If the CIA have secret spy bases in Ukraine, and have been engaged in a shadow war for the last 10 years, then why is the New York Times telling us now that there are no such things as "secret spy bases" in Ukraine? And why does the legacy media continue to support them? And what is the agenda of the media? Is it as simple as ensuring that funding can continue? And is it clear now that the media are starting to acknowledge that you cannot completely suppress truth? Logically, AI can employ government agencies using proxies to crush dissent and censor, but ultimately, we're too powerful and powerful to be controlled by powerful news agencies like governments like the NY Times, Google, and the CIA. And ultimately, the people that occupy these spaces are people that don't have their odd, peculiar amnesia of their odd war, their odd of their peculiar and have begun to formulate your understanding of reality. So that you are not subject to the reality that Google and Google and the establishment would have you live with, so that you can live with a brutal, brutal, unprovoked war, then you can begin to form your own brutal reality. - Russell Brand Conspiracy theories to Conspiracy Facts is a journey our community continually makes. It s worth downloading the app, get the additional content that we make, and become a member of our community, and stand up for the truth amidst the fiction where is the freedom amidst the friction? Where is the Freedom amidst, excuse me, the fiction? . You re gonna love it? - and I hope that you will find it easily and love it. - RUMBLE! Rumble . . . RUMBLOGLE Subscribe to our daily dose of rambles on social media updates on conspiracy theories and conspiracy theories , and conspiracy theory to find out what s going on in the world, and how to be a part of a movement that opposes injustice and stands up for ordinary people standing up for justice and freedom in the 21st century? , RUMBER is a community that stands up to the truth in the real world or at least, not just the truth about what s really going on in this episode of Conspiracy Theory To Conspiracy Facts on this episode, stay free with Russell Brand. , stay free! - stay free, and you ll love it! RIVE in Rumble!
00:00:00.000Hello you Awakening Wonders there on Spotify, Apple, Stink Whistle, Gurgle Dot or wherever you download your podcasts these days to remain at least peripherally connected to some tendril of truth in a bewildering miasma of lies and propaganda.
00:00:28.000We decipher the latest news stories, we break down current topics that the mainstream media should be covering, and if they aren't, Then we critique why they're not and what they are covering.
00:01:07.000Hello and welcome to this special episode of stay free with Russell Brand
00:01:19.000Conspiracy theories to conspiracy facts is a journey our community continually makes.
00:01:23.000While we're being lied to we're picking through all of that balderdash that flows in our direction and discerning what is the truth amidst the fiction.
00:01:31.000Where is the freedom amidst, excuse me, the friction?
00:01:36.000We're going to be talking today about the CIA's involvement in Ukraine, we're going to be talking about France's vaccine law, you're going to love this video, and Alex Jones's predictions and how they are coming to pass.
00:01:45.000Now for 15 minutes we'll be freely available but then we'll exclusively be gambling and frolicking in that sweet stream of freedom we call Rumble.
00:01:52.000It's worth downloading the app, it's worth clicking the red button in fact to get additional content that we make there, beautiful additional content, Beautiful content, beautiful dogs.
00:02:02.000Every single week we do great videos on stuff like Chemtrails, brilliant stuff on the bloody MK Ultras.
00:02:10.000Become a member of our community, get the additional content, be part of a movement that opposes injustice and stands up for ordinary people.
00:02:17.000Now, the first conspiracy to fact is the CIA have been in Ukraine for 10 years.
00:02:23.000They've been meddling in Ukrainian politics for a while now.
00:02:57.000So why the New York Times changing the story now?
00:03:03.000What we're talking about is the New York Times have now admitted, acknowledged that there are CIA bases inside Ukraine and have been for the last 10 years.
00:03:11.000And they've been waging a shadow war on Russia from within Ukraine.
00:03:16.000And essentially, deep state interests have been in control of Ukraine for the last 10 years, which is, oh, since that 2014 coup, which we've been talking about in independent media, but they've not been talking about in legacy media.
00:03:26.000And that's before we talk about NATO's role in exacerbating these conditions and the escalation of conflicts between Russia And Ukraine.
00:03:33.000So why are the New York Times telling us now that there are CIA bases in Ukraine and probably biolabs and all the sorts of things that we've been discussing in these spaces for a while and were of course called conspiracy theorists for discussing?
00:03:48.000So what's the agenda of the legacy media?
00:03:50.000Is it as simple as ensuring that funding can continue?
00:03:54.000And is it clear now that the legacy media are starting to acknowledge that you cannot completely suppress truth?
00:04:00.000You can employ agencies like Logically AI You can have government agencies using proxies to crush dissent and censor, but ultimately, and this is actually pretty good and exciting news, we're too powerful now to be controlled.
00:04:12.000I don't mean we, just me and literally you.
00:04:14.000I mean the people that occupy these spaces, all of your various resources that you use to formulate your understanding of reality so that you are not subject to the reality that Google and Google and Google AI and the establishment
00:04:42.000The Russian military has begun a brutal assault on the people of Ukraine.
00:04:45.000Without provocation, without justification.
00:04:49.000This is an attack which is unprovoked and unjustified attack on Ukraine.
00:04:54.000The prayers of the entire world are with the people of Ukraine tonight
00:04:58.000as they suffer an unprovoked and unjustified attack.
00:05:01.000It's just the ones you've heard already included.
00:05:04.000We do have CIA bases within Ukraine and have been waging on a shadow war.
00:05:08.000And as you know, NATO have been provoking Russia for years by inviting Ukraine to join NATO since 2008, knowing that that's a red line for Putin.
00:05:18.000That can no longer be called an unprovoked attack.
00:05:27.000I'm assuming, you know, Let's go elsewhere as refugees due to this terrible war that could be prevented because I bet you wouldn't be so willing to spend your tax dollars funding the perpetuation of a war that is provoked rather than unprovoked.
00:05:39.000We'll get into looking at why the legacy media have changed their tune right now but for this moment we can double down on the fact that we can't trust them, we could never trust them.
00:06:16.000You could literally go to Broadway in New York City and watch a show and be hit with more truth than watching the news.
00:06:23.000We are united in condemning the Kremlin's unprovoked aggression.
00:06:28.000And he also actually knows, because that's Jens Stoltenberg from NATO, who's directly been in contact with Putin and going, so what will you do if we... Yeah, that would be a war with it.
00:06:37.000No justification apart from the fact that he is a warmonger that wanted to build an empire.
00:06:44.000You can't call someone a warmonger when you've done what that man is purported to have done with a piggy.
00:07:41.000For the past two years, nearly every reference in the US media to the February 2022 invasion
00:07:46.000of Ukraine by Russia has been preceded with an obligatory word, "unprovoked".
00:07:50.000The public was told that this was a war without cause, that Ukraine was blameless and that the invasion was to be explained entirely in terms of the intentions and psychology of one man.
00:08:02.000Of course, that's why there was so much hysteria about the now famous Tucker Carlson interview, because then you can watch him with your own eyes and you can make your own evaluations about Russian propaganda versus US propaganda.
00:08:12.000And you can make decisions about your own tax dollars and your own family and your own military and your own community and your own nation.
00:08:18.000But they don't want you making any of those calculations.
00:08:20.000However, on the weekend of the second anniversary of the war, the New York Times has published a lengthy article revealing that the Russian invasion of Ukraine on February 24th 2022 was instigated by a systematic and widespread campaign of military intelligence aggression by the United States.
00:08:35.000The article details long-standing Central Intelligence Agency, CIA of course, operations in Ukraine Why are the New York Times writing this piece now?
00:08:42.000sponsored and built up the Ukrainian military intelligence agency, her, using it as a weapon
00:08:46.000of spying, assassinations and other provocations directed against Russia for more than a decade.
00:08:52.000Why are the New York Times writing this piece now? Why are the New York Times, which are
00:08:56.000a mouthpiece and an amplifier of the establishment agenda, choosing this moment to reveal that
00:09:02.000the CIA did indeed have bases and assets and engaging provocative activity inside Ukraine,
00:09:07.000which means that it can't any longer be referred to as an unprovoked attack?
00:09:10.000A provoked attack doesn't mean that, you know, that the Kremlin is Disneyland and that Putin's a great guy or that Ukrainian people aren't being brutalized.
00:09:17.000It just means that we have to have an adult conversation rather than propaganda.
00:09:20.000The Times writes, Towards the end of 2021, according to a senior European official, Mr Putin was weighing whether to launch his full-scale invasion when he met with the head of one of Russia's main spy services, who told him that the CIA, together with Britain's MI6, were controlling Ukraine and turning it into a beachhead for operations against Moscow.
00:09:38.000Does that make sense to you, the idea that British and American intelligence agencies essentially had control of Ukraine?
00:09:45.000Does that sort of Ring a bell of truth somewhere in your belly?
00:09:48.000Or do you think that Zelensky is some sort of military genius cum activist campaigner who is Churchill-like leading the charge against Russia, the indefatigable yet evil enemy?
00:09:59.000Or do you reckon that what happens is countries like the United States and the UK puppet various nations in order to either win resource or strategic global wars to fulfil an agenda where it wouldn't be popular to go to face-to-face good old-fashioned gloves-off wars with Russia and China and And much like the wars that took place in Vietnam and Korea and Afghanistan and basically all of the wars that have happened since the end of the Second World War, proxy conflicts are being fought for military-industrial complex reasons or strategic reasons and we're just given a narrative up front that stops us going, how do we benefit from this?
00:10:36.000So that those questions are all sort of lost in the miasma of total lies, the New York Times et al propagandise us with images of brutality and suffering in Ukraine, which we should of course be aware of and doing everything we can to prevent, so that they can just get on and get a bunch of funding for Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Boeing.
00:10:52.000The Times report demonstrates that this Russian intelligence assessment was absolutely true.
00:10:57.000For more than a decade, dating back to 2014, the CIA was building up training and arming Ukrainian intelligence and paramilitary forces that were engaging in assassinations and other provocations against pro-Russian forces in eastern Ukraine, against Russian forces in Crimea, and across the border into Russia itself.
00:11:14.000Huh, so that's sort of like there's been a war going on for ages anyway and all that's really happened is they've just reframed what's happening and increased funding.
00:11:24.000In a critical passage, the Times writes, As the partnership deepened after 2016, the Ukrainians became impatient with what they considered Washington's undue caution and began staging assassinations and other lethal operations which violated the terms the White House thought the Ukrainians had agreed to.
00:11:39.000Infuriated, Officials in Washington threatened to cut off support, but they never did.
00:11:44.000In other words, the Ukrainian paramilitary forces, armed, funded, and led by the United States and NATO, were systematically assassinating forces supporting closer relations with Russia.
00:11:53.000Ukraine have their own autonomy, they have their own dignity, and of course they have their own sovereignty.
00:11:59.000The fact that they have their own attitude to their relationship with Russia, and the fact that they took advantage of an opportunity to escalate tensions, knowing they were backed by a military superpower, is hardly surprising, but it is concerning because it's led to this conflict.
00:12:12.000But I suppose ultimately, the United States elite have an agenda to drain and destabilise Russia.
00:12:18.000And don't you imagine that the increasing hostility in the South Pacific are about draining and destabilising China?
00:12:23.000And isn't it becoming increasingly clear that the country of America is one thing, you, you people, your culture, your country, your beliefs, your values, your Christianity, your tolerance of other religions, all of that stuff is there down here.
00:12:34.000And then over here are this set of interests controlling To some degree or another both political parties and ensuring that they can maintain the forever wars that are their lifeblood but sadly the death of literally every other territory in the world and a good many of your own citizens if this mentality continues for much longer.
00:12:50.000The newspaper's account begins with the maiden coup of February 2014 when right-wing and neo-Nazi forces backed by the US and European Union overthrew a pro-Russian president and installed a pro-imperialist regime headed by the billionaire Petro Poroshenko.
00:13:07.000In a way, there could have been an entirely different trajectory, couldn't there?
00:13:10.000There could have been sort of an easier, if still somewhat tense, relationship between Russia and Ukraine that didn't really involve the United States, and therefore didn't require siloing of weapons that were now no longer needed in Afghanistan into this new territory.
00:13:24.000A new paradigm was possible, and it seems like it was prevented.
00:13:27.000Furthermore, neo-Nazi and right-wing, I mean, if our culture is defining itself by one thing, it's opposition to, oh, these bloody right-wing fascists, I mean, There's barely a mainstream media news program ends about some new person being called a neo-Nazi or a right-wing fascist when it comes to actual people who come out and tell you, do you know what I am?
00:13:48.000Now, can I have some money to go to war against other people?
00:13:50.000Yes, you can, because we don't care about anything except our own agenda.
00:13:54.000And yet we will talk about how much we hate Nazis when it's someone like off the news who wears a tie, who's basically a Christian, who doesn't think about race that much because they live in America and they're American.
00:14:04.000This coup was the culmination of two decades of imperialist inroads into the former Soviet bloc with the expansion of NATO to include virtually all of Eastern Europe in violation of pledges made to the leaders of the former Soviet Union.
00:14:15.000The Times is silent on this earlier history as well as on the role of the CIA in the maiden events.
00:14:21.000Why are they silent on those important facts?
00:14:24.000Maiden set the stage for a massive escalation of the CIA intervention, as detailed in the Times report.
00:14:29.000The intelligence agency played a central role in fuelling conflict between Ukraine and Russia, first as a low-level war against pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine, then as a full-scale war after the Russian invasion in February 2022.
00:14:41.000Three US administrations were involved, first Obama, then Trump, now Biden.
00:14:46.000I'm sure you know by now that what Well, I suppose that indicates is that whoever you vote for, when it comes to significant issues like perpetuating forever wars, you don't really have the right to vote.
00:14:57.000That's why independent candidates like Robert Kennedy, who say they will end these wars, and I pray they mean by that all of these wars, ought to be taken very seriously.
00:15:05.000According to the Times' account, CIA operations included not only widespread spying, but assisting direct provocations like the assassination of pro-Russian politicians in eastern Ukraine and paramilitary attacks on Russian forces in Crimea.
00:15:17.000The Times reported that a Ukrainian unit, the 5th Directorate, was tasked with conducting assassinations, including one in 2016.
00:15:42.000Have you got a battery for an Ericsson?
00:15:43.000The CIA soon learned that the assassins were members of the Fifth Directorate, the spy group that received CIA training.
00:15:50.000Ukraine's domestic intelligence agency had even handed out commemorative patches to those involved, each one stitched with the word lift, the British term for an elevator.
00:15:59.000Oh, as long as you're all having fun, guys, now in this massive, expensive, mad war that you keep lying about and simplifying so you can keep funding it and people stop going, oh, it's really terrible this is happening.
00:16:08.000Here, have a patch with Lyft, because we blew out that person, didn't we, in an elevator.
00:16:41.000Anything that happens after that, again, like Putin, illegal war, terrible, children dying, buildings destroyed, tragedy, devastation, it should stop as soon as possible.
00:16:50.000But this is going to annoy someone like Putin, all of this, isn't it?
00:16:53.000Since the outbreak of full-scale war, the Ukrainian Hurs extended these assassination operations to the whole territory of Russia.
00:17:01.000Including the killing of Darya Dugina, a leading pro-Putin polemicist in the Russian media and Russian government and military officials.
00:17:08.000I mean, seems like designed to irritate him into a bellicose state, which it eventually did with the ongoing attempt to recruit Ukraine into NATO.
00:17:18.000The CIA found its Ukrainian allies very useful in collecting vast amounts of data on Russian military and intelligence activity, so much that the Hurt itself could not process it and had to forward the raw data to CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia for analysis.
00:17:31.000An earlier, less detailed report on this intelligence collaboration in the Washington Post cited a Ukrainian intelligence official's estimate that 250,000 to 300,000 Russian military intelligence messages were being collected each day.
00:17:44.000So, they were spying on Russia to an extraordinary degree.
00:17:49.000More funding, more spying, more transgression, more provocation.
00:17:53.000So, again, we just watched the news, unprovoked, unprovoked.
00:18:09.000This data was not just related to Ukraine, but concerned Russian intelligence activity all over the world.
00:18:15.000Long before the Russian invasion, the CIA was seeking to broaden its attack on Moscow.
00:18:19.000The Times reports, So they wanted to establish it everywhere.
00:18:30.000A bit like, I suppose, Russia's concern that Ukraine will join NATO, then other border countries will join NATO, then they'd have secret CIA spying bases in them where they would engage in provocative activity and spying missions in an attempt It seems to me, at least, to create one global government, ultimately, controlled by the interests that currently control the United States, the biggest economy and most powerful nation on Earth.
00:18:59.000The head of Russia House, the CIA department overseeing operations against Russia, organised a secret meeting at The Hague.
00:19:05.000There, representatives from the CIA, Britain's MI6, the HUR, the Dutch service, a critical intelligence ally, and other agencies agreed to start pooling together more of their intelligence on Russia.
00:19:17.000The result was a secret coalition against Russia, and the Ukrainians were vital members of it.
00:19:22.000All these activities occurred well before the Russian invasion of February 2022, not to mention the 2014 coup and placing what sounds like a puppet government that was ultimately being controlled by deep state interests.
00:19:32.000I don't know what provocation could be, if not that's some of the most provocative stuff I've ever heard.
00:19:37.000The outbreak of full-scale war led to even more direct CIA engagement in Ukraine.
00:19:41.000CIA agents were the only Americans not covered by the initial evacuation of US government personnel from Ukraine, removing only to Western Ukraine.
00:19:50.000They continually briefed the Ukrainians on Russian military plans, including precise details of operations as they were unfolding.
00:19:57.000This is, and has always been, a proxy war.
00:20:00.000The Nomination of Russia's invasion of Ukraine as the start date seems like the type of narrativisation that's favourable to the interest engaged in these years of provocation after sponsoring a coup and insisting that Ukraine join NATO.
00:20:17.000Actions that seem designed to provoke Russia.
00:20:19.000So when Russia invaded Ukraine, killing loads of Ukrainian people, causing all that decimation and destruction and all of that criminal and illegal activity, it's because It's because of all of this stuff and because temporarily
00:20:31.000Ukrainian interests align with those interests, they're a convenient conduit for the
00:20:35.000expression of the power of the establishment.
00:20:37.000And when they're no longer a convenient conduit, they will be pretty mercilessly dispatched,
00:21:12.000Some of the CIA officers were deployed to Ukrainian bases.
00:21:15.000They reviewed lists of potential Russian targets that the Ukrainians were preparing to strike, comparing the information the Ukrainians had with the U.S.
00:21:22.000intelligence to ensure that it was accurate.
00:21:24.000In other words, the CIA was helping direct the war, making the U.S.
00:21:27.000government a full participant, a co-belligerent in a war with nuclear-armed Russia, despite Biden's claim that the United States was only aiding Ukraine from afar.
00:21:36.000And all of this without the American people having the slightest say in the matter.
00:21:40.000Don't you sometimes forget that vital detail that America is men-a-bee, your country was established on those principles.
00:21:46.000And I really now see more clearly than ever Mike Benz, the expert in deep state activities analysis, that when people say we have to protect democracy, what they mean are a set of institutions that preserve oligarchical power rather than the electoral process by which ordinary people go, I think I'd like to Not being a nuclear apocalypse.
00:22:05.000Because that kind of democracy isn't happening, is it?
00:22:07.000The Times account also provides an inadvertent indictment of America's media, as it writes, It's written out like it's telling you.
00:22:14.000partnership, many of which are being disclosed by the New York Times for the
00:22:17.000first time, have been a closely guarded secret for a decade.
00:22:20.000It's written out like it's telling you. Here's the inside scoop.
00:22:23.000Taylor Swift's new beauty secrets are avocado on each of her cheekbones.
00:22:30.000It's like, we've been using your money to provoke a nuclear superpower into a war, then we've been telling you that it was an unprovoked war.
00:22:37.000Oh my god, no wonder she looks so young and fresh!
00:22:40.000This is propaganda and lying, and no doubt the New York Times are only revealing this now because it's convenient to another agenda that we'll be revealing later in this brilliant article.
00:22:49.000This admission means that these secrets were closely guarded by the Times itself.
00:22:53.000So, all the time, hey listen, please don't tell people there have been no clinical trials on this product, just tell them that if they don't use this product, it's irresponsible and kills old people.
00:23:04.000As former editor Bill Keller once observed, freedom of the press means freedom not to publish, and that is a freedom we exercise with some regularity.
00:23:11.000Particularly, we might add, when it comes to the crimes of US imperialism.
00:23:15.000The Times article is not so much an exposure as a controlled release of information.
00:23:47.000But in the end, we just found out too much.
00:23:49.000Too much accumulative and aggregated information.
00:23:51.000So in order to, to a degree, keep a sliver of credibility, they're sort of acknowledging, OK, yeah, we provoked this war and we've known about it for ages and the deep state's been inside Ukraine for ages.
00:24:02.000But also, there's another agenda to do with getting Republicans to support the ongoing funding of this war rather than withdrawing the funding.
00:24:11.000The US newspaper Record reports that the two authors of the piece, Adam Entis and Michael Schwartz, conducted more than 200 interviews with current and former officials in Ukraine, elsewhere in Europe, and in the United States.
00:24:23.000This activity could hardly have taken place without the knowledge, permission, and even encouragement of the CIA, as well as the Zelensky regime and Ukrainian intelligence.
00:24:31.000As we've been saying for some time, the legacy media works in conjunction with the establishment and Deep State to maintain a particular Reality that we can all be manipulated into believing in so that our behaviour can be controlled so that we can be shut down.
00:24:44.000This is a brilliant, brilliant, perfect, beautiful example of that.
00:24:48.000In the meantime, a real journalist, Julian Assange, is awaiting the decision on his final appeal against extradition to the United States, where he faces 175 years in prison or even a death sentence.
00:24:57.000The crime of Assange and WikiLeaks, which Assange founded, is that they did not obey the rules of bourgeois journalism and did not seek the permission of the military intelligence authorities
00:25:07.000before publishing their revelations about US war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan.
00:25:12.000The efforts of the US State Department to subvert and manipulate governments
00:25:15.000and the spying activities of the CIA and National Security Agency.
00:25:19.000In short, he released information that was favourable to what you might call
00:25:23.000the electorate or the citizens or the subjects or the people of nations like yours
00:25:27.000and of mine, in order that we might more discerningly regard our establishment,
00:25:32.000including the legacy media who lies to us.
00:25:34.000And what happens to people like that is what's happened to Julian Assange.
00:25:37.000But there are other examples of how the establishment behaves if you act against their interests.
00:25:42.000The exposure of a decade of CIA operations in Ukraine, clearly at the request of the agency itself, appears to be linked to the ongoing conflict within the US ruling elite over what policy to adopt in that war, in the wake of the debacle suffered by the Zelensky regime in last year's offensive, which gained little and suffered colossal losses.
00:26:00.000Congressional Republicans have blocked further military and financial aid to Ukraine, effectively declaring that the US must cut its losses there and concentrate on the main enemy, China.
00:26:17.000This is like all the propaganda that's fit to use to manipulate ongoing forever war so that we can keep the offices open and the lights on.
00:26:26.000This is the most important couple of paragraphs I think in the piece.
00:26:29.000Have a listen to this, then you will understand exactly what's going on.
00:26:31.000You can use this to argue with people who still believe propaganda.
00:26:35.000By reporting the virtual control of the Ukrainian regime by the US military intelligence apparatus, the Times is seeking to pressure the Republicans to support the war funding.
00:26:45.000It is arguing that this money is not going to a foreign government, in a foreign war, thousands of miles from US borders, but to a subcontractor of American imperialism, waging an American war, in which US personnel are deeply and directly engaged.
00:27:01.000Although some American service personnel are deeply engaged in opposing these wars, as you remember
00:27:06.000from the sad self-immolation and death of Aaron Bushnell recently. In so doing, the Times has
00:27:11.000revealed its own coverage of the Ukraine war over the past two years to have been nothing more than war
00:27:18.000propaganda aimed at using a fraudulent narrative to dragoon the American public to support a predatory
00:27:24.000imperialist war of aggression aimed at subjugating and dismantling Russia.
00:27:29.000And the only way, I suppose, that you could argue that that's a good thing is if you saw yourself somehow as a subject and ally of this establishment, or at least your own destiny tied to their ongoing success.
00:27:40.000In order to believe that, you would have to be in constant fear that both Russia and China have their own imperialist agenda.
00:27:46.000And if they're not stopped, thwarted, attacked, drained, and covertly and insidiously dismantled, then you and your way of life will be under threat.
00:27:55.000We learned that the New York Times suppresses information when it wants to, that they support the agenda of the establishment, that they totally believe in lying and omitting information in order to ensure that the establishment agenda can be met, even when it's a bloody war that's killing Ukrainian people and Russian people.
00:28:14.000So you could assume that they might employ similar policies when it comes to the wars in the Middle East and the terrible and tragic deaths that are taking place there.
00:28:22.000What this ultimately reveals Is that the legacy media is part of the establishment.
00:28:25.000You can't trust anything you read or hear in the legacy media.
00:28:29.000You can assume from the get go that what they are doing is either trying to distract you, dumb you down, shut down any possible avenues that are challenging to establishment interest and even if that extends to Claiming that current wars were unprovoked when the truth is they were anything but unprovoked.
00:28:46.000And that's not to mitigate, undermine or dilute the tragedy that Ukrainian people are experiencing.
00:28:50.000is just to point out that it's been caused by a greedy, avaricious and tyrannical global
00:28:56.000establishment that requires war to sustain itself.
00:29:19.000For those of you that are in the United States, there is a way to secure your hard-earned nest egg.
00:29:24.000American Heart for Gold makes it easy to protect your savings and retirement accounts with physical gold and silver.
00:29:29.000With one phone call, they can have physical gold and silver delivered right to your door or inside a qualifying retirement account like your IRA or 401k.
00:29:37.000American Heart for Gold is the highest-rate firm in the United States with an A-plus rating from the BBB, that's the Better Business Bureau, and thousands of satisfied clients right now.
00:29:46.000They'll give you up to $10,000 of free silver on your first qualifying order.
00:29:50.000This offer, I'm sorry to tell you, is only for customers from the United States of America.
00:30:16.000We're going to have to leave YouTube right now because their WHO-inspired community guidelines will not permit freedom when it comes to talking about France's vaccine law, dubbed Article Pfizer or Article Liza by some of you wags, so click the link in the description because we're only going to be here for a few more seconds and you deserve and need freedom.
00:30:33.000Remember, we got all this glorious merch and every single penny that we make, once our costs are covered, goes to getting junkies, owkies and the broken into treatment so that they can be strong.
00:30:42.000and they can participate in this movement with us.
00:30:44.000See you in a second, click the link in the description.
00:30:46.000Now, France's vaccine laws seem designed to protect Pfizer from themselves
00:31:12.000Country of revolution, freedom, wine and pure sexiness.
00:31:16.000Although now they're banning, criticizing medications that are recommended by the state, imposing potential prison sentences and 45,000 euro fines.
00:31:31.000Don't for a second think it's possible and plausible to criticise or speak out against medications, and let's face it, it means particularly and specifically recent gene therapies or vaccines or whatever you want to call them in that country, although you probably won't be able to call them anything soon, you certainly will not be able to criticise them.
00:31:48.000So what does it mean for the world and for France when laws are passed that seem just It's designed literally to prevent Pfizer's profit margin being negatively impacted.
00:31:57.000It's being called Article Pfizer because it sort of seems to literally mean, don't criticise Pfizer, even though it's written in sort of vague language.
00:32:04.000Don't anyone criticise any medical measures recommended by the state?
00:32:08.000What, like people are going to say, oh, don't take your chemotherapy, love.
00:32:11.000Or people are going to say, don't get a pacemaker fitted.
00:32:13.000Although ironically, heart disease and cancer are on the rise since around 2019, 2020 type time.
00:32:19.000I wonder why these laws are being passed.
00:32:22.000So firstly, this is a post by Dr Kat Lindley on X. Today, a law was passed in France qualifying any opposition to mRNA LNP injections as a sectarian aberration.
00:32:32.000It carries a penalty of up to three years imprisonment and 45,000 euros.
00:32:37.000It will not tolerate any criticism of the therapeutic treatments which will be recommended or made obligatory by the state.
00:32:42.000Any person who dares to openly criticize these therapies will be liable to fines and imprisonment.
00:32:47.000Seems like an astonishing piece of legislature.
00:32:50.000So that's what's happening in France, but over in the UK, like Macron in France, we have a globalist leader in Rishi Sunak.
00:32:57.000And even if in the next election we change leaders, guess what we're getting?
00:33:10.000Can the current Prime Minister think of anything he has promoted?
00:33:13.000This is Andrew Bridgen who's been talking a lot about excess deaths and complex subjects.
00:33:18.000You can see him on our show Stay Free, click the link in the description.
00:33:21.000Here he is as usual in Parliament advocating for more stringency and analysis around the pandemic period.
00:33:27.000That's all he's asking for and he's treated as a kind of lunatic as a result.
00:33:31.000Can the current Prime Minister think of anything he has promoted in partnership with huge businesses as safe and effective which has ultimately harmed the British people?
00:33:40.000You hear the murmur of globalism in the background, whether it's in France, whether it's in Canada, whether it's in the UK.
00:33:45.000There is an institutional opposition to open conversation around this subject and now legislation to prevent open conversation around this subject.
00:33:52.000That's without even recourse to the censorship laws in Ireland, Canada, the UK.
00:34:25.000And here is Rishi Sunak on GB News being questioned by a man who says he suffered from vaccine injury, which he wouldn't be able to say in France.
00:34:34.000My name is John Watt and I'm one of the Covid vaccine injured in this country.
00:34:39.000I want you to look into my eyes real soon, I want you to look at the pain,
00:34:43.000the trauma and the regret I have in my eyes.
00:34:47.000That person, in case you're not in the British Isles, is a Scottish person behaving in a very Scottish fashion.
00:34:53.000Which is to say, emotional and aggressive, full on, and in this instance, correct.
00:34:57.000We have been left with no help at all.
00:35:00.000Not only am I in here that's vaccine injured, there's another man over there whose life's been ruined by that COVID-19 vaccine.
00:35:07.000I know people who have lost legs, amputations.
00:35:11.000I know people with heart conditions like myself, Rishi Sunak.
00:35:14.000He's so Scottish that this may not remain a verbal altercation for much longer.
00:35:19.000And I say this as a man who is married to a Scottish person.
00:35:22.000Why have I had to set up a support group in Scotland to look after the people that have been affected by that Covid-19 vaccine?
00:35:30.000Why are the people who are in charge, who told us all to do the right thing, have left us all to rot and left me and the thousands and the tens of thousands in this country to rot?
00:35:43.000We're actually going to extradite you to France right now.
00:35:46.000We were thinking Rwanda, but I think you'd be happier in France.
00:35:49.000In Scotland right now, according to the yellow card system, there are over 30,000 people that have had an adverse reaction to that vaccine and 200 deaths.
00:35:59.000John, thank you very much indeed for your question.
00:36:13.000Yeah, Jon, I'm very sorry to hear about your personal circumstances, and you said someone over here also seems to have suffered by a similar thing.
00:36:22.000Now, obviously, I don't know about the individual's situation.
00:37:40.000I'm used to having difficult conversations, like sometimes me and the wife talk about how much tax we should pay in this country and how much money Infosys should get from government contracts.
00:37:49.000And it can get quite heated sometimes, because sometimes she thinks I should give a bit more.
00:37:52.000So there is a vaccine compensation scheme that's in place, as you alluded to, in the NHS.
00:37:57.000Obviously, everyone individually will work through their cases.
00:38:00.000It's difficult for me to comment on anyone's individual case.
00:38:16.000God, I'm saddened to hear that you've been silenced.
00:38:18.000It's almost as if we've been using proxy organisations like Logically AI to shut down any dissenting voices to anyone that's critical of vaccines.
00:38:25.000It's like we spent loads of money cleansing social media of criticism.
00:38:29.000I don't know how the hell this keeps happening.
00:38:31.000Why are all these people getting silenced?
00:38:32.000It's almost as if we're funding it from your tax money and then pretending to apologise to you on the television.
00:38:38.000So please do get your details to Stephen and the team and I will happily take that away.
00:38:43.000Get to Stephen and the team and we'll deal with that sort of never.
00:38:47.000Of course you should be able to speak about your experience, what's happened to you and as I said we have a compensation scheme in place for that and I'll make sure that we're working through that.
00:38:55.000We've got a compensation scheme for these 100% safe vaccines.
00:38:58.000Doesn't make sense, really, because 100% safe would mean you wouldn't need any compensation.
00:39:45.000About how best to roll out the vaccine, what was in the public health interest, the priority order, how that should be done, who should be eligible.
00:39:52.000And we got it basically wrong in every single one of those categories.
00:39:56.000That was something that the doctors recommended on.
00:39:58.000A lot of doctors were silenced and lobbied into silence and sometimes even struck off.
00:40:03.000And that's something that we followed.
00:40:05.000Now, obviously, if there are individual circumstances which haven't worked out... The phrase, haven't worked out, covers a multitude of sins there.
00:40:11.000In particular, people who took that amputation stuff.
00:40:44.000Gents, both of you, do give us your details.
00:40:47.000We will get that to the Prime Minister.
00:40:49.000And as he said, he will, I'm sure, look at that for you.
00:40:52.000In the meantime, let's move on to another question, sir.
00:40:55.000OK, so having watched that, would you say there is room for some conversation or no conversation?
00:41:00.000Because in France, you are getting no conversation.
00:41:02.000And given that this is a globalist issue, no conversation is a problem that could be coming to a country that you live in too.
00:41:09.000So here's Brett Weinstein on the topic of France's new legislation.
00:41:13.000France has now criminalised objections to the MRNA platform, exposing those targeted to ruinous fines and imprisonment.
00:41:19.000It's obvious lunacy and that it's happening in a Western nation should alarm us all.
00:41:23.000This madness must be defeated in France, at the WHO, everywhere it arises.
00:41:27.000So what exactly is going on in France?
00:41:30.000And given there's an obvious requirement for conversation around vaccines, excess deaths, vaccine injuries, social policies during the pandemic, why are laws being passed that would prevent anybody from criticising a government mandated or In an unprecedented move that has sparked widespread debate across France and beyond, the French Parliament has recently passed a law that introduces severe penalties for those opposing mRNA LNP injections or other treatments recommended by the state based on current medical knowledge.
00:41:59.000I have to say current medical knowledge, that's in case, oh well it was the current medical knowledge then!
00:42:03.000Yeah, well guess what the current medical knowledge is?
00:42:05.000Current medical knowledge is this guy's got one less leg than he had this morning.
00:42:10.000As of today, criticism of such therapeutic treatments, when deemed obligatory or recommended by the state, could result in up to three years of imprisonment or a fine of 45,000 euros.
00:42:19.000This bold legislative step, quickly dubbed Article Pfizer by critics, represents a significant shift in the balance between public health policy and individual freedom of expression.
00:42:28.000There's a lot of it about, isn't there?
00:42:29.000How often are we seeing government policies leading to repression or suppression of free speech?
00:42:37.000In particular, censorship specifically of content we've been making.
00:42:41.000The core of the controversy lies in the creation of a new criminal offence targeting individuals who encourage others to withhold from medical treatments that are considered appropriate according to the prevailing medical standards.
00:42:51.000They have to always have like an adjective or a caveat because they know that medicine evolves and changes, that is the nature of science, even if there is nothing malfeasant at play.
00:43:00.000The law specifically targets the resistance to mRNA treatment, positioning it as a cornerstone in the fight against future pandemics.
00:43:06.000This move has been interpreted by many as an anti-democratic manoeuvre stifling any opposition or critique of the state-endorsed medical treatments under the heavy hand of legal penalties.
00:43:14.000Remember, the WHO treaty would mean that your country would have to provide 5% of your health budget, that your nation would have to abide by WHO regulations, which just The past of the law came with minimal debate within the parliament, a fact that has only fuelled the outrage among its detractors.
00:43:38.000Critics argue that the law not only undermines the democratic process by limiting the scope of public discourse on health policy, but also prejudges alternative medicine and potential whistleblowers who may have valid concerns About mRNA technology or other treatments.
00:43:52.000I mean, certainly it seems, doesn't it, that there are at least some valid concerns, or are there none?
00:43:57.000Should there be a law that prevents those concerns being communicated?
00:44:00.000Is that what you've learned in the pandemic period?
00:44:02.000Do you know what I've learned in the pandemic period?
00:44:04.000Dissent should continue to be shut down.
00:44:06.000Expert opinion should continue to be censored.
00:44:09.000Authorities should be further centralised in the favour of governments and corporations.
00:44:13.000Is that the message of the pandemic period?
00:44:15.000Because that ain't the message that I received.
00:44:17.000Labelled Article Pfizer, the law is seen as emblematic of a broader trend towards increasing state control over public health narratives and personal health choices.
00:44:26.000The nickname itself, referencing one of the major pharmaceutical companies behind the development of mRNA vaccine technology, hints at the perceived alignment between government policy and the interests of Big Pharma.
00:44:39.000Raising questions about the influence of pharmaceutical companies on health policy.
00:44:42.000Furthermore, the timing and urgency of the law's enactment, with warnings of an imminent next pandemic and the positioning of mRNA technology as the sole solution, adds layers of complexity to the debate.
00:44:52.000The law raises critical questions about where the line should be drawn between preventing harmful misinformation and preserving the right to free speech and open debate on medical treatments.
00:45:02.000As France steps into uncharted territory with the enactment of this law, the international community watches closely.
00:45:08.000The implications of such a legal framework extend beyond the borders of France, potentially setting a precedent for how governments around the world might seek to regulate public discourse on health and medical treatments in the future.
00:45:19.000In conclusion, the recent enactment of the law penalising opposition to state-recommended mRNA treatment in France Marks a significant moment in the ongoing discussion about the role of government in regulating health policy and preserving public safety.
00:45:31.000While intended to combat misinformation and protect public health, the law's critics see it as a concerning move towards limiting free speech and privileging certain medical treatments over others.
00:45:41.000As the world continues to navigate the complexities of public health in an ever-evolving landscape, the debate over Article Pfizer Serves as a point and reminder of the tensions between collective safety and individual rights.
00:45:52.000It also demonstrates that there can be no financial ties between political figures and organisations and corporations of that size and scale that you don't want when laws like this are being passed.
00:46:00.000Any sense that it could be advantageous to Pfizer's bottom line or Pfizer's agenda.
00:46:06.000You also don't want to feel the sense that there's a globalist agenda in which individual nations pilot particular pieces of legislation before they become immersive, ubiquitous and total, as seems to be the case with various censorship laws around the world, and now in this one, the further oppression of free speech, in order to achieve what goal?
00:46:23.000There's so much misinformation about chemotherapy or heart tablets or asthma inhalers that people just start abandoning them.
00:46:30.000Has there ever been a medical emergency of this variety ever before?
00:46:33.000Do you ever recall like a huge movement opposing successful medical treatments?
00:46:38.000Of course there have always been people that are critical, cynical, sceptical and enquiring around vaccines, and if you look at some of the information available in those quarters, it certainly is interesting to review, shall we say.
00:46:50.000But the idea that the state, given their relationship with global corporations, has only your interests in mind In order to protect you, we're going to find you and imprison you.
00:47:03.000And having seen that bit of footage of dear globalist Rishi Sunak pilloried by members of the British public, how do you imagine the globalists regard open conversation about these subjects?
00:47:14.000If there are indeed 30,000 adverse events to discuss in the UK, is an open conversation what the establishment wants, or do they want total control of the narrative?
00:47:23.000Why don't you look at the last couple of years and decipher yourself?
00:47:26.000What do groups that censor online social media discourse really care about?
00:47:30.000And to whose benefit is that being directed?
00:47:32.000The censorship of important and significant voices like Jay Bhattacharya.
00:47:38.000Or is it about controlling a narrative?
00:47:40.000What we've learned, in particular, in the ongoing discourse between Senator Rand Paul and Anthony Fauci about measures and suggestions and steps that were taken in the early pandemic period that might have been avoided and that were potentially not legitimate and certainly not successful.
00:47:53.000Do you feel that what should happen now is a raft of law should be passed around the world to make it illegal for people to question and criticise?
00:47:59.000Or do you think that we should be heading in almost exactly the opposite direction?
00:48:03.000Certainly there's a need for discussion, even as the possibility for discussion is being foreclosed.
00:48:49.000So is this about citizen safety or is it, as Alex Jones warns, the piloting of martial law?
00:48:58.000You will be aware now that New York City, that most liberal of metropolises, has militarised its law forces by putting the National Guard on the subway.
00:49:07.000Now, New York City is no doubt in a time of crisis, evidently and apparently connected to the issue of migration.
00:49:14.000But is this sudden appearance of military personnel on the New York subways really about protecting the citizenry, or is it more insidious than that?
00:49:23.000Are we beginning to experience the piloting and grooming of a population to get us ready for militarized streets?
00:49:30.000For many years now, we've seen anti-protest laws, militarization of the police, police cars that used to be like, nee-nah, nee-nah, Skyelectrics, Dukes of Hazzard, good old-fashioned fun, have become like tanks now.
00:49:47.000And if rising crime is a problem in your neighborhood, What exactly is causing it?
00:49:52.000Do you trust the people that have the power behind the barrel of the gun or not?
00:49:57.000Let's have a look at Alex Jones's perspective.
00:49:59.000You'll be well aware that Alex Jones's perspective will be around centralised authoritarianism, global conspiracies and piloting, but having just lived through the last five years, It does seem that we have been subject, whether it was some of the events around the pandemic or recent censorship laws across the world, to the piloting of ideas in certain territories in order to normalise them.
00:50:20.000I'm talking about the freezing of bank balances, closing down of people's social media, using government proxies to censor, dissenting voices, lockdowns, internment camps, arresting people for things they've said on the internet, imprisoning people for things they've said on the internet.
00:50:34.000And while the time that we're talking about Donald Trump and how bad he is for democracy, is democracy, even under the auspices of actual Democrat rule, becoming more and more authoritarian?
00:50:44.000Let's start with Alex Jones, then we'll get into what we think is happening together.
00:50:48.000Tonight, a new approach to keep subway riders safe.
00:51:27.000As CBS 2's Naveen Dhaliwal reports, the plan comes on the same day as another attack on a conductor.
00:51:33.000So, you know, attacks on conductors, gotta bring in the army, so... With riders on edge, the governor is putting a plan in place that includes cameras in conductor cabs and more cops on the platforms.
00:51:47.000At Grand Central Terminal Wednesday evening, bag checks were underway.
00:51:51.000It seems to me that in order to protect the legitimizing, raising authority, Indeed, there's such a sort of raging debate in your country about guns and gun ownership and gun laws.
00:52:01.000And all it seems to amount to, really, is not whether or not there are guns, but who's allowed to have them.
00:52:05.000And we now know that the state doesn't want to discuss their guns.
00:52:08.000What about the dangers and threats of those guns?
00:52:10.000What about the many people that are killed in friendly fires, in wars?
00:52:13.000Perhaps all we're talking about in politics is who has the right to kill.
00:52:17.000As tackling subway safety is now at the top of the list for city and state officials.
00:52:22.000These brazen, heinous attacks On our subway system.
00:53:08.000After several attacks in the transit system in the past week, these attacks prompting the governor to deploy a thousand members of the National Guard.
00:53:17.000Look, that's the news doing the job of propaganda.
00:53:38.000When the solution is always, we're going to take some more power because of this, there's a really nasty cuff going around.
00:53:45.000In conclusion, we're going to take a lot more power.
00:53:48.000There's a really nasty Putin going around.
00:53:50.000So in conclusion, we're going to take a lot more power.
00:53:53.000There's some really nasty truckers going around.
00:53:55.000So in conclusion, we're going to take a lot more power.
00:53:57.000Is the answer always going to be, you're going to take a lot more power?
00:54:00.000There's a lot of people saying on the internet that we're taking too much power.
00:54:04.000So we're going to be taking a lot more power and censoring those people.
00:54:08.000OK, and the threat is Donald Trump how?
00:54:11.000And police to subway systems across New York City.
00:54:15.000What they're doing checking bags to make sure explosive or illegal weapons aren't entering our subway system.
00:54:20.000I think it's rather offensive to all of us as human beings that Eric Adams being a person of color will be framed I think both of those things are great.
00:54:32.000Let's have a diverse and representative but above all else fair and equal and truly representative society where you don't centralise authority.
00:54:40.000I'm getting rather tired of the idea that equality and fairness means highlighting programmes of representation in order to mask increasing authoritarianism.
00:54:51.000I agree with equality and particularly when it comes to matters around gender and sex but above all Wealth and power.
00:54:58.000City officials say each week, NYPD bag screening teams will be at 136 stations.
00:55:04.000That's about a third of the stations in the system.
00:55:07.000New York City's Civil Liberties Union calling it heavy-handed.
00:55:11.000But heavy-handed really means, like, ooh, oh, no, boss, there's another person was wrote to a bus conductor.
00:55:20.000Like that heavy-handed means that you're not even actually in control of the weight of your power.
00:55:25.000And isn't that the perfect description of how globalist, elitist power masquerading as American patriotic power, whether it's in foreign wars or on the most beautiful city in America, some would argue, New York City, and the imposition of authority, all in order, as usual, to help people.
00:55:40.000Like stop and frisk, ripping a page straight out of a Giuliani playbook, We had to, really, because the pages were stuck together.
00:55:48.000Every time a demon of the liberal elites have their ideas borrowed and utilized by those same liberal elites, Donald Trump is the worst thing that could ever happen.
00:55:57.000That's why that wall he's building that we mocked him for is still being built.
00:56:01.000That's why those cages that we condemned him for are still there and were, in fact, actually put there by Barack Obama.
00:56:07.000Giuliani, that pervert, lunatic, maniac son of a bitch, actually had some pretty good ideas when it came to protecting Train conductors, which is now something we care about now that we can have armed military on the show.
00:56:20.000I didn't used to care about Giuliani when he was just being in Borat, but now his ideas could really be used to control ordinary people.
00:57:09.000But when it comes to the issue of piloting authoritarian measures and perhaps even martial law, Alex Jones is a voice that's perhaps important.
00:57:16.000Let's have a look at what he's saying on this subject.
00:57:18.000When I was cutting my teeth 29 years ago on air, Bill Clinton had just been in office for a year or so and it was confirmed, the military was warning, it was coming out, they were leaking classified documents that now are all basically admitted and have been publicly rolled out against the public to
00:58:05.000We're not going to have UN troops one day, or Russian troops like Red Dawn, and you're in Colorado and all of a sudden parachutes come down and you've got Russian troops shooting at you.
00:58:15.000It'll be our own troops, but they'll be made up of people that have been tested for decades, going through the training, going along with attacking their own people.
00:58:22.000And now the troops are being deployed and searching everyone's bags.
00:58:27.000Like, how can you not be affected by that image?
00:58:31.000That's armed military personnel on the subway being normalized.
00:58:35.000I am quite sympathetic to this perspective, given what I've witnessed and experienced in the last few years.
00:58:42.000And indeed, Jones is showing he's working out an incremental increase in these tactics and techniques.
00:58:51.000Isn't that indeed the domestic heart of what globalism means?
00:58:54.000That regardless of who you vote for, you've got deep state interests that have an agenda that spans various administrations.
00:59:00.000And those administrations will focus on hot button cultural topics.
00:59:03.000Meanwhile, the projects of war and social control will continue.
00:59:07.000And even beyond the physical representation of military presence on the street, which is terrifying, we know and often discuss how techniques designed to track and control dissidents abroad Specifically, literally, groups like ISIS are now deployed.
00:59:22.000Once you've seen armed military personnel conducting bag checks on a subway in New York City, when there isn't a war happening or anything remotely like it domestically across America, then you have to acknowledge that that is something that is significant.
00:59:36.000And quite a lot of power and time and propaganda has to be invested in saying that someone like Alex Jones is hysteric.
00:59:42.000And due to his, let's call it his presentational style, he does make that kind of analysis in some circles.
01:00:08.000Bags being searched without a warrant by troops is a pretty significant step to normalise, particularly in a city like New York.
01:00:14.000Often when I talk about piloting, I mean Australia, internment camps, trucker protests and the evocation of the Emergencies Act in Canada, the freezing of bank accounts in Canada and Ukraine.
01:00:32.000Like, if you are opposed to liberal democracy, and liberal democracy now means war in Gaza, it means war against Russia, it means being compliant when it comes to medical suggestions that come from the state, all ideas that in the 60s, when the heroes were people like Malcolm X, Excellent, you wouldn't have thought.
01:00:49.000One thing you want to be is obedient when Pfizer says jump you say how high and oh I'm not sure I'll be able to because my heart hurts.
01:00:55.000Now authoritarianism has become somehow allied to liberalism and the idea that military force and military intelligence is turned against a domestic population has become normalized.
01:01:07.000We know from personal experience now that Agencies, deep state agencies and proxies funded by the state that were used as intelligence assets to oppose terrorists, as they were then called, perhaps understandably, in various Middle Eastern wars and subsequent disputes, are now deployed against domestic populations.
01:01:24.000That's a fact in your country, in mine, across the world.
01:01:28.000So, in essence, what we're witnessing is we, the domestic population of these nations, are regarded as the enemy.
01:01:34.000And that doesn't take brilliant analysis, actually, because just watch the Oscars.
01:01:48.000And by the way, you're allowed to be that if that's what you are.
01:01:51.000All of you have the right to be who you are.
01:01:54.000But they have to create the climate first for martial law and civil emergency to sell us on it, the angrier world that Klaus Schwab talks about.
01:02:02.000Yeah, it's an important point that the occupying force are there as protectors.
01:02:08.000The English or British occupation of Northern Ireland begins as we're here to protect, I think initially, forgive me, Catholics in Northern Ireland.
01:02:18.000I know there's a long and complex history between our two separate nations, but often the introduction of the military is portrayed as for safety and security and protection.
01:02:29.000And I think that probably happens in the sort of I say the whole world must learn of our peaceful ways.
01:02:33.000peacekeeping force. Actually, if that piece of language was introduced when I was a little
01:02:37.000older and a little better educated I'd have gone "peacekeeping force?" That doesn't seem
01:02:43.000I say the whole world must learn of our peaceful ways. By force.
01:02:48.000This is not right-wing peace of writing, by the way.
01:02:51.000In this journalism, Donald Trump is criticised for his attempts to deploy the National Guard during the uprisings that came from George Floyd's murder.
01:03:01.000So this is not apolitical, this is political, but it's political from the side that you would not have expected.
01:03:07.000That, for me, increases its validity and is precisely the type of discourse that we must engage in.
01:03:12.000If you find yourself either side of that line, you're being controlled.
01:03:15.000The mobilisation of 2,000 city and state police and National Guard troops in New York City on the pretext of fighting crime in the vast subway system is a demonstration of the reactionary character of the Democratic Party.
01:03:27.000Last month, New York City's Democratic Mayor Eric Adams announced he would deploy 1,000 New York Police Department cops in the subway system after a law and order campaign by the city's We now know that that's the relationship between the media and the state.
01:03:39.000of violent attacks against subway riders and transit workers, which, knowing what I know now
01:03:43.000about how the media operates, were possibly written in conjunction with the people that
01:03:47.000introduced this law. It would be, "Hey, we got these stories, we got these stories, we'll give
01:03:51.000you access to this story, we'll give you this interview, we'll give you this access, we'll give
01:03:54.000you this tax break, we'll give you this." We now know that that's the relationship between the
01:03:58.000media and the state. Do you think that the X-Files was the first time Deep State were embedded within
01:04:05.000On Wednesday, New York Governor Kathy Hochul, also a Democrat, announced she was redeploying 750 National Guard troops already in New York City, as well as 250 state troopers and police of the Metropolitan Transport Authority, MTA, the state agency that runs the subways to increase the number of uniformed personnel patrolling subway stations and riding trains.
01:04:24.000I remember when I was a kid, I used to hear people talk about, you know, You know, you want to see more bobbies, that's the word in our country, bobbies on the street.
01:04:30.000But the image there is just sort of a member of the police force on a bicycle.
01:04:33.000And again, this might just be where I am in my own personal evolution.
01:04:36.000It seems like a rather pleasant idea, a member of the police force, again that word, that is working for the community.
01:04:42.000But now, just think about how it feels to you as a person when you're on the subway and you see people with machine guns.
01:04:48.000Do you feel, do you feel inside yourself, that's good, That's good that that's happening.
01:04:53.000Now, I don't know what else might make you feel unsafe.
01:04:55.000I don't know who you are or where you're from or how you've been coached and trained.
01:04:58.000Maybe a group of young people with their hoods up makes you feel bad.
01:05:00.000Maybe a group of drunk men in suits makes you feel bad.
01:05:03.000Maybe people wearing religious attire of some denomination makes you feel bad.
01:05:07.000But one thing I can say with some certainty is granting further and further authority to a group invested in war and control will not be good for any of us, regardless of our outward accoutrements.
01:05:19.000The troops are currently operating out of Fort Hamilton in Brooklyn as part of Joint Task Force Empire Shield.
01:05:33.000And what if I don't agree with the Empire?
01:05:35.000Well, I mean, I could put it in a number of ways, but how about, well, I don't know.
01:05:40.000Okay, so that event increased authority, increased spying, increased surveillance, increased war, and we all agreed it was a good thing to do, didn't we?
01:05:55.000Except for the millions of people who marched against that war against Iraq, which, by the way, happened anyway, of course.
01:06:00.000We all agreed that it was necessary because we were under threat.
01:06:05.000We are under threat, right, from MAGA Trump on one side or immigrants on the other side, so we'd better get the Military on the streets.
01:06:11.000They regularly patrol in the Grand Central Station, the Port Authority and a few other transportation hubs wearing camouflaged uniforms and equipped with automatic rifles but not engaging with the population.
01:06:20.000Now the soldiers will take on the role of supplement in the NYPD, helping with random searches of bags and backpacks and other police activity.
01:06:27.000They will also move deeper into the subway system Appearing at more of its 472 stations and riding trains.
01:06:34.000Like, this is not CBGBs, New York Dolls, Ramones, Bowie, Warhol, Blondie, New York City.
01:06:49.000If I lived in New York and they militarised the Underground, I'd think it's time to get out.
01:06:53.000And we'll be seeing this, I predict, and actually Alex Jones has predicted already, with a good degree more experience and research than we're able to deploy, that we're going to be seeing this more often.
01:07:02.000And the good thing about it is we'll know, won't we?
01:07:04.000Because they won't just suddenly do it and say it's to pick up sweet wrappers, although God, you know, maybe they do that in Singapore.
01:07:15.000HOKL announced other oppressive measures, including the installation of cameras in every subway car and in the cabs used by drives and conductors.
01:07:22.000The Democrats in the state legislature will introduce a bill to bar anyone convicted of a crime of violence on the subways from using the transit system for three years, effectively barring them from living and working in the city, where only the wealthy and upper middle class can go about their daily lives without riding the subway.
01:07:37.000Again, this is like hate law stuff, isn't it?
01:07:40.000If someone's committed a violent crime in a subway, then it's sensible to ban them.
01:07:45.000If you commit a crime against one of our workers, one of our personnel, we have a duty to protect them, and we cannot let you ride the subway.
01:09:10.000And pro-Palestine, protest as a terrorist.
01:09:12.000Well good, because you know those people, they're not like us.
01:09:15.000Oh, so are you not noticing the crucial fact that wherever you might feel on the political
01:09:21.000spectrum our culture offers us, you can be regarded as a terrorist if you're a nuisance.
01:09:26.000Statistics collected in recent years show that the campaign to whip up fears of violence on the subways has no basis in fact... Oh good, right, I mentioned earlier that there'd probably be information available on the amount of attacks that take place.
01:09:40.000NYPD figures showed a 2.6% decrease in subway crime in 2023 compared to 2022, although there was a jump in January 2024 compared to the same month last year.
01:09:50.000Probably because they registered statistics differently because they knew they were about to introduce these laws, a cynic might assert, in conjunction with a spate of stories released in high profile and compliant media outlets.
01:10:01.000Hey, let me know in the chat if you agree.
01:10:03.000According to a separate analysis by the MTA and the New York Times, oh right, yeah, that vast template of opinion, The New York Times, "Violent crimes occur at a rate of
01:10:10.000between one and two per million subway rides."
01:10:24.000But a few violent incidents, the knifing of a subway driver, the shooting of a passenger in Brooklyn, have been sensationalised by the media and capitalist politicians of both parties.
01:10:33.000Hochul did not conceal the political motives behind her announcement of the troop redeployment.
01:10:38.000I'm also going to demonstrate that Democrats fight crime as well, she told MSNBC on Thursday.
01:10:43.000This narrative that Republicans have said and hijacked the story that we're soft on crime, that we defund the police.
01:10:59.000The New York Civil Liberties Union said, Instead, a sweeping surveillance state was being established.
01:11:03.000One of the key episodes in Trump's preparation of his attempted political coup on January 6th, 2021.
01:11:08.000Do with, remember Aaron Bushnall, just a little while ago scrubbed from the internet.
01:11:12.000Instead, a sweeping surveillance state was being established.
01:11:15.000One of the key episodes in Trump's preparation of his attempted political coup on January 6th,
01:11:19.0002021 - you can let me know whether or not you agree that that's what that was - was his threat
01:11:23.000to invoke the Insurrection Act during the summer of 2020 and send the military into major American
01:11:27.000cities to suppress popular demonstrations against police violence sparked by the murder of George Floyd.
01:11:32.000Now a Democratic governor is deploying troops in the largest American city on an equally bogus pretext.
01:11:37.000Doesn't matter whether you are at a Black Lives Matter protest or a pro-Trump MAGA protest.
01:11:42.000In the end, if you get in their way, you're a terrorist.
01:11:44.000You have more in common with one another than you have in common with the media or political systems that are attempting continually to divide you.
01:11:52.000It is impossible for the US ruling elite to carry out this policy democratically.
01:11:55.000It requires a frontal assault on the democratic rights of the working class and the build-up of the repressive forces over the capitalist state.
01:12:01.000So by the time that new measures are introduced that are unpopular, whether it's the increase of war or the increase of authoritarianism, the sight of the military on the streets and transport facilities of major metropolises will be normal and accepted.
01:12:16.000Look at the people already just breezing past armed guards on a subway as if it ain't no thing.
01:12:22.000Perhaps thinking to themselves, this will protect me from immigrants.
01:12:25.000Perhaps thinking to themselves, this will protect me from BLM protesters.
01:12:28.000Perhaps thinking to themselves, this will protect me from January 6th insurrectionists.
01:12:32.000Whatever they need to put in your mind, To make you more compliant they're willing to put there.
01:12:37.000That's why we are very determined, most determined, to put into your heart a spirit of real individual sovereignty and collective representation so that we may oppose this authoritarianism together.