End of the Enlightenment | Guest: Jonathan Pageau | 1⧸10⧸24
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 13 minutes
Words per Minute
185.07907
Summary
Jonathan Peugeot is an icon carver and an Orthodox Christian. In this episode, he talks about how he sees the world through many different lenses, and how he uses his art as a tool to understand the world around him.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
We hope you're enjoying your Air Canada flight.
00:00:10.720
Fast-free Wi-Fi means I can make dinner reservations before we land.
00:00:25.260
Wi-Fi available to Airplane members on Equipped Flight.
00:00:33.280
I've got a great stream with a great guest that I think you're really going to enjoy.
00:00:38.140
So Jonathan Peugeot is somebody who gets into the symbolism behind things.
00:00:44.440
He talks about what it's like to look at this world through many different lenses.
00:00:49.160
And I know many people are very excited to have him on.
00:00:57.200
So I think a lot of people who have found your work talking about, you know, different
00:01:02.420
ways to understand the world through narratives, through story structures, but you have a very
00:01:07.500
interesting kind of approach to this, the way you came into this space.
00:01:15.820
A lot of people learned about you, I think, probably from Jordan Peterson.
00:01:24.060
You obviously have an understanding of the different stories and the way they connect to meaning.
00:01:29.980
What was that route that took you to this place where you're not just an artist, but you're also talking about all these things?
00:01:34.700
Yeah, so, I mean, I studied fine art in school, but already then I was interested in reading.
00:01:42.080
I read a lot of philosophy, even during my degree in art.
00:01:46.460
And by the end of my degree, well, maybe not by the end, after my degree, maybe like a year after my degree,
00:01:52.180
I realized that I really wanted nothing to do both with contemporary art, but also with academia in general.
00:01:58.680
Because a lot of the crazy stuff that people see now or that I've seen in the last 10 years that has been happening in academia,
00:02:05.800
you can imagine that in the art world, it was already there in the 90s when I was in school.
00:02:13.120
And so I could already see all this stuff coming over the hill, and I really wanted nothing to do with it.
00:02:19.300
And so I left academia, I left contemporary art, and started, let's say, studying things on my own.
00:02:24.600
I did do some theology, study in theology, and did a few things here and there, but mostly it was through my own reading and with my brother.
00:02:31.360
Both him and I did extensive reading and researching and thinking in our 20s.
00:02:40.340
I discovered orthodoxy, and I realized that in orthodoxy, I could be an artist in a way that made sense,
00:02:46.640
in a way that integrated the different aspects of my life together.
00:02:50.540
And so that's when I became orthodox, also because of the theology, because of the mystical aspect of the theology of the Eastern Church.
00:02:56.960
But all of that time, so it's just kind of funny because people kind of knew me, or Jordan met me as a carver,
00:03:03.760
but I never saw myself as, really, as a carver.
00:03:09.920
I see myself as having a way of seeing the world, and carving is one way of implementing it into my life,
00:03:16.060
which is, you know, I see the necessity to kind of integrate these different aspects and different levels together in their purpose and in their meeting.
00:03:24.580
And for me, icon carving was a way to do that, both to plunge into the language of the church, the visual language of Christianity,
00:03:31.500
and then to actually be there in the workshop, you know, hammering away.
00:03:35.860
It's kind of like how people do jujitsu, you know, or do martial arts and feel like it's a way to understand reality in your body, right?
00:03:42.940
It's not just up here, but it's like being facing oppositional forces, understanding the resistance of matter,
00:03:49.460
understanding the desire to kind of, to, let's say, to shape things in a certain direction.
00:03:54.500
So that's the way to understand that, is that I don't really actually feel like I'm first and foremost an artist, actually.
00:04:01.880
One of the things that I found very interesting about you is the way that you approach, I think,
00:04:07.660
a lot of the political or cultural issues that people have today,
00:04:13.400
A lot of people, I think, are often scared of people who don't directly take things in a hyper-rational way.
00:04:20.380
And one of the things that I saw was, you did a tweet, let me just read it,
00:04:27.380
Rock-a-bye lock on the treetop, when the wind blows, the enlightenment will rock,
00:04:31.800
and when the bow breaks, the enlightenment will fall,
00:04:33.880
and down will become freedom, the enlightenment and all.
00:04:37.420
And when you posted that tweet, it got some pretty interesting reactions.
00:04:42.720
Jane Lindsay immediately called you a fascist, which endeared me to you,
00:04:47.600
because Lindsay likes to spurg out at a lot of people who aren't huge enlightenment fans.
00:04:54.900
Why did that strike at the core of so many people?
00:04:57.620
Yeah, well, the conversation had already begun, by the way.
00:05:00.480
And so Lindsay appeared on one of my tweets where I was talking about something happening at OpenAI,
00:05:06.860
right, during the kind of weird coup that was going on, but we don't know exactly what it is.
00:05:10.340
But during that moment, there were some articles being posted about the new leader,
00:05:17.240
And there was one in the future that talked about all these weird rituals that they were doing at OpenAI
00:05:21.780
and how they made like little statuettes, and they were kind of invoking the true AI
00:05:26.740
and trying to banish the old AI with all these kind of weird little rituals.
00:05:30.700
And I was just pointing out how it's like the world of the future is religious, folks.
00:05:37.900
So the question is, which way do you want it to go?
00:05:47.600
And then I started to answer and then went back and forth.
00:05:49.740
And then he obviously did James Lindsay and exploded and started insulting me
00:05:54.520
But that was mostly that particular poem was accompanied with an image,
00:06:02.320
So Goya made this carving called The Sleep of Reason Produces Monster
00:06:11.820
He's working on some text, but he's fallen asleep.
00:06:14.300
And then there are all these kind of monsters that are appearing behind him.
00:06:17.820
And my my contention is something that I've talked about several times,
00:06:23.360
is that there's something about enlightenment rationalism,
00:06:25.940
which just ignores an aspect of reality, which just ignores it.
00:06:30.560
It's like it pretends as if it doesn't exist or if it's just something that has to be banished.
00:06:34.140
But that aspect of reality, the unreasonable aspect of reality,
00:06:40.160
is part of our perception and our experience and part of reality.
00:06:47.640
my contention is that the enlightenment produced a shadow within itself
00:06:50.920
and that there is in the enlightenment already right at the outset,
00:06:56.600
but then also you have alchemy and magical systems and secret societies.
00:07:00.680
And all of these two things just happen at the same time.
00:07:03.640
Freemasonry is a byproduct of the enlightenment, right?
00:07:06.680
It's like at the same time, it's all happening.
00:07:09.100
Rosicrucianism, all this occultism are the kind of shadow of the enlightenment,
00:07:13.620
but not just the shadow, but deeply ingrained with it, right?
00:07:18.120
And so many of the like Descartes spent a large part of his life
00:07:21.560
trying to contact Rosicrucians and was in contact with Rosicrucians.
00:07:26.040
there was this discussion between the more kind of esoteric occultist aspect
00:07:30.640
of the enlightenment and the hyper-rationalist aspect of the enlightenment.
00:07:34.640
And one of the contentions of some of the more English enlightenment types
00:07:39.800
in the modern world is that I think they're trying to rewrite history
00:07:45.820
which is basically just in English enlightenment, to be honest,
00:07:48.420
and then everybody else is counter-enlightenment.
00:07:51.140
So like calling Kant counter-enlightenment is just like,
00:07:55.700
this is just trying to rewrite the narrative for your own purpose
00:08:01.220
but it's not a reasonable, it's not a reasonable position.
00:08:03.740
And so I was poking a little bit and trying to say,
00:08:10.940
And there are many of those figures right at the outset
00:08:20.220
without understanding the relationship between the enlightenment
00:08:25.560
and the occultism that was pervasive at the same time.
00:08:38.740
and you won't have understood how you got there.
00:08:43.820
Yeah, it feels like there's a very weird PR thing
00:08:55.900
And that's the only thing that it's attached to.
00:08:58.060
And those things are owned specifically by the enlightenment.
00:09:02.860
any acknowledgement that we're moving beyond it,
00:09:26.760
when, you know, the enlightenment gets questioned.
00:10:06.500
Absolute monarchy is an enlightenment phenomena.
00:10:08.480
It is not a medieval or early modern phenomena.
00:10:58.560
and all of these are the counter-enlightenment.
00:57:01.300
quick we've got a creeper weirdo I only have the
00:57:13.760
congrats on the Daily Wire show also well thanks
00:57:28.360
what's a good way to capture alter the narrative
00:57:31.240
yeah so I mean that's one of the things that I've
00:57:53.880
provide us narrative which is our our TV series
00:57:58.120
are all so completely captured but what's great
00:58:01.860
about it is that it obviously like I said nothing
00:58:24.580
series of fairy tales we started with Snow White
00:58:27.620
and I'm going to kind of retell the fairy tales
00:58:29.620
with a a desire to tell them with reverence and
00:58:35.240
also maybe a type of subtlety and a capacity to
00:58:38.700
understand what's going on that might not be as
00:58:41.620
present in the original Grimm versions but I think
00:58:46.060
it's a so there's a massive opportunity because
00:58:48.400
people are like even the studios like people are
00:58:50.760
fleeing them people are fleeing Disney that like
00:58:53.320
they're losing their best talent and those people
00:58:57.980
capture the storytelling moment yeah the implosion
00:59:06.260
were just going to be this unstoppable juggernaut
00:59:08.360
and it's so clear that just yeah just completely
00:59:14.160
properties I can't remember the last time someone
00:59:17.240
actually cared about one of the movies that are
00:59:23.960
excitement the big budget isn't enough anymore people
00:59:31.260
hundred million dollars in a movie and actually
00:59:33.000
care about content again and that's that's a great
00:59:34.980
opportunity for so many on the right yeah definitely
00:59:37.700
and but people the thing about conservative types is
00:59:44.120
attentive to that for some reason you know they're
00:59:46.200
just they're concerned with business and making
00:59:47.660
money and whatever and having families which is
00:59:51.260
stuff too but we definitely need storytellers and
00:59:54.520
people that are willing to jump in and to and to
00:59:58.000
provide that because like I said it's it's time so
01:00:03.240
artists Christian artists all that like this is your
01:00:05.580
moment folks like right now is the time to do that as
01:00:08.820
we watch everything implode you know I need these
01:00:12.820
fairy tales like I'm doing it myself but I'm telling
01:00:14.680
you they're up for grabs now because Disney doesn't
01:00:16.720
want them right the Disney literally doesn't want
01:00:19.080
Snow White they're like and I knew that's one of the
01:00:22.860
because two years ago I heard that Disney was putting
01:00:25.500
out Snow White for their 100th anniversary and I was
01:00:28.140
like what they can't tell that story I was like I knew
01:00:31.120
it I was like they can't have the kiss they can't have
01:00:33.280
the dwarves there's so many aspects of that story
01:00:35.500
that they cannot do and I thought they're not they're
01:00:38.680
basically can't make Snow White so I thought now's
01:00:41.100
the time to do this yeah great a great strength is
01:00:44.000
just the ability to tell the truth through narrative
01:00:46.100
that you know that that kind of the left can't touch
01:00:49.000
that's it's a superpower in many ways last part of that
01:00:52.520
question actually dovetails here I heard somewhere that
01:00:54.800
the best Christian stories are godless or don't directly
01:00:57.560
have God in them I was wondering what you thought
01:00:59.700
of that yeah I think that this is something people find
01:01:03.260
that weird but this is something that I think is
01:01:05.120
important to understand the hierarchy of how you tell
01:01:08.320
stories so you you have to be careful that the secular
01:01:12.020
stories are not told in the same way that the Bible is
01:01:15.600
told and so if you're going to tell secular stories that
01:01:19.200
aren't actual like the story of saints or the story of holy
01:01:21.900
people or the or stories that are equivalent to to what is
01:01:25.900
there in the tradition then you should take it down a notch
01:01:29.200
and show how secular reality and how all those realities
01:01:32.900
actually kind of cohere towards towards meaning towards
01:01:35.600
purpose you can hint at the idea of something transcendent but you
01:01:39.820
have to be careful not to be too explicit because then it just
01:01:43.540
looks like proselytizing or then it just looks like and that's
01:01:46.460
why most of the Christian movies are horrible because it's just
01:01:50.800
basically like a like evangelism moment and nobody's going to pay to be
01:01:55.420
evangelized I don't know what to tell you like whereas people like
01:01:58.880
obviously we know C.S. Lewis and Tolkien but then also Dostoevsky and
01:02:03.840
some of the 19th century there are other 19th century authors as well that we
01:02:07.880
can take as examples as ways to tell stories within the Christian world
01:02:14.700
without being without being without proselytizing well one of the things you
01:02:19.760
said is that you know the Bible you know Jesus is they're trying to
01:02:22.820
communicate the way the world works so in many ways simply communicating the
01:02:26.620
truth of the world is itself a Christian truth and so if you're properly
01:02:30.640
displaying that you will be delivering a Christian message you'll be
01:02:34.460
implicitly Christian whether it's explicit about it's kind of altar call at
01:02:38.180
the end yeah exactly no don't put it on the actual end of your movie oh you
01:02:43.800
know who's gonna go see it yeah you know it won't be reaching any of the people
01:02:47.500
who need the altar yeah exactly exactly yeah literally the preaching to the
01:02:51.900
choir yeah uh uh Jake Bowen here says how aware are uh are of the Yarvin
01:02:57.020
critique of the modern world are people like Jordan Peterson and the IDW I guess
01:03:00.940
yeah those those are circles you'd be a little more familiar with are you
01:03:04.400
familiar with Curtis Yarvin have you heard anything well I saw him at Ark and I
01:03:08.100
wanted to talk to him but he was heading out I was like I was like I was like
01:03:11.580
Curtis Yarvin and uh and he kind of said hi to me but he was he was I think he was
01:03:15.580
tired or whatever so I never actually had the chance to talk to him I'd be happy to
01:03:18.640
talk to him at some point uh and I'm not sure I imagine that his criticism is
01:03:22.900
probably the the classical liberal criticism against classical liberalism um which
01:03:28.400
I'll be honest with you I could say without a without a doubt that Jordan
01:03:32.600
Peterson is no longer a classical liberal it's like you might if you want to
01:03:36.580
listen to stuff that he said seven years ago maybe but if you pay attention to
01:03:40.420
what he's saying now listen to his final speech at Ark and you'll see that he's
01:03:45.560
no that that is no longer his take and he recently said on a podcast he said he said
01:03:50.580
we're the counter enlightenment which I was like interesting I mean interesting
01:03:54.940
that you're going all all the way there so uh so yeah but I don't know about the
01:03:59.680
other IDW people but for sure I think Jordan is no longer in that camp all right
01:04:05.080
yeah we've got a uh just a super chat from Ed there and then uh Jake Bowen again
01:04:09.680
asked can we anticipate a highly produced sub 30 minute uh ultimate explainer on
01:04:14.200
hyper agents uh escaping the modernist frame etc uh yeah that that would be
01:04:19.800
packing it in pretty tight I want to do my best I I so I did a I did a speech more or
01:04:24.260
less on this uh including uh a lot from Nick Land uh at an event over uh in
01:04:30.040
England and I've been meaning to turn that into a video and an essay at some
01:04:33.960
point so you might get something along those lines from me I've got I've got
01:04:37.880
the framework set up already so uh at some point I might put that together for
01:04:42.140
you by the way I just want to say I never I don't use the word hyper agent for
01:04:46.820
a reason is because I think the problem with the word hyper agent is that it takes
01:04:51.220
for granted that we are single agents and that now and on top of us they're like
01:04:56.800
hyper agents and and and also John talks about uh hyper objects uh and I think that
01:05:03.000
that's a I think it's a mistake because you're a hyper agent too right the person
01:05:09.380
is a hyper agent there are plenty of there's all this agency multiple agencies
01:05:13.380
within you that are joined into one agent and that happens also at higher levels
01:05:19.220
it's the same with objects it's like there is no the the objects that we
01:05:23.240
usually call objects are already hyper objects and so I'm I'm worried about
01:05:27.340
making that distinction because I think that it it it gives us the illusion that
01:05:32.140
we have this stable like unity unit based thing down here and now we have these
01:05:37.500
almost these these stranger things that are hyper on top of it but I think it's all
01:05:42.880
the same structure all the way through yeah I think it's only useful in so much
01:05:47.140
as people who are kind of stuck in this completely uh non-spiritual
01:05:52.800
individualistic framework it allows them to understand something that could act
01:05:57.420
outside of them that isn't directly tied to like the god of the bible I think
01:06:02.220
yeah okay yeah I understand what you mean that is there's that too like people
01:06:05.180
don't and also the problem with is that yeah the problem that also people they
01:06:10.560
because of the frame of the angel and demon thing they they kind of struggle it's one
01:06:15.200
of the things in Christianity is a little more difficult like we have fairies and in
01:06:18.500
Christianity but we don't have neutral agents like super personal agents so much
01:06:25.040
it's it's so but a lot of those agencies are not are kind of neutral C.S. Lewis does a
01:06:30.360
good job at trying to hint at that where he has I don't know if you remember in in the
01:06:35.400
trilogy he he has the the these these god figures that are like angels but then at the end they see
01:06:43.240
them as the god Mars and Venus and saying that in some ways the the there's a distorted version of
01:06:51.340
that which the devil has distorted toward being kind of negative aspects but that in their truest form
01:06:57.100
they are transparent vehicles for the higher for higher participation um so he's he's trying to deal
01:07:03.520
with that problem of like how to how to talk about these these transpersonal agency I like
01:07:09.240
transpersonal agency I like that one I think okay yeah all right I have to think about that verbiage
01:07:14.080
there uh Ed says what books would either of you recommend on the events and people that led to
01:07:19.460
the devolution scene in the French Revolution Weimar Germany etc um I mean I so I for the French
01:07:28.400
Revolution uh I don't know about this you know specific actors but people have always asked me
01:07:33.560
about like how do you get different perspectives on the French Revolution and I always say you've got
01:07:37.520
Burke you've got Carlisle and you've got Demaestra and they all wrote uh kind of summations on the
01:07:43.520
French Revolution the events they think that were involved in I think those give you kind of full
01:07:48.920
of the spectrum from kind of a classical liberal to fully uh reactionary takes on that so that would
01:07:55.000
that would be my suggestion yeah I totally agree I think I think for sure the thing is that most
01:07:59.860
people don't read Demaest they don't even know about his existence and so it's probably a good idea
01:08:04.460
to to help to help to remind people that that perspective was there at the outset yeah it's he's writing
01:08:10.880
right close to the event that it's a it's a really fantastic if you haven't read any of his work
01:08:15.080
I've got a couple different videos on him and I believe um that uh there's a press that has a
01:08:22.400
collection of his works out uh recently some of some of the basic work so you should definitely
01:08:26.560
check that out if you haven't read uh him yet uh let's see here uh Jake again last one I recently
01:08:33.320
returned to mass uh a a deck uh after a decade away because of you uh and uh Paul uh B. Oh Vander
01:08:42.200
Clay Vander Clay okay yeah and others in the corner made uh uh made a click thank you well yeah
01:08:47.940
Paul is excellent I've had him on a number of times he's he's really great uh and uh guys like
01:08:53.860
Jonathan I've actually I had several comments before you even got on Jonathan saying Jonathan's
01:08:57.860
why I'm not an atheist anymore so I'm glad you're having him on so you're doing great work man
01:09:01.820
thanks thanks yeah Paul's great I love him I love him too we just had a conversation today so
01:09:06.160
oh did you fantastic look forward to that uh George uh hey Duke says AI poetry uh human servitude
01:09:12.520
is all about inversion and inversion of re-enchantment should we all be uh should we still be watching
01:09:19.040
the fools so yeah it's like he's I talked about that quite a bit I was saying and I still think
01:09:26.200
by the way that this still uh this still applies because about five years ago maybe I'm not sure
01:09:33.960
when I started telling people watch Kanye people watch Kanye just watch him I'm not saying follow him
01:09:39.060
I'm not saying agree with him but I'm saying watch him because he's gonna flip like he's starting to
01:09:43.900
flip in ways that are prophetic like that'll help us understand what's uh what's coming over the hill
01:09:50.980
uh and sadly I have to say that that's still true uh and I think that we need to pay attention to those
01:09:58.420
characters because they they they're they're almost divinatory in the sense that they they manifest what's
01:10:05.140
coming you know because things are so unstable that they show us the how order will be will kind
01:10:11.800
of come back so but yeah like I said yeah I'm not saying follow I'm saying just watch yes well it's
01:10:17.980
it's certainly entertaining if nothing else uh hard to look away in some ways uh uh uh George follows
01:10:25.120
that up by saying thank you for changing my life Jonathan oh well that glory god is all I can say
01:10:30.620
absolutely and creeper weirdo last one I swear uh John what does Jonathan think about right wing
01:10:35.760
takes on left on left wing or leftist stories that kind of bother me sometimes do you think that the
01:10:42.020
right has a problem kind of understanding left wing stories has a problem you know they often try to
01:10:47.280
mimic them in a certain way I think the form without understanding the content yeah why I don't think I
01:10:54.280
think that the right wing has been horrible in storytelling just absolutely horrible at storytelling
01:10:59.700
for a very long time and uh there that's why it's like basically talking like that's it everybody
01:11:05.840
is like talking talking talking he's the only one in like almost the entire 20th century that people
01:11:10.560
can kind of you know there are a few uh uh so so I would say the best thing that the right wing
01:11:19.280
people can do is understand the margin right now is to understand what that is and what its function
01:11:25.680
is and how it plays out and I think that the best thing that that right leaning uh storytellers can
01:11:33.420
can do is tell stories that also include the perspective of the margin in them that way you
01:11:39.320
actually um you could say that you short circuit the problem that the the left winger is is presenting
01:11:47.140
you um that's the best thing so it's like people don't know but I mean some people probably know we
01:11:53.020
we're publishing this graphic novel series called God's Dog and God's Dog is about Saint Christopher
01:11:59.720
who's a who is who is in there's a secret tradition about Saint Christopher most people don't know that
01:12:04.340
he's a dog-headed man he's a he's a cenocephalus right he's a monster from the edge of the world
01:12:08.780
and despite that that he became a saint in the Christian church and so telling a story like that
01:12:15.220
like not in my case that's what we wanted to do my brother and I it's like we're telling a story
01:12:18.980
about a monster from the edge of the world who's excluded who has all these characters all these
01:12:22.900
characteristics but now we have that story really grapple with the problem the opportunity of
01:12:28.260
identity the danger of the margin the opportunity of the margin because the margin is dangerous you
01:12:33.000
know obviously uh but it also has opportunities so it's like trying to find the balance rather than
01:12:38.440
just going full identitarian because identitarian stuff is boring and it's it doesn't it doesn't it
01:12:46.360
doesn't account for reality so you have to find that if I a true representation of the world
01:12:51.280
yeah there's a coarseness um in many ways uh you know that just it it not integrating all the
01:12:58.640
different aspects are is always a mistake I think and uh so all right guys well we're gonna go ahead
01:13:04.420
and wrap this up but of course thank you Jonathan for coming on uh had a great time talking to you and
01:13:09.480
of course guys if you're for some reason not watching his YouTube channel or reading any of his work
01:13:14.180
his other stuff you definitely need to check all that out but thank you for coming on it was really
01:13:17.640
great to having a chat with you it was fun anytime absolutely all right guys well thank you for coming
01:13:22.720
on uh and or sorry thank you for watching guys and make sure that if you uh have not subscribed to
01:13:28.780
this channel if it's your first time here make sure that you do so and of course if you'd like to get
01:13:33.060
these broadcasts as podcasts make sure that you just subscribe to the ora mcintyre show on your
01:13:37.560
favorite podcast platform great questions guys always nice having the audience around uh and I will talk