Join us as we take a look at the number of times this year that you were right about something, and the people who try to tell you how to think. We re talking about Nord Stream and the Ukraine war, where the legacy media and the state told you one thing, and then, oh, let s just wait a little bit more, and here comes the truth. The holy name of the truth: Conspiracy Theory to Conspiracy Fact. In part 1 of our special show, "Conspiracy Theory to Fact," we re taking a look back at all the times you were correct this year about things like Nord Stream, the Ukraine War, and much more. The first part is available on YouTube here. The second part will be available on the Home of Free Speech YouTube channel here. Stay tuned for Part 2 of Conspiracy Theory To Conspiracy Fact, coming soon! You awaken wonder. You awaken wonders. You're going to see the future. In this video, we re fighting for souls. We want you to join us in saving souls. This is the time, the spooky time of the awakening of the divine. This is where the revolution's gonna come from. - Russell Brand Stay free, you awaken wonder! In the season of the Awakening of the Divine, you're gonna need to wake up, you awakening wonder. You're gonna wake up! - in this special holiday special with Russell Brand, Stay Free, stay free, stay Free, Stay free! . in this episode of Stay Free With Russell Brand Stay Free! Stay Free with Russell for the rest of the holiday season, stay tuned in! Thank you for joining us in the season. . . . - - stay tuned for part two of Conspiracy Theories to conspiracy theory to Conspiracy Theory: Conspiracy Theory to Conspiracy The Fact, Conspiracy Theology. (Part 1) - Part 2 coming soon, part 2 will be out on YouTube - part 2, part 3, part 4, and part 2 on Conspiracy Theory 2, Part 3 on Conspiracy Theorism To Conspiracy Theory, Conspiracy Theory. , part 4 on the Truth, Conspiracy theory to Fact, conspiracy theory, conspiracy, conspiracy theories, and conspiracy theory part 2 and part 3 on conspiracy theory? Here Comes The Truth? - Part 1, part 1 Part 2 on the first part of Conspiracy theory: The Holy Name of the Truth
00:02:34.000Thanks for joining me for Stay Free with Russell Brand holiday festive special.
00:02:39.000Yes, you're probably bored of your family by now.
00:02:42.000You're sick of watching legacy media propaganda.
00:02:45.000You know that even in the season of goodwill to all men, they're hating on you.
00:02:50.000Well, today is part one of our special show, which is called Conspiracy theory to conspiracy fact, where we show you the number of times this year that you were right.
00:03:02.000Not those people who try to tell you how to think.
00:03:05.000We're talking about Nord Stream, January the 6th, and the Ukraine war, where the legacy media and the state told you one thing, And then, oh, let's just wait a little bit of time, and here comes the truth.
00:04:55.000We can't all live in a TikTok mindset, where if something happened 30 seconds ago, you're not interested in it anymore.
00:05:00.000Remember, when that Nord Stream Pipeline blew up, we all went, that's interesting, because here's why.
00:05:05.000America have been talking about blowing up that pipeline to make sure that Europe are reliant on resources that they are able to control.
00:05:11.000It's really odd that the legacy media are saying, Russia blew up that pipeline themselves because Putin, as we've been telling you every day now on the news, is crazy and this is an unprovoked attack.
00:05:21.000Again, obviously that war is really bad and Russia's aggression and destruction of Ukrainian citizens and the ending and annihilation of the Ukrainian people, that's really, really terrible.
00:05:30.000But 2014 was a really significant date in this conflict and the fact is the fact now, the actual fact, because the legacy media
00:06:33.000Are you saying that the US, because of the way that the popularity of international and foreign wars has waned since Vietnam, have to set up proxy states and fund foreign armies in order to meet their agenda and set up alliances with other countries and end, like, legitimised wars that facilitate their aims?
00:06:47.000What are you... I'm actually offended.
00:09:08.000The man in this picture is Colonel Roman Shevinsky.
00:09:11.000According to an exclusive from the Washington Post and Spiegel, he was central to the controversial bombing of the Nord Stream natural gas pipelines last year.
00:09:44.000I certainly think it's really worth talking to actual military experts that are not somehow shepherded by the military-industrial complex, like people that have been high up in the military but now have no connection to it.
00:09:55.000They'll look at it and go, yep, that's special ops.
00:09:58.000To plant explosive charges on the gas pipelines.
00:10:02.000They say he didn't act alone and that his orders ultimately came from senior military officials.
00:10:12.000Lee Harvey Oswald resurrected himself out of the grave, then he swam, went into that book depository place, got himself a couple of books on how to blow up pipelines, swam down to the very depths, and then he blew that bloody thing up.
00:10:59.000Like when that happened, Nord Stream Pipeline blew up.
00:11:01.000It's like, well, is that because like it's advantageous to this alliance between the Ukraine and the United States after the 2014 coup that they want Ukraine to basically become a kind of Balkan state that they can use control to agitate one of their What's happened there is plain and simple.
00:11:20.000Lee Harvey Oswald and Putin and Osama Bin Laden are sort of a supergroup now and they've done that together.
00:11:25.000did it himself. Like, didn't you sort of just think that?
00:11:28.000Not because you're some sort of strategic geopolitical genius, because it's obvious! And
00:11:32.000then they can't be blinking or that other guy's a commentator. What's happened there is
00:11:35.000plain and simple. Lee Harvey Oswald and Putin and Osama bin Laden are sort of a super group now and
00:11:41.000they've done that together. They're like the Beatles but for blowing up pipelines. I get it.
00:11:54.000Not that you can particularly blame Zelensky, because you only need to see poor old Zelensky trotted out of the Golden Globes or begging for money on the television to recognise that he's temporarily been hoovered up into the system, trotted around like a pawn.
00:12:32.000A senior Ukrainian military officer with deep ties to the country's intelligence services played a central role in the bombing of the Nord Stream natural gas pipelines last year, according to officials in Ukraine and elsewhere in Europe, as well as other people knowledgeable about the details of the covert operation.
00:13:02.000James' role provides the most direct evidence to date tying Ukraine's military and security leadership to a controversial act of sabotage that spawned multiple criminal investigations and that US and Western officials have called a dangerous attack on Europe's energy infrastructure.
00:13:14.000That is pretty dangerous and it's, I don't know if it's a war crime or whatever, I don't know how these words are used anymore, who gets to determine how stuff gets labelled, but what I will say is it was a total lie.
00:13:23.000The media, without any investigation And then go, well, should we look into this?
00:13:27.000It didn't sound like, right, guys, let's get a scoop now.
00:13:40.000Roman Chervinsky, a decorated 48-year-old colonel who served in Ukraine's special operations forces, was the coordinator of the Nord Stream operation.
00:13:48.000People familiar with his role said, managing logistics and support for a six-person team that rented a sailboat under false identities.
00:14:05.000And use deep sea diving equipment to place explosive charges on the gas pipelines.
00:14:10.000Incredibly brave and brilliant in one way, except for all the lying.
00:14:13.000On September 26, 2022, three explosions caused massive leaks on the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines, which run from Russia to Germany under the Baltic Sea.
00:14:21.000The attack left only one of four gas links in the network intact as winter approached.
00:14:31.000And did not plan the operation, according to the people familiar with his role, which has not been previously reported.
00:14:36.000The officer took orders from more senior Ukrainian officials, who ultimately reported to General Valery Zaluzhny, Ukraine's highest-ranking military officer, said people familiar with how the operation was carried out.
00:14:47.000Ukraine has launched many daring and secretive operations against Russian forces.
00:14:51.000They're even trying to propagandise this.
00:14:53.000But the Nord Stream attack targeted civilian infrastructure built to provide energy to millions of people in Europe, while Gazprom, the Russian state-owned gas conglomerate, owns 51% of Nord Stream.
00:15:03.000Western energy companies including Germany, France and the Netherlands are partners and invested billions in the project.
00:15:09.000So it was an attack on something that belongs to a wide variety of European interests.
00:15:44.000Like, so many conflicts are about canals and ships and commerce and service.
00:15:48.000It's worth paying attention to canals when it comes to geopolitical issues, I've learned.
00:15:53.000Zhivinsky's participation in the Nord Stream bombing contradicts Zelensky's public denials that his country was involved.
00:15:59.000I am president and I give orders accordingly, Zelensky said in a press interview in June, responding to a report by The Post that the US Central Intelligence Agency had learned of Ukraine's plans before the attack.
00:16:09.000I wait to hear what the deep state of the USA and BlackRock executives want, and then I give those orders.
00:16:15.000Nothing of the sort has been done by Ukraine.
00:16:17.000I would never act that way, Zelensky said.
00:16:28.000A year on, with world attention on Gaza, the Western media quietly reports that the biggest ever act of industrial sabotage and environmental terrorism was carried out by supposed ally Ukraine.
00:16:41.000Like, you know, these are the people that are always Hang on about the environment and everything.
00:16:44.000We've got to do something about climate change, and here's what that is.
00:16:47.000Stay in your house, have an ID card, shut up and do as you're told.
00:16:50.000Meanwhile, we're just going to blow up this pipeline, mess with the economies of all Europe, the energy resources of the entire population, not to mention polluting the sea, which suddenly isn't relevant in this conversation.
00:16:59.000When we blow up things in the middle of the sea, all of the little crabs and coral and that just go...
00:17:06.000Now put a sticker on your car window and shut up!
00:17:09.000That's the same Ukraine that has received untold billions of dollars in weapons and aid that could have been spent on alleviating hardship in the West.
00:17:15.000Would you rather that your tax dollars, or tax pound, or tax whatever your currency is, is spent on infrastructure in your country, or are you happy supporting all these wars?
00:17:30.000The blowing up of the Nord Stream pipelines plunged Europe into a prolonged energy crisis, tipping its economies deeper into a recession from which they are yet to recover, and forced Europe to buy in more expensive US liquid gas.
00:17:52.000Well, people keep blowing up all the pipelines, so, you know, that's just supply and demand.
00:17:57.000Given the close ties between the Ukrainian and US militaries and the extremely sophisticated operation necessary to blow up the deep-sea pipelines, there is an additional conclusion to draw that the Western media continues to avoid.
00:18:17.000If the United States of America is providing the training, is providing the military equipment, is providing the intelligence, is demanding that Starlink provide the hookups for guided missiles and stuff, like, how is it Ukraine?
00:18:31.000Because Ukraine, in the hearts of the individuals that are suffering, that believe in Ukraine, they're being sent to their deaths to avoid a PR crisis in America that's less inclined towards endless foreign wars that need not affect the domestic population.
00:18:44.000And in fact, there's an argument for negatively affecting the domestic population because of the tax dollars, because of the ultimate death of military personnel, because there's an energy crisis that's been exacerbated, creating scarcity.
00:18:54.000If it wasn't for independent media, you wouldn't be talking about this right now.
00:19:20.000Ukraine's spy agencies have developed military capabilities over nearly a decade since Russia first seized Ukrainian territory in 2014, a period during which the services also forged deep new bonds with the CIA.
00:19:31.000The missions have involved elite teams of Ukrainian operatives drawn from directorates that were formed, trained, and equipped in close partnership with the CIA, according to current and former Ukrainian and U.S.
00:19:41.000Since 2015, the CIA has spent tens of millions of dollars to transform Ukraine's Soviet-formed services into potent allies against Moscow, officials said.
00:19:49.000Alright, so there's just entrenching immersion.
00:19:52.000I suppose like the way that you know that Barack Obama was funded by Wall Street, Biden's funded by Wall Street, the big tech have control through donations.
00:20:01.000The deep state of the United States and Ukraine are so sort of interconnected that there's no independent action.
