Stay Free - Russel Brand


Wait... Putin Says He'll Nuke! Why Is No One Reporting This?!! - #086 - Stay Free With Russell Brand


Summary

In this episode of Stay Free With Russell Brand, we talk about the possibility of a nuclear apocalypse, Chinese balloons and the Ohio derailment, and the Spanish decriminalisation of sex with animals. We're joined by anarchist and author Darren Allen, who explains why new systems are necessary in order to prevent an apocalypse, and why he doesn't want to write a book about it. Stay Free with Russell Brand is out now on all of the major podcast directories, if you search for Stay Free, you'll find us. To find a list of our sponsors and show-related promo codes, go to gimlet.fm/OurAdvertisers and use the promo code: "ELISSA" to receive 10% off your first pack of M&S or G&S when you place an order of $55 or more. To buy your own copy of the new book, go here. To learn more about Darren Allen's new book "Anarchy Is Not Necessary: How To Build a Better World," head to bit.ly/Anarchy-Isn't That Good? And to find out more about his book, head over to the Amazon or Barnes & Noble or wherever else you might buy a copy of Anarchy Is Good, you can read the book here. It's available in Kindle, iBook, Paperback, Hardcover or Hardcover, or buy it on amazon, or download it on Audible, wherever you get your copy of The Anarchist's Guide to Anarchism. . And if you're looking for a good ol' fashioned anarchist book, click here. , you can also get 10% Freebie, $5, $10, $20, $25, $50, or $50 or $60, and get a free copy of it for $99, and we'll send you an autographed copy of It's That Good, it's Free, $99 or $150, and it'll get you a lifetime of the book, plus shipping starts from Amazon Prime, shipping starts at $99 a month and shipping includes shipping starts starting at $49,99 a pop any other place you get a maximum of $99.99, plus two months shipping starts, plus a free shipping starts and shipping starts get you an extra $50 a month, plus they'll get an additional $99 and shipping discount, plus you'll get two months of shipping starts start-up, plus all other options, plus an additional shipping discount.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 I'm going to go ahead and get started.
00:01:35.000 Brought to you by Fyjer.
00:01:43.000 In this video, you're going to see the future.
00:01:56.000 Hello, you Awakening Wonders!
00:01:57.000 Thanks for joining me on Stay Free with Russell Brand today.
00:02:01.000 Wherever you are, the whole show will be exclusively available only on Rumble because we can literally speak freely and we use that freedom of speech to bring people together for even deeper experience.
00:02:10.000 Click on that red button and join us on Locals.
00:02:12.000 That's where I read the comments from, like this one from Orion Rain.
00:02:14.000 Hello, hello, hello!
00:02:16.000 Hello there, darling.
00:02:17.000 We've got a fantastic show for you today.
00:02:19.000 Unless you're worried about dying in a nuclear apocalypse, in which case, we should probably turn off now.
00:02:24.000 Joe Biden, your president, if you're America, is in Poland right now, giving some weird, crazy, simplistic, reductive, Fisher-Price-style speech for morons out there, simplifying a very complex situation.
00:02:37.000 Putin has just suspended the only remaining nuclear arms treaty that they have with the US.
00:02:43.000 Well, I think if actually you are gonna have a nuclear war, like the treaty, might not be of that much value.
00:02:50.000 In our presentation, here's the news.
00:02:53.000 We'll be looking at Chinese balloons and the Ohio derailment.
00:02:56.000 What's the real threat to you in your life?
00:02:58.000 Let me know in the chat what you think.
00:03:00.000 And after 10 minutes, we skip over to being exclusively on Rumble today
00:03:05.000 to discuss new data on the effects of lockdown on children.
00:03:10.000 For a lot of you, it's going to be exactly what you expected, exactly what you discussed, but we can't discuss that kind of thing on YouTube because it's controversial, isn't it, on-screen assistant and producer Gareth?
00:03:21.000 We have to be careful.
00:03:22.000 It doesn't matter what new information comes about.
00:03:24.000 On YouTube, the rules don't change.
00:03:26.000 They don't change.
00:03:27.000 That's why there's a link in the description.
00:03:28.000 You can watch us on Rumble.
00:03:29.000 We'll speak freely there about the stories that matter to you and your life, and as well as presenting potential solutions and alternative systems.
00:03:37.000 That's why today's guest is author and anarchist Darren Allen.
00:03:40.000 I'm not writing this book.
00:03:41.000 I can't be bothered.
00:03:42.000 That's not what anarchy means.
00:03:43.000 Grow up!
00:03:44.000 Anarchy isn't nihilism, it's absolute democracy and a refusal to accept domination.
00:03:49.000 I can see new ways that libertarianism and anarchism could live side by side quite easily.
00:03:54.000 We'll be talking with our guest Darren about new systems and new systems seem to be necessary right now in order to prevent an apocalypse.
00:04:02.000 Maybe you're not bothered about an apocalypse.
00:04:04.000 I don't like them.
00:04:05.000 But first of all, let's discuss some important stories from around the world that will restore your faith in the system.
00:04:15.000 Restart Spain of decriminalised sex acts with animals.
00:04:18.000 So that's good news, isn't it?
00:04:19.000 Unless you're an animal who's hoping to not have sex with a person for some reason, in which case it's not legal, but decriminalised.
00:04:27.000 Usually you hear that around controlled substances, don't you?
00:04:29.000 It's not legal, but it's decriminalised.
00:04:31.000 I'm certainly not endorsing any controlled substance.
00:04:33.000 Why would I?
00:04:34.000 Neither am I endorsing sex with an animal in Spain.
00:04:38.000 Yeah.
00:04:39.000 Why is this happening?
00:04:40.000 What's happening right now that makes you think the solution to this problem is... Hmm, look at that tortoise.
00:04:45.000 I hope it's not a tourist thing.
00:04:50.000 Welcome to España!
00:04:52.000 Normally it's no, no.
00:04:53.000 Here it's we say si, si.
00:04:57.000 Viva España!
00:04:58.000 Surely not, surely not.
00:04:59.000 I don't want to be reductive or simplistic, but it is a story about allowing human beings to potentially have sex with animals.
00:05:05.000 Doesn't seem like progress.
00:05:07.000 Seems like literally an attempt to reverse evolution.
00:05:10.000 Oh no you don't!
00:05:12.000 We're not going to ascend to the realm of angels.
00:05:14.000 I just think it's an interesting response to, you know, potential nuclear Armageddon.
00:05:19.000 Is that maybe Spain is just going All bets are off.
00:05:21.000 We can all do what we want now.
00:05:22.000 Okay, bad news.
00:05:24.000 Putin has torn up the last remaining nuclear treaty.
00:05:27.000 Okay, but on the bright side, I have a very attractive pig.
00:05:32.000 Sorry for that accent.
00:05:33.000 It's a Spanish person, basically European like me.
00:05:36.000 Also, don't worry about a thing because there's this new singing robot mouth thing.
00:05:41.000 Who needs monkeys?
00:05:43.000 Why bother going down the zoo with some bolt cutters when you can simply acquire this singing mouth.
00:05:49.000 If it doesn't give you an eerie and terrified sensation, you may need to see a psychiatrist.
00:05:53.000 Let's have a look.
00:05:54.000 Well, I'm hard.
00:06:01.000 Norfolk Southern are lobbying.
00:06:03.000 You know, the dudes that spill all them chemicals all over Ohio, polluting the water around there.
00:06:08.000 They are... Look at this business.
00:06:11.000 Norfolk Southern has thrown roughly $100 million into politics since 1990.
00:06:15.000 They're valued at $55 billion.
00:06:16.000 They've spent nearly $80 million since 1998 on lobbying.
00:06:20.000 Since 1990, it's sent about $17 million directly to candidates' coffers, and it's given Let's focus on our main story now.
00:06:28.000 Your president and mine for America is a hegemonic globalist.
00:06:33.000 You know I love American people, but this kind of stuff, man.
00:06:36.000 Make it last guys!
00:06:38.000 Cause you're gonna need it.
00:06:40.000 Let's focus on our main story now.
00:06:42.000 Your president and mine for America is a hegemonic globalist
00:06:46.000 power. I know, you know I love American people, but this kind of stuff
00:06:50.000 man. Check him out.
00:06:52.000 Oh.
00:06:54.000 Surely the people of Ohio are not gonna
00:06:58.000 appreciate this music. Are they?
00:07:00.000 Because surely a lot of them are suffering.
00:07:01.000 They're looking at a lousy $5 bill thinking, how am I going to make this last?
00:07:05.000 Not too keen on cancer or that weird vinyl sounding chemical they're splashing about over there, that little fish killer.
00:07:05.000 I need a shower.
00:07:13.000 No, he's actually in Poland, mate, simplifying the war.
00:07:16.000 I remember when I was a lad, you didn't have anniversaries for wars.
00:07:19.000 Because they were considered terrible, terrible catastrophes rather than like, you know, not world cups for the military industrial complex.
00:07:27.000 Not pop concerts.
00:07:28.000 Not a pop concert.
00:07:29.000 This is a terrible event.
00:07:30.000 Also, Joe Biden isn't the sort of politician that can be showcased in this way.
00:07:35.000 You don't want to see Joe Biden coming up a runway over a period of time.
00:07:39.000 You don't need a long period of time to study his gait.
00:07:42.000 No.
00:07:43.000 If you look at how he walks for too long, the torso is too rattly, the hands ain't right.
00:07:47.000 If you were putting together a list of catwalk models, he wouldn't be top of the list, would he?
00:07:51.000 I don't know, I'd want Seal.
00:07:53.000 Right.
00:07:54.000 Because I feel like Seal would really stride down that.
00:07:57.000 If the president was Seal, even Zelensky, he would like troglodyte shuffle down there looking pleased with himself and khaki, wouldn't he?
00:08:04.000 With his jumper on, yep.
00:08:05.000 Yeah, like Odi or whatever.
00:08:06.000 How about those jumpers become old-fashionable?
00:08:10.000 Like people are wearing them.
00:08:11.000 Do you know what I mean?
00:08:11.000 Because he's a symbol now, isn't he?
00:08:13.000 Let us know in the chat in the comments if you've got one of them sort of car key hoodies and you're trying to bust that stuff and capitalise on Zelensky glamour.
00:08:20.000 You can join us on the locals chat.
00:08:21.000 You can click that button.
00:08:23.000 This is the chat that we have open here.
00:08:24.000 A lot of people love us.
00:08:25.000 Look at this person.
00:08:27.000 Stone Owen.
00:08:28.000 Actually, they're just talking to each other.
00:08:29.000 They're not even talking to us in there as bloody usual.
00:08:31.000 It's nice in there.
00:08:32.000 I think people are falling in love and all sorts of stuff.
00:08:34.000 Let's look at a little bit more old strutty Joe.
00:08:36.000 I've been looking for something you can give me a symbol.
00:08:40.000 Isn't even the right ambience, like looking up, you know, like, so we heard that there were like smoke machines there.
00:08:46.000 Which, you know, might be good to acclimatise you to the radioactive fog that you're soon going to be living within
00:08:46.000 Sorry.
00:08:51.000 if this Armageddon thing kicks off.
00:09:10.000 Alright, atmosphere, it's going on too long isn't it?
00:09:12.000 He's smiling isn't he, but internally I think he's thinking, why is this so bloody long?
00:09:16.000 Because you know Joe Biden, that is one area where he really struggles.
00:09:19.000 He's getting on and off stages without wandering.
00:09:22.000 In fact, that's probably what everyone's so pleased about, is that he didn't wander off into the crowd, he didn't turn off, he didn't sniff someone on the head.
00:09:28.000 He's done very well actually.
00:09:31.000 All of his better performances.
00:09:32.000 I would say top five.
00:09:34.000 So you may be terrified about the potential nuclear war that we're heading towards, but
00:09:40.000 in other news, Joe Biden can make it down a relatively long runway.
00:09:44.000 Putin did a comparable propaganda speech, much more what you would expect, slightly
00:09:49.000 more ascetic, stringent, austere, much more Russian, obedient crowd, not such a celebratory
00:09:56.000 tone.
00:09:57.000 Have a look.
00:09:58.000 Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin.
00:10:15.000 We'll do a version of the Grammys!
00:10:17.000 Make it like the Grammys!
00:10:20.000 This is what it would be like if they did put music over it, just in case you're...
00:10:20.000 Line it up!
00:10:23.000 🎵 Give me some more, more, more, more, more, more, more 🎵
00:10:27.000 🎵 Give me some more, more, more, more, more, more, more, more 🎵
00:10:30.000 🎵 I've been looking for something, baby 🎵 🎵 You give me some more 🎵
00:10:33.000 In spite of all the fanfare, Joe Biden did of course give a speech.
00:10:36.000 And what I'd like to draw your attention to is the simplistic language that's used in this speech.
00:10:41.000 Talk of heroes, villains, bravery.
00:10:43.000 Now I love archetypes, deep truths, trying to get to the essence of a story.
00:10:48.000 What aspect of human nature underwrites our current systems?
00:10:51.000 Is it greed?
00:10:52.000 Is it selfishness?
00:10:53.000 Lust is altruism and philanthropy.
00:10:55.000 But when you talk about complex geopolitical situations that definitely have transgressions
00:11:02.000 on both sides, if you're a regular viewer of our channel, and I hope you are, you know,
00:11:07.000 we've spoken to people like Jeffrey Sachs, who's explained to us about the 2014 coup,
00:11:13.000 how people that are in the Cheney-Bush administration are operating on behalf of the US government
00:11:18.000 right now, advocating for more aggressive measures.
00:11:22.000 You know how much military support the US are giving to Ukraine.
00:11:27.000 You know that Russia feel aggrieved about the impeachment of their initial, not treaty,
00:11:33.000 but agreement with America after the fall of the Berlin Wall.
00:11:36.000 No.
00:11:36.000 complicated story, but you wouldn't know it to listen to Joe Biden. It's a simple tale about sort of bullying or
00:11:42.000 something that you would how you explain it to a child. They thought that we would
00:11:46.000 roll over. Listen, listen, it's an insult to your intelligence, I think.
00:11:50.000 Autocrats only understand one word. No. No. No.
00:11:56.000 It's actually three words, and I think autocrats probably have good vocabularies.
00:12:04.000 No, you will not take my country No, you will not... My country?
00:12:09.000 I thought this wasn't a proxy war.
00:12:10.000 ...not take my freedom.
00:12:11.000 No, you will not take... Freedom, be careful about that word, by the way.
00:12:14.000 Freedom, that's a word that's about bigotry now.
00:12:17.000 It's a far-right word.
00:12:18.000 Although, some of the units within the Ukraine army might be into that type of freedom.
00:12:23.000 ...my future.
00:12:25.000 And I'll repeat tonight what I said last year in the same place.
00:12:28.000 Boring.
00:12:30.000 I'll find Joe Biden hard enough to concentrate on if he gives a new speech.
00:12:33.000 It doesn't mean what he said last year.
00:12:34.000 I'd like to see the narrative evolve a little bit.
00:12:37.000 Listen, if you're watching this on YouTube or anywhere other than Rumble, we can only stay for a few more minutes.
00:12:42.000 After that, we're going to be talking about the impact of lockdown on children and several other early pandemic myths that have been busted.
00:12:51.000 So you're going to want to click that link and join us where the speech is free and the fun keeps on flowing.
00:12:56.000 Let's analyse Joe Biden's speech a little further, and I want you to particularly pay attention to simplistic, reductive language that tries to frame this complex conflict in terms that allow, I would say, systemic abuses to continue, i.e.
00:13:09.000 profiteering, post-war restructuring, That's highly profitable for NAE, such as Black Rock.
00:13:15.000 Have a look at the framing of this conflict.
00:13:15.000 Have a little look at this.
00:13:17.000 I like to be spoken to like a grown-up.
00:13:20.000 Like, this is a difficult situation.
00:13:21.000 This is a very difficult war.
00:13:22.000 Obviously, we have an obligation to protect Ukrainian people, but we have said that Ukraine won't join NATO, and now NATO are operating on behalf of Ukraine.
00:13:29.000 Yes, there's lots of profits being made from this war.
00:13:29.000 It's very, very complicated.
00:13:31.000 You know, all of that stuff, that's the kind of conversation I want to have.
00:13:34.000 Why won't the mainstream media conversation have that conversation with you?
00:13:37.000 Why are they so complicit?
00:13:39.000 A dictator bent on rebuilding an empire will never be able to ease the people's love of liberty.
00:13:47.000 Not a catchphrase, is it?
00:13:49.000 A dictator hell-bent on rebuilding an empire will never be able to ease people's... I mean, I think the fact that you can't remember it... It's not catchy enough, is it?
00:13:58.000 It's not like Just Say No or something like that.
00:14:02.000 Brutality will never grind down the will of the free, and Ukraine Ukraine will never be a victory for Russia.
00:14:12.000 Never.
00:14:13.000 That's called jingoism, it's called bombast and reductivism.
00:14:16.000 We'll be talking more about the complexity and potential threat over the course of the show.
00:14:20.000 We're going to talk about Putin tearing up the nuclear treaty
00:14:23.000 and the obvious potential risk that that poses.
00:14:25.000 If you're my age, you grew up under the threat of the Cold War and potential nuclear plight,
00:14:29.000 but we thought that sort of stuff was behind us.
00:14:32.000 And America, up until very recently, had a much more favorable and amenable relationship with Russia.
00:14:37.000 Where has that gone?
00:14:38.000 Who's benefiting from this situation?
00:14:40.000 If you're watching this on YouTube or anywhere else, we're going to click over exclusively onto Rumble right now, because we're going to be talking in a few minutes about the pandemic and several myths that are being busted.
00:14:50.000 We'll also be talking to Darren Allen, Anarchist and critic of our current social system about his new novel and some of his observation about many of the myths that hold our culture together.
00:15:00.000 So do join us right now because I'm hankering after free speech, Gareth.
00:15:04.000 Could you see that?
00:15:04.000 I can tell.
00:15:05.000 I'm going to start speaking freely any minute.
00:15:07.000 Vesuda, the throat chakra, the place of deep truth.
00:15:10.000 It's about to light up.
00:15:11.000 So if you're watching this anywhere else, click over and watch us on Rumble right now.
00:15:14.000 See you there.
00:15:16.000 Should we watch a little bit of Joe Biden, but I'll be a little bit more critical?
00:15:18.000 Let's do it.
00:15:19.000 Fly out from the seat of my pants a bit more?
00:15:22.000 When President Putin ordered his tanks to roll into Ukraine, he thought we would roll over.
00:15:29.000 That's the reason why it happened, because there'd have been a lot of strategy, a lot of contemplation, a lot of consideration, and I imagine there's been sort of ongoing discussions about what military intervention would look like, what would provoke it.
00:15:39.000 You have to consider the Nord Stream Gas Pipeline stuff that's been running alongside this until it was blown up.
00:15:44.000 It's not running alongside it anymore.
00:15:47.000 One of the things I resent is the jingoism, the reductivism being spoke to in this tone, even the event itself, Gareth.
00:15:53.000 Having an event like this in Poland to celebrate the anniversary of a war, is that how the world works?
00:15:58.000 It's strange.
00:15:59.000 I mean, obviously, you know, this week we've literally heard we had the news that Zelensky said he never agreed to and was never going to agree to honour the Minsk accord.
00:16:08.000 We heard that he still wants to retake Crimea.
00:16:12.000 We've heard that that's a red line for Putin.
00:16:14.000 We've heard that America is Supporting aims to retake Crimea.
00:16:18.000 These are all parts of a very complex story that, as we have also had admitted by a NATO chief this week, goes back to 2014.
00:16:27.000 That you can't just be reduced to a speech with some flags and some pop music.
00:16:32.000 Even the equation that Gareth just outlined there, Zelensky's admission that they never planned to obey the Minsk accord, What's wrong?
00:16:41.000 America saying they will report action in Crimea, Putin tearing up that treaty, that's enough to have
00:16:48.000 That's enough for a nuclear war. That's a recipe for a nuclear war being
00:16:52.000 Casually read out and it's and it's being framed as if it's like a Beyonce concert. It doesn't seem like the right time
00:17:00.000 What's wrong?
00:17:01.000 The Ukrainian people are too brave America, Europe, a coalition of nations from the Atlantic
00:17:08.000 to the Pacific We were too unified.
00:17:11.000 Unified, too brave, too reductive, too ridiculous.
00:17:15.000 This is the level they think you operate at, psychologically and psychically.
00:17:19.000 You're regarded as idiots and children.
00:17:21.000 That's what's required for political parentalism to continue and abide.
00:17:25.000 That's why I'm excited to talk to Darren Allen a little later, because I suppose essential to anarchy is automatic self-rule, self-rule, autonomy.
00:17:34.000 Freedom!
00:17:35.000 A word that is now being attacked, but a word that is fundamental to all of us, and I think enshrines values of respect for one another's freedom and differences within it.
00:17:46.000 Okay, so yeah, there it is.
00:17:47.000 There's the story about that bloody treaty being torn up.
00:17:50.000 That takes us into terrifying territory.
00:17:52.000 And here's a, like, if you're about my age, you know, like from the 70s, 80s, them days, here's a clip of this film.
00:17:59.000 After I saw this, when I knew that nuclear war was a thing, till I'd seen this film, I didn't know that nuclear war existed and the potential for an apocalypse was real.
00:18:06.000 When this was on, I said to my Uncle Jimmy, God rest his soul, that film, that can't happen in real life, can it?
00:18:12.000 And Uncle Jimmy, to his credit, said, yeah.
00:18:15.000 No, it was bedtime after that.
00:18:16.000 I'd better think about Armageddon.
00:18:18.000 There it is the day after.
00:18:37.000 It is odd that we're not seeing this kind of stuff now, in a sense.
00:18:42.000 You know, if we're as close as it seems that we are, you know, God forbid, something like this happened, we're not seeing this because I guess it doesn't suit the narrative at the moment.
00:18:50.000 I think there's a kind of cultural myopia and individual solipsism.
00:18:54.000 We're sort of locked into screens.
00:18:56.000 We're locked into a consumer mentality.
00:18:58.000 We're not invited to consider geopolitical issues unless in the kind of reductive framing offered to us
00:19:04.000 by Joe Biden.
00:19:05.000 And certainly on this channel, we don't claim to have the answers,
00:19:08.000 but with you, we want to engage in the questions.
00:19:11.000 Let us know in the chat how you regard this shift to individualism, reductivism,
00:19:17.000 is kind of cultural stupidity at a ubiquitous level.
00:19:22.000 Loads of people are getting involved in here and actually they're paying attention.
00:19:26.000 as a reality. Good, you're paying attention. I'm glad. Ash Hether said I wish I hadn't seen that
00:19:29.000 clip. People are cozying up with their pillows, they're breaking down. One of the things that
00:19:32.000 concerns me most is that this is a unilateral attitude. In American politics there is some
00:19:39.000 dissent towards the march towards this particular war from the Republican party. Every single
00:19:45.000 Democrat voted for all of the military aid packages.
00:19:48.000 And that's not called a military aid package.
00:19:49.000 It's military industrial complex products being sent to Ukraine, along with IMF monetary aid that locks Ukraine into political promises in the reconstruction era that will follow this awful war if we ever reach that stage.
00:20:04.000 You know we're English.
00:20:05.000 I've never hidden that from you, right?
00:20:06.000 I'm from the UK.
00:20:07.000 I've always been upfront about that.
00:20:09.000 Well, in our political system, it's ultimately the same as yours.
00:20:13.000 A couple of parties that are basically the same.
00:20:15.000 If there's any kind of anomalies or fluctuations, they're quickly shut down by the system.
00:20:19.000 Here's Keir Starmer, the current leader of the opposition, presumed to be the next Prime Minister because our W.E.F.
00:20:24.000 Bozo current leader can't last too long.
00:20:27.000 Giggling little schoolgirl, cuddling up to Trudeau, giggling about Vladimir Zelensky.
00:20:32.000 But this dude, who's a lawyer, is a novice, might as well be just a sort of a node of the state.
00:20:39.000 Listen to his perspective on the Ukraine-Russia conflict.
00:20:43.000 It's very important for me to be here in Ukraine with the people of Ukraine, making clear that support for Ukraine in the United Kingdom is united, making it absolutely clear that should there be an election next year and a change of government, the position on Ukraine will remain the same.
00:21:00.000 It's necessary for globalism to continue its relentless advance that any people that are in potential positions of power, let alone actual positions of power, have to spout and mouth the same rhetoric.
00:21:12.000 And I just mentioned that there is some Republican opposition to the ongoing military aid and weapons and that going to Ukraine.
00:21:20.000 But look, Republicans want billions for Taiwan military aid to counter China. So the
00:21:25.000 war machine in either case is going to be significantly supported. And
00:21:32.000 what does that make you feel about your political system, your current political
00:21:36.000 system? Remember we're going to be talking about alternative political systems a
00:21:38.000 bit later and I think that ultimately...
00:21:40.000 a new type of populism has to emerge. A decentralized, truly democratic set of systems, a new confederacy.
00:21:48.000 Something's got to change guys. This is why we're doing all this, to discuss these ideas
00:21:51.000 with you, isn't it Gareth? Absolutely. That's what drives us. One of the ways that they're
00:21:55.000 undermining Putin is by saying he's not very well all the time.
00:21:58.000 Have you noticed that?
00:21:59.000 Every day, a new health story.
00:22:00.000 Oh, he's got bad teeth.
00:22:01.000 Oh, his bum nearly fell off the other day.
00:22:03.000 He's got bunions.
00:22:04.000 You should see his toenails.
00:22:05.000 They're all yellow, they are.
00:22:07.000 Another way they're undermining him is giving him a jittery translator.
00:22:12.000 Like, well, the person that's interpreting Putin, he's so like a nervous wreck.
00:22:16.000 If Putin ever hears this, he'll push that button.
00:22:18.000 And now there's no treaty to stop him.
00:22:20.000 Have a look.
00:22:21.000 It's well known.
00:22:22.000 None of the countries in the world has such a great number of military bases abroad as the United States.
00:22:30.000 Oh, America, they got too much military bases.
00:22:33.000 Oh, no.
00:22:34.000 Oh, my cat done a piddly-me-berry.
00:22:37.000 What am I trying to make of that?
00:22:38.000 Is that designed to make us not scared of Putin?
00:22:40.000 He's not scary.
00:22:41.000 This guy's worked.
00:22:42.000 Look at how he talks and thinks.
00:22:44.000 The guy's a nervous wreck.
00:22:46.000 When you listen to him sat by them yellowing old 1980s phones in his powerbox, he is very certain, determined, I have killed people, I will kill people again.
00:22:46.000 That's not our fault.
00:22:57.000 Apparently some of the people there, and just look at their first still.
00:22:59.000 I'll tell you what, they're doing well on the diversity front over in Russia, better than I would have expected, and for that, in my opinion, they should be applauded.
00:23:06.000 There's like an orthodox Russian minister, there's a Buddhist monk.
00:23:08.000 It's like a game of guess who.
00:23:10.000 It's brilliant, isn't it?
00:23:11.000 Is yours wearing a big green religious hat thing?
00:23:15.000 I'm afraid to say yes.
00:23:18.000 Everyone, is it this dude?
00:23:19.000 You know it is.
00:23:20.000 Next to the Tibetan monk looking fella.
00:23:23.000 Let's have a look.
00:23:24.000 They're bored out of their minds listening to Putin.
00:23:26.000 They'd probably prefer the jittery translator.
00:23:31.000 Bored by nuclear war?
00:23:39.000 If the Geysers are ripping up treaties, they're dozing off the soppy sods.
00:23:42.000 I'll tell you who ain't bored, the military of Belarus.
00:23:45.000 While the Russians might be finding this whole thing a bit tiresome.
00:23:49.000 In Belarus, they're well up for it.
00:23:51.000 Now, if you look at the presentation of the advancing military conflict from an American perspective, you get all that light and color show going on in Poland right now, simplifying the war, making war into a commodity.
00:24:03.000 You watch Russia's more ascetic version of it.
00:24:07.000 The military in Belarus, they talk about war like an old school war.
00:24:11.000 Like, check this geezer out.
00:24:12.000 He's up for it.
00:24:13.000 He's willing to take it there.
00:24:14.000 Check it.
00:24:15.000 If you need to fight, you're ready to fight.
00:24:18.000 Of course, he tells me.
00:24:19.000 We'll tear you with our teeth.
00:24:23.000 I'll tear it with our teeth.
00:24:25.000 I mean, that's not what you want to hear if you're facing them.
00:24:27.000 We're going to need them little clip-clop robot dogs to send out there, because in Belarus, if they ain't got no weapons, they're just going to eat the people that they're fighting.
00:24:36.000 Impressive.
00:24:38.000 Like, I've met quite a lot of people from around that region over the years, Eastern Europe, Ukrainians, like people from around there, Belarus.
00:24:45.000 I'd say in short, don't fuck with them.
00:24:48.000 Don't have a war with any of them.
00:24:50.000 Encourage them.
00:24:51.000 I've been on holiday where there's been a lot of Russian and Ukrainian people.
00:24:54.000 They kick your head in just for getting in the swimming pool.
00:24:57.000 You're acting Ross like there was at some point a peace deal on the table.
00:25:01.000 And as we all know, that was simply never the case.
00:25:04.000 There never was a peace deal available that Boris Johnson, our little fluffy baby chick former Prime Minister, went out and derailed for what reason exactly?
00:25:14.000 That's been sort of widely disseminated now.
00:25:16.000 We broadly understand that that did happen.
00:25:18.000 Hey, if you came over here to hear...
00:25:21.000 Contraband information about the lockdown, stuff you can't discuss anywhere else.
00:25:24.000 Come a little closer.
00:25:25.000 Relax.
00:25:25.000 Sit down.
00:25:26.000 There's a couple of studies that have come out recently that demonstrate that what many of us suspected, that the lockdown was going to have a detrimental effect on our children.
00:25:26.000 Here it is.
00:25:35.000 I'm a father of children and by God, those kids They need all the help they can get, Lemaitre.
00:25:40.000 Two studies show the pandemic lockdown's devastating effect on kids.
00:25:44.000 The American public was assured by both the mainstream media and people in federal government that our children were resilient and could easily make up...
00:25:51.000 Any learning loss incurred through digital at-home learning.
00:25:54.000 But in September, the U.S.
00:25:55.000 Department of Education revealed reading and math scores of elementary school students plummeted during the pandemic.
00:26:01.000 See?
00:26:01.000 We said that would happen.
00:26:03.000 COVID-related school shutdowns and delayed reopenings have placed learning losses at the equivalent of a year or more schooling.
00:26:08.000 So your kids are gonna need to do, like, I don't know, In America you have to do a grade again, don't you?
00:26:12.000 We have a different education system over here.
00:26:14.000 Resulting in 6-9% lower lifetime earnings.
00:26:17.000 Oh poverty!
00:26:18.000 It's going to lead to poverty!
00:26:19.000 It's not just now, it's like decades and decades ahead.
00:26:23.000 More wealth transfer going on.
00:26:25.000 And look at some of the other myths and stories that were Things that were just dismissed at the beginning of the pandemic.
00:26:32.000 Johns Hopkins University study reveals Covid lockdowns prevented just 0.2% of deaths.
00:26:37.000 Is that worth it?
00:26:38.000 Is it worth cashing in the lives of children for those deaths?
00:26:40.000 I don't know.
00:26:41.000 I'm not claiming to be able to make those kind of decisions.
00:26:41.000 I don't know.
00:26:44.000 Face masks made little or no difference.
00:26:46.000 Another one.
00:26:47.000 You know, when you think of all those things, hold on, what about if these lockdowns are worse than the thing they're supposed to be curing?
00:26:52.000 Hey, these masks, they work.
00:26:53.000 Look at this.
00:26:53.000 Immunity acquired from having COVID, i.e.
00:26:56.000 natural immunity, is as protective as vaccination.
00:27:00.000 Oh my God.
00:27:01.000 So, basically, every single thing you thought Was right.
00:27:07.000 Difficulty as well isn't it that people find and especially frustrating with regard to the children is that they literally had no choice.
00:27:13.000 I mean you could say that we all had no choice when it came to lockdowns and in America mandates which at least we didn't we didn't have in this country.
00:27:19.000 All of those nurses and key workers losing their jobs because of a refusal to be compliant.
00:27:24.000 I wonder if there will be a spate of legal cases to remunerate them for what I would say is wrongful dismissal on the basis of this evidence.
00:27:31.000 You see like It's not like we want to bang on and on or sort of say, oh, we were right all along.
00:27:35.000 That's not really it.
00:27:36.000 Look, the narrative has shifted significantly and you can observe it in real time.
00:27:42.000 All I reckon the pandemic provided was a lens for how systems of power operate, how they obfuscate truth, how they change narratives to their advantage.
00:27:52.000 And when the consequences of that deception come home to roost, they evade it, avoid it, say you're a nutter, smear opposition, shut down dissent.
00:27:59.000 That's what I'm And who's this affected most?
00:28:01.000 Lower income children.
00:28:03.000 It is the story of the pandemic all over again, that these, you know, huge amount of wealth was taken from poorest people and shoveled right to the top.
00:28:11.000 I think I'm about to coin a phrase.
00:28:13.000 We've already seen the wealth transfer, now we're seeing an intelligence transfer.
00:28:18.000 Poor kids are not going to be able to compete, even with the odds already stacked against them.
00:28:24.000 The odd plucky kid would make it through, but Not for the post-pandemic generation.
00:28:28.000 Their chances are even more limited.
00:28:31.000 Okay, it's time now for a deeper look.
00:28:35.000 I mean, we're looking pretty deeply already.
00:28:36.000 Would you agree?
00:28:37.000 Tell us in the chat.
00:28:37.000 I mean, are you happy with the service?
00:28:38.000 We're doing our best.
00:28:39.000 We're trying to bring people together.
00:28:41.000 We believe in your freedom, no matter where you're from or who you are.
00:28:44.000 We believe in your right to believe whatever you want to believe.
00:28:46.000 We know you know stuff we don't know.
00:28:48.000 We're not preaching to you.
00:28:50.000 We want you in this conversation with us.
00:28:52.000 We've got a presentation now, though, we've worked quite hard on, and I think you're going to enjoy it.
00:28:56.000 Were these Chinese balloons a massive distraction?
00:28:59.000 How did the media support that narrative?
00:29:02.000 And how does it compare to the Ohio derailment?
00:29:06.000 Where, in essence, does the real threat to national security come from?
00:29:10.000 There, up, up in the sky?
00:29:11.000 Or there, right in the middle of Washington and at the heart of the corporate world?
00:29:15.000 Here's the news.
00:29:16.000 Oh no!
00:29:17.000 Here's the effing news.
00:29:22.000 Here's the fucking news!
00:29:24.000 AHHHHH!
00:29:26.000 Balloons! They're everywhere!
00:29:28.000 That's the most dangerous thing that could ever happen!
00:29:30.000 Certainly more dangerous than POISON in your drinking water!
00:29:34.000 That's why the mainstream media should focus on AHHHHH! Balloons! Balloons!
00:29:38.000 Now for a drink of some delicious poison!
00:29:40.000 You're just like your father!
00:29:42.000 By now you're aware that the Ohio train wreck has possibly caused enormous toxicity in drinking water supplies.
00:29:51.000 This is not being significantly reported on or sufficiently reported on.
00:29:54.000 We're also pointing out how balloons have been prioritised and favoured in mainstream media reporting.
00:30:00.000 Are these balloons just a distraction?
00:30:02.000 Is the real disaster toxicity in your drinking water?
00:30:05.000 Let's have a look at these two stories, how they compare and contrast, why certain information is prioritized, why certain information is extracted, and how your consciousness is being controlled and directed by the media machine.
00:30:16.000 It's a simple business really.
00:30:17.000 Let's have a look at what Secretary of State Anthony Blinken has to say about the balloon story, a man whose surname describes what he must have been doing when that train crashed.
00:30:25.000 Do we still believe that the balloon...
00:30:27.000 Uh, the surveillance balloon.
00:30:29.000 Do we still believe in the balloon?
00:30:30.000 I mean, God, I can't even keep this up anymore.
00:30:33.000 Listen, you're on the mainstream, focus.
00:30:35.000 Say it's a surveillance balloon, say it's important, and for God's sake, don't mention that everyone's water's got poison in it.
00:30:40.000 Over the continental United States was an intentional act, or do you believe that part of it was an accident?
00:30:46.000 So, there is no doubt.
00:30:48.000 In our minds at all, that A, this was a surveillance balloon, and B, it was attempting to engage in active surveillance.
00:30:55.000 And C, it was an evil balloon.
00:30:57.000 I think a terrorist one.
00:30:58.000 The U.S.
00:30:59.000 is reportedly examining the possibility that the Chinese spy balloon was pushed off course by strong winds when it entered U.S.
00:31:04.000 airspace, with strong winds blowing it south over the border.
00:31:08.000 The deviation has prompted analysts to explore whether China meant for it to enter U.S.
00:31:12.000 airspace.
00:31:13.000 So the whole thing Might have been an accident, literally caused by the wind.
00:31:16.000 So this is a story about hot air blown around by cool air.
00:31:19.000 That doesn't really sound evil enough, does it?
00:31:21.000 A White House official has admitted three unidentified objects shot down by US fighter jets since Friday may turn out to be balloons connected to benign commercial or research efforts.
00:31:30.000 So that just means they shot down, essentially, balloons.
00:31:32.000 It might as well have been the Goodyear blimp or Phileas Fogg or that little kid from Up.
00:31:37.000 Nevertheless, just to be on the safe side, blow it up with a $400,000 missile, I'd say.
00:31:41.000 I gave the order to take down these three objects.
00:31:45.000 I say, pleased with myself.
00:31:46.000 I gave the order to take down these harmless, inoffensive balloons.
00:31:50.000 This is the level we've literally reached.
00:31:52.000 The US president is a man who has the authority to take down a balloon, but not to take down your drug prices.
00:31:57.000 A group of balloon enthusiasts, teens, dads, and grandpas, Joe Biden refers to that group of octogenarians as pesky scamps and youngsters, say they believe their $12 balloon, just like the one in this photo, was the balloon shot down over Alaska by a $400,000 missile.
00:32:16.000 Doesn't seem like good use of your taxpayer dollars.
00:32:20.000 $12 balloon, $400,000 missile.
00:32:22.000 Anyway, $12 balloon or not, it's definitely the most important story in America right now.
00:32:27.000 It's not as if there's been a terrible, terrible chemical spillage literally into your water that you need to stay alive.
00:32:33.000 Tonight, growing skepticism in East Palestine, despite the Norfolk Southern Railway CEO pledging to earn the Ohio village fragile trust.
00:32:42.000 I'm deeply sorry.
00:32:43.000 He's just trying to sell you on the depth of his apology.
00:32:45.000 I'm gonna give you an apology now, and it actually goes right down here to beneath my asshole, which I'm shitting out of, into your water.
00:32:53.000 Shelby Walker lives within feet of the train tracks.
00:32:56.000 She says in the last two weeks, she, her daughter, and grandchildren have been dealing with eye infections, sore throats, and headaches.
00:33:07.000 This morning on This Week, environmental experts told Martha Raddatz the equipment used to monitor the chemicals isn't helpful enough.
00:33:15.000 We've got some equipment for you, ma'am.
00:33:16.000 Isn't it helpful enough?
00:33:18.000 No.
00:33:18.000 We've also got this $12 balloon.
00:33:20.000 Mayday!
00:33:21.000 Blow that son of a bitch down!
00:33:21.000 Mayday!
00:33:25.000 It doesn't tell us what chemicals are present, it just says they're below some level.
00:33:28.000 There's plenty of chemicals that can be created from that fire that can be toxic at much lower levels.
00:33:33.000 Could we get that black cloud of smoke, put it in a maybe $12 balloon, tie it up, float it up in the air?
00:33:38.000 Then blow the son of a bitch up with a missile!
00:33:40.000 Bottom line, would you move back to East Palestine if you were living there?
00:33:44.000 I have two little boys, I would not.
00:33:45.000 Good news everyone!
00:33:46.000 The train derailment and chemical spill in Ohio has highlighted just how bizarre such a focus on perceived external national security threats has become.
00:33:54.000 The far greater threat may be from within.
00:33:55.000 Perfect metaphor in many ways, we're continually distracted and invited to think that there is a foreign invader or threat, whether it's terrorists, the cold war, or even germs on some occasions, when the real threat is the fact that we live in a deeply corrupt and hypocritical society where where political parties and corporate interests that
00:34:12.000 transcend national boundaries have such deeply entrenched interests that democracy is redundant and
00:34:17.000 meaningless.
00:34:17.000 While they're telling you to look up up up in the sky for superman or a balloon or whatever,
00:34:22.000 they are down down down on the ground spilling chemicals into your water and exchanging large
00:34:26.000 sums of money to keep things the way they are.
00:34:29.000 East Palestine residents were told the municipal water was safe to drink but also advised to
00:34:33.000 buy bottled water.
00:34:34.000 It's safe to drink but maybe, you know, you might not want to put it in your mouth and
00:34:39.000 use your esophagus to swallow it down.
00:34:41.000 Instead, go to a store and buy water that may not have chemicals in it.
00:34:46.000 No reason though, just for fun!
00:34:48.000 And many have complained of rashes after they shower.
00:34:51.000 Nothing to worry about there.
00:34:52.000 Residents were told they only had vinyl chloride to fear.
00:34:56.000 It's only vinyl chloride.
00:34:58.000 That sounds fucking terrifying.
00:34:59.000 That sounds like what happened to Venom covered with some sort of awful black lacquer and that your teeth are gonna go all pointy.
00:35:04.000 I know.
00:35:05.000 I'd recommend some bottled water.
00:35:06.000 Drink bottled water, but your tap water is fine straight from the faucet.
00:35:10.000 Sorry, are you giving me a coded message?
00:35:12.000 Uh, no.
00:35:13.000 I also think the water cause is twitching.
00:35:14.000 But then the list of dangerous chemicals spilled by the train grew.
00:35:17.000 What, on its own?
00:35:19.000 Or were they always on it?
00:35:20.000 Oh no, you know that list we gave you?
00:35:22.000 Yeah, we didn't put some of the things on it.
00:35:24.000 So here's the real list.
00:35:25.000 You bastards!
00:35:26.000 Federal agencies may not release the full list of chemicals for months.
00:35:29.000 Why not?
00:35:30.000 Probably because we'll be so excited about that list of chemicals that we'll all go crazy and jump into the sea and start shooting down balloons without government authorisation.
00:35:38.000 Oh, you thought that the list of chemicals would be really toxic and worrying and would cause you to lose faith in your government and their regulatory agencies?
00:35:46.000 That list of chemicals were a surprise for your birthday!
00:35:51.000 And you've ruined it.
00:35:52.000 You're just like that Chinese balloon thing that's definitely from China.
00:35:57.000 Oh God, is there anything in this?
00:35:59.000 Anyway, this is just a one-off.
00:36:00.000 Most rivers aren't full of deadly poisons.
00:36:02.000 Most of America's waterways are likely contaminated by toxic PFAs.
00:36:07.000 Forever chemicals.
00:36:08.000 A new study conducted by US water keepers finds.
00:36:11.000 Don't make it sound nice.
00:36:12.000 We're forever chemicals.
00:36:14.000 That's why you're being fertile.
00:36:16.000 Well, your children will be infertile.
00:36:17.000 You're not going to have any.
00:36:18.000 The Water Keepers Alliance analysis found detectable PFAS levels in 95 out of 114, or 83%, of waterways tested across 34 states and the District of Columbia, and frequently at levels that exceed federal and state limits.
00:36:32.000 Okay, so most water is polluted with forever chemicals, which doesn't sound like very good news unless you're another chemical and you're lonely.
00:36:39.000 Hold on a minute, we don't know what PFAS are.
00:36:41.000 They may not be that bad.
00:36:42.000 Sounds nice, prefers.
00:36:43.000 Let's see what they are.
00:36:44.000 PFASs are linked to cancer.
00:36:47.000 Oh.
00:36:47.000 And liver problems.
00:36:48.000 Oh.
00:36:48.000 And thyroid issues.
00:36:50.000 Okay, well, it's just me.
00:36:51.000 And birth defects.
00:36:52.000 Oh.
00:36:52.000 Kidney disease.
00:36:53.000 Decreased immunity.
00:36:53.000 Mm-hmm.
00:36:55.000 Is that the end of the list?
00:36:56.000 It's just one more thing on the list.
00:36:57.000 Mm-hmm.
00:36:58.000 Other serious health problems.
00:36:59.000 When are we gonna get that list?
00:37:00.000 We'll release the list when we're ready.
00:37:01.000 Previous analyses have used municipal utility data to estimate that the chemicals are contaminating drinking water for over 200 million people.
00:37:09.000 That's nearly everyone!
00:37:10.000 Lacks regulation allows industrial users to discharge the chemicals into the environment largely unchecked.
00:37:15.000 Landfills, airports, military bases, paper mills and wastewater treatment plants are among common sources.
00:37:22.000 We're destroying the land, we're destroying the water, we're not going to do anything about it,
00:37:25.000 because it's simply not profitable.
00:37:27.000 Regulators and utilities have been slow to address PFAS contamination in part because of cost.
00:37:33.000 EPA has proposed designating PFOS and PFOA as hazardous substances, which could force industry to fund cleanups for those compounds, but not the other 33 found in the study, or thousands more that exist.
00:37:45.000 That will leave it up to taxpayers to cover those cleanup costs.
00:37:48.000 So they make the profits, you do the cleaning up.
00:37:50.000 And that's freedom.
00:37:51.000 But not bad freedom, good freedom.
00:37:53.000 In response to the Ohio disaster, government and railway officials decided to burn off the vinyl chloride, effectively dumping 1.1 million pounds of the chemical into the local community, according to a new lawsuit.
00:38:05.000 Officials said that they did so to avert the vinyl chloride from exploding.
00:38:09.000 In contrast, an attorney for the lawsuit has said that the decision was cheap, unsafe, and more interested in restoring train service and appeasing railway shareholders than protecting local residents.
00:38:19.000 Oh no, that doesn't sound right.
00:38:20.000 No, no, no.
00:38:21.000 Not these guys that profit while getting taxpayers to fund the cleanups.
00:38:25.000 Even just to the untrained ear.
00:38:26.000 Blowing stuff up, that's always the solution.
00:38:29.000 Whether it's Vladimir Putin or these chemicals.
00:38:31.000 Just blow it up!
00:38:32.000 Everything will be okay.
00:38:34.000 Who's to say that what comes down in all of the ashes and acid rain won't be good for us and make us into superheroes?
00:38:40.000 Norfolk Southern basically nuked a town with chemicals to get a railroad open, a former hazmat technician told a local news outlet.
00:38:47.000 It certainly seems like a company with a $55 billion market cap chose to sacrifice the health of thousands of people to keep its profits flowing.
00:38:54.000 Unlike the river, which won't be flowing because it's full of stinking brown sludge.
00:38:58.000 It's just another way of taking the temperature of the way that our systems operate.
00:39:02.000 When there's the requirement for a decision to be made, the factors that are most important are profit, not the health of ordinary people.
00:39:07.000 Whenever this system works for you, it's by accident.
00:39:10.000 Oh, look, I've got a new phone, but it benefits the system in loads and loads of ways.
00:39:13.000 Oh, I'm eating this food, but it benefits the system in loads of ways.
00:39:16.000 Your life, your well-being, your experience of reality is irrelevant.
00:39:21.000 You are a blob of commodity just dumped there to consume.
00:39:25.000 If ever your interests are at odds with their interests, you are fucked.
00:39:29.000 That's what I've been learning over the course of running this channel.
00:39:31.000 Let me know what you think in the chat and the comments.
00:39:32.000 The situation demands immediate action from President Biden.
00:39:35.000 Without it, thousands of people, including children and the elderly, fuck them, and animals, will be at continued risk of premature death.
00:39:42.000 Biden must declare a state of emergency and create an independent task force to take over the remediation of this eco-catastrophe.
00:39:48.000 That's the sort of thing he'll do.
00:39:49.000 Norfolk's response to this crisis so far comes from a time-tested corporate strategy.
00:39:53.000 Manage the situation as a public relations challenge and not the humanitarian and ecological catastrophe that it is.
00:39:59.000 That doesn't sound familiar.
00:40:00.000 Government is supposed to protect us from the excesses of industry.
00:40:03.000 Instead, it often acts like its partner.
00:40:05.000 That's because the government and corporate interests are partners.
00:40:07.000 If you don't know that yet, then you've not been listening.
00:40:10.000 Ah, an environmental disaster that affects the American working class.
00:40:13.000 I remember Biden from his campaigning.
00:40:15.000 He cares about the environment, doesn't he?
00:40:16.000 He can't get close enough to Greta Thunberg and not just to sniff her hair.
00:40:19.000 And he really cares about workers.
00:40:21.000 He's the best worker president there's ever gonna be or ever has been, arms cuddling around.
00:40:25.000 So this is it!
00:40:26.000 Your savor!
00:40:26.000 Joe Biden!
00:40:27.000 Joe!
00:40:28.000 Oh, Joe!
00:40:30.000 A looming Supreme Court decision could end up making it easier for the railroad giant, who's train derailed in Ohio this month, to block lawsuits, including from victims of the disaster.
00:40:40.000 There's no precedent for that.
00:40:41.000 I don't remember big corporations being granted indemnity for many of the consequences of their actions in re- Oh.
00:40:48.000 In the case against Norfolk Southern, the Biden administration is siding with the railroad in its conflict with a cancer-stricken former rail worker.
00:40:56.000 The railroad!
00:40:56.000 Great!
00:40:57.000 This is the founding fathers all over.
00:40:59.000 They'd love this.
00:41:00.000 Who are you going to stand with?
00:41:01.000 Big corporation or cancer-stricken former rail worker?
00:41:04.000 A high court ruling for Norfolk Southern could create a national precedent, limiting where workers and consumers can bring cases against corporations.
00:41:11.000 No Biden, not on your watch.
00:41:13.000 Surely Joe, say it ain't so!
00:41:14.000 Limiting lawsuits is exactly what the American Association of Railroad, the industry's primary lobbying group, wants.
00:41:21.000 It is also apparently what the Biden administration wants.
00:41:23.000 The Justice Department filed its own brief in favour of Norfolk Southern.
00:41:27.000 Oh, so the Biden administration supports Norfolk Southern, not the potentially sick people, not the environment, not railroad workers, not the vulnerable.
00:41:37.000 Nothing they said while campaigning is true.
00:41:38.000 That's why I didn't get all excited like it was some sort of big deal.
00:41:43.000 Such a decision could affect lawsuits filed by residents exposed to hazardous chemicals as the result of accidents in other states, such as the East Palestine-Ohio derailment disaster, which occurred five miles west of the Pennsylvania state line.
00:41:55.000 Curious at a time like this, a precedent might be established that would prevent forthcoming lawsuits, but that must just be some kind of coincidence, because I know that Joe Biden cares about the environment and cares about workers, not about corporations and giving them an easy ride, which is not what those chemicals got, and we still haven't seen the full list of them.
00:42:12.000 So it's easy to conclude, then, that America is a country that supports corporations while claiming to care about workers and the environment, but when they get the perfect opportunity to show that they care about the environment by, for example, dealing with an environmental disaster successfully and succinctly, they don't do it.
00:42:25.000 So does that mean, then, when they're talking about climate change and all that stuff, it's kind of bollocks?
00:42:30.000 No, it can't mean that.
00:42:32.000 We'd have to lose our faith in the system to come to that conclusion and that's something that I've not done years ago when I was about 12.
00:42:38.000 So that's just what I think.
00:42:39.000 Let me know what you think in the comments in the chat.
00:42:40.000 I'll be with you in a few seconds.
00:42:42.000 Thank you for choosing Fox News.
00:42:44.000 You're welcome.
00:42:45.000 No, he's the fucking news!
00:42:48.000 Joe's dog says 400 grand on a missile and poor kids can't afford to eat a school lunch.
00:42:55.000 McWackwy says, EPA says it's all good now.
00:42:58.000 Shekelsburg says, does anyone know who the military industrial complex fights for?
00:43:03.000 Like, whose agenda they are pursuing?
00:43:05.000 Yeah, we'll be talking about that.
00:43:07.000 Rolling Rainbow Funder Dear Mother Earth, please do not hold the actions of 1% of our population against all of humanity.
00:43:14.000 A plea there to Gaia, to the deep systems that underwrite our terrestrial existence.
00:43:19.000 If you want to join us in the chat, you can.
00:43:21.000 Click on that locals button and become a member.
00:43:24.000 of our community. Joining us now is Darren Allen, anarchist and author of Fired and Ad
00:43:30.000 Radicum and 33 Myths of the System, sharing his analysis on how we might propose, discuss
00:43:37.000 and bring about alternative systems. Right Darren, thanks for joining us. We met because
00:43:41.000 I like that book 33 Myths of the System that you wrote, where you talked about a lot of
00:43:46.000 presumed ideas around our culture.
00:43:48.000 The myth of education, the myth of science, the myth of fun.
00:43:51.000 I think a lot of your writing came to people's attention during the pandemic, when your analysis was that the crisis was being used to implement further surveillance and that there was a lot of observable Duplicity, can you talk us through how you came to some of those conclusions and broadly speaking, what you think the significance of the pandemic was and what we can learn from it when it comes to how power operates and the convergence of interests that coalesce around an event like that?
00:44:19.000 Well, first of all, do you think it was a pandemic?
00:44:24.000 I mean, by that, I suppose when I'm using that name, I mean, you know, there was coronavirus, SARS, people had symptoms, it was travelling between China, Italy, so under those terms, yeah.
00:44:36.000 I mean, the IFR, the infection fatality rate was kind of like that of a bad flu.
00:44:43.000 The all-cause mortality wasn't out of the ordinary.
00:44:49.000 There weren't people dying in the streets.
00:44:52.000 Young people didn't die.
00:44:53.000 All of Africa seemed to get through okay.
00:44:55.000 Celebrities were getting through okay.
00:44:58.000 All of Africa first and then celebrities.
00:45:02.000 Africa of course where the patents weren't made available and so the vaccine weren't so widely disseminated and you're saying there weren't any significant difference in like for alleys or even infection?
00:45:13.000 Well, the old WHO definition of pandemic used to be a large number of people dying.
00:45:20.000 And there wasn't.
00:45:22.000 I don't think so.
00:45:22.000 I mean, I call it a pseudo pandemic.
00:45:27.000 In the event then that it was hard?
00:45:30.000 Straight out the block, Sir Darren.
00:45:32.000 They'll love you.
00:45:33.000 Over here in the chat for that pseudo-pandemic.
00:45:35.000 Plandemic is what they'll be saying down there in the chat.
00:45:38.000 Uncha, uncha.
00:45:39.000 So given that you even refute the definition, pandemic, what do you think about the broader response and some of the manifestations around it, mate?
00:45:49.000 Well, I mean, it takes a while before you can discover what really is behind vast crimes.
00:45:54.000 I mean, when they're actually happening, no one really knows.
00:45:58.000 The best analysis I've found is by a guy called Fabio Vigi, I think it is, and he has a pretty convincing case for the fact that it was just a means of pumping in trillions of dollars into the economy and switching off Main Street.
00:46:14.000 That is basically the modus operandi of the economic system since forever really.
00:46:22.000 It's a debt-based Ponzi scheme and it's inevitably going to crash and crash and crash and crash and the only way to save it is to print money.
00:46:31.000 So it's just a way of printing money.
00:46:33.000 I see, so you think it's economically driven.
00:46:35.000 When you say something like that... And technologically, I mean it was another, it was an excuse to expand the techno-sphere as well.
00:46:43.000 Certainly both of those things happened, but ultimately now we're in the terrain of what the mainstream media would
00:46:49.000 call conspiracy theory.
00:46:51.000 And I suppose the area of that that's always challenging to discuss is how something of that nature would be
00:46:59.000 coordinated.
00:46:59.000 We can see there was a massive wealth transfer. We can see it facilitated greater surveillance.
00:47:03.000 You can see that it was a soft sell for social credit scoring and introduced ideas that previously would have
00:47:09.000 been unconscionable.
00:47:10.000 But when we talk about the execution of a global conspiracy, it always leads to the necessity for collaboration.
00:47:20.000 Whilst there are sort of propagandist and sort of greenwashing organizations like WEF hidden in plain sight,
00:47:27.000 while there are bodies like the IMF that leverage debt and their actions around this war and previous wars,
00:47:34.000 you can certainly apply a comparable analysis to the one you just applied there.
00:47:38.000 When you say something at that scale is a way of flooding the system with money,
00:47:44.000 do you feel that it requires actual conspiracy or do you see that the convergence of interest can just bring about
00:47:50.000 those kind of states?
00:47:51.000 Option B.
00:47:52.000 Yeah. I mean, the system is self-operating to a large extent.
00:47:52.000 Yeah.
00:47:59.000 It is basically a machine.
00:48:01.000 And that's something that's often missed in radical analysis, that we are living in a machine.
00:48:09.000 And you've got the people on the right who own the machine, what you call capitalists, and then you've got people on the left who manage the machine, the professional class.
00:48:20.000 But it's the machine that is the problem.
00:48:22.000 We are all suckling at this vast, vast robotic world now.
00:48:32.000 And it has its own priorities, its own way of working.
00:48:36.000 It forces us to think and live in certain ways.
00:48:41.000 It forces us to become like machines.
00:48:43.000 Yes.
00:48:44.000 That is the target.
00:48:45.000 Something as immersive and inherently totalitarian as that will require, do you agree, something quite cataclysmic and seismic to bring about its overthrow.
00:48:58.000 Yes.
00:48:58.000 Isn't that sometimes a disheartening paradigm?
00:49:02.000 No, no.
00:49:03.000 Gordon, may I?
00:49:03.000 Fabulous.
00:49:05.000 That's an opportunity.
00:49:07.000 I mean, do you love this system?
00:49:10.000 Does anybody who has a heart beating in their breast?
00:49:16.000 No.
00:49:17.000 It's despicable.
00:49:18.000 It's horrendous.
00:49:19.000 The faster it can fall apart, the better.
00:49:21.000 I used to enjoy Mark Fisher's analysis, in particular his book, Late Capitalism, where he suggested that part of the mastery of this system, and he used a comparable Deleuze and Guterres analysis of it being a machine-like system that generated other machines and created that kind of mentality and that kind of lens.
00:49:21.000 No?
00:49:39.000 He said that part of what he had achieved meant it's impossible for us to envisage new systems, but we see it as reality.
00:49:49.000 He said it's easier to envisage the end of the world than the end of capitalism.
00:49:53.000 A famous phrase that I think Mark coined, God rest his soul, though he was an anarchist and probably a socialist and an atheist, certainly.
00:50:02.000 So when you're saying that there's some optimism in this, We're all yearning to be free.
00:50:07.000 We're all yearning for a deeper connection to one another, to ourselves and to nature more broadly.
00:50:12.000 What is it that you propose?
00:50:14.000 Obviously, I know that you're an anarchist and so I'm assuming that what you propose as an alternative system is anarchy.
00:50:20.000 Can you talk us through it, bearing in mind that a lot of people watching this and a lot of people asking this question may have only a rudimentary understanding of anarchy and even a misunderstanding of anarchy because a lot of people relate it to nihilism and punkishness and smash the state, smash the system.
00:50:34.000 So can you talk us through what you mean by anarchy and indeed what anarchy means more broadly?
00:50:40.000 Anarchism means freedom from control.
00:50:43.000 Control by what?
00:50:44.000 Control by any force that is coercive.
00:50:50.000 And there's basically seven of those.
00:50:52.000 There's kings, there's governments, states, corporations, there's the technocratic system, there's the professional institutional system, there's the mass, the democratic mass, and there's the human ego.
00:51:07.000 The degree to which we can be free of all of those things is the degree to which we can be joyous and free.
00:51:14.000 Just cutting out one or two of those things, which tends to happen with socialist thinking, for example, okay, let's get rid of capitalism, okay, let's get rid of the elites, or okay, let's attack, you know, the elite doesn't do anything.
00:51:27.000 The whole thing has to be identified, first of all, for what it is, and then naturally, by itself, spontaneously organic social forms emerge, as they do when anybody is free.
00:51:43.000 I mean, ordinary people are anarchists when they're at their very best.
00:51:48.000 So when you are in love, For example, when you have a loving family and everything's going okay, when you have a group of friends, even when you're at work and the boss isn't there, things work well.
00:52:01.000 Our boss is off, actually.
00:52:02.000 What, here?
00:52:03.000 Yeah, and it's going quite well.
00:52:04.000 Well, there you go.
00:52:05.000 He was holding us back.
00:52:06.000 Right, exactly.
00:52:07.000 So you're saying that anarchy is almost an anthropological system.
00:52:11.000 It's like a cosmic nature.
00:52:13.000 Yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:52:14.000 The universe is anarchic.
00:52:18.000 I like the way, mate, that you suggest that there's a deep spiritual component to it, the human ego, that the first system that we must overcome is the system of self and that there's a, I suppose what you say, there's a kind of, if not uniformity, there's a, there is a sort of a kind of a linear expression of freedom right through the self to the systems that we create.
00:52:38.000 In your book, 33 Myths About the System, I liked how you took on sort of broad topics like science and Fun and professional class and sort of broke down how these things that sort of come together more in a sense, in a sense, faith based systems.
00:52:54.000 You said a minute ago that anarchy breaks out, you know, wherever it gets its chance.
00:53:00.000 And I suppose you don't mean like in sort of experimental communities, you mean sort of almost naturally and organically.
00:53:06.000 Can you talk us through a few examples of it?
00:53:07.000 Because I think I'd like our viewers to appreciate the possibility that it's something that We talk all the time about how are we going to change the world.
00:53:17.000 This channel is a lot about critiquing establishment power, establishment thinking.
00:53:22.000 Similarly, we talk about individual awakening and personal and spiritual awakening not being a subset that is ultimately about how you can operate better within the system, like how many traditionless or hybrid forms of spirituality tend to be applied.
00:53:38.000 Learn to meditate and be better at your job.
00:53:41.000 Do yoga and be more attractive to potential mates.
00:53:44.000 Spirituality that is at its core challenging to these interwoven machines.
00:53:52.000 Can you talk to us about a few examples of where we see anarchism at play and how we might in our own lives apply anarchism?
00:54:00.000 Well, the Postal Service, for example, is anarchistic.
00:54:05.000 Essentially, I mean, they have bosses and they have fat cats screaming it off, but the way that the Postal Service works, no one's in charge of it.
00:54:14.000 It's self-organising.
00:54:17.000 There have been times in history when anarchism has had some kind of independent success.
00:54:25.000 Civil War Spain?
00:54:26.000 For example, although that was, it didn't, that was anarcho-syndicalism, but that, yeah that worked pretty well, but the supreme example Which we should all look towards for all manner of inspiration in our lives is primal, hunter-gatherer, simple human beings before civilization.
00:54:47.000 For 99% of our history, we have been anarchists.
00:54:53.000 Essentially, there has been no democracy.
00:54:56.000 Democracy is deeply un-anarchist system.
00:54:59.000 Go on, what do you mean?
00:55:00.000 Democracy forces you to obey, it's dictatorship of the 51% basically.
00:55:07.000 It smooths people over into a manageable pace, that's why it rose in popularity, because it's a means to organise and control people, democracy.
00:55:18.000 And it's something else, which I've forgotten.
00:55:22.000 Daniel Pinchbeck, who brought me to your attention, is like a mate of mine, a brilliant writer on many of these topics.
00:55:29.000 He's talked about Oscar Wilde's famous essay, The Soul of Man Under Socialism.
00:55:37.000 And it's pretty clear that you're not a pro-socialism person.
00:55:40.000 I know a lot of people at home will have, as soon as they hear that word, will think about the great 20th century expressions of Maoism and Stalinism and all of those kind of expressions of post-Marxist ideology.
00:55:53.000 What Wilde talks about, it's interesting that we're talking about a romantic genius rather than an avowed philosopher or theologian.
00:56:01.000 He talked about the idea that technology could be utilized to generate leisure and freedom and an aesthetic culture.
00:56:09.000 Are you fundamentally anti-technology?
00:56:12.000 Do you think that it's a kind of utility of power or do you think that we could use technology to create a more liberated and free society?
00:56:23.000 There's no way.
00:56:24.000 Why not?
00:56:25.000 What are we going to bloody well do then, Darren?
00:56:27.000 We have to go back to simple tools.
00:56:30.000 Oh, look at the pain on his face.
00:56:31.000 People are going to struggle.
00:56:33.000 I know, but that is inevitable.
00:56:36.000 It's going to happen anyway.
00:56:37.000 Well, it seems like a post-apocalyptic ideology, in a sense.
00:56:41.000 Yeah, I mean, yes, that's it really.
00:56:43.000 Well, I'd prefer that not to happen.
00:56:50.000 I can't just wander face first into Armageddon safe in the knowledge that immediately afterwards we're going to all be able to eat vegetables at our own pace.
00:57:00.000 Contaminated vegetables at that.
00:57:03.000 There has to be an interventionist component to this.
00:57:05.000 There has to be a revolutionary component.
00:57:08.000 Is anarchism fundamentally anti-revolutionary because that would require a degree of organisation?
00:57:14.000 First of all, I don't talk for anarchists.
00:57:16.000 It's anarchism as it is today.
00:57:18.000 I mean, I'm talking about a very, very extreme form.
00:57:21.000 Anarcho-primitivism, basically.
00:57:23.000 What I call primalism.
00:57:26.000 Um, so there might be anarchists listening to this just frothing at the mouth.
00:57:30.000 Um, but as far as I'm concerned, technology itself is a dominating force in our lives and that it's not neutral.
00:57:38.000 It's connected with a vast system that is, uh, subordinating.
00:57:42.000 You know, if I, when I start criticizing technology, people often say, Oh, you've got a smart, but I don't actually have a smart, but you've got a phone.
00:57:48.000 What did you write that would, you know, of course I use individual Items of technology because I live in this crummy world that forces me to.
00:57:57.000 The system as a whole, the massive interlocking technological system, it's not neutral.
00:58:04.000 It reduces us to machines and it forces a bureaucratic management system that also coerces and subordinates us.
00:58:13.000 But that doesn't mean that imagination couldn't be applied to these technologies and ideals.
00:58:20.000 Certainly, I recognise the value of what you're saying and honouring our nature, but I also feel that we have to start from where we are, that there are such things as electoral democracy that have to be overcome.
00:58:35.000 And I see that there's a sort of, in a sense, a kind of...
00:58:38.000 Acceptance that we may be carried by a cosmic flow, by a kind of Gnosticism, a kind of ease.
00:58:45.000 But me, I've always been a bit more of a conflagratory, let's get stuck in there and bring about a revolution type of person.
00:58:51.000 Yeah, I'm all for wanton destruction.
00:58:57.000 Darren, thank you very much.
00:59:00.000 You've taken us on an incredible journey to anarcho-primitivism, a rare and esoteric sect within anarchism.
00:59:07.000 I suppose what I mostly take from this is that when we are told that the system is the way it is, nothing can change, it's fundamentally benign, and the best that we can hope for is reform and incremental improvement, when you listen to ideas around anarchism, It bears that, it exposes that as fundamentally untrue.
00:59:26.000 Hey, look at this!
00:59:26.000 A quote from Russell Brand on the back, as well as Irving Welch, and Terry Gilliam, Chris Morris, and Alan de Botton.
00:59:32.000 Check out all of Darren Allen's work, and follow him on Substack, where he writes and where I read many of his essays, and sometimes in the comments.
00:59:41.000 Oh, you got a bit too far there, Darren.
00:59:43.000 Thank you very much for joining us, mate.
00:59:45.000 That's a fantastic contribution.
00:59:47.000 And now, as if to trivialise the entirety of Darren Allen's contribution and life's work,
00:59:53.000 here is a singing sex robot mouth that makes you feel that perhaps technology is fundamentally bad.
01:00:00.000 The system now guys! How do you like your utopia now?
01:00:25.000 Singing vile sex robots.
01:00:27.000 I can't look at that and listen to that without feeling a bit of a sense of dis-ease and perhaps longing for a narco-primitiveism.
01:00:34.000 Well, exactly.
01:00:34.000 Maybe he's got a point.
01:00:35.000 Would we be happier, gal, were we to just live in harmony with the system?
01:00:39.000 Or would we be happier if we were to get ourselves a singing... What can only be described as a sex mouth?
01:00:45.000 Have you got to the bit... Can we play the clip a little further?
01:00:47.000 Because I want to see the bit where it starts, like, fluctuating its esophagus.
01:00:51.000 Oh, yeah.
01:00:52.000 Yeah, it does that, man.
01:00:53.000 There's a bit... Look at that!
01:00:54.000 That's not good, is it?
01:01:01.000 Yeah, that's in our minds now.
01:01:03.000 That's in our minds forever.
01:01:06.000 Is the tone troubling you?
01:01:08.000 Is that what you don't like?
01:01:09.000 Yeah, it is that.
01:01:10.000 It's all of it, isn't it?
01:01:11.000 It's just the whole package.
01:01:13.000 Yeah, the whole thing's pretty disturbing.
01:01:15.000 You know how Joe Biden triumphantly emerged in Poland to celebrate one year of wanton destruction and the march towards Armageddon?
01:01:26.000 Do you think that Biden's walk to that runway would have been any more bearable if backed by good old sexy robot mail?
01:01:34.000 Let's find out.
01:01:35.000 I actually think that's better.
01:01:43.000 Yeah, I think it's more commensurate.
01:01:45.000 It's more of a soundtrack to a potential Armageddon because that's probably the only sounds that will be existing after that.
01:01:52.000 When Orwell offers us the vision of the future that can be reduced to a boot stamping on a human face, I think I visited a future as a robot mouth singing a terrifying sort of just multi-tonal song that you can't extract from the sex industry objects that have already emerged.
01:02:12.000 I'm thinking in particular of the fleshlight, which I've never, you know, I'm going to say this, I've never used one of those things, but I've seen them and I've seen them and I don't like them, gal.
01:02:24.000 Do they function as a torch as well?
01:02:27.000 I don't know if it's a two-in-one thing.
01:02:28.000 Right.
01:02:29.000 I think it's more like, so you're not embarrassed.
01:02:32.000 Oh, you've just got that, oh dear, oh his torch isn't working!
01:02:32.000 I see.
01:02:36.000 I better, I better change the batteries!
01:02:43.000 It also sounds like Aphex Twin's song.
01:02:45.000 I can't remember which one, but one.
01:02:47.000 Anyway, it's not just the orifice that is being emulated by our AI overlords.
01:02:55.000 There are now sperm extractors that help patients overcome embarrassment.
01:02:59.000 Obviously, only the embarrassment.
01:03:00.000 Look, a Chinese company says its automatic sperm extractor is helping clients collect semen from donors reluctant to masturbate in a hospital setting.
01:03:09.000 I can't.
01:03:09.000 No, this isn't right.
01:03:11.000 Not in this setting.
01:03:13.000 Why have they gone in the first place?
01:03:15.000 Because the whole point is, if you're going to donate sperm... Hello, I'm here to donate some sperm!
01:03:20.000 Well, unless you're going to just spontaneously ejaculate, you recognise what this is going to involve.
01:03:25.000 You mean, use my hand?
01:03:27.000 That I eat with?
01:03:28.000 In this setting?
01:03:29.000 A hospital where people come to die and take potentially unnecessary medicines that could kill them?
01:03:36.000 I won't do it!
01:03:37.000 Well sir, it's your lucky day because we've invented this horrifying dystopian fuckhole.
01:03:47.000 This unusual machine aims to take the embarrassment out of sperm donation.
01:03:51.000 I don't think that takes the embarrassment out of it at all.
01:03:54.000 What that does is it makes it eerie, uncanny, and godless.
01:03:54.000 No.
01:03:59.000 Because the only embarrassment would be if you're masturbating in a hospital setting in a room and someone interrupts you.
01:04:05.000 That's the only real embarrassment.
01:04:06.000 But if someone interrupts you when you're using this... Oh, that's it.
01:04:09.000 That's it.
01:04:09.000 Life's over.
01:04:10.000 Like, yeah, it's bad enough.
01:04:12.000 You're in a hospital setting.
01:04:12.000 Sure.
01:04:13.000 You're there.
01:04:13.000 You're in a sperm donor's clinic.
01:04:15.000 Anyway, people can't go, What the hell are you doing?
01:04:20.000 You pervert!
01:04:20.000 What are you doing?
01:04:21.000 I can't help myself.
01:04:23.000 We're here to donate sperm and actually thinking about it I did have a sperm test once I now remember and you do have to masturbate into a cup.
01:04:31.000 Were you sure you have to?
01:04:32.000 Well, I say sperm test centre, I meant to say cafe.
01:04:38.000 Like, if you're interrupted in that, if you're standing having that thing sort of at your midriff, pulsating at your midriff...
01:04:48.000 Sorry, sir.
01:04:48.000 Everything OK?
01:04:49.000 Oh, yeah.
01:04:51.000 I see this one's occupied.
01:04:53.000 I'm talking about the room.
01:04:54.000 I'm going to close that door again, sir.
01:04:57.000 Just going to... You won't see me, right?
01:05:00.000 You might hear a couple of... No!
01:05:02.000 Like, no! I want to...
01:05:05.000 Ahhhhhh!
01:05:08.000 Well, I finished.
01:05:09.000 Ahhhhhh!
01:05:12.000 Called the sperm extractor, it was devised by Ding Gui Jiang, chairman of China's Jianggu Sanwei...
01:05:18.000 Don't have the name Ding Gui Jiang.
01:05:20.000 No.
01:05:20.000 If what you're going to go on to do is invent a false cum sucker, because people are good at it.
01:05:26.000 It was prophesied.
01:05:28.000 Ding Weijiang, this was your destiny, sir.
01:05:31.000 Look at him, Pat, and he's proud of it.
01:05:31.000 I know, I know.
01:05:32.000 Of course he is.
01:05:33.000 And wouldn't you have to have Ding Weijiang?
01:05:37.000 Mate, have you used it?
01:05:38.000 Well, of course he has.
01:05:39.000 That's the thing, you wouldn't just let it loose on everyone, would you, if you hadn't tested it yourself?
01:05:45.000 Because normally with a technological advancement like that, you say, we're going to test it on monkeys.
01:05:48.000 Don't worry, I'll handle that process myself.
01:05:51.000 I've got a monkey at home.
01:05:52.000 Really?
01:05:53.000 Oh yes, loads of them actually.
01:05:55.000 I say at home, I mean in my holiday home in Madrid.
01:06:00.000 Why did you move to Madrid again?
01:06:01.000 Mind your own business!
01:06:03.000 And for God's sake, let me experiment on my machine!
01:06:07.000 A medical science and technology centre.
01:06:15.000 Scientist!
01:06:16.000 I'm a genius!
01:06:17.000 Hospitals mostly use masturbation as their collection method without providing a venue or equipment.
01:06:23.000 Of course they do.
01:06:23.000 Mostly.
01:06:24.000 What else are they going to do?
01:06:25.000 It's mostly that.
01:06:26.000 Well, I've just done a heart operation on your nan.
01:06:30.000 I've got half an hour and I see that you're sat there.
01:06:33.000 Well, I have a steady hand, my man!
01:06:35.000 Yeah, entirely, surely.
01:06:37.000 Do you think at that hospital, or science unit, the other scientists kind of mock him?
01:06:41.000 Because they can't all be doing it there, can they?
01:06:44.000 He's just on his own doing that.
01:06:45.000 Within the community, he cannot be a highly respected... What did you do today?
01:06:50.000 I did put, like, a stent in someone's heart.
01:06:53.000 And what about you?
01:06:53.000 I removed the tumour from someone's brain.
01:06:56.000 I sucked a bunch of spunk out of a bloke using my little fuckbot.
01:06:56.000 And what about you?
01:07:01.000 Who was that bloke?
01:07:02.000 Uh, it was me actually.
01:07:03.000 I can't remember his name now.
01:07:04.000 Ding Wang something.
01:07:06.000 Very brilliant man.
01:07:08.000 Looking forward to that sperm.
01:07:09.000 I think we're going to help a lot of people.
01:07:12.000 Also, it's delicious.
01:07:16.000 No!
01:07:16.000 We're alright now!
01:07:18.000 If I can't do a little sippy smugly... Alright, I'll try it, I'll do it.
01:07:22.000 Maybe if there isn't a Klaus Schwab talks like that, it's because he tastes the other end.
01:07:28.000 Ding-wang!
01:07:29.000 Why don't you... We've gone too far now.
01:07:32.000 It's because I got excited about my perfect topic.
01:07:36.000 It's robots.
01:07:37.000 It's a sex robot.
01:07:39.000 We should have started with this.
01:07:40.000 Of course we should have done.
01:07:41.000 This is all we should do.
01:07:42.000 We're here trying to understand Darren Allen's anarcho-primitivism.
01:07:46.000 We're experts in this.
01:07:49.000 We're the absolute elite when it comes to this thing.
01:07:53.000 We're the Klaus Schwab of spunk-up machines.
01:07:56.000 This makes collecting sperm on the spot very difficult.
01:07:59.000 In order to meet clinical demands, we invented this automatic sperm extractor, which is also user-friendly.
01:08:07.000 No, a bit too friendly.
01:08:12.000 The machine is equipped with a massage pipe that resembles a vagina.
01:08:16.000 I've got news for you, mate.
01:08:19.000 Some interesting colour choices.
01:08:20.000 How big of a problem was this?
01:08:22.000 That's my thing.
01:08:22.000 It's like, what was the data and statistics on the amount of people that left the hospital without having donated sperm?
01:08:31.000 I just can't imagine that many people who, their whole thing was, I'm going to this, what are you doing today?
01:08:36.000 I'm going to donate sperm.
01:08:37.000 And then returned without having done it.
01:08:39.000 I think he's fixing a problem that didn't exist.
01:08:43.000 You would say that.
01:08:44.000 Necessity is the mother of invention.
01:08:47.000 Oh no, wait, come back!
01:08:49.000 Another disappointed wanker.
01:08:53.000 No, no, not in this setting.
01:08:55.000 Not on your Nelly.
01:08:56.000 But the day you invent some sort of terrifying pink rimmed sex orifice, then I'm your man.
01:09:03.000 Ding Wang.
01:09:04.000 I've got to get his name right because I think there is potentially racism risks here because you're being reductive around a sort of a non European sounding name, but I don't mean it like that.
01:09:12.000 I'm trying to remember it.
01:09:13.000 Fact is that, uh... He's a very naughty boy.
01:09:16.000 You're a very naughty boy.
01:09:17.000 You shouldn't have made that machine.
01:09:19.000 And I'm beginning to... Like, how often, like, the amount of thinking is that, is that to go into it?
01:09:23.000 How okay is this politician?
01:09:25.000 Like, he's had to think his way through numerous things.
01:09:26.000 He's spent years doing that.
01:09:28.000 He hasn't just knocked it up in a weekend, has he?
01:09:30.000 No, that's not... That's not Tracy Island on Blue Peter.
01:09:33.000 That's his life's work.
01:09:34.000 That's someone's life's work.
01:09:35.000 He's dedicated...
01:09:37.000 Will you please come make love to me?
01:09:40.000 Doing what?
01:09:40.000 I'm busy!
01:09:41.000 My business!
01:09:43.000 I'm not going down there.
01:09:44.000 I can't have sex in that setting.
01:09:46.000 I'm upstairs with my robot.
01:09:48.000 My delicious sex robot.
01:09:50.000 Trust the science!
01:09:52.000 Fight out the science!
01:09:54.000 Its height is adjustable, while its speed, force and temperature can be varied.
01:10:02.000 When I see that, that, for me, that ruins the concept of sex.
01:10:06.000 Yeah, right.
01:10:07.000 Like, sex can be so magical, so beautiful.
01:10:08.000 Reduce it to that.
01:10:09.000 Because that's all we are.
01:10:11.000 Like, it makes you think that maybe, like, once they create that, you know, the metaverse and everything, they just strap that to your head.
01:10:17.000 Yeah.
01:10:17.000 Strap that to your winkle.
01:10:18.000 That's right.
01:10:19.000 What's a temperature?
01:10:20.000 How high do you want that temperature?
01:10:22.000 Body temperature.
01:10:23.000 Not like a toaster.
01:10:24.000 You don't leave a pattern.
01:10:26.000 You don't look down at your own penis and see Christ's face there.
01:10:29.000 Not again.
01:10:30.000 Not after last time I see him staring up.
01:10:33.000 What are you doing?
01:10:34.000 Women have been trying to awaken and bring about global change.
01:10:37.000 Just give me a minute.
01:10:38.000 I can't ejaculate.
01:10:39.000 Not in this setting.
01:10:41.000 It simulates a female organ and replicates the physical movements of sexual intercourse
01:10:46.000 by moving back and forth.
01:10:48.000 It's able to, by a huge extent, provide comprehensive coverage.
01:10:52.000 Have you considered making one with another hole, possibly?
01:10:55.000 Sorry, sorry.
01:10:57.000 Much impression.
01:10:59.000 This story's not bringing out the best in me.
01:11:00.000 It's not, is it?
01:11:01.000 It's bringing out... No, a lot of people like it.
01:11:03.000 They like it?
01:11:04.000 Yeah, they're saying, like, he's got his hands behind his back.
01:11:06.000 He's done a good job of, er, sexism.
01:11:09.000 Yeah, this is desacralising, look at this, Ash Ella, this is desacralising a very human soul, yeah.
01:11:14.000 Sex is sacred, sex is a union transcendent of apparent separateness.
01:11:19.000 And also, it's funny what Gareth said, I think, that how many people were walking out of that hospital waving their hands, oh no, no way, that it became... I bet that's 60 grand, that machine.
01:11:30.000 Oh yeah, yeah.
01:11:31.000 Do you reckon?
01:11:32.000 Oh yeah.
01:11:33.000 Should we club together, get one?
01:11:37.000 The machine has also proved useful for urological patients at Shanghai Pudong Hospital, who are unable to produce sperm without a great deal of help.
01:11:46.000 Dr. Lee seeming unable to break through sperm without a great deal of help.
01:11:51.000 I need barely any!
01:11:53.000 I've been making mine on my own since I was a wee lad!
01:11:56.000 ...says it's an efficient way to maximize the... When they're sitting, when they're sitting up, why, what made them think we need a shot from underneath for?
01:12:04.000 You don't, that's the machine, they're objectifying the sex machine.
01:12:06.000 What are you going to do, put a little pair of stilettos on it in a minute?
01:12:10.000 ...mount and quality of sperm collected, but says there's still room for improvement.
01:12:17.000 This device is far more efficient than masturbation.
01:12:21.000 And I can speak to that from personal experience!
01:12:24.000 Before you came in here... Oh, sorry!
01:12:27.000 There are still some weaknesses.
01:12:29.000 For instance, it cannot exactly simulate the temperature and feel of a female organ.
01:12:35.000 It's morally wrong.
01:12:37.000 Back to the lab.
01:12:39.000 Another five years.
01:12:40.000 Back to the attic.
01:12:42.000 Please come down here.
01:12:44.000 I love you.
01:12:44.000 I love you.
01:12:45.000 I'm not coming down there to you.
01:12:47.000 Not in this setting.
01:12:48.000 Right.
01:12:48.000 Well, hey, maybe we'll cover the rest of this in our special show behind the show, Stay Connected, which me and Gareth make on a weekly basis for the members of our community.
01:12:58.000 And also I read out your comments much more often.
01:13:01.000 Belly heart, give him a monkey mind.
01:13:03.000 Probably got thousands of dollars a grant for that.
01:13:06.000 They always measure the outcome data.
01:13:08.000 You, saucy lot, you can be a member of this community.
01:13:11.000 Make beautiful online friendships by clicking the button below and becoming a member of our locals community.
01:13:16.000 We do loads of extra content.
01:13:17.000 My stand-up special drops there pretty soon.
01:13:20.000 Tomorrow, and I can't believe I'm saying this after such a giddying array of pure old jokes, Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Chris Hedges joins us tomorrow.
01:13:29.000 Oh no, I fucking don't!
01:13:31.000 On Friday, Jeremy Corbell, UFO expert, will be talking to us about spy balloons, the deep state, the recent spate of UFO sightings, and whether or not it's being used as a distraction, and what the deep state, deep truths are around the phenomena of non-terrestrial life.
01:13:48.000 For a couple of weeks, guys, we are gonna be off We are going to be off, I imagine, until March the 13th.
01:13:58.000 There'll still be fresh presentations regularly dropping, meditations and more.
01:14:04.000 My pre-sale of my stand-up special goes live next week.
01:14:07.000 If you're a member on Locals, you'll get it for nothing, just as part of your yearly package, but if you want to buy it as a one-off, there'll be some information published soon about how you can do that.
01:14:16.000 And if you want to come see me live and you're in the United States, on March the 2nd, I'm going to be in Los Angeles at the Vermont Theatre.
01:14:22.000 On March the 6th, I'm going to be at the Clearwater Theatre in Bilheimer.
01:14:26.000 No, I'm going to be in Clearwater at the Capitol Theatre, Bilheimer.
01:14:29.000 I don't know, just click on the link.
01:14:30.000 Go to Russell Brand and you'll get all the information there.
01:14:33.000 See you in a couple of weeks, not for more of the same, but for... You could do this bit.
01:14:37.000 More the different?
01:14:38.000 That's what I generally say.
01:14:39.000 Until then, stay free.