Stay Free - Russel Brand - “Wait, They Did WHAT?!” Did Pfizer Give People A Different Vaccine?! - Stay Free #230

00:00:00.000 I'm going to go ahead and do that. And then I'm going to go ahead and do the other one.

00:00:07.000 I'm going to go ahead and do that.

00:16:21.000 Bye, bye, dude.

00:16:22.000 I'm rotting, so I'm looking for the sea.

00:16:25.000 In this video, you're going to see the future.

00:16:34.000 We've got a live shot there.

00:16:41.000 Hello there, you awakening wonders.

00:16:42.000 Thanks for joining me for Stay Free with Russell Brand today.

00:16:45.000 Thank you for being a part of this movement.

00:16:47.000 Thank you for believing in revolution.

00:16:48.000 Thank you for being willing to take part in the change inside yourself that's necessary if we're gonna change the world.

00:16:54.000 Thank you for not being one of the people that watches mainstream legacy media and says, Everything's as it seems.

00:17:01.000 Let's do as we're told.

00:17:03.000 Let's sit like larvae in our homes being pumped full of some synthetic sugary fluid rather than the honey of sweet truth.

00:17:12.000 Sorry I was late you lot.

00:17:14.000 Guess who I'm talking to?

00:17:15.000 Jordan Peterson and we just did a fantastic Two hour long interview that if you are an awakened wonder and press the red button to become one, you can see straight away full two hour long conversation with me and JP.

00:17:29.000 Fantastic.

00:17:30.000 And SheBitesALot says we want Gareth.

00:17:33.000 Gareth is just there.

00:17:34.000 And Gareth will return in peacetimes.

00:17:37.000 When we have peace, Gareth will return.

00:17:40.000 So that is why we've got to work together.

00:17:42.000 When we hit 20,000 live viewers, Gareth will return.

00:17:46.000 And I'm seeing you now, there's nearly 11,000 when we get to 20,000.

00:17:48.000 So if you're watching this anywhere other than Rumble, other than locals, I like to see you there in locals.

00:17:53.000 I like you in my little community.

00:17:54.000 I'm looking at the various screens where I can see you.

00:17:57.000 Get over to Rumble.

00:17:58.000 You might be watching this on YouTube now, and you can watch it for a while, but a little bit later, Dr. Bob Gill will be joining us.

00:18:03.000 He used to just be a family doctor.

00:18:06.000 Then the pandemic came around, and he realized that he, like many physicians across the world, was being lied to.

00:18:12.000 And you would have realized that, I suppose, maybe during the Sackler crisis, the opioid crisis, where they said, Why don't you try a little bit of risk-free fentanyl?

00:18:22.000 Try it.

00:18:22.000 If one's good, 20's fantastic!

00:18:25.000 And those very same companies and that very same ideology, come the crisis time of the pandemic, who did we turn to?

00:18:33.000 The just, the judicious, the awakened, the enlightened?

00:18:36.000 No!

00:18:36.000 The peripherally, perennially, and dreadfully frightened.

00:18:40.000 That's who we turn to.

00:18:41.000 Pfizer, sweet lady Pfizer herself, entrusted with undue power.

00:18:46.000 Well at least they're admitting, I can't even say it, you know what they're admitting right?

00:18:49.000 Let me know in the chat if you can see that.

00:18:51.000 Can't say it while we're still on YouTube and if you're an awakened wonder watching this on YouTube, if you got the notification, I suppose I'm grateful for even that because we know whose tune YouTube dances to.

00:19:03.000 The government say demonetize, YouTube says let's do it.

00:19:07.000 Not over on Rumble, where people speak freely, where we can unify together.

00:19:11.000 So Dr. Bob Gill's coming up a little bit later, and my apologies for my tardiness, because I loves ya, and I should nary be late.

00:19:18.000 Have you seen the breaking news?

00:19:19.000 There's Trump's gagging order, we're talking about that.

00:19:22.000 We're talking as well, of course, about Trump's former campaign lawyer, Jenna Ellis, pleading guilty in Georgia.

00:19:30.000 What do you think about that, guys?

00:19:31.000 Is that good?

00:19:32.000 Is that good stuff?

00:19:33.000 Oh, is it?

00:19:34.000 Is that?

00:19:34.000 Is this the final nail for Trump?

00:19:36.000 Or will Trump, the perpetual phoenix, continue to rise?

00:19:42.000 I think we've got that story here.

00:19:45.000 And also we're going to be talking about Wikipedia and his funny joke.

00:19:48.000 You know, Musk's funny joke.

00:19:49.000 Wikipedia, that stuff.

00:19:49.000 Did you see that?

00:19:51.000 Love it.

00:19:51.000 Oh, increase volume, please, it says here in the chat.

00:19:53.000 So we've had stuff like that before, so I'm going to assume it's necessary.

00:19:57.000 Get the volume up on the rumble stream, please.

00:19:59.000 Can someone tell me they've heard that and give me a response time for that?

00:20:03.000 Thank you very much.

00:20:04.000 Now first of all, let's have a look at the Trump campaign lawyer, or at least a news

00:20:09.000 report on that, over from our friends at their legacy media, baby.

00:20:13.000 News that just came through out of the state of Georgia, moving to a different criminal

00:20:16.000 case where Jenna Ellis, one of Trump's former attorneys, now joining Sidney Powell in pleading 0.97

00:20:23.000 guilty.

00:20:24.000 What do you read into that?

00:20:25.000 That's right.

00:20:27.000 Well, you know, Willie, we've seen four pleas so far in that Fulton County case.

00:20:30.000 Three of them have come from people who behaved in a legal capacity.

00:20:34.000 And I think going back to Michael Cohen, there's a lesson here that Trump didn't appear to have absorbed.

00:20:38.000 Hell hath no fury like a former lawyer whose own legal fees were unpaid and then is left to hang in the It's like the old saying goes, hell hath no fury like a former... Queen McSteve, are you drunk, Russell?

00:20:51.000 No, not for 20 years.

00:20:53.000 For 20 years not drunk.

00:20:55.000 That's not a catchphrase.

00:20:56.000 That's never going to catch on, is it?

00:20:58.000 Hell hath no fury like a lawyer not paid their fees.

00:21:01.000 So I guess there's an indication.

00:21:02.000 Still quiet, it says, Leggie23.

00:21:04.000 Louder, someone's saying.

00:21:05.000 Turn the audio up louder.

00:21:07.000 Make it louder, please, says Leggie23.

00:21:10.000 Can you tell me that you've got that?

00:21:11.000 And how long it will be guys because it's super important to our audience lots of people asking for that on the chat 13,000 people with us now when we get to 20,000 we will parade Gareth around on roller skates Okay, so see you the rest of the story from it's from MSNBC.

00:21:29.000 to see what they say.

00:21:30.000 Win while that person is being investigated.

00:21:32.000 That certainly seems to be what we're also seeing from Ken Chesbrough's plea, from Sidney

00:21:36.000 Powell's plea, and now Jenna Ellis' plea.

00:21:39.000 All three of them are believed not to have had their legal fees paid by Trump.

00:21:43.000 And then as defendants and or people under investigation, their own legal fees, you know,

00:21:49.000 in terms of their roles as defendants or investigative persons, weren't being paid.

00:21:53.000 The poverty that that caused for all three of these people could have been a major factor

00:21:57.000 in their decisions to plea.

00:21:58.000 That's no good is it?

00:22:00.000 If actually it's not about justice because they've not been paid their fees.

00:22:04.000 So tell me, do you think this escalation spells the end for Trump?

00:22:09.000 Put Y in the chat if you think this is the end for Trump or N in the chat if you think that Trump will prevail.

00:22:17.000 And if we want to get our facts straight what better than a quick trip to Wikipedia where the truth is available to you uneditorialized except for in the view of course of Elon Musk who says that he'll give it a billion dollars if they change their name from Wikipedia to Dickipedia.

00:22:34.000 I like this aspect of Elon Musk that's a pure prankster.

00:22:39.000 Don't you?

00:22:40.000 You know that he just wants to use money.

00:22:42.000 But last time he did something like that, he ended up owning Twitter, didn't he?

00:22:46.000 I'll just buy Twitter then.

00:22:47.000 And then now he's got that Bloody thing.

00:22:50.000 That albatross around his neck changed its name to X. Is this going to end up with Elon Musk owning Wikipedia with a bloody stupid name? 1.00

00:22:58.000 Should he do that? 1.00

00:22:59.000 Should it change it?

00:23:02.000 The trickster in me rather likes the idea that Wikipedia will have to change its name begrudgingly to Dickipedia and still take itself seriously on their stationery.

00:23:14.000 It'll be irritating for them.

00:23:17.000 We had Larry Sanger on the show recently.

00:23:21.000 You're familiar with Larry Sanger, you guys.

00:23:23.000 He's one of the founders of Wikipedia who sort of disavows it now.

00:23:29.000 He says it's become editorialised.

00:23:31.000 He says it's become a tool of the establishment.

00:23:33.000 He says it's lost its way and lost its objectivity.

00:23:37.000 Here's a conversation we had with Larry Sanger.

00:23:39.000 He wants a kind of decentralised but unified approach to the internet.

00:23:44.000 A lot of you, I think you're basically saying no when it comes to Trump, that this won't be the end of Trump.

00:23:49.000 Is there anything they could say about Donald Trump that would disrupt your love of Trump, who you see as the berserker?

00:23:57.000 We've got some great Trump stories coming up, so stay with us.

00:23:59.000 The berserker in the somewhat corrupted capital system.

00:24:05.000 Okay, let's have a look at Larry Sanger now.

00:24:07.000 You'll like this.

00:24:09.000 I was talking to him about information, about how How editorialized the data we consume is.

00:24:16.000 Even something like Wikipedia, which I suppose is meant to be a neutral source of information, is heavily editorialized.

00:24:23.000 But I had a little fool around with him as well.

00:24:25.000 He's absolutely adorable.

00:24:26.000 I have to say, Wikipedia is not the only encyclopedia out there.

00:24:31.000 And there is, I hope you're going to ask me about the solution, because there is a very clear solution.

00:24:39.000 All right.

00:24:40.000 Well, Larry, it would be quite remiss and almost unbearably recalcitrant for me now not to say.

00:24:46.000 Larry, watch me do this because I'm a professional.

00:24:49.000 Larry, this is very difficult for me to listen to.

00:24:53.000 Almost inducing despair.

