Episode 141 – The Disappointing DOJ. How to Challenge the Electoral College in Congress. Trump's Strongest Move Yet Against Big Tech.
Episode Stats
Words per minute
152.83514
Harmful content
Hate speech
1
sentences flagged
Summary
Bill Barr says there's no evidence of widespread voter fraud that could have impacted the outcome of the 2020 election. Rep. Matt Gaetz has a hot take about that, and other news out of the Department of Justice, including the appointment of a special counsel to investigate the Trump-Russia investigation.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Welcome to Hot Takes. I'm Congressman Matt Gaetz. Let's talk about the news. A lot of
00:00:21.260
news coming out of the United States Department of Justice. Let's start with Durham. You'll
00:00:26.740
remember some 18 months ago Bill Barr announced that John Durham would be taking the lead in an
00:00:33.680
investigation to review the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation. The potential criminal
00:00:40.340
activity associated with trying to frame a president, alter evidence before a secret court,
00:00:47.920
continue to renew an application to spy on Americans despite having the knowledge at the
00:00:53.800
Department of Justice that the basis, that the underlying reason for that spying was flawed.
00:01:00.520
That it was based on the work of Christopher Steele who the FBI knew to be a known liar and
00:01:07.580
analysis of Carter Page who was freely working with the FBI, giving them information regarding
00:01:15.180
his meetings with Russians. It was all so fake. It was all just an effort to try to frame the
00:01:21.520
president, undermine the presidency, and empower the deep state. I think people should go to jail
00:01:28.220
for that crime against our country. But despite the many months of investigation, we haven't seen
00:01:35.580
anything from John Durham in the nature of indictments or even his scope of work. You'll remember when
00:01:42.500
Robert Mueller was appointed special counsel, subpoenas were flying out. Roger Stone was getting
00:01:48.040
arrested by an amphibious assault SWAT team. You had Paul Manafort getting drugged before courts because
00:01:55.600
of tax crimes that he'd allegedly committed back in the 1980s. And here you have the Durham investigation,
00:02:04.140
not resulting here at the conclusion of the president's first term with indictments or even a
00:02:10.960
description of what he's been doing, but just a memo from Bill Barr converting him from an investigator
00:02:17.880
to a special counsel on this matter. It's a little disappointing for me. I mean, it kind of feels like
00:02:24.660
we're ending where they started. I mean, they began the Trump presidency by appointing a special counsel
00:02:31.460
to go after Trump, his family, his campaign team, his supporters. And yet here we are, you know,
00:02:39.400
potentially at the conclusion of the Trump presidency. And only now we're getting to the point where they
00:02:46.160
started. If we couldn't get results and accountability during the Trump presidency regarding the framing of
00:02:53.720
Donald Trump, we're very unlikely to get results after the Trump presidency regarding the framing of
00:03:00.400
Donald Trump. That's why I'm disappointed in the decision. I would have liked to have seen more. And
00:03:05.440
it's shocking really that we find ourselves in this moment where the United States Department of
00:03:11.280
Justice spent more time investigating Donald Trump for fake allegations against him than they spent
00:03:19.620
investigating the real allegations of voter fraud in this election. And that brings us to the next big
00:03:27.000
piece of news out of the Department of Justice, Attorney General Bill Barr saying that he's got no
00:03:32.900
evidence of widespread voter fraud that could have impacted the outcome of the 2020 election.
00:03:39.660
Here's my hot take. If your house gets robbed because the alarm system malfunctioned, maybe you
00:03:46.700
shouldn't exclusively trust the alarm company to catch the thief. That's kind of what happened here.
00:03:53.520
And that's not a full indictment of all people associated with the DOJ. There are actually some
00:03:58.180
good folks in U.S. attorney offices around the country. There are some good ones here in Florida
00:04:03.100
who were really focused on ensuring that in the registration process on the front end, in the ballot
00:04:10.500
request process on the front end, in the mail out of ballots, in the management of the retrieval of those
00:04:17.580
ballots, that there were not crimes being committed. Because after the fact, it's very hard to put
00:04:23.480
humpty dumpty back together again and figure out who committed what crimes, what polluted ballots
00:04:29.760
are commingled with legitimate ballots. And so you can show all of the affidavits and all of the claims,
00:04:37.900
but it's very difficult to obtain the relief that the Trump campaign is requesting after the fact.
00:04:43.960
That's why this was such a failure on the Department of Justice, on the front end,
00:04:49.920
not everywhere. You know, we forget in most places in this country, we ran clean elections.
00:04:56.140
It was basically in four cities, Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta, and Philadelphia. And in those four places,
00:05:03.700
there was mechanized ballot fraud, and there was not sufficient attention from the Department of
00:05:09.940
Justice on the impact of that fraud, of that ballot laundering. And so lo and behold, after the fact,
00:05:16.800
they're unable to reconstruct the elements of this criminal activity and make a finding, I do not
00:05:23.780
believe that that is some blessing upon the 2020 election. I do not believe that absolves the fact
00:05:31.880
that you had people voting in more than one state, you had dead people voting, you had people voting who
00:05:37.260
had already filled out a change of address form. Matt Brainerd is one of the leading minds at the
00:05:44.580
Voter Integrity Project. He was on the Lou Dobbs program, and I think laid out the specificity of
00:05:52.100
the fraud, the specific voters involved. Take a listen to the interview with Matt Brainerd and Lou Dobbs.
00:05:59.060
Tell us what you gave them that you think may be most helpful to them to assure integrity in this election.
00:06:06.800
What we're giving them is we're giving to every of our target state's attorney generals,
00:06:12.260
the legislatures, governors, and secretaries of state is hard evidence of potentially illegal
00:06:17.360
ballots cast in those states. And I'm not sending them charts or line graphs or speculation about
00:06:23.280
what may or might not have happened. I send them the names, addresses, phone numbers, dates of birth,
00:06:28.560
and voter record numbers of people who either had ballots cast in their name and said they didn't
00:06:34.460
or who did cast ballots they shouldn't have because they didn't meet residency requirements
00:06:38.320
or cast ballots in multiple states. And what we found is in several key states,
00:06:43.280
specifically Wisconsin, Georgia, and Arizona, the number of these ballots, individual voters
00:06:49.280
we've identified who cast early and absentee ballots in these states surpassed the margin of victory,
00:06:54.600
which means that we can, nobody can honestly say for certain that Joe Biden actually won the election
00:07:01.480
just on the basis of our data alone. Now, other people have done other analyses, which I think has
00:07:06.040
some validity, and others have taken our data and projected it to like a larger universe to come up
00:07:11.260
with even more substantial numbers. But just on the people we've identified ourselves, we believe that
00:07:16.880
that surpasses the margin of victory in enough states to have denied Joe Biden a win in the electoral
00:07:21.920
college. Without those three states, this election would have gone to the U.S. House of Representatives
00:07:26.720
and President Trump would have been reelected. So we cannot say with confidence that Joe Biden's
00:07:31.720
the deserved winner of the election based solely on the data that we've uncovered.
00:07:38.200
President Trump has just taken his strongest stance yet against censorship on the Internet.
00:07:45.800
We've covered extensively how Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act gives large digital
00:07:52.960
platforms the ability to avoid the liabilities that would append to this podcast, that would append to
00:08:00.300
cable news station or your local newspaper or local network, a news show. President Trump tweeting,
00:08:08.840
Section 230, which is a liability shield gift from the U.S. to big tech, only the companies in America
00:08:16.860
that have it, corporate welfare, is a serious threat to our national security and election integrity.
00:08:23.580
Our country can never be safe and secure if we allow it to stand. Therefore, if the very dangerous
00:08:30.400
and unfair Section 230 is not completely terminated as part of the National Defense Authorization Act,
00:08:36.760
I will be forced to unequivocally veto the bill when sent to the very beautiful Resolute Desk.
00:08:44.340
Take back America now. Thank you. Here's my hot take. I support the President and his desire to
00:08:51.880
repeal Section 230. I think it would be excellent to include that repeal in the National Defense
00:08:58.140
Authorization Act that we are sending the President. There's a lot in that National Defense
00:09:03.180
Authorization Act that I like. Pay increases for troops, benefits for surviving spouses,
00:09:10.460
ensuring that we've got the weapons to vanquish our enemies downrange whenever we need to.
