Stay Free - Russel Brand - Tucker Interviewing PUTIN In Russia?! Legacy Media & The Establishment FREAK OUT! - Stay Free #299

00:00:00.000 ...

00:02:15.000 Hey you Awake and Wonders, thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.

00:02:20.000 We've got a fantastic show today.

00:02:22.000 Even as we speak, Tucker is trying to trump his last interview, which I think was very good, with a plucky little outsider called ol' Russ.

00:02:31.000 He's gonna talk to Putin.

00:02:32.000 Will that interview be as well covered?

00:02:34.000 Will it be as interesting?

00:02:36.000 Will it be as pivotal for the future?

00:02:39.000 Of the world.

00:02:40.000 So we're going to be talking a bit about Tucker going to Russia to interview Putin.

00:02:43.000 He's bringing a bit of footage of Tucker even before he's anywhere near Putin.

00:02:47.000 He's in a hotel and you can hear he's using Russian manners.

00:02:50.000 Any of you that know Russian people will know what I mean by Russian manners.

00:02:53.000 You do not go chuckling and being too, what I call, flamboyant around Russian people. 1.00

00:02:59.000 Haven't they got like a phrase, like something like, he who smiles gets a smack in the mouth.

00:03:04.000 I'd like to talk to Lex Friedman about that one day.

00:03:06.000 I've spent some time around Russian people.

00:03:07.000 They don't play.

00:03:08.000 I'd say they're the sort of country that you should think very carefully before going to war with, and if there is a diplomatic solution available, take the diplomatic solution!

00:03:17.000 Again, I can't express my sympathy for the Ukrainian people who are suffering in this war, and indeed the Russian people who are suffering in this war, enough.

00:03:25.000 And of course that is just a purported interview with Putin at the moment, although I'm pretty sure it's gonna happen.

00:03:31.000 In here's the news, we're gonna be exploring the new Child Safety Act, which Well, the fact that it's called the Child Safety Act suggests it's not anything to do with bloody child safety.

00:03:44.000 It's going to be about government control over social media.

00:03:46.000 You'll love it.

00:03:47.000 You'll enjoy seeing Zuckerberg participate in a piece of propaganda.

00:03:51.000 You'll enjoy seeing the rather dignified head of TikTok spoken to as if he's a rent boy. 0.74

00:03:57.000 It's pretty extraordinary and amusing and I think you'll like it.

00:04:00.000 I'm just hearing, of course, that some people are saying that Tucker could be in Russia to talk to Snowden.

00:04:04.000 That's a pretty good interview, but You want to see the Putin interview, don't you?

00:04:10.000 That's the thing you really want to see.

00:04:12.000 Now if you want to see our conversation with Tucker, that is up For our Awakened Wonders, right now!

00:04:20.000 In fact, have we got, uh, where's our, like, we're going to play that, um, we're going to play that for you, because if you're watching this on YouTube, we got, the show today is brilliant.

00:04:28.000 We're going to start off with Tucker and Putin, then we're going to talk about the new Apple Goggles.

00:04:32.000 You know those Apple Goggles?

00:04:33.000 The augmented reality?

00:04:35.000 They're absolutely, well, this is the thing where I'm conflicted by technology.

00:04:39.000 These Apple Goggles look bloody brilliant, but they also I'm going to present an opportunity to literally control our total experience of reality.

00:04:49.000 If you're watching this on YouTube, we're going to do about 15 minutes over there, then the rest of our fun-packed, jam-packed, free-speaking, free-wheeling hour will be over on that stream of freedom Here's a little moment from my conversation with Tucker Carlson to whet your appetite if you're considering becoming an Awakened Wonder and supporting our work.

00:05:19.000 This is where he's speaking out against dictatorships, and I notice that my dog Bear, who's in this room somewhere,

00:05:25.000 has managed to get dog hair on his upper pectoral.

00:05:29.000 Have a look.

00:05:30.000 People want a dictator, actually. 0.99

00:05:33.000 I mean, the founders of my country certainly believe that, and they set all these very complicated systems in place

00:05:38.000 to deny people their desire to be ruled over.

00:05:42.000 You should get dog hair there just as you were outlining the American... I'm so covered in dog hair!

00:05:48.000 Have a look at that.

00:05:49.000 That's exclusively available for our Awakened Wonders.

00:05:53.000 Meanwhile Tucker is using a very different aspect of his persona because he is in Russia!

00:05:58.000 Let's have a look at our legacy media reporting on that.

00:06:00.000 Tucker Carlson apparently pictured in Russia amid rumours of interview with Putin.

00:06:03.000 Former Fox News host, check this, bit of propaganda even there, who is sympathetic to the Russian president, appeared in Kremlin media at a performance of Spartacus in Moscow.

00:06:14.000 A few things to unpack there.

00:06:16.000 I don't know that You would say that Tucker Carlson is sympathetic to the Russian president.

00:06:21.000 It's just like, you know, we showed you last week there was a poll of 40,000 people in our country where we were asked, who would you vote for?

00:06:27.000 Rishi Sunak, Moderna investor, W.E.F.

00:06:30.000 Stooge, Keir Starmer, centralist Davos affiliate of Vladimir Putin.

00:06:36.000 And you know what people are like now?

00:06:37.000 People went, Putin!

00:06:38.000 We'd vote for Putin!

00:06:40.000 People are so now...

00:06:42.000 Throbbing with anti-establishmentism that we'd literally roll the dice on former KGB agent Putin.

00:06:49.000 Is it Vladimir Putin?

00:06:51.000 Like, I should learn the name of actual world leaders given the job I do.

00:06:55.000 Who's that guy over there in front of that castle?

00:06:57.000 That's the Kremlin.

00:06:58.000 Aha, he seems pretty cross.

00:07:00.000 Yeah, he's the president of Russia.

00:07:01.000 Frightening guy.

00:07:02.000 Has he got a first name at all?

00:07:03.000 Listen, I'm too busy.

00:07:05.000 And who's this last guy, Boris Yeltsin?

00:07:07.000 All right, I've not got time to educate you.

00:07:09.000 Nevertheless, what I would say is that what Tucker Carlson's not done is immediately bent over to globalist, anti-war, jingoist rhetoric that... Do you remember?

00:07:17.000 Check this out, just as an example.

00:07:19.000 After the Second World War, and during the Second World War in fact, Japanese American citizens were put into internment camps, weren't they?

00:07:26.000 It's like, well, we're at war with Japan. 0.71

00:07:27.000 We've got to round up Japanese people. 1.00

00:07:29.000 And then, like, after the Second World War, there was a kind of reckoning.

00:07:32.000 Was that right that we did that to Japanese people? 1.00

00:07:35.000 Didn't we mistreat them a little?

00:07:36.000 Was that the right way to behave?

00:07:38.000 And now we're back to the kind of jingoism that preceded it. 0.99

00:07:41.000 Like, oh, well, if you're Russian, if you're Russian, you're a baddie. 1.00

00:07:45.000 If it's Solzhenitsyn, Tchaikovsky, Lex Friedman, Konstantin over in our country, They're baddies.

00:07:52.000 They're like, you know, we're not at war with Russia purportedly, are we?

00:07:55.000 We may be advocating for, supporting, financing Ukraine's war with them and not questioning the principles of Ukrainian democracy.

00:08:03.000 A lot of Ukrainian people think that Ukrainian democracy is in Serious trouble.

00:08:08.000 Now, former Chief of Staff Bill Kristol, who played a leading role in advocating for the 2003 invasion of Iraq, also is the director of a group called Defending Democracy.

00:08:18.000 Check out where that's funded.

00:08:19.000 It'll be one of those organizations called Defending Democracy.

00:08:22.000 Brought to you by Pfizer!

00:08:24.000 Bought to you by Northrop Grumman, won't it?

00:08:27.000 I mean, I haven't even done this research yet.

00:08:29.000 Why don't one of you in the rumble chat, I'm talking about you central scrutiniser, you, Steve McGraw, find out now where Defending Democracy gets its funding from.

00:08:37.000 I bet it ain't from the Girl Guides.

00:08:39.000 I bet you it ain't.

00:08:41.000 Anyway, this is what he posted about Tucker, literally saying, Perhaps we need a total and complete shutdown of Tucker Carlson re-entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what's going on.

00:08:53.000 That's a late-night tweet, Bill.

00:08:55.000 He's taking Elon Musk's advice, isn't he?

00:08:57.000 And doing his own ex-posts, and maybe some people shouldn't do that.

00:09:02.000 Tucker Carlson's a journalist.

00:09:04.000 A journalist has every right to speak to a world leader.

00:09:07.000 I think what they're realizing now... Tell me if you agree with this.

00:09:12.000 I think what they're realizing Tucker Carlson is like a monarch of online space and journalism, okay?

00:09:18.000 Isn't he?

00:09:19.000 If Tucker Carlson posts a conversation on X that won't censor it because of Elon Musk with Putin, and Putin says, if you let us have Crimea, if you allow some sovereignty and autonomy for Russian natives in the area of Donbass, the disputed region of Donbass, and if Ukraine don't join NATO, we'll end this war tomorrow.

00:09:42.000 Now if that gets said, and we all see it, how many of you want your taxpayer dollars and pounds going upstream to NATO?

00:09:51.000 How many of you even know what NATO is for in the post-Cold War world?

00:09:56.000 How many of you wouldn't welcome a genuine reckoning when it comes to the role of the IMF, the World Bank, the WHO, the WEF, NATO?

00:10:06.000 What are all these things doing for you lately?

00:10:08.000 They helping you with your grocery prices?

00:10:10.000 They helping you with your energy prices?

00:10:11.000 They helping you in your community?

00:10:13.000 They helping your democracy? 0.78

00:10:14.000 They helping you in your marriage?

00:10:16.000 They helping you in your relationship with God?

00:10:18.000 Oh no!

00:10:18.000 I don't know what I'll do if NATO gets ended!

00:10:22.000 The truth is I literally don't know because as far as I know maybe Russia is an imperialist expansionist nation that has designs to recreate the Soviet Union.

00:10:31.000 Maybe they are a nation of Mongol people that will stop at nothing until they've achieved total control. 1.00

00:10:37.000 You know what?

00:10:38.000 I'd like to see an interview with a guy that's running that country and to say that it's like a Treason to have that conversation. 0.98

00:10:46.000 What kind of moronic language is that? 0.91

00:10:48.000 What do the legacy media think they're playing at? 0.99

00:10:51.000 What do they think they're dealing with?

00:10:52.000 Dupes, dopes, and rubes from rinky-dink towns that don't know nothing, that can't assess information for themselves? 0.59

00:10:59.000 Is that what they think we are?

00:11:00.000 We know that the answer is yes.

00:11:02.000 That's exactly what you think you are.

00:11:04.000 They think you are, excuse me.

00:11:05.000 You can think whatever you want in your own private consciousness for now until the Apple goggles are on and then you'll think whatever the state demands you think.

00:11:13.000 Another move that offers leisure and convenience that ultimately might end up controlling the spaces of your attention.

00:11:21.000 In our conversation with Vivek Ramaswamy that our community on Locals joined us for, we talked about that attitude of parentalism.

00:11:29.000 I liked it.

00:11:31.000 I liked it a lot because what I like was is he said that what they believe in, essentially, the establishment, let's call it, for simplicity's sake, the NATOs, the WHO, the neocons, the neoliberal organization, what they believe in is parentalism.

00:11:46.000 They believe that you don't know how to assess information.

00:11:48.000 That's why they advocate for censorship because they think, oh my god, if those poor fools see all this information, They're going to make bad decisions. 0.91

00:11:56.000 They mean your humble narrator in the rumble chat. 0.94

00:11:59.000 They mean FX Extreme.

00:12:00.000 They mean Ghoststar. 1.00

00:12:01.000 All of you are too stupid, they think. 1.00

00:12:04.000 We even talked about controlled opposition, you know, because I see some people talking about my tattoo. 1.00

00:12:08.000 I love the tattoo.

00:12:10.000 33 vertebrae in the spine.

00:12:11.000 I love our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

00:12:14.000 Sacred number.

00:12:14.000 I'm telling you, do some research.

00:12:16.000 You will not find me in the Masons or the Illuminati.

00:12:20.000 Let's have a look at Tucker in a Russian hotel and anyone that spent My name is Alexey.

00:12:24.000 I like what you do.

00:12:25.000 that stay calm around them because they can you know they can get pretty leery

00:12:30.000 My name is Alexey. I like you. You are the best American journalist. Thank you.

00:12:41.000 I love this city.

00:12:42.000 It's beautiful.

00:12:43.000 What are you doing in Russia?

00:12:44.000 I wanted to see it.

00:12:44.000 You know, you sort of go, thank you, thank you.

00:12:46.000 Or maybe if you're at a funeral, thank you, thank you, thank you.

00:12:50.000 Moscow.

00:12:51.000 I love this city. It's beautiful.

00:12:54.000 Thank you, thank you.

00:12:56.000 It's really, yes, yes.

00:12:58.000 What are you doing in Russia?

00:13:00.000 I wanted to see it. I read so much about it.

00:13:03.000 Has Taka got every right to be in Russia and talk to Putin or Edward Snowden?

00:13:07.000 He's a journalist, isn't he?

00:13:08.000 He's communicating with the world.

00:13:09.000 We did a poll earlier on a number of sites.

00:13:12.000 Let's have a look at those poll results right now.

00:13:15.000 We asked you, does he have every right?

00:13:17.000 This is good, the way we pose this question here.

00:13:19.000 45,000 of you voted.

00:13:20.000 Who's the real traitor?

00:13:21.000 Joe Biden for continuing to fund the Ukraine war or Tucker Carlson for maybe interviewing Putin in Russia?

00:13:28.000 Do you believe in democracy?

00:13:30.000 Do you believe in referenda?

00:13:31.000 If so, I've read so much about it, but I've never seen it before.

00:13:34.000 So I wanted to talk to people and see how it's going.

00:13:37.000 I won't mention that, I think.

00:13:38.000 And it's doing very well.

00:13:39.000 Let's carry on, if I press play, it's going to continue with Tucker where we left off. Let's have a look. No. So

00:13:43.000 let's continue with Tucker where we left off.

00:13:46.000 Thank you.

00:13:47.000 You know, because I've read so much about it, but I've never seen a performance.

00:13:52.000 So I wanted to try and talk to people about it. I won't mention that, I think.

00:13:57.000 And it's doing very well.

00:13:58.000 I think, uh...

00:13:59.000 Maybe we can take an interview with Putin?

00:14:01.000 Putin?

00:14:02.000 Oh, why, uh, you know, this Moscow...

00:14:08.000 Oh.

00:14:09.000 American media.

00:14:13.000 I don't know. 1.00

00:14:14.000 They're crazy.

00:14:18.000 That, in America, or the UK, would have been a Tucker laugh, no?

00:14:21.000 You know, when he goes, ha ha ha!

00:14:22.000 You know, when he does them mad laughs.

00:14:23.000 Oh my god, you peed in my yard!

00:14:25.000 That's a, ho ho! 0.88

00:14:27.000 You know, and I say this as an advocate of Tucker Carlson, and I believe, if I was voting in that, of course Tucker Carlson should interview Putin.

00:14:34.000 Of course we should all hear what Putin's saying.

00:14:36.000 If Putin publicly says, these are the conditions under which we would be willing to accept a diplomatic agreement, then we We triangulate that with our assessment of current Ukrainian democracy and the well-being of Ukrainian people, and the number of Ukrainian lives lost and Russian lives lost, and American taxpayer dollars spent, and what we know now about the expenditure in the Afghanistan conflict, two trillion dollars, what the hell did that achieve?

00:14:59.000 Our other adventures in the Middle East, the escalating conflicts elsewhere in the Middle East, The Houthis?

00:15:05.000 Shouldn't we be saving some money to kill Houthis wherever I see a Houthi? 0.99

00:15:09.000 I say youthy are in trouble, Houthi. 0.99

00:15:12.000 Can't we, you know, if you assume that we are unable to assess information, then you are at odds with everything we believe in.

00:15:18.000 In fact, that's the video we made for our Awakened Wonder community is on that subject precisely.

00:15:23.000 We take some of the work of Terence McKenna and talk about individual sovereignty.

00:15:28.000 I'm being asked in the chat by 136H90M, Russell, will you interview President Xi?

00:15:33.000 Yes, I will.

00:15:34.000 I'm on my way to China.

00:15:36.000 I've already been accused of being a Chinese asset.

00:15:38.000 I'm getting over there now.

00:15:39.000 Logically AI, they say I'm a Chinese asset.

00:15:42.000 I'm getting the hell over China right now. 0.94

00:15:44.000 You see some politeness there, I tell you.

00:15:46.000 Like I'm laughing about Tucker's manners in Russia.

00:15:49.000 You mean China.

00:15:50.000 Hello, Mr. Xi.

00:15:52.000 I've always thought you're doing a good job, sir.

00:15:55.000 I liked the Olympics.

00:15:57.000 I like Chinese food.

00:16:00.000 I'm panicking!

00:16:00.000 I can't think of anything to say.

00:16:03.000 Let's see how the legacy media reacted.

00:16:05.000 And if you're watching us over on YouTube, you've got to join us.

00:16:08.000 You think we're interested in hate speech?

00:16:10.000 You think that's what inspires us?

00:16:12.000 You think me, as a father of three children, I get up every day and say, how can I spread hate?

00:16:16.000 I want to spread love, so that we have a chance of saving the lives of future generations that this globalist establishment cartel is hell-bent on destroying.

00:16:25.000 You've seen their games.

00:16:26.000 Okay, let's have a look at how the mainstream media reacted to Tucker.

00:16:30.000 Tucker Carlson in Moscow for Putin.

00:16:32.000 That's the pro-Kremlin crowd, I hope so. 0.84

00:16:34.000 Are you pro-Kremlin?

00:16:35.000 Are you pro-Putin?

00:16:37.000 I ain't pro.

00:16:38.000 Yeah, Queen Manor, someone on GGFD, one of our community members says, Queen Manor, yeah, I did meet Her Majesty the Queen once.

00:16:43.000 I was like, hello, Majesty.

00:16:46.000 Hello, yes, no, Your Majesty, please, thank you.

00:16:48.000 Let's have a look what Mother Jones say about Tucker going to Russia.

00:16:55.000 Leaked Kremlin memo to Russian media.

00:16:58.000 It is essential to feature Tucker Carlson.

00:17:00.000 Do you remember as well?

00:17:01.000 Isn't part of like the Tucker's deal with Fox like and getting booted out Fox like and remember people were hacking his phone weren't they saying oh he's in he's in touch with the Russians.

00:17:10.000 Superday 101.

00:17:12.000 Keep going, Russell.

00:17:13.000 I'll keep going.

00:17:13.000 You keep going.

00:17:14.000 We'll all keep going together.

00:17:16.000 Pro stay free only, says chaotic02244.

00:17:19.000 We're about to hit 20,000 in the Rumble stream.

00:17:22.000 Guys on YouTube, we need you to join us.

00:17:24.000 Before that, I'm going to show you a brilliant reaction from RFK on X. The legacy media is in shambles because we've caught on to their lies and propaganda.

00:17:33.000 Tucker Carlson has every right to interview Putin.

00:17:36.000 We need more transparency instead of less.

00:17:38.000 It used to be understood journalists would interview world leaders, even those with whom we were at war.

00:17:42.000 Look at how the legacy media behave now.

00:17:44.000 The legacy media want to shut down dissent.

00:17:46.000 The legacy media are an arm of the establishment now.

00:17:50.000 They will actively find people, I know this from personal experience, that are opposing government narrative and they will do anything they can.

