Episode 136 LIVE： Santos Expelled – Firebrand with Matt Gaetz
Episode Stats
Words per minute
148.26009
Harmful content
Misogyny
5
sentences flagged
Toxicity
8
sentences flagged
Hate speech
5
sentences flagged
Summary
On a historic day, Congressman George Santos of New York s Third District was expelled from the United States Congress by a more than two-thirds vote. We break down the arguments, who voted each way, and what it means for the House of Representatives.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
matt gates the biggest firebrand inside of the house of representatives you're not taking matt
00:00:08.360
gates off the board okay because matt gates is an american patriot and matt gates is an american
00:00:13.680
hero we will not continue to allow the uniparty to run this town without a fight i want to thank you
1.00
00:00:21.240
matt gates for holding the line matt gates is a courageous man if we had hundreds of matt gates
00:00:28.260
in dc the country turns around it's that simple he's so tough he's so strong he's smart and he
00:00:35.020
loves this country matt gates it is the honor of my life to fight alongside each and every one of you
00:00:42.820
we will save america it's choose your fighter time send in the firebrands
0.76
00:00:48.580
welcome back to firebrand we are broadcasting live out of room 2021 of the rayburn house office
00:01:00.080
building on the capitol complex in washington dc on a historic day when congressman george santos of
00:01:06.720
new york's third district was expelled from the united states congress by more than two-thirds vote
00:01:11.520
we're going to break down the arguments who voted each way and what it means for the house of
00:01:16.340
representatives this effort was spearheaded by anthony d'esposito someone who has not yet served
00:01:22.620
his first full year in the united states congress but somehow felt the need to set new precedent by
00:01:28.500
advancing this expulsion and uh you had really uh quite the debate high emotions and for all the time
00:01:38.300
that the united states congress has existed there's been pretty clear benchmarks as to what it takes
00:01:43.340
to muster an expulsion and congressman d'esposito again not having served his first full year here
00:01:49.860
believed it was upon him to set a new standard the d'esposito standard for due process and here is
00:01:57.400
that brazen and that brazen admission take a listen the american people expect us to do the right thing
00:02:06.200
the american people are watching for us to do the right thing and if we have an opportunity
00:02:12.640
in this great institution to start a new precedent one that means we hold members of the house of
00:02:22.140
representatives to a higher standard well ladies and gentlemen i'm pretty confident that the american
00:02:28.600
people would applaud that i'm pretty confident that the american people expect that and i hope that
00:02:35.300
tomorrow in this great chamber we set that precedent mr speaker we set a precedent that we as members
00:02:44.360
of america's oldest institution are held to a higher standard
00:02:49.380
i guess we are all so fortunate that we have anthony d'esposito to set the higher standard for all of us
00:02:58.360
but is it a higher standard when you lower due process i had debate in response to congressman d'esposito
00:03:06.640
that i offered on the floor take a listen i'd like to yield as much time as uh he may consume my
00:03:13.920
colleague from florida mr gates gentleman from florida is recognized i do not believe that the long
00:03:19.420
island crew is acting in bad faith just exceedingly bad judgment and here's why since the beginning of
00:03:27.000
this congress there's only two ways you get expelled you get convicted of a crime or you participated in
00:03:34.740
the civil war neither apply to george santos and so i rise not to defend george santos whoever he is
00:03:44.660
but to defend the very precedent that my colleagues are willing to shatter now let's speak to due process
00:03:53.360
mr santos hasn't been convicted of anything but we haven't even moved to expel the people who have
00:04:01.860
mr bowman pled guilty to a misdemeanor for his little fire alarm stunt weeks ago so like while the ethics
00:04:10.520
committee is marching to throw george santos out of congress they take no action as to someone who
00:04:15.640
actually pled guilty to a crime what's that all about and then there's all this talk about well
00:04:20.740
he could have come and testified to the ethics committee and he didn't so he had his due process
00:04:25.780
but that belies the fact that he faces a trial and had mr santos testified before the ethics committee
00:04:32.340
an argument could have been made that he waived any of his rights that he would have had at trial
00:04:37.720
that any american would enjoy so it was a it was a procedural double bind that shouldn't be held
00:04:43.580
against mr santos as some sort of adverse inference let's also talk about this precedent the fact
00:04:50.900
pattern as to mr santos is remarkably similar to the fact pattern of former representative duncan hunter
