00:06:23.280All I have to show is that it improves my business and that I never had any racist intent when I put that into place.
00:06:30.260Workplace requirements and selection procedures, such as background checks, aptitude tests, and SAT scores, are presumptively job-related.
00:06:40.340Only irrational or arbitrary practices with no plausible job-relatedness can create disparate impact liability.
00:06:46.680So this opens up a whole category here because one of the reasons that colleges have such a stranglehold on the job market is they were basically a de facto proxy for the IQ test, right?
00:07:02.120Well, I'm not technically allowed to give you some kind of aptitude test or IQ test.
00:07:06.720So instead, you need a college degree.
00:07:08.840And because I filtered it through that, I no longer am subject to disparate impact.
00:07:12.960But now there's a possibility that we could just have something like an aptitude test or a raw SAT score without a college degree, and that would be sufficient.
00:07:21.860It's no longer considered a disparate impact liability.
00:07:26.340Disparate impact plaintiffs must both establish that the challenged employment practice specifically caused the alleged disparate impact and provides evidence that an equally effective alternative practice causes less disparate impact.
00:07:40.700So if someone brings a lawsuit and they say, hey, there's a disparate impact here, they have to prove that there is not some other version of the same mechanism that will not have the disparate impact.
00:07:54.200So it's not enough to say, hey, that aptitude test is showing more white people or more Asian people are qualified than black or Hispanic people.
00:08:01.820That is not enough. You have to say there is another version of the same test, another version of the same sorting mechanism that would have less of a disparate impact.
00:08:10.500You have to be able to show that empirically instead of just implying that it's racist.
00:09:47.380these are the kind of things moving forward
00:09:48.840where we're not going to have a legal backing
00:09:51.800of a certain kind of corporate culture
00:09:53.740that prevents American companies and American businesses
00:09:56.700and really just the entirety of the federal government
00:09:59.600from basically being tied behind its back
00:10:02.260under allegations of racism i mean while the corporate culture and the sort of woke era as
00:10:07.680we call it is still very much alive it's still very much powerful we see this in everything from
00:10:12.180hollywood down to the private sector by taking away some of the legal you know sort of superstructure
00:10:17.700that they're based off of it's a very positive step in the right direction but also as you know
00:10:22.620senator eric schmidt had pointed out on x earlier to you know today when we were recording is that
00:10:27.400this allows the executive order that he had put out on April 23rd, 2025, at the beginning of his
00:10:35.120term, that, you know, disparate impact liability is anti-merit and that we need to actually treat
00:10:41.060ourselves on neutral grounds instead of, you know, simply allowing this disparate impact standard to
00:10:46.560exist. That has to be done away with. So this puts forward furthermore of what the Trump
00:10:50.560administration wants to do to return, I think, more of an actually colorblind system into the
00:10:55.880country, one that is not actively anti-white. And instead, it's moving forward, I think,
00:11:00.740on returning to a much more fair and efficient era of American business and American law.
00:11:07.780Yeah, again, the fact that so many businesses have been staffing up, have been hiring with
00:11:14.940this thumb on the scale that was largely anti-white, was almost exclusively used against
00:11:21.360white people, and then at some level, Asian people, uh, to make sure that they were not0.59
00:11:26.220hired in the appropriate numbers, that it was all based on quotas or, you know, some0.53
00:11:30.800kind of desired racial outcome, uh, anything that did not fit some kind of artificial rubric
00:11:36.880about what racial makeup should look like was considered, uh, you know, racist and,
00:11:41.660and was an actionable, uh, you know, uh, uh, uh, piece of law.
00:11:45.440Ultimately this shifts it because of course, if the DOJ is looking at it this way, you
00:11:50.360know, the Department of Civil Rights there, they're the ones who are going to handle these
00:11:53.120types of cases. So if this is the opinion and it holds up and, you know, this guy, Eric Weiss,
00:11:59.400who I think did a good thread on this, also backs it up with some recent case law from the Supreme
00:12:04.600Court. As you said, this all kind of converges with the previous executive order and it creates
00:12:10.500a scenario where we just have a paradigm shift in how corporations, government agencies, everyone
00:12:17.020else is allowed to hire again. And there probably will still be some residual resistance. Of course,
00:12:23.040we've seen this when it comes to colleges and the Supreme Court ruling when it comes to affirmative
00:12:27.260action. Many of these have found ways to skirt it. But ultimately, this at least allows business to
00:12:33.160return to its own interests. It no longer has to create this artificial hiring structure that
00:12:38.700favors minorities or people who aren't American. And that means that if you have a qualified white
00:12:44.640guy in a job next to a Hispanic guy or a black guy who is less qualified, you no longer have to skew
00:12:50.240your hiring practices and you no longer have to weight them in favor of those minorities. You're
00:12:55.280allowed to hire those more qualified white candidates and you don't have to worry about
00:13:00.200some kind of backlash coming from the government, which is a huge win. Again, it will probably take
00:13:05.600some time for hiring departments to shift, for HR departments to shift their mentality.
00:13:10.120You know, the personalities there, the kind of people who work in HR departments,
00:13:13.560They'll probably continue some level of that bias. But ultimately, the legal framework that was forcing it down their throats is now effectively dead. Now, again, of course, the problem is, as with all of this stuff, this is stroke of the pen stuff, right? Like, so the next administration that comes in, if it's a Democrat administration, can reverse all of this. That makes it very fragile.
00:13:35.420you'd like to see big changes uh you know amendments to the civil rights act those kind
00:13:40.260of things through the republican congress but let's be real if we can't pass the save act we're
00:13:44.680definitely not doing any kind of amendments or repeals of the civil rights act even though we
00:13:49.160absolutely should so this is as good as the as as the trump administration could have done and i
00:13:54.320think they deserve big credit for this you know i i tried to call you know balls and strikes with
00:13:59.220the administration i certainly uh you know give them a hard time when i think that something is
00:14:03.660going wrong but this is a big win it's as much as they could have hoped for in this area a huge
00:14:08.840move from them very happy to see it and i think they deserve all the praise that they're getting
00:14:12.660uh for this decision yeah absolutely and i mean we have to look you know towards the the past
00:14:18.940how much disparate impact has played a major role in here you know justice scalia had famously said
00:14:25.580during his time on the bench that at some point in the future the battle between disparate impact
00:14:30.960and equal opportunity, as well as our basic freedom to pick who we want to actually hire
00:14:35.640is going to come to a face, and it's going to have that battle. And I mean, that was back in 2009.
00:14:41.240When we look at things now, obviously, we're nearly 20 years later. And this battle is,
00:14:45.620you know, coming very front and center, I think, out of this administration.
00:14:49.000And I think this is just in sort of the greater backdrop of what the Trump administration has
00:14:52.360been doing. While yeah, a lot of it's stroke of the pen. But I mean, we have to consider our,
00:14:56.480as we've said on the air before, Oren, you know, this administration is operating with one hand0.91
00:15:02.200tied behind its back because half of the party would love to just wait him out as a lame duck
00:15:07.000and not get anything done in the Congress. While the entirety of the civil service that is either
00:15:11.360holdovers from Biden and Obama appointees fight him at every turn, and you still have a multi
00:15:15.420billion dollar left wing octopus that's ready to use every tentacle it has to stop him and fund
00:15:21.600to protesters and to fund lawfare across the country. So to see this take place and still
00:15:26.320everything that he's got going against him, this is an amazing step in the right direction. I think
00:15:31.320that it's important to celebrate the victories when we get them, absolutely. But at the same
00:15:36.580time, we have to consider the fact that there's still a lot more that needs to be done. I think
00:15:41.680that this significantly opens up for American businesses that have maybe a favorability towards
00:15:47.700the administration or would like to game it out in lawfare. Various other states, I mean,
00:15:51.900this would be another win for Ron DeSantis if he wants to take the remaining time he has as
00:15:56.000governor to maybe find a case that he can move forward to see if this can be challenged before
00:15:59.980the Supreme Court. But overall, I mean, this gives us significantly more room for red states to make
00:16:05.300their hiring practices for local businesses in their states fairer and give a stronger position
00:16:11.400towards aptly qualified candidates rather than being harangued or, you know, either being
00:16:15.860discriminatory racist or not hiring enough people under the names of just like a diversity hire
00:16:21.520absolutely i want to go ahead and read this uh summary paragraph that they have in the decision
00:16:26.820here it says disparate impact liability as currently interpreted by the eoc is unconstitutional
00:16:32.760we interpret title seven to conform to the safeguards of disparate impact liability that
00:16:38.680the supreme court has indicated are constitutionally required setting an appropriate
00:16:44.080threshold for business necessity, required robust causality, and demanding evidence of an equally
00:16:50.880effective alternative practice that causes less disparate impact are essential prerequisites
00:16:57.300to any imposition of liability. The EEOC's regulations and guidance fail to incorporate
00:17:03.560these safeguards in key respects, and the validation study and affirmative action
00:17:10.080regulations conflict with title seven and the constitution so again it's previously it was
00:17:17.960basically absolutely a win if you filed any kind of disparate impact lawsuit and there's any
00:17:24.280statistical difference you're going to automatically win that case that was never supposed to be the
00:17:28.420intention of the civil rights uh uh the civil rights act that was explicitly something that
00:17:34.300they tried to box out of the civil rights act because so many people uh said this was going
00:17:38.180to be concerned when it was originally passed. And yet anyway, the courts kind of built it in0.86
00:17:42.580and it got re-instantiated in the 1991 Civil Rights Act by Republicans, by the way. And so
00:17:48.680the fact that they have changed that standard, they say, look, you have to have all these
00:17:54.400barriers before you can trigger disparate impact. You have to show the intention. You have to show
00:17:59.940that this was hurting people and you have to show there's no alternative. And if you can't prove
00:18:05.080all of these things which are going to be pretty hard to prove then you can't trigger this basically
00:18:10.480you may you you functionally have to catch someone writing a memo saying we only hire white people
00:18:15.280here or black people here and so if you don't have that memo somewhere you simply cannot create you
00:18:21.280know this disparate impact standard anymore and so that means that businesses just have a a higher
00:18:26.460degree of latitude at pretty much every area in every area of hiring uh which is is huge again
00:18:32.920can't say enough about this um this is a big win for the Trump administration there's no other way
00:18:37.540to frame this great job from them uh you know always want to praise the admin when they're
00:18:42.080doing a good job and this is just a fantastic example this is what we voted for more of this
00:18:47.360this is what we want to see fantastic job guys love it yeah absolutely and again like I think
00:18:53.800this just opens up so much more room now for uh future cases I mean to be tested I think that if
00:19:00.900this is going to be the standard that we're using. I mean, now with the difference in the Supreme
00:19:05.120Court, I think that this means that you can potentially take a look at various standards
00:19:09.400that have been challenged in the past when it comes to Title VII with disparate impact. I think
00:19:13.060that you could look at this with like, you know, Ricky versus Stefano back in 2009, where you're
00:19:19.320moving away from sort of a strict approach under Title VII. I think that now that we're having this
00:19:23.780move going forward, I think that we're finally going to see a proper, you know, at least for
00:19:28.800right now until we have a case or the Supreme Court decides to legislate from the bench or if
00:19:33.100Congress ever gets off its butt and does something, then at least for right now, we're seeing an open
00:19:37.560door for various states' attorney generals to just go forward and move in the right direction towards
00:19:43.660proper meritocratic employment, the utilization of tests. That way, we're no longer giving
00:19:49.540the legal force, the real cudgel that the left has when it comes to making sure that whites and0.79
00:19:57.020other well-qualified candidates are deliberately kept out of positions that they are certainly more
00:20:01.060than qualified for. When you travel well, your KLM Royal Dutch Airlines ticket takes you to more than
00:20:07.740just your destination. It takes you to winding streets, spontaneous detours, and the realization
00:20:14.420that neither of you is actually good with directions. Recalculating route. And when the
00:20:19.780final shortcut taken isn't exactly short, welcome aboard KLM Royal Dutch. Our crew is here to give
00:20:26.400you a trip home that goes just as planned. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines. When you travel, travel well.
00:20:33.100And this is very interesting because it dovetails with something you had sent me
00:20:36.140earlier. We looked at a study that was saying that artificial intelligence algorithms are being used
00:20:43.560to kind of pre-interview people when it comes to job selection, which, by the way, is nightmarish
00:20:50.000and terrible. Like as somebody, I think both of us have been in situations where we're looking for
00:20:54.680job, sending out, you know, dozens of resumes a day, hundreds of resumes over a week, you know,
00:21:00.900wondering if we're ever going to hear back. So the fact that you have this impersonal force between
00:21:05.700you and hiring managers is already terrible. But the study was claiming that the AI was preferring
00:21:12.060white people. It was, you know, disproportionately setting out black and Hispanic candidates
00:21:18.940because they weren't meeting the requirements that had kind of been built into the artificial
00:21:23.420intelligence and the claim of the study was that ultimately this was a violation of this exact
00:21:28.860section title seven of the civil rights act because it created a disparate impact and so
00:21:34.320very interestingly when you couldn't use iq tests or you couldn't use uh you know any of these
00:21:40.040aptitude tests basically ai was being used as an alternative to kind of avoid the civil rights
00:21:46.000implications but they were trying to say oh no it's also creating disparate impact so that could
00:21:50.560be a lawsuit with a ruling like this it looks like you could probably continue to use that ai
00:21:56.180algorithm without it being considered a violation you would avoid you know those triggers so you now
00:22:02.980have these other ways again i don't want to be evaluated by an ai before being hired but if you
00:22:07.740have to be evaluated by an ai without being hired at least it's no longer uh you know under suspicion
00:22:14.680of this violation of title seven it's no longer considered disparate impact you could actually
00:22:20.240go ahead and implement something like that, even if it ends up favoring white candidates
00:22:24.860because they tend to be more employable.0.59
00:27:12.720And now you have a scenario where there's a real shift where not only can you no longer
00:27:18.360favor the minority in this ridiculous manner, but you might even open the door to legal liability0.94
00:27:23.820if you are biased against white males. And that is just so outside the realm of anything that0.96
00:27:30.160corporations have interacted with for 50 plus years at this point that it completely shakes
00:27:36.220up the hiring. HR managers and legal liabilities, corporate lawyers are sitting right now staring
00:27:41.940at their hiring practices, trying to figure out what to do, I'm sure, because this just
00:27:46.280completely upends everything that they have built their structure around when it comes to
00:27:50.720selecting employees and hedging your bets against lawsuits and all of these things.0.89
00:27:54.500So the fact that this is now something that is genuinely in the court of the average white
00:28:00.880American male is huge. It means that you can actually hopefully get a fair shot when you0.63
00:28:06.620are stepping into an interview, when you're looking at even an algorithm in a process,
00:28:11.860admissions, all these things. Again, I'm sure there will be holds out holdouts. I'm sure
00:28:16.040there'll be corporations that violate this. I'm sure they're going to need to litigate this and
00:28:19.620force it through. You have to see that enforcement. That's going to be the follow through, right?
00:28:23.500We're doing a lot of praising here and they deserve it a hundred percent. But just like
00:28:27.640when it comes to the, you know, the universities, we need to see the follow through. If you're not
00:28:31.160threatening these people with lawsuits, if you're not bringing legal consequences,
00:28:34.860they're just going to ignore this ruling. So big praise, you know, fully behind this,
00:28:39.420love it, but we also want to see the follow through. We want to see the finish. This is
00:28:42.880an amazing first step they deserve all the credit in the world for taking that step but we need to
00:28:48.080see the rest of the race run and i hope they hold to that yeah and this is where you know so much of
00:28:53.560our i think time on social media kind of gets wasted sort of arguing over things that the
00:28:59.220administration does or doesn't do or we're reacting to the news so often i think you know
00:29:03.760there's i think we compare i think comparing ourselves to boomers can be quite apt because
00:29:07.340just as our parents and grandparents would yell at the television or at the radio about news that
00:29:12.480they hear we're doing the same thing sort of reacting to the news or quote tweeting about it
00:29:16.060and so on but i mean i think like you had said the follow-through is really important and like
00:29:20.640as we saw when we discussed years ago with the claudine gay uh situation at harvard on your
00:29:25.400channel you know there are there's going to be ways in which they get around it and whether it0.96
00:29:29.340leads to sort of this creation of like an anti-woke neoconservatism which has certainly
00:29:33.160happened since that whole debacle took place but i think that this is a really good opportunity to
00:29:38.040encourage listeners as those are especially in the in the legal field like if you are a young
00:29:43.020hotshot lawyer who is seriously thinking about a political career a litigation against this you
00:29:48.900know sort of stuff where companies and corporations are trying to get around it this is how you're
00:29:52.820going to make a name for yourself and taking advantage of what the doj has now opened up for
00:29:57.720you i think really gives us a chance to begin to strategize both on a legal front but also on a
00:30:02.720political one as to what we can do on the state and local level to ensure that red states across
00:30:08.060the country can enshrine this into law based off of these legal decisions. And if someone wants to0.53
00:30:13.100sue predicated on that, this is a fantastic way forward in which, at least for right now with our
00:30:18.100current system, if the court's going to legislate by the bench as it has been for the entirety of
00:30:22.300our lifetimes put together, then at the very least it could be potentially done in a way that
00:30:26.320actually enshrines this into law. And I think that this is a good step forward and the follow-through
00:30:30.980is there for um political actors across the country for those who are really interested
00:30:35.300in making sure that this happens all right well like i said this is our white pill episode you
00:30:40.200know once a year enjoy it guys you know treasure this you know you hold on to this one to warm you
00:30:45.100through the cold of winter uh but the other big story of course is the carmelo anthony verdict
00:30:51.460of course uh you know he has been found guilty of murdering austin metcalf uh this is big on a
00:30:58.800number of levels of course we just saw uh you know the horrific death of uh you know a young
00:31:06.260man in england due to a migrant and then just another you know migrant trying to behead a man
00:31:12.540in uh in northern ireland we see this kind of you know uh violence against white people uh often by
00:31:19.080immigrants but in this case we're talking about the carmelo anthony uh just a a situation where
00:31:24.600uh you had a black man or a black uh student who you know tried to walk in you know to to this tent
00:31:31.140uh during uh this game this track meet and ended up stabbing austin metcalf brought a a knife to
00:31:37.860uh you know the the uh the uh track meet and uh did you know was claiming self-defense as if he
00:31:45.200needed to for some reason uh murder a guy who was just kind of trying to move him out of the tent
00:31:50.840uh interestingly in this a couple important things first uh carmelo anthony raised a
00:31:56.660giant pile of money uh claiming to be a victim of racism you know ultimately saving this is
00:32:02.700self-defense and it's being brought against me just because i'm black uh raised an enormous
00:32:06.700amount of money uh hilariously enough uh his family decided to spend that money i guess on
00:32:12.640cars and and and renting houses and such because he ended up with a public defender uh so even
00:32:18.280though there were a bunch of people who jumped on predominantly black people uh donating just
00:32:23.820because the guy was black and he killed a white guy uh and uh you know he ended up with this pile
00:32:28.480of money uh his family basically stole it from him and hung him out to dry uh which is exactly0.89
00:32:33.400what he deserves uh and uh you know he ended up with this public defender the defense was terrible
00:32:38.500uh they they attempted to eventually claim that austin metcalf accidentally stabbed himself
00:32:44.680with the knife uh which is just insane but they tried to like basically say oh well no it was like
00:32:50.920a struggle and he ended up stabbing himself and that's that's how he died uh the jury was even
00:32:55.700allowed it was instructed by the judge that they were allowed to pursue a lower charge so they
00:33:02.680could have gone with something like uh manslaughter which would have can uh carry a much lower uh
00:33:08.920penalty obviously but they refused they went to uh the murder charge so not only uh was this guy
00:33:15.520convicted he was convicted of the maximal charge uh available even though the the jury had a free
00:33:21.840out to kind of try to try to avoid i guess like a uh you know a uh oj simpson uh scenario uh but
00:33:29.400they went and gave the entire uh sentence and so we're still waiting for the sentencing and
00:33:35.120sentencing itself. In Texas, the span is wide. You could go anywhere from five years to 99 years
00:33:42.060or life. It's an interesting thing. We'll have to follow up and see what the sentencing itself is.
00:33:48.380But obviously, this is huge. The fact that justice is being done here, of course, it's still
00:33:53.200incredibly tragic. Austin Metcalfe's death is horrific. This doesn't solve anything for his
00:34:00.800family. His loss is still felt quite considerably in the community. However, it is good to see that
00:34:08.140even in this racially charged environment where often an advantage is given to minorities, a
00:34:14.160sympathetic narrative is built out that encourages juries to ultimately side with
00:34:20.300a minority in this scenario. Instead, they did exactly what they should have and they returned
00:34:25.720the correct verdict. They didn't chicken out and take the lesser charge or anything like that.
00:34:30.340And so, again, we'll have to wait for the final sentencing, but the verdict itself is justice.
00:34:36.460And I think everyone should be heartened to see that in this environment, with all of the political charge and all the racial animus involved, we still saw proper justice done here.
00:34:47.480Yeah, I mean, when we take a look at what happened, you know, when we see, you know, after the fees from Give, Send, Go, they had collected $636,400 for the claims of legal defense.
00:34:58.900and instead of lawyers his family bought a cadillac escalade a new house fresh clothes etc
00:35:04.260um and he went to court with a public defender which for even if you are not a lawyer or familiar
00:35:09.220with the legal system a public defender is you know they'll do their best uh they may not be
00:35:13.720trained it's at the public service they don't make as much money as they would working as their
00:35:17.180independent private practice um and you know they're there to ensure that the defendant is
00:35:21.000not unfairly treated by the prosecution and by the state um and we saw what happened and we know
00:35:25.680that the jury is the only ones who had saw um the footage that has been remained closed and
00:35:31.980unavailable to the public uh because had it been i think available we would have seen a lot more
00:35:36.640action on this issue i think more swiftly just as we've seen already what happened in northern
00:35:41.360ireland where you know you can call it an assault you can call it whatever you want but when i'm
00:35:45.740watching someone get stabbed and attempted to be beheaded uh you're not going to be able to tell
00:35:49.940me to not believe my lying eyes um and of course the american people and of course the the entire
00:35:54.640region out of the demands for safety or our previous conversations we've had on the community
00:35:58.520relations service um that it's something that needs to be out there for people to understand
00:36:03.740this is not some you know case of the self-defense yes the knife that he had is not illegal under
00:36:10.020texas law uh it doesn't matter he carried it with a purpose and he used to stab austin metcalf
00:36:14.440um and now that we're seeing the reactions play out in front of the courthouse uh it's you know
00:36:20.040they're trying to get that oj simpson thing going on as we've discussed but i think that it just
00:36:23.780becomes really clear and in everyone's face about what we're dealing with here which of course is
00:36:28.560a very racially motivated form of support we saw it earlier outside on on the news and from people
00:36:35.680reacting you know what am i supposed to tell my boys and i mean you know as a few accounts have
00:36:40.760said well you just tell them not to kill anybody this shouldn't be crazy um but sadly it is in
00:36:45.600part because you can't act like you're the great al sharpton you're not going to act like and he's0.81
00:36:50.380not even great to begin with but like you can't act like a thespian this is not theater for you0.60
00:36:54.800this has been allocating thousands and millions of dollars over my lifetime and countless others0.87
00:37:00.840uh predicated to basically get away with racially motivated murder um when you can get away with it
00:37:06.600and treat it as such because that you know that there's an entire legal apparatus and a cultural0.93
00:37:10.640movement and moment uh that is predicated on saying well it's okay to kill a white guy0.98
00:37:15.540that Carmelo Anthony and his family made over half a million dollars for killing a white kid.0.97
00:37:20.260And I think that that's very clear in this case. It's very apt. And of course, what is the media1.00
00:37:25.140going to run with? What are his supporters going to run with? They're simply going to say tomorrow
00:37:29.100as the news breaks out, and this all comes national news, that Carmelo Anthony did not
00:37:32.960have a single black juror on the jury. And we know during jury selection, this has been a very
00:37:38.640public trial for anyone to look at on the news, that they had gone through and asked everyone who
00:37:44.780was a potential member of the jury on the jury pool to make sure that they weren't discriminating
00:37:49.540and that they weren't going to have any biases in place when being on the jury. Because that's
00:37:54.960a big part of, if you've ever been called into jury duty, it's something they're going to ask
00:37:58.180with criminal cases. If you have any biases or just the subject matter of the case, you know,
00:38:02.300with the victim being white or the defendant being black, that's going to, you know, put any
00:38:05.920sort of bias on you. And there were black individuals who were there on the jury pool
00:38:10.520that said, I'm not sure if I could put a brother in prison. And they were thanked for their time
00:38:14.440in their service and that they were dismissed for obvious grounds because that would have been
00:38:17.780incredibly prejudicial. So with all that being said, I think that this is good news that Austin
00:38:22.500Metcalf and his family gets some semblance of justice. It's a reminder that we won't have
00:38:27.160Austin with us anymore. May his memory be eternal. But at the same time, you know, this is a step in
00:38:33.160the right direction to see something happen. Whether or not he gets 99 or life or whatever
00:38:37.600they decide to do with him, that's up to the jury and what the court does. But the reactions out
00:38:42.680here in place should make it very obvious that despite all claims about what wokeness is for
00:38:48.880or for what progressive or what equal protection has been for, it has been adamantly motivated by
00:38:54.420agitators, by political activists, and by the popular culture that these kinds of things are
00:38:59.960acceptable, that these kinds of things are part and parcel of our, you know, multi-ethnic,
00:39:05.120multi-racial, multi-cultural society. And really what it has come from, just with the same thing
00:39:09.440with Title VII, is that it is legally and culturally mandated that the life of someone
00:39:15.540like Austin Metcalf or earlier, you know, that was big in the news with Irina, their lives do not0.57
00:39:21.460matter, that they are not worth it, and that this is something that should be celebrated. And we've0.88
00:39:25.320seen it on the timeline. If you want to go look for it, you certainly can. It's not very hard to
00:39:29.420find. And there are people countlessly celebrating what Carmelo Anthony had done. And so while the
00:39:35.100case for justice is good to see that he was found guilty of murder um it still is just one of
00:39:41.400countless thousands of cases that will happen in america statistically speaking there will be
00:39:45.500thousands of austin metcalfs and arenas in this country that take place and i think that things
00:39:50.240like this need to be motivated and highlighted because from the obama administration onward
00:39:54.540you know whether it's blm or even obama himself has you know told me to remember a litany of names
00:40:00.160of individuals that had been killed by the police or killed because of their own criminal activities
00:40:04.780that have burned down the country in 2020
00:40:06.940in the name of mostly peaceful protests.
00:40:09.380No, I think that I would much rather remember
00:40:11.600the names of people who were murdered in cold blood
00:40:14.240for no other reason than because they felt
00:40:32.520the different orientation of this story when it comes to, you know, kind of George Floyd 2020
00:40:40.040and today. The difference is stark. You know, obviously there's a lot of ethnic entitlements,
00:40:46.320as you say. Unfortunately, we've gotten to a point in jury selection where there are many people
00:40:51.660of minorities that will simply say, I'm voting for people who look like me no matter what.
00:40:56.540I will always side with them. That pretty much destroys the idea of a jury of your peers.
00:41:02.000If you have, if every jury is simply an ethnic headcount, then there is no justice. And sadly, that has been, you know, kind of the direction we're going. And so you have a scenario where everyone who is, you know, black or these other minorities, they just kind of assume that they're going to get these automatic votes, that things should go their way, that they're, you know, of course, I'm never going to vote a black man into jail, even if he did murder some white kid in cold blood.0.96
00:41:27.580uh you know i i just won't do it because of racial solidarity and so this has been a very
00:41:32.180dangerous time and it's very clear i think that the left uh hates trump uh certainly would not be
00:41:38.100sad to see another summer of love kick off in a moment like this uh but it seems like the energy
00:41:43.800is just not there it seems like there is simply you know while they're trying to gin that up
00:41:48.020they're trying to create this after this verdict uh there are still you know people saying oh black
00:41:52.320man can't get a fair trial around here because of the white jury ultimately it seems like there's
00:41:56.240just not enough juice there to generate that result. And that's very positive. You know, I
00:42:00.960did a post on Twitter that kind of went viral about this. But just a few days ago, I was in a
00:42:07.820store, you know, and I'm in a part of Florida where the law is applied, to be clear, like this
00:42:12.340isn't San Francisco, people go to jail, you'd think in general, for crime. But I was in a store,
00:42:17.820and there's some, you know, black guy who was mumbling to himself, running, you know, kind of
00:42:23.080walking through the shelves uh you know i just kind of kept my distance and paid attention but
00:42:28.500otherwise you know i was fine when he went out the door woman ran up to the counter and said
00:42:34.160i'm pretty sure that guy scooped a whole bunch of items into his bag before he left and the woman
00:42:39.240working there said the company doesn't allow us to call the police because they wouldn't do anything
00:42:44.520anyway and it looks bad he does that all the time and so it's just one of the scenarios where
00:42:49.420this guy can't be held to the same standard that a white guy would be held to because he's black0.59
00:42:54.300and it would look bad and the police don't want to deal with it so we just let him steal stuff0.96
00:42:58.460and that's the way it goes and for a lot of people that seems to be like the explanation0.93
00:43:03.380for Kamala Anthony's actions well a black guy is allowed to act this way he's allowed to
00:43:09.360you know accelerate things you can't treat a black person the same way you treat a white person0.93
00:43:14.740because they're going to become more violent and they have the right to do so and if you try to0.76
00:43:18.700stop them or you try to take general action you're the racist you're the bad guy so you know best
00:43:24.560case scenario you're just a racist worst case scenario you're austin metcalf and that was austin0.97
00:43:29.360metcalf's final crime was treating carmelo anthony the way he would treat any other white guy you0.99
00:43:35.060can't behave this way you weren't supposed to be here you're here i try to remove you and i end up
00:43:40.940dead an unnecessary escalation perhaps in any other scenario there would have been a scuffle
00:43:45.780maybe even a fistfight but that would have been the end right but because of this entitlement
00:43:50.680because of this idea that i get to act a certain way and no one gets to challenge me because of
00:43:55.620the color of my skin i'm basically an aristocrat because of the color of my skin austin matcalf
00:44:01.780is dead right that this is the way that many people see the world minorities get these special0.99
00:44:07.560privileges like they do in the uk and you just have to hand it over to them and so it is good1.00