00:17:57.000 They will amplify untruths, they will lie, they will do whatever it takes to destroy. 1.00

00:18:01.000 Let's have a look at what Glenn Greenwald saying that a journalist or any American becomes a traitor by visiting a foreign country we're not at war with and interviewing its leader is in equal parts demented, stupid and authoritarian. 0.99

00:18:13.000 But this McCarthyite jingoism is also fully normalised in liberal discourse. 0.99

00:18:17.000 That's liberalism!

00:18:18.000 Those are the countries that will say, you know, well Russia, you know, like remember when Sting released that song, do the Russians love their children too?

00:18:25.000 Now the answer will be, no, they don't love their children at all.

00:18:28.000 Poor old... Once you start arguing with Sting, you've got a problem.

00:18:32.000 He's one of our great pop stars.

00:18:34.000 OK, listen, if you're watching us on YouTube, we've got some fantastic stuff.

00:18:38.000 We're talking about the Apple Goggles.

00:18:39.000 I'm not even going to call them their proper name out of, I don't know, childishness?

00:18:42.000 Call it what you will.

00:18:43.000 That's the future now.

00:18:45.000 Will the world be augmented?

00:18:46.000 Well done in apple goggles.

00:18:48.000 We're talking a little bit about Rogan's new deal and what that means for Legacy Media.

00:18:51.000 We're talking about Nikki Haley on SNL.

00:18:54.000 Is she an establishment stooge or what? 0.98

00:18:58.000 If you're watching this anywhere other than Rumble, click the link.

00:19:01.000 Get over here. 0.99

00:19:02.000 Join in with the freedom.

00:19:04.000 We're spirited.

00:19:05.000 We believe in change.

00:19:05.000 We ain't terrified.

00:19:06.000 We ain't a part of the apocalyptic cult.

00:19:08.000 We're part of freedom and love, and you can be with us.

00:19:11.000 Click the link in the description.

00:19:13.000 Get over here now, y'all.

00:19:14.000 Click that link right now.

00:19:15.000 Listen to this.

00:19:16.000 This is the Apple Vision Pro headset.

00:19:20.000 Went on sale in the US this weekend.

00:19:22.000 It's free and half grand.

00:19:23.000 That three and a half grand, £3,500.

00:19:27.000 You should go to Russia, Russell.

00:19:29.000 Yeah, I will.

00:19:31.000 I'm a bit scared, a bit scared of Putin.

00:19:31.000 I'd like to.

00:19:33.000 I reckon it's when the people... If I can't make someone laugh, I get edgy.

00:19:37.000 And I think getting a laugh out of Putin, that would be a good laugh.

00:19:40.000 If he went, oh, oh, yes, good, good, good.

00:19:44.000 Hey, Putin, I hear you've got... The media says you've got bum cancer. 0.95

00:19:48.000 I don't think this is good funny.

00:19:51.000 Yeah, I would be well into that.

00:19:53.000 Russian brand, what do you mean?

00:19:54.000 What my personality would be like over there.

00:19:56.000 Oh, Russian brand.

00:19:57.000 Is that a pun, Cal?

00:19:59.000 Russian brand, that's what the headline would be.

00:20:01.000 Our producer, Gareth Roy, said that the headline would be Russian brand.

00:20:04.000 Russ in Russia says long time listener.

00:20:06.000 If you think RFK is different, I have some land to Syria.

00:20:10.000 I love Bobby Kennedy.

00:20:11.000 I gotta tell you, I pray that he's different.

00:20:14.000 I pray, because I know Bobby now, and I love him!

00:20:16.000 Russell, can you list all your smoothie ingredients?

00:20:18.000 All right.

00:20:20.000 Kale, spinach, lemon, ginger, apple, and I try to go heavy on the spinach and kale.

00:20:24.000 Is that what you guys meant?

00:20:25.000 Welcome!

00:20:26.000 If you're over here for the first time from YouTube, thank you so much for joining us.

00:20:29.000 It's good to be in a space that's not, I would say, regulated by the WHO.

00:20:34.000 Would you pay that, yes or no?

00:20:34.000 Let's have a look at this.

00:20:36.000 Y or N? 0.96

00:20:37.000 Would you pay Three and a half grand for a Vision Pro headset.

00:20:41.000 Let's have a look at it.

00:20:45.000 Alright, this is officially a dream come true, right?

00:20:49.000 We got the NBA dashboard over here.

00:20:52.000 I mean, it's good, isn't it?

00:20:53.000 You'll be sucked in.

00:20:53.000 It's good.

00:20:54.000 Wouldn't you get sort of sucked in to that?

00:20:55.000 it smaller but then I'd also make it huge like look how big I can make this thing.

00:20:58.000 I mean it's good isn't it? It's good. You'll be sucked in.

00:21:03.000 Wouldn't you get sort of sucked in to that? I mean but here's the issue. I would say

00:21:08.000 that they will normalize this technology and could it become in the project of transhumanism

00:21:15.000 a problem if we all start to accept the idea of augmented reality?

00:21:20.000 To a degree, we live in an augmented reality already, don't we?

00:21:23.000 The information we're granted access to is heavily censored and heavily curated.

00:21:28.000 That's one of the things we talk about continually.

00:21:29.000 A lot of you are saying no, but what if you got it for nothing?

00:21:33.000 I must say, I'm such a, like, I can't believe, I'd go, oh my Oh my god, there's tellies all over my house!

00:21:38.000 There's a telly over there with X on it!

00:21:39.000 There's a telly over there and this is the rumble telly!

00:21:42.000 Oh my god, I could put me on different telly! 0.98

00:21:44.000 You know, it's bloody ridiculous. 0.96

00:21:46.000 I don't think that...

00:21:48.000 I personally don't believe that technology is going to deliver the solution, not technology as a subset of this kind of globalist state capitalism.

00:21:57.000 The same as with science, you know?

00:21:58.000 Like, science is obviously miraculous and incredible and can deliver and has delivered so many solutions, but when it's a subset of state globalist capitalism, all of its ingenuity and endeavours are marshalled towards control.

00:22:10.000 And God, man, Apple have got enough power, don't you think, at the moment?

00:22:15.000 They've got enough power as it is.

00:22:17.000 They can already... Like, when on your news feed, you know, do you get that when it's like Apple curated news that you didn't ask for?

00:22:23.000 It goes, Ukraine have got a new 100-mile bomb made by Boeing. 0.89

00:22:27.000 And that's a headline.

00:22:27.000 I didn't ask for that information.

00:22:29.000 Why are you giving me this information?

00:22:30.000 Why are you trying to curate and control my reality?

00:22:33.000 But isn't it possible for us to sort of enjoy the ingenuity of these products?

00:22:38.000 If I was earning five grand a week, I would take it.

00:22:40.000 Would you take it for free?

00:22:42.000 Stop asking about Corn Pop!

00:22:45.000 You've asked about Corn Pop.

00:22:46.000 Corn Pop was a bad dude.

00:22:47.000 That's all you need to know.

00:22:48.000 That's all you need to know about Corn Pop.

00:22:50.000 I will tell you that.

00:22:51.000 Let's look at the rest of this.

00:22:52.000 But I don't want to show this and for you lot to think it's propaganda, because I'm not endorsing it at all.

00:22:56.000 I think probably it's a step in the wrong direction, even though it would be sort of amazing.

00:23:02.000 And it feels real.

00:23:03.000 Like, it feels like it's in my space.

00:23:04.000 Like, look, half my dog is not even showing up.

00:23:06.000 What's up, Archie?

00:23:07.000 I'm walking through here.

00:23:09.000 I'm going over here to grab this, right?

00:23:11.000 Like, it just feels real.

00:23:12.000 I got Twitter over there in the corner.

00:23:14.000 I'm not showing any more of it.

00:23:15.000 It's too powerful.

00:23:15.000 It's too seductive.

00:23:16.000 Those of you talking about Bobby Kennedy there, like, I guess, look, you probably, if you are, if you have concerns about ongoing events in the Middle East, Then watch our conversation with Max Blumenthal because he's going to give you information that's going to blow your mind.

00:23:31.000 But we do have to find ways of creating alliances if you want to make a difference in this system.

00:23:37.000 I don't know what you guys, I don't know what you lot think is the route out for us, man.

00:23:42.000 I don't know what you think the route is.

00:23:43.000 Let's have a look at the legacy media selling Apple products.

00:23:46.000 That is our next guest having some fun testing Apple's new Vision Pro headset.

00:23:46.000 Let's have a look.

00:23:50.000 Apple's first mixed reality headset blends digital content into the literal space around us.

00:23:56.000 And today, you can get it yourself for $3,500.

00:23:58.000 Oh, thank you so much for allowing me to get that myself for just a small, small thing.

00:24:04.000 It's a bit cumbersome, isn't it?

00:24:06.000 Might as well be a swim mask.

00:24:08.000 That is our next guest having some fun... Sorry, I've already played that.

00:24:11.000 Let's have a look at some... Is this people using it? 0.99

00:24:16.000 In my mind, he's just going to start masturbating. 0.99

00:24:20.000 He's probably like, OK, just doing my computer. 0.99

00:24:23.000 This is good.

00:24:24.000 And finally, now I express myself in the way that Mother Nature intended, in public, on a trade, wearing my lavender goggles.

00:24:33.000 Yeah, that can't be the future, can it?

00:24:34.000 Can it?

00:24:34.000 Yeah, nice.

00:24:41.000 OK, hey, listen, you lot, we've got some fantastic content coming up for you.

00:24:44.000 We're going to be looking at that social media inquiry where they got all of their CEOs of various social media companies lined up and they pretend... No, stay there, guys.

00:24:54.000 Stay there.

00:24:55.000 I'm going to do that now.

00:24:55.000 That's good.

00:24:57.000 I may pretend that this is about child safety when in fact we know it is about censorship and it's about control.

00:25:04.000 We'll be going to that in a second.

00:25:07.000 Now it's time for a word from our partners.

00:25:10.000 Behold the elixir.

