The Art of Manliness - October 30, 2015


#151: The Way of the Stoic Warrior


Episode Stats


Length

40 minutes

Words per minute

154.72485

Word count

6,330

Sentence count

5

Harmful content

Hate speech

4

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Nancy Sherman is a Professor of Philosophy at Georgetown University and the author of two books: Stoic Warriors and After War. She is also a former chairwoman of ethics at the U.S. Naval Academy and served as the Chairwoman of Ethics at the University of Chicago's Naval Academy.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 rott mckay here and welcome to another edition of the art of manliness podcast so we've talked
00:00:18.320 about stoicism on the site it's a philosophy born in ancient greece but really embraced by
00:00:22.340 the ancient romans particularly high-class romans like seneca and even emperors like marcus aurelius
00:00:27.840 who's one of the most famous stoic philosophers with his meditations but i guess they wrote a book
00:00:32.520 talking about how the philosophy of stoicism can help soldiers who men and women who are served
00:00:39.740 fighting in our wars uh face the challenges that come with that profession her name is nancy sherman
00:00:45.420 she is a professor of philosophy at georgetown university she served as a chair the chairwoman
00:00:50.540 of ethics at the u.s naval academy and in her book stoic warriors she takes a look at how different
00:00:55.920 facets of stoic philosophy can help soldiers navigate things like losing a partner losing
00:01:01.760 a comrade losing an arm dealing with ptsd so we talk some about that we also discuss her most recent
00:01:07.900 book after war healing the moral wounds of our soldiers we discuss how not only war how war can
00:01:13.500 traumatize someone mentally emotionally physically but also morally and what soldiers can do to heal
00:01:19.840 those moral wounds what the military is doing to do that and what civilians can do to help the men and
00:01:25.000 women who are fighting for them really fascinating discussion thinking a lot out of it even if you're
00:01:28.820 not a soldier uh the stoic principles that we talk about it can definitely help your own life
00:01:33.640 so without further ado nancy sherman stoic warriors and after war
00:01:37.840 nancy sherman welcome to the show my pleasure so you've written several books uh we're gonna talk
00:01:51.800 about a few of them today uh one of your books that i really enjoyed was stoic warriors you look at
00:01:57.360 stoic philosophy and how it can inform the military or how the military prepares soldiers for war
00:02:04.420 but then also deal with the aftermath of war um before we get into the details about stoicism's
00:02:11.380 connection to the military i would love for you to give us a just a brief summary of what stoicism is
00:02:17.040 because i think you did such a great job of it in stoic warriors well stoicism is an ancient philosophy
00:02:22.960 uh both that the ancient greeks uh after aristotle and the romans embraced and it's in the tradition
00:02:32.800 of ancient philosophy of being concerned about the good life and flourishing but they take issue
00:02:41.780 these are especially the romans like seneca and marcus aurelius uh and epictetus
00:02:49.420 they take issue with the idea that happiness should include exposure to luck good and bad
00:03:01.120 and so they develop a philosophy of self-sufficiency and self-reliance essentially um well before um emerson
00:03:11.480 and the idea is that your virtue alone should be sufficient for happiness it's actually a
00:03:18.740 socratic position from way back um and so that's the idea that cultivating your strengths and uh
00:03:26.820 intellectual and uh endurance are a matter of enormous self-discipline and that you can be in a
00:03:34.440 certain way invincible is too strong but protected from the outside world infringing on your projects
00:03:42.480 okay so it's basically you're not letting the world or all the the chaos the things that are in flux
00:03:48.560 disrupt you emotionally mentally it's not even an issue that's right and the emotional part of not
00:03:57.360 being disrupted is critical they think that the emotions are disturbances almost um um pathologies
00:04:06.200 if you like so uh and the idea some ways that emotions a little the normal ordinary ones of fear
00:04:13.540 and of of even love and anger um are ways that you are attached to the world and want the objects of
00:04:24.000 those emotions and so they leave you open to disappointment and to the inability to um uh
00:04:31.780 to avert or go for the objects of the emotions in the case of fear adequately avert the risk in the
00:04:39.500 case of desire um sort of get what you're going for yeah so it's very kind of attachment free in a way
00:04:47.260 not buddhist it's not about quiet meditation and getting rid of the self the self is very important
00:04:53.440 but it's just should be your reason has has dominion in this world yeah and i guess they'd say a lot of
00:04:59.140 the emotions are based on perception right so if you can change how you view an event so it's not the
00:05:05.500 thing itself like if you're your child dying that's not the thing that's actually disturbing it's just
00:05:10.420 your perception of how you approach it is what causes the disturbance within you that's right so they have
00:05:16.080 this view that emotions are a sense to impressions that's the way they put it and a sense to ways that
00:05:26.280 you're being perceived upon you might say as you're saying so there and you can say yes or no to those
00:05:33.860 a sense and you might be affected by it just sort of subliminally almost you know you you um there's a great
00:05:42.820 example they give you're on a you're on a ship and uh someone you're supposed to be a sage a great sage doctor
00:05:49.760 but yet you start turning green and so someone turns to you and say i notice you you profess to be a sage
00:05:56.680 but you're you're getting very seasick and scared and the response that a stoic will allow well yes
00:06:03.980 but that's just a pre-emotion or a proto-emotion it's kind of a physiological response
00:06:10.340 but and it's momentary and the true stoic won't indulge it so you know i can sort of say no to it
00:06:18.120 without it taking hold and and without the without it really fully coming to fruition and that in a sense
00:06:24.740 tracks where we are uh in terms of our understanding of of psychology um kahneman for example the great
00:06:32.720 nobel prize winning psychologist has a of the notion and many do that we have two track systems
00:06:39.560 emotions those that are sort of fast track and and go without much brain circuitry and very
00:06:45.060 immediately responsive and those that are more mediated and so the stoics had that notion early
00:06:51.440 on and they think that maybe some are a kind of arousals that you can't control but you won't be
00:06:56.980 impugned for having them and in the long term you can maybe control even those better than you do
00:07:02.000 right now yeah and it also seemed they were very um uh sort of foretold cognitive behavioral therapy
00:07:08.380 to some degree to some degree that's right because they're they view the emotions as not just uh
00:07:16.800 impressions but the part of your brain that's doing it in a sense well that we'll put it differently
00:07:23.320 the part of the part of you you are just reason they're uh they're uh monolithic in that regard
00:07:33.160 and so you uh should be able to control emotions insofar as they are a sense but a sense to that are
00:07:42.940 governed by reason and the and and so uh even your perceptual um capacity should be under the control of reason
00:07:51.820 so a lot of talking and a lot of uh suasion and um persuasion should be able to change your your
00:08:00.220 state what you eventually assenter or um do not give assent to okay i think there's this popular
00:08:06.320 conception of stoics as just like not having any emotion whatsoever or not enjoying life and you have
00:08:12.220 to to be a stoic sage you have to go off into a cave and cloister yourself off but a lot of the the
00:08:17.760 famous stoic thinkers they were like marcus aurelius he was an emperor and he lived a pretty good life
00:08:22.840 seneca he was the tutor to nero and he lived a pretty he enjoyed things he enjoyed life probably
00:08:28.980 wore nice clothes ate good food um it's like how does how does stoicism allow for us to enjoy the good
00:08:36.760 things in life is this where the whole things in different come into play well popular stoicism
00:08:42.620 first of all is the kind of notion suck it up and truck on if you're in the military or or or or you
00:08:49.440 profess a kind of stoic popular stoic mentality you are just sort of um sucking it up and moving on
00:08:56.520 um the stoics were um somewhat um mixed about this the roman stoics were in embracing stoicism embracing a
00:09:07.600 very widespread popular view out there you know it was it was a court as you say it was it was the
00:09:14.440 the court's philosophy um sanica was the tutor de niro and marcus aurelius was the emperor who wrote
00:09:22.180 the meditations which were to himself um at night after during the day a huge golden statue of himself
