Breaking Down Douglas Murray VS Dave Smith | 4⧸14⧸25
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 11 minutes
Words per minute
176.19878
Harmful content
Misogyny
9
sentences flagged
Toxicity
38
sentences flagged
Hate speech
30
sentences flagged
Summary
In this episode of the Joe Rogan Experience, comedian Dave Smith is joined by Douglas Murray to debate the Israel-Palestine conflict. They debate who's better at being an expert on the conflict, and who's not. And it's not hard to figure out who's the better expert.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
We hope you're enjoying your Air Canada flight.
00:00:10.720
Fast-free Wi-Fi means I can make dinner reservations before we land.
00:00:25.260
Wi-Fi available to Airplane members on Equipped Flight.
00:00:36.340
So over the last week, the internet has kind of exploded
00:00:40.680
when it comes to an episode of the Joe Rogan experience.
00:00:45.240
Rogan is known for bringing on a wide swath of different people.
00:00:49.980
And of course, one person he's had on on a regular basis is Dave Smith,
00:00:54.220
a comedian whose show I have been on and has been on this show,
00:01:00.680
He was discussing with another, with an interlocutor, Douglas Murray,
00:01:07.440
who is someone who is very pro the Israel side of the Israel-Palestine war.
00:01:14.720
Dave Smith is famously very against Israel's action in Gaza.
00:01:19.060
And Douglas Murray is someone who has just written a book about this.
00:01:23.720
In fact, I think even President Trump recently tweeted out about Douglas Murray's book,
00:01:28.380
focused very much on the role that Israel is playing
00:01:32.540
and what he sees as a struggle of the Western world with Islam.
00:01:36.480
Ultimately, what is interesting about this debate, I think,
00:01:39.860
is not so much the differences between the two positions when it comes to Israel or Palestine.
00:01:46.200
As always, I am rather uninterested in foreign wars.
00:01:50.180
I would like to be uninvolved in them whenever possible.
00:01:53.760
The only thing that I usually care about is if the money or resources or troops from my country
00:02:00.300
are being funneled into the conflict in a different country,
00:02:03.600
which is something that does happen, for instance, when it comes to the Ukraine war,
00:02:11.440
But ultimately, what I really am interested about is that these two really came to heads
00:02:18.840
Something Douglas Murray emphasized over and over again was how Dave Smith was just unqualified
00:02:24.920
and other people that he brought up regularly were very unqualified to opine on the war,
00:02:31.460
which is particularly interesting, given Murray's background,
00:02:34.620
which has very little to do with fighting wars or foreign policy or anything like that.
00:02:40.000
And so that's kind of what I wanted to look at today.
00:02:43.900
It's a three-hour podcast, as Joe Redgan often runs.
00:02:48.120
And there are some interesting exchanges throughout.
00:02:50.900
But I singled out a clip here that I think will really help us to understand the tenor of this conversation.
00:02:56.820
But before we get to that, guys, let's hear from today's sponsor.
00:03:01.100
This episode of The Oren McIntyre Show is proudly sponsored by Consumers Research.
00:03:06.480
You've heard about Larry Fink and BlackRock and ESG and all the ways that they're ruining your life,
00:03:12.400
making grocery stores more expensive, making video games more woke.
00:03:16.980
Well, Consumers Research has spent the last five years making Larry's life hell,
00:03:23.440
Their work and its consequences have been profiled in The Washington Post,
00:03:27.700
The New York Times, and most recently, Fox Business reporter Charlie Gasparono wrote a whole chapter in his book,
00:03:34.940
Go Woke, Go Broke, on how effective they've been at dismantling BlackRock's ESG patronage scheme.
00:03:41.760
He's making Larry Fink lose that last bit of hair on his balding head,
00:03:45.540
and you should follow Will's work on X so you can laugh along with him.
00:03:49.580
His handle is at W-I-L-L-H-I-L-D, so give him a follow.
00:04:03.080
All right, so like I said, this is just a clip from the overall show.
00:04:08.480
You should go back and watch the whole thing if you would like to get a better idea about the context
00:04:12.820
of everything surrounding this, though this clip is very early on in the debate,
00:04:16.960
and I felt it really set the tone of the debate.
00:04:20.160
Again, the intricacies of the Israel-Palestine conflict are neither my specialty nor my interest.
00:04:30.200
Ultimately, I think that, you know, I don't like terrorism,
00:04:35.280
but ultimately people have to be measured in their response.
00:04:39.300
Obviously, that is the huge blow-up between these two sides, ultimately, I think,
00:04:45.060
that most people are focusing on, but that is not my focus.
00:04:49.020
What I thought was interesting, again, was this back and forth between
00:04:52.100
Murray and Smith over what qualifies as an expert
00:04:56.160
and why we should rely on certain sources and not others,
00:05:02.400
And so I want to play that clip and just kind of break it down as we go.
00:05:06.440
So let me bring this up real quick, and we'll hear what they have to say,
00:05:10.560
and I'll just stop as we get to important parts.
00:05:13.480
I think that one of the bigger, kind of the bigger picture dynamics to all of this
00:05:18.680
is that we have, at least since 9-11, been in a state of perpetual war,
00:05:30.240
They have been so many lies involved in selling all of them.
00:05:33.900
I mean, the whole Iraq war, the whole war in Afghanistan,
00:05:39.920
I mean, I remember literally having conversations with Green Berets
0.97
00:05:42.900
in the middle of the war in Afghanistan, and they're like,
00:05:45.700
George W. Bush is telling you that the army we're building up there
00:05:50.080
This thing's going to fall in a week without us.
00:05:52.500
So Dave Smith has a pretty standard libertarian opposition to war.
00:06:00.300
I think that, and I'll say this, I give the libertarians a lot of guff, obviously.
00:06:10.240
However, obviously, in this scenario, the libertarians have been more right than wrong.
00:06:16.360
Their understanding that the perpetual need to stay at war
00:06:21.600
is a big part of the American government's ability to rake in money
00:06:25.640
and to kind of project power overseas and make demands on its citizens
00:06:36.480
And so this is something that many people, like Tucker Carlson and others,
00:06:40.920
who were big boosters of the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, got wrong.
00:06:48.120
To be fair, I also was pro the war at the time, but I think I was like 18 or 19.
00:06:55.340
I didn't really have a firm grasp on the political dynamics involved.
00:07:03.000
It's not like I was out there leading anyone into war.
00:07:06.360
But ultimately, this is something that I misunderstood when I was young as well.
00:07:10.300
And so, you know, Dave Smith puts forward a position that I think has
00:07:14.540
stood the test of time over the last few decades.
00:07:17.640
Now, the thing I will say is that Dave Smith is probably too reflexively anti-war for me.
00:07:24.680
I am not anti-war in principle in a way that I think guys like Scott Horton
00:07:29.980
or Dave Smith would probably describe themselves.
00:07:38.840
And when nations reach an impasse in their ability to interact with each other and they
00:07:45.440
both demand something that the other will not yield, eventually war does occur.
00:07:53.620
There can be wars fought for the right reasons.
00:07:55.780
Every war is its own tragedy in that many things that should not happen happen and things
00:08:02.160
get out of hand very quickly, which is why so many people correctly see war as something
00:08:07.280
that should be your last, you know, the last thing that you move towards, right?
00:08:12.820
But ultimately, we recognize that war is a part of human life.
00:08:21.760
There are wars that are ultimately ones that you should involve yourself in.
00:08:26.700
But it's very clear that the United States has not necessarily been involved in those actions.
00:08:33.460
Again, not that there wasn't a correct response to the terrorist attacks of 9-11, not that there
00:08:39.360
weren't certain groups that needed to be targeted.
00:08:41.680
But obviously, we didn't need to involve ourselves in two multi-decade regime change wars over this
00:08:50.100
And the ways that the wars were prosecuted is its own issue.
00:08:59.480
We didn't take the steps necessary to secure victory in many cases because they would have
00:09:06.740
And so there is a scenario in which being too hesitant to enter into a war, being half into
00:09:18.600
You either need to be willing to do what it takes to succeed and bring victory as soon as
00:09:23.780
possible, because ultimately, that is actually what is best for everyone, or to not involve
00:09:36.080
And that is ultimately kind of what we did in both of their scenarios.
00:09:39.660
So I'll say at the beginning that while Smith obviously is correct about the wars in Iraq
0.98
00:09:45.960
and Afghanistan and kind of the plans that we had there, and again, I want to make it
00:09:51.140
clear that this is not about the people fighting those wars.
00:09:53.900
They have little to no say when it comes to the way in which the war is actually being
00:10:00.040
executed, the way in which strategy is being deployed, what political objectives are on
00:10:05.660
the table, what's being presented by the government itself.
00:10:08.680
I think I have the highest respect for military members.
00:10:11.820
I grew up on military bases, large amounts of my family and friends are service members
00:10:17.200
And so this is not to say anything about the job that they did, but simply the facts are
00:10:22.620
that our leaders in the United States have not been telling the truth when it comes to
00:10:28.100
war and have not had good plans, good outcomes for many decades.
00:10:32.340
The United States is ostensibly the greatest military power that has ever graced the surface
00:10:39.900
And yet we find it impossible to win wars against goat herders in the mountains, not because
1.00
00:10:45.540
our troops aren't good enough to do it, not because we don't have the technology or the
00:10:52.540
It's literally that we're not interested in winning wars.
00:10:56.060
We deploy tactics that are not going to finish the job.
00:10:59.040
We get ourselves into political turmoil that makes it impossible for us to do the job.
00:11:03.720
We are setting ourselves up for failure and then finding ourselves in the middle of a
00:11:08.200
So Smith, while I, like I said, is reflexively probably too anti-war for me, his argument
00:11:14.400
here does have legs given our current situation.
00:11:17.580
And all through the Obama administration, it's just like lie after lie after lie with disastrous
00:11:22.340
And so this does create a fertile ground for people to say, I wonder if they were lying about
00:11:28.100
Again, I'm not really trying to argue with you about World War II.
00:11:32.120
I think the interesting question is whether you're busy watering it.
00:11:35.560
Well, should you not talk about mistakes that were made overall?
00:11:45.380
It's a very weird thing to go back, zone in on a man, say this one thing is a mistake and
00:11:52.060
should characterize him, and you ignore everything else.
00:11:56.800
So to give a little bit of context here, they started the whole podcast by talking about
00:12:02.700
Daryl Cooper, who runs the Martyr Maid podcast.
00:12:05.640
Again, he has been on this podcast several times.
00:12:13.080
Like, he was very, very angry at Daryl about the way that he had presented facts, specifically
00:12:18.440
Well, and so, you know, what Dave Smith is laying out here is, look, if you are lying
00:12:25.520
about wars on a regular basis, if people see that they are being led into war on the basis
00:12:31.700
of a lie, and not just once, but multiple times in their lifetime, they're going to
00:12:36.040
go back and they're naturally going to start asking questions like, well, if my government
00:12:39.760
is willing to lie about this war, why wouldn't they lie about previous wars?
00:12:44.040
And the first lesson we should have here, the most important lesson you should take away
00:12:48.200
from this, is not the danger of asking about whether or not you were lied to about previous
00:12:54.340
The most dangerous thing is lying about the war itself.
00:13:05.460
This is the long, extended version of the Norm MacDonald conversation.
00:13:10.820
I think it's where he and Jerry Seinfeld are like sitting and they're talking about
00:13:18.080
And like, you know, people are like, oh, the worst part is the outrage or reaction.
00:13:21.140
And Norm MacDonald turns to him and is like, you know what?
00:13:27.280
And I feel like that's exactly what we're getting in this conversation is Douglas Murray's
00:13:31.000
like, you know, the worst thing you could do is go back and look at history and say,
00:13:35.540
what if I was lied to about about these events in history?
00:13:38.780
And like, no, the worst part is actually your government lying about the whole thing.
00:13:46.300
The fault lies not with the people asking the question.
00:13:49.260
The problem is with the people who shredded the credibility of the institution.
00:13:54.300
And this is going to be the crux of the debate here.
00:13:57.860
Douglas Murray would like the entire institutional apparatus to stay in place no matter how many
00:14:09.460
But when it comes to consequences for the lie, he has a problem with that.
00:14:15.080
He doesn't want the institutions to suffer any consequences for their lies.
00:14:20.480
But ultimately, his real problem is with people who would then say, well, if the institution
00:14:25.440
is lying and the institution is failing, maybe we need to question it.
00:14:31.620
And he gets very angry at the people who question the institution in a way he did not get angry
00:14:39.920
Now, I'm sure somewhere Douglas Murray has said, I don't like, you know, he says here in
00:14:43.420
the podcast, I don't like it when people lie about the war.
00:14:50.580
Actually, he seems to care way more about Daryl Cooper doing a podcast than he does about
00:14:57.000
literally having the governments that he is pledging allegiance to lie to him and get
00:15:05.360
people killed, like he seems way less offended by innocent people dying, by brave soldiers
00:15:12.820
dying because of a lie than he seems offended about people who would then say, well, if the
00:15:18.840
institution was wrong here, maybe it was wrong somewhere else.
00:15:26.700
I have not done the level of research that either Daryl Cooper or other historians have done
00:15:32.100
on this topic, the ones that disagree with Daryl quite vehemently.
00:15:35.780
So I'm not going to wade in on to whether Churchill is like, you know, I'll just say this.
00:15:41.500
I don't think Churchill is the big villain of World War Two.
00:15:44.200
That said, obviously, the man made some very serious mistakes and probably exacerbated a
00:15:53.440
However, that said, Hitler's probably a much worse person, right?
0.91
00:15:59.240
But Douglas Murray is more offended by him, by Daryl Cooper looking back and saying, you
00:16:07.220
know, I don't think that this is the best read on history to just make Hitler this one
00:16:13.440
Like, I think we should probably better understand the motivations of the Germans and the Third
0.71
00:16:18.220
Reich and everything before we just jump off a cliff every time we go into a war saying,
00:16:24.740
Because Daryl's point, which he's made repeatedly, and this one is correct and is just irrefutable.
00:16:29.920
Every single war we get into, it's all about Hitler.
0.99
00:16:43.720
And so the belief that we have about World War Two impacts our current willingness to
00:16:49.400
Now, that doesn't mean that everything Daryl said about World War Two is correct.
00:16:53.040
Again, I don't even agree with the comment that he got in trouble with, you know, when it
00:16:57.200
comes to Tucker Carlson, the one that blew up everything.
00:16:59.920
But of course, people are going to question this if you keep lying to them.
00:17:08.140
The problem is with the people who degraded the institution.
00:17:11.620
If they had not done this, if they had not repeatedly shown themselves to be liars, then
00:17:18.260
you would not be running into the problem you are running into now.
00:17:22.700
I don't think every vaccine is fake or going to give you autism or something like that.
00:17:31.000
But when you show me during COVID a vaccine that clearly does not work and clearly hurts
00:17:38.200
people and the head of the CDC looks me in the eye and says, this is safe and this will
00:17:44.780
protect you and this will keep you from getting this disease.
00:17:47.160
I know I've been lied to and that's going to make me question other vaccines.
00:17:53.800
Now, I might find that most of the vaccines are fine.
00:17:59.680
However, it's going to make me ask questions I never asked before.
00:18:03.240
And it's your job as the head of the CDC to not lie to me so I don't go around questioning
00:18:10.560
And it's your job as a regime that is asking people to go to war to not lie to them.
00:18:16.500
Because if you do, they're going to start questioning all the other things you've said.
00:18:24.360
I think it's the experience most of us have had over the last few years.
00:18:28.000
And yet, Douglas Murray starts just getting very angry at people like Daryl Coopler and
00:18:35.040
When you're talking about Daryl, who's done, what was it, 30 plus hours?
00:18:43.260
I'm so this is where, you know, for sure that Douglas Murray has no clue what he is talking
00:18:52.700
about, has absolutely zero clue what he is talking about, which is going to be great because
00:18:58.400
he is going to get very angry about people not knowing what they're talking about.
00:19:02.400
But it is very clear that Douglas Murray has no idea what he is talking about.
00:19:12.980
Fear and Loathing in New Jerusalem, I believe, is the name of the podcast, right?
00:19:20.200
And you turn around and you hear Douglas Murray say, oh, no, anyone can do 30 hours of podcasts.
00:19:28.180
Now, yes, the Joe Rogan show, I mean, he does three hours every day.
00:19:35.720
It only takes him a couple of weeks to do the amount of raw volume of hours that Daryl
00:19:41.540
However, the level of research involved putting on that is very, very different, right?
00:19:48.420
30 hours of a masterfully produced film that you have released as a director into cinema
00:19:55.980
over your entire career is very different than 30 hours of reality television.
00:20:01.140
Yes, they are both 30 hours, technically, of content, video content.
00:20:07.900
But if you take 30 hours of Martin Scorsese and you stack it up against 30 hours of, I
00:20:13.120
don't even know, The Bachelor or something, whatever a contemporary reality show is, if you stack
00:20:18.540
them up, they are obviously very different things.
00:20:20.900
Daryl Cooper puts a lot of work and reading and production into those podcasts.
00:20:27.780
Again, you can say he's wrong, but flippantly saying, oh, well, whatever, you just do that
00:20:33.520
and you clearly have no clue what you're talking about.
00:20:36.580
And that is, again, my big problem with Murray.
00:20:39.220
A lot of people are going to focus on the Israel-Palestine thing.
00:20:45.900
I wish I never had to hear about this stupid war again.
0.99
00:20:49.120
However, this concerns me because I've heard arguments like Douglas is putting forward over
1.00
00:20:54.860
and over again from guys in this like IDW sphere.
00:20:58.640
This is Douglas Murray's Sam Harris moment where he reveals that the most important thing
00:21:08.500
It has nothing to do with reforming the system.
00:21:13.500
Douglas has issues with what the system is doing, but at his core, he is a defender of
00:21:19.940
And so he is not even going to bother to listen to the guy he is correcting while he's going
00:21:26.500
to complain about everyone else having not done their research, not being an expert, not
00:21:32.580
Yeah, it's a very, it's a very different, it's a very different.
00:21:34.680
He's not doing a podcast like talking to people.
00:21:41.380
I mean, this is, he is not the historian of our era.
00:21:47.260
So again, he gets very angry that Tucker Carlson called martyr maid, Daryl Cooper, a historian.
00:21:59.080
Now, I think it's pretty interesting as to when and when, when you are not a historian,
00:22:07.780
Is it someone who has entered into the profession of studying history?
00:22:15.820
Do you need the doctorate in, uh, to become a historian?
00:22:19.200
I know many people who hold a doctorate in history.
00:22:24.400
I mean, Tom Woods is somebody who I'm pretty sure holds a doctorate in history.
00:22:28.640
He is not officially a historian in the sense that he has never worked academically in the
00:22:34.680
However, I am very sure that Tom Woods knows more history than most people who have the
00:22:40.680
title of historian, or at least in his chosen area of expertise.
00:22:45.340
That said, you don't need to have the title in order to have some idea of what history is,
00:22:52.880
but that's going to be Douglas's contention here.
00:22:57.000
No, but you, you don't, you don't consume, but you don't consume his work.
00:23:00.560
What I'm saying, because I don't need to consume endless versions of a revisionist history.
00:23:07.820
So again, Douglas directly here admits he does not know what he's talking about.
00:23:13.440
No, I have not heard anything that, you know, that this podcaster has put out.
00:23:19.400
Yes, ultimately, I don't really know anything about this guy.
00:23:25.100
I don't, I've never listened to Daryl Cooper other than watching some snippets on Twitter.
00:23:33.240
I know exactly the arguments he's putting forward.
00:23:38.680
I don't need to know anything about this guy in order to condemn him.
00:23:42.560
I don't need to know anything about this guy to call his credibility into question.
00:23:47.060
I don't need to see anything, listen to anything, consume any of his content, pay any attention.
00:23:52.580
I don't need to know the first thing about this guy to make all the judgments in the world about his character, about his credibility, about his sources, everything involved.
00:24:03.980
Because Douglas Murray is a professional historian.
00:24:12.520
Douglas Murray has never worked as an academic historian.
00:24:15.320
Douglas Murray does not hold a university position in a history department.
00:24:21.640
Douglas Murray has exactly the same level of professional qualification to opine on World War II history as Daryl Cooper does.
00:24:31.680
He has exactly the same level of academic credibility, which is to say zero.
00:24:38.800
Douglas Murray does not hold any of the credentials he is demanding from other people.
00:24:45.320
And yet he is very sure that without listening to them at all, even one time,
00:24:50.640
that he knows everything that they are going to say and that they are wrong.
00:25:00.840
If you listen to his work, it's not revisionist history.
00:25:06.020
Yeah, I know, but, okay, so this is my point about jelly.
00:25:19.680
You say he doesn't claim to be a historian, but he's pumping out tens of hours of history.
00:25:25.140
When I found out my friend got a great deal on a designer dress from Winners,
00:25:29.720
I started wondering, is every fabulous item I see from Winners?
00:25:34.500
Like that woman over there with the Italian leather handbag.
1.00
00:25:56.140
So, I am somebody who has a bachelor's degree from a party school in Florida.
00:26:03.340
I taught high school, and I worked for several years as a reporter.
00:26:11.100
I am in no way academically qualified to discuss political theory.
00:26:19.000
If you're looking at the raw credentials that I have,
00:26:25.980
However, from what I have heard from people who are in academia,
00:26:31.280
from the chair of a philosophy department, no less,
00:26:44.180
hey, I think all the really interesting work in political theory
00:26:47.480
is being done with guys online like Nick Land and Curtis Yarvin.
00:26:53.260
So, who knows more about what should be going on here, right?
00:27:00.660
Now, this isn't to say that everybody who enters into popular entertainment
00:27:05.300
and shares an opinion has a high level of qualification
00:27:10.980
Probably, you know, if you don't want to treat me as an expert, that's fine.
00:27:14.920
But it's very strange for Douglas to pretend that nobody who does any work
00:27:21.580
in any academic area who does not have an official degree from a school
00:27:25.100
he feels is sufficiently qualified, they just don't count.
00:27:32.340
Because, again, Douglas Murray doesn't have that.
00:27:35.500
Douglas Murray, I believe, has a bachelor's degree in English.
00:27:47.040
because they keep doing the clown nose on, clown nose off thing, right?
00:27:51.060
They'll say, oh, I have a serious political opinion.
00:27:56.740
I got to say, I don't see a lot of that from Dave Smith.
00:28:00.940
and I do have a problem with that particular maneuver.
00:28:03.880
Because then you're just saying, well, I'm just this guy, right?
00:28:06.160
You're making assertions, and you're saying, I'm just this guy.
00:28:10.480
You don't need the credential, but you do need the backup.
00:28:13.360
You do need to actually show me your work, right?
00:28:20.000
You may disagree with the work, but I can show you the research.
00:28:27.520
I can give you the intellectual genealogy I'm arguing.
00:28:33.440
So I do have a problem with people who make an assertion
00:28:43.000
and then just run away and be like, oh, no, I'm a comedian or something.
00:28:48.180
But I'll be honest, again, I haven't really seen that from Dave Smith here.
00:28:57.440
But that is not a feature of debates that Dave Smith involves himself in,
00:29:07.980
It's like some weird jujitsu move where you say, hang on,
00:29:16.700
but I'm going to spend my time talking about history.
00:29:21.100
but I'm going to spend my time talking about this thing.
00:29:25.080
but I'm going to spend my time talking about this.
00:29:35.780
but I'm going to, I'm not going to, I'm going to talk a history.
00:29:39.120
but I'm going to talk about a topic as if I'm an expert.
00:29:42.360
but I'm going to talk about a variety of things.
00:29:45.240
Well, one of those things isn't like another, right?
00:29:52.440
apparently gives you carte blanche to talk about a lot of things you have
00:29:55.780
no clue about because what you have a journalism degree.
00:30:07.240
So there I have several years as a senior staff writer on a paper without having a journalism
00:30:19.020
But, but Douglas thinks that being a journalist allows you to just comment on anything as if
00:30:26.560
And it's very clear because Douglas is going to comment on politics.
00:30:32.000
He's going to come comment on social situations.
00:30:36.420
He's going to comment on a lot of things that he does not have a degree in that he in no
00:30:42.800
And yet he's going to assert his opinions as if they are factual and valid, despite him
00:30:50.200
lacking all of the qualifications he has listed here, except for that of journalist.
00:30:56.820
And that tells you a lot because the journalistic class.
00:31:02.000
In the United States, in the wider Western world, obviously Douglas is in the UK, but
00:31:08.820
The journalistic class in the wider Western world sees itself as the priestly cast.
00:31:13.880
They are the ones who are in charge of the truth.
00:31:17.140
They are the ones that decide what opinions are valid or invalid.
00:31:21.120
And you see this over and over again from the IDW crowd, whether it's Sam Harris or Barry
00:31:27.280
Weiss or Douglas Murray, their problem is not that the system has failed.
00:31:32.100
The problem is not that the system is malfunctioning.
00:31:34.620
The problem is not that society is collapsing around them.
00:31:37.280
The problem is that their position in the expert class is being challenged.
00:31:42.040
And that is what Douglas really cares about here.
00:31:44.340
Because if journalists don't have the final say, if journalists who are no more qualified
00:31:51.180
to opine on history or war have the final say, they get to decide what everyone believes
00:31:58.400
But if podcasters who are as qualified as Douglas Murray to comment on both war and history,
00:32:08.000
which is to say, not at all, if they can shape a public opinion in the same way a journalist
00:32:13.360
can shape a public opinion, well, then guys like Douglas Murray and people like Barry Weiss,
00:32:25.460
They're no longer to decide which narratives are sacred and which narratives are not.
00:32:29.700
And this is what Douglas is really worried about.
00:32:32.120
What he's really worried about is that his class of activists is losing their power.
00:32:42.980
He's not going to listen and try to discern whether or not someone like Daryl Cooper is
00:32:49.120
telling the truth and presenting something factual.
00:32:58.520
Telling the truth, telling people what the truth is.
0.99
00:33:11.420
Because he has the exact level of expertise in this area as both Dave Smith and Daryl Cooper,
00:33:23.320
He knows the authoritative truth because he's a journalist.
00:33:26.920
And journalists, they get this magical free pass where they can comment on anything all the
00:33:32.840
time with an air of expertise and yet don't need to have expertise in any of it because
00:33:40.940
Turns out, Douglas's position is just as full of jelly as Dave Smith or is just as made of
00:33:51.280
It morphs itself into any given situation just the same as Dave Smith.
00:34:11.460
Liberty, free markets, peace, prosperity, not getting in another stupid catastrophic war,
0.99
00:34:16.680
which we're on the precipice of right now.
0.95
00:34:19.400
So you notice here for Douglas Murray, the problem is not actually that you have no expertise.
00:34:26.500
In fact, it turns out anyone can opine on these topics.
00:34:31.000
That's in direct contradiction to what he just spent the last few minutes saying, but
00:34:37.960
But Douglas Murray says, no, no, of course you can comment on what you want to comment on.
00:35:06.500
I want to shut you up because you're saying the wrong thing.
00:35:16.680
You could be an expert and he would tell you you are wrong if you are saying things he
00:35:26.020
Well, I think you weren't you just talking about it the other day.
00:35:28.460
Everyone I hear on the inside says we're about to attack around.
00:35:32.080
I think you just said something about that the other day.
00:35:36.120
I thought I saw in one of your interviews that you did.
00:35:39.000
That doesn't mean we are on the verge of a war.
00:35:41.420
I mean, you keep referring to we being in wars.
00:35:43.780
There's a very big difference between a country having a military that's engaged and a country
00:35:53.760
I want you to take this moment and I want you to drink in the importance of this moment.
0.98
00:35:58.120
What Douglas Murray just said is the most entitled neoconservative garbage you can imagine.
0.98
00:36:06.520
The most entitled neoconservative BS that you have ever heard spun.
0.99
00:36:15.780
It's very different to say that a country is at war as opposed to its military is at war.
00:36:28.000
I have a friend who spent many, many years in the sandbox and he tells the story all the
00:36:33.900
time about how he was speaking with a superior officer at some point and he talked about
00:36:41.540
how we were at war as a country and that officer turned to him and said, you know what?
00:36:49.400
The rest of the country is at the mall and that's tough, but that's also true that in
00:36:56.620
the United States, unfortunately, because we have went from a large force that was
00:37:03.220
representative of the wider United States where most people had gone in or a larger number
00:37:10.320
of men had been a military service at one time or another.
00:37:13.320
Obviously, many cases due to the draft, people are going to have very different opinions on
00:37:17.580
But because we went from what was a conscription based force when we had large wars to a
00:37:25.360
entirely voluntary, very small military, what we ended up, I mean, not small globally, but
00:37:31.300
as a percentage of the population, what we ended up doing was creating effectively a warrior
00:37:36.640
And that warrior caste has fought most of our wars since World War II or well, since Vietnam,
00:37:46.180
And that caste is hereditary, which means that usually it is the sons and daughters is the
1.00
00:37:54.220
children of soldiers that end up entering back into the military.
00:37:57.260
Not exclusively, obviously, new people join the military all the time, but we see a very
00:38:01.060
high rate of recruitment among people whose parents have been in the military, meaning
00:38:05.680
that when we go to war, really, it's not a representative large percentage of our male population that
00:38:14.880
It is really just that smaller amount of professional warrior caste people that go to war on America's
0.65
00:38:22.760
Now, that might sound like an improvement, but it has some pretty big downsides.
00:38:27.480
One of the downsides is the average person doesn't recognize the cost of the war.
00:38:31.640
They no longer think of their country going to war.
00:38:35.520
They no longer think of the specific people who are putting their lives on the line because
00:38:42.140
Those people are just abstract objects out somewhere.
00:38:45.180
They know a war is happening somewhere in the United States or the UK is involved, but they
00:38:51.560
The idea of growing a victory garden so that the troops have what they need on the front
00:38:58.340
The idea of sacrificing on behalf of the war effort, even if you're not personally involved,
00:39:10.400
Douglas loves that because Douglas is never going to go to war.
00:39:14.420
Douglas's children are never going to go to war.
00:39:20.520
Yeah, your military goes to war, but your country isn't going to war.
00:39:25.680
Why would you say as if your country is going to war?
00:39:28.220
And this is the core of the neoconservative problem.
00:39:31.700
Douglas expects a professional military force completely detached from the American or British
00:39:36.980
population to go around setting up governments in the name of liberal democracy or whatever,
00:39:49.300
He's never going to put any of his, you know, progeny at risk.
00:39:56.540
That is just not going to be the case because the country doesn't go to war.
00:40:00.960
The military goes where that's that's for the poors, right?
1.00
00:40:03.980
They go fight their wars on our, you know, on behalf of the government.
00:40:07.540
But, but, but, but, you know, the journalist class, they're going to sit around talking
00:40:14.760
Like Douglas is probably not going to refer to, well, you know, the, the, the military
00:40:20.360
That's I'm guessing, you know, comb through his language, but I got a feeling we might be
00:40:24.340
able to catch Douglas saying we, when he means military there, excuse me.
00:40:28.480
But obviously the problem here is the incredible detachment we have from what is happening from
00:40:39.360
And Douglas just displays this so beautifully here that ultimately he doesn't see it as the
00:40:46.900
It's some professional military, uh, force, like, like a bunch of mercenaries.
00:40:50.400
They go out, we pay them, they go fight, they do their thing on our behalf, and then they
00:40:55.660
He does not understand the connection between a country and its military.
00:40:59.580
He does not appreciate the link between a people and their military.
00:41:03.760
In fact, he specifically criticizes someone who would understand their country as going
00:41:08.620
to war rather than, you know, moving some kind of a discrete military unit around the
00:41:19.000
You have not been fighting for the American homeland for 25 years.
00:41:24.260
We've been picking on third world countries halfway around the world.
1.00
00:41:26.820
Well, you haven't been randomly picking on them.
00:41:32.680
It wasn't like you suddenly decided to bomb again, Myanmar or something.
00:41:37.280
You went for Afghanistan to find bin Laden and take revenge for 9-11 and stop an attack
0.93
00:41:43.660
like that happening again on the American homeland.
00:41:46.120
That is very different from a country being at war.
00:41:50.740
So again, Douglas looks at this and says, okay, there are some legitimate engagements
00:41:57.240
And to be fair, I think he's relatively right about some of this, right?
00:42:01.360
He's right that there had to be a response to 9-11.
00:42:04.740
That you did need to take action to make sure that there were no terrorist attacks in the
00:42:14.380
There was some level of reciprocal response necessary in order to stop what was going on.
00:42:20.280
But you'll notice what he doesn't point out is that both of those turned into multi-decade
00:42:27.380
And this is always the neocon shuffle, right?
0.76
00:42:30.940
And by the way, when I use the word neocon here, Douglas wrote a book saying we need neoconservatism.
00:42:36.700
So this is not a slur, this is not me fabricating a term and applying it to someone to whom it
00:42:44.040
Douglas literally calls himself a neoconservative and wrote the book on why we need neoconservatism.
00:42:50.300
So I'm not just like throwing this language around in order to smear or insult this guy,
00:42:57.720
This is the problem that we have over and over again with the neocon shuffle.
00:43:01.760
Yes, there is a proportionate and reasonable response to 9-11.
00:43:07.060
That response is not believing that you're going to turn Afghanistan into the 51st state
00:43:12.700
of the United States because secretly George Washington and Alexander Hamilton and Thomas
00:43:17.220
Jefferson are just hanging out in caves somewhere.
00:43:19.320
And if you just drop enough bombs on them, eventually they'll emerge from the cave and
00:43:23.220
they'll write a constitution and boom, liberal democracy will bloom across Afghanistan.
00:43:27.500
And yet that is exactly the approach that we took for decades.
00:43:33.220
And I would say that in Douglas Murray's defense here, Dave Smith probably doesn't believe there
00:43:39.220
I think that that's probably something that Dave Smith struggles with.
00:43:42.380
He is so anti-war, he doesn't even know when a proportionate just response would be achieved,
00:43:49.600
But Douglas Murray is going to just kind of sidestep the fact that these responses turned into massive
00:43:58.700
It's one thing to say that might be an accurate characterization of the special operations
00:44:02.680
mission in late 2001, but then we thought a 20-year regime change war against the Taliban.
00:44:08.380
Because you got dragged into the quicksand of war.
00:44:15.460
Again, Douglas just kind of hand waves this away.
00:44:19.380
You do not get drug into the quicksand of a 20-year war.
00:44:26.080
You do not get involved in a military conflict and nation-building for 20 years because you
00:44:33.800
You didn't just, like, stumble in after a drunken night and end up in a war.
00:44:40.300
But Douglas Murray just portrays it as if it's a mild, mild consequence of having to go in and,
00:44:49.160
It's a giant systemic failure from our expert and leadership class, which you are specifically
00:44:58.100
It's your use of we as if you're personally, like, suffering this war.
00:45:06.980
If I went back and corrected you on every time you've used the term we to refer to your
00:45:10.640
government or something like that, like, if I were to say, oh, we just imposed tariffs
00:45:14.140
on China, would you point out that I didn't and it was the Trump administration?
00:45:17.500
You take it, obviously, very personally, and that's your right to do so, of course.
00:45:21.680
I'm just trying to make sure we're accurate here.
00:45:23.640
So, again, Douglas, throwing this little shade at him.
00:45:28.160
Douglas Murray has literally, like, dedicated his life to promoting foreign wars.
00:45:34.160
Like, this is a man who's currently pushing involvement of all Western countries in, obviously,
00:45:41.600
the Israel-Palestine-Gaza conflict, and I believe also in the Ukrainian-Russian war, okay?
00:45:49.180
So, the idea that, like, that Dave Smith is taking this very personally, but Douglas Murray
00:45:54.500
is just this cool, objective cucumber, is pretty comical.
00:45:58.820
Also, Douglas, again, does this thing where he pretends that countries and their militaries
00:46:05.300
are very different things and that you, as a citizen of a country, should not care what
00:46:09.880
your military is doing, that that should not be something that you are emotionally involved
00:46:20.100
This is the most neocon garbage I have ever heard.
1.00
00:46:25.360
The people pushing this ideology have to be discredited.
00:46:28.440
We cannot let people running around and pretending this is reality run our countries anymore.
00:46:36.380
If you leave people like Douglas Murray in the elite, they will get your sons and daughters
0.99
00:46:44.800
Like, these people will drive you into pointless wars because they do not even see your military
00:46:51.580
They do not even see the people of your country as having any input as to how the military is
00:46:58.420
Dave Smith doesn't get to decide how the military is used.
00:47:01.160
He doesn't get to have an opinion on how the military is used.
00:47:03.580
He doesn't get to have an opinion on whether the war should be fought or not because he's
00:47:07.340
not personally there, which is funny because neither is Douglas Murray, but whatever.
00:47:21.300
I think they've killed hundreds of thousands of people and cost my country eight trillion
00:47:29.060
And there's a very good argument to make on that.
00:47:31.680
I'm still slightly bemused about this move from I'm an expert on this and I have views
00:47:40.580
I've never claimed to be an expert on anything.
00:47:45.160
I mean, if somebody says you have to claim to be an expert on something to have an opinion
00:47:56.540
Like he stops talking to Dave Smith and he pivots to Joe Rogan in the hopes that that's going
00:48:04.320
That that maybe Joe Rogan's going to save him from this exchange.
00:48:10.500
But again, Douglas Murray is being exactly what he claims Dave Smith is right.
00:48:17.220
Every time Douglas Murray runs into a problem, he's just jelly.
00:48:21.040
All of a sudden, Douglas Murray, Douglas Murray demands expertise.
00:48:28.740
You must personally be involved in wars in order to comment on them, recognize when there's
00:48:35.540
a problem, point out some kind of historical that you like, you have to have this expertise.
00:48:39.840
And then the minute someone's like, so you're just to clarify, you're saying that everyone
00:48:49.680
I'm just I'm just wondering why they're commenting on these things because they're events
00:48:53.660
happening now, Douglas, because when you have a war and you're demanding more people be involved
00:49:02.180
in it and more money go to it and more weapons and material and lives get spent on it, people
00:49:09.380
have a right to comment on what you are asking them to involve themselves in.
00:49:15.060
Douglas Murray does not have some kind of objective opinion on this.
00:49:19.340
It's not like, oh, well, I'm just bringing forward the facts.
00:49:22.300
No, Douglas has a specific partisan demand he is making on both the United States and
00:49:31.480
He has the right to make that demand, but he does not have the expertise that he is demanding
00:49:40.300
Now, again, I think that a man whose country is literally being invaded as we speak, the United
00:49:47.900
Kingdom is in a position right now where it is run by a government that is hostile to its
00:49:58.640
People cannot pray outside in their heads in the United Kingdom.
00:50:05.620
A retiree who was disabled was threatened on the street by a police officer with hate crime
00:50:10.760
charges for saying these people should speak English in the country where English was invented.
00:50:29.040
Now, to Douglas's credit, he wrote a book on the strange death of Europe.
00:50:34.760
I was at the speech at ARC when he did so, though I noticed he didn't mention anything
00:50:39.160
about deportation, so one wonders how committed he is to that problem.
00:50:43.660
But ultimately, yes, Douglas has spoken out about that problem in a way that many people
00:50:52.080
But if my country is being invaded, if my country is becoming tyrannical, if free speech is ending
00:50:58.280
in my country, then running around and demanding censorship of other people is probably not
00:51:05.880
Spending all of my time obsessing over a foreign war and writing a book on a foreign war is
00:51:13.020
Now, again, Douglas is free to write whatever book he wants.
00:51:17.780
However, he is no more of an expert than anyone else on this issue who he is criticizing.
00:51:25.240
And yet he thinks that ultimately, he is the only one qualified to have an opinion.
00:51:32.560
This is like, I'm not a historian, but I'm pumping out history.
00:51:36.020
I'm not an expert, but I'm talking all the time about this thing.
00:51:38.920
But you're not even talking about specifically on what he just said.
00:51:44.520
Again, like Joe Rogan just puts out, like, you are doing exactly what you said you don't
00:51:49.440
You have exactly the same problem that you are saying that Dave Smith has.
00:51:53.360
The minute you get pinned down, you pivot, you talk to somebody else, you don't address
00:52:03.320
Oh, well, you don't have to be an expert to have an opinion, but you're not an expert,
00:52:19.580
How many academic degrees in history do you hold?
00:52:34.240
And like Sam Harris or Barry Weiss, he recognizes his expert class is being threatened.
00:52:51.700
Well, the expert class hasn't done a great job, man.
00:53:08.760
So what's the solution to this problem, Douglas?
00:53:11.960
What consequence for failure should the expert class have?
00:53:20.100
Yes, I'll admit they got it wrong, but I would never allow them to feel any pain for the decisions
00:53:29.320
By the way, every Democrat after the election of Donald Trump said that the reason that Donald
00:53:36.880
Trump won, like every one of these Democratic strategists, all these talking heads on TV,
00:53:41.180
they all claim that the reason that Donald Trump won and Joe Biden lost, or sorry, Kamala
00:53:46.640
Harris lost, is that ultimately, the Republicans had the podcast bros, right?
00:53:59.020
And more young people are listening to the new media instead of the old media.
00:54:03.100
And you know why people are listening to the new media instead of the old media?
00:54:06.920
You know why people are trusting podcasts rather than experts in these areas?
00:54:11.100
Because the experts have lied, because the experts are controlled, because the old media
00:54:16.340
curates heavily everyone who comes onto their program.
00:54:23.540
But the new media, yes, it's less curated, less credentials.
00:54:28.180
However, they seem to get things right more often than the mainstream media.
00:54:33.240
Now again, I often say this is the Alex Jones effect.
00:54:38.220
Does he have some kind of special gift from on high?
00:54:43.320
I think the reason Alex Jones has a better batting average than the average media person
00:54:46.780
is Alex Jones just always says that the regime is evil and assumes that whatever they're doing
00:54:53.700
And because the regime is evil, and what they do is often terrible and nefarious, Alex Jones
00:54:58.600
is right more often than the average MSNBC analyst.
00:55:01.880
That doesn't mean that Alex Jones has done the research.
00:55:04.600
It doesn't mean that Alex Jones has the degrees.
00:55:09.520
But his batting average is higher simply because the people in charge decide to light their
00:55:16.800
And the only thing left are people who are questioning what's going on.
00:55:21.360
Now, a lot of people like Douglas Murray and many members of the IDW who think that they
00:55:27.420
are God's gift to the world and they decide intellectually what is correct and what is not.
00:55:38.960
And so even though the expert class has failed entirely, they insist that the expert class
00:55:45.260
is the only one that can opine on these issues.
00:55:52.520
It's more people with the same broken epistemology.
00:55:54.920
I'm going to be writing something about that here this week because I think it's really important
00:55:58.260
to understand how critically the failure of the liberal epistemology has really rocked
00:56:05.080
But guys like Douglas Murray simply do not have a solution in the same way that Sam Harris
00:56:10.280
And that's why both of them have the clown themselves when it came time to actually talk
0.72
00:56:16.240
Because in both cases, both men recognize that there are problems with the system, serious
00:56:21.180
problems with the system, fatal problems with the system.
00:56:23.440
But they would rather hold that system aloft and enshrine it and defend it than allow people
00:56:32.880
to correct it because they are so scared of losing their positions of power and letting
00:56:39.020
They are so desperate that their class stay in power that they refuse to address the issues
00:56:47.460
And so Douglas over and over again admits, yes, obviously the experts failed.
00:56:53.300
Yes, obviously the experts are no longer fit for purpose.
00:57:06.300
I will put my track record against any of the expert class on COVID.
00:57:14.280
Should I have shut up by opposing lockdowns and opposing vaccine mandates?
00:57:28.540
I've already spent an hour breaking down just this clip, so I can't go through everything.
00:57:34.220
Again, I think Douglas Murray sounded much better when he was actually discussing the war that
00:57:38.680
he supports rather than when he was arguing over who's qualified to opine on it.
00:57:43.960
Like if Douglas had just stuck to the facts that he was discussing, again, I'm not highly
00:57:52.860
However, I think he sounded much more convincing when he actually discussed the topic he wanted
00:57:58.280
to discuss rather than spending all his time trying to shut up people who he wanted to
00:58:03.820
So if you want to listen to the rest of that, you might hear some arguments from Douglas that
00:58:09.920
The point is you'd actually have to listen to the words Douglas said, which is something
00:58:18.460
And obviously does not do for people like Dave Smith.
00:58:22.700
He would not afford any of his interlocutors, right?
00:58:25.780
Because ultimately what Douglas is here to do is defend his position as an arbiter for
00:58:31.240
And his main problem is that other people are saying the wrong things and that he doesn't
00:58:36.340
know how to address the epistemological crisis that liberalism has found itself in.
00:58:43.320
His entire system was built on the idea that experts are holy and they are the ones that
00:58:48.820
They are the ones that have massage narratives, the very narratives that Douglas Murray relies
00:58:54.500
If they come apart, Douglas is worried that he will lose his position in the pecking order.
00:59:05.640
Again, amazingly passionate about the Israel-Palestine war in a way that he criticizes other people
00:59:13.940
So obviously he has other motivations beyond just his position in the expert class.
00:59:18.200
But I think that's a huge part of it, which is why him and Sam Harris, Harris, while talking
00:59:22.240
about very different things, be it Joe Biden's lies and the censorship that went along with
00:59:27.400
that by the social media and the security apparatus in the United States, as opposed to Douglas
00:59:33.520
here discussing whether or not people can talk about history or the situation in Gaza.
00:59:38.100
Either way, they are both focused on the same thing.
00:59:42.980
Anybody who threatens the expert class is the enemy.
00:59:46.340
Even if I have problems and I know that ultimately the expert class has wounded itself in a way that is
00:59:52.240
fatal, I am going to cling on to the sinking ship.
00:59:55.280
I am going to go down with the sinking ship because my narrative, my power, my position, my identity
01:00:03.480
And so that is what I am going to defend to the death.
0.98
01:00:09.580
The funny thing is there's another clip going around online of Douglas making an argument
01:00:16.280
Douglas has repeatedly said that the idea of lived experience or credentials and the need
01:00:21.720
to shut people up if they have not had those experience or hold those credentials, that is
1.00
01:00:29.740
And yet here he has exactly the opposite position.
01:00:33.600
Well, because previously it was being used to push him out and now he wants to use that
01:00:42.320
When Douglas is weak, he wants to use your principles against you.
01:00:46.100
And when Douglas is strong, he no longer cares about those principles.
01:00:50.040
They were only being used against you when you were strong.
01:00:55.280
Now that he's in the position of power, he does not care.
01:01:00.540
He doesn't care about the ability to question things.
01:01:12.840
All right, guys, we've got quite a bit of questions or comments from the audience here.
01:01:28.040
Uh, Aramaic Discourse says, for my fellow Zoroastrian Catholic cultists.
0.99
01:01:34.760
I guess James is definitely going to fall into the category of people who probably agree
01:01:40.160
very much with Sam Harris and Douglas Murray here.
01:01:43.600
Uh, Perspicacious Heretic says, you're an expert as long as I agree with you.
1.00
01:01:49.420
Like, shamelessly, that really does seem to be the standard here.
01:01:56.620
Uh, No Guard says, I especially loved Murray's reaction to Dave citing specific actions by
01:02:05.080
Again, you can go back and listen to the whole thing if you would like to get a better grasp
01:02:11.300
Uh, I think Murray sounded better when he was actually discussing the topic.
01:02:15.860
But again, multiple times he does get caught, you know, by, by points like this that Dave
01:02:21.080
Smith makes that he doesn't seem to have very much of a response for.
01:02:25.220
Torin McCabe says, let's grow up less comedians just asking questions, more experts and institutions
01:02:37.380
The only problem is that our institutions are currently not oriented to help our peoples.
01:02:44.360
In a, in a good society, in a correct society, Dave, uh, rather Douglas Murray would be correct
01:02:51.760
In a, in a healthy society, both of these guys would be correct to defend the institutions
01:02:56.760
because the institutions would be working on behalf of the people would be perpetuating
01:03:04.120
They'd be inculcating the culture of the people, but that is just not the case.
01:03:11.500
In fact, they specifically destroy the credibility of their institutions in an attempt to control
01:03:21.760
I understand that this is a very, uh, dangerous place to be.
01:03:25.260
I've actually written a piece on the dangers of having your consensus making apparatus break
01:03:30.860
Uh, if people want to revisit that, I think it's a good time to do so.
01:03:34.120
But ultimately we have to recognize that something has to change here and it's not going to change
01:03:38.220
unless people are deconstructing some of the false narratives that put forward by, by experts
01:03:49.300
Oren McIntyre can't say my name, so I changed it.
01:03:54.900
Would love more occasional breakdowns of media like that one for fun.
01:04:04.400
And, uh, I do try to break in those from time to time.
01:04:06.820
I've done those with, uh, the Prudentialist when it comes to some video games.
01:04:11.440
I, I believe, uh, Dave, uh, Green and, uh, Morgoth have joined me for some movie reviews,
01:04:18.980
So I don't do it as often as I probably should.
01:04:21.640
Maybe I'll pepper more of those in, but I'm glad that you enjoyed it.
01:04:27.200
CB says, is we getting a Manhattan Institute for Americans?
01:04:33.520
Uh, perspicacious heretic says, what does being a scholar actually mean?
01:04:37.420
Do you literally have to be inside a fancy brick building for it to count as, uh, being
01:04:42.440
well-read again for a lot of people, sadly, that is the case.
01:04:45.680
Uh, and, you know, in general, that's a reasonable heuristic throughout most of, uh, American
01:04:51.000
However, uh, there have been very many, uh, very important scholars who have worked outside
01:04:59.040
Um, you have a number of guys who never held university positions and still said very profound
01:05:07.620
The guy was a history teacher in high school, I believe, uh, his whole life.
01:05:11.680
He never entered into the university, uh, and yet very influential and very influential.
01:05:15.340
I think, uh, so yeah, uh, obviously, you know, uh, it would be nice if we could trust our
01:05:20.460
institutions and it would be nice if the majority of people coming out of those institutions
01:05:26.120
And that was where the important work was getting done.
01:05:28.220
But as I've said, when I've discussed this with people who are in academia, they say,
01:05:32.180
yeah, in most cases, that's just not actually what's going on.
01:05:38.340
Uh, man, William says the British mind cannot comprehend having free speech without a license,
01:05:46.020
Uh, unfortunately, I think that might be the case.
01:05:49.180
And, and I say that, you know, with a lot of trepidation because I have a lot of friends
01:05:53.380
in England and, uh, you know, it's a beautiful country.
01:05:56.420
Uh, obviously it's something we have deep historical ties to and a tradition I'd like to see continued
01:06:01.480
on, but, uh, things are not looking great there.
01:06:03.580
Uh, and while I think guys like, uh, like the Lotus Eaters and others are, are, are battling
01:06:08.660
valiantly, uh, on that front, uh, I, I gotta say, uh, it, it doesn't look great.
01:06:15.880
Uh, Lurch 685 says Douglas likes Israel only for two reasons.
0.96
01:06:20.220
He absolutely hates Muslims, all of them and sees, uh, anyone who kills a lot of them as
0.99
01:06:28.880
You know, I gotta say this, um, uh, the one mistake that I think a lot of people make
01:06:34.100
is, uh, and I've seen this repeatedly, unfortunately, is that they will have a disagreement with Israel
01:06:40.040
or Israeli influence in the United States or our, you know, us being involved with them
01:06:45.320
foreign policy wise, uh, aid wise, that kind of thing.
01:06:48.340
And then they will say, well, enemy of my enemy is my friend.
01:06:51.100
So maybe the Muslims are, you know, on our side.
0.92
01:06:54.220
And I want to remind you guys that Islam is a historic enemy of Christianity.
1.00
01:06:58.240
Um, uh, Islam has slaughtered countless Christians, enslaved, countless Christians, uh, driven,
1.00
01:07:06.040
uh, countless Christians out of their homelands.
0.99
01:07:12.260
It is a violent religion, uh, that seeks to murder, not just Jews, but Christians as well.
1.00
01:07:17.800
Uh, now this doesn't mean that we should go out there and try to kill as many Muslims as
1.00
01:07:22.760
Obviously you need to be involved in a just war, uh, you know, uh, when that's the case.
0.57
01:07:27.360
However, uh, treating, uh, just because you may disagree with what Israel is doing, or
01:07:32.820
you disagree, uh, with many of its, um, loudest and most obnoxious, uh, uh, you know, uh, proponents
01:07:43.320
That does not mean, uh, that you, you should suddenly say, well, uh, if, if I disagree with
01:07:48.960
some policy policy with Israel, then everything the Palestinians do is justified or Islam is
0.98
01:07:55.640
And you don't really want it in your country either.
0.90
01:07:57.820
Uh, the one thing that Douglas Murray's right about is that there shouldn't be Muslims in
1.00
01:08:02.240
If he's not, if he's wrong about anything, everything else, he'd be right about that.
01:08:08.280
Uh, life of Brian says, I'd like to thank Douglas Murray for taking a neo, uh, a neocon
0.99
01:08:13.240
out of commission and be clowning the British aristocracy, uh, even super, uh, even super
0.56
01:08:20.840
Um, you know, I've seen a lot of people defend his performance on here, but I got to say,
01:08:25.980
you have to be a pretty big partisan, I think, to look at what Douglas Murray said and think
01:08:32.100
Again, when it comes to that war itself, I can see how Douglas probably came off.
01:08:40.480
Like, I think he sounded more competent and more convincing when he was actually discussing
01:08:46.100
Unfortunately, he spent a very large amount of time not doing that.
01:08:49.520
And he discredited him himself in an attempt to discredit others so that most people probably
01:08:54.480
didn't even hear his arguments about Israel or their position in the war because they were
01:08:59.420
too busy looking at him and being like, wow, this guy sounds really entitled and, uh, really
01:09:05.360
ugly and is willing to dismiss the opinion of basically everyone.
01:09:09.320
Uh, you know, again, I'll let people make their own decisions on who won the debate itself.
01:09:15.240
I didn't even play really anything from the actual debate on the issue because his kind
01:09:22.200
of whole preamble was so off-putting that I don't think most people actually even probably
01:09:29.860
Uh, but I would say ultimately, uh, you know, you might be right that he discredited his
01:09:34.720
position, not because of his actual arguments that because his position was factually inaccurate,
01:09:39.960
but because he was so condescending and so entitled and so dismissive of basically everyone
01:09:47.120
else that it's hard to look at someone making an argument in that style and then actually
01:09:54.780
Uh, well, Logan says heartening to see gatekeeping so desperate.
01:09:59.400
Yeah, I'll, I'll say that it does look pretty desperate, which is another thing that another
01:10:04.200
dynamic that did not come off well here for Douglas.
01:10:06.800
Uh, it definitely, it looks like a move of desperation.
01:10:09.240
Uh, in fact, it's the entire, it's the exact move that guys in the IDW would have expressed,
01:10:18.460
They would have said, this looks pretty desperate from the woke left when they were making their
01:10:22.780
Uh, so, uh, yeah, I mean, just not, not a great look, uh, not, not the best ambassador
01:10:28.440
for his position, even if ultimately maybe he made some, some decent arguments throughout
01:10:33.120
most people listening probably wouldn't even know because he was so off-putting in his
01:10:40.220
All right, guys, it looks like that is all of the questions of the people.
01:10:47.600
If you'd like to get these broadcasts as podcasts, you need to subscribe to the Oren McIntyre
01:10:54.160
And if you haven't subscribed on this platform on YouTube, you need to click the subscribe
01:11:00.940
So you actually know when these streams go live.
01:11:03.960
If you'd like to support the show, don't forget that you can head over to shopblazemedia.com.
01:11:08.500
We've got plenty of merch under the Oren McIntyre collection there.
01:11:11.620
You can pick up something and let people know that you enjoy the show.