00:04:57.700
duncan hunter used campaign money on girlfriends and trips and home improvements and all sorts of personal
00:05:04.940
lavishes he was indicted for those crimes and continued to serve in congress he pled guilty
00:05:11.300
to a number of those crimes and continued to serve in congress he was in congress for like
00:05:16.880
an additional pay period after having pled guilty to the very same things that were that mr santos has been
00:05:24.960
indicted for and so i think it's it's persuasive to me that mr higgins and mr nell's two law enforcement
00:05:31.220
officials with sterling reputations are here not necessarily to defend mr santos but to defend
00:05:37.660
this precedent and this due process that is being shattered and i was struck when the author of this
00:05:43.500
resolution said the quiet part out loud he didn't try to shoehorn the expulsion of george santos
00:05:49.900
into some existing construct or precedent he said yep we're making a whole new precedent
00:05:56.220
we're making whole new rules right now but he defends that by saying that the new rules are better
00:06:02.900
that it's a higher standard so we should just throw away everything that's happened from the first
00:06:08.020
congress to the 118th because the new precedent is more robust the problem is it's a lower standard for
00:06:13.860
due process without merit mr speaker whatever mr santos did with botox or only fans is far less
00:06:25.440
concerning to me than the indictment against senator menendez who's holding gold bars inscribed with
00:06:33.160
arabic on them from egypt while he is still getting classified briefings today but he's not getting
00:06:40.540
thrown out of the senate he's getting classified briefings under indictment for bribery but whoa what
00:06:46.860
because because santos was was buying botox and only fans we got to throw him out
00:06:51.020
if george santos is convicted he ought to be expelled but until then it is an incredibly
00:06:59.880
dangerous thing for people in washington dc to substitute their judgment for the judgment of
00:07:07.540
voters winston churchill said that you know in in a democracy people get the government that they
00:07:14.760
deserve well the people of mr santos's district elected him and like this is not some district
00:07:20.880
in rural mississippi with like one newspaper this is new york city and george santos rolls in there
00:07:28.420
wins and you know what it's between him and his voters him and the justice system and the fact that
00:07:34.600
the ethics committee has done this incredible violation of precedent will do grave damage to this
00:07:41.380
institution for many years to come because now there is no requirement of any conviction there is a
00:07:47.520
departure from the precedent from the duncan hunter matter and many others and i i fear what that
00:07:53.000
may indicate lies ahead for the future of due process in the house of representatives i yield back
00:07:58.980
there is no standard anymore for expulsion if the standard was conviction of a criminal violation
00:08:09.420
then jamal bowman would have been subject to expulsion but congressman jamal bowman after his
00:08:16.200
fire alarm stunt didn't even have a single adverse action against him by the ethics committee that's
00:08:23.800
right the matter of jamal bowman was referred to the ethics committee and the ethics committee said
00:08:30.180
nothing to see here we declined to take any action against someone who pled guilty to a crime
00:08:37.180
so that's not the standard is the standard lying george santos told lies so we've got to throw him out
00:08:45.600
if we're throwing out every liar in congress we can get rid of a lot of the seats on the house floor
00:08:50.840
and by the way on the live stream you seem to take particular note of the fact that if we're throwing
00:08:56.420
out liars why don't we start with adam schiff not george santos and what if it's just we throw out people
00:09:04.460
we don't like how about rashida talib you see all of this is crazy there was a standard that held for
00:09:12.940
hundreds of years but some new york freshmen who've been here for all of 11 months decide it's upon
0.83
00:09:20.580
them to set a new precedent a higher precedent how foolish how short-sighted it's important to note
00:09:30.060
this is not on mike johnson so some of you have asked me well if this was something that we shouldn't
0.72
00:09:36.100
have done if it was something speaker mike johnson was against then why did mike johnson allow the vote to
00:09:42.140
come to the floor and as we've discussed kind of the intricacies of procedure on this program when
00:09:48.340
there are certain matters by house rule that are privileged which means they don't require the
00:09:55.860
consent of either party's leadership or the floor managers or the leaders the speaker to have a vote
00:10:02.580
any member can force a vote on something that is privileged and i gotta say i don't disagree with
00:10:11.080
that paradigm because i've used it quite frequently i use the privilege of one member to force votes on
00:10:18.540
where we ought to have u.s troops marjorie taylor green and i have used the privilege to try to advance
00:10:25.960
impeachments that we think need to be voted on for people like mayorkas and i think perhaps
00:10:33.000
considerably more folks within the biden administration joe biden himself
00:10:37.220
you also have privilege to remove a speaker and so we don't disagree with the concept that any member
00:10:48.200
should have privilege to bring certain things to the floor but it's important when you're trying
00:10:53.960
to assess who is accountable for this foolishness to not visit that on house speaker mike johnson
00:11:00.040
santos has been expelled the governor of new york has been notified there'll be a special election
00:11:07.960
and let me just break down the math for you practically and what this means republicans had
00:11:15.940
a four-seat majority okay expel santos that's a three-seat majority congressman bill johnson of ohio
00:11:25.680
he's taking a job to be president of youngstown state no one can blame him for that kind of a dream
00:11:31.360
job now it's a two-seat majority every photograph of kevin mccarthy's offices indicate that he's packing
00:11:39.860
up and i don't think it's just for the holiday break so if mccarthy departs now you're down to a one-seat
00:11:46.260
majority do you know how many octogenarians we have in the republican conference like god forbid
0.87
00:11:53.960
any of them were to take their last breath this action unprecedented would be the reason
00:12:02.940
democrats could take control of the house of representatives so the math is very very important
00:12:09.340
there was uh there was more stirring debate more hypocrisy that i want to showcase for you
00:12:15.520
this was an exchange between ohio congressman max miller and george santos and just for for background
00:12:22.740
here congressman miller previously served in the trump white house and had a romantic relationship
00:12:30.080
with stephanie grisham stephanie grisham then wrote a book saying that max miller used to beat her
1.00
00:12:36.300
i don't think max miller beat anyone i don't know but i don't jump to conclusions based on allegations
00:12:45.800
i've lived too much life and gone through too much to pass judgment just on the face of allegations in
00:12:52.780
the absence of evidence but max miller and george santos had quite the testy exchange on the house
00:12:59.360
i myself have been a victim of george santos and as well as other members of congress in terms of
00:13:06.540
defrauding through public donations i had received an ethics complaint from the fec which i had to spend
00:13:10.940
tens of thousands to defend myself you sir are a crook i know i should direct my comments to the
0.80
00:13:15.360
chair i yield back gentlemen gentlemen's time has expired uh gentlemen from new york mr santos is
00:13:24.580
recognized i'd like to move to have the gentleman from ohio's word stricken from the record please
00:13:28.440
gentleman's request is not timely but i would remind members to direct their remarks to the
00:13:46.220
hypocrisy as i mentioned my colleague wants to come up here call me a crook
0.91
00:13:56.140
same colleague who's accused of being a woman beater are we are we really going to ignore the
0.66
00:14:04.260
facts that we all have passed and we all have the media coming out against us on a daily basis
00:14:09.880
we're back live and a lot of you are asking about senator menendez you on the live stream are
00:14:19.780
very very upset about the fact that bob menendez is caught with these gold bars from egypt while he
00:14:29.860
was the chairman of the senate foreign relations committee and he's still in the senate getting
00:14:35.860
these classified briefings and yet george santos is expelled and here's something quite rich a tweet
00:14:42.300
that we get from olivia beavers of politico who notes that senator menendez's son who serves in the
00:14:52.260
house of representatives actually voted to expel george santos so someone should ask representative
00:15:00.420
menendez if he believes that allegations alone justify removal and guess what it looks like he does
00:15:08.940
that's what his voting card says would he vote to remove his own father maybe we ought to have a
00:15:15.600
sense of congress that senator menendez shouldn't be serving in the senate put that up and see how
00:15:21.460
representative menendez votes on it and and what it again it goes back to the point i made at the top
00:15:26.760
of this report there is no standard there is no bright line it's now a function of your popularity in
00:15:35.780
congress and that that is so beneath the dignity of this institution so who did it what republicans
00:15:46.000
joined with democrats to weaken our majority to erode precedent and due process because they had to
00:15:54.620
expel george santos 105 of them let's put those up let's put those names up i'm going to leave them up
00:16:02.760
so that you have an opportunity to see the 105 republicans who think it's better to set a new
00:16:10.960
precedent and diminish the important due process that our nation is founded on and and there are there
00:16:17.760
are a few names here that are particularly interesting to me because four of the people who voted to expel
00:16:27.480
george santos from congress stood in the way of impeachment of mayorkas
00:16:35.360
those representatives would be cliff bentz of oregon virginia fox of north carolina mr duarte of
00:16:44.580
california and mr buck of colorado those four members sought fit to expel santos but protect
00:16:53.500
mayorkas that is a tough tough sell that's bens buck duarte and fox
00:17:00.660
no impeachment for mayorkas but expulsion for george santos unreal uh there was also activity
00:17:11.580
in the senate that was bizarre and weird this week that i want you to be able to see now the senate of
00:17:17.760
course has the advice and consent function in the constitution for federal nominees to the bench
00:17:24.260
to article three courts so the judiciary committee spends a lot of time in the senate going over who
00:17:29.360
the president is nominated to serve on one bench or another they debate they discuss sometimes i refer
00:17:35.540
to the senate as the house of lords they have they have no real time constraint when they're on the floor
00:17:42.780
they call themselves the most exclusive club in the world the most deliberative body in the world
00:17:49.700
senator dick durbin of illinois is the chairman of the senate judiciary committee and just remarkably
00:17:58.680
he started moving to votes in the absence of full robust and complete debate on the nominees
00:18:08.420
usually the senate is viewed as the collegial body right they're the saucer that cools the tea
00:18:17.040
see if this looks deliberative to you take a listen
00:18:21.280
mr chairman mr chairman don't we get the opportunity to speak we're in a roll call
00:18:29.440
so you're telling us to shut up even though multiple members you want us to shut up is that what you're
00:18:35.980
saying a lot of people didn't speak on the two nominees before we've done i would you raise your
00:18:41.280
hand if you did not speak i did not have a chance to speak senator blackburn had a chance to speak
00:18:48.400
we've got several folks mr chairman who didn't have a chance to speak we want to tell you again why
00:18:53.880
these nominees are awful mr wells or in senator corin's case tell you for the first time you're just
00:19:02.700
going to sit there and ignore us i'm waiting to be heard on the nominee i've requested several
00:19:09.500
times to be heard on the nominee so now i guess senator durbin's not going to allow women to speak
00:19:15.540
either i thought that was sacrosanct in your party next is judge yumi lee nominated to the u.s
0.77
00:19:20.660
district court for the mr chairman who has not been allowed to speak on that mr chairman you just
00:19:26.600
destroyed yeah one of the most important committees in the united states senate chair would and you
00:19:34.760
set a precedent the chair will be repeated every time one party or the other takes advantage and
00:19:41.340
takes the low road it sets a precedent that will then be come the norm congratulations on destroying
00:19:49.520
the united states senate judiciary committee up next to judge yumi lee nominated to the u.s district court
0.97
00:19:55.200
who has not spoken on this nominee i don't know what drives this dick i really don't mr chairman
0.96
00:20:02.740
is it you driving it or is it your staff driving this this is completely inappropriate not to let us
0.98
00:20:11.380
be heard on these nominations and you know that yes senators don't really like it when you cut them
00:20:20.500
off and don't give them the opportunity to give remarks but it begs the question what about the
00:20:26.140
debate from lindsey graham or senator cornyn or senator blackburn was like so concerning to dick durbin
00:20:33.760
that he didn't want to hear it i know one thing dick durbin didn't want to have happen and marsha
00:20:40.340
blackburn was was pretty sharp on this point so you've got a real move in the senate to try to discredit
00:20:47.620
the supreme court right now they don't like the decisions that have come out of the supreme court
00:20:52.160
with trump having fundamentally remade the court and decisions starting to align with originalism
00:20:58.520
through through the work that they're doing and the decisions that are coming out so they want to
00:21:03.420
discredit the court and they've really put a target on clarence thomas we've talked about that a lot on
00:21:09.920
the program and so they're sending out all these subpoenas all of these demands to try to just kind
00:21:18.320
of rough up smear and imperil the court and so senator blackburn marsha blackburn out of tennessee she's
1.00
00:21:25.900
really one of my favorites over there she's a firecracker and she thought well if we're sending
1.00
00:21:31.820
out subpoenas how about we send some out for the epstein flight logs how about get that information
00:21:39.320
senator durbin how about the judiciary committee be more worried about who was flying around with
00:21:45.060
epstein rather than who was flying around with clarence thomas here's how that went take a listen
00:21:50.660
and since we're in the business of issuing subpoenas now here are a few more that i've filed
00:22:00.600
a subpoena to jeffrey epstein's estate to provide the flight logs for his private plane given the
00:22:08.820
numerous allegations of human trafficking and a sexual abuse surrounding mr epstein i think it is
00:22:17.980
very important that we identify everybody that was on that plane and how many trips they took on that
00:22:26.440
plane and the destinations to which they arrived so senator blackburn made that request and senator
00:22:36.820
durbin blocked it blocked the request to send a subpoena for the epstein flight logs you have to
00:22:44.360
wonder why you see the democrats don't like when republicans like senator blackburn punch back and she
00:22:51.400
did effectively and sometimes you you really reveal more about how these folks are thinking
00:22:57.400
by what they're willing to imperil rather than what they're willing to advance incredibly revealing now
00:23:03.200
i saw that on the gateway pundit a website that i read they do breaking news they do investigative
00:23:11.500
reporting they do opinion pieces they publish op-eds the gateway pundit is a great website it's a great
00:23:19.420
source for analysis and information and opinion well we went back to harvest the clip to show you on
00:23:28.440
this program from the gateway pundit and i have breaking news for you the united states house of
00:23:34.700
representatives has blocked access for congressmen and congressional staff to the gateway pundit that's
00:23:41.680
right if you try to go to the gateway pundit the website is blocked according to house of
00:23:47.620
representatives policy so we're going to fix that i don't know who thought that was an appropriate
00:23:53.880
action but we're going to get to the bottom of it i'm going to be speaking with the house
00:23:58.760
administration committee chairman style speaker of the house if necessary we're not going to have the
00:24:05.300
house censoring our access to conservative news into conservative analysis speaking of blocking
00:24:13.120
access to information that is the story of what's going on with unidentified aerial phenomenon right
00:24:20.080
now we've had congressman tim birchett of tennessee on the program before to talk about uaps ufos
00:24:27.620
and right now we're in the process of negotiating the national defense authorization act and we are
00:24:34.720
trying to get provisions into that bill that require the dod and the cia and the faa and the nsa and the
00:24:41.760
fbi and state and local authorities to get this information available for review by members of
00:24:48.760
congress and ultimately the american people the government has been holding secrets for too long
00:24:54.680
on uaps and i'm not here to tell you that they're little green men witnesses have told us that witnesses
00:25:02.800
have talked about biologics that are non-human that are not of earth origin whistleblowers have come
00:25:10.320
forward from the cia to talk about aircraft that have been recovered but i'm about the facts and the
00:25:18.800
evidence i'm a lawyer by trade so just as in the santos matter allegations alone are insufficient but
00:25:27.840
when we see the allegations and then we try to do the investigation to find out okay is this you know some
00:25:34.240
debris is this a foreign adversary is it something even more concerning and nefarious all we get is
0.71
00:25:41.200
the runaround well a few of us had had enough we had a bipartisan press conference to go over what
00:25:48.320
we were doing to try to get answers take a listen we are here today because all of the whistleblowers
00:25:57.600
the hearings the investigations the discussions the work that we have done have culminated in a
00:26:03.200
negotiation that is happening in real time right now over the national defense authorization act a
00:26:09.760
piece of legislation i care deeply about as a member of the house armed services committee
00:26:14.240
and in that negotiation we are fortunate that the amendment congressman birchett offered to the house
00:26:20.560
version of the ndaa provides a beachhead for us to be able to get the answers and to be able to
00:26:27.120
demand the transparency that is necessary it is insufficient though to seek this transparency
00:26:33.920
from the department of defense alone we have to have cooperation so that title 50 authorities through
00:26:41.200
the intelligence community are also subject to review that the faa the nsa the fbi even state and local
00:26:49.680
authorities that have information are able to have that catalogued assessed and then put out before the
00:26:56.080
public it is my belief that the birchett amendment is the strongest position uh when when coupled with
00:27:03.920
the additional authorities and additional agencies that i've just mentioned in order to be able to get to
00:27:10.080
that productive result unfortunately we have members of the house intelligence committee and the senate armed
00:27:16.800
services committee who right now are frustrating the effort that we are putting forward in order to be able to
00:27:24.080
to obtain the information and to move forward i think it is productive that senator schumer has engaged
00:27:30.400
on this issue he's not an insignificant person in this town but i am concerned about embracing a disclosure
00:27:39.040
paradigm that mirrors the jfk assassination disclosure paradigm i don't know that there are any americans
00:27:47.520
who would view the jfk assassination disclosure paradigm as some sort of vaulted standard time and again we've
00:27:55.600
seen that that system fail i also don't believe that pursuant to the schumer language we would have to wait 25
00:28:02.880
years in order to get this information 25 years is a long time when you consider what mr birchett said
00:28:09.600
about the uh the uh the lack of of veracity that the government has provided to the people up into this
00:28:16.560
point and so we're here to call for the most inclusive most robust provisions possible to be included in the
00:28:24.880
ndaa we don't want to see a lot of log jams created and in the event that there's any designation of a national
00:28:34.320
security concern regarding disclosure we believe that this information can no longer be siloed with
00:28:41.520
the entities that have frustrated disclosure that there should be broader briefings to members of
00:28:47.040
congress that the oversight committee which many of my colleagues here serve on should be receiving
00:28:52.320
those briefings that the armed services committee should be receiving those briefings and it should
00:28:56.320
not just be the fiefdom of the intelligence committee and uh the intelligence community and if we
00:29:02.720
achieve that objective i think we can start to restore some of the trust the public has but as we
00:29:08.000
work through the finer points of that legislation we felt it was important today to come forward and
00:29:13.120
express where the log jams exist where the opportunities lay before us and we will pursue those with great
00:29:19.680
vigor i also wanted to specifically thank house armed services chairman mike rogers he allowed the
00:29:26.320
birchett amendment to go on the bill without objection and i think he is to be commended for that
00:29:31.520
and also when uh my my colleagues uh miss luna and mr birchin and i were at an air force base and
00:29:37.920
were told by air force officials that we weren't allowed to see information that whistleblowers had
00:29:44.160
expressed to us existed it was in fact chairman rogers himself who personally engaged with the office of
00:29:50.560
the secretary of defense and gave us the opportunity to view the images that were taken by pilots of some of
00:29:59.040
these unidentified aerial phenomenon so uh work to be done but we hope that this gives you clarity as
00:30:05.520
to what our goals are how the scope and depth of uh of the mission ahead
00:30:12.480
we are back live and uh that was congresswoman anna paulina luna standing behind me in retro on youtube
00:30:18.400
says she makes plaid look good quite quite the observation so we often share information with you about how the
00:30:27.760
government works with private companies to go around your fourth amendment rights and it's
00:30:32.880
too often that i have to report to you time and time again of these egregious examples of federal
00:30:39.280
government malfeasance you are not going to believe what the federal government has been up to
00:30:45.360
with at&t and this time senator wyden a democrat from oregon seems to have stumbled on a real big
00:30:54.720
violation of civil liberties it's called the hemisphere project man if that doesn't sound like the name of
00:31:01.920
some sort of bond villains evil like project i do not know what does so apparently the hemisphere project
00:31:09.360
is a program where the white house office of national drug control policy pays at&t to provide all
00:31:18.800
federal state local and tribal law enforcement agencies with the ability to request searches
00:31:24.640
of trillions of domestic phone records dating back to at least 1987 plus the four billion call records
00:31:34.560
that are added every single day senator wyden thinks that these searches are usually occurring without
00:31:40.400
warrants that is awful but not entirely unbelievable when you look at the faiza abuses that our own
00:31:46.400
government's engaged in so at&t of course claims that any of this information would have been
00:31:51.760
compelled by a subpoena warrant or court order but it's hard to know who to believe the dea of course
00:31:59.120
can issue subpoenas even without the need of courts what we do know is that hemisphere is not subject
00:32:06.720
to a federal privacy impact assessment due to how it's being funded apparently the white house provides a
00:32:12.880
grant to the houston high intensity drug trafficking area which is a partnership between federal state
00:32:18.720
and local law enforcement agencies and then this partnership in turn pays at&t to operate its
00:32:26.960
surveillance scheme potentially outside of the bounds of the constitution now if hemisphere were subject
00:32:35.360
to a federal privacy impact assessment that would mean the public would be able to see a report
00:32:40.880
that includes how any analysis of personally identifiable information is handled a federal privacy
00:32:48.800
impact assessment is both an analysis and a document detailing the the outcomes and the impacts of course
00:32:58.480
but we'll never see such a document because the feds are trying to keep all of this very hush-hush
00:33:04.080
hemisphere is also not subject to the freedom of information act because the justice department has
00:33:10.720
labeled the program and its documents all law enforcement sensitive this designation prevents the documents
00:33:18.240
from being publicly released so they really don't want you to know what's going on behind the scenes
00:33:24.640
senator wyden's law enforcement source a whistleblower has called hemisphere google on steroids and it appears
00:33:32.080
that hemisphere can pull in phone records of everyone who communicated with the target of an investigation
00:33:39.040
that is a huge net and at&t is quite literally casting that net for the feds
00:33:48.160
the white house is dodging having to explain the ins and outs of the program and my guess is that's
00:33:53.280
because they'd have a hard time explaining it to the courts to the american people and as we continue to
00:33:59.680
investigate we'll learn more about this suspect program and we'll see just what big brother is trying to hide from us
00:34:07.040
the federal intelligence apparatus has morphed into a complete and total police state instead of
00:34:14.240
respecting the spirit of the fourth amendment they're working overtime to try to go around it undermine it
00:34:20.880
get private companies to do what they couldn't do directly but then they pay those private companies
00:34:26.160
congress has to put a stop to this and hold the government accountable to the people that's exactly
00:34:33.360
what i plan to do as we move forward with this investigation and senator wyden should be commended for
00:34:39.120
his work and his development of the whistleblower who has brought this forward i also want to give you a
00:34:45.760
key update regarding the border we get this report from the daily caller texas border sector at 169
00:34:54.000
migrant capacity uh the border patrol nationwide has about 20 000 migrants in their custody
00:35:01.520
the arizona tucson sector 175 capacity nationwide the capacity is just absolutely brimming now you know what i
00:35:10.880
think about the border detain or remove detain or remove if we don't have a bed for somebody
00:35:19.520
then they need to go home they need to be rejected at the border of course that's not what the biden
00:35:24.960
administration is doing they they just want more money to process more people into the country and
00:35:31.280
they think that's the sweetener to give conservatives to get us to vote for more money for ukraine which is
00:35:37.680
crazy i will never do that write it down you have my commitment the final story i want to update you
00:35:44.960
on this comes from newsweek seth rich's laptop to be turned over to the fbi a judge has ordered the fbi
00:35:52.880
to turn over the laptop of murdered democrat staffer seth rich rich was killed on july 10 2016 while making
00:36:01.280
his way home in washington dc and in this case it appears as though the records on that laptop have
00:36:11.280
not yet been uncovered and they want to get to the bottom of it rich's death sparked a wave of conspiracy
00:36:20.640
theories claiming he was responsible for publicly leaking thousands of dnc emails this according to newsweek
00:36:28.640
but are they conspiracy theories i guess we'll find out one person's you know there's there's an
00:36:33.600
interesting cycle in washington right first it's a conspiracy theory then it's russian disinformation
00:36:40.640
then it's true but not that big a deal and then it's a basis to go and target prosecute defame
00:36:46.880
conservatives well a lot of people have been trying to get to the bottom of the seth rich thing for a
00:36:51.600
while and i think that requiring this laptop to be turned over might give us more answers than we've
00:36:59.200
received to date thank you so much for joining me today on firebrand again a historic day
00:37:06.000
with the erosion of due process and precedent in the house of representatives with the expulsion
00:37:11.520
of george santos it was an act of self-mutilation by the house republican conference 105 republicans voting for
00:37:18.880
it even including four who stood in the way of accountability for failed homeland security secretary
00:37:26.240
ali mayorkas make sure you're subscribed that you've got notifications turned on and it would be a big help
00:37:32.560
if you gave us that five star rating and left us a review thanks so much roll the credits