Stay Free - Russel Brand - May 01, 2023


WAIT…BIDEN, CIA & EPSTEIN | This REVEALS Everything! - #119 - Stay Free With Russell Brand


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour

Words per Minute

192.53955

Word Count

11,562

Sentence Count

873

Misogynist Sentences

20

Hate Speech Sentences

11


Summary

Russell Brand is back with a brand new episode of Stay Free With Russell Brand. This week, we look at the White House Correspondents Dinner and the hypocrisy of the Democratic Party when it comes to their attempts to smear Robert F. Kennedy as an anti-Vaxxer. Plus, we learn why Joe Biden has the nerve to quote Jefferson and his views on the media. And, of course, there's a special guest on Locals with Ryan Grim, who was kicked out of the dinner last year for brawling with a fellow journalist. Stay Free with Russell Brand is out now! Logo by Courtney DeKorte. Theme by Mavus White. Music by PSOVOD and tyops. If you like what you hear, please leave us a five star rating and review on Apple Podcasts and we'll read out your comments and thoughts on the next episode. Thank you so much for all your support, stay free and keep spreading the word about this podcast. - stay free, love, positivity and positivity. xoxo - EJ & Billie - The Ewing Project and the Ewing's Anatomy of the Mind is a production of Gimlet Media. Please don't forget to rate, review and subscribe to stay free with your favourite podcaster, and spread the word to your friends about what you're listening to this podcast! - it's a good one. Thank you, Billie Eichner, EJ and EJ is a wonderful humanist and she's work is inspiring us all around the world. XOXOooooooo . - Ej and Ej thinks you'll love it. Ej is a good thing, and so much so we'll talk about it and we're glad you'll like it, too. -- Thank you EJ thinks it's good, Ej loves it and it's great, too much, too good, thank you, bye bye, bye, Bye Bye Bye bye bye bye. - Billie, bye Bye Bye, Bye, bye. Love, bye - bye,bye, bye-bye, Bye. - bye Bye. bye, bye - bye- bye. Billie x - Yours Truly, bye... - OJ & EJ xOXO - - JUICY - Rachael & GABE