00:09:33.260 would be wheeled out and then wheeled back so he doesn't look like too much of an aesthetic
00:09:36.740 um when he's leading uh you know massive uh legions of troops and has gold statues um on his behalf
00:09:45.700 that said he is very much trying to distance himself from those things with which he doesn't have full
00:09:56.180 control so epictetus um who was once a slave but then goes on to teach philosophy and the time of
00:10:03.100 neera will say of those things that you cannot um control you know say that they are indifferent to
00:10:08.780 you now the indifference doesn't mean as you were sort of saying before it doesn't mean
00:10:12.780 you don't feel anything it means excuse me it means that you're not attached or desirous fully of the
00:10:24.740 objects of your interest and that you can have them or not have them in that regard they're indifferent
00:10:34.140 not you you don't have an attitude of indifference but they're they're not constitutive of happiness
00:10:41.240 that's what's critical they do not add one iota to your happiness if you have things that you um
00:10:50.580 that you desire um through the emotions nor do they detract if you get the things that you don't
00:10:58.740 want having them is better than not having them but they don't add to the thing that's called
00:11:07.200 happiness flourishing thriving okay so you can have lots of money for a moment but if you lose the next
00:11:12.800 day you're like meh it's no big deal you kind of develop this notion that uh if my kid dies
00:11:19.900 um and i lose the things to which i am really attached then i have to realize that they really
00:11:28.980 weren't a part of true genuine happiness now there's going to be cognitive dissonance for most
00:11:35.300 of us because you don't get to be a sage ever for most of us and you'll still hold on to worldly
00:11:43.840 goods and by that i don't just mean material goods i mean the goods that many of us hold on to love of
00:11:48.680 our children whom we prize and uh spouses and partners whom we um adore and whose loss would be to rip
00:11:58.960 something precious out of our souls and psyches um but they still think that if you got to the highest
00:12:07.500 point of perfection you would somehow realize and embrace the idea that your goodness if you had
00:12:17.920 developed virtue was sufficient for your flourishing let's get to this connection to the military
00:12:23.420 because you are you're a professor of ethics um how did you get interested in seeing how stoicism
00:12:29.540 could inform uh military life well i was at the naval academy in the mid-90s in the wake of a cheating
00:12:39.200 scandal and i was asked to design uh a brigade wide ethics course which i i had taught ethics for
00:12:50.280 years and so that wasn't a novel task you might say but on the other hand i hadn't talked to
00:12:58.360 military folks and not just shipmen but officers so i did the stuff i always do aristotle
00:13:05.620 um plato and uh and and uh some contemporary readings when i got to stoicism early in the course
00:13:15.580 everyone resonated with it in part they resonated with it because one of their own uh that is uh
00:13:22.640 admiral stockdale jim stockdale uh had embraced stoicism wholeheartedly he was a graduate student
00:13:31.480 way back uh at stanford and kind of wandered into the philosophy department and someone handed him
00:13:41.060 a text of epictetus the little handbook and he has sort of said uh what do i need that for you know
00:13:46.820 a martini drinking aviator who plays golf what do you need that for so he put it aside but then he
00:13:52.680 found himself on the ticonderoga in the middle of um uh uh on his way to hanoi or excuse me on his way
00:14:02.220 to saigon and he um started reading it in the ward room and then one day he's an aviator he was shot
00:14:08.360 down and the lessons of epictetus were sort of inscribed in his soul and he said i'm jim stockdale
00:14:16.560 leaving leaving the world of technology and entering the world of epictetus and he imbibed it um
00:14:26.180 for himself it was a salvation to be able to say no to the things that he wasn't in control of because
00:14:33.640 he ended up being in uh prison as a pow for about seven and a half years or so two two and a half in
00:14:41.820 solitary with leg irons so he found this uh absolutely empowering and it helped him as the
00:14:49.460 um head of the chain of command which there is uh in a in a in a military uh prison where you're pows so
00:14:57.620 uh being able to say no i control the show and not you cat eye who was the name of one of his
00:15:04.640 um his torturers slash slash uh prison guards was critical to his survival and and so the
00:15:13.720 long story is the it made sure the military knew of his story and even if they didn't if they were
00:15:22.180 to read epictetus they would find it's kind of good medicine for those who are in situations of
00:15:31.100 deprivation and stress yeah this is where the i guess that what's called the stockdale paradox
00:15:36.100 comes from uh i think he said that the way he survived was like he you had to be both hopeless
00:15:42.260 but also have hope at the same time which is kind of weird
00:15:46.100 so going on to this so in stoic warriors you you look at how stoicism can inform different aspects of
00:15:54.780 a soldier's life uh throughout their career and we start off with talking about the body so for
00:16:01.440 uh the soldier his body is important or because that's that it's trained to be fit to be able to
00:16:08.740 do hard work to fight but when you're a soldier there's a good chance that you're probably you might
00:16:15.200 lose a limb or become disfigured um and that affects them i mean sometimes i think that affects the
00:16:21.640 soldier more than losing the limb it's just the emotional trauma that comes from being disfigured
00:16:26.900 from an iud or something like that but the stoics would say like you know the hardcore stoics would
00:16:31.840 say well you know it's your body it's something external you shouldn't be disturbed by that um
00:16:37.960 is there a stoic approach to our bodies that takes into consideration the role that our our body
00:16:44.860 plays in our sense of self well i'm not sure uh they fully do the most exaggerated case is epictetus
00:16:56.360 who thinks of your body is just one more encumbrance um sort of like a little donkey that you that is you 0.92
00:17:04.340 and then you have to carry all these uh things that it needs and so you've got to carry the bucket of
00:17:11.680 water and you've got to carry your food and all of the encumbrances and so it's a it's an unpleasant
00:17:18.940 image and it's just uh being burdened down um and you're supposed to be able to distance yourself as
00:17:26.820 you say from the physical injuries that you might suffer by realizing that the body is somehow not
00:17:34.840 really not you the which is uh which is reason that's a hard view to have uh given in fact that
00:17:43.380 uh you couldn't survive without a brain and the brain is one of the of the body parts that it may
00:17:50.440 not visibly be disfigured but certainly you mentioned ieds ieds can cause enormous rattling and traumatic 1.00
00:17:58.100 brain injury tbi which leads to other kinds of of um difficulties in being in the world having memory
00:18:06.460 having um good cognitive functioning and the like so is there a a a more palatable version of stoicism
00:18:15.960 um stoicism is kind of hard to swallow in its full form so i would probably say not really i've always
00:18:24.140 advocated to the degree that i find myself attracted to stoicism a kind of moderate stoicism where there
00:18:31.720 are blessings and curses and i guess seneca is the person who's always um feeling the tension he says i'm
00:18:41.020 the doctor they call themselves doctors who heal um the pathology of of of emotional attachment but i'm
00:18:49.020 also the patient meaning i'm sick too i can't fully get rid of my attachment to my body i can't fully
00:18:56.660 get rid of my grief that i lost a a dear friend and that i find myself sinking in um in sorrow i'm
00:19:06.260 struggling too and so he he's always acknowledging the the way in which the externals touch him and that
00:19:12.740 he's trying to limit their impact a bit and i guess that's one way to approach stoicism moderately
00:19:19.000 and with um some recognition that if you are trying to minimize uh the the effect of these
00:19:27.140 devastating accidents on you that you you go forth with some humility about just how how much you can
00:19:34.840 control in the end yeah and that's one of the things i i problems i've had with stoicism is that
00:19:39.700 you try to be stoic like you make that your ideal okay i'm just not gonna let this bother me at all
00:19:44.120 whether you be you lose a limb or something happens you know even like the the daily trifles
00:19:49.780 of life that just annoy you but the problem with is you set that as your ideal and if you don't
00:19:54.500 achieve it then you like get angry at yourself because you you feel bad about yourself that you
00:20:00.140 didn't achieve that ideal and it sort of spirals downward well that's right i think um perfectionism
00:20:06.160 can be a curse and um and to the degree that the stoics set very very perfectionist ideals 0.95
00:20:14.300 with it can come the psyche that freud would say it produces a harsh superego and anger and and self
00:20:23.960 anger um in the form of guilt or in the form of shame um and certainly in the form of disappointment
00:20:30.880 and so i'm not sure it's a a wonderfully winning strategy the other thing is you have to um be able
00:20:38.960 to uh acknowledge loss in order to go forward to readjust to new body images um to be able to
00:20:50.340 do the hard work that will come with um re um physical therapy and and kind of reconstitution of
00:20:59.680 yourself if you've lost as some of those i write about in after war have full full half of their
00:21:06.180 body you know they've lost the whole bottom of their bodies and they can't go on as they did before
00:21:12.840 and so there has to be an adjustment to loss that does involve a grieving process if you're to go
00:21:19.720 forward and i'm not sure the stoics are the best uh uh philosophers to help us with that so let's talk
00:21:27.780 a little bit about this uh the anger because it seems throughout western history anger has played
00:21:34.280 a big role in the ethos of the warrior right if we go back to homer that's what that's what the
00:21:39.860 was all about right is how anger fueled this this 10-year war um and it seems like the military uses
00:21:48.120 anger to an extent like through boot camp you have the the stereotype of the the yelling drill sergeant
00:21:53.540 from full metal jacket and this the like like the things like that but stoics would say well no
00:21:58.660 anger is one of those emotions you shouldn't have because it's a disturbance and yada yada so how did
00:22:04.860 the stoic philosophers approach war if you know other for for centuries anger was often used as a
00:22:11.860 motivator for for battle and for war that's a great question um anger whets the appetite um
00:22:19.460 for for for uh for for war and action um it's often said and so what do they replace it with well just
00:22:27.740 just sort of be clear anger is this disturbance pathology it uh seneca rails on about it it it it
00:22:35.880 makes you livid and it causes enormous havoc inside you and and in the world and part of their railing
00:22:45.100 against it is because seneca and others are advising kings who use it a lot and who go to war
00:22:53.500 needlessly or or throw their servants in in pools of sharks and the like when they break a crystal or
00:23:02.200 do something minor so there's um anger management that's required and so that's part of their interest
00:23:09.260 in being able to get rid of anger now anger comes in waves you know some people think you should be
00:23:14.620 it it is a good thing and other people think it isn't and anger also is uh of of a different sort
00:23:21.320 um it's not clear that you need anger in order to motivate um or incite uh troops to battle what you
00:23:31.840 might need is in the case of the drill sergeant a performance of anger just like the orator performs
00:23:40.720 certain emotions actors perform certain emotions and they instill fear in their listeners and that
00:23:48.240 would get a young boot camp a young person in boot camp to sort of to move in and do better if you
00:23:54.760 um incite the wrath of your drill sergeant now it could also be that the the inductee
00:24:04.200 you get a real dose of anger that moves them to battle but the problem the stoics will say is that
00:24:11.500 you can't shut it off um easily and so you have um rampages and um revenge um killings and um hadithas
00:24:22.060 or me lies or the like so um the stoics think that you can actually fight on principle you know you might
00:24:29.820 have a sense of what's right and wrong and the sense of justice and that will be able to carry um
00:24:38.780 carry you forth in in action and i think it's a real live question as to how useful anger is i mean
00:24:46.000 we wouldn't want to get rid of many would argue resentment indignation moral protest moral outcry
00:24:51.440 if you don't have those emotional reactions to horrific world world scenes of refugees or 1.00
00:24:58.820 or innocent victims being killed um what how do you morally engage um but others would say we'll have
00:25:10.860 that first proto emotion of it and maybe the stoics will give you that have it so it kind of rouses you
00:25:19.520 but then be able to put it into or contain it and use your reason to motivate you forward after that
00:25:28.380 use it as a transitional pivot and move on after that and that may be a way to um to get the the best
00:25:36.740 of both worlds yeah both light the match but then contain it yeah and speaking of that idea that you
00:25:43.540 know the fear of anger is that once you get it going it's hard to turn off particularly in warriors
00:25:48.960 i think you mentioned in your book how um oftentimes when men return from war like increases in spousal
00:25:55.320 abuse happen yes i mean it's a complicated story uh and to just say well it's um there's anger
00:26:07.120 management problems is is too narrow um there's all sorts of reactions to war that have to do with grief
00:26:14.600 have to do with the difficulty of civilian reintegration resentment to civilians who don't
00:26:21.000 understand was uh confusion about uh or or anger about of the injustice of the war whether it's the
00:26:28.900 conduct or the cause or too many collateral killings that were authorized or not enough because then you
00:26:35.620 lose your troops the moral mess of war is endless and you're asking thinking soldiers to sort it through
00:26:42.880 um and it's got a uh bubble up in frustration as well as a certain kind of um difficulty in adjusting
00:26:51.180 to the tempo of life afterwards so just sort of say it's anger and that you can't control the anger
00:26:57.460 when you come home i think understates the moral complexity of trying to adjust the emotions of war to
00:27:03.680 the emotions of civilian life yeah i want to get more into the uh the moral complexities of after war
00:27:08.520 because that's what your most recent book is called after war um but before you mentioned grieving that's
00:27:13.380 a problem that soldiers have and the stoic approach it you know there's a story of uh i forgot who gave
00:27:19.160 it but like the king who forced a person to eat their own child and the the appropriate stoic response
00:27:25.940 was well that was thank you you know like not not be upset about just do it and just calmly eat it and
00:27:32.820 then go away that to me seems uh doesn't seem very healthy a very healthy approach i guess the question
00:27:40.460 would be is there a way we can look at use moderate stoicism to help soldiers and civilians alike deal with
00:27:47.440 the loss of loved ones well that was cambius yeah who who uh uh uh was uh was asked to do that i think
00:27:57.000 um there's it's so attractive to be stoic in some ways and i'm one of those persons who's attracted to it
00:28:07.920 the world throws up tons of things that we can't control the vicissitudes of fortune are around us all
00:28:20.940 the time the limits of our being able to uh influence our children exactly the way we want to or our spouses
00:28:28.540 exactly the way we want to or our students or or the political process or the army or the navy or or the course
00:28:37.700 of of of of a country's future we're just we're small and we all live in systems and the systems
00:28:45.680 collectively exert enormous amount of pressure on us and yet we are asked to hold on to our individual
00:28:52.540 consciences and we can't always be whistleblowers and yet we have to do good in a world that's
00:28:59.520 extremely flawed with pressures that we can't manage always so why not try to be stoic about some of these
00:29:08.840 things now it doesn't mean indifferent but it does mean know the limits of your control and try to
00:29:13.860 try to expand the circle of your control as as widely as you can without being a control freak
00:29:21.860 because no one likes a control freak who's managing other people's lives or if you're too
00:29:28.100 self-managing then you yourself are letting out to the experience of too many things that you can't
00:29:34.960 manage that but but you need to feel so i think experimenting with the borders of control is
00:29:41.880 the best way to be a mindful stoic um and i you might say at the end of the day you end up an
00:29:49.480 aristotelian that's really i think yeah you mentioned in the book how you know you know some
00:29:57.480 soldiers right now that the way they deal with grief is maybe they'll they might not cry in front of their
00:30:03.920 their troop but when they're in their tent with like their close buddy that's when they'll let it out
00:30:09.640 have that moment of grief um so they're like i guess they're mindful of it well yes um there's
00:30:17.360 always a performative element in being a leader and especially a leader with all the modeling
00:30:22.940 that comes with wearing the uniform and projection to very young troops um who may be less seasoned in
00:30:33.440 in battle than you are some more seasoned officers don't always face and often don't face the same
00:30:39.260 stresses that that um the enlisted who deploy over and over again do so you're you're you got to be
00:30:47.160 there for them and you're sort of trying to show toughness but if we look at the suicide rates recently
00:30:51.920 um we know that the modeling doesn't always hold in your most private moments and it's you can't
00:31:00.440 you can't you can't closet off parts of yourself and hope that you will forever not see them they
00:31:07.580 come back to haunt you yeah so in your most recent book after war um you make the case that in a lot
00:31:14.120 of ways we've made clinical the emotional mental and moral wounds that our veterans come home with
00:31:20.920 um first off let's talk about this the moral moral wounds or moral trauma because that's something
00:31:26.280 you don't hear very often when we talk about uh soldiers coming home from war you hear about
00:31:31.000 uh ptsd traumatic brain injuries lost limbs but you never hear about moral trauma how would you describe
00:31:37.860 a what is moral trauma so moral trauma or moral injury is a sense of uh it's a psychological sense
00:31:48.680 that you may have done wrong in a in a serious way uh or been wronged in a serious way or fallen from
00:31:58.540 ideals that you subscribe to in a very serious way and that you um um are hurting there's anguish as a
00:32:08.300 result so it can be accompanied by reactions of enormous um guilt in the case of transgression or if
00:32:15.620 you've been transgressed resentment or in the case of falling short um um uh annihilating shame
00:32:26.240 and uh the it's a psychological injury but ptsd is typical or pts without the d for disorder
00:32:36.860 which some find stigmatizing has clinically at least been understood as a fear response
00:32:43.920 you're responding to a sense of being helpless to a threat a life threat and the treatment has been
00:32:52.680 the kind of deconditioning of that fear and that life threat uh because you're now not in a
00:33:00.160 condition of threat but yet you're reliving the the the stimulus as if you were uh we need to
00:33:08.020 recognize that all sorts of emotions that are that are that cause anguish and enormous pain come home
00:33:16.180 from war or come home from other kinds of assaults and and um and infringements and that they're not
00:33:24.760 all fear-based and so moral injury is a way to um to to talk about that like like ptsd it can be
00:33:30.840 invisible meaning you're not coming home from uh from the battlefield or or or from um uh a trailer
00:33:40.480 in nevada if you're a uh remote um pilot with with a visible loss uh missing something or blinded or
00:33:49.960 or without hearing but you're coming home with um with a psychological injury so how how do we
00:33:57.220 treat is the right word because it sounds again sounds clinical right i mean we know we can do
00:34:02.560 for physical injuries psychological injuries you can go to counseling but what do you do for moral
00:34:08.460 injuries is it well yeah i think you still can um see clinicians mental health professionals um so i
00:34:17.360 don't mean to depathologize um all of the suffering that comes home from war by no means and we're very
00:34:24.420 short on mental health clinicians um in the services and in the va and people need to be able to reach
00:34:30.660 out without stigma but we also have to realize that some of what we do in this country um isn't enough
00:34:38.400 and we could do more um we say thank you for your service um as a quick way of separating the war from
00:34:44.940 the warrior um but it's also kind of pat and a bit superficial and doesn't always lead to a deeper
00:34:51.320 um conversation that builds bridges between military and civilian um we are afraid to ask
00:35:00.820 what people's war experiences were or what people's experiences um when they didn't deploy but are
00:35:07.100 sitting um doing war related work on bases at home because we think we might be prying or it's private
00:35:14.960 or we don't really know what we're talking about you know they're soldiers and they wear uniforms and we
00:35:19.520 don't so we live in different worlds um we're not really so willing to engage in the hard
00:35:26.000 conversation was it a was it an unjust war and we shouldn't have had it and and the awful feelings
00:35:32.300 of futility that many soldiers feel as they think about what's going on with isis in areas they thought
00:35:38.040 they secured in tala fair mosul or fallucia etc so um there's a moral mess that comes home
00:35:48.620 if you've got a thinking brain on you and it's some of it is um some of it you can't process because
00:35:57.020 there's a lot of cognitive dissonance some of it you don't want to process and you want to
