The Anchormen Show with Matt Gaetz - Episode 61 - The Hottest Moments from ＂The Swamp＂ Documentary. MSNBC Producer Rips Network and Quits. Massive Beirut Explosion.

00:00:00.000 Welcome to Hot Takes, I'm Congressman Matt Gaetz.

00:00:18.780 Let's talk about the news and the HBO documentary The Swamp making some news following its premiere

00:00:24.940 last night. It's still available on HBO to be viewed through their streaming service and I suggest if

00:00:31.300 you've got an interest in the inner workings of Washington and Congress, which you clearly do if

00:00:36.260 you're listening to this podcast, you check it out. One of my favorite scenes was with my good

00:00:41.860 friend Thomas Massey as we discussed the corruption and the pressure of DC-based fundraising. Here's

00:00:49.260 that scene. I've seen the way you've been an independent member here. I'm starting to get a

00:00:53.600 sense that when you don't always adhere to kind of the establishment leadership viewpoint on things

00:00:59.640 that you see an impact in your fundraising. I raised about a couple hundred thousand dollars here in

00:01:04.520 Washington DC in my first term, but after they found out I wasn't here to go along to get along,

00:01:09.640 it went almost to zero. In fact, there was a six-month period where they ranked me number 437

00:01:16.260 in the house for fundraising. I thought there were only 435 members. There are only 435 voting members,

00:01:22.280 but Guam and Puerto Rico, their delegates raised more money. They don't have a vote. They don't have a vote and they raised more

00:01:28.320 money than me in that six-month period. But what do you got there? Is this your fundraising plan,

00:01:32.960 your campaign? Well, here's this meeting I recently had and I somewhat resented it. I meet with these

00:01:37.080 guys and they say, Gates, you know, you're on TV, people know who you are in your state and we really

00:01:41.760 think you can run for a higher office, but you don't raise enough money. And so they write me this plan

00:01:46.520 and it's just like, it's basically how to whore yourself out for money. And when I say like,

00:01:51.980 who's, who's going to do this? Like who wants to give me a hundred thousand dollars? They basically

00:01:56.680 say, well, what the next question is, what committees are you on? How can you use your

00:02:01.080 congressional pin to go and, and help a lobbyist as your primary objective? It's demoralizing.

00:02:08.400 And folks like AOC, Bernie Sanders have proven that you don't need that.

00:02:12.920 And that's the truth. That's really how it goes with the corruption of the swamp and the extent to

00:02:19.060 which fundraising is really the elixir to allow that corruption to metastasize. It wasn't just

00:02:26.040 Republicans who offered their perspective in the film. My good friend, Congressman Ro Khanna of

00:02:31.580 California is someone I've worked closely with to try to reassert congressional war powers. Congressman

00:02:37.800 Khanna correctly reflected on the great successes of our country when we work together and achieve our

00:02:44.820 highest level of prosperity and achievement. Here's Ro.

00:02:48.260 I think what frustrates people today is it seems that we're unable to find a sense of what can we do

00:02:54.620 together. But at our best, our country has risen to the challenge of finding common purpose or the

00:03:02.600 common good. We've done it when we have defeated tyranny in World War II, when we've helped establish the

00:03:10.600 international order. We've done it in building the interstate highways, winning the Cold War,

00:03:18.280 inventing the internet, and sending a man to the moon. Our country has done extraordinary things and most of

00:03:26.120 those extraordinary achievements have been bipartisan. So the idea that we can't rise to the occasion again

00:03:33.000 defies American history. And the film concludes with the decision I've discussed on this podcast from

00:03:38.920 a policy perspective. And that is that I am the only returning Republican to the United States Congress

00:03:45.160 who has sworn off all PAC money. Here's how I arrived at that conclusion.

00:03:49.720 So we did 40k for October. 40k. Net? Yes, netted. Wow. And then for November, so for November,

00:03:58.840 right now, we are already at 15. Netted. Netted? Yeah, 15,000. So what do you think we'll net

00:04:05.960 then this month? I think we're going to get around 40. That's amazing. Yeah. So when we met last on

00:04:11.480 fundraising, you said we were functionally bankrupt. And now what has saved us has been impeachment? Yeah,

00:04:17.160 so all of it is mostly small dollar, but everyone's doing well off of it. It's not just our office.

00:04:22.040 Some lobbyists have randomly texted me that they've donated or given money. Has there been any revenue

00:04:27.960 from the special interest community? I would say about $3,000, not much.

00:04:32.760 As is usual then. Yeah. But you know, I mean, if we were to make some announcement that like we have

00:04:38.280 converted to this new faith that that is absent any lobbyist or PAC money, once you cross the Rubicon,

00:04:45.560 you can't go back. I will never again accept a donation from a federal political action

00:04:51.400 committee, not one red cent. The American people are my one and only special interest.

00:05:01.880 How do you feel? I feel great, man. I feel relieved. I feel like

00:05:05.880 just like a tremendous weight has been lifted. Don't know what it's going to mean, but

00:05:10.040 I tell you, it's one of my best days in Congress. So I hope you watched the film. I hope you enjoy the

00:05:13.720 film. I also had a great time afterwards chatting with a Congressman Ken Buck and Thomas Massey

00:05:19.400 in a Facebook live series we did at the end of the premiere. Take a listen.

00:05:23.720 I'm going to throw it to Matt with the question that Ken and I asked ourselves here, which is,

00:05:29.960 would you do it again, Matt? Would you do this again? I mean, we gave them incredible access. We

00:05:34.680 didn't control what came out at the end. So that's the big question that we're going to start off with.

00:05:40.200 I am incredibly proud of this movie, Thomas. I'm proud to do it with Ken and with you.

00:05:46.920 And I'm glad we had the opportunity to expose the corruption that frustrates so many members of

00:05:53.480 Congress, even those who perhaps wouldn't be in this movie. But when you see the trading of political

00:05:59.560 favors for donations, when you see committee assignments for sale, and when you see an institution

00:06:06.760 that is so able to meet the challenges of our country, handicapped by corruption, it draws us

00:06:13.640 all to a project that would excite the nation and hopefully bring just a greater sense of focus to the

00:06:20.760 things that we can do to improve our democracy. And that doesn't mean embracing a system of voter

00:06:27.240 fraud or same day voter registration, or perhaps as the movie would suggest, public financing of campaigns,

00:06:34.040 which would take money away from some taxpayers to give to political ideas that they don't even agree

00:06:39.800 with. I think that what Ken and you and I are calling for is an invigorated democracy where people

00:06:45.640 stand up and say, hey, why don't we have the system that rewards merit? Why don't we have a system that

00:06:51.640 takes the talents of people who are willing to serve in the Congress and elevates them? You know,

00:06:56.280 Thomas, I have often said to you privately and I've said publicly, I think you've probably got the

00:07:00.760 highest IQ in Congress. And I'm ashamed that several of our colleagues- I was about to cut

00:07:05.480 him off, but I'm going to let him keep going. No, Thomas, I'm ashamed that we have several colleagues

00:07:11.240 who opposed you in a primary because they didn't like the fact that you called the body to account.

00:07:17.240 And I was proud to stand with you in that primary. And I think that as a Republican conference,

00:07:24.040 as a Republican party, we have a lot of work to do to define the core values that matter to us and

00:07:30.760 that reflect the interests of our constituents. And I think you really do that for the folks in

00:07:35.320 Kentucky and for a lot of the folks around the country who, as you correctly say, wouldn't be

00:07:40.120 members of our movement if you were not such a great leader in our party. So grateful to do it with

00:07:45.560 you and with Ken. And my question, I guess, back to you, Thomas, is what do you hope comes of this

00:07:51.320 project? We gave a year of our lives and a lot of access. And frankly, we put ourselves at risk

00:07:57.560 that we might not be portrayed super favorably. And so following this project, what do you hope

00:08:02.680 happens to change a place that needs to change in order for us to meet the challenges of our great

00:08:08.760 nation? Yeah. Well, I told somebody today, most people vote based on emotion and some people vote

00:08:15.640 based on policy, but hardly anybody votes based on process. And what is broken in Washington,

00:08:22.120 D.C. is the process, the way things are done. The fact that if we tried to get an amendment,

00:08:28.600 a vote on it on the floor, it doesn't happen anymore. When I first got to Congress,

00:08:33.880 you could actually offer amendments as long as they were germane to the bill. I'm not talking about

00:08:38.600 sticking pork in there. Only the leadership can do that now. And same when I got elected to Congress.

00:08:46.200 But just to make a minor change to the bill, not to add any spending, just something germane

00:08:51.560 is impossible now. And so what I would hope comes from this is that people start looking at the process

00:08:58.440 and how the process is broken and not going for the simple solutions or the overly ambitious solutions.

00:09:08.600 The American conservative has yet another wonderful report on the need to embrace a realistic and

00:09:16.840 restrained foreign policy when engaging with the world. The report comes to us from W. James Anteil III

00:09:24.920 entitled, The Foreign Policy We Need. Restrainers on the right must stop being passive observers in a

00:09:32.360 debate Trump and their libertarian allies have already joined. And this is really a call to action for

00:09:38.440 Republicans to have a view of foreign policy that takes, I think, a higher view of the freedom,

00:09:46.520 the need for people who want to earn freedom to have to, in fact, fight for it themselves and earn it

00:09:53.240 themselves and tell stories about the need for a national identity as a consequence of winning freedom.

00:10:00.360 We cannot use American blood as the sole currency to purchase freedom around the world. And so

00:10:07.320 the American conservative makes the case. It is truly a call to fellow populists, whether they're on the

00:10:15.160 left or the right, to stand against these unpopular, unfocused, unconstitutional wars. And I'll just read

00:10:22.200 you one quote from the piece. The new national conservatism has produced exactly one reliable

00:10:27.640 populist Republican politician who has shown a willingness to vote according to Trump's foreign

00:10:33.080 policy campaign promises when the going gets tough. Rep. Matt Gates of Florida. So I'm grateful for the

00:10:40.360 recognition. There are obviously others who have been very helpful in this endeavor. And we hope that the caucus for

00:10:47.160 realistic foreign policy will continue to grow.

00:10:50.040 The massive explosions in Beirut, Lebanon, have captivated the global news. And reporting from

00:11:00.920 The Guardian seems to suggest that the political dynamic continues to evolve in Lebanon. A ministerial

00:11:07.800 meeting resulted in the decision to turn over the capital for the next two and a half weeks to the

00:11:13.320 military. And also an interesting element of the investigation. They are holding everyone who has

00:11:19.880 been involved in port security since 2014 in house arrest. We're also seeing reports from official state

00:11:28.360 media in Lebanon that the casualty tolls continue to rise with the death toll at 135, as many as 5,000

00:11:37.320 people enduring wounds during this event. I think there's still a lot more to learn, a lot more to

00:11:44.200 know. I've got some suspicions as to what this may be, but I am still communicating with my sources with

00:11:50.440 knowledge of the region and with an understanding of this internal politics in Lebanon where the Lebanese

00:11:57.160 government has had to functionally form a unity government with Hezbollah. Hezbollah has their terrorist

00:12:04.680 activity co-mingled with their business activity, co-mingled with their political activity.

00:12:11.160 And the government in Lebanon, I think, has been far too reliant on Hezbollah for security features

00:12:19.080 of their operation. And at times there is an instability that that can create. That's not a

00:12:26.200 commentary on this particular explosion. It is a commentary on the dynamic that I think you'll see

00:12:32.280 continue to unfold as Lebanon as we learn more. And as I learn more, I'll be sharing them with you on Hot Takes.

00:12:43.080 The third major media figure has left their position as a result of the toxicity in the modern media

00:12:51.160 environment. We get the story from Just The News and John Solomon. NMSNBC producer

00:12:57.960 Quits says Job forces skilled journalists to make bad decisions. And the piece chronicles the decision

00:13:06.440 made by Ariana Pacari, who has left MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell show where she had worked.

00:13:14.760 And she describes the reason really as a toxic culture tied to ratings over journalism,

00:13:20.760 a sacrifice of quality reporting to feed particular narratives, and really the extent to which MSNBC,

00:13:30.360 and she critiques other cable companies, are willing to divide the nation without reporting the news,

00:13:36.280 without giving the honest facts, without providing the nuanced context, just for their own financial

00:13:43.960 goals and for their own ratings goals. It is no surprise that MSNBC, that this particular producer

00:13:51.000 critiques that it's functionally baked into the editorial decisions to reinforce a particular

00:13:57.800 viewpoint and that that's not journalism. So she's quit as a result of of that culture and of that

00:14:03.960 dynamic. And again, it's not unique to MSNBC. I think we see it throughout the media. You know,

00:14:09.480 we saw it when Barry Weiss had to leave the New York Times and she persuasively argued that there

00:14:15.640 was no diversity of thought and here that same critique seems to be leveled at MSNBC. So we hope

00:14:22.680 that the media will be better and we suspect that there will be more journalists who are simply

00:14:28.280 unwilling to tolerate the toxic culture that exists at MSNBC and many other mainstream media outlets.

00:14:36.280 Thanks so much for listening to Hot Takes. I'm Congressman Matt Gaetz. Make sure you are

00:14:42.440 subscribed to our podcast on whatever your listening platform is so that each and every day you are up

00:14:48.200 to date regarding the ongoings of Washington, D.C. Tune in tomorrow. I'll be back with more Hot Takes.

The Anchormen Show with Matt Gaetz - August 05, 2020

Episode 61 - The Hottest Moments from ＂The Swamp＂ Documentary. MSNBC Producer Rips Network and Quits. Massive Beirut Explosion.

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript