#658: In Praise of Maintenance in a World Obsessed With Innovation
Episode Stats
Summary
Humans like starting new things much more than taking care of older things. This is true on both an institutional and individual level. It s more exciting to build a new road than to maintain an old one, and it s cheaper to lose weight than to keep it off. There s plenty of short-term pleasure and intrinsic motivation when it comes pursuing something novel, but the effort to keep up unsexy maintenance on what we ve already got takes real intent. My guest today says we ve lost that intent and need to revive it.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
brett mckay here and welcome to another edition of the art of manliness podcast
00:00:10.940
humans like starting new things much more than taking care of older things this is true on both
00:00:15.600
an institutional and individual level it's more exciting to build a new road than to maintain an
00:00:19.580
old one more exciting to lose weight than to keep it off there's plenty of short-term pleasure and
00:00:23.680
intrinsic motivation when it comes pursuing something novel but the effort to keep up
00:00:27.300
unsexy maintenance on what we've already got takes real intent my guest day says we've lost that
00:00:32.100
intent and need to revive it his name is lee vinsel he's professor of science technology and society
00:00:36.600
the co-founder of the maintainers which is a research network dedicated to study of maintenance
00:00:40.940
repair upkeep and ordinary work and the co-author of the innovation delusion how our obsession with
00:00:45.600
the new has disrupted the work that matters most lee and i began our conversation with how our
00:00:49.920
cultural focus on innovation has come at the expense of attention paid to maintenance repair
00:00:53.980
and yet how talking more about innovation hasn't really led to greater progress we then get into
00:00:58.640
the way the necessity of maintenance repair and caretaking has been neglected in business and
00:01:02.320
government creating a situation where we keep building new things without investing the upkeep of
00:01:06.600
our current infrastructure from there we turn to the way our all too common neglect of maintenance
00:01:10.720
applies not only to big institutions but also our personal lives as in the areas of home ownership
00:01:15.200
and health we discuss how there's less incentive these days repair things in our disposable society
00:01:19.300
where everything is cheap and stuff is harder to fix even if we want to fix that stuff we
00:01:23.740
end our conversation with how we can revive a maintenance mindset in our culture and individual
00:01:26.540
lives after the show's over check out our show notes at aom.is slash maintenance
00:01:30.880
lee vinsel welcome to the show thanks for having me all right so you've co-authored a book dedicated
00:01:46.020
the idea that we need to revive our sense of the importance of maintenance and repair but you spend the
00:01:50.500
first half of the book arguing that one of the reasons that maintenance has been neglected is
00:01:54.580
that we started spending all of our time thinking about innovation even though all that emphasis on
00:01:59.680
innovation ironically doesn't actually result in more real innovation we'll talk about what this
00:02:04.700
modern over emphasis on innovation looks like here in a minute but to start when did you first
00:02:09.980
realize that maybe our focus on innovation isn't all it's cracked up to be um it really came from
00:02:16.740
like a frustration with the way people were talking about innovation you know i work in universities and
00:02:23.340
university administrators just talk about innovation innovation innovation all the time um and you also
00:02:30.220
hear in the business world especially in the kind of silicon valley tech sector so for us it started with
00:02:36.280
just a frustration with how empty the word had become and then only later um my buddy made a joke so
00:02:44.540
walter isaacson's book the it was called the innovators how a group of hackers geniuses and
00:02:50.200
geeks created the digital revolution um that book came out my buddy andy who i wrote the book with said
00:02:56.200
we should write like a counter volume which would be called the maintainers how bureaucrats standards
00:03:01.980
engineers and introverts create technologies that kind of work most of the time and we played with
00:03:07.420
that online like on twitter and blog posts and stuff and it just kind of took on a life of its own
00:03:11.920
and then it was through kind of exploring that um that like that you know that dichotomy between
00:03:18.280
the way people are talking about innovation and you know maintenance repair that we started to see
00:03:23.800
that you know the may that the way we talk about innovation has these dark sides so i wouldn't say it
00:03:29.240
was like a like immediate insight it would really kind of came over time from thinking about these issues
00:03:34.260
well let's talk about this idea about the way we talk about innovation uh at universities and
00:03:39.360
businesses even in the government in the book you make you make this point it's important to
00:03:43.600
distinguish between actual innovation and innovation speak what's the difference between the two yeah
00:03:49.340
so actual innovation is the process of introducing new things or new processes new business models things
00:03:55.780
like that um and one of the reasons we want to make you know this distinction is because we think
00:04:01.480
innovation is really important you know human life has really changed over the last 150 or 200 years
00:04:07.420
with you know the rise of all these technologies like electricity and computing and you know we can go on
00:04:12.760
and on um but innovation speak though even the our use of the word innovation didn't really start until
00:04:20.320
after world war ii um and not only that so we wanted to say like this way we've we've talked about
00:04:29.340
innovation has a history and if you if you look at like some people argue that actual innovation
00:04:35.240
slow down since about 1970 or so um and yet we've been talking about innovation more and more uh and
00:04:43.800
so it's not clear that talking about innovation is actually getting us innovation and so that's one
00:04:48.760
reason why this distinction is really important is to be clear that you know the kind of talk and hype
00:04:54.680
is different from the thing and and just to be very clear about that well in some of the the stuff you
00:05:00.820
hear today about innovation speak it's like we're going to innovate or we're going to disrupt that
00:05:05.980
that's the kind of stuff you hear and you're like what exactly does that what does that what does that
00:05:09.600
actually mean yeah disruption is one of these things that started off with a very narrow precise
00:05:14.780
meeting in the early 1990s and then it just becomes you know this hot buzzword uh that people
00:05:21.500
throw around that has no meaning basically you know um and there's lots of other ones like agile and lean
00:05:27.780
um you know uh all kinds of innovation social innovation social entrepreneurship there's just
00:05:35.960
this huge like bag of buzzwords design thinking of course design thinking yeah design thinking
00:05:42.960
yeah that's another one well i think you make this interesting point sort of the history of this
00:05:47.680
innovation speak the way we talk about innovation before world war ii people didn't use the word
00:05:53.080
innovate and when they talked about technology they use the word progress and when when you hear
00:05:58.600
progress you think okay things get better like our life gets better and you you and your co-author
00:06:03.260
make this case that yeah like before world war ii like the technological advancements that we made
00:06:09.800
a lot of them like they brought progress like they brought us out of poverty and increased health etc
00:06:15.540
well i mean so you could there's a tool that your your listeners can play around with called google
00:06:20.760
ngram it's n-g-r-a-m and it allows you to track word use over time it's just fun to throw in there like
00:06:27.420
peanut butter and jelly or whatever and see when people started talking about that but if you throw
00:06:31.840
in progress in there you can see that our use of the word progress actually starts going down in the
00:06:37.520
late 1960s you know i mean that's the time of like nixon and the vietnam war and there's all these
00:06:44.760
environmental problems and the economies like in the garbage and people started kind of lost faith
00:06:50.940
in progress moral progress that our society was getting better and better and innovation almost
00:06:56.640
becomes a substitution word it's not saying you know it's not saying that society is going to progress
00:07:03.440
necessarily it's like technology is going to get better and somehow that's going to save us right so
00:07:08.920
there's there was like a there's been a decoupling between like innovate like actual innovation and
00:07:13.960
human progress before like you know you get electricity that changes people's lives or indoor
00:07:18.040
plumbing or antibiotics that that's a game changer but now it's like okay you have a new app on your
00:07:23.320
smartphone does it really make that much of a difference totally yeah and you see all these firms
00:07:28.580
like uber and peloton and we work and there's so many firms right now that are struggling to be
00:07:34.300
profitable right and they're like app driven often app driven things and they're just not that big of
00:07:40.560
a benefit to human life you know they smooth out some things that make some things more convenient
00:07:45.300
but it's not electricity it's not the automobile um it's not you know modern chemicals or whatever
00:07:52.360
right it's not that big but what happened like why was there a decoupling like you right around the
00:07:57.160
1960s of like technological innovation and and what we call progress like our lives getting better
00:08:03.740
what do you think happened so it's a really there's huge debates in economics and history about this
00:08:09.540
issue right now um my take is that you know one way to put it is that we we kind of plucked all the
00:08:17.180
low-hanging fruit in technology and some of the biggest changes in technology were and this is like
00:08:24.560
the economist robert gordon argues they came between 1870 and 1970 so you're talking about the car
00:08:30.180
electricity the airlines chemicals uh electronics industries early computing all these things right
00:08:37.720
and then you know after 1970 or 1980 those things are not improving that rapidly so when we talk about
00:08:46.260
innovation a lot of times we're talking about cell phones and the internet right and i would never say
00:08:52.180
that though i mean right now you and i are talking over skype and doing this interview remotely and you know
00:08:57.780
in higher ed today because of covid we're running our classes over zoom or whatever i would never say
00:09:03.520
that those things have not had some effect but it's a very narrow band of human life and then you know
00:09:10.040
your toilet hasn't improved that much over the last 50 years or whatever right like there's a lot of areas
00:09:15.800
in human life where things are pretty set and mature and i think that's the issue is that there's a lot of
00:09:21.520
parts of our lives that just haven't been changing that rapidly yeah i've heard like this thought
00:09:25.780
experiment people ask like a hypotheticals like would you rather give up like your ipad and your
00:09:30.440
internet connected devices or indoor plumbing electricity and antibiotics concrete right you're
00:09:36.980
like yeah i could i would be fine without all this like pretty much all the tech inventions from
00:09:41.980
2000 on i'd be okay if i didn't have it i mean like slack is nice to do business work over with and
00:09:48.460
even though you know we can also talk about how a lot of these things are also distractions and
00:09:52.440
actually interrupt our work too right so they're not always wins but it's not that big of an
00:09:58.180
improvement over email or the kinds of things we had in the 90s another point you you guys make is
00:10:02.760
that well so we we want innovation like because we have this idea that new is better um but not
00:10:08.620
necessarily and so as a result there's been these like industries that have built up they're like
00:10:13.040
innovation industries where they sell you the idea of innovation like walk us through some of these
00:10:18.040
businesses that have grown up to sell us the idea of innovation yeah so we highlight three in the in
00:10:23.740
the book um i'll start with clayton christensen he was a harvard business school uh professor he died
00:10:32.380
a year or two ago now and he's the guy who came up with the idea of disruptive innovation or at least
00:10:38.160
the term he was actually borrowed the idea from an earlier economist um and you know the idea of
00:10:44.680
disruption is that is that some new innovation is going to like blow um an existing industry or
00:10:51.820
technology out of the water like now we have netflix and you know the only remaining blockbuster you can
00:10:57.460
like rent from airbnb and sleep in it or something like that right um and so christensen had a consulting
00:11:04.940
firm called innocyte or i guess they like put innovation goggles on you um that you could hire in to
00:11:11.780
either teach you to be a disruptor or teach you to avoid being disrupted i guess um and he made a lot
00:11:17.920
of money off of off of that consulting group and then you know we also talk about richard florida who's
00:11:25.400
the guy who created the notion of creative class he's made a lot of money off of basically cities uh hiring
00:11:31.920
him and his firm to come in and make their you know their places more appealing to hipsters and creative
00:11:39.040
types who are supposed to create economic growth and you know then there's like the design thinking
00:11:43.380
ideo stanford d school folks um who promise to make you more innovative but don't really have any
00:11:49.500
evidence for it and i should say that part of the issues is christensen's ideas actually don't hold up to
00:11:55.560
like uh you know social scientific analysis this notion of disruption just doesn't hold any water
00:12:01.600
but part of you know so part of the part of what we're trying to argue is that because we want
00:12:07.580
innovation and because it makes profit for companies and because it makes growth for nations and
00:12:13.980
governments you know it creates this space for people to like claim their experts to that could
00:12:20.340
give you some solution that could come and make you more innovative or you know make us all you know
00:12:26.480
create more innovations and and you know that's the so it creates a consulting space you know and they
00:12:33.060
have like incentives to not really be honest with us about their ideas and how effective they are
00:12:39.660
and a lot of this uh uh innovations like well that's interesting but you talk about the point
00:12:44.660
that like innovation actually happens but when it does happen it usually happens like slowly and often
00:12:50.260
accidentally like serendipitously you can't like plan for innovation it's hard to
00:12:54.340
yeah i mean i'm i'm like enough of a you know a progressive professor like you know stereotypical
00:13:01.220
in that way where i'd like i want the government to spend money on like scientific research because
00:13:06.780
i think that leads downstream to actual innovations that benefit our life but you know like this is a
00:13:14.420
place where i actually think there's something to like conservative and libertarian arguments where you
00:13:18.880
can't really steer this stuff right it's like you can't plan it in a way
00:13:23.620
uh and i think that's part of the problem with these innovation consultants is they want to give
00:13:29.480
you a recipe for how to produce innovation and it just doesn't work that way so all this time while
00:13:35.200
we've been spending money on and time and energy on thinking about how to be more innovative and like
00:13:40.080
there's innovations that we come up with i mean they're not that great like at best we get email
00:13:44.840
slack which can help things a little bit emails helped a lot slack not so much then you have things
00:13:49.220
like the juicero which you talk about right i just said there's new juiceros there's one now for
00:13:55.120
tortillas like homemade tortillas and there's one there's like a cocktail juicero so instead of making
00:14:01.360
your own cocktails uh which i think is a manly thing to do you're you're supposed to use this uh
00:14:06.860
you know use this gadget to just have it do it for you right well for those who don't know the
00:14:11.720
juicero it's just it's it's a it's a smart juicing thing where you you have to buy these pouches
00:14:16.220
with juicing we're basically kind of pulpy juice and then the juicero squeezes it because you push
00:14:21.320
a button your smartphone i guess people realize you could just squeeze the stuff out with your
00:14:25.280
hands out of the pouch yeah you could just cut it cut the thing open with scissors and squeeze it out
00:14:29.560
and there was the machine wasn't doing that much so so yeah we that innovation speaks can get you
00:14:34.800
innovations like that which aren't very useful so all this time we've been thinking about how to be
00:14:39.060
innovative we've you make the case we've been neglecting maintenance what do you think is going on
00:14:45.240
there like why let's talk about maintenance in the first place you make the case in the book that
00:14:51.220
maintenance is it's necessary but it's often neglected and this isn't new this has been a
00:14:57.420
problem for most of human history like how far back do we know that people have had problems with
00:15:01.440
maintenance oh all the way back you know we talked to the historian pam long uh and uh she's a
00:15:09.700
historian of like the middle ages and in the ancient world and she says that in rome and like
00:15:16.640
the 14th or 15th century like it's just absolutely awful there was no maintenance going on um and so
00:15:24.300
you know there's and there's lots of other examples of like failing sewer systems in ancient rome and
00:15:29.500
stuff so maintenance has always been a problem as you say and how has it become more of a problem in
00:15:34.740
the 20th and 21st centuries there's a number of areas of life we can talk about i mean i think the
00:15:41.280
the kind of high theme here is that there's a lot of incentives these days for short-term thinking
00:15:48.620
so in the corporate sector for instance uh there's a lot of emphasis put on the quarterly report
00:15:55.980
and for producing short-term growth and you know to boost stock prices and such well that is going to
00:16:04.160
lead you to put a lot of emphasis on you know creating the new thing that's going to get that
00:16:10.960
that extra boost and distract you from keeping going you know the things that are already there
00:16:18.180
and we see the same thing in government so our our federal infrastructure programs are aimed to get money
00:16:25.900
to localities uh to build roads and such but then there's no federal money for maintenance and what
00:16:34.380
the localities are doing is signing on to maintain those things forever right or until they want to
00:16:41.300
put the road to bed and and they don't have the tax money to do that so they have the short-term incentive
00:16:47.460
to take the federal money to build the thing that's awesome and everyone can stand in front of it and
00:16:52.760
take a pretty picture and you know cut a ribbon or whatever um but then you know they're not
00:16:58.040
considering the downturn the downroad costs of it well it was so i thought an interesting point you
00:17:03.300
made in the book was like at the 19th century like the railroad tycoons they actually kind of figured
00:17:08.900
out that maintenance was an important part of their business operation and they had to invest a lot
00:17:12.860
and they actually built up an infrastructure for maintenance and they actually um like maintainers
00:17:18.000
people who'd maintain that like that that was a not a high status but it came with it was well paid
00:17:23.580
and was it was it was well regarded but then like slowly into the 20th century like maintenance or
00:17:30.820
the maintenance professions kind of were seen as dead-end dead-end work what do you think happened
00:17:35.360
there like from the 19th century to the 20th century where maintenance or being involved in
00:17:39.900
maintenance work was seen as uh you know like just not something not not something to aspire to
00:17:44.820
yeah well part of it is that we look at like the status that is associated with work is part of our
00:17:51.700
argument um and something that happens is as technologies age they they go down in terms of
00:17:58.740
social status so in the 19th century it was high status to be a mechanic or an electrician those were
00:18:06.340
both things that you would do as a aspiring young person who wanted to move up in the world well
00:18:11.660
obviously that's not how we talk about those trades now that's not i'm not saying you know like
00:18:15.860
socially we judge those as like the trades right and they're for people you know in quotation marks who
00:18:22.420
aren't you know college material or whatever this is not how i think about it that's how people talk
00:18:26.860
about it and so as technologies age the status of working on them tends to go down and we see that
00:18:34.260
actually happening with coding and um computer work right now um so they're becoming more blue collar
00:18:41.400
like um and eventually you might not even need to go to college to do them so i think that this is
00:18:47.020
one dynamic and answer your question is as the things get older the the status of working on them
00:18:53.160
uh declines we're gonna take a quick break for your word from our sponsors
00:18:57.180
and now back to the show let's go back to this idea of where we're having problems with maintenance
00:19:03.720
you mentioned roads and i thought this was really interesting because in the u.s we're always talking
00:19:07.580
about the poor state of of our infrastructure and it's always it's always sort of like a platform for
00:19:11.440
both whatever partition whatever side of the spectrum they're on roads are bad bridges are
00:19:16.440
crumbling and i mean i really don't understand like what's going on there and you as you said before
00:19:22.180
like what happened is like the federal government subsidizes federal highways but then passes it on
00:19:26.900
to the states and the local municipalities to maintain the roads i guess the problem is like
00:19:33.400
when these local governments decide to take on these these new roads or new bridges like why don't
00:19:38.420
they think about the maintenance costs like why don't they think about oh we're gonna get this free
00:19:42.320
bridge basically but they don't think about and then we're gonna have to pay for it 30 40 years down
00:19:47.260
the line i think because they're not required to you know i mean it's it's basically free money
00:19:53.980
they're getting from the federal government or very very low interest loans um and they're not
00:20:00.140
required to show that you know that they they can handle the cost down the line so the incentives
00:20:06.540
are like directly aligned for them taking the money and then dealing with it later and they won't even be
00:20:12.540
in office when or around when when it becomes a problem like 20 or 30 years down the road
00:20:18.400
um so i think it's about incentives ultimately and the other problem too is that you know maybe they
00:20:24.080
accepted the money when things were were great but then they're like tax base has been decimated
00:20:29.540
because they've lost an industry so i'm thinking like rust belt type places where they had all the
00:20:34.880
car industry and they thought yeah maybe in 50 years we'll be able to maintain it but now that the
00:20:39.660
industry's gone they don't have the tax base to support the maintenance of the road anymore
00:20:42.800
yeah i mean this guy chuck marone at strong towns who's really a good person to follow on these
00:20:48.500
issues i mean he he's shown and argues that this issue of like taking on too much you know too much
00:20:56.500
infrastructural debt and not being able to maintain it is a problem in like normal healthy communities
00:21:02.420
but obviously there's lots of part of lots of parts of our country that have depopulated over the last
00:21:07.960
30 or 40 years so that becomes an even bigger problem right you just don't even have the
00:21:12.640
tax base to keep going uh then then you face really tough questions about like how to handle
00:21:19.280
handle repair water systems for a municipality when there's no money right uh those are those
00:21:25.880
are huge questions for our society well are there places in the world that you found where they've
00:21:30.600
been able to crack this maintenance not like were they able to keep their infrastructure it's it's
00:21:34.460
stable it's good it's in good working order you know it's funny uh we do look at a couple places
00:21:39.560
in the book so first of all you can look like at japanese high-speed rail systems they have amazing
00:21:45.740
maintenance um they've never had a deadly accident and uh you know like their average annual delay
00:21:54.720
is like by a minute the average delay over time is is a is a minute and you tell that to people on like
00:22:00.900
the northeastern corridor uh where you know they use the train to get from new york to washington dc
00:22:07.620
or whatever they're gonna cry um and then we also looked at look at like water maintenance
00:22:14.360
water management systems in the netherlands that are pretty amazing and they do a good job
00:22:20.680
maintaining um this is how they deal with ocean water but you know since the book came out there's
00:22:26.340
been a series of articles about the canal systems in amsterdam and how they're collapsing so it's just
00:22:33.020
like i think you can find some cultures that are better at it in general but there's always exceptions
00:22:38.700
you know apparently even the dutch aren't good at maintaining some things well so one point you make
00:22:44.240
in the book is that in order to solve these maintenance issues like when stuff's falling apart
00:22:48.220
governments even universities businesses the typical solution is okay we're going to grow our
00:22:53.840
way out of it right we don't have the money now maybe if you throw more money at it right now get
00:22:58.620
bigger that'll solve the problem but then you guys make this case that well growth yeah it can solve
00:23:04.460
the problem but then it just perpetuates the problems you already had before like how so what's
00:23:09.400
going on there well i think there's two sides of it the first side is that in a sense our infrastructural
00:23:16.780
problem comes from growth right or the the way we use federal money to build infrastructure is a post
00:23:23.600
world war ii thing and during that time we've grown out the suburbs in our country at an amazing rate
00:23:30.260
and so we've we've used federal it's almost like a bubble of sorts you know we've used federal money
00:23:35.980
to blow build up all this infrastructure now we're stuck with it um so growth becomes a liability down
00:23:43.340
the road and i also think growth is just not sustainable as a strategy it's not sustainable
00:23:48.420
environmentally uh in in for lots of production but you know you look at universities today they want
00:23:55.120
to deal with everything um in terms of growth well every university in the nation is trying to deal
00:24:02.120
with their problems via growth and you just think about the numbers of students and how there's actually
00:24:07.220
going to be declining numbers of college students over the last next decade not everyone's going to grow
00:24:12.920
you know it's just it's not realistic so i i think both how growth becomes a liability and is not like a
00:24:19.600
realistic long-term strategy those are the two sides that come to mind right now right so as you get bigger
00:24:25.340
it's just more stuff to maintain yeah and you know i mean that's part of the history of you know we can
00:24:30.480
think of like modern life is that you know we had the railroads then we had you know the telephone system
00:24:36.400
and we had the electricity system and then the highways and the road systems water systems all
00:24:43.060
these things that make modern life modern life as we've built them up over the last 150 years they
00:24:49.020
become debts and liabilities that we're accountable for so i mean that's an argument for saying we really
00:24:55.200
need to if we're going to build more we need to think about how we're going to pay for it before we do so
00:25:00.100
yeah i've heard this phrase like this term i think it's part from that guy parkinson who's like
00:25:04.820
he came with parkinson's law like time fills the space available or work fills the time available
00:25:10.660
he also had like some other things like basically if an organization gets above a thousand like
00:25:14.960
most of the work at that point just goes to maintaining the organization and not not actually
00:25:19.980
doing anything new and you can see that yeah yeah you can see that at universities i mean you look at
00:25:24.000
all the number of deans and administrators and they're not it's just i mean that's that's a problem
00:25:27.980
and there's like not much teaching going i have a friend who's a professor and it's a constant i mean
00:25:32.960
he carps about it i get it oh man it's so so true and you talk about like you know how we
00:25:37.680
saddle students with like all this debt in our country and i think there's a pretty strong
00:25:42.760
argument to be made that the reason we've been raising tuition is because we've added this enormous
00:25:46.980
layer of administration you know so we've been talking about the problems institutions have with
00:25:53.480
maintenance so governments businesses etc but we also have these same problems of maintenance on the
00:26:00.100
personal level like where in our personal lives do we do you have you seen people having problems with
00:26:05.380
with maintenance boy i mean i think at home if you're a homeowner or renter but especially if
00:26:11.520
you're a homeowner i think you know the realities of maintenance and how it's so easy to push it push it
00:26:16.900
off so one of the things i did for the book is i actually bought a bought a house here in
00:26:21.780
blacksburg virginia when we were working on the book and i i talked to a home inspector you know a guy who
00:26:28.080
does inspections for sales and he was just telling me all kinds of wild stories of like you know he
00:26:36.260
climbed on climbs on people's roofs to find if they're sound or not and he actually fell half partway
00:26:42.060
through one like a month or two before we had talked and he said you know he said that the the
00:26:48.280
scariest thing he sees is when he goes and looks at people's decks on the back of their houses and he
00:26:55.040
says so often he just has nightmares that people are going to have like a family party or something
00:27:00.200
they're just going to collapse under too many people so i mean i think that's you know we can
00:27:04.700
also talk about you know what renters experience but home ownership is a very clear example of
00:27:09.880
where we see this kind of deferred maintenance problem right owning a car same thing totally
00:27:15.100
totally but even like your like our health right there's a lot of like stuff we should be doing
00:27:19.580
we know we should be doing like sort of preventative maintenance you go get the yearly checkup
00:27:23.560
to make sure you catch things early but people are just like yeah especially men they're like yeah
00:27:28.140
i don't know right i just put that off put the beer gut on right yeah i'm okay with that i don't
00:27:32.640
have to do that but that then again you defer the cost and then like when you're 60 or 70 you have
00:27:36.820
like diabetes and all these other health issues that could have been you could have nipped it in
00:27:40.820
the bud earlier yeah like heart disease is a great example of that right but yeah i mean i mean
00:27:46.260
that's really where it touches people on the it's funny because we write about you know we write about
00:27:51.080
the nation we write about organizations we write about all these different things but it's often
00:27:55.260
like the bodily maintenance and thinking about like short-term rewards of like another cookie or
00:28:01.960
another beer or whatever it is versus exercising and all the you know the long-term thinking that's
00:28:08.800
really where it hits people it's like oh yeah like this is a an individual level problem as well
00:28:14.660
as a social society level one right and then also on the personal level you guys talk about there
00:28:19.540
was a we had it in a at a time in our culture this idea of like you know use it up wear it out
00:28:25.180
make do do without like sort of you could fix stuff right if something wore out you could
00:28:28.640
your grandma would darn her socks grandpa would fix um the tractor but now because stuff is so cheap
00:28:37.780
if something breaks just like well just go get a new one buy one on amazon i'll be here the next day
00:28:42.520
don't have to worry about fixing it yeah and i mean you know this is another part of the
00:28:46.880
technological revolution of the last couple hundred years i have a lecture um called modernity equals
00:28:52.900
cheap crap that i give most of my classes and it's you know i start the lecture with things just like
00:28:58.720
falling out of people's closets or falling out of like their uh garages about like half of american
00:29:06.220
garages are full full still full of stuff that they can't be used to put cars in and um you know i mean
00:29:14.460
what this is about is the cheapness of things in our lives we we don't we take that for granted and
00:29:20.640
we don't really realize how amazing it is but as a result it is often cheaper for you to go buy a new
00:29:27.340
toaster than it is to get your toaster fixed and of course this has big environmental ramifications
00:29:33.200
right because we're just like we become a very disposable society well the other problem too is
00:29:38.200
that companies have started to make consumer goods that they're it's harder to repair so like apple
00:29:43.720
i think is a prime example of that it's like if you want to replace the battery you can't do it
00:29:48.500
yourself anymore you have to like go somewhere and have them replace the battery for you yeah you know
00:29:53.040
i was kind of aware of this thing called the right to repair movement which is fighting companies
00:29:58.100
locking down uh repair before we wrote the book but as we wrote the book i really became a big
00:30:04.760
proponent of it um and so i look up to people like kyle wines of ifixit the repair site or nathan
00:30:11.340
proctor at us purg these guys are really fighting to pass laws to make our stuff repairable again um but
00:30:20.040
it's true it's become a corporate strategy but from you know it's john deere and some automakers and
00:30:27.240
apple and a lot of other gadget makers have like really tried to make their things not repairable so
00:30:33.020
that we have to rely on them yeah you go to them and then i mean it also brings up i like this kind
00:30:38.040
of brings up ideas and law like what does it mean to own something like do you really own the thing
00:30:41.960
if you can if you can't fix it if it breaks down are you just are you just leasing it i know it's it
00:30:48.780
gets weird like are you licensing your phone from apple um i think this really pushes in the states i
00:30:55.860
think this you know this kind of upsets really deep long-held traditions of autonomy and you know
00:31:02.880
individualism and stuff that we've kind of feel cut off from our things and that we don't have the
00:31:08.080
right to repair them that doesn't fit for us i think well uh so we there's the problem we're not
00:31:13.200
maintaining this i think part of the problem is humans are really bad at thinking about the future
00:31:17.780
like we're short-term thinkers don't think about the long terms this happens on the micro level and
00:31:22.620
then you see it happen on the macro level um you think people will get smarter uh when you start
00:31:28.020
thinking high level they actually get dumber um but then also just the our culture has changed things
00:31:34.340
have gotten cheaper things are harder to repair so we've lost this ability or this idea of uh of
00:31:40.320
maintenance so what can we do to get back the maintenance mindset like what what do you guys
00:31:45.400
propose at the maintainers yeah so we try to boil it down in the book to a couple ideas i mean i i think
00:31:51.740
first of all for organizations it really requires leadership and realizing that this stuff is
00:31:57.680
important and um and valuing it up front and then it requires a kind of cultural shift right uh we have
00:32:07.740
to get better at this together uh especially if we're talking at the organizational um level and then
00:32:13.720
you know where we can we we also need to like you know talk about innovation and maintenance like
00:32:19.760
actual innovation and maintenance so in the book we cover uh companies that are making digital apps
00:32:26.420
um and other uh software mostly to better manage maintenance whether it's through predictive analytics
00:32:34.200
and ai or remote sensing and stuff there's ways we can get better both in in infrastructural
00:32:40.920
maintenance and in organizations at maintaining things so we we don't have like a like you know we
00:32:46.660
there's a there's another genre of book like this where you end with a um uh you know a bullet list
00:32:54.100
of like policies that you'd like to see put in place whether in government or or uh businesses and
00:33:00.440
we didn't chose not to end that way we it's more of a inviting people to the realization that this is
00:33:05.760
important and then you know talking and thinking together about how we can improve yes you know ideas of
00:33:12.040
like innovation helping maintenance i know like in the oil fields they're using drones to like check
00:33:17.620
lines to make sure there aren't any leaks and it's all ai stuff so they can see like oh there's a leak
00:33:22.820
and then they go and fix it yeah we have a buddy um named varoon who works in basically predictive
00:33:29.020
analytics around uh gas leaks in you know uh natural gas heating uh type pipes and it's it's you know
00:33:38.780
they can use remote sensors and algorithms now to to watch things at a distance so there's a lot of
00:33:45.800
improvements that can happen at the same time you know i think we're skeptical that those improvements
00:33:50.900
alone are going to save us we're in such a hole right now when it comes to infrastructure in the
00:33:56.260
states that it's not going to be like through in it you know innovation alone is not going to save us
00:34:01.240
we're going to have to kind of get real about where we're at it's a mindset yeah you take on right
00:34:06.180
well another cultural shift that has to happen is we have to raise the status of maintenance work
00:34:12.440
as well like instead of thinking as okay it's a dead-end job that's where you go if you don't go
00:34:16.960
to college actually hey these people are important part of like keeping like sort of like the mike
00:34:21.280
mike roe approach these are the guys who make civil civilized life uh possible yeah and you know
00:34:27.400
you can live uh you know a pretty good middle class life in the trades you know i think we've just
00:34:33.640
really have shot ourselves in the foot by assuming that you have to go to college to to have a good
00:34:41.680
life you know we talk that's the way a lot of people talk it's not true and i work in universities
00:34:46.560
right like it's in it's in my interest to say yes come to come to school but um the trades are great i but
00:34:53.180
i think that like you're saying we have to rework how we value these jobs and realize that these people
00:34:59.800
are important and they're they're giving value to our lives in important ways i think the big takeaway
00:35:05.460
that i got this from personally from your from the book was whenever i buy something now it's like
00:35:09.980
okay not only think about the cost i had to clunk over to get the thing i got to think about what's
00:35:14.520
the cost of maintaining this thing as well um and i usually don't do that but now i've been thinking
00:35:19.080
about that and not just in terms of like monetary cost but like bandwidth cost like where am i going to
00:35:23.400
put this uh what what happens when i have to get rid of it i mean it's going to be a pain in the
00:35:28.000
butt to get rid of you buy some big thing i'm starting to think about that stuff now well that's
00:35:32.460
great the andy and i had these kind of realizations as we were working on the book too and i think
00:35:37.040
um you know that's that's where you end up is like you know i'm looking we have one of these you
00:35:43.380
know what are the the kind of dehumidifiers you plug into the wall right now in our basement
00:35:48.160
and i'm thinking about buying a built-in one because for a variety of reasons to put in the
00:35:54.320
basement but now you know i'm doing research i'm like what are the maintenance costs what am i
00:35:58.840
getting myself into here right i would have never done that before before we worked on this and also
00:36:05.240
that causes you to like just kind of shift away from the growth mindset and thinking okay more stuff
00:36:10.580
is better it's like well actually sometimes more more isn't good right right yeah more is more
00:36:16.100
costly and like you make the example like obesity like getting fat like at a certain point like fat's
00:36:22.420
good but at a certain point it becomes costly yep that's a great way to think about it so yeah
00:36:26.980
just pare down it makes maintenance a lot easier um so where can people go to learn more about the
00:36:32.640
book and your work the easiest way a place to go is the maintainers.org um and we have a email list
00:36:39.980
serve people can join there it's a it's not too many emails and it's a fun group and then they can
00:36:46.260
also just reach out to me i'm lee at the maintainers.org uh or andy's andy at the maintainers.org
00:36:52.620
i'm also on twitter at sts uh underscore news fantastic well lee vinsel thanks for your time
00:36:59.260
it's been a pleasure thanks man this was fun my guest today was lee vinsel he's the co-author of
00:37:04.340
the book the innovation delusion it's available on amazon.com and bookstores everywhere find out
00:37:08.360
more information about his work at the website the maintainers.org also check out our show notes at
00:37:12.620
aom.is slash maintenance where we find links to resources we can delve deeper into this topic
00:37:16.620
well that wraps up another edition of the aom podcast check out our website at art of manliness.com
00:37:24.180
where you find our podcast archives as well as thousands of articles written over the years about
00:37:27.340
pretty much anything you think of and if you like to enjoy ad free episodes of the aom podcast you can
00:37:31.620
do so on stitcher premium head over to stitcherpremium.com sign up use code manliness at checkout for a
00:37:36.040
free month trial once you're signed up download the stitcher app on android or ios and you start
00:37:40.580
enjoying ad free episodes of the aom podcast and if you haven't done so already i'd appreciate it
00:37:44.740
if you take one minute to give us review an apple podcast or stitcher it helps out a lot and if
00:37:48.120
you've done that already thank you please consider sharing the show with a friend or family member
00:37:52.100
who you think would get something out of it as always thank you for the continued support until
00:37:56.180
next time this is brett mckay reminding you all you listen they win podcast but put what you've heard