00:36:00.120 just medicate with booze or or medicate by driving fast on bases or medicate by being angry and and um
00:36:09.740 being prone to um strike out and and have altercations um but some of it requires actual
00:36:19.240 thinking about the circumstances of war and what you saw and what you did in a safe place with a
00:36:26.860 person you trust and so the opposite of moral injury is moral recovery and moral repair and some of those
00:36:32.320 emotions like guilt um can be relieved a bit by empathy and self-empathy some of them shame by a
00:36:39.900 sense of people hoping in you and you hoping in yourself trust a sense of betrayal that your
00:36:45.780 leadership betrayed you or your country betrayed you by re um restoring bonds of trust somehow and
00:36:52.800 that's civilian work as much as clinical work long answer sorry no that's great no it's i love that
00:36:58.120 um i'm curious if the military is doing anything proactively um you know i know they're working
00:37:05.120 hard to get more clinicians uh for mental health and things like that but um are they doing anything
00:37:09.140 else to i don't know help soldiers prepare for after war and dealing with this the moral complexities
00:37:16.260 of it well there are you uh both researchers and clinicians and um lots of outreach groups that are
00:37:25.720 beginning to recognize that moral injury has a slightly different face than clinically understood
00:37:33.860 ptsd so the the bible of of clinicians for reporting for insurance purposes and for diagnosis which is
00:37:43.220 called the dsm diagnostic and statistic manual we're now up to to um edition five has slightly changed
00:37:51.340 the definition of ptsd so that it includes some factors that or experiences mood experiences i believe
00:37:59.860 they call it they call it of guilt and shame and whatnot recognizing that's not just um responses to fear
00:38:06.340 so that's one thing um that in that bible out there of of diagnosis there's a wider understanding of
00:38:15.340 of of of of trauma and post-traumatic stress trauma um in addition um there are folks that are doing
00:38:24.860 active research on this on a on a on a clinical basis um through the va and in trying to set up
00:38:32.700 treatment protocols uh that would involve um telling your story but not in a sense of trying to
00:38:40.420 decondition the fear but trying to develop compassion for yourself with the buddy that you left behind
00:38:46.860 who whose life you just couldn't save or the child who was caught in a collateral incident would she
00:38:53.220 hold you and condemn you in the very way that you condemn yourself that kind of thing so the conversation
00:39:00.260 is expanding um in clinical circles i think as well as in outreach groups that deal with families that
00:39:08.700 who are who are who are at the core of of um helping a returning service member uh in retreats
00:39:16.440 and the like and you know and i go around talking at various conferences there are many conferences i
00:39:22.220 it it's it's uh a slowly growing um there's so awareness of the complexity of the issues
00:39:31.660 very good well nance before we go where can people learn more about your work
00:39:35.400 uh well after war is a kind of character driven service member driven uh book so i would recommend
00:39:44.380 that um and um it's available uh at all places that sell books including amazon um and it's extremely
00:39:54.340 readable when i say character driven it's it tells the stories of service members who've come home many
00:39:59.360 i've i've known for years who are my students or or or that i've known so that's one place i have a
00:40:05.280 website nancy sherman.com that um has lots of information about the kind of work i do and the
00:40:12.340 kinds of um interests i have um so those are two places all right well fantastic well nancy sherman
00:40:19.460 thank you so much for your time it's been a pleasure thank you so much brett pleasure talking thanks
00:40:24.020 my guest today was nancy sherman she is the author of the book stoic warriors and after war and you can
00:40:28.500 find those both on amazon.com go check them out well that wraps up another edition of the art of
00:40:36.460 manliness podcast for more manly tips and advice make sure to check out the art of manliness website
00:40:40.060 at artofmanliness.com and if you enjoy this show again i'd really appreciate it if you'd give us a
00:40:43.760 review on itunes or stitcher really help us out in getting the word out about the show and also help
00:40:48.260 you giving us feedback on ways we can improve it i really appreciate your support and until next time
00:40:52.380 this is brett mckay telling you to stay madly