The Art of Manliness - December 19, 2017


#365: Why Are 7 Million Men Missing From the Workforce?


Episode Stats


Length

37 minutes

Words per minute

142.12505

Word count

5,371

Sentence count

8

Harmful content

Misogyny

2

sentences flagged

Hate speech

6

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

For the past few decades, there s been an intense focus on getting more women in the workplace and helping them thrive and succeed there. At the same time, a silent problem has emerged that could have serious repercussions on our economy and society. More and more men have been dropping out of the workforce completely.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 brett mckay here and welcome to another edition of the art of manliness podcast for the past few
00:00:18.700 decades there's been an intense focus on getting more women in the workplace and helping them 0.99
00:00:21.980 thrive and succeed there at the same time however a silent problem has emerged that could have
00:00:26.540 serious repercussions on our economy and society more and more men have been dropping out of the 1.00
00:00:31.660 workforce completely i guess today is an economist who has written a book highlighting what he calls
00:00:35.440 an invisible crisis his name is nicholas eberstadt and his book is men without work today on the show
00:00:39.840 nicholas delves into the research that shows that while unemployment is down the number of men actually
00:00:44.140 working or looking for work is lower than a generation ago we then delve into some of the
00:00:48.060 possible causes of the disappearance of men from the workforce what these non-working men are doing
00:00:52.300 while they're not working and how they're supporting themselves without a job nicholas then
00:00:56.280 discusses the possible economic societal problems that this growing number of non-working men create 1.00
00:01:00.780 and what we can do on a micro and macro level to encourage men to be self-reliant and industrious
00:01:05.340 after the show's over check out the show notes at aom.is slash men without work where you can
00:01:09.440 delve deeper into this topic and now nicholas joins me via clearcast.io
00:01:12.740 nicholas eberstadt welcome to the show hey thank you for inviting me so you're an economist and you wrote
00:01:22.200 a book last year called men without work and it highlights research that shows that there are
00:01:30.220 fewer and fewer working age men who could work and aren't working and you say this is an invisible
00:01:36.120 crisis why why is this issue of men labor force petition participation an unknown or invisible crisis
00:01:44.840 that's a really good question and i i kind of wondered about that while i was doing my homework for this
00:01:50.800 maybe it's a little bit less invisible since the 2016 presidential election but we have to ask why a
00:01:59.080 problem that was gathering for half a century was basically outside the radar screen of the decision
00:02:08.440 makers in washington the news media academia for the most part i have some guesses but i don't know the
00:02:16.340 answer to this partly i think it is what my friend and aei colleague charles murray referring to as the
00:02:24.780 bubble effect this is something that has been occurring outside the bubble and people inside the bubble
00:02:30.420 haven't paid as much attention to it as they should partly it's because the flight from work this exodus
00:02:40.340 from the labor force by working age man didn't turn out to cause riots or other sorts of
00:02:48.400 public security problems so it could be ignored a little bit more easily that way it's also perhaps
00:02:56.220 true that working age men are not a designated victim class for the academy and for the media
00:03:06.380 they're supposed to be self-sufficient they're supposed to be supporting other people they're not
00:03:11.300 obviously a vulnerable group and so maybe a little bit less attention was paid to their plight
00:03:17.980 than would have been warranted for whatever reason though this problem has hidden in plain sight for two
00:03:27.380 generations as it has almost steadily worsened yeah we'll talk about its origins i think a lot of people
00:03:33.440 think that this is a recent phenomenon but we'll talk about how it's no it started as you said two
00:03:37.980 generations ago but let's let's get to definitions because i think for the layman who hears unemployed
00:03:42.500 they think oh they're just unemployed like these guys are just unemployed and they can't get a job but
00:03:47.960 what you're looking at is no this is they're not just unemployed they're also not even just they're
00:03:52.460 not even looking for work yeah i'm glad you uh i'm glad you framed it that way so we've got three
00:03:58.760 classifications you can be employed you may only be employed for an hour a week but you're getting
00:04:06.440 paid work that means you're classified as employed you can be unemployed that means you don't have any
00:04:13.700 paid work but you're looking for paid work then there's a third category you're out of the labor force
00:04:20.900 altogether you're neither working nor looking for work nowadays in america for every prime age guy
00:04:30.700 let's say prime age is defined uh by the you know labor statistics folks as 25 to 54 years of age
00:04:40.780 for every prime age guy who is unemployed there are another three who are neither working nor looking for
00:04:50.880 work so they're totally outside the unemployment statistics and if you just look at the unemployment
00:04:58.640 statistics you're missing three quarters of the problem and how do economists figure out like or how
00:05:05.520 exactly how many men are there out there who are unemployed but neither looking for work because
00:05:11.520 unemployed you know sort of you have statistics you can go to you can look at you know people going to
00:05:16.300 unemployment office looking for uh benefits but there's not that's not going to happen with a man 1.00
00:05:20.700 who's not even looking for work well so we have a national jobs report which was devised as a consequence
00:05:29.920 of the great depression when the great depression hit we didn't have any national apparatus for
00:05:39.740 gathering labor statistics we just had the decennial population census so we know what it looked like in
00:05:47.260 1930 and we know what it looked like in 1940 but we didn't know what we didn't know exactly how bad it was
00:05:55.300 in like 1932 or 33 so starting in 1940 the u.s government pulled together a system for tracking labor
00:06:05.740 trends and we were about to launch it in 1941 but instead we did a little thing called world war ii
00:06:15.100 and so it had to be postponed until after we won the war and things calmed down a little bit so this was
00:06:23.260 launched in 1947 it's a monthly report conducted by the census bureau for the labor department and
00:06:32.940 it tracks people all over the nation in a way that's supposed to be random and representative
00:06:39.660 in the civilian uh non-institutional population if you want to get really nerdy as to their existence
00:06:47.100 and then their employment status it depends upon asking people questions and upon relatively accurate
00:06:56.680 uh responses to those questions although although there are some ways of checking on it but that's the uh
00:07:02.840 that's the bread and butter for
00:07:05.960 our post-war
00:07:07.480 employment statistics
00:07:09.400 unemployment statistics and also for finding out about people who are neither working nor looking for work but are of uh prime working age
00:07:18.720 so roughly based on the these statistics how many men in the prime working age are not working today
00:07:26.880 uh round number today seven million between the ages of 25 and 54 seven million it's an enormous army
00:07:37.520 and this army of men who are neither working nor looking for work in prime work ages
00:07:47.920 has been growing three times as fast as the total population of prime age men for fully half a century
00:07:58.640 so if you do anything three times as fast as something else for half a century you change the world
00:08:04.000 at this point in time more than a tenth of all civilian non-institutional prime age men
00:08:13.120 are out of the workforce altogether neither working or looking for work and that's in addition to
00:08:20.400 those who are formally unemployed and this isn't a recent phenomenon this this as you argue in the book this
00:08:26.560 began in the 1960s yeah um from the first months of the jobs reports in the late 1940s until
00:08:38.720 the mid-1960s there was really no trend the uh the proportion of men not at work kind of bounced around
00:08:48.720 without any sort of uh real you know direction to it it was kind of seemingly stable over the long this
00:08:54.640 long period around the mid-1960s there's a breaking point and since then the proportion of guys who are
00:09:05.680 neither working nor looking for work has grown exponentially and if you flip it around the other way
00:09:14.400 if you look at the percentage of guys who have paid work you can see a a real collapse
00:09:24.880 the percentage of guys with paid work in the united states has dropped from almost 96 percent in the
00:09:37.440 mid-60s to about 85 percent today it's dropped by more than 10 percentage points and in fact if you look at
00:09:48.400 the latest figures that came out last month for the percentage of uh prime age guys with paid work even uh
00:09:58.400 you know even an hour of paid work a week it's slightly worse than it was in 1940 in the 1940 census
00:10:08.800 which is to say at the tail end of the great depression when the national unemployment rate
00:10:14.400 was over 14 percent so the scale of the problem we're looking at today is kind of great depression
00:10:22.240 scale wow and is this a uniquely american problem or other western industrialized countries saying the same
00:10:28.640 issue well all rich western democracies have seen some decline in the percentage of prime age guys
00:10:43.200 in the workforce over the past let's say two generations but our decline is by far the worst
00:10:50.960 ours is the steepest and the largest so we have to wonder why is that i mean there are a bunch of
00:11:01.840 other rich countries around the world who've had economies that have been a lot more moribund than ours over
00:11:10.080 the last you know 50 years i mean look at what's happened in japan over the last generation it's been
00:11:15.520 pretty flat in the water but but japan's performance it's a lot better than ours you take a look at a
00:11:22.720 place like france which has got a famously rigid set of rules on the labor market it's got a great big
00:11:31.680 expensive welfare state their labor force participation for guys is a bunch above ours i mean you know um
00:11:39.520 greece is in extremis you're kind of perennially but it's uh performance is also uh more favorable
00:11:46.960 than ours so there's something what would you say we've won a race that we don't want to win and we're
00:11:52.800 exceptional in a way that we shouldn't want to be exceptional so why is that i mean what is going on
00:11:59.440 in america is are there fewer well-paying jobs is it a cultural thing what do you what do you suspect i
00:12:05.440 know there's no definitive answers but what are your hunches well of course like any other great
00:12:09.680 big historical change i don't think we can have a kind of like a one-factor theory of history it's
00:12:15.040 probably a bunch of different things in uh in the usa like other rich industrial democracies we've had
00:12:23.760 a big you know what you might call structural economic change we've had the decline of manufacturing
00:12:29.680 we've had more trade competition china and the world trade organization outsourcing decline in demand
00:12:38.320 for less skilled work uh all of that's a very big factor in this we've also clearly had some
00:12:48.960 changes in the way that our social welfare state works our social welfare state as you know i'm
00:12:56.240 constantly reminded when i go to other affluent societies it's a very stingy one compared to
00:13:01.200 theirs so it's not the the scale of generosity perhaps of our social welfare state but maybe some
00:13:07.920 of the perverse incentives we have a sort of a disability archipelago which plays a very important 0.99
00:13:17.200 role in providing alternative income to men who are neither working nor looking for work in this
00:13:25.920 prime age of life we also have something which is kind of invisible and i think terribly
00:13:33.200 sad and overlooked in our society which is quite different from almost any other country on earth
00:13:40.400 and this is the enormous invisible population of felons of people who have been sentenced to a felony
00:13:51.360 who are not behind bars uncle sam does not collect information on this i think to our shame but others who have attempted to estimate the
00:14:03.920 the size of this population suggest that as of the year 2010 there were over 19 million
00:14:13.200 adults in america with a felony in their background now they're obviously overwhelmingly guys
00:14:18.800 if you do the arithmetic and look at flows and stocks today there are most likely over 20 million americans
00:14:28.560 not behind bars in society as a whole who have a felony in their background overwhelmingly guys
00:14:36.160 this means that today whether or not we discuss it in general in public something like one in eight
00:14:43.760 adult guys not behind bars has a felony in his background and uh probably a somewhat higher
00:14:51.520 proportion for the men of prime working age this is one thing that is very different in america from
00:14:59.600 any other rich country and i have to think that this is part of the tableau we're looking at as well
00:15:06.320 right because most on most job applications they ask you if you have committed a felony
00:15:11.920 and that might be a reason people don't hire them well that's one of the reasons i mean there's
00:15:18.320 it's kind of ironic there's a movement in different places around the country called ban the box which is
00:15:27.840 supposed to mean that employers are not allowed to ask about that and ironically in the places where
00:15:35.840 this initiative has has succeeded people are much more likely not to hire uh ex-cons because they
00:15:45.200 presume that everybody's an ex-con and um right so it has the it has the opposite of its intended effect
00:15:54.160 but it's certainly true that if you've committed a felony there are a whole bunch of things you can't
00:15:58.880 do you can't work in financial services i mean you could just think about all the different things you
00:16:02.800 can't do but there are other aspects which i don't think we really understand uh well enough i mean
00:16:08.800 in my book using non-government data i show that no matter what a guy's age or his ethnicity or his
00:16:19.120 educational level he's way more likely to be out of the workforce if he's been to prison than if he is
00:16:27.040 just you know been arrested and way more likely to be out of the workforce if he's just been arrested
00:16:33.280 than if he's never had any trouble with the law now i can't tell you why that is i mean one reason
00:16:40.480 might be discrimination against felons another might be that people who go to prison lose their skills
00:16:48.240 somehow while they're in another hypothesis might be that employers just aren't all that interested in
00:16:56.000 the type of people who tend to get in trouble or there may be something else or there may be other
00:17:01.440 things or it may be some combination of these but as long as we have this glaring lack of information
00:17:09.760 about this now enormous share of our adult male population we don't don't know we can't know right
00:17:21.680 well give us a snapshot i mean what does this disengaged male worker look like i mean what
00:17:28.880 average age i guess the average age is you know between 25 and 50 but where do they live primarily uh
00:17:35.200 what do they do with their all their spare time if they're like if they're not working
00:17:38.640 what are they doing well let's start with that we can we can tell about that aspect of life from
00:17:47.840 information the government regularly collects in what are called time use surveys these are things
00:17:55.120 which the labor department collects you know to get an idea of when people are working and you know
00:18:00.880 what they're doing getting to work and stuff like that but they also ask people who aren't employed
00:18:05.840 about this adults who aren't employed so of the seven million neither working nor looking for work
00:18:13.760 between the ages of 25 and 54 a little bit more than a tenth are adult students you know they're studying
00:18:24.880 they're trying to gain skills presumably to get back into the game and get a better job
00:18:31.680 um their time use looks pretty much like employed men um the overwhelming majority though of guys in this
00:18:45.440 out of the labor force pool are in what is called the neat category n-e-e-t neither employed nor in
00:18:56.880 education or training and for them the picture is pretty grim i mean for one thing and this is all
00:19:07.440 self-reported people in this group basically don't seem to do civil society not much volunteering
00:19:16.400 not much charitable work not much worship you might think they have nothing but time on their hands
00:19:22.880 but they do relatively little in the way of child care or caring for other people in their household
00:19:32.960 family and not that much in the way of household chores what they do what they report doing is watching
00:19:44.640 and the surveys don't ask whether it's watching a tv or a handheld device or a laptop or whatever but
00:19:55.840 it's watching stuff about 2100 hours a year i mean which is akin to a full-time job and these same time
00:20:06.480 use surveys suggest that these guys are getting out less and less that they're
00:20:15.280 not leaving the house not traveling outside the house as much today as they used to in the past now
00:20:22.960 some other work that was done since i published this book uh suggests that a very large proportion
00:20:32.400 of these um men not in the labor force are taking uh pain pills maybe something like almost half taking pain
00:20:46.480 pills every day according to self-reported uh survey data so this tableau is not just of guys
00:20:57.600 as sitting at home you know playing world of warcraft it's uh playing world of warcraft while stoned
00:21:05.680 and it's it's a very grim picture that is grim i mean what are i mean that for the individual it's
00:21:14.480 grim but let's talk about a like sort of a societal ramification what are the some of the economic
00:21:19.680 and social ramifications of having so many disengaged men from the workforce more or less exactly what
00:21:26.960 you'd imagine and none of it good uh so what does it mean you have this enormous chunk of prime age
00:21:36.160 male manpower sidelined in this sort of way well slower economic growth bigger income gaps bigger wealth
00:21:47.120 gaps in society more social welfare dependence probably higher budget deficits and thus higher public debt
00:21:55.920 obviously more pressure on fragile families less social mobility less healthy civil society i mean
00:22:04.080 you know just go through the whole thing there's nothing good in it it's all bad i i mean i wish i could
00:22:09.440 figure out a good thing in it but it's it's it's it's a problem for the individuals it's a problem for
00:22:15.440 their families for their communities and for our nation do like i mean i guess the individuals are having
00:22:20.320 because they're taking pain medication which they probably might not even have physical pain might
00:22:25.360 be a way to soothe the psychological campaign but i think when guys hear like oh you just get to watch
00:22:30.480 tv and play video games all day and it sounds like the dream life are there some men who are like that
00:22:34.160 they're like yeah just i have no desire to get back into work even though i could this is great for me and
00:22:40.640 i want to keep doing this well if you look in particular at what has happened to the anglos the
00:22:50.960 non-hispanic whites at working age men it's true of working age women too i guess but if you look at
00:22:58.560 the men in particular there's been a noticeable increase in death rates for lower skilled prime age anglo
00:23:08.480 men over the past two decades let's say and a lot of these are from what the princeton economists uh
00:23:17.120 and case and angus deaton angus um won the nobel prize in economics a couple of years ago a lot of
00:23:23.440 these deaths are from what they call deaths of despair from um cirrhosis of the liver and from drug
00:23:30.720 overdoses and from suicide so that aspect of it doesn't look like such a happy picture
00:23:38.880 now this isn't only men not in the workforce i hasten to say that they weren't focusing just on
00:23:45.520 that group but but that's part of it and the consumption of pain medication looks to be a lot
00:23:54.240 higher for those who are out of the labor force altogether than for unemployed or for employed guys
00:24:01.920 going back to what this demographic looks like our education level is it primarily just high school
00:24:08.960 grads are there college grads or is it primarily a lower education uh demographic i'm glad you asked
00:24:15.520 that so now if you have let's say seven million uh people in a group you're going to have some of
00:24:21.920 everybody most likely but as you indicate some uh groups are overrepresented and some are underrepresented
00:24:29.360 so to start with the ethnic thing african americans are decidedly overrepresented in this group
00:24:37.840 but among what's called persons of color both asian and latinos are underrepresented they're more
00:24:46.320 likely to be in the labor force than the national average with education it's just like you said high
00:24:51.520 school dropouts way more likely to be in this group than the national average college grads and
00:24:59.440 people with graduate degrees way less likely turns out that marital status is a big predictor no matter
00:25:06.640 what your educational background or ethnicity if you're married you're less likely to be in this
00:25:14.800 group if you've never been married you're way more likely to be in this group no matter whether you
00:25:19.920 have kids or not having a kid at home by the way all other things being equal means you're less likely
00:25:25.680 to be out of the labor force more likely to be in the game in the labor force looking for work or
00:25:31.040 getting work then there's finally this category that the census bureau awkwardly calls nativity and it
00:25:37.920 doesn't mean like christmas scenes it's uh it means like whether you were born in the usa or not guys
00:25:45.360 who are born in america are more likely to be out of the workforce altogether than guys who are born
00:25:51.520 abroad and it doesn't matter again about your ethnicity asian anglo african-american latino immigrants
00:26:01.520 of all flavors are more likely to be in the workforce than their native-born counterparts so
00:26:10.160 that's kind of like the broader picture of how you know different source of code uh social
00:26:16.880 categories uh look in this respect how are these men supporting themselves and what's their living
00:26:22.320 standard like so you mentioned disability payments as one source from what we can divine from
00:26:31.520 government information on spending patterns which i think are the important
00:26:40.080 numbers in trying to understand consumption and standards of living the men who are out of the
00:26:49.120 workforce altogether are not in the bottom fifth of our income distribution people who are in the bottom
00:26:58.240 fifth of our income distribution and our spending patterns are single mothers they're the ones who are 1.00
00:27:06.400 in the most disadvantaged in the most disadvantaged position these men without work without workforce
00:27:13.120 participation are in the quintile above that ironically they're kind of in the group that used to be the
00:27:23.440 kind of the status for people who are called working class except these are guys who are neither working
00:27:28.960 or looking for work they clearly have lower standards of living than men who are at work they are drawing their sustenance
00:27:42.880 off of their families other family members off of their girlfriends and off of their uncle and that uncle would be uncle sam
00:27:54.960 according to one government survey done by the census bureau
00:28:02.560 almost three and five of the guys who are neither working or looking for work in this critical group
00:28:09.760 the 25 to 54s almost three and five receive benefits from at least one government disability program
00:28:20.080 and if you qualify for benefits uh from disability programs by convention then are eligible for other
00:28:29.200 benefits as well low income healthcare medicaid snap which we used to call food stamps and other things like
00:28:37.120 that so it is clear that men who are out of the workforce um don't live like princes but on the other hand
00:28:47.920 they are not at the bottom of u.s society either and what do you think we can do about this i know you're
00:28:56.800 primarily describing the problem and don't get too much of the prescriptions but what what could we
00:29:02.960 do to solve this issue or is it solvable well it's a it's a big long-term historical trend so i tend to
00:29:13.680 think that big uh long-term historical trends take a while to turn around doesn't mean they can't be
00:29:20.080 turned around of course we have to try to turn them around i was very light on recommendations in this
00:29:27.280 book partly because i didn't want to bigfoot this it seemed to me was much more important to get people
00:29:33.600 talking about the problem and offering discussions from all around the public square than to have nick come
00:29:41.760 in with his i don't know you know a 10-point program or whatever to uh you know uh show us the
00:29:48.000 tablets from the mountain for what it is worth i would talk about things that government can do and
00:29:56.640 things that government can't do and then a couple of things that maybe government should be looking at
00:30:03.440 among things that it possibly might be able to do so this problem clearly corresponds with the breakdown
00:30:11.520 of the family in post-war america that's something i don't think the government can fix and i i think
00:30:17.840 i'd be kind of scared if the government you know set up a bureau for fixing the family in america because
00:30:23.760 the unintended consequences of that would be unimaginable and maybe worse than anything positive
00:30:29.680 they tried to do so the family is a huge uh aspect in here and probably outside of washington's purview
00:30:38.720 by the same token religion and faith has some important role here and i'm not sure we should
00:30:48.080 want uncle sam to be monkeying around with that either that's a civil society matter among things that
00:30:55.280 the government might be able to do however i i would point to three or four in particular
00:31:01.120 one is skills college is not for everybody obviously but nobody should graduate without having a skill
00:31:12.720 and one of the awful things about education in america today is a lot of people graduate from high
00:31:21.680 school without a marketable skill we need to fix that broken aspect of our educational system
00:31:29.840 and maybe destigmatize vocational training a little bit so that's one thing that could be done
00:31:37.040 not necessarily in washington maybe in localities but it's something in general that should be examined
00:31:43.360 second thing we've seen small businesses in america increasingly struggling and this is a trend that goes back
00:31:51.520 decades it's happened under republican presidents under democratic administrations under red congresses blue
00:31:59.920 congresses we've had a long-term trend of declining business startups it's not entirely clear why this
00:32:11.040 is i mean i suspect it is related in part to the increasing difficulties that small businesses face in attracting
00:32:20.720 finance and the growing tax burden that they face and the growing regulatory burden not just in washington and
00:32:30.160 states and localities as well if we have a healthier small business environment we're going to have a much better
00:32:38.400 job creating engine than we enjoy right now so that's a second thing i think worth looking at third has to do
00:32:46.880 with our disability insurance programs they were established for a very good purpose which is to provide social
00:32:56.160 insurance for people who can't work the programs as a whole have mutated away from their intended purpose
00:33:04.240 and there are a lot of people now who rely on disability programs as an alternative to employment
00:33:14.800 it's hardly a princely life it's a penurious income but it is an alternative to working life we had a welfare
00:33:24.480 reform 20 years ago that worked pretty well in transforming aid for families with dependent children
00:33:33.040 into uh temporary assistance for needy families i think we should wholesale reform our national
00:33:42.000 programs for disability benefits into on a kind of a work first principle i realize that's easier said than
00:33:49.840 done but that would be the objective and then finally we've got this invisible population of 20 million
00:33:56.640 people who are ex-felons who are kind of living in the shadows of society i mean that's that's kind of 1.00
00:34:03.520 appalling we're a government that set up the census uh in 1790 because our founders thought that information
00:34:13.120 was important for public policy that was more than two centuries ago can't we really have some information
00:34:21.040 about how people in this enormous group live what their health is like what their employment is like
00:34:27.600 what their incomes are like what their government program dependence is like we can't have evidence-based
00:34:33.840 policies for bringing people out of this pool and into the workforce unless we have the evidence so
00:34:40.320 those would be a couple of the directions that i think might be worth examining let's put it that way
00:34:46.480 and what do you think for people who are listening to this podcast they could sure they could go and
00:34:51.040 you know write a letter to their congressman about these issues and vote for someone who who's doing
00:34:56.160 you know who's on the same who's got this on their platform but what can individuals like in civil society do
00:35:02.160 you know to help with that that problem well i mean of course there's to begin with what we might call the
00:35:10.240 the empathy barrier in a time of increasingly gated communities and decreasing contact between social strata you might start by wanting to get
00:35:25.920 out a little bit and seeing how the other half is living and what the real life circumstances of some of your fellow american citizens are like
00:35:38.240 and then maybe you'd have a little bit more perspective on some of the problems which we are facing today
00:35:48.160 because what's happened in the us over the last decade or so is that the escalator has broken for a large
00:35:58.640 fraction of our fellow citizens and i guess i'd say the first thing we ought to do
00:36:06.000 is get out a little bit and kind of you know recognize the reality the information revolution
00:36:13.680 has been wonderful in innumerable ways but it's also balkanized us and in a way it's kind of separated us
00:36:23.520 from our fellow citizens because we all find you know kind of like self-validating self-confirming
00:36:30.320 kind of sources of news and in some ways may kind of like retreat from the uh from the public square
00:36:37.120 a bit i think it would be really valuable for for more contact between americans and i realize that's
00:36:44.000 extraordinarily vague to say but i think that might be a very positive starting point for for self-informing
00:36:52.320 approaches towards addressing really long-term problems in our country well nicholas eberstadt
00:36:58.480 this has been a great conversation thank you so much for your time it's been a pleasure
00:37:03.120 my guest is nicholas eberstadt he's the author of the book men without work it's available on amazon.com
00:37:07.840 also check out our show notes at aom.is men without work where you can find links to resources
00:37:12.240 where you delve deeper into this topic well that wraps up another edition of the art of
00:37:25.680 manliness podcast for more manly tips and advice make sure to check out the art of manliness website
00:37:29.360 at artofmanliness.com if you join the podcast i've gotten something out of it i appreciate if you take
00:37:33.200 one minute to give us a review on itunes or stitcher it helps out a lot and if you've already done that
00:37:36.720 thank you please share the show with a few of your friends word of mouth is how this show expands
00:37:40.960 his audience the more the merrier as always thank you for your continued support and until next time
00:37:45.120 this is brett mckay telling you to stay manly