Leftist Storm Minnesota Church, Violate Federal Law | Guest: Will Chamberlain | 1⧸19⧸26
Episode Stats
Words per minute
206.41147
Harmful content
Misogyny
13
sentences flagged
Hate speech
23
sentences flagged
Summary
The left is out of control in Minnesota, and they are now storming churches. Will Chamberlain, senior counsel at the Article 3 Project, joins me to discuss the latest installment of the "anti-white supremacist" madness that has swept across the state.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hey everybody, how's it going? Thanks for joining me this afternoon. I've got a great stream with a great guest that I think you're really going to enjoy. The madness in Minnesota continues. The left has been violent. The left has been out of control, but they have now moved on, not just to attacking ICE agents or going outside and protesting, harassing people. They are now storming churches inside of the state.
00:00:24.860
Joining me to discuss this today is Will Chamberlain. He is the senior counsel at the Article 3 Project, along with several other very impressive titles. Will, thank you so much for coming on, man.
00:00:37.300
Absolutely. So the very interesting thing about this instance is that it was led by a former CNN news anchor, Don Lemon. And that's very important because it's very clear that the people who walked into this church
00:00:52.440
thought that they were going to have the cover of just being part of the mainstream media. They had an embedded journalist. What could happen to them? They're leftists, right? They can do whatever they want, whenever they want.
00:01:02.800
They're not going to get in trouble. But it does look like the Trump administration is intending to take this very seriously. We're going to walk through several pieces of the footage for people who have not seen it.
00:01:14.780
But what are your initial impressions of the left feeling emboldened enough to walk into a place of worship, shut down the service, hold the pastor hostage as he attempts to lead his flock?
00:01:26.340
Do you think they just they just assume they were immune from everything else that had been allowed to go on kind of the under the auspices of a protest in Minnesota?
00:01:35.900
Yeah, it's it's a weird bit of amateur hour from left wing criminals. Normally, we're used to actually you have to give not to give Antifa you never have to give Antifa anything, but they're usually a bit more sophisticated in how they approach being criminals.
00:01:48.100
They, you know, Antifa people show up in black block masked, and they don't read their phones, and they don't post about post proof of identity so that other people investigators could find them at the location because they know what they're doing is stepping over the bounds of the law.
00:02:02.780
What happened here is a group, I think, of BLM protesters primarily, who had no understanding that what they were doing was in violation of federal law, it obviously was, but they clearly didn't know that.
00:02:13.300
And, you know, the most bizarre thing, or I guess the most predictable thing, rather, is that the leader of this is apparently a civil rights lawyer, and yet she's perfectly unaware that civil rights law federal civil rights law prohibits this conduct in multiple different statutes.
00:02:26.500
So I see this as the closest thing to January 6 that we've seen from the left, and in the sense of why, you know, January 6, in my view, had widespread criminal conduct, right, it was a bunch of people who were breaking federal law when they were running into the Capitol.
00:02:42.020
And it's a bunch of people who didn't realize they were breaking federal law, and I think that's a big part of the reason why so many people were prosecuted so easily.
00:02:50.880
I think that Hermie Dillon and Pam Bondi are about to throw the book at these people.
00:02:55.100
I think my bet, if I were, you know, the most likely outcome is that every single one of these people faces charges under 18 U.S.C. 241, conspiracy against rights.
00:03:04.880
Everybody who showed up and protested, Don Lemon included.
00:03:08.160
Yeah, I think that's absolutely critical because, of course, the impulse here is going to be to avoid charging Don Lemon.
00:03:16.840
Maybe you charge some of the other people, right, but you find some way to say, oh, he's a media figure, he's covering things, you know, because you don't want the bad optics.
00:03:25.320
You don't want the left getting to make him a martyr, say, oh, it's a journalist, he's just out there doing the job, and the Trump administration is throwing journalists in jail for doing their job.
00:03:34.240
But it is very clear, and we'll show this evidence as we roll through the different pieces we've collected here, but it's very clear that Don Lemon knew exactly what he was doing, that he's one of the ringleaders of this thing, that it was endorsed by him and others in social media posts, in footage that is taken, in post-action interviews.
00:03:53.260
He is woven into this action throughout, and so it's critical, I think, that the administration makes it clear that Don Lemon doesn't get some special ability to violate federal law because he happened to show up on CNN at some point.
00:04:10.560
This is just what the protesters taped coming in, and then we'll talk about, you know, Lemon and these other clips separately.
00:04:18.920
But this is the main protest as they enter the building.
00:04:49.500
This man is also going to go up and harass individual prisoners.
00:05:07.800
Why are you guys at Wibble every day fighting for the humanity?
00:05:17.520
What do you do to stand for your Somali and Latino communities?
00:05:40.600
Doing absolutely nothing for your Latino and Somali brothers and sisters.
00:05:44.280
Once again, you can see him getting in the face of all these people screaming.
00:05:47.020
He wants to make sure that he's videoing himself.
00:05:49.180
He wants to make sure that he's videoing himself.
00:05:50.980
It's the political pornography of watching himself get down here and harass all these
00:05:58.200
Why are you not standing with your Somali and Latino communities?
00:06:01.400
Why do I not see you out at Whipple every day protesting this attack on humanity?
00:06:08.000
We don't have to play through all of that, but can we talk a little bit about the possible
00:06:18.300
This is an act that famously was used by the Biden administration to go after pro-life
00:06:23.220
protesters, even in many cases where they didn't physically enter a building, but simply
00:06:27.140
the idea that they'd be near an entrance, blocking an entrance is sufficient.
00:06:32.600
How can the Trump administration turn this kind of law around since it's already in place?
00:06:37.840
So the FACE Act is going to be really interesting and sort of it's not clear which way it's going
00:06:43.680
And so part of the reason is that there really haven't been any FACE Act prosecutions until
00:06:48.800
like literally this fall on for people obstructing entrance to churches.
00:06:53.460
Every single prior FACE Act prosecution has been for obstructing entrance to abortion clinics.
00:06:58.160
So it's going to be, it's really, there's a lot of room for judges to interpret what do
00:07:04.420
And the logistics of physical obstruction are going to be different for a church than they
00:07:10.760
You know, if you think about any medical facility, there's usually just one entrance, one exit,
00:07:14.760
and you can shut it down by, and you can physically stop people from entering and exiting much more
00:07:21.000
And that's really what the language in the FACE Act is kind of focused on, this physical
00:07:26.180
obstruction language and the way it's been interpreted to being like, are you preventing
00:07:30.920
So I wouldn't say it's like an open and shut case on the FACE Act.
00:07:34.500
I think it's, there's, there's a lot of, there's ambiguity.
00:07:37.580
There's a real question about, well, they're standing in the middle of the church, but people
00:07:43.920
That's where, there's, there's no questions like that.
00:07:45.840
So, but what I will say is I think there's a slam dunk and I didn't learn, realize this until,
00:07:56.580
That's why you saw Harmeet flag that this morning in her interview with Benny Johnson.
00:08:01.100
That simply criminalizes any conspiracy to oppress people in the exercise of their constitutional
00:08:07.520
I can't, don't know any other way to describe what you saw here.
00:08:10.100
It was an attempt to, it was a group of people who conspire to shut down a church service
00:08:19.660
Uh, you, and something that I caught that I hadn't heard before, but, uh, you know, in
00:08:23.240
that video clip, the one thing that I, that I heard that might actually open up more criminal
00:08:27.180
statutes, that guy didn't just, wasn't just talking at one point, somebody tries to touch
00:08:35.880
So that's another, that opens up a couple other statutes, I think.
00:08:38.520
But yeah, I think the most likely, the Ku Klux Klan act is actually the most likely,
0.98
00:08:42.620
uh, way to get a slam dunk conviction on all these people.
00:08:46.060
The FACE act is still, if FACE act is viable and I'm sure it'll be charged, I would just,
0.60
00:08:51.040
you know, if I were a lawyer advising these people as like a defense lawyer, I'd be like,
00:08:54.680
you don't have to plead guilty because of the FACE act.
00:08:56.160
We have some arguments to make there, but the conspiracy against rights, we're, we're,
00:09:02.460
And I appreciate that Dylan explained in that interview with Benny Johnson, that that is something
00:09:06.740
the Biden administration has tacked onto the FACE act to, to further those charges.
00:09:11.100
Apparently it also escalates things from a possible misdemeanor to a felony.
00:09:16.260
Uh, so you're getting a more significant charge.
00:09:19.780
So I appreciate both the fact that they are attempting to apply the same standards that the
00:09:24.500
Biden administration has applied in reverse, but they're also looking, uh, outside of those
00:09:29.740
possibilities, other charges that could be brought.
00:09:32.100
Uh, we're obviously, uh, you know, we're, we're not doing anything legally novel here,
00:09:35.860
but, uh, it's good to see that it's not just, you know, the strictest, most obvious by the
00:09:40.060
books charge that might just, you know, get thrown out immediately.
00:09:42.880
We're looking at a wide range of possible charges that could be applied there.
00:09:47.340
And like you said, uh, you're obviously in a scenario where this, these people are not
00:09:55.640
Uh, you know, these are not just protesters walking in and raising their fists though.
00:10:01.780
You, you cannot walk in to public gatherings in which you are not invited, which you are
00:10:06.780
not a participant and then walk in and shut them down, especially when they're involved
00:10:11.420
It's free speech is not the ability to walk into any and all buildings and speak, uh,
00:10:16.420
That is, that is not, uh, what, you know, what the first amendment says there, especially
00:10:20.320
when you are obviously in a violation of the first amendment rights.
00:10:23.960
Now we have, uh, the interview Don Lemon walks up, of course he needs to, as, as a journalist
00:10:29.420
needs to shove his mic in the face of the pastor who is simply attempting to keep order and
00:10:35.080
Obviously there's only so much this guy can do from the pulpit as this is happening.
00:10:38.720
Uh, but you can see Lemon, uh, getting in there and getting aggressive with this guy.
00:10:45.500
It's shameful to, to interrupt a public gathering of Christians in worship.
00:10:51.000
So, but there were folks who will say, I have to take care of my flock.
00:10:56.660
Listen, we live in a, there's a constitution in the first amendment to freedom of speech
00:11:03.860
We're here to worship Jesus because that's the hope of these cities.
00:11:11.220
I love this moment where Lemon is obviously in this man's church, invading his space, shoving
00:11:16.980
his microphone into the guy's face and the guy who's trying to get literally any space
00:11:21.960
And they say, Oh, don't shove me because Don is the victim here.
00:11:30.300
Do you think Jesus would be understanding and love these folks?
00:11:35.880
But did you try to talk to them as a Christian?
00:11:39.120
Did, did you attempt to talk to them as they walked in and shouted over your service?
00:11:44.540
I mean, just the level of entitlement that Don Lemon went in there thinking he was completely
00:11:49.520
untouchable, that he's allowed to harass, that he's allowed to get in people's faces.
00:11:54.540
No one is allowed to have their first amendment rights.
00:11:58.500
And of course knows exactly what Jesus would do in this situation.
00:12:02.420
I know we talked about this a little bit, and obviously this is terrible.
00:12:05.720
And we're going to talk more about why it's terrible, why it's a threat in the United States.
00:12:09.740
But I must say, this is also a political opportunity.
00:12:12.320
The level of just the terrible optics of this, the level of prosecution the left have opened
00:12:21.220
This is an easy way to cause a lot of, frankly, fear that the left needs to have for their just
00:12:30.360
Finally, I think the right has a clear case in which it can significantly publicly punish
00:12:37.480
prominent people and really make an example that will hopefully make it clear that there's
00:12:42.480
an extreme cost when it comes to this kind of action against average people when you're
00:12:52.780
And I really have a lot of confidence in Harmeet and the team to do that.
00:12:57.020
I mean, within 15 minutes of me tagging her on Twitter with a CC about all this stuff,
00:13:02.940
there was posts from her personal account, her official account, and the civil rights
00:13:13.820
I personally got a phone call from a civil rights lawyer following up on some of the stuff
00:13:22.300
They're sending two people out there this morning.
00:13:25.240
They've got an FBI team in Minneapolis and local attorneys at the U.S. Attorney's Office
00:13:31.100
I mean, they're not going to happen today because it's Martin Luther King Day.
00:13:34.400
And my understanding is when you're talking about conduct like this, it wasn't a felony
00:13:39.460
committed in the presence of the officers, so they don't do an instant arrest.
00:13:45.360
I'm not sure if they need to actually go through the full indictment process to go ahead and arrest
00:13:53.560
But I think people need to, the way to think about this is what happened in the January 6th
00:13:58.180
The first one's rolled out in like 36, 48 hours.
00:14:00.860
It might take a little longer because this happened on the weekend in the middle, you know,
00:14:05.260
But I would expect 72 to 96 hours is when you'll see the very first indictments.
00:14:09.860
And since it's only about 40 people instead of hundreds, I think you'll see six months
00:14:17.340
Because there's a block of, you know, because it's, you have to write all these indictments
00:14:22.960
You know, there's lawyers that have to sit there with each of these individual defendants
00:14:31.820
And there's plenty of work that needs to be done on the legal research side.
00:14:34.640
With each of these individual defendants, what can we charge?
00:14:36.960
Like some of them, you know, that guy who was doing all those intimidating things, for
00:14:40.200
example, I think he's going to open himself up to a whole slew of other statutes that talk
00:14:45.120
about stopping people's religious practice by force or threat of force.
00:14:48.960
I think it's really obvious that when you threaten, you say, don't touch me, see what
00:14:55.860
So Lemon might not have the, that statute might not apply to him, but he still might be
00:14:59.860
viable on conspiracy against rights, that sort of thing.
00:15:02.400
So all this, all that takes a certain amount of prosecutorial time and energy.
00:15:08.320
And for the same reason that the J6 prosecutions, I mean, we were getting new J6 prosecutions
00:15:18.480
And that's even with just this enormous flooding of resources into the U.S. Attorney's Office
00:15:28.620
That's me, not talking to you, but I'm talking to the broader, broader public.
00:15:37.420
I think that, I think DOJ, this is what those people went to the Civil Rights Division to
00:15:41.720
go do, is to prosecute people for invading churches.
00:15:44.240
That's why you went to go work at Army Dillard Civil Rights Division.
00:15:46.640
So I think it's, I just think it's almost certainly going to happen.
00:15:52.520
I will say I am, I am not always a plan truster when it comes to, you know, rolling out the
00:16:00.380
I think the Trump administration has, has failed on this in several areas.
00:16:05.780
And so I'm not going to just sit here and say, yeah, they've been great.
00:16:11.160
I will say the, the rapid response, the clarity of communication from Dillon, those have been
00:16:20.280
That's something I don't feel like we've gotten in other cases.
00:16:23.340
Um, and maybe that is simply because they feel so well grounded in the evidence here
00:16:33.820
And I think we need to, to strike the right balance of, you know, uh, we need to trust
00:16:38.020
the plan, but a little bit of chimping on this too.
00:16:40.040
I want to see, I want to see people give, you know, I get it.
00:16:44.160
The local police department could have made these arrests, but there's a, you know, we have
00:16:48.440
a system in which the local and state law enforcement is responsible for immediate actions in these
00:16:55.100
And when they fail to do that, and we can, we'll have that conversation in a minute.
00:16:59.220
When they fail to do that, it's going to take the federal government a little more time
00:17:05.380
I get that makes total sense, perfectly willing to give the time and the space, but that's
00:17:10.900
also the kind of thing we heard when it came to going after Antifa, uh, after Charlie's
00:17:17.340
Maybe it just takes more time, but I'm sorry, I'm going to continue to pressure that this
00:17:23.280
I, again, I want to believe, I think they will this time.
00:17:26.460
I think you're right about that, but I'm not just going to sit back and be like, well,
00:17:32.160
I'm sorry, but the track record has just not been sufficient enough to give me full trust
00:17:38.600
I, but I will say this about the, the Antifa prosecutions, especially after, you know,
00:17:43.600
They apprehended the guy who did it and within 48 hours, you know, the, the problem is his
00:17:49.820
His parents turned him in, but I mean, that's part, that's product.
00:17:55.460
They were able to put out a very good public presentation.
00:18:02.580
So as a result of not bringing his phone, they didn't have like an instant identification,
00:18:05.840
but they're like, this is the guy, find him please.
00:18:09.300
Uh, the Antifa prosecutions are going to take some time.
00:18:12.560
Cause the, the, in terms of like prosecuting them is like Rico organized crime stuff.
00:18:17.520
I mean, think about how long mob prosecutions take, you know, they're, you know, those are,
00:18:22.740
Those, they don't, they don't, they take a lot of infiltration.
00:18:25.540
They take actually proving the crimes, proving knowledge, proving the way that these organizations
00:18:31.000
function, uh, when, when that's not transparent and they're not.
00:18:34.920
And so that that's, that's a real challenge, especially when it comes to, you know, going
00:18:38.900
after the people who fund them, that's a whole nother level of prosecutorial effort.
00:18:42.580
This is, you know, this is the difference between, you know, uh, uh, uh, 18 yard, you know,
00:18:48.740
like a full completing a full 18 hole golf course and like a putt, you know, a gimme putt.
00:18:53.520
Like that's these, these indictments are gimme putts.
00:18:58.740
And like I said, we, we, I think that's pretty obvious just because Don Lemon is arrogant
00:19:03.180
and retarded enough to do stuff like this.
0.94
00:19:05.880
And to Minneapolis, um, a little bit ago and did some, um, some reconnaissance on the
00:19:14.280
ground and speaking to an organization there that's gearing up to, um, for resistance and
00:19:22.360
He's, he's behind the line to this organization.
00:19:26.320
That's going to do this resistance in front.
0.94
00:19:28.420
Oh, so you've been talking to them and coming to an agreement about what you're going to
00:19:31.580
do, which is literally the conspiracy against rights.
00:19:34.580
You know, there was, I think it was beyond reasonable doubt who quote tweeted one of the
00:19:38.240
things I said, which was, it's just with this image of a, of a criminal defendant, a criminal
00:19:42.840
defense lawyer or quote, one of the makings she's saying, your honor, given that, you know,
00:19:47.440
most of the evidence in this case was tweeted out by my, by my client, wouldn't you give
00:19:54.900
Like maybe Don Lemon just gets a cooperation credit based on this video alone.
00:20:01.700
It's beautiful because he actually transitions from saying they, to we in the middle of this
00:20:06.880
So let me just prize, pleasantly surprised to see the community coming together.
00:20:13.300
If you see this, when we first pulled up, we're like, wait a minute, what is, which, um, which
00:20:19.080
And as it turns out, because we were like, well, this is kind of MAGA coded, right?
00:20:34.100
They're planning an operation that we're going to follow them on.
00:20:36.260
And I can't tell you exactly what they're doing, but it's called operation pull up.
00:20:42.320
And she has been doing this since George Floyd, um, Dante Wright and others where they surprise
00:20:50.060
people, catch them off guard and hold them to account.
00:20:54.500
And then we're after that, after we do this operation, you'll see it.
00:20:57.520
So after we do this operation, he is openly admitting he is not just there to observe.
00:21:07.340
And of course, even better because then later on, he says,
00:21:10.260
heard what some of the folks said in there, um, you know, that this is, uh, um, they shouldn't
00:21:17.540
be there and you know, they shouldn't be uncomfortable and this is our house and whatever.
00:21:21.880
That's what protesting is about is to make people uncomfortable.
00:21:27.920
That's, that's the point where this is a terrorist operation.
00:21:31.080
We're coordinating together to terrorize these people and shut down.
00:21:34.440
We're working with the, like, it's just all there.
00:21:37.660
And then you shared this, which was just the, just the, you know, chef's kiss at the, at
00:21:41.640
the, the, the back end of this, just a woman like the, who coordinated the whole thing,
1.00
00:21:46.160
just listing the names of all the people involved, all the groups involved, everyone involved
00:21:57.800
I think the Trump administration is going to hit this, but if the Trump administration
00:22:00.460
can't knock this one out of the park, I'm sorry, they have lost.
00:22:06.140
I am never, ever, ever supporting anyone involved in this administration again, if they
00:22:13.380
I, I, I, I, I, I think they know that I think that there's, there's a, there is a real
00:22:21.080
And I mean, gosh, given what you just showed me, oh my word.
00:22:24.480
I mean, if you're a prosecutor wanting to prosecute a case, this is exactly what you're
00:22:28.460
Like, please go on and explain exactly what your intent is, exactly what you intended
00:22:33.320
The whole knowledge that this is an operation, like you, you've revealed so much about what,
00:22:39.060
you know, it's just all admission after admission, after admission there, there, all these people
00:22:43.740
Like, it's going to be in the same way that in the DCJ6 cases, the right answer for like
00:22:53.840
Now, the, I mean, the question of course is going to be juries and it's not the same
00:22:56.780
to face a Minnesota jury as a DC jury, but I wouldn't be too black billy there either
00:23:00.220
because if these claims are brought in federal court, then it's a federal grand jury.
00:23:03.720
There's only one federal district in Minnesota, the district of Minnesota.
00:23:06.920
So that means people, you know, you'll get plenty of Republicans on the grand jury.
00:23:11.440
It won't just be the weirdos in the city of Minneapolis.
00:23:16.240
It's the family and friends event at Shoppers Drug Mart.
00:23:19.660
Get 20% off almost all regular priced merchandise.
00:23:22.760
Two days only, Tuesday, January 20th and Wednesday, January 21st.
00:23:33.020
So obviously we're laughing at the inept nature of Don Lemon here, but I want to be clear.
00:23:42.420
Uh, there's a picture going around of a young girl crying and clutching her parents as these
00:23:47.960
And, uh, will that, that can't happen in the United States of America.
00:23:52.020
Like no child should, should fear going to church in the United States.
00:23:57.280
Uh, this is a state that has seen anti-Christian terrorism not too long ago.
00:24:06.280
Like this is, they could have easily had guns breaking in here.
00:24:11.900
One, um, you know, what, to, to what extent are churches allowed to defend themselves in this situation?
00:24:20.080
These people have walked in, they're violating the law.
00:24:25.680
I know at my church personally, uh, there, we have, uh, former law enforcement military
00:24:33.840
I'm very sure this wouldn't happen there, but if something like this did occur, do, does
00:24:39.600
the security team of that church have the right to physically remove these people from
00:24:45.700
And if so, and they escalate violence, what is the appropriate response?
00:24:52.960
Uh, whether or not they have the right to physically remove the people from the building is going
00:24:57.080
to depend on the nuances of Minnesota trespass law or the trespass law of wherever state
00:25:02.160
And also like what, what, what self-help remedies are you allowed to pursue?
00:25:06.560
Um, I think, I don't know the answer to this question.
00:25:12.880
I would think it would vary from state to state.
00:25:14.520
Some states are going to give you more laxity in terms of your self-help remedies.
00:25:19.780
I would be shocked if anybody would permit use of deadly force, for example.
00:25:22.740
So if you say, you know, somebody says, I'm here standing, protesting, you can't just
00:25:28.540
So like that, that would be shocking if that were true anywhere.
00:25:30.480
But the question about whether you can physically remove them, I bet, I bet that's going to
00:25:35.900
I think some states will, some states will probably say, no, no, no.
00:25:38.420
You need to call the cops and let them handle the trespass.
00:25:40.500
Like trespass, you're not allowed to self-help out of it.
00:25:43.680
And other states will say, sure, you can self-help.
00:25:45.500
You can just physically remove them from the presence, the premises if you want.
00:25:49.200
But without looking at the statute, I don't want, you know, this is one of those cases
00:25:55.120
where there's many legal questions that I don't know the answer to.
00:25:57.940
I would have to look up before I could be confident.
00:25:59.580
Is there a possibility that the, and I know Congress does nothing at this point, but is
00:26:06.100
it possible that a federal law could be passed that would allow a uniform ability to defend
00:26:13.760
oneself or defend one's exercise of your religious First Amendment rights through physical removal
00:26:22.140
if someone decides to trespass into a house of worship?
00:26:25.560
Could you have a face act style law that says you as an individual have the right to protect
00:26:33.240
your house of worship against illegal invasion?
00:26:37.860
I think, you know, you'd almost need to like have a, because the question is, could you
00:26:43.620
have a federal affirmative defense to what would be a state law crime, right?
00:26:47.100
Because the idea is that the state law crime would be some sort of assault and battery on
00:26:51.420
the protester because you're removing them without law, without lawful justification.
00:26:56.500
So could you have a federal affirmative defense to that, to a state law crime?
00:27:03.260
The answer, that's a, that's a, that's a, you asked, maybe you didn't realize it, but
00:27:06.480
you asked actually what is a very tricky question off the, you know, from a legal perspective.
00:27:11.240
I was, I was somewhat familiar that it was, it was tricky, but I do want this to be a
00:27:15.680
conversation that is being had in the Republican party in the conservative commentariat.
00:27:20.440
This needs to be, and I really mean this, this needs to be ground zero for a religious
1.00
00:27:31.840
I want to see, uh, you know, the departments drafting, you know, outlines about how they're
00:27:37.580
Cause I have already seen several different posts from left to saying, this is the playbook.
00:27:44.300
We're going into these churches, by the way, Joe Rigney, uh, a guest on the show who is,
00:27:50.540
uh, one of the, uh, higher up guys, I believe in, uh, Doug Wilson's, uh, uh, church.
00:27:56.080
Uh, he said he was a guy who helped plant this specific church in Minnesota and is also now
00:28:02.960
a pastor at, uh, Pete Hegseth's church in DC, which has also received repeated harassment
00:28:10.860
So this is a scenario where multiple churches across multiple States are being targeted.
00:28:16.840
I believe in coordination through the internet, through, uh, by these, by these organizations,
00:28:22.320
by these activists, there's, I believe criminal conspiracy involved here.
00:28:26.380
I believe that there are other, uh, agencies involved, but I really do want to see just
00:28:31.380
a absolute revolution from the Trump administration, from the Republican party, from, uh, federal
00:28:36.960
agencies, uh, say laying out how we are going to protect the rights of Christians specifically.
00:28:45.500
Well, if this was a synagogue, I don't think anyone would be having a single discussion about
0.99
00:28:50.460
every one of these guys spending 15 years in jail.
00:28:52.560
Uh, so I really need to see like just an absolute, you know, pedal to the floor, uh, effort, not
00:29:01.220
I absolutely hope that's the case, but I want to see this go further.
00:29:03.600
I want to see shields of protection out there for Christian places of worship.
00:29:06.780
The funny thing is you, the reason you don't see these things in synagogues, interestingly,
0.95
00:29:13.520
If they've synagogues have had their own series of problems that have led them all to
1.00
00:29:19.120
Uh, what I will say more with churches too, well, yeah.
00:29:23.820
I think that's actually a really important reason why the administration needs to act here.
00:29:27.220
I think there were, there are two specific things I think that a Congress could do that
00:29:31.920
I think the first is to have a law that explicitly prohibits this specific conduct, right?
00:29:36.820
Like conspiracy against rights is a pretty vague statute that does capture the conduct
00:29:41.200
at issue here, but there should, it's always fine to have your belts and suspenders with
00:29:45.860
You can write a specific law that says you're not allowed to trespass into a church and shout
00:29:50.760
down, uh, a service as it's going on, forcing the service to come to an end.
00:29:59.000
Part two is I've been hearing a lot about the use of whistles and vuvuzelas stuff to be
00:30:03.040
really loud and hurt people's ears in these protests.
00:30:05.580
And basically say that like, you know, we're going to, in the context of all the civil rights
00:30:10.160
laws, audible damage via overly loud use of artificial devices like bullhorns and vuvuzelas
00:30:16.140
and whistles, uh, is treated as force or threat of force.
00:30:19.860
It is not just speech, uh, because of the damage it can do to people's hearing.
00:30:23.520
So I think that would be a useful amendment to a lot of these laws because I see it's not
00:30:28.440
It's also in all the protests, you see this endless use of these extremely loud whistles
00:30:36.600
That's an attempt to really hurt people and deter them from doing their job by making them
00:30:44.860
Um, so I think that there's plenty of room for Congress to do some belt and suspenders
0.84
00:30:47.940
work here to prohibit the specific conduct issue.
00:30:50.800
What, what, you know, what should be allowed here?
00:30:52.600
What should be allowed is like any other protest.
00:30:54.920
You stand on the sidewalk and you'll hold a sign.
00:30:58.340
If these people wanted to stand on a sidewalk and hold a sign saying that how, you know,
00:31:02.660
even if it's as obnoxious and appalling as like the Westboro Baptist church was some
00:31:06.540
horrible sign about the, the ice officers, fine.
00:31:11.660
You're not allowed to walk into the church and stop the service.
00:31:15.240
So I will say, I agree with you that, that all needs to happen.
00:31:18.640
I'm, I'm pushing for it right here, live on the show.
00:31:20.900
So obviously, you know, I agree a hundred percent with the steps that need to be taken
00:31:24.800
I will say though, I am concerned about the extent to which law can solve this problem.
00:31:31.000
And I don't want to say, I'm not getting accelerationist or anything here.
00:31:35.000
I'm just stating a basic fact of, you know, uh, of, of how politics and societies work.
00:31:41.580
If you're to the point where free speech is literally being weaponized in the sense of
00:31:47.900
we are turning our voices into weapons to hurt you because we think that's the one way
00:31:52.620
we won't get hit by some kind of federal law or something.
00:31:55.540
When you're manipulating the words down to that level, when we, when the tactics are getting
00:32:00.160
that radical, that abstract, when you're bending and breaking the law in such radical ways across
00:32:06.340
the board, I am concerned that, that there simply is not a legislative solution, especially
00:32:12.360
when many blue States are simply going to ignore the vast majority of this stuff, enforcement,
00:32:20.240
I don't know that the Trump administration really has the manpower or the will to go
00:32:24.980
after every single left-wing jurisdiction and make sure that they enforce any of these
00:32:29.540
things were they to get them through Congress, which I am again, unfortunately, rather, uh,
00:32:34.520
The GOP, uh, you know, Congress is just completely used, useless in this area.
00:32:38.680
And so, uh, you know, I I'm brought to this moment where I want the Trump administration
00:32:45.640
It can't, I want them to do everything they can because the color of law is critical to
00:32:51.980
It's critical to maintaining your status as being legitimate.
00:32:55.260
All of those things are very important, but I also can't look at this with a young child
00:33:00.120
crying as her father holds him because these people are in there threatening her during
00:33:05.960
And, you know, a lot of people were joking about Protestant Franco, but you know, when
00:33:10.620
the Bolsheviks are literally breaking into your church to threaten you, you know, how many
0.91
00:33:17.580
I don't think the left is up for a full scale organized, you know, uh, you know, uh, uh, you
00:33:24.120
know, uh, left, left, uh, Spanish revolution style, civil war style, uh, fight.
00:33:29.480
But I do think that they are willing to harass, uh, dox, threaten and kill people basically
00:33:36.800
as like sporadic terrorists for a very long time, like literally insurgency style.
00:33:42.120
I've said this before and I've seen you kind of echo it, but I think we are in the point
00:33:46.400
where we really do need to see a reconstruction of these blue States.
0.79
00:33:50.300
We need consent decrees that law enforcement is no longer something these people are able
0.85
00:33:56.180
They cannot be trusted with the ability to self-govern.
00:34:01.440
It has to be turned over some kind of lawful authority that will actually protect people
00:34:09.200
I think what we need to, you know, I, I, I, I joke about reconstruction and in some sense,
00:34:15.740
I do think they're like what you need is akin to reconstruction in the form of just an
00:34:20.120
enormous use of federal authority under the color of law.
00:34:23.620
Like, I don't think here's, I think we're actually seeing what's the beginning of a
00:34:30.340
It's starting with the one big, beautiful bill, because think about what the one big,
00:34:34.640
It just provided infinite money to border patrol and ice.
00:34:46.680
We like, just, just resources are no longer going to be an issue for what you're doing.
00:34:50.500
Like, you know, class, what said you need conflict to win a conflict, you need the means
00:34:54.960
Well, now you have the means we have the means.
00:34:56.860
I mean, and I think that's demonstrated, you know, left us for so long have played this
00:35:00.460
game where they're like, well, if we don't cooperate with federal law enforcement, you
00:35:03.800
won't be able to functionally do it because you need our help.
00:35:06.760
You don't have the resources to do on your own.
00:35:08.560
And after the one big, beautiful bill, the answer is watch us, right?
00:35:16.300
Like we're, we're going to enforce the law in Minneapolis.
00:35:18.380
I think, and honestly, like to the extent that there's anybody in your audience that's
00:35:22.220
blackpilled, I think you need to step back and it's, it's easy to forget about the good
00:35:26.140
Like that's a good thing that we now just send 3000 federal officers to Minneapolis.
00:35:34.280
That's not something that happened in the first Trump administration.
00:35:37.140
And talk about anybody who is whining about the one big, beautiful bill needs to realize
0.92
00:35:40.780
that our ability to fight in Minneapolis is a product of the fact that we have those
00:35:46.760
I think that, you know, if you were against it before, it's maybe recalibrate and rethink
00:35:50.800
what you, what, what your, your cost benefit analysis that you were doing back then.
00:35:59.480
So I guess, so my point is because we were sort of, we're, we have a new thing that we
00:36:04.020
can do, which is over overwhelming federal force under color of law.
00:36:10.000
This is really the first time I think it's been tried.
00:36:11.580
And so I, I want to see this run out in the sense, I think we can accomplish the ends
00:36:18.920
If we just don't lose the will, because at a certain point, if you're there with five,
00:36:24.440
with a federal force, five times the size of the local police force, well, then the
00:36:30.400
They just have to let you enforce federal law or they can rebel.
00:36:33.860
And if they rebel, then, you know, if they, if they do something like those idiots have
00:36:37.460
been talking about calling up the national guard to fight ice agents, like watch what
00:36:47.080
So I think I, that, that means I want to see, let's, I want to see them put the pedal
00:36:50.680
of the metal of Minneapolis using the tactics they have.
00:36:52.740
I don't even think they need the insurrection act.
00:36:54.460
I think it's as simple as I want them to, I think they can with the forces available to
00:36:59.200
them under the, under, under ice, you know, the ability to send thousands of federal
00:37:05.000
I just want them to do that and to keep doing it and keep arresting it, you know, keep detaining
00:37:09.640
every criminal alien you find, keep arresting everybody who obstructs you.
0.92
00:37:13.920
You know, if, if like law, you know, the attorney general or the mayor or whatever started,
00:37:19.360
you know, if you, you think he's obstructing open a federal investigation into him, just,
00:37:22.860
you know, and keep the pressure on until the job is done.
00:37:25.060
Because if you do that, and then maybe you demonstrate, you do it again in Philadelphia,
00:37:28.920
you know, Larry Krasner has all that, he has a big mouth right now talking about how he
00:37:32.520
wants to arrest ICE agents, do the same thing in Philadelphia, make Josh Shapiro and Larry
00:37:37.480
Krasner sit there and make a decision about, you know, oh, okay, we're going to withdraw
00:37:43.460
We're going to send thousands of officers onto your streets and arrest every criminal
00:37:48.580
And we're going to do that again and again and again and again, until finally people realize
00:37:54.580
I think that could be the, I think that could obviate the need for reconstruction.
00:37:59.960
You definitely need to break the back of these people.
00:38:03.320
And I agree with you again, that I'm doing as much under the color of law is the goal.
00:38:08.320
Maintaining legitimacy during this operation is the goal.
00:38:11.200
And I agree that there is, we have, the Republicans have been so weak and so feckless and so cowardly
00:38:18.440
up to this point that there is just actually a mile of, you know, of rope that they have.
00:38:24.880
They simply have not deployed in this that they can use.
00:38:27.540
There are so many different levers that they can actually apply to these, you know, cut
00:38:32.520
the funding to sanctuary cities, deploy these people massively.
00:38:36.060
Like there's so much that can be done under the law that simply having the will to do that
00:38:43.080
And unfortunately, I feel like the will has lacked previously, but I am encouraged to see
00:38:48.420
that despite the pushback the Trump administration has received, they have stayed stalwart in the
00:38:55.800
I think there's a few big, really important tells about this that, that show the resolve
00:39:03.780
There was this overwhelming pressure to like prosecute the ICE agent.
00:39:11.720
She doesn't have a wife, but I hear what you're saying.
00:39:15.340
She's got her partner's getting prosecuted.
1.00
00:39:17.240
And potentially any, their ice watch little group is getting prosecuted.
00:39:21.420
And they're totally, you know, I think there's a real understanding, you know, from the top
00:39:26.940
down in both the administrative, the White House and the Department of Justice.
00:39:33.340
If we lose here, we're going to lose everything.
00:39:38.680
So not only are we not going to prosecute the ICE agent who did nothing wrong, who
00:39:42.800
acted in self-defense, but we are going to prosecute the wife of the widow of, sorry,
00:39:55.780
These people with their weird, their weird, domestic arrangements.
00:40:00.580
We're going to prosecute the wife and we're going to make, we're going to teach the country
1.00
00:40:05.240
that in fact, the only criminal activity here was committed by the protesters.
00:40:09.940
Now, one more thing before we go to the questions of the audience, right before this, and I have
00:40:19.280
I've liked a lot of the work that he's put out.
00:40:23.440
But right before this, we saw him talking about how the Trump administration needs to back
00:40:32.100
They need to pull ICE agents out, only get the worst people.
00:40:37.280
And of course, it's, you know, as, as bad as Catholic charities has been, I mean, I would
00:40:41.600
really like to know, you know, again, I like Bishop Barron, but how aware was he about the
00:40:47.620
amount of Catholic charity money flowing through here?
00:40:51.600
Does his bishopric include any, any oversight of this money?
00:40:56.420
You know, is, is there a reason he's out there saying ICE needs to dial things back while
00:41:01.920
my charities, you know, pour more Somalis into this area, but it's not, to be fair, it's
00:41:06.960
Obviously we know this church is Lutheran charities, right?
00:41:11.280
Many evangelicals have been just as bad on this.
00:41:13.940
So I want to be clear across the board, Jewish organizations, all across the board.
00:41:18.960
There've been, it's a Judeo-Christian failure.
1.00
00:41:22.200
In this one's instance, I will use Judeo-Christian.
0.97
00:41:24.780
Yes, it is an entire, it is a collective failure.
00:41:28.580
And so how important is this to snap these church organizations, these religious organizations
00:41:36.820
Because these people have been getting rich off of this leftist grift.
00:41:40.800
They have been defending their actions saying, oh no, it's our brother.
00:41:47.420
You even see guys like Bishop Barron getting out there saying, you need to dial back ICE.
00:41:50.640
You know, deportation is one of the most conservative, theoretically right-wing guys in the, you know,
00:41:57.740
Catholic leadership in the United States coming out against, you know, deportation actions.
00:42:03.120
I mean, the, the, the leadership of the church is going to lose the laity entirety if it cannot
00:42:09.680
at the very least verbally affirm the ability of the administration to defend parishioners while
00:42:17.480
It is literally the most basic job of the shepherd to protect the flock.
00:42:22.260
It is like in the biblical metaphor as thoroughly as one can imagine.
00:42:27.680
Yeah, I'm, I'm, I'm certainly, I'm not a religious person.
00:42:30.000
So I, I, I don't, I, I never get into the intra-religious fights, but I'll just say this
00:42:36.900
I mean, if we don't, you have, isn't there some obligation that people follow the law,
00:42:42.520
In religion that like religious authorities tell their adherents that they must follow
00:42:48.440
Like, why aren't you telling your legal alien adherents to return to their country of origin?
1.00
00:42:54.220
And if they wish to come here, apply legally to get in, get right with the laws of the
0.99
00:42:59.980
Uh, and I think I don't want to hear, I mean, until I hear that from religious authorities,
00:43:05.380
I don't want to hear anything about the heavy handedness of federal law enforcement.
00:43:09.680
I don't, it's about protecting the American people and the, you know, the, the idea that
00:43:14.740
we would somehow give up on our number one campaign promise.
00:43:17.000
Like it's Donald Trump put secure the border number one and the largest mass deportation
00:43:21.860
operation in American history at number two and it was on his platform.
00:43:30.140
And no amount of, you know, leftist agit prop street theater nonsense is going to stop
00:43:34.860
I mean, if anything, I'm really great in some perverse sense.
00:43:38.260
I'm grateful that this happened because it, it, it completely ends the moral debate, right?
00:43:42.600
Like, I'm sorry, you know, you're protesting churches now.
00:43:45.580
Uh, yeah, we know it's pretty clear who the good guys are and who the bad guys are here.
00:43:51.560
And I also hope this, this refocus of the administration, there's been a lot of focus on foreign policy.
00:43:56.980
The world doesn't stop the minute we have to solve things at home, but Trump was elected
00:44:03.680
You know, I'm sure Iran's full of bad people, but when people are storming into my church,
00:44:08.320
get around to bombing the mullahs sometime later.
0.88
00:44:11.460
Right now I would like you to drive the progressives, literally threatening children in churches
00:44:21.960
All right, guys, we're going to take a look at your questions here real quick, but before
00:44:27.560
Uh, you can find me at Will Chamberlain on X and you can follow what the article three
00:44:37.920
Cherry Coke Nixon says, uh, the woke farmer twos TikTok comments fully support his church
00:44:44.020
incident and want more woke is energized and fired up.
00:44:49.520
Well, I'm hoping that this is going to reinvigorate, uh, what has been a somewhat lagging, uh, right
00:44:56.340
I hope that this puts the stakes very directly back into focus.
00:45:00.140
It is a shame that after the murder of Charlie Kirk, the assassination of Charlie Kirk, that
00:45:04.980
the right could not stay focused enough to fight the left.
00:45:07.840
Uh, but I hope this really brings everybody back to, uh, I don't give a flying whatever
00:45:18.220
So maybe, maybe, maybe we can all stay focused on, uh, that and, uh, and hopefully, uh, that
00:45:23.420
will be, uh, something that will drive, uh, both, both the Trump administration and its
00:45:30.220
Uh, he also says first shutting down the streets, then accosting random pedestrians, forcing
00:45:35.700
people to say F ice now occupying churches, uh, target 2020 is back.
00:45:40.860
He also says, uh, jury nullification for me, felony charges, uh, for the, how worried are
00:45:47.140
I know we already talked about the juries, uh, there, but I guess, as you said, if they
00:45:51.660
do get a federal grand jury, it's going to pull from the whole state.
00:45:54.480
It's not just going to be from the radical leftist, uh, municipalities, but this, maybe
00:46:02.520
Um, urban juries are going to become more and more sympathetic to the left.
00:46:06.340
And since the majority of our population centers are obviously going to be urban and going
00:46:11.320
to have that demographic understanding, isn't it just the case that if things continue,
00:46:16.880
as they are, juries in major areas are going to continually be more left-wing sympathetic?
00:46:25.100
Uh, especially, and as our government gets more and more polarized, you know, I was, I
00:46:28.800
was actually testifying in front of the Senate a couple of weeks ago about impeaching judges.
00:46:34.360
And of course, Peter Welch asked me this random question about January 6th.
00:46:38.120
Like, I don't know where, uh, you know, asked me at first, you know, what I, do I think
00:46:42.500
it was a good idea to bring the protesters out there?
00:46:44.180
And I'm like, you know, I don't know that that's not really my bailiwick.
00:46:46.800
Like it probably, in my intuition is that it was probably a bad idea to get that broadcast
00:46:50.920
But like, you know, you're, you're making an ex-post judgment of an ex-ante fact.
00:46:55.220
But then he asked me, like, would you support pardons of everybody who was convicted?
00:47:00.620
Because none of them got fair trials because they were in DC.
00:47:02.760
Every single person who's tried in DC did not get the benefit of a, of a fair trial by
00:47:12.200
And that's the, it's a source of primary polarization.
00:47:15.360
And I think, you know, if, if we ever get to the world where we have to do this reconstruction,
00:47:19.880
we're going to have to rethink the trial by jury.
00:47:21.700
Because for the same reason Singapore had to rethink it, that they, you know, Singapore
00:47:24.540
looked at it and said, if you have this massive multi-ethnic, you know, extremely polarized
00:47:29.560
society, then juries don't offer objective justice because everybody votes with their
00:47:36.980
And it no longer becomes about what these people did wrong.
00:47:46.080
He says, I found, I found it so ironic that the FACE Act protects Christian temples and child
00:47:54.360
It's like, as you said, up until now, the FACE Act basically didn't protect any churches.
00:48:02.380
You have, well, law is only, uh, only matters if it's animated by will.
00:48:07.180
And if the prosecution, if the, if the, uh, you know, different people involved, the machinery
00:48:11.620
is only going to use it one way, then that's a huge problem.
00:48:14.760
I've had this laid out to me several times by people saying we have to protect the Civil
00:48:19.200
Rights Act because it's going to be used to protect Christians and white people.
0.91
00:48:22.540
And every time I have laughed very heartily at them because that is absolutely not how it's
00:48:26.440
been used since its inception in almost any instance.
00:48:31.660
Uh, and so now it's nice to see finally one person possibly make good on that.
00:48:38.260
Uh, I'm still fairly sure we need to dismantle, uh, civil rights legislation.
0.75
00:48:43.320
Uh, however, uh, it is nice to see at least someone, you know, turn, turn the, uh, the, the
00:48:49.260
gun back on, uh, you know, uh, now that the rabbit has it, uh, as, as they say.
00:48:54.840
Yeah, it really is remarkable that Harmeet DeVille is the first person, the first Republican
00:48:58.520
in decades since the enactment of the Civil Rights Act to actually try and take meaningful
00:49:02.940
political control of the civil rights division, the DOJ.
00:49:05.280
Uh, and so, you know, I think it's another example of the, the, the second Trump administration
00:49:15.880
It's the first time we've really had a serious and dedicated attempt to sort of take control,
00:49:21.520
to use the federal government to achieve conservative ends aggressively.
00:49:25.280
And I think, you know, before people need to, should let, let, you know, in the world,
00:49:33.320
Give them a chance, like give, give, give, give the administration that's doing the thing
00:49:38.580
And it's clearly trying to do the thing that's never been done before.
00:49:41.180
Like they're, they've, they've made public statements and they've made personnel changes
00:49:45.700
So can, with those, with a real change in political will at the top and, you know, a mass
00:49:51.920
I mean, I think she's lost, she's fired something like 80% of the, yeah, the problem is that
00:49:56.480
there's like three, three lawyers in a, in a copier, I think in that department right
00:50:00.320
now, that's the only real challenge they're facing.
00:50:02.340
Well, more of, you know, where, I mean, I would, I would do it, but I'm me, right.
00:50:05.200
I got to like, I have a lot of other things going on.
00:50:08.520
Like if you're, if you're mad about this, if there's any, if there's any lawyers in the
00:50:13.980
And imagine like, really, this is a good example of what is your work going to be?
00:50:17.920
If you go work for the civil rights division or to harm me, Dylan, you're going to
00:50:20.200
get to go prosecute leftist protesters and put them in jail.
00:50:23.120
Like, do you want to be involved in making Don Lemon sit in federal penitentiary?
00:50:30.360
It's like that, our ice officer, the guys are trying to make fun of him.
00:50:33.600
He's like, I make $200,000 a year, locking illegals in jail.
1.00
00:50:37.460
It's like, all right, that's one of our boys right there.
00:50:42.140
You know, we, what if, and I mean, we really haven't played this out.
00:50:45.100
Like what, if we, if JD wins and we keep this going for another 10 years, what does this
00:50:49.880
What does it look like when you have 10 years of new ice hiring and everybody there joined
00:50:54.680
up because they wanted to deport illegal immigrants?
00:50:57.860
Like, I think there's, there are, you know, it's been a frustrating period.
00:51:01.320
And I think it's frustrating also because you're, you're just turning the cruise ship around,
00:51:07.320
They're actually really are good faith trying to turn the ship around.
00:51:13.260
There's a, there's a term revolution in the form.
00:51:20.160
They leave the form that everyone's familiar with, but they completely revolutionize its
00:51:27.260
And I believe the Trump administration is, is attempting the same thing in reverse.
00:51:33.000
It is, is itself a bit of a science experiment, political science experiment.
00:51:37.240
Uh, but it is, I think the best option you have up until the next option, which is very
00:51:43.580
Uh, so up, up to that point, I, I certainly, uh, am rooting for them to pull this off.
00:51:48.960
And I, and while I, you know, I, I am always going to push, I'm always going to encourage
00:51:53.460
people to go further, take more power, take more action.
00:51:56.540
Uh, I want to be clear, uh, just completely like black pilling and all the, you know, the
00:52:02.320
Uh, like I said, if they do nothing here, if they do nothing here, okay, I'm with you
00:52:08.920
They, they've lost me if that's the case, but they're talking like they're going to do
00:52:16.280
They've got the evidence, you know, I'm going to give them the time to get this done because
00:52:20.540
again, if they can't do this, then they can't do anything.
00:52:24.480
If they can't, if they can't do this, I don't know what they can do.
00:52:29.040
And I, I don't want to put pressure on her on me because I just, I just like, she's a
00:52:32.800
I know, but I know her, she's really good.
0.89
00:52:36.980
People need to forget that she was on the side of the angels fighting against all these
00:52:41.000
abuses, suing governments that were oppressing Trump supporters.
00:52:43.680
Like she's really, really, really good and is on totally on side.
00:52:50.360
Red Mountain News says we cannot have a repeat of bill airs at all where these people just go
00:53:00.860
Its terrorists get professorships and they get, you know, the, the sinecures and they just
00:53:05.480
collect a couple hundred thousand dollars while doing their professional activism after becoming
00:53:11.280
That's why I'm saying guys like Don Lemon must do significant time.
00:53:16.800
You cannot just let this guy like go back to making, you know, a hundred thousand dollars,
00:53:21.980
a couple hundred thousand dollars off a podcast somewhere.
00:53:23.920
Like that cannot be the result of what happens here.
00:53:26.640
And I don't think that's what's going to happen here.
00:53:28.300
So interesting side note, we didn't really cover this, but I literally just did a different
00:53:31.500
podcast with a civil rights attorney, a guy who sues the government and sues private actors.
00:53:36.200
And he pointed out that the civil rights laws and the, you know, the ability for the plaintiffs,
00:53:42.140
like the parishioners to sue people like Don Lemon is even more expansive than the criminal
00:53:45.900
prosecution because you're liable, not just if you were in the conspiracy, but if you knew
00:53:51.240
about the conspiracy and did nothing, you're civilly liable.
00:53:54.280
So like, even in the horrible world where we don't get a criminal prosecution of Don
00:53:57.660
Lemon, there's enormous civil liability there because of all the things he was also saying,
00:54:01.600
like, even somehow he's like, he wins this, like I was a journalist argument.
00:54:08.960
Like, so I hope that any of the money going to these people, I think there is going to
00:54:12.620
go right back into the pockets of the parishioners if they get a good lawsuit.
00:54:16.640
I want to see a Alex Jones, 1 billion, a trillion, whatever judgment style thing happening here.
00:54:23.500
Like Don, I want Don Lemon to be sending payments to, uh, to Christians in Minnesota for the rest
1.00
00:54:29.740
Uh, uh, Cherry Cognick says, what do, uh, what do we do when states like Minnesota refuse to
00:54:35.520
trespass protesters from private property with the cops and DAs?
00:54:39.520
Well, I think, as you said, it's, it's then all federal law enforcement.
00:54:44.580
Obviously the, the state, uh, and, and local police are not cooperating.
00:54:48.840
Otherwise none of these incidents would be happening.
00:54:50.480
Remember guys, they're deporting people in my home state.
00:55:00.960
You know, like you don't, you don't need to have this whole operation.
00:55:04.040
The only reason you're seeing what you're seeing is that the left is basically running
00:55:11.660
Uh, so yes, you're, you're absolutely right that these people are not doing their jobs,
00:55:17.120
And we, we've already kind of gone over those in detail.
00:55:19.900
So I'm not going to run over them again this time.
00:55:23.040
Uh, Spartan says, uh, if nothing move, uh, if nothing moved to Trump after Charlie Kirk and
00:55:28.760
two national guardsmen died, I'm not expecting much of the people, uh, uh, much for the people
00:55:36.460
Well, again, as, as we'll laid out, uh, those charges are more complicated.
00:55:44.420
I don't think enough has been done to punish the left after the death of Charlie Kirk and
00:55:48.340
I'll continue to push for it, but these are separate things.
00:55:52.140
So let's, let's, let's, you know, let's try not to conflate them.
00:55:55.360
Uh, this is a scenario where this is a much easier open and close, you know, you can go
00:56:07.260
I think we're looking at a different animal here.
00:56:12.260
I share them, but again, let's, let's, let's not, let's not, uh, get these situations
00:56:18.720
Menehude says, I'm sorry, but the idea that Don Lemon and BLM protesters get federal charges
00:56:25.060
under the KKK act on Martin Luther King day will never not be fun of me.
00:56:30.900
I love, I will love Dylan forever if she just does that, just that like, okay, you have
00:56:37.160
my undying allegiance, whatever, but just make that happen.
00:56:41.060
I mean, it really will be, you know, this is, it really will be a new epoch in civil rights
00:56:46.780
law, if this is, if this is how we're going to start using the Klan act.
00:56:49.920
I think, you know, you've got to, you really could open up a new era.
00:56:54.060
And again, another decade of this, what happens if we create an entire new civil rights division,
00:56:58.200
500 lawyers, staff of people of similar mind, you can't do that instantly.
00:57:02.640
You have to vet them background checks, blah, blah, blah.
00:57:04.560
And you have to find the people willing to do that.
00:57:06.480
Like going to DC is a big sacrifice for, for good lawyers.
00:57:09.280
People forget that, you know, I'm not going to do it because I can't, it's just not
00:57:18.460
The left benefits from this incumbency effect where they've had years of hiring atrocious
00:57:23.360
And we're, we're finally putting a stop to that and trying to do the other thing.
00:57:26.760
In some ways, this is why collapsing institutions rather than trying to restaff them is, is the
00:57:33.160
But I understand that is its own, own number of hurdles.
00:57:36.800
But, but you're right that if, if your goal is to revolutionize these things inside the
00:57:41.060
form, it's going to take time, you're going to have to restaff, you're going to have to
00:57:43.920
change the culture, you're going to have to change the direction.
00:57:46.380
But once you have that momentum, then you've got the guys buried in, you've got the guys
00:57:51.140
who've got the 30 years, uh, who are just unmovable, who are going to make sure that
00:57:55.080
no matter who gets elected, that's the direction things stay.
00:57:58.040
I, I've written a book about why bureaucracy is going to eventually go left wing.
00:58:01.340
So I won't get into all the details now, but at least in these moments, you have opportunities
00:58:06.620
Uh, Babalu says in the myths of always chimp, I found there was within me an invisible trust
00:58:14.960
Uh, yeah, again, I, I, I think that it's key to continue to encourage the administration
00:58:19.880
to take action, to be strong, the main, and, and to be clear, guys, one of the main reasons
00:58:25.160
I make these overtures to people in power to take these actions is because so many conservatives
00:58:33.900
So many conservative pundits, voters, even, even politicians are terrified of actually
00:58:41.520
We need to give them the permission structure to do this stuff.
00:58:45.500
When you're building this, you're building a, you're building a preference cascade.
00:58:51.260
Yes, of course, this is what's going to happen.
00:58:55.360
Aren't you like that, though, that not, not, Oh, you're useless.
00:59:01.340
You know, no, no, of course, as a Trump supporter, I'm going to see this happen from you guys.
00:59:07.000
Like that's, that's the stance you want to take positive pressure, right?
00:59:10.460
Like it's pressure, but it's positive pressure to continue that momentum that has already
00:59:17.340
Nixon again says reconstruction requires electoral vote and a congressional delegation loss.
00:59:22.960
Yeah, again, um, obviously larger, larger problems with literal reconstruction, but as
00:59:28.400
Will said, as, as much as one can get done in this scenario, Latrita bidet, IRS enforcer,
0.98
00:59:35.640
possibly the best name in the game says, I'm sure the real estate investor in chief will
00:59:42.160
It's 5d chess after all, trust the plan just two more weeks guys.
00:59:45.940
Again, I know you can black pill on this if you want, but in this scenario, I think the
00:59:54.240
I think the trend administration has stated their intention and laid out the plan as to
01:00:00.560
I encourage you in this instance to give them positive enforcement to make this change.
01:00:05.560
Again, understand the frustration, but let's push forward.
01:00:09.900
And mostly peaceful merchandise says chimp out with me now for wrath now for ruin.
1.00
01:00:15.420
All right, guys, thank you very much for joining me.
01:00:18.160
Thank you, Will so much for coming on everybody, please make sure you're checking him out on
01:00:22.380
If for nothing else, you can see the legal, uh, uh, you know, the, the legal, uh, arguments
01:00:27.700
laid out before the justice department, uh, lays them out.
01:00:30.840
And of course, if it's your first time on this channel, you need to click subscribe on YouTube,
01:00:35.360
the bell and the notifications, all that stuff.
01:00:37.180
So, you know, when we go live, if you'd like to get these broadcasts as podcasts, you need
01:00:40.600
to subscribe to the Oren McIntyre show on your favorite podcast platform.
01:00:43.920
And if you do leave your rating or review, it really helps with the algorithm magic.