The Art of Manliness - July 31, 2025


The Laws of Connection — The Scientific Secrets of Building Stronger Relationships


Episode Stats

Misogynist Sentences

3

Hate Speech Sentences

5


Summary

The quality of our social ties has a huge impact on our physical and mental health, and our overall feeling of flourishing. Yet many people still struggle to create these strong relationships in their lives, and often figure that things like weakening communities and digital technology are to blame. But my guest, David Robson, says that the barriers to establishing bonds with others may actually be more psychological than physical. And he shares research-backed tips for breaking through them in his new book, The Laws of Connection: The Scientific Secrets of Building a Strong Social Network.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey, this is Brett.
00:00:00.700 I wanna let you know that we're having an enrollment
00:00:02.400 for our summer cohort of The Strenuous Life
00:00:04.680 starting this Tuesday, June 11th.
00:00:07.520 The Strenuous Life is an online offline program
00:00:09.380 that we created to help you put into action
00:00:11.100 all the things we've been talking about
00:00:12.500 and writing about on AOM for the past 16 years.
00:00:15.140 And we've done that in a few ways.
00:00:16.720 First, we created 50 different badges
00:00:18.240 based around 50 different skills.
00:00:19.960 There's hard skills like wilderness survival,
00:00:22.040 outdoorsmanship, knot tying, building fires,
00:00:24.600 but also soft skills like how to be a better host,
00:00:26.960 how to improve your social skills,
00:00:28.220 how to be a better husband, better father.
00:00:30.420 We also provide weekly challenges
00:00:31.780 that are gonna push you outside of your comfort zone,
00:00:33.820 mentally, physically, and socially.
00:00:36.200 We also provide daily accountability
00:00:37.760 for physical activity and doing a good deed.
00:00:40.300 And every new member of The Strenuous Life
00:00:41.660 goes through what we call The Strenuous Life Challenge.
00:00:44.320 It's a 12-week bootcamp
00:00:45.380 that's gonna help you develop a bias towards action
00:00:47.400 that's gonna carry over to other areas of your life.
00:00:49.840 And at the end of the 12-week bootcamp,
00:00:51.820 if you completed all the requirements,
00:00:53.220 we'll send you a challenge coin
00:00:54.500 that'll commemorate your achievement.
00:00:56.680 If you wanna learn more about The Strenuous Life,
00:00:57.960 head over to strenuouslife.co.
00:00:59.420 You can also sign up if you wanna sign up.
00:01:01.740 Deadline to sign up is Thursday, June 13th
00:01:05.260 at 9 p.m. Central Time.
00:01:07.080 And then the challenge, the bootcamp challenge,
00:01:08.960 starts on Saturday, June 15th.
00:01:11.360 Strenuouslife.co, go check it out.
00:01:13.420 I hope to see you on The Strenuous Life.
00:01:15.180 Brett McKay here, and welcome to another edition
00:01:24.620 of the Art of Manliness podcast.
00:01:26.900 Everyone has heard about the incredible benefits
00:01:28.760 that come to mind, body, and spirit
00:01:30.620 from having strong relationships.
00:01:32.640 The quality of our social ties has a huge impact
00:01:34.900 on our physical and mental health
00:01:36.360 and our overall feeling of flourishing.
00:01:38.600 Yet many people still struggle
00:01:39.960 to create these strong relationships in their lives
00:01:41.900 and often figure that things like weakening communities
00:01:44.440 and digital technology are to blame.
00:01:46.680 But my guest, David Robson,
00:01:48.320 says that the barriers to establishing bonds
00:01:49.900 with others may actually be more psychological
00:01:51.860 than physical.
00:01:53.000 And he shares research-backed tips
00:01:54.480 for breaking through them in his new book,
00:01:56.360 The Laws of Connection,
00:01:57.740 The Scientific Secrets of Building a Strong Social Network.
00:02:01.100 Today on the show,
00:02:01.920 David discusses how we can feel lonely
00:02:03.420 even when we're surrounded by people
00:02:04.840 if we don't have what he calls a shared reality.
00:02:07.820 We then discuss ways to build
00:02:09.040 that shared reality with others.
00:02:10.600 We talk about why frenemies are so bad for you,
00:02:13.000 how to overcome the liking gap,
00:02:14.700 why you might want to interrupt someone
00:02:15.920 to connect with them,
00:02:17.140 the need to be aware of the novelty penalty
00:02:18.900 in conversations,
00:02:20.220 why you should stop telling white lies,
00:02:21.920 and much more.
00:02:23.280 After the show's over,
00:02:24.100 check out our show notes at aom.is slash connection.
00:02:39.040 All right, David Robson,
00:02:40.600 welcome back to the show.
00:02:42.280 Thanks so much for having me.
00:02:43.720 So we had you on two years ago
00:02:45.260 to talk about your book,
00:02:46.300 The Expectation Effect,
00:02:47.620 which is about the placebo effect.
00:02:50.100 You got a new book out.
00:02:51.460 It's about the science of social connection.
00:02:55.220 You took a deep dive into
00:02:56.520 what makes us feel connected to others,
00:02:58.700 and then you offer these research-backed tips
00:03:01.960 on how we can improve our connection with others.
00:03:04.860 You start off the book talking about
00:03:06.280 the loneliness crisis
00:03:07.380 that people have been talking about
00:03:09.000 that's been happening in the United States
00:03:10.500 and other Western countries.
00:03:11.920 You have a fresh take
00:03:13.880 on the source of this loneliness crisis.
00:03:17.520 And you talk about it's the lack of shared reality.
00:03:20.900 So how is a lack of shared reality
00:03:22.980 behind our feeling of loneliness?
00:03:25.560 Right.
00:03:26.080 I mean, there's a lot of talk, you know,
00:03:28.320 on how like modern society
00:03:29.880 and new technologies
00:03:31.080 are kind of driving people apart.
00:03:33.400 And I'm sure there's certainly
00:03:35.740 an element of truth in that.
00:03:37.600 But the fact is, you know,
00:03:38.860 if you look at historic data from,
00:03:40.980 you know, what we know,
00:03:41.840 it seems that loneliness
00:03:42.920 has been a problem for humans
00:03:44.440 for a very long time.
00:03:46.400 And, you know, even if we think about
00:03:48.080 the people who surround us,
00:03:50.240 you know, celebrities,
00:03:51.260 like, you know, cultural references,
00:03:53.900 you can really see that people
00:03:55.740 can be surrounded by a lot of friends
00:03:58.520 or a lot of people,
00:03:59.900 but still feel pretty lonely.
00:04:02.160 So there's more to kind of
00:04:04.480 feeling social connection
00:04:05.620 than just having face-to-face contact
00:04:08.780 with a lot of people.
00:04:10.620 And what I propose
00:04:11.720 and what the scientific research suggests
00:04:13.720 is that, you know,
00:04:15.220 even when we're kind of
00:04:16.480 in conversation with someone,
00:04:17.900 we can often feel a sense
00:04:19.260 of existential isolation
00:04:21.440 because we lack a shared reality
00:04:23.580 with that person.
00:04:25.240 And put simply,
00:04:26.440 a shared reality is
00:04:28.100 the sense that the other person
00:04:29.940 is on the same wavelength as you.
00:04:31.940 So you feel that their thoughts,
00:04:33.440 their emotions,
00:04:34.300 their reactions to events
00:04:35.560 are very similar to your own.
00:04:38.180 That's really the basis
00:04:39.320 of our sense of social connection.
00:04:43.180 And too often we have
00:04:44.640 these psychological barriers
00:04:46.040 that prevent us from forming
00:04:47.580 that shared reality.
00:04:49.380 To give just a few examples,
00:04:51.400 you know, when we're in conversation,
00:04:53.160 our conversations can be so
00:04:54.720 kind of shallow and superficial
00:04:56.460 because we're too scared
00:04:57.680 of disclosing the things
00:04:59.480 that are most important to us
00:05:00.780 that we just don't give
00:05:01.880 the opportunity
00:05:02.620 for shared reality to develop.
00:05:05.400 So it could perfectly well be
00:05:06.980 that the other person
00:05:07.900 is really thinking
00:05:08.620 the same stuff
00:05:09.720 that you're thinking,
00:05:10.900 but you just,
00:05:11.840 neither of you say it.
00:05:12.940 So you feel that distance
00:05:14.920 even though there's that potential
00:05:16.700 for communication
00:05:17.640 and for connection.
00:05:19.240 And that's what
00:05:19.740 the laws of connection
00:05:20.600 is all about.
00:05:21.660 It's overcoming
00:05:22.380 those psychological barriers
00:05:23.720 so that we don't miss
00:05:25.340 all of these opportunities.
00:05:26.360 And actually what I really discovered
00:05:28.240 from all of the research
00:05:29.280 that I read
00:05:29.840 was that there are
00:05:30.620 so many opportunities
00:05:31.900 for us to feel
00:05:33.240 some meaningful connection
00:05:34.700 with the people around us.
00:05:36.420 And with just a few changes
00:05:37.560 to our mindset,
00:05:38.440 to our behavior,
00:05:39.240 to the content
00:05:40.100 of our conversations,
00:05:41.020 we can make the most
00:05:41.960 of those opportunities
00:05:42.940 and achieve our social potential.
00:05:45.540 Yeah, I love this idea
00:05:46.940 because as you said,
00:05:48.240 a lot of times
00:05:48.640 when people talk about
00:05:49.480 how do we solve
00:05:50.180 the loneliness crisis,
00:05:51.360 it's these really drastic
00:05:53.140 engineering our environment.
00:05:54.880 Well, we need to get people
00:05:55.940 more into face-to-face situations.
00:05:57.800 We need to redesign
00:05:58.540 our communities
00:05:59.440 or you tell people,
00:06:00.620 just get out there,
00:06:01.600 sign up for a rec league,
00:06:02.980 go to church
00:06:03.600 or something like that.
00:06:04.680 And all those things
00:06:05.700 are potentially good,
00:06:07.040 but it might not be
00:06:09.060 the solution.
00:06:10.160 It's not sufficient
00:06:11.380 because you can be around people
00:06:13.640 and you can still feel
00:06:15.340 completely lonely.
00:06:16.260 I mean, you see this
00:06:16.800 in relationships.
00:06:17.960 People, they just,
00:06:19.120 they're in their family
00:06:19.740 and they absolutely feel
00:06:20.800 alienated from their family.
00:06:22.220 And as you said,
00:06:22.680 it's because they just
00:06:23.820 don't feel like they're
00:06:24.380 on the same wavelength
00:06:25.640 as their family.
00:06:27.620 Right, exactly.
00:06:28.680 And you know,
00:06:29.240 like in today's
00:06:30.460 kind of social environment,
00:06:31.840 you could blame this
00:06:32.820 on say things
00:06:33.440 like political polarization.
00:06:35.280 And certainly like
00:06:36.060 sharing a similar worldview
00:06:37.820 is important
00:06:38.580 for shared reality,
00:06:39.760 but it can also be
00:06:40.460 something very intimate.
00:06:41.980 It could be that
00:06:42.560 the two of you
00:06:43.220 are sitting,
00:06:44.380 watching a film together
00:06:45.700 and one of you
00:06:46.920 is laughing
00:06:47.600 and finding it
00:06:48.180 absolutely hilarious
00:06:49.140 and the other person
00:06:50.240 is just totally
00:06:51.300 turned off by that film.
00:06:52.500 They just like,
00:06:53.140 don't get what's funny.
00:06:54.380 And that's a very
00:06:55.180 alienating experience
00:06:56.560 that creates
00:06:57.400 this sense of
00:06:58.220 existential isolation
00:06:59.760 because in that moment
00:07:00.680 you have no shared reality.
00:07:02.880 And conversely,
00:07:03.680 actually,
00:07:03.980 you can have a shared reality
00:07:04.920 with someone
00:07:05.420 who is thousands
00:07:06.700 of miles away.
00:07:07.820 Like I have a friend
00:07:08.700 who lives in DC.
00:07:11.140 I'm based in England,
00:07:12.400 but we grew up together
00:07:13.200 and he can just send me
00:07:14.280 like a GIF
00:07:15.200 on WhatsApp
00:07:16.180 and I know
00:07:17.600 that he's found it funny.
00:07:18.900 He knows that
00:07:19.580 I'll find it funny.
00:07:20.660 That creates
00:07:21.380 a sense of shared reality
00:07:22.580 in that moment
00:07:23.320 even though
00:07:23.960 we're not
00:07:24.840 in the same room.
00:07:26.380 And you highlight research
00:07:27.260 when people
00:07:27.840 have this shared reality
00:07:29.120 their brains
00:07:30.540 actually start
00:07:31.220 matching each other
00:07:32.140 in different ways.
00:07:34.000 Yeah,
00:07:34.200 that's what I love
00:07:34.840 about this whole topic
00:07:36.160 is that,
00:07:36.900 you know,
00:07:37.140 you can do
00:07:37.580 these psychological
00:07:38.280 questionnaires
00:07:39.120 where you measure
00:07:40.220 how much
00:07:40.820 shared reality
00:07:41.400 people experience
00:07:42.840 with another person
00:07:43.660 and,
00:07:44.180 you know,
00:07:44.300 that can be like
00:07:44.980 measured on,
00:07:46.260 you know,
00:07:46.440 whether you have
00:07:46.980 the sense
00:07:47.360 that you're
00:07:48.320 kind of thinking
00:07:48.820 the same thing,
00:07:49.580 do you kind of feel
00:07:50.340 that you've got
00:07:50.800 a shared stream
00:07:51.460 of consciousness,
00:07:52.200 do you finish
00:07:52.620 each other's sentences?
00:07:54.200 And we know
00:07:54.540 from those studies
00:07:56.080 that the sense
00:07:57.220 of shared reality
00:07:57.920 really is important
00:07:58.760 for our feelings
00:07:59.900 of closeness
00:08:00.680 and that,
00:08:02.140 you know,
00:08:02.420 it overrides
00:08:03.240 often kind of
00:08:04.380 broader superficial
00:08:05.340 similarities
00:08:06.060 between people,
00:08:07.620 for example,
00:08:08.800 like if they both
00:08:09.460 come from the same
00:08:10.140 hometown.
00:08:11.100 So we know
00:08:11.600 that this intimate
00:08:12.500 sense of sharing
00:08:13.700 our inner world
00:08:14.320 with someone
00:08:14.760 is important.
00:08:16.440 But then there's
00:08:16.980 a whole bunch
00:08:17.660 of studies
00:08:18.440 from neuroscience
00:08:19.120 that showed
00:08:19.740 that there's
00:08:20.300 literal truth
00:08:21.560 to the idea
00:08:22.140 that we're
00:08:22.520 on the same
00:08:23.540 wavelength as
00:08:24.360 someone when
00:08:24.800 we share
00:08:25.260 a reality
00:08:26.120 with them.
00:08:26.880 And basically
00:08:27.380 one of my
00:08:28.440 favourite studies
00:08:29.560 looked at,
00:08:31.160 got a bunch
00:08:31.700 of students
00:08:32.220 from this
00:08:32.780 kind of graduate
00:08:33.420 class at a
00:08:34.380 university
00:08:34.800 to watch
00:08:35.820 a series
00:08:36.700 of YouTube
00:08:37.260 clips.
00:08:37.840 So it could
00:08:38.060 be a music
00:08:38.500 video,
00:08:39.100 documentary,
00:08:39.860 a comedy
00:08:40.280 routine,
00:08:41.240 and they measured
00:08:41.780 their brain
00:08:42.240 activity as each
00:08:43.300 person watched
00:08:44.080 the clips.
00:08:45.240 And what they
00:08:45.600 found was that
00:08:46.180 the similarities
00:08:46.920 in the brain
00:08:48.240 activity to
00:08:49.400 the same
00:08:49.800 events could
00:08:50.840 predict how
00:08:51.500 close the
00:08:52.280 friendships were
00:08:52.980 between the
00:08:54.300 classmates,
00:08:54.980 whether they
00:08:55.540 were kind of
00:08:56.380 a direct
00:08:56.880 connection or
00:08:57.680 whether they
00:08:58.040 were more
00:08:58.380 of like a
00:08:59.760 kind of
00:09:00.260 an acquaintance
00:09:01.060 who you
00:09:01.340 might bump
00:09:02.040 into at
00:09:02.680 another friend's
00:09:03.260 party,
00:09:03.700 but you'd
00:09:03.940 never choose
00:09:04.540 to spend
00:09:04.920 time together.
00:09:06.500 And this
00:09:06.940 kind of
00:09:07.300 interbrain
00:09:07.880 synchrony is
00:09:08.760 called or
00:09:09.160 interbrain
00:09:09.600 coupling,
00:09:10.580 and that's
00:09:10.820 really the
00:09:11.380 neurological
00:09:12.000 foundation of
00:09:13.140 social connection.
00:09:14.900 Okay, so in
00:09:15.340 the course of
00:09:15.840 your research,
00:09:16.340 you developed
00:09:16.860 13 laws
00:09:18.240 that can
00:09:19.120 help you
00:09:19.980 develop more
00:09:21.020 shared reality
00:09:22.060 with people
00:09:22.600 around you.
00:09:23.600 I want to
00:09:23.980 talk about
00:09:24.260 some of
00:09:24.440 these laws
00:09:24.760 today.
00:09:25.600 The first
00:09:26.060 one is be
00:09:26.820 consistent in
00:09:27.600 your treatment
00:09:28.040 of others.
00:09:29.060 Avoid being
00:09:30.060 a stressful
00:09:30.880 frenemy.
00:09:32.260 I want to
00:09:32.460 talk about
00:09:32.660 that frenemy
00:09:33.180 part.
00:09:33.580 What is a
00:09:34.100 frenemy?
00:09:35.460 So a
00:09:36.060 frenemy is
00:09:36.900 or the
00:09:37.820 kind of
00:09:38.080 scientific
00:09:38.400 term for
00:09:39.240 a frenemy
00:09:39.740 is an
00:09:40.300 ambivalent
00:09:41.020 relationship.
00:09:42.640 And essentially
00:09:43.240 they're the
00:09:43.900 kind of people
00:09:44.540 who blow
00:09:45.840 hot and
00:09:46.340 cold.
00:09:47.020 They're
00:09:47.180 kind of
00:09:47.420 Jekyll and
00:09:47.860 Hyde
00:09:48.120 figures.
00:09:49.140 So you
00:09:49.920 might go
00:09:51.000 to them
00:09:51.340 one day
00:09:51.740 and they
00:09:52.240 act like
00:09:53.300 your best
00:09:53.680 friend,
00:09:54.100 like they
00:09:54.360 have your
00:09:54.720 best interests
00:09:55.480 at heart.
00:09:56.320 And then
00:09:56.580 the next
00:09:56.900 day they'll
00:09:57.920 ignore you
00:09:59.220 or lash
00:10:00.240 out because
00:10:00.720 they're feeling
00:10:01.200 jealous.
00:10:01.900 They're not
00:10:02.160 reliable.
00:10:03.180 They're not
00:10:03.460 consistent in
00:10:04.320 their behaviour.
00:10:05.540 Now there's
00:10:06.520 been a bunch
00:10:07.100 of longitudinal
00:10:08.040 studies that
00:10:09.080 have looked
00:10:09.540 at the
00:10:10.660 importance of
00:10:11.300 social networks
00:10:12.240 for our
00:10:12.940 health and
00:10:13.880 one way of
00:10:14.800 looking at
00:10:15.140 this is just
00:10:15.820 calculating how
00:10:16.880 many connections
00:10:17.520 you have and
00:10:18.140 it does seem
00:10:18.600 that people
00:10:18.960 with bigger
00:10:19.920 social networks
00:10:20.800 tend to be
00:10:21.660 healthier.
00:10:22.400 You know it
00:10:22.660 can be as
00:10:23.600 important the
00:10:24.320 size of your
00:10:24.800 social network
00:10:25.520 as things like
00:10:26.440 whether you
00:10:27.160 smoke or drink
00:10:27.800 or whether you
00:10:28.800 exercise regularly
00:10:29.820 how high your
00:10:31.520 BMI is.
00:10:32.920 But then it's
00:10:33.860 not just the
00:10:34.320 number it's the
00:10:35.180 quality of the
00:10:36.820 interactions with
00:10:37.800 people that you
00:10:38.500 have.
00:10:39.480 And what was
00:10:39.920 really surprising
00:10:40.740 to me was that
00:10:41.980 the ambivalent
00:10:44.160 friendships, the
00:10:45.900 frenemies who are
00:10:47.180 kind of good and
00:10:48.380 bad in equal
00:10:48.920 measure, they're
00:10:50.280 not just worse
00:10:51.420 than the people
00:10:52.020 who are wholly
00:10:53.120 supportive to you.
00:10:54.620 They can actually
00:10:55.220 be more stressful
00:10:56.180 than the people
00:10:57.140 who are purely
00:10:57.920 aversive.
00:10:58.780 Those relatives
00:11:00.100 for example or
00:11:01.140 that colleague at
00:11:02.080 work who's just
00:11:02.800 so consistently
00:11:03.980 nasty that you
00:11:05.080 just know to
00:11:05.940 avoid them.
00:11:07.140 And I think the
00:11:07.620 problem with the
00:11:08.200 frenemies is
00:11:08.840 that you feel
00:11:10.780 invested in the
00:11:11.560 relationship and
00:11:13.020 you kind of want
00:11:14.320 their approval.
00:11:15.660 And so when
00:11:16.400 there's this
00:11:16.920 uncertainty on how
00:11:18.120 they're going to
00:11:18.540 respond to you, it
00:11:19.380 actually hurts a
00:11:20.460 lot more.
00:11:21.360 And so there are
00:11:21.820 studies showing that
00:11:22.540 just knowing that
00:11:23.300 a frenemy, that
00:11:24.240 an ambivalent
00:11:24.920 relationship is
00:11:26.220 sitting in the
00:11:27.080 room next to
00:11:28.360 you and that
00:11:29.060 you're going to
00:11:29.660 have to interact
00:11:30.300 with them in a
00:11:30.920 few minutes, that
00:11:32.180 can make your
00:11:33.320 stress levels
00:11:34.040 sore.
00:11:34.580 It can actually
00:11:35.060 raise your blood
00:11:35.780 pressure just
00:11:36.360 knowing that
00:11:37.380 they're going to
00:11:37.820 be there and you
00:11:38.480 don't know how
00:11:38.940 they're going to
00:11:39.500 react.
00:11:40.360 Now the
00:11:40.960 conclusion of
00:11:41.640 this research is
00:11:42.520 obviously that we
00:11:43.860 should be more
00:11:44.740 mindful of the
00:11:45.520 people in our
00:11:46.020 social networks and
00:11:46.920 maybe keep a
00:11:48.040 distance from these
00:11:48.860 people who are not
00:11:50.540 good for our
00:11:51.180 well-being.
00:11:51.880 We probably don't
00:11:52.540 want to eliminate
00:11:53.180 all of them
00:11:53.920 altogether because
00:11:55.040 sometimes the good
00:11:55.780 outweighs the bad,
00:11:56.700 but an awareness of
00:11:58.280 those people and
00:11:59.580 their effects on our
00:12:00.300 well-being can at
00:12:01.080 least help us to
00:12:02.080 manage our
00:12:03.020 expectations and to
00:12:04.640 make sure that if
00:12:05.560 they stress us out
00:12:06.340 that we do
00:12:07.180 something to kind
00:12:07.960 of calm ourselves
00:12:08.860 afterwards and put
00:12:09.880 their behavior into
00:12:11.200 perspective.
00:12:12.160 But equally
00:12:12.700 important, we need
00:12:13.680 to avoid being
00:12:14.360 frenemies ourselves
00:12:15.420 and we could be
00:12:16.500 doing this without
00:12:17.220 realizing like maybe
00:12:18.300 it's just that you're
00:12:19.160 the kind of person
00:12:20.140 who is always late
00:12:21.620 and that leaves your
00:12:22.260 friend feeling
00:12:22.920 devalued or you
00:12:24.560 never respond to
00:12:25.280 their messages, you
00:12:26.240 forget their
00:12:26.700 birthday, you know,
00:12:27.320 all of these things.
00:12:28.500 We want to be
00:12:29.060 consistent.
00:12:29.680 If people really
00:12:30.280 matter to us, we
00:12:31.360 really want to show
00:12:32.160 that regularly and
00:12:33.480 consistently.
00:12:34.680 Okay, so that takes
00:12:35.080 some self-reflection
00:12:36.360 and you might even
00:12:37.440 have to ask your
00:12:38.040 friend, hey, am I
00:12:38.980 doing anything that
00:12:39.680 just really bothers
00:12:41.100 you and what can I
00:12:42.140 do to improve?
00:12:44.000 Right, exactly.
00:12:44.900 It's like asking, you
00:12:45.840 know, am I the
00:12:46.540 asshole in this
00:12:47.560 relationship?
00:12:48.560 You might not want
00:12:49.580 to hear what they
00:12:50.180 have to say, but
00:12:50.860 ultimately it's going
00:12:51.660 to help you to be a
00:12:52.660 better person if you
00:12:53.460 do.
00:12:54.600 Okay, so the second
00:12:55.320 law is create a
00:12:57.220 mutual understanding
00:12:58.180 with the people you
00:12:59.140 meet.
00:12:59.980 What are some tips
00:13:00.620 you found in your
00:13:01.360 research for how to
00:13:02.360 create a shared
00:13:03.280 reality with
00:13:03.920 someone by fostering
00:13:05.440 mutual understanding?
00:13:06.800 Just actually making
00:13:07.920 the effort to
00:13:08.840 verbalize your
00:13:10.040 feelings to the
00:13:10.720 other person is
00:13:11.580 hugely important.
00:13:12.760 So if they're
00:13:13.140 telling you something
00:13:14.540 that really mattered
00:13:15.220 to them in their
00:13:15.760 life, you know, it
00:13:16.320 could be like a
00:13:17.080 tragic event, it
00:13:17.800 could be something
00:13:18.280 that they're super
00:13:18.940 proud of, but just
00:13:20.120 verbalizing how you
00:13:21.340 feel for them, that
00:13:22.820 is something that we
00:13:23.580 sometimes forget to
00:13:24.700 do.
00:13:24.960 We might just assume
00:13:26.120 that they can kind
00:13:26.780 of read it from our
00:13:28.160 facial expression, our
00:13:29.040 body language, but
00:13:29.880 just saying it out
00:13:30.580 loud can be really
00:13:31.900 important.
00:13:32.380 And, you know, if
00:13:33.100 you're having joint
00:13:33.860 activity together, like
00:13:35.660 just to actually say
00:13:36.960 how much you're
00:13:37.520 enjoying it so that
00:13:38.440 they know that they're
00:13:39.340 not the only person
00:13:40.220 who's experiencing that
00:13:42.140 kind of exhilaration.
00:13:43.420 You know, that's one
00:13:44.860 way that we can do
00:13:45.680 this.
00:13:46.620 Another way that was
00:13:48.100 super surprising to me
00:13:49.280 was that you can often
00:13:52.160 achieve that neural
00:13:53.400 synchronization that is
00:13:55.440 kind of behind this
00:13:57.120 shared reality by changing
00:13:58.900 your kind of physiological
00:14:00.480 experience.
00:14:02.320 So, rhythmic activities
00:14:04.200 when you're moving or
00:14:05.960 singing in time with
00:14:07.280 other people, so, you
00:14:08.620 know, going to karaoke,
00:14:10.100 dancing, these are very
00:14:11.340 effective bonding
00:14:12.440 activities because they're
00:14:14.100 synchronizing your
00:14:14.920 brainwaves.
00:14:15.820 And so, fundamentally,
00:14:17.180 you know that that other
00:14:17.920 person is living in the
00:14:19.360 kind of physical world in
00:14:20.500 the present moment,
00:14:21.700 experiencing exactly the
00:14:22.960 same sensations that you
00:14:24.220 are.
00:14:24.720 That's been proven to be
00:14:26.080 really good for
00:14:27.300 establishing a bond
00:14:28.340 between strangers and
00:14:29.640 between people who know
00:14:31.080 each other.
00:14:31.920 All of these experiments,
00:14:32.940 you know, show that when
00:14:33.620 people kind of dance
00:14:34.980 together, they become more
00:14:36.180 altruistic to one another,
00:14:37.580 they feel closer, they're
00:14:38.960 more likely to share their
00:14:40.860 secrets with each other.
00:14:42.240 It's very, very powerful.
00:14:44.360 And it doesn't have, you
00:14:45.220 know, if dancing's not your
00:14:46.200 thing, if singing's not your
00:14:47.180 thing, something like, you
00:14:48.760 know, going to a chili
00:14:49.560 eating contest together, if
00:14:51.240 that's what, like, you and
00:14:52.840 your friend enjoy, you know,
00:14:54.280 experiencing that kind of
00:14:56.080 pleasurable pain together,
00:14:57.800 that is also a good way of
00:14:59.180 establishing this kind of
00:15:00.780 momentary shared reality
00:15:02.280 that can then, you know,
00:15:03.900 just ease your interaction
00:15:05.080 and maybe you can develop
00:15:06.680 that into some more
00:15:08.100 meaningful relationship, a
00:15:09.700 more lasting relationship.
00:15:11.300 Yeah, the sociologist
00:15:12.060 Emile Durkheim called that
00:15:13.220 collective effervescence
00:15:14.480 when you felt you're
00:15:15.560 connected with everyone
00:15:16.480 when you're dancing.
00:15:17.520 Okay, so do things together
00:15:18.780 that require synchronized
00:15:21.060 movement.
00:15:21.440 So dance, play music
00:15:22.820 together, you can even do
00:15:24.420 comedy or improv with each
00:15:26.020 other.
00:15:26.460 And then I like that
00:15:27.180 other idea.
00:15:27.600 It's very simple.
00:15:28.880 Just validate the thoughts
00:15:30.120 of other people.
00:15:30.780 If they say something and
00:15:32.340 you agree with it, like,
00:15:33.980 say so.
00:15:34.600 And don't just assume that
00:15:35.360 they know that you agree.
00:15:36.860 And we talked about, like,
00:15:37.700 what it feels like when
00:15:38.720 you've created that mutual
00:15:39.520 understanding.
00:15:40.360 It can actually feel, I
00:15:41.840 mean, it feels like you're
00:15:42.420 on the same wavelength, but
00:15:43.620 then you also highlight
00:15:44.640 research, and I think people
00:15:45.920 might experience this as
00:15:46.840 well.
00:15:47.480 There's a sense of self-
00:15:48.440 expansion.
00:15:48.920 Like, you feel like you're
00:15:50.360 getting bigger whenever you
00:15:52.200 have created the shared
00:15:53.560 reality with someone.
00:15:54.320 Talk to us about that idea
00:15:55.120 of self-expansion.
00:15:57.100 Yeah, self-expansion is
00:15:58.680 super important.
00:15:59.940 So, you know, even after
00:16:01.180 you've clicked with someone,
00:16:02.660 even, you know, if you've
00:16:03.800 spent a lot of time with
00:16:05.140 them, you share the same
00:16:06.180 interests.
00:16:07.060 The most successful
00:16:07.900 relationships are the ones
00:16:09.560 that also allow each party
00:16:11.260 to grow.
00:16:12.160 And, you know, that's as
00:16:13.080 true with platonic
00:16:14.060 relationships as it is with
00:16:16.020 romantic relationships.
00:16:17.280 It's not restricted to the
00:16:19.300 particular kind of connection
00:16:21.700 you have with someone.
00:16:23.280 We just want to surround
00:16:24.300 ourselves with people who
00:16:25.800 are encouraging us to kind
00:16:28.120 of exit our comfort zone in
00:16:30.320 some way.
00:16:31.320 Now, they could do that
00:16:32.340 purely by being themselves.
00:16:34.500 Perhaps they're just
00:16:35.180 bringing a whole new range
00:16:37.280 of knowledge and
00:16:37.980 perspectives that you never
00:16:39.900 had yourself.
00:16:41.260 So, you know, maybe your
00:16:42.120 backgrounds are just so
00:16:42.960 different that actually they
00:16:44.280 always help you to see the
00:16:45.800 world in a slightly different
00:16:47.560 way, that they always have a
00:16:48.700 new insight to bring.
00:16:50.580 That's one form of self
00:16:51.680 expansion.
00:16:52.520 It could be that they
00:16:53.320 encourage you to do
00:16:54.260 activities that you wouldn't
00:16:56.280 have tried before.
00:16:57.120 You know, maybe it's like they
00:16:58.620 practice a different sport and
00:17:00.640 they help you to do the same
00:17:01.880 or, you know, they're a real
00:17:03.500 foodie and they're kind of
00:17:05.380 taking you, encouraging you
00:17:06.940 to go to like new
00:17:08.040 restaurants to try like
00:17:09.800 different gastronomic
00:17:10.920 experiences.
00:17:12.240 It could be that you both do
00:17:13.260 stargazing together.
00:17:14.440 Like, you know, there's so many
00:17:15.700 ways that you can create
00:17:17.280 self expansion within a
00:17:18.880 friendship or a romantic
00:17:20.020 relationship.
00:17:21.160 But it's really fundamental to
00:17:22.740 to making sure that your
00:17:24.540 shared reality doesn't
00:17:25.740 grow stale.
00:17:28.140 Another law that you have
00:17:29.660 you talk about in the book
00:17:30.660 is trust that others on
00:17:32.720 average will like you as
00:17:34.040 much as you like them.
00:17:35.360 And this law seeks to
00:17:37.080 resolve a problem of
00:17:38.340 socializing called the
00:17:40.060 liking gap.
00:17:40.960 What is the liking gap?
00:17:42.940 So the liking gap is a very
00:17:46.100 common phenomenon that I
00:17:48.240 think we've all experienced
00:17:49.400 as some of us experience it
00:17:51.140 more than others.
00:17:52.180 And it's the fact that when
00:17:53.340 you meet a new
00:17:55.060 acquaintance for the first
00:17:56.160 time, you can have a
00:17:58.380 great conversation.
00:17:59.940 Now you can really hit it
00:18:00.940 off like you're laughing at
00:18:01.960 the same stuff.
00:18:02.960 You have the same interests.
00:18:04.680 You really find that other
00:18:06.160 person fascinating.
00:18:07.600 But when you go away from
00:18:08.600 that conversation, you start
00:18:10.440 to experience these doubts.
00:18:11.840 You start to think that, you
00:18:13.380 know, maybe I said a faux
00:18:14.940 par, maybe I was a bit
00:18:15.900 boring at this point of
00:18:17.180 the conversation.
00:18:18.360 You come away, despite your
00:18:20.120 good experience, assuming
00:18:21.500 that the other person
00:18:23.280 didn't like you as much as
00:18:25.180 you liked the other person.
00:18:27.120 You just underestimate how
00:18:29.140 appealing you were.
00:18:30.680 The research shows that the
00:18:31.640 liking gap, you know, is
00:18:32.480 probably happening to both
00:18:33.580 parties.
00:18:34.220 So each person within that
00:18:35.920 conversation is going away
00:18:37.360 thinking the same thing,
00:18:38.580 that the other person just
00:18:40.320 didn't like them as much as
00:18:41.420 they liked the other person.
00:18:42.700 And you can see how this can
00:18:44.420 drive people apart, because
00:18:46.340 if you have that kind of
00:18:48.100 anxiety, you're less likely
00:18:49.480 to capitalize on that
00:18:50.840 interaction afterwards.
00:18:52.220 You're less likely to arrange
00:18:53.420 to meet up a second time,
00:18:55.380 to go out for a drink, to
00:18:56.660 get a coffee, to maybe
00:18:57.800 engage in some kind of
00:18:59.120 creative collaboration if
00:19:00.660 it's at work.
00:19:01.600 And the sad thing about the
00:19:02.680 liking gap is that it
00:19:04.160 lingers for quite a while.
00:19:05.620 So one study looked at
00:19:07.480 university suite mates, you
00:19:09.560 know, who were living
00:19:10.140 together, should have got to
00:19:12.220 know each other pretty well.
00:19:13.600 But they found that even
00:19:14.540 after, you know, seven or
00:19:15.620 eight months, these
00:19:16.520 suite mates still had this
00:19:17.700 liking gap.
00:19:18.220 They still weren't
00:19:18.960 confident that the other
00:19:19.880 person liked them as much
00:19:20.940 as they liked the other
00:19:22.060 person.
00:19:22.980 And if we want to build
00:19:24.180 better relationships more
00:19:25.820 quickly, we want to kind of
00:19:27.300 overcome that liking gap
00:19:28.660 after the first few
00:19:30.180 meetings.
00:19:31.480 So it sounds like the
00:19:32.300 liking gap is maybe you
00:19:34.300 established a shared
00:19:35.120 reality with someone, but
00:19:36.220 then after the fact, you
00:19:37.440 you start questioning it.
00:19:39.660 Yeah.
00:19:39.860 Yeah.
00:19:40.380 Yeah.
00:19:41.120 Yeah.
00:19:41.380 You start, I mean, you
00:19:42.540 kind of allowed that shared
00:19:43.640 reality to crumble because
00:19:44.960 you start to think that what
00:19:46.880 you perceived was not what
00:19:48.080 the other person perceived.
00:19:49.240 You don't trust that
00:19:50.060 actually those feelings of
00:19:51.320 closeness were real and
00:19:53.140 true for each party.
00:19:55.160 And this liking gap is more
00:19:56.500 common for introverts than
00:19:58.040 extroverts.
00:19:59.060 Another thing about
00:19:59.920 introverts is that they
00:20:01.060 think or they predict that
00:20:03.160 they will enjoy a social
00:20:04.900 interaction less than they
00:20:06.900 actually do.
00:20:07.720 So I'm not doubting that
00:20:09.400 there are like meaningful
00:20:11.060 fundamental differences
00:20:12.240 between introverts and
00:20:14.220 extroverts and the kind of
00:20:15.960 situations that they might
00:20:17.240 find most kind of
00:20:18.520 recharging or restorative.
00:20:20.500 But in general, introverts
00:20:22.480 tend to have more pessimistic
00:20:24.320 assumptions about social
00:20:26.300 events.
00:20:27.420 They're more likely than
00:20:28.340 extroverts to assume that
00:20:30.140 they're just not going to
00:20:31.340 enjoy an interaction with a
00:20:32.880 stranger that is going to be
00:20:34.360 exhausting and awkward and
00:20:36.220 embarrassing and that
00:20:37.540 they'll come away feeling a
00:20:38.600 lot worse than they did
00:20:39.500 before the interaction.
00:20:41.160 But what the research shows
00:20:42.160 is that when you compare
00:20:44.000 introverts and extroverts
00:20:45.440 after an interaction, they
00:20:47.540 both actually find these
00:20:48.840 social engagements really
00:20:49.840 meaningful and enjoyable.
00:20:52.060 So those introvert
00:20:53.320 expectations just aren't as
00:20:55.140 well calibrated as they are
00:20:57.020 for the extroverts.
00:20:58.600 Yeah, I've experienced that.
00:21:00.600 I'm an introvert.
00:21:01.440 I write for a living.
00:21:02.620 I do my podcast.
00:21:03.540 My podcast views, my
00:21:04.500 closets.
00:21:05.040 I'm just at my house all the
00:21:06.440 time.
00:21:07.420 And so when there's an
00:21:08.160 opportunity to socialize, I
00:21:09.440 always have like, oh, I'm
00:21:10.260 not, it's going to, I'm
00:21:11.300 going to be really
00:21:11.760 exhausted.
00:21:12.320 I'm not going to be very
00:21:13.060 good.
00:21:13.420 And then I do it and I feel
00:21:14.720 great.
00:21:15.060 That was awesome.
00:21:15.960 I don't know.
00:21:16.260 Have you had that same
00:21:17.180 experience as a writer?
00:21:19.440 Yeah, all the time.
00:21:20.280 But I mean, especially I
00:21:21.700 think after the COVID
00:21:23.180 pandemic lockdowns that we had
00:21:24.760 in England, it was like I'd
00:21:26.800 forgotten kind of how to, you
00:21:28.980 know, only temporarily, only
00:21:30.140 for like the first few
00:21:30.880 meetings, but I really felt
00:21:31.960 like I was worried that I'd
00:21:33.360 forgotten my social skills
00:21:34.960 and how to interact with
00:21:36.220 people.
00:21:37.120 And then, you know, once I
00:21:38.580 had those conversations, it
00:21:39.860 was great, but it took, you
00:21:41.360 know, maybe a few weeks for
00:21:42.800 me to kind of fully feel
00:21:45.220 engaged again to the same
00:21:46.640 degree that I had before the
00:21:48.660 pandemic.
00:21:49.480 And this actually comes out in
00:21:50.900 the research quite nicely,
00:21:52.800 that to overcome phenomena
00:21:53.960 like the liking gap and that
00:21:55.640 those kind of official
00:21:56.760 nerves about meeting
00:21:58.000 strangers.
00:21:58.940 Anyone can do it, no matter
00:21:59.980 what our personality, but you
00:22:01.740 do need to put in practice.
00:22:02.880 So you have to, you know,
00:22:04.600 make it a kind of intention
00:22:06.580 every day to try to speak to
00:22:08.880 someone that you don't know.
00:22:10.000 And then after just one week,
00:22:11.500 you'll find that your
00:22:12.460 expectations are much better
00:22:13.840 calibrated, that you feel
00:22:15.540 more confident about enjoying
00:22:17.620 those interactions and more
00:22:18.760 confident in your ability to
00:22:20.600 conduct those interactions
00:22:22.180 with fluency.
00:22:23.460 You just need the experience.
00:22:24.720 But if you let it go by for a
00:22:27.320 few weeks or months without
00:22:28.720 kind of pushing yourself in
00:22:30.640 that way, the nerves and the
00:22:32.120 fear, they're going to kind of
00:22:33.120 creep back and you're just
00:22:34.900 going to have to kind of warm
00:22:36.020 up again before you feel that
00:22:37.540 same confidence.
00:22:38.460 Yeah. And you say that Jane
00:22:40.300 Austin's Pride and Prejudice can
00:22:42.860 teach us this principle of
00:22:45.040 needing to take an intentional
00:22:47.740 approach to developing our social
00:22:49.560 skills.
00:22:50.460 Right. I mean, there's a great
00:22:53.300 scene between Mr. Darcy and
00:22:55.680 Elizabeth Bennett, who is kind of
00:22:58.580 his love interest, even though they
00:23:00.240 don't realize it at the time.
00:23:01.560 And, you know, she is basically
00:23:05.320 pointing out the fact that he just
00:23:07.180 doesn't speak to people at parties
00:23:08.900 and he's like very standoffish and
00:23:10.900 it seems to her very rude in the
00:23:13.180 fact that he'll just kind of keep
00:23:14.220 to his group and he just makes no
00:23:15.920 effort.
00:23:16.820 And he says something like, well, I
00:23:18.500 just don't have the ability that
00:23:20.520 you have to to make small talk and
00:23:22.960 to connect with people.
00:23:24.600 And she's playing the piano at the
00:23:26.340 time and she says, well, I'm not a
00:23:27.760 great pianist, but I don't pretend
00:23:29.520 that that's just like inherent
00:23:32.080 within me.
00:23:32.880 I'm not a great pianist because I
00:23:34.260 just don't put in as much practice
00:23:35.740 as all of the other girls who can
00:23:37.300 play much better than me.
00:23:38.820 And, you know, maybe your kind of
00:23:40.700 social awkwardness is just part of
00:23:42.880 the fact that you just have never
00:23:44.740 tried to practice.
00:23:46.360 And that's really what the science
00:23:48.680 demonstrates for us is that, you
00:23:50.860 know, you put in the practice and
00:23:52.420 you reap rewards in just the same way
00:23:54.400 that you would with learning a
00:23:55.960 musical instrument, that these skills
00:23:58.040 don't necessarily come naturally
00:23:59.460 to anyone, but we're all much
00:24:01.460 better than we think.
00:24:02.460 If only we we try hard to to put
00:24:05.360 ourselves in the kinds of
00:24:06.320 situations where we need to use
00:24:07.900 those skills.
00:24:09.320 Yeah, I love that scene.
00:24:10.100 That was a very incisive insight
00:24:12.160 from Jane Austen.
00:24:13.040 I really like that a lot.
00:24:14.740 We're going to take a quick break
00:24:15.440 for your words from our sponsors.
00:24:21.460 And now back to the show.
00:24:23.380 So in the book, you also talk about
00:24:24.800 how conversation can help us create
00:24:27.380 and nurture shared realities with
00:24:29.420 others.
00:24:30.060 How can we better use conversations
00:24:32.560 to create that shared reality?
00:24:35.440 Right.
00:24:36.020 I mean, again, there are like these
00:24:38.060 psychological barriers where we might
00:24:40.380 be trying our hardest to connect and
00:24:42.040 often we are successful, but we're
00:24:43.820 maybe not doing it as well as we could
00:24:46.420 be.
00:24:47.420 One of the problems that a lot of people
00:24:49.440 have is that they just don't ask
00:24:51.280 enough of the right questions in a
00:24:53.660 conversation.
00:24:54.180 So I think it's quite well known that,
00:24:56.120 you know, you should ask questions to
00:24:57.420 achieve a shared reality.
00:24:59.740 But the problem is that when people
00:25:02.320 take that advice, they can often do it
00:25:04.120 quite kind of algorithmically, like
00:25:06.000 robotically.
00:25:07.200 And they're just kind of it's almost
00:25:08.300 like an interview.
00:25:09.040 They've got like a list of things like
00:25:10.200 what professions you do, like where
00:25:11.620 did you go to school, where do you
00:25:13.220 live, like, you know, what family do
00:25:15.780 you have, you know, all of these
00:25:17.340 things.
00:25:17.860 But each question isn't really building
00:25:19.600 on the other ones.
00:25:20.600 It's just like a stream of new
00:25:21.960 questions.
00:25:22.500 Now, that's fine.
00:25:24.320 It's certainly better than just those
00:25:25.820 kind of icebreakers of like, hey, how
00:25:29.040 are you doing?
00:25:29.760 And it's better than this habit that
00:25:31.560 some people have, which is like, hey,
00:25:34.040 how's work going?
00:25:34.680 Anyway, I got a great promotion and I
00:25:36.380 was given this huge bonus where you
00:25:38.120 just use the question as an excuse to
00:25:40.540 turn the conversation back to
00:25:42.360 yourself.
00:25:42.960 So those are bad questions.
00:25:44.280 But the best questions are the ones
00:25:45.740 that ask the other person to open up
00:25:47.880 and then build on what they've just
00:25:49.160 said.
00:25:49.460 So kind of follow up questions that
00:25:51.700 really make an effort to dig deep
00:25:53.940 into into this experience that they've
00:25:56.180 shared with you.
00:25:57.580 Any examples of questions that are
00:25:58.880 really good for digging deep and
00:26:00.640 establishing that shared reality with
00:26:02.500 somebody?
00:26:03.620 Yeah.
00:26:03.900 I mean, you know, to say you are just
00:26:05.460 getting to know someone, it's reasonable
00:26:07.280 to say, like, you know, what's your
00:26:08.560 profession?
00:26:09.040 What do you do for your day job?
00:26:10.940 Then, you know, if they tell you they're
00:26:12.200 like a lawyer or scientist or whatever,
00:26:14.340 just asking them like, well, you know, why
00:26:16.400 did you choose that profession or what does
00:26:18.200 it involve?
00:26:18.900 Like, what's your favorite part of that
00:26:20.800 profession?
00:26:21.300 What's the worst part of it?
00:26:23.140 You know, just showing that you have a
00:26:24.700 genuine curiosity in what they're saying
00:26:27.840 is hugely flattering.
00:26:29.340 And it's just building that shared reality
00:26:31.560 by kind of constructing all these details
00:26:34.040 that allow you to understand their life
00:26:36.000 better.
00:26:36.740 And from your reactions, you're allowing
00:26:38.960 them to understand where you're coming
00:26:40.420 from and how you feel about these
00:26:42.600 different topics.
00:26:44.640 You also talk about there's some research
00:26:45.940 saying that in order to establish a
00:26:48.360 shared reality with someone during a
00:26:49.840 conversation, you may need to interrupt
00:26:52.320 them, which goes against the advice you
00:26:54.880 hear about, like, oh, don't interrupt
00:26:56.100 people, just listen.
00:26:57.240 Maybe you do some nodding and ha-ha
00:26:59.280 while you're listening, but you don't
00:27:00.680 interrupt.
00:27:01.360 Tell us about this research because I
00:27:02.440 thought it was really counterintuitive.
00:27:04.540 So, I mean, the way we show attention to
00:27:06.780 someone else is really important for
00:27:08.460 establishing a shared reality.
00:27:10.020 Now, a lot of us rely too much on what's
00:27:13.900 known as paralinguistic cues.
00:27:16.300 So, that's things like murmuring a scent,
00:27:19.020 like, mm-hmm, uh-huh, yeah, or, you know,
00:27:21.220 nodding along, you know, that kind of body
00:27:23.120 language.
00:27:24.120 We think because we know that we're
00:27:25.960 listening that the other person is going
00:27:27.740 to read those cues as they were intended.
00:27:30.740 But the fact is, it's, like, really easy to
00:27:34.140 fake those cues.
00:27:35.960 If you're not concentrating, you can just, like,
00:27:37.740 murmur a scent every few minutes, and it's
00:27:40.400 really difficult to tell whether you were
00:27:41.760 listening or not.
00:27:43.380 So, what's much better is to demonstrate
00:27:45.820 actively that you're engaged with what
00:27:48.240 they're saying.
00:27:48.720 So, it could be paraphrasing what they've
00:27:50.820 just told you, asking one of those follow-up
00:27:52.960 questions, but then the super surprising
00:27:55.400 thing is that interruptions are actually a
00:27:57.700 really useful way of demonstrating your
00:27:59.980 interest and curiosity.
00:28:01.660 If you're finishing their sentences, or, you
00:28:04.060 know, when they pause because they don't quite
00:28:05.580 know what to say, and you interrupt to ask
00:28:08.820 them to continue, or to kind of guess what
00:28:11.480 they were going to say, you know, that shows
00:28:13.300 that you're really engaged, and that's
00:28:14.860 actually very flattering.
00:28:16.420 Now, obviously, not all interruptions are
00:28:18.640 equal, so if you're interrupting someone to
00:28:20.820 completely change the topic, that's super
00:28:23.920 insulting, like that's never going to work.
00:28:26.420 But yeah, if you're interrupting because it's
00:28:28.700 a sign of your genuine curiosity and passion for
00:28:31.220 what they're saying, you know, we don't have to
00:28:33.200 listen to the etiquette guides, that is going to
00:28:35.580 be a way of forging this connection.
00:28:38.980 You also talk about the novelty penalty in
00:28:41.080 conversation.
00:28:41.680 What's that?
00:28:42.700 Yeah, that's super counterintuitive to me, and
00:28:45.380 it's the fact that when we're listening to other
00:28:48.660 people, or they are listening to us, we all have a
00:28:51.900 preference for hearing about something that we
00:28:54.540 already know, a topic that's already familiar.
00:28:58.740 And so, if you talk about something that isn't in the
00:29:01.480 other person's life, so it's totally novel, that's
00:29:04.820 when you have the novelty penalty, they just don't
00:29:07.080 feel the same level of connection to you through
00:29:10.020 that.
00:29:10.860 I think it's very common when we're talking about
00:29:13.680 our kind of holidays, if the other person hasn't
00:29:16.740 been to the location that we're talking about, they
00:29:19.340 can feel very alienated and bored by the conversation
00:29:22.180 very quickly, because it's just difficult for them to
00:29:25.120 grab hold of.
00:29:26.620 Now, one of the reasons this happens is partly
00:29:28.400 that our storytelling abilities just maybe aren't as
00:29:33.120 well-developed as they could be.
00:29:36.300 So, you know, you're leaving too many gaps in the
00:29:40.200 conversation in your descriptions that make it very
00:29:44.440 hard for them to really get a handle on what was so
00:29:46.920 exciting or fun or interesting about your experience and
00:29:50.540 why it mattered to you.
00:29:52.340 And so, actually, to overcome the novelty penalty, it's
00:29:55.400 often better to embellish our stories a little bit more than
00:29:57.960 we would naturally do.
00:29:59.300 And I don't mean embellish with, like, you know, false
00:30:02.140 details, but I just mean, like, fill in those gaps, be a bit
00:30:05.480 more emotional in what you're saying.
00:30:07.180 Like, if something, like, completely changed your life by
00:30:11.160 having an experience, make that clear.
00:30:13.340 Actually explicitly say what it was that was so
00:30:16.220 transformative about the experience.
00:30:18.300 That just allows the other person to see inside your mind.
00:30:23.220 And that's really what is a shared reality is when people
00:30:26.180 can see inside each other's minds and really get to know
00:30:28.800 what's actually making you tick and what's actually
00:30:30.840 motivating you.
00:30:32.360 And I guess if you're listening to someone tell us a story and
00:30:36.000 the novelty penalty is kicking in for you, like you're just
00:30:38.620 like bored, I think the solution to that would be ask
00:30:41.100 questions to flesh out those emotional details.
00:30:44.500 Right.
00:30:45.040 That's it.
00:30:45.420 I think like, you know, we should be really humble about
00:30:47.860 this and rather than just assuming that the other person is
00:30:50.860 really boring or getting irritated, like we should think
00:30:53.740 that maybe this is a reflection on us and that actually maybe
00:30:57.240 we're not asking the right questions or leading the
00:31:00.020 conversation in the way that will allow them to tell us why
00:31:03.380 that experience was so important to them and why they think
00:31:06.020 it's worth sharing with us.
00:31:08.560 So oftentimes in a relationship to maintain it, we might tell
00:31:12.980 white lies.
00:31:13.900 We basically tell something untruthful to not hurt the other
00:31:16.500 person's feelings.
00:31:18.460 So, you know, typical one, hey, what'd you think of this food I
00:31:21.620 made?
00:31:22.020 And you're like, oh, it was so good.
00:31:23.420 And you're thinking, well, actually I thought it was gross.
00:31:25.920 What does the research say about how that affects relationships?
00:31:29.060 I mean, there are very few situations where dishonesty pays off in
00:31:34.500 relationships.
00:31:35.560 It's pretty much limited, actually, like a white lie can be beneficial
00:31:39.720 and is kind of acceptable if the other person has no opportunity to
00:31:44.740 respond to that feedback constructively.
00:31:47.200 So the obvious example is if you have like a bride or groom on their
00:31:51.920 wedding day and they're just about to kind of walk down the aisle and
00:31:56.080 they look pretty awful for some reason and there's nothing they can do about
00:31:59.860 it.
00:32:00.060 Like they can't manage to get a new suit, a new dress.
00:32:02.400 They can't manage to redo their hair.
00:32:03.960 Hearing that news is only going to make them feel a lot worse and be less
00:32:08.400 confident.
00:32:09.440 You know, then it's fine to tell a white lie.
00:32:13.540 But in almost every other situation, people really respond well to the negative
00:32:18.400 feedback much, much more than we would expect.
00:32:21.200 And that's because people value honesty so much, because honesty is so essential
00:32:26.120 for that shared reality.
00:32:27.280 If you start to question whether the other person is really telling you the
00:32:31.280 truth, all of the shared reality that you've constructed together starts to
00:32:35.500 feel like this kind of illusion, this mirage that might disappear.
00:32:39.100 So, you know, even if you have negative feedback, don't be afraid to share it.
00:32:43.800 Just make sure that you are, firstly, you're being honest.
00:32:46.940 Secondly, that you're being nuanced.
00:32:48.540 So don't make sweeping statements, but try to be very specific in, you know, what
00:32:53.760 you liked, what you didn't like on their project, for example, and try to offer your
00:32:58.540 own kind of support and resources to help them to make the changes that they need.
00:33:03.800 So, you know, if you're talking about a work project, offering to go out for coffee
00:33:08.500 with the person to kind of talk it through and to impart your expertise, that's going
00:33:12.300 to mean that the negative feedback is much better received and it's going to help
00:33:16.560 them to feel less stressed about the whole thing.
00:33:19.760 But there have been studies where, like, researchers got students to either go out
00:33:25.540 into the world for a few days and to be as kind as possible to all the people that they
00:33:30.560 met.
00:33:30.880 You know, kindness was their number one objective.
00:33:34.360 Or they asked them to be honest.
00:33:36.560 So totally honest, even when it was uncomfortable, even when they might have naturally told those
00:33:41.560 white lies. And what they found was that actually both groups performed equally well.
00:33:47.280 They found similar benefits to their well-being compared to a control group who just carried
00:33:52.160 on as normal. And actually, those who had the honest conversations, they often reported
00:33:57.440 like feeling greater meaning in their interactions.
00:34:00.800 Like even when there was the discomfort, they felt that they got to know the other person
00:34:04.960 better and the other person got to know them better because they'd been brave enough
00:34:09.380 to tell them the truth.
00:34:11.120 It has reminded me of a scene. So we just got done in our family. We just got done watching
00:34:16.240 Little Women. Have you seen the most recent one from 2019 with?
00:34:21.100 Yeah, yeah. Greta Gerwig's.
00:34:22.460 Yeah, yeah. She directed it. So it's that scene where Joe, the heroine of the story,
00:34:27.400 writes this novel and she presents it to this guy, Friedrich, who she kind of likes and he likes
00:34:33.060 her. And he reads it and he's like, this is awful. And she's like, what are you talking about? It's
00:34:39.800 like, no, it's just not good. I don't think it's good. And then she got really defensive. Like,
00:34:43.560 you think I'm a bad writer? He's like, no, I don't think you're a bad writer. I just,
00:34:46.020 I think what you wrote was not good. And in the short term, it kind of hurt the relationship.
00:34:51.520 Like she got all in a huff and she left. But in the end, it seemed like it was the right thing to do
00:34:57.360 because they ended up creating that shared reality.
00:35:00.580 Yeah, exactly. And so that's it. Sometimes like you might get a negative reaction initially because
00:35:05.940 the other person needs to calm down and to process what you've said. But you know, according to these
00:35:10.980 studies, ultimately, it does bring you closer together to be honest. I don't think this means
00:35:17.260 that we, it gives us like an excuse to just be rude or tactless. I think there's always going to be
00:35:23.080 a much kinder way of kind of telling the brutal truth than just saying it in the kind of nastiest
00:35:29.120 way possible. Like there's always a way that you can make your words like really emphasize how much
00:35:33.620 you care about the other person and your honest intentions for doing so. The purity of your
00:35:38.560 intentions to help the other person. But yeah, mostly like just having that bravery, it's going to pay
00:35:44.760 off for you and the other person. It's going to help them to achieve their goals better. And it's going
00:35:49.120 to help you as a kind of dyad, like as friends or as in a relationship, it's going to help you to grow as
00:35:55.900 well.
00:35:57.560 So another thing that can get in the way of relationships is the emotion of envy. I think
00:36:03.100 this is a really fascinating topic. We did a podcast last year about the philosophy of envy with Sarah
00:36:08.640 Protassi. And she described envy as this aversive feeling when somebody, could be even a friend, has
00:36:15.820 something that you don't have, but you want and you feel bad. How do people typically manage envy in a
00:36:23.260 relationship?
00:36:25.060 So I don't think we manage it very well. So often, our fear of provoking envy in the other person
00:36:32.800 just leads us to not share the things that we're really proud of, like the stuff that's given us
00:36:38.180 joy. That's been shown in like multiple surveys that people will just keep it quiet if they've got
00:36:43.560 promotion or, you know, if they've received a bonus, if they're, you know, if they're super proud,
00:36:48.820 even like a personal best at the gym or by the number of like Twitter followers that they've just
00:36:54.500 received, like it's kind of part of their personal reality. They want to be able to share that with the
00:37:01.000 people that are closest to them, but they avoid doing it because they don't want to seem like some
00:37:06.220 kind of blowhard, like some kind of braggart. And those motives are so misdirected because actually
00:37:12.740 what the research shows is that the very act of hiding your success can be incredibly insulting
00:37:18.680 to the other people because your motives seem pretty paternalistic. So when you finally found
00:37:24.520 out that your best friend has got a promotion or, you know, that he's won this amazing like prize for
00:37:31.620 his novel, when you find that out and you realize that he was hiding that from you, that makes you feel
00:37:37.240 like he kind of, he expects you to act like this spoiled child who has to win at every competition
00:37:43.800 and that you're going to act like this kind of, you know, brat who has a tantrum. It kind of shows
00:37:49.700 disrespect as if you're not strong enough to deal with that good news and to actually feel joy for that
00:37:54.660 other person. So there've just been so many studies showing this, so many multiple experiments showing
00:38:00.920 that false modesty really doesn't pay off. And that includes humble brags, you know, where you try to
00:38:06.080 kind of bail your boast in this kind of complaint or self-deprecating joke. Like all that tells the
00:38:13.380 other person is that you're trying to manipulate them and that you're kind of trying to make them
00:38:19.240 respect you without risking envy. And that doesn't go down well either because when there's the
00:38:26.800 perception of insincerity in someone that shakes the foundations of shared reality. So pretty much we
00:38:34.380 should be more willing to celebrate our achievements. You know, we don't need to be ashamed of them.
00:38:39.380 We just have to make sure that what we're saying is honest and what we're saying doesn't involve any
00:38:44.920 social comparison. So that's really crucial. So it's fine to kind of talk about your promotion,
00:38:51.440 talk about your prize, talk about your achievements at the gym. Just don't say something like,
00:38:57.120 oh yeah, I was running like faster than everyone I could see at the gym. Or, oh yeah,
00:39:01.180 like I'm now earning more money than like 90% of the people I know. Because this social comparison,
00:39:07.000 it triggers all of these kind of hardwired evolved responses where we're really suspicious of people
00:39:12.320 who are trying to kind of climb the ranks of our society's hierarchy. Like we just don't want to
00:39:18.180 think of people overtly comparing themselves to others because we might also be included in their
00:39:24.180 negative judgment. That really puts people's defenses up. But provided that you're honest and you avoid
00:39:29.800 social comparison, people respond really well to hearing about your successes. And often they
00:39:35.460 experience this emotion called konferlicity or mitfreude, a German word like schadenfreude,
00:39:41.840 which means, you know, joying with someone, like experiencing that vicarious happiness of
00:39:47.580 seeing another person's joy and contentment.
00:39:51.500 Okay. So the antidote to envy is this konferlicity.
00:39:54.520 Yeah.
00:39:54.680 And the way you can do that, just share the good news, don't do the social comparison.
00:39:58.500 And then when someone shares good news with you, what can we do to have better mitfreude?
00:40:03.600 Basically, like when someone shares their good news with us, like even if we are feeling a little
00:40:08.540 bit of envy, we just have to let the kind of mitfreude shine. We have to try to kind of put our envy
00:40:14.960 to one side. I mean, the chances are you're, you know, we have complex emotions,
00:40:20.200 so you might feel a little bit of jealousy, but you know, you probably are genuinely happy
00:40:24.620 for the other person. And just expressing that, showing the other person how glad you
00:40:29.120 are for them, you know, that is a really good bonding experience. Scientists call that process
00:40:35.860 where you experience mitfreude with another person, they call that capitalization because
00:40:41.940 it actually ends up increasing the well-being of both parties, the person who's had the good
00:40:46.720 news and the person who is vicariously experiencing the good news.
00:40:51.500 So you got a law about helping others who are going through a hard time and it's offer emotional
00:40:56.020 support to those in need, but do not force it upon them. And I think there's another thing that keeps
00:41:01.740 people from connecting with others. When they see someone going through a hard time, they don't reach
00:41:06.320 out because, you know, they don't know what to say, right? So if they have a friend who lost a loved
00:41:11.880 one to death or someone lost a job, they don't say anything or reach out. It's like, I'm going to say
00:41:16.440 the wrong thing and it's just better that I don't say anything. But the research actually says that
00:41:21.080 that fear is unfounded. What does the research say? And then what can we do to overcome that fear
00:41:25.900 of reaching out?
00:41:27.840 Yeah. So, I mean, what I found so surprising about this research was the fact that actually the nature
00:41:33.860 of the relationship didn't seem to really change how grateful someone was to receive that emotional
00:41:40.960 support. So whether they were close friends or whether they were vague acquaintances, like walking
00:41:47.060 up to someone and saying, I'm really sorry to hear that your dad died or that you've been ill or you're
00:41:54.380 going to be kicked off your course. Like, I'm really sorry and I want to be here to support you. You know,
00:41:59.420 no matter what the nature of that relationship, people really appreciate your effort to reach out.
00:42:05.400 So we don't need to be as scared of offering our support as we would be. Because, you know, most people
00:42:12.060 do assume that it's going to be kind of awkward, that they'll say something clumsy, that they'll end up
00:42:17.020 making the other person feel worse rather than better. But the research suggests that, you know,
00:42:22.220 those fears are unfounded. We're actually much better at providing the support that they need than we
00:42:27.900 think we are. And what we really need is just a bit more bravery to do so.
00:42:31.760 When we do reach out to someone and say something, anything that the research says is or isn't
00:42:37.780 helpful?
00:42:39.360 Yeah, definitely. So, I mean, one thing is that, you know, it's one thing to express your support
00:42:45.600 to another person, but you shouldn't be overbearing in the way that you go about that. So, you know,
00:42:51.080 sometimes a few short words, a few short sentences is enough. Trying to force someone to speak about
00:42:57.820 something when they're still, you know, in the middle of a painful experience, that's not really
00:43:02.980 going to help them to feel closer to you. So just making it clear that you're there for them whenever
00:43:07.960 they want you, but you're going to kind of be willing to step back and allow them to approach you.
00:43:13.800 That can be really important. Secondly, there's a lot of research looking at the downsides of venting.
00:43:20.900 And essentially, when we have supportive conversations with people, sometimes we can just
00:43:26.460 kind of egg them on to kind of relive the painful experience in as much detail as possible. And in
00:43:33.220 some ways that can be very validating because, you know, people want to be heard. They want their
00:43:39.060 feelings to be known. You're engaging in their shared reality by kind of telling them how painful
00:43:45.700 that must have been and how much you sympathize with them. But after a certain point,
00:43:50.560 it can become quite toxic because when you're reliving a painful event again and again and again,
00:43:57.060 it's not really helping them to move on. It's not really helping their mental health. And so that's
00:44:01.980 why we need to combine validation with some kind of attempts at helping them to see a new perspective
00:44:08.960 on the situation. Now we have to be like sensitive and delicate in the way that we do that. So kind of
00:44:16.680 blundering into the conversation and being like, oh, well, what you need to do is this and giving like
00:44:21.320 really misguided advice because you don't actually really know, you know, precisely what they're
00:44:26.280 feeling. Like that's not going to help too much. But it could be you tentatively suggest another way of
00:44:33.820 looking at the problem, but do it humbly and kind of ask for their opinion. Like, do you think that
00:44:39.340 would be helpful? You know, that's a sensitive way of helping them to reappraise what they're going
00:44:43.920 through. Sometimes it's just kind of asking the right questions and allowing them to kind of come
00:44:50.500 to a different perspective by themselves. So just asking them, you know, what do you think you might
00:44:55.480 learn from this experience? Or how do you think you might move on from this? Like, what's your plan
00:45:01.940 now? Just making sure that that is part of the conversation so that it's not solely focused on the
00:45:08.960 pain that they're feeling. That has been proven to be really fundamental to not just reaffirming
00:45:14.780 your relationship, but actually helping the other person to recover from whatever they're going
00:45:19.720 through. A related law to that is a law on forgiving and asking for forgiveness. And you talk about the
00:45:27.060 research about what happens to us when we hold on to a grudge. What does that research say?
00:45:32.200 Yeah, I mean, there's been a lot of like, philosophical and religious teaching around
00:45:39.300 this. Like, I think it's probably pretty well established in so many traditions that holding
00:45:45.160 a grudge is bad for us. And the scientific research just kind of proves that point. Like,
00:45:51.300 you know, if you kind of lash out and retaliate, that can help you in the moment, but it doesn't
00:45:56.400 necessarily help you to recover emotionally afterwards. In fact, when we act spitefully
00:46:02.020 to someone, even if we feel that we're justified, it kind of causes us to lose our sense of humanity.
00:46:08.360 We, you know, there's lots of scientific questionnaires that psychologists can use to
00:46:13.660 kind of measure that aspect of, you know, how human do you feel? And what you find is that people's
00:46:19.060 answers subtly change. So it looks like they are now considering themselves to be a bit more kind of
00:46:23.920 animal-like than they would have been if they'd expressed forgiveness instead. So choosing
00:46:30.360 forgiveness, taking that moral high ground, that can be, you know, really beneficial to how we feel.
00:46:36.740 And then there's, you know, a bunch of research showing that people who forgive over those who
00:46:40.220 hold lasting grudges, they tend to be much healthier with their psychological well-being,
00:46:47.340 but also their physical well-being. When you hold a grudge, you really feel disconnected from
00:46:52.120 other people. So it kind of poisons you inside. And, you know, you face the consequences of that
00:46:58.560 for things like your, you know, risk of chronic pain, even, you know, your risk of things like
00:47:03.920 heart disease can be linked to whether you hold grudges or not.
00:47:08.300 What about asking for forgiveness? Is there research that tells the best way to approach
00:47:12.380 offering an apology and how we typically mess it up?
00:47:15.720 Yeah. I mean, I think the biggest problem that most of us face is that we just
00:47:20.300 don't apologize, even when we know that we've acted wrongly. That's not just stubbornness. I think
00:47:26.040 there's research showing actually that, you know, people often really want to express
00:47:30.160 their apology, but they just assume that the other person isn't going to forgive them. So
00:47:35.040 they don't say those words. They think, again, that they're going to be rejected,
00:47:40.040 that they might even make the situation worse by apologizing. So they almost just,
00:47:44.580 they're too fatalistic about losing the relationship rather than recognizing that
00:47:49.380 they might be able to heal this rift and that often relationships are much more robust
00:47:54.180 than we expect, even when they have suffered some serious damage through some wrong behavior.
00:48:02.060 So the first thing to learn, I think, is just to, you know, if you genuinely feel sorry,
00:48:06.760 it's to actually to say those words. When you're apologizing, you kind of need to tick like multiple
00:48:14.260 boxes. So you've got to accept your full responsibility for what you've done. You have to listen to the other
00:48:22.060 person to hear about what the consequences were of what you did and take responsibility for that too.
00:48:28.840 You really should then try to show how you're going to act differently in the future. Like,
00:48:34.140 you have to make it clear what you've learned from your mistake and why you're going to avoid hurting
00:48:40.240 the other person again. A lot of the time we just try to rush our apologies. You know, if we are brave
00:48:45.760 enough to apologize, we might be like, oh yeah, I'm sorry. Anyway, now you have to get over it because
00:48:50.140 we need to go back to normal. That is not going to help the other person. Like, they need to feel
00:48:55.060 that they've been heard and that you are going to change as a result of what's happened.
00:49:01.260 Well, David, this has been a great conversation. Where can people go to learn more about the book
00:49:04.500 and your work?
00:49:06.280 So my website is davidrobson.me. You can find links to buy my book there. You know,
00:49:14.140 it should be available in all of the usual retailers. So your local bookshops, big stores
00:49:19.080 like Barnes and Noble, Amazon, obviously, you know, wherever you get your books. You can also
00:49:24.960 follow me on Twitter. That's D underscore A underscore Robson. And on Instagram, where I'm
00:49:31.780 just starting to kind of build a following. It's david A. Robson.
00:49:36.180 Fantastic. Well, David Robson, thanks for your time. It's been a pleasure.
00:49:38.900 A pleasure for me too. Thank you.
00:49:40.280 My guest here is David Robson. He's the author of the book, The Laws of Connection. It's available
00:49:45.260 on amazon.com and bookstores everywhere. You can find more information about his work at his website,
00:49:49.480 davidrobson.me. Also check out our show notes at awim.is slash connection, where you find links
00:49:54.680 to resources, where you delve deeper into this topic. Well, that wraps up another edition of the
00:50:05.820 AOM podcast. Make sure to check out our website at artofmanless.com, where you find our podcast
00:50:09.500 archives, as well as thousands of articles that we've written over the years about pretty
00:50:12.780 much anything you think of. And if you haven't done so already, I'd appreciate it if you take
00:50:16.220 one minute to give us a review on the podcast or Spotify. It helps out a lot. And if you've
00:50:19.480 done that already, thank you. Please consider sharing the show with a friend or family member
00:50:23.020 who you think gets something out of it. As always, thank you for the continued support. And until
00:50:26.720 next time, this is Brett McKay. Remind your time to listen to the podcast, but put what you've
00:50:30.560 heard into action.