00:01:50.800been a case that has been near and dear to my heart. I think many American loving conservatives
00:01:56.600have been worried about this, but I think anyone who knows anything about anything has seen the
00:02:01.420writing on the wall and knew that this was not going to go our way. I mean, did we really expect
00:02:08.140a woman with two kids from Haiti to vote on our side? Of course not. So we lost this. And like I1.00
00:02:15.360was talking with david earlier we lost it barely just barely you know as i was telling david i was
00:02:22.300expecting a seven to two ruling on this we'd only have alito and thomas on our side but
00:02:27.600incredibly we got the other two we got gorsuch and uh and we got kavanaugh um yeah so that was
00:02:36.100incredible. Um, the thing is, you know, courts don't like changing things. They, they revere
00:02:44.700precedent. You know, it takes a lot to get a new understanding of the constitution,
00:02:47.820but I think this is showing that there is a change. You know, we are one justice away from
00:02:53.820getting birthright citizenship. And I think this shows that the tide is shifting and that we've
00:02:58.640got more American minded, new thinking people running things. And so hopefully that means that
00:03:04.620in our lifetimes, we might see Congress do something with this. I don't know. Matt,
00:03:09.060what do you think? I can't wait to get David's perspective. I think the birthright citizenship
00:03:17.280ruling is a disgrace. I think that everyone who is with the majority will have this as a part of0.99
00:03:23.860a tainted legacy forever, no matter what else they do. This decision lashes America to a
00:03:33.400self-destructive path. In the modern world today, birthright citizenship is not a thing
00:03:39.760among our peer countries. It is absolutely not a thing. And if it were not being used to scam us,
00:03:47.440maybe I would not be so upset. But we see these birthing tourism centers. We see the Chinese0.99
00:03:53.540Communist Party. We see the narcos from Latin America getting their baby mamas across the0.99
00:03:59.860border and getting the next generation of narco talent, the full suite of protections that we0.97
00:04:05.640would apply to our fellow Americans. And I, for a moment, was optimistic. I was not as pessimistic0.99
00:04:13.700as you, Pearson. So maybe the eggs are my face, because I didn't think that Amy Comey Barrett's
00:04:18.640home situation would have dictated her views on this subject. She is proving to be an unreliable1.00
00:04:25.500vote on the Supreme Court. That's kind of the sub headline here, is that Amy Coney Barrett is not
00:04:31.020a reliable vote. Probably was a mistake to have on the court, frankly. You know, her biggest backer
00:04:36.440was Mike Johnson. You know, the number one person pushing Donald Trump to pick Amy Coney Barrett0.98
00:04:41.340was Mike Johnson. You know, they were law school classmates. But I am enraged by the decision. I
00:04:47.060need to go get my blood pressure medication from All Family Pharmacy because of it. But David,
00:04:52.080you know, talk me off the ledge here, buddy. I might just push you because I watched yesterday
00:04:58.900this terrible, terrible vote by mail decision come down. And I saw what Barrett did. And I saw
00:05:06.420that, you know, Robert side with her. And I said, Ooh, this, this is going to tell me something
00:05:11.360about tomorrow. The way they rule on birthright will tell me everything I need to know about
00:05:15.100Roberts and Barrett, whether yesterday was actually a constitutional decision. And really,
00:05:20.360they saw an opportunity to let Congress make the decision, which justices do sometimes.
00:05:24.560We've read about it in law school, Matt. Sometimes justices would rather Congress make the decision
00:05:28.320and not put the pressure on the court. I think yesterday was a really bad decision
00:05:32.060because I don't think it's a state's issue about whether or not
00:05:36.280election day is election day. I think it's a constitutional interpretation. I think the Supreme Court
00:05:40.240really put us in a really difficult position with respect to what is election day.
00:05:44.520Congress doesn't get to decide what election day is because guess what? Congress changes
00:05:48.180every two years and the definition of election day can't change every two years with congress but
00:05:52.420i'll put that aside for a second because i said to myself i said depending on how they rule
00:05:57.240with birthright will tell me if this was a political decision or a constitutional one
00:06:01.580and today with comey barrett and with um roberts deciding essentially that um you a baby an infant
00:06:10.820born um to illegal aliens can have full faith and allegiance to a country when they don't even know0.99
00:06:15.700who their parents are, it's the stupidest Supreme Court precedent I've ever said.0.99
00:06:19.380And they're relying on a case from the 1800s with two Chinese parents0.99
00:06:23.460who were lawful permanent residents who had a child that became a citizen.
00:06:27.020They're doing that essentially to rewrite the citizenship clause
00:06:31.300which grew out of descendants of slavery.
00:06:34.100There's absolutely no nexus, no precedent for illegal aliens coming to the United States,
00:06:40.040having children, and having those children have full faith and allegiance when their parents don't.
00:06:43.760it was a terrible decision it's terrible case law and i agree with you matt um this this really
00:06:48.120screws america you guys are incredible i i never ever thought this was going to go any other way
00:06:55.840this was 100 predetermined you know and to take it back into my realm my my wheelhouse uh you know
00:07:03.100this is like in lord of the rings the scouring of the shire you know when you have all the orcs
00:07:07.620move into the shire suddenly they're having babies in the shire and now they're hobbits
00:07:11.920no no these are orcs to begin with and they don't belong here so i hope somebody at home
00:07:19.360is following that i don't know um no i it's a it's a core question about identity actually
00:07:26.620yeah and i think i think it's well made even even with the strange uh literary reference
00:07:31.660because what this decision does is it erodes our identity and as americans whether you're an
00:07:39.480american by naturalization whether you're a heritage american what this says is what you
00:07:45.020have isn't valuable and it's hard for a society be it human hobbit or otherwise to survive if
00:07:53.800the society doesn't hold an identity and cherish it and work to culture matter that identity and
00:08:00.700advance that identity right and what this is saying is a culture uh you know what's your
00:08:06.460subject to the jurisdiction, to all of that, that kind of goes out the window. This is more like a
00:08:12.580lottery. And if you win the lottery by being born here, you're just it. And there are very real
00:08:18.740policy implications of this. You know what it got me thinking, fellas? I bet you in the boiler room
00:08:26.940of Stephen Miller's office with all the brilliant attorneys he has working with him in the policy
00:08:30.960shop, they're working up some responses to this around visas and who's allowed to come here.
00:08:36.360Because did you know right now you can't even ask someone in a lot of cases if they are planning to become pregnant, if they if they have that as part of the deal on their way into the United States, if they're going to one of these birthing tourism centers.
00:08:51.540And so we may have to use a lot more administrative screening on the front end and a lot more border enforcement and, as Tom Homan said, more internal enforcement of our immigration laws as a direct response to this bad ruling.
00:09:06.700Well, let me jump in on that, if I can, real quick, because I want to touch on two of the things you said.
00:09:10.520One, with respect to diluting what it means to be American.
00:09:13.460That was directly in Clarence Thomas's beautiful dissent, where he basically said that you were diluting what it means to be a citizen.
00:09:20.440And more so than diluting what it means to be a citizen, it also dilutes American culture.
00:09:24.800And they said, and Roberts was very specific to say, well, there is no bloodline privilege to becoming a United States citizen.
00:09:30.540That was made clear after Dred v. Scott.
00:09:33.320And for those who don't know, that was the decision that basically said that a slave isn't entitled to U.S. citizenship.
00:09:38.420The Civil Rights Act and then later the Citizenship Clause that we're referring to, born in the United States, being subject to the jurisdiction thereof, grew out of wanting to make right a wrong.
00:10:40.560So how in the world are we going to get our naturalization process amended to accommodate for this decision0.99
00:10:46.600when we can't even keep illegals from voting in our damn election.0.98
00:10:49.380So, I mean, the naturalization process is one aspect of this.0.99
00:10:52.760But the other thing that assumes that you are catching them before they come into the country.
00:10:58.420You know, the majority of these anchor babies are had by people who come over without us being aware of it.
00:11:04.780You know, they hop the border and they drop the baby and bam, they got an American citizen.0.70
00:11:08.620It's one thing to have, you know, these red Chinese tiger moms flying over here and dropping a little baby who's just as suddenly an American as you or I.0.89
00:11:16.600But, you know, the majority of these people are coming over 250,000 on the low end a year.
00:11:22.040The Center of Immigration Studies gave us that number.
00:11:41.200And it's crowding out the NICUs too, Pearson,
00:11:44.720Because a lot of these are not the mothers who got the prenatal care, who got the vitamins, who had the right diet.
00:11:51.740And so the most heartbreaking stories I ever heard in Congress were, you know, the parents who lived in Yuma, Arizona.
00:12:00.180And they needed the NICU services for the taxes they had paid.
00:12:05.460They'd lived in the community for an extended period of time.
00:12:08.340They thought their baby would be taken care of.
00:12:10.300But they had to take a three-hour drive to Phoenix with a baby clinging to life because the people who had just come over the border and had a baby were soaking up those services.
00:12:24.820What's disgusting is just that, you know, the disadvantage this puts Americans at.
00:12:31.400And Democrats just don't seem to care about that.
00:12:33.300Like, it's all about the migrants, their rights, whatever we can give them.
00:12:38.980What about the people born here? Our heritage, our rights, the job market that we're looking at, the houses that we want to buy, all of that. They're just throwing that down the drain. There's an incredible heat map that maybe we can pull up and put on the screen that shows, they did a study where they talked to a statistically significant number of participants, and they were conservatives and Democrats, and they asked them questions about their priorities.
00:13:04.060and the democrat priorities were it you know it starts in the middle with self and family and
00:13:11.200then neighborhood and then city and state and country and then international and all the
00:13:16.500democrat values were for things away from their family away from their home for for further out
00:13:21.620and away from the things that were closest to them all the conservative values the things they cared
00:13:25.740about most were their family their friends the things immediately close to them and i think we
00:13:30.740see that playing out in large in these kinds of rulings you know the democrats don't care what
00:13:35.680happens to us it's all about the other people and it's just disgusting um i wanted to uh to read
00:13:45.640something that thomas said that i thought was phenomenal um because this is about the 14th
00:13:51.280amendment that's what this comes down to which everybody kindergarteners understand this was
00:13:57.220about giving blacks the right to vote. You know, this is basic United States history. And Thomas
00:14:03.240said the blacks were entitled to citizenship because they were Americans. That's indisputable.0.97
00:14:07.880You can't argue that. They had no other homeland, owed allegiance to no other foreign power, and
00:14:12.880were subject to no other authority. You know, the citizenship clause, he said, has consistently
00:14:19.580been interpreted not to apply to the children of foreign temporary visitors who were by definition
00:14:24.400not domiciled in the united states today's opinion totally devalues citizenship yeah well
00:14:31.180and domicile that is the key and and and roberts took a long time to suggest that domicile isn't
00:14:37.660the um isn't the standard he was suggesting that you don't have to be domiciled here because the
00:14:44.760founders or the framers had the this idea that you can be passing through america have a child
00:14:50.740and that child would then be a citizen and so that was sort of the logic is that you can even
00:14:58.760be telling me domicile isn't the key and obviously clarence thomas disagreed with that i agree with
00:15:02.500clarence thomas's dissent this is going to be one of those cases and and i taught law school you
00:15:07.540learned about these dissents that end up becoming the law after bad decision paul's graph being one
00:15:12.120of the most famous ones um the dissent in that case ended up becoming law later on um the the
00:15:17.920the idea here is this is a slippery slope. It has to be dealt with. And I think Congress can
00:15:23.140potentially pass a law, bring another case to the Supreme Court, and maybe we'd have a different
00:15:27.180result. But this is bad. What's astonishing, too, is that the birthing tourism was not even
00:15:33.580addressed. Robert said that he didn't see how that applies to this case. Yeah. Well, no, yeah,
00:15:39.220he said it doesn't apply because the public policy implications doesn't sort of trump the 14th
00:15:46.780amendment. They're saying that the, the, yes, these things happen, but that doesn't mean the
00:15:50.980constitution doesn't apply. That's stupid. So one thing I wanted to ask, um, some people who1.00
00:15:55.940are smarter than me, you know, there's both of you, um, you have Ohio Senator Bernie Moreno
00:16:01.880calling on Congress to act now, uh, to address the issue of birthright citizenship. And you have
00:16:07.980Trump saying, uh, quote, no long and unwieldy constitutional amendment is necessary. Where are
00:16:14.900you going with that? How's that going to work? Do you think it's a possibility?
00:16:19.800Matt, you were in Congress. I think it's a real sign that in, yeah, I think it's a real sign that
00:16:24.180in a state like Ohio, that let's be honest, you know, there's some real competitive races statewide
00:16:29.060in Ohio, a big governor's race, a big Senate race, some big congressional races, you know, not like
00:16:34.300ruby red, you know, South Carolina or something like that. And so in Ohio, for the sitting
00:16:41.540Senator to say that it shows that there's not some big backlash from persuadable voters that
00:16:46.960lawmakers are worried about. The politics could be good in even swing jurisdictions to really lead
00:16:54.200on this. But practically speaking, as I said earlier, guys, let me burst your bubble. Not only
00:16:59.960are there not 60 votes in the United States Senate for this, there aren't even 50. Like a bunch of
00:17:05.340the McConnell wing of the Republican Party is not going to back Senator Marino on this. And that's
00:17:11.200a shame. His vision is the right one. And it is a frequent source of frustration when we have these
00:17:16.980discussions that like, here we have it all. We have the House, we have the Senate, we have the
00:17:21.440presidency, we have the Supreme Court. And on something as foundational culturally as birthright
00:17:27.400citizenship, it doesn't appear as though this is where we're going to make the progress. So
00:17:30.680the sad answers don't look to Congress. But I return to the fact that I think there are some
00:17:35.280remedies in sharper review of potential visa applicants that could reduce this. But when
00:17:43.460you're talking about 7% of the overall births in the entire country, Pearson, it's an astonishingly1.00
00:17:49.120high number, and you're not going to deal with it with nips and tucks.
00:17:53.140So Trump is just, that's a pipe dream? There's nothing behind that?0.65
00:17:58.840I think he wanted to do it. Look, he took the bold action of doing the executive order. The
00:18:03.900problem is, of course, we've invalidated that. I think it remains to be seen. I mean, it's
00:18:10.140interesting. David, if we think about this decision, if it were not an executive order,
00:18:15.140if it were a congressional action, you would probably still lose the majority of the court
00:18:19.760because as much reference as they have for Congress, they're doing an analysis of the
00:18:25.40014th Amendment using some of the arcane jurisprudence you referenced. But I don't know that a Senate
00:18:30.700and House passed bill signed by the president fares any better with this court materially?
00:18:38.720That was literally going there in my mind when you asked me that question.
00:18:43.420I think if Congress passed this and this hit the president's desk for a signature,
00:18:48.080I don't know that the court would have ruled on it the same way.
00:18:51.120I believe, and I've said this before, I think Comey Barrett and John Roberts, it's no secret.
00:18:57.880I mean, we're talking about a Bush appointee, somebody who's establishment, somebody who does not like Trump, somebody I'm sure who's on the phone with the former President Bush, and they talk about how much they dislike Trump.
00:19:07.780I'm sure. I don't know. I don't have anything to prove that, but it wouldn't surprise me if they get on the phone who's like, hey, good job, good job.
00:19:15.540So when you look at Amy Comey Barrett, and like you mentioned, Mike Johnson's pick, she has been on the wrong side of a lot of decisions, and so has Roberts.
00:19:25.380So it doesn't surprise me here, and I can't help but think, I'm not saying that their jurisprudence wasn't based on the Constitution, but on these decisions where you can really go one way or the other, and if you ever err on the side of the Constitution versus erring on the side of politics, I think the conservatives in the dissent in both these decisions erred on the side of the Constitution.
00:19:46.480And it seems politics crept in, in some form of bias in these other decisions because they don't make sense. They're not consistent with the way a conservative justice would rule. And that is the problem I have with it. So no, I think if it went through Congress, I don't think it would have Trump's, you know, sort of brand on it. And as a result, I think it might have had different scrutiny. I really do.
00:20:07.720I just – I can't find a way to make sense of these decisions because they're really – it's a constitutional interpretation that they erred on the side of not being conservative.
00:20:18.160The conservative justices decided, eh, let's be a little less conservative when interpreting the Constitution.
00:20:23.860That doesn't make sense to me if you're a constitutionalist because the logic goes both ways.
00:20:29.460The logic of giving states the rights in this mail-in ballot thing and ignoring the Constitution to say we can have mail-in ballots and then the very next day saying that the Constitution gives you these rights that it doesn't – it's just – there's no sense.
00:21:47.180FEC, the one people aren't talking about, now political parties can now donate a lot more money to candidates, which is good for Republicans.0.99
00:26:20.600Well, right, but by the way, don't we want to live in a world where it's not just the Republican Party or the Democratic Party that gets that elevated microphone?
00:26:29.800I want to live in a world that is politically messy.
00:26:33.620And, yeah, you do see independent groups, and I want transparency, and I want people to be able to utilize their free speech through campaign speech.
00:26:42.820But I just, like, I kind of think the two-party system has failed us as a country.
00:26:49.240And I think that it's not even really a two-party system.
00:26:52.360You've got, like, bands of tribes that kind of align under these banners.
00:26:56.340And maybe I'm just – the libertarian streak in me makes me just a little skeptical of the ruling.
00:27:02.820Though it is something the vice president wanted.
00:27:04.820It does materially give Republicans an advantage in the way that David described.
00:27:11.140But I think of the downstream effects, and they worry me.
00:27:32.200And then you have Zoran Mandami ushering in democratic socialists into the into the fray while we're sitting here tearing each other apart. This is bad for America. We can put our differences aside until November to say, hey, let's not let the socialists take America. And if they take the Senate, oh, boy, the filibuster will be laughing about the days when there was a filibuster and we'll never have an election again.
00:28:06.540But we also have to go, okay, that's cool.
00:28:09.360Let that aside for a second and understand that the other side is literally lying, like lying about everything, reckless disregard for the truth, and they're winning.
00:28:17.460And, by the way, they're counting ballots weeks after the election, changing the outcome.
00:28:22.340Nobody seems to care anymore that Spencer Pratt's not going to be mayor.
00:28:25.240And Nithya Rahman, who will be mayor of Los Angeles, I'm telling you again and again and again, the Democratic Socialists, will be mayor of Los Angeles.
00:28:33.220Two of America's biggest cities will be run by socialists.
00:28:36.380This is why we have to put aside our differences.
00:28:43.480And in the upcoming elections in Colorado, the Democrat Socialists are ascending.
00:28:49.120I think that that is the Democratic Party's message.
00:28:52.980I think that as we go into these midterms, for just the reasons David described, Democrats are going to try to put like the spookiest version of Trump that they can lie about and conjure up on the ballot.
00:29:04.260And what Republicans have to put on the ballot is socialism.
00:29:08.740We have to put that on the ballot and show how a rising Democratic Party is just a pathway to socialism and the bad outcomes that that has endured around the world.
00:29:19.100In a way, you're going to have the Republican Party doing everything possible with whatever spending power they have following this decision, making these Democratic socialists very famous in the suburbs and in the jurisdictions and congressional districts that decide control of power.
00:29:36.860So that takes us to, I think, our next topic, which is the communists taking over the Democratic Party.
00:29:42.140Well, before we get to the communists, I don't want to throw you off.
00:29:44.340There's one really, really important decision that came down yesterday that we haven't talked about yet because all it's getting overshadowed.
00:29:54.600The slaughter decision that says Trump can actually get rid of what they called independent heads of agencies, which were never independent.
00:30:00.980They were always politically appointed, and they always screwed the next president came along, especially if they're Republican.
00:30:06.200Trump can fire them now without cause.
00:33:57.820Any state, and this is an important distinction, the court did not ban trans or men from women's sports.
00:34:03.620It just allowed states to do it, which is really important because the liberals are out there suggesting that the court did something they didn't.
00:34:30.300I wonder if the Commerce Clause is going to come in with that.
00:34:34.020Well, I have a question for every man, Pearson Sharp, on this, okay?
00:34:38.440Because we have complained on this platform and others about a Congress unwilling to codify
00:34:45.220President Trump's executive orders in permanent law. And Trump's executive order wouldn't leave
00:34:51.380women that are competing in Illinois or New York or California unprotected. It was a nationwide0.79
00:34:59.820ban. Now, there is a bill right now regarding college sports moving through the United States
00:35:07.880Senate. It deals with all the NIL issues that David and I debated on a previous episode of
00:35:13.360this podcast so pearson sharp can the save college sports act actually save college sports if it does
00:35:22.280not nationally codify no men in women's sports pursuant to trump's executive order in this court
00:35:29.480decision i wouldn't think so i would think you'd need a national application of the rule it has to0.99
00:35:36.060apply in all cases in every situation otherwise wherever it's left out the girls are going to be0.74
00:35:41.060vulnerable to these predators and that just seems like common sense so would you vote against the
00:35:46.240save college sports act that does all the nil stuff if if a provision codifying trump's executive
00:35:52.220order on the subject is not included in the bill rephrase that for me how does that i'm getting
00:35:58.980like a double negative so you're a senator right you're you're a senator the save college sports
00:36:04.080act comes up and you say well gosh i want to put on to that bill trump's executive order so it's
00:36:10.120not just an executive order it's in law and it protects all the women of this country that sounds
00:36:14.520great and then the majority leader comes to you and says well we're not going to let you do that
00:36:17.700we're not going to let you put that amendment on the bill i know that this is exactly what they're
00:36:21.320going to do to bernie marino when he tries this would you then hold your vote would you then say
00:36:25.700well i'm not going to vote for some safe college sports bill if it doesn't include the provision
00:36:30.620that protects women i think you might you know this might take a political mind sharper than mine
00:36:37.620but the way i see it you might look at this as incremental gains you start with the lower win
00:36:45.020and you work up to the higher win that seems like a reasonable assumption but maybe that's
00:36:49.640not how it works but you don't get the higher win that's the problem pearson sharp you are nothing
00:36:53.720if not an advocate for constant incrementalism i mean i would say i would want the whole thing
00:37:00.340the whole kit and caboodle um right now all the listeners of this podcast are like legitimately
00:37:06.700wondering if the aliens have taken Pearson Sharp and installed in the anchor's chair tonight
00:37:12.480an incrementalist, because I've never even heard you use the term incrementalism in a favorable way.
00:37:19.040I mean, not as a general policy. I'm just looking at if we can get a win. That sounds like a
00:37:23.340reasonable win. I will admit this has not been a subject that has been high on my radar. It's
00:37:28.820something that I completely disagree with, and it should have been tackled a long time ago.
00:37:32.380But of the wins that we've had from the Supreme Court the last couple of days, I would have taken this as a loss and exchanged it for birthright citizenship.
00:37:41.660Frankly, I feel like that's more of an important issue.
00:38:54.900so communists taking over the party yes can we talk about that now yeah is that all right
00:39:03.440if it's up to you you're incrementally we're incrementally getting good we should we can
00:39:07.780incrementally move through the topics um so we obviously have uh what james carvel is calling
00:39:15.760a schism in the democratic party i thought that was interesting um he came on a talk show and said0.99
00:39:22.000Lady, I ain't the same party as you, referencing Assemblywoman Daria Liza Avila-Shavala, some stupid commie name.1.00
00:39:34.280Carville took an issue with her attack on the American flag and interracial relationships.0.99
00:39:39.000He said, I actually do think it's time for Democrats to talk the S-word, schism.
00:39:43.260He emphasized the party is now under the control of the Democratic Socialists of New York City, calling it insane.
00:39:49.080and he warned these people do not like democrats not only are they not democrats but they wish
00:39:54.720democrats poorly matt what do you think is the uh is the party on the verge of a breakup is the
00:40:00.400is the radical wing going to take over the middle well it's very it's very clear there are a lot more
00:40:07.880communists and socialists than there are james carville's james carville is like the ghost of
00:40:14.260Christmas past with the Democratic Party. He helped lead Bill Clinton in the early 90s to
00:40:19.980this big pivot to the center that even at the time, a lot of people like Jerry Brown and Paul
00:40:25.720Songus were pushing against. And this is where the energy is in the Democratic Party. People can
00:40:31.280like that. People cannot like that. But there's not some big mobilized force of door knocking
00:40:37.440democratic moderates you cannot find them they cannot be produced but they are uh they are
00:40:44.460motivated around the socialism message and that's what they're offering like we we can uh bemoan it
00:40:50.360and mock it but their message is now socialism and uh we better have a competing message because
00:40:57.800there are a lot of young people who don't think capitalism worked for them capitalism might not
00:41:01.940have helped them get a house or a family or all the other things they wanted in life and there's
00:41:06.360a reason some societies turn to socialism because it can be seductive so apparently uh to that point
00:41:14.380there was a big study that was just done um and it said that who you know who were the people who
00:41:21.240were voting for these socialist communists and apparently young and college educated voters in
00:41:26.440denser urban areas formed a core block for many candidates aligned with the socialist left
00:41:32.100The new socialist DSA surge is not mainly a working class revolt.
00:41:36.220These candidates winning heavily with young, college educated, higher income urban voters, while more lower income, non-college, religious, orthodox Jewish and some Hispanic and outer neighborhood blocs are sticking with more traditional Democrats.
00:41:51.240So, I mean, the socialist left is being powered, according to this, by the educated urban class and not necessarily by, you know, the poorest downtrodden voters they claim to represent.
00:42:03.960Of course, that's why they believe that.0.65
00:42:05.200Well, yeah, all the gender studies majors.
00:42:06.680Yeah, they went through elementary school, taught how to line up and put their finger over their mouth.
00:42:12.460Then they went to middle school, and they were told that anything that they did that made them different subjected them to ridicule.
00:42:17.720Then they went to high school, and they were told that they knew nothing.
00:42:20.280But they had to go to college to learn what they didn't know.
00:42:22.940And then as soon as they got to go to college, they were told that everything their parents told them and everything that they understood in common sense didn't apply because of all the injustices done to their friends.
00:42:30.500And don't you care about your friends?
00:42:31.920Next thing you know, you raise a little communist.
00:42:33.800This is why my kids are getting a better education than that.
00:42:37.080But the second thing is this is how college-educated high-income earners in these urban areas end up thinking like this and voting like this because they've been taught to think like this because they'll never actually suffer the policies in which socialism will bring them because they don't actually live under the umbrella of labor.
00:42:53.800yet they feel like they have to protect those people
00:42:55.940because they have the privilege of an education
00:42:57.720that they borrowed $300,000 that they'll never
00:43:46.260and maybe you guys have an opinion on this.
00:43:48.040I feel like the the radical left has the voting block of the radical left is eating the center such that if you are a moderate Democrat, if such a thing exists, if you are someone who has semi reasonable opinions on some of these topics, you cannot go out and say that you are against open borders.
00:44:08.720You can't go out and say, well, I don't think we should pack the Supreme Court.
00:44:14.980If you did that, you would be destroyed.
00:44:16.880You'd lose. You have no chance whatsoever. So you have these rabid little piranha voles in the voting base ensuring that all of their candidates have to take these extremist positions or they'll die in the primaries.
00:44:32.400that's right and with donors by the way a lot of the donors have uh a purity test on some of
00:44:42.080these ideological issues and they are into they're enthusiastic about it none of them are really
00:44:48.200eager to go like give away their own money to the illegal immigrants who are camped out on their
00:44:53.600street corners but they definitely want to do it with government money well and you know this is0.92
00:44:57.420actually a great example you talk about the purity test matt and it's exactly what this is
00:45:00.740Look what happened to Wiener over the weekend in San Francisco.
00:45:28.040And because he supports Israel, because he wouldn't say free Palestine, they chased him out of the event almost violently, regardless of, you did fine, you have great, you support trans people, you're so good on queer stuff, but you're terrible on Israel.0.83
00:49:36.020Do you think Supergirl would have done better at the box office if she didn't have to compete against the male movies that were in the box office?1.00
00:49:45.360No, because there's a lot of precedence that women heroes do fine.1.00
00:50:47.400So I think we're seeing independent films start to return and the mainstream audience rejecting this propaganda slop that we've been fed for the last decade.
00:51:59.660And I will bring back all the good scoops from D.C.
00:52:02.420And I will be watching David Pollack at a new time.
00:52:05.600Can we give a little programming note about where folks can watch David Pollack Prime Time?
00:52:10.620Yeah, so this is the last week you can watch me at 7 p.m.
00:52:14.640So if you're an early-to-bed person, start getting your sleep training in now because David Pollack Primetime is moving to 10 p.m. Eastern.
00:52:23.380That's right, 10 p.m. Eastern to watch David Pollack Primetime following the great Matt Gaetz.
00:52:29.040I go right after him, so he gets everybody warmed up, and I'm like, all right, let me close the show.
00:52:33.760So you can't chase the audience off, Matt.
00:52:35.180You have to keep them, so that way they stick around for me.
00:53:04.620We talk about a lot of different topics, but from different – same topics, different angles.
00:53:08.900And so the viewers will definitely get the full spectrum of an issue from watching your show and then my show because they'll get different perspectives of a lot of the issues of the day.
00:53:17.180So I think it's a really fantastic duo.
00:53:19.880Real America, The Matt Gaetz Show, David Pollack, Primetime.