00:09:16.440
There's also a lot I don't like. There's a piece in The Intercept that Glenn Greenwald just tweeted out
00:09:22.920
about the work that I did with some progressives to try to advance the America First foreign policy
00:09:30.200
agenda supported by President Trump. And we faced a lot of resistance from the defense contractor-funded
00:09:37.480
Democrats and, of course, Liz Cheney and the Warhawk Republicans. And so the Defense Authorization Act
0.71
00:09:44.300
now has got good and bad in it. It would definitely be an improved piece of legislation if the President
00:09:50.760
gets his way and we can get a repeal of Section 230 in that bill. And that is exactly what I'll be fighting
00:09:57.740
for in the Congress. Former President Barack Obama says that liberals lose a substantial portion of
00:10:08.100
the country with snappy slogans like defund the police. In an interview with Axios, the former
00:10:15.040
president said that progressives should try to accomplish their policy goals without these types
00:10:20.540
of slogans that turn off a great deal of the country. Here's my hot take. It's not the slogan,
00:10:27.740
defund the police that bothers me. It is the objective to defund the police that bothers me.
00:10:34.360
And by the way, with what we see from Democrats, particularly in the House of Representatives,
00:10:39.300
that's exactly what they're trying to do. When they strip police of their immunities, when they
00:10:44.940
make it harder for police to acquire body protection, personal protection for the incredibly
00:10:51.460
difficult jobs they have, they're doing everything they can to keep that police officer in the car
00:10:56.920
rather than encouraging proactive policing. So whether it's the slogan or the objective or the policies
00:11:04.200
and bills, whether it's the appropriations made or the signals sent, it is very clear to the country
00:11:10.800
the Democrats are against the police. The Republicans are for the police. It seems like the only
00:11:16.760
law enforcement that the Democrats are for are some of the highly politicized folks who've cycled in and
00:11:23.760
out of the FBI and the Department of Justice, who've been criticized roundly by Inspector General's
00:11:28.900
reports and who still should face consequences.
00:11:34.580
When the Electoral College results are sent to the United States Congress for review by
00:11:40.780
a joint session of the Congress, we have the opportunity to object to any state's slate of
00:11:47.320
electors. That objection must be in writing. It must be submitted by at least one member of the House
00:11:53.960
of Representatives and at least one member of the Senate. And it would result in a two-hour debate
00:11:59.500
in each chamber regarding the legitimacy of those electors sent by a particular state. So this doesn't
00:12:06.620
mean challenging the entire national election. It doesn't mean challenging every state or every
00:12:12.580
circumstance. It means isolating some of those places where we remain concerned about voter
00:12:18.860
registration irregularities, the accounting of the ballots cast to the particular number of people
00:12:25.580
in a precinct. I had an opportunity to discuss this phenomenon and the potential for an objection in the
00:12:32.120
electoral college and the certification process before the Congress on Newsmax last evening with
00:12:40.660
Newsmax has still not called this race. We're waiting for the president to exhaust his challenges
00:12:45.100
in the states. But I just want to be clear that, I mean, if you look at it objectively, you can say
00:12:49.200
that the number of states that have certified their electors favors Joe Biden getting 270. But you have
00:12:57.420
been quoted in this story that I saw that I think was fascinating in Politico that says how Trump's Hill
00:13:03.380
allies could take one last shot to overturn the election. Nothing is off the table, said Congressman
00:13:08.360
Matt Gaetz. I think this is fascinating. Walk me through what you're thinking, what the strategy is, and
00:13:18.580
Just today, I've talked to Republicans in the House of Representatives, and I've also talked to Republicans in
00:13:24.360
the United States Senate. And there is an interest in looking into these irregularities and presenting
00:13:31.080
them to force a debate in the Congress about whether or not to certify these or accept, I should say,
00:13:37.620
these states' electors. Every state's electors are individually subject to objection, as you correctly
00:13:44.440
pointed out to top off the show. And if we don't see, I think, some explanation for why in places
00:13:50.560
there is not a match with the number of people who voted and the people who are on the voter rolls,
00:13:55.720
if we see these voter registration anomalies continue, I think it would be worthy of a debate.
00:14:01.540
So if it were to be the case that members of the House and a member of the Senate were to
00:14:06.260
offer that objection, it would require a two-hour debate about that state's process and about the
00:14:12.680
validity of the electors that they have sent. And I think the nation would survive that, Sean.
00:14:17.680
I think somehow the union would hold if we took the opportunity to isolate the irregularities
00:14:23.460
in Georgia, in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin in particular, and to lay that bare before the
00:14:29.440
nation so that at a minimum, we ensure that this type of erosion of election integrity never happens
00:14:35.160
again. In Los Angeles County, California, now they even want to ban outdoor dining, gutter dining,
00:14:45.060
as I call it. You see, in the state of Florida, we believe that human beings ought to have the choice
00:14:51.400
to go inside and enjoy a meal if they exercise that choice. In LA County, first they threw everybody out
00:14:59.860
next to the gutters. Now they even want to close that outdoor dining, but they are facing some
00:15:05.840
resistance. The Beverly Hills City Council unanimously votes to oppose the LA County dining ban. I guess the
00:15:14.760
Woketopians in Beverly Hills have had enough. They want to be able to have their meals. They want to
00:15:19.800
be able to have them at restaurants. I just think this is all so crazy. I mean, I look at a lot of
00:15:25.240
these outdoor dining setups, and basically you've got a nice, cozy, wonderful restaurant, and then outside
00:15:31.220
they'll go set up a tent, put heaters inside of it, stick everybody in the tent, and then convince
00:15:38.060
themselves and try to convince you that somehow everything is safer as a consequence. People need
00:15:44.520
to eat. They need to have the choice to do it inside. I stand with the City Council of Beverly Hills,
00:15:51.460
California, and against the LA County mandate to stop dining of any kind, indoor, outdoor, or otherwise.
00:15:59.300
And again, I cannot stress this enough. These lockdowns hurt blue-collar people the most. They
00:16:07.200
hurt people that live month to month, paycheck to paycheck, and the worst impacts of this coronavirus
00:16:14.280
will undoubtedly come from the government decisions to lock down, to limit choice, and to harm our
00:16:22.800
country. There is no lockdown strong enough to hold back the American spirit. That spirit must
00:16:29.680
prevail, and it must be enduring. Let us go to eat. Let us do it inside or outside at our choosing.
00:16:40.460
This week, marijuana reform is on the agenda in the House of Representatives. The Moore Act will pass
00:16:46.820
the House on Friday. It will not even get a hearing in the Senate, so it won't become law. It will largely
00:16:53.600
be a messaging bill, a measuring stick for where the marijuana reform movement currently stands,
00:17:01.040
particularly in the House of Representatives. If you want to check out the specifics of the Moore Act,
00:17:06.660
I've noted that episode 80 of the podcast goes through the substantive provisions of the bill,
00:17:12.660
the pros and cons, and some of the committee debate. But if you want further reading on where the
00:17:19.780
marijuana reform movement stands, there is a piece in a Bloomberg opinion, can marijuana help Biden
00:17:27.400
heal a divided nation? And of course, the piece starts with the premise that Biden is going to be
00:17:32.820
the president. It reads, after more states have legalized pot, support at the federal level is what
00:17:38.740
is needed to make cannabis investors cheer again. And now it's possible. Now, the piece talks about
00:17:44.660
the five states in this last election that approved ballot measures for marijuana reform. They include
00:17:51.680
Arizona, Mississippi, Montana, New Jersey, and South Dakota. So pretty much a cross-section. You get a
00:17:58.520
purple state in Arizona, some pretty red states in Mississippi, South Dakota, Montana, and then
00:18:04.220
even a blue state in there, New Jersey, modernizing their cannabis programs. And it appears, based on
00:18:11.800
the results from the people, that when marijuana initiatives are on the ballot in this country,
00:18:17.360
they typically pass. And so whether or not marijuana is that which could help Biden heal a divided nation,
00:18:24.280
I think is an outstanding question. But check it out in the Bloomberg opinion piece we will be posting.
00:18:30.800
Thanks for listening to Hot Takes. I'm Congressman Matt Gaetz. This podcast is written, produced,
00:18:37.960
and directed by a team that includes myself and Luke Ball and Joel Valdez from our communications team.
00:18:44.140
Make sure to subscribe, to like, to review on your podcast listening platform of choice,