Stay Free - Russel Brand - January 08, 2024


Vandana Shiva - Climate Change, Transhumanism & The Profitabilty of Sick People


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 6 minutes

Words per Minute

137.94766

Word Count

9,231

Sentence Count

515

Misogynist Sentences

5

Hate Speech Sentences

12


Summary

Vandana Shiva is a world-renowned activist, activist and teacher who has dedicated her life to fighting against globalism and corporate greed. In this episode, we talk about the need to find sovereignty in the seed, the need for individual sovereignty, and the victory that can be achieved against globalists and their corporatist agenda. We also discuss the role of the seed and the role that individuals can play in standing up to globalism, and how they can use their individual awakening to achieve victory against corporate greed and globalism. Stay Free with Russell Brand - Remember, there's an episode every single day, 7 days a week, to educate and elevate our consciousness together. Stay Free, and enjoy the episode. Music: Awakening Wonders - "The Seeds of Vandana Shiva" by Veena Shiva (The Seeds) We really appreciate you, our listeners, and want to bring you more content. We bring you in depth conversations with guests like Jordan Peterson, R.R.K. Jr., Sam Harris, Gabor Mate and many more. We will be delivering a podcast every day, seven days, 7 a week. You'll get a detailed breakdown of current topics that the mainstream media should be covering, but if they are covering, they're amplifying establishment messages and not telling you the truth. - Russell Brand - Stay Free With Russell Brand, and more content delivered by You Awakenings Wonders, wherever you download your podcasts. . To find a list of our sponsorships and show you what we're listening to, we'll be delivering the best of what we can do best - stay free, stay free with us everywhere else! Thank you, Russell Brand's Unfiltered - Stay free, Stay free! - Thank you for listening to Stay Free! , and enjoy this episode of Stay Free? , by You Awakening Wonders - a podcast delivered by Russell Brand. (Apostrophe (Podcast) - The Awakening Wonders Podcasts: A podcast by You're Awakening Wonders? - This episode is produced by You, I'll be giving you a chance to help elevate your consciousness and elevate your awareness of the world's consciousness together? (Coming Soon, I'm working on a podcast that matters more than you can do more than that, and I'm waking you up, so you'll get more of that in the next episode? )