00:25:11.000 I'm calling this love mace.

00:25:14.000 Ah it's mace in the face but it's love mace because this is from our sponsors Charlize.

00:25:18.000 Charlize is like a cosmetics brand that doesn't include any toxins at all in their brand. 0.87

00:25:24.000 If you're looking for a gift for someone, this is a fantastic gift.

00:25:27.000 This ain't the only product, this is the toner.

00:25:29.000 A toner that lifts your serotonin levels and is based on apple stem cells.

00:25:33.000 You've noticed how the humble apple remains pure and glorious on the counter?

00:25:37.000 While the saucy banana browns itself off, where the filthy peach wrinkles like a pelosi neck. 0.98

00:25:44.000 No, I don't mean to criticise people for their physical appearances.

00:25:47.000 It's wrong and I don't agree with it.

00:25:48.000 This guy, by Charlize, the toner, it lifts your mood, it tightens your face, it makes you feel fantastic.

00:25:56.000 Me and my wife are using these products.

00:25:58.000 Bona Juice, central screw.

00:26:01.000 I don't.

00:26:02.000 I've not sprayed it there.

00:26:03.000 I daren't.

00:26:04.000 But it's 100% toxic free.

00:26:07.000 The whole Charlize skincare line is.

00:26:09.000 She, by the way, this woman, she powerful.

00:26:11.000 She's already stood up against the Biden administration.

00:26:13.000 She's been in trouble for spreading disinformation. 1.00

00:26:15.000 She one of us.

00:26:17.000 I will look at Daniel in the Bible.

00:26:19.000 I will read the book of Daniel and read a lot about IT.

00:26:21.000 Good suggestion.

00:26:22.000 Thanks for that, guys.

00:26:23.000 So listen, you lot, if you want some beauty products for yourself or a loved one, because I'm a man.

00:26:28.000 I can use these beauty products.

00:26:30.000 Use our code.

00:26:32.000 This is a good way to fight aging without toxicity.

00:26:34.000 You could drink this.

00:26:35.000 I don't recommend it.

00:26:36.000 I'm a recovering alcoholic.

00:26:37.000 I can't touch it.

00:26:38.000 No drinks, no drugs, 21 years.

00:26:40.000 But you can get 25% off by going to charlize.beauty and using the promo code brand.

00:26:45.000 You'll get a quarter off, okay?

00:26:47.000 So, consider this product makes you look like Charlize Theron.

00:26:51.000 Possibly, Paul Schroeder.

00:26:52.000 Possibly. 0.99

00:26:53.000 They're a damn good company from a damn fine American woman. 1.00

00:26:57.000 Support them if it's within your interest and means because you'll be supporting us by doing it. 0.97

00:27:01.000 Thank you.

00:27:02.000 Now, what do you think about Rogan extending his deal?

00:27:06.000 250 million dollars, although often these things aren't entirely true.

00:27:09.000 There's gonna be more of it up on YouTube.

00:27:11.000 What does this mean for journalism?

00:27:13.000 What do you guys think about that?

00:27:14.000 Because what about what Rogan said just recently about liberals?

00:27:18.000 Like he's out.

00:27:19.000 Didn't he say, I'm never voting for Democrats again?

00:27:22.000 See if you can find that.

00:27:23.000 We'll talk about that in a minute after our presentation because I want to show you this social media thing.

00:27:31.000 Recently the heads of all the various social media platforms, the dude from TikTok, Zuckerberg of course, the woman that runs X for Elon, they were all lined up while various senators were sort of like Really tried to go for them.

00:27:48.000 And what I feel like is, like anyone, you would think that child safety is paramount.

00:27:53.000 The protection of children, that's our job, that's our function as a species, to protect the children, to protect the vulnerable, to build a better future.

00:28:01.000 Just, I can't help but notice, whether it's child poverty, or certain medications that were pretty heartily recommended in recent years, that may have caused an 8% rise in the UK in child deaths.

00:28:15.000 May of course, may of course, I'm not saying that for an absolute fact.

00:28:17.000 There's some information that suggests that.

00:28:18.000 Certainly there's been an 8% rise in child deaths in the UK.

00:28:22.000 That's a fact.

00:28:23.000 I don't know what's caused it, but it's happened in the last couple of years.

00:28:26.000 Are the government and the state interested in child safety or are they interested in control?

00:28:31.000 Yeah, so one, if you think child safety.

00:28:33.000 Two, if you think control.

00:28:35.000 While you settle down and enjoy this episode of Here's the News.

00:28:38.000 No, Here's the Effing News.

00:28:39.000 We'll be back with Jake Sullivan and some of his propaganda.

00:28:42.000 We'll be talking a lot about Nikki Haley on SNL.

00:28:45.000 We've got some great stuff.

00:28:46.000 Want one or two?

00:28:47.000 Let us know.

00:28:48.000 See you in a few seconds, guys.

00:28:52.000 Is it rolling?

00:28:53.000 Thank you for choosing Fox News.

00:28:55.000 Thank you so much.

00:28:56.000 No. 0.99

00:28:56.000 Here's the fucking news. 0.99

00:28:58.000 Senators are grilling the CEOs of social media companies in order to implement, they say, 0.99

00:29:05.000 new child safety laws to protect children.

00:29:08.000 All of us want to protect children, but is that the aim of the government?

00:29:11.000 Or is this about control of social media?

00:29:14.000 Cast your mind back now!

00:29:17.000 These ongoing inquiries into online safety of course are about an important subject.

00:29:23.000 No one would question the integrity of the notion that children should be protected from online bullying, from pornography, from Potential forms of exploitation from being able to access information on how you might harm yourself in a variety of ways Even with the most ultimate and irreversible of acts now speaking to someone who is as an adolescent experience Well, yes, I'm bullying but also I had a lot of mental health issues and addiction issues and did engage in self-harm I recognize that these are important issues and yet more significantly, of course, I'm a parent and

00:29:55.000 Right now I have three children whose safety is obviously the most important thing in my life.

00:30:00.000 So no one's questioning the importance of child safety.

00:30:03.000 What we are questioning is what these hearings are really about.

00:30:07.000 Because the very same social media companies that are now being harangued and barracked by senators and it's extraordinary to watch because it's so theatrical.

00:30:15.000 You can tell it's propaganda even as you're watching it.

00:30:17.000 There are literally staged moments that couldn't have happened without pre-discussion and without conversation and organisation.

00:30:24.000 It's brilliant.

00:30:25.000 You're really going to enjoy this.

00:30:26.000 What we're actually questioning is what are these hearings really about?

00:30:30.000 It's a bit like the pandemic.

00:30:31.000 We all agree that human life is sacred, that we should all protect one another.

00:30:35.000 Love one another.

00:30:36.000 That we're all invested in one another and your safety and my safety and our collective safety are important and when we forget that we go crazy.

00:30:43.000 That's something we need to be reminded of.

00:30:45.000 Like the pandemic period was exploited to introduce measures that were potentially advantageous either in terms of profit or the ability to regulate and legislate but Perhaps this conversation around child safety is similarly open to exploitation in so much as it would grant governments the ability to censor and regulate social media companies that would inevitably go beyond getting rid of things that might be harmful for children.

00:31:11.000 Let's have a look.

00:31:12.000 For a start, there's this tweet by Glenn Greenwald. 1.00

00:31:14.000 Tom Cotton, one of the senators conducting the inquiry, is a complete imbecile. 0.99

00:31:19.000 As this clip vividly demonstrates, and both parties' fearmongering over TikTok is grounded in dumb innuendo, there's far more evidence they're censoring for the US government than China. 1.00

00:31:30.000 This is all about more government control over social media.

00:31:33.000 Now, Glenn Greenwald is obviously An expert in this subject has worked long, hard and successfully on the degree to which governments control, censor, surveil their populations, working in ingenious ways to ensure that nothing we ever say cannot be tracked if necessary.

00:31:51.000 So let's have a look at this inquiry and note how the CEO of TikTok is vilified and barracked by this extraordinary senator and think about how theatrical it is and note how language that's literally redolent of McCarthyism is used.

00:32:06.000 Are you a member of the Communist Party?

00:32:08.000 Are you a member of the Communist Party?

00:32:10.000 How do I know Singapore is even a real place?

00:32:12.000 If he openly declares himself to be a communist...

00:32:15.000 I think the man that sits behind Mr Cotton is Tom Cotton's inner life.

00:32:18.000 was over Tunis. I can't remember the name. No, no, it was the Biden administration that

00:32:22.000 reversed those sanctions just like, by the way, they reversed the terrorist designation

00:32:26.000 on the Houthis in Yemen. How's that working out for them?

00:32:29.000 I think the man that sits behind Mr Cotton is Tom Cotton's inner life. That's actually

00:32:35.000 what happens in Tom Cotton's mind to some sort of kind of, oh, just sort of staring.

00:32:40.000 His expression doesn't change during this entire inquiry.

00:32:42.000 He's either bored by it or understands it on a level so deep that it doesn't register.

00:32:47.000 But it was sanctioned as a Chinese communist military company.

00:32:51.000 He's got a bit of a nerve saying that because social media companies in the United States have explicit ties to both the military and have often engaged with deep state organizations like the CIA and FBI.

00:33:02.000 We know that because of the Twitter files And it's pretty clear that ultimately what the government

00:33:06.000 want is control over social media sites.

00:33:09.000 To sort of claim that there's a connection between the Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese military and TikTok

00:33:14.000 when TikTok is a company founded in China is actually superfluous.

00:33:17.000 Of course there is. It's from China.

00:33:19.000 It's very difficult to create a company in America that's both successful and doesn't have ties to the state.

00:33:26.000 And what we're watching now is the dramatization of the government looking to get control over social media companies that have become too big and powerful.

00:33:34.000 Sometimes that might be beneficial to ordinary people.

00:33:36.000 Sometimes that might be deleterious to ordinary people.

00:33:38.000 What the government want is to be able to use that power for their own ends.

00:33:42.000 What would make people join them in that crusade?

00:33:45.000 Well, if it was, I don't know, threatening to my children, We'll use that then.

00:33:49.000 You said today, as you often say, that you live in Singapore.

00:33:53.000 Of what nation are you a citizen?

00:33:55.000 Singapore.

00:33:56.000 You keep saying Singapore.

00:33:58.000 Now, why do you love it so much?

00:34:00.000 Do you want to marry it?

00:34:01.000 Are you a citizen of any other nation?

00:34:03.000 No, Senator.

00:34:04.000 Have you ever applied for Chinese citizenship?

00:34:06.000 You can see that Xu Chu is considerably more intelligent than Mr. Con.

00:34:10.000 They're sort of talking to him how you might talk to somebody on the other side of a bus window bound for a lunatic asylum.

00:34:16.000 Okay.

00:34:17.000 Okay.

00:34:18.000 If you truly believe that you're Napoleon, I'm sure you are.

00:34:21.000 Senator, I served my nation in Singapore.

00:34:23.000 No, I did not.

00:34:24.000 Do you have a Singaporean passport?

00:34:27.000 Yes, and I served my military for two and a half years.

00:34:29.000 Yes, that's what we do in Singapore.

00:34:31.000 Uh-huh.

00:34:32.000 I don't suppose you go to sleep in a Singaporean house at night, do you? 1.00

00:34:35.000 You goddamn commie! 1.00

00:34:37.000 Do you have any other passports from any other nation? 1.00

00:34:39.000 No, Senator.

00:34:40.000 Your wife is an American citizen, your children are American citizens.

00:34:43.000 That's correct.

00:34:44.000 Have you ever applied for American citizenship?

00:34:46.000 No, not yet.

00:34:47.000 Okay.

00:34:48.000 Okay, this isn't going how I planned it.

00:34:51.000 Now, time to bring out the big guns.

00:34:55.000 Have you ever been a member of the Chinese Communist Party?

00:34:57.000 That's a really weird thing to say, isn't it?

00:35:01.000 If a person supports organisations labelled communist by the Department of Justice, she may be a communist.

00:35:07.000 Also, would the Chinese Communist Party even let you in if you were from Singapore?

00:35:11.000 They'd probably be quite restrictive of that.

00:35:14.000 Senator, I'm Singaporean.

00:35:15.000 No.

00:35:16.000 Have you ever been associated or affiliated with the Chinese Communist Party?

00:35:19.000 No, Senator.

00:35:20.000 Again, I'm Singaporean.

00:35:21.000 You sometimes dress up like you are, remember?

00:35:24.000 Like Justin Trudeau, how he pretends to be from another country sometimes, dressing himself up.

00:35:28.000 You love communists, don't you?

00:35:30.000 Let me ask you some hopefully simple questions.

00:35:32.000 You said earlier, in response to your question, that what happened at Tiananmen Square in June of 1989 was a massive protest.

00:35:39.000 Anything else happen in Tiananmen Square?

00:35:41.000 This is a weird bit because like all of us know about Tiananmen Square.

00:35:44.000 The fella with the carrier bags, the tank, all of that.

00:35:47.000 He seems to be trying to blame old Shu Chu for Tiananmen Square.

00:35:51.000 He's already said he's from Singapore.

00:35:53.000 Probably weren't even born when that happened.

00:35:55.000 Look how young he is.

00:35:56.000 It's kind of weird and as Glenn Greenwald said in his tweet, full of innuendo, we all know that that was a terrible massacre.

00:36:01.000 I don't think anyone's saying, do you know who I like?

00:36:03.000 China.

00:36:03.000 And in particular, I like their massacres.

00:36:05.000 I'm not suggesting that TikTok don't surveil, don't spy, isn't a manipulative space.

00:36:09.000 I'm sure it's all of those things.

00:36:10.000 What I'm saying is this inquiry is not about that.

00:36:13.000 It's certainly not about protecting your children.

00:36:14.000 They don't care about protecting your children.

00:36:16.000 They still haven't done a proper inquiry into what the hell went on on Epstein Island.

00:36:19.000 If you care about children, let's look into that.

00:36:21.000 Let's look at children's health.

00:36:22.000 Let's look at diets and pharmaceutical measures that were taken in the last few years that may or may not have been beneficial to children.

00:36:28.000 Children's safety is the issue.

00:36:30.000 Don't just focus on an aspect of children's safety that can be utilised to advance a particular agenda.

00:36:35.000 It should be, we care about children's safety in all areas of life.

00:36:39.000 That's why Kraft Foods and McDonald's are in a hell of a lot of trouble. 0.99

00:36:42.000 We're shutting that shit. 0.99

00:36:43.000 They're not going to do that, are they? 1.00

00:36:44.000 Why?

00:36:45.000 Because it's profitable and it can't be utilised in order to advance a censorship and surveillance agenda.

00:36:50.000 Yes, I think it's well documented.

00:36:51.000 There was a massacre.

00:36:52.000 There was an indiscriminate slaughter of hundreds or thousands of Chinese citizens.

00:36:57.000 No, it was more than a massacre.

00:36:58.000 Don't just say it was a massacre.

00:37:00.000 You enjoyed it.

00:37:01.000 Were you there that day?

00:37:02.000 Were you either him or the guy in the tank?

00:37:04.000 Even more likely.

00:37:05.000 He doesn't think he understands what Singapore is, what China is, what history is.

00:37:09.000 I actually think the bald geezer at the back is controlling him.

00:37:09.000 He's so confused.

00:37:12.000 I can't become a senator. 1.00

00:37:13.000 Not with this crazy face. 0.96

00:37:15.000 But this pretty boy, you can do it, Cotton! 0.83

00:37:17.000 Do you agree with the Trump administration and the Biden administration that the Chinese government is committing genocide against the Uyghur people?

00:37:23.000 Not also this bit, like, he's pretending to care about the Uyghur people.

00:37:26.000 Like, you can tell that geezer's like, what's happening to the Uyghur people? 1.00

00:37:29.000 Can we do something about the Uyghurs? 1.00

00:37:31.000 I think it's outrageous that they can't practice their religious beliefs in China.

00:37:34.000 Let's do something about the Uyghurs. 1.00

00:37:35.000 Now, what's happening to the Uyghur people in China is outrageous. 0.96

00:37:37.000 It's disgusting.

00:37:38.000 It might even be a genocide. 0.73

00:37:40.000 But what it isn't is of any concern to Mr. Cotton.

00:37:43.000 And he don't care about it in the context of this inquiry.

00:37:46.000 He's just pulling out all of the bad things that have ever happened.

00:37:48.000 Have you seen the movie Ice Age?

00:37:50.000 That squirrel, he had months to live before he froze to death. 1.00

00:37:53.000 Goddamn dinosaurs, they all dropped dead because of the asteroid. 0.99

00:37:55.000 I'm from Singapore, mate. 1.00

00:37:57.000 I don't know anything about this.

00:37:58.000 Senator, I've said this before.

00:37:59.000 I think it's really important that anyone who cares about this topic or any topic can freely express themselves on TikTok.

00:38:04.000 Very simple.

00:38:05.000 Key point there.

00:38:05.000 Anyone who cares about these topics can freely express themselves on TikTok.

00:38:09.000 Now, he's taken us to the heart of the matter because what this inquiry is about is we should be able to censor the information that's on TikTok.

00:38:15.000 He's saying, get on TikTok and talk about Uyghurs and sort that out. 1.00

00:38:18.000 Now, in China, I imagine that information is heavily censored because for the internal politics of China, that's an important subject.

00:38:23.000 Over here, you know, the Uyghurs, people aren't doing a great deal about it, are they? 1.00

00:38:26.000 Let's face it.

00:38:27.000 What they, I believe, want to control, and I believe what this Congressional or Senate inquiry is interested in establishing, is the ability to censor information that could cause disobedience, uprising, counter disinformation, organisation, lack of trust in political institutions, lack of trust in the media, the breakdown of the pandemic narrative This is what we're witnessing now, along with the ubiquitous now, censorship laws that have been passed in Canada, UK, EU, US.

00:38:51.000 People have realised, the powerful have realised, oh no, this online technology means that people can instantaneously communicate, news organisations can formulate around counter-narratives, communities can organise around different ideas.

00:39:03.000 We have to shut that down.

00:39:04.000 Of course misinformation's a thing, but I'll tell you what is actual, definite, real-time misinformation, is Tom Cotton pretending to care about Uyghurs and Tiananmen I know that because I've seen how the government in my country give money to organisations like Logically AI and a bunch of other organisations to censor stories.

00:39:25.000 Well, let me tell you what the topics are.

00:39:26.000 Pandemic and Big Pharma.

00:39:28.000 Moderna have been involved in that.

00:39:29.000 War and the origins of the Ukraine-Russia conflict.

00:39:32.000 True information gets censored around that.

00:39:34.000 January 6th, an uprising and insurrection.

00:39:36.000 Tracker's movement.

00:39:37.000 Oh, it's interesting.

00:39:38.000 They're all counter-narratives where there's definitely been an attempt to control information

00:39:43.000 and prevent true but unhelpful information getting out.

00:39:46.000 And that's what this inquiry is about.

00:39:47.000 It's a very simple question that unites both parties in our country and governments around the world.

00:39:52.000 Is the Chinese government committing genocide against the Uyghur people?

00:39:55.000 I may have a lot of beefs with Joe Biden and Donald Trump, but when the three of us get together and the subject of

00:40:01.000 the Uyghur people comes up, as it inevitably does because we all care so much about the

00:40:05.000 Uyghur people, that's why you'll never find exploitative practices within

00:40:09.000 companies like Apple or Facebook or Meta or any of our energy companies or Halliburton or any of

00:40:15.000 Because if it could happen to a Uyghur, it could happen to any of us. 1.00

00:40:15.000 those guys. 1.00

00:40:20.000 Oh God, I promised myself I wouldn't cry.

