Stay Free - Russel Brand - WHO "Murdered" People In Ebola Clinical Trails!! Dr Dave Martin EXPOSES WHO Like Never Before - SF #368

00:00:00.000 Thank you for watching.

00:00:12.000 I'm looking for the seal.

00:00:14.000 I'm looking for the seal.

00:00:16.000 In this video, you're going to see the future.

00:00:19.000 Hello, this is Edery. Hi.

00:00:23.000 We're going to be working in. We've got a live spot there.

00:00:25.000 Hello there, you Awakening Wanderer.

00:00:30.000 Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.

00:00:33.000 Today we have one of those guests that's going to change the way you think about globalism, who's going to change the way you think about the establishment, who's going to help you to understand the origins of the WHO and how there's always been a criminal element to global bureaucracies that...

00:00:47.000 If it's explained to you, makes clear and plain sense.

00:00:51.000 You will have seen our interview with Mike Benz, how Mike Benz explained how the deep state forms relationships with what I would call cartilage organizations to ensure that corporations can benefit from globalist activity.

00:01:03.000 Dave Martin will help you to understand how Various bureaucracies benefit from forms of legislation and ultimately oppression that negatively affect you.

00:01:14.000 He explains it beautifully and incredibly and you could have joined us live for that conversation if you are an awakened wonder because one of the things we do for our community is create opportunities for you to join us for these conversations.

00:01:25.000 People like Jump and Jeff, they were in the chat when we were chatting to Dave Martin.

00:01:29.000 People like Ash Ella, they were there when we were chatting to Dave Martin and if you want to join us for that as well as see our video on Antarctica And the various conspiracies that surround that extraordinary place.

00:01:39.000 And if you want to be a member of our book club, and if you want to meditate every single week and pray with us, then consider trying us for one month and seeing if you like what we offer.

00:01:48.000 Let's get into our conversation with Dave Martin now.

00:01:50.000 Remember, concentrate.

00:01:51.000 This, as I say, like the Mike Benz conversation, is an interview that if you watched it three or four times and memorized it, It's like going to some sort of informal university to tool you up for conversations with people that advocate for the establishment, that believe that the legacy media is telling the truth, and that we don't have an extraordinary opportunity on our hands to overthrow institutional corruption at the highest level.

00:02:15.000 For the first 15 minutes we'll be on YouTube, then we'll be exclusively streaming at our home, Rumble.

00:02:21.000 So, you can enjoy this first part wherever you are, but ultimately, to speak freely, you have to get onto Rumble.

00:02:26.000 Because why?

00:02:26.000 Because YouTube are part of a set of organisations that participate in the kind of censorship that we radically oppose.

00:02:32.000 You know that without further ado.

00:02:34.000 Let's begin our conversation with Dave Martin, the scientist and inventor who from the beginning of the pandemic period has been holding institutions and big corporations to account.

00:02:44.000 Dave Martin, welcome to the show.

00:02:46.000 Russell, so good to be here.

00:02:47.000 It's awesome to be with you and your community.

00:02:50.000 You look like you're in a beautiful gothic enclave wearing your characteristic trademark dickie bow.

00:02:56.000 You look magnificent and wonderful.

00:02:59.000 Thank you for everything you do for this community of illumination and thank you for joining us today.

00:03:04.000 It's always an honor to be here, Russell.

00:03:06.000 I count it as a blessing.

00:03:08.000 Do you consider this, Dave, to be a time of reckoning and a time of revelation?

00:03:15.000 I mean, at least first, somewhat parochially, the letter from members of the GOP to the Senate.

00:03:23.000 I think 49 members have written to oppose the WHO treaty saying it's against the principles

00:03:28.000 of democracy, even on the most rudimentary level.

00:03:30.000 They've not been given a standard four-month period to discuss it.

00:03:35.000 They demand that as a minimum.

00:03:36.000 The UK are pushing back on the WHO treaty, and even though it's clear that the WHO have

00:03:43.000 tried to mask some of its more nefarious intent behind vagueness, it's still a treaty that

00:03:49.000 would grant them the ability to impose lockdowns, impose medical measures including mass inoculation,

00:03:57.000 and significantly censor content that they do not like.

00:04:02.000 It essentially could be called the we're going to put Joe Rogan inside a steel cube next time we try and pull this move treaty.

00:04:11.000 Yeah, well listen, you know, it's funny when you know that somebody has something to hide, it's one thing.

00:04:20.000 When you actually see that they enshrine the hiding into the actual language of their agreement, it's an entirely different thing.

00:04:29.000 So yeah, the great news is we've got a world where we've been told that we're not supposed to have any conversations, we're not supposed to talk, we're not supposed to have any free inquiry, and they want to make Absolutely certain that none of us have a chance to talk and have free inquiry, so giant shock.

00:04:45.000 Bad news for them is we will have free inquiry and we will continue to talk.

00:04:51.000 I have a sense that you have always deeply understood, from the beginning of the pandemic period and the measures that were implemented, that something seismic was happening, but even to talk of the scale of the challenge, even though I suppose even the most parochial or, no, quotidian framing would acknowledge that it's global by nature of the fact that it's a pandemic.

00:05:21.000 Implies that this is something unprecedented.

00:05:24.000 It seems to me that you understood that bureaucracies, unelected bureaucracies, pose a greater threat than what we're invited to be terrified of.

00:05:35.000 Figures like, populist figures like Trump and counterparts across the world.

00:05:40.000 It seems like you've understood that.

00:05:42.000 And I almost get the sense that you've been a follower of your content That you see it not only in material and rational terms, although you are always clear about your working out on the material rational aspects of these arguments, that you seem to suggest to me that something even darker and deeper is happening.

00:06:03.000 Did you have that understanding right from the beginning of the pandemic because it fitted in with the worldview that you already had?

00:06:09.000 Well, not only that, Russell, if we go back, my first congressional testimony was in 1983.

00:06:14.000 Whoa.

00:06:18.000 So yeah, does it go back a bit?

00:06:21.000 It goes back a long way.

00:06:23.000 I don't know if you recall, but back in the end of the Carter administration, there was the resurgence of what was meant to be the roots of a draft, a compulsory military service program in the United States.

00:06:37.000 And that was in the lead up to what was going to become the Iran-Contra scandal.

00:06:40.000 We were going to try to figure out how to make sure that American men and women—at the time, young men, but it became men and women—were going to be forced into supporting the cover story arguments for every conflict we wanted to get into.

00:06:55.000 And as a 16-year-old in Congress—and you heard that right.

00:06:58.000 I was 16 years old.

00:06:58.000 It was 1983.

00:06:59.000 I testified against the mandatory military service, suggesting that it actually would be a good idea to have the American people understand the role and the need to be involved in some form of service

00:07:16.000 But to actually have options that didn't include military service, because at the time it was very clear, in 1983, that the war on drugs was not a war on drugs, that the war on terror was not a war on terror, that none of these things were absolutely real.

00:07:28.000 As a matter of fact, it was the ongoing, really, continuation of something that goes back, ironically, to 1604.

00:07:36.000 Which is the fact that since 1604, since the establishment of the British East India Company, we have had a business plan that has been create a drug trade, create a war to mask it, get the populace to support whatever the version of the war narrative is, and we just hit rinse and repeat.

00:07:56.000 And so whether it was You know, the opium trade in the 1830s when we actually had the Opium Wars, whether it was the establishment of what became the League of Nations, which most people don't know was the Committee on Opium Trade.

00:08:10.000 Did you hear me?

00:08:11.000 The Committee on Opium Trade.

00:08:12.000 That's where we started the UN.

00:08:16.000 I mean, when you sit there and go, this has been a drug dealing racket for the last 250 years to be conservative, and we could go back and argue that it's since 1604, there is no surprise.

00:08:29.000 When you have the game plan, it's not a worldview, it's actually just going, we've got a game plan, it keeps working, the public still falls for it, so let's hit play again.

00:08:39.000 And that's exactly what's happening.

00:08:41.000 This is a bit like the Tucker-Putin conversation when Tucker asks about the origins of the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the answer begins like, the Mongols were in the Plainlands!

00:08:55.000 Exactly!

00:08:57.000 Because it's fascinating to consider that I suppose what is significant from the perspective of a British person is you're talking about the conflation of the interests of commerce and trade with the interests of an empire.

00:09:13.000 That's exactly right.

00:09:15.000 Nationhood itself as a concept, the state, masks for the population that are governed that the true interest and intent of the state are elitist interests masked behind a cavalcade of reasons that can be amplified or edited out.

00:09:36.000 According to what's working.

00:09:39.000 I like that you talk about the significance of the box wars and the opium wars.

00:09:44.000 I didn't know that the League of Nations was established to regulate the opium trade, which was legal until relatively recently.

00:09:52.000 And it's still, I suppose, legal in some form.

00:09:54.000 It's still entirely legal.

00:09:55.000 It's just called pharmaceuticals.

00:09:58.000 We've called it a different word now, and we would like you to pretend that you can't see that.

00:10:04.000 Exactly right.

00:10:06.000 That's the first time that's ever happened, the rebranding to make sure that the criminal conspirators get away with the crime.

00:10:12.000 Giant shock.

00:10:14.000 Don't call it bank robbery.

00:10:15.000 Call it the relinquishment of unnecessary cash deposits in an institution.

00:10:20.000 And all of a sudden, it's not bank robbery anymore.

00:10:23.000 Okay then Dave, then what if this is something that it sounds like you've understood since you were, you know, transitioning, forgive the use of the word, from a child to a man, that you understood that state is using phony wars to legitimize authoritarianism and the manipulation of the population.

00:10:43.000 You've listed a set of phony wars there.

00:10:48.000 What is it that has been, what was unique about the pandemic?

00:10:51.000 Was it that many previously covert interests became temporarily visible, like the recent Aurora Borealis in Northern Europe?

00:11:01.000 Suddenly, something that is always there became visible to a new population.

00:11:06.000 Hang on a minute, the pharmaceutical industry and the state are operating in conjunction with these unelected bureaucratic bodies in order to centralise authority and generate profit.

00:11:16.000 Is that what it was?

00:11:18.000 Well, so I think there's two things that make the COVID situation somewhat dramatic, at least.

00:11:24.000 I wouldn't say unprecedented, but certainly dramatic, because we can actually make the argument that certainly the establishment of the Commonwealth was the legitimization of the British East India Company, and that company's 86% of its trade was opium.

00:11:38.000 Unambiguously, this is not a new phenomenon.

00:11:41.000 The difference probably is the degree to which the audacity of the direct suppression of civil and human rights was part and parcel of this exercise.

00:11:53.000 And I've seen it, as I've said many times, as a marketing exercise to see exactly how far the complicit population will go before they start pushing back.

00:12:03.000 Because I think that's really what it was.

00:12:04.000 I think this was a market test more than it was a substantive act.

00:12:08.000 And the fact is that the market test was to see how far humans are willing to allow themselves to be caged, curtailed, limited, delimited, everything else.

00:12:20.000 And I think that what we really did was we had a market test on humanity and humanity came with a, let's just say, not a passing grade.

00:12:27.000 Have you got any corroborating evidence to suggest that indicates or even proves that it was that?

00:12:36.000 Yeah, absolutely.

00:12:38.000 I mean, listen, you only have to go to the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board Look at the decade of vaccines that they published in 2011.

00:12:46.000 They actually said that they were going to do this.

00:12:48.000 They said by 2020, we were going to have a universal acceptance, a universal vaccine mandate across the world on a universal platform.

00:12:57.000 And then in September 18th of 2019, they specifically said that there would be an accidental or deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen.

00:13:05.000 This comes right out of their document, Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, September 18th, 2019.

00:13:10.000 And in that document, they said the purpose of it was so that by September 2020, the world would have a universal vaccine plan.

00:13:19.000 Period.

00:13:20.000 That's not an allegation.

00:13:22.000 That's an accusation because it's reading right out of their script.

00:13:25.000 So this is not putting the pieces together.

00:13:28.000 This is something basic.

00:13:29.000 I know it challenges a lot of people, but it's called literacy.

00:13:33.000 You just have to read their plan.

00:13:35.000 And if you actually, God forbid, read the words on the page, you actually see that this was nothing but a market test, which is the reason why we have Answer Corporation, ATI, Forsmarsh, and the companies that were involved in the rollout of this pandemic, we have them all setting up the marketing program, which was the launch of Event 201 and other things, where they actually told us exactly what was going to happen.

00:13:58.000 They told us what the media was going to sound like.

00:14:01.000 They told us what the marketing was going to sound like. 0.95

00:14:03.000 They told us all of these things in advance of this bullshit story of patient one in Wuhan. 0.85

00:14:10.000 All of this was theater To get the public to accept the next round of the drug trade. 0.97

00:14:17.000 And the next round of the drug trade is genetically modified humans.

00:14:21.000 We're gonna have to park this conversation for people watching the stream on YouTube right now.

00:14:25.000 As you can already sense, we're going to stray in areas that the Trusted News Initiative and various other conglomerations of censorship and NGOs that are deployed to use AI to censor your free speech, to legitimize ways to censor and control you and smear dissenters, they'll be up in arms!

00:14:42.000 They'll be panicking right about now.

00:14:44.000 If you want to see the rest of the conversation, click the link in the description.

00:14:47.000 Go over to Rumble.

00:14:48.000 Remember, consider becoming an Awakened Wonder.

00:14:49.000 There's additional content as well as the great thrill of being part of a movement committed to real, radical change.

00:14:55.000 Now, see you in a few seconds.

00:14:58.000 Extraordinary.

00:14:58.000 I wonder if I might ask you the somewhat taxing favour that by the time we are doing this now for our community and locals, so if you come and awaken one day, you can join us for these conversations and put your questions to our treasured guests like Dave.

00:15:12.000 I wonder if by the time we stream this on Friday, if you could send us some links that we can post in the chat.

00:15:18.000 Absolutely!

00:15:18.000 For example, in particular, the various documents that you've referred to that permit you to make those accusations, just so that we can learn together from the brilliant work that you've done in compiling these narratives.

00:15:31.000 I mean, it's extraordinarily significant.

00:15:33.000 So really, what you're saying is that many of them, what seemed to be the most outlandish statements that Could be located online at the commencement of the pandemic are closer to the truth than what you would see on the BBC or NBC or the New York Times.

00:15:51.000 The people that are saying this is a this is a staged event, this is a pandemic, this is a mass marketed attempt to see if you can assert civilization control.

00:16:01.000 Now that how do you tally that with something like The discovery that in Ukraine, through DIA, they are now monitoring and observing Ukrainian transactions and have tied digital identity to the ability to shut down bank accounts, causing some Ukrainian civilians that refuse the conscript to have their assets frozen.

00:16:23.000 Do you think that the control of finance, social credit scores, digital ID are part of this, you know, launch, as you very explicitly said, next phase of the drug phase, genetically engineered Well, no question.

00:16:41.000 It's not by accident, Dustin Moskowitz, the name I love to mention that nobody seems to ever bother to keep reciting, and I encourage people to do it.

00:16:49.000 But Dustin Moskowitz, the co-founder of Facebook and the guy behind paying for Event 201 and the guy behind paying for a number of other things, including his joint venture with the Wellcome Trust through SYNCOVA.

00:17:02.000 And in a number of funding sources, this program is about, once again, making sure that there is an ability to access a control mechanism on human beings, and by genetically modifying people with mRNA, by doing all sorts of those kinds of manipulations, and then by encouraging things like central bank digital currencies, And all of the kinds of things we're supposed to track on our phones, the vaccine passport or the personal identity transactions, all of these things are meant to control and limit the ability for the free association and the free movement of thoughts and ideas and people.

00:17:42.000 If you're going to actually control and manipulate a population, what you have to do is effectively create house arrest for the non-compliant. 0.98

00:17:52.000 And it turns out that house arrest for the non-compliant is what I said in my interview in April of 2020.

00:18:00.000 I said this entire program was the launch of the universal house arrest program.

00:18:05.000 And what do I mean by that?

00:18:07.000 What I mean is that by creating, using, by the way, the only tool that can subvert constitutional rights, which is public health.

00:18:15.000 Public health was written into the law.

00:18:18.000 As the way of subverting constitutional rights and using public health as the means to do it, we have been placed under a virtual house arrest and the technologies that are enabling that are going to be increasingly rolled out, whether it's your 5G, 6G personal identity chips, whether it's the things that you wear, it's the personal devices that monitor your behavior, the personal devices that monitor your health status.

00:18:44.000 These are all meant to effectively be the anklet on your leg for the criminal that you are if you think you are

00:18:54.000 entitled to liberty.

00:18:55.000 It's extraordinary how many of these measures have been observably introduced through commodity,

00:19:02.000 the normalisation of handheld technology, the normalisation of biotech,

00:19:08.000 the normalisation of monitoring your sleep, monitoring your sugar levels.

00:19:12.000 Do you suggest then that that's a process of familiarization?

00:19:17.000 That doesn't require the explicit complicity of the commercial entities involved in the marketing of those products because they will simply sell a product if it's profitable and the population will acquire those products if they believe that they are somehow beneficial.

00:19:31.000 But once this infrastructure is in place and once these ideas have been normalized, they can be centralized and used coercively.

00:19:41.000 Yeah, Russell, let's take a page out of history.

00:19:44.000 I've said many times that the debate between Westinghouse and Edison and Tesla is one that gets nostalgically thrown about as Tesla, this giant libertarian who was a victim of circumstances.

00:19:56.000 People forget that he received several million dollars of funding from J.P.

00:19:59.000 Morgan.

00:19:59.000 So last time I checked, that doesn't make you a victim of anything.

00:20:03.000 It makes you complicit.

00:20:04.000 But that's me being judgmental, I suppose.

00:20:07.000 But the fact of the matter is what made electricity normalized, because remember, we used to use whale oil.

00:20:13.000 You know, that's how we used to light our nights.

00:20:15.000 We used to use oils and we used to use all sorts of other things to actually light our nights.

00:20:20.000 But we started using electricity.

00:20:23.000 But the problem is you couldn't make electricity work until you could do what?

00:20:26.000 Put a meter on the outside of the house.

00:20:30.000 Most people don't know that the triplet company from Bluffton, Ohio is the company that figured out how to put a little device on the outside of every house that used to, you remember this when you were a kid, used to have a little dial that spun on the outside of the house and it just measured how much electricity was going in the house.

00:20:46.000 It's about metering behavior.

00:20:49.000 Because by metering behavior, you can do two things.

00:20:52.000 One, you can extract attacks on the public, whether they're using something or not, that's helpful.

00:20:57.000 And the other thing is you can monitor and manipulate behavior, because if you want to, people are not playing the game, you just shut them off.

00:21:05.000 There's no difference in an eye, you know, right now an Apple Watch is no different.

00:21:12.000 Then the power meter on the outside of your house in the 1920s or 30s.

00:21:16.000 It is the monitoring system that you think is innocent and innocuous, but it becomes a permanent taxation and a permanent behavior control mechanism that you actually just blindly went along walking past it every day going, Oh, look at the thing is spinning.

00:21:30.000 Well, it's spinning.

00:21:32.000 Yes, but it's also monitoring, manipulating and controlling your behavior.

00:21:39.000 It's becoming increasingly obvious that this relationship that you've described between the state and commercial interests, rather beautifully identifying the advent of the East India Tea Company as a sort of a moment of inception, continues abound because as the great George Carlin said, where interests converge, no conspiracy is necessary.

00:21:59.000 Corporate entities will of course embrace, always embrace, the utility and benefits of new products and new systems of sale.

00:22:11.000 We had a great conversation with Mike Benz where he explained how the CIA A CIA cutout was sponsoring Serge Brin and Larry Page even while they were doing their Stanford dissertations and that the reason that Google got the run on the market when it came to Google Maps and satellite technology is because they were granted access to CIA spyware.

00:22:32.000 And when you're told something like that you feel Yeah of course, of course that couple of kids didn't launch satellites into space and didn't like work out on a computer program.

00:22:42.000 Oh look we can coagulate or they simply were given it and repackaged and re-skinned military technology paid for by taxpayers to be utilized for commerce.

00:22:55.000 Presumably if a back channel is kept open to the CIA should they need access to that information?

00:23:02.000 Russell, if we go back to the Second World War, the program called Operation Paperclip became what was granted to a corporation in the United States called Ampex.

00:23:11.000 If you've ever driven up 101 coming up into San Francisco, you remember the giant Ampex sign on the side of the road.

00:23:18.000 Most people don't know that out of Ampex came little things like Dolby Sound.

00:23:24.000 Did you know that Dolby was a government classified technology?

00:23:28.000 Why?

00:23:29.000 Because by manipulating sound waves, you could actually manipulate human behavior.

00:23:33.000 Everybody goes, oh, I've got Dolby surround sound.

00:23:36.000 No, what you have is you have a classified technology to manipulate your brain.

00:23:40.000 And you've been told that that makes a better theater experience.

00:23:44.000 Well, guess what?

00:23:45.000 It does make a better theater experience.

00:23:46.000 It turns the whole world that you're living in into the theater into which you are merely a little pawn in someone else's script.

00:23:54.000 That's what it does.

00:23:55.000 And that came out of Ampex Corporation.

00:23:58.000 Oracle, that little company that no one's ever heard about.

00:24:01.000 Oracle was what?

00:24:02.000 It was a classified CIA project On figuring out how to do a serialization of data in what was then called database structures.

00:24:13.000 And it turns out that that classified technology became a company that's ubiquitous.

00:24:17.000 And everybody runs on Oracle.

00:24:20.000 But guess what Oracle was?

00:24:22.000 And guess what Larry Ellison was?

00:24:23.000 And by the way, employee at Ampex Corporation.

00:24:27.000 Go back and look.

00:24:28.000 The history of Ampex Corporation is the laundering of technology that came through defense acquisitions, most of which came out of the Second World War.

00:24:37.000 A.M.

00:24:37.000 Pontioff, the founder of Ampex Corporation, was not a scientist.

00:24:41.000 He was actually the technology laundering arm of the defense infrastructure.

00:24:48.000 And we sit there going, oh, no, no, it's innocent.

00:24:50.000 It's the thing that we use in theaters.

00:24:52.000 It makes the experience so much better.

00:24:54.000 No, it doesn't.

00:24:55.000 It controls your mind.

00:24:58.000 What we're saying then, Dave, is that the reason the pandemic period was significant for a lot of people is because, let's face it, there were a lot of people, among them Alex Jones, David Icke, you, plainly, and me in a more, what you might say, a kind of post-60s, counter-cultural, never trust the man, eastern mysticism, post-Beats type way.

00:25:21.000 was saying you cannot trust the establishment, you cannot trust the man. You can see how the

00:25:26.000 civil rights movement was at the very center of that. Curiously now the civil aspects of the

00:25:30.000 civil rights movement are now being utilized to legitimize further authoritarianism on the basis

00:25:36.000 that the vulnerable groups are being protected and I would also say legitimizing cultural,

00:25:44.000 using cultural arguments to legitimize the fact that both parties in the United States of America

00:25:50.000 ultimately work for the donor class and I'm sure you will offer for interests that go far deeper

00:25:56.000 and far beyond that.

00:25:59.000 We talked a little while recently about George Soros and how significant George Soros' wealth is when you consider that much of it is derived from advanced knowledge of CIA activity when it comes to the disruption and often dissolution of nations.

00:26:17.000 And these kind of figurehead billionaires, Gates, Soros, who have brilliant PR, incredible influence across media, turn up with the Clintons in Haiti before a disaster from which they doubtless profit.

00:26:31.000 I wonder what you have to say about the significance of the philanthropist billionaire that's there to help you.

00:26:38.000 What's their role in this?

00:26:40.000 Well, in my movie, Future Dreaming, I talk about the fact that philanthropy is the aftertax of unconsidered consumption.

00:26:48.000 And I wish that people would actually take that seriously.

00:26:51.000 It's the aftertax of unconsidered consumption.

00:26:53.000 If you actually did enterprise correctly, there would be no need for philanthropy because you would have actually cared for the ecosystem in which you're operating and nobody would be poor and nobody would be destitute and nobody would be In need of what philanthropy allegedly serves so starting off with the construct philanthropy itself is disgusting because what it is is a way to launder your conscience after you've raped and pillaged the world so starting with that little problem but let's let's unpack this you've just mentioned a bunch of names but we just lost this past week Jim Simons who's a name you haven't mentioned and that's a shame.

00:27:27.000 Because Jim Simons, far more powerful than George Soros ever was, is the guy who ran the Rentech funds and Meritage and all these kind of things with the giant Republican donor Bob Mercer, who has been responsible for an enormous number of elections and election outcomes for the last couple decades.

00:27:44.000 These guys were printing 60% at their peak, 60% returns on their transactions in their hedge funds and equity markets.

00:27:53.000 And by the way, Russell, 60% returns.

00:27:56.000 are not because you're actually a smart person.

00:28:00.000 60% returns are because you are, once again, tapping into unaccessible, unpublic, rapid-available information, which is uniquely afforded to you.

00:28:10.000 And that's the reason why, when we think about this convergence of the ultra-powerful, the Michael Bloombergs of the world, the Jim Simonses, the late now Jim Simons, the Bob Mercers of the world, the Peter Thiels of the world, when we think about these individuals, What we have is a world in which George Soros becomes, not surprisingly, like Bill Gates, the public-facing boogeyman, but behind those people are even more powerful structures, and we need to understand that the structure at its core, and this, by the way, goes back to something as simple as the criminal conspiracy that took over the United Kingdom health services in the 1920s and the 1930s.

00:28:51.000 Very specifically, the Wellcome Trust.

00:28:54.000 Because the Wellcome Trust, which was the modern expression of the opium trade of the British East India Company, in 1941 set up what was called the Therapeutic Research Corporation in the UK, and that formed the basis for what would ultimately become the modern criminal organizations, the World Health Organization, And all of the stuff that the UN, League of Nations, and everything else did, as well as informing what became the FDA in the United States.

00:29:21.000 But go back and ask the question, where did all this come from?

00:29:25.000 And the answer is it actually came from the opium trade.

00:29:29.000 It's the modern expression of the British East India Company, which happened to be unified under the Wellcome Trust.

00:29:37.000 Nothing giant surprising about it.

00:29:40.000 All of that money, all of it, Came out of criminal drug trade.

00:29:45.000 I'm not going to sit here and let you blame Her Majesty the Queen, God rest her eternal soul, and Great Britain, after all of our endeavours, our incredible flag, William Wilberforce, Shakespeare, some very, very fine people, and you, unavowedly, a member of one of our colonies, criticising us in this manner.

00:30:12.000 I know, it's disgusting.

00:30:14.000 It's disgusting when you actually have something as simple as, I don't know, the Charter that actually puts it all in motion.

00:30:21.000 So you're saying that these, it's interesting because when you speak to people that have perhaps previously made an income in criminal ways, in organised crime, you have a version of that in North America, you have versions of that around the world, and in Britain, The sort of post-1960s style gangster culture has an incredible glamour to it, and in part what you always feel is this, aside from the, you know, violence and the criminality, it's difficult to avoid the conclusion that really these are people that have bypassed systems that are supposed to repress and control them.

00:30:59.000 And in a way, when you describe the enterprises that have grown out of, by your reckoning, and you say you have the receipts, and we totally want to see them, and I completely love this stuff, there are just criminal enterprises that are taking place on a much larger scale that kind of legislate in their wake to mask the criminal nature, creating whatever institutions or global entities required to frame, badge, and provide sigils and insignia that legitimize Listen, I mean, it's hilarious.

00:31:35.000 You go to 1941, the Therapeutic Research Corporation, which was the Therapeutic Substances Act in the UK, and you go back and say, well, hold on a second.

00:31:45.000 You mean that the biggest drug company in the UK set up the regulator for the drugs in the UK?

00:31:54.000 So the company set up the regulator.

00:31:58.000 And continues to this day to fund the regulator.

00:32:01.000 It's brilliant.

00:32:02.000 It's so good because this is more creative than the mob could ever be.

00:32:06.000 Because this is not, we get a couple corrupt cops to look the other way.

00:32:10.000 This is, we hire the police force.

00:32:15.000 The police force are us.

00:32:17.000 And so this is actually one step further.

00:32:19.000 Remember, and I've said this many, many times, in the World Health Organization's founding charter, they wrote an absolute, absolute amnesty for all criminal acts conducted by themselves.

00:32:34.000 Russell, I don't know how you would feel, but if by fiat, you and I just come to an agreement right now, wave our royal scepter and say, from now on, everything that Russell and Dave do are exempt from any prosecution of any kind in perpetuity.

00:32:49.000 Thank you very much.

00:32:51.000 A few people might raise their hand and go, I wonder if Russell and Dave are up to something?

00:32:58.000 Because it turns out that if you give yourself amnesty from all forms of criminal prosecution, including murder, by the way, let's get clear, it cannot be By law, no member of the World Health Organization, in the execution of anything they said they were doing in their own capacity as a World Health Organization, not a single one of them can not only be tried and prosecuted, they can't even be investigated.

00:33:28.000 Have you any, okay, of course... A statute!

00:33:31.000 I take your premise that even the implementation of such a piece of regulation or legislation, global regulation, and it's extraordinary to see how often global regulation is being proposed these days.

00:33:45.000 Of course we've discussed the WHO treaty, of course we've not touched on Australia attempting to implement a piece of censorship legislation that would by virtue Of their attempts, they say, to bypass the capacities of VPN, be international and global.

00:34:02.000 It's extraordinary.

00:34:04.000 So what you're saying, Dave, is that at the inception of the WHO, they granted themselves somehow amnesty.

00:34:10.000 Now, I wonder if there are examples in the history of the WHO of where that amnesty has been implemented or effective or where its boundaries might likely be tested.

00:34:20.000 Do you think in the pandemic period, during the HIV crisis, at what points are there likely to have been actions generated by people protected by that statuette, that were they not offered those protections, they would have been prosecuted for the type of crimes?

00:34:37.000 Well, let's keep it really current.

00:34:39.000 Remember that in 2018, during the Ebola clinical trials run by the World Health Organization in Africa, It was very clear that Remdesivir, the drug that was promoted by Dr. Deborah Birx and Dr. Anthony Fauci as a drug for the treatment of COVID, remember,

00:34:58.000 That in 2018, the World Health Organization, in its infinite wisdom and high morality, decided that remdesivir was actually too lethal to inject into Africans.

00:35:08.000 And that is because the fatality rate of people exposed to remdesivir in the Ebola trials was 53%.

00:35:15.000 And the bad news about that number is that Ebola doesn't kill 53%.

00:35:20.000 You get over Ebola.

00:35:22.000 You don't get over remdesivir.

00:35:23.000 53% of the people given that drug died.

00:35:27.000 They were murdered.

00:35:30.000 And it was so egregious that the drug was pulled from the clinical trials because it was unethical by World Health Organization standards.

00:35:37.000 That's like saying that something's too hot by the devil's standards in hell.

00:35:43.000 That's what that is.

00:35:43.000 Right?

00:35:44.000 So let's just really be clear.

00:35:45.000 We're not talking about a high moral compass there. 0.99

00:35:48.000 We're talking about a holy shit. 0.99

00:35:50.000 When you're telling me that the World Health Organization's morality meter got pegged, And they said in 2018 remdesivir was too deadly to use on Africans. 0.99

00:36:01.000 That's a whole new level of that feels like a line that probably shouldn't be crossed, which is the reason why every physician who injected a patient with remdesivir anywhere in the world was at least committing negligent homicide if not willful murder.

00:36:19.000 And because it was a standard of care during an emergency, You could kill people.

00:36:30.000 And by the way, that's not, once again, it's not an allegation I'm making, it's an accusation I'm making, because the facts were all available.

00:36:37.000 Every physician could have read the exact same documents I read.

00:36:41.000 Everyone could have read the World Health Organization's interim report, which said that regardless of viral load, people that got remdesivir were killed.

00:36:49.000 That means, Russell, the World Health Organization murdered people without Ebola In the clinical trial, murdered them.

00:37:01.000 Do you see that particular set of staggering crimes that is difficult to comprehend because of their scale?

00:37:11.000 As forms of genocide and mass corruption often are, as somehow pertaining to the type of themes you refer to in much of your discourse elsewhere.

00:37:24.000 Do you see that as being an outlier event, an anomaly, an aberration?

00:37:29.000 Or do you see that as being part of a broader scheme that the WHO is participating in?

00:37:37.000 There's no question that like any other theater of social engineering, the more egregious the crime to steal a page from Plato.

00:37:49.000 Remember, he talks about the fact that, you know, if a simple thief steals a loaf of bread, we call him a thief.

00:37:56.000 If an organized group of young people steal a bunch of loaves of bread, we call it Oliver Twist.

00:38:04.000 But there's a certain level at which a crime becomes so egregious that the sum of our emotional and spiritual awakening to the egregious nature of the crime is seared in its consciousness and we actually start marveling at its audacity.

00:38:21.000 We go from seeing a crime to pondering how somebody could have pulled it off.

00:38:29.000 Think of a serial killer, right?

00:38:31.000 One person kills one person, it's a murder.

00:38:33.000 One person kills ten people, we go, well that was effort.

00:38:37.000 One person kills a hundred people and we start going, let's do a discovery series on the mind of a serial killer.

00:38:43.000 But when one person kills a million people, we don't have a million moments of consternation.

00:38:52.000 We actually As Plato observed, we flip the crime on its head and we start marveling at its audacity.

00:39:02.000 And this is exactly the intent of what happened with COVID, because by marveling at the audacity of the fullness of the complicity of the horrific crimes that were done, We actually don't have a conscience to say every single person in a nursing home who was able to have a glass wall put between them so that they couldn't die in the arms of a loved one, every single person that was put into an ambulance and put on a respirator, which we knew was going to kill them,

00:39:37.000 Every single person who was put into a hospital and injected with remdesivir, every single one of them was a willful act of something that started in 1913 with the Carnegie Foundation, which was the eugenics program that is still absolutely alive and well at Cold Spring Harbor Labs. 0.72

00:39:56.000 And by the way, go back and look at it.

00:39:58.000 It was in the 1920s and the 1930s that Hitler was inspired by the work of the United States Eugenics Office. 0.50

00:40:07.000 So, let's not sit here and pretend that this is some sort of shot.

00:40:11.000 Our willingness, in the name of what we call public health and in the name of what we call science, our willingness to murder people, and I don't mean, oh, it was an accident kind of thing.

00:40:24.000 I mean stuff like in 1920, when we went to orphanages and we poisoned children with radioactive oatmeal so that we could watch how they die.

00:40:37.000 In the United States.

00:40:38.000 That was not a, you know, concentration camp exercise.

00:40:42.000 That was funded by and supported by the Eugenics Research Office here in the United States.

00:40:48.000 That was injected digoxins.

00:40:51.000 That was injected all kinds of other toxins.

00:40:54.000 That was radiation exposure.

00:40:56.000 And we did that with impunity on, are you ready for this?

00:40:59.000 Orphans.

00:41:01.000 Yes. 0.99

00:41:02.000 In the 1960s, in the United States and in the UK, we had debates on whether it was ethical to use the incarcerated population for lethal drug studies because they were doing their time for society anyhow, so let's go ahead and kill them.

00:41:22.000 Eugenics emerges as an idea in a sense, I suppose, from ideas perhaps that become popularized in the Enlightenment and emerge too from the theory of evolution that ultimately you can legitimize managing entire populations and however grand a statement it might initially seem, we are dealing with civilian management, we are dealing with Elite... elite institutions and individuals within them making choices that affect entire populations then...

00:41:59.000 Undergirding those choices with new kinds of morality.

00:42:03.000 One can see the necessity for the philanthropic component.

00:42:07.000 It becomes, as described earlier, the way you used it in your film.

00:42:13.000 What I feel is pretty fascinating, Dave, is that I know that you're a spiritual man.

00:42:19.000 I know that you are investigating your relationship with Christ.

00:42:25.000 I know that I know that what feels to me to be a possibility is that with, I'm talking just now about mainstream stories that help us to observe that, you know, when you talk about the emotional personal experience that people would have had watching loved ones die,

00:42:45.000 Behind, you know, glass or going to funerals on the internet and not being able to attend stuff.

00:42:50.000 That stuff that became normalized and our kind of shared cultural amnesia and the giddying pace with which information seems to be broadcast and consumed allows that to move into the past.

00:43:01.000 And as you have described, we're using sort of Plato's maxim.

00:43:06.000 We can't even really comprehend that there are organizations or individuals that would

00:43:11.000 get orphans to ingest radioactive or oatmeal.

00:43:14.000 I'm always like, that's too big for me, I'm going to have to park that iceberg of terror

00:43:18.000 elsewhere, it's too big for me to digest.

00:43:22.000 But like there's the AstraZeneca story now, AstraZeneca have withdrawn.

00:43:26.000 Pfizer have settled a bunch of cases out of court because it looks like there's an implication

00:43:31.000 that some of their anti-heartburn drugs cause cancer.

00:43:34.000 Elsewhere, there are numerous claims that HIV medications were improperly researched and possibly punitive.

00:43:43.000 I wonder, what you seem to be describing is evil. You know, it goes beyond just rationalism,

00:43:51.000 materialism, and we start to approach something that... and I noticed that you used the devil of hell

00:43:58.000 himself to describe the WHO's potential standards there, and moral compass pointing straight down

00:44:04.000 to Hades. I wonder then where you see how personal and communal uplifting through spiritual

00:44:14.000 practice becomes a necessary inoculation and counterpoint to the evil that we're discussing.

00:44:23.000 Well, so I think there's a couple angles that we can take on this, Russell, and I encourage people.

00:44:28.000 And by the way, I just did an interview yesterday where I spoke at depth about my appreciation for your very public conversation recently about your own journey.

00:44:39.000 And I genuinely am in awe.

00:44:43.000 of what you're modeling, because I love the fact that humans are perpetually in an open inquiry, if they allow themselves to be, to make greater sense of the world in which they're operating.

00:44:54.000 And I think the way you're doing it is actually absolutely luminous, and I really appreciate it.

00:44:59.000 But let me make a couple observations.

00:45:02.000 It was in the 3rd and 4th century in the Common Era that we decided to adopt a view that became in the institutional Latin Church an idea of original sin.

00:45:18.000 Ironically, from a mistranslation and ultimately an illiteracy of the writings of the Apostle Paul himself, because one of the things that people don't bother reading Is that while the doctrine original sin comes from the statement that says, you know, all of sin and come short of the glory of God or, you know, as in Adam came death and all these kinds of of references from the Bible.

00:45:42.000 Ironically, people don't even finish reading the sentence, which is as in Christ comes life, which means that the way the document is actually written suggests that this idea that somehow we're all a broken and failed state.

00:45:56.000 is actually an illusion for the control of a population rather than the emancipation Which is what the message of Christ was.

00:46:04.000 The message of Christ was, let him without sin cast the first stone.

00:46:08.000 The message of Christ was, sit with the tax collectors, sit with the people who are not like you, sit with the people who are outside the approved narrative, sit with all of those people and actually break bread with them.

00:46:19.000 That's what that message was and what we've done, and I've said this many times, we could not have had asymptomatic spread of COVID without original sin.

00:46:30.000 As a carrier frequency idea, we could not have the possibility that someone could tell you you're sick because, remember, COVID was a series of symptoms.

00:46:40.000 So you couldn't have asymptomatic COVID because it doesn't exist.

00:46:44.000 COVID was only symptoms. 0.97

00:46:46.000 So if you didn't have If you didn't have a concept in our minds that was delivered by religion that said you could be created in the image and likeness of God and still be a piece of shit, which is the church's official dogma and narrative since the 4th century, 0.90

00:47:06.000 It turns out that if you didn't have that carrier frequency, nobody would have believed asymptomatic COVID because the idea that I can be perfectly healthy, I can be out running, I can be out jogging, I can be out in the park, I can be out with my family, and I'm an asymptomatic spreader, that comes from the logic framework, the ontology that says you can be born into the perfection of this world and be broken on arrival, which is bullshit.

00:47:32.000 We have to get to a clear picture, and this is what I love about your journey that you've played out very publicly for the world to see, which is that if we had a story of the emancipation of a Christ consciousness that says, It's a bigger thing than you, buddy.

00:47:52.000 This is about when you see the naked, do you clothe them?

00:47:55.000 When you see the hungry, do you feed them?

00:47:57.000 When you see your brother and sister in need, do you actually reach out to them?

00:48:01.000 If you, God forbid, followed the teachings of Christ, what you would do is you'd find yourself in a very different world.

00:48:08.000 And I have said many times, COVID was only successful, and this is actually objectively the case.

00:48:16.000 COVID was only successful in countries with occidental cultural narratives around a Judeo-Christian template of original sin.

00:48:26.000 Take that away, and you don't have COVID.

00:48:29.000 Because the countries where you didn't have people dying of it, and you didn't have people falling off the wagon, you didn't have all these giant outbreaks, were countries that actually don't think that when you're born, you're broken.

00:48:40.000 And my point is simple.

00:48:43.000 This is a spiritual battle, but the spiritual battle lives inside each one of us.

00:48:48.000 Because the goal is not to sit here in judgment and say, oh, they're bad actors doing bad things.

00:48:53.000 Yes.

00:48:54.000 You know what?

00:48:55.000 Just like the poor you'll always have with you?

00:48:57.000 Well, guess what?

00:48:58.000 The evil you will always have with you.

00:48:59.000 There will always be people who actually have given themselves over to darkness.

00:49:04.000 For what?

00:49:05.000 For greed, for power, for corruption, for all the controls that they want.

00:49:09.000 And those people will be around.

00:49:11.000 But, if we actually had a good news message of the emancipation of what it means to actually live in the fullness of your created purpose, you wouldn't fall for their games.

00:49:25.000 No one would.

00:49:26.000 And so, so I do think it's an invitation to a deeper examination.

00:49:31.000 I really do.

00:49:31.000 And I think it's great.

00:49:33.000 Like I said, I mean, I think it's great that you're playing a role model, very, very explicit kind of John the Baptist moment of actually going, Hey, I'm going to be honest with you.

00:49:46.000 I'm doing the best I know, and I'm living the experience I'm having, and I'm surrounded by people who are holding me accountable.

00:49:53.000 And those are the things that actually enrich our lives.

00:49:56.000 Thank you for this beautiful compliment.

00:49:58.000 There is also a lot to unpack theologically and epistemologically there.

00:50:03.000 I like the idea of a molecular paradigm that affords the contagion to operate because the archetypal and psychic space has been created for it.

00:50:16.000 I would like to add to your earlier point about sort of globalism and corporatism begins with the establishment of the East India Tea Company and the relationships inherent within it.

00:50:29.000 I would like to perhaps use a similar conversational device, although actually we're going to have to wrap this up, which kills me because I enjoy talking to you so much.

00:50:42.000 I note that when you refer to the corrupting influences within ecclesiastical circles you point to 400 years AD as a significant moment around the conversion of Constantine when the state utilizes and potentially metastasizes the principles of the early Christians Christianity, it seems to me, in its essence, is a rebellious idea, and it is an anti-establishment idea, and it is a radical opposition to materialism, and perhaps to use a kind of rhetorical device that you are using, that perhaps the molecule of self,

00:51:26.000 It is the inception of materialism.

00:51:29.000 Once I believe in the idea of Russell, the business of Russell, and the God of Russell is the one that has to be served, then I am a closed off unit.

00:51:39.000 Exactly.

00:51:40.000 I'm on the circuit board of the system now.

00:51:42.000 But when I say, oh no, Russell wasn't real!

00:51:46.000 I'm out!

00:51:47.000 Then something radical happens and I suppose my conversion has been because I saw that that is what Christ is offering and before I did not see that.

00:51:57.000 Now I see it.

00:51:58.000 Now I see what it is.

00:52:00.000 And it begs a question.

00:52:02.000 I mean, if we actually were able to take a step back and just say, hold on, do we have a broken narrative of self?

00:52:08.000 Because if we saw ourselves as the sentient exception, so each individual one of us is a manifestation, is a sentient exception, which is in the universe right now, having the experiences we're having to feed information back into the whole from our experience.

00:52:26.000 It doesn't mean that we are throwing ourselves into some sort of self-deprecation.

00:52:30.000 We're actually inflating the importance of activating all of our senses to make sure that we're very aware, to make sure that we're actually doing all the inquiries we can, because every one of those is in service to the wisdom of the whole.

00:52:44.000 So it is not an absence of individuation from the standpoint of function, right?

00:52:50.000 Because individually, you have a function.

00:52:54.000 Individually, I have a function.

00:52:56.000 But my identity is not that function.

00:53:00.000 That's the point.

00:53:02.000 That's the point.

00:53:03.000 That is what a Christ awareness is.

00:53:06.000 It's not about me.

00:53:09.000 What did Jesus say?

00:53:09.000 If you see me, you see the Father.

00:53:12.000 He's not saying I am a thing.

00:53:15.000 He's saying that if I'm living rightly, Then through my acts, through my deeds, through my words, through the way in which I engage in my world, I'm modeling a thing.

00:53:27.000 And if you see what I'm modeling, that's the template that you could live by.

00:53:33.000 He at no point said, I am that thing.

00:53:37.000 He said, through me, you will see a thing.

00:53:42.000 And that's where I think we've probably lost so much of the narrative of the beauty of it, because once you are there, once you are in that role, you know, when I make a statement about the World Health Organization, about the United Nations, about COVID, about Anthony Fauci, what I'm doing is I'm simply saying through the words I'm sharing, what I'm trying to show is the essence Of the archetype in which we're operating, where the structures of this world are currently hijacking the sovereignty of humanity, the beauty of the created order, the wonder of a world that does not require gain-of-function research legitimized in October of 2014 by NIAID, by Anthony Fauci, on the Wuhan Institute of Virology Coronavirus-1.

00:54:30.000 We don't need that world!

00:54:32.000 And we don't need that world because the world in its created order actually works.

00:54:38.000 David, that is very, very beautiful.

00:54:40.000 Thank you so much for explaining that so elegantly and articulately and for moving between realms, for bringing your receipts and showing you're working out and making the whole thing so enjoyable with your effortless abilities as a raconteur as well as a science communicator.

00:54:58.000 It's very valuable, Dave.

00:54:59.000 Thank you very, very much for joining us today.

00:55:02.000 Always honoured, Russell.

00:55:03.000 I always am honoured.

00:55:04.000 Thank you so much.

00:55:06.000 Thank you very much for joining us for our conversation with Dave Martin.

00:55:09.000 Remember to see these conversations live when they happen.

00:55:12.000 Become an Awakened Wonder.

00:55:13.000 We do additional content every single week.

00:55:16.000 Become a part of our growing movement.

00:55:18.000 Support us when you can.

00:55:20.000 See you next week.

00:55:21.000 Not for more of the same, but for more of the different.

00:55:22.000 Until then, if you can, stay free.

00:55:33.000 Man, he's switching, switching, switching.

Stay Free - Russel Brand - May 20, 2024

WHO "Murdered" People In Ebola Clinical Trails!! Dr Dave Martin EXPOSES WHO Like Never Before - SF #368

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript