The Art of Manliness - April 26, 2021


The Hidden Qualities of Genius

Topics
Hosted by
Mentioned
One Man's Impossible Quest — To Make Friends in Adulthood How to Keep Your Edge as You Get Older

Episode Stats


Length

40 minutes

Words per minute

180.15

Word count

7,266

Sentence count

507

Harmful content

Toxicity

6

sentences flagged

Hate speech

1

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

What makes an actual genius a genius? My guest today has spent over two decades exploring that question by studying the world s most iconic and original thinkers and creators, both past and present. His name is Craig Wright. He s Professor Emeritus of Music at Yale, who continues to teach a course there called Exploring the Nature of Genius, and he s also the author of the book The Hidden Habits of Genius: Beyond Talent, IQ, and Grit.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 Brett McKay here, and welcome to another edition of the Art of Manliness podcast.
00:00:10.700 Now, we tend to throw the word genius around pretty casually, saying so-and-so has a genius
00:00:14.700 for a particular skill, or sarcastically pointing out someone's failure by saying,
00:00:18.000 nice work, genius. But what makes an actual genius a genius? My guest today has spent
00:00:22.120 over two decades exploring that question by studying the world's most iconic and original
00:00:25.620 thinkers and creators, both past and present. His name is Craig Wright. He's Professor Emeritus of
00:00:29.840 Music at Yale, who continues to teach a course there called Exploring the Nature of Genius.
00:00:34.020 And he's also the author of the book, The Hidden Habits of Genius Beyond Talent, IQ, and Grit.
00:00:38.420 Today on the show, Craig reveals the characteristics and patterns of behavior of true geniuses and
00:00:42.740 begins by answering the questions of whether there's a connection between genius and intelligence,
00:00:46.660 whether genius is hereditary. We talk about several drivers of genius, including situational
00:00:50.900 advantages, a childlike ability to play with possibilities, a keen curiosity, a strong
00:00:55.440 memory, broad interest in vision, the ability to toggle between intense concentration and
00:00:59.260 loose relaxation and keeping a daily routine. We then discuss whether there's a connection
00:01:02.960 between genius and mental health issues and what effect being a genius tends to have on
00:01:06.620 someone's personal life. Along the way, Craig illustrates his points with examples from the
00:01:10.420 lives of Mozart, Da Vinci, Steve Jobs, and more. After the show's over, check out our show notes
00:01:14.540 at aom.is slash genius. All right, Craig Wright, welcome to the show.
00:01:31.600 Hey, thanks very much, Brent, for inviting me.
00:01:33.940 All right, so you wrote a book called The Hidden Habits of Genius, where you look at human history,
00:01:37.960 geniuses in human history, to try to figure out what it was they did that made them a genius.
00:01:42.080 But before we get into those qualities, I think it'd be helpful to note how you defined
00:01:46.440 genius in your research. Because in the book, you note that you can define genius in all sorts
00:01:51.060 of different ways. But in your book and in your research, you have an equation, basically,
00:01:55.820 that defines genius. And here's the equation. Genius equals significance times the number of
00:02:01.620 people impacted by an idea or creation times duration or lifespan of their insight. It's basically
00:02:07.920 a genius creates something of significance that impacts a lot of people for a long time.
00:02:13.260 So I think an important thing to note there, it's not just about being good at something.
00:02:16.360 Like you couldn't, you wouldn't call someone like Michael Phelps a genius, even though he's
00:02:20.000 really good at swimming. But instead, it's about changing the world in some way with your ideas.
00:02:24.480 So with that equation in mind, let's talk about the factors that do or do not impact its components,
00:02:30.120 starting with intelligence. Now, in your study of geniuses throughout history,
00:02:34.160 did you find a connection between genius and intelligence?
00:02:37.700 That was the single biggest misconception when I started this project. I had a stereotype in my
00:02:44.520 head, a genius does this, and a genius looks like this. Maybe somebody that seemed like hugely smart
00:02:51.340 would score 200 on an IQ test, which could just slap the forehead and say, aha, I've got it.
00:02:57.540 And that's not really the way it is. From reading, say, the lives and studying for 15 years,
00:03:02.660 the backgrounds of probably 100 different geniuses, it's much slower. That so-called aha moment is
00:03:10.560 actually the culmination of thinking over a long period of time. It's just the peak, the tip of
00:03:16.940 the iceberg and a great deal of substratum underneath. So that's important that we don't want to
00:03:24.740 overemphasize IQ. And from what I'm able to, they're very interesting tests. California guy at
00:03:32.780 Stanford for decades did a test of some 500 individuals with IQs of 132 or higher. And at
00:03:41.260 the end of the test, not a single so-called genius, no Pulitzer Prize winners, no Nobel Prize winners,
00:03:47.720 no Academy Award winners, nothing. As one of the people working on it said, we didn't have a single
00:03:52.660 genius with all these high scores. But by the same token, there are a couple of people that were
00:03:58.260 rejected from this because their IQ wasn't high enough that went on. William Shockley and Luis
00:04:03.420 Alvarez went on to win Nobel Prizes in the sciences, but they've been rejected because they didn't meet
00:04:08.460 the IQ threshold. My sense of this is you have to have a good general IQ. And I would say they're
00:04:15.000 based on the standards of today, probably 110, 115, 120. But once you reach that generally above
00:04:21.900 average, sort of B plus, A minus IQ, then you're in the game. And it's all these other enablers of
00:04:27.720 genius that are going to push you forward. Well, and okay, so that's interesting. So there's,
00:04:32.400 you don't, you don't have to be, you don't have to be Mensa smart to be a genius.
00:04:36.120 No. Okay. Good for you. So you, you know about that. So maybe, maybe you tell us,
00:04:40.500 what the heck is Mensa? You don't have to be Mensa smart. You're absolutely right.
00:04:43.800 Well, is that organization, if you have a certain IQ level, you could say, well,
00:04:46.760 I'm a member of Mensa. Yeah. It used to be, I remember like it was a big deal. I don't know
00:04:50.460 if it's such a big deal anymore. People don't really talk about it.
00:04:52.520 Yeah. I think people catch, maybe this is some, something of a scam. They're sort of catching on
00:05:00.280 to this, that you can do very well in this world without being a member of Mensa. And maybe you,
00:05:06.800 you get so caught up in it all. I'm so smart and I don't have to do this or do that. Or so I don't
00:05:12.560 know, but there is, I think it's, it was founded in England in the 1940s. And so it's been around for
00:05:18.480 about 80 years or so. And you have to have an, a verified IQ of 135, I think is it, but, but maybe
00:05:27.460 it's 132. We'd have to check on that. Okay. So genius intelligence, you just got to be,
00:05:33.140 you know, a minus B plus smart. Another interesting thing you noted is genius isn't
00:05:39.780 really heritable. Like you can't find genius pedigree. You found that geniuses typically
00:05:44.540 don't have parents or grandparents who were geniuses, nor do they have progeny who are
00:05:51.720 geniuses either. What's going on there? You think? I think it's a kind of one-off event. It's something
00:05:57.320 akin to a perfect storm of, you know, let's say of a genetic crapshoot. You've got a kind of
00:06:03.840 reshuffling of genes with each new fertilized embryo, I suspect. And thereafter they can reassemble
00:06:12.520 in some surprising ways. And it's, as I say, something of a perfect storm. It happens,
00:06:20.040 but it's not heritable. Intelligence, a certain level of intelligence, a certain level of curiosity
00:06:27.380 is heritable. These, the enablers, the drivers of genius have to come all together. They have to
00:06:34.680 come all together in, at a particular point, in a particular time, in a particular way. And when that
00:06:40.720 happens, you get this sort of outlier. Psychologists have this fancy word for it,
00:06:45.060 emergenesis, something that just hops out completely unexpected from the genetic pool.
00:06:51.700 And it doesn't happen, doesn't hop out that way in the generation after generation after
00:06:57.020 generation. And very rarely do we have long streams or any kind of strings of genius. So it's a kind of
00:07:03.720 one-off, one-off event. My favorite story here, as you know, from Brent, from taking a peek at the
00:07:11.160 book is the story of the horse secretariat. Now, obviously the horses are not people,
00:07:16.000 but that's a horse that came out of nowhere in terms of its genetic pool. One had only
00:07:21.160 sired 400 offspring. Only one of them ever won one triple crown race, despite the stud fees that
00:07:29.520 were being paid. But that horse still holds the track record, secretariat still holds the track
00:07:36.380 records of the three triple crown races. It was just off the charts. As I say, it was a one-off
00:07:42.420 event, the perfect storm. Right. So there's a genetic crapshoot going on with genius. There's
00:07:47.960 also a circumstantial crapshoot. I think everyone's heard the story about Bill Gates. He happened to go
00:07:55.160 to a high school where there was a computer or something like that. And if Bill Gates had been
00:07:59.380 somewhere else, Bill Gates probably wouldn't have been Bill Gates because of that environmental
00:08:04.340 factor wasn't there. It's an interesting question and it has to do with luck and genius. There's a
00:08:10.000 fancy word for that called situational advantage, situational advantage. Now I suspect having read a
00:08:18.400 bit about Bill Gates, I suspect Bill Gates probably would have, his exceptional abilities would have
00:08:24.000 manifested eventually. It probably would have taken him more time to find his way to computers. So he had
00:08:30.640 a situational advantage. His, his interest, his passion was sort of jump-started by the fact,
00:08:36.300 one, his parents were rather well off. Two, he had access to materials at the University of Washington
00:08:41.920 there in Seattle. And three, he went to a good, very good school in which they appreciated and gave
00:08:50.040 him access to computers. He probably again would have wended his way in that direction, but it may have
00:08:56.420 taken him longer. How do you get this situational advantage? Generally speaking, you have to move
00:09:03.140 to places to put yourself in, kind of get in the game or get out of the game. In some cases, you have
00:09:12.060 to move to a big city. Let's say you're a tech investor. You may want to be in Silicon Valley. If
00:09:17.740 you're interested in the arts and Broadway theater and stuff like that, you probably want to be in New York.
00:09:22.200 If you're interested in energy production, maybe you want to be in Tulsa. So you have to get to these
00:09:27.460 centers that, where there's an agglomeration of money and where there's an agglomeration of talent
00:09:32.880 and competition and information that you can run with and build off of.
00:09:39.020 All right. So we've talked about intelligence and genius, the connection there, not big connection there.
00:09:44.120 We talked about situational advantage. Let's talk about some of these habits that you've found when you
00:09:48.960 actually looked at the lives of what these geniuses did. And one habit you found amongst
00:09:54.640 all these geniuses you've studied is that they maintain a childlike view of the world throughout
00:10:00.780 their adult life. What does that childlike worldview look like for a genius?
00:10:07.500 It probably looks different for each child, and it may look different based on the emotional
00:10:13.040 context in which that child is being weird. Children have wonderful imaginations. And the curse is,
00:10:23.340 the problem is that in terms of the process of growing up, adults basically, I won't say beat that 0.98
00:10:30.840 out of them, but suck all the, I don't know, suck all the imagination out of them. And I'm just as guilty 0.97
00:10:37.000 of this as a parent of four children as the next. Although I think I've learned a lot,
00:10:44.200 and I think I'm a lot better at it with the seven grandchildren. You know, kids have this
00:10:48.620 fantastic imagination. They don't know what is possible. There's this thing on a table. I've
00:10:54.800 watched this happen. There's a thing on the table, and it could be this long thing with a point and
00:11:00.700 some lead at the end, or it could be this long thing that's very sharp and has another kind of point
00:11:05.540 at the end. And how does the kid know that one is a pencil that they could create a wonderful
00:11:09.400 drawing from? The other is a knife that they could kill the cat with or whatever. So only over time
00:11:15.020 depends. No, no, don't touch it. Don't touch it. So we gradually developed this whole idea of the
00:11:20.080 don't touch that mentality. Don't go there. You can't think that way. So how do you fight against
00:11:25.880 that? Let me indulge myself here and tell you about a couple of stories in my own life. Once on a family
00:11:33.140 vacation, I think we had one son with his three children, then age eight, 10 and 12 out at the
00:11:39.600 beach making sandcastles. They were making up stories and they were playing their sandcastle and
00:11:45.780 they had moats and characters. And there's the 12 year old kind of voicing over this and making up
00:11:51.740 this. Oh, let's do this. I said, well, gee, should this kid, you know, is this appropriate behavior
00:11:56.700 for a 12 year old shouldn't be out there chasing a ball or do, you know, involve some kind of
00:12:01.640 competitive sports or something like that. And then, then fortunately I caught myself and said,
00:12:07.100 you know, this kind of imaginary play is really good. This is how people, this is how people come
00:12:13.040 up with ideas. Alfred Hitchcock was famous as a director for saying, you know, we're pressing too
00:12:19.600 hard. We've got to relax. We've got to play. We've got to have fun. We've got to imagine. So go out
00:12:25.000 there, be crazy. Do any, do any, like I said, make a fool of yourself. Just release your inner 1.00
00:12:30.660 creativity. Don't set up these barriers. Recently with one grandchild, I have found myself climbing
00:12:37.980 up and at my age, it's something of a, of a challenge, but climbing up into a tree fort,
00:12:42.880 tree forts are really cool, but you can go in there and you go up in there and you can play and imagine
00:12:49.240 things. You can imagine pirates. You can imagine rocket ships. You can think up characters. You can
00:12:54.400 think up imaginary friends. There's no reason that we should necessarily have to stop doing this as
00:13:00.600 we grow up. Maybe the worst thing that we can say to a child is, oh, grow up because maybe those
00:13:09.580 creative fantasies or fantasies that they're having will lead to better ideas because the mind of the
00:13:19.300 child is not an ultimately the adult is not so constricted. All right. So make time for play.
00:13:25.360 I think you've highlighted, there's several geniuses that still played even as adults. I think Richard
00:13:30.640 Feynman, he did magic, which you typically think of as like, well, magic, that's what you do when
00:13:35.140 you're 12. You stop doing that when you're 18, you're getting serious with life, but now the guy
00:13:39.780 kept doing magic tricks. Yeah. That's a, that's a very good point. You know, to be honest with you,
00:13:44.020 good for you, Brett. I'd, I'd actually forgotten that Feynman did that. So Brett won Craig nothing
00:13:49.980 on the magic, magic score. Good for you. Keep going. No, yeah. Well, I mean, I think of other
00:13:57.160 ones. I mean, like, okay, this is a debate. If he's a genius, not Theodore Roosevelt, you know,
00:14:01.720 he continued to explore and have fun even as, as, you know, as an adult. And even after he was
00:14:07.580 president, he kept doing new and different things. Well, Mozart's a perfect example of that. I mean,
00:14:12.420 his sister said in an obituary for him, he was always the eternal child. He would never,
00:14:17.440 he would never grow up. Yeah. He would write like a, he liked potty, like he liked potty
00:14:23.620 language. Yeah. Yeah. That's right. Potty talk. He couldn't, he didn't make the distinction. He said
00:14:29.440 a lot of stupid, silly things and drove his father crazy. But then at the same time, he's writing these 1.00
00:14:34.760 operas, such as the magic flute. We were talking about magic there and it's populated with all these
00:14:39.540 imaginary characters. He's 35 years old when he wrote this. He has imaginary friends. He writes
00:14:45.540 letters in which he refers to this imaginary friend, that's imaginary friend. And my daughter,
00:14:52.020 maybe you have children also, but we all know friends who have imagined children have imaginary
00:14:57.320 friends. That's a good thing to have. But Mozart, some of these minds and Einstein was sort of,
00:15:01.460 sort of the same way too. They talked about one famous physicist talks about the endless childlike
00:15:07.420 mentality of Albert Einstein. And if you want to envision new things, this is probably a good
00:15:15.780 way to do it. So I guess caveat to parents, don't clamp down on your kid. If you think they're being
00:15:22.300 silly and immature, cut them a break, let them explore. We're going to take a quick break for 0.99
00:15:28.460 your word from our sponsors. And now back to the show. So one genius you explore in the book is
00:15:36.240 Da Vinci. And you go into depth on him to explore this idea of geniuses. One of the habits they have
00:15:42.520 is they maintain an intense curiosity and a lust for learning their entire life. How did that manifest
00:15:49.480 itself in Da Vinci? Da Vinci was fearless. He was interested in everything. He would climb
00:15:57.500 mountains. He would dive into swamps. He would cut up bodies to find out how they worked. And okay,
00:16:07.200 big deal. We have people working in pathology these days and coroners that do biopsies, but they're
00:16:14.280 operating under refrigeration and they're operating with air conditioning where the tissues doesn't
00:16:20.640 degenerate. Can you imagine doing this back in the 15th century where this doesn't smell particularly
00:16:28.620 good and you start cutting it up and this tissue is degenerating into muck? And by the way, the church
00:16:35.640 thinks that this is illegal and may come along and arrest you for this. So you've got to do it at night
00:16:41.520 when you can't really see very well. You've got to be really interested in what you're doing.
00:16:46.800 Find about how the human body works, cutting up eyeballs or cutting out hearts and guts and all
00:16:52.040 of this in the middle of the night under the most horrific conditions. Was that courage or was that
00:16:58.240 curiosity? Did they go hand in hand? Could he even smell the stench? Maybe he was so curious, he was so
00:17:06.060 driven, so passionate by what he was exploring that he didn't even notice. That's an interesting
00:17:12.540 possibility. So they are curious. Another, I don't think I got to this or maybe I did. Yes,
00:17:18.660 I think, I guess, is Isaac Newton, when he's working on his theory of light and color, he takes
00:17:24.000 this thing called a bodkin, which is a big knitting needle, and he sticks it in his eye and he starts
00:17:30.640 wiggling it around to see the effect of pressure on color perception. I'm not curious enough to want to
00:17:38.640 undertake that particular task. I don't know about you, Brad. Do you want to try that at home this
00:17:42.800 afternoon? No, I remember reading about that. I took a history of science class and we studied
00:17:48.000 Newton. And yeah, when I read that, I was like, I would never have done that. Oh yeah, that must
00:17:52.020 have been a really enlightened instructor there because that's not a terribly well-known anecdote.
00:17:57.700 Well, good for you. Yeah. Yeah. And another thing about Newton is, okay, and sort of this
00:18:03.560 connected to this idea of curiosity and how it can maybe help your main pursuit when you're trying
00:18:10.620 to be a genius. And like, a lot of people don't know this about him, but he was really into, okay,
00:18:14.940 he's the father of physics, basically what we have, Newtonian physics. But while he was exploring physics,
00:18:21.820 he was also really into alchemy. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And the occult. Now, in fairness to Newton,
00:18:31.020 alchemy back in the day was about as close as they got to chemistry. So, but a lot of this wasn't
00:18:39.760 chemistry. A lot of it was just superstition and astrology and things such as that, that he was
00:18:46.100 playing off of. He wanted to find a way of turning mercury into gold. So he was playing a little bit
00:18:52.740 with that. He thought that this could be a real moneymaker, but he actually had more books on alchemy
00:18:58.620 and astrology and sort of pseudoscience in his library than he had on physics. And for, I think,
00:19:06.700 about a 20-year period, that's really what he was most interested in. He went over into the dark side,
00:19:13.000 almost a kind of conspiracy theory with regard to, I wouldn't say bogus, fraudulent, scientifically
00:19:21.360 incorrect ideas, or at least things that in the course of time have proved to be scientifically
00:19:26.180 incorrect. So I guess the genius doesn't get it right all the time. Isaac Newton got it wrong with
00:19:34.600 regard to alchemy for about a 20-year period of his life. But I think the idea there is be curious,
00:19:41.500 like don't be afraid to just, I think a lot of times people think they have to stick with one thing.
00:19:45.500 You can have multiple interests. I mean, I wouldn't say go start studying alchemy so you can make the
00:19:51.100 philosopher's stone, but it's okay to have multiple interests because that can somehow,
00:19:55.160 it might carry over. You might make connections you otherwise wouldn't have made if you had just
00:19:58.840 stuck to one domain. Yeah, that's the thing. That's the advantage of being the fox, you know,
00:20:05.780 thinking laterally in the story of the fox and the hedgehog. Rather than going a thousand miles deep,
00:20:12.180 you go a thousand miles wide. Why do you do that? Because you see a lot of stuff. Yes,
00:20:16.720 you got to pay your dues. Usually as a young, you know, you got a little good, but maybe if you want
00:20:21.400 to be a petroleum engineer, maybe you've got to study chemistry very heavily in school and then
00:20:27.060 maybe go to a business school or something like that to see how the business of petrochemical
00:20:32.820 production works or how oil companies ship things around the world, whatever. Yeah, you got to learn
00:20:37.480 some specifics, but actually over time, it probably would be useful to study other kinds of things,
00:20:43.320 maybe ocean currents, maybe geography, maybe weather patterns, things like this. And gradually you
00:20:49.700 broaden out your point of view. How does this give you a leg up? Why is this a good idea? I think
00:20:55.100 it's because it allows you to combine things. If you've seen a lot of stuff, you have a greater
00:20:59.920 chance of combining disparate things into new ideas. And that's what Steve Jobs was always
00:21:08.420 trumpeting. He said, you know, that's how smart people get where they get. They just see things
00:21:13.520 because they have the capacity of combining things. But in order to see things, you got to be, you know,
00:21:19.520 combine things. You've got to be able to, one, seen a lot of stuff and two, have a reasonably good
00:21:24.300 memory so you don't forget stuff. If you see something and forget its importance or forget how it works,
00:21:28.980 then that's not going to be much help. So you have to have a, again, like intelligence,
00:21:32.940 you have to have slightly above average memory, but that combined with a wide lateral vision can
00:21:40.040 be a very powerful tool. Yeah. Speaking of Steve Jobs, like the thing,
00:21:44.760 sort of the story that he did, how he was a fox and able to combine things to make Apple was
00:21:49.040 that he took that calligraphy class in college or just, I don't even know if it was in college.
00:21:53.220 I think it was just as an adult, he did it for fun. And that gave him the inspiration of,
00:21:56.960 oh, we should make computers that are visually appealing, have a visually appealing interface
00:22:01.540 when someone uses it. And that's how you got the first Mac.
00:22:06.940 Yeah. And he studied Zen, kind of the philosophy of it and how you think within yourself and how you
00:22:13.500 stay in your zone and how it's possible to develop self-confidence that way. Chinese calligraphy
00:22:21.220 and Zen Buddhism are not the kinds of things that you immediately associate with a computer
00:22:26.380 engineer. And it's these rather different combining mindsets from two rather different
00:22:31.260 spheres of activity that allow the individual to have unusual and perhaps unique insights.
00:22:38.220 All right. So you want to be a fox, have different interests, but also what geniuses were able to do,
00:22:42.220 they were able to switch into hedgehog mode when they needed to. And so hedgehog is this idea where
00:22:47.320 you just focus on one big thing. Geniuses often did that.
00:22:52.740 Yeah, they did, but sometimes it didn't work out so well. Generally speaking, as I look at this over
00:22:58.920 time, geniuses start small and narrow or go down deep, and then they broaden bigger out into bigger,
00:23:07.040 bigger projects, whether it's Shakespeare and the type of drama that he's writing, whether it's Mozart
00:23:12.440 and the type of opera that he's generating, or Wagner and the type of opera he's generating,
00:23:18.460 or George Lucas and that these big, massive film projects that go on that encompass a number of
00:23:25.140 volumes. The same thing with J.K. Rowling, a number of volumes of that sort of thing. And it doesn't
00:23:31.240 always end well for them. There's this expression that I've come to be paying attention to called
00:23:36.860 Sunk Cost Syndrome, where you think, and I suspect that Isaac Newton experienced Sunk Cost Syndrome
00:23:46.820 with regard to alchemy. You get going down a particular road of investigation. Great case here
00:23:53.980 is Thomas Edison with direct current, as opposed to Nikola Tesla's alternating current. Edison started
00:24:00.340 with direct current and began wiring Manhattan with direct current and was expensive, and he's building
00:24:05.380 all these generators. It turned out not really to be necessary if you had alternating current, but he
00:24:10.380 was so deeply into both the science and into the expense of it that he couldn't cut his losses.
00:24:16.400 And finally, as a result of that, it cost him control of what was Edison Electric, which became
00:24:23.580 General Electric, and the bankers eased Thomas Edison out of it because he'd bet on the wrong pony there.
00:24:29.640 He'd bet on direct current and didn't know when to pull the plug. And for so many of us in life,
00:24:36.120 myself included, that's the dilemma. You want to be passionate. You want to be persevering. You want
00:24:41.800 to have grit. You want to stick it out to the end. But supposing you're wrong, this isn't going to work
00:24:48.160 out. How do you know when that moment arrives? How do you know when it's time to pull the ripcord on
00:24:54.100 your great passion in life because it's just not going to work out and go on to other things?
00:24:59.560 That's a really difficult moment, really difficult thing to know. The only consolation is if you've
00:25:06.820 studied a lot of things, you can then go on to something else where if this is your only pony
00:25:14.580 in the race of life, then you may be in trouble. I think what I was getting at with that geniuses
00:25:20.500 get into hedgehog moon. I mean, I was confusing just being able to concentrate for a long time
00:25:25.740 on a particular task or thing. It doesn't necessarily mean you're concentrating only on
00:25:32.160 a single domain, but it's just like the geniuses you highlight often able to just, they had like
00:25:35.980 these immense power of concentration. They can just sit for hours if they needed to, to really think
00:25:41.460 through a problem until they got to a solution. Like you highlight Da Vinci when he was working on
00:25:46.160 the last supper, sometimes he'd go in and just stare at the wall for four hours and not do
00:25:52.720 anything. And then he'd make like just a few strokes and that was it for a day. That was, that was work.
00:25:57.740 Yeah. Or, or he could be overworking on another project and suddenly just drop it and race across
00:26:03.760 town, go up to that, go up to that, in this case, the last supper and paint a couple of strokes there
00:26:09.640 and go back to the other job. In other words, he's probably, he's multitasking, but he has the
00:26:14.060 capacity to concentrate intensely, even though physically he may be somewhere else. It's a very
00:26:20.000 interesting case, but it's the interesting kind of dichotomy between relaxation and creativity
00:26:26.880 as opposed to concentration and then getting the product out the door. So we want to have these
00:26:34.600 ideas that are original, maybe by combining things, maybe by having a great night's sleep where we're
00:26:40.260 dreaming and we get at this wonderful new idea, but how is this going to work out? Is this machine
00:26:44.900 really going to work? Or what are the negatives here? Can you think of all the reasons? Can you
00:26:49.760 concentrate on how this will work and why it might not work and just sit there for four hours and work
00:26:56.020 through these kinds of things? So they go hand in hand in a strange way. You, I think that these great
00:27:01.760 minds have the capacity to toggle, and maybe that's the key word here, toggle back and forth,
00:27:06.940 toggle back and forth between relaxation and imaginative insight and focus, execution. How will
00:27:15.700 this work? Let me make this work. Let's get this work done. So at different stages of the creation,
00:27:24.200 process of creation, I suppose different sorts of expertises are needed.
00:27:28.680 No, yes. Oftentimes geniuses kind of, they figured out that they had to plan their, I mean,
00:27:34.720 maybe they weren't even planning their day, but they figured out a rhythm to their life where
00:27:39.120 they'd have intense periods where they're just thinking, working, et cetera. And then they knew,
00:27:43.760 well, if I'm going to get a solution to this, I got to put that aside, go do something else,
00:27:47.860 and then I'll probably get an answer just popping my head when I'm relaxing.
00:27:52.660 Yeah. I think, I think they do do that. And there's so many cases like that. That's why,
00:27:58.220 you know, you have kids and one thing you should never say to a kid is grow up. Maybe another thing
00:28:03.580 you should never say to a kid is stop daydreaming, get back to work. My mother used to say that to me
00:28:09.340 all the time in the kitchen when I'd be sitting there in the dining room doing my homework and
00:28:12.980 clearly not doing my whole homework. So it is, it is this kind of tension between the two and you
00:28:22.500 have to have relaxation to give you the insights and you have to be able to concentrate to execute
00:28:27.420 the insights and, and in a number of different ways. It helps also to have a, to have a habit and,
00:28:33.960 and, and maybe one of the habits of genius is they have a habit. They have a schedule.
00:28:38.680 Do you have a schedule for your, for your life, Brett? I do have a schedule. Yeah. And so why,
00:28:45.900 why do you do that? Well, I mean, first I have, you know, with kids, you kind of have to have a
00:28:50.820 schedule because they have to be at school at a certain time. So that's helpful. And then they're
00:28:56.020 going to be home at a certain time. And so you got to get the work done before they're home and,
00:29:00.400 you know, starting distracting, you got to hang out with them. So, I mean, that's part of the reason,
00:29:04.160 but also it just gives some rhythm. Like I know when I wake up, here's one, here's the sequence
00:29:08.920 of things I'm going to do today. And so, so there you are, you, you woke up and you say to yourself,
00:29:15.180 well, maybe I'll go exercise first today, or maybe I'll go out and garden and mow the lawn today.
00:29:21.640 Maybe I'll go off play golf today, or maybe I'll go work today. No, you probably are going to do the
00:29:26.920 same thing at roughly the same time every day, because that's an efficient way of operating. You don't
00:29:32.820 waste a lot of time considering your options. You just go there. And once you're in your study or
00:29:38.460 wherever your workroom is, your studio or your lab, then what else are you going to do? At that,
00:29:44.340 at that point, you can't mow the lawn. You can't play golf. So you're served. And it,
00:29:49.640 so having a habit makes you a heck of a lot more productive.
00:29:53.740 No, and it's, it's funny. I don't think you've talked about this in your book, but it's interesting to
00:29:57.980 read some of the strange things that geniuses have done to get work done. There's some writer,
00:30:03.560 I forgot who it was, or maybe it was a musician or I can't remember who it was, but like when he
00:30:08.180 didn't want to work, he would put himself in his room and like strip himself naked and like give
00:30:13.820 his clothes to his, his servant, whatever. And said, don't give me my clothes until a certain amount
00:30:20.800 of time. Cause he, and he just wanted to be able to sit and, and work. I think that's, I mean,
00:30:25.800 it's interesting that you see that with a lot of geniuses.
00:30:29.000 Yeah. That's interesting. If you can find that one, send me, send that my way.
00:30:33.040 I'm going to send, yeah, I'll send that your way. Cause I remember reading that.
00:30:35.280 Even if you have, even if you have to make it up, give us a good example of creativity and
00:30:39.740 creative imagination here, make up a plausible story. Cause it sounds like a really good plot.
00:30:44.740 No, yeah, I know it's not, it's definitely, I've, I've read this somewhere. I know I've read this.
00:30:49.140 No, no, I'd love to hear about it. Cause that's one I've missed.
00:30:53.320 Something we haven't talked about that is, I think people have this idea of genius is that 0.61
00:30:57.860 geniuses tend to have some sort of mental illness. Have you, as you studied the lives of geniuses,
00:31:04.760 did you find that connection?
00:31:06.480 Yeah, I think that, I think, yeah, let's call it mental discords. They're somewhat off kilter
00:31:12.800 with the rest of the population. But, but remember geniuses are supposed to think outside the box.
00:31:18.720 Geniuses are not ordinary people. They don't have a typical mindset. So if this manifests as some kind
00:31:25.780 of seeming psychic disorder, then that's not entirely unexpected. And people, you know, I'm
00:31:31.500 no expert in, in psychology and I'm not a psychiatrist, no training in this whatsoever,
00:31:36.280 but there are people, Nancy Anderson at the university of Iowa, Kay Jamison at Johns Hopkins that
00:31:42.780 have written extensively and well about this particular topic. And what they see is a correlation
00:31:48.040 between mental disorder and particularly artists. Top of the list are poets and writers, poets at the
00:31:56.180 very top of sort of, we won't let's call them imbalanced. Let's say imbalanced, a mental imbalance
00:32:02.800 with poets and writers, musicians and painters, and on it goes. Once we get to the scientists,
00:32:09.600 not so much the idea of a, the mad scientist, maybe something of a, of a fiction of some
00:32:17.180 semi-disordered writer. Well, that was the Mary Frankenstein lady. Yeah. Mary Shelley. Mary Shelley.
00:32:25.220 Right. So, so, so she created, she created the, that's absolutely right here. She created the
00:32:30.260 archetype of the mad scientist, Dr. Frankenstein, but she, she was a writer. She was not a scientist.
00:32:37.480 So scientists have a much lower factor of psychic disorder compared to the other sorts of, of artists.
00:32:47.160 And there are lots of interesting questions about that, how it worked out. And so oftentimes it works
00:32:52.380 out by way of an advantage. Deafness was an advantage in a strange way to Edison. And what did he invent?
00:32:58.240 The phonograph. So we could, so we could hear things. Beethoven's music is so revolutionary in part
00:33:03.660 because he was hearing the world differently. We mentioned Isaac Newton. He probably had, was autistic, 0.98
00:33:10.520 maybe Asperger's, we don't really know. And obviously Asperger's has been backed out of the autism
00:33:16.620 spectrum. But the point is that he could really, really concentrate in an almost maniacal sort of way,
00:33:23.740 but seemed totally clueless with regard to personal empathy. So there are characters and they have
00:33:29.620 these special personal characteristics. And it's interesting to note how oftentimes they seem to
00:33:36.160 intersect with a different creative vision of the world. What role trauma plays in this is very
00:33:43.420 interesting to note, to think about a kind of psychic trauma is having a happy childhood.
00:33:50.760 Dylan Thomas said, the only thing worse than having an unhappy childhood is having a too happy childhood.
00:33:57.460 In other words, you're not going to be a creative spirit if you had a very happy, unblemished sort of
00:34:04.460 well-centered childhood. I don't know that that's true, but it's a very interesting theory. And it's
00:34:10.640 interesting to think about all of the individuals over the centuries who lost a parent at a very early
00:34:18.380 age, whether it's Bach or Virginia Woolf or Picasso lost a sister, Tesla lost his older brother,
00:34:26.740 all his children. Mozart was his mother at an early age. Beethoven may have mentioned Beethoven's
00:34:32.740 mother. He had to go back and help raise the younger siblings. So that's interesting. And it'd be worth
00:34:40.980 having somebody pursue that a bit more. Another thing with genius you explore in the book is,
00:34:46.500 do geniuses have happy persons? Is there a cost to being a genius? And a lot of these geniuses we've
00:34:53.640 talked about, they did significant work that's impacted the lives of millions, billions of
00:34:59.280 people. But if you look at their personal lives, oftentimes, I think with a few rare exceptions,
00:35:04.360 it was a mess. Family life was in discord or it's not happy.
00:35:10.640 Yeah. They seem to be happy in their own world, but they bring discomfort and unhappiness around them.
00:35:18.000 Generally speaking, there are a few exceptions. I can't say that I would say that about Bill Gates.
00:35:23.860 One hears about Elon Musk and his antics. One reads about Steve Jobs and his behavior.
00:35:30.460 What a, you know, they would, well, we can't say this on the air or anything like this, but he was
00:35:36.160 called lots of, lots of names. And my, the quickest way to make the point is to say that the biography of
00:35:42.340 Steve Jobs is the only biography I've ever read where there's an index entry under the title,
00:35:49.780 despicable behavior of. And so that's the kind of, that's Walter Isaacson's book,
00:35:55.340 biography of Steve Jobs. So those are some of the kinds of issues in play here. The problem is that
00:36:03.100 they're so obsessive. They're so one tracked in getting the job done. They may be peripheral thinkers,
00:36:09.240 but they're not going to rest until they've changed the world, whatever their vision of the
00:36:13.520 change world may be, that everybody else is kind of roadkill, collateral damage as they race forward
00:36:20.920 to change the world. They are not empathetic characters with their colleagues, with their
00:36:28.140 coworkers. And most of all, they're not empathetic with the family members, the wives, the spouses,
00:36:34.120 husbands, children of the genius. So what do you hope people walk away with thinking after they
00:36:41.620 finish your book? You know, that's a good question. I think it surprised me what people walk away
00:36:49.300 thinking. I hope they walk away thinking, hey, I read this book and I'm going to start leading my life
00:36:56.020 in many different sorts of ways. I'm going to be not so worried about my kids' grades or SAT scores.
00:37:02.900 I don't really care if they get into Harvard or Yale. If they could go to the University of
00:37:06.440 Oklahoma and still, there's nothing to matter with the University of Oklahoma. I was actually
00:37:09.960 born in Oklahoma, born in Lawton, Oklahoma, Fort Sill. So I think there are a lot of misconceptions
00:37:16.820 here. And I hope I've allayed some of these misconceptions or exposed some of these misconceptions
00:37:22.200 and allow parents to allay some of the fears that they may have about failure and all this sort of
00:37:27.420 thing. I hope they come away thinking, hey, I could lead my life very differently with
00:37:32.760 regard to relaxation. And I could turn relaxation into a way that makes me very productive and very,
00:37:39.640 very creative. I think what they say, ultimately, what I've been surprised by
00:37:44.920 is the following. People read this book. I thought they might come to me first and say,
00:37:50.460 you know, I never thought of a genius quite like that. Or I learned so much about,
00:37:54.540 and I'm going to become, I think I can become a genius. What they say is, you know,
00:37:58.780 I really like this book because of the stories of all of the lives here. These are very, very
00:38:05.440 interesting people. So in a strange way, this is like reading a hundred great novels, or I'm
00:38:11.820 extracting the high points of a number of maybe as many as a hundred human stories here relevant to
00:38:18.500 exceptional human accomplishment. And maybe that's why I'm a humanist rather than a scientist.
00:38:23.720 It's not so much the specifics that interest me, but the people that are the geniuses that interest
00:38:30.680 me. Well, Craig, this has been a great conversation. Where can people go to learn more about the book
00:38:34.780 and your work? You can just go to Amazon, which is a creation of Jeff Bezos, a genius par excellence,
00:38:41.960 changing the world for all of us every day. If we needed proof of how a genius changes things,
00:38:48.280 we need only go to Amazon and buy Craig Wright, The Hidden Habits of Genius. It comes in hardcover,
00:38:55.740 it comes in a Kindle edition, comes in audio format, and you can also go to a public library
00:39:01.740 and get it there too. I was pleased to even walk into my little local bookstore the other day and
00:39:07.180 there it was sitting on the shelf. So I think it's available virtually everywhere. And thanks very
00:39:11.120 much, Brett, for asking about that. Well, Craig Wright, thanks for your time. It's been a pleasure.
00:39:14.620 It's been my pleasure. Thank you for inviting me again, Brett. Appreciate it.
00:39:19.060 My guest today was Craig Wright. He's the author of the book, The Hidden Habits of Genius. It's
00:39:22.780 available on Amazon.com and bookstores everywhere. You can find out more information about his work
00:39:26.140 at his website, craigwrightgeniusmusic.net. Also check out our show notes at aom.is
00:39:30.940 slash genius, where you can find links to resources where we delve deeper into this topic.
00:39:34.140 Well, that wraps up another edition of the A1 podcast. Check out our website at artofmanlios.com
00:39:45.540 where you can find our podcast archives, as well as thousands of articles written over the years
00:39:48.500 about pretty much anything you think of. And if you'd like to enjoy ad-free episodes of the A1
00:39:51.840 podcast, you can do so on Stitcher Premium. Head over to stitcherpremium.com, sign up,
00:39:55.680 use code MANLIOS at checkout for a free month trial. Once you're signed up, download the strap on
00:39:59.480 Android or iOS, and you can start enjoying ad-free episodes of the A1 podcast. And if you haven't
00:40:03.520 done so already, I'd appreciate if you take one minute to give us your view on Apple Podcasts
00:40:06.600 or Stitcher. It helps out a lot. And if you've done that already, thank you. Please consider
00:40:09.940 sharing the show with a friend or family member who you would think would get something out of it.
00:40:13.060 As always, thank you for the continued support. Until next time, this is Brett McKay. Remind
00:40:16.480 you not on the list of the A1 podcast, but put what you've heard into action.