00:24:56.000 If only there was some sort of solution to this centralised, authoritarian, highly censored and cultivated space.

00:25:03.000 There is.

00:25:03.000 Is there?

00:25:05.000 There is.

00:25:07.000 That's all we've got time for today.

00:25:09.000 We're going to have to... That's a joke.

00:25:11.000 Matt, I'm part of the problem!

00:25:16.000 He loved that.

00:25:17.000 He loved that little joke.

00:25:18.000 OK, so you guys, there's nothing, nothing that could sway you from your support of Donald Trump.

00:25:25.000 I'm looking at the Rumble chat.

00:25:27.000 In particular, we're at 17,000 now.

00:25:28.000 We are so close to Gareth Roy being dragged around on a skateboard.

00:25:32.000 Did we say skateboard or roller skates?

00:25:34.000 He's going to be pulled out here.

00:25:35.000 If that's what it takes, if that's what you want, if that's what's going to make you happy, we will provide it.

00:25:40.000 For democracy and free speech, live on Rumble.

00:25:43.000 If you're watching this on YouTube, Dr. Bob Gill coming up.

00:25:45.000 Former family doctor turned radical crusader against the influence of Big Pharma.

00:25:51.000 We'll be talking about a variety of subjects that YouTube would not permit.

00:25:55.000 For now though, Donald Trump is critiquing the Capitol.

00:25:59.000 Not politically though, I think from a real estate perspective.

00:26:02.000 Let's have a look.

00:26:03.000 You know, big in real estate, I always kept clean properties.

00:26:05.000 I like clean, clean, well run, you know, tippy top we say.

00:26:10.000 It's not a normal way to... tippy-top, tippy-top.

00:26:12.000 Tippy-top.

00:26:13.000 We want them to be tippy-top.

00:26:14.000 Well, our capital is the opposite of tippy-top.

00:26:16.000 It's a... The opposite of tippy-top.

00:26:18.000 That's what I think we're all saying.

00:26:19.000 Whereas we want a bit more of a tippy-top democracy, don't we?

00:26:23.000 You guys decide.

00:26:23.000 Or a republic.

00:26:24.000 Shit house. 1.00

00:26:26.000 Horrible. 1.00

00:26:27.000 It's horrible.

00:26:30.000 That's amazing.

00:26:31.000 That is amazing.

00:26:33.000 Why don't they understand that it is the personality that is powerful?

00:26:37.000 That it is the power of charisma and personality that has raised him to a degree, to a point, to a plateau that they can't reach.

00:26:46.000 You only need to see Biden speak.

00:26:48.000 You only need to see his opponents speak to recognize that There's just a sense of personal connection, of emotional reality, of good humour.

00:26:57.000 The automatons and who knows what forces lurk behind the masks, right guys?

00:27:03.000 They can't compete with him.

00:27:04.000 And Trump also believes it's his personality.

00:27:06.000 Do you think he's a Gemini?

00:27:07.000 Yeah, Conker306 on the Rumble chat.

00:27:09.000 I also am a Gemini.

00:27:11.000 We're at 18,000 now.

00:27:12.000 We're so close.

00:27:13.000 So close to Gareth being dragged around on a skateboard.

00:27:16.000 Trump says his personality would actually prevent war.

00:27:20.000 I mean, that is such an incredible claim.

00:27:23.000 Is it true?

00:27:24.000 And whether you're a Democrat, Republican or Independent, surely you'd roll the dice on that in the midst of the Omnicrisis.

00:27:30.000 Is he the one man that could bring peace?

00:27:34.000 Let me know.

00:27:35.000 Yes, he could bring peace.

00:27:36.000 Or no, he could not bring peace.

00:27:38.000 In the chat right now.

00:27:39.000 And then let's watch dear Donald Trump making that declaration.

00:27:42.000 And I was the first president in decades who didn't start a war.

00:27:45.000 Remember, Hillary said, he will start a war.

00:27:47.000 No, my personality kept us out of war.

00:27:51.000 She said, his personality will get us into World War III.

00:27:54.000 No, my personality kept us out of World War 3.

00:27:56.000 I'll be the next speaker!

00:27:58.000 Woo! 0.99

00:28:00.000 Kept us out.

00:28:02.000 Kept us out.

00:28:03.000 Personally, not even policies.

00:28:05.000 It's not like it was as a result of, well I'd say this to Putin, I'd say that to Zelensky, 0.92

00:28:10.000 this is how we would restore peace to the Middle East through this deal and that deal.

00:28:14.000 No, simply the personality.

00:28:16.000 We're getting tantalisingly close to the 20,000 guys.

00:28:18.000 If there's anything you can do to elevate those views.

00:28:22.000 And of course you believe that Trump, amidst his many other evident qualities, is a prince

00:28:28.000 of peace.

00:28:30.000 Now someone from the public space that I know you adore and love because Rachel Maddow, she has the exact opposite view of Donald Trump. 1.00

00:28:41.000 She believes that if Trump were ever to be elevated again to high office, I think she says that he would execute the The press!

00:28:52.000 I mean, do you think we have more free speech now, or less free speech now?

00:28:58.000 Do you think that we have a better, more responsive media now, or a worse media now?

00:29:03.000 Do you think there's more censorship under Biden, or more censorship under Trump?

00:29:09.000 If you think there's more censorship under Biden, press B. If you think there's more censorship under Trump, press T. We're not getting to that 20,000.

00:29:15.000 Gareth, you can put your top back on.

00:29:17.000 Ultimately, if you listen to what Trump is saying, you don't just sort of regard him as a spectacle, but you listen to what he's saying.

00:29:24.000 He's basically portraying a future for America, if he is put back in the White House, in which we don't have another election after that.

00:29:31.000 Ever.

00:29:32.000 Because the elections are all rigged, that the democratic process can't be trusted.

00:29:36.000 That's all true though, isn't it?

00:29:37.000 That's all true, I agree with all of them.

00:29:39.000 That Congress should just work for him, the Justice Department should just work for him, that's a strongman form of government, that's not what we have.

00:29:44.000 He'd cancel the news, like the news are done.

00:29:46.000 That he wants to put MSNBC on trial for treason so that he can execute us.

00:29:50.000 That's not true.

00:29:52.000 That's the kind of hyperbole that they condemn in Trump.

00:29:56.000 And sometimes Trump's hyperbole, I think this, is good humour.

00:29:58.000 Like he's mucking around, he's playing around, he's joshing, he's having some fun with us, to use a variety of idioms to explain that.

00:30:06.000 I've never seen more bees than I'm seeing in the rumble chat right now.

00:30:09.000 And we're staying just beneath that 20,000 mark.

00:30:12.000 Gareth, there will be no need for that harness.

00:30:14.000 I can tell you that, my man.

00:30:16.000 So we're going to watch Biden's speech in a minute on Bidenomics, which I do not like the sound of.

00:30:23.000 Don't apply his name to an economic formula.

00:30:26.000 That's going to be a disaster.

00:30:28.000 After that, we can either cover One of two stories.

00:30:31.000 And it's you that will decide.

00:30:32.000 You being the ultimate determinants.

00:30:34.000 You being those that pull the strings behind the scenes when it comes to this particular spectacle.

00:30:39.000 Not the unhidden forces that govern our global elites.

00:30:44.000 The set of corporate interests and three-letter acronym agencies across the US that dominate our systems.

00:30:50.000 No.

00:30:51.000 You are in charge here.

00:30:51.000 You.

00:30:52.000 We believe in you.

00:30:53.000 We believe in democracy.

00:30:54.000 Uh, when it comes to a simple matter of selecting a cliff, I mean, God, there's not much at stake, I suppose.

00:30:58.000 Uh, do you want to see a story about the WEF's prediction that we're all gonna be soon- uh, soon-eating bugs coming true?

00:31:05.000 Like, that bug thing, that was another conspiracy theory, wasn't it?

00:31:08.000 Do you want to see that?

00:31:09.000 If you do, press one.

00:31:10.000 Or, do you want to see the skyrocketing demand for safe rooms?

00:31:14.000 Apparently, everyone wants safe rooms, or panic rooms, as they used to be called, which I always thought was bad branding, because, you know, who wants to go in a room full of panic?

00:31:21.000 So, if it's one for the- you'll- you will- you will- Good afternoon, folks.

00:31:25.000 I'm not introducing me.

00:31:26.000 enjoy it prediction that press one or if you want to see the safe room thing press two now joe biden

00:31:31.000 has surpassed even his own low standards by messing up a speech even before it starts this time i'm not

00:31:40.000 ignoring your chat i love you guys i love you in the chat okay so let's have a look at that number

00:31:49.000 yeah here folks i'm not introducing me mark is i forgot mark

00:31:56.000 I went straight to the podium.

00:31:58.000 I apologize.

00:31:59.000 No problem.

00:32:02.000 Good afternoon.

00:32:04.000 No, that's not a good start.

00:32:06.000 Before announcing an economic policy that you've named after yourself, don't march to the podium instead of the man that was supposed to introduce you.

00:32:17.000 What's going on?

00:32:18.000 What's happening?

00:32:20.000 That's not a good start.

00:32:21.000 I don't trust Bidenomics anymore.

00:32:22.000 If you're watching us on YouTube, remember Dr. Bob Gill is coming up and in our conversation we're going to be talking about Myocarditis, pericarditis, new studies, new revelations, the corruption during the pandemic period and how he went from family doctor to crusader.

00:32:39.000 Outrageous.

00:32:40.000 Now we've asked you, what do you want to see?

00:32:42.000 The WF's prediction that we're all going to be eating bugs soon.

00:32:45.000 Bug life coming, absolutely true. 0.86

00:32:48.000 Or do you want to see about the safe rooms?

00:32:50.000 We're going to go for the, because of your, I mean, it's a landslide.

00:32:53.000 And let me tell you, you can rely on these elections.

00:32:55.000 There's no meddling going on here, baby.

00:32:58.000 You resoundingly requested the insect stuff.

00:33:02.000 And remember, if you're watching us on YouTube soon, you're going to have to click over and join us.

00:33:05.000 And if a thousand of you did that right now, you would get the happy sight of producer of the show marched around just because of the sweet nature of democracy.

00:33:14.000 So if you're watching on YouTube, click the link in the description.

00:33:16.000 You're going to have to do that before we get to Dr. Bob Gill.

00:33:19.000 And if you are with us on Rumble, remember, consider becoming an awakened wonder because you get access to fantastic conversations like the one I've had with JP.

00:33:26.000 Jordan Peterson just now and I tell you we go on a little journey, but for now you will eat bugs and you will be happy!

00:33:35.000 Oh, that's their story.

00:33:36.000 And is there a video to this?

00:33:38.000 All right, so here we go.

00:33:39.000 Here's the story.

00:33:40.000 By 2050, the world's food supply will need to feed another two billion people.

00:33:45.000 Insect farming.

00:33:46.000 Farming them?

00:33:47.000 They're the problems for the farm.

00:33:49.000 An animal feed could offer an environmentally... Animal feed?

00:33:52.000 I'm not eating animal feed and bugs.

00:33:54.000 Could... An environmentally friendly... Friendly to the environment?

00:33:57.000 I'm part of the environment solution to impending food crisis.

00:34:00.000 A source of protein and fertilizer emerging technologies could help bring insects back into the food system at scale.

00:34:06.000 Now, I do... Braig's on the chat.

00:34:08.000 You should try talking a little faster, Russell.

00:34:11.000 I recognize sarcasm when I see it.

00:34:13.000 I am, after all, English, the sweet home of sarcasm. 1.00

00:34:17.000 Like, I do miss seeing an insect on a windshield.

00:34:21.000 Who doesn't?

00:34:22.000 Who doesn't miss that sight of All those little things, oh no, yeah, we're tantalizingly close.

00:34:26.000 We're at 19,000.

00:34:28.000 But if you YouTubers, you're gonna have to join us, you awakened one. 0.99

00:34:31.000 Just get over here, we'll bring him out.

00:34:33.000 But, I tell you this, I don't wanna eat them.

00:34:36.000 I don't wanna eat them.

00:34:37.000 Like the only insects, here are the insects I'll allow in the house.

00:34:40.000 Ladybugs, because they're lovely, aren't they? 1.00

00:34:42.000 You see them in the house, ladybugs.

00:34:44.000 You don't think of them as the same as a cockroach.

00:34:47.000 And maybe butterflies.

00:34:48.000 You don't think of a butterfly as the same as a moth.

00:34:50.000 Other than that, insects, they've got a bad rap.

00:34:53.000 Right?

00:34:53.000 You don't want them in the house.

00:34:54.000 So it's the ladybug. 0.50

00:34:55.000 Even them, I wouldn't eat a ladybug. 0.99

00:34:57.000 I wouldn't eat a butterfly and be happy.

00:34:59.000 I would consider that to be Klaus Schwab's recipes gone dreadfully awry.

00:35:05.000 I think there's a big food company now, Tyson Foods.

00:35:08.000 Surely Mike Tyson can't be involved in this.

00:35:11.000 Not an awakened wonder like Mike.

00:35:12.000 We're over 19,000.

00:35:13.000 I can't believe that.

00:35:14.000 This is incredible, the escalation.

00:35:16.000 Just a few more of you on YouTube now who won't be able to watch Dr. Bob Gill anyway, because he's going to be saying things like, Well, I can't even say it.

00:35:24.000 Like, a vaccine... Like, well, he is right.

00:35:27.000 All right.

00:35:28.000 Did you see that episode of The Simpsons?

00:35:30.000 He goes, I want you to call back and say the opposite of everything you just said, like about Homer, and then he lets Bart and Lisa listen.

00:35:36.000 Dr. Bob Gill will be telling him about how effective vaccines were, and how you should just take medications without any consideration, and that the clinical trial process was 100% reliable, that there was no clinical trial information that was kept back, and there certainly was no Appetite for profiteering.

00:35:54.000 Dr. Bob Gill will be saying that.

00:35:56.000 And so much more if you're watching this on YouTube.

00:35:59.000 Make the jump.

00:36:00.000 Make the jump to Rumble.

00:36:01.000 Okay, let's have a look at Tyson Foods latest new product.

00:36:04.000 Disgusting bugs between your teeth at a price that's right.

00:36:07.000 Tyson has reached an agreement for a two-fold investment with Protix.

00:36:11.000 It's a leading global insect ingredients company.

00:36:14.000 That investment will support the growth of the emerging insect ingredient industry and expand What?

00:36:20.000 Emergent insect?

00:36:21.000 Don't try and make it sound nice, innit?

00:36:24.000 Do you know what I like, honey?

00:36:26.000 It's the emergent bug industry.

00:36:28.000 They can't just say something's an industry and expect that people are going to get into it.

00:36:32.000 That's not... That's eating insects. 0.99

00:36:34.000 That's not good.

00:36:35.000 That is normal. 0.90

00:36:36.000 Crazy guy says the end is near.

00:36:38.000 That is... Is that one of the... Locusts!

00:36:40.000 It's in the Bible!

00:36:41.000 It's in the actual Bible!

00:36:43.000 Oh no!

00:36:44.000 Gareth, I tell ya, we'll do it.

00:36:44.000 We're at 19,500.

00:36:48.000 We'll do it when we've made the exclusive switch.

00:36:50.000 If we get over that 20,000 mark, bring your friends.

00:36:53.000 You're right, Raph.

00:36:53.000 Only 400 left.

00:36:54.000 You're right, mate.

00:36:55.000 Some of the names on here, I nearly read out the names and I'm like, whoa, I'm not reading that name out!

00:36:59.000 Oh no, no you don't.

00:37:00.000 Okay, let's have a look at the rest of these bug lies.

00:37:02.000 Upcycle!

00:37:03.000 Byproducts!

00:37:04.000 Upcycle!

00:37:05.000 Byproducts!

00:37:06.000 Upcycle!

00:37:07.000 Byproducts!

00:37:08.000 Upcycle!

00:37:09.000 Byproducts!

00:37:10.000 Upcycle!

00:37:11.000 Byproducts!

00:37:12.000 Upcycle!

00:37:13.000 Byproducts!

00:37:14.000 Upcycle!

00:37:15.000 Byproducts!

00:37:16.000 Upcycle!

00:37:17.000 Upcycle!

00:37:18.000 Byproducts!

00:37:19.000 Upcycle!

00:37:20.000 Upcycle!

00:37:21.000 Byproducts!

00:37:22.000 Insect proteins and lipids, primarily to be used in the pet food, aquaculture, and livestock industries.

00:37:32.000 Nah, I'm not eating that.

00:37:33.000 What did you, what did you say, Gareth?

00:37:34.000 You were saying?

00:37:35.000 Yeah, that's where it starts there.

00:37:37.000 Now listen, if you're watching us on YouTube, we're at 19,800.

00:37:39.000 We're gonna have to leave you because Dr. Bob Gill is coming up.

00:37:44.000 Oh, we're gonna go over the 20,000.

00:37:46.000 We're about to go over 20,000 right now.

00:37:48.000 Gareth, you better come around here and let me see your face.

00:37:50.000 Join us on Rumble to see Gareth.

00:37:52.000 Join us on Rumble to see Dr. Bob Gill.

00:37:55.000 Join us to see about Trump's gagging order.

00:37:58.000 Okay, so we've got to leave you, YouTube.

00:37:59.000 We love you.

00:38:00.000 Click the link in the description.

00:38:01.000 We are way over 20,000 now, and we have a little something for you.

00:38:06.000 Are we off, YouTube?

00:38:07.000 Can we get confirmation of that?

00:38:08.000 Because... Are we off?

00:38:11.000 Stand by.

00:38:11.000 We're still on YouTube.

00:38:12.000 Get over here. 0.99

00:38:13.000 Get over to Rumble.

00:38:14.000 Get ready for it.

00:38:15.000 Get ready for some free speech.

00:38:16.000 We're here.

00:38:17.000 We are here.

00:38:18.000 We are free.

00:38:20.000 Are you ready?

00:38:20.000 Are we off YouTube?

00:38:21.000 Because we're going to be telling you about Trump's gagging order.

00:38:23.000 Former members of Trump's legal team are all pleading guilty.

00:38:26.000 You know that now.

00:38:27.000 But what position does that put Trump in?

00:38:30.000 And is this gagging order, we'll be talking about this in a minute, about Deposing Trump, getting rid of Trump, making sure that he can't stand as an opponent to Biden, or is it about sweet lady justice herself?

00:38:41.000 You'll have to tell me.

00:38:42.000 Are we ready?

00:38:44.000 Come here, look who this is.

00:38:45.000 Here's a little person you may have missed.

00:38:47.000 What on earth has happened that's so serious that you have to go and stand over there?

00:38:51.000 I'm doing this now, aren't I?

00:38:53.000 Working, working hard.

00:38:54.000 There he is, Gareth Roy.

00:38:56.000 He has come again.

00:38:57.000 He has risen as prophesied.

00:38:59.000 There's plenty more where that came from, let me tell you.

00:39:02.000 Thanks for joining us over on Rumble.

00:39:03.000 Remember, you can become an Awakened Wonder on Locals and you get I've realised now that the secret to our success is that man.

00:39:09.000 If you want an hour of Gareth, you can just observe Gareth.

00:39:12.000 If we have to put cameras all around Gareth's home and observe him, we'll do it.

00:39:17.000 If that's what it takes to bring about democracy.

00:39:19.000 If that's what it takes to bring about a spiritual awakening.

00:39:21.000 If that's what it takes for us to overcome our divisions and unite against the centralising authoritarian forces that seek to control us all through our constant fissures and fractures, then we will put cameras in Gareth's house.

00:39:35.000 But for now, let me tell you what we're going to do.

00:39:37.000 We're going to tell you a little more about Donald Trump's ongoing legal travails.

00:39:41.000 Is it about the observance of justice, Or is it about controlling the free speech of a political opponent?

00:39:49.000 So if you think it's about controlling Trump, put C. If you think it's about justice, put J. And here's the news.

00:39:58.000 No, here's the effing news. 1.00

00:40:00.000 No, here's the fucking news! 0.98

00:40:06.000 Trump's been fined for breaching his gagging order and former members of his legal team have pled guilty in the 0.99

00:40:13.000 Georgia subversion case.

00:40:15.000 But who is it that really subverts democracy?

00:40:18.000 And is there any crime that warrants the closing down of free speech?

00:40:23.000 And what is the agenda of Trump's opponents?

00:40:25.000 To bring about justice or bring an end to Trump because they fear him?

00:40:31.000 The question we're asking today is now that Trump's been fined for breaching his gagging order and former members of his legal team have pled guilty in the Georgia subversion case, where does that leave Donald Trump and his campaign to become president in 2024?