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hello there you Awakening Wonders on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you download your podcasts.
00:00:05.000 We really appreciate you, our listeners, and want to bring you more content.
00:00:08.000 We will be delivering a podcast every day, seven days a week, every single day.
00:00:13.000 You'll get a detailed breakdown of current topics that the mainstream media should be covering, but if they are covering, they're amplifying establishment messages and not telling you the truth.
00:00:23.000 Once a week, we bring you in-depth conversations with guests like Jordan Peterson, RFK Jr., Sam Harris, Vandana Shiva, Gabor Mate and many more.
00:00:31.000 Now enjoy this episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:00:34.000 Remember, there's an episode every single day to educate and elevate our consciousness together.
00:00:40.000 Stay free and enjoy the episode.
00:00:41.000 [MUSIC]
00:00:48.000 Hello and welcome to Stay Free with Russell Brand 2024.
00:00:52.000 We could have no greater teacher and leader than Vandana Shiva.
00:00:55.000 If you don't know about Vandana Shiva yet, she is a person that's bold enough to go full on against globalist, corporatist aggressors.
00:01:05.000 She knows how to tie together a variety of complex ideas.
00:01:09.000 She is able to explain that when the legacy media says, oh, these people are racist, it's a complete smokescreen.
00:01:17.000 She is a galvanizing leader and a fantastic teacher.
00:01:21.000 You should watch her documentary, The Seeds of Vandana Shiva, at vandanashivamovie.com to learn more.
00:01:27.000 Today we talk incredibly about the ability to find sovereignty in the seed, sovereignty in the individual, sovereignty in the community, and how globalism is really truly about tyranny. We talk about oneness versus the 1%. In particular,
00:01:42.000 how even when climate change is being used to legitimize authoritarian, excuse me, globalist
00:01:48.000 measures, they neglect to mention that 1% of the world's population generates 66% of its
00:01:56.000 pollution.
00:01:57.000 We talk about the monopolisation of seeds and we talk about, importantly, the victories that can be attained against global corporatists.
00:02:04.000 Over the course of this conversation, a vision is sketched out about how your individual awakening is a vital part of the global opposition movement.
00:02:13.000 She talks about the language that we use, ways that we can unite that will terrify the opposition. Now let's go straight
00:02:19.000 away to a woman that I regard as a world teacher and perhaps I should just spend the rest of my life
00:02:25.000 finding ways to bring Vandana Shiva to as many people as possible. Certainly there would be a
00:02:30.000 bloody value in it. Thank you for joining me today, Vandana Shiva. Vandana, it's been, since
00:02:37.000 we've last spoken, I feel that there's been further protest in the agricultural world, more and
00:02:45.000 more observable attempts to control food sources.
00:02:49.000 The Netherlands, one of the second largest producers of food in the world, as I understand, seems like deliberately having its capacity to farm managed down.
00:03:02.000 Can you tell me, what do you think is the broader goal in managing the world's ability to produce and control their own food sources?
00:03:16.000 You know, ever since industrial agriculture began, and industrial agriculture began with the fossil age, age of oil, because every chemical in industrial farming is a fossil chemical, so many people are mobilizing on oil, Don't realize that they're eating oil.
00:03:33.000 And when you put agrochemicals to work based on oil, you're basically depending on energy slaves.
00:03:45.000 And you have to get rid of the farmers.
00:03:47.000 So the profits that are linked to industrial farming, which are profits of big ag, big poison, big oil, farmers are an obstruction for them.
00:03:59.000 And I remember when I started to work on the globalization of agriculture, you know, the W.O.2 Treaty Agriculture Agreement, and there was a quote of a secretary of agriculture in those days who said, you've got to squeeze the farmer off the land.
00:04:16.000 Brought a toothpaste tube with me.
00:04:18.000 You've got to squeeze the farmer off the land like you squeeze the last bit of toothpaste.
00:04:23.000 out of a toothpaste tube.
00:04:25.000 So that's how they've always viewed farmers.
00:04:28.000 And industrial agriculture, just like they see insects as nuisance to spray insecticide, they see farmers working on the land as an obstruction to their profits, because their market is displacing farmers with chemicals and machines.
00:04:43.000 This has progressed much more in the current times.
00:04:47.000 What we are witnessing today is they're not just wanting less farmers on the land, They want no farmers on the land.
00:04:55.000 The slogan is farming without farmers, food without farms.
00:05:01.000 What does that add up to?
00:05:03.000 Basically, the next step of industrial farming, which is a combination of fossil fuels, chemicals, and now the digital technologies, drones, I mean, they want drones to pick your apples.
00:05:18.000 Look at the amount of energy this will use.
00:05:20.000 You know, Emery Lovins did a calculation that if we take the energy slaves into account, the population of this planet is 3.5 trillion.
00:05:29.000 We keep worrying about the 8 billion.
00:05:32.000 But the real population is of the energy slaves, which means the fossil fuel industry.
00:05:37.000 And what does food without farms mean?
00:05:40.000 That we will not grow food that we can eat.
00:05:43.000 There'll still be large-scale agriculture.
00:05:46.000 And as Bayer has said, these openings are wonderful for us because we're the only ones who grow raw crops that can be managed by machinery to produce the raw materials for lab food.
00:05:57.000 Amino acids, proteins, food disappears.
00:06:00.000 Raw materials stays.
00:06:02.000 And of course the pretence, the terribly unscientific pretenses, this is a solution to climate change.
00:06:08.000 No, it'll make the climate problem worse because 50% of the emissions come from an industrial food system.
00:06:14.000 Hyper-industrialization will mean there'll be more emissions.
00:06:19.000 It seems that this move towards globalism is being met with a rise of nationalism and populism and a simultaneous and ongoing vehement condemnation of nationalism as necessarily racist, anti-immigrant As retrograde, one of the things I'm observing, and even in your answer to the first question, when you outline the scale and ambition of the project to beyond industrialize agriculture, to technologize agriculture, so that it's entirely out of the hands of humanity, entirely beyond the reach of people,
00:07:12.000 It seems that this will have to be opposed by a movement that is able to consolidate what seems to be at the moment a number of competing and indeed combative interests.
00:07:26.000 In some of the countries that are being most affected by the issues that you described, notably the Netherlands, there are agricultural movements.
00:07:35.000 There is an agricultural movement in Germany.
00:07:39.000 Both of these are described by the legacy media as being racist and nationalist and it seems to me to a degree understandable that nationalism would be part of a response to globalism and anti-establishmentism but for in order to have a successful There's going to be a degree of, if not inclusivity, certainly alliance that's not been precedented before, or has never happened before, excuse me.
00:08:15.000 I wonder what you feel about the current populist movements, both that are explicitly connected to farming and beyond farming.
00:08:25.000 And indeed, what type of alliances are going to be required if something on this scale is to be opposed?
00:08:34.000 Well first Russell, actually the big global media will cover protests in Netherlands and they'll cover the protests.
00:08:45.000 In Germany.
00:08:46.000 But there are protests everywhere.
00:08:48.000 Because farmers are being squeezed everywhere by the same group of companies.
00:08:52.000 The same Monsanto and Bayer wanting to control seed and push chemicals.
00:08:56.000 The same Cargill and Conagra wanting to destroy local farming to create their markets with subsidies they collect from all governments.
00:09:07.000 Second, to make high-cost production cheap and allow dumping to take place and undercut local production.
00:09:14.000 And the third, to destroy local artisanal processing.
00:09:19.000 Which creates healthy food with under-processed food, which is the root of so much disease today.
00:09:27.000 And that's the junk food industry, the Pepsis, the Cokes and the Nestles.
00:09:31.000 Those are the three that wrote the agreements of WTO that have created the situation today on which Bill Gates is now riding.
00:09:39.000 You know, he is, in effect, doing exactly what Monsanto did.
00:09:46.000 But he's doing it with the help of acceleration and concentration of technology.
00:09:51.000 So we must recognize there are farmers' movements everywhere.
00:09:56.000 Many don't get covered.
00:09:59.000 Kenya.
00:10:00.000 You know, they held Mr Gates at bay.
00:10:03.000 He went there and said, I've eaten GMOs forever.
00:10:05.000 I've eaten GMO bread all my life.
00:10:07.000 There isn't GMO bread in the world.
00:10:09.000 GMO wheat isn't yet commercial.
00:10:11.000 You know, just lied his way through.
00:10:13.000 And the peasants are still fighting and they've received protection from the courts.
00:10:19.000 To say you cannot import GMOs.
00:10:22.000 I don't use the word populism.
00:10:23.000 It's very much the big media's word.
00:10:27.000 When we started to fight globalization, which is corporate globalization, our basic commitment was to protect sovereignty at every level.
00:10:40.000 The movement Especially from the South, but it's also in the North, is the movement of food sovereignty.
00:10:47.000 Food sovereignty means you must be free to grow your food.
00:10:51.000 You must be free to grow it in ways that's good for the planet and good for people.
00:10:55.000 And you must be free to eat healthy food.
00:10:59.000 The food sovereignty movement is both about localization.
00:11:04.000 And national sovereignty, because if you don't have democratic systems under your control to make decisions, whether you'll get GMOs or not get GMOs, whether you'll ban a pesticide or a roundup or not ban a roundup, when you have no sovereignty, you basically have handed over all power to corporate control.
00:11:27.000 And both with the nature of the corporations, the kind of things they produce, and the way they behave, I have called this phenomenon food fascism.
00:11:38.000 Because when you take all freedoms of the people away, And you do it for profits.
00:11:44.000 That is fascism.
00:11:45.000 So, sovereignty is an absolutely vital element.
00:11:50.000 And sovereignty is not about states alone.
00:11:53.000 Sovereignty is about people.
00:11:54.000 Sovereignty is about communities.
00:11:56.000 Sovereignty is about the seed being sovereign to itself.
00:11:59.000 That cow being sovereign to itself and being allowed to live.
00:12:03.000 About the planet as a whole being sovereign.
00:12:06.000 It's about freedom.
00:12:08.000 And, you know, the reason I am able to resist this nonsense is because, like, I've just come from a week in the village communities we work with, and they were celebrating their harvest festivals.
00:12:23.000 And I get regenerated watching how the seed itself is the goddess in these communities.
00:12:31.000 It's the seed they worship.
00:12:33.000 They know their food begins in the seed.
00:12:35.000 Caring for the seed is their duty.
00:12:37.000 They will fight for the freedom of the seed and their freedom to protect the seed.
00:12:41.000 But the beauty they bring to all of this, the celebration and joy that they bring to all of this, there's no divisions between nature and humans.
00:12:50.000 There's no division between The sacred buffet.
00:12:55.000 Everything is sacred.
00:12:56.000 And I think that sacredness of seed and food and life lived in alignment with the larger laws is basically what is being crushed and what communities are holding on to.
00:13:12.000 And I think when you said what kind of alliance, the alliance has to be An alliance that respects the rights of the earth and respects the rights of those who produce food in accordance with the rights of the earth.
00:13:25.000 And if they've been forced to farm in different ways, well, give them a chance.
00:13:30.000 Instead of putting 50% of European tax money at the service of the corporation, put it at the service of farmers wanting to make a transition to do ecological agriculture, build local food economies.
00:13:44.000 And it has to be an alliance of All citizens, everyone eats.
00:13:50.000 There's nobody who doesn't eat.
00:13:51.000 There's no species that doesn't eat.
00:13:53.000 Eating is part of living, and eating in ways that's good for your health and the health of the planet.
00:14:02.000 We bring that together.
00:14:03.000 We bring the health movement together that's recognizing that ultra-processed food and poisons in our food is the center of chronic disease epidemics.
00:14:12.000 The ecological movement, the farmers' movement, and the freedom movement.
00:14:17.000 That's a very powerful movement.
00:14:19.000 It's just that we need to create our own communication systems like you have, but communication not just in platforms, but communication in terms of the ability to understand each other.
00:14:33.000 I think we should just never use the words the dominant system uses.
00:14:39.000 I don't think we should call our movements populism.
00:14:42.000 We should use our movements, deep earth movements, deep human movements, deep movements that are spiritual, deep movements that recognize we are one humanity on one planet.
00:14:55.000 And our universal values are much deeper than the globalist greed values who only think for themselves and are willing to wipe out all the species on the planet, wipe out the last farmer and wipe out the last person by denying them food.
00:15:12.000 It's very beautiful to hear that the principle of sovereignty can be pursued to the level of the seed.
00:15:22.000 This great emblem of potential.
00:15:25.000 The seed as that which is not yet manifest.
00:15:29.000 The seed as nature's blueprint.
00:15:32.000 It's very interesting to hear that a war is taking place at the level of patenting an attempt to own the intelligence of nature as compounded in the seed.
00:15:47.000 It's interesting to hear, Vandana, that there is no actual distinction between that which is sacrosanct or sacred and that which is material and profane.
00:16:00.000 In practice, when you have communities that are Naturally celebrating their harvest, which I suppose must be the celebration of mutual endeavor, the requirement that the earth will return what we have given in faith back to us, that it suggests a necessary relationship of ecological respect that doesn't even need to be conceptualized in the manner that we would ordinarily suggest.
00:16:35.000 I like too that you, excuse me, attack the language that we use, that we accept the language of the oppressor.
00:16:45.000 Given that what you appear to be talking about is new forms of colonialism and tyranny, as an Indian, I wonder, do you feel That the successes of the Indian Revolution can somehow be deployed in this new form of oppression, or would you say that within the Indian Revolution were the kind of challenges that we now face in so much as a new elite class was able to take over India in perhaps the way that the British had previously governed India?
00:17:27.000 I wonder, given that what you appear to be telling us is that there is a need for a unified, decentralized movement of the world's people that requires connection to the land, connection to one another, connection to the food and the lived experience of that which is sacred.
00:17:47.000 That's what it seems that you described to me in that Harvest Festival.
00:17:51.000 And because there is a requirement, as you said towards the end of your answer, for good communication, for good communication.
00:17:59.000 And you also included in your answer that there are many protests that we never hear about.
00:18:04.000 And I think you said that there are Kenyan farming movements that oppose the attempts by Bill Gates or whatever foundation Bill Gates was deploying to impose GM techniques and technologies on agriculture there.
00:18:18.000 But because it's not reported on, we don't even have that picture.
00:18:22.000 Because we use the language of the oppressor, we use their framing inadvertently.
00:18:27.000 So I wonder if within these various Movements that at present may feel atomised, there is the potential in the way that you described is being naturally realised in the village where a harvest festival is an acknowledgement of the sovereignty of the seed, the sovereignty of the individual, the sovereignty of the community.
00:18:51.000 I wonder if there are principles here that can be replicated and do they require Do they require new models, Vandana?
00:19:02.000 Or are these models already around us and simply not being used?
00:19:07.000 And indeed, again, to oppose figures like Bill Gates, who appears to have a truly globalist, colonialist project, whether it's the acquisition of farmland in the United States, his various medical projects that he's involved with, his agricultural projects in India and across Africa, appear to suggest a truly global project and of course he is obviously not
00:19:31.000 alone in that.
00:19:33.000 I suppose what you're saying is that through individual connection and sovereignty, there
00:19:39.000 is the possibility for opposition, for meaningful opposition.
00:19:43.000 But it seems to me sometimes to be very fractured.
00:19:46.000 I think a lot of people will say, "Well, the Netherlands are having this problem, Germany
00:19:50.000 are having this problem, Sri Lankans are having this problem."
00:19:53.000 It's it seems very difficult to Suggest a global solution because they've even co-opted.
00:19:59.000 You know you use the phrase corporate globalism But there does need to be a type of globalist response doesn't there and even that sounds like it might be complicated We are going to have to leave YouTube.
00:20:13.000 Why?
00:20:13.000 Because free speech is not hate speech.
00:20:17.000 Free speech is the ability to discuss ideas that will by their nature be an antithesis, an antidote to the interests of the powerful.
00:20:24.000 We're going to be talking about how we can attack The corporatism, the global corporatism, spearheaded by the likes of Bill Gates, shielded and veiled by the likes of the WEF.
00:20:35.000 How agricultural movements from Iowa to Sri Lanka have more in common than that which divides them and that we must find ways to have a decentralized but unified attack against the forces of corporate globalism.
00:20:48.000 If you're watching us on YouTube, click the link in the description.
00:20:50.000 If you're watching us on Facebook, wherever you're watching us in the world, click the link in the description to see the rest of this fantastic conversation With a woman that is changing the world, with a teacher that can bring out the best in all of us.
00:21:02.000 Click the link.
00:21:02.000 There's only a few seconds left.
00:21:03.000 There's only a few seconds left.
00:21:07.000 Yeah, we definitely need a much more universal sense of who we are, you know, that we are part of a beautiful Earth.
00:21:18.000 We are members of an Earth family, that we are human.
00:21:22.000 All of us, no matter who we are, we are human.
00:21:24.000 You know, eat food.
00:21:25.000 We become other species food.
00:21:27.000 We drink water.
00:21:28.000 You're drinking water.
00:21:29.000 Yeah, we all drink water.
00:21:32.000 And these basic issues connect us to our earthiness.
00:21:37.000 You know, we've been made to look down.
00:21:41.000 On being of the earth.
00:21:42.000 The earth was made passive.
00:21:44.000 She was made dead.
00:21:46.000 And then anything that belongs to the earth was made to look like it's inferior.
00:21:51.000 And anything that was imposed was imposed as superior.
00:21:57.000 Except that when you impose toxic chemicals and pesticides and Roundup, it's not a better place to be either for nature or humans.
00:22:07.000 When you create non-renewable seed, it's not a better place to be.
00:22:11.000 Now, when I attended a meeting in 1987, after having done my study on Punjab, because the Green Revolution was first introduced in Punjab in India, because it's the most prosperous part of India in the world.
00:22:28.000 And it's Bill Gates who's taken the alliance for the Green Revolution to Africa, but the Green Revolution destroyed the most prosperous part of India.
00:22:38.000 In 1997, I was called to this meeting where the industry laid out its agenda of patenting seed and said, this will be our future profits.
00:22:45.000 And we'll be five companies controlling all seeds of the world.
00:22:48.000 And we can only do this when we make it illegal for farmers to save seeds.
00:22:53.000 And I said, whatever you're speaking is so wrong at every level, at the ethical, ecological, scientific level, because you don't make seed.
00:23:02.000 You don't invent seeds.
00:23:03.000 He was not a machine.
00:23:05.000 So that's the first ontological lie.
00:23:07.000 Second, saving seeds is a human duty of being of the earth.
00:23:12.000 In every culture, you see people have died, but they've never destroyed the seed.
00:23:17.000 When people have migrated, they've taken seeds with them.
00:23:20.000 That's how the world has got all the different crops.
00:23:24.000 And I said, how can you forbid farmers from saving seeds?
00:23:27.000 I'm going to dedicate my life to seed freedom, freedom of the seed to renew because your profits come from making seed non-renewable, and of the farmer to save and exchange seed.
00:23:37.000 And because we were at that time, you know, our parliament listened.
00:23:43.000 Our governments listened.
00:23:44.000 The government asked me to write a law on farmers' rights, and we wrote a law on farmers' rights, a law that threw out Pepsi's claim that all potato For the future was theirs.
00:23:56.000 And they sued Indian farmers, 40 million rupees.
00:23:58.000 Four Indian farmers were sued, 40 million.
00:24:01.000 And I sent my book on the issue of patenting and this law on farmers' rights, Article 39, that farmers' right to save, exchange, develop, sell seeds can never be taken away because it's the first breeder.
00:24:15.000 I sent it to the lawyers and judges who were fighting the case.
00:24:18.000 And Pepsi's case had to be dismissed.
00:24:21.000 They could not sue.
00:24:23.000 And the other law, which is even more important, the patent law.
00:24:27.000 We said we don't invent the seed.
00:24:30.000 We don't invent plants.
00:24:31.000 We don't invent life.
00:24:32.000 We modify it.
00:24:34.000 But if I bring a brick into my building and then claim this brick has made this building, I'm the owner, I'm the architect, and you pay me rents, you know, who would accept someone?
00:24:49.000 To take that claim, but we do it on the basis of living systems.
00:24:53.000 So when I briefed Parliament, our Parliament wrote a clause, Article 3J.
00:24:58.000 Plants, animals and seeds are not human inventions.
00:25:02.000 Therefore, they cannot be patented.
00:25:04.000 So in spite of all its efforts, Monsanto has not managed to patent seeds in India.
00:25:09.000 They can manage a lab technique, but the lab technique is not what goes to the field of pharma.
00:25:14.000 The lab technique stays in the lab.
00:25:17.000 What goes to the field of a farmer is a seed, because that's what farmers grow.
00:25:21.000 And the attempt of industry has been to make seed non-renewable.
00:25:26.000 Our work in Navdanya is to keep the renewability evolution of the seed constantly at work.
00:25:33.000 Every time there's a cycle, the farmers now, because we've created community seed banks, are able to share seeds that are salt-soluble.
00:25:44.000 If we hadn't done that at that time and saved the seeds as common, the disaster would have wiped out the farmers and then they couldn't build back because they wouldn't have the money.
00:25:55.000 To buy the patented seed.
00:25:57.000 So seed patents is just one more step of the illusion of creation.
00:26:01.000 I always say, you know, between patents and GMOs, their intention is really, God, move over.
00:26:07.000 You know, we are the creators.
00:26:08.000 And now we're going to work to make the world respect us as the new bots.
00:26:13.000 And all other sacred must go.
00:26:17.000 All other integrity must disappear.
00:26:20.000 All other self-organization must be wiped out.
00:26:23.000 You said, what does the Indian freedom movement tell us?
00:26:27.000 I mean, when I heard about them owning all the seed of the world, I said, how do we deal with this?
00:26:34.000 And my mind went back to our freedom movement, that Gandhi pulled out the spinning wheel.
00:26:39.000 So I said the spinning wheel of today will be the seed.
00:26:42.000 And the second thing he did was And if they impose unjust law, just say no.
00:26:50.000 A no from the deepest conscience is the most democratic act, the deepest act of freedom.
00:26:56.000 And he called it Satyagraha.
00:26:58.000 Satya, truth.
