The Anchormen Show with Matt Gaetz - October 06, 2020


Episode 103 - Fired for Being "Too American." Reporter Claims Covering North Korea is Safer than Covering the White House. Strippers Go Digital.


Episode Stats

Length

20 minutes

Words per Minute

159.06903

Word Count

3,194

Sentence Count

205

Misogynist Sentences

4

Hate Speech Sentences

4


Summary

The President's condition is improving, and he's back on the road to recovery. President Trump also tweets about the need to repeal Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects online platforms from liability for their speech and conduct.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Welcome to Hot Takes. I'm Congressman Matt Gaetz. Let's talk about the news.
00:00:21.100 The news is that the president's condition is improving. I'll let him give you his hot take.
00:00:26.480 Here's the president. I just left Walter Reed Medical Center and it's really something very
00:00:32.000 special. The doctors, the nurses, the first responders. And I learned so much about
00:00:37.660 coronavirus. And one thing that's for certain, don't let it dominate you. Don't be afraid of it.
00:00:46.620 You're going to beat it. We have the best medical equipment. We have the best medicines all developed
00:00:52.200 recently. And you're going to beat it. I went, I didn't feel so good. And two days ago, I could
00:00:58.160 have left two days ago. Two days ago, I felt great, like better than I have in a long time. I said just
00:01:02.760 recently, better than 20 years ago. Don't let it dominate. Don't let it take over your lives.
00:01:09.500 Don't let that happen. We have the greatest country in the world. We're going back. We're going back
00:01:14.220 to work. We're going to be out front. As your leader, I had to do that. I knew there's danger
00:01:18.560 to it, but I had to do it. I stood out front. I led. Nobody that's a leader would not do what I did.
00:01:27.320 And I know there's a risk. There's a danger, but that's okay. And now I'm better. And maybe I'm
00:01:32.680 immune. I don't know. But don't let it dominate your lives. Get out there. Be careful. We have the
00:01:39.280 best medicines in the world. And it all happened very shortly. And they're all getting approved.
00:01:43.860 And the vaccines are coming momentarily. Thank you very much. And Walter Reed,
00:01:50.180 what a group of people. Thank you very much. The president is also back contributing to
00:01:54.920 policy discussion, tweeting today, repeal 230. That's section 230 of the Communication Decency Act.
00:02:02.420 It's something that we've discussed on the podcast before that there's a lot of legislation around.
00:02:07.620 Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act gives liability protection
00:02:11.720 to major technology platforms so long as they are, in fact, neutral platforms. And those,
00:02:18.040 of course, are different liability protections that are given to publishers. You know, a publisher
00:02:22.820 would be considered your local newspaper or even Fox News or MSNBC or CNN. Matter of fact,
00:02:29.240 this podcast could be considered a publication, but it wouldn't be considered a platform. It's hosted
00:02:34.860 on Apple, which is a platform. Section 230 then cloaks these platforms from threats of lawsuits and other
00:02:44.480 liabilities that they might otherwise accrue. And the consequence of that is that they've been able
00:02:50.260 to grow very large and get a lot of market dominance and, in fact, divert from the mission
00:02:55.580 of a non-biased platform to one of a curator, a publisher. Look, Apple decides what podcasts you see
00:03:02.500 and don't see. If there's a particular viewpoint they don't like, they could suppress it. You know,
00:03:08.020 Amazon could determine what type of literature you should read or should not read. And they could
00:03:13.700 suppress or enhance certain types of content. And obviously, we see on social media like Facebook
00:03:20.040 and Twitter, the willingness to self, I guess, you know, appoint as the truth monitors, as the
00:03:29.380 hall monitors of mean tweets or those who would suppress your ability to see maybe a conflicting
00:03:37.060 viewpoint, someone who has an alternate perspective. And maybe it's right, maybe it's wrong, but should
00:03:43.500 people be able to make that decision for themselves or should the so-called unbiased platform, you know,
00:03:50.600 laid out, designated in Section 230, have the right to do that for you? So I'm glad the president is
00:03:57.420 taking a strong stand against these tech platforms. I think we need a lot more transparency. And it's
00:04:02.960 one of the things we worked on in the antitrust subcommittee. That brings me to the news of the
00:04:08.580 antitrust subcommittee. There is a report coming out from Chairman Cicilline that has major agreement
00:04:15.980 on findings from Ken Buck and myself, Doug Collins, there may be other Republicans that sign on to it.
00:04:22.840 But you have a bipartisan work product, a bipartisan agreement that there are practices that are
00:04:29.460 utilized by Amazon and Apple and Facebook and Google that are anti-competitive. And there are
00:04:38.140 options to deal with that from a legislative standpoint. I think that before you change the
