Whistleblower testimony in the House Judiciary Committee reveals the extent to which political capture has taken over the FBI and as a consequence of that political capture, Americans were targeted by a weaponized government who never should have been targeted.
00:03:09.000Those are the three principal whistleblowers that we had today.
00:03:12.000Frankly, there were a lot more whistleblowers that we took testimony from and developed evidence from.
00:03:18.000But after Democrats and the mainstream media tried to smear them, ruin their lives, dox their kids,
00:03:25.000get their spouses fired from their work,
00:03:28.000even some of the brave people who brought us important information do not want to sit before Congress.
00:03:34.000So these three, I really, really appreciate their willingness to put themselves on the line to do what they know is right for their country.
00:03:41.000And it's probably not a coincidence. They're all really strong Christians.
00:03:45.000And there is a sense of durability with the Christian faith that we saw on display with these men.
00:03:51.000So I want to play you this first clip.
00:03:53.000This is five minutes I get focusing on the issues of targeting with Agent Friend
00:04:01.000and then focusing on some of the retaliation issues with Agent O'Boyle. Take a listen.
00:04:06.000So which Americans were being targeted?
00:04:12.000Now, August 20, August 2, 2022, a media organization attained a copy of a document
00:04:18.000which whistleblowers subsequently authenticated to the committee
00:04:21.000that is styled the FBI's domestic terrorism symbols guide on militia violent extremists.
00:04:28.000Mr. O'Boyle, are you generally familiar with that guide?
00:05:37.000And in the parking lot of a school board meeting where the FBI sent you, you were taking down information regarding people's license plates.
00:06:23.000And then you were in the parking lot of a school board meeting, taking down the information of parents.
00:06:29.000What happened to the cases that you were working to protect our communities from the worst predators that exist?
00:06:36.000I was told they were not to be resourced.
00:06:38.000And then after I was suspended, they were handed off to local law enforcement.
00:06:43.000Wow. So the FBI just decided it was more important to have you in that parking lot of that school board meeting than getting the worst of the worst away from people that they could harm.
00:08:35.000But what was it like when you had to go and explain to your wife that you didn't have coats for your children because the FBI wouldn't give them back to you?
00:09:06.000I never thought I'd have to accept charity in my life.
00:09:09.000I thought I would be able to take care of my family, but I'm grateful for everyone who has provided charity to me.
00:09:14.000That even includes a former colleague's church.
00:09:17.000I would name the church to give them recognition, but I'm too worried that the FBI would send informants to infiltrate that church as well.
00:09:24.000Yeah, well, they've already done that with the Catholics.
00:10:01.000And Patriot Mom on Getter wants to know why our domestic terrorism law enforcement assets are not being directed at Antifa and BLM
00:10:11.000and are instead directed at parents at school board meetings, traditional Catholics, anyone in Washington, D.C. on January 6th.
00:10:20.000Wait till I get to the January 6th stuff.
00:10:22.000You're not going to believe the revelations that we've been able to uncover.
00:10:26.000But first, you have to see how some of these Democrats reacted to the raw, sincere, and I thought very effective testimony of our whistleblowers.
00:10:36.000Linda Sanchez is a particularly odious member of the United States Congress.
00:10:40.000She's a Democrat who, at the congressional baseball game, ran by the Republican dugout and flipped her middle finger to the Republicans.
00:10:53.000So, she decides to utilize her time in this whistleblower hearing to try to smear Marcus Allen, one of the whistleblowers, and it ends humiliatingly for her.
00:17:33.000To which WFO said, we can't show you those videos unless you can tell us the exact time and place those individuals were inside the Capitol.
00:17:45.000And I was privy to these conversations firsthand.
00:17:47.000And why can't you show us, why can't you just send us, give us access to the 11,000 hours of video that's available?
00:17:56.000Because there may be, may be UC's undercover officers or CHS's confidential human sources on those videos whose identity we need to protect.
00:18:11.000So, Mr. Allen, you got retaliated against for the very thing, for saying the very thing that the Washington field office was telling Boston.
00:18:20.000When the Boston field office was saying, we're not going to go and investigate people that just showed up at a rally without sufficient criminal predicate.
00:18:28.000The Washington field office told Boston, well, you know what?
00:18:31.000We can't give you the evidence because it might disclose the very CI's and UC's that you are concerned about.
00:18:37.000But that doesn't surprise you, Mr. O'Boyle, does it?
00:18:42.000And the reason it doesn't surprise you is that in a different part of the country, you saw that same pressure from the Washington field office.
00:18:50.000And did they ever try to get you to do something that was outside the normal order of law enforcement activity?
00:19:24.000And so while I agree that January 6th was a violent day, a bad day, a day that nobody wants to relive, violence on January 6th doesn't justify weaponizing the government against people who were innocent and did nothing wrong.
00:19:37.000Thank you for blowing the whistle on that.
00:19:43.000Homey girl on Rumble says it is time to impeach Christopher Wray.
00:19:47.000I would not want to make the Wray impeachment defense argument, certainly not after we saw how these whistleblowers were treated and just the underlying bad conduct that has permeated Christopher Wray's entire tenure at the FBI.
00:20:12.000Think about what you just heard there from George Hill.
00:20:15.000They wanted the Washington field office to provide videos if the Washington field office wanted Boston to go open up criminal cases on people who allegedly were in Washington, D.C.
00:20:28.000or at the Capitol or committing crimes on January 6th.
00:20:31.000And when the Boston field office said, OK, well, like, give us the video for that.
00:20:35.000The Washington field office replied, we can't give you the video because it may expose confidential human sources and undercover federal agents.
00:20:45.000This is what we've been saying the whole time.
00:20:49.000That there were elements of the events of January 6th that included federal assets woven into some of these groups.
00:20:59.000And we're still investigating the extent to which any of those federal assets increased the level of criminal acuity.
00:21:11.000And, like, think about the arrogance of the Washington field office to tell these guys in Boston, hey, we want you to go put down the shoe leather to go and chase down a bunch of J6 subjects.
00:21:23.000But we don't trust you enough to give you the videos that might include our undercover officers and our confidential human sources.
00:21:46.000And it's one of the reasons I think they came forward.
00:21:48.000Now, it wasn't just George Hill who raised concern about videos seemingly showing people trapped unwittingly into some technical violation of trespassing law.
00:22:05.000The video, to me, indicated potential problems with the investigation as far as informants were concerned and our organization's potential forthrightness about utilization of informants there on that day.
00:22:26.000That might have some impact on our cases and, you know, the subjects that we were looking up.
00:22:33.000And then just a general awareness overall for the investigation as a whole, that there might have been some kind of potential federal involvement with the activities on January 6th.
00:22:45.000And I thought it was important enough that it, like, wanted our attention.
00:22:52.000Yeah, Marcus Allen is an analyst when there's video that shows that something ain't right, that there's a scaffold commander yelling at people to get in the Capitol, that there's this guy, Ray Epps, who appears to be like the Forrest Gump of January 6th, popping up at every key moment, that there's all kind of activity with the barricades that were seemingly taken down as folks were walking around the Capitol complex.
00:23:22.000So, it's really something that those videos weren't analyzed further, but at least there were people like Marcus Allen saying, we've got to take a closer look at these things.
00:23:30.900And for him just raising that prospect, not defending the January 6th subjects, not siding with some sort of spirit of insurrection, that's always the word that Adam Schiff and Jamie Raskin like to misapply.
00:23:47.560No, he just wanted people to be aware, and for that, he was revoked from his security clearance, suspended from his job, left without pay, and unable to get outside employment, because he's still technically an FBI employee, even though he's not getting paid, unable to make a living for his family for a year.
00:24:10.760Remember, that's Marcus Allen, American patriot, whistleblower, targeted by a weaponized Biden government.
00:24:18.600Gerardo Boyle also talked about this dynamic where the Washington field office wanted to create the sense that there was this great eruption of domestic terrorism and extremism all over the country as a consequence of January 6th,
00:24:32.760when the reality is the January 6th matter should have been one matter, if a matter at all, and if they wanted to evaluate subjects within that, those would be subjects within one matter,
00:24:43.300but instead, so that they could act as though there's this great threat of racism and white supremacy and extremism,
00:24:51.680they cooked the books and had individual cases open on each of these individual folks who they wanted to target.
00:24:58.180Garrett O. Boyle brought attention to that ridiculousness. Take a listen.
00:25:06.280As a DT agent, I encountered similar stat padding or case bolstering.
00:25:14.860Truth be told, it was one case, but the FBI had me open up four different cases,
00:25:20.340because they had me open a case for every individual that I had an articulable factual basis that there may have been potential federal law being violated.
00:25:33.240Or like on a criminal case, say you're working like a gang, which this case was, I guess, like a militia.
00:25:38.980If you're working like a gang, you have a case open on the gang, and you have a sub-file for each person in it.
00:25:46.840Like, you know, John Doe 1, 2, and 3, they all have their own sub-file.
00:25:51.880Or in my case, John Doe 1, 2, 3, and 4 all had their own separate case,
00:25:57.180because then the FBI can, from my perspective, the FBI can come back to Congress and say,
00:26:01.900look at all the domestic terrorism we've investigated, where really I was working one case.
00:26:06.900But the FBI can then say, well, he actually had four.
00:26:10.480And so we, you know, we need you to give us more money, because look at how big of a threat all this domestic terrorism is.
00:26:18.740That is an astonishing clip, because so many of these joint terrorism task forces
00:26:24.460were originally given resources and authorities to fight terrorists abroad,
00:26:29.500to go after radical Islamic extremists who wanted to destroy America.
00:26:35.880And over time, as Eric Holder and Barack Obama were converting the Department of Justice
00:26:42.440into a left-wing enforcement operation,
00:26:46.880well, then you saw the inward turning of many of those resources and authorities,
00:26:51.800and they were no longer going after Osama bin Laden or al-Baghdadi overseas.
00:26:57.200They were trying to say that your neighbor is a domestic terrorist because they fly a Trump flag
00:27:01.500and have a Make America Great Again hat.