On today's episode of Hot Takes, Congressman Matt Gaetz responds to calls for Attorney General Bill Barr to be impeached, a CNN op-ed written by Aja Rangappa, and a report from Gizmodo on why Google doesn't want to sell technology to law enforcement.
00:00:00.000Welcome to Hot Takes, this is Congressman Matt Gaetz.
00:00:19.160If the audio is a little different today, I'm traveling with the president in Phoenix, Arizona,
00:00:23.460where he'll be examining the progress we're making on the border wall in Yuma, Arizona,
00:00:28.700and he'll be addressing a number of students at Turning Point USA.
00:00:32.900On yesterday's episode, we talked about the efforts by some Democrats to begin the impeachment in drag of Bill Barr,
00:00:40.480and there is more evidence that that is in fact the game plan today.
00:00:44.420The Daily Beast is running an opinion piece by the rather odious CNN contributor Aja Rangappa,
00:00:50.760where Aja says that Barr is above the law and that the only answer is to impeach him and that he has obstructed justice.
00:00:59.060Doesn't this sound familiar? Didn't we see this movie before?
00:01:02.720I think not only did I see this movie with the Russia hoax, I even saw the knockoff Ukrainian sequel afterwards.
00:01:08.460The problem is that now, months away from an election, Democrats still have no agenda for America,
00:01:14.100they have no vision, they have no policy to improve people's lives,
00:01:17.200and they've already impeached the president, and so now you have to see the drumbeat around Bill Barr.
00:01:22.460Here's the real news. Bill Barr has had to go into an infested Justice Department and clean up a place that was so captivated by politics that they were unable to fairly enforce the law.
00:01:35.460And so you will hear in committee tomorrow, people at the Justice Department saying,
00:01:40.380well, Bill Barr was involved in making decisions on this case.
00:01:43.540Well, Bill Barr thought there should be a different type of sentencing recommendation in this case.
00:02:01.480That's a question one can reasonably ask following a petition signed by over 1,600 Google employees to Sundar Pichai, the CEO of the company,
00:02:12.080asking that Google cease all sales of technology to law enforcement.
00:02:17.400So this isn't just like high-end Google web services to the New York Police Department.
00:02:23.180This is like an email to a cop in your local town or a constable in your community.
00:02:32.060Police officers are the people who go and stand between the chaos and the vulnerable.
00:02:37.620They're the ones that are called when we need assistance.
00:02:40.680And now, purportedly, one of these great American companies, Google, is not willing to stand with some of our American patriots.
00:02:47.480And I think it does inform on the broader decisions we have to make on technology platforms that, like, are they really trying to make America better?
00:02:56.080I know they all have these, like, kind of, you know, cheesy slogans about making the world a better place.
00:03:00.940But when have they stepped up to make America better?
00:03:04.580And I think that when they contribute to the demonization of our law enforcement, they're certainly not acting in the best interests of our country.
00:03:13.060So this is an explosive report in Gizmodo by Brian Menges.
00:03:17.720They're asking for an end to all kind of stuff here in our country with law enforcement.
00:03:23.240But it's quite hypocritical that these same employees don't seem to have a problem with the unity government that Google seems to have established with China.
00:03:32.800That's right. Google has no problem going over to the Chinese Communist Party and negotiating terms to allow them to enslave their people.
00:03:42.320The ethnic minorities like the, you know, 1.5 million Uyghurs and others who are in concentration camps, the absolute technology application to autocracy and the abuses in Hong Kong.
00:03:58.040I mean, if you don't think that China is going to use tech platforms to try to execute their will in Hong Kong, then you would have to believe that they're going to break the very pattern and practice that they've utilized in other parts of the country where they've seen civil resistance.
00:04:11.640And so if Google can jump in bed with China, I think that they can at least service American law enforcement.
00:04:19.360I think that there needs to be some reaction to this from our government.
00:04:23.100I think that, you know, the attorney general, I think that a number of our state attorneys general need to continue to speak out on behalf of law enforcement and not allow them to be deprived basic services.
00:04:35.160Like what's next? Is a law enforcement officer not going to be able to get a bank account?
00:04:39.400Are they not going to be able to get, you know, an Uber?
00:04:44.060Are they not going to be able to, you know, access other elements of life that have become essential in a digitized world like freaking email?
00:04:54.440So to stand with law enforcement actually means standing up for law enforcement when they're under attack.
00:05:00.300And these America last companies like Google certainly need to be held to account.
00:05:05.020I exposed this bias in Google when Sundar Pichai testified last year before the House Judiciary Committee.
00:05:11.240Here is just an example as to how oblivious this company is when it comes to the bias in their company and the impact of that bias on users.
00:05:20.120Have you ever launched an investigation into whether political bias is impacting the consumer experience?
00:05:24.300Congressman, we do, to the extent there are concerns, we look into them and, you know, it's...
00:05:30.520Have you expressly launched an investigation into political bias of your employees?
00:05:38.660You know, to the extent, you know, we always take, we take any allegations around court of conduct across every issue seriously and we look into them.
00:05:45.780But at your company, your employees can get together and chat in groups, right? Google groups?
00:06:23.600You know that the resist movement is a movement built to resist the agenda of President Trump.
00:06:27.420If there's a resist group within your company where groups of employees, not one, are getting together within that group to engage in discourse on company time, with company infrastructure,
00:06:36.740does that strike you as the type of thing you would want to investigate?
00:06:40.420Congressman, I'm not aware of any such group.
00:06:42.700None like that has been brought to my attention and, you know, happy to follow up to, you know, and understand the concern better.
00:06:49.420If you haven't launched an investigation in any of your employees, because it would take a group of employees to engage in improper conduct,
00:06:56.520and if those groups of employees are engaging in discussion on your platform,
00:07:00.060and if one of those platform groups is resist, and if on that resist movement site or any other sites in your platform,
00:07:07.780there's discussion of suppressing conservative speech,
00:07:10.700why would that not be something that you would launch an internal investigation in, publish the reports,
00:07:16.360sanction those employees that may or may not be engaged in improper conduct,
00:07:20.000so that we can all have greater comfort in the user experience?
00:07:23.520Congressman, first of all, I want to assure you, we have checks and balances so that employees,
00:07:28.180and we, not just on this issue, across any issue, we protect the sanctity of our systems,
00:07:33.120our product development process, and we would do that.
00:07:35.540How can I have confidence that you're protecting the sanctity of your system
00:07:38.800when you don't even know that your employees are getting together on your own company's infrastructure