00:04:43.540 law, you need good enforcement of the existing law. So I think that there's work that can be done at the
00:04:47.920 Department of Justice to ensure that there is compliance with an existing antitrust law and
00:04:54.400 also that there's sufficient transparency to demonstrate that these entities are in fact
00:04:58.600 non-biased platforms and that they aren't engaged in the other conduct from the report. So we'll post
00:05:03.600 links on our official Twitter to the Cicilline report, but joined in large part on the factual findings
00:05:10.660 with myself, Congressman Buck, Congressman Doug Collins, the former ranking member of the Judiciary
00:05:15.940 Committee, a now candidate for the U.S. Senate. And there may be other Republicans that sign on as
00:05:21.020 well. We'll certainly make mention of those on social media. Check it out.
00:05:28.840 How out-of-work strippers made their show virtual and are taking the power back. That's Medica Esther's
00:05:36.200 story in the Los Angeles Times. And the story comes from a strip club in Los Angeles called Jumbo's Clown Room.
00:05:45.500 And the ladies who worked there realized that no one was going to save their business, that the model
00:05:52.780 was pretty much over in the era of COVID. And then they created a website where they put their content
00:05:58.620 online and mixed their normal dancing activity with edgy social and political commentary. They have now
00:06:07.520 shared with this reporter that creating content online allows them to be more empowered, allows them
00:06:15.440 to make more money, it allows them to avoid some of the more seedy elements of the industry that
00:06:23.360 they're in, and direct to consumer, just like a lot of other businesses. So I'm not here to either
00:06:29.520 criticize or endorse anyone's decision to do this for a living. But I do think it is an interesting
00:06:36.660 commentary on how something pre-coronavirus can change in a way that actually empowers the worker
00:06:44.640 rather than the corporate entity, right? Like probably the guy who owns the strip club or gal who
00:06:49.880 owns it or whomever is not able to move the model as fast as the working class. And so is there a way
00:06:56.840 in other elements of our commerce and other elements of our life where being more direct, being more
00:07:02.660 digital, being more connected, allows us to be more empowered and more prosperous? Are there ways in
00:07:09.240 any of our jobs where we could think, you know, that that might be a commonality? I don't know.
00:07:12.700 That's why I thought the LA Times story was interesting. Check it out. Let me know what you think.
00:07:21.780 Quite the hot take from CBS White House reporter Ben Tracy, tweeting,
00:07:26.640 I feel safer reporting in North Korea than I currently do reporting at the White House.
00:07:32.100 This is just crazy. And then he added a tweet, for context, folks, this is in reference to the
00:07:38.580 COVID-19 outbreak at the White House. So we do understand that there has been a coronavirus
00:07:44.280 outbreak at the White House. But it seems worth noting that in North Korea, they actually kill
00:07:50.280 journalists who are critical of the administration as dissidents. That is not something that is comparable
00:07:56.460 that is not something that is acceptable. All of humankind should, I think, call North Korea to
00:08:03.200 have a free and open press. But they're nowhere near that. They have a state that literally puts
00:08:10.400 your life in danger and kills you. I think at the White House, while it's been a challenging
00:08:14.520 environment, and look, it's a very small environment. I've been over there to the White House. It is not
00:08:19.120 like this big, grand, large space when you really get in there to the offices and the press room. I mean,
00:08:24.700 the press reporting room is a very small, huddled up little area where a lot of those reporters are
00:08:30.100 working on their stories. And even the West Wing offices are not large. And the conference rooms are
00:08:35.580 not, you know, any larger than a conference room you might expect at a medium-sized law firm. But
00:08:40.860 they're august and important. But it is difficult at all times to social distance in the White House. So
00:08:47.100 we will see the president, I'm sure, taking every precaution now that he's back to feeling better.
00:08:54.240 But we also, I think, should calm down a little before suggesting that working in and around the
00:09:00.400 White House is anything tantamount to dealing with reporting in North Korea on a dictatorship
00:09:06.560 that kills reporters. The Wall Street Journal has the story, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell saying
00:09:16.920 the U.S. faces tragic risks for doing too little to support the U.S. economy. He claims the recovery
00:09:23.460 will be stronger and move faster if government spending supports the economy until it is clearly
00:09:28.940 out of the woods. The Federal Reserve Chairman then lays blame at the Congress and White House for not
00:09:35.080 reaching a deal to provide additional support to households and businesses disrupted by coronavirus.
00:09:41.620 Quote, the expansion is still far from complete, Mr. Powell said in remarks to be delivered at a
00:09:48.120 virtual economics conference on Tuesday. So the Fed has printed like $9 trillion as a consequence of
00:09:57.260 our coronavirus response. They have kept major businesses in the country afloat. They've kept the
00:10:03.700 airline industry operating to the extent that they have been, you know, with still a lot of job loss
00:10:10.460 there. And there is a call here, I think, to direct additional support, you know, to the people. And I
00:10:18.900 think also I would suggest to a lot of the small businesses who maybe don't have access to some of
00:10:24.560 those Fed programs that are intended for the largest businesses in the country. Essentially, there was
00:10:29.460 there was one program that was basically set up for for Boeing, GE, those types of very familiar
00:10:36.560 companies. And there are conservatives deeply concerned about what this says about how our
00:10:42.260 nation responds. And I think there are also those who say, well, look, we've printed $9 trillion and
00:10:50.220 the dollar is still the hottest in the world. I mean, the dollar is still very strong. We have not seen the type
00:10:57.060 of inflation impact. We've not seen the type of weakening of the dollar compared to other markets.
00:11:02.820 And I think it's because when you look around the world, you know, the euro having its problems,
00:11:07.340 having to deal with likely a protracted dispute over Britain's exit. And in fact, the EU, we saw some
00:11:15.000 reporting on this, even talking about litigating with Britain over their proposed exit without a deal
00:11:22.540 and they're not in compliance with with prior versions of the deal. And so you've got the euro
00:11:26.800 that's sort of a mess, you've got the structural debt problems in China, and in the Asian markets.
00:11:32.100 And so we've been able to print money to bridge our country through this unprecedented global pandemic.
00:11:40.300 And we've survived doing so. Now, I don't think that means that, you know, you just totally let go of
00:11:46.640 the reins and allow the American dollar to become funny money. I think we've got to make sure that we
00:11:51.860 utilize that which we've already appropriated and spent. I think that we also don't want to create
00:11:57.760 the type of moral hazard, where if state and local governments make bad decisions, then there really
00:12:03.500 are no consequences because every pandemic, every challenge will justify this big backfill. Well,
00:12:09.200 you know what that'll mean? State and local governments will make more bad financial decisions.
00:12:13.160 That's the whole concept of moral hazard. So it's my expectation that we will continue to see
00:12:18.840 a lot of posturing around this until the election. While the reauthorization of the Paycheck Protection
00:12:24.540 Act would be totally bipartisan and would pass overwhelmingly, Nancy Pelosi still refuses to
00:12:31.780 allow us to take a vote on that issue. And again, you know, this is one of the major critiques I have
00:12:36.320 with Congress. It's one of the reasons why Congress doesn't really get a whole lot done in America.
00:12:40.900 issues are not given the dignity of a separate vote, and they are all wrapped up in one gigantic deal
00:12:48.940 or not. And what that does is it empowers the deal makers at the expense of everyone else and their
00:12:54.940 constituents and the country and the sound logic that comes with decision making as a body as our
00:13:00.880 founders intended. I hope we can do better. Not optimistic before the election, and the Fed chairman
00:13:07.320 says could be consequences. Read about it in the Wall Street Journal.
00:13:14.380 We found this story on revolver.news originally reported in the New York Post. Man fired for being
00:13:21.640 too American, old, and wearing khakis. A former marketing executive was chastised by his bosses for
00:13:29.500 being too American, wearing khaki pants to work, and being old. According to an EEOC complaint,
00:13:37.320 the gentleman's name, Gray Hollett, he was at Boyden World Corporation, a high profile consulting and
00:13:44.380 talent acquisition firm. 61 years old was his age. And apparently, his nationality being American was
00:13:52.900 deemed something that was derogatory, that other people were attacking him on based on on this. And,
00:13:59.880 you know, in the complaint, Hollett said, I felt quite humiliated, a dad of two, and a Long Island native
00:14:05.560 who lives in Connecticut, of being criticized for his just normal, regular business attire. No one
00:14:12.500 should be criticized or ridiculed based on the color of their skin, their nation of origin, the language
00:14:19.020 that they speak. And I think that those protections should extend to everybody. We'll follow the case and
00:14:24.480 report back on any further hot takes. The election for president is very much underway. People are voting.
00:14:36.380 CBS4 Miami has the numbers. More than 571,000 Floridians have already cast ballots for the November
00:14:43.980 election. As Monday marked the final day residents could register to vote. As of Monday morning,
00:14:50.240 571,718 vote by mail ballots had been cast with 306,037 from Democrats and 157,924 from Republicans.
00:15:04.680 About another 100,000 or so have been cast from voters without party affiliation and about 6,500
00:15:11.140 from voters with minor party affiliation. Another 4.78 million ballots were mailed out but have not been
00:15:19.140 returned with more than 2.1 million going to Democrats and more than 1.5 million going to
00:15:25.060 Republicans. So Democrats have more vote by mail ballots out. They are returning them at a rate that
00:15:32.540 has them, you know, about 150, 140, 150,000 votes ahead of the Republicans. But again, those NPAs
00:15:42.900 in Florida, you know, a lot of those sort of break to the right. So it wouldn't surprise me if
00:15:47.860 Republicans were able to cut away at the edge with some of those. But no doubt, the numbers here
00:15:52.480 showing that Republicans are absolutely going to need a huge day on election day to win the state
00:15:57.800 of Florida. That huge election day has occurred in each of the last two elections, providing just
00:16:04.720 enough margin for Governor Ron DeSantis and Rick Scott, and providing about 130,000 vote margin for
00:16:11.500 Democrats. So this is the good news for Democrats. In Florida, the good news for Republicans is that they
00:16:16.520 have substantially closed the registration gap with Democrats, Democrats choosing not to do a lot of
00:16:21.980 door to door campaigning or voter registration. Instead, you're going more with a digital approach,
00:16:28.040 Republicans beat the pavement, got the voter registration in kind of cut the Democrats typical
00:16:33.360 advantage there. And so if Republicans are able to juice that election day turnout, this is sort of
00:16:37.600 setting up for them to be able to continue to prevail, unless the Democrats can continue to build the
00:16:42.960 types of margins and vote by mail that we see now that that are very favorable. Like I mean, look,
00:16:48.480 they have a bigger vote by mail margin now than Donald Trump won the election by in the state of
00:16:53.860 Florida back in 2016. So we'll keep watching the numbers and keep giving everybody the report from
00:16:59.480 the Sunshine State.
00:17:04.360 There's a CNBC story getting a lot of attention by Robert Frank, Biden defines $400,000 a year as wealthy,
00:17:11.860 here's what it buys in big cities. Democratic presidential candidate says that his tax hike
00:17:17.420 would only affect the wealthy. He defines the wealthy as those making more than $400,000 a year
00:17:22.520 by national measures. Those making $400,000 belong to a rarefied group. They represent the top 1.8%
00:17:29.820 of taxpayers earning about 25% of the nation's income. But and then this is the controversial part.
00:17:37.040 This is where CNBC is getting some flack on social media. They say, but according to a financial
00:17:42.660 planning analysis, families making $400,000 a year aren't exactly living large, especially in
00:17:49.360 major cities. And the report goes on to detail the fact that, you know, you've got a lot of family
00:17:54.840 incomes that would exceed that $400,000 threshold, but that there are a lot of expenses that a lot of
00:18:00.560 family have, you know, that are eaten up in things like school care, child care, you know, those are
00:18:07.440 those are major expenses for a lot of families. And they're also expenses that, you know, help families,
00:18:12.640 you know, grow stronger when you're able to actually provide like, you know, funds for education,
00:18:18.300 college education, you can save for that a lot of these middle, upper middle class families by CNBC's
00:18:23.940 labeling are making those financial accommodations. That said, you know, there are still far too many,
00:18:30.460 Americans, you know, who don't have a thousand dollars in their checking account and a major
00:18:34.780 medical event, a major change to someone's job status, you know, could really wipe somebody out
00:18:40.320 and change their life in a negative way forever. And so I think that, you know, there, there is this
00:18:45.120 divide, you know, the CNBC crowd apparently thinking, well, you know, 400,000, uh, that, that by a
00:18:52.680 statistical revenue and cost standpoint, doesn't necessarily put someone in the position to want to be
00:18:58.900 paying more taxes. Uh, and then you've got the folks saying on social media, well, that's a whole,
00:19:05.620 those are, those are the type of problems that I guess the 1.8 top percent of taxpayers have that
00:19:11.120 the rest of us wish we had. So I've never made $400,000 a year. If I made $400,000 a year, uh, I
00:19:16.820 would definitely, uh, not consider myself a part of the middle class. I would consider myself very,
00:19:21.900 very privileged and very blessed. Uh, but, uh, that hadn't been the case for me. Uh, anyway,
00:19:26.920 let me know what you think. Check out the CNBC report. Thanks so much for listening to today's
00:19:32.760 episode of hot takes. I'm Congressman Matt Gaetz. Give us a five-star rating, leave us a review,
00:19:38.240 let us know what you'd like to hear on the show and make sure to tune in tomorrow for more hot takes.
00:19:43.060 You're welcome.