00:06:43.260But I think the thing that really threw conservatives for a loop
00:06:46.800was not just the death of a guy that kind of seemed like the average guy next door,
00:06:51.840the kind of guy who holds your opinions you know charlie kirk was not a radical in any way you know
00:06:57.740at least to most people on the right he seemed like a fairly mainstream person who held their
00:07:02.600opinions on things like immigration or transgenderism uh and when you see the left not just uh
00:07:08.960you know kill this man but then celebrate it openly and again the celebrities were out
00:07:13.920originally when charlie kirk was killed but it was the rake and file it was it was the average0.79
00:07:17.880person the neighbor uh that that really was celebrating that death and i think the average
00:07:23.460person looked at their neighbor and said oh if they would if they would celebrate the death of
00:07:28.020charlie kirk they would probably celebrate my death and you realize then you're in a very dangerous
00:07:33.400position right that's that's absolutely correct um well you know the thing about kirk was you know
00:07:39.960he started we used to make fun of him at vdar.com originally because he was he was a conservative
00:07:45.080inc uh a mainstream figure uh on issues like immigration very remarkably he changed his mind
00:07:51.480on that and he became he became it's one of the very few cases i've ever seen somebody uh change
00:07:58.200their mind in public and migrate towards the more dangerous position i think michelle malkin was
00:08:02.520probably the case uh but but he was no he was not extreme i mean you know i could definitely show
00:08:09.640The more extreme, more extreme figures, I used to publish them, he was not extreme at
00:08:15.480all, and yet he attracts this extraordinary hatred.
00:08:19.740And when you have that kind of vitriol for the mainstream opinion, then obviously anyone
00:08:24.940to Charlie Kirk's right is basically going to be fair game.
00:08:28.680And I fear that this is the moment we've arrived at because the Trump administration,
00:08:34.200uh it eventually you know like a year later declared antifa a terrorist organization uh but
00:08:42.020not much has come of that we know that they shut down a server that was sharing coordinating
00:08:46.980leftist information which is great you know that's more than probably many people have done
00:08:50.700but but desperately insufficient yeah we we needed a response that was going to show people
00:08:56.880that this was not acceptable behavior in public that this was not a winning strategy in politics
00:09:02.680And instead, having just watched the midterms and the collapse of the Republican Party after the death of Charlie Kirk, and honestly, I don't want to just say posthumously that this man was responsible for everything, that he was holding the entire world on his shoulders.
00:09:19.240I think that that can get cartoonish. But I do think that there is a fair case to say that the death of Charlie Kirk was truly the beginning of the decline of the Trump administration.
00:09:30.120It really shook a lot of the operation to the core.
00:09:33.660I think in many ways, TPUSA and Charlie Kirk were kind of the only thing that were keeping those different factions of Tucker Carlson and, you know, the mainstream conservatives and everyone else bound together.
00:09:45.580And so the fact that he was killed and then there was this major like generational loss in the midterms, the lesson that seems to teach the left is that assassination works.
00:09:56.600And because there was no consequence, that not only does it work, it's a viable strategy because it will cost you nothing.
00:10:04.120I mean, what would have been needed was something like what the Democrats did to the J6, like a full court press on taking out anybody who can be remotely said to be in any way connected with whoever the hell it was who killed him.0.97
00:10:18.100You know, he was a tranny, wasn't he?0.99
00:10:22.060One of the things that are really annoying about this is how long it's taking them to bring this case to court.1.00
00:10:26.600If this case was in court, a lot of it would have been publicly recognized while it was happening,
00:10:33.460and we probably found out about all kinds of connections this guy had.
00:10:37.340But as far as I know, they're not even planning to try him this year, are they?
00:10:41.820Yeah, I believe Tyler Robinson, they had the initial kind of vetting to see if the trial could go forward,
00:17:08.140It's always about the Hispanic vote or the black vote
00:17:10.040or the women vote, female vote and all that kind of thing.
00:17:13.400But I'm not aware of any direct discussion
00:17:15.740of what you have to do to win the white vote um such as for example don't run non-white candidates
00:17:21.580because it's very all americans vote for people who look like them but the republicans continue
00:17:26.300to run these people in you know uh like like um that woman in uh in virginia whatever name was
00:17:32.780who was also not not just a woman of black but an immigrant winsome sears they continue to do
00:17:38.300this kind of thing they they have to make a direct explicit appeal to the white vote and to white0.93
00:17:43.500interests and they just don't want to do that they're too cowardly well i think it it really
00:17:48.240is the fact that the republican party um is just progressive on this issue they're just progressive
00:17:53.400leftists when it comes to the issue of voting and race uh they they find the white vote something
00:18:00.660that is low class and uh in some way icky to talk about it's a they might need it they might
00:18:07.440ultimately have to win some percentage of it but they they feel as if they are better than
00:18:12.360needing to pursue a white working class vote, a Rust Belt vote, a Middle America vote.
00:18:18.480And so therefore, they go out and they court the votes of groups that do not vote for them.
00:18:25.040They have gone out of their way to ingratiate themselves with an Indian community that votes
00:18:29.84070% Democrat. They actually bent over backwards in several different areas, including foreign
00:18:35.120policy to benefit the Jewish vote in the United States, and then lost that vote quite handily,0.99
00:18:41.540as they always do. And so, you know, as my colleague Steve Dace has said, you know, there's1.00
00:18:46.240always this, there's always this myth that the brothers be flipping that you're going to have
00:18:50.420all the black votes on the on the Republican side tomorrow, because they suddenly realize how bad
00:18:54.700the Democrat, you know, party is. But the truth is that ultimately, it is white votes and very0.97
00:19:01.380interestingly, actually, mostly white evangelical Christian votes that secure for Republicans,
00:19:06.900We saw Catholics go a 20-point swing about to the left in this election.0.56
00:19:13.300And so there really is a very, very core demographic of voters that the GOP absolutely relies on but simply refuses to touch because they see those people as somehow low class and their votes as somehow a disgrace to the Republican Party that they have to go out and earn them every once in a while.
00:19:28.620I know you want to talk about what the president said last night in 60 Minutes, but one of
00:19:35.300the aspects of it, I mean, most people are talking about his not unusual muttering about
00:19:43.620amnesty, which he's been periodically saying for as long as he's been in politics.
00:19:48.160But what struck me is, it's very remarkable statements about that he thought a lot of
00:19:52.420the problem in this election was Israel, he said that incredibly a lot of people don't
00:19:57.540like israel now i assume that's because his poll didn't their internal polls are telling them that
00:20:02.580but i think that actually is an issue right now i mean i think uh anti-zionism on the left and the
00:20:08.780right uh has been so is dramatically stronger than i've ever seen it in in in the u.s and and you
00:20:15.440know i've been here since 1970 is that longer than you how long have you been here uh well i was born
00:20:50.900warned about the dangers of the muslim invasion and then the jewish vote comes out in favor of0.95
00:20:56.480uh you know mom donnie and el saeed they have higher favorability ratings than donald trump
00:21:01.100in the jewish community so right right uh but if that's so i think that's going to shape a
00:21:08.020reshape american politics quite dramatically and the only person on the right who's to you could
00:21:12.840who's a problem that is eyes will be tucker carlson of course other than that the republicans
00:21:18.700have no spokesman, no way of tapping into this issue at all. So before we move to the president's
00:21:24.800comments, because I certainly want to break those down further, I wanted to ask you in relation to
00:21:29.720the Dave Chappelle statement about the way that people, conservatives allow the left to talk about
00:21:39.640them and very specifically drilling further down the way that white people allow the left to talk
00:21:45.600about them um you know one of the reasons and again you can feel however you want about this
00:21:50.220but one of the reasons that the jewish lobby is so aggressive against any form of anti-zionism
00:21:56.120or any form of anti-semitism is well in their you know experience if you let people talk about you
00:22:01.820a certain way eventually they will take action on those words uh you know and that that that is the
00:22:06.980concern that they harbor uh when you look at conservatives and specifically white conservatives0.97
00:22:11.960Everything in our society is constantly talking about how white men are evil. Conservatives are inherently evil. Christians are inherently evil. We need to eliminate whiteness. The Republicans are all fascists and all these things.1.00
00:22:27.840the rhetoric like that, the kind of rhetoric that Dave Chappelle is exhibiting and is now0.96
00:22:32.160very common to left, that is genocidal rhetoric. That is the type of rhetoric that drives people
00:22:37.160to violence. And we have seen the fruits of that. And yet it is almost impossible for me to explain
00:22:44.280this to conservatives, Christians, and whites. They simply will not hear that if you allow people0.98
00:22:51.300to talk about you in a genocidal manner eventually this will create the very uh actions that they are
00:22:58.320talking about and i don't just mean oh someone had a criticism of white people one time or
00:23:03.080christians one time uh so we have to end free speech i'm talking about the constant malicious0.50
00:23:07.940and upfront attacks where you say we need to eliminate whiteness we have to get rid of these
00:23:14.620fascist gop people we're talking about language that definitely dehumanizes and puts people in
00:23:19.960a position where they are easy to see as something that needs to be put down because ultimately
00:23:25.280you know you're evil and you're not going to fight back because we've seen what's happened
00:23:29.060again with charlie kirk here so what is it about these groups that makes it so hard for them
00:23:35.260to again you know you don't have to go start the the whites only party or something but simply to
00:23:40.220have you know the desire to say hey i'm going to stand up for the you know these people i am not
00:23:46.780going to allow someone to discuss, you know, the color or, you know, the religion or the political
00:23:53.360position of my child as something that's worth being eliminated because one day they will want
00:23:58.040to eliminate my child. What is it about these groups that makes them so impotent in the face
00:24:02.300of this kind of rhetoric? Well, I think a lot of it is almost a cliche, but a lot of it does have
00:24:10.400to be attributed to the legacy media, the hegemony of the left and the legacy media.
00:24:16.780And, you know, you can't even get ideas framed in the legacy media.
00:24:25.300I mean, look at the ridiculous reaction of the New York Times when,
00:24:28.340was it Santa Hawley or Santa Cotton advocated using the Interaction Act
00:24:35.220And the editorial page had to resign because his staff was in revolt.
00:24:40.080I mean, these people are truly evil who run the mainstream media institutions,
00:24:43.900they do produce a sort of a false consciousness i think also that that uh you know the the the
00:24:50.460fact that the whites have been driven into a minority in the us really has only penetrated
00:24:55.020people's consciousness uh very very very recently uh to the to the extent that it has uh uh and uh
00:25:03.420one of one of the results of one of the um interesting aspects of this election as you
00:25:08.620look at george and practically every statewide office in georgia now is held by a black woman
00:25:13.260Well, maybe that will bring home to the whites in Georgia, who is still a majority, that they better wake up and start voting just to defend their interests.0.72
00:25:28.040Well, I want to go ahead and – oh, sorry, go ahead.0.73
00:25:29.960Well, I see in the deep south states, the Republican white share is actually pretty good.
00:25:35.380But if you look at Texas, where there was a white vote, they only got about 55% of the white vote in Texas, which is disgraceful.0.94
00:25:42.460I mean, blacks vote 90% for Democrats.0.79
00:27:28.100They're certainly not afraid to court the Hispanic vote or the Indian vote or the Jewish vote explicitly.
00:27:33.340I'm not sure why this is the one group that they are not allowed to say we care about your interests, too, and we are going to take care of you as a group because we understand that that is very important.
00:27:43.940But I do want to get to the actual comments of the president here.
00:27:47.300So let's tee up that video real quick.
00:27:51.740Whether it was the message or the record, the Republican collapse will give Democrats in Congress new powers over budgets, hearings and subpoenas.
00:28:01.380you came out after the midterms you congratulated the democrats you said that you were open to
00:28:06.580working with them true what is one thing you would like to work with a democratic majority
00:28:10.980i'd love to do something on immigration what because well so do you think immigration hurt
00:28:17.540you in the midterm uh do you think the crackdown i think it both helped and hurt i think i got an
00:28:22.740a plus for closing up the border i get very high marks for getting the bad ones out but i get hurt
00:28:28.660because we also took people that had good jobs that created one violation or breaking
00:28:36.400of the law and that was that they came into the country illegally.
00:28:39.740Now there is a large part of the country that think that they should be put out and there's0.89
00:28:44.620a large part of the country that think that they should be allowed to stay if they're
00:28:48.220good people working in a landscaping company or working in a hotel or doing something right
00:28:54.700And in some cases paying taxes, and there's a large group of people think that they should
00:32:27.940making open and insurrection statements,
00:32:29.640saying that they weren't going to obey federal law.
00:32:32.520So I assume what they would do is impose the Interaction Act and arrest Governor Walz and Mayor Fry, whatever his name is, in Minneapolis, and then run on that.
00:32:46.180Because the Democrats had been maneuvered to a situation where they were openly, you know, calling on people to resist the federal government.
00:32:54.400But apparently what happened was, according to Maggie Haverman in her book on the Trump term, Iran came along.
00:33:00.560uh netanyahu demanded that uh trump attack iran and and that just he doesn't want to be able to
00:33:07.120think about many things at once that just that just uh blue blue is his constant his focus on
00:33:12.320on this immigration structure and so we find ourselves running on the bombing iran rather
00:33:16.880rather than arresting governor waltz which i don't think was a good trade you're right to say that
00:33:22.560trump has said this many times and that's been the reaction that a lot of people have had oh well
00:33:27.200Trump always talks like this. He said this a number of times, but he's never done it. And so
00:33:32.800therefore, you know, this is- Well, actually, I only did try to do it very hard in the first term.0.97
00:33:38.300So trying to do an amnesty for the so-called dreamers in exchange for a border wall and some0.84
00:33:46.140other stuff. And that deal was masterminded by Stephen Miller. So we have reason to worry about
00:33:53.220it. On the end, it fell apart because the Democrats can't control themselves. You know,
00:33:56.460They won't accept any immigration restriction.
00:33:59.160So, and they have a lot of craze in the caucus now.
00:34:02.400So if they do try to do it, maybe we'll fall apart too.
00:34:07.740That is my one hope in all of this, is that the Democrats are so insane that they could not do a deal with Trump for the very simple reason that their base hates Trump with the fire of a thousand suns.0.95
00:34:20.680And they expect the Democratic Party to like put him in jail and torture him.
00:34:24.420And so they would never accept, even though an amnesty deal at this point would basically kill not only the Trump at presidency, but probably the GOP permanently. And I mean that on every level. It would destroy their credibility. It would make them completely unelectable for the simple fact that you're going to be increasing the Democratic vote vastly and lock them out.
00:34:42.880I mean, it would be a disaster for our country, but it would kill the Republican Party dead in
00:34:46.580its tracks. But I think the Democrats aren't even capable of doing that because they hate Trump so
00:34:50.880much that even if they were handed the destruction of Donald Trump and the Republican Party on a
00:34:55.500silver platter, they couldn't take it. They just can't control themselves. But I think this is a
00:35:00.440big dynamic because, you know, previously a lot of people told themselves, well, watch what Trump
00:35:05.300does, not what he says, right? Like that was, you know, don't take Trump literally, but take him
00:35:10.360seriously we got a lot of that and it was generally good advice honestly there's so much
00:35:14.100Donald Trump was always over here over there uh staple staple a green card to every diploma from
00:35:19.320a Chinese spy you know stuff like that on a regular basis but it would never come around
00:35:23.960and then we actually would see deportation numbers uh increase or you know the border close and so
00:35:28.720people said yeah don't worry about it watch what he's doing now what he's saying the problem is
00:35:32.740after the Iran conflict that gets harder to sell to your base because now you've seen him do and
00:35:39.640do the opposite of what he said and so now you've seen him take those actions that ultimately would
00:35:46.160betray those promises and it's hard to go back to the same people and say but on this stuff he
00:35:50.760really means i know he didn't mean it with iran and i know we lied to you about that for like
00:35:54.880a year to try to gaslight you into supporting him even though it was going to be a disaster but
00:35:59.800when it comes to immigration he really means that one now i will say this a lot of people
00:36:04.580have speculated that Stephen Miller is not going to change anything, that ultimately he's not
00:36:11.420capable of this. Everybody I've seen who's met Stephen Miller, talked to him, said he really is
00:36:16.400very hardline on immigration that is in an act. But as you say, there's also the possibility of
00:36:21.680deals that he's helped to broker the past. What's your read on Stephen Miller? Do you think he truly
00:36:25.680is dedicated above all to deportations, or do you think ultimately he will allow Trump to move in a
00:36:33.080direction that is against the base? I think really that he's a true believer, and he actually
00:36:40.000really does understand the issue very well. So I think that it's most likely that he will
00:36:47.560continue. He might even attempt to tee the issue off as an issue to be run on in 2028, again,
00:42:24.920as you say, we can't take it literally.
00:42:26.200We'll just have to see what Miller does.
00:42:29.340So the other response to this that I thought was fascinating that I wanted to get your opinion on is Bishop Robert Barron.
00:42:35.560Now, Bishop Barron is a popular commentator online as well as being a Catholic bishop, does a lot of stuff in what is often considered the based Catholic world.
00:42:48.560Many of the traditional Catholics like Bishop Barron for his ability to kind of reach in and speak to younger people through video and YouTube and that kind of thing, while also kind of maintaining that Catholic aesthetic.
00:43:03.380And he says this. Now, Bishop Barron was denouncing the events in Minnesota when they occurred.
00:43:09.260If you'll remember, he said that they were terrible and that ICE needed to stop immediately.
00:43:14.260he says friends catholic social teaching holds two things together a nation has the right and
00:43:18.920duty to regulate its borders just don't ask the pope i guess uh and every immigrant is a person
00:43:24.500in uh of incomparable dignity who deserves generosity in january amid the tensions in
00:43:29.500minnesota i propose the enforcement uh focus on those who have committed serious crimes
00:43:33.400aka don't actually deport illegals only you know the worst of the worst uh last year together with
00:43:39.380my brother bishops of minnesota i called on congress to pass comprehensive immigration reform
00:43:44.540what the president described sunday in his 60 minutes interview about immigration is very much
00:43:49.460in that spirit he goes on to talk about how basically this is the fulfillment of catholic
00:43:55.760social teaching uh so apparently to bishop baron you know this he believes that the amnesty is
00:44:01.360coming and should come uh and he believes that this is in line with catholic teaching now uh i
00:44:08.180don't want to start an inter-sectarian war here between Christians. I think United
00:44:14.020Christians have more problems than they do with the outside than they do with each other,
00:44:20.100and they need to stand shoulder to shoulder. But it is concerning when we see someone framing,
00:44:25.040someone who's supposed to be conservative, supposed to be right-wing, when he's framing
00:44:30.240a mass amnesty for illegals as something that is part of Catholic social teaching.
00:44:36.120because if a man who is ostensibly right-wing and holds that faith will say something like this
00:44:43.140then you have to start to wonder what level of influence again especially with that 20 points
00:44:47.860or like 15 or 20 point swing of catholics becoming uh you know more left-wing in this
00:44:52.820in this voting block in this election i mean how are we to approach a message like this when
00:44:58.780ultimately it seems to undermine so much of what needs to happen for the future of the united states
00:45:03.600Well, he's wrong, of course. It isn't pointed to by Catholic teaching at all.
00:45:07.840It's just what liberals and Democrats want to think. The Catholic Church is a real problem,
00:45:14.960because it does seem to be thinking in terms of his hemispheric influence, becoming a non-white
00:45:22.640church. So it's a real problem. Here in West Virginia, the local diocese had imposed upon it
00:45:32.240a former illegal illegal alien from el salvador i've forgotten his name but but um he came he
00:45:38.560came across way back when it was amnesty under reagan amnesty and and so he was he's been
00:45:42.960appointed head of data in west virginia where there were virtually no hispanics not many catholics
00:45:46.960either but there are some of these um and i was very disappointed that trump didn't attack that
00:45:52.240it was a deliberately insulting thing that this this pope who was obviously a leftist did it did
00:48:53.240I mean, I've seen I've seen tweets suggesting that young Republicans in Texas have had a great influx of membership since since this election.
00:49:01.600And as I said, I've been through I've been through this a few times.
00:49:39.440It's just that you need to have the will to contain it.
00:49:42.900And all I can say is, you know, from my own point of view, this issue was obviously developed very dramatically.
00:49:47.500And when I founded VDARE after we were purged from National Review in 1999,
00:49:53.220there were very few places where criticism of immigration was allowed, even simple facts about immigration.
00:50:00.960For example, the fact that these illegals are all dependent on government programmes.
00:50:04.760You couldn't, it's almost impossible to get that into the media.
00:50:08.840That's not true now. There's been a tremendous revolution in terms of so many good people out there broadcasting and so on on this issue from a patriot perspective. So that's a very positive sign. I'm going to be 18 next year, so I wish to hurry up about it.
00:50:27.800we all do sir we all do all right before we head to the questions of the people here real quick
00:50:34.200is there anything you want people to check out vader books events anything you want to talk
00:50:38.600about before we get the questions well as you know or we've been attacked by a vampire squid
00:50:44.900in the shape of letitia james the new york state attorney general and she forced us to
00:50:50.160the cost of this thing is so high that we had to suspend the site uh two years ago in april