00:20:07.000I mean, you can see that if you watch our man Zelensky begging on the TV set.
00:20:11.000If you can't give us some financial support, OK, OK, please give us a credit.
00:20:17.000It's pretty clear that's like no please can we have them resources back because independently we don't really have much of a chance against Russia and Russia's considerable might unless we have access to the CIA and Navy SEALs and people know how to blow up pipes, lines and the like.
00:20:34.000There's a degree of integration that negates their sovereignty anyway.
00:20:38.000Of course we sold the narrative that we're assisting them and on that bandwidth, if you kept your consciousness, which is what they want you to do, on that bandwidth, that all makes sense.
00:20:54.000You're telling us the truth, aren't you?
00:20:55.000The agency has provided Ukraine with advanced surveillance systems, trained recruits at sites in Ukraine as well as the United States, built new headquarters for departments in Ukraine's military intelligence agency, and shared intelligence on a scale that would have been unimaginable before Russia illegally annexed Crimea and fomented a separatist war in eastern Ukraine.
00:21:14.000But other than that, we have no involvement whatsoever.
00:21:18.000And to say we do is a conspiracy theory.
00:21:20.000And we did not blow up that pipeline either.
00:21:23.000The CIA maintains a significant presence in Kiev, officials said.
00:21:27.000The extent of the CIA's involvement with Ukrainian security services has not previously been disclosed.
00:21:32.000Presumably because if it was disclosed, it would make you so happy that you'd skip out into the street and maybe get hit by a truck or just accidentally blow up a pipeline in an act of sabotage.
00:21:43.000The CIA-Ukraine collaboration took root in the aftermath of 2014 political protests that prompted Ukraine's pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych to flee the country, followed by Russia's annexation of Crimea and its arming of separatists in the eastern regions of Donetsk and Luansk.
00:21:57.000Training sites were located outside Kiev, where hand-picked recruits were instructed by CIA personnel, officials said.
00:22:05.000This used to be like, oh you know what the CIA do, they go down to Nicaragua or they go down to Panama, they're all involved in causing coups, Argentina, Chile, all of that, Iran.
00:22:14.000It just used to be sort of a thing that everyone knew and then politics went all different and turned into a television show and people forgot that this is plainly still happening.
00:22:21.000The plan was to form units capable of operating behind front lines and working as covert groups, said a Ukrainian official involved in the effort.
00:22:29.000From 2015 on, the CIA embarked on such extensive transformation of the G.U.R., Ukrainian Military Intelligence Service, that within several years, we'd kind of rebuilt it from scratch, the former U.S.
00:22:58.000The GUR began recruiting operatives for its own new Active Measures Department, officials said.
00:23:03.000At sites in Ukraine and later the United States, GUR operatives were trained on skills ranging from clandestine manoeuvres behind enemy lines to weapons platforms and explosives.
00:23:12.000And you think that training them on clandestine manoeuvres behind enemy lines with explosives could somehow be connected to the North Stream Pipeline?
00:23:21.000Those clandestine manoeuvres with explosives were a surprise for your birthday!
00:23:30.000The CIA helped the GUR acquire state-of-the-art surveillance and electronic eavesdropping systems, officials said.
00:23:35.000They included mobile equipment that could be placed along Russian-controlled lines in eastern Ukraine, but also software tools used to exploit the cell phones of Kremlin officials visiting occupied territory from Moscow.
00:23:45.000Ukrainian officers operated the systems, officials said, but everything gleaned was shared with the Americans.
00:23:59.000What they'll do is make a load of loud racket for the propaganda and then little pipsqueak farts like escaping gas when the truth leaks out.
00:24:08.000Concerned that the G.U.R.' 's aging facilities were likely compromised by Russian intelligence, the CIA paid for new headquarters buildings for the G.U.R.'
00:24:16.000's Spetnaz paramilitary division and a separate directorate responsible for electronic espionage.
00:24:22.000The new capabilities were transformative, officials said.
00:24:25.000In one day, we could intercept 250,000 to 300,000 separate communications from Russian military and FSB units, said a former senior G.U.R.
00:24:33.000are official. There was so much information we couldn't manage it ourselves. My god, they're
00:24:36.000inundated. They're just being flooded. Ah, it's too much information.
00:24:40.000Troves of data were relayed through the new CIA-built facility back to Washington where they were scrutinized by CIA and NSA analysts, officials said.
00:24:48.000We were giving them the ability through us to collect on Russian targets, the former GUR official said.
00:24:53.000Asked about the magnitude of the CIA investments, the official said it was millions of dollars.
00:24:58.000But if you've got some sort of peculiar remnant belief in this system, if you think that whether it's Covid or the war and presumably current events that they are telling you the truth and that you're probably morally in alignment with the systems that control what you think, how you speak, What you eat, what you wear, where you go, what you do, and are asking for more and more power of that nature every single goddamn day, here are a series of powerful American figures declaring publicly, prior to the explosion of the Nord Stream pipeline, that they would sort of like to do that.
00:25:30.000Just to just blast away, as if it's an explosive up against the pipeline, any remnant belief that you might have in this system and its reliability.
00:25:38.000Let me answer the first question first.
00:25:40.000If Germany, if Russia invades, that means tanks or troops crossing the border of Ukraine again, then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2.
00:26:06.000Since the project and control of the project is within Germany's control.
00:26:11.000We will, I promise you, we'll be able to do it.
00:26:14.000If I was Trump, it would have said, we'll train Ukrainian secret services to blow it up.
00:26:19.000With regard to Nord Stream 2, we continue to have very strong and clear conversations with our German allies, and I want to be clear with you today.
00:26:31.000If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.
00:26:38.000What did you mean by one way or another?
00:28:27.000You've just witnessed a lot of acting.
00:28:29.000There was a bit when we were acting like Russia blew up that pipeline.
00:28:32.000Then there was a bit where we acted like it was something in Scandinavia.
00:28:35.000Then there was a bit where we acted like Seymour Hersh was a liar, even though he's a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist.
00:28:40.000Then there's the bit where we acted like we didn't say all of this stuff in advance of the Nord Stream Pipeline.
00:28:44.000Then there's the bit where they act as if these wars are humanitarian and for goals other than strategic, resource-based or hegemonic goals.
00:28:51.000Then there's the bit where they tell you that if you criticise this or oppose their agenda, you're the problem, that you should be silenced.
00:28:57.000Then there's the bit where they introduce censorship and surveillance.
00:28:59.000Then there's the bit where they shut down dissent.
00:29:03.000Lovely old acting, pretending everything's okay in the world when we're governed by liars who are trying to destroy us while telling us that they're in our service.
00:29:15.000When are we going to find within ourselves the spiritual resources to firewalk?
00:29:19.000Across the opposition we might feel for people that have different political, social or cultural views in order that we might align and unite.
00:29:28.000Decentralized but united against the greatest powers the world has ever seen.
00:29:33.000A true global hegemony that wants you to be just like a little blob of larvae with no power other than the power to consume presumably rather expensive gas that's come via a pretty inconvenient route to your home.
00:30:11.000Okay, we gave you that, you awakened wonder.
00:30:13.000Let us know in the chat, in the comments, what you think.
00:30:15.000And remember, consider becoming an awakened wonder, joining our Locals' Conversation, where people come together in community to talk about solutions, and you get access to our interviews.
00:30:24.000Plus, why don't you get yourself... Say it like that!
00:30:26.000Why don't you get yourself like a little hat with a crow on it?
00:30:29.000The crow, the figure of the trickster, the figure that moves between worlds.
00:30:34.000Now, before we debunk the next conspiracy, we're going to have to say goodbye to you.
00:31:36.000What are your thoughts about what the activities are going on at the FBI?
00:31:40.000The FBI has sort of evolved from what we expect it to be, which is federal law enforcement.
00:31:44.000And after 9-11, when the national security branch was grown exponentially, the FBI has now essentially evolved into a domestic intelligence agency with a law enforcement capability, which is what I expressed in the hearing.
00:31:56.000Okay, so the FBI has mutated into something other than what it was intended for at its inception.
00:32:03.000What you have to fundamentally ask yourself is, have many of our institutions evolved beyond the point where they are relevant?
00:32:10.000And in many cases, are they literally doing the opposite of what they were intended to do?
00:32:15.000Governments that don't represent the people, Media that behaves more like propaganda, security agencies that make you insecure.
00:32:23.000Is it possible for all these agencies and organizations have been co-opted by elite power?
00:32:28.000It appears on the basis of the testimony of these whistleblowers that the FBI isn't engaged in a process of up And that's a problem because the nature of law enforcement investigations are linear, they have a start and an end, and the nature of intelligence operations are circular.
00:32:41.000actually supporting the interests of powerful groups.
00:32:44.000Let's have a look what else they've been doing and how it plays out.
00:32:47.000And that's a problem because the nature of law enforcement investigations are linear,
00:32:51.000they have a start and an end, and the nature of intelligence operations are circular.
00:32:55.000They just gain more intelligence to gain more intelligence and they never end.
00:33:33.000Will children use this to write their essays?
00:33:34.000Oh, it's gonna reduce the number of people in work.
00:33:36.000These are both problems of varying degrees, but the real problem will become what happens when these powers become co-opted by and utilised by the powerful?
00:33:44.000What was the tipping point for you, Garrett, when you decided, though, hey, I need to talk about what's going on in the FBI?
00:33:52.000I don't know if there was any firm tipping point that I can reach to, but it was more a summation of things that had been adding up and just over and over again saying, this doesn't seem right.
00:34:04.000This isn't what I was taught in constitutional law courses, or this isn't how you implement people's constitutional rights.
00:34:11.000What Garrett O'Boyle whistleblower appears to be saying is that these institutions now have an inertia.
00:34:23.000It's down to us to change individually and collectively in order to hold them to account.
00:34:29.000We must remain capable of discerning truth from fiction.
00:34:33.000We must remain bold and like him, We must remember the oaths we've made to ourselves, to our gods, or to our systems of ideals, to our families, and to one another.
00:34:42.000We must believe it's possible to change the world.
00:34:45.000Once we become hypnotized and bound in bureaucracy, we're just sheep, cattle to them.
00:34:51.000For decades after the FBI was caught spying on Martin Luther King Jr.
00:34:55.000and abusing its powers for political ends, Democrats emphasized strong constraints on domestic spying and the importance of whistleblowers.
00:35:03.000Now Democrats are savaging these former public servants as threats to national security.
00:35:08.000Well, presumably because their interests have changed and they're utilizing these deep state agencies in order to control the population and the narrative.
00:35:17.000At least two FBI whistleblowers are being persecuted for concerns over how the January 6th protesters were treated.
00:35:24.000Now, it can be difficult to talk about the January 6th protests and some of the theories and ideas that surround it, but it seems clear that the FBI have targeted and surveilled protesters from January the 6th, but also George Floyd protesters.
00:35:37.000It seems that it doesn't matter what the issue is per se, but whether or not your protest is at odds with the interests of the powerful that they represent and operate on behalf of, i.e.
00:35:51.000what I'm saying in case you haven't picked it up yet is Put aside your political differences and start working together for God's sake!
00:35:57.000Steve Friend expressed concerns about the FBI's use of SWAT teams to arrest January 6th subjects.
00:36:03.000Within a month of these disclosures the FBI removed Friend's security clearance and removed him from active duty.
00:36:08.000Garrett O'Boyle disclosed that the FBI pressured him to violate the law by opening domestic violent extremism investigations without sufficient basis.
00:36:17.000In addition to an indefinite unpaid suspension, the FBI initiated a campaign of humiliation and intimidation to punish and pressure me to resign, Friend testified.
00:36:28.000The FBI's campaign of personal destruction included leaking Friend's private medical information to a New York Times reporter.
00:36:34.000Before you start listening to that whistleblowing, you might want to know a thing or two about this guy's Verrucas and his troubling athlete's foot.
00:37:10.000Federal law enforcement had a far greater visibility into this sort on the Capitol,
00:37:13.000wrote the Times last fall, even as it was taking place than was previously known.
00:37:17.000Allen's intentions were plainly constructive.
00:37:19.000He'd apparently forwarded an article to other FBI investigators to caution them that, if they were looking at footage, they should be aware that there were informants in the crowd.
00:37:27.000Court documents indicate that there were at least eight FBI informants, known as CHSs for Confidential Human Informants, in the Proud Boys, which was one of the groups that organized the January 6th protest.
00:37:39.000There is evidence that the FBI also had CHS in the Oath Keepers, another January 6th activist group.
00:37:46.000Because if you think of how you're told the story of January 6th, it's like, Donald Trump caused it, his rhetoric was incendiary, look at those tweets, it's terrible.
00:37:55.000And then when you see People usually on the internet, alternative independent media like this, some of the people that we share this space with say, there were FBI informants!
00:38:03.000And the mainstream media go, oh, that's ridiculous, that's a conspiracy theory.
00:38:06.000Well, this whistleblower is saying, no, there were FBI informants within those groups.
00:38:12.000Former FBI supervisory intelligence analyst George Hill told the subcommittee that when the Boston office asked for the video footage from January the 6th protest, the Washington field office said they could not give access to the 11,000 hours of video footage available because there may be undercover officers, known as UCs, or CHSs, confidential human sources, on those videos whose identity we need to protect.
00:38:35.000And it wasn't just the FBI who had undercover informants and agents in the crowd.
00:38:38.000There were undercover agents and informants from other law enforcement agencies, including the Washington D.C.
00:38:43.000Metro Police, who were acting like Trump supporters.
00:38:57.000Indeed, there may have been hundreds of undercover government agents and informants, both local and federal, in the January 6th crowd.
00:39:04.000According to one January 6th witness, there were 100 to 200 Secret Service agents alone at the Capitol before and during the breach of police barriers.
00:39:14.000That doesn't seem like the world we're trying to create.
00:39:17.000Can we get to a point where we have a degree of objectivity around these matters, rather than, OK, this story, before I get involved, is it my side or is it the other side?
00:39:34.000No one's got any objectivity or clarity or good faith in these conversations anymore.
00:39:38.000One court filing alleges that there are at least 20 FBI assets at the Capitol.
00:39:43.000Another court document from the Proud Boys trial suggests there are at least 40 undercover informant or agents doing surveillance among defendants on January the 6th.
00:39:51.000So this isn't just hearsay at this point because there are whistleblowers testifying in front of Congress.
00:39:56.000So it seems like there's the need for a conversation, a conversation that people are unwilling to have and even that suggests that particular outcomes are likely.
00:40:03.000In a motion to compel disclosure of all confidential human sources of Homeland Security, the defence alleges that in addition to the 8 confirmed FBI CHS's, the DC Metro Police had at least 13 undercover plainclothes agents, and there appear to have been some 19 CHS's on January the 6th belonging to an agency called Homeland Security Investigations.
00:40:21.000There's even agencies that are so secret, we don't know that they exist!
00:40:32.000I'm gonna pretend to be his friend and then arrest him in a couple of months after I've got him to come up with a terrorist plot that I'm thinking about.
00:40:38.000One such individual is alleged to have been in the crowd screaming, stop the steal, stop the steal, and pushing the protesters toward the Capitol building.
00:41:06.000And you're gonna have plenty of time to work out in prison for four years.
00:41:09.000It is unsurprising that many agencies would send dozens of officers and informants to the Capitol in anticipation of 10,000 to 30,000 people attending a highly charged political rally.
00:41:19.000However, it is troubling that the public has not been given a full accounting of law enforcement officers' activities on January the 6th, given the fact that Democrats have likened the riot to Pearl Harbor and 9-11.
00:41:32.000You can do your own jokes in the chat and the comments, baby!
00:41:35.000How like Pearl Harbor and 9-11 was it?
00:41:38.000What this is, at very least, is when people are going, oh, they're conspiracy theorists, maybe have a little closer look before dismissing that information.
00:41:46.000The real problem with Allen and Friend is that, according to the FBI, they espoused an alternative narrative about the events at the US Capitol on January the 6th, 2021.
00:41:55.000So why did the FBI and Democrats attack the FBI whistleblowers?
00:42:00.000Perhaps because they are revealing, at a minimum, the FBI's failure to stop the riot, and more maximally, its role in instigating it.
00:42:16.000It's starting to look like there is at least cause to examine the possibility that this event was made worse by operatives, You can, in a sense, inform your own opinion by looking at what has happened subsequently.
00:42:31.000Has it been used to spend more money creating a capital police force?
00:42:35.000Has it been used to introduce more surveillance and police laws?
00:42:38.000Has it been used to shut down conversation?
00:42:39.000If the answer to all of those questions is yes, and then additionally there were FBI operatives, there are FBI whistleblowers, then you And they don't use the phrase hard right in this context.
00:42:49.000friend and O'Boyle all commented on the chilling effect of the FBI's retaliation.
00:42:54.000Too many in the FBI aren't willing to sacrifice the hard right over the easy wrong.
00:42:59.000And they don't use the phrase hard right in this context.
00:43:16.000It creates an Orwellian atmosphere that silences opposition and discussion.
00:43:20.000Perhaps that's what's happening more broadly in our culture.
00:43:22.000Ask yourself the question, do you imagine that these powerful elites really care about what they would deem and term vulnerable people from a variety of backgrounds, who in my view all have the right to freedom of expression wherever they are on the political spectrum, whether it's traditional or progressive.
00:43:35.000Freedom means freedom and it certainly means other people's freedom.
00:43:38.000Or are they interested in creating a climate of silence and control?
00:43:43.000O'Boyle said that the FBI's action against him had rendered him and his family homeless and that they could not access their personal effects, including clothing, because they were in FBI storage when he was suspended.
00:43:54.000But throughout the hearing, it was obvious that the Democrats were trying to distract and derail the subcommittee, refusing to engage with the whistleblower's allegations that the FBI has intentionally exaggerated the threat of domestic terrorism through padded statistics and illegal investigations.
00:44:12.000That doesn't sound like the America that we've been living in for the last couple of years.
00:44:16.000What's more, the hearing made clear that the FBI is working with the Democrats, which underscores the agency's increasing partisanship.
00:44:24.000Democrat Stacey Plaskett, who savaged the FBI whistleblower's previously threatened journalist Matt Taibbi with prison for supposedly lying to Congress under oath.
00:44:33.000Do you remember that sham kangaroo congressional hearing where Matt Taibbi and Michael Schellenberger, good men, good journalists, were subject to criticisms, accusations, and threatened, eventually, with jail time, simply for presenting facts?
00:44:49.000It seems like there's certain information that people just don't want out there.
00:44:53.000The Durham report last week revealed that the FBI's Russia collusion investigation was cooked up by Hillary Clinton to denigrate Donald Trump by tying him to Russia as a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server.
00:45:05.000And that despite knowing it was bogus, the FBI went ahead and launched the ill-fated Crossfire Hurricane investigation while dropping four probes into the Clinton Foundation.
00:45:14.000So some things they really investigate, other things they ignore.
00:45:21.000You can just sort of see the outline of the agenda from all of the actions and behaviours.
00:45:25.000On Friday, a FISA court order revealed that the FBI has been misusing a surveillance tool
00:45:30.000almost 300,000 times in 2020 to 2021, including doing 23,000 searches on January the 6th suspects
00:45:37.000and 20,000 searches on a congressional candidate's donors.
00:45:41.000This is what we continually say to you.
00:45:42.000As long as they have the ability to surveil you and look at your information, then the possibility exists that at some point, you will do something that's at odds with the establishment.
00:45:51.000And given that there are no principles, and given that this is an ongoing circular problem, as our man there earlier described, it could come to you at some point.
00:45:59.000You know, when people say, if you've done nothing wrong, you've got nothing to hide, what they should now say is, as long as you're willing to continually obey centralised authority, then you've got nothing to worry about.
00:46:08.000The FBI also refused to comply with a subpoena from the House Oversight Committee to hand over documents alleging that Joe Biden accepted bribes to change US policy while he was Vice President.
00:46:18.000In the light of just one week of FBI shame, the latest Harvard-Harris poll showing deep public mistrust in the FBI comes as no surprise.
00:46:26.000Not only do 69% of voters believe the FBI violated its own standards in the Russia collusion probe, 70% are concerned the Bureau will interfere in future elections.
00:46:35.000So now you know, when people say deep state, this is what they're talking about.
00:46:38.000When they say deep state collusion, they're talking about stories like this.
00:46:41.000While the January 6th stuff is still under investigation, based on the testimony of these whistleblowers and some of the information here about informants and assets in the crowd, it seems to me that a conversation is required before we march forward in the way that we did with the Russiagate stuff into making conclusions that might be convenient to a certain set of agendas.
00:47:12.000He's always blowing up pipelines and invading things.
00:47:15.000Was it that, or did NATO impede upon former Soviet Union territories in ways that was agreed they were not, would not, excuse me, and indeed, was their US involvement in the 2014 coup also complicated?
00:47:29.000NATO, after months, finally admitted it was due to NATO infringement.
00:47:41.000We are talking about the extraordinary revelation that NATO have acknowledged that they were warned by Putin's administration that continuing to expand NATO would lead to an invasion of the Ukraine, and yet they did it anyway.
00:47:54.000This is not simply to say, oh, aren't NATO bad and isn't Russia fantastic?
00:47:58.000Of course, this is a geopolitical issue.
00:48:00.000What we're interested in Is why are the mainstream media not covering the fact that NATO have acknowledged that they knew that their actions and expansion would lead to this war?
00:48:25.000Is it ours or do they have a different intention?
00:48:27.000Let's have a look at this story together.
00:48:29.000Use our innate wisdom to deduce the truth as one.
00:48:32.000President Putin declared in the autumn of 2021 and he actually sent a draft treaty that he wanted NATO to sign to promise no more NATO enlargement.
00:48:59.000Secondly, of course, many of you are aware that at the climax or indeed conclusion of the Cold War, pledges were made to not expand NATO into former Soviet territories.
00:49:11.000It's not something that's broadly covered because, again, it's not favourable to the preferred narrative.
00:49:15.000And most importantly, as far as I'm concerned, is why are the legacy media, when reporting on the subject of this ongoing war, this drain and strain on human resources and indeed human life, this decimation of Ukraine, half a million people dead so far, why are they not saying, well of course NATO have now acknowledged that they were warned that if they continue to expand Then Putin would invade, and they did it anyway.
00:49:55.000He wanted us to sign a promise never to enlarge NATO.
00:49:59.000He wanted us to remove our military infrastructure in all allies that have joined NATO since 1997, meaning half of NATO, all the Central and Eastern Europe.
00:50:10.000We should remove NATO from that part of our alliance.
00:50:14.000In a sense when you listen to this speech it becomes clear that this war has been a long time coming.
00:50:20.000Probably with the membership of each of these former Soviet nations, in the case that they were former members of the Soviet Union, it has encroached further on the agreement not to expand NATO.
00:50:31.000So it's not It's not like a war that began all of a sudden.
00:50:34.000It's part of the ebb and flow of history.
00:50:37.000And perhaps you will agree with people like Jeffrey Sachs that this war has come about to a degree as a result of the unipolar agenda of centralist American interests.
00:50:49.000Because they have an agenda to deplete Russia, because they have an agenda to create a unipolar world where Chinese interests and Russian interests are challenged, they were willing to agitate Russia to the point of war.
00:51:01.000And the reason I mention that is because, of course, we're continually told this is a humanitarian crisis.
00:51:05.000Remember what you're supposed to believe.
00:51:06.000This is what you're supposed to believe.
00:51:07.000Russia, basically for no reason, started to wage war on Ukraine.
00:51:13.000And again, this is not to advocate for Putin.
00:51:15.000It's not to advocate for the actions of Russia.
00:51:18.000This is simply to say, if the intention, the aim, the goal was to end war, these are probably the sorts of things you'd have to take into account, I imagine.
00:51:36.000more NATO presence in the eastern part of the alliance.
00:51:38.000We're not a pro-Russia channel. This organization is not pro-Russia. I'm sure that were we doing
00:51:44.000this in Russia we would experience a lot more censorship, although hey, who's to say, huh?
00:51:49.000But what we are saying is that everything this man is inventorying here seem like unwise moves
00:51:56.000from a diplomatic perspective if the intention was to have a harmonious relationship with Russia,
00:52:01.000to acknowledge that Russia have their own sovereignty, have their own nation, have their
00:52:04.000own history, have their own trajectory.
00:52:06.000This seems like, well, hold on a minute, aren't you, like, provoking a nuclear superpower for reasons, again, that don't seem that clear, because he's not at any point going, of course, we have to have all these countries as members of NATO in order what?
00:52:39.000Some of us don't want the world to be destroyed.
00:52:41.000This is good for the Nordic countries, it's good for Finland and Sweden, and it's also good for NATO, and it demonstrates that when President Putin invaded a European country to prevent more NATO, he's getting the exact opposite.
00:52:56.000And now we've got a massive war in which half a million people have been killed.
00:52:59.000Let's have a look at Jeffrey Sachs' perspective so we can understand this with a little more detail.
00:53:04.000How do we get into this war and how do we get out of it?
00:53:06.000During the disastrous Vietnam War, it was said that the US government treated the public like a mushroom farm, keeping it in the dark and feeding it with manure.
00:53:13.000The heroic Daniel Ellsberg leaked the Pentagon Papers documenting the unrelenting US government lying about the war in order to protect politicians who would be embarrassed by the truth.
00:53:22.000A half century later, during the Ukraine war, the manure is piled even higher.
00:53:27.000According to the US government and the ever-secret New York Times, the Ukraine war was unprovoked, the Times' favorite adjective to describe the war.
00:53:34.000That is continually what you are told.
00:53:37.000If you only watch the mainstream media, if you only read the New York Times and someone said to you, what's this war about?
00:53:52.000This is NATO saying, well, Putin said that if we kept expanding NATO, there would be a war.
00:53:57.000And so we just like kept expanding NATO, which seems to me to be an extraordinary decision for an unelected body funded somewhat by your nation and my nation to have made on my behalf.
00:54:08.000I don't remember being asked whether I wanted to provoke Russia into war.
00:54:11.000Do you remember Who's agenda is being fulfilled?
00:54:15.000Why is it not being responsibly reported on?
00:54:17.000What kind of cultural curation is taking place that certain ideas are just not allowed to be in the space of public communication?
00:54:25.000Why is it that the media continue to be so obedient To an agenda that plainly is bringing us to the edge of an extremely dangerous situation.
00:54:37.000If you're watching us on YouTube, you 6.6 million Awakening Wonders, we're only putting half the video up here for reasons that are surely obvious to you.
00:54:43.000The majority of the content will be up on Rumble.
00:54:46.000If you're watching us on Twitter or X, Elon, thank you.
00:54:50.000But we will be doing the rest of the content on Rumble because that is our home and that's where we're looked after.
00:54:56.000Putin, allegedly mistaking himself for Peter the Great, invaded Ukraine to recreate the Russian Empire.
00:55:01.000Yet last week, NATO Secretary Jens Stoltenberg committed a Washington gaffe, meaning that he accidentally blurted out the truth.
00:55:08.000This is what a gaffe means these days, an inability to sustain the deceptive narrative that controls the public sphere, that controls the augmented reality that we're invited to live in.
00:55:19.000This is why independent media is under threat, because we can say, hey, look at this thing, NATO said that, does that help you to draw a different conclusion?
00:55:26.000In testimony to the European Union Parliament, Stoltenberg made clear that it was America's relentless push to enlarge NATO to Ukraine that was the real cause of the war and why it continues today.
00:55:33.000Here are Stoltenberg's revealing words.
00:55:34.000That's why these things are challenging, that's why it's important to stay with us.
00:55:37.000In testimony to the European Union Parliament, Stoltenberg made clear that it was America's
00:55:41.000relentless push to enlarge NATO to Ukraine that was the real cause of the war and why
00:56:31.000He wanted us to sign that promise, never to enlarge NATO.
00:56:34.000He wanted us to remove our military infrastructure and all allies that have joined NATO since 1997, meaning half of NATO.
00:56:41.000All the Central and Eastern Europe, we should remove NATO from that part of our alliance, introducing some kind of B or second class membership.
00:56:48.000Can you see why a figure like Donald Trump, who says we'd withdraw from NATO or we'd stop funding NATO, is a kind of wrecking ball to globalist infrastructure?
00:56:58.000Over the last eight years the United States spent more on defence than all other NATO countries combined.
00:57:06.000Because this is the kind of thing that can continue unquestioned.
00:57:09.000Like when in your life do you have time to go, hey I'm not sure if we should be supporting NATO anymore?
00:57:13.000You're being overcharged for your energy, you're being overcharged for your food, you're working too hard, you're living in a nihilistic culture that has no vision for improvement, you're living amongst fracks Fischer, thrashed around by bad ideas and bad lies most of
00:57:28.000When are you ever going to be able to say, hey, is there an alternative way of living?
00:57:32.000Do we need NATO? Are the WHO actually helpful? How are they funded? Where's all this information
00:57:36.000coming from? Is there the ability to pose counter-narratives?
00:57:38.000You've not got time for that, have you? Well, we're going to have to make time,
00:57:41.000because it seems to me that we're on the precipice of some pretty significant changes.
00:57:45.000But what we're moving to is a technological dictatorship where there is the ability to shut down your money, shut down your life, un-person you, if you even dare to question the trajectory of global or national events.
00:57:58.000Or if you want to have a conversation, if you want to have cultural differences.
00:58:01.000You are going to be able to be eliminated.
00:58:02.000This seems to me to be the terrain that they're trying to create.
00:58:05.000And organisations like NATO, WHO, I'm not saying they're entirely malign or malevolent or were created even for the wrong reasons.
00:58:12.000I'm saying that now the way they're operating is certainly beyond the remit of democracy and you're funding for it and you're not voting for it.
00:58:35.000To repeat, he Putin, went to war to prevent NATO, more NATO, close to his borders.
00:58:40.000When Professor John Mearsheimer and I, and others have said the same, we've been attacked as Putin apologists.
00:58:45.000So at this point, this is sort of I suppose where we get into a degree of complexity.
00:58:50.000In this video we're not saying to you Russia are really great and NATO are bad even though I can feel myself getting agitated on behalf of sort of the concept of Russia by the bureaucratic disingenuity of this unelected administrative official.
00:59:04.000But actually what Sax is saying and what he's saying his colleague Mearsheimers are saying is we told you this And we were dismissed as conspiracy theorists.
00:59:13.000Now think about the last couple of years.
00:59:15.000How many times have things been said that are true that you're dismissed as a conspiracy theorist for believing?
00:59:21.000Think of all of the major world events, the pandemic, I mean the litany, it just goes on and on.
00:59:27.000What is happening, in conjunction with very significant geopolitical moves in order, I believe, to create a unipolar globalist world where democracy and sovereignty and community are completely eroded, is the inability even to challenge on any individual issue.
00:59:42.000Dissenting voices shut down, alternative voices annihilated.
00:59:45.000The same critics also choose to hide or flatly ignore the dire warnings against NATO enlargement to Ukraine.
00:59:51.000Long articulated by many of America's leading diplomats including the great scholar statesman George Kennan and the former US ambassadors to Russia Jack Matlock and William Burns.
01:00:01.000So it's not all crackpots and whack jobs and people on the internet that are hippies with an axe to grind that believe in community and autonomy and democracy.
01:00:09.000This is a really dangerous and unprecedented time.
01:00:10.000the answer and you have to find God within yourself, find God now. It's like actual diplomats
01:00:15.000and people that broadly speaking are in the general ebb and flow of international geopolitical
01:00:20.000discourse. It's not like Willie Nelson and Janis Joplin and Jimi Hendrix have decided
01:00:25.000that we're being lied to. It's like Jack Matlock and William Burns and George Kennel, that's
01:00:30.000like dudes in suits in oak panelled rooms. This is a really dangerous and unprecedented
01:00:35.000time, let me know if you agree. Burns, now CIA director, was US ambassador to Russia
01:00:39.000in 2008, an author of a memo entitled, Nyet means nyet.
01:00:43.000In that memo, Burns explained to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice that the entire Russian political class, not just Putin, was dead set against NATO enlargement.
01:00:51.000We know about the memo only because it was leaked, otherwise we'd be in the dark about it.
01:00:54.000How many other things do we simply never have revealed to us?
01:01:12.000Just completely radically re-evaluate all of our democratic systems to first and foremost disable these gargantuan monoliths of horror that are guiding us gently to Armageddon.
01:02:06.000That regime change was a surprise for your birthday!
01:02:09.000They've got a country and an institution in the shape of NATO on their borders.
01:02:14.000Armed, who they know have engaged in regime change 70 times since the last war.
01:02:20.000They know that they are explicitly their enemy.
01:02:23.000And they're saying, do you mind not doing that?
01:02:24.000I mean, it essentially amounts to a polite request eventually followed by a war.
01:02:28.000I know there's a deep and troubling history between Russia and Ukraine that I'm plainly not an expert in.
01:02:32.000What this is about is, why didn't the media simply report accurately on this subject so I can answer my own rhetorical question?
01:02:37.000Because if they did, you'd make up your own mind.
01:02:39.000And when you make up your own mind, you will be less compliant and Less obedient, and they cannot have that.
01:02:45.000And countless more since, including in Serbia, Afghanistan, Georgia, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Venezuela, and Ukraine.
01:02:51.000Yeah, but we're not going to do any more.
01:02:53.000Nor does Russia like the fact that many leading US politicians actively advocate the destruction of Russia under the banner of decolonizing Russia.
01:03:01.000That would be like Russia calling for the removal of Texas, California, Hawaii, and conquered Indian lands, and much else from the United States.
01:03:09.000Imagine that Hawaii, with good reason these days, said, you know what?
01:03:13.000The United States haven't been incredibly helpful to us.
01:03:15.000They're just using us as a missile base when we actually need them.
01:03:18.000They give us derisory payments while they send incredible sums elsewhere, apparently to support a war that it seems like they, to some considerable degree, participated in the provocation of.
01:03:34.000Love America, love your history, love your nation, love your traditions, love your forefathers and your foremothers, but who benefits from there being one centralized government that plainly operates in the service of military-industrial complex, big pharma, uses the legacy media to whitewash and bleach the cultural space free of independent thought and independent conversation?
01:04:54.000Remember, click the red awaken button to attend our interviews and conversations live and to participate in the building of new communities.