Stay Free - Russel Brand - YOU WERE RIGHT! | CIA In Ukraine, France Vax Law & Alex Jones Predicted THIS - Stay Free #338

00:00:00.000 Hello you Awakening Wonders there on Spotify, Apple, Stink Whistle, Gurgle Dot or wherever you download your podcasts these days to remain at least peripherally connected to some tendril of truth in a bewildering miasma of lies and propaganda.

00:00:18.000 We appreciate you, and we love you.

00:00:20.000 You're part of our community.

00:00:21.000 So that's why we're very happy to give you an audio version of our live Rumble Show five days a week.

00:00:27.000 It's on Monday to Friday.

00:00:28.000 We decipher the latest news stories, we break down current topics that the mainstream media should be covering, and if they aren't, Then we critique why they're not and what they are covering.

00:00:38.000 Every week as well, right?

00:00:40.000 We do brilliant conversations with people like Jordan Peterson, RFK, Tucker Carlson, Sam Harris, Vandana Shiva, Gabor Mate.

00:00:48.000 These things are already up and you can listen to them now.

00:00:49.000 So remember, this is an audio version of our daily live show.

00:00:54.000 To tune in live, go to rumble.com forward slash Russell Brand.

00:00:58.000 You'll find it easily and I hope that you will love it.

00:01:01.000 Now please enjoy this episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand.

00:01:05.000 Thanks.

00:01:07.000 Hello and welcome to this special episode of stay free with Russell Brand

00:01:19.000 Conspiracy theories to conspiracy facts is a journey our community continually makes.

00:01:23.000 While we're being lied to we're picking through all of that balderdash that flows in our direction and discerning what is the truth amidst the fiction.

00:01:31.000 Where is the freedom amidst, excuse me, the friction?

00:01:36.000 We're going to be talking today about the CIA's involvement in Ukraine, we're going to be talking about France's vaccine law, you're going to love this video, and Alex Jones's predictions and how they are coming to pass.

00:01:45.000 Now for 15 minutes we'll be freely available but then we'll exclusively be gambling and frolicking in that sweet stream of freedom we call Rumble.

00:01:52.000 It's worth downloading the app, it's worth clicking the red button in fact to get additional content that we make there, beautiful additional content, Beautiful content, beautiful dogs.

00:02:02.000 Every single week we do great videos on stuff like Chemtrails, brilliant stuff on the bloody MK Ultras.

00:02:10.000 You're gonna love it.

00:02:10.000 Become a member of our community, get the additional content, be part of a movement that opposes injustice and stands up for ordinary people.

00:02:17.000 Now, the first conspiracy to fact is the CIA have been in Ukraine for 10 years.

00:02:23.000 They've been meddling in Ukrainian politics for a while now.

00:02:26.000 They were even involved in that coup.

00:02:28.000 And yet the legacy media continues to support them.

00:02:31.000 Should someone scrutinise this subject in a little more detail, we've done it for you.

00:02:35.000 Here's the news?

00:02:36.000 No, here's the F in news.

00:02:38.000 Thank you for choosing Fox News.

00:02:39.000 You're welcome.

00:02:40.000 No, here's the F in news.

00:02:43.000 If the CIA have had secret spy bases in Ukraine for the last 10 years

00:02:49.000 and have been engaged in a shadow war, then whatever Putin's invasion of Ukraine is,

00:02:55.000 it ain't unprovoked, is it?

00:02:57.000 So why the New York Times changing the story now?

00:03:03.000 What we're talking about is the New York Times have now admitted, acknowledged that there are CIA bases inside Ukraine and have been for the last 10 years.

00:03:11.000 And they've been waging a shadow war on Russia from within Ukraine.

00:03:16.000 And essentially, deep state interests have been in control of Ukraine for the last 10 years, which is, oh, since that 2014 coup, which we've been talking about in independent media, but they've not been talking about in legacy media.

00:03:26.000 And that's before we talk about NATO's role in exacerbating these conditions and the escalation of conflicts between Russia And Ukraine.

00:03:33.000 So why are the New York Times telling us now that there are CIA bases in Ukraine and probably biolabs and all the sorts of things that we've been discussing in these spaces for a while and were of course called conspiracy theorists for discussing?

00:03:47.000 It's evidently true.

00:03:48.000 So what's the agenda of the legacy media?

00:03:50.000 Is it as simple as ensuring that funding can continue?

00:03:54.000 And is it clear now that the legacy media are starting to acknowledge that you cannot completely suppress truth?

00:04:00.000 You can employ agencies like Logically AI You can have government agencies using proxies to crush dissent and censor, but ultimately, and this is actually pretty good and exciting news, we're too powerful now to be controlled.

00:04:12.000 I don't mean we, just me and literally you.

00:04:14.000 I mean the people that occupy these spaces, all of your various resources that you use to formulate your understanding of reality so that you are not subject to the reality that Google and Google and Google AI and the establishment

00:04:25.000 would have you live with him.

00:04:26.000 'Cause remember, it's not that long ago that they told you pretty repetitively

00:04:31.000 and with absolute determination that this was an unprovoked war.

00:04:35.000 But because of their odd, peculiar amnesia of our times, you may have forgotten that, but they did do that.

00:04:41.000 Have a look.

00:04:42.000 The Russian military has begun a brutal assault on the people of Ukraine.

00:04:45.000 Without provocation, without justification.

00:04:49.000 This is an attack which is unprovoked and unjustified attack on Ukraine.

00:04:54.000 The prayers of the entire world are with the people of Ukraine tonight

00:04:58.000 as they suffer an unprovoked and unjustified attack.

00:05:01.000 It's just the ones you've heard already included.

00:05:04.000 We do have CIA bases within Ukraine and have been waging on a shadow war.

00:05:08.000 And as you know, NATO have been provoking Russia for years by inviting Ukraine to join NATO since 2008, knowing that that's a red line for Putin.

00:05:18.000 That can no longer be called an unprovoked attack.

00:05:20.000 It's a provoked attack.

00:05:21.000 It's still terrible for the people of Ukraine.

00:05:23.000 I'm aware and I pray that Ukrainian people are watching this and I pray that they're safe.

00:05:26.000 Obviously not within Ukraine.

00:05:27.000 I'm assuming, you know, Let's go elsewhere as refugees due to this terrible war that could be prevented because I bet you wouldn't be so willing to spend your tax dollars funding the perpetuation of a war that is provoked rather than unprovoked. 1.00

00:05:39.000 We'll get into looking at why the legacy media have changed their tune right now but for this moment we can double down on the fact that we can't trust them, we could never trust them.

00:05:47.000 Why would you ever trust them?

00:05:48.000 What do you think they are about?

00:05:50.000 Let's have a look.

00:05:50.000 Russia commenced its full-scale, unprovoked invasion of Ukraine.

00:05:55.000 President Putin has launched a horrific, unprovoked attack on their country.

00:06:00.000 That image, so full of pointlessness and lies, is essentially an artwork at this point.

00:06:05.000 These masks don't work.

00:06:07.000 We know they don't work.

00:06:08.000 This war is completely Completely illegitimate.

00:06:11.000 I shouldn't even really be Prime Minister.

00:06:12.000 I'm pretending to be all nice and I'm evoking emergency.

00:06:15.000 I mean, the whole thing.

00:06:16.000 You could literally go to Broadway in New York City and watch a show and be hit with more truth than watching the news.

00:06:23.000 We are united in condemning the Kremlin's unprovoked aggression.

00:06:28.000 And he also actually knows, because that's Jens Stoltenberg from NATO, who's directly been in contact with Putin and going, so what will you do if we... Yeah, that would be a war with it.

00:06:37.000 No justification apart from the fact that he is a warmonger that wanted to build an empire.

00:06:44.000 You can't call someone a warmonger when you've done what that man is purported to have done with a piggy.

00:06:50.000 Putin is the aggressor.

00:06:53.000 Putin chose this war.

00:06:55.000 I'm really looking forward to seeing the sign language lady have to sort of retract all of that. 1.00

00:07:00.000 Complete lie.

00:07:02.000 Biden.

00:07:03.000 Okay, let's get into some analysis of why the New York Times have chosen this moment to seed a different story.

00:07:09.000 And by my reckoning, this is comparable to the recent study on coronavirus that does indeed reveal, oh yeah, there are adverse

00:07:16.000 injuries, oh, there are peculiar cerebral conditions,

00:07:19.000 oh, we should have perhaps looked at whether or not we need to vaccinate this community or that community,

00:07:24.000 all stuff that could have been discussed years ago, curiously, before they made all the money.

00:07:28.000 It's very interesting that the most censored events in history

00:07:32.000 are the most lied about events in history, and they're not being lied about by conspiracy theorists,

00:07:37.000 they're being lied about by the establishment and their legacy media attack dogs.

00:07:40.000 Let's get into this story.

00:07:41.000 For the past two years, nearly every reference in the US media to the February 2022 invasion

00:07:46.000 of Ukraine by Russia has been preceded with an obligatory word, "unprovoked".

00:07:50.000 The public was told that this was a war without cause, that Ukraine was blameless and that the invasion was to be explained entirely in terms of the intentions and psychology of one man.

00:08:00.000 Russian President Vladimir Putin.

00:08:02.000 Of course, that's why there was so much hysteria about the now famous Tucker Carlson interview, because then you can watch him with your own eyes and you can make your own evaluations about Russian propaganda versus US propaganda.

00:08:12.000 And you can make decisions about your own tax dollars and your own family and your own military and your own community and your own nation.

00:08:18.000 But they don't want you making any of those calculations.

00:08:20.000 However, on the weekend of the second anniversary of the war, the New York Times has published a lengthy article revealing that the Russian invasion of Ukraine on February 24th 2022 was instigated by a systematic and widespread campaign of military intelligence aggression by the United States.

00:08:35.000 The article details long-standing Central Intelligence Agency, CIA of course, operations in Ukraine Why are the New York Times writing this piece now?

00:08:42.000 sponsored and built up the Ukrainian military intelligence agency, her, using it as a weapon 0.81

00:08:46.000 of spying, assassinations and other provocations directed against Russia for more than a decade.

00:08:52.000 Why are the New York Times writing this piece now? Why are the New York Times, which are

00:08:56.000 a mouthpiece and an amplifier of the establishment agenda, choosing this moment to reveal that

00:09:02.000 the CIA did indeed have bases and assets and engaging provocative activity inside Ukraine,

00:09:07.000 which means that it can't any longer be referred to as an unprovoked attack?

00:09:10.000 A provoked attack doesn't mean that, you know, that the Kremlin is Disneyland and that Putin's a great guy or that Ukrainian people aren't being brutalized.

00:09:17.000 It just means that we have to have an adult conversation rather than propaganda.

00:09:20.000 The Times writes, Towards the end of 2021, according to a senior European official, Mr Putin was weighing whether to launch his full-scale invasion when he met with the head of one of Russia's main spy services, who told him that the CIA, together with Britain's MI6, were controlling Ukraine and turning it into a beachhead for operations against Moscow.

00:09:38.000 Does that make sense to you, the idea that British and American intelligence agencies essentially had control of Ukraine?

00:09:45.000 Does that sort of Ring a bell of truth somewhere in your belly?

00:09:48.000 Or do you think that Zelensky is some sort of military genius cum activist campaigner who is Churchill-like leading the charge against Russia, the indefatigable yet evil enemy? 0.86

00:09:59.000 Or do you reckon that what happens is countries like the United States and the UK puppet various nations in order to either win resource or strategic global wars to fulfil an agenda where it wouldn't be popular to go to face-to-face good old-fashioned gloves-off wars with Russia and China and And much like the wars that took place in Vietnam and Korea and Afghanistan and basically all of the wars that have happened since the end of the Second World War, proxy conflicts are being fought for military-industrial complex reasons or strategic reasons and we're just given a narrative up front that stops us going, how do we benefit from this?

00:10:30.000 Who's funding this stuff?

00:10:31.000 Am I paying for this war?

00:10:32.000 Is this unwinnable?

00:10:34.000 Hey, ain't they a nuclear superpower?

00:10:36.000 So that those questions are all sort of lost in the miasma of total lies, the New York Times et al propagandise us with images of brutality and suffering in Ukraine, which we should of course be aware of and doing everything we can to prevent, so that they can just get on and get a bunch of funding for Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Boeing.

00:10:52.000 The Times report demonstrates that this Russian intelligence assessment was absolutely true. 0.92

00:10:57.000 For more than a decade, dating back to 2014, the CIA was building up training and arming Ukrainian intelligence and paramilitary forces that were engaging in assassinations and other provocations against pro-Russian forces in eastern Ukraine, against Russian forces in Crimea, and across the border into Russia itself.

00:11:14.000 Huh, so that's sort of like there's been a war going on for ages anyway and all that's really happened is they've just reframed what's happening and increased funding.

00:11:24.000 In a critical passage, the Times writes, As the partnership deepened after 2016, the Ukrainians became impatient with what they considered Washington's undue caution and began staging assassinations and other lethal operations which violated the terms the White House thought the Ukrainians had agreed to.

00:11:39.000 Infuriated, Officials in Washington threatened to cut off support, but they never did.

00:11:44.000 In other words, the Ukrainian paramilitary forces, armed, funded, and led by the United States and NATO, were systematically assassinating forces supporting closer relations with Russia.

00:11:53.000 Ukraine have their own autonomy, they have their own dignity, and of course they have their own sovereignty.

00:11:59.000 The fact that they have their own attitude to their relationship with Russia, and the fact that they took advantage of an opportunity to escalate tensions, knowing they were backed by a military superpower, is hardly surprising, but it is concerning because it's led to this conflict.

00:12:12.000 But I suppose ultimately, the United States elite have an agenda to drain and destabilise Russia.

00:12:18.000 And don't you imagine that the increasing hostility in the South Pacific are about draining and destabilising China?

00:12:23.000 And isn't it becoming increasingly clear that the country of America is one thing, you, you people, your culture, your country, your beliefs, your values, your Christianity, your tolerance of other religions, all of that stuff is there down here.

00:12:34.000 And then over here are this set of interests controlling To some degree or another both political parties and ensuring that they can maintain the forever wars that are their lifeblood but sadly the death of literally every other territory in the world and a good many of your own citizens if this mentality continues for much longer.

00:12:50.000 The newspaper's account begins with the maiden coup of February 2014 when right-wing and neo-Nazi forces backed by the US and European Union overthrew a pro-Russian president and installed a pro-imperialist regime headed by the billionaire Petro Poroshenko.

00:13:07.000 In a way, there could have been an entirely different trajectory, couldn't there?

00:13:10.000 There could have been sort of an easier, if still somewhat tense, relationship between Russia and Ukraine that didn't really involve the United States, and therefore didn't require siloing of weapons that were now no longer needed in Afghanistan into this new territory.

00:13:24.000 A new paradigm was possible, and it seems like it was prevented.

00:13:27.000 Furthermore, neo-Nazi and right-wing, I mean, if our culture is defining itself by one thing, it's opposition to, oh, these bloody right-wing fascists, I mean, There's barely a mainstream media news program ends about some new person being called a neo-Nazi or a right-wing fascist when it comes to actual people who come out and tell you, do you know what I am?

00:13:44.000 Please, tell us.

00:13:45.000 I'm a neo-Nazi.

00:13:47.000 I'm a new one.

00:13:48.000 Now, can I have some money to go to war against other people?

00:13:50.000 Yes, you can, because we don't care about anything except our own agenda.

00:13:54.000 And yet we will talk about how much we hate Nazis when it's someone like off the news who wears a tie, who's basically a Christian, who doesn't think about race that much because they live in America and they're American.

00:14:04.000 This coup was the culmination of two decades of imperialist inroads into the former Soviet bloc with the expansion of NATO to include virtually all of Eastern Europe in violation of pledges made to the leaders of the former Soviet Union.

00:14:15.000 The Times is silent on this earlier history as well as on the role of the CIA in the maiden events.

00:14:21.000 Why are they silent on those important facts?

00:14:24.000 Maiden set the stage for a massive escalation of the CIA intervention, as detailed in the Times report.

00:14:29.000 The intelligence agency played a central role in fuelling conflict between Ukraine and Russia, first as a low-level war against pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine, then as a full-scale war after the Russian invasion in February 2022.

00:14:41.000 Three US administrations were involved, first Obama, then Trump, now Biden.

00:14:46.000 I'm sure you know by now that what Well, I suppose that indicates is that whoever you vote for, when it comes to significant issues like perpetuating forever wars, you don't really have the right to vote.

00:14:57.000 That's why independent candidates like Robert Kennedy, who say they will end these wars, and I pray they mean by that all of these wars, ought to be taken very seriously.

00:15:05.000 According to the Times' account, CIA operations included not only widespread spying, but assisting direct provocations like the assassination of pro-Russian politicians in eastern Ukraine and paramilitary attacks on Russian forces in Crimea.

00:15:17.000 The Times reported that a Ukrainian unit, the 5th Directorate, was tasked with conducting assassinations, including one in 2016.

00:15:23.000 in 2016.

00:15:36.000 After the phones?

00:15:37.000 So in the end it was television that killed him?

00:15:40.000 Yep.

00:15:41.000 Very good that, yeah.

00:15:42.000 Have you got a battery for an Ericsson?

00:15:43.000 The CIA soon learned that the assassins were members of the Fifth Directorate, the spy group that received CIA training.

00:15:50.000 Ukraine's domestic intelligence agency had even handed out commemorative patches to those involved, each one stitched with the word lift, the British term for an elevator.

00:15:59.000 Oh, as long as you're all having fun, guys, now in this massive, expensive, mad war that you keep lying about and simplifying so you can keep funding it and people stop going, oh, it's really terrible this is happening.

00:16:08.000 Here, have a patch with Lyft, because we blew out that person, didn't we, in an elevator.

00:16:11.000 That was a lot of fun.

00:16:12.000 You guys called it a Lyft?

00:16:13.000 We've got so much in common. 0.92

00:16:14.000 Why don't we sub-bomb some new countries? 0.94

00:16:16.000 Yeah. 0.92

00:16:17.000 OK, then, old chap.

00:16:18.000 The report describes another such operation.

00:16:18.000 Cheers.

00:16:21.000 A team of Ukrainian agents set up an unmanned shoulder-fired rocket launcher in a building in the occupied territories.

00:16:26.000 It was directly across from the office of a rebel commander named Mikhail Tolstik, better known as GV.

00:16:32.000 Using a remote trigger, they fired the launcher as soon as GV entered his office, killing him, according to US and Ukrainian officials.

00:16:38.000 I mean, it's quite provocative, isn't it?

00:16:40.000 It's not unprovoked.

00:16:41.000 Anything that happens after that, again, like Putin, illegal war, terrible, children dying, buildings destroyed, tragedy, devastation, it should stop as soon as possible.

00:16:50.000 But this is going to annoy someone like Putin, all of this, isn't it?

00:16:53.000 Since the outbreak of full-scale war, the Ukrainian Hurs extended these assassination operations to the whole territory of Russia. 0.57

00:16:59.000 Again, that's pretty provocative.

00:17:01.000 Including the killing of Darya Dugina, a leading pro-Putin polemicist in the Russian media and Russian government and military officials.

00:17:08.000 I mean, seems like designed to irritate him into a bellicose state, which it eventually did with the ongoing attempt to recruit Ukraine into NATO.

00:17:18.000 The CIA found its Ukrainian allies very useful in collecting vast amounts of data on Russian military and intelligence activity, so much that the Hurt itself could not process it and had to forward the raw data to CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia for analysis.

00:17:31.000 An earlier, less detailed report on this intelligence collaboration in the Washington Post cited a Ukrainian intelligence official's estimate that 250,000 to 300,000 Russian military intelligence messages were being collected each day.

00:17:44.000 So, they were spying on Russia to an extraordinary degree.

00:17:49.000 More funding, more spying, more transgression, more provocation.

00:17:53.000 So, again, we just watched the news, unprovoked, unprovoked.

00:17:55.000 Were you spying on us, Fragis?

00:17:56.000 Yeah.

00:17:57.000 Did you blow up a geyser?

00:17:58.000 It was really nice of you, but I was on the news.

00:18:00.000 Did you get a load of badges done celebrating the brutal assassination of someone with Lyft on it?

00:18:05.000 We did do that, yes.

00:18:06.000 We all thought it was jolly good fun back at the office, didn't we?

00:18:08.000 Yes, we did.

00:18:09.000 This data was not just related to Ukraine, but concerned Russian intelligence activity all over the world.

00:18:15.000 Long before the Russian invasion, the CIA was seeking to broaden its attack on Moscow.

00:18:19.000 The Times reports, So they wanted to establish it everywhere.

00:18:30.000 A bit like, I suppose, Russia's concern that Ukraine will join NATO, then other border countries will join NATO, then they'd have secret CIA spying bases in them where they would engage in provocative activity and spying missions in an attempt It seems to me, at least, to create one global government, ultimately, controlled by the interests that currently control the United States, the biggest economy and most powerful nation on Earth.

00:18:52.000 Replicate that everywhere.

00:18:54.000 And the only things that are powerful enough to prevent that at the moment are Russia and China. 0.99

00:18:57.000 So let's crack on and destroy them. 0.55

00:18:58.000 Is that basically what's happening?

00:18:59.000 The head of Russia House, the CIA department overseeing operations against Russia, organised a secret meeting at The Hague.

00:19:05.000 There, representatives from the CIA, Britain's MI6, the HUR, the Dutch service, a critical intelligence ally, and other agencies agreed to start pooling together more of their intelligence on Russia.

00:19:15.000 Again, provocation, provocation.

00:19:17.000 The result was a secret coalition against Russia, and the Ukrainians were vital members of it.

00:19:22.000 All these activities occurred well before the Russian invasion of February 2022, not to mention the 2014 coup and placing what sounds like a puppet government that was ultimately being controlled by deep state interests.

00:19:32.000 I don't know what provocation could be, if not that's some of the most provocative stuff I've ever heard.

00:19:37.000 The outbreak of full-scale war led to even more direct CIA engagement in Ukraine.

00:19:41.000 CIA agents were the only Americans not covered by the initial evacuation of US government personnel from Ukraine, removing only to Western Ukraine.

00:19:50.000 They continually briefed the Ukrainians on Russian military plans, including precise details of operations as they were unfolding.

00:19:57.000 This is, and has always been, a proxy war.

00:20:00.000 The Nomination of Russia's invasion of Ukraine as the start date seems like the type of narrativisation that's favourable to the interest engaged in these years of provocation after sponsoring a coup and insisting that Ukraine join NATO.

00:20:17.000 Actions that seem designed to provoke Russia.

00:20:19.000 So when Russia invaded Ukraine, killing loads of Ukrainian people, causing all that decimation and destruction and all of that criminal and illegal activity, it's because It's because of all of this stuff and because temporarily

00:20:31.000 Ukrainian interests align with those interests, they're a convenient conduit for the

00:20:35.000 expression of the power of the establishment.

00:20:37.000 And when they're no longer a convenient conduit, they will be pretty mercilessly dispatched,

00:20:42.000 I'd guess.

00:20:43.000 According to the Times, within weeks the CIA had returned to Kiev and the agency sent in

00:20:47.000 scores of new officers to help Ukrainians.

00:20:50.000 The senior US official said of the CIA's sizable presence, "Are they pulling triggers?"

00:20:54.000 Now, are you able to pull that trigger yourself?

00:21:01.000 Well, I am in the military, so... Okay, well, pull it now and aim it there.

00:21:05.000 Well done, that's good.

00:21:06.000 Any assistance we can give you in this war we're not involved with, you just ask.

00:21:10.000 Could we have some more money?

00:21:11.000 Of course you can, yeah.

00:21:12.000 Some of the CIA officers were deployed to Ukrainian bases.

00:21:15.000 They reviewed lists of potential Russian targets that the Ukrainians were preparing to strike, comparing the information the Ukrainians had with the U.S.

00:21:22.000 intelligence to ensure that it was accurate.

00:21:24.000 In other words, the CIA was helping direct the war, making the U.S. 0.67

00:21:27.000 government a full participant, a co-belligerent in a war with nuclear-armed Russia, despite Biden's claim that the United States was only aiding Ukraine from afar.

00:21:36.000 And all of this without the American people having the slightest say in the matter.

00:21:39.000 Don't you sometimes forget that.

00:21:40.000 Don't you sometimes forget that vital detail that America is men-a-bee, your country was established on those principles. 0.83

00:21:46.000 And I really now see more clearly than ever Mike Benz, the expert in deep state activities analysis, that when people say we have to protect democracy, what they mean are a set of institutions that preserve oligarchical power rather than the electoral process by which ordinary people go, I think I'd like to Not being a nuclear apocalypse.

00:22:05.000 Because that kind of democracy isn't happening, is it?

00:22:07.000 The Times account also provides an inadvertent indictment of America's media, as it writes, It's written out like it's telling you.

00:22:14.000 partnership, many of which are being disclosed by the New York Times for the

00:22:17.000 first time, have been a closely guarded secret for a decade.

00:22:20.000 It's written out like it's telling you. Here's the inside scoop.

00:22:23.000 Taylor Swift's new beauty secrets are avocado on each of her cheekbones. 0.99

00:22:30.000 It's like, we've been using your money to provoke a nuclear superpower into a war, then we've been telling you that it was an unprovoked war. 0.52

00:22:37.000 Oh my god, no wonder she looks so young and fresh!

00:22:40.000 This is propaganda and lying, and no doubt the New York Times are only revealing this now because it's convenient to another agenda that we'll be revealing later in this brilliant article.

00:22:49.000 This admission means that these secrets were closely guarded by the Times itself.

00:22:53.000 So, all the time, hey listen, please don't tell people there have been no clinical trials on this product, just tell them that if they don't use this product, it's irresponsible and kills old people.

00:23:03.000 You got it boss!

00:23:04.000 As former editor Bill Keller once observed, freedom of the press means freedom not to publish, and that is a freedom we exercise with some regularity.

00:23:11.000 Particularly, we might add, when it comes to the crimes of US imperialism.

00:23:15.000 The Times article is not so much an exposure as a controlled release of information.

00:23:20.000 Yeah, that's what I figured.

00:23:21.000 We're starting to spot that now.

00:23:22.000 As independent media becomes more robust and yet more agile, they have to at points recognise, look, do you know what?

00:23:28.000 People can no longer be expected to believe this was an entirely unprovoked attack.

00:23:32.000 There's people going on Joe Rogan, there's Bobby Kennedy out there, people are all the time saying, wait a minute, what about NATO?

00:23:37.000 What about that agreement between Gorbachev and Reagan?

00:23:39.000 Oh, well, let's just say whataboutism is a thing.

00:23:41.000 Yeah, we'll try that for a while.

00:23:42.000 You can't do whataboutism! 1.00

00:23:44.000 Just shut up or you're helping Trump! 0.99

00:23:47.000 But in the end, we just found out too much. 0.99

00:23:49.000 Too much accumulative and aggregated information.

00:23:51.000 So in order to, to a degree, keep a sliver of credibility, they're sort of acknowledging, OK, yeah, we provoked this war and we've known about it for ages and the deep state's been inside Ukraine for ages.

00:24:02.000 But also, there's another agenda to do with getting Republicans to support the ongoing funding of this war rather than withdrawing the funding.

00:24:10.000 And that's coming in a second.

00:24:11.000 The US newspaper Record reports that the two authors of the piece, Adam Entis and Michael Schwartz, conducted more than 200 interviews with current and former officials in Ukraine, elsewhere in Europe, and in the United States.

00:24:23.000 This activity could hardly have taken place without the knowledge, permission, and even encouragement of the CIA, as well as the Zelensky regime and Ukrainian intelligence.

00:24:31.000 Wow.

00:24:31.000 As we've been saying for some time, the legacy media works in conjunction with the establishment and Deep State to maintain a particular Reality that we can all be manipulated into believing in so that our behaviour can be controlled so that we can be shut down.

00:24:44.000 This is a brilliant, brilliant, perfect, beautiful example of that.

00:24:48.000 In the meantime, a real journalist, Julian Assange, is awaiting the decision on his final appeal against extradition to the United States, where he faces 175 years in prison or even a death sentence.

00:24:57.000 The crime of Assange and WikiLeaks, which Assange founded, is that they did not obey the rules of bourgeois journalism and did not seek the permission of the military intelligence authorities

00:25:07.000 before publishing their revelations about US war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan.

00:25:12.000 The efforts of the US State Department to subvert and manipulate governments

00:25:15.000 and the spying activities of the CIA and National Security Agency.

00:25:19.000 In short, he released information that was favourable to what you might call

00:25:23.000 the electorate or the citizens or the subjects or the people of nations like yours

00:25:27.000 and of mine, in order that we might more discerningly regard our establishment,

00:25:32.000 including the legacy media who lies to us.

00:25:34.000 And what happens to people like that is what's happened to Julian Assange.

00:25:37.000 But there are other examples of how the establishment behaves if you act against their interests.

00:25:42.000 The exposure of a decade of CIA operations in Ukraine, clearly at the request of the agency itself, appears to be linked to the ongoing conflict within the US ruling elite over what policy to adopt in that war, in the wake of the debacle suffered by the Zelensky regime in last year's offensive, which gained little and suffered colossal losses.

00:26:00.000 Congressional Republicans have blocked further military and financial aid to Ukraine, effectively declaring that the US must cut its losses there and concentrate on the main enemy, China.

00:26:09.000 Concentrate on peace?

00:26:11.000 Different enemy.

00:26:11.000 No.

00:26:12.000 So this isn't being done in order to, you know, all the news that's fit to print.

00:26:12.000 Wow.

00:26:17.000 This is like all the propaganda that's fit to use to manipulate ongoing forever war so that we can keep the offices open and the lights on.

00:26:24.000 Although we convey mostly darkness.

00:26:26.000 This is the most important couple of paragraphs I think in the piece.

00:26:29.000 Have a listen to this, then you will understand exactly what's going on.

00:26:31.000 You can use this to argue with people who still believe propaganda.

00:26:35.000 By reporting the virtual control of the Ukrainian regime by the US military intelligence apparatus, the Times is seeking to pressure the Republicans to support the war funding.

00:26:35.000 Check it.

00:26:45.000 It is arguing that this money is not going to a foreign government, in a foreign war, thousands of miles from US borders, but to a subcontractor of American imperialism, waging an American war, in which US personnel are deeply and directly engaged.

00:27:01.000 Although some American service personnel are deeply engaged in opposing these wars, as you remember

00:27:06.000 from the sad self-immolation and death of Aaron Bushnell recently. In so doing, the Times has

00:27:11.000 revealed its own coverage of the Ukraine war over the past two years to have been nothing more than war

00:27:18.000 propaganda aimed at using a fraudulent narrative to dragoon the American public to support a predatory

00:27:24.000 imperialist war of aggression aimed at subjugating and dismantling Russia.

00:27:29.000 And the only way, I suppose, that you could argue that that's a good thing is if you saw yourself somehow as a subject and ally of this establishment, or at least your own destiny tied to their ongoing success.

00:27:40.000 In order to believe that, you would have to be in constant fear that both Russia and China have their own imperialist agenda.

00:27:46.000 And if they're not stopped, thwarted, attacked, drained, and covertly and insidiously dismantled, then you and your way of life will be under threat.

00:27:54.000 We learned so much from this.

00:27:55.000 We learned that the New York Times suppresses information when it wants to, that they support the agenda of the establishment, that they totally believe in lying and omitting information in order to ensure that the establishment agenda can be met, even when it's a bloody war that's killing Ukrainian people and Russian people.

00:28:14.000 So you could assume that they might employ similar policies when it comes to the wars in the Middle East and the terrible and tragic deaths that are taking place there.

00:28:22.000 What this ultimately reveals Is that the legacy media is part of the establishment.

00:28:25.000 You can't trust anything you read or hear in the legacy media.

00:28:29.000 You can assume from the get go that what they are doing is either trying to distract you, dumb you down, shut down any possible avenues that are challenging to establishment interest and even if that extends to Claiming that current wars were unprovoked when the truth is they were anything but unprovoked.

00:28:46.000 And that's not to mitigate, undermine or dilute the tragedy that Ukrainian people are experiencing.

00:28:50.000 is just to point out that it's been caused by a greedy, avaricious and tyrannical global

00:28:56.000 establishment that requires war to sustain itself. 0.53

00:28:59.000 Thanks for refusing Fox News.

00:29:01.000 No. 1.00

00:29:02.000 Here's the fucking news. 0.99

00:29:05.000 We can't bring you this content without the support of our partners and our supporters. 0.99

00:29:10.000 I'm honoured to be bringing you this message.

00:29:14.000 Is it me or does the future feel more insecure and uncertain?

00:29:17.000 Wars, pandemics, lies, trickery.

00:29:19.000 For those of you that are in the United States, there is a way to secure your hard-earned nest egg.

00:29:24.000 American Heart for Gold makes it easy to protect your savings and retirement accounts with physical gold and silver.

00:29:29.000 With one phone call, they can have physical gold and silver delivered right to your door or inside a qualifying retirement account like your IRA or 401k.

00:29:37.000 American Heart for Gold is the highest-rate firm in the United States with an A-plus rating from the BBB, that's the Better Business Bureau, and thousands of satisfied clients right now.

00:29:46.000 They'll give you up to $10,000 of free silver on your first qualifying order.

00:29:50.000 This offer, I'm sorry to tell you, is only for customers from the United States of America.

00:29:55.000 Call 866-505-8315.

00:29:58.000 That's 866-505-8315.

00:30:00.000 Or simply text BRAND to 99-88-99.

00:30:02.000 Then they'll know we sent you.

00:30:05.000 Get up to $5,000 in silver and protect your future in this crazy, crazy world with some solid, precious metals literally made in stars.

00:30:14.000 Now let's get back to the content.

00:30:16.000 We're going to have to leave YouTube right now because their WHO-inspired community guidelines will not permit freedom when it comes to talking about France's vaccine law, dubbed Article Pfizer or Article Liza by some of you wags, so click the link in the description because we're only going to be here for a few more seconds and you deserve and need freedom.

00:30:33.000 Remember, we got all this glorious merch and every single penny that we make, once our costs are covered, goes to getting junkies, owkies and the broken into treatment so that they can be strong.

00:30:42.000 and they can participate in this movement with us.

00:30:44.000 See you in a second, click the link in the description.

00:30:46.000 Now, France's vaccine laws seem designed to protect Pfizer from themselves

00:30:51.000 and to not protect us from anything.

00:30:54.000 But the French are awakening, the French are revolting. 1.00

00:30:56.000 I don't mean that in an offensive way.

00:30:58.000 The French are standing up to this Orwellian vaccine law.

00:31:02.000 Here's the news.

00:31:03.000 No, here's the effing news.

00:31:04.000 [Music] 1.00

00:31:07.000 No, here's the fucking news. 0.99

00:31:11.000 Ah! 1.00

00:31:11.000 Vive la France! 1.00

00:31:12.000 Country of revolution, freedom, wine and pure sexiness.

00:31:16.000 Although now they're banning, criticizing medications that are recommended by the state, imposing potential prison sentences and 45,000 euro fines.

00:31:25.000 Liberté! 0.96

00:31:25.000 Ah! 0.96

00:31:26.000 Fraternité! 1.00

00:31:27.000 And just shut your bloody mouth! 0.99

00:31:31.000 Don't for a second think it's possible and plausible to criticise or speak out against medications, and let's face it, it means particularly and specifically recent gene therapies or vaccines or whatever you want to call them in that country, although you probably won't be able to call them anything soon, you certainly will not be able to criticise them. 0.99

00:31:48.000 So what does it mean for the world and for France when laws are passed that seem just It's designed literally to prevent Pfizer's profit margin being negatively impacted.

00:31:57.000 It's being called Article Pfizer because it sort of seems to literally mean, don't criticise Pfizer, even though it's written in sort of vague language.

00:32:04.000 Don't anyone criticise any medical measures recommended by the state?

00:32:08.000 What, like people are going to say, oh, don't take your chemotherapy, love.

00:32:11.000 Or people are going to say, don't get a pacemaker fitted.

00:32:13.000 Although ironically, heart disease and cancer are on the rise since around 2019, 2020 type time.

00:32:19.000 I wonder why these laws are being passed.

00:32:21.000 Let's get into it.

00:32:22.000 So firstly, this is a post by Dr Kat Lindley on X. Today, a law was passed in France qualifying any opposition to mRNA LNP injections as a sectarian aberration.

00:32:32.000 It carries a penalty of up to three years imprisonment and 45,000 euros.

00:32:37.000 It will not tolerate any criticism of the therapeutic treatments which will be recommended or made obligatory by the state.

00:32:42.000 Any person who dares to openly criticize these therapies will be liable to fines and imprisonment.

00:32:47.000 Seems like an astonishing piece of legislature.

00:32:50.000 So that's what's happening in France, but over in the UK, like Macron in France, we have a globalist leader in Rishi Sunak.

00:32:57.000 And even if in the next election we change leaders, guess what we're getting?

00:33:01.000 Another globalist leader!

00:33:02.000 So perhaps legislation like this will be passed in the UK, and maybe it's coming to the US.

00:33:06.000 If Canada haven't done it yet, I don't know what they're playing at.

00:33:08.000 Let's have a look.

00:33:09.000 Thank you Mr Speaker.

00:33:10.000 Can the current Prime Minister think of anything he has promoted?

00:33:13.000 This is Andrew Bridgen who's been talking a lot about excess deaths and complex subjects.

00:33:18.000 You can see him on our show Stay Free, click the link in the description.

00:33:21.000 Here he is as usual in Parliament advocating for more stringency and analysis around the pandemic period.

00:33:27.000 That's all he's asking for and he's treated as a kind of lunatic as a result.

00:33:31.000 Can the current Prime Minister think of anything he has promoted in partnership with huge businesses as safe and effective which has ultimately harmed the British people?

00:33:40.000 You hear the murmur of globalism in the background, whether it's in France, whether it's in Canada, whether it's in the UK.

00:33:45.000 There is an institutional opposition to open conversation around this subject and now legislation to prevent open conversation around this subject.

00:33:52.000 That's without even recourse to the censorship laws in Ireland, Canada, the UK.

00:33:57.000 Can you see what's happening?

00:33:59.000 Or are you just a conspiracy theorist?

00:34:00.000 And will he use this opportunity to correct that safe and effective statement, or will he choose the same line as Tony Blair?

00:34:07.000 Sit back, do nothing, and let the misery just continue to pile up?

00:34:12.000 Prime Minister.

00:34:13.000 Mr Speaker, to what he was more broadly insinuating, let me be unequivocal from this dispatch box that Covid vaccines are safe.

00:34:21.000 And in France you can't say anything other than that.

00:34:23.000 Mr Speaker.

00:34:25.000 And here is Rishi Sunak on GB News being questioned by a man who says he suffered from vaccine injury, which he wouldn't be able to say in France.

00:34:34.000 My name is John Watt and I'm one of the Covid vaccine injured in this country.

00:34:39.000 I want you to look into my eyes real soon, I want you to look at the pain,

00:34:43.000 the trauma and the regret I have in my eyes.

00:34:47.000 That person, in case you're not in the British Isles, is a Scottish person behaving in a very Scottish fashion.

00:34:53.000 Which is to say, emotional and aggressive, full on, and in this instance, correct.

00:34:57.000 We have been left with no help at all.

00:35:00.000 Not only am I in here that's vaccine injured, there's another man over there whose life's been ruined by that COVID-19 vaccine.

00:35:07.000 I know people who have lost legs, amputations.

00:35:11.000 I know people with heart conditions like myself, Rishi Sunak.

00:35:14.000 He's so Scottish that this may not remain a verbal altercation for much longer.

00:35:19.000 And I say this as a man who is married to a Scottish person.

00:35:22.000 Why have I had to set up a support group in Scotland to look after the people that have been affected by that Covid-19 vaccine?

00:35:30.000 Why are the people who are in charge, who told us all to do the right thing, have left us all to rot and left me and the thousands and the tens of thousands in this country to rot?

00:35:43.000 We're actually going to extradite you to France right now.

00:35:46.000 We were thinking Rwanda, but I think you'd be happier in France.

00:35:49.000 In Scotland right now, according to the yellow card system, there are over 30,000 people that have had an adverse reaction to that vaccine and 200 deaths.

00:35:59.000 John, thank you very much indeed for your question.

00:35:59.000 OK.

00:36:01.000 Now, John, that's enough, even for GB News.

00:36:05.000 For you to start doing the right thing, I wish you good night and good health.

00:36:10.000 You've made a really strong point, John.

00:36:12.000 Prime Minister.

00:36:13.000 Yeah, Jon, I'm very sorry to hear about your personal circumstances, and you said someone over here also seems to have suffered by a similar thing.

00:36:22.000 Now, obviously, I don't know about the individual's situation.

00:36:25.000 Well, we just told you about it.

00:36:27.000 So you tiptoe through this little legal nightmare that you're in... We're silenced, Russie.

00:36:31.000 We're silenced.

00:36:32.000 Well, I don't... On social media and everything, we are silenced.

00:36:35.000 We are the most silenced people in this country.

00:36:37.000 We're silenced in the press because my story in the press... Uh-oh!

00:36:41.000 There's another one!

00:36:42.000 ...had to go to the government for comment, and they made them take all this stuff out.

00:36:45.000 Forgive me.

00:36:46.000 Forgive me both.

00:36:47.000 Now, look, we don't usually do this on GB News, and it's getting... He will not come back!

00:36:51.000 And the next one, who's just another version of him from the other party, he won't come here at all.

00:36:55.000 So please, don't ruin this for us!

00:36:57.000 Right, OK, I'm going to have to physically come in now.

00:37:08.000 We've lost the floor.

00:37:09.000 In a way, that's what democracy in conversation looks like.

00:37:11.000 People being able to express themselves, being able to express their emotions, being able to confront leaders with difficult truths.

00:37:17.000 And look at what it's like.

00:37:18.000 It's unusual, isn't it?

00:37:19.000 Rishi Sunak certainly don't seem to like it very much.

00:37:19.000 It's unfamiliar.

00:37:22.000 And, sir, you raised some very valid points, I'm sure.

00:37:24.000 What I've got to say is, though, we haven't got you on microphone and, as you know, we've got to get through this.

00:37:30.000 I'm sure we can raise your points with the Prime Minister at a later date.

00:37:34.000 When he's not Prime Minister anymore?

00:37:34.000 When?

00:37:36.000 But in the meantime, Prime Minister, if you can cover the issue... Yeah, no, I'm very happy to.

00:37:39.000 Yeah, no, I like stuff like this.

00:37:40.000 I'm used to having difficult conversations, like sometimes me and the wife talk about how much tax we should pay in this country and how much money Infosys should get from government contracts.

00:37:49.000 And it can get quite heated sometimes, because sometimes she thinks I should give a bit more.

00:37:52.000 So there is a vaccine compensation scheme that's in place, as you alluded to, in the NHS.

00:37:57.000 Obviously, everyone individually will work through their cases.

00:38:00.000 It's difficult for me to comment on anyone's individual case.

00:38:03.000 I'm sure you'll appreciate that.

00:38:04.000 I'm very happy to go and look at the cases, and I'm sure you'll get them to the team here.

00:38:08.000 Well, there's 30,000 of them, so you better crack on.

00:38:11.000 I mean, I'm very saddened and shocked to hear that you've been silenced by anybody.

00:38:15.000 That is surprising to me.

00:38:16.000 God, I'm saddened to hear that you've been silenced.

00:38:18.000 It's almost as if we've been using proxy organisations like Logically AI to shut down any dissenting voices to anyone that's critical of vaccines.

00:38:25.000 It's like we spent loads of money cleansing social media of criticism.

00:38:29.000 I don't know how the hell this keeps happening.

00:38:31.000 Why are all these people getting silenced?

00:38:32.000 It's almost as if we're funding it from your tax money and then pretending to apologise to you on the television.

00:38:37.000 That's government.

00:38:38.000 So please do get your details to Stephen and the team and I will happily take that away.

00:38:43.000 Get to Stephen and the team and we'll deal with that sort of never.

00:38:47.000 Of course you should be able to speak about your experience, what's happened to you and as I said we have a compensation scheme in place for that and I'll make sure that we're working through that.

00:38:55.000 We've got a compensation scheme for these 100% safe vaccines.

00:38:58.000 Doesn't make sense, really, because 100% safe would mean you wouldn't need any compensation.

00:39:03.000 France!

00:39:04.000 Viva France!

00:39:05.000 Stop the questioning!

00:39:06.000 I'd like to take this opportunity to announce that we are now part of the People's Republic of France.

00:39:11.000 So maybe zip it.

00:39:12.000 I think, look, the last thing I'd say is, you know, we went through a pandemic, like everyone else.

00:39:18.000 Some of us made a lot of money during the pandemic, unlike everybody else.

00:39:22.000 At the points when it came to the vaccine, those decisions were always taken on the basis of medical advice from our medical experts.

00:39:29.000 Good, and I suppose you've got the WhatsApp messages, do you?

00:39:31.000 You deleted them, factory settings, was it?

00:39:34.000 To tell us, as politicians, who are obviously not doctors.

00:39:38.000 Oh, and yet many doctors say that these decisions were made by politicians.

00:39:42.000 It's extraordinary.

00:39:43.000 You should do more of these forums.

00:39:44.000 You're good at them.

00:39:45.000 About how best to roll out the vaccine, what was in the public health interest, the priority order, how that should be done, who should be eligible.

00:39:52.000 And we got it basically wrong in every single one of those categories.

00:39:56.000 That was something that the doctors recommended on.

00:39:58.000 A lot of doctors were silenced and lobbied into silence and sometimes even struck off.

00:40:03.000 And that's something that we followed.

00:40:05.000 Now, obviously, if there are individual circumstances which haven't worked out... The phrase, haven't worked out, covers a multitude of sins there.

00:40:11.000 In particular, people who took that amputation stuff.

00:40:14.000 Sorry, that hasn't worked out.

00:40:15.000 Aye, it hasn't worked out! 1.00

00:40:16.000 I got one less ligament when I fucking came here, you fucking banshot! 1.00

00:40:20.000 That hasn't worked out. 1.00

00:40:21.000 That's deaths, blood clots, waste of money, corruption.

00:40:25.000 Yeah, that really hasn't worked out.

00:40:27.000 How much money you got in that compensation scheme of yours?

00:40:29.000 You're gonna need it.

00:40:30.000 Then that's why we have the compensation scheme in place, and I'll make sure that we follow up on your cases.

00:40:34.000 If it's not worked out, we've got a compensation scheme again for a 100% safe vaccine, which in itself doesn't really make sense.

00:40:40.000 But what does make sense these days?

00:40:42.000 OK, Prime Minister, thank you.

00:40:44.000 Gents, both of you, do give us your details.

00:40:47.000 We will get that to the Prime Minister.

00:40:49.000 And as he said, he will, I'm sure, look at that for you.

00:40:52.000 In the meantime, let's move on to another question, sir.

00:40:55.000 OK, so having watched that, would you say there is room for some conversation or no conversation?

00:41:00.000 Because in France, you are getting no conversation.

00:41:02.000 And given that this is a globalist issue, no conversation is a problem that could be coming to a country that you live in too.

00:41:09.000 So here's Brett Weinstein on the topic of France's new legislation.

00:41:13.000 France has now criminalised objections to the MRNA platform, exposing those targeted to ruinous fines and imprisonment.

00:41:19.000 It's obvious lunacy and that it's happening in a Western nation should alarm us all.

00:41:23.000 This madness must be defeated in France, at the WHO, everywhere it arises.

00:41:27.000 So what exactly is going on in France?

00:41:30.000 And given there's an obvious requirement for conversation around vaccines, excess deaths, vaccine injuries, social policies during the pandemic, why are laws being passed that would prevent anybody from criticising a government mandated or In an unprecedented move that has sparked widespread debate across France and beyond, the French Parliament has recently passed a law that introduces severe penalties for those opposing mRNA LNP injections or other treatments recommended by the state based on current medical knowledge.

00:41:59.000 I have to say current medical knowledge, that's in case, oh well it was the current medical knowledge then!

00:42:03.000 Yeah, well guess what the current medical knowledge is?

00:42:05.000 Current medical knowledge is this guy's got one less leg than he had this morning.

00:42:09.000 I'm sick of it, pal!

00:42:10.000 As of today, criticism of such therapeutic treatments, when deemed obligatory or recommended by the state, could result in up to three years of imprisonment or a fine of 45,000 euros.

00:42:19.000 This bold legislative step, quickly dubbed Article Pfizer by critics, represents a significant shift in the balance between public health policy and individual freedom of expression.

00:42:28.000 There's a lot of it about, isn't there?

00:42:29.000 How often are we seeing government policies leading to repression or suppression of free speech?

00:42:34.000 Have you noticed in your country?

00:42:35.000 I certainly have noticed it.

00:42:36.000 By God, I've noticed it.

00:42:37.000 In particular, censorship specifically of content we've been making.

00:42:41.000 The core of the controversy lies in the creation of a new criminal offence targeting individuals who encourage others to withhold from medical treatments that are considered appropriate according to the prevailing medical standards.

00:42:51.000 They have to always have like an adjective or a caveat because they know that medicine evolves and changes, that is the nature of science, even if there is nothing malfeasant at play.

00:43:00.000 The law specifically targets the resistance to mRNA treatment, positioning it as a cornerstone in the fight against future pandemics.

00:43:06.000 This move has been interpreted by many as an anti-democratic manoeuvre stifling any opposition or critique of the state-endorsed medical treatments under the heavy hand of legal penalties.

00:43:14.000 Remember, the WHO treaty would mean that your country would have to provide 5% of your health budget, that your nation would have to abide by WHO regulations, which just The past of the law came with minimal debate within the parliament, a fact that has only fuelled the outrage among its detractors.

00:43:38.000 Critics argue that the law not only undermines the democratic process by limiting the scope of public discourse on health policy, but also prejudges alternative medicine and potential whistleblowers who may have valid concerns About mRNA technology or other treatments.

00:43:52.000 I mean, certainly it seems, doesn't it, that there are at least some valid concerns, or are there none?

00:43:57.000 Should there be a law that prevents those concerns being communicated?

00:44:00.000 Is that what you've learned in the pandemic period?

00:44:02.000 Do you know what I've learned in the pandemic period?

00:44:04.000 Dissent should continue to be shut down.

00:44:06.000 Expert opinion should continue to be censored.

00:44:09.000 Authorities should be further centralised in the favour of governments and corporations.

00:44:13.000 Is that the message of the pandemic period?

00:44:15.000 Because that ain't the message that I received.

00:44:17.000 Labelled Article Pfizer, the law is seen as emblematic of a broader trend towards increasing state control over public health narratives and personal health choices.

00:44:26.000 The nickname itself, referencing one of the major pharmaceutical companies behind the development of mRNA vaccine technology, hints at the perceived alignment between government policy and the interests of Big Pharma.

00:44:37.000 What?

00:44:37.000 No, I never noticed.

00:44:39.000 Raising questions about the influence of pharmaceutical companies on health policy.

00:44:42.000 Furthermore, the timing and urgency of the law's enactment, with warnings of an imminent next pandemic and the positioning of mRNA technology as the sole solution, adds layers of complexity to the debate.

00:44:52.000 The law raises critical questions about where the line should be drawn between preventing harmful misinformation and preserving the right to free speech and open debate on medical treatments.

00:45:02.000 As France steps into uncharted territory with the enactment of this law, the international community watches closely.

00:45:08.000 The implications of such a legal framework extend beyond the borders of France, potentially setting a precedent for how governments around the world might seek to regulate public discourse on health and medical treatments in the future.

00:45:19.000 In conclusion, the recent enactment of the law penalising opposition to state-recommended mRNA treatment in France Marks a significant moment in the ongoing discussion about the role of government in regulating health policy and preserving public safety.

00:45:31.000 While intended to combat misinformation and protect public health, the law's critics see it as a concerning move towards limiting free speech and privileging certain medical treatments over others.

00:45:41.000 As the world continues to navigate the complexities of public health in an ever-evolving landscape, the debate over Article Pfizer Serves as a point and reminder of the tensions between collective safety and individual rights.

00:45:52.000 It also demonstrates that there can be no financial ties between political figures and organisations and corporations of that size and scale that you don't want when laws like this are being passed.

00:46:00.000 Any sense that it could be advantageous to Pfizer's bottom line or Pfizer's agenda.

00:46:06.000 You also don't want to feel the sense that there's a globalist agenda in which individual nations pilot particular pieces of legislation before they become immersive, ubiquitous and total, as seems to be the case with various censorship laws around the world, and now in this one, the further oppression of free speech, in order to achieve what goal?

00:46:23.000 There's so much misinformation about chemotherapy or heart tablets or asthma inhalers that people just start abandoning them.

00:46:30.000 Has there ever been a medical emergency of this variety ever before?

00:46:33.000 Do you ever recall like a huge movement opposing successful medical treatments?

00:46:38.000 Of course there have always been people that are critical, cynical, sceptical and enquiring around vaccines, and if you look at some of the information available in those quarters, it certainly is interesting to review, shall we say.

00:46:50.000 But the idea that the state, given their relationship with global corporations, has only your interests in mind In order to protect you, we're going to find you and imprison you.

00:47:00.000 Oh, thank you very much, monsieur.

00:47:02.000 Doesn't make sense, does it?

00:47:03.000 And having seen that bit of footage of dear globalist Rishi Sunak pilloried by members of the British public, how do you imagine the globalists regard open conversation about these subjects?

00:47:14.000 If there are indeed 30,000 adverse events to discuss in the UK, is an open conversation what the establishment wants, or do they want total control of the narrative?

00:47:23.000 Why don't you look at the last couple of years and decipher yourself?

00:47:26.000 What do groups that censor online social media discourse really care about?

00:47:30.000 And to whose benefit is that being directed?

00:47:32.000 The censorship of important and significant voices like Jay Bhattacharya.

00:47:36.000 What is that about?

00:47:37.000 Protecting you?

00:47:38.000 Or is it about controlling a narrative?

00:47:40.000 What we've learned, in particular, in the ongoing discourse between Senator Rand Paul and Anthony Fauci about measures and suggestions and steps that were taken in the early pandemic period that might have been avoided and that were potentially not legitimate and certainly not successful.

00:47:53.000 Do you feel that what should happen now is a raft of law should be passed around the world to make it illegal for people to question and criticise?

00:47:59.000 Or do you think that we should be heading in almost exactly the opposite direction?

00:48:03.000 Certainly there's a need for discussion, even as the possibility for discussion is being foreclosed.

00:48:07.000 [Music]

00:48:10.000 No. 0.99

00:48:11.000 Here's the fucking news. 1.00

00:48:13.000 Alex Jones has become something of a soothsayer, hasn't he? 1.00

00:48:17.000 You know that Alex Jones says crazy stuff, but hey, it's a crazy world.

00:48:21.000 Let's look at some of the times that Alex Jones has been ahead of the curve.

00:48:24.000 What does that tell us about news reporting right now?

00:48:26.000 What does it tell us about shamanism?

00:48:28.000 What does it tell us about the necessity to awakening to new narratives and yet remaining circumspect and awake?

00:48:33.000 Here's the news.

00:48:34.000 No, here's the effing news.

00:48:36.000 Thank you for choosing Fox News.

00:48:37.000 Where's the news?

00:48:38.000 No, here's the effing news.

00:48:42.000 New York City are deploying the National Guard, effectively militarizing their streets

00:48:47.000 and especially their subways.

00:48:49.000 So is this about citizen safety or is it, as Alex Jones warns, the piloting of martial law?

00:48:58.000 You will be aware now that New York City, that most liberal of metropolises, has militarised its law forces by putting the National Guard on the subway.

00:49:07.000 Now, New York City is no doubt in a time of crisis, evidently and apparently connected to the issue of migration.

00:49:14.000 But is this sudden appearance of military personnel on the New York subways really about protecting the citizenry, or is it more insidious than that?

00:49:23.000 Are we beginning to experience the piloting and grooming of a population to get us ready for militarized streets?

00:49:30.000 For many years now, we've seen anti-protest laws, militarization of the police, police cars that used to be like, nee-nah, nee-nah, Skyelectrics, Dukes of Hazzard, good old-fashioned fun, have become like tanks now.

00:49:41.000 Why has that happened?

00:49:43.000 When did that become necessary?

00:49:44.000 Is it necessary in your neighborhood?

00:49:47.000 And if rising crime is a problem in your neighborhood, What exactly is causing it?

00:49:52.000 Do you trust the people that have the power behind the barrel of the gun or not?

00:49:57.000 Let's have a look at Alex Jones's perspective.

00:49:59.000 You'll be well aware that Alex Jones's perspective will be around centralised authoritarianism, global conspiracies and piloting, but having just lived through the last five years, It does seem that we have been subject, whether it was some of the events around the pandemic or recent censorship laws across the world, to the piloting of ideas in certain territories in order to normalise them.

00:50:20.000 I'm talking about the freezing of bank balances, closing down of people's social media, using government proxies to censor, dissenting voices, lockdowns, internment camps, arresting people for things they've said on the internet, imprisoning people for things they've said on the internet.

00:50:34.000 And while the time that we're talking about Donald Trump and how bad he is for democracy, is democracy, even under the auspices of actual Democrat rule, becoming more and more authoritarian?

00:50:44.000 Let's start with Alex Jones, then we'll get into what we think is happening together.

00:50:48.000 Tonight, a new approach to keep subway riders safe.

00:50:51.000 Guns!

00:50:52.000 Guns aiming at your face. 0.99

00:50:54.000 The new way. 1.00

00:50:55.000 The army threatening to kill you if you step out of line.

00:50:58.000 Look how compliant the news always is.

00:51:00.000 Look, don't say that this is terrifying.

00:51:03.000 Don't start saying the military are on the subway now.

00:51:05.000 That's a clear indication that whatever your political perspective, things have gone terribly wrong.

00:51:09.000 Say instead, new way to keep you safe.

00:51:12.000 New way to help you go to sleep at night.

00:51:14.000 A firm punch right in the jaw.

00:51:17.000 Bag checks and beefed up security with members of the National Guard.

00:51:21.000 Beefed up?

00:51:22.000 Like it's nutritious?

00:51:23.000 It's like a bone broth made out of a gun pointed at you by the state.

00:51:27.000 Night night!

00:51:27.000 As CBS 2's Naveen Dhaliwal reports, the plan comes on the same day as another attack on a conductor.

00:51:33.000 So, you know, attacks on conductors, gotta bring in the army, so... With riders on edge, the governor is putting a plan in place that includes cameras in conductor cabs and more cops on the platforms.

00:51:47.000 At Grand Central Terminal Wednesday evening, bag checks were underway.

00:51:51.000 It seems to me that in order to protect the legitimizing, raising authority, Indeed, there's such a sort of raging debate in your country about guns and gun ownership and gun laws.

00:52:01.000 And all it seems to amount to, really, is not whether or not there are guns, but who's allowed to have them.

00:52:05.000 And we now know that the state doesn't want to discuss their guns.

00:52:08.000 What about the dangers and threats of those guns?

00:52:10.000 What about the many people that are killed in friendly fires, in wars?

00:52:13.000 Perhaps all we're talking about in politics is who has the right to kill.

00:52:17.000 As tackling subway safety is now at the top of the list for city and state officials.

00:52:22.000 These brazen, heinous attacks On our subway system.

00:52:27.000 On our democracy by me.

00:52:29.000 What?

00:52:29.000 No, sorry.

00:52:29.000 I mean on our subway by someone who's not me have got to be met by everyone's got guns now that works for me.

00:52:36.000 You don't work for me?

00:52:37.000 No guns.

00:52:38.000 You work for me?

00:52:39.000 Guns.

00:52:39.000 Simple.

00:52:40.000 Really?

00:52:40.000 Huh?

00:52:40.000 Will not be tolerated.

00:52:42.000 This was a stern message from the governor.

00:52:44.000 It is a stern message.

00:52:45.000 It's a stern, very aggressive message.

00:52:47.000 It's an authoritarian message.

00:52:48.000 It's not stern, it's authoritarian.

00:52:49.000 It will not be tolerated.

00:52:51.000 I don't care about your past.

00:52:52.000 I don't care about your social conditions.

00:52:54.000 I don't care about your mental health. 0.58

00:52:55.000 I don't care if there's been a fentanyl crisis.

00:52:56.000 I don't care if America's breaking down.

00:52:58.000 I don't care if you're delirious with doubt and you can't feel God in your heart anymore because you're surrounded by lies and treachery. 1.00

00:53:04.000 All I care about is do as you're told or we'll kill you. 1.00

00:53:07.000 I mean, what is the message? 0.98

00:53:08.000 After several attacks in the transit system in the past week, these attacks prompting the governor to deploy a thousand members of the National Guard.

00:53:17.000 Look, that's the news doing the job of propaganda.

00:53:19.000 These attacks prompting the governor?

00:53:21.000 I don't know.

00:53:22.000 I bet if you had the time to look at the data, you'd go, how many attacks are there each year since 1970 in New York on staff members?

00:53:29.000 And then you'd have to look at a variety of factors.

00:53:32.000 Poverty, inequality of wealth, mental illness, some government support.

00:53:36.000 There's so many vital components.

00:53:38.000 When the solution is always, we're going to take some more power because of this, there's a really nasty cuff going around.

00:53:45.000 In conclusion, we're going to take a lot more power.

00:53:48.000 There's a really nasty Putin going around.

00:53:50.000 So in conclusion, we're going to take a lot more power. 0.93

00:53:53.000 There's some really nasty truckers going around.

00:53:55.000 So in conclusion, we're going to take a lot more power.

00:53:57.000 Is the answer always going to be, you're going to take a lot more power?

00:54:00.000 There's a lot of people saying on the internet that we're taking too much power.

00:54:04.000 So we're going to be taking a lot more power and censoring those people.

00:54:08.000 OK, and the threat is Donald Trump how?

00:54:11.000 And police to subway systems across New York City.

00:54:15.000 What they're doing checking bags to make sure explosive or illegal weapons aren't entering our subway system.

00:54:20.000 I think it's rather offensive to all of us as human beings that Eric Adams being a person of color will be framed I think both of those things are great. 1.00

00:54:31.000 How fantastic.

00:54:32.000 Let's have a diverse and representative but above all else fair and equal and truly representative society where you don't centralise authority.

00:54:40.000 I'm getting rather tired of the idea that equality and fairness means highlighting programmes of representation in order to mask increasing authoritarianism.

00:54:51.000 I agree with equality and particularly when it comes to matters around gender and sex but above all Wealth and power.

00:54:58.000 City officials say each week, NYPD bag screening teams will be at 136 stations.

00:55:04.000 That's about a third of the stations in the system.

00:55:07.000 New York City's Civil Liberties Union calling it heavy-handed.

00:55:11.000 But heavy-handed really means, like, ooh, oh, no, boss, there's another person was wrote to a bus conductor.

00:55:19.000 Boom! 0.99

00:55:20.000 Like that heavy-handed means that you're not even actually in control of the weight of your power.

00:55:25.000 And isn't that the perfect description of how globalist, elitist power masquerading as American patriotic power, whether it's in foreign wars or on the most beautiful city in America, some would argue, New York City, and the imposition of authority, all in order, as usual, to help people.

00:55:40.000 Like stop and frisk, ripping a page straight out of a Giuliani playbook, We had to, really, because the pages were stuck together.

00:55:48.000 I'd like to take a note.

00:55:48.000 Every time a demon of the liberal elites have their ideas borrowed and utilized by those same liberal elites, Donald Trump is the worst thing that could ever happen.

00:55:57.000 That's why that wall he's building that we mocked him for is still being built.

00:56:01.000 That's why those cages that we condemned him for are still there and were, in fact, actually put there by Barack Obama. 0.99

00:56:07.000 Giuliani, that pervert, lunatic, maniac son of a bitch, actually had some pretty good ideas when it came to protecting Train conductors, which is now something we care about now that we can have armed military on the show. 0.99

00:56:20.000 I didn't used to care about Giuliani when he was just being in Borat, but now his ideas could really be used to control ordinary people. 1.00

00:56:27.000 I like that guy.

00:56:28.000 In addition to the bag checks, the governor's plan includes amending state law to ban repeat offenders.

00:56:35.000 Every single one of these bullet points will amount to more power for the state, a greater ability to arrest and control.

00:56:41.000 Installing cameras in each conductor's cabin, Mental health, Adriana, you get the idea.

00:56:46.000 Mental health.

00:56:47.000 You know, we'll put something on Instagram.

00:56:48.000 There'll be a hashtag.

00:56:49.000 Everyone's gonna feel a whole lot better.

00:56:51.000 And if they don't...

00:56:53.000 Now, a perspective from the other side of the aisle, to put it mildly, Alex Jones.

00:56:57.000 Alex Jones has been a guest on our show and Alex Jones will be a guest on our show again.

00:57:01.000 As you know, I consider Alex Jones to be a kind of shamanic force in politics.

00:57:05.000 Of course, he occasionally says things that are pretty crazy.

00:57:08.000 Hey, who doesn't?

00:57:09.000 But when it comes to the issue of piloting authoritarian measures and perhaps even martial law, Alex Jones is a voice that's perhaps important.

00:57:16.000 Let's have a look at what he's saying on this subject.

00:57:18.000 When I was cutting my teeth 29 years ago on air, Bill Clinton had just been in office for a year or so and it was confirmed, the military was warning, it was coming out, they were leaking classified documents that now are all basically admitted and have been publicly rolled out against the public to

00:57:42.000 Incrementally bring in martial law.

00:57:44.000 So they went from this being secret under Clinton, and then with Bush, yeah, it's mainly for Al Qaeda, but it's also for domestic groups.

00:57:53.000 And then you're asking, well, what's this really all about?

00:57:55.000 And then you start to realize it's part of a long-term process of just getting the military, the police, the public ready for this.

00:58:03.000 So here's what's happening.

00:58:05.000 We're not going to have UN troops one day, or Russian troops like Red Dawn, and you're in Colorado and all of a sudden parachutes come down and you've got Russian troops shooting at you.

00:58:15.000 It'll be our own troops, but they'll be made up of people that have been tested for decades, going through the training, going along with attacking their own people. 0.99

00:58:22.000 And now the troops are being deployed and searching everyone's bags.

00:58:27.000 Like, how can you not be affected by that image?

00:58:31.000 That's armed military personnel on the subway being normalized.

00:58:35.000 I am quite sympathetic to this perspective, given what I've witnessed and experienced in the last few years.

00:58:42.000 And indeed, Jones is showing he's working out an incremental increase in these tactics and techniques.

00:58:49.000 Over several administrations.

00:58:51.000 Isn't that indeed the domestic heart of what globalism means?

00:58:54.000 That regardless of who you vote for, you've got deep state interests that have an agenda that spans various administrations.

00:59:00.000 And those administrations will focus on hot button cultural topics.

00:59:03.000 Meanwhile, the projects of war and social control will continue.

00:59:07.000 And even beyond the physical representation of military presence on the street, which is terrifying, we know and often discuss how techniques designed to track and control dissidents abroad Specifically, literally, groups like ISIS are now deployed.

00:59:22.000 Once you've seen armed military personnel conducting bag checks on a subway in New York City, when there isn't a war happening or anything remotely like it domestically across America, then you have to acknowledge that that is something that is significant.

00:59:36.000 And quite a lot of power and time and propaganda has to be invested in saying that someone like Alex Jones is hysteric.

00:59:42.000 And due to his, let's call it his presentational style, he does make that kind of analysis in some circles.

00:59:48.000 Quite credible.

00:59:49.000 But let's not forget what we're looking at.

00:59:51.000 We're looking at armed troops on the subway in New York.

00:59:55.000 There's not been a terror attack.

00:59:57.000 There's not been a terror attack.

00:59:58.000 We're not in the middle of COVID.

00:59:59.000 It's just being normalized.

01:00:01.000 Without a warrant, all these decades of preparation for martial law, and that's what this is, is here.

01:00:07.000 It's interesting.

01:00:08.000 Bags being searched without a warrant by troops is a pretty significant step to normalise, particularly in a city like New York.

01:00:14.000 Often when I talk about piloting, I mean Australia, internment camps, trucker protests and the evocation of the Emergencies Act in Canada, the freezing of bank accounts in Canada and Ukraine.

01:00:24.000 New York City, that's a bold move.

01:00:25.000 But I suppose the fact is, is broadly, compliance has become allied to opposition to Trump.

01:00:31.000 That's what it means.

01:00:32.000 Like, if you are opposed to liberal democracy, and liberal democracy now means war in Gaza, it means war against Russia, it means being compliant when it comes to medical suggestions that come from the state, all ideas that in the 60s, when the heroes were people like Malcolm X, Excellent, you wouldn't have thought.

01:00:49.000 One thing you want to be is obedient when Pfizer says jump you say how high and oh I'm not sure I'll be able to because my heart hurts.

01:00:55.000 Now authoritarianism has become somehow allied to liberalism and the idea that military force and military intelligence is turned against a domestic population has become normalized.

01:01:07.000 We know from personal experience now that Agencies, deep state agencies and proxies funded by the state that were used as intelligence assets to oppose terrorists, as they were then called, perhaps understandably, in various Middle Eastern wars and subsequent disputes, are now deployed against domestic populations.

01:01:24.000 That's a fact in your country, in mine, across the world.

01:01:28.000 So, in essence, what we're witnessing is we, the domestic population of these nations, are regarded as the enemy.

01:01:34.000 And that doesn't take brilliant analysis, actually, because just watch the Oscars.

01:01:37.000 You know, Trump, he's in there.

01:01:39.000 That's 50% of the population.

01:01:40.000 That's 50% of the population, and that includes black people, Hispanics, significant numbers of women.

01:01:44.000 It's not just, oh, mega.

01:01:46.000 You know, it's not that.

01:01:47.000 It isn't that.

01:01:48.000 And by the way, you're allowed to be that if that's what you are.

01:01:51.000 All of you have the right to be who you are.

01:01:54.000 But they have to create the climate first for martial law and civil emergency to sell us on it, the angrier world that Klaus Schwab talks about.

01:02:02.000 Yeah, it's an important point that the occupying force are there as protectors.

01:02:06.000 And actually, that's not a new idea.

01:02:08.000 The English or British occupation of Northern Ireland begins as we're here to protect, I think initially, forgive me, Catholics in Northern Ireland.

01:02:17.000 It just became normalised.

01:02:18.000 I know there's a long and complex history between our two separate nations, but often the introduction of the military is portrayed as for safety and security and protection.

01:02:29.000 And I think that probably happens in the sort of I say the whole world must learn of our peaceful ways.

01:02:33.000 peacekeeping force. Actually, if that piece of language was introduced when I was a little

01:02:37.000 older and a little better educated I'd have gone "peacekeeping force?" That doesn't seem

01:02:42.000 like the way you get peace.

01:02:43.000 I say the whole world must learn of our peaceful ways. By force.

01:02:48.000 This is not right-wing peace of writing, by the way.

01:02:51.000 In this journalism, Donald Trump is criticised for his attempts to deploy the National Guard during the uprisings that came from George Floyd's murder.

01:03:01.000 So this is not apolitical, this is political, but it's political from the side that you would not have expected.

01:03:07.000 That, for me, increases its validity and is precisely the type of discourse that we must engage in.

01:03:12.000 If you find yourself either side of that line, you're being controlled.

01:03:15.000 The mobilisation of 2,000 city and state police and National Guard troops in New York City on the pretext of fighting crime in the vast subway system is a demonstration of the reactionary character of the Democratic Party.

01:03:27.000 Last month, New York City's Democratic Mayor Eric Adams announced he would deploy 1,000 New York Police Department cops in the subway system after a law and order campaign by the city's We now know that that's the relationship between the media and the state.

01:03:39.000 of violent attacks against subway riders and transit workers, which, knowing what I know now

01:03:43.000 about how the media operates, were possibly written in conjunction with the people that

01:03:47.000 introduced this law. It would be, "Hey, we got these stories, we got these stories, we'll give

01:03:51.000 you access to this story, we'll give you this interview, we'll give you this access, we'll give

01:03:54.000 you this tax break, we'll give you this." We now know that that's the relationship between the

01:03:58.000 media and the state. Do you think that the X-Files was the first time Deep State were embedded within

01:04:03.000 a media organisation?

01:04:04.000 Let me know in the chat.

01:04:05.000 On Wednesday, New York Governor Kathy Hochul, also a Democrat, announced she was redeploying 750 National Guard troops already in New York City, as well as 250 state troopers and police of the Metropolitan Transport Authority, MTA, the state agency that runs the subways to increase the number of uniformed personnel patrolling subway stations and riding trains.

01:04:24.000 I remember when I was a kid, I used to hear people talk about, you know, You know, you want to see more bobbies, that's the word in our country, bobbies on the street.

01:04:30.000 But the image there is just sort of a member of the police force on a bicycle.

01:04:33.000 And again, this might just be where I am in my own personal evolution.

01:04:36.000 It seems like a rather pleasant idea, a member of the police force, again that word, that is working for the community.

01:04:42.000 But now, just think about how it feels to you as a person when you're on the subway and you see people with machine guns.

01:04:48.000 Do you feel, do you feel inside yourself, that's good, That's good that that's happening.

01:04:52.000 I feel more safe.

01:04:53.000 Now, I don't know what else might make you feel unsafe.

01:04:55.000 I don't know who you are or where you're from or how you've been coached and trained.

01:04:58.000 Maybe a group of young people with their hoods up makes you feel bad.

01:05:00.000 Maybe a group of drunk men in suits makes you feel bad.

01:05:03.000 Maybe people wearing religious attire of some denomination makes you feel bad.

01:05:07.000 But one thing I can say with some certainty is granting further and further authority to a group invested in war and control will not be good for any of us, regardless of our outward accoutrements.

01:05:19.000 The troops are currently operating out of Fort Hamilton in Brooklyn as part of Joint Task Force Empire Shield.

01:05:26.000 I mean, that's not good, is it?

01:05:28.000 Joint Task Force Empire Shield.

01:05:30.000 I mean, they're telling you what they're up to.

01:05:31.000 What are you doing?

01:05:32.000 We're shielding the Empire.

01:05:33.000 And what if I don't agree with the Empire?

01:05:35.000 Well, I mean, I could put it in a number of ways, but how about, well, I don't know.

01:05:40.000 Okay, so that event increased authority, increased spying, increased surveillance, increased war, and we all agreed it was a good thing to do, didn't we?

01:05:55.000 Except for the millions of people who marched against that war against Iraq, which, by the way, happened anyway, of course.

01:06:00.000 We all agreed that it was necessary because we were under threat.

01:06:04.000 So what's happening now?

01:06:05.000 We are under threat, right, from MAGA Trump on one side or immigrants on the other side, so we'd better get the Military on the streets. 0.53

01:06:11.000 They regularly patrol in the Grand Central Station, the Port Authority and a few other transportation hubs wearing camouflaged uniforms and equipped with automatic rifles but not engaging with the population.

01:06:20.000 Now the soldiers will take on the role of supplement in the NYPD, helping with random searches of bags and backpacks and other police activity.

01:06:27.000 They will also move deeper into the subway system Appearing at more of its 472 stations and riding trains.

01:06:34.000 Like, this is not CBGBs, New York Dolls, Ramones, Bowie, Warhol, Blondie, New York City.

01:06:42.000 Let's get on it.

01:06:43.000 Yeah, we're free.

01:06:44.000 If I lived in New York right now, I'd be... I'd be frightened.

01:06:48.000 I've lived in New York before.

01:06:49.000 If I lived in New York and they militarised the Underground, I'd think it's time to get out.

01:06:53.000 And we'll be seeing this, I predict, and actually Alex Jones has predicted already, with a good degree more experience and research than we're able to deploy, that we're going to be seeing this more often.

01:07:02.000 And the good thing about it is we'll know, won't we?

01:07:04.000 Because they won't just suddenly do it and say it's to pick up sweet wrappers, although God, you know, maybe they do that in Singapore.

01:07:10.000 They will say it's to protect you.

01:07:12.000 So watch out for that.

01:07:13.000 Now you know what to watch out for.

01:07:15.000 HOKL announced other oppressive measures, including the installation of cameras in every subway car and in the cabs used by drives and conductors.

01:07:22.000 The Democrats in the state legislature will introduce a bill to bar anyone convicted of a crime of violence on the subways from using the transit system for three years, effectively barring them from living and working in the city, where only the wealthy and upper middle class can go about their daily lives without riding the subway.

01:07:37.000 Again, this is like hate law stuff, isn't it?

01:07:39.000 Well, you can't blame us.

01:07:40.000 If someone's committed a violent crime in a subway, then it's sensible to ban them.

01:07:45.000 If you commit a crime against one of our workers, one of our personnel, we have a duty to protect them, and we cannot let you ride the subway.

01:07:51.000 Except, what if they didn't?

01:07:53.000 And what was the provocation?

01:07:54.000 And under whose authority?

01:07:55.000 And who trusts the judiciary now anyway?

01:07:57.000 And who trusts the military?

01:07:58.000 And who trusts the police force?

01:07:59.000 Even the military don't trust the military.

01:08:01.000 They're setting themselves on fire.

01:08:02.000 They're living on the brink of poverty while still serving.

01:08:05.000 There are 40,000 of them homeless right now.

01:08:08.000 If I see someone in a military uniform, I don't know whether I let them check my bag or flip them a buck.

01:08:13.000 The terms hate and terror are being more widely used.

01:08:17.000 To appropriately categorise groups in ways that means that they can be penalised, controlled, criminalised or shut down.

01:08:24.000 You've all seen videos of a mentally ill kid being dragged out by the police for saying something off-key in public.

01:08:30.000 You know, wasn't that long ago, oh Tourette's, they've got Tourette's, oh yeah.

01:08:34.000 They're using this authority in whatever way is convenient.

01:08:38.000 A terrorist now and for some time has been someone that the centralised authority has a problem with.

01:08:43.000 An individual or group whose intentions are adversarial to the state.

01:08:47.000 Now the problem is all of our intentions ought be adversarial to the state because the state Good, because that was terrible!

01:08:54.000 That was an insurrection!

01:08:56.000 Primarily domestic order in order to continue to facilitate that.

01:09:00.000 Secondarily, and other than that, I don't know, putting on things like the Oscars, I

01:09:04.000 don't know what the other role is.

01:09:05.000 January 6th, protest as a terrorist.

01:09:07.000 Good, because that was terrible.

01:09:09.000 That was an insurrection.

01:09:10.000 And pro-Palestine, protest as a terrorist.

01:09:12.000 Well good, because you know those people, they're not like us.

01:09:15.000 Oh, so are you not noticing the crucial fact that wherever you might feel on the political

01:09:21.000 spectrum our culture offers us, you can be regarded as a terrorist if you're a nuisance.

01:09:26.000 Statistics collected in recent years show that the campaign to whip up fears of violence on the subways has no basis in fact... Oh good, right, I mentioned earlier that there'd probably be information available on the amount of attacks that take place.

01:09:38.000 Here's some information.

01:09:39.000 Get ready.

01:09:40.000 NYPD figures showed a 2.6% decrease in subway crime in 2023 compared to 2022, although there was a jump in January 2024 compared to the same month last year.

01:09:50.000 Probably because they registered statistics differently because they knew they were about to introduce these laws, a cynic might assert, in conjunction with a spate of stories released in high profile and compliant media outlets.

01:10:01.000 Hey, let me know in the chat if you agree.

01:10:03.000 According to a separate analysis by the MTA and the New York Times, oh right, yeah, that vast template of opinion, The New York Times, "Violent crimes occur at a rate of

01:10:10.000 between one and two per million subway rides." 0.57

01:10:13.000 Quick! Get the army down here! 0.87

01:10:15.000 Once every million or two subway rides, there could be a crime!

01:10:19.000 Well, are there any areas in culture where there's continual crime?

01:10:22.000 There are.

01:10:22.000 Do you wanna sort that out?

01:10:24.000 But a few violent incidents, the knifing of a subway driver, the shooting of a passenger in Brooklyn, have been sensationalised by the media and capitalist politicians of both parties.

01:10:33.000 Hochul did not conceal the political motives behind her announcement of the troop redeployment.

01:10:38.000 I'm also going to demonstrate that Democrats fight crime as well, she told MSNBC on Thursday.

01:10:43.000 This narrative that Republicans have said and hijacked the story that we're soft on crime, that we defund the police.

01:10:48.000 No.

01:10:49.000 Not only do we defund the police, we defund and yet still use the military on the subway.

01:10:54.000 There you go.

01:10:55.000 Get down there and search bags.

01:10:56.000 And when you've finished your tour, there's a sleeping bag for you.

01:10:58.000 Go sleep down there.

01:10:59.000 The New York Civil Liberties Union said, Instead, a sweeping surveillance state was being established.

01:11:03.000 One of the key episodes in Trump's preparation of his attempted political coup on January 6th, 2021.

01:11:08.000 Do with, remember Aaron Bushnall, just a little while ago scrubbed from the internet.

01:11:12.000 Instead, a sweeping surveillance state was being established.

01:11:15.000 One of the key episodes in Trump's preparation of his attempted political coup on January 6th,

01:11:19.000 2021 - you can let me know whether or not you agree that that's what that was - was his threat

01:11:23.000 to invoke the Insurrection Act during the summer of 2020 and send the military into major American

01:11:27.000 cities to suppress popular demonstrations against police violence sparked by the murder of George Floyd.

01:11:32.000 Now a Democratic governor is deploying troops in the largest American city on an equally bogus pretext.

01:11:37.000 Doesn't matter whether you are at a Black Lives Matter protest or a pro-Trump MAGA protest. 0.66

01:11:42.000 In the end, if you get in their way, you're a terrorist.

01:11:44.000 You have more in common with one another than you have in common with the media or political systems that are attempting continually to divide you.

01:11:52.000 It is impossible for the US ruling elite to carry out this policy democratically.

01:11:55.000 It requires a frontal assault on the democratic rights of the working class and the build-up of the repressive forces over the capitalist state.

01:12:01.000 So by the time that new measures are introduced that are unpopular, whether it's the increase of war or the increase of authoritarianism, the sight of the military on the streets and transport facilities of major metropolises will be normal and accepted.

01:12:16.000 Look at the people already just breezing past armed guards on a subway as if it ain't no thing.

01:12:22.000 Perhaps thinking to themselves, this will protect me from immigrants. 1.00

01:12:25.000 Perhaps thinking to themselves, this will protect me from BLM protesters.

01:12:28.000 Perhaps thinking to themselves, this will protect me from January 6th insurrectionists.

01:12:32.000 Whatever they need to put in your mind, To make you more compliant they're willing to put there.

01:12:37.000 That's why we are very determined, most determined, to put into your heart a spirit of real individual sovereignty and collective representation so that we may oppose this authoritarianism together. 0.99

01:12:50.000 No, here's the fucking news! 0.94

01:12:54.000 Okay, thank you for joining us for this episode. 0.98

01:12:56.000 On Friday, we'll be looking at... The Culture War.

01:13:00.000 You should join us on Locals.

01:13:02.000 If you use the code GODISGREAT, you get a month free.

01:13:05.000 You will get early access to interviews.

01:13:06.000 You'll be able to join our weekly book club.

01:13:08.000 Meditate with us every week and get a free exclusive video every week.

01:13:11.000 Remember, Lee DeBeans is already with us.

01:13:13.000 Brooke and Ross is already with us.

01:13:15.000 Kuzaku808 and so many more have joined us.

01:13:17.000 See you on Friday, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.

Stay Free - Russel Brand - April 03, 2024

YOU WERE RIGHT! | CIA In Ukraine, France Vax Law & Alex Jones Predicted THIS - Stay Free #338

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript