00:00:00.000I want to share with the public that the Congressional Investigative Committee and the FBI have been withholding from the country blockbuster information about the January 6th pipe bomber as it relates to a particular telephone number that pinged within three meters of both drop locations at the Republican National Committee headquarters, at the Democratic National Committee headquarters,
00:00:24.880and that the FBI said themselves that because of this phone number,
00:00:30.360they now knew that this was a law enforcement individual that placed the devices.
00:00:36.100The official pipe bomber narrative has already been discredited.
00:04:29.200But Kyle Serafin has been all over this.
00:04:31.440He worked the pipe bombing case during it in D.C.
00:04:35.600And, you know, obviously we know that the man that they've said who did it, all the evidence is he's a complete patsy.
00:04:40.860So maybe Kyle should recap what we know.
00:04:44.500But now Steve Baker, one of the best investigators on this, has brought out really smoking gun evidence dealing with the phones, the phone numbers,
00:04:51.720that the system knows that, indeed, they do have a Patsy,
00:04:55.960which falls directly on the FBI director and others who were involved in that.
00:05:01.000We also now have the FBI director saying they're going to hire people
00:05:05.680that have burglary convictions and have been prostitutes.
00:05:18.820But just in general, that's not a job requirement.
00:05:21.160Usually it's when you're trying to hire spies or people that are already corrupted that you would do something like we'll get Kyle Serafin's take on that as first.
00:05:27.820But I'm not going to play the whole interview.
00:05:50.460great information. One of the most accurate people out there. But here's a few minutes
00:05:53.200of the Steve Baker interview yesterday. We knew then it was a law enforcement person.
00:06:01.440We, as in the FBI, knew then it was a law enforcement person. We need to talk face to
00:06:07.400face. I have info that can fill in the gaps, but it points to Capitol Police involvement.
00:06:15.300Who told you not to report that story?
00:06:19.480I want to share with the public that the Congressional Investigative Committee and the FBI have been withholding from the country blockbuster information about the January 6th pipe bomber as it relates to a particular telephone number that pinged within three meters of both drop locations at the Republican National Committee headquarters, at the Democratic National Committee headquarters.
00:06:45.200and that the FBI said themselves that because of this phone number, they now knew that this was a
00:06:53.480law enforcement individual that placed the devices. The committee has been informed of it since October
00:06:58.92016th because that's the date of when this briefing took place. I have no idea how long the FBI knew
00:07:04.600about this. Where was this meeting that you're talking about? This meeting was in Congressman
00:07:08.740Loudermilk's office at the Rayburn Building in Washington, D.C. There was Congressman Loudermilk,
00:07:14.300who was the chairman of the investigative committee.
00:07:17.100And then there was his chief of staff, Rob Atkerson.
00:07:42.800investigative journalist by the name of John Solomon, who runs Just the News.
00:07:47.840October 16th of 2025, a meeting is called, who called the meeting?
00:07:54.300All I know from the whistleblower, the whistleblower is also a former deputy chief level
00:07:59.080officer from the Capitol Police, and he was there on January 6th, as was Chief Sund.
00:08:04.480They actually both got the call from Rob Atkerson, that would be Loudermilk's chief of staff.
00:08:09.300OK, they were called there by Ackerson. Ackerson's the chief of staff. Obviously, Congressman Loudermilk was there as well. So there's your for the person giving the briefing.
00:08:18.400That makes perfect sense that that would be the FBI congressional liaison at the time. So he's the one giving it. And John Solomon, how does he fit into that?
00:08:27.880They don't know. They don't know why he was there. He was certainly the odd bird out. The question that I have.
00:08:33.280Let's stop there. You know, watch the full interview. We got limited time today. We'll get a call back in the next few days.
00:08:38.240He's going to find out when he can come on.
00:09:49.300This person took weird and suspicious photos of the dumpster right next to where the actual pipe bomb was found.
00:09:53.920A couple of other structures and all that was very unusual.
00:09:56.380And so we were, me and my surveillance team the week after, were interested in trying to figure out who the heck that person was and what was going on and how were they connected to another person, Person of Interest 3.
00:10:06.860Person of Interest 3 was a former member of the Air Force, a federal contractor, someone who I believe worked at the Department of Defense at the time, although it slips up my mind right now.
00:10:16.740Anyway, long and short, we were outside the address of Person of Interest 3, who had lent his car, had lent his Metro Pass and some other things to Person of Interest 2, who'd come in from out of town.
00:10:29.060And it just turned out that those two people, POI 2 and POI 3, lived directly next door to a woman who was a Capitol Police officer, later identified by Steve Baker and his team while he was working at the Blaze, as a forensic match for the pipe bomber who was Person of Interest 1, as you're showing on the screen right now.
00:11:08.280A week later, my team is put on surveillance outside the house of POI 3.
00:11:11.620And logically, after two days, we were taken off before the FBI cleared them of any kind of wrongdoing or any kind of involvement in the pipe bomb case that threw up a red flag to me right away.
00:11:19.740While I was an FBI agent, I brought it up to my family members, you know, commensurate to that time.
00:11:23.980I've referred to that and I've reached out to people that were on my team that are still currently working for the FBI.
00:11:29.900And they also thought it was strange at the time and they've always thought it was weird.
00:11:33.260It turns out that this is an ongoing topic of discussion.
00:11:37.000um we might move forward for years where the fbi puts out a reward they're looking for the pipe
00:11:42.640bomber they've offered fifty thousand dollars it started at 25 it ended up at five hundred thousand
00:11:46.800dollars and nobody knows what was going on and why nobody was able to solve the case cash patel
00:11:51.960gets in there in january sorry i think he gets in in february dan bongino first week of march
00:11:56.740of 2025 and literally there was almost nothing done during that time they you know no suspects
00:12:02.280announced they've done all this research they've got all these thousands of you know copies of
00:12:05.900a video chris ray said there were 30 or 35 000 different videos they were pouring through they
00:12:11.040pulled credit card receipts they looked into 6 000 different interviews blah blah blah blah
00:12:14.300the end of the day we get a report in january of 2025 from barry loudermilk and his committee
00:12:19.200and it said basically the only thing that should have mattered there were 186 phone numbers that
00:12:25.040pinged in the vicinity of the pipe bomb being dropped at that time so if the pipe bomber had
00:12:30.000a phone and we know the pipe bomber had a phone because it's on video the pipe bomber is referring
00:12:34.000to a phone on the actual video footage that the FBI released in the few minutes they did,
00:12:39.880186 phones were in the area. 51 of them belonged to members of law enforcement or were excluded.
00:12:45.240How they determined they were law enforcement, we'll get into it in just a second, but essentially
00:12:48.420they didn't look into those and they went after the other ones and they had some high priority
00:12:51.580and some low priority and some interviews to do. At the end of the day, they arrested Brian Cole
00:12:55.880Jr. That was in December of 2025. So that was a year after the Loudermilk report comes out.
00:13:00.160And when they arrested Brian Cole Jr., the entire thing they said that they hinged their arrest on was cell phone pings and credit card receipts.
00:13:07.800This should have taken about a week, maybe two weeks, and it would have made sense that we were in the right vicinity at the time.
00:13:12.740So what the hell happened for four plus years, almost five years, for them to have that space, we don't know.
00:13:18.160But what we do know is that Steve Baker has just reported on a meeting that took place on October the 16th of 2025.
00:13:24.140It was held by Marshall Yates, who is the assistant director of congressional affairs, the congressional liaison.
00:14:46.500But even bigger than that is the whole Jan 6 narrative where the FBI director lied about feds being there, which we now know was happening, and this being a setup, comes crashing down.
00:14:57.840And it was Bongino and it was Cash Patel promising and looking at all the holes in the story that they would come in and expose the real pipe bomber.
00:15:05.140And instead they flipped and we know what happened there.
00:15:07.660That's why this is big, because it brings down the whole deep state if this comes out.
00:15:11.960And why do you, in a fledgling investigation, have the Congress, the Senate, with all these key people, like a Bilderberg meeting, with a key media person meeting when this information starts coming out?
00:15:23.260That's not how this stuff normally works. Right, Carl Serafin?
00:15:25.980Oh, no, there's no way this would normally be the case.
00:15:28.100And, you know, you might send somebody over to brief Congress, but I have no idea why John Solomon's sitting there.
00:15:32.080And that's bizarre. I don't know why you'd bring in former members of Capitol Police to actually be there in the first place.
00:15:36.620I'm not sure what that is unless they were going to add something to the brief.
00:15:38.980And apparently they were just in the receiving mode. So that's kind of strange, too.
00:15:41.960But you've got Marshall Yates, who was, again, on Massey's staff, used to work for a member of Congress who was on the committee, ends up at the FBI as the senior congressional liaison.
00:15:52.080Interestingly enough, Marshall Yates is apparently someone who on the night of January 5th walked past the actual hooded figure in the pipe bomb case and believed it to be a white male.
00:16:02.900Now, if anybody's ever seen the police officer that Steve Baker identified, there's pictures over at The New York Times and so on.
00:16:08.480She's made herself a public figure in this space.
00:16:10.240it does seem like she looks like a dude she has my haircut essentially she just doesn't have the
00:16:15.400beard so very kind of interesting stuff there but the timeline goes as follows silence for years
00:16:20.680upping of the of the reward for a long time and then you get this meeting on october the 16th
00:16:27.940about a week later the fbi boosts their their reward offer and they tell people again hey it's
00:16:34.740five hundred thousand dollars and here's some minimal kind of crappy footage meanwhile you've
00:16:38.980got daniel bongino previously saying that it looks like it's a fed's erection it looks like
00:16:42.760there were people that were deliberately kind of altering the frame rate they were trying to edit
00:16:45.860the actual pixels inside the pictures of the pipe bomber so who's covering what up and we all
00:16:51.100believed at the time and i still believe and i think steve baker does as well and i'm sure your
00:16:55.420audience is going to be fairly well aware it looks like members of the capitol police possibly people
00:17:00.020from the atf probably someone from the cia or members of the cia and then also a couple of
00:17:05.060members of Congress were involved in doing something very specific. They set up a potential
00:17:08.820diversionary tactic on January the 6th, potentially under the guise of it being a training exercise.
00:17:14.740And DOJ and FBI came in as the mop up crew, probably originally investigating in good faith.
00:17:19.320And when they got too close to it, then they were pulled back. And now you've got this weird story.
00:17:22.760So October 16th, they do this meeting. They reveal that a law enforcement specific cell
00:17:28.900phone that was on what's called FirstNet. And FirstNet is a creation post 9-11 to be able to
00:17:34.160make sure that first responders, whether they be in the EMS world, whether they be federal state or
00:17:38.400local law enforcement and a few others are able to get cell phone traffic out. Even when the cell
00:17:44.340phone towers are completely overwhelmed by civilian traffic, it's a non-commercial available thing.
00:17:48.480You have to be law enforcement. You have to be verified through your agency. I used to have a
00:17:52.720personal phone on a first net and I had a work phone for the FBI that was on first net. It's
00:17:57.640my belief that Capitol police use them as well, but that is unique to a very specific group of
00:18:02.120people that can use it. And interestingly enough, FirstNet also has this special sort of parameter
00:18:07.300added. They have a 94% or higher instantaneous location capability so that they can actually
00:18:14.900pinpoint people, not just on the ground in two-dimensional space, but actually in three-
00:18:19.880dimensional space at altitude within 10 feet of the physical location of the person. And they do
00:18:25.040so with 94 accuracy the standard FCC requirement for GPS and accuracy pings is like 80 so it's far
00:18:33.380more accurate it's very very rapid and the idea would be that in the events of an emergency law
00:18:37.320enforcement may need to pinpoint their position and be tracked and so these phones actually have
00:18:41.760but now it can be used the other way to expose if law enforcement is involved well if you have a
00:18:47.000law enforcement phone that's pinging within 10 feet of the bomb drop locations both of them on
00:18:51.220that night. And they're in that 186 phone numbers. That seems really critical. That's what Steve
00:18:56.100Baker was talking about. And the fact that it was being briefed by the FBI to members of Congress
00:19:01.480tells you people in the C-suite, the executive level, the seventh floor of the FBI knew this
00:19:05.940in October the 16th of 2025. A couple of weeks later, Steve Baker does his article. It comes
00:19:11.940out on November the 8th. And then from that time on, there's a panic. We're told from people that
00:19:17.740came out of the cia that came out of the office of director of national intelligence and so on
00:19:21.420that the cia scrambled tried to figure out what to do the intelligence community panicked and then
00:19:26.100they ended up doing something very specific they put um surveillance on brian cole jr's house five
00:19:31.600days after the article comes out they also did an interview with the uh now cia employee but
00:19:36.960previously capitol police officer and she failed a polygraph per filings in court and the polygraph
00:19:42.700that she failed or she indicated deception on
00:22:00.640So the Capitol Police counter surveillance unit officers that found the second bomb left their car.
00:22:05.900And in under 13 minutes, I think it was actually under 12 minutes, went directly to the two places the pipe bomber had stopped in the night before.
00:22:15.720First one was a bush that was in front of the Congressional Black Caucus.
00:22:18.220They actually do a look for it, and they don't see it there.
00:22:20.520And then they go directly to where the bomb actually was placed.
00:22:22.740And that was placed next to a bench where we've all seen the footage of it.
00:22:26.160So let's go back and do 35,000 foot view because for listeners, I know you get it, listeners, but this will bring down the whole narrative.
00:22:32.780Do you think Trump doesn't know about this, or has he decided to use his blackmail against the deep stakes?
00:23:00.760I haven't gotten intel on does he even know about this, but I'm sure he certainly has to.
00:23:05.700And this vindicates Trump. Why the hell the change and what do you think the pipe bomber was really meant to do?
00:23:14.260I don't know what the Trump situation is, other than I do know that Trump has never publicly congratulated Dan Bongino, Pam Bondi, Janine Pirro or Kash Patel for their great work in getting the pipe bomber off the streets.
00:23:27.300he's never done that so people can take and assume that means whatever they think i i actually don't
00:23:32.860know and i don't know what the angle would be if he was in on uh shutting it down and i don't know
00:23:36.960what the angle would be the most likely answer is that he doesn't know but again i i don't know how
00:23:42.860that would work out or how you wouldn't be aware of this so all that said now the the the angle
00:23:47.520has been speculated on that it was a just a mechanism by which you could actually say trump
00:23:51.600supporters are violent extremists he's too dangerous to ever be in politics again and like
00:23:56.900everything else from the january you know probably december onward after the election
00:24:01.300into the raid at mar-a-lago and all the other kind of things there was a concerted effort by
00:24:05.620our media to point out that donald trump was too dangerous for american politics his supporters are
00:24:09.680not just what's been in the news college talk about this off air sometime they were trying in
00:24:15.160florida and texas i know people directly we're talking about like trump moms and stuff to try
00:24:19.400to get them to take 50 cows to dc and then they were trying to get members of oath keepers that
00:24:25.060the top didn't know to like arrest pelosi and take so they they plan this to be far worse the
00:24:30.740question would be why did they then pull back on the pipe bomb scenario when they had it pre-programmed
00:24:37.620um i think they didn't need it uh that's kind of the the assumption that we've been working on
00:24:42.060looking at it that things got out of hand just enough for the optics to be what they were
00:24:45.220uh you know that there was pretty solid evidence that they were instigators from the uh the riot
00:24:50.420and slash the protest part of the mob but then the capital police responded with aggressive force and
00:24:54.920that looked pretty crazy too. The question was, was they going to be able to call it a training
00:24:58.840exercise and try to, you know, basically play it off if they needed to, or could they say this was
00:25:03.200Trump's who, you know, Trump people who were dropping pipe bombs. And so they're domestic
00:25:06.040terrorists. There was a lot of different kinds of angles. We don't have all the answers. What we do
00:25:10.040know is that the story that they've lined up against Brian Cole jr. Doesn't line up at all.
00:25:13.640It doesn't line up because even their internal filings are completely illogical. Apparently the
00:25:17.640guy was an autistic guy, but he was mad about an election that didn't happen yet. And that's why
00:25:22.340He started building bombs years before the election that hadn't happened yet, and then when he decided to drop him, he was motivated by the troubles in Ireland, and he decided to drop him because he hated both parties.
00:25:30.900And like you said, they've got to be worried.
00:25:32.040I looked up the law firm he's got, and now that's linked up with other cases.
00:25:36.280I mean, they're going to tear the living hell out of the prosecution.
00:25:39.360Not only that, but over Friday last week, they dropped a filing from the government side, and they said, listen, you know, the government's case is solid,
00:25:48.060But also the defense is trying to lean on the fact that the same defendant, you know, defendant Brian Cole Jr.'s attorneys are also representing Steve Baker and the blaze and Joe Hanneman in a lawsuit for defamation.
00:26:00.380And so they're trying to use the Brian Cole case in the defense here to actually suss out information to defend against their other client's case, which is defamation.
00:26:08.460And they made this crazy claim, which is really wild.
00:26:10.560They said, you know, clearly this the CIA, whatever, the CIA police officer, she's a security officer there, didn't do anything wrong.
00:26:18.660And she was on her way home and she was actually you can't make this up to CIA.
00:26:23.600I mean, give me a break, folks. But but hear this part, because this is fun, Alex.
00:26:27.760In their filing, it was 28 pages long, basically defending that Shawnee Kirkhoff didn't do anything wrong.
00:26:33.160And she was on her way home and she's this great noble employee.
00:26:35.120And she was heading to her home in Falls Church and she was heading to where her boyfriend lives with her in Falls Church.
00:26:39.820and they were going to go and check out their puppy who's actually an old greyhound in Falls
00:26:44.340Church and she was going to get a wrap or a burrito and it was in Falls Church and she makes
00:26:48.260all they make all these claims and then you find out wait a minute it actually wasn't Falls Church
00:26:52.080they got it wrong because when you're trying to keep your lie straight you end up screwed it up
00:26:54.780on Monday morning they had to drop an emergency filing say hey you know we said Falls Church
00:26:58.820three times in our filing on Friday what we meant was Alexandria it was actually a totally different
00:27:02.540place because the burrito place is actually in Alexandria she was going to Alexandria and the
00:27:05.800house and the dog and the pictures of the dog are actually in Alexandria so sorry about the whole
00:27:09.420thing like we just got the wrong house you know because details don't matter when you make a 28
00:27:13.520page filing in the courts all of this stuff looks like it's just like it's sloppy it looks so let
00:27:18.560me ask you this we got a guest coming up i can talk to you all day what comes next in this because
00:27:23.260they're going to go ahead with trial with this and then what is that going to do in this poor
00:27:28.080black guy you already went into the door dash deliveries miles down the road they literally
00:27:33.320just went and found an autistic black guy to set up totally insane uh kyle seraphins our guest we'll
00:28:29.160I am just flabbergasted at the point we've got.
00:28:31.560Just in the last four minutes, five minutes we have, you're a smart guy.
00:28:34.280I mean, where do you see the republic at any way out of this and just the general 35,000-foot view with the midterm 60 days away and just Trump acting completely insane, the Democrats, a bunch of communists, Islamists?