Stay Free - Russel Brand - WEF SPECIAL: The Most Terrifying Event Of 2023 - #059 - Stay Free With Russell Brand

00:00:00.000 And it's the W.E.F.

00:00:16.000 Davos Convention.

00:00:17.000 And that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.

00:00:22.000 Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.

00:00:28.000 Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.

00:00:31.000 They include all of these world leaders.

00:00:34.000 Who will be representing Pfizer?

00:00:35.000 Who will be representing Big Tech?

00:00:37.000 What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?

00:00:39.000 Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?

00:00:42.000 Good morning, Klaus.

00:00:42.000 Good morning, Mike.

00:00:43.000 who will be the ultimate warrior and who will be the ultimate victims.

00:00:43.000 Where are we?

00:00:47.000 We already know who that is.

00:00:48.000 Join us for an extended stream 7am PT, 10am ET and 3pm GMT.

00:00:54.000 W E W E I can't think of a sign for it.

00:00:57.000 You get the idea. W F World Rumble. See you there.

00:00:59.000 Stay free.

00:01:00.000 Stay free with Russell Brand.

00:01:01.000 See it first on Rumble.

00:01:03.000 Good morning, Klaus.

00:01:04.000 Good morning, like.

00:01:05.000 Where are we?

00:01:06.000 We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.

00:01:09.000 But can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here,

00:01:14.000 we have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your

00:01:25.000 brainwaves.

00:01:27.000 As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.

00:01:32.000 It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.

00:01:39.000 Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.

00:01:45.000 Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.

00:01:49.000 They include All of these world leaders!

00:01:52.000 Who will be representing Pfizer?

00:01:53.000 Who will be representing Big Tech?

00:01:55.000 What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?

00:01:57.000 Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?

00:01:59.000 Who will be The Undertaker?

00:02:00.000 Who will be Hulk Hogan?

00:02:01.000 Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?

00:02:03.000 And who will be The Ultimate Victims?

00:02:04.000 We already know who that is!

00:02:06.000 Join us for an extended stream!

00:02:08.000 7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!

00:02:13.000 Good morning, Klaus.

00:02:14.000 Good morning, Mike.

00:02:14.000 Where are we?

00:02:14.000 You get the idea, WF World Rumble, see you there, stay free.

00:02:18.000 Stay free with Russell Brand, see it first on Rumble.

00:02:21.000 Good morning Klaus.

00:02:22.000 Good morning, Mike.

00:02:23.000 Where are we?

00:02:23.000 We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.

00:02:26.000 But can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here,

00:02:32.000 we have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can, and we measure

00:02:43.000 your brain waves.

00:02:45.000 As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.

00:02:49.000 It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.

00:02:57.000 Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.

00:03:03.000 Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.

00:03:07.000 They include all of these World leaders!

00:03:10.000 Who will be representing Pfizer?

00:03:11.000 Who will be representing Big Tech?

00:03:13.000 What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?

00:03:15.000 Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?

00:03:17.000 Who will be The Undertaker?

00:03:18.000 Who will be Hulk Logan?

00:03:19.000 Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?

00:03:21.000 And who will be The Ultimate Victims?

00:03:22.000 We already know who that is!

00:03:23.000 Join us for an extended stream!

00:03:26.000 7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!

00:03:30.000 W-E-W-E- I can't think of a sign for it.

00:03:32.000 You get the idea!

00:03:33.000 WF World Rumble! 0.97

00:03:35.000 See you there! 0.91

00:03:35.000 Stay free! 0.91

00:03:36.000 Stay free with Russell Brand!

00:03:37.000 See it first on Rumble!

00:03:39.000 Good morning, Klaus.

00:03:40.000 Good morning, Leik.

00:03:41.000 Where are we?

00:03:42.000 We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.

00:03:45.000 But can you imagine that in 10 years, when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains, and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.

00:04:03.000 As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.

00:04:07.000 It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.

00:04:15.000 Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his crowds from around the world.

00:04:21.000 Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.

00:04:24.000 They include All of these world leaders!

00:04:27.000 Who will be representing Pfizer?

00:04:29.000 Who will be representing Big Tech?

00:04:31.000 What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?

00:04:33.000 Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?

00:04:34.000 Who will be The Undertaker?

00:04:36.000 Who will be Hulk Logan?

00:04:37.000 Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?

00:04:38.000 And who will be The Ultimate Victims?

00:04:40.000 We already know who that is!

00:04:41.000 Join us for an extended stream!

00:04:43.000 7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!

00:04:48.000 W-E-T!

00:04:49.000 W... I can't think of a sign for it.

00:04:50.000 You get the idea.

00:04:51.000 WF World Rumble.

00:04:52.000 See you there.

00:04:53.000 Stay free.

00:04:54.000 Stay free with Russell Brand.

00:04:55.000 See it first on Rumble.

00:04:57.000 Good morning, Klaus.

00:04:58.000 Where are we?

00:04:58.000 Good morning, Mike.

00:05:00.000 We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.

00:05:04.000 Can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains, and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.

00:05:21.000 As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.

00:05:25.000 It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.

00:05:33.000 Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his crowds from around the world.

00:05:39.000 Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.

00:05:42.000 They include all of these World leaders!

00:05:45.000 Who will be representing Pfizer?

00:05:47.000 Who will be representing Big Tech?

00:05:49.000 What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?

00:05:50.000 Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?

00:05:52.000 Who will be the Undertaker?

00:05:53.000 Who will be Hulk Hogan?

00:05:54.000 Who will be the ultimate warrior?

00:05:56.000 And who will be the ultimate victims?

00:05:58.000 We already know who that is!

00:05:59.000 Join us for an extended stream!

00:06:01.000 7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!

00:06:06.000 W-E-W-E- I can't think of a sign for it.

00:06:08.000 You get the idea!

00:06:09.000 WF Royal Rumble! 0.99

00:06:10.000 See you there! 0.91

00:06:11.000 Stay free with Russell Brand!

00:06:11.000 Stay free!

00:06:13.000 See it first on Rumble!

00:06:14.000 Good morning, Klaus.

00:06:15.000 Good morning, Leik.

00:06:16.000 Where are we?

00:06:17.000 We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.

00:06:21.000 But can you imagine that in ten years when we are sitting here we have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.

00:06:38.000 As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.

00:06:43.000 It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.

00:06:51.000 Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.

00:06:57.000 Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.

00:07:00.000 They include all of these World leaders!

00:07:03.000 Who will be representing Pfizer?

00:07:05.000 Who will be representing Big Tech?

00:07:06.000 What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?

00:07:08.000 Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?

00:07:10.000 Who will be The Undertaker?

00:07:11.000 Who will be Hulk Logan?

00:07:12.000 Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?

00:07:14.000 And who will be The Ultimate Victims?

00:07:16.000 We already know who that is!

00:07:17.000 Join us for an extended stream!

00:07:19.000 7am PT, 10am ET and 3pm GMT!

00:07:24.000 W-E-W-E- I can't think of a sign for it.

00:07:26.000 You get the idea!

00:07:27.000 WF Royal Rumble! 0.99

00:07:28.000 See you there! 0.91

00:07:29.000 Stay free!

00:07:29.000 Stay free with Russell Brand!

00:07:31.000 See it first on Rumble!

00:07:32.000 Good morning, Klaus.

00:07:33.000 Good morning, Leik.

00:07:34.000 Where are we?

00:07:35.000 We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.

00:07:39.000 But can you imagine that in 10 years, when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains, and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.

00:07:56.000 As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.

00:08:01.000 It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.

00:08:08.000 Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.

00:08:15.000 Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.

00:08:18.000 They include All of these world leaders!

00:08:21.000 Who will be representing Pfizer?

00:08:22.000 Who will be representing Big Tech?

00:08:24.000 What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?

00:08:26.000 Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?

00:08:28.000 Who will be The Undertaker?

00:08:29.000 Who will be Hulk Hogan?

00:08:30.000 Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?

00:08:32.000 And who will be The Ultimate Victims?

00:08:33.000 We already know who that is!

00:08:35.000 Join us for an extended stream!

00:08:37.000 7am PT, 10am ET and 3pm GMT!

00:08:42.000 Good morning, Klaus.

00:08:43.000 Good morning, Mike.

00:08:44.000 Where are we?

00:08:44.000 We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.

00:08:47.000 Stay free with Russell Brand. See it first on Rumble.

00:08:50.000 Good morning Klaus.

00:08:51.000 Good morning Like.

00:08:52.000 Where are we?

00:08:53.000 We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.

00:08:56.000 But can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here we have an implant in our brains

00:09:05.000 and I can immediately feel because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.

00:09:14.000 As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.

00:09:18.000 It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.

00:09:26.000 Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.

00:09:32.000 Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.

00:09:36.000 They include all of these World leaders!

00:09:39.000 Who will be representing Pfizer?

00:09:40.000 Who will be representing Big Tech?

00:09:42.000 What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?

00:09:44.000 Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?

00:09:46.000 Who will be The Undertaker?

00:09:47.000 Who will be Hulk Hogan?

00:09:48.000 Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?

00:09:50.000 And who will be The Ultimate Victims?

00:09:51.000 We already know who that is!

00:09:52.000 Join us for an extended stream!

00:09:55.000 7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!

00:09:59.000 W-E-W-E- I can't think of a sign for it.

00:10:01.000 You get the idea!

00:10:02.000 WF World Rumble! 0.97

00:10:04.000 See you there! 0.91

00:10:05.000 Stay free!

00:10:08.000 Good morning, Klaus.

00:10:09.000 Good morning, Leik.

00:10:10.000 Where are we?

00:10:11.000 We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.

00:10:14.000 But can you imagine that in 10 years, when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.

00:10:32.000 As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.

00:10:36.000 It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.

00:10:44.000 Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.

00:10:50.000 Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.

00:10:53.000 They include all of these World leaders!

00:10:56.000 Who will be representing Pfizer?

00:10:58.000 Who will be representing Big Tech?

00:11:00.000 What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?

00:11:02.000 Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?

00:11:03.000 Who will be The Undertaker?

00:11:05.000 Who will be Hulk Hogan?

00:11:06.000 Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?

00:11:07.000 And who will be The Ultimate Victims?

00:11:09.000 We already know who that is!

00:11:10.000 Join us for an extended stream!

00:11:13.000 7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!

00:11:17.000 W-E-W-E- I can't think of a sign for it.

00:11:19.000 You get the idea!

00:11:20.000 WF Royal Rumble! 0.99

00:11:21.000 See you there! 0.91

00:11:22.000 Stay free!

00:11:26.000 Good morning, Klaus.

00:11:27.000 Good morning, Leik.

00:11:27.000 Where are we?

00:11:29.000 We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.

00:11:32.000 But can you imagine that in 10 years, when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains, and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.

00:11:50.000 As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.

00:11:54.000 It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.

00:12:02.000 Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.

00:12:08.000 Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.

00:12:11.000 They include all of these World leaders!

00:12:14.000 Who will be representing Pfizer?

00:12:16.000 Who will be representing Big Tech?

00:12:18.000 What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?

00:12:19.000 Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?

00:12:21.000 Who will be The Undertaker?

00:12:22.000 Who will be Hulk Hogan?

00:12:23.000 Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?

00:12:25.000 And who will be The Ultimate Victims?

00:12:27.000 We already know who that is!

00:12:28.000 Join us for an extended stream!

00:12:30.000 7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!

00:12:35.000 W-E-W-E- I can't think of a sign for it.

00:12:37.000 You get the idea!

00:12:38.000 WF Royal Rumble! 0.99

00:12:39.000 See you there! 0.91

00:12:40.000 Stay free!

00:12:43.000 Good morning, Klaus.

00:12:44.000 Good morning, Leik.

00:12:45.000 Where are we?

00:12:46.000 We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.

00:12:50.000 But can you imagine that in 10 years, when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains, and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.

00:13:07.000 As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.

00:13:12.000 It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.

00:13:20.000 Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.

00:13:26.000 Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.

00:13:29.000 They include All of these world leaders!

00:13:32.000 Who will be representing Pfizer?

00:13:34.000 Who will be representing Big Tech?

00:13:35.000 What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?

00:13:37.000 Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?

00:13:39.000 Who will be The Undertaker?

00:13:40.000 Who will be Hulk Hogan?

00:13:41.000 Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?

00:13:43.000 And who will be The Ultimate Victims?

00:13:45.000 We already know who that is!

00:13:46.000 Join us for an extended stream!

00:13:48.000 7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!

00:13:54.000 WF... I can't think of a sign for it.

00:13:55.000 You get the idea.

00:13:56.000 WF World Rumble.

00:13:57.000 See you there.

00:13:58.000 Stay free with Russell Brand.

00:13:58.000 Stay free.

00:14:00.000 See it first on Rumble.

00:14:01.000 Good morning, Klaus.

00:14:02.000 Good morning, Mike.

00:14:03.000 Where are we?

00:14:04.000 We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.

00:14:09.000 Can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.

00:14:25.000 As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.

00:14:30.000 It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.

00:14:37.000 Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.

00:14:43.000 Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.

00:14:47.000 They include all of these World leaders!

00:14:50.000 Who will be representing Pfizer?

00:14:51.000 Who will be representing Big Tech?

00:14:53.000 What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?

00:14:55.000 Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?

00:14:57.000 Who will be the Undertaker?

00:14:58.000 Who will be Hulk Hogan?

00:14:59.000 Who will be the ultimate warrior?

00:15:01.000 And who will be the ultimate victims?

00:15:02.000 We already know who that is!

00:15:04.000 Join us for an extended stream 7 a.m PT 10 a.m ET and 3 p.m GMT Good morning, Klaus.

00:15:12.000 Good morning, Mike.

00:15:12.000 Where are we?

00:15:13.000 You get the idea, WF World Rumble, see you there, stay free.

00:15:16.000 Stay free with Russell Brand, see it first on Rumble.

00:15:19.000 Good morning Klaus.

00:15:20.000 Good morning, Mike.

00:15:21.000 Where are we?

00:15:21.000 We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.

00:15:25.000 But can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here,

00:15:30.000 we have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can, and we measure

00:15:41.000 your brain waves.

00:15:43.000 As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.

00:15:47.000 It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.

00:15:55.000 Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.

00:16:01.000 Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.

00:16:05.000 They include all of these World leaders!

00:16:08.000 Who will be representing Pfizer?

00:16:09.000 Who will be representing Big Tech?

00:16:11.000 What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?

00:16:13.000 Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?

00:16:15.000 Who will be the Undertaker?

00:16:16.000 Who will be Hulk Hogan?

00:16:17.000 Who will be the ultimate warrior?

00:16:19.000 And who will be the ultimate victims?

00:16:20.000 We already know who that is!

00:16:21.000 Join us for an extended stream!

00:16:24.000 7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!

00:16:28.000 W-E-W-E- I can't think of a sign for it.

00:16:30.000 You get the idea!

00:16:31.000 WF Royal Rumble! 0.99

00:16:33.000 See you there! 0.91

00:16:33.000 Stay free! 0.91

00:16:34.000 Stay free with Russell Brand!

00:16:35.000 See it first on Rumble!

00:16:37.000 Good morning, Klaus.

00:16:38.000 Good morning, Leik.

00:16:39.000 Where are we?

00:16:40.000 We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.

00:16:43.000 But can you imagine that in ten years, when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains, and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.

00:17:01.000 As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.

00:17:05.000 It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.

00:17:13.000 Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.

00:17:19.000 Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.

00:17:22.000 They include All of these world leaders!

00:17:25.000 Who will be representing Pfizer?

00:17:27.000 Who will be representing Big Tech?

00:17:29.000 What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?

00:17:31.000 Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?

00:17:32.000 Who will be The Undertaker?

00:17:34.000 Who will be Hulk Hogan?

00:17:35.000 Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?

00:17:36.000 And who will be The Ultimate Victims?

00:17:38.000 We already know who that is!

00:17:39.000 Join us for an extended stream!

00:17:41.000 7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!

00:17:47.000 W... I can't think of a sign for it.

00:17:48.000 You get the idea.

00:17:49.000 WF World Rumble.

00:17:50.000 See you there.

00:17:51.000 Stay free.

00:17:52.000 Stay free with Russell Brand.

00:17:53.000 See it first on Rumble.

00:17:55.000 Good morning, Klaus.

00:17:56.000 Good morning, Mike.

00:17:56.000 Where are we?

00:17:58.000 We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.

00:18:02.000 Can you imagine Sir, in ten years when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.

00:18:19.000 As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.

00:18:23.000 It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.

00:18:31.000 Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.

00:18:37.000 Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.

00:18:40.000 They include all of these world leaders.

00:18:43.000 Who will be representing Pfizer?

00:18:45.000 Who will be representing Big Tech?

00:18:46.000 What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?

00:18:48.000 Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?

00:18:50.000 Who will be The Undertaker?

00:18:51.000 Who will be Hulk Hogan?

00:18:52.000 Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?

00:18:54.000 And who will be The Ultimate Victims?

00:18:56.000 We already know who that is!

00:18:57.000 Join us for an extended stream!

00:18:59.000 7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!

00:19:04.000 W-E-W-E- I can't think of a sign for it.

00:19:06.000 You get the idea!

00:19:07.000 WF Royal Rumble! 0.99

00:19:08.000 See you there! 0.91

00:19:09.000 Stay free!

00:19:09.000 Stay free with Russell Brand!

00:19:11.000 See it first on Rumble!

00:19:12.000 Good morning, Klaus.

00:19:13.000 Good morning, Leik.

00:19:14.000 Where are we?

00:19:15.000 We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.

00:19:19.000 But can you imagine that in ten years, when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains, and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.

00:19:36.000 As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.

00:19:41.000 It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.

00:19:49.000 Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.

00:19:55.000 Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.

00:19:58.000 They include All of these world leaders!

00:20:01.000 Who will be representing Pfizer?

00:20:03.000 Who will be representing Big Tech?

00:20:04.000 What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?

00:20:06.000 Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?

00:20:08.000 Who will be The Undertaker?

00:20:09.000 Who will be Hulk Hogan?

00:20:10.000 Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?

00:20:12.000 And who will be The Ultimate Victims?

00:20:14.000 We already know who that is!

00:20:15.000 Join us for an extended stream!

00:20:17.000 7am PT, 10am ET and 3pm GMT!

00:20:23.000 W... I can't think of a sign for it.

00:20:24.000 You get the idea.

00:20:25.000 WF World Rumble.

00:20:26.000 See you there.

00:20:27.000 Stay free.

00:20:27.000 Stay free with Russell Brand.

00:20:29.000 See it first on Rumble.

00:20:30.000 Good morning, Klaus.

00:20:31.000 Good morning, Mike.

00:20:32.000 Where are we?

00:20:33.000 We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.

00:20:38.000 Can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains, and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.

00:20:54.000 As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.

00:20:59.000 It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.

00:21:06.000 Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.

00:21:12.000 Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.

00:21:16.000 They include all of these World leaders!

00:21:19.000 Who will be representing Pfizer?

00:21:20.000 Who will be representing Big Tech?

00:21:22.000 What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?

00:21:24.000 Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?

00:21:26.000 Who will be the Undertaker?

00:21:27.000 Who will be Hulk Hogan?

00:21:28.000 Who will be the ultimate warrior?

00:21:30.000 And who will be the ultimate victims?

00:21:31.000 We already know who that is!

00:21:33.000 Join us for an extended stream 7 a.m PT 10 a.m ET and 3 p.m GMT Good morning, Klaus.

00:21:41.000 You get the idea. WF World Rumble. See you there. Stay free.

00:21:41.000 Where are we?

00:21:41.000 Good morning, Mike.

00:21:45.000 Stay free with Russell Brand. See it first on Rumble.

00:21:48.000 Good morning, Klaus.

00:21:49.000 Good morning, Mike.

00:21:50.000 Where are we?

00:21:50.000 We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.

00:21:54.000 But can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here,

00:21:59.000 we have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can, and we measure

00:22:10.000 your brain waves.

00:22:12.000 As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.

00:22:16.000 It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.

00:22:24.000 Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.

00:22:30.000 Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.

00:22:34.000 They include all of these World leaders!

00:22:37.000 Who will be representing Pfizer?

00:22:38.000 Who will be representing Big Tech?

00:22:40.000 What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?

00:22:42.000 Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?

00:22:44.000 Who will be the Undertaker?

00:22:45.000 Who will be Hulk Hogan?

00:22:46.000 Who will be the Ultimate Warrior?

00:22:48.000 And who will be the Ultimate Victims?

00:22:49.000 We already know who that is!

00:22:50.000 Join us for an extended stream!

00:22:53.000 7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!

00:22:57.000 W-E-W-E- I can't think of a sign for it.

00:22:59.000 You get the idea!

00:23:00.000 WF Royal Rumble! 0.99

00:23:02.000 See you there! 0.91

00:23:02.000 Stay free! 0.91

00:23:06.000 Good morning, Klaus.

00:23:07.000 Good morning, Leik.

00:23:08.000 Where are we?

00:23:09.000 We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.

00:23:12.000 But can you imagine that in ten years, when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains, and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.

00:23:30.000 As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.

00:23:34.000 It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.

00:23:42.000 Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.

00:23:48.000 Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.

00:23:51.000 They include All of these world leaders!

00:23:54.000 Who will be representing Pfizer?

00:23:56.000 Who will be representing Big Tech?

00:23:58.000 What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?

00:24:00.000 Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?

00:24:01.000 Who will be The Undertaker?

00:24:03.000 Who will be Hulk Hogan?

00:24:04.000 Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?

00:24:05.000 And who will be The Ultimate Victims?

00:24:07.000 We already know who that is!

00:24:08.000 Join us for an extended stream!

00:24:10.000 7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!

00:24:16.000 Good morning, Mike.

00:24:16.000 Good morning, Klaus.

00:24:17.000 Where are we?

00:24:17.000 You get the idea, WF, Royal Rumble, see you there, stay free.

00:24:20.000 Stay free with Russell Brand, see it first on Rumble.

00:24:23.000 Good morning Klaus.

00:24:25.000 Where are we?

00:24:25.000 Good morning, Mike.

00:24:26.000 We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.

00:24:29.000 But can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here,

00:24:35.000 we have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can, and we measure

00:24:45.000 your brain waves.

00:24:48.000 As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.

00:24:52.000 It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.

00:25:00.000 Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.

00:25:06.000 Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.

00:25:09.000 They include all All of these world leaders!

00:25:12.000 Who will be representing Pfizer?

00:25:14.000 Who will be representing Big Tech?

00:25:16.000 What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?

00:25:17.000 Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?

00:25:19.000 Who will be The Undertaker?

00:25:20.000 Who will be Hulk Hogan?

00:25:21.000 Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?

00:25:23.000 And who will be The Ultimate Victims?

00:25:25.000 We already know who that is!

00:25:26.000 Join us for an extended stream!

00:25:28.000 7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!

00:25:33.000 W-E-T!

00:25:34.000 I can't think of a sign for it.

00:25:35.000 You get the idea.

00:25:36.000 WF World Rumble.

00:25:37.000 See you there.

00:25:38.000 Stay free.

00:25:39.000 Good morning, Klaus.

00:25:42.000 Good morning, Mike.

00:25:43.000 Where are we?

00:25:44.000 We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.

00:25:49.000 Can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.

00:26:05.000 As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.

00:26:10.000 It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.

00:26:18.000 Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.

00:26:24.000 Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.

00:26:27.000 They include All of these world leaders!

00:26:30.000 Who will be representing Pfizer?

00:26:32.000 Who will be representing Big Tech?

00:26:33.000 What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?

00:26:35.000 Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?

00:26:37.000 Who will be The Undertaker?

00:26:38.000 Who will be Hulk Hogan?

00:26:39.000 Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?

00:26:41.000 And who will be The Ultimate Victims?

00:26:43.000 We already know who that is!

00:26:44.000 Join us for an extended stream!

00:26:46.000 7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!

00:26:51.000 W E Good morning, Klaus.

00:26:52.000 Good morning, Mike.

00:26:53.000 You get the idea, WF World Rumble, see you there, stay free.

00:26:53.000 Where are we?

00:26:56.000 Stay free with Russell Brand, see it first on Rumble.

00:26:59.000 Good morning Klaus.

00:27:00.000 Good morning, Mike.

00:27:01.000 We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.

00:27:01.000 Where are we?

00:27:05.000 But can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here,

00:27:10.000 we have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can, and we measure

00:27:21.000 your brain waves.

00:27:23.000 As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.

00:27:28.000 It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.

00:27:35.000 Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.

00:27:42.000 Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.

00:27:45.000 They include All of these world leaders!

00:27:48.000 Who will be representing Pfizer?

00:27:49.000 Who will be representing Big Tech?

00:27:51.000 What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?

00:27:53.000 Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?

00:27:55.000 Who will be The Undertaker?

00:27:56.000 Who will be Hulk Hogan?

00:27:57.000 Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?

00:27:59.000 And who will be The Ultimate Victims?

00:28:00.000 We already know who that is!

00:28:02.000 Join us for an extended stream!

00:28:04.000 7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!

00:28:09.000 Good morning, Klaus.

00:28:10.000 You get the idea. WF World Rumble. See you there. Stay free.

00:28:10.000 Where are we?

00:28:10.000 Good morning, Mike.

00:28:14.000 Stay free with Russell Brand. See it first on Rumble.

00:28:17.000 Good morning, Klaus.

00:28:18.000 Good morning, Mike.

00:28:19.000 Where are we?

00:28:19.000 We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.

00:28:23.000 But can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here,

00:28:28.000 we have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can and we measure

00:28:39.000 your brain waves.

00:28:41.000 As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.

00:28:45.000 It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.

00:28:53.000 Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.

00:28:59.000 Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.

00:29:03.000 They include all of these World leaders!

00:29:06.000 Who will be representing Pfizer?

00:29:07.000 Who will be representing Big Tech?

00:29:09.000 What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?

00:29:11.000 Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?

00:29:13.000 Who will be the Undertaker?

00:29:14.000 Who will be Hulk Hogan?

00:29:15.000 Who will be the ultimate warrior?

00:29:17.000 And who will be the ultimate victims?

00:29:18.000 We already know who that is!

00:29:19.000 Join us for an extended stream!

00:29:21.000 7am PT, 10am ET and 3pm GMT!

00:29:27.000 WF... I can't think of a sign for it.

00:29:28.000 You get the idea.

00:29:29.000 WF World Rumble.

00:29:31.000 See you there.

00:29:31.000 Stay free.

00:29:32.000 Stay free with Russell Brand.

00:29:33.000 See it first on Rumble.

00:29:35.000 Good morning, Klaus.

00:29:36.000 Good morning, Mike.

00:29:37.000 Where are we?

00:29:38.000 We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.

00:29:44.000 In this video, you're going to see the future.

00:30:09.000 you you

00:30:13.000 Hello there, you awakening wonders.

00:30:15.000 Welcome to WAF Davos Conference Royal Rumble with me, Russell Brand, my online amanuensis, Mr. Senor Gareth Roy.

00:30:27.000 All right, Gareth?

00:30:27.000 Hello, mate.

00:30:28.000 Can you believe it's already Davos again?

00:30:28.000 You all right?

00:30:30.000 Incredible.

00:30:31.000 If you're watching this on YouTube, stay with us, because we're going to be with you for a while here, but there'll be a certain point where what we're saying is so controversial, so at odds with the existing power structures imposed upon you by elites, that they simply will not allow it on YouTube, which, as you know, takes its guidelines when it comes to medical and health matters from the WHO.

00:30:55.000 One of the arguments we're making when we're talking about the WEF and this Royal Rumble spectacular is unelected globalist bodies are now able to exert more power than democratic governments in liberal democracies or even in dictatorships.

00:31:10.000 That we are moving towards a globalist state and globalists will always want more surveillance, more digital IDs, more social credit scoring, more abilities to lock down.

00:31:21.000 So they will create the conditions Not that I'm saying that's happened already or historically.

00:31:29.000 I'm not saying that.

00:31:30.000 Certainly I'm not saying that on YouTube.

00:31:33.000 We're not conspiracy theorists, in spite of the visible tinfoil hat just there, just there out of shot.

00:31:38.000 See that guy?

00:31:40.000 We're not conspiracy theorists.

00:31:41.000 We are looking to find evidence that demonstrates how power operates.

00:31:46.000 We've got some fantastic guests coming up in the show.

00:31:48.000 We're sponsored by Johnson & Johnson today.

00:31:50.000 They are, well they do a lot of things really.

00:31:52.000 They make baby powders that have never been criminally proven to be carcinogenic, even though they have been out of a court settlement.

00:32:00.000 Quite a hefty one.

00:32:01.000 There's been some hefty out of court settlements because some people said that the baby powder was carcinogenic but that was never ever legally proven and I want to be absolutely clear about that.

00:32:11.000 They also made a bloody good vaccine.

00:32:13.000 What about that shampoo for babies as well?

00:32:16.000 What did that do wrong?

00:32:17.000 I don't know if it's done anything.

00:32:18.000 It doesn't make you cry does it?

00:32:19.000 It's nice isn't it?

00:32:20.000 No tears.

00:32:21.000 But the tears may start if you start using the baby powder but certainly not if you're pregnant.

00:32:27.000 But that's never been legally proven.

00:32:28.000 No.

00:32:30.000 So some of the things we're looking at with WEF, we want to approach this like this.

00:32:33.000 Imagine that you approach the WEF how the mainstream media approach it.

00:32:37.000 There's nothing wrong with it.

00:32:38.000 It's just an opportunity for the best and the brightest to come together to discuss the rest of our future.

00:32:44.000 We're going to be looking at how convenience and safety are always presented as ways to assert control.

00:32:50.000 Do you know they're talking about misinformation this year?

00:32:53.000 Misinformation and disinformation and malinformation and all the whole Information family, really.

00:32:59.000 Yeah.

00:32:59.000 Like Donald Duck's nephews.

00:33:01.000 There's Huey, Louie and Dewey.

00:33:01.000 That's right, yeah.

00:33:03.000 Miss, Mal, Dis. 0.82

00:33:04.000 Imagine them as just Donald Duck's nephews.

00:33:07.000 Then they're less offensive.

00:33:09.000 We're looking at some of their best catchphrases.

00:33:11.000 The Great Reset.

00:33:12.000 That was a good one.

00:33:13.000 That's their most famous brand.

00:33:15.000 Yeah.

00:33:15.000 We're going to do a great reset.

00:33:15.000 Isn't it?

00:33:16.000 I think they regret that one a little bit.

00:33:17.000 It came across bad because it came across like we're going to sort of assert undemocratic power.

00:33:22.000 Then, You Will Owe Nothing and Be Happy.

00:33:25.000 They keep getting it wrong, don't they?

00:33:26.000 Their catchphrases are not good!

00:33:28.000 They want to come up with better ones, like, just do it!

00:33:28.000 No.

00:33:31.000 Like or innit?

00:33:32.000 The real thing!

00:33:33.000 Yeah.

00:33:34.000 More, you know, they're good catchphrases.

00:33:37.000 We're going to be looking at how environmental controls might soon be asserted.

00:33:41.000 There's loads of stuff.

00:33:43.000 And the question that we're asking you over the course of this free hour marathon, this WEF marathon, is are the WEF a threat to your freedom?

00:33:50.000 Let me know in the comments.

00:33:52.000 Let me know in the chat if you believe that they're a real threat or are they little more than a soft power organization?

00:33:58.000 Where some of the most influential people in the world can come together to discuss important ideas and we're getting all het up about nothing.

00:34:05.000 We're going to look at some of our... Even that's pretty bad though, isn't it?

00:34:07.000 Yeah, even the... Even when people say, oh it's not that bad, it's just the world's most powerful people coming together to conspire.

00:34:14.000 The best case scenario ain't that good.

00:34:16.000 It's not that great.

00:34:16.000 It's just the world's most powerful people coming together to conspire.

00:34:19.000 And Bono.

00:34:21.000 Why are you excluding Bono from the World's Most Powerful People?

00:34:25.000 Well, musically, maybe.

00:34:27.000 Apart from when they did that free album.

00:34:28.000 I didn't like that.

00:34:30.000 That album that forces its way onto your phone, like every time that my Bluetooth syncs up with my car and I hear some weird song about like wolves or something.

00:34:39.000 Hold on, I don't know this.

00:34:41.000 This isn't what I want.

00:34:45.000 I've met some of the people from YouTube and they were really nice.

00:34:48.000 Bono, Edge.

00:34:49.000 But the way that thing keeps putting itself on my car radio, that's pissed me off.

00:34:57.000 As a matter of fact.

00:34:58.000 We'll cover that.

00:34:59.000 That's one of the key issues.

00:35:01.000 What the hell are you two doing all over my iPod? 0.99

00:35:04.000 We're going to be talking to James Melville live in the studio.

00:35:07.000 Why he's interesting, Gareth, why you're going to love him, is he's someone from what you might call the conventional traditional left who has become deeply suspicious of the WEF and indeed now believes in the more extreme ideas about them like that there are You know, a bunch of cackling villains.

00:35:24.000 Also, Andrew Lawton, we're going to talk to.

00:35:26.000 He's actually at Dallas.

00:35:27.000 Was he going to be there now?

00:35:28.000 Yeah, he's there.

00:35:29.000 He's right now.

00:35:30.000 He's doing clips on Twitter and stuff, having a hell of a time.

00:35:32.000 Do you think we could get him to get a picture with Klaus Schwab or someone?

00:35:35.000 It should.

00:35:36.000 I think that should be the thing we demand from him.

00:35:37.000 James, if you're watching this now, and you should be, it's a professional obligation, make sure you get some selfies with some top WF stars, like as if it's a Panini sticker book.

00:35:46.000 Or baseball cards if you're an American.

00:35:47.000 The top trumps of WEF, Dazzle, Davos.

00:35:51.000 That's going to be people like Larry Fink, Blackrock CEO.

00:35:54.000 I want at least one tech oligarch. 0.98

00:35:57.000 I'm talking Zuckerbergs, someone like that.

00:35:59.000 Trudeau, we want him.

00:36:00.000 If you can get Trudeau, that's fantastic.

00:36:02.000 Trudeau, when he attended, I think in 2018, 800 grand it cost the Canadian taxpayers, just on Davos costs.

00:36:09.000 It's a good fact that, Russ.

00:36:10.000 What was he doing in the minibar?

00:36:12.000 Well, it's because you know I'm an investigative journalist and I just investigated that by talking to our guest earlier.

00:36:19.000 I'm just remembering what he said really.

00:36:21.000 Tim Hinchliffe, he's coming on.

00:36:23.000 What's he going to tell us?

00:36:24.000 He's saying about WF managing director Adrian Monk who once called him a bad faith actor because of his articles on WF.

00:36:30.000 And Schellenberger, my favourite.

00:36:34.000 Can I just call him Schellenberger?

00:36:36.000 No.

00:36:36.000 Michael Schellenberger.

00:36:37.000 You loved him.

00:36:38.000 I really loved him because I like people... I saw your eyes come alive during that interview.

00:36:42.000 When someone comes on our show and they start saying stuff, I'm like, go on mate.

00:36:46.000 Like when they're pushing it more than I would, that's why I push it real good.

00:36:50.000 That's what I like, you know, when they're like pushing that.

00:36:52.000 Where did the phrase come from, pushing the envelope?

00:36:54.000 What's so good about pushing an envelope?

00:36:56.000 Is it that you're meant to be, you're putting something, like you've written a letter and you're really pushing the envelope and you're going to post it?

00:37:02.000 And then, oh, am I really going to post this envelope?

00:37:02.000 Yeah.

00:37:05.000 You're really pushing the envelope.

00:37:06.000 Is that what it is?

00:37:07.000 That doesn't seem like that should be it.

00:37:08.000 It's not that big of a deal to push an envelope, is it?

00:37:10.000 Not really.

00:37:12.000 Let us know in the comments, in the chat.

00:37:13.000 We're going to have a look now.

00:37:15.000 Right, so hey, later on in the show, you've got to stay with us for this because we're doing a great presentation.

00:37:20.000 Here's the news.

00:37:21.000 No, here's the effing news that we literally will not be able to show you on YouTube except with extreme censorship because The WHO made an amazing bit of propaganda about how anti-vaxxers are worse than terrorists.

00:37:34.000 Worse than them.

00:37:35.000 They cause more damage.

00:37:36.000 But we present that with a new study about adverse vaccine reactions, which we simply wouldn't be able to show you on YouTube.

00:37:42.000 So stay for that.

00:37:44.000 And if you know anyone, by chance, that's not watching this yet...

00:37:47.000 Get them watching because this is, anyone that you know that thinks that you're a crackpot tinfoil hat wearing nut job then get them to watch this and we'll help, we'll explain for you why you're not crazy.

00:38:03.000 Also we're on for so long today that you could probably be on the actual show.

00:38:07.000 If you want to come on, all you've got to do is find us and you can come on with us and come and be here.

00:38:11.000 Yeah, we've got ages.

00:38:12.000 We've got probably wherever you are in the world. 0.99

00:38:13.000 You could be at Davos and like whip off your lanyard, unhook yourself from Klaus Schwab and I believe like a sow, he has nipples all the way down his body. 0.99

00:38:24.000 Like a sow. 1.00

00:38:24.000 Oh, is that it? 1.00

00:38:25.000 Yeah. 0.99

00:38:26.000 That's what gives him his power, is that he's got nipples up and down his body. 0.98

00:38:30.000 He's a jolly old, bowled Father Christmas in many ways. 0.97

00:38:34.000 He's got something about him that's quite adorable. 0.99

00:38:39.000 Pussy Blanco! She will own us and she will be happy. 1.00

00:38:44.000 He's a jolly old, bald Father Christmas in many ways. He's got something about him that's quite adorable.

00:38:48.000 We've got some great facts about Klaus coming up as well.

00:38:50.000 We're going to tell you the score on Klaus.

00:38:52.000 Okay, so what are we going to look at first?

00:38:54.000 Are we looking at a news report on Davos?

00:38:57.000 Yeah, I think we should.

00:38:59.000 Maybe we could either look at, here's what the news is saying about Davos, or we could look at a bit of an explanation as to what Davos is.

00:39:05.000 Let's see normal news reporting about it to see if they capture its truth.

00:39:09.000 What if we're wrong?

00:39:10.000 What if it is just the world's most powerful people coming together to come up with ideas that ultimately lead to social credit score systems, more surveillance, more ability for big tech and big government to control you?

00:39:20.000 Essentially, a lot of what we're talking about today is covered in this fantastic book, The Revolt of the Public, written by Martin Goury, who's a man who's got a very... Look at the size of his name in comparison to the size of the title.

00:39:30.000 You wouldn't do that, would you?

00:39:32.000 Check this out.

00:39:33.000 Your books are all called Russell Brand.

00:39:35.000 Look at this one.

00:39:37.000 Revolution by me.

00:39:39.000 Look, firstly... I'm amazed.

00:39:39.000 All right.

00:39:41.000 Revolution's got as big a font on there.

00:39:43.000 I know, but look at old Russ.

00:39:45.000 Funny, full of charm and engaging.

00:39:47.000 And that's just what I've written about myself there.

00:39:49.000 That's by Owen Jones, that.

00:39:51.000 And look at this.

00:39:52.000 Yeah, he's just put his name on that.

00:39:54.000 What he contests, Martin Goury, who's coming on the show next week, I think, in this book is that the powerful are simply unable to deal with the changing dynamic between the public and the establishment.

00:40:06.000 The public being described in this book using Walter Lippmann's terminology as any group that's interested in a particular subject and can agitate in one direction for that issue or against that issue.

00:40:19.000 This is a fantastic book.

00:40:20.000 We're going to be talking to the author of it next week.

00:40:22.000 But let's see how the old news, who have to control the narrative on behalf of established elites, we'll be contesting.

00:40:28.000 Let me know in the chat, let me know in the comments if you agree with that, are covering Davos to see if we've got anything to worry about at all.

00:40:33.000 Let's have a look.

00:40:34.000 Well, in addition to a lot of snow, Charles, we're going to be having a lot of very high level discussions.

00:40:40.000 Why are you mentioning the weather for?

00:40:42.000 They love the weather, don't they?

00:40:43.000 The weather and the news, they're always together, aren't they?

00:40:46.000 They also have traffic report, they'll let that in a little bit, but weather and news are very much the mum and dad of information.

00:40:53.000 About the challenges ahead, the theme of this year's meeting is cooperation in a fragmented world.

00:40:59.000 Cooperation in a fragmented world means centralised power.

00:41:03.000 How do you cooperate in a fragmented world?

00:41:04.000 Why don't you create the ability to exert centralised authority?

00:41:10.000 Yeah also cooperation isn't exactly right is it?

00:41:13.000 You're not cooperating when you're like mandating things.

00:41:16.000 Would you mind cooperating?

00:41:17.000 Oh no I don't want to.

00:41:18.000 Well you will cooperate because we're going to lock you in your house and you're going to own nothing and you're going to be happy.

00:41:23.000 Oh well we'll cooperate then.

00:41:25.000 That's taking away people's ability to choose.

00:41:27.000 I don't mean cooperate.

00:41:28.000 So is it that WF are soft selling tyrannical ideas?

00:41:32.000 Is it that we once believed that Fascism was an Orwellian idea, easy to read aesthetics, greyness, militarised, and we're moving towards a Huxley-esque idea of dystopia, where it's sanitised, banalised, easy and acceptable.

00:41:49.000 With snow.

00:41:51.000 There's plenty of snow here in Dystopia, Dyssnopia.

00:41:53.000 That's the spirit of it, a globalized world of cooperation.

00:41:55.000 thread that runs through all of those challenges that you just mentioned. Now

00:41:59.000 the divisions were felt a little bit at last year's rather unusual midseason

00:42:04.000 meeting. It was held back in May, it was the first in over two years since the

00:42:07.000 start of the pandemic. But the very spirit and identity of Davos is that

00:42:12.000 globalized world of cooperation and it's a... That's the spirit of it, a globalized world of cooperation.

00:42:18.000 That's the spirit. The problem I suppose with globalization is that it's created

00:42:23.000 disassociation, detachment and the ability for corporations to exert more

00:42:27.000 power than perhaps is due to them.

00:42:29.000 But over the course of our marathon WEF Royal Rumble session, we're going to be showing you that we view the world now through a false lens, that ultimately corporations are much more powerful than governments now.

00:42:38.000 I know most of you know that.

00:42:39.000 Let me know if you knew that already in the chat.

00:42:41.000 and the comments and that we can demonstrate that both through GDP and the ability to implement policy.

00:42:47.000 So in a sense the idea that corporations are a subset of nations is erroneous.

00:42:54.000 Therefore we're already further along the globalism trajectory than we imagined ourselves to be.

00:42:58.000 So when they're talking about cooperation in a fragmented world, whose cooperation?

00:43:02.000 It's not you or dear Gareth Royce out there.

00:43:05.000 You don't get a look in this geezer. It's going to be about the power of already incredibly powerful organizations and

00:43:12.000 corporations isn't it?

00:43:13.000 It's one of those phrases you know when you're talking about cooperation in a fragmented world

00:43:17.000 and that's the spirit of Davos that is about cooperation.

00:43:20.000 I mean, that doesn't necessarily mean it's a good thing, does it?

00:43:22.000 No.

00:43:23.000 If all these powers are coming together and cooperating with each other to basically negatively impact the citizens then that you know you can't just use a phrase like that and expect people to go oh that does sound nice that you're cooperating after this i'm gonna i'm gonna shock you by showing you the wef in numbers gal so some important figures that demonstrate can i just ask a bit more of a personal question

00:43:46.000 Yeah, it's very jangling.

00:43:46.000 See this necklace?

00:43:47.000 It's jangling and it's bothering me a bit but I do want everyone to know that it's quite a good necklace and do you think I should take it off to stop the jangling?

00:43:53.000 This is one of the ones we have trouble with when we do our presentations.

00:43:57.000 This one, this has to be taped right down.

00:43:58.000 It's the worst one.

00:44:00.000 My nemesis.

00:44:01.000 I don't know.

00:44:02.000 Should I take it off because it's really jangling?

00:44:02.000 Stop wearing it.

00:44:04.000 All right.

00:44:05.000 Shall I take it off?

00:44:05.000 You've never done that before.

00:44:07.000 Memorise what I look like with this on.

00:44:12.000 I don't want people thinking I don't look as good because suddenly I feel a bit bland and banalised like a globalised world in which I don't own anything.

00:44:19.000 That everything's centrally owned and I rent it like the licensing agreements that we have with Apple.

00:44:24.000 That's all you've got.

00:44:25.000 Do you think you own your records?

00:44:27.000 Absolutely not.

00:44:28.000 Do you think you own their movies?

00:44:29.000 Well, I've got the U2 one.

00:44:31.000 That I own!

00:44:33.000 For life!

00:44:33.000 It's like tinnitus!

00:44:34.000 I wouldn't be surprised if they organised for Adam Clayton to start tapping away in my brain whenever he feels like it.

00:44:41.000 Adam, I'm trying to go to bed!

00:44:43.000 Alright, let's look at a bit more of the news, shall we?

00:44:46.000 ...system that's really struggling to keep up with the shifting balance of global power and the crises of the moment.

00:44:53.000 Now, we are expecting to hear this week from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, although whether by video link or possibly in person is... Maybe by Dalek?

00:45:01.000 Hello, I am talking to you here today.

00:45:05.000 Are you not allowed to take the mickey out of people's voices?

00:45:07.000 Well, we're on YouTube.

00:45:09.000 I didn't even mean that.

00:45:10.000 Everyone's right to say that.

00:45:11.000 That man's a hero.

00:45:12.000 Isn't he though?

00:45:13.000 Yes.

00:45:13.000 Is he?

00:45:14.000 Do you think it's easy?

00:45:15.000 To be a comedian and then suddenly now you're leading the country.

00:45:20.000 Do you think it's easy to get Blackrock in to rebuild your country? 0.99

00:45:24.000 Yes, I think that's probably quite easy.

00:45:26.000 There's a flow.

00:45:27.000 I think they were going to do that anyway.

00:45:29.000 That was pretty planned.

00:45:30.000 But it's difficult to run Ukraine and to keep people's spirits up when they're being, you know, that is a criminal invasion by Russia. 0.76

00:45:36.000 It's bad.

00:45:37.000 And what about when he had to pose in Vanity Fair?

00:45:39.000 Do you think it's easy to pose?

00:45:41.000 I've done that myself and it's actually quite annoying.

00:45:43.000 You didn't like it.

00:45:44.000 I hated it, it's irritating.

00:45:45.000 Didn't his wife go on a shopping spree in Paris? 0.99

00:45:48.000 Apparently so, yeah.

00:45:49.000 Do you think it's easy for your wife to go on a shopping spree in Paris? 0.79

00:45:52.000 People are complicated.

00:45:53.000 When you simplify it into like, Zelensky's nothing but a hero that's having an ear, it's offensive.

00:45:58.000 I think you can be both, personally.

00:46:00.000 I think you can be a hero and go on a shopping spree.

00:46:00.000 Both what?

00:46:03.000 I think both are possible.

00:46:04.000 I'm a hero, I'm on a shopping spree.

00:46:05.000 Not many films about it though, are there, Gail?

00:46:08.000 Indiana Jones and the shopping spree of Rodeo Drive.

00:46:11.000 No, because he's got to get that egg.

00:46:14.000 And he... I thought he was about Zelensky.

00:46:18.000 Is that how the war's going to end?

00:46:21.000 You've got to get that egg before that little king boy.

00:46:25.000 This will never happen in my kingdom again.

00:46:27.000 It's still unclear.

00:46:29.000 There will be no Russian presence here at all.

00:46:31.000 Ursula von der Leyen will be here from Brussels.

00:46:34.000 Not going to help the fractured world.

00:46:35.000 Make sure, this is how we're going to solve fractured world.

00:46:38.000 We're going to completely exclude all countries that we don't agree with.

00:46:42.000 Oh, so you want centralised unipolar world, isn't it?

00:46:45.000 Yeah.

00:46:46.000 I've told you this.

00:46:47.000 I mean, I guess it's very reductive, isn't it?

00:46:47.000 No, I know.

00:46:49.000 This is going to be the best Davos ever.

00:46:51.000 I mean, when we're talking about fragmented worlds, it usually comes about as a reaction to reductivism, doesn't it?

00:46:57.000 Different people want different things.

00:46:58.000 Right.

00:46:59.000 And yet we get along.

00:47:00.000 I guess there'll be, I don't know, People from, well we know, Black Rock.

00:47:04.000 There'll probably be people from Raytheon and all other kind of arms companies.

00:47:09.000 It's alright, they can be there, but there couldn't be anyone from Russia.

00:47:12.000 Even if it was like a tennis player or something.

00:47:14.000 Can't have tennis players turning up willy-nilly.

00:47:17.000 That's complicated.

00:47:18.000 You're not going to help the fragmented world.

00:47:20.000 Yeah, if you've got Raytheon and all them.

00:47:22.000 Are you worried about my papers?

00:47:23.000 I'm worried that you've got things written on the side of that cat.

00:47:26.000 Where's my notes?

00:47:27.000 It says here, we're not really sponsored by Johnson & Johnson.

00:47:31.000 It's a joke.

00:47:31.000 Put that cat back down.

00:47:33.000 Because some of our ardent fans thought we were actually sponsored by Vanguard, but we're not.

00:47:37.000 Sponsored by, frankly, not by anyone.

00:47:40.000 We're not getting enough sponsorship opportunities.

00:47:42.000 We should have.

00:47:43.000 We should have more contacts like at Davos.

00:47:45.000 Klaus, do you think Klaus isn't getting sponsored?

00:47:47.000 Klaus gets a sponsorship!

00:47:48.000 Pfizer!

00:47:50.000 Medicine.

00:47:51.000 Good for you, that.

00:47:52.000 Have a medicine.

00:47:53.000 Not all of them.

00:47:54.000 What do you mean, not all of the medicines?

00:47:55.000 What I'm saying, not the ones you think.

00:47:57.000 Not the ones you think.

00:47:58.000 There have been lawsuits.

00:47:59.000 What?

00:48:00.000 Against Pfizer?

00:48:01.000 No, no, no.

00:48:01.000 I have a tattoo of them on me.

00:48:03.000 They've done such sterling work.

00:48:06.000 Come on, I'm trying to watch the news.

00:48:07.000 Come on, mainstream media, tell me what to think.

00:48:10.000 China is sending its vice premier, that's the highest level delegation from China in Davos, in several years and it will be the first foreign trip for a high-level government official since China lifted its COVID travel restrictions.

00:48:23.000 Now, the risk of a looming global recession, the effects of the energy crisis and high inflation on households and businesses, especially on the most vulnerable families, the ever-widening impact of climate change—all of these are going to be headline issues, along with discussions on things like labor trends, the culture of leadership, gender parity, digitalization, data They've got it all covered.

00:48:47.000 All of it.

00:48:47.000 And they're going to make it all better.

00:48:50.000 I don't think I'd like it there.

00:48:51.000 Should we go next year?

00:48:52.000 Do you reckon they'll let us in?

00:48:54.000 Do you think they will?

00:48:55.000 I don't think they will, no.

00:48:57.000 In a minute I'm going to show you the WEF by numbers.

00:48:58.000 You'd have to go down as... You'd have to have one of those journalist lanyards.

00:49:01.000 But you'd have to do your proper journalism.

00:49:03.000 Right.

00:49:03.000 But I will!

00:49:04.000 ...curity. I'll be bringing you all the latest throughout the week, including a special debate in partnership with

00:49:09.000 the World Economic Forum.

00:49:10.000 Have a great time?

00:49:12.000 That's their slogan.

00:49:13.000 Have a great time.

00:49:15.000 Oh, okay then.

00:49:16.000 You will own nothing and have a great time.

00:49:18.000 She also said, as the news, she just said, we'll be doing a special session next week in partnership with the WEF.

00:49:26.000 It's like, well, it's not the news then, is it?

00:49:27.000 If you're in partnership with them.

00:49:28.000 You can't be in partnership with them and do proper news.

00:49:30.000 No.

00:49:30.000 You've got to be radical, baby.

00:49:32.000 you gotta be independent like us man.

00:49:34.000 ...forum about Europe's energy security and competitiveness that'll be

00:49:38.000 broadcast on France 24 this Friday.

00:49:40.000 Lovely, there you go.

00:49:41.000 That's the mainstream media reporting about it.

00:49:44.000 Some people are talking to us on our numerous platforms, like our special membership community on local Stay Free AF.

00:49:51.000 Colin says, how are they actually becoming unelected overlords?

00:49:55.000 How are we giving up sovereignty to these people?

00:49:57.000 I suppose, mate, it was the gradual trend of corporatism taking over liberal democracies.

00:50:02.000 It was the advent of neoliberalism.

00:50:04.000 It was the decline in true opposition in American politics in particular that took place in the 90s.

00:50:10.000 Tony Blair, who will be at Davos this year, is one of the architects of dismantling democracy in our little old country and some say in advocating for an illegal war.

00:50:21.000 in Iraq that was quite profitable, the reconstruction-wise.

00:50:24.000 Frank says, is there anything formal in government's legislation around

00:50:27.000 the world against government officials being an executive representative of a

00:50:30.000 private organization?

00:50:31.000 If so, how are these conflicts of interest typically resolved? I'm going to ask that

00:50:34.000 to a proper journalist, that was quite a difficult question.

00:50:36.000 Keep letting us know what questions you have.

00:50:40.000 If I can answer them, I will.

00:50:41.000 Gareth will answer them if he can.

00:50:43.000 Some of the top journalists that we're talking to, like Schellenberger, he'll be on.

00:50:48.000 You can't wait, can you?

00:50:49.000 I can't wait to talk to him.

00:50:50.000 You've been counting down the minutes until Schellenberger's back on.

00:50:52.000 I just want to ask you a question.

00:50:53.000 Do you think that Schellenberger's been thinking about me since the last chat?

00:50:57.000 Probably a bit, hasn't he?

00:50:57.000 I think so, yeah.

00:50:59.000 Okay, so in 2013, the American taxpayer, so if you're American and you pay your tax, that's you, Helped fund the sponsoring organisation with tens of millions of dollars in federal grants.

00:51:08.000 Since 2013, the WEF received nearly $60 million from taxpayers.

00:51:12.000 Schwab, or himself, has come under scrutiny for using WEF funds and business contracts to enhance his own personal wealth.

00:51:19.000 Oh, he's trying his hardest.

00:51:21.000 Attendees pay $28,000 just for a ticket.

00:51:23.000 We've coveted all-access badges fetching more like $50,000.

00:51:27.000 That's for all-access though.

00:51:28.000 Before you start saying that's expensive, you can go wherever you want with that.

00:51:33.000 Just wander in one of the tents, see what Klaus is doing.

00:51:36.000 See him chalking himself up.