00:26:59.000 Agra, the force of truth, the power of truth.
00:27:02.000 So in my book, Oneness Versus One Percent, Which really was written about Bill Gates taking over the UN system, at that point the Paris Climate Treaty, and you know he's just taken over the Food and Agriculture Declaration of the recent COP in Dubai.
00:27:20.000 After they'd all worked he walks up on the stage, typically that's what he does, walks up on the stage, says here's this much money and now I'll run the show.
00:27:27.000 And you know my mind at each of these points goes to how do we deal with this kind of Undemocratic, absolute, unaccountable power.
00:27:39.000 And the three lessons from the Freedom Movement that I've learned, which are relevant today, everywhere, even more relevant because of the technological control.
00:27:49.000 First is self-organization.
00:27:53.000 You know, it's the principle of how nature works, how nature stays free.
00:27:59.000 It's been called autopoiesis.
00:28:02.000 You know, the self-making, the poetry written by nature herself.
00:28:06.000 And in our language, Gandhi defined it as swaraj, self-rule, ruling over yourself.
00:28:13.000 So nature does that, self-organizes in nature's law, and it's the law of free societies.
00:28:19.000 Swadeshi, self-making.
00:28:21.000 The day we think we've got to buy what we need to live and become consumers, we've lost freedom.
00:28:29.000 And that's what they're seeking, that even for food now, all of us will have to buy lab food and get sicker.
00:28:34.000 But for them, it's wonderful because big food, big ag, big tech are all one.
00:28:40.000 All Black Rocks, all vanguards.
00:28:43.000 And so for us, for them, a very sick population is a very profitable population.
00:28:48.000 You know, in my hometown in Bali, near our farm, farms are disappearing, but three giant Hospitals have come up because everyone's falling sick.
00:28:57.000 I mean, just because growth is counted, not in terms of how well you are.
00:29:02.000 Growth is counted in terms of how much profits can be generated.
00:29:06.000 So sick people generate profits and healthy people don't.
00:29:10.000 Good food makes healthy people.
00:29:12.000 So wipe off the good food and make fake food everywhere.
00:29:16.000 And the third principle, as I mentioned, is Satyagraha.
00:29:19.000 To never give up your ability to discriminate between truth and untruth.
00:29:26.000 And to never give up your freedom to say no to the untruth and to the wrong things.
00:29:34.000 And that freedom no one can take away.
00:29:36.000 Especially if you are not attached to anything.
00:29:41.000 They'll take away my home, don't be attached to your home.
00:29:44.000 They'll take away my money.
00:29:45.000 So what?
00:29:46.000 They can't take your call away.
00:29:52.000 It's very interesting to me, Vandana, how quickly a conversation with you that can be about something very particular, like popular agricultural movements and its global connotation, or the immorality and illegality of patenting seeds, Become about very deep principles, like the sanctity of truth and non-attachment, a willingness to let go of the various, speaking for myself, idols that a man or a person, a woman, can accumulate over a life.
00:30:36.000 The ways I found myself binded, bound to the world through obligation and attachment and fear.
00:30:47.000 When you talk about the victories against Pepsi and the potential victories that can occur through stating that nature and animals and seeds are not human creations, when you point out that That there is a kind of almost unimaginable malfeasance alluded to at the heart of the globalist project to replace God, to replace God as the originator, to replace God as the indigenous condition and as the proprietor of almost the proprietor of the unmanifest, which is even beyond even many conceptions of God.
00:31:30.000 It seems to me that even these Quite particular issues require of us a quite personal, a deep personal understanding of who we are and what we want.
00:31:46.000 And my question to you is that it seems sometimes that you have had success in India, the successes that you described in your last answer in preventing the corporations being able to own seeds, being able to sue farmers, but Because the relationships between the state and corporations and the movement of globalism are so powerfully entwined, it seems now that you have people moralising.
00:32:20.000 Like, for example, when we began our conversation, we were talking about, they will say that these farmer movements are racists.
00:32:27.000 There are very sort of moral and righteous journalists.
00:32:31.000 In my country that will say this is why the farmers movement is wrong and they use kind of very moral arguments and there are sort of there are what I would say they're like one of the questions we've got from someone on our chat are like you know from someone called Sandy Snoop on our chat what are your thoughts on the save the soil movement that has the ominous backing of the WEF and I'd love your answer to that question as well as the wider phenomenon Of NGOs and righteous media and the state itself claiming to be pursuing a righteous and moral path while apparently acting on behalf of the interests that, by your reckoning, have an intention, whether conscious or not, and I'd love your thoughts on whether it's conscious or not,
00:33:21.000 there seems to be about as evil as I could imagine. The annihilation and the replacement of God.
00:33:28.000 So what do you think about sort of agencies and groups like the WEF and these various globalist
00:33:32.000 organizations that crop up to legitimize what appear to be projects of centralization,
00:33:39.000 touching upon the Save the Soil movement and the various other apparently ecologically sound
00:33:45.000 movements that seem to be advancing globalist interests under a veil of righteousness?
00:33:52.000 You know, I actually wrote a book called Soil Not Oil in the lead up to the Copenhagen Climate Summit
00:34:02.000 because I realized that everyone was looking towards the atmosphere and how many parts per
00:34:08.000 million of CO2 they are.
00:34:12.000 And no one was looking to the plants and the soils that allow us to heal the earth and It's part of the self-organization of Gaia to cool the planet.
00:34:27.000 The Earth brought the temperature down from 290 degrees that it used to be to 13 degrees centigrade through her power of photosynthesis.
00:34:39.000 She brought the CO2 down.
00:34:41.000 Through photosynthesis, you take the carbon dioxide and the sun and you give humans and other species food and oxygen.
00:34:49.000 I mean, isn't that a miracle?
00:34:53.000 And that brought the carbon dioxide down from 98% to 0.03%.
00:34:59.000 Now if we follow that route and we see the earth as teacher and say we will follow the laws of ecology, we will follow the laws of the earth, the first thing we have to do is the earth is alive, the earth is intelligent, the earth is sacred.
00:35:18.000 The second thing you do is Shrink the human arrogance and anthropocentrism.
00:35:27.000 Because we have started to think that till we are present, nothing happens, no?
00:35:33.000 Till we intervene and make GMOs, there's no seed.
00:35:37.000 Till we do these horrible carbon absorption, carbon dioxide machines, we shall have more emissions.
00:35:44.000 You know, to absorb the CO2.
00:35:46.000 And talking about farmers' protests, the big farmers' protests in America, in Iowa, is against the pipelines of CO2 being carried to bury it somewhere in the ground where it might be safe, because it can become very explosive.
00:36:02.000 Farmers of Iowa are resisting these pipelines.
00:36:07.000 They're resisting the false solutions.
00:36:09.000 So the reason there are some NGOs and some voices who are louder and are heard more is because they are playing the message of the masters.
00:36:24.000 And what's the dominant message of the masters today?
00:36:28.000 A. We'll play God and nature must be extinguished totally forever.
00:36:35.000 The second, all this we will do, we'll turn our pollution into the future markets and the future profits.
00:36:42.000 Geoengineering, genetic engineering, fake food, lab food.
00:36:46.000 We will criminalize nature like we've tried to criminalize farmers for saving seeds.
00:36:51.000 Now we will criminalize the farmers for being, for existing, for growing food, and we'll criminalize the poor cow.
00:36:59.000 As Bill Gates said, the problem is the cow has four stomachs.
00:37:02.000 Well, Mr. Gates, all herbivores have four stomachs because they eat roughage.
00:37:07.000 And this planet was just full of herbivores roaming.
00:37:11.000 The bisons roamed the plains of America.
00:37:15.000 We didn't have a methane problem.
00:37:20.000 Your methane problem is the way you treat your animals.
00:37:23.000 It's not the animal that's the problem.
00:37:26.000 But they want to criminalize the existence of the animal.
00:37:29.000 They want to criminalize the existence of an insect.
00:37:32.000 They want to criminalize the insect of a plant, which is why Roundup is used.
00:37:36.000 And sadly, there are enough people with too little experience, too little exposure to pluralistic reality, too little reverence for either the earth or the people who work the land.
00:37:52.000 And they then start echoing.
00:37:55.000 What the big players want to say, so what the big players are basically trying to say is stop farmers, have lab food, let the buyers grow the raw material for lab food, and I've just finished my latest book, it's called Climate Change and the Future of Food, how Our climate change is a pollution problem, is a problem of the one percent.
00:38:19.000 You know, they emit two thirds of the emissions and they're now turning to fake food, which is the next step of taking food sovereignty away from us.
00:38:30.000 The solution and both aspects are so wrong.
00:38:33.000 And you know what the literature is now showing, the scientists are working, they say get rid of the cow.
00:38:43.000 And have lab-fake food, fake meat, and this will reduce emissions and it's a solution to climate change.
00:38:49.000 No.
00:38:53.000 What the cows emit is in the biogenic cycle.
00:38:56.000 It's part of the cycle of life.
00:38:58.000 And all cycles of life close.
00:39:01.000 They recycle.
00:39:03.000 It's the artificial systems that don't have an ability to recycle.
00:39:08.000 So the land that will be used for lab food will be five times more.
00:39:13.000 Five times more feedstock you'll have to produce, and so you'll destroy the land more.
00:39:18.000 And worse, you'll have 25 times more emissions that will pollute the atmosphere.
00:39:23.000 So we are in a moment where anything can be cooked up and be called science.
00:39:30.000 And the best scientists can be censored and shut down.
00:39:33.000 And the best experiences of humanity To grow food with love, to relate to other species with care, to let this planet flourish with diversity, cultural and biological, they would like to silence it.
00:39:49.000 And our work is, in whatever space we have, to keep living the real life, eating the real food, growing the real food, and at least in our communities, to talk to each other.
00:40:01.000 Let the global loudspeaker be with them.
00:40:05.000 Our local conversations must be for real and for truth.
00:40:10.000 Vandana, the climate change issue in the western media sphere is a very divisive one indeed, with many on what this culture currently calls the left regarding it as the most significant issue of our time.
00:40:29.000 Many of the same globalist interests that we are discussing with regard to food sovereignty ...appear to be proposing that a reduction in the freedoms of individuals is the solution to the climate change problem.
00:40:45.000 As you pointed out in your last answer, two-thirds of carbon emissions are caused by one percent of the population.
00:40:54.000 What is, and on the other side of the argument, a lot of people believe that climate change isn't real, it's due to natural cycles of the earth, anthropomorphic, or genic, excuse me, climate change isn't a problem.
00:41:08.000 So I wonder, I wonder, with this issue of climate change, which appears to be on one side being utilised to restrict the freedom of individual people, to legitimise, I would say, measures of restraint and to limit sovereignty and to legitimise, as you say, new forms of agriculture that again deny sovereignty to ordinary people and farmers in particular.
00:41:36.000 How must we conduct the conversation around climate change?
00:41:40.000 How do we respect the earth?
00:41:43.000 How do we address the idea of anthropogenic climate change?
00:41:48.000 How do we create new spaces of unity in a currently divided public sphere?
00:41:57.000 And it seems from what you just said that you believe it to be vital that all of us, all of us, learn to have a relationship with the land and a relationship with food.
00:42:09.000 This is a truly revolutionary idea because it seems that the vision of progress that we are granted is a purely technological one in alignment with the types of colonialism that we've discussed for the first part of our conversation.
00:42:23.000 And many people will see it as Atavistic, nostalgic, arcane to consider growing our own food, connecting to the land, a denial of progress as if progress too is a form of God, a natural unfolding of a true intention.
00:42:43.000 So what, can you give us some clear guidance on climate change, some insight into what, how it is used by, you know, let's call it for simplicity's sake, both sides of the political and public sphere.
00:42:56.000 I'm referring to kind of, you know, the kind of country that I live in, America, et cetera.
00:43:01.000 And yeah, and how can we overcome that division and respond to it?
00:43:07.000 Well, you know, I, right from, you know, I was present.
00:43:13.000 And active in Rio at the Earth Summit, where the Climate Treaty was written and the Biodiversity Treaty was written.
00:43:22.000 And both are related because, you know, the planet and a biosphere is what regulates the atmosphere and the climate.
00:43:30.000 Because it's the power of the biosphere with its power of photosynthesis that really recycles And produces our basic needs and also is able to hold the climate in regulation.
00:43:45.000 Now, just like junk food has created a huge epidemic of chronic diseases, which are increasingly being identified by the medical community as metabolic diseases, which have the same cause, but they have different symptoms.
00:44:03.000 So, you know, You get obesity, you have diabetes, you have heart problems, you have blood pressure, but they're all symptoms of the damage done to your body by a diet that's not meant to be a human food.
00:44:18.000 It's disturbing the metabolism, the ability of your body to manage itself and regulate itself for health.
00:44:25.000 In my view, the whole issue of chemical farming based on Fossil fuels and fossil fuels themselves, not fossil fuels outside, have together, if you look at these maps they do of planetary boundaries, what are the three ruptures?
00:44:45.000 Nitrogen.
00:44:45.000 Why do we have a nitrogen rupture?
00:44:47.000 Because we're using nitrogen fertilizers, which emits a greenhouse gas 300 times more damaging than carbon dioxide.
00:44:54.000 Total silence on it.
00:44:55.000 Nobody talks about it.
00:44:57.000 Because that means addressing the nitrogen problem, not from the farmer's end, but from the industry end.
00:45:04.000 The second is biodiversity disappearance.
00:45:07.000 The same processes that are leading to emissions, high emissions, 50% come from food system that's based on chemicals and fossil fuels, but that same system is making the species disappear.
00:45:21.000 90% species disappearance is because of an industrial agriculture model.
00:45:25.000 Pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, and monocultures.
00:45:30.000 Why do we have monocultures of soybean in the Amazon?
00:45:32.000 Why do we have monocultures of palm oil in the rainforests of Indonesia?
00:45:39.000 So the symptoms of our relationship gone wrong is climate change and biodiversity.
00:45:47.000 Both are symptoms.
00:45:49.000 But a third element of that is actually, I would add, the human element.
00:45:54.000 Treating human beings as dispensable.
00:45:56.000 But we are part of the Earth family.
00:45:58.000 So, so much of what's gone wrong in the climate debate is assuming that people are the problem.
00:46:06.000 Not the industry, not the corporations, not the pollution, but people are the problem.
00:46:10.000 Restrict them more.
00:46:12.000 But that is what a dictatorial system is.
00:46:15.000 But it would also be wrong to deny that there is pollution.
00:46:20.000 That the 1% polluting 2 thirds, that should be the conversation.
00:46:25.000 Our conversation should be about pollution and injustice.
00:46:30.000 Because just as the climate dictators are denying life, the deniers are also denying life.
00:46:39.000 Many of the good scientists have looked at geological time.
00:46:43.000 And they look at geology.
00:46:45.000 There are hardly any who work at living systems.
00:46:49.000 And to address both extremes, we have to turn to living systems and say, we are living on a living Earth.
00:46:55.000 And here are the living solutions which will make our lives better, which will increase our freedoms in times of closure to face these climate colonizers and imperialists.
00:47:08.000 And in addition to that, enhance life on earth for other species too.
00:47:15.000 The Navdanya work shows we have more species on our farm, we grow more food, we have more freedom because we use our own seeds, and that's the conversation we need.
00:47:23.000 That we have to expand our freedom in partnership with other species within the limits that the earth sets for us, but not the artificial fake narratives and false solutions of those who have caused the problem.
00:47:42.000 It seems like there are many institutions that could be valuable that, you know, one would require or it could be useful to have various global bodies that are able to pass on recommendations, that are able to aggregate studies and pass on findings.
00:48:03.000 But what seems to have happened is that these global bodies typically have been co-opted by Corporate globalists, so the recommendations are always beneficial to the kind of institutions that are responsible for generating the pollution and always make recommendations that inhibit and reduce the freedom of ordinary people.
00:48:27.000 It seems like, in a sense, I've heard it said before, that many of the organs of a post-revolutionary world are already present, that the media is already present, that the communications miracle has already taken place, and that the information is available, and many of the ideals are available, but at the top there is a kind of A kind of a malfeasant intention that is difficult to overcome.
00:48:57.000 One of the questions that we have from our community, Kay Kotwas, with all the money and power in the world, what do billionaires like Bill Gates actually want?
00:49:05.000 What are they striving for?
00:49:07.000 And when earlier on you were saying that they seem to, you know, unconsciously or otherwise, want to replace God, I wonder what you feel about that.
00:49:16.000 I wonder what you feel the intentions are.
00:49:19.000 I wonder if you consider them to be conscious agents, or whether you consider there to be some sort of systemic inertia that has taken hold.
00:49:29.000 I think it's a combination of inertia, but an inertia that's pushing you on the same path, but accelerating and expanding.
00:49:45.000 All the wrong direction.
00:49:48.000 You know, Einstein has said, a clear sign of insanity is to do the same thing again and again, expecting a different outcome.
00:49:56.000 Now, we know that forgetting that the world Earth is living and treating it like a machine, the mechanistic worldview, forgetting that the world Earth is sacred, the universe is sacred, and treating everything as mere objects to be exploited, all of that forgetting is the playing God.
00:50:15.000 And at this point it has reached its total peak, because the playing God is not just trying to displace God, it's trying to displace every aspect of a living Earth, from the seed to the Earth's capacity herself, and human beings too.
00:50:37.000 You know, what is this project of Silicon Valley, you know, the Cartesian project of Silicon, transhumanism?
00:50:45.000 Ah yes.
00:50:48.000 We've got to enhance the human being by making them disappear into a machine.
00:50:53.000 That's the crudest kind of thinking that you can have because just like a seed didn't get improved by making it a GMO, it got polluted.
00:51:05.000 Taking away the autonomy of the human being as a conscious actor and turning them into raw material for data And data management and algorithms is, you know, again, that thing of, of, of fear, of fear from fear of others who are free and alive.
00:51:28.000 You know, I think a lot of it just because money gets made, of course, profits and money and control is a big part of it, but it's more than control.
00:51:37.000 It is also fear of others who are free and alive.
00:51:44.000 And that's why the constant attack on freedom and the constant attack on life.
00:51:50.000 So our freedom then is stay free and stay alive, you know, and therefore keep the conditions that give us life and give us freedom alive.
00:52:01.000 That's the Freedom Project.
00:52:03.000 to our own personal freedom must be cultivated.
00:52:07.000 Vandana, after I experienced a lot of attacks recently in the media, I felt to a degree
00:52:15.000 there was a necessary humbling.
00:52:17.000 I felt that there were lessons that could be learned, but definitely this aspect of,
00:52:20.000 you know, particularly with regard to attachment, caring what other people think of me.
00:52:24.000 Of course, even lessons about putting myself in a position to be vulnerable to such attacks with my years of promiscuity and selfishness, even if I never transgressed in the way that I was accused of.
00:52:40.000 I wonder, on a personal and human level, how do you propose that I ought respond to those kind of attacks?
00:52:49.000 What can I learn?
00:52:51.000 Where can I find strength?
00:52:53.000 How can I move forward?
00:52:55.000 What do I take from an experience of that nature?
00:52:59.000 How do I maintain my integrity and my authenticity, my certainty in what I'm doing?
00:53:04.000 What can I learn from it?
00:53:08.000 Well, I think our integrity comes both from the deep consciousness That we are integral beings, but we are integral beings, integrated with other beings.
00:53:20.000 And therefore, respect for all others becomes key.
00:53:24.000 Our integrity rests on respecting their integrity.
00:53:29.000 And the vulnerability just becomes a teacher of where your resilience lies.
00:53:44.000 I think we are at the end of a mechanistic, atomistic age.
00:53:49.000 Mechanistic in terms of the mechanical philosophy, but atomistic that we are all separate individuals, you know, unto ourselves.
00:53:59.000 And I think the next step of human evolution, of deepening our integrity and deepening our autonomy, will be a deeper awareness of our interconnectedness.
00:54:15.000 Yes.
00:54:16.000 And constantly respecting those relationships.
00:54:18.000 Yes.
00:54:21.000 In the community that you are a part of, which I know has a sort of an academic component and that you run courses and we discussed before the courses that you run on Gandhi, can you tell us a little bit more about the principles under which that community is run and is it Are you already in practice living in the type of community that you appear to be saying will be the solution, the antithesis and antidote to globalism, sovereign communities with the self-sustaining sovereign communities that are integrated in the way that you just outlined?
00:55:01.000 So, you know, like I said earlier, one of the problems has always been since colonialism, of this illusion that we are always the creators and the inventors.
00:55:01.000 Yeah.
00:55:16.000 And part of my strength comes from the communities that are, you know, that exist.
00:55:24.000 The communities I spent the last week with.
00:55:27.000 And to learn from them and to learn from their principles.
00:55:30.000 But the Navdanya community, the farm and the courses and the Earth University that we run, yes, it runs on those principles.
00:55:36.000 You know, I wouldn't be the kind of free person I am if there wasn't a community.
00:55:42.000 Because communities sustain themselves.
00:55:44.000 Communities work together in corporations.
00:55:47.000 Communities are mutual.
00:55:49.000 Communities have no hierarchies.
00:55:51.000 Hierarchies are created in In atomized systems with superiority and inferiority built into it.
00:56:00.000 So, for me, freedom means self-organization.
00:56:04.000 Self-organization with respect for each other, respect for nature, respect for the land, respect for the seed, and respect for the other human members of the community.
00:56:15.000 That is freedom.
00:56:17.000 Because that's where, together, you can mutually do amazing work.
00:56:25.000 Do you think then that leadership in a community like that with those values is based on, well, obviously consent and exemplification?
00:56:35.000 Is that the type of leadership that is offered in a community that is non-hierarchical?
00:56:42.000 Well, consent is related to external interventions, you know?
00:56:53.000 But just like a seed becomes a plant through its own capacity to be a self-organized and to be community with the soil organisms that are in the soil, with the mycorrhizae in the soil, each of them, through their intelligence, and I am absolutely convinced all life is The soil organisms are intelligent, the plants are intelligent, animals are intelligent, the bees are intelligent, and there's so much new research being done on this.
00:57:24.000 But they don't have to, you know, it's not like, here's a decision, let's make it, let's talk about it.
00:57:35.000 Each of them is giving their best with intelligence.
00:57:40.000 So the mycorrhizal fungus pulls out all the toxics.
00:57:46.000 It's just the right amount of minerals that that plant needs.
00:57:49.000 Not more, not less.
00:57:52.000 And the plant gives it the food, the carbohydrates.
00:57:57.000 This combination of mutuality and symbiosis, which is intelligence at work.
00:58:04.000 I think that's what's missing because we are spending too much time assuming that we live in an atomized world and therefore we live in a disorganized world.
00:58:14.000 You know, together we are with the Hobbesian idea that we do not know how to live together in harmony.
00:58:23.000 And for that, we must turn to nature.
00:58:26.000 We must turn to the soil organisms.
00:58:28.000 We must turn to our gut microbiome.
00:58:31.000 And so, you know, they know how to live in harmony.
00:58:35.000 And they know how to be considerate to each other, to give to each other, to care for each other.
00:58:41.000 So more than consent, I would say cooperation.
00:58:46.000 I would say compassion.
00:58:49.000 Do you think that we have continually imposed metaphors on natural processes that advance ideas of atomization and dominion?
00:58:57.000 Even the ideas from Darwin that were most popularized and most celebrated seem to indicate that ideas like competition were significant.
00:59:13.000 Elsewhere, you I think there's the common idea that nature is about a kind of brutality and about like a sort of a carnivorous ongoing war.
00:59:24.000 Latterly, some say that there's a kind of a degree of revivalist apocalyptism in the environmental movement where nature is conveyed as very fragile, vulnerable on the precipice of destruction.
00:59:39.000 Beyond nature, the earth, the Gaia say the earth is a goddess.
00:59:44.000 I wonder what you think it tells us about our kind and our consciousness, that rather than models of symbiosis, spontaneous cooperation, full autonomy, integrity, non-hierarchical systems of self-realization and cooperation, the models we impose are either models of violent fragility or Competitive brutality.
01:00:13.000 You sort of mentioned Hobbes, and I wonder what other narratives and academic or theoretical myths we've imposed upon nature to legitimise power structures.
01:00:28.000 Russell, you know, every big idea person Which is what has become the dominant ways of thinking of our time.
01:00:39.000 Actually, there were a small group of people, just like today, the 1% is a tiny clique, a very small number.
01:00:46.000 At that time, too, it was the beginning of colonialism.
01:00:49.000 It was defining economy as colonial commerce.
01:00:53.000 It was defining society as chaotic.
01:00:59.000 It was defining the earth as a machine.
01:01:01.000 All this was happening by a small group.
01:01:04.000 So if you think of it, here's Darwin talking about competition.
01:01:09.000 And here's Adam Smith, father of modern science, of modern economics, talking about scarcity.
01:01:14.000 Now the two go together.
01:01:15.000 You're blind to the abundance of the earth and nature and the ability of nature to constantly renew itself, multiply, share.
01:01:28.000 And you define the world as scarcity.
01:01:31.000 You have created scarcity through colonialism.
01:01:34.000 And then you define the relationships in nature as well as in human society, as those are competing for scarce resources.
01:01:43.000 And this infiltrates at every level.
01:01:46.000 But not only is nature alive, but nature multiplies.
01:01:52.000 You know, for me, the miracle of the seed is the seed can give you a rice plant, corn plant.
01:01:58.000 It can give you a tree.
01:02:01.000 You know, A tiny, tiny seed of a ficus can give you this giant ficus.
01:02:08.000 And it's all in that little seed.
01:02:10.000 And how did it do it?
01:02:12.000 It did it because the patterns are in its intelligence and in its unfolding.
01:02:19.000 You know, my basic training was quantum theory.
01:02:22.000 and David Bohm always talked about enfoldment of the quanta, that the quanta unfolds
01:02:31.000 but its potential is enfolded.
01:02:35.000 The same is for nature, the potential to become the expressions that are there.
01:02:41.000 But this then means instead of competition, cooperation, instead of constant mutual aggression,
01:02:51.000 symbiosis, and we are fortunate that now there is a new biology emerging,
01:03:00.000 which is much more resonant to the way indigenous people live related to nature, and there's a new convergence.
01:03:09.000 It's not in The Guardian and it's not in the BBC.
01:03:13.000 It's not anywhere there but for me it's very very exciting.
01:03:17.000 I can go to a village one day, next day read a book by someone who's talked about the intelligence of nature.
01:03:24.000 And they're saying the same thing in different languages.
01:03:27.000 So, those dominant metaphors are really outmoded.
01:03:30.000 They just don't allow us to make sense of the world we're in.
01:03:34.000 And they don't allow us to be guides, to regenerate the Earth, to overcome this panic that has been created.
01:03:43.000 Yes, we should take seriously our ecological responsibilities.
01:03:49.000 But it does not mean we again interpret the Earth as so helpless.
01:03:58.000 You know, because so much of the panic is for the Earth will die.
01:04:03.000 Earth won't die.
01:04:04.000 That's too powerful.
01:04:07.000 And because I live in the subcontinent, which has the worst disasters, 20,000 people dead in the super cyclone in Rurisat, 1999.
01:04:19.000 20,000 people dead in 2013 in the disasters in my home region.
01:04:23.000 250 people dead two years ago.
01:04:26.000 These disasters are for real.
01:04:28.000 We can't deny them.
01:04:29.000 And the disasters are a result of messing up the Earth's metabolism.
01:04:35.000 Yeah.
01:04:36.000 And creating a total, you know, destabilized system.
01:04:43.000 We have to take that seriously.
01:04:44.000 But then to take it seriously, we have to then take power back from those who are causing this damage.
01:04:51.000 And give power back to the Earth by working with her in service.
01:04:55.000 You know, it's our time not to pretend to be God.
01:05:00.000 Or, on the other hand, to be totally powerless, but to reclaim our true creativity as part of the Earth.
01:05:08.000 And as co-creators working in humility, knowing we're a very small part, do the right thing.
01:05:17.000 As co-creators working in humility do the right thing to be able to handle the apparent paradox of our personal connection to this great power, this aliveness, this capacity for multiplication and manifestation.
01:05:36.000 From a position of humility, not dominion.
01:05:39.000 I see now that what's been mobilized is an ideology to entirely extract divinity from these processes and to claim for the rational, the material, and the personal, that which is divine.
01:05:55.000 And I suppose that's, in a sense, a kind of, yes, a global heresy, a heresy against nature.
01:06:02.000 Vandana, thank you so much for, as always, being able to weld together such complex, diverse, opposing ideas and finding always the confluence and the hope, because I can see how as an individual now I can participate in this by allowing myself to become a conduit for higher forces, by challenging my own integrity, my own willingness, To be vulnerable and to act authentically, my own willingness to let go of attachment.
01:06:28.000 I can participate in this symbiotic miracle.
01:06:31.000 Some people are putting quotes in the chat of things you've said in this conversation.
01:06:36.000 I like the one about compassion.
01:06:37.000 Can you grab that one for me?
01:06:38.000 Vandana, thank you so much for helping me.
01:06:42.000 I value your time and your teaching always.
01:06:44.000 Thank you.
01:06:45.000 And to you and every one of your listeners, A wonderful season, holiday season, and a wonderful New Year.
01:06:54.000 I love you.
01:06:55.000 Thank you.