The Auron MacIntyre Show - April 14, 2025


Breaking Down Douglas Murray VS Dave Smith | 4⧸14⧸25


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 11 minutes

Words per minute

176.19878

Word count

12,660

Sentence count

847

Harmful content

Misogyny

9

sentences flagged

Toxicity

38

sentences flagged

Hate speech

30

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode of the Joe Rogan Experience, comedian Dave Smith is joined by Douglas Murray to debate the Israel-Palestine conflict. They debate who's better at being an expert on the conflict, and who's not. And it's not hard to figure out who's the better expert.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 We hope you're enjoying your Air Canada flight.
00:00:02.320 Rocky's Vacation, here we come.
00:00:05.060 Whoa, is this economy?
00:00:07.180 Free beer, wine, and snacks.
00:00:09.620 Sweet! 0.95
00:00:10.720 Fast-free Wi-Fi means I can make dinner reservations before we land.
00:00:14.760 And with live TV, I'm not missing the game.
00:00:17.800 It's kind of like, I'm already on vacation.
00:00:20.980 Nice! 0.94
00:00:22.240 On behalf of Air Canada, nice travels.
00:00:25.260 Wi-Fi available to Airplane members on Equipped Flight.
00:00:27.200 Sponsored by Bell. Conditions apply.
00:00:28.720 CRCanada.com.
00:00:30.000 Hey everybody, how's it going?
00:00:31.580 Thanks for joining me this afternoon.
00:00:33.200 I am Oren McIntyre.
00:00:36.340 So over the last week, the internet has kind of exploded
00:00:40.680 when it comes to an episode of the Joe Rogan experience.
00:00:45.240 Rogan is known for bringing on a wide swath of different people.
00:00:49.980 And of course, one person he's had on on a regular basis is Dave Smith,
00:00:54.220 a comedian whose show I have been on and has been on this show,
00:00:57.620 just to be fair and make all that clear.
00:01:00.680 He was discussing with another, with an interlocutor, Douglas Murray,
00:01:07.440 who is someone who is very pro the Israel side of the Israel-Palestine war.
00:01:14.720 Dave Smith is famously very against Israel's action in Gaza.
00:01:19.060 And Douglas Murray is someone who has just written a book about this.
00:01:23.720 In fact, I think even President Trump recently tweeted out about Douglas Murray's book,
00:01:28.380 focused very much on the role that Israel is playing
00:01:32.540 and what he sees as a struggle of the Western world with Islam.
00:01:36.480 Ultimately, what is interesting about this debate, I think,
00:01:39.860 is not so much the differences between the two positions when it comes to Israel or Palestine.
00:01:46.200 As always, I am rather uninterested in foreign wars.
00:01:50.180 I would like to be uninvolved in them whenever possible.
00:01:53.760 The only thing that I usually care about is if the money or resources or troops from my country
00:02:00.300 are being funneled into the conflict in a different country,
00:02:03.600 which is something that does happen, for instance, when it comes to the Ukraine war,
00:02:07.260 which they also touched on.
00:02:08.920 So I have a little more feeling about that.
00:02:11.440 But ultimately, what I really am interested about is that these two really came to heads
00:02:17.060 over the issue of expertise.
00:02:18.840 Something Douglas Murray emphasized over and over again was how Dave Smith was just unqualified
00:02:24.920 and other people that he brought up regularly were very unqualified to opine on the war,
00:02:31.460 which is particularly interesting, given Murray's background,
00:02:34.620 which has very little to do with fighting wars or foreign policy or anything like that.
00:02:40.000 And so that's kind of what I wanted to look at today.
00:02:41.960 You can listen to the whole broadcast.
00:02:43.900 It's a three-hour podcast, as Joe Redgan often runs.
00:02:48.120 And there are some interesting exchanges throughout.
00:02:50.900 But I singled out a clip here that I think will really help us to understand the tenor of this conversation.
00:02:56.820 But before we get to that, guys, let's hear from today's sponsor.
00:03:00.280 Hey, everybody.
00:03:01.100 This episode of The Oren McIntyre Show is proudly sponsored by Consumers Research.
00:03:06.480 You've heard about Larry Fink and BlackRock and ESG and all the ways that they're ruining your life,
00:03:12.400 making grocery stores more expensive, making video games more woke.
00:03:16.980 Well, Consumers Research has spent the last five years making Larry's life hell,
00:03:21.840 and they're just getting started.
00:03:23.440 Their work and its consequences have been profiled in The Washington Post,
00:03:27.700 The New York Times, and most recently, Fox Business reporter Charlie Gasparono wrote a whole chapter in his book,
00:03:34.940 Go Woke, Go Broke, on how effective they've been at dismantling BlackRock's ESG patronage scheme.
00:03:41.760 He's making Larry Fink lose that last bit of hair on his balding head,
00:03:45.540 and you should follow Will's work on X so you can laugh along with him.
00:03:49.580 His handle is at W-I-L-L-H-I-L-D, so give him a follow.
00:03:55.700 Again, that's at W-I-L-L-H-I-L-D on X.
00:04:03.080 All right, so like I said, this is just a clip from the overall show.
00:04:08.480 You should go back and watch the whole thing if you would like to get a better idea about the context
00:04:12.820 of everything surrounding this, though this clip is very early on in the debate,
00:04:16.960 and I felt it really set the tone of the debate.
00:04:20.160 Again, the intricacies of the Israel-Palestine conflict are neither my specialty nor my interest.
00:04:26.980 I really don't care that much.
00:04:30.200 Ultimately, I think that, you know, I don't like terrorism,
00:04:35.280 but ultimately people have to be measured in their response.
00:04:39.300 Obviously, that is the huge blow-up between these two sides, ultimately, I think,
00:04:45.060 that most people are focusing on, but that is not my focus.
00:04:49.020 What I thought was interesting, again, was this back and forth between
00:04:52.100 Murray and Smith over what qualifies as an expert
00:04:56.160 and why we should rely on certain sources and not others,
00:05:00.060 and who has the right to speak.
00:05:02.400 And so I want to play that clip and just kind of break it down as we go.
00:05:06.440 So let me bring this up real quick, and we'll hear what they have to say,
00:05:10.560 and I'll just stop as we get to important parts.
00:05:13.480 I think that one of the bigger, kind of the bigger picture dynamics to all of this
00:05:18.680 is that we have, at least since 9-11, been in a state of perpetual war,
00:05:26.040 and all of these wars have been disasters.
00:05:30.240 They have been so many lies involved in selling all of them.
00:05:33.900 I mean, the whole Iraq war, the whole war in Afghanistan,
00:05:37.980 just lying the whole way through.
00:05:39.920 I mean, I remember literally having conversations with Green Berets 0.97
00:05:42.900 in the middle of the war in Afghanistan, and they're like,
00:05:45.700 George W. Bush is telling you that the army we're building up there
00:05:48.900 is really successful.
00:05:50.080 This thing's going to fall in a week without us.
00:05:52.500 So Dave Smith has a pretty standard libertarian opposition to war.
00:06:00.300 I think that, and I'll say this, I give the libertarians a lot of guff, obviously.
00:06:06.360 I'm pretty famous for dunking on libertarians.
00:06:10.240 However, obviously, in this scenario, the libertarians have been more right than wrong.
00:06:16.360 Their understanding that the perpetual need to stay at war
00:06:21.600 is a big part of the American government's ability to rake in money
00:06:25.640 and to kind of project power overseas and make demands on its citizens
00:06:32.700 is a part of what the regime does.
00:06:34.940 They were correct about this.
00:06:36.480 And so this is something that many people, like Tucker Carlson and others,
00:06:40.920 who were big boosters of the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, got wrong.
00:06:46.300 And they have admitted as much.
00:06:48.120 To be fair, I also was pro the war at the time, but I think I was like 18 or 19.
00:06:55.340 I didn't really have a firm grasp on the political dynamics involved.
00:07:00.820 You know, I didn't have a large platform.
00:07:03.000 It's not like I was out there leading anyone into war.
00:07:06.360 But ultimately, this is something that I misunderstood when I was young as well.
00:07:10.300 And so, you know, Dave Smith puts forward a position that I think has
00:07:14.540 stood the test of time over the last few decades.
00:07:17.640 Now, the thing I will say is that Dave Smith is probably too reflexively anti-war for me.
00:07:24.680 I am not anti-war in principle in a way that I think guys like Scott Horton
00:07:29.980 or Dave Smith would probably describe themselves.
00:07:33.500 I think war is part of human nature.
00:07:36.720 It is a reality of human existence.
00:07:38.840 And when nations reach an impasse in their ability to interact with each other and they
00:07:45.440 both demand something that the other will not yield, eventually war does occur.
00:07:51.840 And there can be just wars.
00:07:53.620 There can be wars fought for the right reasons.
00:07:55.780 Every war is its own tragedy in that many things that should not happen happen and things
00:08:02.160 get out of hand very quickly, which is why so many people correctly see war as something
00:08:07.280 that should be your last, you know, the last thing that you move towards, right?
00:08:12.820 But ultimately, we recognize that war is a part of human life.
00:08:18.340 And so I would not say I am anti-war.
00:08:20.480 There can be just wars.
00:08:21.760 There are wars that are ultimately ones that you should involve yourself in.
00:08:26.700 But it's very clear that the United States has not necessarily been involved in those actions.
00:08:33.460 Again, not that there wasn't a correct response to the terrorist attacks of 9-11, not that there
00:08:39.360 weren't certain groups that needed to be targeted.
00:08:41.680 But obviously, we didn't need to involve ourselves in two multi-decade regime change wars over this
00:08:49.400 fact, right?
00:08:50.100 And the ways that the wars were prosecuted is its own issue.
00:08:55.140 We weren't really fighting to win.
00:08:56.740 We were fighting to kind of perpetuate.
00:08:59.480 We didn't take the steps necessary to secure victory in many cases because they would have
00:09:03.580 been unpalatable to the American public.
00:09:06.740 And so there is a scenario in which being too hesitant to enter into a war, being half into
00:09:15.080 a war is its own problem, right?
00:09:16.600 You either want to be all in or all out.
00:09:18.600 You either need to be willing to do what it takes to succeed and bring victory as soon as
00:09:23.780 possible, because ultimately, that is actually what is best for everyone, or to not involve
00:09:28.960 yourself at all, right?
00:09:30.780 Like, it's one or the other.
00:09:32.640 You do not want to limp into a war.
00:09:34.720 That's the worst place to be.
00:09:36.080 And that is ultimately kind of what we did in both of their scenarios.
00:09:39.660 So I'll say at the beginning that while Smith obviously is correct about the wars in Iraq 0.98
00:09:45.960 and Afghanistan and kind of the plans that we had there, and again, I want to make it
00:09:51.140 clear that this is not about the people fighting those wars.
00:09:53.900 They have little to no say when it comes to the way in which the war is actually being
00:10:00.040 executed, the way in which strategy is being deployed, what political objectives are on
00:10:05.660 the table, what's being presented by the government itself.
00:10:08.680 I think I have the highest respect for military members.
00:10:11.820 I grew up on military bases, large amounts of my family and friends are service members
00:10:15.420 or vets.
00:10:17.200 And so this is not to say anything about the job that they did, but simply the facts are
00:10:22.620 that our leaders in the United States have not been telling the truth when it comes to
00:10:28.100 war and have not had good plans, good outcomes for many decades.
00:10:32.340 The United States is ostensibly the greatest military power that has ever graced the surface
00:10:38.840 of the earth.
00:10:39.900 And yet we find it impossible to win wars against goat herders in the mountains, not because 1.00
00:10:45.540 our troops aren't good enough to do it, not because we don't have the technology or the
00:10:50.760 discipline or any of these things.
00:10:52.540 It's literally that we're not interested in winning wars.
00:10:56.060 We deploy tactics that are not going to finish the job.
00:10:59.040 We get ourselves into political turmoil that makes it impossible for us to do the job.
00:11:03.720 We are setting ourselves up for failure and then finding ourselves in the middle of a
00:11:07.440 failure.
00:11:08.200 So Smith, while I, like I said, is reflexively probably too anti-war for me, his argument
00:11:14.400 here does have legs given our current situation.
00:11:17.580 And all through the Obama administration, it's just like lie after lie after lie with disastrous
00:11:21.720 wars.
00:11:22.340 And so this does create a fertile ground for people to say, I wonder if they were lying about
00:11:27.500 all these wars.
00:11:28.100 Again, I'm not really trying to argue with you about World War II.
00:11:30.680 I'd rather argue about these wars today.
00:11:32.120 I think the interesting question is whether you're busy watering it.
00:11:35.560 Well, should you not talk about mistakes that were made overall?
00:11:38.400 You should.
00:11:39.500 Absolutely.
00:11:39.780 Okay, you should.
00:11:40.500 Absolutely.
00:11:41.420 Right.
00:11:41.840 All four going back and looking at mistakes.
00:11:43.640 So what is your argument then?
00:11:45.380 It's a very weird thing to go back, zone in on a man, say this one thing is a mistake and
00:11:52.060 should characterize him, and you ignore everything else.
00:11:54.580 You're taking him out of context.
00:11:56.800 So to give a little bit of context here, they started the whole podcast by talking about
00:12:02.700 Daryl Cooper, who runs the Martyr Maid podcast.
00:12:05.640 Again, he has been on this podcast several times.
00:12:08.700 And Douglas really got angry at Daryl.
00:12:13.080 Like, he was very, very angry at Daryl about the way that he had presented facts, specifically
00:12:17.360 when it came to Churchill.
00:12:18.440 Well, and so, you know, what Dave Smith is laying out here is, look, if you are lying
00:12:25.520 about wars on a regular basis, if people see that they are being led into war on the basis
00:12:31.700 of a lie, and not just once, but multiple times in their lifetime, they're going to
00:12:36.040 go back and they're naturally going to start asking questions like, well, if my government
00:12:39.760 is willing to lie about this war, why wouldn't they lie about previous wars?
00:12:44.040 And the first lesson we should have here, the most important lesson you should take away
00:12:48.200 from this, is not the danger of asking about whether or not you were lied to about previous
00:12:53.740 wars.
00:12:54.340 The most dangerous thing is lying about the war itself.
00:12:59.060 It's lying about the war.
00:13:01.160 That's the problem.
00:13:02.960 This is the problem.
00:13:03.940 I feel, you know what this is?
00:13:05.460 This is the long, extended version of the Norm MacDonald conversation.
00:13:10.820 I think it's where he and Jerry Seinfeld are like sitting and they're talking about
00:13:14.600 talking about the Bill Cosby rape stuff.
00:13:18.080 And like, you know, people are like, oh, the worst part is the outrage or reaction.
00:13:21.140 And Norm MacDonald turns to him and is like, you know what?
00:13:23.160 I think the worst part was the right.
00:13:25.400 Right.
00:13:25.760 Like, that's the worst part.
00:13:27.280 And I feel like that's exactly what we're getting in this conversation is Douglas Murray's
00:13:31.000 like, you know, the worst thing you could do is go back and look at history and say,
00:13:35.540 what if I was lied to about about these events in history?
00:13:38.780 And like, no, the worst part is actually your government lying about the whole thing.
00:13:43.900 Like, that is actually the problem.
00:13:46.300 The fault lies not with the people asking the question.
00:13:49.260 The problem is with the people who shredded the credibility of the institution.
00:13:54.300 And this is going to be the crux of the debate here.
00:13:57.860 Douglas Murray would like the entire institutional apparatus to stay in place no matter how many
00:14:04.540 times it lies.
00:14:05.440 He doesn't like the lie.
00:14:06.760 He'll tell you that he doesn't like the lie.
00:14:09.460 But when it comes to consequences for the lie, he has a problem with that.
00:14:15.080 He doesn't want the institutions to suffer any consequences for their lies.
00:14:18.720 He'd prefer that they tell the truth.
00:14:20.480 But ultimately, his real problem is with people who would then say, well, if the institution
00:14:25.440 is lying and the institution is failing, maybe we need to question it.
00:14:29.600 And he's like, no, no, no, no, not that.
00:14:31.400 No.
00:14:31.620 And he gets very angry at the people who question the institution in a way he did not get angry
00:14:37.560 with people who lied about the war.
00:14:39.920 Now, I'm sure somewhere Douglas Murray has said, I don't like, you know, he says here in
00:14:43.420 the podcast, I don't like it when people lie about the war.
00:14:45.480 But he doesn't seem very passionate about it.
00:14:48.160 He doesn't seem to care a lot.
00:14:50.580 Actually, he seems to care way more about Daryl Cooper doing a podcast than he does about
00:14:57.000 literally having the governments that he is pledging allegiance to lie to him and get
00:15:05.360 people killed, like he seems way less offended by innocent people dying, by brave soldiers
00:15:12.820 dying because of a lie than he seems offended about people who would then say, well, if the
00:15:18.840 institution was wrong here, maybe it was wrong somewhere else.
00:15:22.780 Now, again, I am not a professional historian.
00:15:26.700 I have not done the level of research that either Daryl Cooper or other historians have done
00:15:32.100 on this topic, the ones that disagree with Daryl quite vehemently.
00:15:35.780 So I'm not going to wade in on to whether Churchill is like, you know, I'll just say this.
00:15:41.500 I don't think Churchill is the big villain of World War Two.
00:15:44.200 That said, obviously, the man made some very serious mistakes and probably exacerbated a
00:15:51.300 situation that didn't need to be exacerbated.
00:15:53.440 However, that said, Hitler's probably a much worse person, right? 0.91
00:15:57.960 Like that's a pretty easy sell.
00:15:59.240 But Douglas Murray is more offended by him, by Daryl Cooper looking back and saying, you
00:16:07.220 know, I don't think that this is the best read on history to just make Hitler this one
00:16:12.700 note thing.
00:16:13.440 Like, I think we should probably better understand the motivations of the Germans and the Third 0.71
00:16:18.220 Reich and everything before we just jump off a cliff every time we go into a war saying,
00:16:23.360 oh, well, this next guy's Hitler.
00:16:24.740 Because Daryl's point, which he's made repeatedly, and this one is correct and is just irrefutable.
00:16:29.920 Every single war we get into, it's all about Hitler. 0.99
00:16:34.280 It turns out Saddam Hussein is Hitler. 0.73
00:16:36.460 It turns out Vladimir Putin is Hitler. 0.88
00:16:38.900 It turns out Muammar Gaddafi is Hitler.
00:16:40.540 Everybody is Hitler all the time. 0.92
00:16:43.720 And so the belief that we have about World War Two impacts our current willingness to
00:16:47.940 enter into wars today.
00:16:49.400 Now, that doesn't mean that everything Daryl said about World War Two is correct.
00:16:53.040 Again, I don't even agree with the comment that he got in trouble with, you know, when it
00:16:57.200 comes to Tucker Carlson, the one that blew up everything.
00:16:59.920 But of course, people are going to question this if you keep lying to them.
00:17:03.780 And that's not their problem.
00:17:05.820 Like, the problem is with the people who lie.
00:17:08.140 The problem is with the people who degraded the institution.
00:17:11.620 If they had not done this, if they had not repeatedly shown themselves to be liars, then
00:17:18.260 you would not be running into the problem you are running into now.
00:17:21.140 It's the same thing with COVID.
00:17:22.700 I don't think every vaccine is fake or going to give you autism or something like that.
00:17:27.760 I'm not an anti-vax guy.
00:17:29.000 I never was.
00:17:31.000 But when you show me during COVID a vaccine that clearly does not work and clearly hurts
00:17:38.200 people and the head of the CDC looks me in the eye and says, this is safe and this will
00:17:44.780 protect you and this will keep you from getting this disease.
00:17:47.160 I know I've been lied to and that's going to make me question other vaccines.
00:17:53.800 Now, I might find that most of the vaccines are fine.
00:17:57.200 I think that's probably true.
00:17:59.680 However, it's going to make me ask questions I never asked before.
00:18:03.240 And it's your job as the head of the CDC to not lie to me so I don't go around questioning
00:18:09.080 all the other things you've said.
00:18:10.560 And it's your job as a regime that is asking people to go to war to not lie to them.
00:18:16.500 Because if you do, they're going to start questioning all the other things you've said.
00:18:20.520 It's a pretty simple premise.
00:18:22.020 I think it's pretty graspable by most people.
00:18:24.360 I think it's the experience most of us have had over the last few years.
00:18:28.000 And yet, Douglas Murray starts just getting very angry at people like Daryl Coopler and
00:18:33.600 Dave Smith for pointing this out.
00:18:35.040 When you're talking about Daryl, who's done, what was it, 30 plus hours?
00:18:39.420 So what?
00:18:40.160 30 plus hours of podcasting.
00:18:42.260 You do that in a week.
00:18:43.260 I'm so this is where, you know, for sure that Douglas Murray has no clue what he is talking
00:18:52.700 about, has absolutely zero clue what he is talking about, which is going to be great because
00:18:58.400 he is going to get very angry about people not knowing what they're talking about.
00:19:02.400 But it is very clear that Douglas Murray has no idea what he is talking about.
00:19:09.140 Daryl Cooper.
00:19:10.080 Yes, he has done 30 hours of this podcast.
00:19:12.980 Fear and Loathing in New Jerusalem, I believe, is the name of the podcast, right?
00:19:17.740 That string of episodes.
00:19:20.200 And you turn around and you hear Douglas Murray say, oh, no, anyone can do 30 hours of podcasts.
00:19:26.900 You do that in a week.
00:19:28.180 Now, yes, the Joe Rogan show, I mean, he does three hours every day.
00:19:33.780 He's stacking up large amounts of content.
00:19:35.720 It only takes him a couple of weeks to do the amount of raw volume of hours that Daryl
00:19:40.960 has done.
00:19:41.540 However, the level of research involved putting on that is very, very different, right?
00:19:48.420 30 hours of a masterfully produced film that you have released as a director into cinema
00:19:55.980 over your entire career is very different than 30 hours of reality television.
00:20:01.140 Yes, they are both 30 hours, technically, of content, video content.
00:20:07.900 But if you take 30 hours of Martin Scorsese and you stack it up against 30 hours of, I
00:20:13.120 don't even know, The Bachelor or something, whatever a contemporary reality show is, if you stack
00:20:18.540 them up, they are obviously very different things.
00:20:20.900 Daryl Cooper puts a lot of work and reading and production into those podcasts.
00:20:27.780 Again, you can say he's wrong, but flippantly saying, oh, well, whatever, you just do that
00:20:33.520 and you clearly have no clue what you're talking about.
00:20:36.580 And that is, again, my big problem with Murray.
00:20:39.220 A lot of people are going to focus on the Israel-Palestine thing.
00:20:42.040 I am not.
00:20:42.760 Again, this is not my war.
00:20:44.620 This is not my concern. 1.00
00:20:45.900 I wish I never had to hear about this stupid war again. 0.99
00:20:49.120 However, this concerns me because I've heard arguments like Douglas is putting forward over 1.00
00:20:54.860 and over again from guys in this like IDW sphere.
00:20:58.640 This is Douglas Murray's Sam Harris moment where he reveals that the most important thing
00:21:05.900 to him is maintaining the system.
00:21:08.500 It has nothing to do with reforming the system.
00:21:10.760 It has nothing to do with fixing the problems.
00:21:13.500 Douglas has issues with what the system is doing, but at his core, he is a defender of
00:21:18.340 the system.
00:21:19.940 And so he is not even going to bother to listen to the guy he is correcting while he's going
00:21:26.500 to complain about everyone else having not done their research, not being an expert, not
00:21:31.200 know what they're talking about.
00:21:32.580 Yeah, it's a very, it's a very different, it's a very different.
00:21:34.680 He's not doing a podcast like talking to people.
00:21:37.060 Okay.
00:21:37.440 Nor is he doing scholarly work.
00:21:39.040 Nor is he working in the archives clearly.
00:21:40.940 Come on.
00:21:41.380 I mean, this is, he is not the historian of our era.
00:21:44.560 He's not complaining to me.
00:21:46.060 This is the thing, Joe.
00:21:47.260 So again, he gets very angry that Tucker Carlson called martyr maid, Daryl Cooper, a historian.
00:21:57.600 He gets very angry about that.
00:21:59.080 Now, I think it's pretty interesting as to when and when, when you are not a historian,
00:22:04.740 what is a historian?
00:22:06.120 Is it someone who studies history?
00:22:07.780 Is it someone who has entered into the profession of studying history?
00:22:11.560 Is it people who present historical content?
00:22:13.780 Is it someone who's done X amount of research?
00:22:15.820 Do you need the doctorate in, uh, to become a historian?
00:22:19.200 I know many people who hold a doctorate in history.
00:22:24.400 I mean, Tom Woods is somebody who I'm pretty sure holds a doctorate in history.
00:22:28.640 He is not officially a historian in the sense that he has never worked academically in the
00:22:33.880 field of history.
00:22:34.680 However, I am very sure that Tom Woods knows more history than most people who have the
00:22:40.680 title of historian, or at least in his chosen area of expertise.
00:22:45.340 That said, you don't need to have the title in order to have some idea of what history is,
00:22:52.880 but that's going to be Douglas's contention here.
00:22:55.020 This is like punching jelly.
00:22:57.000 No, but you, you don't, you don't consume, but you don't consume his work.
00:23:00.560 What I'm saying, because I don't need to consume endless versions of a revisionist history.
00:23:06.420 I understand.
00:23:07.820 So again, Douglas directly here admits he does not know what he's talking about.
00:23:13.440 No, I have not heard anything that, you know, that this podcaster has put out.
00:23:19.400 Yes, ultimately, I don't really know anything about this guy.
00:23:25.100 I don't, I've never listened to Daryl Cooper other than watching some snippets on Twitter.
00:23:29.860 However, I know exactly what he believes.
00:23:33.240 I know exactly the arguments he's putting forward.
00:23:35.700 I know they're all wrong.
00:23:37.120 I don't need to know anything.
00:23:38.680 I don't need to know anything about this guy in order to condemn him.
00:23:42.560 I don't need to know anything about this guy to call his credibility into question.
00:23:47.060 I don't need to see anything, listen to anything, consume any of his content, pay any attention.
00:23:52.580 I don't need to know the first thing about this guy to make all the judgments in the world about his character, about his credibility, about his sources, everything involved.
00:24:03.540 Right?
00:24:03.980 Because Douglas Murray is a professional historian.
00:24:07.460 Wait, no, that's not right.
00:24:09.680 Douglas Murray doesn't have a history degree.
00:24:12.520 Douglas Murray has never worked as an academic historian.
00:24:15.320 Douglas Murray does not hold a university position in a history department.
00:24:21.640 Douglas Murray has exactly the same level of professional qualification to opine on World War II history as Daryl Cooper does.
00:24:31.680 He has exactly the same level of academic credibility, which is to say zero.
00:24:38.800 Douglas Murray does not hold any of the credentials he is demanding from other people.
00:24:45.320 And yet he is very sure that without listening to them at all, even one time,
00:24:50.640 that he knows everything that they are going to say and that they are wrong.
00:24:55.960 It's insane.
00:24:57.240 It's absolutely insane.
00:24:58.920 It's not revisionist history.
00:25:00.840 If you listen to his work, it's not revisionist history.
00:25:03.260 He's basing it on historical work.
00:25:06.020 Yeah, I know, but, okay, so this is my point about jelly.
00:25:09.920 It's a shape-shifting thing.
00:25:11.500 Comedian or historian?
00:25:13.840 He's not a comedian.
00:25:15.480 Historian or podcast.
00:25:17.200 It would be historian or actual historian.
00:25:19.680 You say he doesn't claim to be a historian, but he's pumping out tens of hours of history.
00:25:23.660 But neither does it.
00:25:24.480 It's Dan Carlin.
00:25:25.140 When I found out my friend got a great deal on a designer dress from Winners,
00:25:29.720 I started wondering, is every fabulous item I see from Winners?
00:25:34.500 Like that woman over there with the Italian leather handbag. 1.00
00:25:37.440 Is that from Winners?
00:25:38.640 Ooh, or that beautiful silk skirt. 0.99
00:25:41.160 Did she pay full price?
00:25:42.400 Or those suede sneakers?
00:25:43.960 Or that luggage?
00:25:45.060 Or that trench?
00:25:46.200 Those jeans?
00:25:46.900 That jacket?
00:25:47.620 Those heels? 1.00
00:25:48.480 Is anyone paying full price for anything?
00:25:51.460 Stop wondering.
00:25:52.720 Start winning.
00:25:53.260 Winners find fabulous for less.
00:25:56.140 So, I am somebody who has a bachelor's degree from a party school in Florida.
00:26:03.340 I taught high school, and I worked for several years as a reporter.
00:26:11.100 I am in no way academically qualified to discuss political theory.
00:26:16.260 I'm just not.
00:26:17.820 That's just the case.
00:26:19.000 If you're looking at the raw credentials that I have,
00:26:23.260 I don't have any of those things, right?
00:26:25.980 However, from what I have heard from people who are in academia,
00:26:31.280 from the chair of a philosophy department, no less,
00:26:35.080 they have used my work.
00:26:37.500 They have assigned my work to their students.
00:26:41.400 This one particular philosophy chair told me,
00:26:44.180 hey, I think all the really interesting work in political theory
00:26:47.480 is being done with guys online like Nick Land and Curtis Yarvin.
00:26:53.260 So, who knows more about what should be going on here, right?
00:26:57.420 Like, who knows more?
00:26:58.640 The academics or Douglas Murray?
00:27:00.660 Now, this isn't to say that everybody who enters into popular entertainment
00:27:05.300 and shares an opinion has a high level of qualification
00:27:08.540 and should be treated as an expert.
00:27:10.980 Probably, you know, if you don't want to treat me as an expert, that's fine.
00:27:14.260 That's okay.
00:27:14.920 But it's very strange for Douglas to pretend that nobody who does any work
00:27:21.580 in any academic area who does not have an official degree from a school
00:27:25.100 he feels is sufficiently qualified, they just don't count.
00:27:30.020 That just doesn't work.
00:27:32.340 Because, again, Douglas Murray doesn't have that.
00:27:35.500 Douglas Murray, I believe, has a bachelor's degree in English.
00:27:38.600 So, what is he on about?
00:27:40.640 Like, I get it.
00:27:41.560 I also get frustrated sometimes, right?
00:27:43.820 There are comedians I have a problem with
00:27:47.040 because they keep doing the clown nose on, clown nose off thing, right?
00:27:51.060 They'll say, oh, I have a serious political opinion.
00:27:54.080 And then it's, oh, but I'm just joking.
00:27:55.720 I'm just joking.
00:27:56.740 I got to say, I don't see a lot of that from Dave Smith.
00:27:59.420 I've seen it from plenty of other comedians,
00:28:00.940 and I do have a problem with that particular maneuver.
00:28:03.880 Because then you're just saying, well, I'm just this guy, right?
00:28:06.160 You're making assertions, and you're saying, I'm just this guy.
00:28:08.180 If you make the assertion, back it up, right?
00:28:10.480 You don't need the credential, but you do need the backup.
00:28:13.360 You do need to actually show me your work, right?
00:28:16.240 I've got opinions on political theory.
00:28:18.060 I can show you the work.
00:28:20.000 You may disagree with the work, but I can show you the research.
00:28:22.920 I can draw you the line about how I got there.
00:28:25.820 I can give you the bibliography.
00:28:27.520 I can give you the intellectual genealogy I'm arguing.
00:28:31.220 Again, I might be wrong, but I can do that.
00:28:33.440 So I do have a problem with people who make an assertion
00:28:38.580 and just have zero idea of how to back that up
00:28:43.000 and then just run away and be like, oh, no, I'm a comedian or something.
00:28:47.040 It doesn't count.
00:28:48.180 But I'll be honest, again, I haven't really seen that from Dave Smith here.
00:28:54.620 Maybe he's done it at some point.
00:28:55.980 Probably has.
00:28:56.700 I don't know.
00:28:57.440 But that is not a feature of debates that Dave Smith involves himself in,
00:29:02.160 at least what I've seen.
00:29:03.920 He doesn't claim to be a historian either.
00:29:06.060 You see my point about the move.
00:29:07.980 It's like some weird jujitsu move where you say, hang on,
00:29:11.960 you know all about this as well.
00:29:13.480 You say, I'm not a historian,
00:29:16.700 but I'm going to spend my time talking about history.
00:29:19.860 I'm not a journalist,
00:29:21.100 but I'm going to spend my time talking about this thing.
00:29:23.280 I'm not an expert on this,
00:29:25.080 but I'm going to spend my time talking about this.
00:29:27.260 So check out this cool move that Douglas did.
00:29:30.580 This is a really cool move that Douglas did.
00:29:33.440 So he says, I'm not a historian,
00:29:35.780 but I'm going to, I'm not going to, I'm going to talk a history.
00:29:38.440 I'm not an expert,
00:29:39.120 but I'm going to talk about a topic as if I'm an expert.
00:29:41.320 I'm not a journalist,
00:29:42.360 but I'm going to talk about a variety of things.
00:29:45.240 Well, one of those things isn't like another, right?
00:29:47.980 Okay.
00:29:49.100 Being a journalist in Douglas's mind,
00:29:52.440 apparently gives you carte blanche to talk about a lot of things you have
00:29:55.780 no clue about because what you have a journalism degree.
00:30:02.100 Like that makes you a journalist.
00:30:04.380 Guess what?
00:30:04.680 I was a journalist.
00:30:05.460 I didn't have a journalism degree then either.
00:30:07.240 So there I have several years as a senior staff writer on a paper without having a journalism
00:30:15.960 degree.
00:30:16.780 And yet here we are, right?
00:30:19.020 But, but Douglas thinks that being a journalist allows you to just comment on anything as if
00:30:25.880 you are an expert.
00:30:26.560 And it's very clear because Douglas is going to comment on politics.
00:30:30.380 He's going to comment on war.
00:30:32.000 He's going to come comment on social situations.
00:30:34.900 He's going to comment on religion.
00:30:36.420 He's going to comment on a lot of things that he does not have a degree in that he in no
00:30:41.280 way is an expert in.
00:30:42.800 And yet he's going to assert his opinions as if they are factual and valid, despite him
00:30:50.200 lacking all of the qualifications he has listed here, except for that of journalist.
00:30:56.820 And that tells you a lot because the journalistic class.
00:31:02.000 In the United States, in the wider Western world, obviously Douglas is in the UK, but
00:31:06.500 the dynamic there is very much the same.
00:31:08.820 The journalistic class in the wider Western world sees itself as the priestly cast.
00:31:13.880 They are the ones who are in charge of the truth.
00:31:17.140 They are the ones that decide what opinions are valid or invalid.
00:31:21.120 And you see this over and over again from the IDW crowd, whether it's Sam Harris or Barry
00:31:27.280 Weiss or Douglas Murray, their problem is not that the system has failed.
00:31:32.100 The problem is not that the system is malfunctioning.
00:31:34.620 The problem is not that society is collapsing around them.
00:31:37.280 The problem is that their position in the expert class is being challenged.
00:31:42.040 And that is what Douglas really cares about here.
00:31:44.340 Because if journalists don't have the final say, if journalists who are no more qualified
00:31:51.180 to opine on history or war have the final say, they get to decide what everyone believes
00:31:57.480 on those topics.
00:31:58.400 But if podcasters who are as qualified as Douglas Murray to comment on both war and history,
00:32:08.000 which is to say, not at all, if they can shape a public opinion in the same way a journalist
00:32:13.360 can shape a public opinion, well, then guys like Douglas Murray and people like Barry Weiss,
00:32:19.980 they don't have the monopoly on truth anymore.
00:32:22.860 They're no longer the priestly cast.
00:32:25.460 They're no longer to decide which narratives are sacred and which narratives are not.
00:32:29.700 And this is what Douglas is really worried about.
00:32:32.120 What he's really worried about is that his class of activists is losing their power.
00:32:40.760 He's not interested in the truth.
00:32:42.980 He's not going to listen and try to discern whether or not someone like Daryl Cooper is
00:32:49.120 telling the truth and presenting something factual.
00:32:52.480 He's not interested in that. 0.60
00:32:53.980 He just wants him to shut up. 1.00
00:32:56.100 Just shut up and go away. 0.99
00:32:58.520 Telling the truth, telling people what the truth is. 0.99
00:33:00.760 That's our job.
00:33:02.400 That's the journalist class's job.
00:33:04.280 That's me and Barry Weiss.
00:33:05.480 We tell you what is true.
00:33:08.800 That's what Douglas is saying.
00:33:11.420 Because he has the exact level of expertise in this area as both Dave Smith and Daryl Cooper,
00:33:19.540 which is to say none.
00:33:21.460 But he knows the truth.
00:33:23.320 He knows the authoritative truth because he's a journalist.
00:33:26.920 And journalists, they get this magical free pass where they can comment on anything all the
00:33:32.840 time with an air of expertise and yet don't need to have expertise in any of it because
00:33:38.520 at the end of the day, he's just a journalist.
00:33:40.940 Turns out, Douglas's position is just as full of jelly as Dave Smith or is just as made of
00:33:48.880 jelly as Dave Smith.
00:33:49.800 Right?
00:33:49.980 It's just as pliable.
00:33:51.280 It morphs itself into any given situation just the same as Dave Smith.
00:33:55.960 It's a weird move, yeah?
00:33:57.540 No.
00:33:58.320 You don't think?
00:33:58.860 No, I'm a free American.
00:34:00.100 I can talk about what I like to.
00:34:01.400 You can talk about what you want.
00:34:02.180 So what is the point here?
00:34:03.060 I've noticed you can.
00:34:04.200 But what's the point?
00:34:05.900 The point is what are you pushing?
00:34:08.120 What are you watering?
00:34:09.720 Why?
00:34:10.020 Am I pushing?
00:34:10.820 Yes. 0.99
00:34:11.460 Liberty, free markets, peace, prosperity, not getting in another stupid catastrophic war, 0.99
00:34:16.680 which we're on the precipice of right now. 0.95
00:34:19.400 So you notice here for Douglas Murray, the problem is not actually that you have no expertise.
00:34:26.500 In fact, it turns out anyone can opine on these topics.
00:34:31.000 That's in direct contradiction to what he just spent the last few minutes saying, but
00:34:35.120 eh, you know.
00:34:37.960 But Douglas Murray says, no, no, of course you can comment on what you want to comment on.
00:34:42.060 The question is, what are you pushing?
00:34:43.760 So it's not about your expertise.
00:34:44.920 It's about your position.
00:34:47.360 It's about what do you believe?
00:34:50.180 What are you saying?
00:34:51.800 Are you expressing the no, no words?
00:34:53.700 Are you questioning narratives?
00:34:55.160 You're not allowed to question?
00:34:57.380 What's going on here, right?
00:34:58.920 That's what he's actually concerned about.
00:35:01.100 It has nothing to do with expertise.
00:35:03.060 You have the wrong opinion.
00:35:04.900 You believe the wrong thing. 0.93
00:35:06.500 I want to shut you up because you're saying the wrong thing.
00:35:09.580 That's what Murray is saying.
00:35:11.460 All this, I care deeply about expertise.
00:35:13.740 You're not an expert.
00:35:15.440 He doesn't care.
00:35:16.680 You could be an expert and he would tell you you are wrong if you are saying things he
00:35:21.660 disagrees with.
00:35:22.900 That's it.
00:35:24.040 That's what I'm pushing.
00:35:25.120 What are we on the press?
00:35:26.020 Well, I think you weren't you just talking about it the other day.
00:35:28.460 Everyone I hear on the inside says we're about to attack around.
00:35:32.080 I think you just said something about that the other day.
00:35:35.320 Am I wrong about that?
00:35:36.120 I thought I saw in one of your interviews that you did.
00:35:37.940 Possibly.
00:35:39.000 That doesn't mean we are on the verge of a war.
00:35:41.420 I mean, you keep referring to we being in wars.
00:35:43.780 There's a very big difference between a country having a military that's engaged and a country
00:35:49.980 being at war.
00:35:50.680 Well, this is an amazing moment.
00:35:53.440 Okay.
00:35:53.760 I want you to take this moment and I want you to drink in the importance of this moment. 0.98
00:35:58.120 What Douglas Murray just said is the most entitled neoconservative garbage you can imagine. 0.98
00:36:06.520 The most entitled neoconservative BS that you have ever heard spun. 0.99
00:36:13.880 Okay.
00:36:15.780 It's very different to say that a country is at war as opposed to its military is at war.
00:36:21.280 You say we as if you're a country.
00:36:22.880 No, it's your military that's at war.
00:36:28.000 I have a friend who spent many, many years in the sandbox and he tells the story all the
00:36:33.900 time about how he was speaking with a superior officer at some point and he talked about
00:36:41.540 how we were at war as a country and that officer turned to him and said, you know what?
00:36:46.000 Actually, the army is at war.
00:36:49.400 The rest of the country is at the mall and that's tough, but that's also true that in
00:36:56.620 the United States, unfortunately, because we have went from a large force that was
00:37:03.220 representative of the wider United States where most people had gone in or a larger number
00:37:10.320 of men had been a military service at one time or another.
00:37:13.320 Obviously, many cases due to the draft, people are going to have very different opinions on
00:37:17.360 that.
00:37:17.580 But because we went from what was a conscription based force when we had large wars to a
00:37:25.360 entirely voluntary, very small military, what we ended up, I mean, not small globally, but
00:37:31.300 as a percentage of the population, what we ended up doing was creating effectively a warrior
00:37:35.560 caste.
00:37:36.640 And that warrior caste has fought most of our wars since World War II or well, since Vietnam,
00:37:43.220 right?
00:37:43.480 Because we had the draft in Vietnam.
00:37:46.180 And that caste is hereditary, which means that usually it is the sons and daughters is the 1.00
00:37:54.220 children of soldiers that end up entering back into the military.
00:37:57.260 Not exclusively, obviously, new people join the military all the time, but we see a very
00:38:01.060 high rate of recruitment among people whose parents have been in the military, meaning
00:38:05.680 that when we go to war, really, it's not a representative large percentage of our male population that
00:38:13.940 goes to war.
00:38:14.880 It is really just that smaller amount of professional warrior caste people that go to war on America's 0.65
00:38:22.400 behalf.
00:38:22.760 Now, that might sound like an improvement, but it has some pretty big downsides.
00:38:27.480 One of the downsides is the average person doesn't recognize the cost of the war.
00:38:31.640 They no longer think of their country going to war.
00:38:35.520 They no longer think of the specific people who are putting their lives on the line because
00:38:40.660 they don't know those people anymore.
00:38:42.140 Those people are just abstract objects out somewhere.
00:38:45.180 They know a war is happening somewhere in the United States or the UK is involved, but they
00:38:50.000 don't feel the loss, right?
00:38:51.560 The idea of growing a victory garden so that the troops have what they need on the front
00:38:55.980 lines.
00:38:56.440 That just doesn't exist anymore.
00:38:58.340 The idea of sacrificing on behalf of the war effort, even if you're not personally involved,
00:39:03.780 just doesn't exist for our countries anymore.
00:39:08.220 Douglas thinks that's great.
00:39:10.400 Douglas loves that because Douglas is never going to go to war.
00:39:14.420 Douglas's children are never going to go to war.
00:39:16.440 It's just not going to happen.
00:39:17.720 So Douglas doesn't care.
00:39:20.520 Yeah, your military goes to war, but your country isn't going to war.
00:39:24.380 Come on.
00:39:25.680 Why would you say as if your country is going to war?
00:39:28.220 And this is the core of the neoconservative problem.
00:39:31.700 Douglas expects a professional military force completely detached from the American or British
00:39:36.980 population to go around setting up governments in the name of liberal democracy or whatever,
00:39:42.680 right?
00:39:43.160 But he's never going to sacrifice for it.
00:39:45.240 He's never going to put any effort into it.
00:39:46.780 He's never going to put his lifestyle at risk.
00:39:49.300 He's never going to put any of his, you know, progeny at risk.
00:39:53.100 I don't know if he has any.
00:39:54.560 He's not going to do that, right?
00:39:56.540 That is just not going to be the case because the country doesn't go to war.
00:40:00.960 The military goes where that's that's for the poors, right? 1.00
00:40:03.980 They go fight their wars on our, you know, on behalf of the government.
00:40:07.540 But, but, but, but, you know, the journalist class, they're going to sit around talking
00:40:11.060 about how they want a war, right?
00:40:14.760 Like Douglas is probably not going to refer to, well, you know, the, the, the military
00:40:19.280 won the war for us.
00:40:20.360 That's I'm guessing, you know, comb through his language, but I got a feeling we might be
00:40:24.340 able to catch Douglas saying we, when he means military there, excuse me.
00:40:28.480 But obviously the problem here is the incredible detachment we have from what is happening from
00:40:36.400 when we actually go into military situations.
00:40:39.360 And Douglas just displays this so beautifully here that ultimately he doesn't see it as the
00:40:45.920 country going to war.
00:40:46.900 It's some professional military, uh, force, like, like a bunch of mercenaries.
00:40:50.400 They go out, we pay them, they go fight, they do their thing on our behalf, and then they
00:40:54.060 come back, right?
00:40:55.060 But that's it.
00:40:55.660 He does not understand the connection between a country and its military.
00:40:59.580 He does not appreciate the link between a people and their military.
00:41:03.760 In fact, he specifically criticizes someone who would understand their country as going
00:41:08.620 to war rather than, you know, moving some kind of a discrete military unit around the
00:41:13.440 board as if it's a video game.
00:41:15.880 This country has not been at war for 25 years.
00:41:19.000 You have not been fighting for the American homeland for 25 years.
00:41:22.060 Yes, we haven't.
00:41:22.580 That's true.
00:41:22.900 We haven't had a war on our shores.
00:41:24.260 We've been picking on third world countries halfway around the world. 1.00
00:41:26.820 Well, you haven't been randomly picking on them.
00:41:29.380 I mean, Afghanistan, you went.
00:41:30.680 I didn't say it was random.
00:41:31.580 Yeah, right.
00:41:32.180 Okay.
00:41:32.680 It wasn't like you suddenly decided to bomb again, Myanmar or something.
00:41:37.280 You went for Afghanistan to find bin Laden and take revenge for 9-11 and stop an attack 0.93
00:41:43.660 like that happening again on the American homeland.
00:41:46.120 That is very different from a country being at war.
00:41:48.400 Yeah, but that's a total miscarriage. 1.00
00:41:50.740 So again, Douglas looks at this and says, okay, there are some legitimate engagements
00:41:56.340 you can involve in.
00:41:57.240 And to be fair, I think he's relatively right about some of this, right?
00:42:01.360 He's right that there had to be a response to 9-11.
00:42:04.740 That you did need to take action to make sure that there were no terrorist attacks in the
00:42:12.180 United States after that major attack.
00:42:14.380 There was some level of reciprocal response necessary in order to stop what was going on.
00:42:20.280 But you'll notice what he doesn't point out is that both of those turned into multi-decade
00:42:25.160 nation-building projects, right?
00:42:27.380 And this is always the neocon shuffle, right? 0.76
00:42:30.940 And by the way, when I use the word neocon here, Douglas wrote a book saying we need neoconservatism.
00:42:36.700 So this is not a slur, this is not me fabricating a term and applying it to someone to whom it
00:42:43.000 does not apply.
00:42:44.040 Douglas literally calls himself a neoconservative and wrote the book on why we need neoconservatism.
00:42:50.300 So I'm not just like throwing this language around in order to smear or insult this guy,
00:42:56.400 right?
00:42:57.720 This is the problem that we have over and over again with the neocon shuffle.
00:43:01.760 Yes, there is a proportionate and reasonable response to 9-11.
00:43:07.060 That response is not believing that you're going to turn Afghanistan into the 51st state
00:43:12.700 of the United States because secretly George Washington and Alexander Hamilton and Thomas
00:43:17.220 Jefferson are just hanging out in caves somewhere.
00:43:19.320 And if you just drop enough bombs on them, eventually they'll emerge from the cave and
00:43:23.220 they'll write a constitution and boom, liberal democracy will bloom across Afghanistan.
00:43:27.500 And yet that is exactly the approach that we took for decades.
00:43:30.580 So yes, there is a legitimate response.
00:43:33.220 And I would say that in Douglas Murray's defense here, Dave Smith probably doesn't believe there
00:43:37.820 is a legitimate response.
00:43:39.220 I think that that's probably something that Dave Smith struggles with.
00:43:42.380 He is so anti-war, he doesn't even know when a proportionate just response would be achieved,
00:43:48.680 right?
00:43:49.600 But Douglas Murray is going to just kind of sidestep the fact that these responses turned into massive
00:43:54.740 multi-decade boondoggles.
00:43:57.320 Characterization of the war in Afghanistan.
00:43:58.700 It's one thing to say that might be an accurate characterization of the special operations
00:44:02.680 mission in late 2001, but then we thought a 20-year regime change war against the Taliban.
00:44:08.380 Because you got dragged into the quicksand of war.
00:44:11.680 Oh, okay, fine.
00:44:12.940 But I thought it wasn't a war.
00:44:14.440 Like, I don't get...
00:44:15.460 Again, Douglas just kind of hand waves this away.
00:44:17.300 Well, you got drug into the quicksand of war.
00:44:19.380 You do not get drug into the quicksand of a 20-year war.
00:44:24.380 That's not how that works.
00:44:26.080 You do not get involved in a military conflict and nation-building for 20 years because you
00:44:31.600 accidentally got drug into it.
00:44:33.800 You didn't just, like, stumble in after a drunken night and end up in a war.
00:44:38.260 That's not how this works, okay?
00:44:40.300 But Douglas Murray just portrays it as if it's a mild, mild consequence of having to go in and,
00:44:45.720 you know, stop the 9-11 attacks.
00:44:47.460 No, no, it's not.
00:44:49.160 It's a giant systemic failure from our expert and leadership class, which you are specifically
00:44:54.960 defending in this moment.
00:44:56.640 No, I said it was a war.
00:44:58.100 It's your use of we as if you're personally, like, suffering this war.
00:45:02.580 Yeah, you're a taxpayer.
00:45:03.320 When I say we...
00:45:04.000 We're taxpayers, so we pay for it.
00:45:05.680 Okay, fine.
00:45:06.280 Douglas, would you go...
00:45:06.980 If I went back and corrected you on every time you've used the term we to refer to your
00:45:10.640 government or something like that, like, if I were to say, oh, we just imposed tariffs
00:45:14.140 on China, would you point out that I didn't and it was the Trump administration?
00:45:17.500 You take it, obviously, very personally, and that's your right to do so, of course.
00:45:21.680 I'm just trying to make sure we're accurate here.
00:45:23.640 So, again, Douglas, throwing this little shade at him.
00:45:27.160 Oh, you're taking this personally.
00:45:28.160 Douglas Murray has literally, like, dedicated his life to promoting foreign wars.
00:45:34.160 Like, this is a man who's currently pushing involvement of all Western countries in, obviously,
00:45:41.600 the Israel-Palestine-Gaza conflict, and I believe also in the Ukrainian-Russian war, okay?
00:45:49.180 So, the idea that, like, that Dave Smith is taking this very personally, but Douglas Murray
00:45:54.500 is just this cool, objective cucumber, is pretty comical.
00:45:58.820 Also, Douglas, again, does this thing where he pretends that countries and their militaries
00:46:05.300 are very different things and that you, as a citizen of a country, should not care what
00:46:09.880 your military is doing, that that should not be something that you are emotionally involved
00:46:14.400 in.
00:46:15.060 Again, this is just insane.
00:46:18.120 This is absolutely insane. 1.00
00:46:20.100 This is the most neocon garbage I have ever heard. 1.00
00:46:22.720 This ideology has to die. 1.00
00:46:25.360 The people pushing this ideology have to be discredited.
00:46:28.440 We cannot let people running around and pretending this is reality run our countries anymore.
00:46:34.600 This is absolutely insane.
00:46:36.380 If you leave people like Douglas Murray in the elite, they will get your sons and daughters 0.99
00:46:42.140 murdered. 0.97
00:46:43.600 That's it. 0.55
00:46:44.800 Like, these people will drive you into pointless wars because they do not even see your military
00:46:49.700 as actually part of your country.
00:46:51.580 They do not even see the people of your country as having any input as to how the military is
00:46:57.020 used.
00:46:58.420 Dave Smith doesn't get to decide how the military is used.
00:47:01.160 He doesn't get to have an opinion on how the military is used.
00:47:03.580 He doesn't get to have an opinion on whether the war should be fought or not because he's
00:47:07.340 not personally there, which is funny because neither is Douglas Murray, but whatever.
00:47:12.140 Right.
00:47:12.480 I guess that only applies to Dave Smith.
00:47:15.800 What do you think I'm taking personally?
00:47:18.200 Just that.
00:47:18.960 The American wars.
00:47:20.680 Sure.
00:47:21.160 Yeah.
00:47:21.300 I think they've killed hundreds of thousands of people and cost my country eight trillion
00:47:26.100 dollars and degraded my country very much.
00:47:29.060 And there's a very good argument to make on that.
00:47:31.680 I'm still slightly bemused about this move from I'm an expert on this and I have views
00:47:38.720 to I'm a comedian.
00:47:40.580 I've never claimed to be an expert on anything.
00:47:43.240 This is the problem, Joe.
00:47:45.160 I mean, if somebody says you have to claim to be an expert on something to have an opinion
00:47:50.580 on something, you don't have to be.
00:47:52.000 You don't have to be.
00:47:52.980 So Douglas obviously believes that you do.
00:47:56.200 Right.
00:47:56.540 Like he stops talking to Dave Smith and he pivots to Joe Rogan in the hopes that that's going
00:48:02.980 to make him look objective.
00:48:04.320 That that maybe Joe Rogan's going to save him from this exchange.
00:48:10.500 But again, Douglas Murray is being exactly what he claims Dave Smith is right.
00:48:17.220 Every time Douglas Murray runs into a problem, he's just jelly.
00:48:21.040 All of a sudden, Douglas Murray, Douglas Murray demands expertise.
00:48:25.180 You must be a historian.
00:48:26.860 You must be a military expert.
00:48:28.740 You must personally be involved in wars in order to comment on them, recognize when there's
00:48:35.540 a problem, point out some kind of historical that you like, you have to have this expertise.
00:48:39.840 And then the minute someone's like, so you're just to clarify, you're saying that everyone
00:48:43.920 has to have this expertise.
00:48:45.080 Oh, no, no, no, no, of course not.
00:48:46.900 Of course, I would never say that.
00:48:48.440 Of course, I would never say that.
00:48:49.680 I'm just I'm just wondering why they're commenting on these things because they're events
00:48:53.660 happening now, Douglas, because when you have a war and you're demanding more people be involved
00:49:02.180 in it and more money go to it and more weapons and material and lives get spent on it, people
00:49:09.380 have a right to comment on what you are asking them to involve themselves in.
00:49:15.060 Douglas Murray does not have some kind of objective opinion on this.
00:49:19.340 It's not like, oh, well, I'm just bringing forward the facts.
00:49:22.300 No, Douglas has a specific partisan demand he is making on both the United States and
00:49:28.740 the UK.
00:49:29.160 And you know what?
00:49:29.920 That's fine.
00:49:31.480 He has the right to make that demand, but he does not have the expertise that he is demanding
00:49:37.540 of others who are also partisan.
00:49:40.300 Now, again, I think that a man whose country is literally being invaded as we speak, the United
00:49:47.900 Kingdom is in a position right now where it is run by a government that is hostile to its
00:49:53.600 own population.
00:49:54.820 People cannot protest.
00:49:56.640 People cannot speak out online.
00:49:58.640 People cannot pray outside in their heads in the United Kingdom.
00:50:03.460 A man was threatened on the street.
00:50:05.620 A retiree who was disabled was threatened on the street by a police officer with hate crime
00:50:10.760 charges for saying these people should speak English in the country where English was invented.
00:50:18.360 That's where you are right now.
00:50:20.200 But what is Douglas obsessed with?
00:50:23.340 A war in another country.
00:50:26.960 That's all he cares about.
00:50:29.040 Now, to Douglas's credit, he wrote a book on the strange death of Europe.
00:50:32.400 He's spoken about the problems of immigration.
00:50:34.760 I was at the speech at ARC when he did so, though I noticed he didn't mention anything
00:50:39.160 about deportation, so one wonders how committed he is to that problem.
00:50:43.660 But ultimately, yes, Douglas has spoken out about that problem in a way that many people
00:50:49.400 in his country will not, to his credit.
00:50:52.080 But if my country is being invaded, if my country is becoming tyrannical, if free speech is ending
00:50:58.280 in my country, then running around and demanding censorship of other people is probably not
00:51:04.180 the move.
00:51:05.880 Spending all of my time obsessing over a foreign war and writing a book on a foreign war is
00:51:12.100 probably not the move.
00:51:13.020 Now, again, Douglas is free to write whatever book he wants.
00:51:17.780 However, he is no more of an expert than anyone else on this issue who he is criticizing.
00:51:25.240 And yet he thinks that ultimately, he is the only one qualified to have an opinion.
00:51:32.560 This is like, I'm not a historian, but I'm pumping out history.
00:51:36.020 I'm not an expert, but I'm talking all the time about this thing.
00:51:38.920 But you're not even talking about specifically on what he just said.
00:51:41.500 No, I'm saying this is my point about this.
00:51:44.520 Again, like Joe Rogan just puts out, like, you are doing exactly what you said you don't
00:51:48.640 like.
00:51:49.440 You have exactly the same problem that you are saying that Dave Smith has.
00:51:53.360 The minute you get pinned down, you pivot, you talk to somebody else, you don't address
00:51:57.680 the issue.
00:51:58.780 You do it over and over and over again.
00:52:01.400 It's always this constant thing.
00:52:03.320 Oh, well, you don't have to be an expert to have an opinion, but you're not an expert,
00:52:06.680 so you should never be allowed on a podcast.
00:52:08.860 You shouldn't have a podcast discussing this.
00:52:11.100 Which one is it, Douglas?
00:52:12.580 And if so, apply that standard to yourself.
00:52:15.640 Are you an expert or not?
00:52:17.300 How many battles have you been in?
00:52:19.580 How many academic degrees in history do you hold?
00:52:23.360 None.
00:52:25.560 Zero time in any of these things, right?
00:52:28.420 None.
00:52:29.580 And yet, he is uniquely qualified.
00:52:31.880 Why?
00:52:32.180 He's a journalist.
00:52:34.240 And like Sam Harris or Barry Weiss, he recognizes his expert class is being threatened.
00:52:39.740 And that's what he's really worried about.
00:52:41.540 You say, I'm not an expert.
00:52:45.760 So what's the solution?
00:52:46.780 To not talk about it?
00:52:47.800 No, it's to have more experts around.
00:52:51.700 Well, the expert class hasn't done a great job, man.
00:52:53.860 This is follow the science.
00:52:55.120 Yeah, but you know what?
00:52:56.160 I agree with that.
00:52:57.240 I just said to you, I agree with that.
00:52:58.940 But one of the problems is...
00:53:00.400 During all of COVID...
00:53:01.480 So again, Douglas is like, yes, I agree.
00:53:04.040 The experts failed.
00:53:05.180 Yes, I agree.
00:53:06.260 The experts have discredited themselves.
00:53:08.760 So what's the solution to this problem, Douglas?
00:53:10.840 What is the solution?
00:53:11.960 What consequence for failure should the expert class have?
00:53:15.060 Oh, I want to make it clear.
00:53:16.220 I don't think there should be any consequence.
00:53:18.580 Yeah, I agree they got it wrong.
00:53:20.100 Yes, I'll admit they got it wrong, but I would never allow them to feel any pain for the decisions
00:53:25.580 they've made.
00:53:27.000 In fact, we need more experts.
00:53:29.320 By the way, every Democrat after the election of Donald Trump said that the reason that Donald
00:53:36.880 Trump won, like every one of these Democratic strategists, all these talking heads on TV,
00:53:41.180 they all claim that the reason that Donald Trump won and Joe Biden lost, or sorry, Kamala
00:53:46.640 Harris lost, is that ultimately, the Republicans had the podcast bros, right?
00:53:53.480 They had Joe Rogan.
00:53:55.000 They had Theo Vaughn.
00:53:56.420 They had the new media.
00:53:59.020 And more young people are listening to the new media instead of the old media.
00:54:03.100 And you know why people are listening to the new media instead of the old media?
00:54:06.920 You know why people are trusting podcasts rather than experts in these areas?
00:54:11.100 Because the experts have lied, because the experts are controlled, because the old media
00:54:16.340 curates heavily everyone who comes onto their program.
00:54:19.820 And yet, they lie and they get it wrong.
00:54:23.540 But the new media, yes, it's less curated, less credentials.
00:54:28.180 However, they seem to get things right more often than the mainstream media.
00:54:33.240 Now again, I often say this is the Alex Jones effect.
00:54:36.600 Is Alex Jones a prophet?
00:54:38.220 Does he have some kind of special gift from on high?
00:54:42.200 I don't think so.
00:54:43.320 I think the reason Alex Jones has a better batting average than the average media person
00:54:46.780 is Alex Jones just always says that the regime is evil and assumes that whatever they're doing
00:54:51.320 is terrible and nefarious.
00:54:53.700 And because the regime is evil, and what they do is often terrible and nefarious, Alex Jones
00:54:58.600 is right more often than the average MSNBC analyst.
00:55:01.880 That doesn't mean that Alex Jones has done the research.
00:55:04.600 It doesn't mean that Alex Jones has the degrees.
00:55:07.220 It doesn't mean that Alex Jones is an expert.
00:55:09.520 But his batting average is higher simply because the people in charge decide to light their
00:55:14.140 credibility on fire.
00:55:16.800 And the only thing left are people who are questioning what's going on.
00:55:21.360 Now, a lot of people like Douglas Murray and many members of the IDW who think that they
00:55:27.420 are God's gift to the world and they decide intellectually what is correct and what is not.
00:55:32.880 They form the truth.
00:55:34.320 They shape the narrative.
00:55:35.760 They don't like this.
00:55:36.940 They are losing their monopoly.
00:55:38.960 And so even though the expert class has failed entirely, they insist that the expert class
00:55:45.260 is the only one that can opine on these issues.
00:55:47.880 And what the only solution is more experts.
00:55:50.580 It's more people making the same mistakes.
00:55:52.520 It's more people with the same broken epistemology.
00:55:54.920 I'm going to be writing something about that here this week because I think it's really important
00:55:58.260 to understand how critically the failure of the liberal epistemology has really rocked
00:56:04.020 the system.
00:56:05.080 But guys like Douglas Murray simply do not have a solution in the same way that Sam Harris
00:56:08.840 does not have a solution.
00:56:10.280 And that's why both of them have the clown themselves when it came time to actually talk 0.72
00:56:14.920 about these issues.
00:56:16.240 Because in both cases, both men recognize that there are problems with the system, serious
00:56:21.180 problems with the system, fatal problems with the system.
00:56:23.440 But they would rather hold that system aloft and enshrine it and defend it than allow people
00:56:32.880 to correct it because they are so scared of losing their positions of power and letting
00:56:36.920 that narrative actually unwind.
00:56:39.020 They are so desperate that their class stay in power that they refuse to address the issues
00:56:46.420 involved.
00:56:47.460 And so Douglas over and over again admits, yes, obviously the experts failed.
00:56:51.060 Yes, obviously the experts messed this up.
00:56:53.300 Yes, obviously the experts are no longer fit for purpose.
00:56:55.740 But you know what we need?
00:56:56.760 More experts.
00:56:59.560 We're not going to fix anything.
00:57:01.100 We're not going to solve any problems.
00:57:02.500 We just need more of the same failure.
00:57:06.300 I will put my track record against any of the expert class on COVID.
00:57:11.580 I'm glad to do that.
00:57:13.140 So should I have just shut up?
00:57:14.280 Should I have shut up by opposing lockdowns and opposing vaccine mandates?
00:57:17.820 And talking about the last week theory?
00:57:19.580 That's the entire argument that you're making.
00:57:21.720 Let the experts handle this.
00:57:23.780 And of course he is, right?
00:57:25.240 That's, again, it's a three-hour podcast.
00:57:28.540 I've already spent an hour breaking down just this clip, so I can't go through everything.
00:57:32.700 If you'd like to get the context.
00:57:34.220 Again, I think Douglas Murray sounded much better when he was actually discussing the war that
00:57:38.680 he supports rather than when he was arguing over who's qualified to opine on it.
00:57:43.960 Like if Douglas had just stuck to the facts that he was discussing, again, I'm not highly
00:57:48.840 qualified.
00:57:49.340 Yeah, I'm not going to pretend to be on those.
00:57:52.860 However, I think he sounded much more convincing when he actually discussed the topic he wanted
00:57:58.280 to discuss rather than spending all his time trying to shut up people who he wanted to
00:58:03.260 discredit.
00:58:03.820 So if you want to listen to the rest of that, you might hear some arguments from Douglas that
00:58:08.040 you find compelling or maybe not.
00:58:09.920 The point is you'd actually have to listen to the words Douglas said, which is something
00:58:14.820 that Douglas did not do for Daryl Cooper.
00:58:18.460 And obviously does not do for people like Dave Smith.
00:58:21.920 That is a courtesy.
00:58:22.700 He would not afford any of his interlocutors, right?
00:58:25.780 Because ultimately what Douglas is here to do is defend his position as an arbiter for
00:58:30.720 truth.
00:58:31.240 And his main problem is that other people are saying the wrong things and that he doesn't
00:58:36.340 know how to address the epistemological crisis that liberalism has found itself in.
00:58:42.040 The experts fail.
00:58:43.320 His entire system was built on the idea that experts are holy and they are the ones that
00:58:47.480 deliver truth.
00:58:48.820 They are the ones that have massage narratives, the very narratives that Douglas Murray relies
00:58:53.000 on for his position.
00:58:54.500 If they come apart, Douglas is worried that he will lose his position in the pecking order.
00:59:00.080 That's it.
00:59:01.180 That's it.
00:59:01.980 I mean, he has other concerns.
00:59:03.920 Obviously, he's very passionate.
00:59:05.640 Again, amazingly passionate about the Israel-Palestine war in a way that he criticizes other people
00:59:12.300 for being passionate.
00:59:13.940 So obviously he has other motivations beyond just his position in the expert class.
00:59:18.200 But I think that's a huge part of it, which is why him and Sam Harris, Harris, while talking
00:59:22.240 about very different things, be it Joe Biden's lies and the censorship that went along with
00:59:27.400 that by the social media and the security apparatus in the United States, as opposed to Douglas
00:59:33.520 here discussing whether or not people can talk about history or the situation in Gaza.
00:59:38.100 Either way, they are both focused on the same thing.
00:59:40.540 The expert class dictates the truth.
00:59:42.980 Anybody who threatens the expert class is the enemy.
00:59:46.340 Even if I have problems and I know that ultimately the expert class has wounded itself in a way that is
00:59:52.240 fatal, I am going to cling on to the sinking ship.
00:59:55.280 I am going to go down with the sinking ship because my narrative, my power, my position, my identity
01:00:01.680 are wrapped up in that.
01:00:03.480 And so that is what I am going to defend to the death. 0.98
01:00:06.960 And so I'm going to tell people to shut up.
01:00:09.580 The funny thing is there's another clip going around online of Douglas making an argument
01:00:13.280 exactly against this type of argument.
01:00:16.280 Douglas has repeatedly said that the idea of lived experience or credentials and the need
01:00:21.720 to shut people up if they have not had those experience or hold those credentials, that is 1.00
01:00:25.240 wrong and that is stupid. 1.00
01:00:26.700 Douglas has said that at length. 1.00
01:00:29.740 And yet here he has exactly the opposite position.
01:00:32.880 Why?
01:00:33.600 Well, because previously it was being used to push him out and now he wants to use that
01:00:38.140 argument to push other people out.
01:00:40.140 It's unprincipled.
01:00:42.320 When Douglas is weak, he wants to use your principles against you.
01:00:46.100 And when Douglas is strong, he no longer cares about those principles.
01:00:50.040 They were only being used against you when you were strong.
01:00:55.280 Now that he's in the position of power, he does not care.
01:00:58.040 He doesn't care about free speech.
01:01:00.540 He doesn't care about the ability to question things.
01:01:02.820 He doesn't care.
01:01:04.080 He wants more experts to shut you up.
01:01:06.740 That's it.
01:01:07.500 Because the expert class has to stay in power.
01:01:10.280 That is the most important thing.
01:01:12.840 All right, guys, we've got quite a bit of questions or comments from the audience here.
01:01:17.880 So let's move over there real quick.
01:01:24.500 Oh, move this here. 0.84
01:01:28.040 Uh, Aramaic Discourse says, for my fellow Zoroastrian Catholic cultists. 0.99
01:01:33.200 Yes, thank you very much.
01:01:34.760 I guess James is definitely going to fall into the category of people who probably agree
01:01:40.160 very much with Sam Harris and Douglas Murray here.
01:01:43.600 Uh, Perspicacious Heretic says, you're an expert as long as I agree with you. 1.00
01:01:46.760 Yeah, that literally seems to be the standard.
01:01:49.420 Like, shamelessly, that really does seem to be the standard here.
01:01:52.980 It's sadly that simple.
01:01:56.620 Uh, No Guard says, I especially loved Murray's reaction to Dave citing specific actions by
01:02:02.540 particular influential neocons.
01:02:05.080 Again, you can go back and listen to the whole thing if you would like to get a better grasp
01:02:09.440 of the full debate.
01:02:11.300 Uh, I think Murray sounded better when he was actually discussing the topic.
01:02:15.860 But again, multiple times he does get caught, you know, by, by points like this that Dave
01:02:21.080 Smith makes that he doesn't seem to have very much of a response for.
01:02:25.220 Torin McCabe says, let's grow up less comedians just asking questions, more experts and institutions
01:02:33.100 with specific policies that help our peoples.
01:02:35.880 Yes, again, that would be great.
01:02:37.380 The only problem is that our institutions are currently not oriented to help our peoples.
01:02:41.760 That's it.
01:02:42.420 That's the real problem.
01:02:44.360 In a, in a good society, in a correct society, Dave, uh, rather Douglas Murray would be correct
01:02:50.180 and Torin here would be correct.
01:02:51.760 In a, in a healthy society, both of these guys would be correct to defend the institutions
01:02:56.760 because the institutions would be working on behalf of the people would be perpetuating
01:03:01.420 the beliefs and, uh, values of the people.
01:03:04.120 They'd be inculcating the culture of the people, but that is just not the case.
01:03:08.820 Our experts don't care about the people.
01:03:11.500 In fact, they specifically destroy the credibility of their institutions in an attempt to control
01:03:17.160 narratives that they have lost control of.
01:03:19.480 And that's what you just can't abide.
01:03:21.760 I understand that this is a very, uh, dangerous place to be.
01:03:25.260 I've actually written a piece on the dangers of having your consensus making apparatus break
01:03:29.480 down for the right. 0.51
01:03:30.860 Uh, if people want to revisit that, I think it's a good time to do so.
01:03:34.120 But ultimately we have to recognize that something has to change here and it's not going to change
01:03:38.220 unless people are deconstructing some of the false narratives that put forward by, by experts
01:03:44.640 that obviously are not working on our behalf.
01:03:49.300 Oren McIntyre can't say my name, so I changed it.
01:03:51.860 Thank you.
01:03:52.360 Uh, loved your vid on Liberty, uh, Valance.
01:03:54.900 Would love more occasional breakdowns of media like that one for fun.
01:03:58.440 Based media or not.
01:03:59.840 God blessed.
01:04:00.460 Christ is king.
01:04:01.580 Well, thank you very much.
01:04:02.440 I appreciate that.
01:04:03.140 Christ is indeed king.
01:04:04.400 And, uh, I do try to break in those from time to time.
01:04:06.820 I've done those with, uh, the Prudentialist when it comes to some video games.
01:04:10.380 Uh, same thing.
01:04:11.440 I, I believe, uh, Dave, uh, Green and, uh, Morgoth have joined me for some movie reviews,
01:04:17.820 uh, last things and such.
01:04:18.980 So I don't do it as often as I probably should.
01:04:21.640 Maybe I'll pepper more of those in, but I'm glad that you enjoyed it.
01:04:25.880 Uh, let's see here.
01:04:27.200 CB says, is we getting a Manhattan Institute for Americans?
01:04:33.520 Uh, perspicacious heretic says, what does being a scholar actually mean?
01:04:37.420 Do you literally have to be inside a fancy brick building for it to count as, uh, being
01:04:42.440 well-read again for a lot of people, sadly, that is the case.
01:04:45.680 Uh, and, you know, in general, that's a reasonable heuristic throughout most of, uh, American
01:04:50.500 history.
01:04:51.000 However, uh, there have been very many, uh, very important scholars who have worked outside
01:04:56.520 of the, of academia.
01:04:59.040 Um, you have a number of guys who never held university positions and still said very profound
01:05:04.360 and important things.
01:05:05.180 I mean, uh, Oswald Spangler comes to mind.
01:05:07.620 The guy was a history teacher in high school, I believe, uh, his whole life.
01:05:11.680 He never entered into the university, uh, and yet very influential and very influential.
01:05:15.340 I think, uh, so yeah, uh, obviously, you know, uh, it would be nice if we could trust our
01:05:20.460 institutions and it would be nice if the majority of people coming out of those institutions
01:05:24.440 were actually scholarly.
01:05:26.120 And that was where the important work was getting done.
01:05:28.220 But as I've said, when I've discussed this with people who are in academia, they say,
01:05:32.180 yeah, in most cases, that's just not actually what's going on.
01:05:38.340 Uh, man, William says the British mind cannot comprehend having free speech without a license,
01:05:42.580 uh, or a professional background.
01:05:44.260 Sam Hyde is right.
01:05:45.300 They are cooked.
01:05:46.020 Uh, unfortunately, I think that might be the case.
01:05:49.180 And, and I say that, you know, with a lot of trepidation because I have a lot of friends
01:05:53.380 in England and, uh, you know, it's a beautiful country.
01:05:56.420 Uh, obviously it's something we have deep historical ties to and a tradition I'd like to see continued
01:06:01.480 on, but, uh, things are not looking great there.
01:06:03.580 Uh, and while I think guys like, uh, like the Lotus Eaters and others are, are, are battling
01:06:08.660 valiantly, uh, on that front, uh, I, I gotta say, uh, it, it doesn't look great.
01:06:15.880 Uh, Lurch 685 says Douglas likes Israel only for two reasons. 0.96
01:06:20.220 He absolutely hates Muslims, all of them and sees, uh, anyone who kills a lot of them as 0.99
01:06:25.080 inherently good too. 1.00
01:06:26.340 He can participate in all kinds of degeneracy.
01:06:28.880 You know, I gotta say this, um, uh, the one mistake that I think a lot of people make
01:06:34.100 is, uh, and I've seen this repeatedly, unfortunately, is that they will have a disagreement with Israel
01:06:40.040 or Israeli influence in the United States or our, you know, us being involved with them
01:06:45.320 foreign policy wise, uh, aid wise, that kind of thing.
01:06:48.340 And then they will say, well, enemy of my enemy is my friend.
01:06:51.100 So maybe the Muslims are, you know, on our side. 0.92
01:06:54.220 And I want to remind you guys that Islam is a historic enemy of Christianity. 1.00
01:06:58.240 Um, uh, Islam has slaughtered countless Christians, enslaved, countless Christians, uh, driven, 1.00
01:07:06.040 uh, countless Christians out of their homelands. 0.99
01:07:08.520 Uh, Islam is not good. 1.00
01:07:10.580 Islam is a false religion. 1.00
01:07:12.260 It is a violent religion, uh, that seeks to murder, not just Jews, but Christians as well. 1.00
01:07:17.800 Uh, now this doesn't mean that we should go out there and try to kill as many Muslims as 1.00
01:07:21.540 possible all the time. 0.92
01:07:22.760 Obviously you need to be involved in a just war, uh, you know, uh, when that's the case. 0.57
01:07:27.360 However, uh, treating, uh, just because you may disagree with what Israel is doing, or
01:07:32.820 you disagree, uh, with many of its, um, loudest and most obnoxious, uh, uh, you know, uh, proponents
01:07:40.520 does not mean that Islam is your friend.
01:07:42.860 Okay.
01:07:43.320 That does not mean, uh, that you, you should suddenly say, well, uh, if, if I disagree with
01:07:48.960 some policy policy with Israel, then everything the Palestinians do is justified or Islam is 0.98
01:07:53.680 ultimately not that bad.
01:07:54.620 Like, no, it's bad.
01:07:55.640 And you don't really want it in your country either. 0.90
01:07:57.820 Uh, the one thing that Douglas Murray's right about is that there shouldn't be Muslims in 1.00
01:08:01.120 the UK.
01:08:02.240 If he's not, if he's wrong about anything, everything else, he'd be right about that.
01:08:08.280 Uh, life of Brian says, I'd like to thank Douglas Murray for taking a neo, uh, a neocon 0.99
01:08:13.240 out of commission and be clowning the British aristocracy, uh, even super, uh, even super 0.56
01:08:19.440 Zionist ran away. 1.00
01:08:20.840 Um, you know, I've seen a lot of people defend his performance on here, but I got to say,
01:08:25.980 you have to be a pretty big partisan, I think, to look at what Douglas Murray said and think
01:08:31.300 that's okay.
01:08:32.100 Again, when it comes to that war itself, I can see how Douglas probably came off.
01:08:37.260 Okay.
01:08:37.560 For people who are like pro Israel.
01:08:40.480 Like, I think he sounded more competent and more convincing when he was actually discussing
01:08:45.220 the topic.
01:08:46.100 Unfortunately, he spent a very large amount of time not doing that.
01:08:49.520 And he discredited him himself in an attempt to discredit others so that most people probably
01:08:54.480 didn't even hear his arguments about Israel or their position in the war because they were
01:08:59.420 too busy looking at him and being like, wow, this guy sounds really entitled and, uh, really
01:09:05.360 ugly and is willing to dismiss the opinion of basically everyone.
01:09:09.320 Uh, you know, again, I'll let people make their own decisions on who won the debate itself.
01:09:15.240 I didn't even play really anything from the actual debate on the issue because his kind
01:09:22.200 of whole preamble was so off-putting that I don't think most people actually even probably
01:09:26.880 continued in that podcast.
01:09:28.420 I did.
01:09:28.760 I listened to the whole thing.
01:09:29.860 Uh, but I would say ultimately, uh, you know, you might be right that he discredited his
01:09:34.720 position, not because of his actual arguments that because his position was factually inaccurate,
01:09:39.960 but because he was so condescending and so entitled and so dismissive of basically everyone
01:09:47.120 else that it's hard to look at someone making an argument in that style and then actually
01:09:51.800 listen to the substance.
01:09:54.780 Uh, well, Logan says heartening to see gatekeeping so desperate.
01:09:59.400 Yeah, I'll, I'll say that it does look pretty desperate, which is another thing that another
01:10:04.200 dynamic that did not come off well here for Douglas.
01:10:06.800 Uh, it definitely, it looks like a move of desperation.
01:10:09.240 Uh, in fact, it's the entire, it's the exact move that guys in the IDW would have expressed,
01:10:15.960 uh, you know, their concern over.
01:10:18.460 They would have said, this looks pretty desperate from the woke left when they were making their
01:10:22.380 cases.
01:10:22.780 Uh, so, uh, yeah, I mean, just not, not a great look, uh, not, not the best ambassador
01:10:28.440 for his position, even if ultimately maybe he made some, some decent arguments throughout
01:10:33.120 most people listening probably wouldn't even know because he was so off-putting in his
01:10:37.360 delivery and his approach there.
01:10:40.220 All right, guys, it looks like that is all of the questions of the people.
01:10:43.600 I want to thank everybody for stopping by.
01:10:45.480 It's been a pleasure talking with you.
01:10:47.600 If you'd like to get these broadcasts as podcasts, you need to subscribe to the Oren McIntyre
01:10:52.040 show on your favorite podcast platform.
01:10:54.160 And if you haven't subscribed on this platform on YouTube, you need to click the subscribe
01:10:58.520 button, the bell notification, all that jazz.
01:11:00.940 So you actually know when these streams go live.
01:11:03.960 If you'd like to support the show, don't forget that you can head over to shopblazemedia.com.
01:11:08.500 We've got plenty of merch under the Oren McIntyre collection there.
01:11:11.620 You can pick up something and let people know that you enjoy the show.
01:11:14.820 Thank you everybody for watching.
01:11:15.900 And as always, I will talk to you next time.
01:11:22.040 We'll be right back.
01:11:24.060 We'll be right back.
01:11:31.620 Bye.
01:11:32.440 Bye.
01:11:33.880 Bye.
01:11:34.240 Bye.
01:11:35.320 Bye.
01:11:36.140 Bye.
01:11:36.240 Bye.
01:11:36.580 Bye.
01:11:38.780 Bye.
01:11:38.900 Bye.
01:11:39.380 Bye.
01:11:40.040 Bye.
01:11:40.180 Bye.
01:11:40.620 Bye.
01:11:40.820 Bye.
01:11:42.340 Bye.
01:11:43.020 Bye.
01:11:43.620 Bye.
01:11:45.920 Bye.
01:11:46.640 Bye.
01:11:48.100 Bye.
01:11:49.280 Bye.
01:11:50.000 Bye.
01:11:50.280 Bye.
01:11:50.660 Bye.