00:51:37.000 Not with Johnson & Johnson.

00:51:38.000 Would he have them all on display, the teats?

00:51:41.000 I think what he's got is Velcro strips and go like that and all the teats can come out and then Trudeau can be on a teat there.

00:51:47.000 Rishi Sunak, Merkel, she can get a teat.

00:51:50.000 There's a teat for everybody.

00:51:53.000 Look at this, we're flashing around the facts.

00:51:55.000 Here's a Schwab fact.

00:51:56.000 Klaus Schwab has been known to tell underlings he anticipates one day receiving a Nobel Peace Prize.

00:52:01.000 Do you know what I anticipate?

00:52:03.000 I sense it.

00:52:03.000 I sense a movement in the force.

00:52:05.000 There'll be a Nobel Peace Prize coming this way. 0.98

00:52:08.000 Grab a nipple. 1.00

00:52:09.000 On his travels, he demands the privileges of visiting heads of state, complete with welcoming delegations at the airport. 0.99

00:52:15.000 Does he really?

00:52:16.000 Apparently so, yeah.

00:52:19.000 At the Forum's headquarters in Switzerland, a glass-fronted campus looking out over Lake Geneva.

00:52:24.000 Nice.

00:52:24.000 A hallway connecting two wings, he's lined with photos of Schwab posing with world leaders.

00:52:29.000 He's trying his hardest.

00:52:30.000 He loves it.

00:52:32.000 Let's go back to the WF in numbers.

00:52:35.000 Can we go back to that?

00:52:37.000 Yeah, let's have a look at that.

00:52:40.000 50,000, that's it.

00:52:41.000 Those are the numbers.

00:52:42.000 It's 50 grand for that.

00:52:44.000 You can have a little ski while you're there, can't you?

00:52:46.000 Yeah, you can.

00:52:47.000 That's nice to know.

00:52:48.000 Is that it for the numbers?

00:52:50.000 Should we have a look at you will own nothing?

00:52:53.000 Sure thing.

00:52:54.000 Because if one thing has brought Davos, you just settle, if one thing has brought Davos to the attention of the world and perhaps one of the things that's made people query their intentions is their famous slogan, their number one hit, you will own nothing and you will be happy.

00:53:11.000 Let's have a look at that to remind ourselves of how this phrase entered the public consciousness.

00:53:17.000 He is quite happy that blow.

00:53:27.000 Yeah.

00:53:27.000 And whatever you want, you'll rent.

00:53:29.000 Okay.

00:53:31.000 Some of it's sort of, you know, like quite spiritual in a sense, like that you don't own anything, you can't take it with you when you go.

00:53:38.000 Yeah.

00:53:38.000 I'm not sure they mean that.

00:53:40.000 I'm not sure they mean that when they're having discussions with Microsoft and Apple.

00:53:44.000 No.

00:53:45.000 Microsoft and Apple are more wealthy and powerful than a significant number of the world's nations, aren't they?

00:53:52.000 Yeah, they're doing alright.

00:53:54.000 And then when you see pictures of drones with parcels, and this was a few years ago, and now we are seeing that.

00:53:59.000 If you can't trust a drone to accurately bomb a terrorist and instead blow up a wedding,

00:54:04.000 I'm certainly not going to have them delivering me my supplies.

00:54:07.000 How about that one?

00:54:16.000 on.

00:54:17.000 Surely, I mean, the Americans aren't going to like that.

00:54:21.000 No, I don't think they'll enjoy that.

00:54:22.000 But I think that's the thing, isn't it, about the WEF and Davos is that it's, I mean, it's propaganda that's sneaking things like you learn nothing in with messages like, oh, and also the U.S.

00:54:33.000 won't be the richest country in the world anymore.

00:54:37.000 So it's kind of telling you some things that you feel like, oh, that might be good.

00:54:40.000 And then other stuff.

00:54:41.000 Don't worry about that bit.

00:54:43.000 You know, they're not just some evil organisation that's just pumping out loads of, you know, like, stuff that we're going to find really quite vulgar.

00:54:53.000 No one's suggesting that the WF themselves think of themselves as malfeasant while they're doing it.

00:55:00.000 I mean, in fact, isn't, like, this year Idris Elba going to be there?

00:55:05.000 Yeah, of course.

00:55:06.000 Who I really like.

00:55:07.000 Yeah, I mean, loads of amazing... Luffa!

00:55:09.000 Right.

00:55:10.000 Like, he's a great actor.

00:55:11.000 Will.i.am.

00:55:12.000 Will.i.am!

00:55:13.000 He's gonna be there.

00:55:14.000 Yeah.

00:55:15.000 These are not offensive characters on the international stage.

00:55:19.000 And like, what about David Attenborough?

00:55:20.000 He's been there.

00:55:20.000 Exactly.

00:55:21.000 People that you kind of like.

00:55:24.000 But it's just, I suppose, when you have a convergence of interests that have such unprecedented power, not Idris Elba or David Attenborough.

00:55:32.000 That's the lovely wallpaper.

00:55:34.000 The actual power is big tech organizations such as Facebook and Microsoft and how their interests might align with state officials who want a world where for example digital ID becomes Or mandated and where social credit scores becomes acceptable.

00:55:56.000 And it feels like we're being eased towards these type of ideas.

00:56:00.000 Always they use convenience and safety as the kind of lubricant for tyranny.

00:56:05.000 Well, even just there, we just saw a drone delivering and you might go, what's wrong with the drone delivering parcels?

00:56:10.000 You go, well, probably quite a lot.

00:56:11.000 First of all, the advancement of drone technologies, not a great thing because of all the other ways in which it's useful.

00:56:17.000 The ways in which the corporations that create those things, usually military industrial complex,

00:56:22.000 so it's the expansion of that, the expansion of that into police forces, also the loss of

00:56:26.000 human labour, I mean there's all sorts of ways in which that just isn't good is it for human

00:56:30.000 beings, that drones are going to replace people. Globalism in and of itself implies a

00:56:36.000 centralised power and the ability to map one narrative onto a divergent and diverse space,

00:56:45.000 where naturally, ordinarily and understandably, there will be different sets of interests,

00:56:50.000 regional interests, cultural, political interests.

00:56:54.000 In a sense, the opposite of globalism is what ought to be happening.

00:56:58.000 Devolution, more and more community power.

00:57:01.000 More and more localism.

00:57:03.000 The maximum amount of democracy possible.

00:57:06.000 Not creating a world where an aristocratic elite are able to dictate, through soft power, the agenda of the world.

00:57:14.000 That's why the pandemic, I think, was so significant.

00:57:17.000 Because a pandemic, by its nature, requires a global perspective.

00:57:21.000 In one of the pieces of the WEF's own propaganda, they point out that the world's richest organizations, corporations and institutions benefited from the pandemic.

00:57:34.000 I wonder, therefore, what is to prevent comparable conditions being created again?

00:57:40.000 Not that I'm suggesting that the pandemic was anything other than an organic, biological condition, but I'm saying that there already seems to be the creation of a narrative around climate lockdowns.

00:57:55.000 I suppose if what you're interested in is globalism and creating a one-world narrative, It appears that what ends up getting promoted are circumstances and ideas that are advantageous to centralised regulatory authorities, whether they're government or corporate or NGOs.

00:58:11.000 Yeah, absolutely.

00:58:12.000 I mean, one of the things we were talking about, the you'll learn nothing, you'll be happy.

00:58:15.000 And we were speaking earlier about the kind of real world example of how that's manifesting.

00:58:21.000 I think we've got a graphic of the This is brilliant.

00:58:24.000 The Black Rock example. 0.91

00:58:25.000 This is so good this and like our recent presentation on Black Rock rebuilding Ukraine after Russia's criminal invasion has garnered a lot of interest and attention because it's one way of showing how a geopolitical event has led to profits for a powerful investment company.

00:58:44.000 Black Rock as well as we showed in that presentation are involved due to their vastness in a numerous financial activities and in particular in this

00:58:55.000 case what we highlighted in that presentation was BlackRock's practice of acquiring real estate in

00:59:01.000 America which is unduly biasing the real estate market and in fact meaning it's more and more difficult for

00:59:08.000 ordinary Americans to purchase a home which leads to a kind of you will learn

00:59:12.000 nothing and you will be happy reality. So whilst it might seem like a kind of phatic and

00:59:19.000 easy phrase when it's presented in that loopy little video that you can see here from this

00:59:24.000 beautifully created graphic.

00:59:27.000 Wall Street giants want to be your landlord.

00:59:29.000 Data shows that mega banks are buying up a significant amount of US real estate.

00:59:33.000 Renting is up.

00:59:34.000 Home ownership is down.

00:59:36.000 BlackRock CEO Larry Fink takes a private jet to Davos.

00:59:40.000 He'll be there this year, will he, Larry Fink?

00:59:42.000 Yep.

00:59:42.000 He'll be there.

00:59:43.000 One of the stars.

00:59:44.000 He's one of the best ones.

00:59:45.000 Yeah, amongst his deals with Ukraine and Zelensky.

00:59:48.000 So it shows how a globalist agenda can be achieved and how events like this, as well as being opportunities just for sort of off-the-record conflabs, also demonstrates where these interests converge.

01:00:04.000 Shall we look at our presentation on Klaus Schwab, Gal?

01:00:07.000 Why not?

01:00:10.000 This is a beautiful presentation on Klaus.

01:00:12.000 You're going to love this because Klaus Schwab, in spite of the presence of the pussy Blanco, is not like a cartoonish Bond villain. 1.00

01:00:21.000 He's a real man with feelings and a wife and a parking space. 0.98

01:00:25.000 And those teats.

01:00:26.000 He's got sow teats down his flanks. 0.63

01:00:29.000 But having a set of sow teats down your flanks don't make of you necessarily a villain, does it?

01:00:35.000 Not necessarily, baby.

01:00:35.000 No.

01:00:36.000 So here is a presentation on Klaus Schwab where we see what make the man tick.

01:00:43.000 What make him tick, gal? 1.00

01:00:45.000 What is Klaus Schwab all about?

01:00:46.000 How did he get himself into this position of power?

01:00:48.000 How did a plucky little... Is he German? 1.00

01:00:51.000 Swiss?

01:00:52.000 How did this plucky little Germanic seeming guy get himself in there? 1.00

01:00:57.000 He was just a Germanic kid with a dream and a pussy blanco and teats up his flanks. 1.00

01:01:03.000 How's he got himself in this position? 1.00

01:01:04.000 He's a German, isn't he?

01:01:06.000 He's a former economics professor or something, I think.

01:01:08.000 That's what he used to be.

01:01:09.000 Don't judge him by that, Gal.

01:01:11.000 He's moved on.

01:01:12.000 Why can't you?

01:01:12.000 Let's learn a little bit more about Klaus Schwab.

01:01:17.000 It's January.

01:01:18.000 Clear skies and crispness.

01:01:21.000 New beginnings.

01:01:22.000 And to celebrate that, that global festival of oneness, Davos.

01:01:27.000 Yes, Klaus Schwab is putting on his festival once again.

01:01:31.000 You will owe nothing and you will be happy!

01:01:35.000 We all know Davos.

01:01:37.000 We all know its great reset agenda.

01:01:39.000 We all know its catchphrase, you'll own nothing and be happy.

01:01:43.000 But who is Klaus Schwab?

01:01:45.000 What does he want?

01:01:46.000 What goes on at the World Economic Forum?

01:01:49.000 And should we be afraid of their evil malicious agenda?

01:01:53.000 Klaus Schwab, the ringmaster of festivities at the World Economic Forum in Davos, has been known to tell underlings that he anticipates one day receiving a Nobel Peace Prize.

01:02:03.000 Probably get a Nobel Peace Prize one day, don't you reckon?

01:02:06.000 No?

01:02:07.000 Schwab's greatest accomplishment is decidedly entrepreneurial.

01:02:10.000 He has developed a forum from an earnest meeting of policy wonks into a glittering assembly of the world's richest people.

01:02:17.000 To sort of start something.

01:02:17.000 That's pretty good, isn't it?

01:02:19.000 And then before you know it, Obama, Fauci, Bill Gates, Elon Musk, I think all the top bods all show up.

01:02:26.000 So what's going on there?

01:02:28.000 He's achieved this by ingratiating himself with those who wield power, and especially the billionaire class, a tribe known as Davos Man.

01:02:36.000 Schwab has constructed a refuge for the outlandishly wealthy, an exclusive zone where they are free to pursue deals and sundry shenanigans while enjoying the cover of participating in a virtuous undertaking.

01:02:49.000 Their mere presence in Davos at the forum signals their empathy and sensitivity.

01:02:54.000 Not to me, it bloody well doesn't.

01:02:55.000 Makes me think there is a global conspiracy.

01:02:57.000 People that are banned from the internet now for saying stuff like, oh there's this group of people, they're meeting up, they've got the same financial interests, they're looking to put pressure on governments to implement a set of policies that will lead to centralised power that facilitates an ongoing march towards dystopia.

01:03:12.000 Makes me think, oh no, that's definitely happening.

01:03:15.000 Because who are the folks showing up at this stuff?

01:03:18.000 And what are they saying?

01:03:19.000 Like, if you get big tech, big pharma, government all in one place, and then you look out your window or sort of watch the news if it's not too propagandised, you start thinking, wait a minute!

01:03:28.000 These people are in cahoots, I tell ya!

01:03:31.000 In the prevailing pantomime, Davos Man is intent on channeling his intellect and compassion towards solving the great crisis of the age.

01:03:39.000 He might have retreated to his mountaintop palace in Jackson Hole, or his yacht moored off Mykonos, but he is too obsessed with rescuing the poor and sparing humanity from the ravages of climate change, so he's in Davos, paying fees reaching several hundred thousands of dollars a year for a forum membership, plus tens of thousands more per head to attend the meeting.

01:03:59.000 It's a really, really expensive club, And you're not in it!

01:04:02.000 For the billionaires, participation in Schwab's charade may be proffered as evidence that they adhere to the ubiquitous slogan of the forum itself, committed to improving the state of the world.

01:04:12.000 If you wanna improve the state of the world... 0.96

01:04:16.000 Don't invite the people that are most responsible for ruining the fucking thing in the first place. 0.99

01:04:23.000 These are the people that are causing the bloody problem. 0.98

01:04:26.000 In truth, Davos Man has pillaged the global economy, exploiting workers, plundering housing and healthcare, and dismantling government programs while transferring the bounty to his personal accounts tucked in jurisdictions beyond the reach of any pain-in-the-ass tax collector.

01:04:40.000 Do you remember that we worked out a while ago, somewhat because of Julian Assange's maxim, that the function of government is to extract your money from you and give it to private interests.

01:04:51.000 So it's a taxation model and that taxation is then passed on to various private interests which they have affiliations with through their revolving doors.

01:04:59.000 If you use that little equation you'll see how often it's helpful in understanding what's going on.

01:05:04.000 Yet the fact that Schwab appears to believe in his credentials as a moral figure worthy of a Nobel speaks to his faith in the effectiveness of his creation.

01:05:11.000 Like the people he gathers annually in the Alps, or at least virtually during the pandemic, Schwab is an exemplar of the force of pious words as a prophylactic against the consequences of unsavoury deeds.

01:05:23.000 We're more than used to reporting on this channel, aren't we?

01:05:25.000 And let me know what you think in the comments below.

01:05:28.000 That the function of politics is to provide the appearance of change, the appearance of order, the appearance of caring, as opposed to actually doing stuff like that.

01:05:38.000 And it seems that this is, in a sense, I don't know, the Disney world of that, the duck's eye, the bull's eye, the apotheosis of the ideologies of technocratic indifference and paliation that dominate our planet right now.

01:05:51.000 Like most Davos men, Schwab has mastered the art of holding two irreconcilable positions at once, unencumbered by the typical constraints of rank hypocrisy.

01:06:01.000 He blithely disregards... I like blithely.

01:06:03.000 Blithely means like this... Disregards the obvious contradictions between the pristine values he publicly champions, inclusion, equity, transparency, and the unsavory compromises that he makes in wooing people with money and influence.

01:06:16.000 Schwab's movements through the Congress Center unfold like military exercises, a coterie of agitated minions accompanying him everywhere.

01:06:24.000 On his travels, he demands the privileges of a visiting head of state, complete with welcoming delegations at the airport.

01:06:30.000 I'm sorry, I'm a bit jealous of Klaus Schwab, the way he's marching around, like a dignitary.

01:06:36.000 Klaus Schwab!

01:06:38.000 Is my Nobel Prize here yet?

01:06:40.000 You're not getting a Nobel Peace Prize for trying to destroy everyone's lives.

01:06:44.000 What do you get them for?

01:06:45.000 Peace!

01:06:46.000 At the Forum's headquarters in Switzerland, a tax haven.

01:06:50.000 What are you there for?

01:06:51.000 Toblerones?

01:06:52.000 A glass-fronted campus looking out on Lake Geneva.

01:06:55.000 A hallway connecting two wings is lined with photos of Schwab posing with world leaders. 0.98

01:07:00.000 What a prat! 1.00

01:07:02.000 When a forum employee who was late for a meeting once pulled into Schwab's spot in the parking lot, aware that the boss was overseas, he caught wind of it and insisted she be fired, relenting only after senior staff intervened to save her. 0.95

01:07:14.000 Senior staff?

01:07:15.000 Oh no, don't sack somebody, Klaus, for taking your parking spot.

01:07:19.000 But what about my Nobel Prize?

01:07:20.000 Well, that's not that peaceful.

01:07:23.000 We're dealing with someone nicking his parking spot.

01:07:26.000 Where's his slogan, their catchphrase down the front?

01:07:29.000 Committed to improving the state of the world.

01:07:31.000 Hey! 1.00

01:07:32.000 Get out of my fucking parking spot! 1.00

01:07:34.000 Oh sorry, I thought you were on holiday. 1.00

01:07:35.000 And you were.

01:07:36.000 Yeah, but it's still in my parking spot.

01:07:38.000 It should be empty.

01:07:39.000 Sorry, sorry. 1.00

01:07:40.000 You're fucking fired! 0.99

01:07:41.000 There, the world is a little bit improved now. 0.99

01:07:45.000 In the mid-90s, when the Forum convened a gathering in South Africa, Schwab delivered a speech in front of Nelson Mandela at the closing plenary, in which he cribbed from Martin Luther King Jr.' 's I Have a Dream.

01:07:56.000 He said dramatically, You're like this, Nelson?

01:07:59.000 I also have a dream!

01:08:00.000 Hey! 1.00

01:08:01.000 Get out of my fucking parking spot! 1.00

01:08:03.000 Several of us almost threw up, recalled Barbara Erskine, who then ran the Forum's communications. 1.00

01:08:09.000 But if Schwab is something of a ludicrous character, He is also begrudgingly admired as a savant.

01:08:14.000 He has a knack, an incredible knack, to smell the next fad and jump into it, said one former colleague. 0.95

01:08:20.000 Pogs!

01:08:21.000 People are gonna like pogs!

01:08:23.000 Drones, but just for kids, you know, fly them around!

01:08:26.000 NSYNC, gonna be big!

01:08:28.000 He recognized early on that the forum had to distinguish itself from the run-of-the-mill business conferences, where people sat around talking about money, in defining a high-minded mission improving the state of the world.

01:08:38.000 Hey, get out of my parking spot! 1.00

01:08:40.000 Schwalb turned attendance into a demonstration of social concern.

01:08:44.000 He's the creator of virtual signaling.

01:08:46.000 He reinforced the value proposition through relentless networking, making Davos an indispensable venue for business.

01:08:52.000 He enticed multinational corporations to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars a year for the privilege of serving as strategic partners Securing access to exclusive lounges and private conference rooms inside the Congress Center.

01:09:04.000 There, executives encounter one another along with heads of state, investors and other people capable of improving the state of their balance sheets.

01:09:12.000 Schwab choreographs bilateral meetings at which heads of global banks and energy companies can personally beseech presidents of countries for preferential tax treatment and access to promising oil fields.

01:09:23.000 And that is not improving the state of the world, is it?

01:09:26.000 Like granting global banks the opportunity to pressurise heads of state and new oil fields.

01:09:32.000 I thought one of the main things they're into is climate change and that.

01:09:35.000 Here, look at this, we've got to do something about climate change.

01:09:39.000 Why don't you guys talk about new oil fields?

01:09:43.000 Consulting giants and software companies make plays for government contracts by speaking directly with the decision makers.

01:09:49.000 Top executives can fly in and meet a dozen heads of state in the course of four or five days, sitting across tables in soundproof rooms beyond the purview of securities, regulators, journalists and other hindrances.

01:10:00.000 Despite the forum's status as a not-for-profit organisation, I mean, take profit out of it.

01:10:05.000 How long to fix that?

01:10:06.000 One thing we're gonna have to not do is make profit.

01:10:08.000 Wait, where are you all going?

01:10:09.000 Where are you going?

01:10:11.000 You can have my parking space!

01:10:13.000 Schwab and his wife Hilda Schwab, the organisation's co-founder, have adeptly positioned themselves to benefit from the gusher of money moving through.

01:10:21.000 This is not for profit!

01:10:24.000 They're actually drowning in money!

01:10:26.000 The Forum budget covers his globetrotting and the catering and security services at his palatial home in the colony neighborhood of Geneva, the Beverly Hills of Switzerland, where Schwab frequently hosts extravagant dinners.

01:10:39.000 Over the years, the Forum has spent almost 70 million Swiss francs, nearly 80 million dollars, to purchase land in the area.

01:10:46.000 I will own something and be happy.

01:10:48.000 Including two parcels bridging Schwab's home and the Forum headquarters.

01:10:52.000 Even in the 1990s, when the Forum employed only a few dozen staff, Schwab's salary was tied to the pay for the Secretary General of the United Nations, supplying him roughly 400,000 a year.

01:11:03.000 We had a few people.

01:11:04.000 I should probably earn the same amount as the Secretary General of the United Nations.

01:11:08.000 But Schwab was not satisfied by ordinary wealth.

01:11:10.000 He entrusted his nephew, Hans Schwab, with the construction of a series of for-profit businesses, tapping the forum as a venture capital fund.

01:11:18.000 Schwab was cognizant that running a for-profit company on the side of a non-profit could bring unwanted scrutiny from the authorities.

01:11:25.000 Well, yeah, because it's corrupt and awful.

01:11:28.000 Yeah, he was so proud of his entrepreneurial exploits that he pressed Erskine, the communications chief, to write about the event's business in the forum's annual report.

01:11:37.000 I shouldn't let people know about this money I'm making because it's meant to be a not-for-profit enterprise.

01:11:41.000 But then again, Klaus has done so well!

01:11:44.000 Tell everybody!

01:11:45.000 When she balked, suggesting that this would constitute an admission that the forum was taking liberties with its non-profit status, Schwab was not grateful for her counsel.

01:11:53.000 He was furious.

01:11:54.000 He sat me down and said, look, I want to be regarded as a businessman.

01:11:58.000 According to his website, the Schwab Foundation promotes small scale enterprises that address issues of social importance, extending the reach of clean water and electricity in the developing world and creating opportunities for women.

01:12:10.000 Where the money has gone is effectively unknowable.

01:12:13.000 Well, I bloody well hope it's gone that way.

01:12:15.000 It won't help that woman who parked in his spot very much, will it?

01:12:18.000 Swizzle for it, it's required minimal disclosure, which is why he lives there and why all this stuff happens there.

01:12:24.000 Well, there you go.

01:12:25.000 Davos, the Great Reset, the mystery of Klaus Schwab.

01:12:29.000 What do you think about it?

01:12:30.000 Do you think it seems like a place where conspiracies come to live?

01:12:33.000 Do you see the hubris, the reality, the truth that when all those people come together, of course they have a shared interest?

01:12:39.000 I like this story because it shows us that stuff that It gets called conspiracy, and you know how you've suffered for being called a conspiracy theorist, which someone in our comments once said, conspiracy theories should be known as spoiler alerts now.

01:12:50.000 Why don't you hit us up with a good bit of content in the comments?

01:12:53.000 When you read a story like that, you see the kind of figures that are behind these movements.

01:12:57.000 Fascinating, what a terrific book, what a fantastic story, and what a great illustration of the reality of the Great Reset.

01:13:04.000 You will own nothing and you will be happy. 0.99

01:13:06.000 Klaus Schwab will have a fucking big house and two parcels of land! 0.99

01:13:10.000 But that's just what I think. 0.99

01:13:11.000 Let me know what you think in the comments below.

01:13:13.000 Please, if you enjoyed this video, have a look at this one or indeed this one.

01:13:16.000 And if you want to know what I'm up to or want to come see me live, I'm all over the UK performing.

01:13:20.000 Sign up to my mailing list and I'll keep in constant communication with you.

01:13:23.000 But please don't park in my spot.

01:13:26.000 Stay free.

01:13:26.000 And what do you think about Klaus Schwab?

01:13:34.000 Is he as bad as everyone says?

01:13:35.000 What a fantastic conversation we're about to have now with James Melville, political pundit and WEF commentator, but not in a wrestling-type way, although that is a pun we've been mobilising.

01:13:46.000 James, thanks for joining us.

01:13:47.000 Russell, it's great to be here.

01:13:49.000 I love your cardigan, by the way.

01:13:50.000 I feel far too overdressed compared to you.

01:13:52.000 Thank you very much for commenting on my physical appearance.

01:13:55.000 It's one of the things that I pride myself in.

01:13:57.000 Ah!

01:13:58.000 James, you got some nerve coming in here saying that the WF have got anything other than our best interests at heart.

01:14:04.000 Also, I noticed on Twitter you get much more traction out of our content than we do.

01:14:08.000 But let's focus firstly and foremostly on the WF and their agenda.

01:14:13.000 The number one question that we want to address to our viewers on Rumble, where we in a minute will be talking about some stuff that you simply cannot say on YouTube, And our awakening wonders there on YouTube is that the WAF do have an agenda that saying that the WAF are simply a lovely little conference where under the auspices of Klaus Schwab's generosity and potential six niplets they're doing nothing but discussing good ideas in the snow is reductive.

01:14:40.000 So what is the agenda and what is the evidence that there is an agenda, James?

01:14:44.000 I mean, I think it's aspects of control, first of all.

01:14:47.000 I mean, if you look at the WF historically back in the 70s, it was effectively policy wonks coming up with some ideas, but not getting much mainstream traction.

01:14:56.000 You know, it's very much in the shadows.

01:14:58.000 And I think what's happened over the last two or three years because of the pandemic and the response to the pandemic is more and more people are scrutinizing what the WF is about.

01:15:06.000 And I think there's a number of reasons why that's happened.

01:15:08.000 First of all, Gross hypocrisy.

01:15:11.000 When you get a bunch of political leaders, you're getting technocrats and you're getting billionaires and corporations who are going across on private jet and motorcades and effectively wanging on about saving the planet, people are going to look at that and say, well, that's a little bit rich.

01:15:26.000 Secondly, a lot of the things that WF have been talking about historically, In particular, things like the response to the pandemic, globalised treaties, digitalisation, a lot of these things are coming down the tracks and a lot of governments are actually implementing them now, either in consultation stage or pilot stage.

01:15:44.000 A perfect example of that is the digitalisation of currency and central bank digital currency.

01:15:48.000 So I think what's happened with the WF, they were on the margins, but because of a lot of the agendas they've tried to set over the years, A lot of that's beginning to come down the tracks in terms of government policy.

01:16:01.000 And then there's the optics as well of things like what Klaus Schwab has said about young leaders and penetrating the cabinets and, you know, you'll own nothing and be happy.

01:16:09.000 And if you look at a lot of the papers and a lot of the tweets that WF have done as well.

01:16:14.000 People look at that and think, actually, some of this is joined up here.

01:16:17.000 This is all about technocratic, corporation and also aspects of government control that ends up looking like bureaucratic domain and control.

01:16:29.000 And in particular, in a cost of living crisis, when you get individuals who are struggling to even put their heating on or they're facing a zero sum game choice of heat or eat, And you're looking at individuals who are clinking glasses in Davos when actually might be a better opt if you're in a volcano like a Bond villain or something like that.

01:16:47.000 They're looking at these individuals and thinking this is so far removed from our day to day concerns.

01:16:53.000 Most people just want to get through this winter discontent.

01:16:56.000 And when they see individuals either at Davos or previously at COP or the G20 or the G7 when the same individuals are turning up And they're coming up with ideas supposedly for our convenience and our safety and our good.

01:17:11.000 And yet over the last two years, the transfer of wealth to the super rich is at record levels.

01:17:17.000 I get it.

01:17:18.000 So listen, on one hand, what we're saying is that it don't look good flying about in private jets, talking about your carbon footprint when it's like the BFG's giant sandals banging down on the mountain sides up there in the snow.

01:17:32.000 but perhaps significant and also that it's yet another one of these unelected globalist bodies

01:17:38.000 where they preach in rarefied air about matters that will affect the lives of ordinary people

01:17:45.000 and things that won't directly affect them because they're able to protect themselves from that through wealth.

01:17:50.000 But the area that perhaps interests me most, James, is the actual policies that are conceived,

01:17:57.000 discussed and popularized through the discourse at Davos that end up being implemented through governments.

01:18:02.000 And you think that digitization and CBDCs, which I always nearly say CBBBs, don't I, Gail?

01:18:07.000 It's so difficult because CBBBs, if you're a British person, is a very good children's TV scheduling section.

01:18:15.000 So, mate, what in particular around the pandemic and digitisation and digital IDs did we see, as you say, come down the tracks, move from something being discussed to being implemented?

01:18:26.000 If you look back historically with the WEF and some of the things they're putting out on social media, but also some of their agenda papers and so on, they were talking about this stuff quite a few years ago, but it really wasn't getting that much.

01:18:36.000 Were they really?

01:18:37.000 I mean, we're talking about we've all got digital IDs.

01:18:37.000 Yeah.

01:18:40.000 Well, they were nudging... And were they talking about pandemics as well?

01:18:42.000 Well, they weren't saying so much that everyone's got to be and digitalise it, but they were saying there's aspects of digital ID that's coming down the tracks.

01:18:49.000 They were talking about net zero responses.

01:18:51.000 They're talking about, you know, globalised response for future emergencies through healthcare and so on.

01:18:55.000 And so people have gone through their back catalogue in sort of real time now.

01:18:59.000 So, well, actually, that's where they were nudging the agenda.

01:19:02.000 But I think one of the key things at the moment is if you look at, say, the pandemic response, there's almost two stages.

01:19:07.000 First of all, there was a lockdown stage and then it went into forms of digitalisation, particularly vaccine passports.

01:19:14.000 Which for me, I had a massive problem with that.

01:19:16.000 I think it was illiberal, it was unethical, there isn't actually a justifiable argument for something like that.

01:19:20.000 I'll just point out that we're still on YouTube and YouTube is governed by the WHO's policies when it comes to discussing those medications and if you would just bear that in mind later on on Rumble we'll be able to talk without bearing in mind the WHO, another unelected body funded In part by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

01:19:39.000 I think I can say that on YouTube.

01:19:40.000 So just want to be careful.

01:19:41.000 Remember to stay with us on Rumble when we come off YouTube.

01:19:44.000 It's very important that you do that.

01:19:45.000 Very important you do that.

01:19:46.000 Please continue.

01:19:47.000 So I think in terms of digitalization, we're now heading at stage where if you look at all the different aspects of emergency response, And also the issues that the WF and governments and also corporations are moving towards, whether it's a net zero, whether it's due to a pandemic response, whether it's due to financial, it looks like we're heading toward aspects of digitalization control.

01:20:08.000 Central Bank Digital Currency is a perfect example of that.

01:20:11.000 In fact, the UK government produced a consultation document last week to talk about digital ID.

01:20:17.000 Now, these are things that came out on the 4th of January.

01:20:20.000 I mean, this is something that's been coming down the tracks and Sunak's been talking about

01:20:23.000 central bank digital currencies for quite some time.

01:20:26.000 He did it when he was chancellor.

01:20:27.000 I've seen him talking about that.

01:20:28.000 I've seen him talking to camera like when he does that thing where he don't look like

01:20:31.000 he knows where he's looking properly, you know, saying that digital currencies are coming.

01:20:34.000 We all have moments of that.

01:20:35.000 You know, I'm getting that here.

01:20:36.000 We all have moments of that.

01:20:37.000 But I think what's happened with the WF, they were talking about a lot of these issues quite

01:20:40.000 a few years ago.

01:20:42.000 So you end up having a global response to the pandemic, which ends up with aspects of

01:20:46.000 increased digital ID.

01:20:48.000 And then you end up having these functions, not just the WF, but also things like COP

01:20:53.000 and also things like the G20 and the G7, where they're talking about globalized coordination

01:20:59.000 agendas.

01:21:00.000 And you're talking about potential treaties coming down the track.

01:21:02.000 And then you're getting individual governments are putting consultation exercises for digital

01:21:06.000 ID.

01:21:07.000 People look at, well, who are the conduits for this?

01:21:09.000 Who are nudging us towards this?

01:21:11.000 We know the WF, they haven't got Any sort of legitimacy and authority in terms of legislation.

01:21:17.000 But they have been talking about this for quite some time.

01:21:20.000 They're nudging governments in a particular direction.

01:21:23.000 You have a bunch of young leaders of the WF who are now, as Klaus Schwab said, penetrating government.

01:21:29.000 And you end up with a situation where people start asking a lot of questions and people start getting very suspicious about this.

01:21:35.000 This is not some sort of conspiracy theory.

01:21:37.000 When you end up having governments Doing consultation exercises and also pilot schemes for something like central bank, digital currency or other forms of digital ID when you end up having things like vaccine passports through the pandemic.

01:21:50.000 And so people end up taking a step and go, well, how did this actually begin?

01:21:54.000 What organizations were talking about this before?

01:21:56.000 The WF, it's one of those organizations.

01:21:58.000 So in a sense, they provide lubrication for ideas to enter into the mainstream and help to house and frame these notions.

01:22:07.000 A couple of good examples that you've just explained, First James.

01:22:09.000 Digital ideas, which for a long time, in British politics particularly, people have talked about that and rejected it.

01:22:18.000 The WEF at best are a soft sell for a globalist agenda and soft influence rather than direct political power because they are of course unelected.

01:22:27.000 I suppose you could also say Ross is that the pandemic was a way in which these ideas were utilised and brought into the kind of mainstream ideas because when you're saying things like digital passports and people are broadly agreeing with them because of health reasons Maybe 10, 20 years ago when Tony Blair was bringing in the idea of ideas, national ideas, people were rejecting them.

01:22:47.000 Because there's no reason for it.

01:22:48.000 It wasn't the virtue to create this.

01:22:50.000 Well, this is, I suppose, one of the concerns is that if you have a particular agenda, then perhaps, and this is for you to let me know in the chat, let me know in the comments, do you imagine that they Let me know in the chat, let me know in the comments.

01:23:06.000 James, I want you to talk me through some of the star players of the WEF.

01:23:10.000 in the chat, let me know in the comments. James, I want you to talk me through some of the star

01:23:13.000 players of the WEF. Have a look now at some of the key figures that we're looking to highlight.

01:23:22.000 Let's see them as a football team.

01:23:24.000 There they are.

01:23:25.000 Right.

01:23:26.000 So tell me, out of this starting 11, who in particular stands out?

01:23:30.000 These are some of the great heroes of the WF.

01:23:33.000 Some of the players, obviously, Klaus Schwab's up front with his missus, Hilda Schwab.

01:23:37.000 Them two, they're a deadly duo up front.

01:23:40.000 Elsewhere in that team are some other significant players.

01:23:42.000 Who else there is important and influential within the organization?

01:23:46.000 Well, I think they all have that in terms of their own influence in different markets.

01:23:50.000 Like Man City.

01:23:51.000 They've all got a role to play and they can all carry the ball forward, but they've all got to feed Erling Haaland.

01:23:56.000 But whether they can play total football, I'm not sure about that.

01:23:59.000 Whether they can change positions, I'm not sure at all.

01:24:01.000 Yeah, and whether or not it biases the team to have Haaland up there because he needs to run onto forward boards.

01:24:06.000 We can see that now!

01:24:07.000 But ultimately they don't have fan support, and that's people like us.

01:24:10.000 I mean, people in the wider communities are suffering a cost of living crisis.

01:24:14.000 I think one of the major problems we've got at the moment is there seems to be, you know, I used to be, and to an extent still am, a huge fan of aspects of globalism that came out of the Second World War, which is basically to stop perpetually warring Europe and go down the same route again.

01:24:30.000 So they looked at trade, they looked at defence, and largely for a period of time they were successful with

01:24:35.000 institutions like the WHO, the WEF, you know the UN, the EU, they're all aspects of

01:24:41.000 that. But there is a suspicion now that these organisations are not in the best interest of

01:24:47.000 day-to-day concerns of people.

01:24:48.000 Yes, and if militarised conflict is being diffused because economic interests have

01:24:53.000 already been centralised and are already cooperating, then that isn't an enormous

01:24:59.000 It's just nullified the necessity for conflict at the level of a sovereign nation because those interests have already coalesced, much in the way that we can see that in American politics it doesn't...

01:25:10.000 Ultimately matter that much whether you have the Republican Party or the Democrat Party in power because the same interests are finding it.

01:25:16.000 Let me know in the comments.

01:25:17.000 Let me know in the chat if you think that's true.

01:25:19.000 Have a look at some of the corporate partners of the WF.

01:25:22.000 There are some of the finest names in medicine, entertainment, sugary drinks, investment and football and weapons.

01:25:30.000 They're there.

01:25:30.000 Lockheed Martin.

01:25:31.000 We've not had to say if we've been sponsored by Lockheed Martin yet.

01:25:33.000 We're still here.

01:25:34.000 So when you talk about fragmentation, one of the ways in which they want to solve a fragmented world, I mean, and they mentioned the energy crisis, didn't they, and the cost of living crisis.

01:25:42.000 When you're sponsored by Shell, do you think how much of a... You can't take Shell's money if you're interested in an energy crisis.

01:25:49.000 When Shell are having record profits at the moment, or Lockheed Martin, who are profiting up 50% in their stocks now.

01:25:55.000 Coca-Cola were sponsoring COP.

01:25:57.000 Considering the pollution levels of, you know, plastic... The worst plastic pollutants in the world.

01:26:01.000 So there's baked in hypocrisy.

01:26:03.000 That's one of the things that you know.

01:26:04.000 But it's not only that though, is it?

01:26:05.000 It's that this, surely this will affect... That's how they can do it, yeah.

01:26:07.000 It's also about ethical governance as well.

01:26:09.000 They wrap it around, you know, so social responsibility is now morphed into, for instance, ESG and so on.

01:26:14.000 So you're taking some good values there about environmental sustainability, corporate government's ethical behavior and management, providing aspects of community re-engagement and transformation in areas that have been sort of hollowed out in terms of de-industrialization over the last 40 years.

01:26:29.000 These are good ideas, but it's rhetoric.

01:26:32.000 And what's happening is these institutions, whether it's from a corporate point of view, a technocratic point of view, or a political point of view, There's been decline for decades.

01:26:42.000 If you look at what's happening in this country, the industrialized areas have been completely hollowed out for 40 years, you know, and nothing has rebooted.

01:26:49.000 We get a lot of cheap talk from governments going on about northern powerhouses and so on, but it's not happened.

01:26:54.000 We've got forgotten communities and people in those communities.

01:26:57.000 What's happening right now in Davos is so far removed from them, and it's not addressing their needs.

01:27:05.000 And people hear this talk, whether it's coming from our politicians, from our government, whether it's from corporates or technocrats.

01:27:10.000 I think we've heard this before.

01:27:12.000 What they do is like Emperor's New Clothes rhetoric.

01:27:14.000 They just sort of unwrap it and then come and put more wrapping on and come up with a new phrase.

01:27:18.000 They move social responsibility to ESG.

01:27:21.000 But meanwhile, communities are getting poorer, more and more people in poverty.

01:27:25.000 We've got a cost of living crisis, an energy crisis.

01:27:27.000 We've got inflation going through the roof and you've got talking shops in Davos We're effectively going to save the planet and help your lives, but they're not.

01:27:36.000 They're getting richer, but everyone else is getting poorer.

01:27:38.000 Of course.

01:27:39.000 I suppose one of the main things that institutions and organizations like this have to achieve is...

01:27:46.000 The appearance of presenting solutions that will never impact the interests of the powerful.

01:27:52.000 You can never present a solution that would meaningfully impact the interests of the powerful.

01:27:57.000 Would you go back to those logos just for a minute because there's a few comments I want to make.

01:28:00.000 Firstly, what the hell are Lego investing in it for?

01:28:03.000 Lego seem to be needlessly investing in Davos and Dow Jones need to work on their logo.

01:28:11.000 There are my two main points.

01:28:14.000 I mean, that is some collection of companies there.

01:28:18.000 That's some of the best, isn't it?

01:28:19.000 I mean, it is.

01:28:19.000 I mean, if you look at this, for me as someone who's left of centre, People think I'm somehow off on the right because I've got a lot of questions about the pandemic response and also digitalisation that came out of the pandemic response and also the role of the WUF.

01:28:35.000 Not at all.

01:28:36.000 What I care about is basically having most communities to have the opportunity to flourish or regenerate, opportunities for next generation, good education, good schools, good public services generally, the opportunity for enterprise culture.

01:28:49.000 These are things that should be mandatories that a government should be focusing on.

01:28:53.000 And these are things that these guys who are attending Davos claim that they're doing all this.

01:28:58.000 They're trying to do it for the best interest of the people.

01:29:00.000 But based on their track record over the last, say, 30, 40 years, where there's terminal decline in so many communities, and yet they're saying that somehow, yet again, they're going to change the world.

01:29:11.000 I and many others aren't buying it.

01:29:13.000 Well, I suppose there's two things.

01:29:15.000 You have to eliminate any solutions that would meaningfully impact the interests of the

01:29:19.000 powerful and you have to delegitimize any dissent.

01:29:22.000 As long as dissent can be dismissed as being, for example, a conspiracy theory or alt-right,

01:29:27.000 then you don't have to address those concerns.

01:29:29.000 And even when it's huge numbers of people, you know, 50% of a country,

01:29:33.000 let's say in the case of the United States or the post-Brexit argument, it doesn't matter.

01:29:39.000 As long as you can delegitimize dissenting voices, then you don't have to meaningfully address the fact that there is inertia at the center of democracy or the direction that inertia is heading in.

01:29:50.000 This is another study from Oxfam.

01:29:52.000 Oxfam has called for immediate action to tackle a post-Covid widening gap in global inequality.

01:29:58.000 Can I have that article back on the screen, please?

01:30:00.000 Two-thirds of new wealth amassed since the start of the pandemic has gone to the richest 1%.

01:30:04.000 We talk a lot on this show about Naomi Klein and how, when Naomi Klein was talking a lot in her

01:30:12.000 book Shock Doctrine about the CIA agenda as implemented in Central and Latin American

01:30:19.000 countries, this was a talking point of the left.

01:30:21.000 The destabilization of sovereign nations so that American corporate interest could be implemented and pursued in those nations was understood to be an area that was of concern for the left.

01:30:32.000 This appears to be a narrative that has slipped out of the conversation in the sort of shuffling that's occurred in the last ten years.

01:30:40.000 I think a lot of the left have been duped over the last two or three years.

01:30:45.000 And I say this as someone who stayed pretty consistently left of centre.

01:30:49.000 My views in terms of sorting out inequality and poverty and looking at good governance in terms of corporate, but also good governance in terms of governments, that hasn't changed.

01:30:58.000 And yet what's happened with this, under the auspices of virtue and safety and convenience, I think we've now got a virtual contract whereby what's happening is that more and more assets are getting hoovered up by the same corporations, by governments and technocrats actually kind of putting it on there and saying to governments and also to corporations, this is the kind of new message, this is new ESG, this is SDG or this is social responsibility.

01:31:25.000 and governments then saying we've got to do this because it's in your best interest.

01:31:28.000 But based on the track record of governments over the last 30, 40 years,

01:31:32.000 there's no evidence to suggest that they are acting in accordance to the best interests

01:31:36.000 of millions of people in the countries they're supposed to be governing.

01:31:39.000 We're paying our taxes to have good public services, good infrastructures, and government that is competent

01:31:45.000 to reach out to communities right around the country.

01:31:48.000 But all that's happening is more and more communities feel forgotten about, they feel disenfranchised,

01:31:52.000 they're getting poorer, we've got to cost a living crisis, and in terms of the last two or three years,

01:31:57.000 the super rich are getting richer.

01:31:59.000 And they're getting richer in a number of different ways in terms of whether it's land, whether it's data,

01:32:03.000 whether it's energy, whether it's tech.

01:32:05.000 These are the same institutions individuals are all going to be at this jamboree over the next few days.

01:32:10.000 And meanwhile, the majority of people are so far removed from that.

01:32:13.000 So Davos isn't simply a PR exercise, a meaningless affair, but in fact, a significant conference where the world's most powerful interests come together to set and delineate the agenda for coming years.

01:32:29.000 Let me know in the chat, let me know in the comments what you think.

01:32:32.000 But what do any of us really know about Davos and the WF?

01:32:36.000 We can't say we're actually there.

01:32:38.000 Andrew Lawton will be joining us live from Davos.

01:32:40.000 He's actually there.

01:32:41.000 He's got the snow on his boots.

01:32:43.000 We will be talking to him in a minute.

01:32:44.000 James, you said so much that was interesting there.

01:32:46.000 The thing I took most from it is how the WF and their virtue signalling agenda is part of the bifurcation that has occurred between the class that governs and ordinary folk that govern.

01:32:57.000 Let me know in the chat and the comments what you think.

01:32:59.000 We're going to be having a look now at that aspect of the WF in particular and the use of philanthropy by organisations like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Clinton Foundation and the sort of soft sell that occurs here and how often we're being told that the agenda of an organisation is philanthropic but sometimes there's real examples of tax avoidance, tax evasion and certainly not paying tax that can also come along as a side dish to that apparent philanthropic agenda.

01:33:30.000 Thanks for joining us, James.

01:33:31.000 Have a look at this now.

01:33:33.000 See you in a moment.

01:33:34.000 Every year, billionaires turn up at Davos to discuss philanthropic solutions to the world's problems.

01:33:40.000 But many of these solutions actually help them to increase their wealth.

01:33:44.000 Let's learn about this hypocrisy and see if there's anything we can do to understand it better and even stop it.

01:33:50.000 The World Economic Forum ended last week.

01:33:52.000 Historian Rutger Bregman made a claim that took many attendees by surprise.

01:33:57.000 Let's listen.

01:33:58.000 I mean, I hear people talk in the language of participation and justice and equality and transparency.

01:34:04.000 But then, I mean, almost no one raises the real issue of tax avoidance, right?

01:34:07.000 And of the rich just not paying their fair share.

01:34:13.000 10 years ago, the World Economic Forum asked the question, what must industry do to prevent a broad social backlash?

01:34:24.000 The answer is very simple.

01:34:25.000 Just stop talking about philanthropy. 1.00

01:34:29.000 I mean, we can talk for a very long time about all these stupid philanthropy schemes. 0.99

01:34:33.000 We can invite Bono once more. 0.99

01:34:35.000 But come on, we've got to be talking about taxes.

01:34:38.000 They won't be having him back next year.

01:34:39.000 All right, well, thanks for coming, mate.

01:34:41.000 Next year at Davos, I think we'll have someone who plays by the rules a bit and sings from the same hymn sheet that comes in here and takes the piss out of you, too.

01:34:49.000 The world is more than 2,000 billionaires.

01:34:52.000 Many of them are being asked to give half of their fortunes to charity.

01:34:56.000 The Giving Pledge was created by Bill Gates, his wife, Melinda, and Warren Buffett.

01:35:00.000 A decade ago, Bill Gates and Warren Buffett, and, like, we're only mentioning them because they're famous billionaires.

01:35:05.000 You know, a lot of billionaires, they're faceless.

01:35:07.000 I don't mean literally, although possibly they are.

01:35:09.000 I mean in a sense that it's difficult to get a handle on them.

01:35:11.000 But Buffett and Gates organised the Giving Pledge to inspire their fellow billionaires to donate money to charity.

01:35:18.000 Well, it led to, a decade later, which is where we are now, the reality is that billionaire wealth has increased by 95%.

01:35:25.000 They pledged when they came up with the Giving Pledge to give away half.

01:35:29.000 Instead, their wealth has almost doubled.

01:35:32.000 So the pledge was, give away half.

01:35:34.000 The reality was, it's nearly doubled.

01:35:38.000 What's gone on with this pledge?

01:35:40.000 And how can you create a Giving Pledge that involves so much taking?

01:35:44.000 The US Treasury estimates philanthropy will cost it $740 billion in lost tax revenue over the next decade.

01:35:52.000 So how do they set up these kind of philanthro-capitalist funds?

01:35:57.000 How does it work?

01:35:58.000 How do you seem like you're giving?

01:36:00.000 When actually you're taking?

01:36:02.000 Well the fastest growing areas of the giving sector are private foundations and donor advised funds.

01:36:08.000 So watch out if you hear words like foundation or donor advised funds.

01:36:13.000 These are often these slippery backdoor channels for appearing like you're donating when actually you're taking or moving capital around in ways that tax can be avoided.

01:36:24.000 There's over 1.2 trillion parked in private foundations and an estimated 120 billion in donor advised funds.

01:36:30.000 The super-rich have created foundations at a rapid pace.

01:36:33.000 From 2003 to 2015, the number of foundations grew by 28%.

01:36:37.000 The amount of assets held in those foundations doubled over that period.

01:36:41.000 Here's some of the rules around these esoteric and bureaucratic terms.

01:36:46.000 DAFs, that's Donor Advised Funds, which I'm going to be calling DAFs from now on.

01:36:51.000 It's probably DAFs, isn't it?

01:36:52.000 Donor advised funds have no mandated payout at all.

01:36:55.000 The donor takes a generous tax break when placing funds in the DAF, but the DAF does not legally have to pay out ever.

01:37:01.000 Donors can set up a DAF and pass it on to their grandchildren who may or may not ever share the money with active charities.

01:37:08.000 So, in a sense, it's like a promise, isn't it?

01:37:10.000 It's just like saying, at some point, Unspecified, I might give this money to charity.

01:37:16.000 Meanwhile, there it is, safe in me old daff.

01:37:19.000 If you ain't a mad fan of the government, say, you might think, I don't want to pay tax either.

01:37:24.000 I don't want to pay loads of half my money, or 40% of my money, or 30% of my money, whatever bracket you fall in, so it can be spent on ...bombing the Yemen or doing stuff that I'm not particularly into, that if you as a normal person try tax avoidance, you ain't getting nowhere.

01:37:38.000 You're not going to be able to set up a DAF or a foundation and say, in the future, I might give this tax to someone.

01:37:44.000 Meanwhile, I'm getting an extension done.

01:37:47.000 You're not going to get away with it.

01:37:48.000 This is another layer of hypocrisy and a further, I don't know, augmentation, say, of the distinction between a billionaire class and the rest of us.

01:37:59.000 The Chronicle of Philanthropy calls them a personal charitable savings account.

01:38:03.000 The money, even when it comes in large amounts or mega gifts, doesn't always trickle down to grassroots organisations it's supposed to help.

01:38:10.000 Whenever you hear the phrase trickle down, aren't you a bit concerned?

01:38:13.000 It never trickles down, does it?

01:38:14.000 What about trickle down economics?

01:38:16.000 It'll trickle down, it'll trickle... Hold on a minute!

01:38:18.000 Where's it trickling off to?

01:38:20.000 It's gone into Bill Gates's pocket!

01:38:20.000 Oh no!

01:38:23.000 Hey, I can't help it.

01:38:25.000 It trickled there.

01:38:26.000 Today's super wealthy are richer than ever.

01:38:29.000 And they're giving away their billions like never before.

01:38:32.000 Let's drill down on some specific billionaires.

01:38:35.000 We're not saying these billionaires are worse than anyone else.

01:38:37.000 Don't wanna bully.

01:38:39.000 Billionaires, alright?

01:38:40.000 Billionaire bullying is at an all-time high.

01:38:42.000 Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg promising to give away 99% of his shares of the company to charity.

01:38:48.000 In 2015, him and his missus, Priscilla Chan, wrote and published a letter to their new baby, Max.

01:38:54.000 The letter made a commitment that over the course of their lives they would donate 99% of their shares in Facebook, at the time valued at $45 billion, to the mission of advancing human potential and promoting equality.

01:39:06.000 Firstly, Why are you writing a letter to a baby for, anyway, about tax?

01:39:10.000 They wrote in an open letter on Facebook that they were creating the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative.

01:39:15.000 The wording of Zuckerberg's 2015 letter could have been interpreted as meaning he was intended to donate 45 billion to charity.

01:39:23.000 But, as the reporter Jesse Isinger, whose name's too close to the geezer who played him in Social Network, reported at the time, the Chan Zuckerberg initiative through which this was given is not a not-for-profit charitable foundation, but an LLC, a limited liability company.

01:39:36.000 This legal status has significant practical implications, especially when it comes to tax.

01:39:41.000 As a company, the initiative can do much more than charitable activity.

01:39:44.000 Its legal status gives it the right to invest in other companies and to make political donations.

01:39:48.000 Effectively, the company does not restrict Zuckerberg's decision-making as to what he wants to do with his money.

01:39:53.000 Really, all that happened is his money went from here to here.

01:39:56.000 It didn't go anywhere else.

01:39:58.000 Details on the new foundation haven't been released.

01:40:01.000 Let's not bog this down in details.

01:40:03.000 This is a happy occasion!

01:40:04.000 Max is a baby!

01:40:06.000 Max doesn't want details about our LLC and how ultimately what we're doing is moving the money over there, then there, then there, then there.

01:40:13.000 In fact, Max would probably be quite grateful.

01:40:15.000 Talk about a baby present!

01:40:17.000 So that Zuckerberg, what he could have written, if he was going to be more accurate, is I'm going to set up a Limited liability company, Max, and we're going to move a lot of the assets into that, some of which will be used for commercial purposes.

01:40:29.000 Are you still reading this, Max?

01:40:31.000 What do you really want to ask?

01:40:32.000 Get to bed!

01:40:33.000 America, the charitable.

01:40:35.000 There are a number of billionaires in this country, but of these, who is the most philanthropic?

01:40:40.000 Now, again, in the spirit of not billionaire bullying, but just billionaire observation, Bill Gates, who the first syllable of his name is the same first syllable of the word billionaire, coincidence.

01:40:53.000 Bill Gates ranks second for giving since they created their foundation in 1994.

