00:00:00.240Hey everybody, how's it going? Thanks for joining me this afternoon. I've got a great stream with a great guest that I think you're really going to enjoy.
00:00:07.240The discussion around political violence has obviously been very, very active right now after the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
00:00:16.680It's become clear to many that the left has been allowed to charge the political environment with a large amount of hatred, vitriol, and direct calls for violence,
00:00:27.500which I think has ultimately culminated in the type of actions we're seeing from the radicals like Antifa.
00:00:35.240Now, a lot of people have pointed to a few guys.
00:00:38.780San Piker is one of them, and he has appeared recently on a New York Times interview with Ross Douthat,
00:00:46.720which is kind of like the House conservative for the New York Times.
00:00:50.520I'm not going to count David French. He's completely hopeless.
00:00:53.520Ross, at least, is, I think, somewhat conservative with,
00:00:57.500some good insights, and he did a very interesting interview with Hassan Piker,
00:01:03.100not because it gave you any kind of, I think, deep insights,
00:01:06.760but ultimately it simply allowed Hassan Piker to kind of reveal ultimately who he was.
00:01:11.620So I wanted to break that down today. I've clipped some of it together.
00:01:14.680It's an hour-long interview. You can watch the whole thing if you want,
00:01:17.780but obviously we can't go through the whole thing because the show is about an hour.
00:01:20.560So I put together some of the highlights that really cut to what we're discussing,
00:01:25.420but you can, of course, go and check that out if you'd like.
00:01:29.000Joining me today to discuss this is a man who has himself commented on the dangers of streamers like Destiny
00:01:34.720and Hassan Piker. Aristocratic Utensil, thank you so much for coming on, man.
00:01:39.280Thank you very much. It's good to be back.
00:01:41.360Absolutely. Well, we're going to play through this.
00:01:44.460We're going to watch the footage back. We're going to comment and break this down.
00:01:47.460But before we do, let's hear from today's sponsor.
00:01:49.900You know, we spend a lot of time here talking about what's going on in culture and politics,
00:01:54.260the battles, the noise, the craziness, but here's something different.
00:01:57.700If you're a woman listening right now or if there's a woman in your life that you care about,
00:07:50.840I mean, every time I've seen him talk, I just go, you would not do well in any debate.
00:07:56.780I think in anyone, anyone that is remotely right wing with like an IQ above 95 would be able to destroy him easily just by asking him basic questions.
00:08:07.180I mean, for goodness sakes, when he was talking with Asmund Gold some months ago,
00:08:09.740he was talking about like queer liberation in Palestine, like as if should they get security,
00:08:14.940that is going to be the next logical step for their ancient civilization.
00:08:17.540It's like, what are you talking about?
00:08:18.820This is in no way connected to reality.
00:09:09.580And we'll play a montage of of the fact that that's just not the case.
00:09:12.920But this is going to be a core to his argument, Spoon, as he's talking the entire time about how the state is already involved in the violence.
00:09:21.700And so all he's acting as a asking is to redirect the violence, a.k.a.
00:09:25.700I would like to use violence against you and the state because the state is already violent on your behalf.
00:09:31.560So I'm already justified in in hurting you because you're already doing violence to me.
00:10:16.760You can even use the structural violence of equity.
00:10:19.880I don't never heard that phrase in my entire life.
00:10:23.440It really is just the word salad, because what he's trying to say, like, I know what he's trying to say.
00:10:28.440Like what he's trying to say is that the very structure of a system that produces poverty is basically doing violence to those who are poor.
00:10:38.760And so what he wanted to say there is that equity is like somehow the solution.
00:10:43.000But because he's just a complete idiot, like all he can do is talk about how there's a violence of equity because he literally just doesn't know how to sequence sequence words in a sentence to bring about the appropriate meaning.
00:10:57.000He's read these somewhere in like a Marxist blog or a podcast.
00:11:02.240He heard someone who kind of understood Marx and explained it to him, and he's trying to say it back.
00:11:07.780And it's just embarrassing because he has absolutely no clue what he's talking about.
00:11:13.200It's again, it's just a thinly veiled way to say, I believe you're already doing violence to me.
00:11:19.840And so any violence I do to you is therefore justified.
00:11:22.740Because whenever I hear people argue for this kind of thing, I just want to ask them like a basic question.
00:11:28.600Is your ideal, the private sphere is making too much money, and you believe the public sphere has the right to basically co-op some of that wealth and basically be the middlemen to spend their wealth in a manner that is more appropriate for the well-being of the people.
00:11:43.560But I want to ask, like, you don't trust politicians, so why on earth would they listen to you or any of your ideas?
00:12:05.080Well, it is kind of the, like, you know, people who say that the Trump administration is entirely controlled by, like, Israel or something.
00:12:12.340It's like, okay, if you believe that, that's fine.
00:12:14.820But then there's no reason to participate in politics at all, right?
00:12:18.080Like, because they're just completely controlled.
00:12:19.940So either the government is a system of violence to attack the poor, and that's the only reason the government exists, and there's no reason to participate in politics as such.
00:12:31.180Or that's not what the government is, and your entire ideology is a lie.
00:12:35.780Like, and you're just coming up with a reason to hurt people.
00:12:40.580You can't tell me, okay, I'm going to do politics to move things in my direction.
00:12:44.540But also, the entire structure of the political system is designed to do violence to people like me, you know, as he drives this $200,000 sports car.
00:12:54.800Yeah, so you can't have the slightly approach to, I want to completely flip the switch, because it seems to me that your end goal is, I can't use the current system as it is, I have to overturn it.
00:13:09.120In which case, any little small change basically just leads to, no, I want revolution, and the small tweaking is just bullshit, basically.
00:13:17.140Well, I mean, this is what happened to the Tsar, right?
00:13:19.600Like, the worst thing the Tsar ever did was give in to the peasants' demands, because then they wanted more, and they ended up murdering him.
00:13:24.800You know, it's kind of the classic communist move.
00:13:28.060Don't listen to peasantry is basically the, listen from that.
00:13:32.560Well, and just that there's no such thing as a half a revolution, right?
00:14:41.800But in your explanation, which is completely detached from all history and all truth and all reality, like you're obviously just smuggling a violent revolution.
00:14:53.620It is basically what he's just, you know, he's just dropping that on him, which I appreciate the slow burn on that one.
00:14:59.020But I don't even think Hassan recognizes the burn either.
00:45:05.140But I will say, I appreciate that Ross throughout the interview, he doesn't walk away from the idea that that states are inherently violent forces.
00:45:19.940The difference is, when we, you know, when we look at these systems, and you and I have our own consequence, you know, our own criticisms of democracy.
00:45:28.180But when you look at democracy, the idea, at least in theory, is yes, the state has the monopoly on force.
00:45:33.740And what you have is a debate on how the monopoly on force should be used.
00:45:38.020And if one side loses that debate, then that is simply what happens, right?
00:45:42.980Like, the system's agreement is that you and I debate on this, and ultimately, you know, I win the debate, and now the state does what I want while I'm in power.
00:45:53.020And then I have to be careful about what the state does, because if you step into power, then you could wield the same power against me.
00:46:00.200Again, we both have our own criticisms of that system.
00:46:02.660But the point being is that is what, you know, is generally considered the argument for how this works.
00:46:08.920For Hassan, he says, no, if you control any part of the state, if I ever lose the debate, then the use of the state on your behalf is basically murder.
00:46:18.020And so I have, if I lose the political contest, then I have a blank check to respond to your social murder in kind.
00:46:27.160It basically, you know, politics, if I win, I'm allowed to use the state however I want to steal your money and steal your stuff and hurt you.
00:46:34.240But if I lose, then I'm allowed to shoot you because you're going to use the state to do the same to me.
00:46:39.680And so there is no losing in politics for Hassan.
00:46:42.280Either he wins and controls the state and punishes his enemies, or he loses and he kills his enemies to make sure they don't do the same to him.
00:46:56.760And so in a way, I appreciate him taking the mask off for everybody.
00:46:59.240We don't have to give the illusion of democracy, or we don't have to pretend that Hassan believes in, you know, a peaceful transfer of power of the state and its monopoly on violence to someone who he disagrees with on, you know, the contention that they won an election.
00:47:38.920I think it's a matter of bodily autonomy, and the government shouldn't interfere in this, between a medical professional and a woman.
00:47:46.080Having said that, you get to argue about women's bodily autonomy being potentially removed by making the argument through the systematized version of violence.
00:48:04.400Because I think, as you would probably also recognize abortion restrictions have come down in numerous states since the decision of Roe v. Wade was overturned.
00:48:13.080And in the process, women have found themselves in this unique predicament where they can't even get their ectopic pregnancies dealt with because their medical professionals are worried about potential prosecution.
00:48:25.320This has led to a lot of pain, this has led to a lot of pain and a lot of torment, and maybe even in some instances, death.
00:48:31.820When you argue on behalf of the pro-life position, you don't have to say, like Bill O'Reilly did, Tiller Tiller, the baby killer, and then someone goes out and actually shoots a doctor.
00:48:46.140You can simply say, I'm not putting words in your mouth, I don't know what your position is, or your advocacy around abortion, but someone of this mindset can easily just advocate for the harm that is done to millions of Americans, potentially, without uttering a single word that could be considered remotely violent by the broadest
00:49:17.300So again, it's straight up, you know, my violence is speech, your speech is violence, right?
00:49:24.340You are advocating for a policy, a policy that the majority of Americans, you know, at least used to believe in, and a large percentage of Americans do today.
00:49:34.800But by simply advocating for this basic political position, which has existed in the United States basically the entire time this has been a debate, you are doing violence.
00:49:45.840To women, to me, like, you're, you're just advocating this means you control a system and that system will visit violence on them.
00:49:53.900And therefore, I have a justification to fight you, to fight back, to do violence to you, because you are already engaged in violence simply by existing as my political opponent.
00:50:03.560And that's really all he's saying here.
00:50:05.420You have differing political views, and your political views, simply being espoused, are violence on me.
00:50:11.680And so I have, again, a blank check from the beginning, from the word go, simply because you hold these positions that says, I should be able to murder you.
00:50:33.360The minute you say a political opinion I disagree with, you are, you are arguing on behalf of systemic violence.
00:50:40.180And therefore, I have the right to engage in direct violence.
00:50:45.100I would like to know what is his perspective of bodily autonomy when it came to the, the needle of doom during the red sniffle season.
00:50:52.040Um, yeah, I imagine he probably was not for bodily autonomy during that particular period.
00:50:56.200Then it was all for the good of the country and all that, you know, hippie bullshit.
00:51:00.860But, um, I would, I would like to ask him if he realizes how many people before were pro-choice because they had a more libertarian view on it.
00:51:10.600And then they saw the amount of people, women, especially that were glorifying it to the point where you go, that's kind of gross.
00:51:17.140And you became pro-life just because, okay, you women are clearly disgusting and evil and someone should really clamp down on you because your behavior is morally abhorrent.
00:51:25.960Well, and ultimately the point is that it, the, the, the simple, the, the idea that simply because you could advocate for it could, because remember, Hassan advocates for straight up like wealth confiscation.
00:51:39.840And you notice early on, he says, well, I don't even want to think about how that works.
00:51:43.220Of course you don't because how it actually does impact you.
00:52:09.600Like if you're, if you're saying that, uh, advocating against, uh, like just, you know, open abortion and at all times is violence against women.
00:52:17.740Well, by like inherently just for advocating it.
00:53:02.520Someone should really tell them if that's the position that you hold, then you should really not be surprised if you end up birthing a Franco or a Pinochet.
00:53:10.320Yeah, well, that's the classic solution to this, right?
00:53:13.960Like, how do you stop people who have this mindset, who are who are willing to do open violence, Spanish revolution, these kind of people who are bombing, murdering public officials, you know, saying that any advocates advocacy for another political opinion is violence.
00:53:28.800I mean, the only option becomes a strongman if that's actually how you're doing, because now politics can't function because one side says, I want to advocate for policies.
00:53:38.140And Hassan Piker says, I want to murder anyone who, you know, advocates for policies.
00:53:42.900OK, well, then I guess we don't have a lot of options left politically at that point.
00:53:51.660You're kind of heading in that direction at this point in time, how I think pretty much most of the West is at this point.
00:53:56.780Yeah, I think, unfortunately, that's correct.
00:53:59.600I mean, you have a scenario where all of these people are openly, you know, just saying, look, communist revolution, we can kill anyone we want because they disagree with us.
00:54:24.580So, I mean, you're kind of familiar with Marxists, you know, and third worldists attempting to seize, you know, and appropriate all of your stuff and being willing to kill you if you if you disagree.
00:55:55.760But so the policing is a necessary institution.
00:55:57.740But then why do you just point to it and demand more of it?
00:56:00.520But that in that demand, they're technically demanding more of the the unreasonable outcomes and unjustifiable outcomes of policing that lead to, for example, the death of George Floyd.
00:56:14.600But this analogy is itself part of why people think you are normalizing the things that are taboo, which would be which again would include right wing forms of violence.
00:56:28.080But if you said so, again, he's just walking them up to and, you know, again, I love that Hassan does not understand.
00:56:36.380He's too stupid to grasp the implications of his own worldview.
00:56:40.060And so like doubt that has to walk him through.
00:56:42.680OK, so I just want to make it clear to you that if you understand the world in this way, you are just saying that any advocacy for any political position that you don't hold is worthy of violence.
00:57:28.440No, his positions, I think, are more sort of reflexive utopianism, if that's a phrase I just made up, because that's basically all he's saying.
00:57:37.820I just realized what he's doing in almost every single instance is he's he's literally just giving Hassan the rake into saying, here, step on it by advocating your position.
00:57:47.540And he's just doing that repeatedly because the police one, he just said that if someone is calling for more police, you you get outcomes that you don't like politically.
01:00:04.980Like you're basically saying the person who incites violence against a politician is in the same position as the person who supports border security.
01:00:13.760And that seems like an argument that lends itself to encouraging people to commit political violence because you're saying, oh, it's all normal already.
01:00:38.120I want people to to actually take a serious look at the violent structures that already exist, that from the point of the recipient is already experienced as like a direct form of violence.
01:00:54.360I forgot I left that in before we got to the Israel part because I just because again, Ross just kind of laid out, you know, laid the whole thing bare there as to where he was going in the implications, the ultimate implications there.
01:01:14.980And I see that as a as a as a byproduct of the rampant destabilization that has existed in this resource rich region.
01:01:23.140And I my criticism against these countries not having the allowance or not having any moment of of respite to be able to evolve.
01:01:32.060I see that as a byproduct of American imperialism and Western imperialism as well.
01:01:37.520So you see, Spoon, the reason that the Middle East is not a civil rights, multicolored, you know, queer gendered, you know, paradise is because Israel and the United States force them to do this.
01:01:52.240Like otherwise, if if they just been left to their own devices, if Turkey or or Saudi Arabia or Yemen had been left to their own devices, ultimately, these places would just be, you know, they would be hyper tolerant.
01:02:03.700They would be embracing furries and and troons and and all this other stuff.
01:02:08.780And it's really just it's really just the Western imperialism that has set them down this course.
01:02:13.200Otherwise, they they're still to development would have come to fruition and they would have become the ultimate civil rights, socialist, gay race, communist paradise.
01:02:21.880Well, what I don't understand from that perspective is that pretty much anyone that is under the Western imperial hood has all of that shit that he's advocating for.
01:02:31.900What was I don't I don't even know how you get to that.
01:02:38.600Everything that you advocate for is part of Western imperialism out of my language.
01:02:43.040But what the fuck are you talking about?
01:02:45.240Yeah, I don't know how he even gets to that.
01:02:47.280It's beautiful, right? Because, yeah, everything he's advocate advocating for is a product of neoliberalism.
01:02:53.260It is a product of like degenerate Western embrace of neoliberalism to the extent that there's a problem with the West.
01:03:01.800It is the fact that like that is a fruit of some of the perverse progressive ideology that has taken over the West.
01:03:09.140And what he's saying is, if only the West hadn't been there, then the gay race communism would be more like the West.
01:03:15.440Like we're talking about like, you know, the Biden administration was raising gay pride flags like in every embassy that the United States had.
01:03:48.760But we don't want people to be like our model, even though that I literally want them to do everything that the current situation that I live in has produced, which makes no freaking sense.
01:03:59.100It's like, what do you actually want these places to look like?
01:04:02.440So you basically want Western imperialism's end point, but without the violence whilst also advocating for violence.
01:04:09.620I just realized how utterly incoherent his ideology actually is, if I just say it out loud.
01:04:16.000Well, and, you know, these guys have this is what you have to do, right?
01:04:19.560This is what this is the downside of winning as a revolutionary, right?
01:04:22.920What do you do when the revolution has to become eternal?
01:04:25.440So in Hassan Piker's mind, like it's the establishment that is kept from, you know, us from embracing queer liberation and all these things.
01:04:34.740And the fact that like every corporation has been pushing it and selling it and advancing it and like every power center and educational system and Hollywood, the fact that like they all hold these beliefs and advance them.
01:04:48.940Well, that's just the capitalist co-opting the socialist message.
01:04:52.320They don't really believe it, even though it's literally the outcome of the very system he's decrying.
01:04:57.920Like the woke capital is the end point.
01:05:01.600And Hassan is, of course, the most beautiful, as you say, exemplar of this.
01:05:06.100He is the same champagne socialist to his core.
01:05:11.680I'm advocating for gay rights and then saying if I could just get rid of capitalism, then all of a sudden gay rights would enter into all these traditional countries that otherwise would have advanced.
01:05:22.940And this is the so here's the dumbest thing, because he's such an idiot.
01:05:25.860Like he really has never even read a lick of actual Marxism.
01:05:29.200It's very clear because the actual whole point of, you know, kind of the Marxist idea is that capitalism itself will dissolve traditional societies.
01:05:40.240Right. Dissolve monarchies, dissolve all of these other structures, these these these these patriarchal Christian structures.
01:05:46.980And that will allow for all of this feminism and homosexuality and all this other stuff.
01:05:53.000And then once capitalism has done its job of breaking down these traditional societies, then the Marxist can come in and like scoop up all the wealth from the capitalists.
01:06:03.440And now that we have this utopian post traditionalist society, they can redistribute.
01:06:13.820But he's skipping all the steps and he doesn't understand like Marx's and, you know, the post Marxist theories.
01:06:20.920He doesn't even know that, like, they actually support this process.
01:06:25.660Like if you read Deleuze and Guattari, they're talking about how this is a good thing and how you need capitalism to actually do this work.