The Alberta Roundup with Isaac Lamoureux - July 01, 2023


Danielle Smith accused of ‘stalling’ clean energy


Episode Stats

Length

12 minutes

Words per Minute

163.21393

Word Count

1,988

Sentence Count

151

Misogynist Sentences

3

Hate Speech Sentences

2


Summary

The federal government's new carbon tax regulations are coming into effect on July 1st, and the Alberta government has some thoughts. Premier Danielle Smith was asked why her government is stalling the transition to clean energy, and she had some thoughts! Plus, Sheila Lewis is the unvaccinated Canadian who's been denied an organ transplant, and more than 100 doctors in Alberta are upset that Dina Hinshaw's job offer was revoked. All that and more happening now on the Alberta Roundup.


Transcript

00:00:00.640 It's the family and friends event at Shoppers Drug Mart. Get 20% off almost all regular priced
00:00:06.160 merchandise. Two days only. Tuesday, February 24th and Wednesday, February 25th. Open your
00:00:12.140 PC Optimum app to get your coupon.
00:00:16.900 Hey everyone, welcome back to the Alberta Roundup. I hope that you guys are having a
00:00:20.740 great week. You'll have to excuse my hair. It is very humid outside and it kind of just
00:00:26.080 has a mind of its own. If you suspected that it's been a quiet week in Alberta politics,
00:00:31.640 you've been correct. Certainly a little bit slower on the news front. I expect that trend
00:00:36.300 will continue throughout the summer. But here's today's headlines. The federal government's
00:00:41.640 clean fuel regulations are coming into effect today on Saturday, July 1st. And the Alberta
00:00:47.020 government has some thoughts. Speaking of energy, Danielle Smith was asked why her government is
00:00:52.240 stalling the transition to clean energy this week. And she had some thoughts. I also have
00:00:57.760 an update for you on Sheila Lewis. That's the unvaccinated Canadian who's been denied an organ
00:01:02.700 transplant. And finally, more than 100 doctors in Alberta are upset that Dina Hinshaw's job
00:01:08.700 offer was revoked. All that and more happening now on the Alberta Roundup.
00:01:22.360 Okay guys, up first on Thursday, just two days ahead of its enforcement, the Alberta government
00:01:27.720 joined forces with Saskatchewan and the Atlantic provinces to call on the federal government to
00:01:33.540 immediately halt the implementation of the federal clean fuel regulations. The new regulations which
00:01:39.760 take effect today are part of Canada's plan requiring producers and importers of liquid
00:01:44.960 fossil fuels like gasoline and diesel to gradually reduce the fuel's carbon intensity. But Alberta
00:01:52.020 Environment and Protected Areas Minister Rebecca Schultz says the new policy will harm provincial economies
00:01:57.480 in Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Atlantic Canada. In a statement, Schultz said, quote,
00:02:02.440 combined with the federal government's carbon tax increase, higher gasoline and diesel costs are
00:02:08.080 expected, putting added cost pressures on other goods and services across the industry. Now is not
00:02:15.140 the time to drive up prices at the pump and increase expenses for vulnerable households, businesses and
00:02:20.640 industries. Families and businesses cannot continue to afford reckless cost and tax increases imposed by
00:02:26.820 the federal government. Per the new regulations, the carbon intensity of impacted fuels
00:02:32.140 must fall below 15 percent. It's 2016 levels by 2030. According to Environment and Climate Change
00:02:40.080 Canada, this will deliver 26 million tons of greenhouse gas emissions reductions. It also establishes a
00:02:48.280 carbon credit market in which reducing emissions earns credits that can be sold. In May, the Parliamentary
00:02:54.900 Budget Office said the Canadian economy will take a hit under the policy. It revealed that the regulations
00:03:00.740 will decrease Canada's real GDP by 0.3 percent or $9 billion by 2030. The Parliamentary Budget Officer further
00:03:09.780 estimated that the cost for a low household income would be $231 or over $1,000 for higher income
00:03:17.300 households. Saskatchewan is one of the provinces that will be hit the hardest, costing the average
00:03:22.740 household over $1,100 by 2030, the PBO estimated. And while we're on the topic of energy, Alberta Premier
00:03:29.860 Danielle Smith was asked why her government is, quote, stalling the transition to clean energy while at the
00:03:36.180 annual Western Premier's conference earlier this week. I don't think she liked that question very much.
00:03:41.060 Here's what she had to say about it. We don't stall anything. We just don't accept that oil and natural
00:03:47.700 gas should be phased out. And by the nature of your question, I'm assuming that's what you think
00:03:52.580 needs to happen. I totally disagree. We are going to reduce emissions and we're going to reduce
00:03:57.220 emissions by carbon capture utilization and storage by transitioning to hydrogen and by working with our
00:04:03.220 partners to export LNG. We're going to have continued use of hydrocarbon fuels for petrochemicals.
00:04:09.700 Dow Chemical has a zero emissions petrochemical plant that they're close to making a final investment
00:04:15.380 decision on. Air Products is making a net zero hydrogen investment. Our oil sands are making a
00:04:24.260 net zero investment by 2050. We're increasingly seeing bitumen beyond combustion for the use of
00:04:29.860 bitumen for asphalt, which is a construction material. And so that's the framework we need to get into,
00:04:35.700 is that we are not transitioning away from hydrocarbons. We are not transitioning away from oil and natural gas.
00:04:40.500 We're transitioning away from emissions and we have embraced the 2050 target. Moving into what we're
00:04:45.940 watching in the weeks to come. I wanted to include this in today's episode because not many of you
00:04:50.900 guys got the chance to watch it during the week. Probably you weren't looking for it because I don't
00:04:55.380 typically release episodes midweek. However, I did have the opportunity to interview Sheila Annette Lewis.
00:05:01.860 She is of course the Canadian woman who's been denied an organ transplant because she refused the
00:05:07.300 COVID-19 vaccine. And I had a chance to ask her a little bit about her story, including how she has
00:05:14.180 found the resilience to keep fighting against all odds. Here's what she had to say about it.
00:05:19.460 There's lots of times. There really is. There's lots of times that, you know, I'm sitting here and
00:05:26.100 I'm thinking and it's quiet and I'm by myself. You know, it's late at night and I can't sleep for one
00:05:32.820 reason or another. And yeah, I think about just that's it. Nothing's enough. But what's that going
00:05:43.220 to do? It's not going to get me nowhere and it's not going to get anybody else anywhere. But at the
00:05:47.780 same time, the truth needs to come out. And if I just stop it all, which they want me to,
00:05:55.300 these doctors, they want me to go away. Like they used to ask me in the zoom calls at the end,
00:06:02.900 they would say when they called, Oh, you're still hanging in. I see. Because I answered the phone.
00:06:09.380 It's like, yeah, I'm still hanging in. But they want me to go away. They want to silence me. And no,
00:06:16.740 it ain't going to happen. So I will fight as long as I can and do what I can to fight for myself
00:06:28.420 and the rest of Canada for the other people that need these surgeries as well. But yes, there's times
00:06:37.620 it gets tough, like really tough, especially when it's hard to breathe. And there's a lot of times
00:06:45.860 when I exert myself, when I get up to do something, even with the third machine. It's tough.
00:06:55.860 It's tough to keep going sometimes. But I have to. I have to keep fighting.
00:07:03.700 I never was one to give up before. So I'm going to start now.
00:07:08.580 For those of you who are interested in her story, you can go and find the full interview
00:07:13.220 on our website, tnc.news or on YouTube. It is posted as a typical Alberta roundup episode.
00:07:19.540 And of course, you are more than welcome to donate to Sheila's GoFundMe. We will link that below.
00:07:24.980 Moving into the controversy of the week, more than a hundred Alberta doctors have signed letters
00:07:29.700 voicing concern over the decision to rescind former chief medical health officer Dina Hinshaw's
00:07:35.620 appointment earlier this week. As we discussed extensively on the show last week,
00:07:40.180 Hinshaw was hired for a role with Indigenous Wellness Corps. That's an Alberta health services
00:07:45.060 program. And that offer was rescinded shortly after public backlash emerged. Now concerned
00:07:51.300 doctors have sent a letter to Alberta's official administrator, Dr. John Cowell, as well as Alberta
00:07:56.420 Premier Daniel Smith to express their concerns. The letter reads, quote, revoking Dr. Hinshaw's contract
00:08:02.980 has caused significant harm. Dr. Hinshaw has been prevented from working for AHS.
00:08:08.020 This is entirely unfair and unprofessional. Further, it signals to all physicians in this
00:08:12.980 province that their positions are unsafe and could be targeted for political gain. There is no place
00:08:18.260 for leadership which undermines the decisions, recommendations and sovereignty of the Indigenous
00:08:22.900 Wellness Corps, and no place for political interference in healthcare delivery. At a press conference
00:08:28.980 earlier this week, Danielle Smith was asked about the decision to rescind Hinshaw's offer, and if
00:08:34.100 there was any political interference. The Premier has remained very tight-lipped about the situation.
00:08:40.100 Here's what that looked like. No, I have a person I've hired at the head of Alberta Health Services,
00:08:47.060 Dr. John Cowell, to make personnel decisions. He makes personnel decisions. It's up to
00:08:52.340 him to answer those questions. And moving into our comment roundup, last week I asked you guys what
00:08:58.500 we should call our conservative country if, hypothetically speaking, we were to form one,
00:09:03.540 and I got a lot of answers. Some of you understood the assignment, some of you not so much. John Hines
00:09:09.620 said, as far as name goes for a conservative nation, it will have to be a republic, so just call it the
00:09:13.860 Republic of Canada. The flag is easily a grizzly crowned majestically over blue, green, and white colors.
00:09:20.180 Obviously, King Ralph can be the adverse bust on our coinage. This seemed to be a very popular
00:09:26.260 comment. I am entirely on board with King Ralph being on all our coinage. Don't know if we want
00:09:31.060 to call our country the Republic of Canada if Canada keeps its name, but I suppose we can dive
00:09:35.780 into that discussion a little later on. Dave Hines said, for a new country including Alberta,
00:09:40.580 Saskatchewan, Manitoba, we should include invite the relevant territories in Northern BC. Generally,
00:09:46.580 the area was originally to be one province, the province of Buffalo, so it seems fitting that it
00:09:51.220 would be the country of Buffalo. Buffalo isn't a terrible name. However, I don't really like that
00:09:55.860 there's also a state called Buffalo because we'll always have to make that distinction. Buffalo,
00:10:00.020 the country, not the state, similar to places like Georgia. So I think it'd be better. I think
00:10:04.420 we could find something a little more original. I don't hate it, but I think we can do better.
00:10:08.500 And Jason Lorenzen said, considering that we Albertans would still be the ones filling the bill,
00:10:12.900 the country should be named Alberta. Manitoba has nothing for us other than access to the
00:10:17.380 Hudson's Bay and Saskatchewan doesn't come anywhere close to our revenues. I saw a lot of comments
00:10:22.580 sort of with the same mindset. We should just continue to call ourselves Alberta. I think
00:10:26.980 that's a fair proposal. I think that's definitely something that we could discuss down the line.
00:10:30.180 I think it's probably better than something like the Republic of Canada, especially if Canada
00:10:34.340 keeps its name way too confusing. Tony Nichols said, I love Canada as one nation.
00:10:39.700 If you formed your own country, tell it like it would be. Call it Traitoria or Seditionville,
00:10:44.500 or perhaps Quebec West. Tony, now you're just being unnecessarily offensive. Of course,
00:10:49.860 we're not going to call ourselves Quebec West. Also, I think you might be taking this assignment
00:10:54.420 a little too seriously. It's just a hypothetical question. I don't think real talks of separation
00:10:59.380 are on the table at all right now. And Pat's Garage said, can we just keep the name Canada
00:11:03.380 and the East can change theirs to new China? Yes, absolutely we can. That seems like the most
00:11:08.660 reasonable response of all the ones that I have read so far. Okay guys, that's all I have for you
00:11:13.460 today. Thank you so much for tuning into today's episode of the Alberta Roundup. I hope that you
00:11:18.420 enjoy your long weekend and happy Canada Day. May God keep our nation strong and free. See you all next week.
00:11:38.660 This is Disruptors. No hype, no hot takes, just clear thinking, real trade-offs, and practical insight
00:11:47.300 with a focus on what matters for Canada. Every episode, we talk to the people shaping what comes next
00:11:53.940 in business, policy, technology, and the real economy. I'm John Stackhouse, follow Disruptors,
00:12:00.020 and never miss an episode.