Dr. Dave Martin is a scientist and inventor who has been holding institutions and big corporations to account since the beginning of the pandemic period. In this episode of Stay Free With Russell Brand, Dr. Martin discusses the role of the deep state, and the role played by the World Health Organization (WHO), and how they have been instrumental in perpetuating globalism and corporate greed. He also discusses the dangers of globalism, and why we should all be concerned about it. Stay Free with Russell Brand is a podcast produced and hosted by Edery and Edera, and produced in partnership with Awakening Wanderer. Stay Free, and spread the word to your friends and family about what's going on in the world around you. Stay free, and remember to stay free, because we're here to help you stay free! This episode is sponsored by Rumble, and can be found at Rumble.co.nz/StayFree with RussellBrand. If you want to be a member of our book club, and meditate every single week and pray with us, then consider trying us out for one month and seeing if you like what we offer, then join us for a month and see if you'd like to meditate with us for the rest of the month. You'll get access to all the great books mentioned in the book club and much more! We're looking forward to hearing from you in the coming weeks. Stay free with us! -Edery & Ederi - Ederia Thank you for listening to Stay Freezing Wanderer, Ederic and Good Morning and Good Luck! -Eddy Ederian. -Shawn . . . - . & Ash Ella And if you're looking for a good book recommendation? ? Can't wait to hear back from you're going to see the future? , , Ederie in the next episode? - Thank you, Ester Thanks for watching this? ? -Esera -Josiah JOSH ! - JOSIE (Josielle I'm looking for the seal? . JOSH MILLER : JOSH MENDOCHTER ... GRAVY ENJOYING IT? JORDAN
00:00:30.000Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:00:33.000Today we have one of those guests that's going to change the way you think about globalism, who's going to change the way you think about the establishment, who's going to help you to understand the origins of the WHO and how there's always been a criminal element to global bureaucracies that...
00:00:47.000If it's explained to you, makes clear and plain sense.
00:00:51.000You will have seen our interview with Mike Benz, how Mike Benz explained how the deep state forms relationships with what I would call cartilage organizations to ensure that corporations can benefit from globalist activity.
00:01:03.000Dave Martin will help you to understand how Various bureaucracies benefit from forms of legislation and ultimately oppression that negatively affect you.
00:01:14.000He explains it beautifully and incredibly and you could have joined us live for that conversation if you are an awakened wonder because one of the things we do for our community is create opportunities for you to join us for these conversations.
00:01:25.000People like Jump and Jeff, they were in the chat when we were chatting to Dave Martin.
00:01:29.000People like Ash Ella, they were there when we were chatting to Dave Martin and if you want to join us for that as well as see our video on Antarctica And the various conspiracies that surround that extraordinary place.
00:01:39.000And if you want to be a member of our book club, and if you want to meditate every single week and pray with us, then consider trying us for one month and seeing if you like what we offer.
00:01:48.000Let's get into our conversation with Dave Martin now.
00:01:51.000This, as I say, like the Mike Benz conversation, is an interview that if you watched it three or four times and memorized it, It's like going to some sort of informal university to tool you up for conversations with people that advocate for the establishment, that believe that the legacy media is telling the truth, and that we don't have an extraordinary opportunity on our hands to overthrow institutional corruption at the highest level.
00:02:15.000For the first 15 minutes we'll be on YouTube, then we'll be exclusively streaming at our home, Rumble.
00:02:21.000So, you can enjoy this first part wherever you are, but ultimately, to speak freely, you have to get onto Rumble.
00:02:34.000Let's begin our conversation with Dave Martin, the scientist and inventor who from the beginning of the pandemic period has been holding institutions and big corporations to account.
00:03:36.000The UK are pushing back on the WHO treaty, and even though it's clear that the WHO have
00:03:43.000tried to mask some of its more nefarious intent behind vagueness, it's still a treaty that
00:03:49.000would grant them the ability to impose lockdowns, impose medical measures including mass inoculation,
00:03:57.000and significantly censor content that they do not like.
00:04:02.000It essentially could be called the we're going to put Joe Rogan inside a steel cube next time we try and pull this move treaty.
00:04:11.000Yeah, well listen, you know, it's funny when you know that somebody has something to hide, it's one thing.
00:04:20.000When you actually see that they enshrine the hiding into the actual language of their agreement, it's an entirely different thing.
00:04:29.000So yeah, the great news is we've got a world where we've been told that we're not supposed to have any conversations, we're not supposed to talk, we're not supposed to have any free inquiry, and they want to make Absolutely certain that none of us have a chance to talk and have free inquiry, so giant shock.
00:04:45.000Bad news for them is we will have free inquiry and we will continue to talk.
00:04:51.000I have a sense that you have always deeply understood, from the beginning of the pandemic period and the measures that were implemented, that something seismic was happening, but even to talk of the scale of the challenge, even though I suppose even the most parochial or, no, quotidian framing would acknowledge that it's global by nature of the fact that it's a pandemic.
00:05:21.000Implies that this is something unprecedented.
00:05:24.000It seems to me that you understood that bureaucracies, unelected bureaucracies, pose a greater threat than what we're invited to be terrified of.
00:05:35.000Figures like, populist figures like Trump and counterparts across the world.
00:05:42.000And I almost get the sense that you've been a follower of your content That you see it not only in material and rational terms, although you are always clear about your working out on the material rational aspects of these arguments, that you seem to suggest to me that something even darker and deeper is happening.
00:06:03.000Did you have that understanding right from the beginning of the pandemic because it fitted in with the worldview that you already had?
00:06:09.000Well, not only that, Russell, if we go back, my first congressional testimony was in 1983.
00:06:23.000I don't know if you recall, but back in the end of the Carter administration, there was the resurgence of what was meant to be the roots of a draft, a compulsory military service program in the United States.
00:06:37.000And that was in the lead up to what was going to become the Iran-Contra scandal.
00:06:40.000We were going to try to figure out how to make sure that American men and women—at the time, young men, but it became men and women—were going to be forced into supporting the cover story arguments for every conflict we wanted to get into.
00:06:55.000And as a 16-year-old in Congress—and you heard that right.
00:06:59.000I testified against the mandatory military service, suggesting that it actually would be a good idea to have the American people understand the role and the need to be involved in some form of service
00:07:16.000But to actually have options that didn't include military service, because at the time it was very clear, in 1983, that the war on drugs was not a war on drugs, that the war on terror was not a war on terror, that none of these things were absolutely real.
00:07:28.000As a matter of fact, it was the ongoing, really, continuation of something that goes back, ironically, to 1604.
00:07:36.000Which is the fact that since 1604, since the establishment of the British East India Company, we have had a business plan that has been create a drug trade, create a war to mask it, get the populace to support whatever the version of the war narrative is, and we just hit rinse and repeat.
00:07:56.000And so whether it was You know, the opium trade in the 1830s when we actually had the Opium Wars, whether it was the establishment of what became the League of Nations, which most people don't know was the Committee on Opium Trade.
00:08:16.000I mean, when you sit there and go, this has been a drug dealing racket for the last 250 years to be conservative, and we could go back and argue that it's since 1604, there is no surprise.
00:08:29.000When you have the game plan, it's not a worldview, it's actually just going, we've got a game plan, it keeps working, the public still falls for it, so let's hit play again.
00:08:41.000This is a bit like the Tucker-Putin conversation when Tucker asks about the origins of the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the answer begins like, the Mongols were in the Plainlands!
00:08:57.000Because it's fascinating to consider that I suppose what is significant from the perspective of a British person is you're talking about the conflation of the interests of commerce and trade with the interests of an empire.
00:09:15.000Nationhood itself as a concept, the state, masks for the population that are governed that the true interest and intent of the state are elitist interests masked behind a cavalcade of reasons that can be amplified or edited out.
00:10:15.000Call it the relinquishment of unnecessary cash deposits in an institution.
00:10:20.000And all of a sudden, it's not bank robbery anymore.
00:10:23.000Okay then Dave, then what if this is something that it sounds like you've understood since you were, you know, transitioning, forgive the use of the word, from a child to a man, that you understood that state is using phony wars to legitimize authoritarianism and the manipulation of the population.
00:10:43.000You've listed a set of phony wars there.
00:10:48.000What is it that has been, what was unique about the pandemic?
00:10:51.000Was it that many previously covert interests became temporarily visible, like the recent Aurora Borealis in Northern Europe?
00:11:01.000Suddenly, something that is always there became visible to a new population.
00:11:06.000Hang on a minute, the pharmaceutical industry and the state are operating in conjunction with these unelected bureaucratic bodies in order to centralise authority and generate profit.
00:11:18.000Well, so I think there's two things that make the COVID situation somewhat dramatic, at least.
00:11:24.000I wouldn't say unprecedented, but certainly dramatic, because we can actually make the argument that certainly the establishment of the Commonwealth was the legitimization of the British East India Company, and that company's 86% of its trade was opium.
00:11:38.000Unambiguously, this is not a new phenomenon.
00:11:41.000The difference probably is the degree to which the audacity of the direct suppression of civil and human rights was part and parcel of this exercise.
00:11:53.000And I've seen it, as I've said many times, as a marketing exercise to see exactly how far the complicit population will go before they start pushing back.
00:12:03.000Because I think that's really what it was.
00:12:04.000I think this was a market test more than it was a substantive act.
00:12:08.000And the fact is that the market test was to see how far humans are willing to allow themselves to be caged, curtailed, limited, delimited, everything else.
00:12:20.000And I think that what we really did was we had a market test on humanity and humanity came with a, let's just say, not a passing grade.
00:12:27.000Have you got any corroborating evidence to suggest that indicates or even proves that it was that?
00:12:38.000I mean, listen, you only have to go to the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board Look at the decade of vaccines that they published in 2011.
00:12:46.000They actually said that they were going to do this.
00:12:48.000They said by 2020, we were going to have a universal acceptance, a universal vaccine mandate across the world on a universal platform.
00:12:57.000And then in September 18th of 2019, they specifically said that there would be an accidental or deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen.
00:13:05.000This comes right out of their document, Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, September 18th, 2019.
00:13:10.000And in that document, they said the purpose of it was so that by September 2020, the world would have a universal vaccine plan.
00:13:35.000And if you actually, God forbid, read the words on the page, you actually see that this was nothing but a market test, which is the reason why we have Answer Corporation, ATI, Forsmarsh, and the companies that were involved in the rollout of this pandemic, we have them all setting up the marketing program, which was the launch of Event 201 and other things, where they actually told us exactly what was going to happen.
00:13:58.000They told us what the media was going to sound like.
00:14:01.000They told us what the marketing was going to sound like.
00:14:03.000They told us all of these things in advance of this bullshit story of patient one in Wuhan.
00:14:10.000All of this was theater To get the public to accept the next round of the drug trade.
00:14:17.000And the next round of the drug trade is genetically modified humans.
00:14:21.000We're gonna have to park this conversation for people watching the stream on YouTube right now.
00:14:25.000As you can already sense, we're going to stray in areas that the Trusted News Initiative and various other conglomerations of censorship and NGOs that are deployed to use AI to censor your free speech, to legitimize ways to censor and control you and smear dissenters, they'll be up in arms!
00:14:58.000I wonder if I might ask you the somewhat taxing favour that by the time we are doing this now for our community and locals, so if you come and awaken one day, you can join us for these conversations and put your questions to our treasured guests like Dave.
00:15:12.000I wonder if by the time we stream this on Friday, if you could send us some links that we can post in the chat.
00:15:18.000For example, in particular, the various documents that you've referred to that permit you to make those accusations, just so that we can learn together from the brilliant work that you've done in compiling these narratives.
00:15:33.000So really, what you're saying is that many of them, what seemed to be the most outlandish statements that Could be located online at the commencement of the pandemic are closer to the truth than what you would see on the BBC or NBC or the New York Times.
00:15:51.000The people that are saying this is a this is a staged event, this is a pandemic, this is a mass marketed attempt to see if you can assert civilization control.
00:16:01.000Now that how do you tally that with something like The discovery that in Ukraine, through DIA, they are now monitoring and observing Ukrainian transactions and have tied digital identity to the ability to shut down bank accounts, causing some Ukrainian civilians that refuse the conscript to have their assets frozen.
00:16:23.000Do you think that the control of finance, social credit scores, digital ID are part of this, you know, launch, as you very explicitly said, next phase of the drug phase, genetically engineered Well, no question.
00:16:41.000It's not by accident, Dustin Moskowitz, the name I love to mention that nobody seems to ever bother to keep reciting, and I encourage people to do it.
00:16:49.000But Dustin Moskowitz, the co-founder of Facebook and the guy behind paying for Event 201 and the guy behind paying for a number of other things, including his joint venture with the Wellcome Trust through SYNCOVA.
00:17:02.000And in a number of funding sources, this program is about, once again, making sure that there is an ability to access a control mechanism on human beings, and by genetically modifying people with mRNA, by doing all sorts of those kinds of manipulations, and then by encouraging things like central bank digital currencies, And all of the kinds of things we're supposed to track on our phones, the vaccine passport or the personal identity transactions, all of these things are meant to control and limit the ability for the free association and the free movement of thoughts and ideas and people.
00:17:42.000If you're going to actually control and manipulate a population, what you have to do is effectively create house arrest for the non-compliant.
00:17:52.000And it turns out that house arrest for the non-compliant is what I said in my interview in April of 2020.
00:18:00.000I said this entire program was the launch of the universal house arrest program.
00:18:07.000What I mean is that by creating, using, by the way, the only tool that can subvert constitutional rights, which is public health.
00:18:15.000Public health was written into the law.
00:18:18.000As the way of subverting constitutional rights and using public health as the means to do it, we have been placed under a virtual house arrest and the technologies that are enabling that are going to be increasingly rolled out, whether it's your 5G, 6G personal identity chips, whether it's the things that you wear, it's the personal devices that monitor your behavior, the personal devices that monitor your health status.
00:18:44.000These are all meant to effectively be the anklet on your leg for the criminal that you are if you think you are
00:18:55.000It's extraordinary how many of these measures have been observably introduced through commodity,
00:19:02.000the normalisation of handheld technology, the normalisation of biotech,
00:19:08.000the normalisation of monitoring your sleep, monitoring your sugar levels.
00:19:12.000Do you suggest then that that's a process of familiarization?
00:19:17.000That doesn't require the explicit complicity of the commercial entities involved in the marketing of those products because they will simply sell a product if it's profitable and the population will acquire those products if they believe that they are somehow beneficial.
00:19:31.000But once this infrastructure is in place and once these ideas have been normalized, they can be centralized and used coercively.
00:19:41.000Yeah, Russell, let's take a page out of history.
00:19:44.000I've said many times that the debate between Westinghouse and Edison and Tesla is one that gets nostalgically thrown about as Tesla, this giant libertarian who was a victim of circumstances.
00:19:56.000People forget that he received several million dollars of funding from J.P.
00:20:23.000But the problem is you couldn't make electricity work until you could do what?
00:20:26.000Put a meter on the outside of the house.
00:20:30.000Most people don't know that the triplet company from Bluffton, Ohio is the company that figured out how to put a little device on the outside of every house that used to, you remember this when you were a kid, used to have a little dial that spun on the outside of the house and it just measured how much electricity was going in the house.
00:20:49.000Because by metering behavior, you can do two things.
00:20:52.000One, you can extract attacks on the public, whether they're using something or not, that's helpful.
00:20:57.000And the other thing is you can monitor and manipulate behavior, because if you want to, people are not playing the game, you just shut them off.
00:21:05.000There's no difference in an eye, you know, right now an Apple Watch is no different.
00:21:12.000Then the power meter on the outside of your house in the 1920s or 30s.
00:21:16.000It is the monitoring system that you think is innocent and innocuous, but it becomes a permanent taxation and a permanent behavior control mechanism that you actually just blindly went along walking past it every day going, Oh, look at the thing is spinning.
00:21:32.000Yes, but it's also monitoring, manipulating and controlling your behavior.
00:21:39.000It's becoming increasingly obvious that this relationship that you've described between the state and commercial interests, rather beautifully identifying the advent of the East India Tea Company as a sort of a moment of inception, continues abound because as the great George Carlin said, where interests converge, no conspiracy is necessary.
00:21:59.000Corporate entities will of course embrace, always embrace, the utility and benefits of new products and new systems of sale.
00:22:11.000We had a great conversation with Mike Benz where he explained how the CIA A CIA cutout was sponsoring Serge Brin and Larry Page even while they were doing their Stanford dissertations and that the reason that Google got the run on the market when it came to Google Maps and satellite technology is because they were granted access to CIA spyware.
00:22:32.000And when you're told something like that you feel Yeah of course, of course that couple of kids didn't launch satellites into space and didn't like work out on a computer program.
00:22:42.000Oh look we can coagulate or they simply were given it and repackaged and re-skinned military technology paid for by taxpayers to be utilized for commerce.
00:22:55.000Presumably if a back channel is kept open to the CIA should they need access to that information?
00:23:02.000Russell, if we go back to the Second World War, the program called Operation Paperclip became what was granted to a corporation in the United States called Ampex.
00:23:11.000If you've ever driven up 101 coming up into San Francisco, you remember the giant Ampex sign on the side of the road.
00:23:18.000Most people don't know that out of Ampex came little things like Dolby Sound.
00:23:24.000Did you know that Dolby was a government classified technology?
00:24:28.000The history of Ampex Corporation is the laundering of technology that came through defense acquisitions, most of which came out of the Second World War.
00:24:58.000What we're saying then, Dave, is that the reason the pandemic period was significant for a lot of people is because, let's face it, there were a lot of people, among them Alex Jones, David Icke, you, plainly, and me in a more, what you might say, a kind of post-60s, counter-cultural, never trust the man, eastern mysticism, post-Beats type way.
00:25:21.000was saying you cannot trust the establishment, you cannot trust the man. You can see how the
00:25:26.000civil rights movement was at the very center of that. Curiously now the civil aspects of the
00:25:30.000civil rights movement are now being utilized to legitimize further authoritarianism on the basis
00:25:36.000that the vulnerable groups are being protected and I would also say legitimizing cultural,
00:25:44.000using cultural arguments to legitimize the fact that both parties in the United States of America
00:25:50.000ultimately work for the donor class and I'm sure you will offer for interests that go far deeper
00:25:59.000We talked a little while recently about George Soros and how significant George Soros' wealth is when you consider that much of it is derived from advanced knowledge of CIA activity when it comes to the disruption and often dissolution of nations.
00:26:17.000And these kind of figurehead billionaires, Gates, Soros, who have brilliant PR, incredible influence across media, turn up with the Clintons in Haiti before a disaster from which they doubtless profit.
00:26:31.000I wonder what you have to say about the significance of the philanthropist billionaire that's there to help you.
00:26:40.000Well, in my movie, Future Dreaming, I talk about the fact that philanthropy is the aftertax of unconsidered consumption.
00:26:48.000And I wish that people would actually take that seriously.
00:26:51.000It's the aftertax of unconsidered consumption.
00:26:53.000If you actually did enterprise correctly, there would be no need for philanthropy because you would have actually cared for the ecosystem in which you're operating and nobody would be poor and nobody would be destitute and nobody would be In need of what philanthropy allegedly serves so starting off with the construct philanthropy itself is disgusting because what it is is a way to launder your conscience after you've raped and pillaged the world so starting with that little problem but let's let's unpack this you've just mentioned a bunch of names but we just lost this past week Jim Simons who's a name you haven't mentioned and that's a shame.
00:27:27.000Because Jim Simons, far more powerful than George Soros ever was, is the guy who ran the Rentech funds and Meritage and all these kind of things with the giant Republican donor Bob Mercer, who has been responsible for an enormous number of elections and election outcomes for the last couple decades.
00:27:44.000These guys were printing 60% at their peak, 60% returns on their transactions in their hedge funds and equity markets.
00:27:56.000are not because you're actually a smart person.
00:28:00.00060% returns are because you are, once again, tapping into unaccessible, unpublic, rapid-available information, which is uniquely afforded to you.
00:28:10.000And that's the reason why, when we think about this convergence of the ultra-powerful, the Michael Bloombergs of the world, the Jim Simonses, the late now Jim Simons, the Bob Mercers of the world, the Peter Thiels of the world, when we think about these individuals, What we have is a world in which George Soros becomes, not surprisingly, like Bill Gates, the public-facing boogeyman, but behind those people are even more powerful structures, and we need to understand that the structure at its core, and this, by the way, goes back to something as simple as the criminal conspiracy that took over the United Kingdom health services in the 1920s and the 1930s.
00:28:51.000Very specifically, the Wellcome Trust.
00:28:54.000Because the Wellcome Trust, which was the modern expression of the opium trade of the British East India Company, in 1941 set up what was called the Therapeutic Research Corporation in the UK, and that formed the basis for what would ultimately become the modern criminal organizations, the World Health Organization, And all of the stuff that the UN, League of Nations, and everything else did, as well as informing what became the FDA in the United States.
00:29:21.000But go back and ask the question, where did all this come from?
00:29:25.000And the answer is it actually came from the opium trade.
00:29:29.000It's the modern expression of the British East India Company, which happened to be unified under the Wellcome Trust.
00:29:40.000All of that money, all of it, Came out of criminal drug trade.
00:29:45.000I'm not going to sit here and let you blame Her Majesty the Queen, God rest her eternal soul, and Great Britain, after all of our endeavours, our incredible flag, William Wilberforce, Shakespeare, some very, very fine people, and you, unavowedly, a member of one of our colonies, criticising us in this manner.
00:30:14.000It's disgusting when you actually have something as simple as, I don't know, the Charter that actually puts it all in motion.
00:30:21.000So you're saying that these, it's interesting because when you speak to people that have perhaps previously made an income in criminal ways, in organised crime, you have a version of that in North America, you have versions of that around the world, and in Britain, The sort of post-1960s style gangster culture has an incredible glamour to it, and in part what you always feel is this, aside from the, you know, violence and the criminality, it's difficult to avoid the conclusion that really these are people that have bypassed systems that are supposed to repress and control them.
00:30:59.000And in a way, when you describe the enterprises that have grown out of, by your reckoning, and you say you have the receipts, and we totally want to see them, and I completely love this stuff, there are just criminal enterprises that are taking place on a much larger scale that kind of legislate in their wake to mask the criminal nature, creating whatever institutions or global entities required to frame, badge, and provide sigils and insignia that legitimize Listen, I mean, it's hilarious.
00:31:35.000You go to 1941, the Therapeutic Research Corporation, which was the Therapeutic Substances Act in the UK, and you go back and say, well, hold on a second.
00:31:45.000You mean that the biggest drug company in the UK set up the regulator for the drugs in the UK?
00:32:17.000And so this is actually one step further.
00:32:19.000Remember, and I've said this many, many times, in the World Health Organization's founding charter, they wrote an absolute, absolute amnesty for all criminal acts conducted by themselves.
00:32:34.000Russell, I don't know how you would feel, but if by fiat, you and I just come to an agreement right now, wave our royal scepter and say, from now on, everything that Russell and Dave do are exempt from any prosecution of any kind in perpetuity.
00:32:51.000A few people might raise their hand and go, I wonder if Russell and Dave are up to something?
00:32:58.000Because it turns out that if you give yourself amnesty from all forms of criminal prosecution, including murder, by the way, let's get clear, it cannot be By law, no member of the World Health Organization, in the execution of anything they said they were doing in their own capacity as a World Health Organization, not a single one of them can not only be tried and prosecuted, they can't even be investigated.
00:33:28.000Have you any, okay, of course... A statute!
00:33:31.000I take your premise that even the implementation of such a piece of regulation or legislation, global regulation, and it's extraordinary to see how often global regulation is being proposed these days.
00:33:45.000Of course we've discussed the WHO treaty, of course we've not touched on Australia attempting to implement a piece of censorship legislation that would by virtue Of their attempts, they say, to bypass the capacities of VPN, be international and global.
00:34:04.000So what you're saying, Dave, is that at the inception of the WHO, they granted themselves somehow amnesty.
00:34:10.000Now, I wonder if there are examples in the history of the WHO of where that amnesty has been implemented or effective or where its boundaries might likely be tested.
00:34:20.000Do you think in the pandemic period, during the HIV crisis, at what points are there likely to have been actions generated by people protected by that statuette, that were they not offered those protections, they would have been prosecuted for the type of crimes?
00:34:39.000Remember that in 2018, during the Ebola clinical trials run by the World Health Organization in Africa, It was very clear that Remdesivir, the drug that was promoted by Dr. Deborah Birx and Dr. Anthony Fauci as a drug for the treatment of COVID, remember,
00:34:58.000That in 2018, the World Health Organization, in its infinite wisdom and high morality, decided that remdesivir was actually too lethal to inject into Africans.
00:35:08.000And that is because the fatality rate of people exposed to remdesivir in the Ebola trials was 53%.
00:35:15.000And the bad news about that number is that Ebola doesn't kill 53%.
00:35:50.000When you're telling me that the World Health Organization's morality meter got pegged, And they said in 2018 remdesivir was too deadly to use on Africans.
00:36:01.000That's a whole new level of that feels like a line that probably shouldn't be crossed, which is the reason why every physician who injected a patient with remdesivir anywhere in the world was at least committing negligent homicide if not willful murder.
00:36:19.000And because it was a standard of care during an emergency, You could kill people.
00:36:30.000And by the way, that's not, once again, it's not an allegation I'm making, it's an accusation I'm making, because the facts were all available.
00:36:37.000Every physician could have read the exact same documents I read.
00:36:41.000Everyone could have read the World Health Organization's interim report, which said that regardless of viral load, people that got remdesivir were killed.
00:36:49.000That means, Russell, the World Health Organization murdered people without Ebola In the clinical trial, murdered them.
00:37:01.000Do you see that particular set of staggering crimes that is difficult to comprehend because of their scale?
00:37:11.000As forms of genocide and mass corruption often are, as somehow pertaining to the type of themes you refer to in much of your discourse elsewhere.
00:37:24.000Do you see that as being an outlier event, an anomaly, an aberration?
00:37:29.000Or do you see that as being part of a broader scheme that the WHO is participating in?
00:37:37.000There's no question that like any other theater of social engineering, the more egregious the crime to steal a page from Plato.
00:37:49.000Remember, he talks about the fact that, you know, if a simple thief steals a loaf of bread, we call him a thief.
00:37:56.000If an organized group of young people steal a bunch of loaves of bread, we call it Oliver Twist.
00:38:04.000But there's a certain level at which a crime becomes so egregious that the sum of our emotional and spiritual awakening to the egregious nature of the crime is seared in its consciousness and we actually start marveling at its audacity.
00:38:21.000We go from seeing a crime to pondering how somebody could have pulled it off.
00:38:31.000One person kills one person, it's a murder.
00:38:33.000One person kills ten people, we go, well that was effort.
00:38:37.000One person kills a hundred people and we start going, let's do a discovery series on the mind of a serial killer.
00:38:43.000But when one person kills a million people, we don't have a million moments of consternation.
00:38:52.000We actually As Plato observed, we flip the crime on its head and we start marveling at its audacity.
00:39:02.000And this is exactly the intent of what happened with COVID, because by marveling at the audacity of the fullness of the complicity of the horrific crimes that were done, We actually don't have a conscience to say every single person in a nursing home who was able to have a glass wall put between them so that they couldn't die in the arms of a loved one, every single person that was put into an ambulance and put on a respirator, which we knew was going to kill them,
00:39:37.000Every single person who was put into a hospital and injected with remdesivir, every single one of them was a willful act of something that started in 1913 with the Carnegie Foundation, which was the eugenics program that is still absolutely alive and well at Cold Spring Harbor Labs.
00:39:56.000And by the way, go back and look at it.
00:39:58.000It was in the 1920s and the 1930s that Hitler was inspired by the work of the United States Eugenics Office.
00:40:07.000So, let's not sit here and pretend that this is some sort of shot.
00:40:11.000Our willingness, in the name of what we call public health and in the name of what we call science, our willingness to murder people, and I don't mean, oh, it was an accident kind of thing.
00:40:24.000I mean stuff like in 1920, when we went to orphanages and we poisoned children with radioactive oatmeal so that we could watch how they die.
00:41:02.000In the 1960s, in the United States and in the UK, we had debates on whether it was ethical to use the incarcerated population for lethal drug studies because they were doing their time for society anyhow, so let's go ahead and kill them.
00:41:22.000Eugenics emerges as an idea in a sense, I suppose, from ideas perhaps that become popularized in the Enlightenment and emerge too from the theory of evolution that ultimately you can legitimize managing entire populations and however grand a statement it might initially seem, we are dealing with civilian management, we are dealing with Elite... elite institutions and individuals within them making choices that affect entire populations then...
00:41:59.000Undergirding those choices with new kinds of morality.
00:42:03.000One can see the necessity for the philanthropic component.
00:42:07.000It becomes, as described earlier, the way you used it in your film.
00:42:13.000What I feel is pretty fascinating, Dave, is that I know that you're a spiritual man.
00:42:19.000I know that you are investigating your relationship with Christ.
00:42:25.000I know that I know that what feels to me to be a possibility is that with, I'm talking just now about mainstream stories that help us to observe that, you know, when you talk about the emotional personal experience that people would have had watching loved ones die,
00:42:45.000Behind, you know, glass or going to funerals on the internet and not being able to attend stuff.
00:42:50.000That stuff that became normalized and our kind of shared cultural amnesia and the giddying pace with which information seems to be broadcast and consumed allows that to move into the past.
00:43:01.000And as you have described, we're using sort of Plato's maxim.
00:43:06.000We can't even really comprehend that there are organizations or individuals that would
00:43:11.000get orphans to ingest radioactive or oatmeal.
00:43:14.000I'm always like, that's too big for me, I'm going to have to park that iceberg of terror
00:43:18.000elsewhere, it's too big for me to digest.
00:43:22.000But like there's the AstraZeneca story now, AstraZeneca have withdrawn.
00:43:26.000Pfizer have settled a bunch of cases out of court because it looks like there's an implication
00:43:31.000that some of their anti-heartburn drugs cause cancer.
00:43:34.000Elsewhere, there are numerous claims that HIV medications were improperly researched and possibly punitive.
00:43:43.000I wonder, what you seem to be describing is evil. You know, it goes beyond just rationalism,
00:43:51.000materialism, and we start to approach something that... and I noticed that you used the devil of hell
00:43:58.000himself to describe the WHO's potential standards there, and moral compass pointing straight down
00:44:04.000to Hades. I wonder then where you see how personal and communal uplifting through spiritual
00:44:14.000practice becomes a necessary inoculation and counterpoint to the evil that we're discussing.
00:44:23.000Well, so I think there's a couple angles that we can take on this, Russell, and I encourage people.
00:44:28.000And by the way, I just did an interview yesterday where I spoke at depth about my appreciation for your very public conversation recently about your own journey.
00:44:43.000of what you're modeling, because I love the fact that humans are perpetually in an open inquiry, if they allow themselves to be, to make greater sense of the world in which they're operating.
00:44:54.000And I think the way you're doing it is actually absolutely luminous, and I really appreciate it.
00:44:59.000But let me make a couple observations.
00:45:02.000It was in the 3rd and 4th century in the Common Era that we decided to adopt a view that became in the institutional Latin Church an idea of original sin.
00:45:18.000Ironically, from a mistranslation and ultimately an illiteracy of the writings of the Apostle Paul himself, because one of the things that people don't bother reading Is that while the doctrine original sin comes from the statement that says, you know, all of sin and come short of the glory of God or, you know, as in Adam came death and all these kinds of of references from the Bible.
00:45:42.000Ironically, people don't even finish reading the sentence, which is as in Christ comes life, which means that the way the document is actually written suggests that this idea that somehow we're all a broken and failed state.
00:45:56.000is actually an illusion for the control of a population rather than the emancipation Which is what the message of Christ was.
00:46:04.000The message of Christ was, let him without sin cast the first stone.
00:46:08.000The message of Christ was, sit with the tax collectors, sit with the people who are not like you, sit with the people who are outside the approved narrative, sit with all of those people and actually break bread with them.
00:46:19.000That's what that message was and what we've done, and I've said this many times, we could not have had asymptomatic spread of COVID without original sin.
00:46:30.000As a carrier frequency idea, we could not have the possibility that someone could tell you you're sick because, remember, COVID was a series of symptoms.
00:46:40.000So you couldn't have asymptomatic COVID because it doesn't exist.
00:46:46.000So if you didn't have If you didn't have a concept in our minds that was delivered by religion that said you could be created in the image and likeness of God and still be a piece of shit, which is the church's official dogma and narrative since the 4th century,
00:47:06.000It turns out that if you didn't have that carrier frequency, nobody would have believed asymptomatic COVID because the idea that I can be perfectly healthy, I can be out running, I can be out jogging, I can be out in the park, I can be out with my family, and I'm an asymptomatic spreader, that comes from the logic framework, the ontology that says you can be born into the perfection of this world and be broken on arrival, which is bullshit.
00:47:32.000We have to get to a clear picture, and this is what I love about your journey that you've played out very publicly for the world to see, which is that if we had a story of the emancipation of a Christ consciousness that says, It's a bigger thing than you, buddy.
00:47:52.000This is about when you see the naked, do you clothe them?
00:47:55.000When you see the hungry, do you feed them?
00:47:57.000When you see your brother and sister in need, do you actually reach out to them?
00:48:01.000If you, God forbid, followed the teachings of Christ, what you would do is you'd find yourself in a very different world.
00:48:08.000And I have said many times, COVID was only successful, and this is actually objectively the case.
00:48:16.000COVID was only successful in countries with occidental cultural narratives around a Judeo-Christian template of original sin.
00:48:26.000Take that away, and you don't have COVID.
00:48:29.000Because the countries where you didn't have people dying of it, and you didn't have people falling off the wagon, you didn't have all these giant outbreaks, were countries that actually don't think that when you're born, you're broken.
00:49:11.000But, if we actually had a good news message of the emancipation of what it means to actually live in the fullness of your created purpose, you wouldn't fall for their games.
00:49:33.000Like I said, I mean, I think it's great that you're playing a role model, very, very explicit kind of John the Baptist moment of actually going, Hey, I'm going to be honest with you.
00:49:46.000I'm doing the best I know, and I'm living the experience I'm having, and I'm surrounded by people who are holding me accountable.
00:49:53.000And those are the things that actually enrich our lives.
00:49:56.000Thank you for this beautiful compliment.
00:49:58.000There is also a lot to unpack theologically and epistemologically there.
00:50:03.000I like the idea of a molecular paradigm that affords the contagion to operate because the archetypal and psychic space has been created for it.
00:50:16.000I would like to add to your earlier point about sort of globalism and corporatism begins with the establishment of the East India Tea Company and the relationships inherent within it.
00:50:29.000I would like to perhaps use a similar conversational device, although actually we're going to have to wrap this up, which kills me because I enjoy talking to you so much.
00:50:42.000I note that when you refer to the corrupting influences within ecclesiastical circles you point to 400 years AD as a significant moment around the conversion of Constantine when the state utilizes and potentially metastasizes the principles of the early Christians Christianity, it seems to me, in its essence, is a rebellious idea, and it is an anti-establishment idea, and it is a radical opposition to materialism, and perhaps to use a kind of rhetorical device that you are using, that perhaps the molecule of self,
00:51:29.000Once I believe in the idea of Russell, the business of Russell, and the God of Russell is the one that has to be served, then I am a closed off unit.
00:51:47.000Then something radical happens and I suppose my conversion has been because I saw that that is what Christ is offering and before I did not see that.
00:52:02.000I mean, if we actually were able to take a step back and just say, hold on, do we have a broken narrative of self?
00:52:08.000Because if we saw ourselves as the sentient exception, so each individual one of us is a manifestation, is a sentient exception, which is in the universe right now, having the experiences we're having to feed information back into the whole from our experience.
00:52:26.000It doesn't mean that we are throwing ourselves into some sort of self-deprecation.
00:52:30.000We're actually inflating the importance of activating all of our senses to make sure that we're very aware, to make sure that we're actually doing all the inquiries we can, because every one of those is in service to the wisdom of the whole.
00:52:44.000So it is not an absence of individuation from the standpoint of function, right?
00:52:50.000Because individually, you have a function.
00:53:15.000He's saying that if I'm living rightly, Then through my acts, through my deeds, through my words, through the way in which I engage in my world, I'm modeling a thing.
00:53:27.000And if you see what I'm modeling, that's the template that you could live by.
00:53:37.000He said, through me, you will see a thing.
00:53:42.000And that's where I think we've probably lost so much of the narrative of the beauty of it, because once you are there, once you are in that role, you know, when I make a statement about the World Health Organization, about the United Nations, about COVID, about Anthony Fauci, what I'm doing is I'm simply saying through the words I'm sharing, what I'm trying to show is the essence Of the archetype in which we're operating, where the structures of this world are currently hijacking the sovereignty of humanity, the beauty of the created order, the wonder of a world that does not require gain-of-function research legitimized in October of 2014 by NIAID, by Anthony Fauci, on the Wuhan Institute of Virology Coronavirus-1.
00:54:40.000Thank you so much for explaining that so elegantly and articulately and for moving between realms, for bringing your receipts and showing you're working out and making the whole thing so enjoyable with your effortless abilities as a raconteur as well as a science communicator.