Transcript

00:00:00.000 It's a good thing I brought my phone today. I'm gonna be late.
00:00:03.000 I just got here.
00:00:05.000 I'm so sorry.
00:00:07.000 I'll call you later.
00:00:09.000 Ok, bye.
00:00:11.000 Bye.
00:00:13.000 I'm so sorry.
00:00:15.000 I'll call you later.
00:00:17.000 Ok, bye.
00:00:19.000 Bye.
00:00:21.000 I'm so sorry.
00:00:23.000 I'll call you later.
00:00:25.000 Ok, bye.
00:00:27.000 Bye.
00:00:36.000 In this video, you're going to see the future.
00:00:48.000 You're awakening.
00:00:50.000 You're wonderful.
00:00:51.000 You are an awakening wonder.
00:00:52.000 Welcome to Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:00:55.000 It's another week.
00:00:56.000 We've got a lot of things to discuss with you.
00:00:58.000 Over the course of the show, there will be great vicissitudes and undulations in energy.
00:01:03.000 At some points, I'm going to seem incredibly calm and focused and mature.
00:01:07.000 At others, erratic, fast, fizzing, effervescent.
00:01:11.000 I'm starting off quite mature, Gal.
00:01:13.000 No, this is a nice, relaxed tone.
00:01:15.000 Very in control, I would say.
00:01:17.000 Thank you very much.
00:01:18.000 Very easy entry into the week's news.
00:01:20.000 We're going to look at some hypocrisy, in particular the hypocrisy of the Democrat party when it comes to claims around rigged elections.
00:01:28.000 If you're watching this on YouTube now, by the way, After about 10-15 minutes we will disappear into the annals, I said annals, of Rumble where we can speak more freely.
00:01:39.000 We're not there to discuss conspiracy theories, well a little bit, and we're certainly not there to do anything other than bring people together and to speak freely against the establishment.
00:01:48.000 We've got such an exciting week this week.
00:01:49.000 We're going to be learning more about Robert F Kennedy and why the mainstream media en masse are attacking him as an anti-vaxxer.
00:01:57.000 You're going to love it.
00:01:58.000 We've got a great guest on, Ryan Grim.
00:02:00.000 He's going to be telling us about Well, we're going to be talking a little bit about the White House Correspondents Dinner, which Ryan Grim, who has the nerve to call himself a journalist, was chucked out of last year for brawling.
00:02:12.000 And I think one man said the back of his hand was scratched.
00:02:15.000 Another fellow said he received, and this is a direct quote, a Chinese burn.
00:02:19.000 And I'm not even sure that you can say that anymore.
00:02:21.000 I don't think so.
00:02:21.000 It's probably not the sort of thing that people should say.
00:02:24.000 We're going to start by looking at the White House Correspondents Dinner.
00:02:27.000 Why I like the White House Correspondents Dinner is because it's a living embodiment of the corruption and collusion that exists between the state and the mainstream media.
00:02:40.000 Joe Biden, your president, had the out-and-out nerve to quote Jefferson and Jefferson's views on the media.
00:02:49.000 This is absolutely fantastic.
00:02:50.000 Watch this.
00:02:51.000 If you're not watching us on Locals, by the way, join us on Locals because we do extra content on here and we can see your questions.
00:02:57.000 Blessed El Bird, for example, saying rug burn or American burn.
00:03:01.000 Yeah, that's right.
00:03:03.000 Like the you know suggestions of script alts actually is what's coming through there now, but let's look at Joe Biden Do you think Joe Biden's even got the right to cite Jefferson one of the founding fathers?
00:03:11.000 We interact with our audience whilst the White House Correspondents, what they do is they just bleach out your There you go.
00:03:18.000 Consciousness we like we're listening to you. What do you think guys? We care about you. We love you
00:03:22.000 No, like old Fox News is expressing opinion You're out the door not like MSNBC where they're just
00:03:28.000 trying to turn you into a drone and not an NPC without a view
00:03:32.000 To see not a chance to be free Let's have a look at this where Joe Biden has the audacity
00:03:38.000 to cite Jefferson look at it serious. No Jill Kamala Doug and I and members of our administration
00:03:46.000 Are here to send a message of the country and quite frankly to the world
00:03:50.000 time.
00:03:53.000 I'm not pausing, I'm just showing you that this don't work no more.
00:03:57.000 The free press is a pillar, maybe the pillar of a free society, not the enemy.
00:04:05.000 Thomas Jefferson wrote Of course they're cheering that, because they are the press.
00:04:12.000 You know, they've just had like four years of Trump saying, you know, fake news, fake news.
00:04:17.000 They're essentially applauding themselves.
00:04:19.000 I put it to you, whether you're watching this on YouTube or Rumble, where we'll do the whole show unexpurgated, that this is a sort of an onanistic circle jerk, a media masturbatory circle of self-congratulation, where everyone is drenched, not in news, but in...
00:04:37.000 Ugly sputum.
00:04:38.000 Nice, I'm glad you said that.
00:04:41.000 I wondered where you were going there.
00:04:43.000 I was always, as I often am, heading towards... Sputum.
00:04:46.000 Just the word sputum.
00:04:47.000 The word sputum is never far from my lips.
00:04:49.000 Note that I said the word sputum.
00:04:51.000 I know.
00:04:52.000 Simply a linguistic sign.
00:04:54.000 So like, you can't say that, but this isn't even the best bit of the clip.
00:04:59.000 This isn't even the best bit.
00:05:01.000 By the way, other things we could be talking about in the news this week.
00:05:05.000 We could be talking about US corporations cashing in on Ukraine's oil and gas.
00:05:09.000 What a surprise.
00:05:10.000 Who would have imagined that?
00:05:12.000 US corporations cashing in on... But don't worry about the free press that's holding power to account, to complete Jefferson's quote before dear old Doddery Joe does.
00:05:21.000 Let's see the rest of Joe.
00:05:25.000 You all know this quote.
00:05:26.000 Thomas Jefferson wrote, we're left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government.
00:05:35.000 I should not hesitate to prefer the latter.
00:05:38.000 Right, so he's saying that a free media is more important than the government.
00:05:43.000 How many of you agree with that?
00:05:45.000 But how many do you think that we have a free media?
00:05:48.000 Right now, there are stories that we can't discuss on YouTube, which is a media platform that's regulated in a variety of ways.
00:05:54.000 When we come off, we're going to be talking about an Epstein story that's going to... I'm not going to use my usual metaphor, like knock your knickers down, because it doesn't seem appropriate with regard to that particular story.
00:06:03.000 But we're going to be talking about Epstein's calendar.
00:06:06.000 And it's not a calendar where Epstein's posing like February's a fireman with a kitten.
00:06:11.000 March, he's got a little apron on and he's whipping up a cake with a bit of batter up his face.
00:06:16.000 All batter spattered up his noggin.
00:06:18.000 You've done the fireman, have you?
00:06:20.000 Yeah, I started with fireman.
00:06:22.000 Now I'm going through the film Calendar Girls with my head.
00:06:25.000 And then maybe a football calendar is probably next in mind.
00:06:28.000 I said well since I've had a calendar but like apparently Epstein had meetings in with some people that are quite surprising and we'd like you know we don't know if those meetings took place and we certainly can't discuss it on YouTube.
00:06:38.000 No.
00:06:39.000 We can't discuss Epstein's calendar on YouTube can we?
00:06:44.000 You can barely say his name on YouTube to be honest.
00:06:47.000 What if it was the one that's the Beatles manager?
00:06:48.000 Oh, let's go with that one then.
00:06:50.000 Was it that one?
00:06:51.000 It's not that one.
00:06:52.000 He was a lovely man.
00:06:53.000 The way he got those boys to come together as a band, he took them to the top of most, the top of the pops, as they used to say amongst themselves in happier times.
00:07:01.000 So listen to this bit as well, back to Joe Biden's White House circle.
00:07:09.000 Can I finish it?
00:07:11.000 You know what I mean.
00:07:12.000 Have a look at this.
00:07:13.000 Have a look at this bit.
00:07:14.000 Look at the question.
00:07:15.000 In your mind, prepare right now for the question that this begs.
00:07:19.000 Journalism is not a crime.
00:07:22.000 Evan and Austin should have written... Woah!
00:07:24.000 Woah!
00:07:25.000 Journalism is not a crime?
00:07:25.000 Woah!
00:07:27.000 Guess what this is the anniversary of?
00:07:30.000 Julian Assange, journalist, is still in Belmarsh, since the 50 weeks by British court on May the 1st, 2019.
00:07:39.000 Wait a minute, what's the...
00:07:42.000 What's the date now?
00:07:43.000 Is this 2023?
00:07:43.000 That's more than 50 weeks.
00:07:46.000 Yeah.
00:07:48.000 I see what you mean.
00:07:48.000 Right.
00:07:49.000 Well, he's waiting potential extradition, isn't he, for trial in the US.
00:07:53.000 So his dad is 50 weeks.
00:07:54.000 He's still banged up in there.
00:07:56.000 Journalism is not a crime, says Biden.
00:07:58.000 Journalism is not a crime.
00:08:01.000 Listen to the end of it.
00:08:02.000 Immediately, along with every other American held hostage or wrongfully detained abroad, He's quite excited now.
00:08:11.000 I know that he's scrotum tightened during that bit.
00:08:13.000 I can tell from his face that he sort of went... He saw his snout.
00:08:17.000 He's pushing the snout forward.
00:08:19.000 He's going up into the paddock.
00:08:20.000 Every journalist abroad.
00:08:22.000 Like, what about dear old Edward Snowden?
00:08:24.000 What about Julian Assange?
00:08:26.000 What about Chelsea Manning?
00:08:27.000 Now I know Chelsea Manning isn't a journalist.
00:08:30.000 Edward Snowden's not a journalist.
00:08:32.000 They're both whistleblowers.
00:08:33.000 But Julian Assange is a journalist.
00:08:36.000 The hypocrisy is outlandish and outrageous.
00:08:40.000 Do we care about the Chi Chi thing?
00:08:42.000 You know about that by now, right?
00:08:43.000 You've all seen that.
00:08:44.000 Yeah, everyone's seen that.
00:08:45.000 You've seen that.
00:08:45.000 We don't need to see that.
00:08:47.000 Do you know what the White House dinner, the point of the White House dinner is?
00:08:51.000 Well it's about freedom of speech essentially it's about the relationship with government and the press and free or so-called freedom of speech but on whose terms is this freedom of speech?
00:08:59.000 Because if that freedom of speech was the type to which Jefferson was referring Assange will be out.
00:09:06.000 That's what he's referring to.
00:09:07.000 He's talking about the type of journalists that want to challenge power, not the type of journalists that essentially promulgate and propagate the messages of the state, who themselves, in my view, are just the managerial class of a globalist corporate cartel.
00:09:23.000 Yeah.
00:09:24.000 That's not what Jefferson wanted, is it?
00:09:26.000 So he said journalism is not a crime.
00:09:26.000 No.
00:09:28.000 What about publishing?
00:09:29.000 But publishing is a crime then.
00:09:31.000 If you're Julian Assange, publishing is a crime.
00:09:33.000 You mustn't publish.
00:09:34.000 No.
00:09:35.000 And Jefferson was clear on that.
00:09:36.000 You can journal.
00:09:37.000 Journal?
00:09:37.000 That's fine.
00:09:38.000 What are you doing?
00:09:39.000 Journaling.
00:09:40.000 What are you going to do after that?
00:09:43.000 Don't you publish, you son of a gun.
00:09:43.000 Nothing.
00:09:45.000 We'll have you.
00:09:46.000 The White House correspondents didn't, because we wondered what it was.
00:09:48.000 I was confused.
00:09:49.000 It's an event held by the White House Correspondents Association to celebrate journalism and freedom of speech.
00:09:56.000 The event gathers journalists, politicians and celebrities to put their differences aside while raising money for journalism scholarship.
00:10:02.000 Why don't you just go to Bill Gates and get your journalism scholarship from him and do your reporting in alignment with his views?
00:10:09.000 You can't have real journalism, because real journalism, I feel like, is Barry Weiss, who's coming on the show later this week, Matt Taibbi, been on the show, coming on the show again, Schellenberger, and might I even venture, little old us, I think so, trying our best to keep you informed about stories that we believe matter, like the candidacy of Robert F. Kennedy, who indeed, if you notice, the two emergent smears of our time are your right wing, or your far far far far far far far far
00:10:40.000 far far far right wing, or you're an anti-vaxxer. Two terms that have almost had to
00:10:45.000 be created to smear people.
00:10:47.000 Now RFK, because he is running for the leadership of the Democrat party, or the presidential
00:10:52.000 candidacy for the Democrat party, I don't think they can use far right without making the whole
00:10:57.000 Democrat party sound bad, can they? No, probably not. They're going to have to go anti-vaxxer,
00:11:00.000 and by god have they. Good job they've got that though, isn't it? Got anti-vaxxer though,
00:11:04.000 We've got something.
00:11:07.000 We're not going to be able to do it far right, but what about that?
00:11:10.000 What's your attitude towards vaccines?
00:11:12.000 Well, under certain conditions, I would take them.
00:11:14.000 Under certain other conditions, I would... Whoa there!
00:11:18.000 No, you don't on Alphabet!
00:11:20.000 No, you don't on Google!
00:11:22.000 No, you don't on Oodtube!
00:11:24.000 That's why you have to join us on Rumble, when we'll be talking not only about issues like that, but also Epstein.
00:11:30.000 Epstein's calendar girls.
00:11:31.000 Not necessarily calendar girls.
00:11:32.000 It was a variety of genders.
00:11:34.000 It was.
00:11:35.000 Mainly very important men.
00:11:37.000 Oh, what the hell's drawing all these important men?
00:11:41.000 Taiwan now has real-time intelligence sharing links with Five Eyes.
00:11:46.000 So that means Five Eyes, which are the anglophonic countries and their various secret service agencies that I believe were part of the exposures of Snowden, actually.
00:11:55.000 And we learned about that, the extent of like, well like, because America ain't meant to spy on Americans.
00:12:01.000 Britain ain't meant to spy on British.
00:12:03.000 Australia ain't meant to spy on Australians.
00:12:04.000 Yeah, but what if we spy on yours?
00:12:07.000 Yeah, keep talking.
00:12:08.000 And we were to spy on yours?
00:12:10.000 Oh, I like your stuff.
00:12:11.000 That's fantastic.
00:12:12.000 So, it's like, I would call it deep state wife swap.
00:12:16.000 It's deep state wife swap.
00:12:18.000 You do mine, I do yours.
00:12:19.000 Isn't it?
00:12:21.000 That's why Epstein's always involved.
00:12:21.000 Isn't it though?
00:12:23.000 Because there's always saucy swinging.
00:12:25.000 Saucy swinging in the deep state, baby.
00:12:27.000 I spy with my little eye, says the unicorn plug, and I'm not even going to ask what that name's supposed to mean.
00:12:32.000 I didn't.
00:12:33.000 You mustn't.
00:12:34.000 Not on YouTube.
00:12:35.000 I can see you're tromping at the winkle to make a point.
00:12:39.000 Obviously, like, we're talking about the hypocrisies of that, you know, White House correspondence.
00:12:43.000 It is hypocritical.
00:12:44.000 So obviously all the things we've spoken about loads of times, but when they're talking about freedom of speech, freedom of the press, we've had the Twitterphile revelations recently.
00:12:53.000 We know about that.
00:12:54.000 Even when the press do get it right, as with Hunter Biden, laptop story, that was when that was actually censored by the government.
00:13:01.000 So that's even when the press are doing their jobs and reporting something that's true, that then gets censored.
00:13:06.000 You've got the warrantless surveillance that we're talking about, which Five Eyes actually fits into.
00:13:10.000 Protest laws, which are on the rise massively in the United States.
00:13:14.000 So when it's all talking about freedom of speech, it's whose freedom of speech is this?
00:13:18.000 It's certainly not the public's freedom of speech.
00:13:19.000 When they want to protest against things, they're going to get shot down in that respect.
00:13:24.000 Silence is on the rise.
00:13:25.000 You sound like this is actually all starting to get on your nerves.
00:13:27.000 It is a little bit, Ross.
00:13:28.000 They've actually gotten to the point where they're getting on Gareth's nerves.
00:13:31.000 So that's something that I don't like to hear.
00:13:33.000 This is what I did get on my nerves, actually.
00:13:36.000 So in the coverage of the Correspondents' Dinner, no mainstream production made any mention of Assange or the contradiction between Biden's declaration fidelity to the First Amendment and the continued drive of his administration to extradite and jail Assange.
00:13:49.000 That's what the collusion, I suppose, is about.
00:13:51.000 A kind of consensus to double down and reiterate the framing.
00:13:53.000 These are the stories we talk about.
00:13:54.000 These are the ideas that we support.
00:13:56.000 We don't talk about Assange.
00:13:57.000 That's what the collusion I suppose is about, a kind of consensus to double down and reiterate the framing.
00:14:04.000 These are the stories we talk about, these are the ideas that we support.
00:14:07.000 We don't talk about Assange, we don't question surveillance, we don't talk about how the mainstream media, in particular
00:14:13.000 TV networks, could generate the majority of their revenue by bundling
00:14:17.000 together your data and selling it to other companies even more than porn sites
00:14:23.000 do.
00:14:24.000 Isn't that astonishing?
00:14:26.000 They don't talk about surveillance.
00:14:28.000 In a way, it's a bit like the WEF.
00:14:30.000 How the WEF operates is by PR-ing for globalist interests and making sure that the agenda stays within an acceptable framework that will never challenge the interests of the powerful.
00:14:43.000 We've got to do something about the environment, but we're never going to meaningfully change what powerful organisations do.
00:14:48.000 We've got to do something about pandemics, but we're never going to say, for example, start exercising all the time or eat healthy.
00:14:55.000 That's not the kind of thing that's going to be on the agenda.
00:14:57.000 The White House Press Correspondents Dinner is essentially a coming together, as many circular, onanistic ceremonies are, Yeah.
00:15:08.000 Nice.
00:15:09.000 Thank you.
00:15:10.000 To establish what's discussed and what's not discussed.
00:15:13.000 And actually that recent story about Biden's cheat notes shows that.
00:15:18.000 It shows that they discussed the questions in advance.
00:15:21.000 At least Donald Trump wouldn't go to it because there's bad That means it's just rhetoric.
00:15:25.000 him in the media. Would you not prefer a degree of animosity between the state and those that
00:15:29.000 are supposed to hold them to account? Wouldn't that be necessary? Particularly when you know,
00:15:34.000 you know for a fact, whoever you are and whatever you believe in politically, that prior to
00:15:37.000 the 2020 campaign, Biden told the donors of the Democrat Party nothing will fundamentally
00:15:44.000 change. That means it's just rhetoric. Who do they work for?
00:15:48.000 Is it you?
00:15:49.000 So let us know in the chat what your concerns are, and let us know why you think these stories are continually repressed.
00:15:56.000 What would it cost to have a free media?
00:15:57.000 Because the possibility for a free media plainly exists.
00:16:00.000 The journalists are out there now.
00:16:02.000 The Twitter files shows that.
00:16:04.000 The outbreak of new organizations such as Rumble, I have to say, and even YouTube at its best with like organizations like breaking points and Jimmy Dore and obviously the kind of stuff that Joe Rogan talks about and even Organizations that are left of center like what are we like we like redacted and even people that are Like don't don't like me like what's that one called minority report majority report?
00:16:26.000 They're all out there being independent voices.
00:16:29.000 But what I would say is if you find yourself parroting the views of the establishment,
00:16:33.000 that's a problem.
00:16:34.000 They seem to think it's a greater problem if you find yourself attacking the establishment
00:16:39.000 alongside people that they define as right wing.
00:16:42.000 But I don't think that's as big of a problem.
00:16:44.000 Take the Tucker Carlson story.
00:16:46.000 You can see that Tucker Carlson does have concerns about demographics.
00:16:50.000 And me, that's not what I'm about.
00:16:52.000 I'm about the ordinary people from all cultures, all backgrounds, all identities should find new alliances
00:16:57.000 and ways of loving one another in order that we may confront establishment power.
00:17:01.000 Put aside your differences.
00:17:03.000 Allow people to express themselves freely, whether that's traditionally or progressively.
00:17:07.000 These are just simple terms that I use to try to avoid getting mired in this stuff.
00:17:11.000 What I don't think we should be doing is finding ourselves on the same side as the Defense Department and the Pentagon and massive corporations.
00:17:18.000 If you're doing their dirty work for them, you ain't on the right side.
00:17:23.000 You can't be.
00:17:24.000 When did being anti-war become right-wing?
00:17:27.000 How does freedom of speech and supporting Assange become right-wing?
00:17:29.000 It doesn't make sense.
00:17:31.000 When the Department of Defense Celebrating the fact that Tucker Carlson's gone vocally, letting it be known that they're pleased that he's gone, whether the Pentagon are pleased that Tucker Carlson's gone, is obviously because he was doing something that they didn't like.
00:17:31.000 No.
00:17:43.000 And are there any other voices as big as his at the time saying those things?
00:17:48.000 There weren't.
00:17:48.000 Let us know if you can think of any voices.
00:17:51.000 In the mainstream media, who?
00:17:53.000 Is there anyone at CNN, MSNBC, that's willing to come out and be anti-war?
00:17:57.000 The war discourse is being limited, so where's your free press there?
00:18:01.000 A White House Correspondents' Dinner worth having would go.
00:18:04.000 Even though we're greatly at odds when it comes to the funding of this war and the continual flow of American taxpayer dollars into Ukraine, Who do deserve to be supported from a humanitarian perspective, of course, but a diplomatic solution ought be sought.
00:18:19.000 That's not even being discussed, is it?
00:18:20.000 No, I mean, you couldn't get a better example recently of the kind of collusion, literal kind of physical collusion between the state and the press in that Jack Teixeira or He's called Buddy Boy Texera.
00:18:32.000 Buddy Boy Texera the whistleblower.
00:18:34.000 Well the New York Times, as we've kind of spoken about before, they like got 12 of their best journalists together to like uncover his name and reveal it before like setting the FBI to go and actually arrest him.
00:18:34.000 Go on.
00:18:45.000 The New York Times are actually involved in the investigation.
00:18:48.000 No one with Buddy Boy Texera, the recent Pentagon papers whistleblower, no one is correctly covering except organizations like Grayzone and we've got, who have we got on tomorrow?
00:18:57.000 Max, is it?
00:18:58.000 Yeah, Max Blumenthal.
00:18:58.000 He's coming on tomorrow.
00:18:59.000 None of them were talking about, oh it's a bit weird that this dude's saying that there are American troops in Ukraine even though we've been told again and again that there aren't.
00:19:07.000 It's a bit weird that privately the American government admit that there's no way that this can be won and that it's pointless and they're never going to get the territory back.
00:19:16.000 No one talked about that.
00:19:17.000 When they lined up to have that conference, like when they do those press conferences where Joe Biden's got the questions in advance, it's theatre.
00:19:23.000 Like the White House press conference is theatre.
00:19:25.000 This is what I want to talk to you about on an emotional level.
00:19:27.000 Nothing's real anymore.
00:19:29.000 We're not, we're engaged in a spectacle and I feel like I can feel I feel it on some level.
00:19:33.000 Even in my actual life, everything that you participate in, life has become like a theme park.
00:19:38.000 Politics has become a theme park.
00:19:40.000 When you hear authenticity in the voice of a narrator, or in the voice of a TV pundit, it chimes with us.
00:19:46.000 Even if you don't agree with what they're saying, at least you can agree with their authenticity.
00:19:50.000 Let me know in the chat, in the comments, whether you're on Rumble, or whether you're on Locals, and if you're not on Locals yet, join us there.
00:19:55.000 We do weekly meditations, and by God, you're going to need them.
00:19:58.000 This crazy, crazy world that we're living in.
00:20:00.000 I'm sure Glenn Greenwald, right-wing fascist Glenn Greenwald, would think the same thing.
00:20:04.000 I mean, obviously for him, going back to the revelations around Snowden, that they were partnering with, like, The Guardian, and then that spread to other publications.
00:20:12.000 Now, would there be a publication that would facilitate them in that way?
00:20:16.000 What do you think?
00:20:16.000 There wouldn't, would there?
00:20:17.000 Like, if Edward Snowden, what, came forward now and went, oh my god, I've got these revelations, the American government are spying on their citizens in ways that are unconstitutional and illegal, Do you think the New York Times would publish that?
00:20:28.000 Yeah.
00:20:29.000 Do you think that the Guardian would publish that?
00:20:32.000 No, they wouldn't, would they?
00:20:32.000 I don't think so.
00:20:33.000 Do you think so?
00:20:34.000 I mean, I feel like it would be down to us.
00:20:37.000 Yeah.
00:20:37.000 And that's a worrying trend.
00:20:39.000 What's going on?
00:20:40.000 The mad thing is that that is actually going on, this section 702, which sounds really boring because it's meant to sound boring.
00:20:45.000 It does sound boring, Gary.
00:20:46.000 You better Well it is about the warrantless surveillance of Americans so it's all done in that oh we're trying to stop terrorists but it's about collecting apparently more than 3 million backdoor searches which I knew you'd be interested in.
00:21:00.000 Gareth I've had personally over 3 million backdoor searches and I've passed Every single one of them.
00:21:05.000 Every single one of them.
00:21:07.000 Every one of them I emerge with flying colours.
00:21:10.000 Squeaky clean.
00:21:12.000 Another day, another back day or so.
00:21:13.000 I don't think I've ever flown into America without a backdoor surge.
00:21:16.000 You've got quite used to them, haven't you?
00:21:16.000 No, no.
00:21:18.000 I like it.
00:21:19.000 That on-go the blue gloves.
00:21:21.000 I'm grinning from ear to ear like that.
00:21:23.000 I'm like, OK, got the cream!
00:21:24.000 Mr Brand, we're going to need to take you to secondary immigration.
00:21:27.000 Mr Brand, come back!
00:21:28.000 Do your belt back up, Mr Brand!
00:21:31.000 Get out of there!
00:21:32.000 Mr Brand, you will have to leave now.
00:21:33.000 You've been here for hours.
00:21:34.000 You've not checked round the corner!
00:21:36.000 I could have all sorts of gubbins up there!
00:21:41.000 That's the sort of thing that people say, isn't it?
00:21:41.000 Do you know?
00:21:43.000 So in the news this week, this was a hearing last week, heads of federal intelligence agencies were not willing to reveal how much data they collect on US citizens.
00:21:51.000 Expert witnesses were also not able to say how many can conduct the unlawful and warrantless searches.
00:21:58.000 So it's like, not only do they not know how many searches are taking place, but how many people have access to these searches.
00:22:02.000 It's pretty worrying.
00:22:03.000 So it's a bit like that Pentagon audit.
00:22:06.000 They don't know how many searches, like with the Pentagon failing their audit, last five at least, these dudes don't know how much data they're collecting and they don't know how many people are accessing it.
00:22:15.000 This is your private data.
00:22:16.000 And what about this?
00:22:17.000 The WAF calls on leaders to make good use of mass data collection.
00:22:20.000 One of the recent proposals to come out of the World Economic Forum It's to develop ways to harvest and monetize satellite data, biological data, you saucy devils, and citizen generated data.
00:22:30.000 Penned by the MIT Media Lab, the proposal calls for putting all this spuriously collected in the first place data to good use now.
00:22:37.000 So there you go, that's the intersection between a globalist organization like the WF, a national organization such as Gareth just described, And even the Five Eyes set up, where now Taiwan are in league with international deep state agencies, presumably in order to spy on citizens, to develop narratives that will be beneficial to the cultivation of war.
00:23:02.000 Now, pretty soon we're going to head off of YouTube, if that's where you're watching us.
00:23:06.000 You'll find a link in the description where you can flip over onto Rumble, and we'll be talking a little bit about Epstein over there, plus we've got Ryan Grimm.
00:23:13.000 I call him Grimmy.
00:23:14.000 Nice.
00:23:15.000 Or Grimesy, like in that episode of The Simpsons.
00:23:18.000 Or Grimbo!
00:23:19.000 Like that.
00:23:19.000 And I'm going to be asking him about his White House correspondent dinner brawl.
00:23:22.000 Right.
00:23:23.000 Like where he scratched someone's eyes out and he kicked someone straight up in their nutbag.
00:23:26.000 I'm not sure he did that.
00:23:28.000 He told me privately that he gave someone a wallop in the perineum so they didn't sit down for a fortnight!
00:23:33.000 That's the British word for two weeks.
00:23:36.000 Do you want to see a little bit more of the White House thing?
00:23:38.000 Or do you want us to slink off of YouTube like a...
00:23:44.000 Excuse me, Joe!
00:23:46.000 Excuse me!
00:23:47.000 I miss that guy, don't you?
00:23:52.000 Saucy little devil.
00:23:54.000 Are you ready to go on to Epstein and talk about... No, are you ready to go on to Rumble and talk about Epstein?
00:23:59.000 Sure, okay, alright.
00:24:00.000 Or should we go on Epstein and talk about Rumble?
00:24:02.000 Where did they bury him?
00:24:02.000 No, not that one.
00:24:03.000 I don't know, let's go off to...
00:24:05.000 How?!
00:24:06.000 Why is there no security footage of the night he died?
00:24:10.000 Hmm...
00:24:14.000 What's going on in that there prison?
00:24:17.000 Well, we'll get into it as soon as we cross over.
00:24:19.000 You can't keep just doing um.
00:24:23.000 Can't I?
00:24:25.000 No.
00:24:27.000 Right, come in.
00:24:28.000 Let's see what's going on with Epstein.
00:24:30.000 I'm starting to feel sorry for him.
00:24:31.000 Epstein's private calendar reveals prominent names including CIA chief and Goldman's top lawyer.
00:24:36.000 That's a nice calendar.
00:24:39.000 You're meeting some top-notch fellas there, aren't you?
00:24:41.000 Yep, certainly are.
00:24:43.000 Who else was he meeting?
00:24:44.000 Let's have a look at some other people scheduled in.
00:24:46.000 William Burns, from the CIA.
00:24:48.000 Yeah, not just... this is the now Director of the CIA.
00:24:51.000 That's a pretty important position, now Director of the CIA.
00:24:55.000 It's a good job of the CIA, because they've got a lot of power.
00:24:58.000 For example, say Joe Biden needs 50 people to sign a petition saying that the Hunter Biden laptop stories are... There was some disinformation, yeah.
00:25:06.000 Then, you know, you probably have to organise that.
00:25:09.000 When you watch the film Gangs of New York, starring Daniel Day-Lewis, what you realise is that the sort of crucible out of which America, and indeed, presumably, all nations grew, is one of corruption and primal interest as expressed through individuals.
00:25:21.000 Like William Cutting, William the Butcher, played by Daniel Day-Lewis.
00:25:25.000 Hmm, oopsie-daisy!
00:25:28.000 Do the milkshake one.
00:25:28.000 I like Daniel Day-Lewis.
00:25:30.000 Well, that's a different film.
00:25:30.000 I know.
00:25:31.000 I drink your milk!
00:25:33.000 I like people that are in that sort of mood.
00:25:35.000 Don't you?
00:25:36.000 People that are intense like that.
00:25:37.000 But can you be around them?
00:25:38.000 No.
00:25:38.000 No.
00:25:39.000 On a personal level.
00:25:40.000 Someone's like, I drink your milkshake!
00:25:40.000 No you can't.
00:25:42.000 Mate, I'm actually getting a bit unnerved by you now.
00:25:45.000 I wonder, why did Epstein have so many friends? Was he charismatic as hell?
00:25:49.000 I mean, he looks nice, doesn't he?
00:25:50.000 Or do you think it's mostly because he could facilitate liaisons with extremely attractive women?
00:25:54.000 Uh...
00:25:55.000 Potentially non-consensual, potentially underage.
00:25:58.000 Ultimately it's power, isn't it, in whatever format.
00:26:00.000 Yeah, I mean, yeah.
00:26:01.000 What was his actual job though, Epstein?
00:26:02.000 Like, where's the money coming from?
00:26:04.000 a White House counsel under Barack Obama, had dozens of meetings with Epstein over the years
00:26:08.000 after a White House service before she became top lawyer at Goldman Sachs.
00:26:11.000 What was his actual job though, Epstein?
00:26:13.000 Like where's the money coming from?
00:26:14.000 Is it like he's also, what, has he got an ice cream van?
00:26:16.000 Yeah, that's right.
00:26:18.000 What's he doing?
00:26:18.000 What's his actual job?
00:26:20.000 Leon Botstein, president of Bard College, invited Epstein, who brought a group of young female g... hmmm... to the campus.
00:26:27.000 Noam Chomsky, right, we're going to give Chomsky a pass.
00:26:29.000 What was Chomsky doing?
00:26:30.000 Chomsky can't have been interested in any of that.
00:26:32.000 No.
00:26:32.000 To fly with Epstein to have dinner at Epstein's Manhattan Tower.
00:26:34.000 And that's not everyone's...
00:26:36.000 No, well look, Chomsky was teaching at MIT and Epstein was donating lots of money to MIT.
00:26:42.000 So, you know, that's the way the world works, isn't it?
00:26:44.000 Is you scratch my back, I scratch yours.
00:26:46.000 I don't want my back scratched!
00:26:47.000 If my back's itching, I'll do it myself.
00:26:47.000 I know, I know, I know.
00:26:49.000 Oh, is it because you can't reach bits of your own back?
00:26:51.000 Well, just be like Balu out of Jungle Book.
00:26:53.000 Go up against a tree.
00:26:55.000 Or rather than that, why don't we go and challenge Jeffrey Epstein's house?
00:26:57.000 You should tell Chomsky that next time you talk to him.
00:26:59.000 Chomsky, I've got an idea.
00:27:00.000 Next time you backstage it.
00:27:01.000 Yes, Russell.
00:27:03.000 Oh, Russell, it's actually not that practical to rub your back against a pineapple tree on a prickly pawpaw.
00:27:09.000 You know, if you look under the rocks and plants and still glance at those fancy ants and maybe try a few.
00:27:15.000 That's right, but they have bare necessities in life.
00:27:17.000 Chomsky, you're not making it any easier to listen to you by talking all the time like that as if what you're saying is not actually that interesting when you're revealing vital information.
00:27:26.000 Chomsky and Taka Taka Taka Can't You See are actually two of the only people that are willing to criticize the war.
00:27:32.000 So what is Chomsky then?
00:27:34.000 Is he anti-vax or right-wing?
00:27:35.000 Let us know in the chat because I can't know.
00:27:37.000 I don't know how to discredit Chomsky except for maybe that dinner.
00:27:40.000 But like, I mean, I'm hoping, where did he go?
00:27:43.000 He went What was it for?
00:27:44.000 It was because there was funding, that Epstein was giving funding to MIT.
00:27:46.000 So where's Epstein getting all this funding?
00:27:48.000 We need to talk to that woman again.
00:27:49.000 I guess he was just like a businessman, wasn't he?
00:27:51.000 Who's that lady we talked to?
00:27:52.000 Whitney Houston?
00:27:53.000 Whitney Webb.
00:27:54.000 Whitney Webb, because Whitney Houston... Well, she's not alive, and I don't know how good she'd be on it.
00:28:00.000 Whitney Houston believed the children were the future.
00:28:02.000 Jeffrey Epstein believed children were the present.
00:28:05.000 That was the problem, wasn't it?
00:28:06.000 Wait, Geoff!
00:28:09.000 Jeff!
00:28:10.000 Give it 10 years!
00:28:10.000 It's a good joke.
00:28:13.000 Good joke?
00:28:13.000 We're on Rumble?
00:28:14.000 You're allowed to do stuff like that?
00:28:15.000 Yeah, it was Ash X 3-1 and 3-X.
00:28:18.000 Disgraceful, disgraceful shitbag.
00:28:20.000 But talking about Epstein... Oh, not you.
00:28:22.000 No.
00:28:23.000 I once saw someone say about Fred West, who was a mass murderer in our country, he was well out of order.
00:28:28.000 Yeah.
00:28:28.000 That's what I said.
00:28:29.000 But like, but that's worse than well out of order.
00:28:31.000 Yeah.
00:28:31.000 To actually murder people and bury them under your patio.
00:28:33.000 That's what he done.
00:28:34.000 Good afternoon.
00:28:35.000 Probably some of the stuff he did was just out of order.
00:28:37.000 Right, yeah, like, what do you mean?
00:28:39.000 Like bad, reckless driving?
00:28:40.000 Yeah, or putting the bins in the wrong place or whatever, you know?
00:28:43.000 Probably, because the patio was uneven.
00:28:44.000 Right.
00:28:45.000 There you go.
00:28:45.000 Farting in the car.
00:28:47.000 Things like that.
00:28:47.000 Car farter.
00:28:48.000 Car farter.
00:28:49.000 Alright, so that's what Epstein's been up to.
00:28:51.000 Yeah, I guess all this does is just back up the fact that he had access to very, very important people and that maybe that could have been the reason for why he died in that jail.
00:29:01.000 Right, yeah.
00:29:02.000 I agree, mate.
00:29:03.000 Could be.
00:29:04.000 Hold on.
00:29:04.000 Allegedly.
00:29:06.000 Oh, now you use allegedly.
00:29:07.000 Yeah, that's right.
00:29:07.000 After all of that.
00:29:08.000 Excuse me, that's allegedly.
00:29:09.000 Allegedly.
00:29:11.000 Funny crap.
00:29:11.000 All right, sorry.
00:29:12.000 Allegedly.
00:29:14.000 Oh no, is that a meeting?
00:29:17.000 He's meeting the Pope now.
00:29:18.000 Someone on our chats just said he met the Pope.
00:29:21.000 He's got a good booker, hasn't he?
00:29:22.000 Bloody hell, yeah.
00:29:23.000 Whoever booked Epstein's bookings, can we get him to work here?
00:29:27.000 We'd finally get Jim Carrey on.
00:29:29.000 No, I'm not saying Jim Carrey went to... I'm just saying, no, Jim Carrey's clean.
00:29:29.000 Hang on, what are you saying?
00:29:33.000 I'm just saying he would be a good guest.
00:29:34.000 I'm saying that that is a good booker if you put aside the noncery for a moment.
00:29:39.000 So a good White House dinner will be talking about proper stuff.
00:29:43.000 They'll be talking about the war and anti-war.
00:29:46.000 They'll be talking about their Five Eyes gear.
00:29:48.000 They'll be talking about our Epstein's gift.
00:29:50.000 There he is, the Holy Father, giving Epstein and Ghislaine, if that's her name, Maxwell the same Oh, that's the old one!
00:30:00.000 Luckily it's not my favourite Pope.
00:30:01.000 I like new Pope, don't do that one.
00:30:03.000 That's the Pope when I was a kid.
00:30:08.000 Yeah, that's the Pope of yesteryears.
00:30:09.000 A very sort of cloud-like individual, isn't he?
00:30:12.000 Yeah.
00:30:13.000 It's too much.
00:30:14.000 All right, and also, like, so that's my problem with the White House Correspondents' Dinner.
00:30:18.000 They're citing Jefferson, saying that, you know, if you had to choose between government and press, you should take the press, but that's on the basis that the press Are intrepid and bold and willing to report on all manner of stuff.
00:30:32.000 Listen, we've got a fantastic show.
00:30:33.000 I hope you enjoyed that.
00:30:34.000 Well, I don't know if you enjoyed the Epstein stuff.
00:30:36.000 It sort of makes me feel sick and anxious.
00:30:37.000 It's an awful, disgusting story of exploitation, corruption, and also it sort of alludes to a level of deep state power that's sort of terrifying.
00:30:45.000 Yeah, I hear you, babe.
00:30:46.000 Some people saying, that's Illuminati shit!
00:30:48.000 They're saying in our chat.
00:30:50.000 Where we're going to go in a minute, right, is we're going to do our, we're going to do a presentation of Here's The News.
00:30:55.000 What's it about today, Gal?
00:30:57.000 Today it's about rigged voting, or apparently those pesky little machines that depend on what party you're in.
00:31:02.000 You're not saying Dominion machines don't work, because that's pricey, mate.
00:31:07.000 I'd like to go on record as saying, them Dominion voting machines, I've done a vote in one once.
00:31:10.000 Oh, did you?
00:31:10.000 Oh, my vote come out squeaky clean!
00:31:12.000 Did it?
00:31:13.000 Who did you vote for?
00:31:15.000 I don't know, a lady one.
00:31:17.000 I voted for a lady one, I think.
00:31:19.000 Yeah, like, it's not about that actually.
00:31:21.000 What we're saying is that the Democrat Party, who are like super excited and all stiff as boards and like doing sort of spattery little poops down their knickknacks on account of all this Fox payout, They themselves are always banging on about how bad voting machines are.
00:31:38.000 We've got, like, videos of it.
00:31:39.000 It's amazing that Democrats are willing to say that voting machines don't work when it suits them because no one's got any values, no one's got any principles, no one cares.
00:31:47.000 Well, I'm not saying no one cares about you.
00:31:48.000 Loads of people in your own life.
00:31:49.000 But no one in the political establishment cares about you.
00:31:52.000 We need a new orthodoxy.
00:31:55.000 We need an awakening.
00:31:56.000 You're right, Lady Midnight.
00:31:58.000 No one has a memory.
00:31:58.000 You've got to join us on this chat over here.
00:32:01.000 Some of the conversation.
00:32:02.000 Sorry about that little burp there.
00:32:04.000 Sorry about that.
00:32:04.000 We wait till I've got this down me.
00:32:06.000 Wait till I've got my fizz waters down me neck.
00:32:08.000 After that, we're going to be looking at old news of yesteryear to see how the media reporting has altered over the years in a new item called Back to the Future.
00:32:18.000 I don't think it's called that, is it?
00:32:20.000 Old News?
00:32:20.000 Something like that.
00:32:21.000 Turnback Time?
00:32:22.000 Yeah.
00:32:22.000 Something like that?
00:32:23.000 We'll go with that.
00:32:23.000 Sorry about my dog.
00:32:24.000 Sorry about my dog doing that.
00:32:25.000 Dan, get a shot of the dog doing that, darling.
00:32:26.000 That's right.
00:32:27.000 Zip across that floor like lightning, as if it was the big breakfast TV show from the 90s in the UK.
00:32:31.000 See him there?
00:32:32.000 Look at that lovely little dog.
00:32:34.000 Also, but before, can't we have, well, we'll judge the graphics before, because I want you lot to choose which graphic, because we've got a graphic for the item and everything.
00:32:42.000 Oh, look, there's this one.
00:32:43.000 Can we hear the musical sting, aye?
00:32:43.000 Right, show it.
00:32:45.000 🎵 Should you use that, Gret? Or should we use that?
00:32:55.000 That's the graphic with that musical sting.
00:32:57.000 This is musical sting B. And this is the one that young Jack who works here did before we intervened and told him to start having some references to his work rather than just creating mad random... He's deleted it!
00:33:13.000 He's like a proper artist, isn't he?
00:33:15.000 Like, oh, you don't like it, do you?
00:33:15.000 Yeah.
00:33:17.000 Well, that's it then!
00:33:18.000 Gone!
00:33:19.000 Just deleted it away.
00:33:20.000 That's petulant, isn't it?
00:33:21.000 Yeah.
00:33:22.000 We should dock him some wages, should we?
00:33:23.000 Tribunal?
00:33:24.000 Have a look at him through the window.
00:33:26.000 Defrost!
00:33:27.000 That's his tribunal.
00:33:28.000 Defrost!
00:33:29.000 There he is, yeah.
00:33:30.000 Why did you delete it for?
00:33:31.000 That's petulance.
00:33:33.000 Look at him, he's a petulant little sod, isn't he?
00:33:35.000 Maybe he was just ashamed.
00:33:37.000 Oh, it's shame.
00:33:38.000 Is it shame?
00:33:39.000 It's shame.
00:33:40.000 Shame will do that to you, Ross.
00:33:41.000 Because I've always said to him that his graphics that he makes, they don't have a cohesive image system.
00:33:46.000 Right.
00:33:47.000 But that's not a terrible attack on someone, is it?
00:33:50.000 Your graphics don't have a cohesive image system.
00:33:50.000 No, no.
00:33:52.000 Maybe you could be more encouraging.
00:33:54.000 Kelly P says he's a cutie.
00:33:56.000 See?
00:33:56.000 There you go.
00:33:57.000 That's not what we want.
00:33:57.000 That's encouragement.
00:33:58.000 We're trying to punish him.
00:33:59.000 Oh, then someone says, just say 2498.
00:34:02.000 He can delete if he wants.
00:34:03.000 It's his work.
00:34:05.000 He's paid for it, isn't he?
00:34:07.000 That's not getting... I mean, this is... We're getting bogged down.
00:34:09.000 We're getting bogged down.
00:34:10.000 Tell us which one do you want.
00:34:10.000 All right, listen.
00:34:12.000 He's no Lee Fang, says Pride Faults, who's the person who started the objectification of Pride Faults in the first place, actually.
00:34:18.000 Needs a spanking.
00:34:19.000 Oh, my God, it's getting dark on there.
00:34:20.000 Right, listen, buddy, you used to not belong on Epstein Island.
00:34:23.000 I tell you what we're going to do is we're going to have a look at this rigged election farrago, then we'll call it the one you want.
00:34:28.000 So have a little vote on there, would you?
00:34:30.000 All right.
00:34:30.000 Here's the news.
00:34:31.000 No, here's the F in news.
00:34:33.000 Thank you for choosing Fox News.
00:34:35.000 No, here's the F in news.
00:34:35.000 The news.
00:34:39.000 Pucker is gone and now we can get on with a proper democracy that functions well where everyone accepts the
00:34:41.000 results of elections Particularly now Fox has had to pay out to those brilliant Dominion machines because no one else has ever complained about electoral fraud ever before in the history of democracy.
00:34:55.000 Oh no, they always do.
00:34:56.000 Both sides.
00:34:59.000 Tucker Carlson's departure has predictably caused celebration in some quarters, grief in others.
00:35:05.000 Let's look at the claim that Tucker Carlson's departure is connected to the ongoing voter fraud stories and the Fox payouts to Dominion, and whether or not democracy is ultimately broken now, because whoever wins the next election, whether it's Biden or whoever the Republicans put forward, do you imagine that after the result the other party's going to go, Congratulations, let's work together now to build back better, or make America great again, or whatever catchphrase we've got that ultimately ends up serving powerful interests.
00:35:33.000 Or do you think they'll say, you never won that election fairly, the machines are broken, I saw her hanging, Chad!
00:35:39.000 Carlson's firing is somehow related to the Dominion lawsuit that was recently settled by Fox.
00:35:45.000 We can always rely on that guy's insights.
00:35:47.000 He's always absolutely impartial.
00:35:50.000 I'm the shiniest news reporter you ever did see.
00:35:53.000 Take that, Joe Rogan!
00:35:54.000 The story that we want to cover now is the state of American democracy.
00:35:58.000 For years now, the losing side generally alleges electoral fraud, dodgy voting machines, some kind of breakdown.
00:36:05.000 We're out of state now, but whatever the result of the election, there's only one thing you can be sure of, that the party that's in government will not fulfil the pledges that they made, and the party that loses will say that they are the victim of electoral fraud.
00:36:16.000 It's been going on a lot longer than since 2020.
00:36:18.000 They fired him because of messages that were found during the discovery process.
00:36:23.000 I believe there's material in those private messages that was incredibly ugly.
00:36:27.000 It gave Fox a reason to remove Carlson.
00:36:30.000 So, essentially, Stelter and other mainstream voices are saying that Tucker's departure is connected to Fox's fraudulent claim that the Dominion machines were faulty.
00:36:39.000 Well, let's make sure, then, that that is not a ubiquitous and perennial lament offered forth by either party in the event they lose.
00:36:48.000 In particular, I've got to say, the Democrats, who have been saying that there are rigged elections, problematic machines, problems with voting systems for a long time now.
00:36:57.000 But who are you going to believe?
00:36:58.000 The mainstream media?
00:37:00.000 Or your own lying eyes.
00:37:01.000 Let's have a look.
00:37:01.000 Virginia just stopped using touchscreen computer voting because it's so vulnerable.
00:37:07.000 We need to look at all the voting machines.
00:37:09.000 Every Secretary of State needs to be, you know, assisted in making sure that they are not being hacked and attacked.
00:37:16.000 I continue to think that our voting machines are too vulnerable.
00:37:19.000 Researches have repeatedly demonstrated that ballot recording machines and other voting systems are susceptible
00:37:24.000 to tampering.
00:37:25.000 So you don't like the voting machines?
00:37:27.000 What about the Dominion ones?
00:37:29.000 Even hackers with limited prior knowledge, tools and resources are able to breach voting machines in a matter of minutes.
00:37:35.000 So you see, in microcosm, democracy means we get a mandate for what we want to do anyway.
00:37:41.000 In the event we lose, we complain about the system.
00:37:44.000 The Republicans do it, and plainly, as you just saw, the Democrats do it.
00:37:48.000 I don't think the Democrat party are sufficiently different from the Republican party or the right to be able to complain in this way.
00:37:55.000 Loads of you think they're a lot worse.
00:37:57.000 Loads of you think they're better.
00:37:58.000 I'm telling you they ain't different enough and neither party is going to make a significant difference to your life.
00:38:04.000 In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted votes for certain candidates or switch votes from one candidate to another.
00:38:11.000 The biggest seller of voting machines is doing something that violates cybersecurity 101.
00:38:17.000 Directing that you install remote access software which would make a machine like that, you know, a magnet for fraudsters and hackers.
00:38:24.000 These voting machines can be hacked quite easily.
00:38:26.000 So the legitimacy of elections and the results of elections is something that's been queried for a long time.
00:38:33.000 Here are voices of the Democrat party in various settings making the exact same claims.
00:38:39.000 You know my position is different.
00:38:40.000 Whether or not the voting machines work is irrelevant because whichever party you end up voting for, that party is funded by, lobbied by, ultimately works for globalist financial corporate interests including
00:38:54.000 the military industrial complex, the financial industry and the conglomerates that own media
00:38:59.000 companies and they all work together to ensure that any legislative changes that do
00:39:03.000 take place don't meaningfully impact their ability to profit and generally do not allow ordinary
00:39:09.000 people to democratically change their own lives.
00:39:12.000 You could easily hack into them, it makes it seem like all these states are doing different
00:39:17.000 but in fact three companies are controlling this.
00:39:20.000 It is the individual voting machines that pose some of the greatest risk.
00:39:25.000 There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines.
00:39:30.000 Right?
00:39:30.000 Which are vulnerable to being hacked.
00:39:32.000 So basically they just say stuff unless they win.
00:39:34.000 Unless they win they say the problem is the machine.
00:39:37.000 You don't see any more politicians going listen we lost fair and square but ultimately we all love America and we want American people to succeed.
00:39:45.000 So it becomes this kind of quibbling around minutiae and technicalities ultimately because they've got nothing big to offer you anymore.
00:39:53.000 Neither party is going to say we are going to get this country And we are going to genuinely change it.
00:39:58.000 And how we're going to change it is by empowering you to run your own communities.
00:40:01.000 The only reason to have government at all is to protect you, yes, from potential foreign threats and to protect you from domestic and globalist corporate interests.
00:40:10.000 That's what we're going to do.
00:40:11.000 We're going to ensure that ordinary Americans have real power.
00:40:13.000 We're going to ban lobbying.
00:40:15.000 We're going to ban donations to our party.
00:40:17.000 We're going to ban people in Congress owning stocks and shares in the companies that they regulate.
00:40:21.000 Workers were able to easily hack into an electronic voting machine.
00:40:26.000 system. No one's gonna say that, no one's offering it, they just want to quibble
00:40:29.000 about the legitimacy of electoral results that ultimately if you ask me
00:40:32.000 don't make any bloody difference anyway.
00:40:34.000 Workers were able to easily hack into an electronic voting machine. It was possible to switch votes.
00:40:39.000 43% of America's I think that Dominion needs to look into Ron Wyden.
00:40:43.000 He hates voting machines.
00:40:45.000 have found have serious security flaws including back doors.
00:40:45.000 Backdoors.
00:40:51.000 Back doors!
00:40:52.000 I think that Dominion needs to look into Ron Wyden.
00:40:55.000 He hates voting machines.
00:40:56.000 Back doors!
00:40:57.000 They've got bad breath and stinking little dicks.
00:41:00.000 We know how vulnerable now our systems were.
00:41:03.000 We know, I know the hackathon that took place last year, where virtually every machine was broken into fairly quickly.
00:41:08.000 Oh my god!
00:41:09.000 They're all broken!
00:41:09.000 All of them!
00:41:10.000 None of them work!
00:41:11.000 Is Dominion watching this?
00:41:12.000 I actually held a demonstration for my colleagues here at the Capitol.
00:41:16.000 Um, where we brought in, um, folks who, before our eyes, hacked election machines.
00:41:22.000 These are the same people that, after Trump made the claims that the election was rigmarole, that's impossible!
00:41:28.000 How dare you say that!
00:41:30.000 You, sir, are a disgrace to democracy!
00:41:33.000 And you keep causing insurrections, and your hair's ridiculous, and you're orange, and that's all there really is to discuss.
00:41:39.000 This once again shows you there are no ultimate values or principles, there's just rhetoric attached to achieving the outcomes that they would prefer to achieve that are themselves tethered to financial interests that they're personally affected by.
00:41:52.000 Look at all the nepotism, look at all the stock ownership, and look at the way they legislate on the behalf of big business.
00:41:57.000 Let me know in the chat in the comments if you think that the problem is rigged electoral machines or a rigged electoral system.
00:42:02.000 I'm very concerned that you could have a hack that finally went through.
00:42:06.000 You have 21 states that were hacked into.
00:42:08.000 They didn't find out about it for a year.
00:42:11.000 It is worth fighting for integrity in our election system, which means that they are free from interference by a hostile or an unfriendly Like Russia, for example.
00:42:24.000 No evidence of that at all.
00:42:25.000 Absolutely no evidence.
00:42:26.000 Completely cooked up media concoction in conjunction with the Democrat Party.
00:42:31.000 Perhaps all of us, if we're honest, recognise that we all tend, if the outcome is favourable to our own self-interest, Oh yeah, this is a good system.
00:42:39.000 Maybe sometimes you say like, I don't like that person.
00:42:41.000 Oh no, they really like you.
00:42:42.000 I do like that person.
00:42:43.000 We're all capable of that level of fallibility.
00:42:46.000 I'm not saying actually that politicians are uniquely bad.
00:42:48.000 I'm saying they're ordinarily corrupted by a corrupt system and therefore we should change the system.
00:42:54.000 We're all capable of nepotism.
00:42:55.000 We're all capable of acting in self-interest.
00:42:58.000 I know I'm capable of doing it.
00:42:59.000 Why don't we have systems that bring to the forefront the better aspects of our nature and and a reliant on congregation, the collectivism, and true democracy, rather than systems that encourage you to become self-centered, biased, just to argue for outcomes that suit you, to have no principles or values, to change your argument in order to meet the outcome that you want, as in the case of these machines.
00:43:19.000 If the election results go their way, these are some of the best electoral machines we've ever... How dare you criticize those machines?
00:43:26.000 This Dominion voting machine's been like a brother to you!
00:43:29.000 How dare you criticize it?
00:43:30.000 You lost the election, you little son of a bitch!
00:43:32.000 You little Russian racist son of a fuck!
00:43:35.000 I sit on the Senate Intelligence Committee and Senate Homeland Security Committee.
00:43:41.000 And we receive all kinds of information about the vulnerabilities to our national security.
00:43:45.000 We are vulnerable in terms of foreign interference with our elections.
00:43:50.000 On the road to the White House 2020.
00:43:50.000 Did you see that?
00:43:52.000 So when they're on the way to the White House, oh my God, we could lose.
00:43:55.000 The voting machines, if we do lose, they are terrible voting machines.
00:43:58.000 They could be hacked by, you know, a Russian with a hat, with snow in their boots, with cancer, like Putin.
00:44:03.000 Bastard, son of bitches.
00:44:04.000 You've won the election.
00:44:05.000 Those are some of the best voting machines.
00:44:07.000 Look at this little guy.
00:44:09.000 What a reliable voting machine.
00:44:09.000 I love it.
00:44:11.000 How can I stay mad at you?
00:44:13.000 There's a saying that I'm sure many of you have heard, which is the, you know, the difference between being hacked and not being hacked.
00:44:19.000 Go on.
00:44:21.000 Is knowing you've been hacked.
00:44:24.000 Yeah, you know.
00:44:25.000 OK, don't do that joke again.
00:44:27.000 Hilary, how do you feel about voting machines?
00:44:29.000 Do you have a principled perspective on them that will not change depending on whether you win or lose an election?
00:44:34.000 The opinion will stay the same, right?
00:44:35.000 There are some tax experts in Silicon Valley with whom I have met who say that maybe what they'll do this next time is to really disrupt the actual election.
00:44:47.000 shut down the servers that you send results to, interfere with the operation of voting machines,
00:44:55.000 because still, too many of them are linked to the internet.
00:44:58.000 So we are still very vulnerable.
00:45:01.000 Why don't they just accept that some people vote for Donald Trump
00:45:05.000 because they're disillusioned with the political class?
00:45:08.000 Why don't we all accept more broadly that the problem is deeply systemic and is a result of the ability of powerful deep state and corporate interest to manipulate the congressional and democratic process to the point where democracy is sort of a facade.
00:45:23.000 That's the actual problem.
00:45:25.000 The actual problem is they can hack the internet.
00:45:27.000 There's hackers.
00:45:28.000 They're only the size of a Lego man.
00:45:31.000 They get in.
00:45:31.000 That's not the issue, is it?
00:45:32.000 The issue is the whole system's broken.
00:45:34.000 OK, so after the 2016 election, the Democrats said there's a problem with voting machines.
00:45:39.000 But after the 2020 election, there's no problem with voting machines.
00:45:41.000 What an amazing miracle!
00:45:43.000 After Republican victories in 2000, 2004, and 2016, Democrats in Congress used the formal counting of electoral votes as an opportunity to challenge election results.
00:45:53.000 Derek Muller, a law professor at the University of Iowa, wrote in a New York Times opinion piece in 2021.
00:45:58.000 In January 2001, Representative Maxine Waters joined several other Democrats challenging George W. Bush's victory, claiming Florida's electoral votes were fraudulent.
00:46:08.000 In January 2005, after Bush's re-election, Senator Barbara Boxer formally challenged Ohio's electoral Even though Bush won Ohio by more than 118,000 votes.
00:46:18.000 Wait, let's recount that because what they've done is that 118,000 votes could have been done by a little cyber Lego hacker that gets in the machine.
00:46:28.000 Did you see the Lego movie?
00:46:30.000 They're bastards.
00:46:30.000 In January 2017, after Trump's victory, Representative Sheila Jackson-Lee said there was the malfunction of 87 voting machines and Representative Jim McGovern, Democrat, Massachusetts said there were confirmed and illegal activities engaged by the government of Russia in the 2016 election.
00:46:46.000 Then as now, each member of Congress was within their rights to make an objection, Mueller wrote.
00:46:51.000 But the objections were naive at best, shameless at worst.
00:46:55.000 Either way, the readiness of members of Congress to disenfranchise millions of Americans was disconcerting.
00:47:00.000 And now there's Stacey Abrams, the Democrat who ran for governor of Georgia, who claims that Brian Kemp, the Republican who beat her four years ago, won under the rules of the game at the time, but the game was rigged against the voters of Georgia.
00:47:12.000 Fraudulent electoral votes, malfunctioning voting machines, rigged elections.
00:47:16.000 Sound familiar?
00:47:17.000 Well, yeah, it does, actually.
00:47:18.000 It sounds like exactly what's being claimed right now.
00:47:21.000 How is it different?
00:47:22.000 In September 2022, the Washington Post reported Democrats have spent nearly $19 million across eight states in primaries this year, amplifying far-right Republican candidates who have questioned or denied the validity of the 2020 election.
00:47:35.000 They're willing to fund people that make those claims.
00:47:38.000 In a decent, Fair, moral system.
00:47:41.000 You just wouldn't do that, would you?
00:47:43.000 It wouldn't be about tactics and strategy.
00:47:45.000 Wait a minute.
00:47:46.000 I disagree with those people and what they're saying is illegal and wrong.
00:47:49.000 Let's give them some money so they can say it more loudly because I think in the long run it'll pay off and then we'll be able to benefit from being in Congress and regulate companies that own stocks and shares in.
00:47:59.000 And that's the American way.
00:48:01.000 Strategy is part of modern life.
00:48:03.000 You have to understand strategy to function in the world.
00:48:05.000 So having a strategy where you amplify the voices of people that make claims that the election was fraudulent seems like it could be a good strategy.
00:48:13.000 But if you're simultaneously persecuting Trump for making those same claims and declaring that he oughtn't be able to run as president as a result of making those claims, then your strategy is so sort of contradictory and hypocritical that it's become unmoored from morality.
00:48:30.000 And in the business of government, where you actually hold sway over the lives of ordinary people when it comes to their healthcare, their education, judiciary matters, cultural, military matters, then morality and values and principles must be the very spine, the skeleton of it.
00:48:46.000 Decent values have to be present.
00:48:48.000 Fallibility is inevitable, but outright hypocrisy is unacceptable.
00:48:53.000 If Biden really wants to unite the country, which he doesn't, he ought at least try to do the difficult work of reaching out to the other side, which he won't.
00:49:00.000 But that would be risky since the left wing of his party isn't in any mood for making peace with Republicans, MAGA or otherwise.
00:49:07.000 He talks about MAGA Republicans and how they're a threat to democracy because it's one more weapon in his political arsenal, a way he hopes to win over those crucial swing voters.
00:49:15.000 As a cynical political strategy, it may work.
00:49:18.000 We'll know soon enough.
00:49:19.000 But please, Mr President, spare us the sanctimony.
00:49:22.000 It makes it really hard to take you seriously.
00:49:24.000 The sanctimony is laid on thick.
00:49:26.000 In fact, sanctimony is a significant part of their propaganda policy.
00:49:30.000 We are all together.
00:49:32.000 We care about the vulnerable.
00:49:33.000 We've done this.
00:49:34.000 We're trying to achieve that.
00:49:35.000 We would have done if it wasn't for those bastards.
00:49:37.000 You can't use that kind of mawkish language if ultimately you are a cynical careerist strategist who works on behalf of corporate interests.
00:49:46.000 That's just plain hypocrisy.
00:49:49.000 So whether or not there's electoral fraud isn't actually the issue.
00:49:52.000 The system is rigged, and whoever wins the next election, and I would argue whoever it is ain't gonna make no difference in your life, not significantly anyway, you might get some pyrrhic victory within yourself, essentially equivalent to your sports team winning.
00:50:03.000 I really do think it's that basic.
00:50:05.000 What we know is the losing side will go, oh, the game was rigged, it wasn't fair, because that's what they always do.
00:50:13.000 There is no morality, there are no values, there are no real principles in politics anymore, because they've set up a system that simply will not afford those type of values.
00:50:21.000 But that's just what I think.
00:50:22.000 Let me know what you think in the comments in the chat.
00:50:24.000 See you in a second.
00:50:25.000 Thanks for watching Zik Fox News. I'm Joe Mike.
00:50:28.000 Now here's the fucking news.
00:50:31.000 Without our sponsors we simply can't keep making this world-changing, earth-shattering, revolution-creating content.
00:50:38.000 That's why I'm proud and pleased to tell you about this glorious product from Black Forest.
00:50:44.000 If you're looking for a supplement to dramatically improve your health and longevity, you want to live forever, right?
00:50:49.000 Then these three letters could be the answer.
00:50:53.000 NMN.
00:50:53.000 Not M&M, NMN.
00:50:55.000 Or to use its fancy name, Nicotinamide Mononucleotide.
00:50:59.000 A couple of capsules a day and you could be looking at improved energy, enhanced metabolism that can help reduce the risk of obesity, protection against age-associated diseases, all falling apart, getting older, revolting, increased endurance and strength.
00:51:16.000 Our old friends at Big Pharma, those guys, And the FDA are trying to get a piece of the action by labeling NMN as a drug instead of a supplement.
00:51:24.000 Not because of any concerns over safety or efficacy.
00:51:27.000 Oh no!
00:51:28.000 But so they can monopolize sales and of course, as you know already, raise the prices.
00:51:33.000 The scumbags!
00:51:34.000 So join the fight against Big Pharma and stay healthy.
00:51:38.000 Go to blackforestsupplements.com and get 10% off this bottle of NMN by using the code RUSSELL.
00:51:45.000 Now back to the video.
00:51:47.000 No, back to me right now.
00:51:49.000 Here I am.
00:51:49.000 Look, here I am.
00:51:50.000 This is me, baby.
00:51:51.000 Wow.
00:51:51.000 That's real you.
00:51:52.000 Where's that shopping channel version of you?
00:51:54.000 I'm good at that, am I?
00:51:55.000 I tell you what, you're getting better every week.
00:51:57.000 Look at it.
00:51:58.000 That bit where you got all the pills in your hand and then dropped them to the table.
00:52:01.000 That's the best bit.
00:52:02.000 That was excellent.
00:52:03.000 Could I encourage you, my good man, to take some M&Ms?
00:52:06.000 I'll have them right now.
00:52:09.000 None for you, my friend!
00:52:11.000 They're expensive!
00:52:12.000 What about that bit where you talk about getting old and like it's a really bad thing and then just show a picture of an old man?
00:52:18.000 That's my favourite bit.
00:52:19.000 I felt sad for him.
00:52:20.000 Is he gonna be alright, that old guy?
00:52:21.000 No, probably not.
00:52:22.000 This is sad, it's like episode 3 of Succession.
00:52:24.000 I can't take it no more, baby!
00:52:26.000 I can't take it!
00:52:30.000 Uh, okay, so voting is neck and neck.
00:52:33.000 The voting is so tight in the which one of the graphic sequences do you want for our item this week in history, old news, whatever.
00:52:42.000 Old news, whatever?
00:52:43.000 This is the item.
00:52:44.000 It's this week in history.
00:52:45.000 I mean, it literally says it there.
00:52:46.000 I see.
00:52:47.000 Okay, okay.
00:52:47.000 All right, mate.
00:52:49.000 You need to take some of them nem-nems because you've gone all funny.
00:52:52.000 I think I took too many.
00:52:53.000 I think you've had so many nem-nems that you've actually gone unusual.
00:52:56.000 Yeah, that's it.
00:52:58.000 I had a Tom Jones look-alike appear at my mother's birthday.
00:53:02.000 What a collection of words that is.
00:53:02.000 Wow.
00:53:04.000 He was good.
00:53:05.000 It's not unusual!
00:53:06.000 Like, he was excellent.
00:53:09.000 When you say appeared at, like, he was meant to be there.
00:53:12.000 He didn't just turn up.
00:53:14.000 Yeah, that would be an amazing story.
00:53:16.000 I'd be telling that on a Gaia channel if it was that.
00:53:19.000 Tom Jones came back to life while he was still alive as another him at my mum's birthday.
00:53:24.000 That'd be a much better, one weirder story.
00:53:26.000 We paid for it to spice up my mum's birthday.
00:53:29.000 So I went there, but I sent a Tom Jones lookalike, the next best thing.
00:53:33.000 Of course, yeah.
00:53:34.000 That's what every mother wants.
00:53:36.000 Tom Jones' lookalike, named Ian Stott, he's been sending me, like, he writes a lot of, like, quite radical literature about revolution and global conspiracies and religion and, like, it's a bit of an unusual combination of things to do, like, to write books about anti-establishmentism and appear as Tom Jones at my mum's birthday.
00:53:57.000 We've all got to have a day job, haven't we?
00:53:58.000 You've got to do what you've got to do to survive.
00:54:01.000 It's not unusual to do that, is it?
00:54:04.000 What's new?
00:54:05.000 No.
00:54:06.000 Yeah, how far will we go?
00:54:07.000 Okay, so look, wait a sec.
00:54:09.000 No, Tom Jones is alive.
00:54:10.000 That's what I'm saying.
00:54:11.000 Tom Jones is alive.
00:54:12.000 I said he can't come back from the dead whilst he's still being here.
00:54:15.000 Look, people are saying...
00:54:17.000 Erzmummy.
00:54:19.000 We are not a democracy.
00:54:20.000 Barry John M. Fox.
00:54:21.000 I'm still convinced 2020 was stolen.
00:54:23.000 Oh, Barry John.
00:54:24.000 That's going to cost you $758 million, believe it or not.
00:54:27.000 Peace, love, light.
00:54:28.000 It's fascinating where they put their energy.
00:54:29.000 It shows their vulnerabilities.
00:54:31.000 Erzmummy.
00:54:31.000 Again, I'm going to vote for my dog because I'm in Massachusetts and my vote don't count.
00:54:36.000 Oh, Unicorn Plug.
00:54:37.000 Again, politics is a horse and pony show.
00:54:39.000 All this kind of stuff.
00:54:41.000 Anyway, we're going to go with whoever says one of them next.
00:54:44.000 You know, one of the, uh, you can either have A, which was like a Back to the Future sounding one, or B, which is, uh... Cher.
00:54:53.000 Cher.
00:54:54.000 Right, which one do you want?
00:54:55.000 A was first.
00:54:56.000 All right, so we're going... I wanted Cher, actually!
00:54:58.000 Well, I mean, you are in charge.
00:55:00.000 Yeah, but you gotta democracy, you gotta respect it.
00:55:02.000 Oh, I see.
00:55:02.000 And A's winning, hands down.
00:55:03.000 Loads of people are saying A.
00:55:05.000 Alright, bloody democracy.
00:55:07.000 Are we doing this before or after Ryan Grimbo Grimmie?
00:55:11.000 I think we are.
00:55:12.000 We're going to have to do this only in locals, guys.
00:55:14.000 You're going to have to join us in locals.
00:55:16.000 Bring on Ryan Grimmo Grimmie!
00:55:19.000 Ryan, Grimo, Grimmy, we've got to bring you out.
00:55:22.000 Ryan, we invited you to a perfectly good White House Correspondents' Dinner and you disgraced us by brawling!
00:55:30.000 I believe you were filming someone called Jesse Waters from some other news channel.
00:55:37.000 Foxy, from Foxy Lady.
00:55:39.000 Then I heard, and this is a direct quote, that you kicked him in the dick.
00:55:43.000 Now, is that true, Ryan?
00:55:45.000 The tip of the dick?
00:55:46.000 This was a while ago.
00:55:48.000 There were a lot of feet and fists flying, so anything's possible.
00:55:52.000 Caught the tip of anything that day, couldn't you?
00:55:54.000 Thank you so much for joining us.
00:55:57.000 What do you think about Biden having the balls, the wrinkled gonads to declare that journalism isn't a crime?
00:56:08.000 What do you think about that with Assange banged up?
00:56:12.000 I don't think that that took balls at all because I think he knew that nobody would push back in that room against him.
00:56:18.000 So it didn't even take any courage.
00:56:20.000 I bet he didn't even register the hypocrisy, you know, as it came out of his lips.
00:56:28.000 And I doubt many people in that room even did.
00:56:31.000 That's how far apart they are kind of from the rest of the public on this on
00:56:36.000 this question.
00:56:36.000 Ryan, your analysis chimes with ours in that what they do in at events like that is they reiterate
00:56:43.000 what the status quo is, they reiterate what the framing for debate is, that when the press that
00:56:50.000 are supposed to hold power to account enter into a consensus that Julian Assange don't even register
00:56:56.000 in your mind when talking about the criminalization of journalists, that this is precisely the
00:57:00.000 problem we have. The zeitgeist is being determined by banalized institutions that are not interested
00:57:08.000 in democracy, that are not interested in transparency, that are not interested in free
00:57:13.000 speech. That event is pure theater. No wonder you got Uganda up and started kicking people on the
00:57:18.000 tip of the dick. What sort of journalists get invited to White House Correspondents Dinner
00:57:22.000 and why? Who gets invited, who don't get invited, Ryan? I mean, so DC is...
00:57:28.000 You know, probably more than most cities in the United States, very status obsessed because it's all about power and politics.
00:57:35.000 And so, you know, getting invited to it is a status symbol.
00:57:38.000 But then on top of that, you needed to then have the best celebrity.
00:57:41.000 this started around kind of the Obama years, that whichever news organization could get
00:57:47.000 Scarlett Johansson or whatever, like to be at their table, you know, that would be,
00:57:52.000 then they would be one upping the other ones, and then they would also invite their ad sales folks
00:57:57.000 and also then invite their big clients, like, you know, Dove Soap would be there,
00:58:03.000 or like the guy from GM, or the guy from Cadillac would be there.
00:58:07.000 And so you've got these news organizations that are attracting celebrities
00:58:11.000 with the access to the president, and then wooing the ad sales people
00:58:17.000 with access to these celebrities.
00:58:20.000 And it's just a gigantic kind of money-making operation.
00:58:24.000 Yeah it feels like that it feels it feels saccharine and theatrical and appalling and ridiculous and I feel like it cannot go on for much longer.
00:58:37.000 What do you think about the candidacy of RFK and the early surge there. We're going to have him
00:58:42.000 on our show, Ryan. How do you feel?
00:58:44.000 In fact, don't answer that, mate, because we are going to wrap here and head over to Locals.
00:58:48.000 There's a link. You can join us over on Locals right now where we conduct this conversation.
00:58:53.000 Plus, we'll carry out that game as well, you know, the old news game.
00:58:57.000 Ryan, perhaps you'll join us for a little bit of that game where we're going to look at old news and we'll marvel at the way that the news media has altered.
00:59:05.000 Click the red button, you can join us.
00:59:06.000 Remember, I do a festival every year from July the 14th to July the 17th, Community.
00:59:11.000 There's a link in the chat for that as well.
00:59:12.000 People like Vandana Shiva, Wim Hof, Satish Kumar will come, plus Callie Means who talked about all that food corruption stuff.
00:59:20.000 Tomorrow we've got Max Blumenthal on the show.
00:59:22.000 What are we going to be talking to Max about?
00:59:24.000 There's a really sort of relevant new story that Max was being incredibly vocal about.
00:59:28.000 I think I remember us being excited.
00:59:29.000 Yeah, we were going to talk about potentially 9-11 and the new revelations.
00:59:34.000 9-11 and CIA operatives.
00:59:37.000 I mean, can this even be true?
00:59:38.000 You've got to join us for that.
00:59:39.000 Join us tomorrow on Rumble, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
00:59:43.000 And join us on Locals with Ryan to play a kinky little game.
00:59:47.000 And you know the kind of games Ryan likes to play when he's out and about kicking people in the nether regions.
00:59:51.000 So join us right now on Locals with Ryan.
00:59:54.000 So see you tomorrow if you're watching us on Rumble.
00:59:57.000 See you on Locals right now if you're with us.
00:59:59.000 Stay free.
01:00:00.000 Man you switch it, switch on, switch off.