01:40:58.000 He launched his foundation in 94 after the Microsoft antitrust case.

01:41:03.000 Is that to do with that little Pipperclip guy?

01:41:05.000 That Pepperclip? 1.00

01:41:06.000 I never trusted him when he used to pop up.

01:41:08.000 Hey, why don't you try opening a document?

01:41:11.000 Gates has invested 36 billion into this foundation he set up in 94, which has a value of 46 billion, and him and his wife exercise total control over it.

01:41:20.000 The foundation has given away 23 billion in charitable grants.

01:41:23.000 These gifts include billions in tax-deductible donations to companies in which Gates is invested, like Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and Sanofi.

01:41:33.000 If someone says I'm making a charitable donation and it's to GlaxoSmithKline, I'm gonna think, well, hold a minute, ain't that a big massive company?

01:41:41.000 That's what's interesting about this, is it places the power in the hands of the already powerful and diminishes the power of, for example, the state to impose wealth distribution.

01:41:53.000 There's a lot of talk now about breaking up these monopolies and it seems that this is a necessity because as long as they have the power they do.

01:42:01.000 You can't rely on them to make decisions that are going to do anything other than stay in alignment with their raison d'etre, the accumulation of profit, service of their shareholders.

01:42:11.000 You know, in fact, the jokes I was making about billionaire bullying, they're just, as far as I'm concerned, human beings like you or me.

01:42:17.000 They're born, they're going to die.

01:42:18.000 But the systems within which they operate advantage particular mindsets and behaviours.

01:42:22.000 And unless they fundamentally ought to, which they will not do if the most powerful people benefit from them staying the same, Then you're going to perpetuate these systems.

01:42:29.000 The balance tipped in the year 2000 when the Institute for Policy Studies in the US reported that of the 100 largest economies in the world, 51 were corporations and 49 were national economies.

01:42:43.000 So now we live in a world where even though the nation might be the primary way that you understand geography and you understand politics, from an economic perspective that is an inaccurate perception.

01:42:57.000 You are literally living in an illusion, because 51 of the most powerful economic entities are corporations.

01:43:06.000 What are the implications, therefore, in the kind of laws that we're going to see around economics?

01:43:10.000 Taxation.

01:43:12.000 National taxation models are no longer going to be sufficient when 51 of the most powerful economic entities transcend national boundaries, where their interests transcend national interests.

01:43:22.000 So we have to start recognizing now that the logo of a brand like Facebook or Amazon or Microsoft is a kind of

01:43:30.000 flag.

01:43:30.000 They have planted their flag in the territory of the earth and whether you believe in it or not,

01:43:36.000 you salute to it every time you put your hand in your pocket.

01:43:39.000 You know, after I had given my short speech, the response in the room, you know, from the audience was quite

01:43:45.000 aggressive.

01:43:46.000 And no one really came up to me to say, hey, that was a good speech.

01:43:49.000 So, you know, I went home with a bit of a bad feeling, to be honest.

01:43:52.000 When you look at Davos and who attends it, it's clear to see the balance of world power shifting.

01:43:58.000 CEOs and the heads of recognizable corporations are at least as significant as the political figures that also attend.

01:44:05.000 So we can see At this event, how there is collaboration and cooperation, there's another C word for that, is taking place at Davos, and also how the balance of power is shifting.

01:44:18.000 The T word is really the forbidden word in places like Davos.

01:44:23.000 You can talk about anything, about education, about feminism, about climate change, as long as you don't talk about higher taxes on the rich.

01:44:32.000 That can't be a coincidence, can it?

01:44:34.000 It's because, and Adam Curtis is big on this, and if you watch our Under the Skin with him, you'll see him talk about it, that nations, as yet, do still have the power to control corporations.

01:44:44.000 They can pass anti-monopolisation legislation.

01:44:47.000 They can pass legislature for higher taxation.

01:44:50.000 I ain't talking about taxation on normal bods, or even people that are well off.

01:44:53.000 I'm talking about super powerful corporations.

01:44:57.000 Like, for example, in 2008, when at the stroke of a pen, Barack Obama wrote off through quantitative easing the financial mismanagement and corruption of Wall Street.

01:45:06.000 That was a government that did that.

01:45:08.000 That is the kind of power governments have.

01:45:10.000 It's not that they don't have the power, it's that they won't use it.

01:45:12.000 The Gates have already committed to giving 95% of their wealth away.

01:45:17.000 Warren Buffett, 99%.

01:45:18.000 What do they mean by that?

01:45:20.000 Are they actually going to do it?

01:45:21.000 Do you think they're actually going to go, right, I had 100 quid, now I've got a quid.

01:45:25.000 The rest of it I've give away.

01:45:26.000 No, it's going to be this skullduggery, isn't it?

01:45:29.000 We moved the 99 quid there, then we moved it there, then we moved it back here.

01:45:32.000 I've still got it!

01:45:33.000 They say that kind of extreme giving is needed because the rich have been getting so much richer.

01:45:39.000 Tech innovations and rising global markets have produced vast fortunes not seen since the industrial revolution.

01:45:47.000 There's a terrible problem with capitalism.

01:45:49.000 These elites have risen to the top, creating these sort of uber-powerful figures that have got much more money than everyone else combined.

01:45:54.000 Who should we turn to to create a solution for it?

01:45:57.000 Them?

01:45:57.000 No!

01:45:59.000 Not them.

01:45:59.000 We've seen what they do already.

01:46:01.000 The 45 billion dollar giveaway was applauded by some big names.

01:46:06.000 Melinda Gates wrote to Max Zuckerberg, You are lucky to have such an amazing mom and dad.

01:46:11.000 You can't have Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates and all these people in charge of wealth distribution.

01:46:20.000 They're experts in wealth accumulation.

01:46:24.000 If you want some advice on wealth accumulation, they're the people to go to.

01:46:27.000 But if it's wealth distribution, you've got to go to someone with a little bit more objectivity, I would say.

01:46:34.000 What conditions are there?

01:46:36.000 I mean, can they say, yes, I'm with you, I'm here, but I want to give it to this institution or that institution?

01:46:42.000 We're not endorsing any flavor of philanthropy.

01:46:48.000 We celebrate the diversity of philanthropy.

01:46:50.000 The American dream is anyone can make it.

01:46:52.000 The problem with a myth like that is one, it ain't true.

01:46:56.000 Not anyone can make it.

01:46:58.000 And two, it suggests that if you aren't a billionaire, it's somehow your fault and that it's laudable and admirable to accrue obscene wealth.

01:47:09.000 You can't really, though, call a nation a society when the free richest people have as much money as the 50% of the poorest people.

01:47:18.000 That's no longer a society.

01:47:19.000 There's no longer a relationship between them.

01:47:21.000 You may as well accept the truth that some of us are under this flag, the flag of corporation and the transnational globalist privilege that it represents, and others are under this flag, a tattered, battered, decaying rag that stands for nothing but inequality and exploitation.

01:47:38.000 One panel hidden away in the media center that was actually about tax avoidance?

01:47:41.000 I mean, it feels like I'm at a firefighters conference and no one's allowed to speak about water.

01:47:46.000 I suppose then, if the point of Davos is to come up with solutions, one of the things they might consider discussing next time is the breakup of monopolies and the taxation of the extreme wealthy, and placing that power in the hands of nations, states, governments, better yet, ordinary people.

01:48:04.000 Rather than in the hands of the people that are set to gain most from things staying the same.

01:48:12.000 If you enjoyed that video, please like, subscribe, set up the notification bells if you're crazy and you want a ringing in your ears, and please go over to my mailing list and sign up on RussellBrand.com to receive things directly from me should something ever happen to our direct access to you.

01:48:28.000 Also, I've got a book coming out, Revelation, in which I talk about the spiritual principles that underwrite my personal transformation and transition.

01:48:36.000 There's a link here to the pre-order.

01:48:39.000 Most of all though, Thank you very much indeed for watching this video.

01:48:43.000 appreciate your time.

01:48:46.000 Hello, thanks for joining us for our WF Royal Rumble where we cover Davos live.

01:49:10.000 This conference, is it little more than a PR fair, a jamboree, or is it truly the crucible of where the agenda for globalists are set?

01:49:20.000 Not to say that people are like, this year Idris Elba's there.

01:49:24.000 Who doesn't love Idris Elba?

01:49:25.000 Everyone loves Idris Elba.

01:49:26.000 I'd like an agenda set by Idris Elba.

01:49:28.000 Put Idris in charge, but also who's there is Tony Blair.

01:49:32.000 Tony Blair's there.

01:49:33.000 I bet he's going to have more influence than Idris.

01:49:35.000 Yeah.

01:49:36.000 Isn't he?

01:49:36.000 Idris Elba never said, as far as I can remember, Idris Elba has never gone, Iraq have got weapons of mass destruction.

01:49:44.000 They're going to have to kill at least a million people to get this under any kind of control.

01:49:48.000 I don't know. 0.96

01:49:49.000 Maybe I missed that episode of The Wire.

01:49:51.000 No, or Luther.

01:49:53.000 In Luther, he was a reliable cop who got the job done.

01:49:58.000 We're going to be talking to Andrew Lawton in a minute, live from Davos, but here are some more of your comments.

01:50:04.000 Sarah Jefferson says, I want to see what pandemic they're planning for us next.

01:50:08.000 Well, they had to have planned a pandemic in the first place.

01:50:10.000 I don't think anyone's Suggesting that that's happened, Sarah Jefferson, especially not while we're still on YouTube.

01:50:15.000 We'll be only on Rumble in a minute, so if you're watching this on YouTube, remember to click over, particularly to see our presentation on the WHO's propaganda and how that relates, or rather is at odds with, an incredible new study about adverse reactions that we literally are unable to discuss on YouTube, but I know you're going to love.

01:50:33.000 You're going to feel vindicated by it, you're going to feel educated by it, you're going to feel informed.

01:50:37.000 Shall we talk to Andrew Lawton now, who's actually at Davos, because whatever we may feel or think about Davos, we simply haven't got the snow under our feet.

01:50:46.000 We're simply unable, unlike Andrew, to feel the genuine atmosphere of Davos.

01:50:52.000 Andrew, what's it like there?

01:50:53.000 Are you having a nice time?

01:50:55.000 Yeah, it's great.

01:50:56.000 You walk through and everyone's giving you hot chocolate.

01:50:59.000 Today I was given Saudi Arabian hot chocolate.

01:51:01.000 I was given Facebook hot chocolate.

01:51:04.000 I was given United Arab Emirates hot chocolate.

01:51:06.000 There's lots of hospitality, although a little bit of a cold weather for those of us that are not necessarily used to it.

01:51:12.000 I'm Canadian, so I'm good, but some of the others I worry for.

01:51:15.000 You can't just douse yourself in hot chocolate in an attempt to inoculate yourself against circumstances.

01:51:22.000 Andrew, have you seen anything so far?

01:51:25.000 Firstly, I just want to get an idea of what it's like.

01:51:27.000 Is it just like any ordinary conference or can you see any evidence of globalist skullduggery aside from what sounds like delicious hot chocolate?

01:51:37.000 I haven't seen the globalist skullduggery just yet, but we're also still getting set up here.

01:51:42.000 And it's a bit like a weird billionaire trade show because when you walk down the main street,

01:51:48.000 all of these stores, which the rest of the year are ski shops and coffee shops,

01:51:53.000 have all been taken over by corporations that pay a large amount of money

01:51:57.000 just to basically turn themselves into exhibits.

01:52:00.000 You've got Microsoft and Salesforce and Uber and Amazon, and they all just try to bring in politicians and investors

01:52:07.000 into these little pavilions, they call them.

01:52:09.000 Lovely metaphor for globalization.

01:52:12.000 Little local stores taken over by big corporations.

01:52:15.000 That's amazing.

01:52:16.000 They just turn them into little temporary little booths, lure you in like you're going to be Shanghai'd. 0.96

01:52:22.000 So essentially WAF Davos, it's a capitalist Coachella, it's globalist Glastonbury.

01:52:29.000 It sounds like a lot of fun.

01:52:30.000 Places where you would be buying a snowboard, you can be badgered about investing in Uber.

01:52:35.000 That's what it's most Have you been lured into any of them yet, Andrew?

01:52:39.000 Or are you remaining discerning as a journalist?

01:52:42.000 Well, it can't both be true.

01:52:44.000 I walked into them voluntarily because I want to get a sense of what the message is that they're giving.

01:52:49.000 Interestingly enough, I went in earlier to the Mohammed bin Salman Foundation pavilion.

01:52:54.000 This is the foundation that is run by the Saudi royal family, although not officially.

01:53:00.000 And was thrown out of it because my videographer dared to take a video of me walking through what they said was an open tour because they wanted to show off all the work they were doing to the public.

01:53:10.000 And it strikes me as a bit odd that they would have the expense and effort of being here to show off what they're doing and then kick out a journalist for daring to want a video of it.

01:53:23.000 And I find this to be very perplexing, although not all that surprising at the same time.

01:53:27.000 Andrew, I can explain that to you.

01:53:28.000 You were about to engage in what is called malinformation.

01:53:31.000 That's information that is true, but taken out of context.

01:53:34.000 As long as they can control the context of the information, i.e.

01:53:37.000 you're in a ski resort for globalists now, that's a fine context.

01:53:42.000 But you start posting that on your social media and talking about what kind of... I'm going to use the word tomfoolery this time.

01:53:49.000 The Saudi Arabian affiliates might have been engaged in that.

01:53:53.000 That could be malinformation.

01:53:55.000 It doesn't sound like Andrew's being granted the same kind of immunity that the Biden administration granted to Bin Salman himself.

01:54:02.000 Do you see that?

01:54:04.000 Because Bin Salman there, even though he's not a head of state, was granted immunity and the ability to travel into America, even after America said that they would make Saudi Arabia a pariah of the world.

01:54:14.000 And presumably that was because of their involvement in the murder of... Well, they're alleged.

01:54:18.000 They're alleged?

01:54:19.000 Hold on, we're still on YouTube.

01:54:20.000 What the hell am I saying?

01:54:22.000 Oh, crack it! 0.91

01:54:22.000 Sorry, hold on. 0.91

01:54:24.000 This is the point.

01:54:24.000 This is the key to the World Economic Forum, is that all of the rules that exist everywhere else in the world for these countries don't apply.

01:54:31.000 This is the place that right now is talking about Russia as being public enemy number one, but a couple of years ago had Vladimir Putin as a keynote speaker.

01:54:39.000 It's a country that talks about the importance of free market and international cooperation.

01:54:45.000 But rolled out the red carpet for Chairman Xi Jinping.

01:54:48.000 They talk about press freedom on one side, but invite Saudi Arabia as being the special partner on the other.

01:54:55.000 And they don't even seem to really care about that hypocrisy, because they really are above criticism.

01:55:00.000 And that term malinformation is, I think, a great way that they deflect against that criticism.

01:55:06.000 Because you just don't understand it.

01:55:08.000 You're a conspiracy theorist.

01:55:10.000 You just don't get it. 0.97

01:55:11.000 You're a bad actor.

01:55:12.000 And this is all that happens to anyone who raises what I think are pretty legitimate criticisms about what happens here.

01:55:18.000 We're criticising it and I challenge anyone to call me a bad actor, especially if they've seen the film Arthur, which I believe was very well acted indeed.

01:55:25.000 Yes by Mirren, but mainly by me.

01:55:28.000 Mate, what kind of workshops they got going on there?

01:55:30.000 We've got some of the events that could be attended.

01:55:34.000 It reminds me a little bit as a comedian of the Edinburgh Festival.

01:55:37.000 Can we see on screen some of those classes that are taking place?

01:55:41.000 I know that Tony Blair is running a sesh over there.

01:55:44.000 Look at that.

01:55:45.000 There's Brian Stelters doing the clear and present danger of disinformation with Brian Stelter.

01:55:52.000 That's going to be a good one.

01:55:54.000 Al Gore still going on about how difficult everything is.

01:55:57.000 And look, Tony Blair, 100 days to outrace the next pandemic with Tony Blair.

01:56:03.000 My God, he's got a head start.

01:56:04.000 I hope that pandemic doesn't happen.

01:56:06.000 It's all right, though, because it's him and Albert Boer, though.

01:56:08.000 And you dared to mock that woman that asked the question about the next pandemic.

01:56:12.000 They've got a session called The Next Pandemic.

01:56:14.000 That's outrageous, isn't it?

01:56:16.000 Extraordinary.

01:56:17.000 Which sessions are you keen to attend, Andrew?

01:56:20.000 Well, the one actually tonight that I'm interested in is about how we can all live a climate positive lifestyle.

01:56:26.000 Because last time they all met in May, there was this executive with Alibaba bragging about how he was inventing this individual carbon footprint tracker that monitored What you weighed and where you travel and how you travel and what you do.

01:56:42.000 So I'm wondering if that might feed into the climate positive lifestyle that they're going to be prescribing this evening.

01:56:49.000 Yes, it seems like the management of behavior, the ability to observe transaction and the sort of BF Skinner style capacity to nudge or even, let's face it, control the way that we live our lives, where we spend our money, how we spend our money seems to be centrifugal to the tenets When you bring that into conjunction with the advances around AI, and that means another area where working people won't have any power or ability, i.e.

01:57:22.000 to bond together in low paid work in order to form unions and to oppose the agenda of the powerful, Seems like they're, in a sense, creating the perfect conditions for globalism, shutting down dissent, controlling information through these new terms that are becoming popularised, mis-, mal-, and dis-information.

01:57:41.000 Are you having a look at any of the AI stuff while you're there, Andrew?

01:57:45.000 Yeah, AI is actually one of the big themes they're moving in towards this year.

01:57:49.000 And I mean, obviously, it's here, there's no avoiding it.

01:57:52.000 It's a part of life now and will become more of one.

01:57:54.000 But what's interesting is that on one hand, they're celebrating it and really making AI the central focus.

01:58:00.000 But on the other hand, one of the sessions on the agenda is about how to deal with technology displacing 1 billion people, billion with a B, from their jobs because of technology.

01:58:10.000 And this is not just replacing some pair of hands on an assembly line with a machine.

01:58:15.000 We're talking about now with AI, replacing human minds.

01:58:18.000 We're talking about replacing thinking individuals.

01:58:21.000 And I think it's gonna be a heck of a lot more than a billion people that are AI'd out of work.

01:58:26.000 But the challenge is, it's not the people here at Davos that are ever gonna find themselves out of work

01:58:32.000 because of these innovations and because of these technological developments.

01:58:35.000 No one here suffered during the pandemic.

01:58:38.000 No one here is going to suffer from the need for re-skilling or retraining

01:58:43.000 because some computer has made their job redundant.

01:58:47.000 James Melville, our guest in the studio, similarly was diagnosing as the main problem

01:58:55.000 or flaw in the Davos and the Davos mentality is that it exposes this bifurcation

01:59:03.000 between the governed and the governing.

01:59:05.000 that essentially the...

01:59:07.000 The inadvertent metaphor of them being in rarefied air on the top of a mountain issuing decrees that will not affect them but will affect ordinary people whose lives they do not understand nor wish to understand is central to this problem.

01:59:23.000 And it seems to me that in a way, the amendment to the conditions created by the ability of people to instantaneously

01:59:30.000 communicate through new technology and therefore organize, the ability to oppose centralized establishment agenda

01:59:35.000 through the communication of our own stories and narratives, in particular those that expose hypocrisy and corruption,

01:59:42.000 is one, to create this new terminology, misinformation, disinformation and malinformation,

01:59:46.000 and of course to replace working people in this AI era, to disempower people so that there's even less leverage for

01:59:54.000 ordinary people when it comes to countenancing the evident agenda that the WEF Davos perfectly represents,

02:00:02.000 even if you do get a wide array of sweet chocolatey beverages, Andrew, which seem to have swayed you and

02:00:09.000 brought you over to the dark side.

02:00:13.000 Yeah, Andrew, I was just wondering if you might have any ideas around the kind of disinformation, because obviously one of their big main topics is around disinformation this year.

02:00:20.000 And as we've seen with Davos before and the WEF, things that they've spoken about, for example, digital ID, that now we're seeing in California, Gavin Newsom is actually bringing in digital ID.

02:00:31.000 So we are seeing the manifestation of things that are spoken about at Davos actually coming to become government policy.

02:00:37.000 With disinformation and misinformation, we found a lot out through the Twitter files recently in ways in which there were these collusions between big tech and the government.

02:00:47.000 So we are learning a bit more about that kind of influence.

02:00:50.000 But what do you think the next big play might be to come out of Davos this year and what we might see in the future manifest?

02:00:59.000 Well, a lot more people are paying attention to the World Economic Forum now than were five years ago.

02:01:05.000 And I think a big part of this was when they came out with their Great Reset, which I know you're very well familiar with, in 2020, as far as rebuilding the world after the pandemic.

02:01:15.000 A lot of people who had never really had this organization on their radar started to look into it.

02:01:19.000 And as you were talking about with James earlier, they start looking through the back catalog and seeing all of these other things that have been talked about before.

02:01:27.000 And I think in the context of this year, the big challenge we're seeing is that there are conspiracy theories about the World Economic Forum that have no basis in fact.

02:01:35.000 When you hear people talking about, you know, everyone being, you know, For example, this pandemic was planned and orchestrated, people being injected with 5G chips and stuff like that.

02:01:45.000 But the problem is that they use those and elevate those conspiracy theories to deflect all of the other criticism that is very reasoned, that is very rooted in fact, that is very much Defined and delivered in terms of their own language, their own prescriptions.

02:02:02.000 And that's the challenge here.

02:02:04.000 And to go back to the malinformation point, I think we're going to start to see more pushes to regulate this form of information, which means to censor this information.

02:02:14.000 Last year at the annual meeting, there was a woman from Australia who has a government digital safety commission role.

02:02:22.000 Who talked about the need to, in her words, recalibrate things that we've always understood, and she included in that specifically freedom of speech.

02:02:30.000 So we need to recalibrate freedom of speech because it might not apply to the modern era.

02:02:35.000 And I think that's going to be something we hear a lot more of.

02:02:38.000 And if you look at what the UK is doing with the online harms bill, What Canada is doing with a number of internet regulations.

02:02:46.000 These things are already coming and I think when you get all these leaders that are of a shared mindset in one place, it will accelerate that.

02:02:53.000 It also shows that when people with shared interests come together, that there is an inevitability that a centralized agenda will emerge.

02:03:04.000 Andrew, of course, you wrote the book Freedom Convoy.

02:03:08.000 I wonder if you see in the WEF the topics discussed and in particular what you have just said about that we are likely now to see a calibration of freedom of speech.

02:03:19.000 A lot of you I know watching this, let me know in the chat, let me know in the comments, regard freedom of speech as an absolute right, an absolute value, obviously excluding immediately and evidently harmful declarations, you know the famous fire in a theatre example.

02:03:36.000 I wonder How did you, how do you feel a globalist agenda played out during the trucker convoy?

02:03:43.000 I'm referring of course to the freezing of bank accounts of people that sought to fund that protest, the media, the ongoing media malignment of the trucker or maligning of the truckers and of course the fact that they were responding to a mandate decree that likely came from centralised and unelected bodies.

02:04:04.000 Well, I don't think anyone who watched what was happening in Canada in February of last year would be surprised to learn that there's a lot of criticism towards central bank digital currencies.

02:04:15.000 Why would we ever accept a digital currency that the government controls when we've already seen a government in a so-called democratic nation freeze the bank accounts Of its political critics.

02:04:26.000 And as an added point, there was in Canada in, I believe it was in May, a system outage of the largest telecommunications provider.

02:04:34.000 And for a day and a half, you could not send money to people.

02:04:38.000 You could not use debit or credit cards in most retail outlets because they couldn't connect to the Internet.

02:04:44.000 And I think that was actually a very useful illustration of what happens when everyone's finances are controlled in a very centralized Digital way.

02:04:54.000 So I think that is very important here because we're talking about control and you cannot have centralization without control that can be used either in a very malicious way by governments or even just by virtue of technological issues.

02:05:08.000 That can come down.

02:05:09.000 So I think that this is something that people need to be more concerned about and people need to pay more attention to and not just be consumed by the so-called convenience of these innovations that they don't realize the inevitable, I think, outcomes of this in someone who doesn't actually value fundamental freedoms.

02:05:27.000 That's brilliant, Andrew.

02:05:28.000 Again and again, we hear how convenience and safety are used to advance the agenda of these authoritarian regimes that present themselves as anything but authoritarian.

02:05:39.000 The promotion of digital IDs and centralized currencies ultimately lead to a greater ability to control.

02:05:45.000 Even if you don't want to directly accuse existing administrations or corporate interests of having that agenda, certainly this new technology implemented in that way will afford that Ability.

02:05:56.000 Now, Andrew, you're at Davos.

02:05:57.000 I want you to include, over the coming days, I'd like you to stay in touch with us through a variety of social media outlets.

02:06:03.000 Yes, locals, where our Stay Free AF community is housed, but Twitter and elsewhere.

02:06:07.000 I'd like to see selfies of you with various power players.

02:06:11.000 You, Klaus Schwab, in an embrace.

02:06:14.000 Do you think that you can stay in touch with us and get us some of those assets, please?

02:06:18.000 Absolutely.

02:06:19.000 In fact, you mentioned Idris Elba earlier.

02:06:21.000 All of the journalists covering Davos have tonight been invited to a reception just for journalists with Idris Elba.

02:06:28.000 So I'll see if I can snag a selfie with him for you.

02:06:31.000 Yeah, because Idris Elba, of everyone there, is probably my favourite person there because of Luther.

02:06:36.000 I like him in a lot of films.

02:06:37.000 Not Tony Blair, not Anthony Scaramucci.

02:06:39.000 No, actually, I do like Tony Blair as well.

02:06:41.000 I think in particular, I liked it when he said, Iraq definitely have got weapons of mass destruction. 1.00

02:06:45.000 We're going to have to go to war with them. 0.99

02:06:47.000 Then I think a million Iraqi folk died.

02:06:49.000 And then he just sort of says, sorry about that.

02:06:50.000 And then he grew his hair too long in that lockdown when he looked like sort of Nosferatu, turned himself into a sort of a literal vampire man.

02:06:59.000 Yeah, him, that guy, Tony Blair.

02:07:01.000 When I was here, when I was here last time, Nick Clegg had a security detail.

02:07:06.000 So wacky things happen in Davos.

02:07:08.000 Because who wants Nick Clegg, former leader of the Lib Dems in our little country, the UK, now, I believe, working, by coincidence, at Facebook Meta?

02:07:17.000 He used to work in the government, now he's got a job at Facebook Meta.

02:07:17.000 It's weird, doesn't it?

02:07:20.000 Almost as if there's a sort of a porous relationship between those two organisations.

02:07:24.000 He's just good at interviews.

02:07:25.000 He's just so... Get that guy!

02:07:27.000 I'll tell you who should run Met now.

02:07:28.000 That guy.

02:07:28.000 Him.

02:07:29.000 But keep him safe.

02:07:30.000 Make sure he's got a security detail at Davos.

02:07:33.000 You don't want anyone sloshing hot chocolate up his abdomen.

02:07:36.000 All right.

02:07:37.000 Hey, Andrew, thanks so much for joining us.

02:07:39.000 The first session's about to begin, which I'll tell you about in a second.

02:07:43.000 Hopefully Andrew's going to scoot on over now to see Hilda Schwab and Idris Elba at the first WEF session.

02:07:49.000 I think we're going to try and have a look at it.

02:07:51.000 Do you know that Andrew wrote the book Freedom Convoy?

02:07:54.000 You should follow him on social media and you should do what I do and adore Andrew, open-heartedly.

02:08:00.000 Andrew, I hope we speak to you again soon.

02:08:01.000 You're a lovely man.

02:08:02.000 Thank you.

02:08:03.000 See you, mate.

02:08:04.000 Enjoy the rest of Davos.

02:08:05.000 There he goes.

02:08:06.000 Oh, I loved him.

02:08:07.000 He was lovely, wasn't he?

02:08:09.000 Brilliant.

02:08:10.000 Klaus Schwab is literally on stage.

02:08:12.000 This is right, guys.

02:08:14.000 I don't want to get too excited, but Klaus Schwab is at Davos right now. 0.95

02:08:18.000 I'm going to get my pussy Blanco at the ready and we are going to go over to Davos.

02:08:22.000 Let's put on the audio. 0.99

02:08:23.000 I want to hear what he's saying.

02:08:24.000 What's he saying?

02:08:25.000 Crystal Award Ceremony.

02:08:26.000 What does that even mean?

02:08:28.000 Good evening, and a very cordial welcome to the annual meeting 2023.

02:08:35.000 I express this cordial welcome on behalf of the Board of Trustees and my colleague, Borge Brende, the President, and all the members of the Management Board, as well as all the people who are here.

02:08:57.000 He's had so much time to prepare and he still hasn't swallowed that phlegm.

02:09:01.000 Klaus, you've had a year to get rid of it.

02:09:04.000 Before you go on the stage, Klaus, would you swallow?

02:09:07.000 Just do this.

02:09:09.000 Then swallow that down.

02:09:10.000 Now talk.

02:09:13.000 That's 2023.

02:09:14.000 That's only the way it talks.

02:09:15.000 You shouldn't ridicule a man for that.

02:09:16.000 You should ridicule them instead for their globalist agenda.

02:09:21.000 We're going to have to come off YouTube in a minute because there are things that we have to discuss that cannot be permitted on a platform that has ultimately allowed... It's not phlegm.

02:09:31.000 What do you think it is?

02:09:32.000 It's not his phlegm, is it?

02:09:33.000 Well, what do you think it is?

02:09:34.000 What other fluid could we have in it now?

02:09:35.000 No, I meant that's not the thing we can't talk about.

02:09:37.000 Oh yeah, it's not phlegm.

02:09:39.000 No, we're not going to go deeper.

02:09:41.000 What fluid is Klaus gargling and where did he get it from? 0.75

02:09:45.000 Surely not his own, surely his own sow teats.

02:09:48.000 That's enough. 0.99

02:09:49.000 His shanky sow teats aren't so long that they can pull a nipple that's as long as a noodle. 0.99

02:09:54.000 No. 0.99

02:09:55.000 That can go into his own mouth, making himself a succulent circle.

02:09:59.000 Uh-oh, an alarm's gone off there.

02:10:01.000 That can't be good news.

02:10:01.000 You've gone too far.

02:10:02.000 That's YouTube, that is.

02:10:05.000 A YouTube red flag has happened there.

02:10:07.000 Listen, join us now over on Rumble.

02:10:10.000 Click over right now.

02:10:11.000 We have got a fantastic presentation for you on WHO propaganda, another unelected globalist body.

02:10:16.000 And a recent study on adverse reactions that we simply are not able to discuss on this platform, but that you are going to love.

02:10:23.000 You knew you were right.

02:10:25.000 You knew something bad was going on.

02:10:27.000 And now we're going to show you exactly how it's going down.

02:10:30.000 And also Idris Elba, who I love as an actor.

02:10:32.000 So let's check him out.

02:10:33.000 Goodbye, YouTube.

02:10:34.000 Hello, Rumble.

02:10:35.000 Hello, Klaus.

02:10:36.000 Now swallow that down, why don't you?

02:10:39.000 Is he still alive?

02:10:40.000 Are we able to pause him?

02:10:41.000 Or do we just have to, once he starts, he just can't stop?

02:10:43.000 Is that it with Klaus?

02:10:45.000 To make your stay here enjoyable and productive.

02:10:50.000 We couldn't meet at a more challenging time.

02:10:54.000 We are confronted with so many crises simultaneously.

02:11:02.000 What a coincidence!

02:11:05.000 What does it need to master the future?

02:11:09.000 I think to have a platform Where all stakeholders of global society are engaged.

02:11:18.000 Government.

02:11:19.000 Gareth, our clock by which I run the show, it's actually reached 99 minutes and 59 seconds.

02:11:26.000 So I have to start it again.

02:11:28.000 You could say.

02:11:29.000 It's quite a great reset.

02:11:31.000 Now, I've done that now.

02:11:33.000 That's actually happened.

02:11:34.000 OK, we've got a fantastic guest coming up.

02:11:37.000 To explain more about events, that was Tim Hinchliffe, journalist and editor of The Sociable.

02:11:44.000 He's been referred to as a bad faith actor.

02:11:47.000 Not by us.

02:11:48.000 Not by us, we like him.

02:11:50.000 We were calling him earlier, we were booking him.

02:11:53.000 Thank you, Gareth.

02:11:54.000 But it was the MD of the WEF that called him that.

02:11:57.000 Was that not stylish?

02:11:58.000 It's not easy to do these great resets, actually.

02:12:00.000 It's a lot of effort.

02:12:02.000 Actually, let's get behind this Klaus Schwab guy.

02:12:05.000 If there's someone willing to take on the task of great resets that can handle it, then we should get behind him.

02:12:10.000 The WF for his article... Oh yes, I'm still talking about Tim Hinchliffe.

02:12:14.000 Is Tim joining us now online?

02:12:16.000 Is he there or are we talking to him later?

02:12:20.000 He's enjoying this laser, is he?

02:12:21.000 Okay, well, listen, one of the things that old Klaus Schwab's pretty keen to have happen is that we get... Now, without wanting to sound conspiratorial, I think he does literally want us to have microchips in our brain at some point.

02:12:30.000 Who is saying that?

02:12:31.000 Let's have a look.

02:12:34.000 Are we gonna do that or do we... Okay, let's do that then.

02:12:38.000 Let's have a look at there.

02:12:39.000 By the way, I'm really enjoying this.

02:12:41.000 That bit there was my favorite bit.

02:12:42.000 When we went from the guest having Klaus Schwab live, I was like... Oh, amazing.

02:12:46.000 This is actually... I'm well into this.

02:12:47.000 Yeah, this is like football.

02:12:49.000 At that point, it did fall apart a bit because the clock ran out.

02:12:52.000 It's all about the clock.

02:12:53.000 We can't find the clock.

02:12:54.000 Right, so we're going to be talking to Tim In a minute.

02:12:56.000 I'm not sure what the cue is for Tim and then but now let's have a look at Klaus Schwab.

02:13:01.000 This is like one of the things that people say is like you know I like that Andrew just said they promote some of the more baroque ridiculous conspiracy theories like uh you know well no we're on rumble now like the pandemic was planned the plannedemic idea and that the vaccines have things in them like that make you trackable and stuff like that.

02:13:19.000 These are not things that I believe by the way.

02:13:23.000 But they do say some pretty crazy shit over there, like here's Klaus Schwab literally endorsing the idea of a microchip in the brain. 0.86

02:13:30.000 This gives us questions about Elon Musk as well, because Neuralink is one of his prized projects, and sometimes we think You know, Musk, when it comes to the release of the Twitter files, is obviously a kind of a provocateur and an anti-establishment figure. 0.97

02:13:43.000 They don't work that hard to bring someone down if their agenda is in alignment.

02:13:47.000 But elsewhere, Musk is a transhumanist who believes in progressivism and that technology can solve all of humanity's problems.

02:13:54.000 Whereas I, if you care about this, I believe that spirituality and personal awakening and a willingness to sacrifice, decentralised power, democratised communities has to be part of it.

02:14:05.000 That you can't have an aristocratic solution.

02:14:07.000 You can't have elites governing ordinary people and expect ordinary people's lives to improve.

02:14:13.000 That's basically it.

02:14:14.000 So let's have a look at Klaus Schwab right now advocating for sticking a microchip right down in the old grey matter.

02:14:24.000 have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel because you all will have implants I can and we measure you all So they're mandated implants?

02:14:40.000 We didn't like it when it was the vaccines!

02:14:43.000 You won't be allowed into clubs, you won't be allowed to go on certain airlines.

02:14:43.000 Wow!

02:14:50.000 It's not safe for you to come into this discotheque without a microchip that will help you with the percussion.

02:14:57.000 How are you going to move correctly to the boogie without a microchip in your brain?

02:15:01.000 You will jitterbug and you will be happy.

02:15:06.000 Your brainwaves, and I can immediately tell you how some people react.

02:15:11.000 Brainwaves sounds like old-fashioned science as well.

02:15:14.000 The two of us are on a pretty cutting edge, like Neuralink and sort of like chips in your brain.

02:15:18.000 Your brainwaves are gonna be in alignment with a mush!

02:15:22.000 Can feel how some people react to your answers.

02:15:27.000 That used to be as well called compassion and empathy.

02:15:30.000 So you could like recognize that this person is unhappy because they have water coming out their eyes like when my salteeds leak.

02:15:39.000 Sorry about that metaphor.

02:15:40.000 I came up with it quite early.

02:15:40.000 Yeah, I know.

02:15:41.000 It's not even a metaphor, is it?

02:15:42.000 It's just an image, an unusual and unnecessary grotesque image of Klaus Schwab with a series of salteeds running down his flanks. 0.99

02:15:49.000 And for some reason... I can see why you did it.

02:15:50.000 I liked it! 1.00

02:15:51.000 Because, like, he's the mother pig, the sow, the one that all little Trudeau and that suck off. 1.00

02:15:57.000 Trudeau, Rishi, they'll come up to the teats. 1.00

02:16:00.000 The thing is, every time I watch Clash Royale, I like him.

02:16:03.000 Do you?

02:16:04.000 Well, I like his vibe.

02:16:05.000 I know what you mean.

02:16:06.000 I think he seems friendly.

02:16:07.000 Well, he does.

02:16:08.000 He does seem friendly.

02:16:09.000 But it is amazing when you watch him come out at the very start of Davos again.

02:16:12.000 You see this guy that literally has never been elected to anything.

02:16:16.000 Who are you, mate?

02:16:17.000 It's incredible.

02:16:18.000 And now he's going out in front of... I mean, you know, it's been spoken about everywhere now.

02:16:22.000 There's global leaders from across the world.

02:16:24.000 There's the biggest partners in the world in terms of corporations.

02:16:28.000 And you've got this guy who basically just created this thing.

02:16:31.000 It's astonishing.

02:16:32.000 So let's talk about the power, but they say behind every great man there is a great woman. 0.88

02:16:36.000 And I know that's true in your case.

02:16:38.000 It certainly is.

02:16:39.000 Let's have a look who's the great woman in Klaus's case.

02:16:43.000 Hilda Schwab.

02:16:43.000 It's Hilda!

02:16:45.000 APPLAUSE What's going on with you?

02:16:49.000 What's going on with you?

02:16:51.000 What's going on with you?

02:16:56.000 What's with the crystals and everything?

02:16:57.000 What's happening?

02:16:58.000 What's this image system?

02:16:59.000 Why are they going into an amethyst space scape?

02:17:02.000 Who's designing this?

02:17:04.000 Come on, let's see what Hilda's got to say. 1.00

02:17:05.000 I like her.

02:17:20.000 Is it imaginable?

02:17:23.000 What?

02:17:25.000 They're doing an award ceremony within Davos?

02:17:28.000 Yes.

02:17:28.000 That's what's happening there?

02:17:29.000 Yes.

02:17:30.000 They're creating their own Golden Globes or something.

02:17:32.000 What are they going to do?

02:17:33.000 They're going to give this award to Idris Elba to justify Idris Elba being there.

02:17:37.000 Again, it's difficult for me to do this because sometimes there's people that turn up, David Attenborough, Greta, Idris Elba, and I think these are good people.

02:17:37.000 Got it.

02:17:43.000 They're not saying they're bad people, obviously.

02:17:46.000 So I guess Idris Elba is going to get the Crystal Award.

02:17:50.000 I want to see how he's going to pull off taking it in a sincere way.

02:17:54.000 Obviously, like we discussed this earlier, Idris Elba must have some foundation or organisation that he's very keen to help and he's doing this for the right reasons, obviously.

02:18:04.000 But it's going to be weird.

02:18:04.000 That's an amazing, that's a good trick though, isn't it?

02:18:06.000 If you want to get a few celebrities in, get an award ceremony going.

02:18:09.000 If they were to offer me a crystal, what would you want?

02:18:12.000 That crystal looks alright.

02:18:14.000 What would you want the title to be?

02:18:15.000 What's it for?

02:18:17.000 To do like my hair or something?

02:18:22.000 Or like being a good guy just generally.

02:18:24.000 The best guy on YouTube.

02:18:27.000 Many of us have enjoyed his videos, his impersonations.

02:18:32.000 Hey, would you like now, we've had a look at Klaus Schwab, we've had a look at Hilde Schwab and I want to look at how Do we want to look at your Idris Elba acceptance speech?

02:18:41.000 I don't know.

02:18:42.000 And we've also got an inside view from Andrew Lawton into the realities of Davos.

02:18:46.000 It sounds like mostly a hot chocolate ceremony so far.

02:18:49.000 Oh yeah, that's the bit I like.

02:18:51.000 Sloshing about in the chalk.

02:18:53.000 But now we've got Tim Hinschliff, journalist and editor of the Socialable.

02:18:58.000 He's been referred to as a bad faith actor by the MD of the WF for his articles on the conference.

02:19:04.000 Here he is Tim, have you been watching the conference so far?

02:19:08.000 Have you got any highlights so far?

02:19:10.000 No, actually I've been watching you so far, so the highlights are coming directly from you.

02:19:15.000 That's right, and you can trust us to convey this story to you without any agenda.

02:19:23.000 Sorry, we've got Davos on in the background and every so often they try to jam our stream.

02:19:28.000 So listen, we know that big tech are, broadly speaking, in bed with Davos.

02:19:33.000 So while we get a handle on that, let me tell you that Tim is going to give us some unique insights into exactly what it is that's so malevolent about the WF and Davos.

02:19:43.000 Isn't this just a business conference, Tim?

02:19:45.000 Are we making a lot of fuss about nothing?

02:19:48.000 Exactly.

02:19:49.000 They're all in this, you know, for the common good and for our benefits.

02:19:53.000 And there's really nothing to worry about.

02:19:56.000 No, but what they are doing is, you know, as James said earlier, bringing in the system of control, and they're doing that through many technological means, digital identity being one, central bank digital currencies being the other, but then also the internet of bodies.

02:20:15.000 So there's going to be a session coming up ready for brain transparency, which is about hacking the human brain through neurotechnology.

02:20:24.000 Which is basically discussing privacy and freedom once your brain can be decoded.

02:20:33.000 So if you think disinformation is bad now, censorship and freedom of speech, then coming up is going to be freedom of thought.

02:20:42.000 That's going to be one to look out for.

02:20:45.000 You can see, in a sense, ideologically, that the curation of the public space might lead to a kind of self-censorship, but the idea that actual neurological activity could be interceded is extraordinary.

02:21:00.000 And I suppose that an organisation that is interested primarily in control and selling the idea of control as positive and beneficial to ordinary people will have no upper limit, I suppose.

02:21:14.000 I'm always struck, really, when I look at this stuff, by how anodyne it is.

02:21:19.000 Seemingly lacking in menace it is, but I suppose that's what corporatism offers.

02:21:24.000 Because it's come via commercialisation, they understand semiotics, they understand messaging, they understand that they have to capture a blend of sort of mundanity, sort of tedium, that it's kind of boring and banal, that you don't want to take it in.

02:21:38.000 The kind of blue backgrounds, the kind of innocuousness.

02:21:41.000 These aren't jagged and fascistic systems of messaging.

02:21:45.000 They make their agenda seem normal and necessary and part of a progressive flow of life.

02:21:52.000 Could you talk to me a bit as well, mate, about what circular economies are and how that's going to impact us in coming years?

02:22:00.000 Oh yeah, definitely.

02:22:01.000 So that's what Adrian Monk, the managing director, pretty much the propaganda minister of the World Economic Forum, had referred to One of my stories referred to me as a bad faith actor for targeting the forum's coverage on the circular economy.

02:22:17.000 So the circular economy on the surface, like you say they incorporate, they make it look so mundane and nice and all these things, on the surface it's about reusing and recycling materials and longer lifespans and everything for supply chains.

02:22:32.000 On the back end of that though is their business model.

02:22:35.000 So their Circular economy business model is product as a service.

02:22:40.000 This is where you'll own nothing and be happy actually comes from this business model.

02:22:45.000 Of course, Ida Auken, the Danish MP, she wrote that in 2016, that story about owning nothing.

02:22:51.000 But then, that's what she credited was the circular economy. 0.97

02:22:56.000 Breakthroughs in the circular economy is what allowed a nation, a class of renters.

02:23:01.000 So what the circular economy in business models looks like is that there's a small asset class of owners who own everything while they rent out every single product which has become a service to everyone else.

02:23:17.000 And this can also tie into where, you know, if you own nothing and automation is taking over many jobs, then how do you get money?

02:23:25.000 How do you survive?

02:23:26.000 How do you live?

02:23:27.000 That's when you introduced universal basic income using central bank digital currencies, which can be programmed To limit how much you can own.

02:23:37.000 Where you can spend it, what you can spend it on, so on and so forth.

02:23:41.000 And so while you're sitting there collecting your universal basic income, which is just a voucher pretty much to what you use it on, then they can say, we've eliminated poverty.

02:23:53.000 That's one of the sustainable development goals.

02:23:56.000 So if everyone's down here, you guys got all this income and you just plugged into the metaverse, then what's the problem?

02:24:02.000 We'll take care of you.

02:24:03.000 You just have to sit back, do nothing, and that's all that.

02:24:05.000 All good.

02:24:06.000 My God, that's a really terrifying depiction that you've just offered us there.

02:24:10.000 I had the image of like citadels, the idea of walled cities that were only accessible to people that were sanctioned and permitted within the walls, but that's happening on a kind of a cyber level now that there are just there are certain boundaries and thresholds that won't be able to be crossed and With your idea there about the universal basic income and the elimination of poverty, presumably these vouchers that will be issued will only be able to be permissible to be spent in particular ways, allowing the kind of corporate partners, I might imagine, a kind of assurity that the money's only going to be spent within their organisations.

02:24:46.000 And when, as we've not used that brilliant asset yet, of how many nations, Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, these are now essentially more powerful than I can't say any nation on earth because of China and the United States, but these corporations operate within those nations.

02:25:03.000 So the idea that the corporation is a subset of the nation is gone.

02:25:07.000 The idea that these unelected bodies like the WHO, IMF and WEF, in perhaps a less tangible way, we now have unelected private entities that have a lot more power than any nation and we're seeing now that democracy within

02:25:25.000 those countries in itself is a kind of stitched up game because of lobbying,

02:25:30.000 because of conflicts of interest.

02:25:32.000 It's much easier Tim to imagine that sort of horrifying warly image sort of coming to fruition. Gail what do you

02:25:38.000 want to say before we go back to Tim?

02:25:40.000 Jump in and say like this, you know it sounds like conspiracy.

02:25:43.000 You can quite easily get to the place where it sounds like, oh, they're going to control our lives.

02:25:47.000 You know, this kind of universal credit and keep us all, you know, being able to spend on what we want.

02:25:52.000 But literally, Tom Morton, the director of the Bank of England, said about CBDCs, he said there could be some socially beneficial outcomes.

02:25:59.000 You could think of giving your children pocket money, but programming the money so that it can't be used for sweets.

02:26:05.000 So, I mean, this is literally in response to, and that is for the source of the Telegraph, this is not from anywhere other than the mainstream media itself, where the director of the Bank of England is basically telling us that once digital currencies come in, we'll be able to control how people spend it.

02:26:18.000 Again, it's not conspiracy.

02:26:19.000 It's not a conspiracy.

02:26:21.000 What do you think are some of the far, the more far out ideas that are likely to come out of this conference, Tim, and what kind of future does it infer?

02:26:33.000 Well, one of them is, when you talked about kind of digital walling off of things, is an actual physical one within the cities.

02:26:40.000 So, I don't know if you've heard the notion of a 15-minute city, but actually in the program of this year's Davos, there's a session called Bold New Cities Take the Stage, in which they talk about 10-minute cities.

02:26:54.000 So that's basically where the thing, the city is sectioned off.

02:26:58.000 So you have quadrants, you know, this is the Hunger Games kind of thing.

02:27:01.000 So you got your sectors, 12, 10, and all that, and you're not allowed to go outside that area.

02:27:06.000 How do you control and monitor and either incentivize or coerce people into staying in their quadrants?

02:27:13.000 Well, you need a digital identity as a foundation for that.

02:27:16.000 And guess what?

02:27:18.000 We've already got that technological foundation all set up through The last couple of years with these digital health certificates, aka vaccine passports, that's at the stage because in order to do anything, participate in society, access essential goods and services, that's what's going to be needed.

02:27:36.000 So that's one of the crazy ones that's out there.

02:27:38.000 That's been going on for a while, still continuing.

02:27:41.000 But again, talking about that brain transparency thing.

02:27:45.000 Yeah, go ahead.

02:27:46.000 Well, I'm saying like, what I imagine is that once the technology exists to do something, almost the incentive exists to implement it.

02:27:55.000 I suppose we have weapons that have been invented that have, thank God, not yet been used.

02:28:01.000 But it's easy now to look at a kind of history of piloting and say, oh, look, that's where they tested that idea.

02:28:07.000 When you said the stuff about the 10 minute city, I thought about like the kind of tags you wear if you're sort of convicted of like, you know, tags that will buzz or inform people.

02:28:16.000 And if we're all if we've all carrying digital IDs and our actions and movements would be easier to monitor.

02:28:22.000 And it seems to me that they're using the climate change narrative to Introduce the possibility of lockdowns where ordinary people, not these guys who fly around on private jets at a whim, will have travel restricted.

02:28:41.000 And it seems as well, even on Rumble, I'm not suggesting that the pandemic was not a legitimate biomedical event, but That you can see how they have piloted the idea of lockdowns now.

02:28:56.000 In countries like the UK, wherever it is you're living, Tim, at the beginning of the lockdown they said, oh, in China they can lock people down because it's an authoritarian, centralized, communist country.

02:29:07.000 You won't be able to pull that stuff off in Italy or the US or England.

02:29:11.000 But they did.

02:29:12.000 We just obediently did it.

02:29:14.000 And all you have to do is condemn dissenters.

02:29:18.000 If you smear dissenters as conspiracy theorists and whack jobs, Man, not that long ago, even if you were avowedly and overtly a conspiracy theorist entitled to be in a conversation, you can have edgeland views, unusual opinions that needn't be hateful.

02:29:35.000 So already in the conversations we've had today, we've talked about freedom of speech being calibrated.

02:29:40.000 We've talked about the ability to scan people's Consciousness and mental activity, the ability to monitor movement, the elimination of poverty, even a goal like that that seems so sort of beautiful and fruitful and noble being used as a way essentially to assert more regulation and control.

02:30:01.000 So I suppose that's an interesting lens to use with the WF.

02:30:03.000 Look at the stuff they've been saying in the past and look at what things have subsequently been implemented.

02:30:07.000 Look at the technologies that are being introduced and then imagine how they might be used.

02:30:12.000 No, even if you want to give people the benefit of the doubt and say, no, neoliberalist Western democracies don't have that kind of malevolent intent.

02:30:20.000 Well, what if things change?

02:30:22.000 What if a different or centralised authority were ever to get that authority?

02:30:26.000 And I would say the way that things are heading at the moment, it's kind of looking like that's the kind of dystopic vision we're moving towards anyway.

02:30:32.000 What are you saying, Tim?

02:30:34.000 Yeah, well, you're exactly right about the narratives.

02:30:38.000 So before COVID and before the Great Reset, the World Economic Forum was pushing these policies for climate change, you know, digital ID, limited mobility, climate refugees, things like that.

02:30:52.000 And then once the pandemic came along, they just kind of transcribed all that climate stuff onto COVID.

02:30:58.000 So instead of having climate lockdowns and things, you had health lockdowns and quarantines and Things like that.

02:31:05.000 And so now that the COVID control narrative is all but collapsed, they're moving right back into climate change.

02:31:12.000 So that's where digital ID is going to be needed for all these climate refugees they say are going to exist. 0.99

02:31:19.000 There's what else?

02:31:21.000 As Andrew mentioned earlier, the individual carbon footprint trackers.

02:31:25.000 So measuring, you know, what you're consuming, you know, which is tied to digital ID.

02:31:30.000 So it's like You go someplace and they say, well, you've eaten too much meat or you bought too much meat.

02:31:36.000 You can't have that.

02:31:38.000 Petrol and gasoline, you know, you can't use that and switch to electric and all that.

02:31:42.000 And so what it is, is creating that system of, you know, behavior modification, which is a type of social credit system.

02:31:50.000 It's all based on trying to incentivize manipulative or worse human behavior.

02:31:56.000 It's very interesting.

02:31:57.000 It seems that no matter what the problem is, the solution that will be presented is digital IDs, social credit scores, the ability to lock people down.

02:32:07.000 So that's something we can watch for, isn't it?

02:32:09.000 We can say, oh, wow, the problem used to be the pandemic.

02:32:12.000 And these were the solutions.

02:32:14.000 And now the problem is pollution or climate change.

02:32:16.000 And these are the solutions.

02:32:17.000 And also, you know, in a sense, you know, some of what you're talking about, about carbon emissions and, you know, carbon foot tracker.

02:32:26.000 If, in a sense, for me personally, if I knew that, as a collective, this was the only way that we were going to tackle some of the issues, you know, to eat less meat so we all had to track what we ate, these were the only ways to tackle some of the issues that are facing this planet.

02:32:40.000 And everyone was doing it.

02:32:41.000 But then when you know that 71% of global emissions are caused by 100 of the biggest companies in the world, and they're getting tax breaks, They're represented at Davos by paying their money to be there and getting favourable decisions and colluding with governments.

02:32:55.000 So you know, it's not them that's doing it, it is us.

02:32:58.000 And this comes back to the hypocrisy that James was talking about.

02:33:00.000 That's brilliant because they will only present solutions that do not meaningfully impact the agenda of the powerful.

02:33:07.000 Solutions that are like, hey, why don't we just Shut down all of that type of fossil fuel, and at great expense, set up new systems of energy.

02:33:14.000 We had a guest on the show the other week who told us that solar and wind could only meet one fifth of our energy needs, even operating at maximum capacity.

02:33:21.000 So it seems that there is some disinformation that comes out of that anyway, and we'll check that further.

02:33:25.000 But yeah, one of the, I think, the great tools for examining this stuff is Are the solutions that they present never a challenge to the existing framework?

02:33:34.000 They never say that we're going to break up these monopolies, we're going to democratize these workplaces, we're going to give you control of your communities.

02:33:42.000 These kind of solutions are never suggested.

02:33:45.000 Tim, we've got to, unless you've got something to say mate, we've got Idris Elba's on stage at Davos.

02:33:50.000 and we're about to convey that. You're very welcome to stay on the line.

02:33:53.000 I think we're going to... Tim, stay with us, mate.

02:33:55.000 If we've got that technical capacity.

02:33:58.000 Let's have a look at Idris Elba now, an actor who I admire, addressing the Davos Massive. Let's have a look at him.

02:34:06.000 Yes, she is a hard act to follow. 1.00

02:34:10.000 Thank you, Sabrina.

02:34:13.000 Shh.

02:34:14.000 Thank you to the World Economic Forum, Hilda.

02:34:18.000 Thank you, Professor Klaus, for this honour.

02:34:22.000 We are very privileged to be here and don't take it lightly.

02:34:27.000 But let's be frank.

02:34:30.000 It's taken decades for corporates, for governments to understand, for economies to be built to last.

02:34:37.000 We need to empower the youth.

02:34:40.000 We need social equity.

02:34:43.000 We need to protect our environment.

02:34:45.000 Today is well recognized that economic, social and natural well-being of our planet are completely interrelated and Davos may be one of the first platforms to get it.

02:34:59.000 We understand the power and the change that can come from this room.

02:35:05.000 Davos has become the de facto platform for governments, for corporates, for philanthropists,

02:35:11.000 for activism, for protesters, to mobilize quickly, which is why we're all here, because

02:35:18.000 we can move with agility and speed and your speed.

02:35:22.000 I like Idris Elba a lot and I wouldn't want to criticize Idris Elba for like a number of reasons.

02:35:28.000 That's not a person who I would want to sort of feel ill about me because I feel like he's a good person and he's a self-made man.

02:35:35.000 But he's got a cause obviously hasn't he?

02:35:37.000 He wants to help the youth.

02:35:38.000 But it's pretty, when he said like this is a centre of power for governments and corporates it's I mean, if you look at the attendees and if you look at the agenda that's being represented, I feel like, you know, I'd love to directly talk to Idris Elba about the WEF and Davos.

02:35:38.000 Yeah.

02:35:54.000 Maybe that's a conversation that we'll be able to have.

02:35:58.000 I'm much more happy criticising politicians and corporate leaders because I feel like I don't trust their intention.

02:36:06.000 Whereas I guess with Idris Elba, you feel like this guy wants to help this organisation that he's advocating for.

02:36:13.000 Tim, we're going to do a video, we're going to show you a presentation now.

02:36:18.000 This is something that we're rather excited about.

02:36:21.000 We did a, I'm going to call it a short film.

02:36:24.000 It's a bit lofty.

02:36:26.000 It's a bit lofty and grandiose.

02:36:28.000 I think seeing Idris Elba on stage, except in a crystal, reignited my appetite to be taken seriously as a content creator.

02:36:39.000 We made a presentation about the WHO and their anti-vaxx propaganda, saying that anti-vaxxers are more dangerous than uh terrorists i mean they literally say it you'll see it in a moment in our short movie they call it anti uh vaccine active anti-vaccine activism activism is more dangerous than terrorism we've presented it alongside some information that we can talk about explicitly actually on rumble that's the advantage that there's been a new study that shows that the adverse reactions to some of the vaccines and this is using

02:37:08.000 Information from the NIH and from Pfizer and Moderna comes back as regular as one in 800 events.

02:37:13.000 And to give that some context, there's a couple of other vaccines historically that had adverse effects as infrequently as one in 100,000 that was pulled off the shelves.

02:37:23.000 Another one, one in 10,000 that was pulled off the shelves.

02:37:26.000 So it seems like this vaccine was not treated like other Vaccines and I suppose in order to do that, you have to present the problem is so enormous and significant that it warrants a new approach now over the course of the last couple of years.

02:37:40.000 I think many of us changed our perspective on on the pandemic and the use of power and control around it and certainly the profits that Pfizer along with other pharmaceutical companies made.

02:37:50.000 Certainly gave us some questions.

02:37:53.000 Tim, thanks for joining us, man.

02:37:55.000 These are presumably those what I just outlined there.

02:37:57.000 They're subjects that you're interested in because you seem like that sort of person in your flat cap with your headphones on with your sparkling blue eyes.

02:38:05.000 I mean, where are you?

02:38:07.000 Thanks very much.

02:38:08.000 I'm in Medellín, Colombia.

02:38:10.000 Oh, you're in?

02:38:11.000 OK, fair enough.

02:38:11.000 You're reporting from Colombia.

02:38:13.000 OK, fair enough.

02:38:14.000 Right.

02:38:14.000 Well, fantastic.

02:38:14.000 All right.

02:38:15.000 I'd love to have you on again.

02:38:16.000 You really helped us to understand some of these complex issues in a very apposite and easy to discern fashion.

02:38:23.000 I hope you'll join us again.

02:38:23.000 Thanks, mate.

02:38:25.000 Big fan.

02:38:26.000 Always look at your website.

02:38:27.000 Do you, Gal?

02:38:28.000 Yeah.

02:38:29.000 Cheers.

02:38:29.000 Yeah, we love you.

02:38:30.000 What is this website so people can see it?

02:38:32.000 The Sociable.

02:38:34.000 Yeah, check out Tim Hinchliffe's website, Sociable, and Tim, we'll talk to you again soon.

02:38:39.000 Now it's time for us to have a look at our presentation on the anti-vax activism movement as presented by the WHO and some information about adverse reactions I think you're going to love that you will only be able to see unedited and uncensored here on Rumble.

02:38:54.000 Here's the news.

02:38:55.000 No, here's the effing news.

02:38:57.000 The WHO have released a delicious piece of propaganda explaining that anti-vaccine activism is worse than global terrorism.

02:39:06.000 Meanwhile, you cannot discuss new studies that show information about adverse vaccine reactions.

02:39:15.000 Now, we are up against some pretty powerful forces.

02:39:18.000 For example, the WHO.

02:39:19.000 Do you know where they get their funding from?

02:39:21.000 They've released a beautiful little piece of propaganda that reveals that anti-vaccine activism is the worst threat facing the world.

02:39:28.000 It's worse than terrorism.

02:39:29.000 It's worse than anything.

02:39:30.000 Imagine something.

02:39:31.000 It's worse than that.

02:39:32.000 It's the worst thing there is.

02:39:33.000 Meanwhile, there are some studies that have come out that make some interesting claims about adverse vaccine reactions based on available information from the Let's have a look now at the WHO's brilliant piece of propaganda.

02:39:48.000 We have to recognize that anti-vaccine activism, which I actually call anti-science aggression.

02:39:53.000 That's what I call it, because that sounds worse.

02:39:55.000 Anti-science aggression.

02:39:56.000 Because science, that means objectivity.

02:39:58.000 That means empiricism.

02:39:59.000 That means experimentation.

02:40:00.000 That's what science is.

02:40:01.000 And of course, if science was funded in a particular way and had a particular desired outcome or agenda, like, for example, to accrue profits and revenue, It would still be science.

02:40:09.000 That wouldn't mean that it was a subset of a corporatist globalist movement.

02:40:13.000 No way.

02:40:13.000 It's still science.

02:40:14.000 It's science till I say it's not science.

02:40:16.000 It's now become a major killing force globally.

02:40:19.000 It's a major killing force.

02:40:20.000 Are there any other killing forces you want to discuss?

02:40:22.000 No.

02:40:23.000 During the COVID pandemic in the United States, 200,000 Americans needlessly lost their lives because they refused a COVID vaccine.

02:40:31.000 Okay, well let's make sure there's data on that.

02:40:33.000 Even after vaccines became widely available, and now the anti-vaccine activism is expanding across the world, even into low- and middle-income countries.

02:40:42.000 Even those people, poor people, even poor people are anti-vaccine now.

02:40:46.000 I mean, that's not as bad because we won't give them vaccines anyway because Bill Gates won't allow them to have the patents, so that's not as bad.

02:40:52.000 But it shows you how bad, even people that can't afford the vaccines don't want the vaccines, and that's a problem!

02:40:57.000 It's a killing force.

02:40:59.000 Anti-science now kills more people than things like gun violence.

02:41:03.000 It's worse than guns.

02:41:05.000 Global terrorism.

02:41:06.000 Worse than terrorism, that's bad as well.

02:41:08.000 Nuclear proliferation or cyber attacks.

02:41:10.000 The worst thing you could have in this world is Putin and not being vaccinated.

02:41:14.000 My God!

02:41:15.000 Just imagine an unvaccinated Putin!

02:41:17.000 And now it's become a political movement.

02:41:19.000 In the U.S.

02:41:20.000 it's linked to far-extremism on the far-right.

02:41:22.000 Far-right as well, you know, similarly, there's two things.

02:41:26.000 Not wanting to take a medicine for reasons that we'll be talking about in a minute, and also being a racist.

02:41:31.000 Somehow those things have been combined, almost as if you want to smear people who dissent to ensure that that message can never reach people.

02:41:38.000 Same in Germany, so this is a new... Literally got the word propaganda repeated again and again and again because it is propaganda!

02:41:44.000 Face of anti-science aggression and so we need political solutions to address this.

02:41:51.000 What, like censorship, misinformation, disinformation, malinformation?

02:41:55.000 the subject of the current WEF Davos Convention.

02:41:58.000 What a coincidence, yeah, it's almost like they're trying to create an appetite

02:42:01.000 where people really want censorship.

02:42:02.000 That's interesting, isn't it, that they're doing that?

02:42:04.000 Almost as if the elite powers cannot cope with a technological revolution

02:42:08.000 and the sudden ability to immediately communicate data, so need a machine now to crush dissent,

02:42:14.000 smear opposing voices, and control the narrative, co-opting all available voices

02:42:20.000 and shutting down any opposition.

02:42:22.000 That's weird.

02:42:23.000 To address this.

02:42:24.000 World Health Organization.

02:42:25.000 They're proud of it.

02:42:26.000 They put the hairline up at the end of it. 0.96

02:42:28.000 They shouldn't be embarrassed about that thing.

02:42:30.000 Okay, so there's their propaganda.

02:42:31.000 Now, this is written by two far-right, worse-than-terrorist nuclear threats. 0.99

02:42:36.000 For example, this terrorist bastard, Robert M. Kaplan. 0.97

02:42:40.000 Yeah, sure, he might be Emeritus Distinguished Professor at the UCLA Fielding School of Public Health and an adjunct professor of medicine at Stanford University's Clinical Excellence Research Center, but that's not the full picture. 1.00

02:42:52.000 As well as that, he's a terrorist. 0.67

02:42:55.000 Oh yeah, he's also an elected member of the National Academy of Medicine, but he's also worse than a nuclear bomb. 0.96

02:43:00.000 Alongside him, his dastardly companion in this murderous endeavour, was Sander Greenland, Emeritus Professor of Epidemiology and Statistics at UCLA and Fellow of the American Statistical Association and Royal Statistical Society, and he's also worse than a loaded gun in the hand of a baby boy pointed at an orphan.

02:43:19.000 In September 2022, along with an international group of physicians and scientists, we published a study suggesting that the risks of COVID-19 vaccines may be greater than previously reported.

02:43:30.000 No!

02:43:31.000 Using publicly available data from Pfizer and Moderna studies, okay, so it's Pfizer and Moderna's studies, they're just collating and presenting existing data.

02:43:41.000 Which also, by the way, could be biased.

02:43:43.000 Let me know in the chat, let me know in the comments, if you think you can trust wholly and solely Pfizer and Moderna.

02:43:47.000 Before you tell me, have a look at how much money they made from the pandemic.

02:43:50.000 We found one serious adverse event for each 800 vaccinees.

02:43:54.000 That translates to about 1,250 serious events for each million vaccine recipients.

02:43:59.000 Many physicians and scientists believe that vaccination programs are the key to ending the coronavirus pandemic.

02:44:05.000 Some warn that our analysis might harm public health by stimulating more vaccine hesitancy.

02:44:10.000 Yet if some concerns are valid, remaining quiet could also result in harm and further erode public trust in science.

02:44:16.000 Seems like a reasonable argument.

02:44:18.000 How about having a conversation and allowing people to decide for themselves?

02:44:21.000 We believe that scientists have a responsibility to report on suspected hazards to authorities.

02:44:26.000 Consider a 1 in 800 risk of a serious adverse reaction in the context of other vaccines.

02:44:32.000 Okay, so here are some other vaccines that were pulled and what the ratios were there.

02:44:36.000 The 1976 swine flu vaccine was withdrawn after it was associated with Guillain-Barre syndrome at a rate of approximately 1 in 100,000.

02:44:44.000 So at a rate of 1 in 100,000, they pulled it.

02:44:47.000 They ended it.

02:44:48.000 Compare that to the other statistic.

02:44:50.000 In 1999, the rotavirus vaccine, Rotashield, was withdrawn following reports of interception in about 1 or 2 in 10,000.

02:44:59.000 As widely acknowledged, COVID vaccines prevent hospitalizations and the clinical trials estimated that between 225 and 625 hospitalizations were prevented per million vaccinated persons.

02:45:10.000 So the same data that these guys are using has some information which I guess they want you to hear because it's advantageous and beneficial, and presumably also true.

02:45:19.000 Perhaps both of these bits of information are true, which would mean that there is a place, according to this information, for those vaccines, but perhaps the case has been somewhat misrepresented.

02:45:27.000 I don't know.

02:45:27.000 Tell me what you think in the chat.

02:45:29.000 But these benefits are likely to be concentrated among vaccinees who are elderly or have chronic illnesses.

02:45:34.000 It's less clear which groups are at risk for serious adverse vaccine reactions.

02:45:37.000 Those at low risk for hospitalisation may still be at risk of serious vaccine reactions.

02:45:42.000 We only consider mRNA vaccines and it's not clear that other Covid-19 vaccines confer the same risk.

02:45:48.000 Regrettably, our analysis was hindered by an addressable problem.

02:45:51.000 The individual level data that could confirm or refute our analysis has not been made public.

02:45:56.000 Presumably because that information would make us so excited we all might run into the streets vaccinating ourselves in an irresponsible way.

02:46:03.000 For example, We would have greater confidence in our conclusions if we knew how often individuals experience multiple serious adverse events.

02:46:10.000 Pfizer, Moderna and the FDA have these data but have kept them hidden from public view.

02:46:14.000 That data was a surprise for your birthday and you've spoiled it!

02:46:14.000 For some reason.

02:46:19.000 This information is essential to the understanding of the balance between vaccine benefits and harms.

02:46:24.000 Hmm, who would have a vested interest in influencing or biasing the balance between vaccine benefits and harms?

02:46:29.000 I don't know, let me know in the chat.

02:46:31.000 We are calling upon Pfizer, Moderna and the FDA to release all information needed for a comprehensive assessment of these products.

02:46:37.000 Why would you not just do that anyway?

02:46:39.000 COVID-19 vaccines are now among the most widely disseminated medicines in the history of the world.

02:46:43.000 They've cost taxpayers tens of billions of dollars, which you'd think would give you a right to transparency, wouldn't you?

02:46:48.000 Rivaling the annual US federal expenditure on biomedical research.

02:46:52.000 There's no legitimate reason why scientists and the public should not have the access to the evidence that justified that purchase.

02:46:58.000 Seems reasonable.

02:46:59.000 Let me know if you hear anything here that sounds like a conspiracy theory or something.

02:47:02.000 Like, when you hear something, tell me, tell me, put it in the comments.

02:47:05.000 That bit, that was a conspiracy theory.

02:47:07.000 At the moment, I'm just reading this thinking, yeah, yeah, yeah.

02:47:09.000 Except when I allow this thought to enter my mind.

02:47:12.000 What is best for those organisations if the intention is power, control and profit?

02:47:17.000 When I think that, everything makes sense again.

02:47:18.000 Yet evidence is being withheld which adds uncertainty to our conclusions and leaves lingering questions about the scientific foundation for Covid-19 vaccine promotion.

02:47:27.000 Public posting of raw data is a reasonable response.

02:47:29.000 Open data is becoming the norm in science and is now required by many leading journals.

02:47:34.000 The time has come for the FDA and EMA to reopen their investigations and for Pfizer, Moderna and all vaccine manufacturers to provide the data that will allow scientists and physicians to address outstanding concerns.

02:47:45.000 Terrorists!

02:47:46.000 You nuclear threat! 1.00

02:47:48.000 That is worse than ISIS. 0.98

02:47:50.000 I've seen some of ISIS's videos, have you?

02:47:52.000 And they made me sick because of the lack of humanity, the barbarianism. 1.00

02:47:56.000 But this, for example, statements like there is no legitimate reason why scientists and the public should not have access to the evidence that justified the purchase. 0.96

02:48:04.000 You terrorists!

02:48:05.000 That's actually took the wind out of my sails a bit, that bit.

02:48:09.000 And what about the bit where they said, the vaccines are among the most widely disseminated medicines in history.

02:48:14.000 They've cost the taxpayers tens of billions of dollars.

02:48:17.000 Oh, you make me sick.

02:48:20.000 I've heard some rumours in my time, but this!

02:48:23.000 I wasn't ready for that.

02:48:24.000 I thought I had a strong stomach, but that's actually turned it.

02:48:26.000 Is Guantanamo Bay being closed?

02:48:28.000 Because we need it open again.

02:48:29.000 Get the orange jumpsuits.

02:48:31.000 Get these guys in there.

02:48:32.000 Get the water.

02:48:33.000 Is Dick Cheney still around to do coaching on waterboarding?

02:48:35.000 Because I want these so-called scientists with their wacky views, like allowing the public and other scientists access to data. 0.99

02:48:43.000 I'll give you access to some waterboarding, you bloody terrorist! 0.98

02:48:47.000 Anyway, maybe the WHO ain't that bad. 0.99

02:48:49.000 They're probably an objective, agenda-free organisation with no concerns in the world other than helping us put your bloody conspiratorial mind at rest.

02:48:58.000 The Gates Foundation, yeah, I've heard of them.

02:49:00.000 Bill Gates' foundation.

02:49:02.000 The Gates Foundation is the second largest contributor to the WHO.

02:49:05.000 Okay.

02:49:06.000 As of September 2021, it had invested nearly $780 million in its programs this year.

02:49:12.000 That's a good program, though.

02:49:14.000 That's charity, isn't it?

02:49:15.000 That's philanthropy.

02:49:15.000 Giving it to the old WHO, who, you know, they've got no real power except the power to control what's on, for example, YouTube.

02:49:20.000 The community guidelines are controlled by WHO.

02:49:22.000 You can read that for yourself.

02:49:23.000 So in a way, you could say that Bill Gates has some influence over what's allowed on YouTube.

02:49:27.000 Could you?

02:49:27.000 Let me know in the chat.

02:49:28.000 Let me know in the comments.

02:49:29.000 For an intergovernmental organisation such as the WHO to be so reliant on private philanthropy, especially one whose leaders have personal interests and investments in healthcare, is problematic.

02:49:38.000 For one, it gives a non-government actor an outsized influence on the development and health priorities carried on by the international organisation.

02:49:45.000 Oh right, yeah, so this guy's never been elected by anybody.

02:49:48.000 His wealth has now been accrued and is now invested in a highly influential body and is called philanthropy.

02:49:54.000 There's no way that that influence could lead to further opportunity for profit and power, is there?

02:49:59.000 Let me know in the chat.

02:50:00.000 Let me know in the comments.

02:50:01.000 While private foundations can be very generous, they can also be even faster than governments to change their mind about donations, or more dogged in demanding that their funding is used for specific priorities over others.

02:50:11.000 Private foundations' resources tend to be more dependent on the stock market and other investments that could have financial interests that run contrary to their state admissions.

02:50:20.000 Oh, that's weird.

02:50:21.000 That would mean that their state admissions are untrue.

02:50:23.000 This has been the case for the Gates Foundation, which was once a big investor in fossil fuel.

02:50:27.000 And it's true of some of Bill Gates' personal investments, which include farmland that sells its produce to fast food chains.

02:50:33.000 There you go then.

02:50:34.000 I don't ever see him turning up on the TV saying, you know, well it's really bad for you McDonald's and stuff,

02:50:39.000 but actually it's sort of quite profitable also, that's why I sell them stuff.

02:50:43.000 Don't see him, he's all about like, oh, helping these farmers and corn on the cob

02:50:47.000 and all that stuff, ain't he?

02:50:48.000 They're never telling you what he's actually up to.

02:50:49.000 I like to call another cub for lunch.

02:50:51.000 If a private foundation were to become the WHO's highest donor,

02:50:54.000 it would be transformational, said Lawrence Gostin, Faculty Director for the O'Neill Institute

02:50:58.000 at Georgetown University and Director of WHO's Collaborating Centre on National and Global Health Law.

02:51:03.000 When WHO was formed as an intergovernmental organisation, it would have been unimaginable that a private foundation could have such influence, he continued.

02:51:10.000 Well, imagine harder then, because it's happening, baby.

02:51:13.000 It would enable a single rich philanthropist to set the global health agenda.

02:51:17.000 Gostin said, referring to Bill Gates, co-chair of the foundation.

02:51:17.000 What?

02:51:21.000 Gates himself was slammed by some global health experts last year when he defended stringent intellectual property rights as the best way to speed innovation and move some sort of prioritising profits over vaccinations.

02:51:31.000 So, what you could say is if Bill Gates believes so strongly in this vaccination programme that he's willing to significantly invest in the WHO, which might give him some influence over the WHO's policies which affect what things are allowed to be said on YouTube, then similarly when it comes to other countries that haven't got the vaccines, which he believes in because Remember I've just explained to you all the investment in that.

02:51:49.000 Then you would remove the patent so that they could make their own vaccines which you've already said you believe in because there's nothing to worry about there and it's not just because they're profitable or anything, it's because they're good for you.

02:51:58.000 Oh, they're not willing to remove the patent.

02:52:00.000 So he's explained in a variety of ways why that is but for me it just don't make sense.

02:52:04.000 So there you are.

02:52:05.000 You've seen some WHO propaganda.

02:52:07.000 You've heard the gist of what this adverse events study has revealed and suggested using information from Pfizer, Moderna and the FDA.

02:52:14.000 Why don't you make up your own mind?

02:52:16.000 Or do you need someone else to make up your mind for you?

02:52:18.000 Would you like someone to control the information you get access to?

02:52:21.000 But that's just what I think.

02:52:22.000 Let me know what you think in the comments.

02:52:23.000 Let me know what you think in the chat.

02:52:24.000 I'll see you in a minute.

02:52:29.000 Yeah?

02:52:30.000 Oh, here we are.

02:52:31.000 So what do you think about that?

02:52:32.000 I've got something... Well, I'll tell you what you think about that by simply reading back your words to me.

02:52:36.000 Because, Gareth, one of the things I love about our community... Do you want to hear just one of the things I love about our community?

02:52:41.000 Is that they educate us.

02:52:42.000 Think of the journey we've been on.

02:52:43.000 When we first met you, we didn't even know what the W.E.F.

02:52:46.000 was.

02:52:47.000 Let alone the strings of influence it had attached to the centres of power.

02:52:51.000 You've introduced us to great journalists, great views, great perspectives.

02:52:54.000 You've helped us balance anti-authoritarianism with rigorous journalism, so that we don't just lean into mindless conspiracy theories.

02:53:02.000 We want to demonstrate that elite establishments are controlling the world, subverting and avoiding democratic process, and that it isn't beneficial to ordinary people.

02:53:12.000 We don't just want to deluge you in empty rhetoric.

02:53:14.000 We want to amuse you, arouse you, stimulate and empower you, so that we can create a revolution.

02:53:20.000 The truth is, we can reorganize reality however we want to.

02:53:24.000 That is why they're working so hard to control information.

02:53:28.000 That is why they're introducing these new categories of misinformation, malinformation, disinformation.

02:53:33.000 If they were right, what would they have to be afraid of?

02:53:35.000 They would say, let the ideas win out in the marketplace of communication.

02:53:40.000 But they're unable to do that, Gareth.

02:53:42.000 Because we're right.

02:53:43.000 Because ordinary people should be running their own communities. 1.00

02:53:45.000 Because they are trying to centralise power in needless and nefarious ways.

02:53:49.000 And because the WEF Davos Conference is an example of globalist agenda being enacted on, well, the only stage it could be.

02:53:58.000 A global one.

02:53:59.000 Here's some comments from our beloved community. 0.87

02:54:02.000 This is frickin' nuts! 0.74

02:54:05.000 Frickin' Nuts said, a threat to their control. 0.99

02:54:08.000 It's not about any illness, because they don't give a crap about us. 0.97

02:54:11.000 They don't really care about us, said Frickin' Nuts. 0.92

02:54:13.000 That's talking about the WHO, another unelected, privately funded body, though they do get some taxpayer dollars.

02:54:18.000 The US is a big funder of them, of course.

02:54:21.000 Daedalus777.

02:54:23.000 Safe and effective, brought to you by Pfizer.

02:54:26.000 Well done, Daedalus.

02:54:27.000 Blessed old bird.

02:54:28.000 I think it's the problem that they want complete obedience no matter what.

02:54:32.000 I think they do want compliance and obedience, don't they?

02:54:34.000 We watched a bit of WEF propaganda earlier.

02:54:36.000 It was fascinating, actually, because they understand so much of the messaging, don't they?

02:54:41.000 They even use, as a reference, that Is it Idiocracy?

02:54:44.000 The film where, you know, the guy puts on the glasses and he can see that all adverts say obey and stuff.

02:54:49.000 I mean, is it Them?

02:54:50.000 I can't remember the name of that film.

02:54:52.000 But anyway, it's like they do understand the nature of the accusations being levelled at them.

02:54:56.000 And if you watch Idris Elba there, a person that I sort of respect and admire, it's like he's talking about a totally benign and, what do I want to say, sort of progressive But I just don't see how it can be that big pharma, big tech and the state can be the hero.

02:55:14.000 I just don't see how that can be because I'm living in the world and I'm watching what's happening.

02:55:19.000 We are now.

02:55:20.000 We've not gone mad.

02:55:21.000 No, we've not gone mad at all.

02:55:23.000 I mean, we've got a little graphic just to kind of follow up one of the things we were talking about with Tim a few minutes ago around the kind of climate agenda.

02:55:31.000 Again, it's something that, you know, we talk about with our audience and you talk about protection of the planet as being something that's important.

02:55:37.000 I think it is important.

02:55:38.000 I love the planet.

02:55:39.000 But this is kind of a way in which the WEF and these kind of global elites use this kind of, these emotions that we feel about the planet and wanting to protect it.

02:55:49.000 So here you've got Klaus talking about leaders.

02:55:53.000 You are asking firms to replace any corporate board directors who is unwilling to transition to cleaner energy sources.

02:56:04.000 So what they're suggesting that the WF have the power to replace corporate leaders.

02:56:08.000 Now, what I would say, Gareth, if he's talking about organizations like Exxon Mobil and other traditional fossil fuel type organizations, I would have traditionally and conventionally seen them as part of the problem.

02:56:20.000 And so I can see how someone like Idris Elba or Greta Thunberg or David Attenborough and people that love nature, like, you know, I'd include myself in that, think, well, look, there he is advocating for control.

02:56:30.000 Well, you might say that, but one of the main sponsors or partners of the WF and Davos is Shell.

02:56:35.000 So why would you accept Shell's money, Klaus?

02:56:38.000 It does its right.

02:56:39.000 You can't take their money.

02:56:40.000 So, looking at this graphic here, we've just got Klaus saying we're aiming to ask firms to replace corporate directors, but then we know that just 100 companies are responsible for 71% of global emissions.

02:56:51.000 At the same time, we know that the Dutch government are trying to shut down 3,000 farms over their emissions.

02:56:56.000 Can I unpack each one of these a little bit?

02:56:58.000 All of that 100 companies responsible for 71% of global emissions, one of the themes that's come up over our WF Royal Rumble special, which I think has been a great success.

02:57:05.000 Judging from the comments in the chat, you lot are loving it as well, aren't you?

02:57:08.000 Will you let me know?

02:57:09.000 Give us some more feedback on that.

02:57:10.000 We know that they'll only suggest solutions that impact us at the level of the individual, but do not intervene, intercede, or negatively affect the agenda of the powerful.

02:57:23.000 This is an example of that, is it Gary?

02:57:24.000 Garifullo, they're bringing in measures that won't affect corporations but will affect

02:57:30.000 ordinary people.

02:57:31.000 Well not only are these global emissions by these hundred companies, but these big fossil

02:57:34.000 fuel companies like Shell that are making massive record profits at the moment get government

02:57:39.000 subsidies, get tax breaks, get all sorts.

02:57:42.000 And these are the kind of partners that they are.

02:57:43.000 So they control the agenda and they control the conversation.

02:57:45.000 If the WF was what it purports to be, why don't they go, what we're advocating for is ending government subsidy for these type of energy companies.

02:57:54.000 We're not accepting their funding anymore.

02:57:56.000 That's what it would sound like.

02:57:57.000 Right, good, good.

02:57:58.000 Because sometimes it's my own naivety and optimism that gets in the way, my willingness to believe in this stuff.

02:58:03.000 Yeah, and then you've got leaders like Justin Trudeau talking about the environment and things.

02:58:08.000 We know at the same time he's flying around in his private jets.

02:58:11.000 He's giving big subsidies to these fossil fuel companies themselves.

02:58:14.000 He's just bought in F-35s.

02:58:15.000 There you go.

02:58:17.000 So at the same time, the Dutch government is trying to shut down 3,000 farms over emissions.

02:58:21.000 Now, this is a story, again, like reported in The Guardian and all sorts of things.

02:58:25.000 These farms that they're saying are contributing to emissions, which is in some cases true.

02:58:30.000 And yet, But at the same time, we know that the vast majority of these emissions have been caused by the same companies that are sponsoring the WEF.

02:58:37.000 Not the farmers.

02:58:38.000 These individual farmers in Holland or the Netherlands aren't sponsoring the WEF, so they're not going to get favourable legislation.

02:58:46.000 So the agenda is what sets the solution, not the problem.

02:58:50.000 Because, of course, if you can centralise agriculture, then you grant more power to these elites that are in advantageous positions already.

02:59:00.000 And so it penalises ordinary farmers.

02:59:02.000 It's a little bit like the previous example.

02:59:04.000 If you know that 100 companies are responsible for 71% of global emissions, that's where the change needs to take place, not the level of the individual.

02:59:11.000 You're not going to be tagging and digital ID'ing CEOs of big corporations.

02:59:15.000 It will be ordinary people who have their movements restricted.

02:59:18.000 Essentially, what you have is an organisation that are able to construct regulation and legislation that won't meaningfully impact them.

02:59:25.000 Like our second guest.

02:59:26.000 No, it was our first guest, wasn't it, James?

02:59:29.000 The attendees of Davos are not people that are negatively impacted by the pandemic.

02:59:33.000 And with the agricultural example, it's negative, meaningfully and negatively affects ordinary farmers,

02:59:43.000 but it doesn't affect figures like Bill Gates that are acquiring farmland.

02:59:48.000 Well, there you go. So there you go to our final point here.

02:59:51.000 If we just go back to the previous slide, it was basically saying that Bill Gates is now the biggest farmland owner in the United States.

02:59:58.000 So what is happening?

02:59:59.000 Well, you know, it's quite demonstrable that this land that was owned by independent farmers is being transferred.

03:00:05.000 Because they're being bankrupt because of these new edicts which are presented as ecological solutions, but actually they are designed to bankrupt Those farmers.

03:00:16.000 Sometimes I hear in spaces like this, and let me know in the chat in the comments if you agree, that sometimes you can, if you just look at the effects of a piece of legislation, then you can see what the desired effect was.

03:00:27.000 For example, you might argue that if the pandemic meant that some of the most powerful interests in the world became more powerful, that corporations became richer, that it benefited big tech, it benefited big pharma, and it benefited governments because of their ability to regulate, particularly at a time When they feel like they're losing control because of the availability of information and the new ability to organize, suddenly a situation occurred that was beneficial across the board to all those organizations.

03:00:51.000 That's not the same as saying that it's a plannedemic or they made it up or there's microchips in the vaccines.

03:00:56.000 You know, I don't care what people say in the comments in the chat.

03:00:58.000 You lot can discuss what you want.

03:00:59.000 I'm interested in what there's evidence for.

03:01:01.000 And just with this one example around, you know, ecology and climate change,

03:01:05.000 which I believe are important issues, and that's why they use them to leverage them.

03:01:08.000 Same with popular ideas around identity and prejudice and inequality.

03:01:13.000 All important ideas that are used rhetorically, but never are...

03:01:19.000 the solutions that are presented will never negatively impact the sponsors of the event

03:01:23.000 or the most powerful interest in the world.

03:01:25.000 And that's just common sense, isn't it?

03:01:27.000 What's the next one?

03:01:28.000 We've got another one of these World Economic Forum breakdowns.

03:01:32.000 This is, I think, one around big tech.

03:01:35.000 Whatever you are, this is the famous number one, you'll own nothing and you'll be happy.

03:01:39.000 Whatever you want, you'll rent and it'll be delivered by drone.

03:01:44.000 So they said that in 2018.

03:01:45.000 By 2022, robot grocery delivery services were launched. 1.00

03:01:48.000 Bloody stupid looking things. 0.99

03:01:50.000 Things with most robots, either it's like old Klip Klop, the robot police dog. 1.00

03:01:55.000 They look like little bastards. 0.99

03:01:57.000 Or it's that robot bouncer thing, that big scaffold skip, that dumpster made of scaffold. 1.00

03:02:03.000 Yeah, from Robocop 2.

03:02:04.000 I didn't like him.

03:02:05.000 Well, sometimes they're a bit awkward, aren't they?

03:02:08.000 They look embarrassed.

03:02:09.000 Yeah, they look embarrassed about themselves.

03:02:10.000 They skit about like Bambi on the ice and then fire off a few rounds, I think, to cover their own awkwardness.

03:02:19.000 Then, oh, Gecko Robotics is an official partner of the WAF.

03:02:23.000 And a lot of people are choosing to rent rather than buy.

03:02:26.000 I don't think they're choosing.

03:02:27.000 They can't afford to buy.

03:02:28.000 And we've tagged that Blackrock and Larry Fink will be at Davos this year.

03:02:33.000 Blackrock are buying up real estate across the United States of America, manipulating real estate prices. 0.80

03:02:38.000 So why don't they have a session at Davos going, right, let's get into with Larry Fink, our special guest, Larry Fink from Blackrock.

03:02:46.000 Why are you buying up all these houses?

03:02:48.000 Yeah, these are the questions you want.

03:02:50.000 Like Larry, mate.

03:02:51.000 Like, all right, obviously, like all of us here, you're interested in a better, fairer world.

03:02:54.000 That's why we came.

03:02:56.000 Stop buying up all the houses, mate.

03:02:57.000 Oh, I can't because we have to make profits.

03:03:00.000 Albert Baller, back again.

03:03:01.000 What a year it's been for you, Albert.

03:03:03.000 Now, we remember you saying... He is a little bit taller.

03:03:04.000 You are taller.

03:03:05.000 Well, the reason I'm taller is I'm a little bit richer.

03:03:08.000 Now, you said very plainly it would be unconscionable to make a profit from the pandemic, and yet Pfizer have returned their greatest ever profit.

03:03:15.000 Presumably, you're going to be giving this profit to good causes in the field of medicine about which you care so much.

03:03:21.000 Hello?

03:03:22.000 Albert?

03:03:23.000 Where you gone?

03:03:23.000 Larry?

03:03:24.000 So that's how you know, by their fruits shall you know them, to quote the Holy Bible.

03:03:30.000 Now, Gareth, you've probably sensed I'm getting excited, have you?

03:03:32.000 I certainly have.

03:03:33.000 Do you know why that is?

03:03:34.000 I've got a good idea.

03:03:35.000 There's a little guy called Michael Schellenberg coming our way.

03:03:38.000 He's been a guest on the show just last week.

03:03:40.000 He's one of the ingenues, entrepreneurs and radicals that have bought you the Twitter files.

03:03:46.000 He's currently releasing them, probably even as we speak.

03:03:48.000 In fact, he was a bit late, probably because he was on the phone to Elon Musk.

03:03:51.000 Michael, how are you?

03:03:53.000 What's going on in your world?

03:03:55.000 With you guys.

03:03:56.000 Exciting day.

03:03:56.000 Yeah.

03:03:57.000 First day at Davos.

03:03:58.000 I'm in a great mood.

03:03:59.000 It's a magical time, isn't it?

03:04:00.000 It's like bloody Christmas.

03:04:02.000 You never forget your first Davos, do you?

03:04:05.000 It thrills me.

03:04:06.000 I feel giddy.

03:04:07.000 I feel giddy as a school girl.

03:04:08.000 I really do.

03:04:09.000 Why are we late?

03:04:10.000 What were you doing?

03:04:13.000 Um, washing and combing my hair.

03:04:15.000 It does look very nice.

03:04:17.000 There's a bit of... No time to shave, but... No, fair enough.

03:04:20.000 We'll let that pass.

03:04:22.000 Now, Michael, when we spoke to you last week, which is obviously a seismic event in my life and the trajectory of my ongoing and ambiguous sexuality, since then the Davos...

03:04:34.000 What can we anticipate this year?

03:04:35.000 What are the elites working on this year to introduce into the mainstream and to indoctrinate us and prepare us for?

03:04:39.000 sorts of wacky stuff like you're going to eat bugs now, you're going to have Chinese 1.00

03:04:42.000 solar power, panels that are built by Uyghurs in concentration camps. 1.00

03:04:47.000 What can we anticipate this year?

03:04:51.000 What are the elites working on this year to introduce into the mainstream and to indoctrinate

03:04:55.000 us and prepare us for?

03:04:56.000 How are we being prepped this year?

03:04:59.000 I mean, so what's so interesting about this conference and about World Economic Forum in general is just that all the conspiracy theories about it are true.

03:05:07.000 So when you first hear them, they say they there's all these stories that go these conspiracy theories.

03:05:13.000 About the Great Reset, that they want you to eat insects rather than meat, or that they want you to, you know, own nothing, give up your privacy and be happy.

03:05:23.000 Those are all conspiracy theories.

03:05:24.000 Well, actually, no, they all came out of Davos and are on the World Economic Forum website.

03:05:30.000 A lot of them have been deleted, we discovered.

03:05:32.000 And I did a piece that's up today at our Substack newsletter called Public with Izzy Kaminska, who used to work at Financial Times and has been researching world economic form for almost 10 years.

03:05:44.000 And in fact, met with Klaus Schwab in his lair in Switzerland.

03:05:51.000 And she's the one that described it.

03:05:54.000 She described it as a James Bond villain lair.

03:05:57.000 Like she said, that's how it looks.

03:05:59.000 It's a lair.

03:06:00.000 Is it inside a volcano?

03:06:00.000 Fair enough.

03:06:02.000 Are there people in silvery suits?

03:06:06.000 Yeah, so I mean, that's what's going on.

03:06:08.000 Now, look, Schwab himself has said that he's not going to be there.

03:06:11.000 He's apparently sick.

03:06:13.000 And also George Soros is not going to be there.

03:06:16.000 Bill Gates is apparently not going to be there.

03:06:18.000 Elon Musk said that he was not going to be there.

03:06:20.000 They just have one lousy of the top 20 rich guys.

03:06:24.000 They only got one of them.

03:06:25.000 And he's also on the WEF board.

03:06:27.000 But I think that this is the beginning of the end.

03:06:30.000 I think you might have killed the World Economic Forum, Russell, because they just you drag them into the light and Sunlight is the best disinfectant and I think World Economic Forum has suffered such a reputational hit over the last two years that it really is on a downward trajectory.

03:06:46.000 Whilst I'd like to claim that victory simply for myself and wear laurels and march through Rome receiving the plaudits of the mob, And the plebs, I would have to say that we are an organisation that are legion, that are many, that these victories belong to us all. 0.65

03:07:02.000 And it is actually only through the power of the populari, through true populism, through an informed population, through true democracy, through collective action, through the democratisation of community, that these centralising globalist forces can ever be exposed.

03:07:16.000 Now, you seem to be portraying Klaus Schwab rather childishly, in my view, Michael Schellenberger, as a James Bond style villain.

03:07:24.000 Which is a trick so low that we'd never stoop to it. 1.00

03:07:27.000 Oh, just my pussy blanco! 1.00

03:07:30.000 But the WF, why would they be so transparent and willing to share their secrets and information about their own funding and investments if they had anything to hide? 1.00

03:07:41.000 Is there anything around the lack of disclosure that you want to share with us, you mad conspiracy theorist?

03:07:46.000 Well, right.

03:07:47.000 So, I mean, here's an organization that part of its main message from the World Economic Forum and Klaus Schwab is that institutions need to be more transparent, particularly with their finances, that we need all the energy companies to open up the books, that really we need all this transparency.

03:08:03.000 But when we asked for basic financial information for the World Economic Forum and the Klaus Schwab Foundation, They said they wouldn't give it to us.

03:08:12.000 So we have basically almost no information about how they invest their resources.

03:08:18.000 We know that the partnerships now cost up almost a million dollars up to a million dollars each just to and they made very clear that doesn't necessarily get you on stage.

03:08:29.000 Which I'm assuming is something everybody would want for that money.

03:08:32.000 But I think that, yeah, we basically don't know anything.

03:08:34.000 And again, like I said, my co-author on this, who really deserves, I think, the disproportionate amount of credit, Izzy Kaminska, had been researching this organization for 10 years, and they basically won't say how their money is invested.

03:08:45.000 We do know some of it is invested in minerals.

03:08:50.000 And there's been a huge amount of controversy around the use of child labor to produce these minerals in Africa.

03:08:55.000 There's an African minerals company on the W.F.

03:08:58.000 board.

03:08:59.000 So we know that W.F.

03:09:00.000 is almost certainly invested in the various products that it's selling whether that's insect protein or electric vehicles or one of the many kind of proposals they have to move us to a sort of low energy lifestyle.

03:09:15.000 It's pretty extraordinary that it seems, on a superficial analysis at least, that the best thing the WEF could do is simply stop.

03:09:24.000 If they stopped, it would improve the world almost immediately.

03:09:28.000 The idea we're told about in a lot of the kind of propaganda that we receive about the WDF is they just chose Switzerland by accident.

03:09:35.000 They just chose it.

03:09:36.000 It's just because it's nice and it's snowing and everyone can go skiing.

03:09:39.000 But when you find out that Swiss authorities require minimal disclosure about anything financial, you kind of think, no, I think there might be another reason why they chose that.

03:09:49.000 It's also, over the course of this, because we've been, you know, as a fellow investigative journalist, because we are resolute and rigorous in our examination of facts, I keep returning to the idea, is there anything wrong with it?

03:10:01.000 And you see Idris Elba there and you think, no, I like Idris Elba.

03:10:05.000 But actually, even just in the last 10 minutes when me and Gareth were talking about it,

03:10:09.000 they've got Larry Fink there.

03:10:10.000 They're not going to say, Larry Fink, hey, if you really want to help people, why are

03:10:14.000 BlackRock continually invested in the real estate and biasing the markets?

03:10:18.000 They've got Albert Baller from Pfizer there.

03:10:20.000 Why are they not saying, hey, what are you going to do with the profits that Pfizer made

03:10:23.000 this year after you said it would be unconscionable for Pfizer to make any profit?

03:10:26.000 Why, if they're saying that fossil fuels are so much of a problem, are they accepting funding from Shell?

03:10:31.000 I mean, just everywhere you look there is hypocrisy and, you know, yet more hypocrisy exposed even in the course of this short but very sexy conversation.

03:10:40.000 Yeah, I think that to some extent you're right when you say like it just loses its power when you point out that it's just kind of an advertising spectacle or at worst, I think, kind of investment scheme.

03:10:52.000 I mean, one of the people that didn't want to use their name, but is somebody that had been very close with WEF and close with Schwab over a period of years, Um, said that he called it a bit of a Ponzi scheme where investors come in and they kind of get early in on something and then they go sell it to the pension fund holders of Ontario or Florida or whatever.

03:11:14.000 And they then end up owning stocks that really lose a lot of their value and don't have a really good underlying basis to really exist.

03:11:22.000 And so we've seen that in some case, you go insect protein. 0.94

03:11:26.000 You know, it's kind of dumb, probably not companies that are going to succeed because it's just a disgusting product.

03:11:33.000 But certainly other things like these conflict minerals, you know, like I mentioned last time we were together, the Chinese made solar panels, the production of these mines in places like Africa and Asia, where we were, you know, the one of the experts on I told Joe Rogan recently that basically 100% of the cobalt In Congo is produced in mines with kids in them. 0.91

03:11:52.000 So they do have real world impacts.

03:11:53.000 And we're in the midst of an energy crisis.

03:11:55.000 We should be moving away from coal to natural gas like everybody.

03:11:59.000 Doesn't matter your point of view.

03:12:00.000 Usually politically most people think that's benevolent.

03:12:03.000 But last year we went back from gas to coal because of this war on natural gas.

03:12:07.000 And so Groups like WF kind of platform the idea that we don't need natural gas to power our world.

03:12:14.000 Europe obviously shows that it does, and that if you're not burning natural gas then you're going to end up burning something much worse like coal, wood, or even plastic waste.

03:12:22.000 Yeah, I see.

03:12:23.000 Mate, you've made a lot of sense, as you did last time you were on our show.

03:12:26.000 Now, over the weekend you were, I'm not going to say frantically tweeting, because I don't like to imagine you frantic under any circumstances, Michael, but there were further revelations around their Biden classified documents.

03:12:36.000 Can you tell us a little more about how that story has evolved, please?

03:12:41.000 Well, this is a very interesting case because obviously during the summer, and I was surrounded by progressives because I was on Martha's Vineyard off the East Coast, but progressives were very excited because they had found classified documents in Trump's property, Mar-a-Lago, in Florida.

03:12:59.000 And people made a very big deal about how terrible this was.

03:13:02.000 I had a number of people say, well, this is really going to bring Trump down.

03:13:05.000 This is finally what's going to get him to go to prison.

03:13:07.000 There was intimations that maybe he had broken espionage or treason laws.

03:13:12.000 Well, now we see that Biden not only had top secret documents, he actually, he did not make them public, the fact that he had them until after the election.

03:13:21.000 So we know they discovered them on November 2nd.

03:13:24.000 They did not notify the appropriate agencies until early January, and they did not notify the Department of Justice until they were contacted.

03:13:32.000 So there's a lot of efforts right now in the media to sort of say, Oh, they're totally different because Trump had many more documents or because Trump resisted giving them to the federal government.

03:13:43.000 But on both of those cases, you have a similar problem, which is that first, we don't know how many classified documents Biden had.

03:13:48.000 So we can't say that Trump had more.

03:13:50.000 And then on the issue of Trump resisting, he was resisting because he thought he was in the right legally, and maybe he wasn't.

03:13:57.000 And maybe, you know, Biden behaved impeccably and Trump behaved terribly.

03:14:01.000 The point is, we don't know.

03:14:03.000 And there was this huge rush to judgment.

03:14:05.000 I think that really betrayed a powerful, as we know, very powerful bias against Trump and for Biden.

03:14:12.000 When we have two cases that look pretty similar, at least from what we know now, we can't tell that one person behaved less ethically or less legally than the other.

03:14:21.000 The Bidens are very sensitive about releasing information close to elections.

03:14:26.000 That much we can tell for sure.

03:14:29.000 And this vanity of small differences and this outrage over differences that don't seem to be as important as we're being told by partisan interests appears to be a theme that's becoming easier to discern in our time.

03:14:44.000 Michael, thanks for joining us again.

03:14:47.000 Your hair looks magnificent.

03:14:47.000 Whatever it was you were doing while preparing, it's certainly paid off.

03:14:51.000 I hope we'll be seeing you on the show again soon.

03:14:54.000 You can follow Michael on Substack, where you will gain access to his many fantastic articles.

03:15:00.000 I'm thinking of just referring to you as Schellenberger for the rest of the time, and in fact I was doing that in much of the build-up.

03:15:04.000 Is that alright with you?

03:15:05.000 Yeah, or people even call me Shelly.

03:15:07.000 My friends call me Shelly.

03:15:09.000 Shelly! 0.81

03:15:09.000 I don't think he said you were one of his friends. 0.81

03:15:12.000 I think we're moving in the direction of friendship quite rapidly.

03:15:15.000 That'd be great.

03:15:16.000 Shelly, thanks Kevin.

03:15:17.000 It's good to see you, mate.

03:15:18.000 It's good to see you, Shelly.

03:15:19.000 All right, thanks.

03:15:20.000 Well, what a fantastic conversation with Michael.

03:15:22.000 Shelly Schellenberger we had there.

03:15:25.000 This is the end of our WF Royal Rumble and what a climax it was.

03:15:29.000 They have a summit but we have arrived at a summit at an apex at a zenith and while they were at the mountaintops of exclusivity we here in the Olympia of popularity have realised that when people come together

03:15:42.000 and collectivise and democratise, we can bring down these titans, these mighty Goliaths of

03:15:48.000 corporate and state interest, simply by, I think a couple of our guests said, shining the

03:15:53.000 light of truth on the sow's teats of Klaus Schwab's injurious flanks.

03:16:00.000 There are the nipples that feed corporate and state interests and his many progeny of 0.80

03:16:05.000 world leaders, from Rishi Sunak to Justin Trudeau.

03:16:09.000 They can be brought down, I think, by ongoing conversation.

03:16:11.000 There were points over the course of this marathon, Gal, where I was thinking, maybe the WF ain't that bad, but the bits that turned it for me most of all was when you said about why would you, if you really care about fossil fuels, why would you accept sponsorship from big fossil fuel companies?

03:16:27.000 Why would you?

03:16:28.000 And if you did care about For example, inequality, why would you have Blackrock as a major partner and why would you invite Larry Fink there and then not have a conversation with Larry Fink?

03:16:37.000 Because if Larry Fink came here, we would say, I'd be respectful because I bet he's charming, he's the CEO of a massive corporation, I'd go, Larry, mate, with this thing with the housing market, do you think... You'd probably call him Finky or something.

03:16:48.000 Finky, Finky, I like you!

03:16:50.000 Finky, Finky! 0.99

03:16:52.000 Finky, let us become Pinky friends!

03:16:55.000 And after that, why don't you tell us the truth?

03:16:58.000 You did Pinky promise me, Finky promise? 0.99

03:16:59.000 And like, you know, you've got to have conversations, or if you had got Albert Baller from Pfizer, you'd have to say, what about the profits?

03:17:05.000 Do you think that that was ethical, particularly when you presented it as a philanthropic endeavor, a moonshot that was saving humankind?

03:17:11.000 These questions aren't answered because the answers to these, these questions aren't asked, because the answers to those questions are revelatory about globalist interests.

03:17:19.000 So, While WEF presents itself either as a cosy little corporate conference or, you know, in the darker corners of the internet, as a nefarious cartel of world leaders and corporate interests coming together to set an agenda, it seems that, you know, of the two, it's closer to the latter.

03:17:37.000 And certainly our brilliant investigation today, I think, has leaned in that direction.

03:17:41.000 Would you say, Gareth?

03:17:41.000 I would absolutely agree and I think that where we started off by suggesting, as you say, that it was a kind of business conference that maybe not all that much bad stuff happens and that maybe they just all go around drinking hot chocolate together.

03:17:53.000 Actually when you get into it and just talking about digital ID for a start, you start to see that this was mentioned then, now it's been implemented, the same The technology that was used in vaccine passports is now getting used into digital IDs.

03:18:06.000 This is something that was being proposed and is now actually happening.

03:18:09.000 And the ways in which that could negatively affect people's lives, this is just, this isn't like this will never affect you.

03:18:15.000 It's once people, once governments can control the way you spend money or where you're able to go because of The digital passports that you've got.

03:18:23.000 This is like real life effects that this is going to have.

03:18:28.000 So it's kind of, and I think, who was it earlier on who was saying to us?

03:18:32.000 Was it Shelly?

03:18:34.000 It wasn't Shelly, no.

03:18:35.000 Timbo? 0.92

03:18:36.000 It was Andrew.

03:18:36.000 Julie Melville?

03:18:38.000 And he was saying that they highlight the worst conspiracies to kind of, so that we focus on those.

03:18:45.000 But actually the real ones are these things that are happening.

03:18:48.000 You know, this stuff around farmers losing their farms or digital ID and digital currency actually starting to be implemented are the real things that are happening as a result.

03:18:58.000 And no matter what the problem, the solution they suggest is always the same.

03:19:01.000 Digital IDs, social credit scoring, more ability to regulate and control.

03:19:06.000 So I believe that we've learned a great deal and it's only day one of the WEF conference.

03:19:11.000 Can you believe that?

03:19:12.000 And we've got a fantastic week coming up.

03:19:14.000 We want you to join a cartel, but this is a good cartel.

03:19:17.000 Join our Stay Free AF membership community for more More access to us and more access to truth and more access to conversation.

03:19:25.000 We genuinely don't care if you're a traditionalist, a progressive, what you believe.

03:19:29.000 You're welcome here because we believe you should run your community.

03:19:33.000 We believe you should be in control of the information you consume.

03:19:36.000 You should be in control of what freedom of speech means, not some centralised authority that veils itself behind snow and hot chocolate.

03:19:45.000 So yeah, join us.

03:19:46.000 We've got daily podcasts, we've got a big interview every Friday that you can gain live access to.

03:19:50.000 We've got some fantastic guests coming up this week.

03:19:53.000 Alex Berenson's going to be with us, David Sirota from the left right there, Jay Shetty, Jeremy Corbyn, a person who knows how the deep state can influence the direction of elections and how the media can corroborate stories that prevent meaningful change taking place.

03:20:08.000 Tony Robbins, a friend and mentor of mine, will be joining us.

03:20:12.000 He doesn't call himself a guru, he's specifically got a documentary called I Am Not Your Guru, but he's certainly a person who teaches you how to utilise your inner power.

03:20:19.000 And Martin Goury, author of this book that I'm reading right now, that gives you a good understanding of the framing around information currently and how the centralised authority has to control information now by condemning dissenters and creating new categories like malinformation, disinformation, all that stuff.

03:20:37.000 Okay, so it's going to be a fantastic week.

03:20:38.000 You've got to join us for this week because we have to educate ourselves.

03:20:42.000 We have to bind together.

03:20:43.000 We have to become stronger together.

03:20:45.000 All of the values that they present to us are the values that we should have, but we're not going to get it from these corrupted, centralized interests.

03:20:51.000 We're going to get it from one another.

03:20:53.000 See you tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.

03:20:56.000 Until then, stay free.

03:21:06.000 Man he switchin', switch on, switch on.

Stay Free - Russel Brand - January 13, 2023

WEF SPECIAL: The Most Terrifying Event Of 2023 - #059 - Stay Free With Russell Brand

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript