Stay Free - Russel Brand - April 11, 2024


WOAH! Brazil CRIMINALLY Investigates Musk Over X After Rumble Pulls From Brazil- Stay Free #342


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 15 minutes

Words per Minute

167.2643

Word Count

12,687

Sentence Count

757

Misogynist Sentences

5

Hate Speech Sentences

12


Summary

This week, Russell Brand talks about Elon Musk's censorship in Brazil and why he should be worried about it. He also talks about the eclipse and why it's a bad idea to be silly in an eclipse. And he's joined by Roseanne Barr and Joe Biden to talk about why you should be careful about what you do in a solar eclipse. Stay free, wherever you are, and everywhere you go! Logo by Courtney DeKorte. Theme by Mavus White. Music by PSOVOD and tyops. All rights reserved. Used by permission. If you enjoyed this episode, please leave us a five star rating and review on Apple Podcasts. It helps us to keep pushing the boundaries of what's possible and spread the word. Thank you so much for being an Awakened Wonder. You are an inspiration to us, and we are so grateful to have you here. In this video, you re going to see the future. in this video you re gonna see the past, in the present, and in the future, you ll see the present. This episode is brought to you by Awakening Wonders. Stay Free, You're Going to See The Future. - Russell Brand. (featuring: Stay Free With Russell Brand) Stay Free with Russell Brand and the crew at BUILDING WON'T Stop Censored by Russell Brand & Friends at RUMBLEAKELEC (Coming Soon) (coming soon, featuring Roseanne Barbour, Roseanneanne Barr, Joe Biden, Dr. Ladder Poe, and more! and much more. Stay Free! - Don't Be Silly in this episode will be out soon! Thank You for listening to this episode of Awakening Wonders with Roseanne, Rachael, Rocha, Raldsy, and Raldee, and Roseanne Livesay, and so much more! Thank You For Listening to this Episode? - Rachie, Raffy, Rizzi, Roxy, and So Much More! (ROSEANNAYES, ROSEANNE BONUS, RACY, RALYSE, RYANNAH, RACHIE, RAYANNA HAYES, AND SO MUCH MORE! ) and RALLYESANNA LYNNE BONDEZ, RALLYE,


Transcript

00:00:00.000 birds buddha
00:00:21.000 so so
00:01:20.000 so brought to you by
00:01:57.000 In this video, you're going to see the future.
00:02:09.000 Hello there, you Awakening Wonders!
00:02:11.000 Thank you so much for joining us today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:02:16.000 If you're watching this anywhere else in the world, I don't mean here in this room, I understand how space works, I mean outside the platform of Rumble.
00:02:24.000 Rumble, the platform that has stood up boldly in Brazil and said, no more!
00:02:30.000 No more censorship!
00:02:31.000 You will speak Portuguese freely in Brazil.
00:02:34.000 You will say whatever you want to and if you lot noticed that once again the situation in Brazil is demonstration that the language of liberalism is used to legitimize yet more authoritarianism and yet more censorship.
00:02:47.000 Let me know if you have noticed that extraordinary phenomena for we will be talking ...about Brazil and censorship and Elon Musk's position as the potential, not sole, but a significant opponent of this censorship in Brazil and what we have to do, what all of us have to do collectively for
00:03:08.000 The Messiah will not be a human Messiah, that much we surely know.
00:03:14.000 No one's coming to save us in human form, I don't think.
00:03:14.000 It won't be.
00:03:17.000 Let me know what you lot think on that.
00:03:19.000 So we're talking about Musk's censorship.
00:03:21.000 We're going to be talking a lot about some of the things I've missed, because did you know, do I look brown?
00:03:25.000 Because I've been away quite a lot, so I'm hoping that I look At least, well.
00:03:30.000 I mean, I'm essentially looking to the rumble chat now for some form of compliment.
00:03:34.000 If you want to support our content, you can join us and become an Awakened Wonder on Locals, which is where we've got our home.
00:03:40.000 You get an additional video every single week.
00:03:42.000 We're talking about Project Paperclip this week, which, as I understand it, and I've not researched this yet, it's where, at the end of the Second World War, a whole bunch of scientists were Imported from a little old country called Germany to do some research for NASA and the like.
00:03:58.000 So let me know if you want to get an additional video.
00:03:59.000 In fact, here's all of the content we'll be doing on Locals this week.
00:04:02.000 We've got Roseanne Barr.
00:04:03.000 You'll be able to join us tomorrow for our conversation with Roseanne live.
00:04:06.000 Put your questions to Roseanne.
00:04:09.000 Sending you all a lot of love.
00:04:10.000 Operation Paperclip.
00:04:11.000 Did I call it the right thing?
00:04:12.000 Did I say the right thing?
00:04:13.000 So listen, it's been a really interesting and peculiar time since we've been away on this break.
00:04:18.000 I hope you've enjoyed some of our conversations with Dr. Lapidot.
00:04:22.000 Ladder Poe?
00:04:24.000 Yeah, Ladder Poe.
00:04:25.000 And the Steve Bannon chat.
00:04:26.000 That's pretty fantastic.
00:04:27.000 I look bronzed.
00:04:28.000 Thank you very much.
00:04:29.000 I've not been on sunbeds.
00:04:30.000 I've been in Florida, baby.
00:04:32.000 I've been in DeSantis land.
00:04:34.000 I've been in that sweet land of freedom and free speech that you call Florida, and it's been absolutely fantastic.
00:04:41.000 Thanks for the compliments.
00:04:42.000 I appreciate it.
00:04:43.000 Operation Paper Hats, says Frank Dick.
00:04:45.000 Don't be childish.
00:04:46.000 It's been an extraordinary time.
00:04:49.000 Even cosmic events and celestial orchestrations have informed us that this is a magical time.
00:04:57.000 And current President of the United States of America, Joe Biden, has advice for all of us facing a topsy-turvy world where day will become night and night will become day.
00:05:09.000 Folks, enjoy the eclipse, but play it safe.
00:05:12.000 Don't be silly.
00:05:16.000 Silly in an eclipse.
00:05:17.000 Don't be silly about it.
00:05:19.000 When the moon crosses the sun, remain just calm.
00:05:23.000 I've seen people actually like... Do you see how everyone's trying to hijack that eclipse and sort of go, this eclipse will cause more... Get vaccinated from that eclipse!
00:05:32.000 Like everyone's trying to say that it's somehow connected to their single issue.
00:05:36.000 But if one person has utilized that eclipse for a marketing It's your friend, and I know many of you hope, the next president of the United States of America.
00:05:47.000 Yes.
00:05:48.000 Music.
00:06:17.000 In the chat, Jarden68 goes, the eclipse gave me fibrous white blood clots.
00:06:23.000 It's pretty funny.
00:06:24.000 I'd say already, you could say, like, say what you like about Trump.
00:06:29.000 The guy knows how to meme.
00:06:30.000 Oh my God!
00:06:45.000 Oh, my God!
00:06:47.000 Oh, my God!
00:07:16.000 Good promo!
00:07:18.000 That's good promo.
00:07:19.000 The dude understands marketing.
00:07:20.000 There's no question about that.
00:07:21.000 He's also, I think, in the use of that silhouette, showing a sort of a good personality and a good sense of humor about his own image and likeness.
00:07:30.000 Do you think?
00:07:31.000 It's Eid for our Muslim brothers and sisters out there.
00:07:34.000 Happy Eid.
00:07:35.000 I don't know how to say it.
00:07:36.000 I know there's a proper way of saying it, you know, but I don't know how to say it.
00:07:39.000 If you are Muslim, happy Eid to all of you.
00:07:42.000 If you are Christian, hey!
00:07:43.000 I hope you're enjoying this Easter season.
00:07:45.000 If you're an atheist, hey!
00:07:47.000 Come on over!
00:07:48.000 Join us!
00:07:50.000 Join our religious revolution by holy Christ!
00:07:55.000 Hey, you know Pax Lovid?
00:07:56.000 It was always a stupid name and now we know it was absolutely bloody pointless.
00:08:01.000 It doesn't even do anything.
00:08:03.000 It's made up.
00:08:04.000 They just did that because they were angry about ivermectin, didn't they?
00:08:06.000 They were like, No!
00:08:08.000 Ivermectin!
00:08:09.000 You can't!
00:08:10.000 Just introduce a drug!
00:08:10.000 No!
00:08:11.000 We've got to have some of that money!
00:08:13.000 Apparently you'd been better off having a simple cup of tea and that is why no one in England got Covid ever!
00:08:21.000 That's why!
00:08:23.000 Have that misinformation and disinformation and malinformation.
00:08:26.000 That's a little old thing we used to have on this planet called a joke where you used to be able to muck about and have a laugh before centralized authoritarian forces vampirically sucked the joy out of every aspect of our life locking us in an unwinnable culture war so we would all hate each other and not be able to rise up together and oppose this kind of peculiar fascism That has emerged.
00:08:48.000 But there are some people we can rely on.
00:08:50.000 There are some people we can rely on to confront this stuff.
00:08:53.000 Among them, your friend and mine, Tucker Carlson, in an extraordinary position of kicking off Kid Rock's tour.
00:09:01.000 Like, Kid Rock, I feel like, is an old school, like, Billy Idol style performer.
00:09:07.000 Like, I've not met Kid Rock before, but I feel like, you know there are some people you feel like it might be hard to get on a relaxed Normal.
00:09:13.000 All right, mate.
00:09:14.000 How's it going, Kid Rock?
00:09:15.000 Like, I feel like he's always quite intense.
00:09:16.000 I don't know, because I don't know him, but Tucker Carlson's gone out there and intro'd him on tour.
00:09:21.000 Remember, if you're watching us on YouTube or anywhere else, YouTube's not a person, although corporations, didn't they say that they've got the same rights as people?
00:09:28.000 I don't know how it works.
00:09:29.000 Hey, if YouTube was a person, what kind of person would they be?
00:09:33.000 We did a thing earlier, didn't we?
00:09:35.000 Like a little poll to see which Which platforms you trust.
00:09:39.000 We'll show you the results of that in a little while.
00:09:41.000 Remember later we're going to be talking about Elon and Brazil.
00:09:43.000 We've got a whole bunch of fantastic topics and subjects to discuss with you on Rumble.
00:09:48.000 The one platform that will stand up and not even stream in Brazil because of Brazil's lack of respect for free speech.
00:09:54.000 They're already out of France because France wanted to ban Russia today.
00:09:57.000 What worries me is those are both likely World Cup winner countries.
00:10:01.000 So you could have like France win a lot of World Cups.
00:10:04.000 Brazil, they win a lot of World Cups.
00:10:06.000 You won't care, because you're likely an American of some description, aren't you?
00:10:09.000 But we care about stuff like that, and we care about freedom, and so does Tucker, but he also is introducing Kidro.
00:10:15.000 Let me see this, I've not watched this yet.
00:10:17.000 Oh, yeah!
00:10:19.000 $500 I'm the Rock eyelids
00:10:25.000 $100 $100
00:10:53.000 Tucker making a lot of new friends out there.
00:10:56.000 As a comedian who has in the past performed with musical acts, it's no joke.
00:11:01.000 It's no fun to have to go up on a stage and sort of do talking and then like have bands on.
00:11:06.000 You remember I used to do things like the MTV VMA Awards and stuff like that?
00:11:10.000 That is a pressurized environment, man.
00:11:12.000 Thank you, Heavenly Father, for releasing me from that.
00:11:15.000 Tucker's been on that show, Kill Tony, so a lot of people are saying he must have gone on Rogan, which that's the first time I figure those two have spoke together.
00:11:23.000 That would be interesting if that's what's gone down, because let's face it, the two of them are dominant figures in American media and determine more now, I suppose, the nature of the conversation in public spaces than your CNNs or your MSNBCs or your Fox.
00:11:38.000 It's fascinating.
00:11:39.000 GustavoXD on the Rumble chat saying, definitely getting fired from Fox was the best thing ever to happen to Tucker.
00:11:46.000 Meanwhile, OopyDoop says, if YouTube was a person, he would be sensorial.
00:11:51.000 Eid Mubarak.
00:11:52.000 Thanks, man.
00:11:52.000 Thanks for giving me that phrase, mate.
00:11:55.000 Okay, let's have a look at Tucker on Kill Tony.
00:11:58.000 Patterson and Tucker Carlson high-fiving. This is crazy. My grandma hates you, nigga.
00:12:04.000 It's good because that's a use of N-word there to call Tucker Carlson N-word.
00:12:24.000 Nice.
00:12:25.000 There's no coming back from that.
00:12:25.000 That's good.
00:12:27.000 Also, it's a grandma's loathing that's being conveyed.
00:12:30.000 Yep, I would say that's near confirmation that there'll be two to three hours of Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson.
00:12:37.000 Coming soon!
00:12:38.000 So that's going to be an interesting show for us to check out.
00:12:42.000 We're talking a lot about censorship today.
00:12:44.000 Later we'll be talking about Brazil's threatened censorship of X and Rumble's departure.
00:12:49.000 Rumble already departed that nation in anticipation and in awareness of some of the censorship that's already being implemented.
00:12:57.000 We asked you a little earlier what platforms you most trust And you've said Rumble X way, way, way more than Meta, your Googles and Alphabet companies, and that makes perfect sense.
00:13:09.000 So coming up in the show later, we've got all sorts of stuff about Elon Musk and elsewhere.
00:13:15.000 I mean, do you guys care about this anymore?
00:13:17.000 Do you care at all about You can't see my naked chest.
00:13:22.000 It feels weird.
00:13:23.000 Well, it's there.
00:13:23.000 It's all in there.
00:13:24.000 Do you not care anymore about what celebrities think about presidents?
00:13:27.000 Evidently, a lot of people do.
00:13:28.000 Do you remember when there was all that sort of chaos about who Taylor Swift would be into and stuff?
00:13:33.000 Do you remember that, people?
00:13:33.000 Like, remember when Joe Biden posted that red-eyed picture of himself?
00:13:37.000 I remember The Rock endorsed, evidently, Biden at some point previously, but this is an endorsement that he appears to be withdrawing.
00:13:46.000 Let's have a look at that.
00:13:48.000 You made that endorsement in 2020.
00:13:49.000 Are you happy with the state of America?
00:13:52.000 Am I happy with the state of America right now?
00:13:54.000 Well that answer is no.
00:13:55.000 Do I believe we're going to get better?
00:13:57.000 I believe in that.
00:13:57.000 I'm an optimistic guy and I believe we can get better.
00:14:03.000 The endorsement that I made years ago with Biden was what I thought was the best decision for me at that time.
00:14:11.000 And I thought back then when we talk about, hey, you know, I'm in this position where I have some influence and it's my job then, I felt like that then, it's my job now to exercise my influence and share with this is who I'm going to endorse.
00:14:29.000 Am I going to do that again this year?
00:14:30.000 That answer's no.
00:14:32.000 There you go, that's interesting.
00:14:34.000 A lot of you are saying that you don't, that you don't care, that you don't care about that.
00:14:34.000 Is it?
00:14:39.000 And I suppose, look, I've been on a journey of celebrity myself where I was on that carousel and immersed in that world already today.
00:14:47.000 I've mentioned the VMAs and sometimes, like, maybe I'll see a bit of SNL and think, wow, I hosted that.
00:14:52.000 Or I'll see Rolling Stone and think, wow, I was on the cover of that.
00:14:56.000 Now I am a, what do you say, apostate of that world.
00:15:00.000 You know, it's a sickly, seductive, dark, dark world.
00:15:05.000 As is being experienced now, because barely a day goes by when you don't hear yet more evil rumours.
00:15:11.000 And obviously I've been the subject of scurrilous, untrue rumours myself, so I'm pretty cautious about repeating them.
00:15:18.000 By God, it seems like a dark, dark world, doesn't it, Hollywood?
00:15:21.000 Let's see, this is an interesting story.
00:15:24.000 Let me know what you think about this in the chat, right?
00:15:26.000 Because Trump has told billionaires he'll keep taxes low, okay?
00:15:31.000 And that's, I guess, if you're at a fundraiser, these are the kind of things people say.
00:15:35.000 Now, how's this being covered by MSNBC and CNN and all that kind of stuff?
00:15:40.000 How are they covering that?
00:15:41.000 Are they attacking Trump for that?
00:15:43.000 Because, and if so, Why are they not more transparent about this?
00:15:49.000 It was a moment for me when I heard that Joe Biden told Wall Street financiers and stuff that nothing would fundamentally change if he were elected.
00:15:56.000 I thought, what is all this hysteria about?
00:16:00.000 What is all of the condemnation of Trump, that wall-to-wall damnation?
00:16:05.000 What is it about when Joe Biden has told the powerful Plainly, and in plain sight, that he ain't gonna do nothing to impair or impede their agenda.
00:16:17.000 It's pretty extraordinary.
00:16:19.000 Over the course of this week, we're looking more and more about how public spaces are controlled and curated.
00:16:24.000 Like, even when something like, um, that... It's not a whistleblower, is it?
00:16:28.000 When that sting operation, uh, has been pulled on that CIA and FBI operative, where they admit that they've been Nudging and implementing measures against Alex Jones.
00:16:40.000 You think, how come these stories don't gain more traction?
00:16:44.000 How come, like, you know, when Aaron Bushnell sets himself on fire and posts it as an anti-war protest, it's kind of scrubbed from the internet?
00:16:53.000 Not easy to find that image now.
00:16:55.000 Imagine if that protest, as I've said to you before, had been demonstrating against something that could be utilised by the establishment.
00:17:03.000 You'd have an Aaron Bushnell day by now.
00:17:05.000 There ain't no Aaron Bush no day.
00:17:07.000 So, let's have a look at one of the measures by which information is funded.
00:17:12.000 The creation of that category of misinformation in and of itself.
00:17:16.000 Here's a new, extraordinary piece of anti-misinformation propaganda.
00:17:22.000 This is a US government-funded comic book that tries to give us all some new perspective.
00:17:28.000 Flowerpower678, why don't you allow free speech on your ex-account?
00:17:31.000 I do allow it.
00:17:32.000 You know that ex-account?
00:17:33.000 I just post stuff on there.
00:17:34.000 You can do what you want on there, mate.
00:17:36.000 You can do what you want on there.
00:17:39.000 Real Fake, the first graphic novel in SZA's Resilience series, explores the deceitful tactics of disinformation.
00:17:47.000 Follow protagonists Rachel and Andre as they travel the world and expose a vast network manipulating content and pushing American voters to the brink.
00:17:53.000 private jet. Anyway, I would say that there's a very, very well funded content and pushing
00:17:59.000 American voters to the brink. With elections coming up, will they be able to follow the
00:18:05.000 trail of deepfakes?
00:18:06.000 I don't know. Really? And stop the real assailants from causing chaos, confusion and division.
00:18:27.000 Look at the badge of the people that sort of is making it.
00:18:31.000 Like that, that's, hmm, CISA, Cyber Security and Infrastructure Security Agency.
00:18:36.000 It's like an eagle with a badge and like a circuit board on its wing.
00:18:40.000 That's not a bad bit of design, it's actually quite beautiful.
00:18:43.000 But that does not fill me with confidence.
00:18:46.000 Why does Russell talk about American news?
00:18:47.000 Well, because I believe that America is still the most powerful nation in the world that generates the most important culture and determines the politics, not only of the United States, but of many, many Nations and even though a country like yours is becoming subordinate to groups like NATO in particular and we've got some interesting Information on how NATO are trying to Trump proof their funding coming up a little later American culture still determines the agenda and events that affect many many lives would you agree with that whether you're American or
00:19:20.000 Or not.
00:19:20.000 It's America after all that gave us the FBI and the CIA.
00:19:23.000 It's America that gave us the deep state.
00:19:26.000 I'm not saying that the KGB ain't powerful or that the Communist Party in China don't have their own deep state power.
00:19:33.000 But have a look at this, this recent sting operation where a CIA officer was caught bragging about
00:19:40.000 being able to put right wing journalists in jail, how the FBI had insiders and
00:19:46.000 agents at January 6th.
00:19:48.000 Happy birthday Sean P, happy birthday, just a simple request there. We've got,
00:19:52.000 you have to recognize it's the most powerful nation in the world with some
00:19:56.000 of the most powerful and influential agencies in the world and their power
00:19:59.000 goes way way beyond American politics.
00:20:02.000 And what we're starting to experience is the criminalization and demonization of entire segments of the population.
00:20:08.000 Of course, this began with Trump.
00:20:10.000 But prior to that, actually, it didn't begin because the FBI have long done operations Against, well you know, Muslim folk and during the civil rights movements they were continually looking for ways to criminalize and bring down activists and evidently Alex Jones is now, you know, at least has grounds for a case and says he's gonna sue the FBI and CIA after seeing this incredible sting.
00:20:33.000 We'll show you a little bit of that, of course, because we're fascinated by it.
00:20:36.000 First, here's what Alex Jones said.
00:20:38.000 This is a FBI agent, a CIA boss.
00:20:42.000 He's a contract manager over a large contract operation.
00:20:45.000 That's a boss.
00:20:46.000 That's like a mini section chief saying all of this and admitting all of this like it's no big deal.
00:20:53.000 He needs to be subpoenaed by Congress.
00:20:56.000 I am planning to launch a lawsuit against the CIA and the FBI.
00:21:01.000 We have to bring all this out.
00:21:03.000 Right, there you are.
00:21:04.000 So the reason for that, of course, is because of this sting operation.
00:21:09.000 They seem to, as I recall from our friend James O'Keefe, do you remember his sting against that dude from Pfizer?
00:21:17.000 Often it seems to take the form of a same-sex date, and I don't know all the details, but this seems to be a same-sex date sting also.
00:21:25.000 It's pretty interesting.
00:21:27.000 Here's a CIA officer, or at least a CIA official, As long as the Bureau is able to progress far enough to be able to put pro-lifers in jail whenever they want.
00:21:36.000 were present on January 6th and that they've been specifically targeting Alex Jones.
00:21:42.000 Let's have a look.
00:21:43.000 How long is the Bureau able to progress far enough to be able to put pro-lifers in jail
00:21:47.000 whenever they want?
00:21:48.000 Yeah.
00:21:49.000 Firstly, if you're on a date and you're looking at your phone like that, that date ain't going
00:21:54.000 anywhere Gavin.
00:21:55.000 So, not only loose lips sink ships when it comes to chatting about CIA secrets, when you're on a date, eye contact, ask questions.
00:22:05.000 What do you do?
00:22:06.000 Oh, that's interesting.
00:22:07.000 That kind of thing.
00:22:07.000 That's on the agenda.
00:22:08.000 You can kind of put me in jail if you know what to do.
00:22:13.000 You shut him up.
00:22:13.000 How?
00:22:15.000 Shut him up!
00:22:16.000 Shut him up!
00:22:17.000 You create the situation to where they have no choice but to act on their impulse.
00:22:23.000 And once they act on that impulse... I like how he's sort of like Oliver Hardy, Mad Boy.
00:22:27.000 You set them up.
00:22:28.000 You put them in a situation where they're unable but to act on their impulses.
00:22:32.000 And in a minute, when he does crossing the line, he demonstrates the line that can be crossed as some sort of little camp fish swimming across a shoreline.
00:22:43.000 We call that an entrapment.
00:22:45.000 It's a fine line.
00:22:48.000 It's bureau practice entrapment.
00:22:50.000 Fine line!
00:22:52.000 We get really close.
00:22:53.000 Not officially.
00:22:54.000 No.
00:22:55.000 We get as close as we can.
00:22:57.000 We get as close as we can to it without doing it.
00:23:00.000 So they can entrap some of these pro-lifers into doing things that they don't do.
00:23:04.000 Depending, yeah.
00:23:05.000 We call it a nudge.
00:23:06.000 A nudge.
00:23:07.000 A nudge.
00:23:07.000 Sometimes you just gotta give them a quick little... just to see what happens, right?
00:23:12.000 And how does that happen?
00:23:14.000 You put a post out there, or you... Sweetest CIA official I've ever... You just set them up.
00:23:22.000 You, uh, play little games with their minds and with their emotions.
00:23:25.000 You have some fake profile say something that triggers... that we know is gonna trigger them, right?
00:23:31.000 Like, we already know your history.
00:23:33.000 If we're to that point, we already know everything about you.
00:23:35.000 So we're like, oh, this'll piss them off.
00:23:40.000 Sometimes you like to fuse and just wait for it to follow, right?
00:23:43.000 Like a railing.
00:23:44.000 Like a, oh!
00:23:45.000 So when a railing happens... A journalist who's doing great work there at Sound Investigations is overplaying the part of their... Oh!
00:23:53.000 Tell me more!
00:23:54.000 Tell me more!
00:23:55.000 Did they get very far?
00:23:56.000 Uh-huh do-do, uh-huh do-do, uh-huh do-do-do-do-do.
00:23:59.000 Is that sometimes the BRO behind it?
00:24:01.000 Yeah, sometimes.
00:24:03.000 Nothing with putting up a fake social media thing, but like really good people may have.
00:24:06.000 Mm-hmm.
00:24:07.000 Post fake news.
00:24:08.000 Sometimes it's me.
00:24:11.000 Mad, isn't it?
00:24:11.000 We've just seen that the government are spending money creating comic books to warn us of the problems of fake news and misinformation, while a deep state CIA official admits that they create fake posts themselves.
00:24:26.000 So the government are preventing other people, institutions and organisations doing what they do.
00:24:34.000 So there is no morality, there are no values, there is simple utility.
00:24:38.000 If something is useful to them, they'll do it.
00:24:41.000 but you are not allowed to do it.
00:24:44.000 Fake?
00:24:45.000 It's embellished a little bit.
00:24:46.000 Who would be like a big influence that you're after?
00:24:50.000 Like a...
00:24:51.000 I don't know, like a...
00:24:55.000 I don't even know these names.
00:24:56.000 Like a Fox News person, or like a Tucker Carlson, or like... Oh, I'm sure he's in there.
00:25:00.000 Right.
00:25:01.000 You always want the biggest and loudest.
00:25:04.000 Like that, what was his name?
00:25:05.000 The one that said the Sandy Hook didn't happen.
00:25:09.000 Alex Jones.
00:25:10.000 So, we were after him.
00:25:10.000 Yeah.
00:25:12.000 You are?
00:25:13.000 Are you still after him?
00:25:15.000 Why?
00:25:15.000 Because he's broke.
00:25:18.000 More evidence that what the establishment engage in is lawfare where they engage in legal complexity opponents or dissidents in order to drain their resources whether that's Donald Trump or or Alex Jones or ad infinitum.
00:25:35.000 Any truly dissident or dissenting voice may face a series of measures to bring them down but the common problem is dissent and the ability to convey information to you that may make you less obedient and more compliant.
00:25:50.000 Let me know in the chat Whether or not you think Alex Jones has got a case against the CIA, Y or N. And we are going to have to leave YouTube right now because we're going to be talking about Elon on Brazil.
00:26:02.000 We're going to be talking a lot about the Ukraine war.
00:26:03.000 We're going to be talking about NATO Trump-proofing their funding.
00:26:08.000 Before I leave you guys on YouTube, I want to endorse NMNs.
00:26:11.000 This is a potential therapy for age-related diseases and ultimately age is going to affect us all.
00:26:16.000 Cardiovascular disease, neurodegenerative disorders, diabetes.
00:26:21.000 Big pharma want to monopolize, charging thousands of dollars in some cases and taking away your rights to non-pharmaceutical alternatives.
00:26:29.000 You know what the FDA are like.
00:26:30.000 They are, well, I would say due to their funding models and due to recent events, whether it's the opioid crisis or the coronavirus period, not worthy of our trust.
00:26:39.000 Transitioning NMN to a drug could inflate costs and prescription fees up to, and this is ridiculous, $30,000.
00:26:45.000 It will make it completely unattainable without insurance.
00:26:47.000 Black Forest partnered with Natural Product Association and are fighting against the FDA and their stance on MNN.
00:26:55.000 This amazing Black Forest supplement could become the first anti-aging FDA approved drug where you would need prescription to buy it.
00:27:02.000 It's going to cost you a bunch.
00:27:03.000 So fight against Big Pharma and FDA corruption as well as fight in time itself!
00:27:09.000 War against time!
00:27:11.000 Buy this NMN and if you use this code that we've got, they'll know that their adverts with us are working.
00:27:17.000 So please do go to blackforestsupplements.com forward slash Russell.
00:27:19.000 You'll get 25% off by the way and You know, they'll know that our ads work, which is good for our business.
00:27:25.000 Excuse me.
00:27:28.000 Hold on a minute.
00:27:29.000 Did I just Benjamin Button myself right back into adolescence?
00:27:32.000 I think I did.
00:27:33.000 So, hey, we're leaving you, if you're watching us on YouTube now, get over onto Rumble.
00:27:37.000 We're going to be talking about Elon and Brazil.
00:27:39.000 We're going to talk a lot more about the censorship war.
00:27:41.000 We've got so much to discuss with you.
00:27:43.000 You might want to become an Awaken Wonders.
00:27:45.000 You can join us live for our conversation with Roseanne Bartemura.
00:27:48.000 But more importantly, you will be part of a movement that opposes corruption across the world, that believes in your individual sovereignty, freedom and ability.
00:27:57.000 To self-determine while building communities of joy and wonder together.
00:28:02.000 Whether you are religious, not religious, we believe in the glory for all of you.
00:28:06.000 See you in a few seconds.
00:28:07.000 Click the link in the description.
00:28:08.000 Come on over to run the brawl.
00:28:10.000 My nose is not broken, Kenzie.
00:28:12.000 What's wrong with you?
00:28:13.000 Okay guys, so should we finish off the... I think we've covered that, the Alex Jones thing.
00:28:19.000 This is fascinating about the events in the Ukraine war.
00:28:22.000 This is a comparable story in some ways about how democracy and freedom are hedged.
00:28:28.000 For example, NATO are Trump-proofing Ukraine aid.
00:28:32.000 So that's in a sense a Subversion of democracy and a subordination of national sovereignty in order to ensure ongoing perpetuation, forgive the tautology, of an unpopular war.
00:28:45.000 And people that happen to be anti-Trump will think, well that's a great thing!
00:28:49.000 Simply because they are anti-Trump, and God knows there's a lot of anti-Trump messaging out there, coaching people to distrust Donald Trump.
00:28:57.000 And you know, you know where I stand on this.
00:28:58.000 I'm not sure that we should be working within those models at all.
00:29:01.000 I believe in decentralization and the empowerment of your community.
00:29:04.000 I think it's the only way for us to get over some of the tensions that are defining the world right now.
00:29:09.000 But the people that are supportive of NATO's ability to Trump-proof Ukraine aid are short-termists in their thinking, because You may not agree with them next time.
00:29:17.000 Before this, let's have a look at our former Prime Minister David Cameron admitting publicly that the Ukraine-Russia conflict, in spite of the hundreds of thousands of lives lost and in spite of its devastation, evident corruption and media deception and deceit, is good value for money.
00:29:36.000 Look at the way that they see the world in economic terms, not in human terms.
00:29:40.000 And let me know if you think that's ...kind of Luciferian in some way, to even place a monetary value on something as devastating and terrifying as war.
00:29:48.000 Listen to me, I argue that it is extremely good value for money for the United States and for others, perhaps for about 5 or 10% of your defense budget.
00:29:58.000 Almost half of Russia's pre-war military equipment has- It's war!
00:30:02.000 It's a war and it's a bargain war!
00:30:03.000 It's 5%, 10% off!
00:30:05.000 We can annihilate the entire Balkan region!
00:30:08.000 It's no money lost!
00:30:10.000 No money bank, no income tax, no VAT!
00:30:12.000 It's been destroyed without the loss of a single American life.
00:30:16.000 This is an investment in United States security.
00:30:20.000 How does that tally with the ongoing rhetoric up till now about This is a humanitarian war, that we have a duty to support Ukraine and Ukraine are being attacked in an unprovoked war.
00:30:34.000 It's extraordinary the lack of morality.
00:30:38.000 Suddenly and occasionally you will witness symptoms of a deeper truth.
00:30:43.000 You will see that these geopolitical conflicts are the observable signs of advancing globalism and an attempt, in many people's view, to create a one world government which you can oppose by becoming an awakened wonder.
00:30:57.000 Have you seen this thing?
00:30:58.000 This is our item of the week this week.
00:30:59.000 I've not worn this one yet, but have I worn it?
00:31:01.000 I think I've had a little go on it.
00:31:03.000 Can you guys see it?
00:31:03.000 Have a look at this thing.
00:31:05.000 This week there's 25% off this glorious item.
00:31:08.000 Let me know if you fancy it.
00:31:09.000 Now check this out.
00:31:12.000 NATO to ensure that even in the event of a Trump victory they will be able to continue to wage war, a proxy war in fact, between Ukraine and Russia by protecting their aid.
00:31:26.000 This is an extraordinary story and a great indicator of how the politics of your nation and the world at large play out now.
00:31:34.000 In the event that you might vote for a president or any politician that is anti-war or anti-globalism more broadly I would argue, The globalist machine will find a means to ensure that its agenda can still be pursued.
00:31:47.000 And I would say that this, aside from the bureaucratic language and legalese and the peculiar normalisation of a war-like geopolitical agenda, this is evidence of that.
00:31:58.000 Have a look.
00:32:00.000 NATO foreign ministers met on Wednesday to discuss a proposal for a 100 billion euro five-year fund.
00:32:06.000 It is a plan seen as a way to Trump-proof aid for Ukraine.
00:32:10.000 The proposals would give the Western alliance a more direct role in coordinating the supply of arms What is obvious is that we need new and more money for Ukraine, and we need it over many years.
00:32:19.000 Asian, diplomats say.
00:32:21.000 Speaking before the meeting, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said the proposal
00:32:26.000 aims to send the message to Russia that it cannot win the war.
00:32:30.000 What is obvious is that we need new and more money for Ukraine, and we need it over many
00:32:35.000 years.
00:32:36.000 And the whole idea of now discussing frameworks, commitments, an institutionalized framework
00:32:44.000 for the support is to ensure more predictability.
00:32:48.000 It's like gym membership.
00:32:49.000 It's like they're trying to get you to sign up for more years of war without the possibility to withdraw.
00:32:56.000 As if we're supposed to forget what happened for a decade in Afghanistan and the two trillion dollars that that conflict cost and for what.
00:33:05.000 Because now there are ongoing, very public conversations and public opposition to both the conflicts in the Middle East and this war, there is an attempt to bypass public opinion, to shut down dissent and to ensure, most importantly of all, that the funding can continue uninterrupted regardless of very obvious public opposition.
00:33:33.000 You will notice that across the world there appear to be ongoing pilot schemes, whether it's for censorship or extreme measures during the coronavirus pandemic, that sometimes play out in nations like Australia or Canada, almost as if we're being prepared for new globalist measures, the legitimization of further authoritarianism.
00:33:52.000 It's happening right now in Brazil.
00:33:55.000 A Brazilian Supreme Court judge is introducing new measures to legitimize censorship and control of social media platforms.
00:34:02.000 Rumble has already left Brazil because they don't want to be bogged down and tied up in this type of censorship and this type of corruption.
00:34:10.000 Now what you will remember is when Bolsonaro was in office, he was regarded as the Brazilian Trump.
00:34:16.000 We got to get rid of this guy!
00:34:18.000 He's a tyrant.
00:34:19.000 He's a dictator.
00:34:20.000 He's an authoritarian lunatic.
00:34:22.000 We've got to bring in Lula da Silva, a liberal politician, a person who's going to bring freedom back to Brazil.
00:34:29.000 And yet, under the guise of neoliberalism, we're seeing more authoritarianism, more censorship.
00:34:36.000 This is extraordinary.
00:34:37.000 Now whatever you think of Elon Musk, when it comes to matters such as these, as you will see Michael Schellenberger say in a minute, he is uniquely positioned and empowered to oppose the type of censorship that will affect all of us sooner or later, because increasingly it becomes clear to me, that once the terrorist was regarded as a foreign invader and a mad renegade but increasingly this term terrorist could be applied to you or to me or to any dissenting voice.
00:35:07.000 Let's have a look at how Brazil are now using censorship laws that would have been unthinkable a few years ago How Elon Musk is opposing it and what we're all going to have to do if we don't want Brazil to become a test case for global censorship.
00:35:22.000 We've seen it in Canada.
00:35:24.000 We've seen it in our country, the UK.
00:35:26.000 Online censorship bills that are not being fully utilized and pushed yet, but you can bet they will be.
00:35:31.000 And notably we've seen it in Ireland with their new hate speech laws.
00:35:34.000 You have to firstly demonise the public, legitimise the use of moral authority, and I believe that an integral part of it, when there's a globalist model that's being craved and worked towards, is piloting it in territories where you might be able to get away with a little more.
00:35:51.000 Let's see how this Brazil thing plays out and let's have a look at some legacy media reporting on the story to kick us off.
00:35:56.000 Musk says he will challenge an order by a Supreme Court judge in Brazil who ordered his company X, formerly known as Twitter, to block some accounts.
00:36:04.000 In a post on X, Musk accused the judge of violating Brazil's constitution and he called for him to resign or be impeached.
00:36:12.000 The judge has been involved in efforts to crack down on... So it's unconstitutional, brazenly and repeatedly betrayed the constitution and people of Brazil.
00:36:20.000 He should resign or be impeached.
00:36:24.000 Imagine these measures were being passed under Bolsonaro.
00:36:27.000 They would have said, see?
00:36:28.000 The Brazilian Trump.
00:36:30.000 Fear these right-wing populist figures.
00:36:33.000 These neo-20th century dictators.
00:36:37.000 We've got to shut them down.
00:36:38.000 And yet, once again, it's under the guise of liberalism that we're seeing this authoritarianism being legitimized.
00:36:44.000 Information in Brazil and threatened to impose heavy fines for any reactivation of the accounts in question.
00:36:51.000 So, is it only censorship when it's used to shut down the free speech of people who you think should be silenced?
00:36:59.000 Or is the principle of free speech something that you would afford to those that most oppose you?
00:37:05.000 Clearly, it's the latter that's true.
00:37:07.000 Michael Schellenberg, our friend of the show, great journalist in my view, has spoken out on this.
00:37:12.000 Let's have a look.
00:37:12.000 This is Michael Schellenberger reporting from Sao Paulo, Brazil.
00:37:16.000 Last night, around 8 p.m.
00:37:17.000 local time, Federal Supreme Court Justice Alexandre J. Moraes announced a criminal investigation into Elon Musk, the owner of Axe, formerly known as Twitter, for allegedly spreading disinformation, obstructing justice, and allowing people who J. Moraes had banned from social media to freely express their views.
00:37:35.000 J. Moraes said he would fine Axe $20,000 per day for every banned person who Musk allows to speak.
00:37:42.000 S.H.G.
00:37:43.000 Mordeis has taken Brazil one step closer to being a dictatorship.
00:37:46.000 What's more, the events of the last few weeks make clear that Elon Musk is the only thing standing in the way of global totalitarianism.
00:37:53.000 Without free speech, there can be no democracy.
00:37:56.000 If X goes down, we must continue to fight.
00:37:59.000 We can continue to communicate through email and other social media platforms such as Facebook.
00:38:04.000 But email is no substitute for the capacity of social media platforms to share information instantaneously with millions of people.
00:38:13.000 It's extraordinary that a platform of that scale, and a person who wields the kind of financial and political and social power that Elon Musk currently has, can be opposed in this way.
00:38:28.000 It's extraordinary to me that free speech appears now to be a mutable matter.
00:38:33.000 That really when people are talking about free speech and censorship they are continually recalibrating what free speech constitutes, what is legitimate to censor and control.
00:38:44.000 Now Rumble, somewhat nobly one has to say, have already left Brazil precisely because they don't want to be subject to this type of compromises and no doubt these kind of fines.
00:38:55.000 Now whatever you think about Elon Musk, you know, because he's got a lot of interest.
00:38:58.000 He's got interest in electronic vehicles, he's got He's got interest in satellites and space exploration.
00:39:03.000 He's even got interest in fire extinguishers.
00:39:06.000 When it comes to this issue, Elon Musk says he is and appears to be behaving like a free speech absolutist.
00:39:13.000 If Brazil are able to ultimately prevent X from freely publishing and are able to ensure through fines That X censors certain accounts, presumably to shut down opponents of the state.
00:39:27.000 Oh, they're opponents of the state.
00:39:27.000 Of course they won't say that.
00:39:29.000 They'll say it's disinformation or misinformation.
00:39:31.000 This is another step towards the kind of centralised totalitarianism that I think all of you in the freedom movement are terrified of, that all of us are collectively trying to oppose.
00:39:43.000 You've heard that the EU are implementing comparable measures.
00:39:47.000 You know that in Ireland hate laws are being proposed that would mean that the police would have the right to come and search your house, search your devices.
00:39:55.000 You're aware from the story we've just seen about Alex Jones that the deep state confess that they themselves publish information that they know not to be true in order to bait and provoke and control and shut down dissent.
00:40:09.000 This is an extraordinary moment for all of us.
00:40:12.000 Let's have a look at Elon Musk's explanation on his own platform X.
00:40:16.000 We kept getting these demands from this Judge Alexander.
00:40:26.000 That's his name on Twitter, at Alexander.
00:40:28.000 Even Elon Musk still calls it Twitter.
00:40:32.000 But how are you going to get this rebrand over if Elon Musk forgets that it's been called X now?
00:40:38.000 And there would be to suspend accounts Immediately, we were given typically two hours to suspend an account or face massive fines.
00:40:49.000 And the final straw is we were being given demands to suspend sitting members of the parliament and major journalists.
00:40:59.000 And moreover, we could not tell them that this was at the behest of Alexander Morales.
00:41:06.000 We had to pretend that it was due to our rules of service.
00:41:10.000 And that was the final straw, and we said no.
00:41:13.000 It's extraordinary now.
00:41:14.000 I suppose what we're being invited to do is ignore that principles are being violated, which many people are willing to do just because of the side of the argument they happen to be on.
00:41:26.000 There will be many people that because of their disdain for Donald Trump will not notice
00:41:31.000 how terrifying it is that NATO are bypassing the national sovereignty of the nation of
00:41:37.000 America, let alone the population of America, by ensuring that the funding model for the
00:41:43.000 ongoing Ukraine-Russia conflict is protected in the event of a Trump presidency.
00:41:49.000 It seems that even becoming President of the United States is not enough to ensure that
00:41:54.000 democracy endures.
00:41:56.000 And when it comes to what's happening now in the nation of Brazil, you know, because in Trump and Musk we're talking about some of the most powerful anti-authoritarian voices.
00:42:05.000 I don't know if you like Elon Musk or Donald Trump.
00:42:07.000 I know there'll be people here watching this that loathe Elon Musk, that loathe Donald Trump, that despair of me.
00:42:13.000 That's why it's important to have values and principles, because if you've got values and principles, the personalities are not so relevant.
00:42:19.000 Do I believe in free speech?
00:42:20.000 Yes.
00:42:20.000 Do I recognize that the value of free speech means that I will sometimes hear speech that I disagree with, and in fact, that has to be the speech that I consider most valuable and most worthy of protection.
00:42:32.000 Well then, now we can have an argument about morality and philosophy and all of those things can happen in a democratic forum.
00:42:38.000 But for now what we are ultimately either through our passivity or by our active endorsement engaging in is the legitimization of further authoritarianism.
00:42:48.000 Let's look at this in a little more detail.
00:42:50.000 This is from public.
00:42:51.000 Alexandre de Moraes, Brazil's powerful president of the Superior Electoral Court and Supreme Federal Court Justice, on Sunday ordered the federal police to launch a digital malicious investigation prompted by ex-owner Elon Musk's conduct.
00:43:07.000 Musk was posting about restrictions imposed on accounts on X at the behest of Brazil's authorities and on Sunday said he would publish everything demanded by Moraes and how those requests violate Brazilian law.
00:43:19.000 He also called for external justice Alexandre de Moraes to resign or to be impeached.
00:43:26.000 Since taking office, President Lula da Silva has massively increased government funding of the mainstream corporate news media, most of which are encouraging increased censorship.
00:43:36.000 I always think this when you see a dissident being attacked.
00:43:39.000 And obviously, I'm not pretending that I've not been personally affected by that.
00:43:43.000 I have.
00:43:44.000 But the legacy media are not neutral observers.
00:43:47.000 They got skin in the game.
00:43:49.000 They are heavily invested in shutting down independent media.
00:43:53.000 And as your great comedian George Carlin said, where interests converge no conspiracy is required.
00:44:01.000 If the state want people on lockdown, if Big Pharma want people to take a medication, if the No conspiracy is required.
00:44:16.000 I'm not saying that there isn't a conspiracy but as you know on this channel we believe it is important to corroborate our claims.
00:44:23.000 Plainly what's happening in Brazil is the simultaneous subsidy of corporate media in exchange, I would assume, for their support of Lula's presidency And in conjunction with that, more draconian and punitive measures for social media, but in particular, independent media operatives utilizing those platforms.
00:44:47.000 If they can do it in Brazil, they can do it in America.
00:44:50.000 They can do it in the UK.
00:44:52.000 Already, Rumble have left France.
00:44:54.000 Rumble are out of Brazil.
00:44:55.000 I'm not saying Rumble is the perfect platform, but they have been perfect when it comes to the principle of free speech.
00:45:02.000 Saying simply this, we don't get involved In what the content creators create, we simply provide a platform.
00:45:10.000 That leaves the moral choices to you.
00:45:13.000 You can decide whether you like me, or trust me, or don't like me, or think I'm lying.
00:45:17.000 That's entirely up to you.
00:45:19.000 And I would say that that discernment...
00:45:21.000 Your ability to decide for yourself whether your government's lying, the judiciary are lying, the legacy media are lying.
00:45:27.000 That is your freedom!
00:45:29.000 Don't allow anybody in that space between you and what I would call God and what you might call intuition.
00:45:36.000 There's no way that we can legitimize or allow the legitimization of authoritarianism of this nature.
00:45:43.000 This is cause for, I would say, deep concern.
00:45:47.000 Since taking office, I've mentioned to you he's massively increased government funding, Maurice illegally demanded that Twitter reveal private information about Twitter users.
00:45:56.000 We've seen more of this.
00:45:57.000 We've seen Google giving over caches of information.
00:46:00.000 We've seen your American government using private firms to capture information which they then purchase, bypassing laws that prevent them doing that directly.
00:46:11.000 Twitter users who used hashtags he considered inappropriate.
00:46:14.000 He demanded access to Twitter's internal data, violating the platform's policy.
00:46:18.000 Let alone, never mind the platform's policy, what about the laws of that nation?
00:46:23.000 He censored on his own initiative and without any respect for due process, posts on Twitter by parliamentarians from the Brazilian Congress.
00:46:29.000 And Moraes tried to turn Twitter's content moderation policies into a weapon against supporters of then-president Jair Bolsonaro.
00:46:37.000 Remember, that guy was the baddie!
00:46:38.000 Do you remember that?
00:46:39.000 Do you remember that?
00:46:40.000 You rarely mention Latin America, and when you do, you get it wrong.
00:46:43.000 Listen, man.
00:46:45.000 You check those sources.
00:46:47.000 You can check the sources.
00:46:48.000 Our sources are here for you to observe yourself.
00:46:50.000 The Twitter files also revealed that Google, Facebook, Uber, WhatsApp, and Instagram betrayed the people of Brazil.
00:46:56.000 They provided the Brazilian government with personal registration data and telephone numbers without a court order, therefore violating the law.
00:47:04.000 Oh well, if you've got, if you've done nothing wrong, you've got nothing to hide.
00:47:08.000 Yeah, well let's just hope that one day the stuff you care about, the stuff you believe in, doesn't transgress the internal policies of an increasingly authoritarian Brazilian government, and yet more terrifyingly than that, even though Brazil is of course one of the most populous and glorious nations on this planet, an entire Planet!
00:47:27.000 Yielding to this kind of mentality.
00:47:29.000 When Twitter refused to provide Brazilian authorities with private user information, including direct messages, the government attempted to sue Twitter's top Brazilian lawyer.
00:47:38.000 Mark Zuckerberg, the owner of Facebook, abandoned his principled free speech position in 2020 after three years of relentless pressure from activists, NGOs, Democrats and corporate advertisers.
00:47:50.000 Today, Facebook actively represses the spread of news.
00:47:54.000 Indeed, you will recall that Instagram just slyly, suddenly, without any announcement or fanfare, just flipped a switch within the app that meant you will not see news on that platform unless you directly request it.
00:48:11.000 And I can already see that the way that some of our posts are being received on that platform has been impacted.
00:48:17.000 They're not trying to protect you.
00:48:19.000 You would have to have almost limitless trust in their motives to believe that this is anything other than the protection and assertion of power.
00:48:28.000 But I will say that they've introduced me to a pretty novel concept.
00:48:31.000 For the first time ever there, I felt, except for when I was watching the Social Network movie, I felt a little bit sorry for Mark Zuckerberg, because I feel like, well, even though he's one of the world's most powerful men, he's only powerful in that role.
00:48:42.000 He's only powerful if he complies.
00:48:45.000 He only has the power to support the system, getting pressure from NGOs, Democrats, corporate advertisers.
00:48:50.000 He's a human being like you and me, and he is a part of the system and a part of the machine.
00:48:55.000 And I guess, again, whatever you think about Elon Musk, he ain't yielding.
00:49:01.000 So I know a lot of people, I see cynicism, and I see people attacking me, I see people attacking all sorts of people, but he is standing up, isn't he?
00:49:09.000 He's standing up, he's participating in the fight right now when it comes to this issue.
00:49:13.000 The mainstream corporate news media have never been more corrupt and totalitarian with few exceptions.
00:49:18.000 They spread government propaganda as a matter of policy.
00:49:21.000 Nobody demands censorship more than the corporate media which benefit from governments shutting down their competitors.
00:49:27.000 Again, this is something I can speak about with some personal experience and understanding.
00:49:33.000 The legacy media want to destroy independent media voices because day by day Their audience is diminishing because you don't trust them and you're right not to trust them because they see it as their role to normalize, popularize and convey the agenda of the powerful with as little circumspection as possible.
00:49:53.000 Think of any shiny floor American news show you like and just Hear the dumb timbre of the voice and the constant conveyance of the agenda of the powerful.
00:50:02.000 The pandemic was a seismic epochal moment because it showed us how these institutions work together to ensure a kind of 360 orb of power impenetrable by all but the most awakened of minds.
00:50:15.000 That's why we have a duty to engage in personal disciplines that allow us to awaken together and discern and a set of values and principles about the freedom of speech of people we disagree with.
00:50:28.000 Governments are either not protecting free speech, or actively participating in the war upon it.
00:50:33.000 So again, Schellenberger here makes the point that legacy media and governments, they don't need to be drilled.
00:50:39.000 The legacy media do not like Joe Rogan's success, or Tucker Carlson's success, or even my success.
00:50:47.000 They don't like it.
00:50:48.000 Me and you have this vibe.
00:50:50.000 That we trust one another.
00:50:51.000 That you know I'm different from you in a hundred ways.
00:50:54.000 That you would disagree with me on a thousand topics.
00:50:56.000 But I believe in your freedom.
00:50:57.000 I believe in your right to disagree with me.
00:50:59.000 I believe in your right to your religion, or lack of religion, or your culture, or your identity.
00:51:04.000 We have a set of basic principles that they're pretending aren't there.
00:51:09.000 About free speech.
00:51:10.000 About consent.
00:51:11.000 About care.
00:51:12.000 About community.
00:51:12.000 About love.
00:51:13.000 And they're saying, although these things, they're a post-structuralist, bizarre concoction.
00:51:19.000 There's no such thing as meaning.
00:51:20.000 There's no such thing as God.
00:51:22.000 There's no such thing as friendship.
00:51:24.000 We're just blobs here to consume and devour whatever's put in front of us.
00:51:29.000 Whether it's bad information or bad, bad television, bad content, bad food.
00:51:34.000 They just put it in front of us and expect us to consume.
00:51:37.000 Last month, the US Supreme Court held a hearing where justices made clear that they were fine with the US government pressuring social media companies to censor.
00:51:45.000 Last week, the Scottish government implemented a law to crack down on so-called hate speech, including jokes by comedians.
00:51:52.000 Are you starting to notice a trend yet?
00:51:55.000 Are you noticing how it's never to empower their opponents?
00:51:58.000 Are you noticing how it's never to empower ordinary people?
00:52:01.000 Do you notice how there's always some slew of victims?
00:52:05.000 That they can utilise.
00:52:07.000 It's all that we've got to protect these people.
00:52:08.000 Do you really think that's what got them into politics?
00:52:11.000 What got them into business?
00:52:12.000 Got them into media?
00:52:14.000 Anything other than this wild and vapid appetite for power?
00:52:18.000 Although even this I want to retract because I know they're human beings too and we must operate from a place of love and forgiveness.
00:52:25.000 That's the end of that piece, huh?
00:52:27.000 No, there's another one.
00:52:29.000 In Ireland, the government wants the power to send police into people's homes to search computers and phones for hate speech.
00:52:36.000 In Canada, the governing Liberal Party wants the power to send people to prison for life for the things they've said.
00:52:41.000 And the European Union has empowered a tiny group of bureaucrats to decide what is true and false and engage in mass censorship.
00:52:47.000 All of this is happening at the very same moment that government intelligence organisations are working through NGOs to interfere in elections by spreading disinformation about populist activists and political candidates.
00:52:58.000 Indeed, it's these kind of NGOs and organisations that were instrumental in the attacks on me in September.
00:53:05.000 We have Freedom of Information Act requesting with several significant agencies and government departments that have already been incredibly revealing and they're still trying to control that information.
00:53:15.000 It's an astonishing time.
00:53:17.000 In other words, governments are demanding censorship in order to protect their ability to spread disinformation.
00:53:23.000 Of course it's that.
00:53:24.000 Of course they don't care about you.
00:53:26.000 What would make you imagine for even a moment that your government cares about you?
00:53:30.000 What have they done for you lately?
00:53:32.000 Which of the wars?
00:53:33.000 Which of the policies?
00:53:34.000 What aspect of the facilitation of global corporations or unelected globalist bodies is it that makes you think they love you and your family and the people you care about?
00:53:45.000 What have they done for you lately?
00:53:46.000 Making matters worse, governments are directly financing corporate news media.
00:53:50.000 The current Brazilian government is spending 30 times more than the previous government on media advertising in order to spread its disinformation.
00:53:57.000 Similarly, in recent years, The political party that runs our country, the Conservative Party, spent more money than any other organisation on advertising.
00:54:07.000 I'd love to fact check that, but I seem to recall it.
00:54:10.000 We'll get a fact check on it before I convey it, because we take this stuff pretty seriously.
00:54:16.000 After Musk bought Twitter, the Biden administration and the Democratic Party declared war on him.
00:54:21.000 Various government agencies filed multiple frivolous lawsuits against Musk and his companies in ways very similar to the war the Brazilian government is waging against X. What all of this reveals is that until Musk bought Twitter, he didn't really have freedom of expression.
00:54:33.000 The US government felt that it controlled both the corporate news media and social media companies.
00:54:38.000 We saw in the Twitter files that the FBI orchestrated a disinformation and censorship campaign in order to protect Joe Biden.
00:54:45.000 That amounts to anti-democratic practices.
00:54:47.000 We know that Google filter, control and curate information to ensure that a news agenda favorable to the Biden administration can be met.
00:54:56.000 And that's not because they love Joe Biden and his ice cream licking lips and his aviator shades.
00:55:00.000 It's because Joe Biden is a stooge of the establishment that the Democrat Party is the party of war, the party of censorship, the party of power now.
00:55:08.000 After that, the US Department of Homeland Security and the Stanford Internet Observatory engaged in a mass censorship effort around the 2020 elections and COVID.
00:55:16.000 And that's why COVID was such a significant time for all of us.
00:55:19.000 We all learned a great deal during that period.
00:55:22.000 Primarily, legacy media works together And here's a significant piece in all this.
00:55:26.000 This is Bernie Sanders in 2022 talking about Joe Biden sending the CIA to ensure democracy in Brazil.
00:55:31.000 that are interested in censorship and de-amplification of information that empowers you.
00:55:37.000 And here's a significant piece in all this. This is Bernie Sanders in 2022 talking about Joe Biden
00:55:43.000 sending the CIA to ensure democracy in Brazil. Fortunately that election went the way that the
00:55:52.000 Biden administration would have it, having a companion, an ally in Lula, something they did
00:55:58.000 not have in the previous incumbent of office in that country. Let's have a look at Bernie Sanders
00:56:05.000 saying that. I believe this is from 2022. And by the way, in fairness to the Biden
00:56:11.000 administration, before we talk about their relationships with progressive governments,
00:56:16.000 they have, and I think in an unusual way, Thank you.
00:56:21.000 You know, sent the CIA and set the Secretary of Defense down to Brazil over the last several months to make it clear that they did not want to see a rigged election or a coup.
00:56:36.000 And that's what the Biden people did.
00:56:38.000 And I appreciate that.
00:56:40.000 Why would you trust the CIA?
00:56:42.000 Isn't that in a way comparable to the CIA involvement in Ukrainian elections and even a Ukrainian coup in 2014?
00:56:52.000 You've got democracy as long as that democracy is in absolute alignment with the interests of the powerful.
00:56:59.000 Otherwise, you ain't got no democracy.
00:57:01.000 You ain't got no free speech at all.
00:57:03.000 But hey, that's just what I think.
00:57:05.000 Let me know what you think in the comments.
00:57:07.000 Stay free.
00:57:09.000 And check this out.
00:57:10.000 This is an extraordinary story.
00:57:12.000 The CDC have been accused of redacting every single word of a 148-page study on myocarditis after the vaccination.
00:57:23.000 Now, this can't be entirely verified, but it's something that's been subject to discussion in a significant hearing, and you're going to love this story.
00:57:30.000 And we know that the CDC has a history of not publishing large portions of its COVID data, and you know that it's likely that they covered up myocarditis risks.
00:57:41.000 I want to welcome all of you that are new members of our community.
00:57:44.000 If you're an Awake and Wonder, thank you for participating.
00:57:47.000 Remember, you can get that glorious... where the hell is that glorious sweatshirt?
00:57:50.000 That's been stolen.
00:57:51.000 It's a brilliant piece of merch.
00:57:52.000 We've got so much fantastic content coming up for you.
00:57:55.000 Stay with us and we've got a fantastic show with you tomorrow.
00:57:58.000 Here's the news.
00:57:59.000 No, here's the effing news.
00:58:01.000 Thank you for choosing Fox News.
00:58:02.000 The news.
00:58:03.000 No, here's the effing news.
00:58:06.000 The CDC appear to have redacted 148 pages of a 148 page document
00:58:11.000 looking into the impact of mRNA vaccines into myocarditis.
00:58:16.000 So what are they covering up?
00:58:18.000 Really good news about how it doesn't have any impact!
00:58:23.000 Without independent media, where would we be now when it comes to our understanding of what happened during the pandemic period?
00:58:29.000 What is the official narrative now?
00:58:31.000 I find it difficult to even identify in the midst of all of the fallen truths and discovered deceptions that have taken place in the last couple of months.
00:58:39.000 Now we know, or at least it appears, that the CDC censored a document of 148 pages in its entirety.
00:58:47.000 We certainly know in the past they have withheld significant information and indeed the claim that they redacted an entire document can be seen by all of us.
00:58:55.000 It's made in a committee hearing which we'll show you a little bit of now.
00:58:59.000 If this practice of redaction continues, how will we ever get to the truth about what's happened in the last five years and what that tells us?
00:59:07.000 about these sets of institutions and how they behave when they face dissent or any threat to their authority.
00:59:13.000 It just keeps happening.
00:59:14.000 The CDC redacts every single word of a 148 page study on a myocarditis after COVID vaccination.
00:59:22.000 So I asked research to print the study for me.
00:59:23.000 148 pages.
00:59:27.000 The entire thing is redacted.
00:59:28.000 The good news is you could put that straight back into the photocopier and it could go through again with minimal impact on the environment and surely it's the environment that must be upmost in our concerns now.
00:59:38.000 Although, I'd be worried about dying in a pandemic or from a nuclear war, then probably environment.
00:59:43.000 What good does a study do if there's nothing there?
00:59:47.000 Then I want to know, wait, what might have been there that they needed to redact it?
00:59:51.000 That's even scarier.
00:59:53.000 We're witnessing an active cover-up.
00:59:56.000 of a colossal consumer product safety debacle.
01:00:01.000 That is, it's basically affected the entire world.
01:00:04.000 This is Dr. Peter McCulloch's testimony and I wonder where this committee and its findings will ultimately lead because already in his first sentence he's told us that there's been a debacle and a cover-up.
01:00:16.000 Are we ever likely to hear those terms spoken at the level of authority necessary for there to be the obviously required reckoning?
01:00:25.000 So in the United States, our CDC, National Institutes of Health and the FDA are actively involved in a cover-up.
01:00:35.000 And the same is occurring in the UK with the MHRA, Europe with European medicine agencies,
01:00:40.000 and Australia with the Therapeutic Goods Administration.
01:00:43.000 So evidently the regulatory bodies in all territories are willing to participate, it seems,
01:00:50.000 in facilitating these pharmaceutical companies in avoiding the consequences or even an investigation
01:00:57.000 into the inefficiency of their product, possibly the dangers of their products,
01:01:01.000 because it doesn't matter where it's taking place globally, Australia, the UK, the United States,
01:01:05.000 there is no clear accountability.
01:01:07.000 Neither is there sufficient journalistic investigation, neither are there sufficient clinical trials.
01:01:12.000 Everything that Peter McCulloch, whilst at this point not being 100% verifiable,
01:01:16.000 at least seems plausible.
01:01:18.000 Something is going on that's very big.
01:01:21.000 Each one of these companies that puts out a product has an obligation to produce 90 days of safety monitoring after their product comes out.
01:01:30.000 It's a regulatory dossier.
01:01:32.000 If somebody has a problem with the new product and they call the company, like Pfizer, Pfizer has to report, write down what happened and they have to collate that in a report and produce it and make it publicly available.
01:01:44.000 When it came to 90 days with Pfizer, the first vaccine that came out, remember Pfizer was approved December 10, 2020, Pfizer didn't produce a report.
01:01:52.000 And then people started asking, well, what's happening with your vaccine?
01:01:56.000 And Pfizer would not disclose what happened.
01:01:58.000 And then it went to court.
01:01:59.000 And the lawyer for the FDA stepped in and said they don't want to release Pfizer's dossier for 55 years.
01:02:07.000 55 years and the plaintiff pushed and finally, slowly, the Pfizer dossier came out.
01:02:17.000 So we'll start with the claim that indeed the CDC have redacted 148 pages of a 148 page document.
01:02:23.000 Seems bloody ridiculous.
01:02:24.000 Then we'll look at comparable recent instances where information has been withheld.
01:02:28.000 Then we'll look at how we know something extraordinary is happening because of the increase in excess deaths, the change in the way that excess deaths are calculated, and the necessity of insurance companies to re-evaluate the way they impose Premiums and charges because people are dying at surprising times from surprising things since about 2021.
01:02:47.000 That's as a result of the research and inquiry mostly of Pierre Cori.
01:02:52.000 So let's go through this information together and see if in the face of a good deal of propaganda we can discern some important truths.
01:02:59.000 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CDC, released a 148-page study on myokiditis after COVID-19, mRNA vaccination, and every single word on every page has been completely redacted.
01:03:10.000 The 148-page document released by the CDC was in response to a Freedom of Information Act, FOIA request by the Epoch Times.
01:03:18.000 They could have left in words like the and a and is.
01:03:21.000 That's an over-redaction.
01:03:22.000 T-t-t-he.
01:03:24.000 T-he.
01:03:25.000 The.
01:03:28.000 Perhaps when you hear a name like Epoch Times you think well this is a new and emergent media space and maybe you don't trust them.
01:03:33.000 Maybe you need legacy media to make you feel comfortable that the information you're consuming has been verified.
01:03:38.000 So this is a piece from the New York Times in 2022 that shows that the CDC redacting and controlling information is a sort of par for the course.
01:03:45.000 For more than a year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has collected data on hospitalizations for COVID-19 in the United States and broken it down by age, race and vaccination status.
01:03:55.000 But it has not made most of the information public.
01:03:58.000 When the CDC published the first significant data on the effectiveness of boosters in adults younger than 65 two weeks ago, it left out the numbers for a huge portion of that population, 18 to 49 year olds, the group least likely to benefit from extra shots.
01:04:13.000 In a way, that's the New York Times a couple of years ago observing that this information was being controlled, presumably with, in this case, a financial outcome.
01:04:22.000 So even if you want to look at this whole exercise simply as an opportunistic way to make money, this piece of information from the New York Times is cause for concern.
01:04:32.000 That's before you get into the health impact and the sort of stuff that Peter McCulloch and Dr. Pierre Corey are talking about.
01:04:37.000 There's already, way there in the midst of the mainstream, cause for concern.
01:04:42.000 Two full years into the pandemic, the agency leading the country's response to the public health emergency has published only a tiny fraction of the data it's collected, several people familiar with the data said.
01:04:52.000 But the CDC has been routinely collecting information since the COVID vaccines were first rolled out last year, according to a federal official familiar with the effort.
01:05:00.000 The agency has been reluctant to make those figures public, the official said, because they might be misinterpreted as the vaccines being ineffective.
01:05:07.000 Which seems like a reasonable interpretation.
01:05:09.000 And if data leads you to a particular interpretation, then it's data that's led you to it.
01:05:14.000 It's not speculative at that point, is it?
01:05:16.000 Hey, we've got a lovely partner today.
01:05:18.000 It's our friends at Hallo.
01:05:20.000 Hallo is the number one prayer app in the world.
01:05:22.000 I use it.
01:05:23.000 You can explore Christianity with over 10,000 prayers, meditations and music.
01:05:27.000 And as Lent continues, what better way to deepen your connection to the loving Lord Christ?
01:05:32.000 It's been downloaded 4 million times in 150 countries, be it like Calm or Headspace, but for Christians.
01:05:37.000 Hallow helps you pray and meditate and sleep better.
01:05:40.000 It's helped me build a daily routine of habit and prayer.
01:05:43.000 I do the rosary.
01:05:44.000 I know it off by heart.
01:05:44.000 Except the end bit.
01:05:46.000 You can pray alongside Mark Wahlberg, Jim Caviezel.
01:05:46.000 I've got to learn that.
01:05:49.000 He was Jesus.
01:05:50.000 Jonathan Rumi.
01:05:51.000 He was Jesus in The Chosen.
01:05:52.000 You can choose your own Jesus.
01:05:55.000 What version of Christianity do you want?
01:05:56.000 And you know Jonathan Rumi was my body double in Ballers.
01:05:59.000 Jesus was my body double.
01:06:00.000 Download it today.
01:06:01.000 Reclaim your rightful peace and grow closer to God.
01:06:04.000 Go to hello.com forward slash brand to try the Hello Prayer app.
01:06:09.000 You will love it.
01:06:10.000 Okay, let's get back to the content.
01:06:12.000 There's also some evidence that the CDC facilitated cover-ups and certainly delayed the release of information according to rhythms that are not immediately clear.
01:06:22.000 A mounting body of evidence shows that the CDC and White House chose to ignore and cover up evidence of a significant myocarditis safety signal in early 2021 putting young people at risk of serious adverse events.
01:06:34.000 On April 27th, 2021, then-director of the CDC, Rochelle Walensky stated,
01:06:39.000 we have not seen any reports of post-vaccination myocarditis, but this was a false statement at the time.
01:06:44.000 Journalist Zachary Stiber of the Epoch Times obtained internal CDC emails
01:06:49.000 through a Freedom of Information Act request.
01:06:51.000 Notice this information only comes available because independent journalists make inquiries
01:06:55.000 using what amount to legal loopholes.
01:06:57.000 As a person who's made Freedom of Information Act inquiries and requests, it's really difficult.
01:07:02.000 They delay it as long as possible, they put you off, you have to involve lawyers.
01:07:06.000 It's a total nightmare to get information that's yours by right.
01:07:09.000 So remember, this is not an example of, well look, they're being clear and transparent now.
01:07:12.000 They're not being clear and transparent now.
01:07:14.000 The information that we have is a result of independent journalism and independent inquiry, and they continue, it appears, based on this committee, to redact significant information even now, and I think we're all beginning to get a picture of just why that might be.
01:07:26.000 Although, Even perhaps the most skeptical, cynical, and fearful among us might not understand the full scale of what we are facing.
01:07:33.000 When Walensky claimed to have not seen any reports, there were dozens of reports in the U.S.
01:07:37.000 Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, VAERS.
01:07:39.000 Although we can't know for sure if Walensky had seen reports of post-vaccine myocarditis, a U.S.
01:07:44.000 government memorandum from March 2021, also obtained by Stieber, stated there were 27 cases of myocarditis, myoopericarditis, and pericarditis, inflammation of the lining around the heart, In June 2021, after most people who were planning to get vaccinated had received at least one dose, the CDC began publicly investigating myocarditis and speaking to the news media about it.
01:08:06.000 So I suppose the implication is they waited till people were vaccinated before telling them that there were risks associated with vaccines and that doesn't seem responsible.
01:08:15.000 The CDC, notes Stieber, was warned by Israel on February the 28th, 2021 about a large number of myocarditis cases after Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination, documents obtained by the Epoch Times show.
01:08:26.000 Internally, the warning was designated as high importance and set for review of US data.
01:08:31.000 Walensky let mumps go by after receiving a warning from the Israeli Ministry of Health, and even when more information about myocarditis became public, her agency continued to downplay the risks.
01:08:41.000 In November 2021, the Biden administration announced sweeping mandates for working-age people, many of whom were in the group, men under 30, who would be most at risk.
01:08:50.000 So actually, there were mandates in place to ensure the necessity of taking a medication that they knew had risks and indeed they insisted the most at-risk group be mandated to take that medication.
01:09:03.000 When you're watching something like the hunt of Biden inquiries and whether or not Joe Biden should be impeached because of financial impropriety and being involved in his son's business dealings you forget that actually in recent memory there's been corruption and negligence of such scale that the entire government needs to be reviewed and you might argue, replaced.
01:09:22.000 In fact, the challenge is so enormous that even people that are enthusiastic about change
01:09:27.000 slightly balk at recognising the significance of just a piece of information like that.
01:09:32.000 It may be that Walensky chose to disregard the safety signals from Israel and the military
01:09:36.000 because she did not want to interrupt the vaccination campaign.
01:09:38.000 After a few reports of blood clots following Johnson & Johnson shots, the CDC placed a
01:09:42.000 temporary pause on the company's vaccines.
01:09:45.000 Doing something similar for Pfizer and Moderna might have brought the whole vaccine rollout to a halt.
01:09:50.000 Right, I see.
01:09:51.000 So they were just managing the perception of the vaccine, knowing that...
01:09:54.000 All that while, hesitancy, shaming, reluctance, really what should have been happening is there are risks.
01:10:00.000 These are the risks.
01:10:01.000 Actually, they were being bombastic, assertive, propagandist and mandating the taking of those medications and now they're curious as to why there is significant and maybe even historic mistrust in the government and in the pharmaceutical industry.
01:10:14.000 To this day the CDC has not released complete updated data on myocarditis.
01:10:19.000 The agency's cover-up of adverse cardiac events has had profound consequences and represents a major breach of trust and abuse of authority.
01:10:27.000 Because of that lack of transparency there are now data sets of billions of people that have taken vaccines and now a study has revealed just how significant a portion of people suffered adverse effects and injuries.
01:10:39.000 A new study on COVID-19 vaccines that looked at nearly 100 million vaccinated individuals affirmed the vaccine's previously observed links to increased risks for certain adverse effects, including myocarditis and Killian Barr syndrome.
01:10:51.000 Both mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna were associated with instances of myocarditis, inflammation of the heart muscle, which occurred more than was expected in the study, with the condition having a significant observed-to-expected ratio consistently after the first, second, and third doses.
01:11:05.000 So that's perhaps an indication as to why the CDC have been reluctant to fully release information on myocarditis.
01:11:10.000 structure that surrounds the heart were also observed following first and fourth doses of Moderna's vaccines.
01:11:15.000 So that's perhaps an indication as to why the CDC have been reluctant to fully release information on myocarditis.
01:11:21.000 It's likely that the information is significant and now the subject that represents the jewel in the crown of
01:11:26.000 coronavirus conspiracy theories, excess deaths. There is significant evidence to suggest that excess deaths, well,
01:11:32.000 there are calculations, not theories, excess deaths are higher.
01:11:35.000 There are attempts to manipulate those figures, but they are not manipulating those figures when it comes to
01:11:40.000 assessing life insurance.
01:11:41.000 There, of course, because of the financial implications, they have to be rigorous in understanding how likely you
01:11:46.000 are to get sick and die because it would cost them financially if they miscalculate.
01:11:52.000 So let's get into excess deaths and the evidence that excess deaths is something to be taken very seriously.
01:11:57.000 21 British MPs and peers have accused the Health Secretary of withholding data that could link the COVID vaccine to excess deaths and criticised a wall of silence on the topic.
01:12:06.000 Ministers have blamed the rise in excess deaths on record NHS waiting lists and the pandemic backlog.
01:12:11.000 But the parliamentarians are demanding to be shown the underlying data to support the government's assertion that there is no evidence linking excess deaths to the vaccines for COVID-19.
01:12:19.000 If those data do indeed exist, please share them.
01:12:22.000 If thorough investigations have already ruled out such a link, please share the relevant reports, their letter says.
01:12:27.000 There is no place here for blind faith.
01:12:29.000 They believe potentially critical data which maps the date of people's COVID-19 vaccine doses to the date of their deaths have been released to pharmaceutical companies but not put into the public domain.
01:12:39.000 The MPs argue that the data should be released on the same anonymized basis that it was shared with pharmaceutical groups And there seems to be no credible reason why that should not be done immediately.
01:12:48.000 If indeed the information has been shared within the pharmaceutical industry and not shared with the public, it's a further indication that something is being significantly masked.
01:12:57.000 And you've got to assume that if evidence existed to show that there was no correlation, that that evidence would be being pretty loudly shared and trumpeted.
01:13:04.000 This while life insurance actuaries are finding that more people are continuing to die at alarming rates, even more than before the pandemic, that cannot be accounted for by Covid.
01:13:13.000 For instance, the Society of Actuaries Research Institute found there was a 34% increase in deaths among working age people, 35 to 44, in the last quarter of 2022.
01:13:23.000 Many of them are working age people who are in the prime of their life, who are suffering deaths from cardiac and neurological disorders.
01:13:29.000 Life insurers have been consistently sounding the alarm over these unexpected or excess deaths which claimed 158,000 more Americans in the first nine months of 2023 than in the same period in 2019.
01:13:39.000 That exceeds America's combined losses from every war since Vietnam.
01:13:44.000 Whatever this collection of cover-ups are ultimately about, it appears that by piecing together a mosaic of the known and indications of what the unknown might include, that as you have long suspected, something significant is taking place.
01:13:57.000 But given that the bureaucracies, whether they are apparent regulatory bodies or state institutions like the CDC, are ultimately either financially entwined with the interests of the pharmaceutical industry Or ideologically entwined with the sets of systems that have coalesced around this issue, presumably existed prior to the pandemic and will continue to remain in some form of power until that trajectory and tendency is interrupted.
01:14:21.000 We are unlikely to receive the truth until it's too late.
01:14:25.000 In fact, the example of the information about myocarditis being withheld till people have taken the vaccinations is probably a pretty good Metaphor for how these things are generally handled.
01:14:33.000 They give you the information, sure, but only when it's too late for you to do anything about it.
01:14:39.000 That's why we in independent media are keen to share this information while we can still assess and to a degree intuit what might be happening right now.
01:14:46.000 It seems significant that the inquiry into Covid in our country, the UK, has with regard to vaccines been delayed indefinitely and they're not even willing to commit to when they'll look into some of these questions.
01:14:57.000 And in Australia there still seems to be a degree of scepticism and inhibition and of course in America, the belly of the beast you might say, as usual the influence and power of the pharmaceutical industry and this set set of subsidiary industries, ultimately, the regulatory
01:15:11.000 bodies, you might argue, that aren't powerful enough to impose sanctions or expose truth
01:15:15.000 or be transparent, means that it's going to be left to you and organisations like ours to
01:15:20.000 investigate and piece together this information and perhaps critically make decisions
01:15:25.000 going forward based on what we understand now and to acknowledge that we're unlikely to be able to
01:15:30.000 impact institutional corruption of this scale simply by voting for one of two parties
01:15:36.000 within a system that seems to of being, broadly speaking, co-opted.
01:15:40.000 But that's just what I think.
01:15:40.000 Let me know what you think in the chat.
01:15:41.000 See you in a second.
01:15:51.000 I don't know.