00:40:22.000 They're not all united.

00:40:23.000 That's not what brings people together like a can of Coca-Cola.

00:40:27.000 Uyghurs, is it? 1.00

00:40:28.000 You never hear Uyghurs talked about. 0.99

00:40:30.000 Except in that brief moment where mentioning a Uyghur would legitimise censorship.

00:40:35.000 I don't know, Uyghurs? 1.00

00:40:35.000 Could we say anything? 1.00

00:40:36.000 What are Uyghurs again? 1.00

00:40:37.000 Just Muslim people in China that are being put in concentration camps.

00:40:40.000 Oh, how's that relevant to me?

00:40:42.000 You could say you cared about them in order to censor TikTok.

00:40:44.000 I do care about Uyghurs! 1.00

00:40:45.000 He's gonna regret pretending to care about them Uyghurs because I think the Uyghurs actually have been employed almost at near slave labor levels to do work for Apple. 1.00

00:40:54.000 And indeed, Apple have enormous contracts in China and the American government have to have a good relationship with Apple.

00:40:59.000 And when bloody their leader of China comes to America, Tim Cook, he's right in there from Apple.

00:41:04.000 He's right over the meat in them. 0.80

00:41:05.000 So if you actually cared about the Uyghurs, you would just be bothering this poor geezer from Singapore. 1.00

00:41:09.000 I reckon as he's the CEO of TikTok, he's not nobody.

00:41:12.000 But what I'm saying is, is Tom Cotton and all of this entire inquiry, if what they really cared about was Uyghurs, they've got a real direct route to the Chinese president, the head of Apple. 0.67

00:41:23.000 They've got so many ways of doing it.

00:41:24.000 It's not like this bloke's got his pent-up rage about Uyghurs.

00:41:27.000 He's never had a chance to mention it ever before up till now.

00:41:30.000 Finally, you're from China.

00:41:32.000 No, I've told you Singapore. 1.00

00:41:33.000 Do something about those goddamn Uyghurs! 1.00

00:41:33.000 That's near enough. 1.00

00:41:35.000 I thought we were here to talk about TikTok censorship.

00:41:37.000 I don't get to that when we're finished talking about those Uyghurs! 1.00

00:41:41.000 Senator, anyone, including, you know, you can come and talk about this topic.

00:41:46.000 You are a worldly, cosmopolitan, well-educated man.

00:41:51.000 Look at you. 0.95

00:41:52.000 Are you gay? 1.00

00:41:53.000 I've told you I've got a wife and children. 0.98

00:41:54.000 And anyway, what's that got to do? 0.99

00:41:55.000 I say, are you gay? 1.00

00:41:56.000 Express many opinions on many topics. 0.98

00:41:59.000 Is the Chinese government committing genocide against the Uyghur people?

00:42:02.000 Actually, Senator, I talk amazingly about my company.

00:42:05.000 I'm sort of got busy at TikTok.

00:42:07.000 I mean, I think so.

00:42:08.000 I'm not sure it's complicated.

00:42:10.000 You've put me in a corner.

00:42:11.000 But actually, if you really care about the Uyghurs, do something about the Uyghurs with the president of China and the president of Apple. 0.83

00:42:17.000 And I'm here to talk about what TikTok does.

00:42:19.000 Yes or no.

00:42:20.000 We allow... You're here to give testimony that's truthful and honest and complete.

00:42:24.000 It's theatre, isn't it?

00:42:25.000 It's like Tom Cotton has seen other inquiries and he's doing an impersonation of what he's seen in other inquiries.

00:42:30.000 Significantly, the McCarthy trials, where he's saying things like, are you a member of the Communist Party?

00:42:35.000 Was one of the repeated refrains.

00:42:36.000 And McCarthyism is something you should be aware of because McCarthyism was Using the threat of communism to impose control over the entertainment industry, which I understand exists to this day, to generate fear so that people won't speak up and generate solidarity with one another, to look for ways to persecute and crush dissent, to generate control when there was a perceived external threat.

00:42:55.000 The threat now is a domestic threat.

00:42:57.000 We all know that.

00:42:57.000 The threat now is you can't keep a population under the level of control you once could by saying China are terrifying!

00:43:04.000 Russia are terrifying! 1.00

00:43:05.000 You can't do that anymore.

00:43:06.000 People now have the ability to get a different type of perspective on reality by using different news sources, aggregating them.

00:43:12.000 We all live in a different world now, and that world is hard to control.

00:43:16.000 And what's being created now is the mechanic to control it.

00:43:19.000 Let me ask you this.

00:43:20.000 Joe Biden last year said that Xi Jinping was a dictator.

00:43:23.000 Do you agree with Joe Biden?

00:43:24.000 Is Xi Jinping a dictator?

00:43:25.000 We can't continue to make this content without your love, devotion, and faith, and we appreciate them all.

00:43:30.000 We also need, of course, our loving sponsors and partners like Field of Greens.

00:43:35.000 Now, resolving to eat healthier this year was easy.

00:43:38.000 Actually doing it?

00:43:39.000 That ain't so easy!

00:43:40.000 Better nutrition is a key to health and longevity.

00:43:43.000 We want to stick around here for the revolution, don't we?

00:43:45.000 And a healthy diet could even help you avoid health risks that run in your family.

00:43:49.000 How is your family?

00:43:50.000 Field of Greens is my healthy super fruit and vegetable habit.

00:43:54.000 It's one of the best habits I've ever had.

00:43:55.000 It's the only fruit and vegetable product that literally promises better health.

00:43:59.000 At your next checkup, your doctor will notice your improved health.

00:44:03.000 If you can get an appointment, Or you will get your money back.

00:44:05.000 Do your vitamins or green drinks promise better health?

00:44:08.000 They're unable to.

00:44:10.000 Each superfruit and vegetable in Field of Greens was doctor-selected by an actual doctor for a specific health benefit.

00:44:16.000 Not at random.

00:44:17.000 Some support the heart.

00:44:18.000 Some support the lungs.

00:44:19.000 Some support the kidneys.

00:44:21.000 Others support metabolism for healthy energy and weight loss.

00:44:24.000 Look, if you resolve to get healthier in 24, it all starts with fill the greens.

00:44:30.000 I've managed, through my own techniques, to get you 15% off your first order and free rush shipping.

00:44:35.000 They're not going to muck about waiting for hoofies to attack their ship. 0.98

00:44:38.000 They're getting out stuff to you!

00:44:39.000 Visit BrickHouseRussell.com and use the promo code BRAND.

00:44:43.000 It's posted here.

00:44:44.000 That's promo code BRAND, B-R-A-N-D, my name, at BrickHouseRussell.com.

00:44:49.000 Two S's, two L's. 0.97

00:44:50.000 Let's get back into our content because this world needs us.

00:44:53.000 It ain't going to save itself.

00:44:54.000 Senator, I'm not going to comment on any world leaders.

00:44:57.000 What?

00:44:57.000 Now, Mark Zuckerberg is a divisive figure in these spaces.

00:45:01.000 In fact, you know, he's a billionaire CEO of Meta.

00:45:04.000 So we all assume that his affiliations will be with the state.

00:45:07.000 Certainly, we know that he censored true information on behalf of the state during the pandemic.

00:45:11.000 Kind of establishment on that, you know, asked for a bunch of things to be censored that in retrospect ended up being more debatable or true.

00:45:18.000 Indeed, Jimmy Dore tweeted, On March 15th, 2020, Mark Zuckerberg privately contacted

00:45:23.000 Anthony Fauci saying, I also wanted to share a few ideas of ways we could help

00:45:26.000 you get your message out.

00:45:27.000 Zuckerberg then censored scientists, professors, doctors, nurses,

00:45:31.000 and citizens from criticizing Fauci's recommendations regarding lockdown,

00:45:34.000 school closures, and COVID mandates, and silenced all criticisms of experimental mRNA vaccines.

00:45:39.000 Facebook classified mRNA vaccine injuries as malinformation, meaning information that is likely true,

00:45:44.000 but still should be censored to prevent doubts about the experimental rMNA vaccines.

00:45:49.000 Numerous Facebook mRNA vaccine injury support groups with hundreds of thousands of members were banned.

00:45:53.000 So, Facebook, when they were compliant with the government agenda, were favoured.

00:45:59.000 Now, it seems the government have a slightly different agenda, plainly, to introduce more regulatory measures and to control Facebook.

00:46:06.000 Nominally, and explicitly in order to protect children. But pause for

00:46:10.000 a moment. Do they really care about your children? I'm not saying that they don't care

00:46:13.000 about your children, I sort of am I suppose, but I'm saying that there are lots of areas of

00:46:16.000 public and political and financial life where the care of your children is relegated. How are your

00:46:20.000 children's nutritional standards being taken care of? What about American infrastructure,

00:46:25.000 healthcare, information? How are children generally being protected? Were there any medical measures

00:46:30.000 in the last few years that potentially were not as beneficial as was claimed, whether that's

00:46:34.000 taking children out of school, making children wear masks, potentially recommending certain 1.00

00:46:37.000 medications that might not have been beneficial for children. So once again let's have a look at

00:46:42.000 how Mark Zuckerberg is handled in this Senate inquiry and in particular notice that what

00:46:47.000 takes place is plainly a staged event.

00:46:49.000 Their control of social media is about controlling your perception of reality,

00:46:53.000 not protecting your children. A stunning moment.

00:46:56.000 Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg faced a withering grilling over allegations his company is failing to protect children on social media.

00:47:04.000 There's families of victims here today.

00:47:06.000 And look at the politicians again, this other one.

00:47:08.000 Look at the style of it.

00:47:09.000 Look at the tone of it.

00:47:10.000 Imagine the sort of psychological and egoic state.

00:47:13.000 There's families of victims here today.

00:47:16.000 One consistent thing, and I'm beginning to think the mastermind is that bald geezer, because he's there again, and he's still not interested.

00:47:22.000 Have you apologized to the victims?

00:47:24.000 Would you like to do so now?

00:47:25.000 Well, they're here.

00:47:26.000 You're on national television.

00:47:27.000 Would you like now to apologize to the victims who have been harmed by your product?

00:47:31.000 Show them the pictures.

00:47:32.000 Zuckerberg stood and turned to address the hearing room filled with the families.

00:47:37.000 That is a sort of a prep moment.

00:47:38.000 Let me reiterate once again that children's lives being negatively affected and ended as a result of information shared online is of course terrible and awful.

00:47:48.000 What I'm questioning is, is this inquiry really about protecting children or is the protection of children merely a spearhead That will allow a lot of other regulations to be passed, a kind of Patriot Act, shall we call it, for online spaces that will lead to regulation, censorship and surveillance.

00:48:03.000 Certainly we know that typically our governments have that appetite.

00:48:06.000 Certainly we know our governments have been doing that for years.

00:48:08.000 Certainly we know that our governments are terrified of independent media and independent political movements emerging out of it and the opposition that's generated in these spaces.

00:48:16.000 And what I query is the degree to which they care about child safety, which like any parent, I believe, should be paramount for all of us.

00:48:23.000 Many held signs with photos of loved ones who they say have suffered because of social media.

00:48:32.000 Look Mark Zuckerberg now who's like a sort of a obviously billionaire and everything but he's just a nerdy guy.

00:48:37.000 Clearly a person with some pretty strong ties to government when it's convenient.

00:48:40.000 Certainly a person who during the pandemic period was willing to have a particular type of relationship with the government and I'm sure even that I pray was motivated by a desire to do good.

00:48:48.000 I'm not going to assume that everybody's evil unless there's corroborating evidence.

00:48:51.000 I really think that's an important way to go.

00:48:53.000 But what I'm saying is this situation where the East Poor, either grieving or hurt parents are holding up these pictures because they've been told to by someone.

00:49:00.000 Like, what we're going to do is we're going to have a moment where you hold up a picture, then the press, oh, this is the bit, is it, where we're going to do the photograph.

00:49:05.000 It's a staged moment so that all of us start to associate online censorship, children's safety, online censorship, children's safety.

00:49:13.000 But the genius out of the box, they're already trying to pass hate speech laws in Ireland where they're not clear about what they mean by hate.

00:49:19.000 Oh, just hate, badness, stuff we don't like.

00:49:21.000 Is that what you mean?

00:49:22.000 The UK online safety bill, which was brought about the time that I was being attacked and we now know that various agencies were involved in that attack.

00:49:28.000 We've made videos about that elsewhere, you can have a look for yourself.

00:49:30.000 So what you do know is you cannot trust the government.

00:49:32.000 What you do know is that the government wants to control online spaces.

00:49:34.000 And what you do know is if the government genuinely care about children, child safety and child health, there's a lot of ways they could do it with food, traffic safety, nutrition, poverty.

00:49:43.000 There are so many ways to look at improving child safety, but this way of protecting child safety gives them more power.

00:49:50.000 Isn't it curious that's the one they've chosen to focus on?

00:49:53.000 Wow.

00:49:54.000 That moment is something that I believe that we are going to be looking back on and talking about for quite some time.

00:50:04.000 And then using to legitimize some draconian online censorship measures which...

00:50:09.000 I suppose we'll be beneficial to the legacy media, because our main competitor is independent media.

00:50:16.000 In fact, any time that we get a chance to destroy an independent media figure, we should really get on board with that.

00:50:22.000 Whether it's Joe Rogan and the Horse Paste, or any independent media figures with dissenting views, we should find, in fact, anything we can to destroy them.

00:50:32.000 We're gonna be annihilated otherwise!

00:50:34.000 This is a convenient piece of legislation that allows the control of social media under that most laudable of reasons, the protection of children.

00:50:42.000 Who among us doesn't want to protect children?

00:50:44.000 Uh, many of Epstein's clients?

00:50:46.000 Yeah, don't worry about that, forget that story, that's not convenient right now.

00:50:49.000 So, You just have to ask yourself, is this about protecting children, or is this about them being able to maintain control over a space that is volatile and doubtless has content in it that's harmful to all human beings, but they don't care about that, they care about control.

00:51:03.000 This is the one issue we are putting party aside and saying no.

00:51:06.000 No, no, Uyghurs, Uyghurs, that's the one issue, we all agree on Uyghurs. 1.00

00:51:10.000 Oh yes, no, Uyghurs, that's important as well. 1.00

00:51:12.000 This will not happen to America's children.

00:51:14.000 All wake us!

00:51:15.000 Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri continued to blast the billionaire.

00:51:19.000 Shouldn't you be held accountable personally?

00:51:21.000 I'm actually quite into this now.

00:51:22.000 You're a billionaire.

00:51:23.000 Will you set up a victim's compensation fund with your money?

00:51:27.000 The money you made on these families sitting behind you.

00:51:29.000 Yes or no?

00:51:30.000 Interestingly, Michael Tracy tweeted this.

00:51:32.000 Again, it's very difficult to take them seriously in all their valour and all their bombast when we know that wars are escalating across the planet that no one's voted for and we're expected to fund.

00:51:39.000 And now for a statement that's beyond irony.

00:51:41.000 strategic bombing campaign that they have not authorized.

00:51:44.000 Hashtag priorities.

00:51:45.000 Again, it's very difficult to take them seriously in all their valour and all their bombast

00:51:50.000 when we know that wars are escalating across the planet that no one's voted for and we're

00:51:54.000 expected to fund.

00:51:55.000 And now for a statement that's beyond irony.

00:51:57.000 Mr. Zuckerberg, you and the companies before us have blood on your hands. 0.65

00:52:01.000 Now, wash that blood off your hands, pick up some missiles, and drop them on Iran. 1.00

00:52:07.000 What do the Senate and Senators and the entire political system care about? 0.86

00:52:10.000 Your children, who they're hoping will go to war for them, incidentally, in Iran?

00:52:14.000 Or do they care about control over the public sphere and the information channels that exist between us right now?

00:52:20.000 I can tell you from personal experience, they care very, very deeply about being able to control the space between this and your consciousness and what you say and what I hear.

00:52:28.000 They are terrified of this type of communication.

00:52:31.000 They're terrified of communities that are starting to coalesce and become disobedient and disenchanted with a narrative.

00:52:37.000 That's why they go for something emotional that goes past the rational mind and right into fear and terror.

00:52:42.000 We've got to protect your children.

00:52:43.000 There are a lot of things that we need to protect our children from and I would include on that long list the government.

00:52:48.000 Let me know what you think in the chat.

00:52:48.000 But that's just what I think.

00:52:49.000 See you in a second.

00:52:50.000 Thank you for choosing Fox News.

00:52:52.000 The dude. 1.00

00:52:53.000 Here's the fucking news. 1.00

00:52:53.000 No. 1.00

00:52:55.000 Ah, to be awakened and wonderful.

00:52:59.000 The moment of our awakening.

00:53:00.000 This is it.

00:53:01.000 Can you feel it?

00:53:02.000 We've got some fantastic comments to read you.

00:53:05.000 Love in action.

00:53:06.000 Mixed reality.

00:53:07.000 Those are the words.

00:53:08.000 Yeah, I see something poetic in the use of the phrase mixed reality as well.

00:53:13.000 UFO Unlimited Hangout.

00:53:14.000 Thanks for the mug.

00:53:15.000 Anytime, guys.

00:53:17.000 Some beautiful comments from you.

00:53:19.000 As I always say to you, you awakened wonders in the locals chat, where you can be watching the Tucker conversation right now.

00:53:25.000 I appreciate the tone in there.

00:53:27.000 It's beautiful.

00:53:27.000 You in the rumble chat.

00:53:28.000 I love you, Duck Clouds, Gracie Groovy, Gruffa, Nivanderphil.

00:53:32.000 I love all of you.

00:53:32.000 But remember, let me remind you that when you speak hatefully to one another in there, you are doing the work of the establishment.

00:53:40.000 Work Klaus Schwab to be able to glance in there and see people hating on one another and say, yes, my work is done.

00:53:45.000 They are spending all their time using language about Islam and Judaism to hate one another.

00:53:52.000 Meanwhile, we control, we dominate.

00:53:56.000 They're truly powerful and not aligned on the basis of such things, but only on dominion and occultist ideologies that we may yet not have heard of even.

00:54:05.000 So be beautiful for one another, to one another.

00:54:08.000 In there.

00:54:09.000 It's worth it, baby.

00:54:11.000 And also, if there's anyone that's bothering you, you can make the suggestion of muting them, and we'll mute them if people want you to.

00:54:17.000 We don't get involved in it.

00:54:18.000 If you go, God, can you mute this dude?

00:54:19.000 He's bugging me.

00:54:20.000 And we'll go, yeah, many of you want us to mute that person.

00:54:23.000 We'll do it for you if you want.

00:54:24.000 Tell you who we won't be muting.

00:54:26.000 Amnesiac 75 talking about that Congressional hearing.

00:54:29.000 Pure theatre.

00:54:30.000 Mr. Joan Moat.

00:54:31.000 How about we stop thinking it's someone else's job to raise our children?

00:54:34.000 Brilliant point.

00:54:35.000 Nancy Strickland, 45. 0.98

00:54:36.000 In almost seven decades of life, I've been told how horrible Russia and China are, but I haven't had one bad interaction, not one, with a Russian or Chinese person. 0.91

00:54:46.000 Orange Tosh commenting on Tom Cotton's conversation with the dude that runs TikTok.

00:54:50.000 Have you ever lived in China?

00:54:51.000 No, sir.

00:54:52.000 But you fantasized it, haven't you? 1.00

00:54:53.000 You filthy bastard! 1.00

00:54:55.000 Tim Bok- Tim Bong, y'all fucking idiots waiting for a rich politician? 1.00

00:54:59.000 Come save your asses? 1.00

00:55:01.000 Lol. 1.00

00:55:02.000 I did that in an accent because it just seemed like the sort of accent I would do in.

00:55:05.000 Nightgazer, did you do 9-11?

00:55:08.000 Did you?

00:55:09.000 Did you?

00:55:09.000 That was a crazy conversation right there.

00:55:12.000 To give you an update on what's happening right now over in Moscow, Tucker is leaving the Kremlin.

00:55:18.000 Elvis has left the building.

00:55:20.000 Tucker's leaving the Kremlin, isn't it?

00:55:26.000 I see, so that's sort of like Russian media filming Tucker.

00:55:29.000 He's been in the Kremlin for one hour, so presumably when I've done my interview of Tucker, I'm not saying I'm as important as Putin.

00:55:38.000 Obviously I'm not a former KGB agent and Neither do I run a superpower.

00:55:44.000 Neither do I have my finger on any button except for the buttons that play in clips.

00:55:48.000 Nor do I have any doubles.

00:55:50.000 Although I have received some pretty negative propaganda over the years.

00:55:53.000 So that's pretty interesting, isn't it?

00:55:55.000 Tucker is doing that interview.

00:55:57.000 Pretty exciting.

00:55:59.000 Remember, subscribe.

00:56:00.000 If you're watching this on Rumble, subscribe.

00:56:01.000 It helps us.

00:56:02.000 And hit like.

00:56:03.000 It helps us in ways I don't fully understand.

00:56:05.000 It was pretty interesting that Nikki Haley appeared, wasn't it, on SNL.

00:56:11.000 Let's have a look at Nikki Haley on SNL. 0.98

00:56:15.000 Do you think that SNL and the establishment, generally speaking, are pushing Nikki Haley as a candidate, sort of a centralist, authoritarianist, globalist candidate for the Republican Party?

00:56:28.000 It's one of the things I asked Vivek Ramaswamy Who, you could join us for that conversation if you're a member of the Local's Awakened Wonder Community.

00:56:34.000 That will be our show on Friday.

00:56:36.000 Brilliant conversation, actually.

00:56:38.000 Let's have a look at Nikki Haley on SNL. 0.98

00:56:40.000 Alright, so last night was the hosting debut for Bear star and Emmy winner Iowa Debris on Saturday Night Live with musical guest star Jennifer Lopez.

00:56:50.000 So we'll see all their, you know, performances later this morning.

00:56:53.000 But we begin here with a surprise appearance from presidential nominee Nikki Haley.

00:56:59.000 Okay, our next question comes from someone who describes herself as a concerned South Carolina voter. 0.86

00:57:04.000 My question is, why won't you debate Nikki Haley?

00:57:09.000 Oh my God, it's her!

00:57:11.000 The woman who was in charge of security on January 6th! 0.99

00:57:14.000 It's Nancy Pelosi!

00:57:16.000 And you've spent $50 million in your own legal fees.

00:57:19.000 Do you need to borrow some money?

00:57:21.000 Oh, Nikki!

00:57:22.000 Don't do this, Nikki!

00:57:24.000 Nikki Kikitavi!

00:57:26.000 Nikki, don't lose that number.

00:57:28.000 Nikki Haley, Joel Osment.

00:57:30.000 Nikki Haley, Joel Osment, we call her.

00:57:32.000 Six cents.

00:57:32.000 Remember that one?

00:57:33.000 I see dead people.

00:57:34.000 Well, it's pretty amazing that Nikki Haley's on SNL because I guess it's, broadly speaking,

00:57:39.000 a neoliberal institute and organ, isn't it?

00:57:45.000 And when you see things framed in the context of the legacy media, you'll know how muted it is.

00:57:50.000 Look at Jake Sullivan, straight out of the WEF.

00:57:53.000 He was there very recently, wasn't he?

00:57:54.000 Here he is on a mainstream media show talking about the potential for airstrikes inside Iran.

00:58:01.000 Now you saw that over the weekend there were 37 strikes, I think, in Yemen mostly, wasn't it?

00:58:07.000 Now, the possibility of strikes within Iran ain't ruled out, which essentially means it might happen.

00:58:13.000 Have a look at this and have a look at the framing of the discourse.

00:58:16.000 Have a listen to the way that certain questions can't be asked and certainly not answered.

00:58:21.000 Ruled out strikes inside Iran.

00:58:28.000 Well, sitting here today on a national news program, I'm not going to get into what we've ruled in and ruled out from the point of view of military action.

00:58:35.000 What I will say is that the president is determined to respond forcefully to attacks on our people.

00:58:41.000 The president also is not looking for a wider war in the Middle East.

00:58:45.000 But is it off the table?

00:58:46.000 It doesn't make sense.

00:58:48.000 So not ruling out attacks, but also, let me go back a bit there, because that's weird double speak.

00:58:54.000 That's a well-in double speak.

00:58:55.000 Strikes inside Iran off the table?

00:59:00.000 Again, Kristen, sitting here on television, it would not be wise for me to talk about what we're ruling in and ruling out.

00:59:08.000 So you're not ruling it out?

00:59:13.000 I'll just say the same thing one more time, which is I'm not going to get into what's on the table and off the table when it comes to the American people.

00:59:20.000 So he said, yeah, can we just go back to the bit where he said, we are not ruling out strikes within Iran, but we're not expanding the war in the region.

00:59:30.000 It's sort of about 15 seconds back from there, because both those things literally can't be true.

00:59:34.000 So one of the things, either you bomb inside Iran and you expand the conflict in the region, or you don't bomb in Iran. 0.70

00:59:41.000 Let's have a look at that bit again.

00:59:42.000 I missed the bit that I was trying to focus on.

00:59:45.000 Let's have a look.

00:59:46.000 Also is not looking for a wider war in the Middle East.

00:59:49.000 Is it off the table?

00:59:50.000 Are strikes inside Iran off the table?

00:59:52.000 Are strikes inside Iran also attacks on our people?

00:59:55.000 What I will say is that the president is determined to respond forcefully to attacks on our people.

01:00:05.000 Determined to respond forcefully?

01:00:07.000 The president also is not looking for a wider war in the Middle East.

01:00:11.000 Is it off the table?

01:00:12.000 Are strikes inside Iran off the table?

01:00:18.000 Again, Kristen, sitting here on television, it would not be wise for me to talk about what we're ruling in.

01:00:25.000 What's the point of going to bloody television if you're not going to answer the questions, if you're going to offer all possible alternatives?

01:00:30.000 Here he is talking about how the expanding violence between Israel and Hamas and the annihilation of that region is increasing tensions and violence across the Middle East.

01:00:47.000 Is the United States already in a wider war in the Middle East, Jake?

01:00:54.000 What the United States is doing is responding to threats as we see them with significant but proportionate force.

01:01:00.000 But has the war expanded?

01:01:01.000 We are seeing threats... Significant but proportionate, that will be a brainstormed and discussed bit of language.

01:01:07.000 It's significant but it's proportionate.

01:01:09.000 War expanded in the region, Jake?

01:01:13.000 Well, first, we don't accept that what's happening in the Red Sea, for example, Kristen, is entirely tied to the war in Gaza, because the Houthis are attacking shipping that has absolutely nothing to do with Israel.

01:01:30.000 Those Houthis would have done that anyway. 1.00

01:01:33.000 Ever since I've known about the Houthis, and you know what they were like, you know, in the 80s, the bloody Houthis. 0.83

01:01:38.000 Then in the 90s, what are the Houthis doing now?

01:01:41.000 Remember when those Houthis were tunnelling under Vietnam? 1.00

01:01:44.000 And do you remember when the Houthis provoked that Cuban Missile Crisis? 0.92

01:01:49.000 And do you remember the Houthis in 9-11?

01:01:52.000 Those bloody Houthis. 0.99

01:01:53.000 They'll stop at nothing. 0.97

01:01:56.000 Some of you are responding to the news that King Charles, King of England, has been diagnosed with cancer.

01:02:02.000 Now, whatever your views are, of course, of establishment power and the monarchy, etc.

01:02:06.000 It's sad when, obviously, when anybody gets cancer.

01:02:09.000 That is sad news.

01:02:10.000 Is there any legacy media reporting on that?

01:02:12.000 Or should we just say, oh, that's a shame that anyone has cancer.

01:02:16.000 Any human being getting cancer is bad.

01:02:18.000 Really, I mean, he waited his whole life to become king.

01:02:21.000 It's just, Not working out is it?

01:02:23.000 Possibly because it's time for these systems to be radically reviewed and perhaps potentially dismantled because what does it ultimately demonstrate?

01:02:31.000 That hierarchical corrupt institutions of wealth accumulated over centuries is a Something to aspire to and it's somehow well literally sacred due to the nature of the ceremonies of Coronation that these are figures that are endowed by God.

01:02:47.000 However as a fellow human being I pray that his treatment is successful and I pray that all people negatively affected by his cancer and cancer more broadly are Receive the comfort that they need.

01:02:59.000 Hey guys, we've got some fantastic shows coming up later in the week.

01:03:03.000 Vivek Ramaswamy is going to be on the show on Friday.

01:03:05.000 That's already up for our Awakened Wonders on Locals.

01:03:08.000 If you do become an Awakened Wonder, you can watch our conversation with Tucker Right now, it's a fantastic little chat.

01:03:15.000 It's beautiful.

01:03:16.000 And you can be part of a community of love and positivity that you will enjoy.

01:03:20.000 I want to welcome our new members.

01:03:22.000 Let's see their names now.

01:03:23.000 SK2023, Stoa Logos, Okamil, Tamarind and JROY1.

01:03:29.000 No relation, Gareth Roy.

01:03:30.000 You guys, we will be back tomorrow for another fantastic show.

01:03:34.000 Tell us what you want to see.

01:03:35.000 Join us then, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.

01:03:38.000 Stay free.

Stay Free - Russel Brand - February 05, 2024

Tucker Interviewing PUTIN In Russia?! Legacy Media & The Establishment FREAK OUT! - Stay Free #299

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript