breach.

00:25:28.000 And then the coverage of the complications around the pandemic stuff is just that, it's just

00:25:33.000 complicated and we won't get into it. One to two hundred, that's like significant. I mean as a

00:25:38.000 percentage of, let's call them insurrectionists, that appears to be the preferred term, that's a

00:25:43.000 significant number. That's probably the biggest, there's probably more FBI agents than there were

00:25:48.000 people with blonde hair.

00:25:50.000 It's ridiculous, it's the biggest single demographic.

00:25:50.000 Right, right, sure.

00:25:53.000 Let me know how you feel about that censorship in a place where you can speak freely because

00:25:57.000 we believe in freedom of speech and where freedom of speech meet you get free speech

00:26:02.000 and where free speech meets you get freech.

00:26:04.000 He's saying that they were using their free speech to say that they would get tattoos.

00:26:15.000 Some reluctance to get them on the reproductive organ.

00:26:17.000 Some people questioning whether or not that makes it a cult.

00:26:20.000 Is this Russell cult?

00:26:21.000 Is Russell's cult, says Ellen Sophia.

00:26:23.000 Not really because it well...

00:26:26.000 It is a cult.

00:26:26.000 Oh, he's struggling.

00:26:27.000 He shouldn't be struggling with that one.

00:26:29.000 Straight away.

00:26:30.000 No.

00:26:30.000 You need a press secretary.

00:26:31.000 That's what you need.

00:26:32.000 Right, I'll be your press secretary in future.

00:26:34.000 This is not a cult.

00:26:36.000 This is not a cult.

00:26:37.000 Yeah, like my press secretary said, well done, we're going to get you such a bloody good job on MSNBC.

00:26:42.000 Thank you, thank you.

00:26:43.000 You deserve your own show.

00:26:44.000 I want my own show on Rumble.

00:26:45.000 You can have your own show on Rumble, you're brilliant.

00:26:47.000 The way you said this isn't a cult when actually it is.

00:26:49.000 Oh no, I've done it again!

00:26:51.000 Oh no.

00:26:51.000 Why else would you tattoo a genital?

00:26:54.000 All it is, is that bloke Stephen Friend, him tattoo himself on the nut bag.

00:26:58.000 No, that was his brother.

00:27:00.000 His brother tattooed himself on the nut bag.

00:27:02.000 No, you're wrong.

00:27:02.000 What it is, well, Stephen Friend's brother's got tattoos somewhere on his body, not the nutbag.

00:27:06.000 That's correct, yes.

00:27:07.000 Finally, the truth!

00:27:09.000 After all of this, it's worth persevering because you will get to the truth eventually, won't you, if you try hard enough.

00:27:14.000 I want to thank you lot.

00:27:15.000 Three million of you watched our show with Tucker on Friday.

00:27:18.000 Thank you so much for being part of this community.

00:27:20.000 Thanks for supporting us.

00:27:21.000 It meant a lot that we got that exclusive.

00:27:23.000 We've got some stuff on it.

00:27:24.000 I'm going to have to do one of my burps, Gal.

00:27:26.000 Can you tell when they're coming?

00:27:27.000 Can you hear in my voice when there's a burp coming?

00:27:29.000 Here's one.

00:27:30.000 Take that, Lord Almighty!

00:27:31.000 Sweet bird of freedom!

00:27:33.000 Fly so high I love thee!

00:27:36.000 Shamans do it to belch out the evil spirits.

00:27:39.000 This is not a cult.

00:27:40.000 This is not a cult.

00:27:42.000 I refer you to my press secretary.

00:27:44.000 This is in praise of Tucker.

00:27:46.000 It's in the category called in praise of Tucker.

00:27:48.000 DawesFan1969.

00:27:49.000 Most people think that Tucker is a hardcore Republican, but he's nothing of the sort.

00:27:52.000 Russell and Tucker have more in common than people would imagine.

00:27:54.000 And both want to expose the truth about what is going on.

00:27:57.000 I had a lovely hang with Tucker.

00:27:58.000 The two of us drove off together after the show.

00:28:01.000 We had good chats.

00:28:02.000 Wasn't he lovely to everyone in the team?

00:28:04.000 He was absolutely adorable.

00:28:05.000 Everyone loved him.

00:28:06.000 It was a wonderful afternoon.

00:28:08.000 And to that point about the Republican, he literally spoke about how much he loves RFK.

00:28:13.000 I mean, RFK is a Democrat.

00:28:15.000 How did the people that hate on Tucker deal with that?

00:28:17.000 We asked him as well, you know that people say about dog whistle, like when he's talking

00:28:20.000 about demographics and American politics, is that dog whistle racist?

00:28:23.000 And he says he ain't racist.

00:28:24.000 He's got views on immigration.

00:28:26.000 Perhaps they're different views from some of you.

00:28:27.000 Perhaps they're different views from me.

00:28:29.000 But I don't feel like he's racist.

00:28:30.000 Let me know in the comments and chat what you feel about that.

00:28:33.000 Mramstom90, now that Tucker has shared the burden of the mainstream media, I believe

00:28:37.000 he will become one of the most influential pundits of all time.

00:28:40.000 For better or worse, Fox firing him is going to be the best thing that's ever happened.

00:28:43.000 Yeah, good point.

00:28:44.000 Anything about that, Gal?

00:28:45.000 Well, look at the massive numbers on Twitter.

00:28:47.000 So yeah, it's significant.

00:28:48.000 It's significant.

00:28:50.000 Davros200.

00:28:50.000 Tucker equals the common sense American.

00:28:53.000 The people absolutely love him.

00:28:55.000 Viewers, here are some of you that have changed your mind about Tucker having seen that.

00:28:58.000 Witshigo.

00:28:59.000 I was never a fan of Tucker, but he's spot on for calling out the lies of the forever war machine and the big pharma cartel.

00:29:05.000 I also respect him for calling for the release of Julian Assange.

00:29:08.000 The extradition of Assange to the US will affect every single one of us.

00:29:11.000 He'll be the final nail in the coffin for journalism.

00:29:15.000 Who else, other than Tucker on Fox, was interviewing members of the Assange family?

00:29:20.000 No one?

00:29:21.000 Yeah, I wonder how they... When people... I'm going to ask him.

00:29:24.000 I'm going to ask him.

00:29:25.000 I'm going to ask some of my friends that are, like, liberals or whatever.

00:29:27.000 I'm going to say, how do you feel, though, that he talks about Julian Assange?

00:29:30.000 How do you feel, though, that he fronts up to the military-industrial complex and big pharma?

00:29:34.000 This is what matters.

00:29:35.000 Cultural issues are of course important but they fall under freedom.

00:29:39.000 People's right to identify however they want to identify, to be whoever they want to be, that falls under freedom and it's a two-way street.

00:29:46.000 Once you believe in that principle of freedom it resolves everything and to do that I think you have to push this decentralization stuff that me and my cult believe in.

00:29:54.000 It's not a cult.

00:29:55.000 I don't need a cult.

00:29:57.000 What's the point of that?

00:29:58.000 Come on, mate.

00:29:59.000 Chaos Buddhists.

00:30:00.000 I found Russell for the first time.

00:30:01.000 This is people that had never even been here before and you came for the tucker.

00:30:05.000 Straight for the fucker.

00:30:06.000 I found... Sorry, I don't know why.

00:30:07.000 I just did it because it rhymed.

00:30:08.000 I don't know.

00:30:09.000 It's just a joke.

00:30:10.000 I think that's fine.

00:30:11.000 As your press secretary, I endorse that.

00:30:13.000 Let's change his credit for that.

00:30:15.000 He's good at this.

00:30:16.000 I found Russell for the first time thanks to this interview.

00:30:18.000 So I'm forever grateful to Tucker for bringing me into this world.

00:30:22.000 Like he's a midwife.

00:30:23.000 Tucker the midwife.

00:30:24.000 Previs, just downloaded Rumble because you're interviewing Tucker.

00:30:27.000 Just saying.

00:30:28.000 Thank you very much, all of you, for supporting that.

00:30:30.000 We've got great tweets from Glenn Greenwald and from Kane the Great.

00:30:33.000 Did you say there's some more free speech on non-Tucker related stuff?

00:30:36.000 Because I can't see it.

00:30:37.000 I'd love to read out some more of your free speech.

00:30:40.000 Or are we going to go to the viewer poll?

00:30:41.000 We've done that already.

00:30:42.000 We've done all of the poll stuff.

00:30:44.000 Oh, the RFK challenge.

00:30:45.000 Is that where we're going?

00:30:46.000 Listen.

00:30:47.000 Like Gail said, Tucker believes in freedom.

00:30:50.000 And believing in freedom might mean anti-establishment figures like Trump.

00:30:53.000 But anti-establishment figures, albeit with the surname Kennedy, like Robert M.

00:30:57.000 We're at $31,000 already.

00:30:59.000 If you want to make a donation, you can make a donation.

00:31:02.000 It all goes to RFK's campaign.

00:31:04.000 There is RFK pulling himself up with such beefy, meaty, well-defined arms that it makes me terrified.

00:31:13.000 We're at $31,000 already. If you want to make a donation, you can make a donation.

00:31:17.000 It all goes to RFK's campaign.

00:31:19.000 As that goes up, do you get more and more nervous?

00:31:21.000 Nervous, yeah. As I see that red line reaching like the letter E in the word raised.

00:31:26.000 Once it's over the word raised, I'm going to be really scared.

00:31:28.000 Then there's that other word raised at the bottom there.

00:31:31.000 My fear levels, and I reckon my ability to do pull-ups is diminishing.

00:31:35.000 I'm practising them.

00:31:37.000 I can't even get the lid off!

00:31:38.000 Show me that, show me that thing over there what I've just give you.

00:31:40.000 Oh, there's some pills?

00:31:41.000 This is gonna...

00:31:42.000 Luckily, I've got a secret weapon in the war against RFK, I tells ya.

00:31:46.000 And it's sweet lady ter-chestosterone.

00:31:48.000 Mmm, this is like your Popeye's spinach, is it?

00:31:50.000 I got- it's disgusting!

00:31:52.000 Pete and Olives, I'm gonna take you down to Chinatown, RFK!

00:31:56.000 Oh, I can't even get the lid off!

00:31:57.000 I want me pudding!

00:31:59.000 Look at RFK right now, backflipping himself!

00:32:03.000 Like, look at him flip himself off.

00:32:05.000 RFK, is there nothing he can't do, this guy?

00:32:07.000 Is he 69?

00:32:08.000 He is 69.

00:32:09.000 He's got a sarcastic, silly age.

00:32:11.000 He's 69.

00:32:11.000 When he come on here with Sheryl Hines, I don't know what I'm going to do, gal.

00:32:15.000 Thanks.

00:32:16.000 Thank God I've got a sweet lady.

00:32:17.000 Oh, you'll be alright.

00:32:18.000 What's her name again?

00:32:19.000 Turkestosterone.

00:32:20.000 Thank God I've got this.

00:32:21.000 This is good stuff, this.

00:32:22.000 I'm pretty sure you can flip yourself off as well, though.

00:32:24.000 I can flip?

00:32:25.000 You better believe I can flip myself off, especially when I'm in turkestosterone.

00:32:28.000 I've heard it.

00:32:28.000 What kind of press secretary are you?

00:32:32.000 Let's have a look at RFK flipping himself into another dimension.

00:32:35.000 Where do you think he's at?

00:32:41.000 I don't think I'd like to do that.

00:32:43.000 I'd hit my head on the edge of the boat if I'd done that.

00:32:45.000 I'm one of them people who's clumsy.

00:32:48.000 When I watch Jackass or something, and they're doing them stunts, I think I'd die if I'd done that.

00:32:53.000 It just would be, Russell Brown got on a skateboard, he's dead now.

00:32:55.000 Or he tried to aggravate a lion.

00:32:58.000 That makes me think about when you used to say that when you were a kid you wanted your mum to watch you swim.

00:33:04.000 Mum!

00:33:05.000 Mum, watch this!

00:33:06.000 Mum, watch this!

00:33:06.000 Watch!

00:33:08.000 You're desperate for her to watch you swim.

00:33:10.000 She thinks I'm a good swimmer.

00:33:11.000 Yeah, of course she does.

00:33:11.000 Does she?

00:33:12.000 She still tells you that, doesn't she?

00:33:13.000 I'm an only child, single mum.

00:33:15.000 Everything I do she thinks is really good.

00:33:16.000 Really good.

00:33:17.000 Especially since I've been getting the old turkotestosterone down me.

00:33:21.000 Turkotestosterone.

00:33:22.000 Mmm, delicious.

00:33:24.000 Never felt more powerful.

00:33:27.000 What about when we've got those free speeches where people go, can you not take your top off please?

00:33:32.000 It's getting on my wick.

00:33:33.000 Do you want to talk a little bit about Fred's?

00:33:35.000 Because, like, is it that?

00:33:39.000 Mark Zuckerberg has started Fred's just to like annoy Elon Musk and also to provide a place like is it like that episode of The Simpsons where Homer Simpson becomes the head of the stonecutters and then they want Homer Simpson not to be in the stonecutters no more so they just start another group.

00:33:56.000 Has Zuckerberg started Fred's just to have a place that they can censor?

00:34:00.000 Well, I mean, this is, this, it does look very much like it is the censored version of Twitter, which is obviously the thing that everyone wants.

00:34:09.000 No!

00:34:09.000 Twitter!

00:34:10.000 But all nice and censored!

00:34:11.000 Do you know what's getting on my nose about Twitter?

00:34:13.000 It's not censored enough.

00:34:14.000 Yeah.

00:34:15.000 He's, I mean, Zuckerberg has very much sold this on the friendly alternative to Twitter.

00:34:19.000 I think there've been a few jibes at Twitter's expense also.

00:34:23.000 But obviously what people have noticed, Michael Schellenberger writes, platform but it's not. Deamplifying anger. That's a magic

00:34:35.000 bit of language. You see how good they're getting at propaganda now. We've got to just

00:34:38.000 deamplify this anger. Like break this, break that down. That means turn down the volume on

00:34:43.000 anger. And that doesn't mean anything. You can't do that. But what you could do is

00:34:48.000 remove dissent, remove critiques of issues and subjects that you have a particular

00:34:53.000 perspective on.

00:34:55.000 How did Zuckerberg handle COVID?

00:34:57.000 Well, you know that he was in direct contact with Anthony Fauci.

00:35:02.000 He said, I'll do anything I can to help you.

00:35:05.000 Zuckerberg admitted on Lex Friedman that they censored true and debatable information.

00:35:11.000 And your man there on ABC, was he on ABC that and pundit we just shot?

00:35:15.000 Oh, MSNBC, that was.

00:35:16.000 MSNBC.

00:35:17.000 He said, like, oh, it was, you know, it was a bit more complicated.

00:35:20.000 It wasn't complicated, was it, Gareth?

00:35:21.000 They censored true information, like Robert Malone, who invented RMNA technology, was censored because he was saying, this ain't the right way to handle this.

00:35:30.000 You don't vaccinate during a pandemic.

00:35:32.000 It's wrong.

00:35:33.000 It will create new variants.

00:35:34.000 People were saying all sorts of stuff that was not anti-the vax.

00:35:37.000 Like, some of us, we all have very particular views, should we say, on those vaccines.

00:35:43.000 But what is absolutely necessary is open conversation around the subject, not presuming that what you know is right for everybody.

00:35:51.000 And so is Threadz.

00:35:52.000 Let us know in the comments now.

00:35:53.000 Join us over on Locals.

00:35:54.000 Hit the red button and tell us, is Threadz just Twitter without the argy bargy?

00:36:00.000 Well, I think it is.

00:36:01.000 I mean, on the first day, so I think they've had 30 million signups, but on the first day of operations, users already reported having their posts taken down, mainly for political reasons.

00:36:09.000 Some accounts, they say they are being blacklisted or greylisted.

00:36:13.000 When you try and follow a problematic person on threads, you might be warned that their account has posted false information or has violated community guidelines.

00:36:20.000 So all the things that were revealed by the Twitter files, all the things that Michael Schellenberg and Matt Taibbi have talked about, are literally now happening on this brand new platform.

00:36:27.000 I can't believe that, that the result of the Twitter files, where people went, hey listen, the deep state are censoring you, there are literally FBI employees here pulling stuff down, they're censoring true information, there's a degree of collaboration that we could never have ever imagined.

00:36:42.000 Oh, alright, well let's leave that one and set one where that continues to happen!

00:36:47.000 Because they exposed it.

00:36:48.000 Because Elon Musk is committed to preventing it.

00:36:50.000 Even Elon Musk has admitted that if the EU introduces the laws that it's proposing that will allow them to censor and will mean that social media companies that don't censor content that the EU demands will be subject to fines that they'll be unable to handle.

00:37:06.000 All around the world, in the Five Eyes countries, they're looking to find ways to reassert censorship.

00:37:11.000 It's extraordinary.

00:37:12.000 It's like people want to be censored.

00:37:14.000 It is Ross and this is obviously there's a very kind of binary reporting of all this as well because now it's kind of Zuckerberg versus Musk thread versus Twitter but you know people have a lot of things to say about Elon Musk and about you know how censorship he's letting right-wing people in, he's platforming so-and-so but Facebook's owner Meta was fined 1.2 billion euros for mishandling people's data when transferring it between Europe and the United States.

00:37:40.000 So, these privacy violations that Meta is getting fined a billion pounds for, or over a billion dollars for, you know, when this is, when obviously all the kind of positive reports that they're getting about Threads versus... They're saying Threads is great in the mainstream.

00:37:55.000 Right, versus, you know, the negative publicity around Elon Musk and Twitter.

00:37:59.000 That guy's getting so much hate and shade.

00:38:01.000 Tamara Spencer says, I said from the beginning that Fred's was going to be a censorship platform for the government.

00:38:06.000 Zuckerberg is still a government shill.

00:38:08.000 God, do you agree with Tamara Spencer, you guys?

00:38:10.000 KROD15.

00:38:11.000 Yes, fuckerberg has become a political pawn in this game.

00:38:14.000 Absolutely ridiculous.

00:38:15.000 We've invited Mark Zuckerberg to come on our show.

00:38:19.000 We'll let you know what he says.

00:38:21.000 Kittiest Kid says, right under censorship comes forced speech.

00:38:25.000 So, there you go.

00:38:26.000 Like a lot of you appear to think that Fred's is essentially a pro-censorship platform.

00:38:32.000 Oh here, someone's posted, account suspended.

00:38:34.000 Like, uh, already people are, is that, that's from site zero.

00:38:38.000 Thanks.

00:38:38.000 Yeah, let us know what experiences you're having on there.

00:38:40.000 Go on there and post some of your free speech.

00:38:43.000 and see what happens.

00:38:44.000 But you know, we know why this is happening and Zuckerberg admitting that it happened

00:38:47.000 during the pandemic is also him kind of admitting, I'm powerless against it.

00:38:50.000 Ultimately, I've got shareholders, I have to maintain a certain kind of image around

00:38:54.000 this.

00:38:55.000 Elon Musk, we know, is losing billions or certainly millions by not having advertisers

00:39:01.000 come on to Twitter as a result of his ideas around free speech.

00:39:05.000 So it's inevitable that this was going to happen.

00:39:07.000 Mark Zuckerberg was never going to create an alternative to Twitter that embraced the

00:39:11.000 kind of values that Elon Musk is embracing.

00:39:13.000 That's the point of it.

00:39:16.000 In a way, it's a good metric for observing what's happening now.

00:39:20.000 Free speech is being conflated with hate speech.

00:39:24.000 The safety is being equated with censorship.

00:39:28.000 We're censoring you to keep you safe from hate speech.

00:39:32.000 I think that gives us an obligation to be very Respectful, even reverential towards one another, and particularly respectful and loving to people we disagree with.

00:39:41.000 To approach people in good faith, to believe in their right to hold different views from us.

00:39:46.000 Because otherwise what they can legitimately do is go, oh Twitter, there's too much hate speech over there.

00:39:49.000 We're going to start up Fred's and we're going to keep it all free from hate by allowing the deep state to curb that hate.

00:39:55.000 Yeah.

00:39:56.000 When we had Jack Dorsey on, he seems repentant.

00:39:59.000 Now, some of you guys felt... I feel like some of you said you don't... Oh look, someone's used their logo to create 666.

00:40:05.000 Nice!

00:40:06.000 Well done.

00:40:06.000 That is the sort of stuff I love.

00:40:08.000 That's Tinaburo1973.

00:40:09.000 Yikes!

00:40:10.000 Have a look at that.

00:40:11.000 You can see that in the local chat.

00:40:12.000 Press the red button.

00:40:13.000 I've just found something of it looking like 666.

00:40:16.000 A picture paints a thousand words.

00:40:18.000 If they've got the number of the beast on there, it's all over for me, baby!

00:40:22.000 When Jack Dorsey was on, he seemed most repentant.

00:40:24.000 He said that he's going to dedicate the rest of his life to creating decentralized platforms.

00:40:28.000 He used a few phrases that have stuck with me.

00:40:30.000 One is point of failure.

00:40:32.000 Never have one point of failure.

00:40:34.000 If there's one person that can be pressured into compliance, that's a weakness.

00:40:38.000 That's why you need democracy.

00:40:39.000 That's why you need consensus.

00:40:41.000 That's why you need free speech.

00:40:42.000 Because all of us are ultimately fallible in one way or another.

00:40:44.000 If you have people that you love, you're vulnerable.

00:40:47.000 Once you have children, once you have views, once you have a pain threshold, you're vulnerable to coercion.

00:40:51.000 You're vulnerable to violence.

00:40:53.000 That's why you need systems that mitigate our human fallibility, not systems that expediate our potential to be corrupted.

00:41:00.000 Jack Dorsey, I believe that he is repentant for real.

00:41:03.000 I believe, like when he says, I shouldn't have banned Trump, That's what he said.

00:41:07.000 He goes, I don't agree with Trump.

00:41:08.000 I shouldn't have banned Trump.

00:41:09.000 Because when he was on here, obviously, I said, how come ISIS and all that lot were on there?

00:41:13.000 Because ISIS, I mean, they're not great guys, are they?

00:41:15.000 I don't know.

00:41:16.000 I mean, I don't know too much about them.

00:41:17.000 But I do remember them chopping off some heads.

00:41:19.000 I mean, is that right?

00:41:20.000 Is that worse than Donald Trump's crazy antics?

00:41:23.000 Surely.

00:41:24.000 And he seems to me repentant.

00:41:25.000 Now, do you guys take that in good faith?

00:41:27.000 Do you recognize that the Simpsons did it again?

00:41:30.000 There is that.

00:41:31.000 Nah, someone's changed that.

00:41:32.000 That's not his normal thing.

00:41:33.000 He looks like Matt Groening.

00:41:35.000 His normal thing's Matt Groening's initials, isn't it?

00:41:37.000 It's an MG.

00:41:38.000 Is that a good logo?

00:41:40.000 You could draw it pretty easy, I suppose.

00:41:42.000 Do you like it?

00:41:43.000 I already sort of feel like it's existed forever.

00:41:45.000 Do you like that logo?

00:41:46.000 I don't care about it.

00:41:48.000 I don't really care about it.

00:41:49.000 Good for a sex tree, not caring about it at all.

00:41:52.000 Yeah, I feel like what you need, you can't have people in that position anymore.

00:41:55.000 Do you agree with me, you lot?

00:41:57.000 What needs to happen is a sort of breakup of those kind of institutions.

00:42:01.000 That's what I reckon.

00:42:02.000 Let me know what you guys think.

00:42:03.000 Yeah, I mean, obviously we know the Biden administration is appealing this social media censorship ban at the moment, and a really good point that I saw earlier was the current administration and its media supporters like to talk about the importance of election integrity, but how about supporting the integrity of your judicial system?

00:42:20.000 So, you know, when it comes to this federal judge made a decision that obviously we saw the CNN reaction to it, but it's a

00:42:30.000 judicial reaction and what am I trying to say? The judge essentially made a decision.

00:42:38.000 Yeah, it's a verdict based on evidence.

00:42:41.000 Based on lots of evidence.

00:42:42.000 Yeah, absolutely.

00:42:44.000 If it suits them, they'll back it.

00:42:45.000 If it doesn't suit them, they won't back it.

00:42:47.000 It's like everything is cluster bombs now.

00:42:49.000 Cluster bombs are bad when Russia uses them.

00:42:52.000 Cluster bombs are good when we're selling them to Ukraine.

00:42:56.000 Free speech is good when it's our free speech, not when it's people's free speech that we disagree with.

00:43:01.000 That's a kind of nihilism.

00:43:02.000 Beyond nihilism, it's an insidious materialism that does not allow for freedom for the other or freedom of conversation.

00:43:08.000 That's why our conversation with Tucker was so important.

00:43:12.000 We're going to stay here for a while.

00:43:13.000 We're going to have a fantastic little session on locals together in a moment, and we're staying here for a bit longer.

00:43:18.000 But here is my reflections and insights, as well as some further revelations from our conversation with Tucker.

00:43:25.000 And here's the news.

00:43:26.000 No, here's the effing news.

00:43:28.000 Stay with us.

00:43:33.000 It's the fucking news!

00:43:35.000 Tucker Carlson gave us his first world exclusive interview since leaving Fox.

00:43:40.000 Let's reflect on some of the things it revealed, some of the pushback, and one

00:43:44.000 thing he didn't say.

00:43:47.000 We were privileged to have Tucker Carlson come here for his first

00:43:51.000 interview since leaving Fox News.

00:43:53.000 We talked about January the 6th with Tucker saying that FBI agents were likely in the crowd.

00:43:58.000 That's something that those FBI whistleblowers said when they came on our show before.

00:44:01.000 We talked too about the Ukraine war and Tucker's belief that it is primarily motivated by the economic requirements of the military-industrial complex.

00:44:09.000 We talked about the culture war.

00:44:11.000 We talked about the reasons that he left Fox.

00:44:13.000 It was amazing to have a person of his stature, magnitude, conviviality, congeniality, kindness, and indeed, let's face it, a controversial figure like him here on our premises as part of our media organisation.

00:44:27.000 It shows me that media has changed now.

00:44:31.000 that Tucker Carlson chose our organisation as the place to make these revelations is

00:44:35.000 an indication that the mainstream is kind of over. Let me know if you agree with that

00:44:39.000 in the comments. In fact, partly what it seems to me that our entire cultural conflict is

00:44:44.000 defined by now is establishment authority trying to assert itself in conditions that

00:44:50.000 are no longer appropriate for it. Put simply, technology and communications has changed

00:44:56.000 This enables decentralised media and indeed political models to thrive.

00:45:01.000 The establishment cannot afford or allow that.

00:45:04.000 When I say the establishment, I mean anything from CNN to Fox to The FBI, to the CIA, to MI5, to the WHO.

00:45:11.000 These are, by their nature, centralised authoritarian structures that require these new models to be restrained.

00:45:18.000 Firstly, in a way, this is a victory for independent media.

00:45:21.000 As Glenn Greenwald pointed out in his tweet, Russell Brand's live midday interview with Tucker Carlson on Rumble was watched by almost 1 million people within the first few hours.

00:45:30.000 We're now nearly at 3 million.

00:45:31.000 Numbers that CNN can't dream of matching ever, let alone in Friday daytime in late July.

00:45:36.000 I suppose that shows you that media has changed now.

00:45:38.000 The type of conversations that you want to listen to, the type of conversations that you want to participate in have altered and the mainstream can't keep up with that.

00:45:46.000 People like that are seeking out independent media because the establishment is fundamentally conservative.

00:45:50.000 I don't mean conservative politically, I mean wants to keep things the same.

00:45:53.000 it whether it's the right thing to do. A popular figure like RFK emerges out of the Democrat

00:45:57.000 establishment whilst attacking it, which I believe is what's necessary. They can't house

00:46:01.000 him or frame him. People like that are seeking out independent media because the establishment

00:46:05.000 is fundamentally conservative. I don't mean conservative politically, I mean wants to

00:46:09.000 keep things the same. Preservative. Let's have a look at our conversation with Tucker

00:46:15.000 Let's share some personal reflections.

00:46:16.000 Like, for example, he was polite and kind to every single person here on the premises.

00:46:21.000 He was an absolute joy to be around.

00:46:23.000 There was a lot of tweets.

00:46:24.000 There was a lot of coverage.

00:46:25.000 Most of it extremely positive.

00:46:27.000 Predictably, some people pushed back.

00:46:29.000 But let's have a look at the conversation in a little more depth together.

00:46:32.000 Right now that we're deeply embedded in Rumble, why the hell did you leave Fox?

00:46:35.000 Tell us the truth!

00:46:36.000 What are you not permitted to say?

00:46:38.000 Tell us!

00:46:40.000 So do you think they sacked you because of Jan 6?

00:46:41.000 Do you think they sacked you because you're too anti-establishment, too anti-war?

00:46:47.000 Tell us.

00:46:48.000 I honestly don't know.

00:46:49.000 I will say, you know, my views changed dramatically over the course of 20 years.

00:46:56.000 As I've said many times, I was a kind of half-hearted booster of the war in Iraq, which is hard to believe.

00:47:03.000 But, you know, that was in 2003.

00:47:06.000 And so my views for the last 20 years have been, and I've realized and I've repented of that.

00:47:12.000 I feel sick even thinking about it now.

00:47:14.000 But even if you're one of the people, and let me know in the comments if you are,

00:47:17.000 that believes that Tucker Carlson is a nefarious influence in the media,

00:47:20.000 do you not think that that's good?

00:47:21.000 That he says, I was wrong in my report on the Iraq war and I feel guilty and ashamed.

00:47:26.000 Have you seen anybody else like Tony Blair or George W. Bush or any of the people

00:47:30.000 that were reporting at that time?

00:47:31.000 Remember, they were Republican politicians in the United States, Labor in our country,

00:47:35.000 so left wing in our country, the UK.

00:47:38.000 Have you seen anyone else offer up a mere culprit like that?

00:47:40.000 How do people fit that into their framework of condemnation when people are like, oh, he's just doing that in order to,

00:47:46.000 what, how do you make sense of that?

00:47:48.000 But my views have remained pretty much the same They've evolved, you know, as things have changed.

00:47:53.000 But in general, I've been skeptical of the storylines and all kinds of different things.

00:47:57.000 And I certainly was for the 14 years I was at Fox.

00:48:01.000 And they were always, they didn't agree with me, of course, I don't think, but they were always very nice to me and they always let me say what I wanted.

00:48:09.000 Not one time did they tell me not to say anything.

00:48:11.000 So I was always grateful to Fox and I am in retrospect grateful to Fox for that.

00:48:15.000 So that never changed up until the moment they called me and said, you know, we're taking the show off the air.

00:48:20.000 And so I can only speculate.

00:48:22.000 I know, but I do think as a general matter, not even about me, the war in Ukraine is a red line for For a lot of people in business and politics.

00:48:32.000 And you see it in our politics in the U.S.

00:48:34.000 where the leaders of the Republican Party in the Congress, who really are repulsive in my view, are now supporting sending cluster bombs to Ukraine.

00:48:43.000 Ukraine is losing the war, obviously.

00:48:46.000 The United States could, and Ukrainians are dying in huge numbers and the country's being destroyed.

00:48:51.000 And so the U.S.

00:48:51.000 could force a peace like tonight.

00:48:53.000 They could.

00:48:54.000 Uniquely, they have that power.

00:48:57.000 And they won't.

00:48:58.000 And they're continuing to allow Ukrainians to be killed and the country to be devastated.

00:49:02.000 So, I don't know their motive.

00:49:04.000 I can only guess.

00:49:05.000 But I know that if you criticize that, they really are intent on making you be quiet.

00:49:10.000 January 6th clearly is one of the issues that drove Tucker out of Fox.

00:49:14.000 What was it?

00:49:15.000 Let me know what you think happened on that day that means this issue remains so contentious.

00:49:19.000 Was it that there were government agents in the crowd?

00:49:21.000 Do you think it was a false flag issue?

00:49:24.000 That's not what Tucker says, obviously.

00:49:26.000 Do you think it's been exploited to introduce new laws and to force forward surveillance and more ability to control and censor?

00:49:32.000 Why was this date so significant in recent American political history?

00:49:37.000 They immediately recoiled when you asked any questions about January 6th.

00:49:41.000 And that was a tip off to me.

00:49:42.000 I mean, I had no thought in my head as I watched this happen on television and in the subsequent weeks that U.S.

00:49:51.000 law enforcement or military agencies had anything to do with it.

00:49:53.000 That never crossed my mind.

00:49:55.000 I never thought there was a false flag or anything like that.

00:49:57.000 I'm not a conspiracist by temperament.

00:49:59.000 I never thought that.

00:50:01.000 And then I interviewed the chief of the Capitol Police.

00:50:06.000 Steven Sund in an interview that was never aired on Fox by the way I was fired before it could air

00:50:10.000 I'm gonna interview him again, but Steven Sund was the totally non-political

00:50:15.000 Worked for Nancy Pelosi. I mean this was not some right-wing activist

00:50:19.000 He was the chief of the Capitol Police on January 6th, then he said oh yeah, yeah that crowd was filled

00:50:23.000 With federal agents what yes well He would know of course because he was in charge of

00:50:29.000 security at the site One moment that I found fascinating let me know in the

00:50:33.000 comments if you agree was Tucker's assertion that Trump is the most

00:50:36.000 significant political force to emerge in America in the last 100 years.

00:50:39.000 He compares him, of course, to that other great American populist, Teddy Roosevelt.

00:50:44.000 What do you think Tucker meant about Trump being the most significant force?

00:50:48.000 Do you think he means that Trump was a wrecking ball to the establishment, the swamp drainer?

00:50:53.000 Do you think that Trump was the emergence of a different type of politics, a new populism?

00:50:57.000 Do you think that Trump is the symptom of a dying establishment?

00:51:01.000 Do you think that Trump is authentic when he says he's going to change things for small businesses, ordinary Americans, that he's going to make America great again?

00:51:09.000 What do you think is the significance of Donald Trump?

00:51:13.000 Plainly, well, literally, Tucker says he loves him.

00:51:16.000 It seems you have occupied varying positions on Trump at various times.

00:51:21.000 Where are you on Donald Trump now, and particularly perhaps how that relates to the emergence of radical anti-establishment figures within the Democrat Party, notably RFK?

00:51:31.000 Where am I on Trump now?

00:51:31.000 Well, I love Trump.

00:51:34.000 Personally.

00:51:35.000 I mean, I made a huge mistake last November in getting involved in American politics, something I've never done before.

00:51:44.000 And making calls, you know, this guy's going to win.

00:51:47.000 I think this is going to happen in this state.

00:51:49.000 Meet your new governor, New York, stuff like that.

00:51:51.000 And I was wrong on almost every call.

00:51:54.000 I'm not a very astute political analyst.

00:51:58.000 I'm not interested in politics.

00:52:00.000 I never have been interested in politics.

00:52:02.000 I'm interested in ideas.

00:52:03.000 I'm interested in people.

00:52:05.000 And so there's a primary going on in the United States between Trump and a bunch of other people, primarily Ron DeSantis, the governor of Florida, but others.

00:52:14.000 Vivek Ramaswamy, for example.

00:52:16.000 And I haven't said word one about it.

00:52:19.000 Don't plan to.

00:52:22.000 I, you know, I think looking back on this 10 years from now, assuming we're still around, I think we're going to see Trump's emergence as the most significant thing to happen in American politics in 100 years, because he reoriented the Republican Party against the wishes of Republican leaders.

00:52:40.000 Uh, but when I think about Trump right now, so it's July of 2023, you know, I'm struck by his foreign policy views.

00:52:49.000 You know, Trump is the only person, um, with stature in the Republican Party, really, who's saying, wait a second, you know, why are we supporting an endless war in Ukraine?

00:53:03.000 And that, you know, leaving aside whether Trump's going to get the nomination or get elected president or would be a good president, you know, I can't even assess that.

00:53:10.000 All I can say at this point is I'm so grateful that he has that position.

00:53:13.000 He's right.

00:53:15.000 And everyone in Washington's wrong.

00:53:17.000 Everyone.

00:53:18.000 And Trump is right on that question.

00:53:20.000 And it's a big question.

00:53:21.000 That war is reshaping the world.

00:53:23.000 It's reshaping the economy of the world.

00:53:25.000 It's reshaping populations.

00:53:26.000 I mean, I was just in Romania last week.

00:53:30.000 We still don't know what Tucker Carlson will do as a broadcaster, but it seems increasingly likely it will be as an independent media journalist.

00:53:49.000 For now at least, he is operating within Twitter.

00:53:51.000 Is that because his Fox contract prohibits other types of relationships?

00:53:56.000 Let me know what you think in the comments.

00:53:57.000 What did he think about Elon Musk and what is the nature of his financial relationship with, perhaps, the most powerful new media operator in the game, Elon Musk?

00:54:08.000 We were all amongst us thinking, where will Tucker go?

00:54:12.000 Will he be joining us on Rumble?

00:54:14.000 Will you set up your own thing?

00:54:17.000 What was it about your conversations with Elon Musk that led you to work there on Twitter?

00:54:23.000 Well, I don't work for Elon.

00:54:26.000 He's paid me zero money.

00:54:28.000 I don't think I ever want to work for anyone again.

00:54:31.000 I've done that.

00:54:32.000 I'd like to make money.

00:54:33.000 I mean, I've, you know, I think that's fair.

00:54:35.000 I've made zero money since I left, and that's fine.

00:54:40.000 But at some point I'd like to, but I'm not working for Elon Musk.

00:54:43.000 He hasn't offered to hire me, and if he did, I wouldn't accept.

00:54:48.000 But what he's done is offered me that what he's offered every other user of Twitter which is a you know a chance to broadcast Your views without a gatekeeper there.

00:54:58.000 But I do think, you know, I think the technology at Twitter is my expectation is evolving.

00:55:03.000 And I think, you know, the subscription model, you know, might work or might not.

00:55:08.000 You know, I don't know, but I think it might.

00:55:10.000 And and I plan to I plan to stay there.

00:55:13.000 But what social media offer in the short term, at least for me, is an audience, but also a reason.

00:55:20.000 This is personal, but a reason to write.

00:55:21.000 I can't think clearly without writing.

00:55:24.000 You know, I started in this business as a magazine writer and a book writer, newspaper writer, and I need to write things out.

00:55:30.000 I'm very dyslexic and I can't, you know, I have trouble processing information in certain ways.

00:55:35.000 And unless I'm forced to write a script, I can't really decide what I think about something.

00:55:40.000 and so the daily or regular discipline of writing a script forces me,

00:55:46.000 and in some cases it really is forced, I don't want to do it, I'd much rather go fishing or bird hunting,

00:55:50.000 you know, I would, but if I have to I will, and there's something wonderful in that,

00:55:56.000 you know, writing a script as you know, forces you to think through everything about the issue,

00:56:02.000 to have a much deeper understanding of it, at least for me that's true.

00:56:06.000 Well let me know what questions do you think I should have asked Tucker Carlson.

00:56:10.000 What would you have liked to have seen more of?

00:56:11.000 Are you excited about the way that independent media is shaping up?

00:56:15.000 Do you share my belief that independent media and independent politics are now forever enmeshed?

00:56:20.000 In a sense, it's one movement, because if you're anti-surveillance, anti-censorship, anti-globalism, anti-authoritarianism, Anti-closing-down-debate and closing-down-conversation, anti-bad-faith-conflagration-causing-reporting, then necessarily you're going to have to convey that through media, and in order to change it, you're going to have to become politicised.

00:56:41.000 That's why I regard what we're doing now more as a movement.

00:56:45.000 Than as a broadcast channel in the conventional sense.

00:56:48.000 I know we have an obligation to you and I hope you feel you have an obligation to us to continue to watch us, to share our content, to guide us, to let us know when we've made mistakes, to let us know when we are guilty of the errors that the mainstream makes, removing nuance, personal biases, deliberate manipulation.

00:57:05.000 Stay in contact with us.

00:57:06.000 Let me know what you think in the chat.

00:57:08.000 See you in a second.

00:57:09.000 Thank you for choosing Fox News.

00:57:11.000 Good day.

00:57:12.000 No.

00:57:13.000 Here's the fucking news.

00:57:15.000 Clancy of Hearts 25, she say, Get Tucker, come to Rumble!

00:57:19.000 We're trying to get Tucker a Cummerumble.

00:57:21.000 Cummerumble, Tucker!

00:57:22.000 Cummerumble, Tucker!

00:57:24.000 Not pictured, says WonderWild09.

00:57:26.000 Tucker loves dogs.

00:57:27.000 We can all unify over that.

00:57:30.000 Yes, he does, doesn't he?

00:57:31.000 And also, he was nice to you, wasn't he?

00:57:33.000 Lovely.

00:57:33.000 He was ever so kind to you.

00:57:34.000 He was actually very complimentary.

00:57:35.000 He said he liked you on the... What was he talking about there?

00:57:37.000 Yeah.

00:57:38.000 He said he loved you on the show.

00:57:39.000 You were great!

00:57:39.000 I saw you!

00:57:41.000 I was great.

00:57:42.000 I really liked you.

00:57:43.000 Yeah, it was one of the best compliments I've ever had.

00:57:44.000 No, I'm always giving you compliments.

00:57:46.000 No, I know, but you know.

00:57:47.000 Oh, you're used to them.

00:57:48.000 My compliments have worn off.

00:57:50.000 What kind of press secretary are you?

00:57:52.000 You can't even defend me from making this sound like a cult and appreciate my compliments properly.

00:57:57.000 Hey, listen you lot, guess what we're going to do?

00:57:59.000 We're going to go exclusively onto Locals now and we're going to show that bit of Trump and Rogan cuddling and all that and talk about that, plus we'll take your questions.

00:58:08.000 Listen, if you're a member of Locals, sometimes you can join interviews live, like when I talked to Eckhart Tolle in about a month, plus Oliver Stone coming up soon, plus Ron DeSantis, he coming up a couple of days now, isn't it?

00:58:20.000 Yeah.

00:58:20.000 What are we going to say to Ron DeSantis?

00:58:22.000 I've not thought about it.

00:58:23.000 I'm crazy, baby!

00:58:25.000 Why did you do that?

00:58:27.000 Look at that face.

00:58:28.000 That wasn't that surprising.

00:58:30.000 Was that that surprising?

00:58:31.000 I don't know.

00:58:32.000 It's because of the bloody Turkomester stones.

00:58:34.000 That's right, yeah.

00:58:35.000 These tablets, give me another one of those.

00:58:36.000 These tablets have got a lot to answer for, you know.

00:58:38.000 They're making me more powerful than ever!

00:58:40.000 Whereas Zeus is growing weaker!

00:58:44.000 So listen, yeah, that's why you want to join us on Locals.

00:58:46.000 Press the red button, get yourself turkestosterone up to within an inch of your life.

00:58:50.000 We've got Jim Caviezel and Tim Ballard coming on, talking about Sound of Freedom that everyone's all up in arms about.

00:58:55.000 There they are, couple of lovely darlings.

00:58:57.000 Him there on the left, he played JC.

00:58:59.000 Now he's playing this dude on his side there.

00:59:01.000 This fella's been on the...

00:59:03.000 I bet they have, mate.

00:59:04.000 They'd be all over it, them lot.

00:59:05.000 Look at them.

00:59:05.000 They're buffers.

00:59:06.000 They're hench.

00:59:07.000 They're enormous.

00:59:08.000 They'd be all over it.

00:59:09.000 Now, this guy, Geisel, Sound of Freedom fella, he's made a film about, like, basically, don't nonce, stop child sex trafficking, which I thought would be an issue we'd all be able to unite around.

00:59:20.000 Like, like, I don't know, you don't want the earth to be sort of blown up by killer aliens or don't chop... I mean, like, there's so many... Cluster bombs?

00:59:27.000 Cluster!

00:59:28.000 Cluster bombs!

00:59:29.000 Another one of the classic issues that surely we all see as being the same.

00:59:33.000 He's a bit like John Travolta, the fella on the left, isn't he?

00:59:36.000 The main guy.

00:59:36.000 Tim Ballard.

00:59:37.000 So we're going to have them on.

00:59:38.000 They're going to be talking about that film that's doing better than Indiana Jones in the supermarket charts.

00:59:45.000 Is that the fella that played Jesus?

00:59:46.000 He played Jesus.

00:59:48.000 He was pretending to be Jesus.

00:59:49.000 How are you going to feel about that?

00:59:50.000 Actually, I'm a bit angry about that.

00:59:51.000 But, guess what?

00:59:53.000 Right, well, I've actually got something good for you here.

00:59:54.000 You're gonna love this.

00:59:55.000 This is an exclusive.

00:59:56.000 Get ready for this.

00:59:57.000 The Geezer, right, this is made by the people that made The Chosen, which was a series some of you will know about our Lord and Saviour J.C.

01:00:04.000 Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the Lamb.

01:00:07.000 Well, the Geezer that played Jesus in it, when I was on ballers with The Rock, he was my body double!

01:00:12.000 Jesus was my body double, baby!

01:00:15.000 Yeah!

01:00:16.000 So...

01:00:17.000 Bear!

01:00:19.000 That's good though, isn't it?

01:00:20.000 I guess it's good.

01:00:21.000 It's just coincidence, isn't it?

01:00:23.000 No.

01:00:24.000 And then Jim Careasle there, what I'm going to say to him is, look mate, you may have been Jesus in a film, but I had Jesus as my body double.

01:00:33.000 You know.

01:00:33.000 Are you saying that you're meeting people who have played Jesus in some form?

01:00:37.000 In order to challenge them.

01:00:38.000 And therefore that means that I could be... Possibly.

01:00:41.000 Let's consider it.

01:00:43.000 We haven't started a movement.

01:00:43.000 Maybe.

01:00:45.000 Free speech.

01:00:47.000 May.

01:00:47.000 This is not a cult.

01:00:49.000 This is not a cult.

01:00:49.000 Sound of Freedom, that film's called.

01:00:51.000 Why, what was I calling it?

01:00:52.000 I thought I was calling it Sound of Freedom.

01:00:54.000 Someone's put up Sound of Freedom.

01:00:55.000 Yeah, Sound of Freedom.

01:00:56.000 Listen, us guys is going over to locals now.

01:00:59.000 On tomorrow's show, we've got Adam Andrzejewski.

01:01:01.000 You'll love this guy.

01:01:02.000 Look at what a darling he is.

01:01:03.000 He's so respectful.

01:01:03.000 He calls me Mr. Brad.

01:01:05.000 He does.

01:01:05.000 He goes, look at all these secrets.

01:01:07.000 He goes in and gets secrets about how much money, your taxpayer money's been wasted on crazy... They spent over 10 million dollars teaching monkeys to suck dicks!

01:01:17.000 Well, you say wasted, I say invested.

01:01:19.000 Like, he's got some brilliant crazy views.

01:01:21.000 Plus... I'll be one of the trialists!

01:01:23.000 Oh, shoot!

01:01:24.000 Who's to say the little fellas can't do it?

01:01:27.000 Bring on another baboon, I tell thee!

01:01:30.000 At least they took the clinical trials.

01:01:32.000 Yeah, do you remember?

01:01:34.000 We've got eight mouses that say that the Moderna vaccine's gonna be good for your little children.

01:01:40.000 The Critical Drinker is on there, that's true.

01:01:42.000 It was only about eight mouses that they used, wasn't it?

01:01:44.000 It was eight, exactly.

01:01:45.000 It's not enough mouses, is it?

01:01:47.000 If you're gonna do a test on mouses, get nine.

01:01:50.000 Right.

01:01:50.000 Up to twelve mouses, I'd say.

01:01:52.000 Critical Drinker's on on Friday.

01:01:53.000 We're going to be talking, you know Critical Drinker from YouTube?

01:01:56.000 He's coming on.

01:01:56.000 We're going to be talking to him about films, culture wars, the ransacking of heritage projects like Indiana Jones, all that.

01:02:03.000 You'll love it.

01:02:03.000 It's brilliant.

01:02:04.000 You'll love it.

01:02:05.000 People that are members of Locals can see that early.

01:02:08.000 Stay with us now on Locals to see us talk about Joe Rogan meeting Trump, plus taking more of your questions.

01:02:13.000 Let me see if you've got a question in here.

01:02:16.000 Love flows.

01:02:17.000 Yeah, nice.

01:02:17.000 That's not a question, that's a statement.

01:02:19.000 Wait a sec.

01:02:19.000 Hold on a sec, let's see what people are saying now.

01:02:22.000 Team Locals, yeah!

01:02:23.000 Get JP on here, yeah!

01:02:25.000 Get Asika Shakur!

01:02:26.000 Rogan, Rogan!

01:02:27.000 Says Carole and Jeep Junk.

01:02:28.000 People are crazy in there.

01:02:30.000 They're crazy, they're out of their minds.

01:02:35.000 This is great fun over there.

01:02:36.000 You're going to have a good time.

01:02:38.000 Join us there.

01:02:39.000 Sweet Terkester Tosterone.

01:02:41.000 One of the nicest tablets there, Lord.

01:02:43.000 Eri did breathe into me.

01:02:44.000 See you in a second.

01:02:46.000 Click on the red button on your screen now to join us for an extended show.

01:02:50.000 And then join us tomorrow for, who did I say?

01:02:52.000 Andrew Andrzejewski.

01:02:54.000 I'm high as a kite, man.

01:02:55.000 Join us tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.

01:02:57.000 Until then, unless you're on Locals right now, press the red button.

01:03:00.000 Stay free!

01:03:01.000 Switch on.

01:03:01.000 Switch off.

01:03:02.000 Switch on.

01:03:03.000 Switch off.

Stay Free - Russel Brand - July 10, 2023

Tucker Interview GONE VIRAL!! - My Reaction - #164 - Stay Free With Russell Brand

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript