00:11:09.120that's interesting because nobody debates that right nobody debates there is no british ethnic
00:11:16.180group there are four ethnic groups that make up the british people the english scottish irish and
00:11:21.760welsh and so the british identity she is correct it is a civic identity it's a state the united
00:11:28.200kingdom of great britain and now northern ireland um so that that is correct but why would you
00:11:35.940juxtapose that with the jewish ethnic identity why wouldn't you juxtapose the english ethnic
00:11:41.360identity with the jewish ethnic identity so for example she goes on to use the example of israel
00:11:46.440having an arab and a jewish population it's like yes so the israeli identity is a civic identity
00:11:52.600that is based on these two ethnic groups that's completely complementors it makes perfect sense
00:11:58.440why would you begin like this and i don't think she's doing it necessarily maliciously i mean i
00:12:04.720just don't know if she's their best and brightest but sorry well i i don't think it's malicious but
00:12:10.320i do think it reveals something we might as well just stop and comment as we go through because
00:12:14.480there is a lot to unpack here um i i do think that there is actually hidden in that admission
00:12:20.240something critical which is that um what the collective jewish ethnic identity in israel
00:12:28.600lets them do is exclude others from that identity yes as she'll go on and talk about in later
00:12:35.040paragraphs there are arab and other uh you know residents of israel they technically have civil
00:12:41.900rights in the sense that they are under the auspices of the nation they are subject to the
00:12:47.800jurisdiction thereof for 14th amendment fans in the united states uh however that does not make
00:12:53.220them part of the jewish nation they are part of israel the civic project they are not part of
00:13:00.020the jewish nation and she says specifically we'll get there in a second that they cannot
00:13:03.840participate in the collective determination determination of that identity because they
00:13:10.340are excluded she's aware of this that is the point draws it that is the point at which she
00:13:17.240will not permit national self-determination and i mean and it's it's really not a big ask either
00:13:24.940it's really not a big ask well i think it is for her because the implication here is
00:13:31.320if you were allowed to make this determination she could be like the arab resident of israel
00:13:37.400she could be that version of a british person where she's subject to the jurisdiction thereof
00:13:44.780she is under the legal auspices of the civic identity but she is not english or she's not
00:13:51.720even collectively perhaps british in the sense that she came from the original four tribes kingdoms
00:13:57.040of uh of the uk and so you know what's very interesting about this is that she actually
00:14:02.960lives in israel even better even better yeah i don't even know what she'd be losing she doesn't
00:14:10.580even have anything to lose from this well but even if it's not her personally she understands
00:14:15.540the implications for other parts of the jewish diaspora right because this is a huge part of the
00:14:21.980issue of of previous iterations of jewish diaspora they had no nation to call their own and so they
00:14:26.840needed to have some level of identity and incorporation into the nations they were a part
00:14:33.500of in fact many of the anti-zionist jews argued against the creation of the nation of israel
00:14:39.400for this very reason because they wanted to be assimilated they wanted to be proper uh citizens
00:14:46.080of you know britain or the united states or whatever they were part of they did not want
00:14:50.500the possible accusation of some kind of dual loyalty of some kind of split identity they
00:14:55.420didn't want to be blamed for the operations of a nation or a state that ultimately would maybe do
00:15:01.180bad things you know on their behalf they wanted to be identified as british or as american or as
00:15:07.480whatever they did not want to primarily be identified as a separate jewish or israeli
00:15:14.400citizen or member of that ethnic tribe and so they were worried that the creation of israel
00:15:19.280would create that dichotomy and i think that is her concern here is that even post the creation
00:15:25.660of israel the creation of the possibility of exclusive identities in the west could push
00:15:31.860jewish diaspora figures outside of israel into this space where they are again part of the civic
00:15:38.440identity but not considered part of the nation itself no you're absolutely correct um there's
00:15:45.440there's a there's a deeper issue with this as well which is the united kingdom has come uh very close
00:15:54.940to breaking apart uh in recent years there was scottish independence referendum in 2014 i think
00:16:01.100it was uh which was only 45 uh yes and 55 no on a bit of a knife edge as these things go a five
00:16:09.680point six point swing would have meant that there was no british civic identity and we would have
00:16:16.120become the kingdom of england and wales again right so this would have been a purely ethnic state
00:16:22.480and then they would have had to have demanded that we were they were as english as we are
00:16:28.980they would demand access to our ethnic group on the grounds that our political state is also the
00:16:35.880ethnic state of the english and the welsh rather than just the abstract british state because i
00:16:41.440mean i i can i can go as far as to concede that yes the british civic identity even though it
00:16:47.320came from four particular identities did go around the world there were a lot of people who felt a
00:16:54.300lot of loyalty to the british uh the british identity the british empire and they worked
00:17:00.000for the british empire and they i mean for generations generations there were indians
00:17:04.820in africa for generations there were uh brits in uh india and various other places so it you can
00:17:11.740make a persuasive argument that the british civic identity is actually very broad um okay that's
00:17:19.380fine. But you can't make the same argument that the particular ethnic identities are very broad
00:17:25.720of the United Kingdom. They're not. They're actually exactly as exclusionary as Melanie
00:17:31.500Phillips is with her defining the boundaries of Jewish identity in Israel. It's the same with
00:17:37.960being English, Welsh, Scottish, and Irish. Yeah, I think it's very obvious, again, that most
00:17:45.920nations are allowed to, as the phrase goes, live historically. They're allowed to recognize
00:17:51.220themselves as a continuation of a people, a tradition, a religion, a way of being that is
00:17:58.060worth protecting, that is worth securing. And it is really only European identities specifically0.69
00:18:04.700that have been required to undergo this transformation. I find the claim that the
00:18:11.300united states is entirely a civic identity to be false but at the very least i can understand how
00:18:17.020it is constructed i get the narrative that you know we came over from the uk and even though
00:18:22.540ultimately you know the american founders were fighting for the rights as englishmen uh you know
00:18:27.800that that identity over time has included the incorporations of a pan-european population and
00:18:33.720you know there is some truth of assimilation and growth of the american identity that does not exist
00:18:38.800for the uk but it's not that is not the history of the united kingdom this is uh where the english
00:18:44.600come from if there is any basic uh you know uh right to a ethnic identity if that exists in any
00:18:52.000way shape or form it most certainly exists for the english and so the only way that you can deny it
00:18:57.720to the english is by presenting this ridiculous double standard there is no logically consistent
00:19:03.160or morally consistent way to frame this to where you can pretend that the English are not an
00:19:09.020ethnicity in the same way that people will try to do with Americans yeah I mean the English is just
00:19:14.740one of the best attested ethnicities historically we know exactly how the English came into being
00:19:21.880we know exactly how the the the kingdom of England was formed and in what circumstances
00:19:27.540in the exact year that it's it's not like um the like i mean the good example is always the maori
00:19:35.180in new zealand right at some point in the 14th century it seems they arrived there you know 300
00:19:40.720years after the founding of oxford university um but there's there's no accurate record of that
00:19:47.040time period it's just archaeology would suggest that's the case um unlike them we have historical
00:19:53.940written records going back about 700 years prior to that so it's it's one of those things where
00:20:00.420you you just wouldn't be able to contest the existence of the english as a people
00:20:06.580in good faith that just can't be done in the same way you can't really contest the existence of
00:20:11.720jewish people as a people in good faith of course very well attested as well like no no one no one
00:20:16.640is questioning this um well they shouldn't be questioning this um but there's there's something
00:20:21.820there's something interesting here which is our conception of um democracy in particular i think
00:20:29.340because in previous eras prior to democracy these questions didn't really come up because
00:20:35.500political suffrage just wasn't an issue um anyone who had political power or political rights
00:20:42.200had them by virtue of heredity or by virtue of physical force as in you were a baron you were
00:20:50.040rebel you had an army you had um entitlements that were given to you from the king i mean the
00:20:55.720jews in england in fact were under the protection of the king and therefore they had certain
00:21:01.520entitlements certain rights and certain privileges to work in certain areas of the economy that other
00:21:07.900people either weren't allowed or didn't want to work in and they were forbidden working in others
00:21:11.860so the the idea that they needed to say a thousand years ago oh yeah we're english of course they
00:21:18.780didn't there was absolutely no need well nearly a thousand years they came over with the normans
00:21:22.780um but there would be no need in fact if they were to do that that would be to lose the special
00:21:29.040status they would be granted by the king it's only in the mass democracy the homogenizing democracy
00:21:36.020that has to view everything in the same category to give it the same status and rights that this
00:21:42.260becomes an issue and this is why the same effect this resistance towards the liberal blender of
00:21:51.360identity is present everywhere you get the the question about the germans and the new germans
00:21:55.980the swedes and the new swedes what is an american what is a canadian it's it's happening everywhere
00:22:00.940all at once because it is a feature of liberal democracy when the nation is handed unlimited
00:22:07.420rights well if someone is in the country but not of the nation they will demand to be given the
00:22:16.200same regard to to make sure they have the same rights because there's no special carve out
00:22:21.680anymore for different groups and different classes in society and this is this is actually
00:22:27.400to take something away from people this is actually to remove something from them and
00:22:32.160if you don't consent to having these things removed either your own personal identity
00:22:36.320a certain legal status i mean the maori in new zealand have a certain legal status based on being
00:22:43.180maori and the new zealand government is trying to give them the same rights as everyone else
00:22:48.160but the maori understand no if we lose this status now identity we get shoved into the
00:22:53.480cultural blender and that's what all the hacker in the parliament's about it looks ridiculous to
00:22:57.440us but actually they're making an argument from the old world not the new world and i'm more
00:23:04.060inclined to agree with it i mean obviously you know tribesmen do what tribesmen do but the way
00:23:11.520the reason the british empire was so successful is because we would just say okay well that's what
00:23:14.780you guys do and this is what we do and we're the guys with the guns so we're all just going to have
00:23:19.180an understanding that we'll let you do your thing you're going to pay us taxes or whatever it is
00:23:22.980and we're going to do our thing and everyone will be okay with this and this lasted for hundreds of
00:23:27.520years with a very very very small amount of military to keep the peace so it was clearly
00:23:33.000something that worked for most people but the the modern attitude of the liberal democracy is
00:23:38.960you are not allowed to be exclusive and therefore what that means is you are not allowed your own
00:23:45.180ethnic group and melanie phillips here is saying that's true for you but it's not going to be true
00:23:51.020for us i'm sorry i just don't accept that yeah there is so much important there so as you point
00:23:58.500out even in like a classic republic it was usually based around a city state and you had a general
00:24:05.960citizenship because all of the men involved were part of the military they were part of the defense
00:24:11.360of the city uh the citizen was he who was the armed and so that you know everyone had a stake
00:24:16.480and a direct action involved in securing their political rights inside the polis once you have
00:24:23.460more of this imperial or this monarchical structure what you have is a whole set of
00:24:29.660different peoples uh all ruled over by different sovereigns and each you know set of people each
00:24:34.560nation inside that sovereign uh you know uh area they have different needs different demands
00:24:41.040different desires ways of life and they're allowed to live more or less inside that way of life as
00:24:46.360long as they kind of recognize the overcoat of the king of the overcoat of the empire that that
00:24:51.820i'm sorry the the suzerainty of the king you recognize the king is the monarch because you
00:24:59.980get kings who are the kings of like the james the first the king of scotland and england that
00:25:05.540doesn't mean that scotland and england are gonna have the same rules the same laws and in fact if
00:25:09.260you think about it for hundreds of years 400 years we've had the same monarch even if before the act
00:25:14.740of union we've had it for 100 years prior to that we are still very distinct ethnic groups very
00:25:21.340distinct peoples even though we've been in a political union for 400 years there's not been
00:25:26.620a blender effect under this system and this this is fine everyone was actually quite happy with it1.00
00:25:32.460it seems to the point where when given the option the scots are like yeah no we don't want to leave
00:25:35.900why would we want to so it's it's one of those things where there's there's clearly advantages
00:25:40.840on a basic human level to allowing different groups to be separate but to to work together
00:25:47.520there's clearly advantages to this but in the shift to nationalism which people often forget
00:25:54.000was considered more of a left-wing move at the time under the shift of in in nationalism the
00:25:59.520idea is that the nation itself the ethnost itself has separate rights to determination that should
00:26:05.660be broken out away from the monarchs and if you look at the death of the monarchies after war war
00:26:11.420one, that's basically Woodrow Wilson's project. He literally created ethnostates. That was the
00:26:17.400idea. Every one of these ethnos has had their own self-determination they should be able to impose.
00:26:23.780And so when you make the state and the ethnos the same thing, when you create the ethnostate,
00:26:28.320which by the way, it's kind of funny that many right-wingers think that's the solution to a
00:26:31.960problem when it was actually the beginning of this problem. But by creating the ethnostate,
00:26:37.280you create the idea, as you're pointing out, that if you're not part of the tribe,
00:26:40.860If you're not part of the people that are making the political self-determination through mass democracy, then you are therefore irrelevant. You do not have a standing inside the community. And so therefore you have to then dissolve the ethnic part of ethnic nationalism.
00:26:56.200And that's the real thing we've seen over time. It wasn't a transition from tribal structures into modern mass democracy. It was the breaking out of this more imperial structure that was kind of the long standard across human existence. And we broke it into these ethno-nationalist ideas.
00:27:14.480And then these ethnostates had to dissolve their ethnosis in order to maintain their kind of identity as cohesive states.
00:27:22.100The state, the ethnicity was sublimated to the existence of the state.
00:27:26.000And the state then had to, as you say, turn itself into a blender for all these identities in order to maintain its power.
00:27:32.940Yeah, this nationalism itself is a result of liberalism.
00:27:37.960Now, that's an unpopular thing to say on the right.
00:27:40.360But philosophically and historically, this is just the fact of it.
00:27:43.920because what nationalism does is interpolate each individual person as an individual person first
00:27:51.340and so this this is where you get the idea of the levion mass and cannon fodder from this is why
00:27:56.660napoleon said look the germans can't beat me i spend 20 000 lives a month well no king in the
00:28:01.880ancient world could have bragged about that because the loyalty and the ability to levy troops from
00:28:07.740any particular subject group would be on the understanding that their loyalty comes with
00:28:13.840caveats it comes with obligations on the part of the king they are subjects but he is also subject
00:28:20.260to them in some way whereas the levion mass when it's when you've when you've just turned people
00:28:25.620into an egalitarian line there's no hierarchy anymore it is citizen or non-citizen and so this
00:28:33.500and really this is the first step towards globalism because there's no reason you can't
00:28:38.380universalize this concept of citizen either actually um this turns everyone into what is
00:28:45.940from the state's perspective functionally the same and so yeah there are no distinctions there are no
00:28:52.440gradients there is no hierarchy you are basically all of the same and i need a hundred thousand men
00:28:58.500to go and invade germany with or whatever it is napoleon was doing you know like it's it's actually
00:29:04.800not good at all and it's it's why it's why the 20th century is such a weird aberration0.74
00:29:11.560national cultures are not normal right the the the idea that there's a french culture0.71
00:29:17.180is not historically attested until the 19th 20th centuries right the the idea that the the people
00:29:24.020in britain are all just the british or the english like there are loads of regions that
00:29:29.620are still trying to cling on to traditional folkways i mean i'm sure you're all familiar
00:29:34.360with like you know bavarian uh dancing and their their particular gear and stuff like well that
00:29:41.760was just what they were like for hundreds of years because there was no blender effect there
00:29:46.600was no homogenization from the nation state but now we're in this era and they're trying to tell0.76
00:29:53.680us that no infinite numbers of foreigners have been brought here they're completely different to
00:29:57.380you maybe culturally maybe they don't speak your language maybe they don't really care about you1.00
00:30:02.160at all and they're just here to get benefits but as far as the state is concerned it can't
00:30:07.240distinguish between one kind of citizen and another you're all the same to me and this is
00:30:11.560why replacement migration seems like a good idea why wouldn't i do this what stops me
00:30:16.520right i mean you had a scenario where you know italy wasn't unified to the late 1800s you know
00:30:23.040in spain catalonia it still sees itself as something entirely different uh you can think
00:30:27.600of quebec in canada though now it's just going to be indian like the rest of of canada and that's
00:30:32.360kind of the point right like all of it all of canada will be indian uh and none of it will be
00:30:37.420in any way separatist they will all be a bunch of socially compliant you know civic canadians
00:30:42.940who are ethnically indian but have no connection to canada and therefore certainly no one in quebec
00:30:48.420to stand around and say no we're something separate or different which is the entire point
00:30:52.640but that said we've made it uh two sentences into this post in about 30 minutes so perhaps
00:30:57.340that's why the jewish people as a people is entitled to live in its ancestral homeland
00:31:05.980um so this one is of course terrifying for anyone who believes that their people should have a right
00:31:13.780to live in their ancestral homeland uh because she's claiming this as some kind of unique right
00:31:18.260that the english or the americans do not have that you and i do not have the right to live
00:31:23.420in our ancestral homeland uh but for some reason jewish people do because of judaism now you have
00:31:31.500coined uh you have coined a turn i think i think you coined the term uh but you're certainly one
00:31:36.820who popularized it demographic demographic security which i think is just perfect phrasing
00:31:42.020that's that's like everybody like wrap it send it use it all the time um but that is going to be i
00:31:48.480think the battle moving forward i think you're exactly right about this that you have to recognize
00:31:53.200the right of these nations of these peoples as peoples to have demographic security which is
00:31:59.700exactly what melanie phillips is arguing about when she says we have demographic when she says
00:32:04.520we have a right to our ancestral land she means jewish people should be the dominant ethnicity0.53
00:32:09.300inside of israel full stop and she doesn't think there needs to be any justification for that
00:32:14.860well no no she gives justification judaism is the unique fusion of a people faith and land
00:32:20.920it's like i don't know if i'd say i mean unique in that it's only jews in judea and israel
00:32:29.040that became the jewish people as we understand now sure but that itself is not actually a unique
00:32:35.220process again i get when i did a video on this i gave the example well england is actually exactly
00:32:40.160the same it's a unique fusion of a people a faith and a land i mean we've got the we know that we
00:32:46.180know the names of the tribes of the israelites who became the jews over a long enough period of time
00:32:51.420well we know that the names of the tribes who became the english over a long enough period of
00:32:56.860time and we also know that christianity was a bedrock of this alfred the great talks about
00:33:03.140christianity all the time he was convinced that the viking invasions were only possible the raids
00:33:08.880on england were only possible the the fall of like you know three quarters of the english kingdoms or
00:33:13.760however many it was was only possible because we had been insufficiently christian and so he spent
00:33:19.380his life um returning to what he viewed as the proper biblical interpretation of christianity
00:33:26.960to the point where he even he personally translated the bible into anglo-saxon english
00:33:34.020and sent this around to the various monasteries and cathedrals of england like so to say that oh
00:33:40.840it's only the jews who have a unique claim to a land a religion and a particular history well no
00:33:48.560it's not actually most peoples have that most peoples have a faith most people have a collection
00:33:54.460of tribes that became the ethnic group you refer them to and most peoples have a homeland it's
00:33:59.640actually really common if you think about it the polish people are a series of silesian or whatever
00:34:05.640you know slavic tribes who existed in this particular area under this particular faith
00:34:11.220went through this particular history and so with the germans and so with the franks and so with
00:34:15.880everyone else this is actually just the normal state of affairs for peoples around the world
00:34:21.740each example is unique i will grant her that the jews are the jews the english are the english the
00:34:27.940polish are the polish but we all went through this same process so aren't we all entitled to
00:34:33.320the same as you say well demographic security i coined that on andrew gold's podcast when i was
00:34:38.060talking to him uh he just had steve law's on and steve law's got a much more hardline position than
00:34:43.540i do uh and i was trying to explain look we don't have to get to steve law's hardline position
00:34:48.540but we have to maintain a security a demographic security to know that the country will be
00:34:54.660controlled by the english in the future and that's not an unreasonable thing at all and this is what
00:35:01.120melanie phillips is arguing for right now for the jews in israel and i actually agree of course the
00:35:06.680jews should remain the majority in israel but i also think the english should remain the majority
00:35:10.600in england yeah it really is just about consistency here the problem is the claim that is not the
00:35:16.720problem is not the claim itself the problem is the claim to exclusivity that this should only
00:35:21.680apply to one people there's there's somehow some unique thing about the jewish people that allows
00:35:27.000them this right that no one else has when you say actually throughout history this is literally how
00:35:32.560every tribe saw themselves in fact the vast majority of gods before christianity and is
00:35:38.280precisely like literally how did you know you were part of the tribe well you sacrificed to
00:35:44.880the god of the city and you ate the meat that was sacrificed to the god of the city and that's what
00:35:49.680made you have this shared identity that's literally the binding ritual so all she's
00:35:54.640describing is how everyone lived historically basically up until the last few hundred years
00:36:01.100even under christianity which is more uh you know universalizable religion it was very clear that
00:36:06.440christianity uh kind of um manifested itself differently in different nations they had very
00:36:13.800specific forms uh you know obviously the anglicans literally broke away uh to to create their own
00:36:20.000you know english version of this uh to have sovereignty inside of it so you know even even
00:36:25.100under that uh general uh universal religion still see the manifestation of exactly what she's talking
00:36:30.800about throughout all of the history including the history of the west no you're completely correct
00:36:35.880i mean like one of my one of my favorite things uh in history is celtic christianity the the irish
00:36:42.940converting to christianity long before most places do and because they're such an insular
00:36:47.960remote place compared to the rest of the roman empire develop their own very um elegant form
00:36:54.300very beautiful form of christianity that persists long after the roman empire has fallen and long
00:36:59.420after england has been settled by the pagan anglo-saxon king kingdoms and so you have this
00:37:05.820kind of weird uh like almost cut off part of the the the former i mean it was never part of the
00:37:12.640roman empire either so you've got this this remote color thing but it didn't stop being christianity
00:37:18.360it's just as christianity is expressed by the irish and as you say it's expressed in whatever0.54
00:37:23.680way from whatever denomination and that's the faith that she's talking about oh only the jews
00:37:29.100have this like no and it really just seems to come down to her ethnic chauvinism that makes her think
00:37:37.160this is a unique phenomenon to her ethnic group because it's actually very common it's actually
00:37:41.540common to all ethnic groups back to her post here she says this is a different uh this is
00:37:49.060different again from israeli identity arabs jews and others are also israeli citizens with
00:37:54.720equal civic and religious rights but unless they convert to judaism they can't be jews with a
00:38:00.620unique claim to self-determination in the land their unique political right to a state of their
00:38:05.840own uh yes that is amazing that's an amazing statement because what she's saying there is0.99
00:38:12.380well you can be an arab or a druz or someone else as an israeli citizen but it's only the jews that
00:38:18.420have the unique political right to the state of israel and i don't even disagree no that means
00:38:25.180it's only the english welsh scottish and northern irish who have the unique political right to the
00:38:30.800state of great britain and northern ireland right it's it it has to follow that that is the case
00:38:37.360even if we have non uh the the acronym that's being used is wise welsh irish scottish english
00:38:43.640non-wise um citizens that's fine but we will always have a unique political right above them
00:38:51.920to britain and melanie phillips is making that claim for israel and i agree with it and she if
00:38:59.440she were to be consistent would have to agree that the native british people have that unique claim
00:39:04.720to britain if you look at something like albion seed you know book a lot of people reference when
00:39:11.980it comes to american identity uh you see the four distinct folkways the four distinct british people
00:39:17.640who come over and constitute the united states many people will call this the heritage american
00:39:22.720stock the the you know the wasp stock uh but ultimately uh the the point is that these are
00:39:28.860the the founding culture the founding understanding of who americans are and you can add people into
00:39:33.920that you know you can have different people fall into the civic identity but this should be the
00:39:38.520guiding self-determining an understanding of what the americans are under melanie phillips
00:39:43.940understanding as well so if we again if we were applying this model to the uk and to the united
00:39:49.680States universally, this would be fine. There would be nothing offensive about what she's
00:39:54.100saying here. It's perfectly logical. It perfectly is coherent when it comes to the traditional way
00:39:59.120that state identities, that national identities, that identities of people were understood
00:40:03.980previously. But again, the problem is the exclusion that only Israel and only the Jews
00:40:09.580in Israel are allowed to live historically, to have this claim, to have this identity,
00:40:14.760to have this level of determination to guarantee themselves as a people along a continuum right
00:40:22.460because it's it's not just in the here and now or in the past that this was the case they're also
00:40:28.560guaranteeing it for the future and there's no reason that we you know you as an american me
00:40:32.800as an englishman there's no reason we shouldn't want to guarantee the same thing for ourselves
00:40:37.580going into the future and melanie phillips saying no sorry you can't have a guarantee on that you
00:40:42.000no, I'm putting a block here. You can't
00:40:44.020have a guarantee on that. It's like, well, I can
00:40:45.940actually, and I know you're going to call me