00:40:44.000 And what is the agenda of Trump's detractors?

00:40:48.000 Is it like they are objective guardians of democracy, righteousness and justice?

00:40:53.000 Or is it that they fear Trump as an opponent and are just throwing a kitchen sink at it and trying to bring down Trump because they don't think they can beat Trump in the 2024 election?

00:41:01.000 Now obviously most of you, I guess, presume that it's the latter.

00:41:05.000 And because of a total lack of trust in what you might call The establishment, the legacy media, the judiciary, the state, careerist politicians who claim to be righteous but are plainly capable of the same corruption demonstrably in some cases.

00:41:21.000 For example, Stacey Abrams denied an election result in Georgia not that long ago.

00:41:27.000 The whole Russiagate hoax Was comparable to many of the things Trump's being accused of.

00:41:32.000 So what is this story really about?

00:41:35.000 I think it's a pretty strong case for saying that the establishment want to shut down all dissenting voices and remove any alternative to their globalist, corporatist agenda.

00:41:44.000 Is that a fair argument?

00:41:45.000 I mean, are you seeing that elsewhere?

00:41:46.000 Let me know in the chat.

00:41:47.000 Remember, we stream at these times every day on Rumble.

00:41:50.000 Download the Rumble app and become a member of our community.

00:41:53.000 It really helps us.

00:41:54.000 And comment below.

00:41:55.000 Let us know what you think about this story.

00:41:57.000 Let's get into it in a little more detail.

00:42:00.000 In the day's other headlines, a judge in New York fined former President Donald Trump $5,000 for violating a gag order in his civil fraud trial.

00:42:09.000 Judge Arthur Engeron had ordered Mr. Trump to delete a social media post attacking a court staffer, but it stayed on the Trump campaign website.

00:42:18.000 A defense lawyer called it an oversight.

00:42:20.000 The judge said, quote, this is a blatant violation of the gag order.

00:42:24.000 They should change the name because gag order doesn't sound like something that the goodies would do. 1.00

00:42:29.000 We're gonna use a gag on you. 1.00

00:42:31.000 A gag?

00:42:32.000 Hold on, shouldn't I be able to talk?

00:42:34.000 What about the gag?

00:42:35.000 Defenseless youngsters were tied up and gagged in the living room.

00:42:38.000 Now I suppose one of the big questions that emerges from this case is do you trust authority anymore?

00:42:45.000 In order for a gag order to be imposed on someone, you have to, I suppose, loathe, mistrust the person upon whom the gag order is placed, and trust, admire and support the institutions that are imposing the gag order.

00:42:57.000 But there's a strong suggestion, through polls not least of all, that every time Trump is penalised in this way, his support grows, his supporters Like him more.

00:43:07.000 If you love Donald Trump, does this make you like Donald Trump any less?

00:43:10.000 Does this make you think, oh bloody hell, he's violated a gagging order there.

00:43:13.000 Plus his former legal team are pleading guilty.

00:43:15.000 Or do you immediately think, oh well, the system is trying to shut down Donald Trump because Donald Trump, whether you like him or not, he's plainly not an establishment guy.

00:43:21.000 He's plainly not part of that particular club.

00:43:23.000 And pleading guilty from the former legal team members, well, They've clearly cut some sort of plea deal, presumably, to testify against Trump.

00:43:30.000 Do any of you think, well, this is new evidence.

00:43:32.000 Oh, no, I'm going to have to reframe my entire perspective of reality.

00:43:35.000 I mean, who at this point watches the news and goes, yeah, that's reality.

00:43:39.000 That's what's going on.

00:43:40.000 Thank you.

00:43:40.000 Everything is as it seems.

00:43:43.000 I can now continue with my life in full trust of these institutions that have not done anything in the last few years to make me mistrustful of them.

00:43:49.000 He stopped short of holding Mr. Trump in contempt, which could have meant jail time.

00:43:54.000 Meantime, a co-defendant of Mr. Trump pleaded guilty in the Georgia election interference case and got five years probation.

00:44:02.000 It also came after another lawyer, Sidney Powell, pleaded guilty Thursday to misdemeanor violations.

00:44:07.000 So what is the agenda of the gagging order and the ongoing persecution of Trump?

00:44:13.000 Is it to bring about justice or is it to end Trump's campaign and bid to become a candidate and indeed president in 2024?

00:44:20.000 Does the derailment of Trump require his imprisonment or would a conviction in this matter lead to him not being able to be on the ballot?

00:44:27.000 What is the agenda here?

00:44:29.000 Because, plainly, after everything we've learned about, for example, Hillary Clinton and the Clinton campaign and Russiagate and the Steele dossier and the Hunter Biden laptop and the impact that potentially would have made in the 2020 election, we can't just go, oh well, this is just what they say it is.

00:44:41.000 You can't anymore, can you?

00:44:43.000 So even if you aren't an ardent Donald Trump supporter, and even if you have doubts about these actions in Georgia, That still doesn't detract from the plain fact that you can't trust the Democrats either, who are plainly trying to create some censorship surveillance state, where the impediment of free speech, the curtailing, the censoring of free speech, the shutting down of free speech is an overall agenda, in particular with Donald Trump, but also everybody else as well.

00:45:06.000 Last week, U.S.

00:45:07.000 District Court Judge Tanya Chukkan, overseeing United States v. Donald Trump, issued a gag order prohibiting a leading presidential candidate, Donald Trump, from engaging in speech aimed at government staff, among others, during his trial.

00:45:19.000 There is some disdain among conservatives for the former president, but if you're cheering on a judge who's inhibiting political speech on rickety grounds, you're no friend of the democracy or the constitution.

00:45:28.000 Mr Trump may still vigorously seek public support as a presidential candidate, debate policies and people related to that candidacy, criticise the current administration, and assert his belief that this prosecution is politically motivated, Chookton explained.

00:45:41.000 But those critical First Amendment freedoms do not allow him to launch a pre-trial smear campaign against participating government staff, their families, and foreseeable witnesses.

00:45:50.000 Now that sounds reasonable and actually standard.

00:45:53.000 But is that what this is really about?

00:45:56.000 Is this about ensuring that justice continues with its unabated trajectory towards empirical demonstrable righteousness?

00:46:04.000 Or is it to foreclose on the ability of Donald Trump to communicate effectively because he's a genuine threat to the system?

00:46:09.000 Let's keep looking at it and work it out.

00:46:11.000 Who is Chuck Tan to dictate the contours of a presidential candidate's political speech?

00:46:15.000 What if one of the participating government staff or a family member is compromised by partisanship?

00:46:20.000 Moreover, preemptively suggesting that without gagging, Trump will engage in a smear campaign is as prejudicial to the case as any of the inflammatory things Trump has thrown around.

00:46:29.000 It implies that any accusation now aimed at the prosecutors is untrue.

00:46:33.000 Trump contends that he is being railroaded by special counsel Jack Smith, the longtime federal prosecutor who works on behalf of Democrats and Joe Biden.

00:46:41.000 You might believe that the special counsel is a chaste defender of lady justice, but there is ample evidence that partisan considerations are at play.

00:46:48.000 Fears of a politicized Justice Department are real.

00:46:51.000 As we speak, the head of the Democratic Party is being mollycoddled by the state in a very similar case involving classified documents.

00:46:58.000 If you don't believe in the objectivity of the judiciary, then these kind of measures become unsustainable and non-applicable.

00:47:07.000 They can't be applied.

00:47:08.000 Unless you think that the Justice Department is independent, unless you ignore that there are whistleblowers within the CIA and FBI currently making claims about the Biden administration, it's difficult to think of these as objective organisations.

00:47:19.000 It's the same with the media.

00:47:20.000 You're at a point now where you, broadly speaking, do not trust the legacy media.

00:47:24.000 You recognise that what they do is amplify propaganda, normalise the agenda of the powerful.

00:47:28.000 You don't think, oh wow, look at this, there's nothing to worry about, or oh fantastic, this is terrifying.

00:47:33.000 We're at a point where the objectivity of these institutions has been interrogated and found wanting so severely that it's almost impossible possible to sustain the idea that there is a justice

00:47:43.000 department that is from a place of neutrality and justice making value judgments on Trump or Biden or you

00:47:51.000 or me. What it appears I think to all of us is these institutions have been co-opted and are

00:47:57.000 now subsidiaries and secondary to higher interests that are difficult for us to entirely assess. So

00:48:04.000 at this point there is no real trust.

00:48:06.000 You can't say, oh well if the Justice Department have gagged Donald Trump, obviously Trump must be saying things that are harmful to justice, the justice system that we respect.

00:48:15.000 You have to always think, I believe.

00:48:17.000 No, probably what this is, is they're trying to just destroy Trump because he's a genuine threat and they'll just use anything.

00:48:22.000 They'll say anything.

00:48:24.000 I mean, that is how the system appears to work to me at this point.

00:48:27.000 Whatever the case, the Justice Department now plays a big part in Trump's campaign for the presidency and probably his legal case as well.

00:48:33.000 If the state's accusations can be spread throughout the media before a trial, why can't the defendant speak openly as well?

00:48:40.000 It would seem to be unfair that accusations and cases can be made almost a totalitarian media campaign.

00:48:47.000 As Joseph Stalin said, quantity has a quality of its own.

00:48:51.000 If every single news outlet is saying the same thing, condemning a person, particularly if that transcends other principles of justice like innocent until proven guilty, you have the right, I think, to question whether or not there's another agenda at play.

00:49:05.000 If you bring that into a context where none of us really trust the legacy media anymore, we know that they lie, we've seen them lying, we've seen their value shifting, and you apply that To a story like this one, where the judiciary appear to be biased in the favour of a particular political outcome.

00:49:21.000 Seemingly, that outcome being, we do not want Donald Trump running for president next year.

00:49:27.000 And what's obfuscating that is, oh, look, he's done this now, oh, he's done that now.

00:49:30.000 I'm obviously not in a position to say, there's no way Donald Trump would tamper in elections.

00:49:34.000 Who knows what Donald Trump's capable of?

00:49:36.000 But what is clear is the agenda of the powerful is being supported, it seems, by the judiciary and certainly by the media.

00:49:42.000 What do you think?

00:49:43.000 Let me know in the chat.

00:49:44.000 In the name of fairness, Chuckton contends that Trump does not enjoy unfettered First Amendment rights because he might intimidate witnesses.

00:49:51.000 It's already illegal to intimidate witnesses.

00:49:54.000 Charge him if he does it.

00:49:55.000 This is happening a lot around free speech issues.

00:49:57.000 They're using ideas that everyone agrees with.

00:50:00.000 Don't intimidate witnesses.

00:50:01.000 Don't use hate speech.

00:50:02.000 Don't have child pornography.

00:50:03.000 All the things that we're like, yeah, of course, yeah, of course, yeah, of course.

00:50:06.000 But there are laws already for all of that.

00:50:08.000 You can use the existing laws to prosecute people for those ideas.

00:50:11.000 When it's like, and because of that, why don't we shut down free speech?

00:50:15.000 No, no, no.

00:50:16.000 You've just artfully moved into a new territory, revealing an entirely different agenda.

00:50:21.000 You want to control dissent.

00:50:23.000 You recognize that the tendency of the world is to move apart into broader, wider, more democratic spaces, where a wider variety of opinions might be conveyed, where centralization is less likely, less plausible, and in order to ensure that the trajectory continues in the direction that the powerful would prefer, you have to manipulate the checker pieces around the board to say, ah, look, see, we have to shut down free speech because, you know, child pornography, intimidation of witnesses.

00:50:47.000 Well, those things are already illegal.

00:50:49.000 Laws already exist to cover all the other premises Smith has used to rationalise the gag order.

00:50:55.000 That means the gag order is, by definition, unnecessary, right?

00:50:59.000 The notion that a jury pool is going to be impartial in a trial involving a divisive former president who is not only a leading contender for the presidency but one of the most famous people on earth is absurd.

00:51:09.000 And the notion a DC jury poll will be impartial when it comes to Trump is fantastical.

00:51:14.000 There is little that can be done about it.

00:51:16.000 But further gagging the defendant only feeds, at the minimum, the perception that this is all politically motivated.

00:51:23.000 And I suppose that, the perception that this is all politically motivated, I suppose that points to a problem that's even larger than this extraordinary one at the centre of current American democracy.

00:51:31.000 What do you think is the motivation behind various current wars?

00:51:35.000 Is it what you're being told?

00:51:37.000 Is it like, oh, we have to intervene in Ukraine-Russia conflict for humanitarian reasons?

00:51:41.000 China are becoming more and more aggressive? 0.99

00:51:43.000 The very reason you need to stop free speech, or the reason they need to stop free speech, whether it's Trump or you or me, is because there is the instant immersive and global ability to go, excuse me, what about the semiconductor business?

00:51:55.000 More broadly than that, as I've said for a very long while, if the Democrat party were serious about opposing Trump, they would change.

00:51:59.000 They would change and become more reliable.

00:52:00.000 that they can't have that conversation anymore.

00:52:03.000 More broadly than that, as I've said for a very long while, if the Democrat party was

00:52:07.000 serious about opposing Trump, they would change.

00:52:10.000 They would change and become more reliable.

00:52:11.000 They would become more accountable.

00:52:12.000 Let's say we recognise we've created Donald Trump for our lying, for our willingness to

00:52:16.000 be the party of big donation, the party of war, and we're going to change that immediately

00:52:21.000 We're so sorry.

00:52:22.000 They're never, ever, ever going to do that.

00:52:23.000 They can't do that.

00:52:24.000 There'd be no point in them if they did that.

00:52:25.000 So what they have to do is ensure that you don't have any alternative and ultimately we'll vote for them out of a kind of weary exhaustion.

00:52:32.000 Establishment media informs us that the gag order is just narrow and meant to protect the integrity of the trial and the jury pool.

00:52:39.000 In her Solomonic wisdom, Chuck Tan cut the state's request in half.

00:52:44.000 A narrow gag order limiting free speech is still a gag order limiting free speech.

00:52:49.000 The fact that Smith was seeking even broader limitations only makes Trump's claims more plausible.

00:52:54.000 Smith has also argued that Trump should not be afforded special treatment because he's a candidate.

00:52:59.000 He's right.

00:52:59.000 No one's right to defend themselves or to engage in speech should be inhibited, not even during trials.

00:53:04.000 Still, gag orders are almost always an unconstitutional prior restraint.

00:53:08.000 For years, the ACLU and similar groups argued the same.

00:53:12.000 We can't bring you this content without the support of Sticker Mule.

00:53:15.000 And in fact, there'll be no point in bringing this content without Sticker Mule.

00:53:18.000 They've created this limited edition sticker pack.

00:53:20.000 There are six stunning designs that are only available in this pack.

00:53:24.000 They're all made with Sticker Mule's magic touch.

00:53:27.000 Sticker Mule has 10,000 of these packs ready to deliver to your address absolutely free.

00:53:33.000 Just go to StickerMule.com forward slash Russell and fill out the form.

00:53:36.000 It's StickerMule.com.

00:53:37.000 dot com forward slash Russell get a free pack of amazing stickers you can adorn your clothes with them. They're

00:53:43.000 fantastic Sticker meal damn loyal damn good company sticker meal 0.94

00:53:48.000 Okay, let's get back to this then many people simply believe Trump deserves it think about the precedent 0.89

00:53:54.000 administrations can now launch prosecutions against political rivals calibrated to take place in favorable

00:53:59.000 cities and time to coincide with elections and then demand gag orders be implemented on

00:54:04.000 those running for office if If you think they won't do it to others, you haven't been paying attention.

00:54:08.000 Trump is a divisive figure.

00:54:10.000 Even if you love Donald Trump, you know that, right?

00:54:12.000 And you imagine that he's divisive because he's causing so much chaos, because he's not the usual type of politician that ascends these kind of spaces.

00:54:19.000 But especially if you detest Donald Trump, Imagine just for a second, the philosopher's friend, the return of Christ and the, you know, the Christian's belief in the actuality of that.

00:54:28.000 If Christ were to return and were to say, we're going to reorganize the world now in tune with ethical and spiritual principles that are based on fairness and justice and love and wherever we see injustice, We are going to address it and amend it.

00:54:42.000 Therefore, I'm running for the candidacy of the Republican Party or as an Independent or heaven forfend as a Democrat.

00:54:47.000 If Jesus Christ were to run, do you imagine that the establishment would go, Oh, this is good.

00:54:51.000 Finally, Jesus is back.

00:54:52.000 Let's get this guy in charge so that we can all be saved.

00:54:55.000 Or do you think Then like last time round, they would go, shut that guy up now! 0.92

00:55:00.000 Kill him, say whatever you have got to say to justify stopping this guy, because he's got an uncanny ability to make ordinary people realise they've not been voting in their own best interest for many, many years now, and that change is possible. 0.95

00:55:12.000 So if you don't like Donald Trump, just imagine it were Jesus. 0.96

00:55:15.000 And I'm certainly not making a comparison between Donald Trump and Jesus.

00:55:18.000 That's a kind of a he might do.

00:55:20.000 But just as an exercise, what would they do if Christ returned?

00:55:20.000 God love him.

00:55:24.000 Would it be, oh, thank God, the Lord, you have returned to save us all?

00:55:28.000 Or would it be, oh no, how are we going to run the world now for financial imperatives and imperatives of dominion?

00:55:33.000 How are we going to keep people suffering through lenses of fear and desire?

00:55:37.000 How are we going to lower the expectations of individual people, turn people against one another all the time?

00:55:42.000 If there's a figure here now that's saying whoever you are, wherever you're from, there is love within you, the possibility of awakening is available to you.

00:55:48.000 you now, you are all welcome here. Let's put aside our material considerations and find

00:55:52.000 the light within. No, they wouldn't be like, oh, this is good stuff, would they? They would

00:55:56.000 kill that guy pretty swiftly. But before they killed him, I imagine they'd gag him. No wonder 1.00

00:56:00.000 Donald Trump has to be gagged because let's face it, he is not a typical orator. Here

00:56:05.000 he is comparing himself favorably to Alphonse Capone. And it's not often you think that

00:56:10.000 Al Capone's full name is Alphonse, is it? Today, a judge put on a gag order. I'll be

00:56:15.000 the only politician in history that runs with a gag order where I'm not allowed to criticize

00:56:21.000 Where is Donald Trump right now?

00:56:22.000 What is that backdrop?

00:56:23.000 It's hay bales, isn't it?

00:56:24.000 And why is there a children's book for sale next to this very serious thing that he's doing?

00:56:30.000 Also though, there's this book for kids available now.

00:56:33.000 Can you imagine this?

00:56:34.000 Do you believe this?

00:56:35.000 I'm not allowed to criticize people, so we'll see.

00:56:37.000 We'll appeal it!

00:56:40.000 We'll appeal it and we'll see but it's it's so on so unconstitutional The good thing is we have so much support.

00:56:48.000 So and it just makes it even more so Look, I'm the only guy that ever got indicted.

00:56:48.000 It's incredible.

00:56:53.000 I got indicted more than Alphonse Capone.

00:56:55.000 Did anyone ever hear about?

00:56:57.000 That's the natural laugh.

00:56:58.000 That's not the forced laugh that you see in many political situations.

00:57:00.000 Oh, are we meant to... Is this where we do a standing ovation?

00:57:03.000 Oh, are we meant to clap now when someone's going, That's just why America's bloody well brilliant!

00:57:07.000 And you're like, oh god!

00:57:09.000 Has anyone heard of Alfred Capone?

00:57:09.000 Like it's a genuine laugh.

00:57:11.000 It's like he understands comedy.

00:57:14.000 Al Capone, if you look him...

00:57:15.000 If you looked at him the wrong way, he was seriously tough, right?

00:57:19.000 He's not even actually condemning Al Capone, is he?

00:57:22.000 He was seriously tough.

00:57:23.000 He's quite admiring of Al Capone.

00:57:25.000 One of the things I feel about our sort of mad puritanical time is many aspects of humanity itself are being cut off.

00:57:31.000 Like our nature.

00:57:33.000 Our true nature is being questioned.

00:57:35.000 Our sense of humour.

00:57:36.000 Our love.

00:57:37.000 Our connection to one another.

00:57:38.000 It's almost like the state wants to undermine every aspect of a human being till everything is just material, rational little blocks.

00:57:45.000 Till there's nothing natural or flowing or free or unquestioned.

00:57:49.000 Till we're just blocked and locked in shame and doubt and fear.

00:57:52.000 And a figure like Trump actually is extraordinary because he doesn't run on that pathway.

00:57:57.000 He ain't ashamed.

00:57:58.000 He's not afraid.

00:57:59.000 He's like, you keep indicting the guy, he's still sort of making jokes, but he hasn't been taking it very seriously, does he?

00:58:04.000 Sort of amazing, really.

00:58:08.000 little scar in there. I'm sure it was a minor accident. But Al Capone, if you looked at

00:58:15.000 him in the wrong way, if he didn't like you, you looked at him a little bit askance, he 0.98

00:58:19.000 blew your brains out. He was only indicted one time. I've been invited, I've been indicted 0.91

00:58:26.000 Four times.

00:58:27.000 And in addition I have the civil trials that are all coming out of the Justice Department.

00:58:31.000 They've weaponised the Justice Department and the FAA.

00:58:33.000 I suppose the challenge is for Trump's opponents is many people find plausibility in Trump's claims.

00:58:38.000 Even someone like me who years ago thought the idea of Donald Trump being president was risible and during his presidency had pretty serious questions about the nature of his presidency.

00:58:49.000 At this point I now believe that what Donald Trump actually is, is a disruptor to establishment incentives, imperatives and overall agenda. 0.98

00:59:00.000 I feel like even if you take your own opinion of Donald Trump and put it to one side, I like him, I love him, I hate him, whatever that is, if you look at him almost like it was chemistry, what happens when you put a droplet of Donald Trump into the establishment, He doesn't fucking like it! 0.99

00:59:15.000 He doesn't like it! 0.97

00:59:16.000 It's disruptive and destabilising to the establishment agenda. 0.99

00:59:20.000 Whether it's from a war perspective, the fact that he just says mad shit all the time, that's, for me, what seems to be most significant about him. 0.96

00:59:28.000 And then I know there's loads of you who think, well, no, his policies are about economics, his policies are about, you know, you let me know, but... 0.96

00:59:34.000 Certainly, plainly, his claim that the Justice Department is being weaponised against him seems, at this point, more verifiable and true to me, because I don't believe in the moral legitimacy of the state at all.

00:59:46.000 Do you?

00:59:47.000 So, the question that we're left with is, are these gagging orders and trials about finding the objective phenomena that we call justice, or is it the weaponisation of the justice system so that establishment imperatives can continue unabated and unobstructed?

01:00:04.000 Sometimes, whether it's COVID or Donald Trump or the war or any issue, if you place a subject to one side and observe the surrounding phenomena, you can come to a better perspective, you know?

01:00:13.000 Because Trump is a divisive figure.

01:00:15.000 COVID was a divisive topic.

01:00:17.000 War is a divisive subject.

01:00:18.000 But if you look at the behaviour of institutions around, if you look at the behaviour of the media, the judiciary, the state, you're sometimes able to see how they are converging around a subject.

01:00:27.000 And I find it so difficult to believe that the incentives of the state, of the Democrat Party, of the legacy media, How can we help everyone?

01:00:35.000 I'm not saying they are demonic forces.

01:00:37.000 I'm saying that collectively the momentum is towards the preservation of a set of interests that aren't really in alignment with the lives of ordinary Americans or ordinary people across the world.

01:00:48.000 That's why I use the Jesus Christ example.

01:00:50.000 All of the values that coalesce around any spiritual practice are completely abandoned, it seems to me, when ensuring that the system functions in the way that's intended to.

01:01:00.000 Do you trust the news?

01:01:01.000 Do you trust the establishment?

01:01:02.000 Do you trust these institutions?

01:01:04.000 Unless the answer to those questions is yes, and basically it can't be, it never is, that would be madness, then you have to be open to the idea that this gagging order is about repressing free speech, not enabling justice to flow unimpeded.

01:01:16.000 But that's just what I think.

01:01:17.000 Let me know what you think in the chat.

01:01:19.000 See you in a second.

01:01:20.000 Thank you for choosing Fox News.

01:01:22.000 Good day.

01:01:23.000 No. 1.00

01:01:23.000 Here's the fucking news. 1.00

01:01:25.000 So, is that gagging order designed to ensure justice or in order to prevent democracy? 0.99

01:01:33.000 Let us know and are you confident that comparable regulations wouldn't be deployed even if it were not Donald Trump but Jesus Christ returned to earth claiming that a new order could be established of decentralised legitimate democracies?

01:01:48.000 What do you imagine the establishment would do?

01:01:50.000 Welcome our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, or gag him double hard, lest he should unite us all.

01:01:57.000 Surely now, as close as we're likely to get on this channel to a returning Messiah, is our next guest.

01:02:04.000 NHS doctor, that in our country means the National Health Service, in the UK that means a general family doctor.

01:02:11.000 But now, Public health activist, enlightened and awakened by events during the pandemic, Dr Bob Gill has become a prominent voice and ally for those of us, excuse me, that are questioning the way that the narrative unfolded during the pandemic.

01:02:27.000 Thanks for joining us, Dr Bob.

01:02:30.000 Great to be here, Russell.

01:02:32.000 So, one of the stories that would be a great place for us to start would be this seemingly peculiar and surely not true claim that the version of the Pfizer vaccine that was initially tested and, as I understand, given to Pfizer employees was different from the initial round of vaccines released in the UK.

01:02:55.000 Am I getting that right?

01:02:56.000 Because it doesn't sound like it should be true.

01:02:58.000 Yeah, that's right, Russell.

01:03:00.000 There were two processes used to produce the mRNA vaccine. 0.81

01:03:04.000 One was a quite expensive but a clean process, which was using our DNA to sequence RNA.

01:03:13.000 And the second process, process two, which was used to mass produce the vaccine, was using E. coli and putting into E. coli plasmids and getting the E. coli to reproduce the mRNA.

01:03:28.000 So it's a cheaper form of producing the vaccine.

01:03:31.000 But the problem with that is you can get contamination.

01:03:35.000 So you can get genetic material from the E. coli into your vaccine vial.

01:03:41.000 Now, there's a very low threshold of tolerating contamination within vaccines.

01:03:48.000 However, you know, researchers looked into this matter and found very high levels of contamination with DNA.

01:03:57.000 Now the problem with DNA is it can potentially get incorporated into your own genome, and also the presence of DNA can actually spark anaphylaxis.

01:04:09.000 That's when you get a severe allergic reaction.

01:04:12.000 I don't know if you remember, but once the Pfizer vaccine came out, Later on, a week or two later, they started telling practitioners to keep the patients with you for 15 minutes, keep an eye on them for 15 minutes after the vaccine.

01:04:28.000 Now, that was related to the potential reaction to the endotoxin from the E. coli contamination.

01:04:35.000 So that's where that came from.

01:04:37.000 And, you know, this research, initially done by Dr. Kevin McKernan, who's a very highly qualified, respected academic, whose whole life is devoted to, you know, researching these matters.

01:04:51.000 He was part of the Human Genome Project.

01:04:55.000 Highly credentialed person.

01:04:57.000 Now, his work has been replicated in Japan, in Europe, in other units in the US and they've all found very worrying high

01:05:07.000 levels of contamination.

01:05:09.000 And you know, the problem was Pfizer didn't declare this to the regulator.

01:05:15.000 So that's the problem.

01:05:16.000 And later on, they were forced to declare it to the European regulator.

01:05:19.000 So they've actually confirmed it themselves that this problem exists.

01:05:23.000 It's been extraordinary the way that information has begun in the protean swamp of conspiracy

01:05:33.000 theory and bubbled its way up through the various channels and valves to accepted medical

01:05:42.000 data.

01:05:44.000 For example, I remember hearing very early in the pandemic period posts that would definitely have been censored that the The problem with this vaccine is it has the potential to alter your DNA.

01:05:54.000 I feel like that was one of the kind of stories I thought, oh, even for me, a person that's open to almost any anti-authoritarian narrative, that has no trust in the legacy media, that has very little trust in Big Pharma at all, no trust in the state, surely it doesn't have the potential to alter your genetics.

01:06:12.000 I thought that was sort of highfalutin, but you're saying that that actually is one of those conspiracy theories that's kind of true.

01:06:22.000 Yeah, there is a risk.

01:06:23.000 So, you know, the DNA contamination poses several threats.

01:06:27.000 It promotes clotting, it promotes immune dysfunction, and at some level it can promote cancerous transformation.

01:06:35.000 Now that, if you have, you know, some of this DNA being Entered into into your own cells DNA, it can actually turn on the process of cancer.

01:06:45.000 And if you add that in with immune dysfunction, then the risk becomes real.

01:06:49.000 And that risk has been documented elsewhere.

01:06:52.000 So, you know, this is coming from highly respected sources.

01:06:56.000 If people want to look into this further, I suggest they look on the World Health Council's Twitter.

01:07:02.000 And they've got a three hour lecture going into the detail of all of this most recent revelation and analyzing the implications.

01:07:09.000 You're talking, I suppose, about SV40 DNA.

01:07:13.000 That's specifically the name, is it, of the aspect of this malformant component that can induce, can be carcinogenic?

01:07:24.000 So it was recognized this SV40, simian virus 40, a, you know, a strip of genetic code has the potential to be a cancer-promoting gene.

01:07:24.000 That's right.

01:07:35.000 It needs other factors to line up.

01:07:38.000 But there is no rational explanation as to why this even got into the Pfizer vaccine.

01:07:43.000 That is the problem with all of this.

01:07:45.000 What is it doing there?

01:07:46.000 Why is that contamination?

01:07:48.000 Why is that sequence of code even in the vaccine?

01:07:51.000 So it raises lots of questions about what's gone on in the production.

01:07:55.000 What questions?

01:07:56.000 What questions?

01:07:57.000 Why shouldn't it be in there?

01:07:58.000 What do you mean they can't identify what the function of that is?

01:08:03.000 You can't explain why that was in the vaccine, you know, why that specific coding, which is recognized to be potentially dangerous, how did that end up in the vaccine?

01:08:13.000 It wasn't required for the production of the vaccine.

01:08:17.000 That's the problem.

01:08:18.000 So between the testing and, you know, Albert Baller turning up on TV shows saying it's 98% effective, claiming it was a kind of wonder drug, that it was a moonshot, a few weird little things happened.

01:08:31.000 They started using plasma out of E. coli that they hadn't previously been doing, and there's the odd introduction of SV40 DNA that promotes cancer.

01:08:42.000 Are you saying that both of those things happened between trial-in and release?

01:08:47.000 Yeah, they used a different, cleaner process for the trial and a cheaper mass production process for the vaccine that was rolled out to the public.

01:08:58.000 Now, to use E. coli to produce mRNA in this way is not uncommon.

01:09:02.000 The problem is the contamination issue.

01:09:05.000 If your quality control isn't good enough, if you outsource the production to labs you've got no control over, that's where the problems arise.

01:09:14.000 Yeah, I suppose you're alluding to the many stories about the lack of standards in many of the labs where clinical trials took place.

01:09:22.000 They're almost too difficult to number and they're certainly difficult to locate due to the clandestine shrouding of these issues.

01:09:31.000 Another thing that seems pertinent to talk about, you and I both being in the UK right now, is the British politician Andrew Bridgen last night, or earlier this week, a couple of days ago I think, Raising the question of excess deaths in British Parliament.

01:09:45.000 There's a few things I want to point out.

01:09:47.000 Like this phenomena of excess deaths is one of the things that's been masked.

01:09:52.000 Many people that were in this space questioning the way that Covid was being reported on noted that there appeared to be an attempt to attribute to coronavirus itself Adverse side effects that could potentially have been caused by the vaccine.

01:10:10.000 This 60,000 additional deaths that took place in the United States, I think I'm right in saying between 21 and 23, as was pointed out in, tell me the name of that author when you get a minute, James, was pointed out in the book about excess deaths, was, you know, a Vietnam War worth of casualties.

01:10:28.000 America lost as many young people in the Vietnam War over a 12-year period as it did in that Two year period to excess deaths.

01:10:36.000 How come excess deaths is still a difficult subject to talk about?

01:10:41.000 How come there was hardly anyone in Parliament, that's our form of Congress, when Andrew Bridgen raised the matter?

01:10:48.000 What's going on with excess deaths?

01:10:50.000 Is this going to be another of the strands around this period of time that's going to disclose important information to us?

01:10:58.000 Well, I think that the politicians, unfortunately, have a vested interest in covering all of this up, don't they?

01:11:03.000 Because they've followed the narrative of the drug companies.

01:11:07.000 They've allowed us to do what amounts to a mass experiment, vaccinating the whole population against a virus which a lot of us had developed natural immunity to.

01:11:20.000 So they were pushing this vaccine down our throat.

01:11:24.000 And now that the chickens are coming home to roost, They don't want the impact of their decisions to be known widely amongst the public, so they might share some of these concerns.

01:11:35.000 You know, Andrew Brigden and others have done a lot to try and bring this to the attention of politicians, and they're willfully being blind about what's going on here.

01:11:45.000 Yeah, it does seem like that because of the many concerns, shall we call them, that sprung up around this period after the initial explosion of euphoria and excitement that accompanied the advent of the vaccine, which many media institutions tried to artificially maintain, When inquiry did begin, it was, I suppose, focused on the potential that the vaccine could have consequences that are worse than the problem that it was invented to solve.

01:12:20.000 Now, As time goes on it seems that we're moving closer to that conclusion rather than further away from it.

01:12:29.000 It did seem that there were a number of sudden unexplained deaths.

01:12:33.000 It's another one of those subjects that people were discouraged from discussing even though it became almost anecdotally observable.

01:12:41.000 The evidence of your own eyes when people were dropping dead on sports fields, young famous people dying and therefore being reported on, the number of You know the sort of the number of morticians and people working in various funeral services saying that they were seeing stuff that was Didn't make sense people within in our country their health service pointing out that deaths were being reported inaccurately At this point it's we've we've arrived now.

01:13:09.000 We've arrived now at It seems to me a point where there needs to be a kind of reckoning.

01:13:15.000 That even if you were to take this subject in isolation, away from the concerns around the military-industrial complex, the nature of legacy media, the obvious hypocrisy and corruption of the years leading up to coronavirus, but that period is simply revealed rather than created.

01:13:34.000 So it seems that there's a necessity for a kind of a pandemic reckoning.

01:13:39.000 But that's unlikely to take place, isn't it?

01:13:42.000 When in this country and in America, broadly speaking, both political parties have a general alliance and very little appetite to hold to account the powerful interests that contributed to, if not caused, many of these problems.

01:13:58.000 Yeah, I think you get to the heart of the matter.

01:14:00.000 There is a distinct lack of accountability.

01:14:03.000 There is no reckoning.

01:14:04.000 We have a media that is docile and complicit, you know, repeating without question the political talking points.

01:14:12.000 So you have a corporate capture of the state and you have a complicit media.

01:14:18.000 So accountability becomes a rarity.

01:14:20.000 You know, if we ever get close to accountability, it's normally lip service.

01:14:24.000 How many public inquiries do we have where nobody goes to jail for major failings?

01:14:29.000 You know, they get a rap on the knuckles and 20 years down the line we get close to the truth.

01:14:35.000 This is a built-in design.

01:14:38.000 It's not a flaw.

01:14:39.000 That's the design of the system.

01:14:41.000 to set up regulatory bodies that give the impression of independent oversight, but they're

01:14:46.000 generally toothless and you appoint people from the very corporate interests that you're supposed

01:14:51.000 to be regulating. So, you know, an idiot might make the, you know, anybody might make a mistake, 1.00

01:14:57.000 but an idiot makes the same mistake again and again. You've got a 50% chance of being right, 1.00

01:15:02.000 even as a fool, right? 0.99

01:15:04.000 In a binary decision. 0.99

01:15:05.000 But these people keep making the same decision, time and time again, and you can only conclude this is deliberate, this is part of the system.

01:15:13.000 Yeah, another of the components of this has been the changing nature of reporting around myocarditis and pericarditis.

01:15:22.000 That's another one of the subjects that just couldn't be discussed, that was regarded as a conspiracy theory.

01:15:29.000 You know, when initial adverse events were reported or when anecdotally people talked about stuff like that, it was regarded as a kind of cultural heresy.

01:15:38.000 But now Now Pfizer have been forced to confirm the increased risk of myocarditis in young males.

01:15:46.000 What does that shift tell us?

01:15:48.000 Are we likely to see further shifts?

01:15:50.000 And at what point do these shifts become tantamount to admission of a failure of the whole project?

01:15:57.000 Yeah, they've been dragged kicking and screaming to this point.

01:16:01.000 You know, people like Peter McCullough have done a lot of work, you know, the famous cardiologist, done a lot of work raising the awareness about myocarditis with the vaccine.

01:16:10.000 At the beginning, you know, people were conflating having the illness with the vaccine, but actually you can do specific tests which show that what was present on post-mortem examination, special stains can identify that the protein within the heart The genetic material within the heart was spike protein produced by the vaccine.

01:16:32.000 So you can do very clever tests to find out, was it the virus or was it the vaccine?

01:16:37.000 And it was work done by, I think it was a team in Germany that looked at post-mortems of people with sudden death.

01:16:43.000 to look unexplained sudden death, to look was there myocarditis and what was the source of

01:16:48.000 that myocarditis. So the hard work has been done and I think Pfizer's, you know, eventual

01:16:53.000 admission of the problem is, I think, their way of managing their corporate image and corporate trust.

01:17:01.000 If you give a little bit you may come across as having an ounce of integrity.

01:17:05.000 And I think that's what's going on there.

01:17:07.000 Yeah and they're obvious and it's hardly necessary to state that the financial, institutional, corporate and global structures that undergird these types of issues and these types of organizations are Never able to be fully interrogated and investigated, because if you were to, you would no longer be able to sustain this model.

01:17:36.000 With Black Rock's Larry Fink showing support, or I think vocalising support, for the Labour leader Keir Starmer, who's the Leader of the Opposition, equivalent I suppose to the Democrats in this country, does that further Demonstrate the impossibility of ever addressing these issues for established democracy.

01:17:55.000 If you put together Andrew Brigdon talking to an empty parliament with Keir Starmer essentially being verified by the, you know, global financial interests, should we say, for the sake of simplicity.

01:18:09.000 How, through parliament, through congress, through conventional democracy, a democracy that many people believe to have been entirely corrupted, are we ever Able to have the reckoning that appears to be necessary.

01:18:22.000 Well, you know, I'll just, um...

01:18:25.000 read you a quote from Mussolini.

01:18:27.000 Fascism should be rightly called corporatism as it is a merger of state and corporate power.

01:18:34.000 That's what Larry Fink has demonstrated.

01:18:36.000 He's given Keir Starmer his blessing.

01:18:39.000 Why?

01:18:39.000 Not because, based on some moral principles or righteousness, based on how he's going to maximize the return for his investors.

01:18:48.000 That's what it's all about.

01:18:49.000 So, you know, That's where the power comes from.

01:18:54.000 It's money.

01:18:55.000 And the politicians are looking for big backers because in due course, no doubt, after they leave politics, they want to cash up for their compliance with corporate power.

01:19:05.000 So this is the belly of the beast, I'm afraid.

01:19:09.000 And, you know, unless we get a critical mass of informed public, awakened public, There can be no reckoning.

01:19:17.000 There can be no change to the system that is endemically putting money above the environment, above human life, above everything else.

01:19:26.000 That is unfortunately the power.

01:19:28.000 And the pandemic we have is of greed and of self-interest.

01:19:33.000 That's the real pandemic.

01:19:34.000 Yeah, and it's difficult to address that kind of pandemic without spiritual measures, without personal awakening, without a set of cultural values that very much are at odds with the current momentum.

01:19:47.000 As well, I would say, Bob, with a culture that seems very fractured, where a lot of energy seems to be spent through the legacy media crushing dissenting voices and discrediting them.

01:19:59.000 And ensuring that there is ongoing cultural conflict between people who in alliance, the kind of alliance that might be achieved if power were wherever possible decentralised and people able to run their lives culturally however they want to.

01:20:15.000 It seems Very difficult to imagine that kind of awakening take place.

01:20:20.000 So can you just for a moment talk on the importance of independent media?

01:20:24.000 Talk for a moment on the kind of spiritual principles that appear to be somewhat lacking and need to be promoted, and how you have gone from being like a family doctor to someone who, like when you're talking and you're sort of quoting Mussolini, not favorably, not as a hero, but as a warning from history, Where do you see this journey going for you?

01:20:49.000 So there's a few questions there.

01:20:50.000 Independent media, spiritual values, and your personal journey.

01:20:54.000 Because it sounds like you're going to get yourself in a lot of trouble.

01:20:58.000 Yeah, so, you know, independent media are clearly a threat to the narrative that corporate media generates.

01:21:05.000 And that's why they're trying to shut people down.

01:21:07.000 People as yourself, you know, other important voices out there are a real problem for them.

01:21:14.000 So, you know, if you're getting attacked, you clearly you're doing something right.

01:21:20.000 The spiritual point you make is important because the values we all share are to be able to look after ourselves, our families, and live a reasonably happy life.

01:21:32.000 These are not unreasonable demands, but that is not allowed to happen.

01:21:36.000 We don't have peace of mind.

01:21:38.000 We don't have secure work.

01:21:40.000 We don't have a welfare state or a social security system which is up to the needs that are out there.

01:21:48.000 In order for us to not look up, not look at the people controlling this system, but to spend our time fighting each other, you need to generate these divide and rule narratives, be it on cultural issues, be it on trans rights, be it whatever.

01:22:06.000 Every one of those narratives is used to divide the people at the bottom, so they don't have time or headspace to look up.

01:22:18.000 When everybody, when all media are pushing a certain line, you need to smell a rat.

01:22:22.000 There's a problem there.

01:22:24.000 When you have the CIA pushing out memes about trans rights, you have to suspect what they're really up to, right?

01:22:32.000 You know, we pay lip service to respecting the rights of women and children in Afghanistan, yet we're quite happy to bomb women and children in Gaza at the moment. 1.00

01:22:43.000 So, these things don't add up.

01:22:45.000 And where, you know, where there is no consistency in the application of stated principles, we need to be suspicious and start looking more critically into that matter.

01:22:55.000 So where are you taking it yourself?

01:22:57.000 Because it seems like it's going to be very difficult for you to sit in a surgery and just, you know, as a doctor say, well, here's your fifth booster shot.

01:23:05.000 I mean, what are you saying to patients at this point?

01:23:08.000 And how is your, the conflation of your roles as a doctor and as an activist balancing out now?

01:23:17.000 So, you know, when Asim Malhotra, who you had on your show, I believe it was last week, he produced a paper looking at Pfizer's own research evidence.

01:23:26.000 And he sent it to me before he published it.

01:23:30.000 He said, what do you think about this?

01:23:31.000 And once I read that, he said, can you give me a quote before we get it published, put it out in the media?

01:23:37.000 I said, reading that, I cannot in any good conscience give anybody an mRNA shot.

01:23:44.000 I can't do it anymore.

01:23:45.000 So I had to stop.

01:23:46.000 I would be a total hypocrite if I came on here pointing out the problems and concerns out there about myocarditis and the contamination, and then to carry on giving them, although there is a significant financial incentive to keep doing so.

01:24:01.000 That is the problem.

01:24:03.000 There are perverse incentives for us to act against our conscience, for us to be selectively and willfully blind about what's going on around us.

01:24:12.000 And you know, I've reached the stage of my career that If they come for me, I'm taking that risk.

01:24:20.000 I'm not prepared to do something.

01:24:22.000 I came into medicine not to harm people, right?

01:24:24.000 And if you come across enough evidence and concern that you might be doing harm, I'm not going to go there.

01:24:30.000 I'm not going to be blind to it either.

01:24:32.000 It's just not for me.

01:24:34.000 And if that means losing my job, well, so be it.

01:24:38.000 It's frightening though, isn't it Bob?

01:24:41.000 It seems that in the United States, Biden's given a green light to corporate control in healthcare.

01:24:49.000 United Health Group's enrolment growth over the past decade is solely from Medicare and Medicaid, with taxpayers significantly contributing to the company's profits.

01:24:57.000 The Medicare programme has transformed into the insurance industry's primary revenue source.

01:25:03.000 Tell me how Biden's posturing around Medicare and Medicaid is actually just another form of profiteering, corporatism and monetization of the health industry.

01:25:21.000 Yes, so Medicare and Medicaid are state-funded health provision for those people who are left out of the insurance-based system because they're too sick or they're too poor.

01:25:32.000 They can't make money out of those people.

01:25:34.000 So the state has had to step in as a last resort.

01:25:39.000 Now, when the state was providing that care itself, There wasn't money being siphoned away.

01:25:45.000 But what's happened over recent years is they've actually appointed people from UnitedHealth and other healthcare companies to run the federally funded service.

01:25:55.000 So the revolving door, we have the revolving door again.

01:25:58.000 And what has that allowed?

01:26:00.000 That's allowed them to bring in, to loosen regulation and to allow the insurance companies to come in and run what is paid by the taxpayer.

01:26:09.000 So they can siphon yet more money into their own coffers.

01:26:13.000 And that's what's happened in the UK.

01:26:14.000 So, you know, legislation passed last year replicated the American managed care system in law, breaking these up into 42 funding units.

01:26:24.000 And guess who's slipping in?

01:26:26.000 The backdoor, UnitedHealth.

01:26:29.000 So the plan is, whatever money is spent, be it through taxpayer or be it through the individual buying private insurance, these companies want a slice of the action.

01:26:40.000 They're intermediaries. You don't actually need them to run a self-service.

01:26:45.000 What you need is a hospital, doctors and nurses, and some drugs, right?

01:26:49.000 You do not need insurance managers and CEOs and all these legion of administrators.

01:26:55.000 They're totally unnecessary.

01:26:58.000 But the growth of the intermediarization in healthcare is what's draining one in three dollars in the U.S.

01:27:05.000 spent on healthcare is going out to these people who provide not one second of care.

01:27:12.000 Now what a lunatic system that is that we have chosen to replicate in this country.

01:27:17.000 Tell me about your documentary, Bob.

01:27:19.000 I feel like you're covering in the film, The Great NHS Heist, how the corporatisation of our still nominally state-run welfare-oriented health service has been co-opted.

01:27:34.000 And almost that's not something that's been voted on or even explained.

01:27:38.000 What is the subject of your documentary, Bob?

01:27:42.000 Yes, it's really to highlight, you know, what the NHS to corporations are a series of assets which are to be stripped or to be mined for the recurrent, you know, taxpayer funded money that comes in.

01:27:56.000 So this is, to them, bags of cash.

01:28:00.000 And, you know, what the government should be doing is protecting the public's interest with our taxes, but what it's actually doing is selling us out.

01:28:08.000 So, you know, healthcare can be divided up into three assets.

01:28:11.000 You've got the real estate, you've got the patient data, which is an increasingly commercializable asset, and you've got the funding.

01:28:20.000 But the control of those assets now is very much transferred into the private sector.

01:28:26.000 And in order for them to maximize profit, they do it through the denial of care.

01:28:31.000 And what the film tries to do is to not make a humanitarian case, to not make an ethical case.

01:28:38.000 We make an economic case for why this is a disaster, not only for the sick people, but for the economy in general.

01:28:45.000 Because the more you waste on healthcare, the less you can do For, you know, investment in infrastructure or whatever it might be, because there's an opportunity cost.

01:28:55.000 If you're wasting 30% on overheads and CEO bonuses, well, you're not spending it on delivering healthcare.

01:29:02.000 So that is what the film explains.

01:29:06.000 And it tries to merge the US experience with what's happening here to have a wider appeal.

01:29:13.000 And, you know, in my dreams, I thought we'd be inundated with calls from Americans telling us, what the hell are you guys doing copying our crazy system?

01:29:22.000 Right?

01:29:22.000 I was inspired by watching Michael Moore's Sicko and, you know, that's what led me to do this.

01:29:28.000 Why did it fall on me as a GP to do this in my spare time?

01:29:32.000 Because of what we discussed earlier, the corporate media are doing a job of keeping us in the dark.

01:29:38.000 That's all they're interested in.

01:29:41.000 Bob, you're a really great ally and you're a great person.

01:29:45.000 Thank God there are people in your position that are willing to take the risks and make the sacrifices that you're making.

01:29:51.000 Thanks very much for coming on our show.

01:29:54.000 Good luck with your documentary and good luck with your ongoing mission.

01:29:58.000 Thank you very much, Russell.

01:29:59.000 Keep up your great work, too.

01:30:01.000 Certainly shall try to.

01:30:02.000 Thank you, sir.

01:30:03.000 Thanks, Doctor.

01:30:04.000 Dr. Bob's documentary, The Great NHS Heist, is available now.

01:30:07.000 We'll post a link right away and you can follow him on X, at DrBobGill.

01:30:11.000 He's worth following because he's a doctor who's willing to confront authority and willing to say to him personally expensive and risky truth.

01:30:22.000 On the show tomorrow we've got Neil Oliver who you might know from GB News, you might know as a public commentator.

01:30:28.000 He's someone who appears to have really captured a lot of attention through his ability to analyse and explain many of the events in recent years and also So I feel like I look a bit like him.

01:30:39.000 It's going to be interesting.

01:30:41.000 I think he's Scottish.

01:30:42.000 He's got a mellifluous, lilting accent.

01:30:44.000 I think it's going to be a pretty good conversation.

01:30:46.000 Join us for that.

01:30:47.000 If you want to become a member of our community and get all sorts of additional content, press the red button that's on the screen now.

01:30:53.000 You get early access to interviews.

01:30:54.000 I do meditations with you.

01:30:56.000 You get readings like we're going through the Bible now.

01:30:58.000 Plus, we discuss how we might move on from where we are now.

01:31:02.000 Seems to me pretty obvious.

01:31:04.000 Awaken everybody that you possibly can.

01:31:07.000 Find people in positions of authority and experience that are interested in living in a new way.

01:31:12.000 Accumulate a new system adjacent to this current corrupt one and vivify it with our powerful spiritual energy and be willing to engage in this spiritual war like these people.

01:31:23.000 These new awakened wonders are Creature61, welcome to the movement.

01:31:27.000 John Gore, SOS, you're gonna love it here.

01:31:29.000 Handsman, I could not love you more.

01:31:32.000 Foobar123, how I love you. 1.00

01:31:35.000 And where would we be without Enough Shit Fuckery? 1.00

01:31:38.000 It's difficult to imagine a world without you. 1.00

01:31:41.000 That is ingeniously spelt, but when pronounced, it amounts to little more than swearing.

01:31:46.000 You are an awakened wonder.

01:31:48.000 You're welcome with us.

01:31:49.000 Join us tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.

01:31:51.000 Until then, if you can,

Stay Free - Russel Brand - October 24, 2023

“Wait, They Did WHAT?!” Did Pfizer Give People A Different Vaccine?! - Stay Free #230

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript