Machiavelli, Technology, and the Soldier | Guest: Lafayette Lee | 1⧸22⧸23
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 33 minutes
Words per Minute
183.20383
Summary
Machiavelli's thoughts on technology and obsolescence are timeless. And yet, there are still people who argue that technology is going to make the soldier obsolete, and that soldiers will no longer need the classical skills of a soldier on the battlefield. In this episode, I chat with two of my favorite veterans, American Ostracon and Lafayette Lee, to discuss this idea.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
We hope you're enjoying your Air Canada flight.
00:00:10.720
Fast-free Wi-Fi means I can make dinner reservations before we land.
00:00:25.260
Wi-Fi available to Airplane members on Equipped Flight.
00:00:33.760
I've got a great stream with some returning guests.
00:00:37.340
Talking about Machiavelli and some of his thoughts about soldiers, technology, the battlefield,
00:00:43.680
and kind of the eternal problem about how infantry and technology interact.
00:00:48.800
And for this discussion, I thought I'd bring on two of my favorite veterans.
00:01:03.220
So when I was reading through Machiavelli's discourses on Livy, you know, he talks about
00:01:11.240
all kinds of great stuff, of course, politics and, you know, formations and what binds a
00:01:16.120
city together and all kinds of the stuff that you would expect in political theory.
00:01:20.760
But he also talks a decent amount about the military, which, you know, a lot of people
00:01:25.120
when they come to political theory, they keep these things very separate, right?
00:01:29.300
They don't talk too much about, you know, the military aspect.
00:01:33.320
They think about the political power dynamics, but they oftentimes don't mention the military.
00:01:39.220
But for Machiavelli, of course, in the time he's living in, these things are very inseparable
00:01:44.200
because, you know, these Italian city-states are in constant conflict.
00:01:48.780
And so the thing that a prince would do with his military is as essential constantly to the
00:01:57.320
And one of the things that he kind of opens up with as he's talking about this is artillery.
00:02:03.620
You know, and he says at this time, everyone is very on to this idea that artillery is going
00:02:09.200
to make the soldier obsolete or that warfare is fundamentally changed and you don't need
00:02:14.660
any of the old skills, any of the ancient skills of like the Romans or anyone like that,
00:02:20.040
because artillery has just completely changed the nature of the game.
00:02:23.920
And it's going to more or less put kind of the standard army to the wayside.
00:02:28.160
And it reminded me a lot of conversations that Ostracon and I have had about, you know,
00:02:34.620
people constantly think that technology is going to make soldiering obsolete that, you
00:02:41.900
know, whether it's artillery in Machiavelli's day or planes or nuclear weapons, like there's
00:02:48.960
always this idea that technology is going to come to the forefront.
00:02:52.340
But it's going to eliminate the need for kind of the capable, brave soldier.
00:02:59.140
And you're going to not need that kind of element that you've always had in traditional
00:03:05.400
But it's interesting that Machiavelli was, you know, was interacting with that question
00:03:10.660
And it's even though we're hundreds of years later, it's one that we still hear constantly.
00:03:15.920
So we'll go through a bunch of different aspects of this.
00:03:19.520
But I just wanted to kind of get your general thoughts on this first.
00:03:24.660
Lafayette, what do you think about kind of this constant struggle between the growth of
00:03:30.840
technology and kind of the assertion that the soldier will be made obsolete or will no
00:03:35.820
longer need the classical skills of a soldier on the battlefield?
00:03:38.460
No, this really resonated with me because coming kind of from an infantry background, I've
00:03:44.220
been hearing this since I was young and then throughout my time in the military is just
00:03:48.260
this idea that technology can make infantry obsolete.
00:03:52.060
And we've been hearing this for a long, long time.
00:03:55.100
And so I'm one of those people who have seen kind of both sides of this coin in a military
00:04:02.320
And I just don't ever see that actually happening.
00:04:05.580
I think I think this focus on the virtues of a good soldier, these ancient virtues are
00:04:12.740
And I think if we really look back and do some soul searching, we'll see that losing touch
00:04:17.820
with those virtues is often precisely why we go astray and why we lose wars that we believe
00:04:27.220
And we should definitely explore that more as kind of we get deeper into the talk.
00:04:31.860
But Oshkong, kind of your initial thoughts on technology and obsolescence of soldiering,
00:04:49.360
It's just, you know, just getting your initial thoughts on, you know, we'll get deeper into
00:04:53.760
but your initial thoughts on kind of the assertion that we're going to have kind of soldiers become
00:05:00.120
obsolete because we hit that critical threshold of technology where soldiering is no longer
00:05:05.280
So like I was kind of talking to Lafayette Lee about before we got started is technology
00:05:18.020
Technology will not make an ineffective soldier effective.
00:05:22.920
So technology is a force multiplier for the infantryman or for like a, you know, somebody
00:05:32.480
But at the end of the day, it can't replace that skill set, that ethos, and that warrior
00:05:39.940
mindset, if you want to call it that, that has to be ingrained through training and discipline
00:05:49.400
And I would argue, I also argue through, it's a multi-generational effort to get a, an effective
00:06:00.200
Yeah, that's another good point that I think is really essential is that continuity of,
00:06:06.760
and tradition that's required to actually build that level of discipline.
00:06:11.760
So I guess maybe we could start with that first, you know, in, in the discourses on
00:06:18.480
Levi, Machiavelli specifically gives the example of the Romans and kind of their three tiered
00:06:23.920
system of possible retreat where you had kind of the first level of the infantry would engage.
00:06:32.080
And if they were defeated or needed to, you know, retreat, the formation was created in
00:06:37.780
such a way that they could back into the second line that would then come fresh to the forward
00:06:42.700
and they would be able to reinforce and continue the battle.
00:06:46.560
And there was even, you know, then the third line that could do the same way.
00:06:49.740
And the, you know, the, the infantry was drilled with such discipline that they would
00:06:54.960
constantly be able to bring kind of a new ferocity to the front whenever one line needed
00:07:00.480
to pull back, meaning that really you had to defeat the army three times over due to the
00:07:06.980
ability of them to then bring the rest, you know, the fresh line back up after the original
00:07:13.280
And he says that in many ways the idea that technologies like artillery in his day, or,
00:07:22.140
you know, we can just sub in, you know, planes or, or whatever, drones, whatever from our
00:07:27.000
current day, that the reliance on this technology and thinking that, you know, we no longer need
00:07:34.620
And maybe as to Ostrakhan's point, the generational training that comes with it means that, you
00:07:41.800
know, you lose that, you lose that key feature that eventually needs to break through when
00:07:47.380
both sides have the same thing, when both sides have, and, and he says this again in the
00:07:51.600
discourses, he says, you know, the, you know, the Romans are fighting the Latins and
00:07:55.420
really the, they, they seem pretty much like the same people.
00:07:58.480
The only difference is really this, this incredible discipline and obstinance that the Romans have
00:08:06.180
And that's due to that drilling, that dedication.
00:08:09.420
And so when you have two sides that have equal levels of technology, the key is going to make
00:08:14.800
sure that you still have those core essential elements of soldiering and that training that
00:08:22.220
So if, if you've got two equally, yeah, if you have two combatants who are technologically
00:08:27.340
equal or, or close, it will come down to discipline and training and, and, you know, to, to determine
00:08:37.440
But it, you know, on, on very lopsided engagements where, where, you know, look at the, you know,
00:08:46.440
we don't like to talk about this a lot because I'm, I'm sure Lafayette Lee feels like I do.
00:08:54.320
Um, and, um, and obviously combat is not a game, but it's also, I, I don't like to say
00:09:00.440
this, but we obviously did not achieve our mission in Afghanistan and we failed there.
00:09:04.980
And you have a, an enemy force that is completely technologically inferior to us.
00:09:11.120
And yet they still had that will to endure 20 years of combat to the point where we just
00:09:20.680
So, you know, technology in, regardless of our technological advancements, they were still
00:09:29.900
Uh, even though they were completely inferior in their technology beyond the most basic
00:09:34.780
of, of rifles and, and improvised weapons for the most part.
00:09:40.780
Yeah, I, I kind of, you know, to piggyback off what you said, something that I think is
00:09:44.280
important is in this day and age, we often talk about how, um, we are becoming more and
00:09:49.240
more disembodied in this, in the modern age with, you know, technology is a major driver
00:09:54.660
of this, but I think kind of returning to what you were saying about how sometimes we
00:09:59.020
try to separate, you know, sex and violence from power, which makes, doesn't make a lot
00:10:05.580
And this goes for war is that we are becoming disembodied from war making and from violence,
00:10:12.020
which is a major, it's a, it's an essential part of who we are as human beings.
00:10:19.420
I think when you look at these conflicts, the American soldiers becoming more and more
00:10:28.060
And at the end of the day, if you have two peers, whether they're, it's a, it's a completely
00:10:32.440
symmetrical conflict, or if it's an asymmetrical conflict, I think we're really seeing that,
00:10:37.400
that, you know, what he would call Machiavelli call these ancient virtues of really do matter.
00:10:42.580
And that if you have an end, if you are, have superior technology, but you do not have a
00:10:47.880
cause, you do not have a population support, you know, these other deeper things, if you
00:10:52.740
don't have courage, bravery, discipline, you're not going to win, especially in protracted
00:10:59.940
And to piggyback off that, I a hundred percent agree with you where we've had this, we're,
00:11:06.740
we're very sterile in the United States, as far as separating our killing for having as many
00:11:14.640
degrees of separation from, from, from killing the enemy.
00:11:19.040
You know, I've often kind of wrestled with this and, and knowing your background, you may have
00:11:23.760
too, you know, why is it that, you know, everyone, when it comes to like a combat pilot who, who,
00:11:31.300
you know, drops the bomb on the enemy and has like more degrees of separation, nobody really
00:11:35.740
blinks an eye when like, you know, talking about, oh, oh, you know, he's got a really
00:11:40.900
cool job and, and what he does is very interesting.
00:11:43.700
You know, I'm talking about like the civilian population, not, not within the military, but
00:11:50.980
Whereas, you know, you tell them you're, you know, you're somebody who's been in close
00:11:55.300
combat with the enemy and you've, you've, you've killed people and, you know, you know, 50
00:12:02.100
And then everyone looks at you and, and thinks you're a bit odd or a bit strange.
00:12:06.820
And it was just, um, that, that was always something that kind of, and it still does bother
00:12:11.620
It's like, was it really just the distance between, you know, the enemy being killed and,
00:12:16.540
and, and the, the technology used is how you're going to judge me as an end of.
00:12:24.060
I, I know this sounds a little, you see what I'm getting at?
00:12:28.640
Well, I think, you know, not to interrupt you, but I, something I love is if you look
00:12:32.520
back at like Jim Webb, who Jim Webb was always a hero of mine growing up, um, you know, this
00:12:38.680
is a guy who, who, who led troops in combat in Vietnam and then wound up on the, in the
00:12:45.180
And I just, I recall back in the, in the 2016 democratic primaries, they were asking it.
00:12:52.420
Like, I think it was like Anderson Cooper was like asking all the candidates on the stage.
00:12:55.980
Like, so, you know, which enemy are you most proud of defeating or something like that?
00:13:01.340
And everybody was like naming things like the NRA or like the very abstract.
00:13:11.520
And he just, he said something about like, I would have to say it's probably the enemy
00:13:15.740
soldier that threw a grenade and wounded me, but he's not around to talk about it right
00:13:21.000
And it just horrified everybody in the audience, you know, everybody like mouths agape.
00:13:26.200
And I mean, he got a lot of flack for that, but I think it speaks exactly to kind of what
00:13:30.500
you're talking about is distance, even a cultural distance that we have from this.
00:13:35.720
I just, you know, even like the collapse of Afghanistan, how it went without very much.
00:13:41.060
I mean, there's a lot of anger, I think, of the veterans community, but there was just,
00:13:44.040
it was so, it was, it was just completely like, you know, three weeks later it was over
00:13:57.000
And, and to, to even talk about it outside of, let's say the veteran community that served
00:14:05.900
And it's, it's, it's something that's really, yeah, it's something that I've really kind
00:14:12.160
of had to wrap my head around where, you know, when we're talking about, you know, government
00:14:17.040
waste, but then you mentioned Afghanistan and I was like, oh, we're not going to talk about
00:14:21.620
Because I spent most of my young adult years dealing with that conflict.
00:14:26.100
And now you just kind of want to sweep it under the rug.
00:14:30.360
But anyway, we can, we can move on from, from this specific situation, but yeah, I agree
00:14:37.820
Like the, the levels or the degrees of separation between us and, and, and killing, um, are very
00:14:44.820
much, uh, is something that Americans seem to care very much about.
00:14:50.060
Well, I do think this is important though, because this, I think then speaks into the topic
00:14:55.800
you, you, you kind of mentioned, uh, there about, uh, the generational thing, right?
00:15:01.420
The necessity of kind of having that knowledge, that discipline, that, uh, those values kind
00:15:07.800
of baked into your society so that when you draw soldiers from it, they're not, it's not
00:15:15.560
And you and I have talked about this so many times, ostracon, how, you know, as you often
00:15:20.060
say, you know, the, the, the army was at war, America was at the mall and America is just
00:15:25.480
so removed from the physical necessity of safety and conflict and those kinds of things.
00:15:32.720
Not just, and not just with the military, but every aspect of life, you know, people
00:15:36.160
have a hard time even understanding, you know, where their food comes from.
00:15:39.260
Cause you can't imagine the idea of killing an animal for, for food, just like these, these
00:15:43.760
basic things about the rhythm of life and the connection to kind of what is necessary
00:15:48.020
for a civilization to continue are really critical because then when you start drawing on a population
00:15:53.760
for, you know, the defense of that nation, you have a generations of people who have been
00:16:01.480
And this is why I think instances of things like PTSD and such are, uh, are so prevalent now
00:16:08.300
is that people are just completely alienated from the necessity of combat and conflict
00:16:15.440
And so when they are forced to interact with it, it's even more shocking.
00:16:20.240
And when they come home, there's no one to talk to about it.
00:16:22.980
There's no, there's no one else who shares those, uh, experiences.
00:16:26.560
And when you have a force like that, it's very difficult to train subsequent generations
00:16:31.740
and instill them the value of kind of needing, you know, that, that martial prowess and that,
00:16:36.480
and kind of the honor of it, the necessity of it and the skills that it takes.
00:16:42.420
I, you know, something that I, I think you hit on, it's really important is that when
00:16:47.000
you talk to the civilian population, when they float, like when they start discussing
00:16:50.620
something like PTSD, you know, the, the vet veterans that everybody recognizes that this
00:16:56.860
is something that exists within the population and that in varying degrees, depending on the
00:17:02.060
person, depending on their experiences, and there's actually quite a much more broad range
00:17:07.080
of what PTSD is or PTS is some people would say.
00:17:11.320
Um, but one of the things that I think is always overlooked is that it, the problems or
00:17:18.660
maybe the issues that people come back with, which has that broad, you know, variance between
00:17:24.100
people, it is made so much worse when they go into, it's almost like going into a dream
00:17:30.680
world where all the existential realities that you were exposed to in the military, and then
00:17:36.040
you also distributed those, uh, your stress, your, the anxieties, you're solving problems.
00:17:43.600
You, you distributed this within a group, right?
00:17:46.500
You know, whether you were engaging in some difficult, you know, uh, you know, task or whether
00:17:51.900
you were dealing with the trauma of what you're going through together as a group, but then
00:17:56.280
you come out into this very alienated, disembodied plane back in the civilian world.
00:18:01.380
And then the, the, the solution to it is go sit on your hands in a corner.
00:18:07.600
We'll give you maybe some money every month and you're, and you become, you're just, you
00:18:12.280
know, you kind of just sit in your obsolescence.
00:18:14.280
And, and I think, I think that without understanding how damaging that is, we can't really wrap our
00:18:20.960
hands or, you know, our arms around PTS within veterans.
00:18:24.960
And I think it, it's interesting to me, you know, reading Machiavelli, you see these, these
00:18:31.960
I mean, these are time tested, they're ancient.
00:18:34.400
And, and I, I really think that that is where we are, we are not really grappling with those
00:18:40.260
No doubt people in the past warriors in the past develop, you know, they had trauma through
00:18:47.160
But I would venture to guess that we struggle so much more today with, with those types of
00:18:53.400
things than maybe they did back then, because you're, you're, you're sending these soldiers
00:18:58.700
back into this disembodied plane where the population is so disconnected from existential
00:19:06.280
The culture is, is, you know, treats those things with hostility rather than understanding
00:19:12.460
So there's really no place for you when you get back.
00:19:16.220
Oh, that was, I mean, you've hit the nail on the head.
00:19:21.660
It wasn't, listen, I knew what I was getting into, right?
00:19:29.900
To engage and destroy the enemy in close combat of the, the enemies of the United States of
00:19:34.540
It was never about like, I knew what I was getting into.
00:19:40.720
And I knew that, you know, there was a very real chance that I would have to kill people.
00:19:46.860
You know, we were trained to be soldiers and warriors.
00:19:50.080
What really hit hard is when I came back to the States and everyone looked at me like I was a
00:19:54.700
garbage man or looked at me like I was strange because I had done those things on the behalf of my
00:20:00.040
My government says, we need you to be a soldier.
00:20:03.580
We need you to destroy the enemies of the United States.
00:20:07.220
This is the task and it's a noble task and one that is required for the stability.
00:20:11.720
Well, you can argue against it these days, but, you know, at the time required for the
00:20:16.140
stability of the United States and, um, and its interests.
00:20:20.960
It was when, you know, people treated me like I had cancer when I came back home because I had
00:20:25.960
actually done the job required that really bothered me.
00:20:32.980
The stress and the, the, um, the difficulties of combat were, were hard, but they were nothing
00:20:39.580
compared to being treated like a social pariah when I came back to the United States.
00:20:43.580
And my personal answer was that I never really did come home.
00:20:48.580
And my solution was to continue to work for the government and work for the military.
00:20:54.760
Um, you know, and, and that was, that was the only way, cause it was just all the same
00:20:58.360
people I had served with in Afghanistan or in similar situations because back home is
00:21:05.020
You know, when I went back to the States, that's, that's where people treated me like,
00:21:08.600
like I had a disease and the first solutions that they gave me for my mental issues is,
00:21:14.560
Hey, take a bunch, you know, take a bunch of, of drugs that are going to turn your brain
00:21:19.420
You know, I asked the doctor when I first came back, it was like, Hey, what's the primary
00:21:23.760
side effect of, um, you know, these, these antidepressants that you're considering putting
00:21:30.040
And it's like, well, it'll most likely reduce your sex drive by like 50 or 60%.
00:21:33.820
And it's like, brother, you, you think I'm, if you think I'm depressed now, you're going
00:21:40.520
And then I can't, you know, perform as like, guess how depressed I'm going to be after
00:21:45.840
And it was really coming to the point where what I found out was there, this came from
00:21:54.040
a good friend of mine who I worked with, who was, who was British SAS.
00:21:59.520
And I told him all about this and he said, you know, at the end of the day, you don't
00:22:05.040
have to be like everybody else and you don't really have to conform.
00:22:08.580
You can live a life that, um, where you don't have to seek the approval of these people who've
00:22:15.920
never had any of the same experience as you and never will understand you.
00:22:19.260
And it's okay that they don't, but you don't have to live in that world anymore if you really
00:22:27.580
I just kind of went back to work and, and lived and, and did jobs where I was with the
00:22:32.260
same community of people, but that's not really an answer for everybody, right?
00:22:36.040
Not everyone who comes back from war can then just completely, you know, choose to reject
00:22:45.320
And then, you know, basically come to an epiphany where they, they can go and completely change
00:22:50.400
their lives to where they can live a life that's completely separate from the society
00:22:55.840
And it's also not healthy for, for the overall wellbeing of that society.
00:22:59.960
But that was, you know, that's, that's why my handle is American Ostracon.
00:23:04.740
It's because, um, you know, I, I feel like in an exile from my own country after I fought
00:23:13.640
Um, and my only way to really keep my sanity was to, to leave and continue to serve the
00:23:20.980
United States, but to serve it in such a way that I wasn't back in the States.
00:23:24.340
Cause those, that was the part I, you know, it wasn't the war that gave me a hard time.
00:23:32.340
Well, and, and like you said there, you know, that's very dangerous for the health of a society
00:23:37.800
for a lot of reasons, one of which being your military force is encouraged basically to
00:23:43.840
separate itself and just not identify with the rest of the, uh, of the populace and the
00:23:50.080
populace, um, you know, isn't, they don't know soldiers.
00:23:53.340
They're not involved with soldiers because such a small percentage of that kind of thing
00:23:56.760
makes it very easy, um, for the government to separate, um, the loyalty of the soldier from
00:24:02.180
from the body of the populace, uh, which is always kind of a recipe for disaster.
00:24:08.640
Um, but, but to kind of pull us back a little bit into the technological aspect, but kind
00:24:12.680
of still pointing to the unhealthiness of the abstraction here, the, the separation of
00:24:18.240
the, of the soldier from kind of the focus of what's going on.
00:24:21.820
Um, one of the issues that I think a technologically based focus of the military does is it tends
00:24:29.700
to abstract the military from kind of the actual effective solutions and wellbeing of the soldier
00:24:36.440
and kind of the, the ability of soldier to do their job.
00:24:38.720
So like one, one example that I've read, uh, there was reading one book and they talked
00:24:43.020
about how, you know, kind of with IEDs in the war on terror, you have this situation where
00:24:48.600
obviously you're losing a lot of soldiers to these very cheap, um, you know, uh, mass
00:24:54.660
And the solution of the military was to go out and invest, you know, like billions of
00:24:59.960
dollars into some kind of aircraft that could fly above the battlefield and was supposed to
00:25:05.340
in theory, be able to detect these IEDs on the road and provide warnings and everything
00:25:11.740
And they sport, they poured so much time and money into this operation, this technological
00:25:20.040
So billions of dollars down the drain made, made no real, uh, tangible benefit for the
00:25:24.960
soldier, but we didn't have money to better armor the vehicles, the soldiers were in, or
00:25:32.420
I'm sure everyone remembers that push to like send body armors to soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan.
00:25:37.420
So we didn't have money to, to properly outfit soldiers on the ground, but we had billions
00:25:43.240
of dollars to pour in a technological solution for something that never really worked when
00:25:47.840
the more practical wellbeing of soldier could have been found in a much more low tech and
00:25:56.960
It's interesting how these things echo when it comes to technology.
00:26:00.460
If I'm, if I'm not mistaken, I think, uh, um, I want to say it was, it might've been
00:26:07.420
it might've been David Hackworth from Vietnam, but I believe he said something.
00:26:11.780
What's better than a well-marbled ribeye sizzling on the barbecue, a well-marbled ribeye sizzling
00:26:17.280
on the barbecue that was carefully selected by an Instacart shopper and delivered to your
00:26:21.500
door, a well-marbled ribeye you ordered without even leaving the kiddie pool, whatever groceries
00:26:27.580
your summer calls for Instacart has you covered download the Instacart app and enjoy $0 delivery
00:26:33.760
fees on your first three orders, service fees, exclusions, and terms apply.
00:26:41.480
He cited that 60% of all casual air American casualties in Vietnam were either by booby traps
00:26:53.360
They're easy to in place, but they do massive damage to soldiers in the, in the field, but
00:26:58.440
they, and then they also strike a great psychological toll as well.
00:27:03.820
And that, and that this was one of the most difficult things for them to contend with in
00:27:08.120
And it's interesting how even after Vietnam and we go through decades later and we, you
00:27:13.540
know, we start talking about air superiority again, and we start talking about how technology
00:27:18.320
We find ourselves in the same situation in Iraq and lesser extent Afghanistan with some of
00:27:23.620
these things, but where these really cheap improvised weapons, booby traps are being used against
00:27:30.580
And it's having, it's having the same disastrous effects.
00:27:34.680
And our answer is, seems to always be trying to remove the soldier out of the equation.
00:27:42.940
We don't double down on even, look, we might spend a lot of money on training, but we always
00:27:47.180
want to find that quick, easy technological fix.
00:27:49.940
And I think that that's kind of a, to me as a soldier, just now that I'm on the outside
00:27:57.540
It worries me about up and coming generations because I see the same, the same desire to
00:28:02.500
outsource the, the old things, the traditional things, the things that human beings have relied
00:28:08.320
on for a long, long time to just quick and easy technological fixes.
00:28:14.700
And, you know, this kind of tech nerd dominion thing that we're living under now, you know,
00:28:20.180
that that's also taking a toll on the military now, and it's not just going to set us up
00:28:25.160
for failure, but a lot of good people are, are, are going like a lot of good potential
00:28:30.240
soldiers are going to be failed by this approach to solving problems by always trying to resort
00:28:46.400
So bad news, here's the problem is, is the more we rely on technology and get away from
00:28:51.120
discipline and, and basic soldiering skills, when we reach or we go into a near peer conflict
00:28:58.800
where we actually have, you know, soldiers, fighting soldiers, you know, um, what's going
00:29:05.340
to happen is that first six months to a year are going, we are going to be underprepared
00:29:13.080
for that conflict, whatever that conflict may be.
00:29:16.680
And unfortunately, what's going to happen is those who are currently serving when that
00:29:22.980
conflict arises are the ones who are going to pay the price with their lives.
00:29:26.840
I, I don't think we're so far gone that once, here's the thing, the first conflict or the
00:29:35.600
first battle, let's call it, that we have where we suffer really egregious casualties where
00:29:42.460
a lot of people die, it will be a wake up call to the old ways where the, the basic soldiery
00:29:49.620
skills will be revived, but it won't be until after a lot of people are killed.
00:29:58.160
When we, when we discipline now where, you know, it's the old saying a pint of sweat is
00:30:06.600
Eventually, I think we will always flex back and be able to produce capable, effective soldiers,
00:30:13.320
but it's about how long it will take to, you know, how many people have to die in order
00:30:19.660
for, you know, these, these very liberal, high-minded ideals of, of technology, replacing soldiers
00:30:26.800
are still going to, before they finally are put to rest, because it's what we always do
00:30:32.580
It's like, no, no, we can rely more and more on technology.
00:30:35.480
And then at the end of the day, a lot of people get killed reliant on this technology without
00:30:42.900
And then you have to go back to these old basic lessons that we have to relearn over
00:30:47.600
and over again at each new conflict until we finally produce an effective combat soldier
00:30:54.320
But a lot of people didn't have to die in the interim to, if we just stuck to our guns and
00:30:59.900
actually followed the rules and discipline and the training that we keep seeming to forget
00:31:06.460
Well, it's interesting too, because, you know, one of the things that Lafayette kind
00:31:11.500
of pointed out was how much the, the things, the problems on the battlefield do mirror kind
00:31:17.240
of our problems in kind of current civil civilization and then how those things kind of reflect each
00:31:23.900
One of the things I think about when it comes to these, uh, advancements and the reliance
00:31:29.720
on, uh, you know, complicated, interconnected technological systems is their maintenance, right?
00:31:36.100
One of my buddies, I'm sure you guys have seen harmless yard dog on, on Twitter.
00:31:40.360
You know, he's one of his tweets is, you know, the, the, the regular maintenance of complex
00:31:46.980
And, you know, the battlefield is the ultimate stress test, right?
00:31:51.100
This is where, you know, obviously the stakes are insanely high.
00:31:54.980
They're as high as things get their, their life and death.
00:31:57.280
They're, they're the continuation of the nation, depending on the nature of the conflict.
00:32:00.660
Uh, and also this is the place where things break down.
00:32:04.420
This is where obviously, you know, you're, you're, uh, in high degrees of, of stress.
00:32:09.800
You know, you have everything that could be going wrong, uh, you know, shocks to the system,
00:32:13.940
attacks on infrastructure, uh, direct efforts by your enemy to hijack or, or otherwise undercut
00:32:24.700
And so having that underlying discipline seems really important because if you don't have
00:32:30.880
the ability, if you, if you've built this really complex technological machine and you've
00:32:35.240
built all of your training and, and made your military entirely reliant on the application
00:32:41.420
of this, uh, highly complicated technological network, and then it's not properly maintained
00:32:46.760
or it's not properly, uh, rolled out or it's somehow taken out in the middle of the battlefield,
00:32:52.320
all of a sudden, you know, you lose this crutch that has been key to your, your training,
00:32:59.400
And all of a sudden, if you don't have that level of discipline built in, then, you know,
00:33:03.680
that's a lesson you, you, you learn, uh, very quickly and at a very high cost as Ostracom
00:33:09.760
I think one, one, you know, you talk about complex systems and the, the, the peers that are,
00:33:16.040
the adversaries that we've had to contend with over the past 20 years, which I think
00:33:25.580
You have a, uh, a cohort of soldiers who know how to fight in a very nebulous environment.
00:33:32.580
Um, it was always, how do you, how do you navigate your own complex system, but how do you fight
00:33:39.620
an, an, an enemy that is continually adapting to the complexity that you're bringing to the
00:33:45.120
And that's something that is going to be, I don't think is going to be lost in a near
00:33:51.100
And this is something that, you know, it's interesting.
00:33:54.380
I always kind of, I like returning to Vietnam because it can be more, it's harder to talk
00:33:58.560
about Afghanistan because most people actually have less knowledge about Afghanistan than
00:34:04.860
We haven't really reconciled with what happened there, but, you know, in, in Vietnam, we had
00:34:09.020
a situation where the American soldiers were demoralized in many units and they were getting
00:34:13.660
killed over and over and over again without ever really fully engaging the enemy, you know,
00:34:20.400
And it took a lot of, uh, innovative field, like field commanders to be able to start
00:34:26.400
forcing, you know, forcing an adaptation to try to break down and kind of out G the G to,
00:34:33.320
to, to adapt a little bit to some of these guerrilla tactics that the Viet Cong were employing.
00:34:39.060
And they were able to do that with a lot of success in certain avenues.
00:34:42.060
But, you know, that's the thing is I always come back to this question because technology is
00:34:46.380
a great tool on the battlefield, no doubt about it, but you become very accustomed to
00:34:52.680
And if you can't adapt to your own complex system or the complexity that your adversary
00:34:58.180
is bringing to the complex system, you know, this is where the only thing that can fill
00:35:02.660
those gaps is that it's, it's going to be those ancient virtues of those soldiers and
00:35:10.040
And if you don't have those, you're not going to be able to adapt no matter how technologically
00:35:16.300
I mean, one of the things that's kind of really shocking when it comes to, you will take the
00:35:23.420
conflict in Afghanistan or you take a Vietnam because it's, the two are comparable, let's
00:35:28.560
Um, is the tooth to tail ratios that the American military had versus like the Viet Cong.
00:35:35.360
Um, so for example, for, for every soldier, every combat soldier that you have on the
00:35:41.000
battlefield, uh, it was something like eight people were, were behind eight to 10 people
00:35:46.540
were behind that individual, meaning it required for every one on the battlefield, it required
00:35:52.080
10 individuals to maintain everything for that individual to be on the battlefield.
00:35:56.360
So like equipment and, and like the supply lines and everything else.
00:36:00.780
And then you look at like the Viet Cong, um, uh, tooth to tail ratio, and it was actually
00:36:06.080
inverse, meaning they could support two soldiers on the battlefield per, uh, with, with one
00:36:14.600
And that's, that's kind of the other side of the house when it comes to, uh, when you have
00:36:21.600
a new piece of technology, it's not just that that individual piece of technology that's on
00:36:27.200
the battlefield is an effective tool, which it can be.
00:36:30.940
It's also, you have to now look at this massive new logistical supply train that you've created
00:36:36.520
as a result of that one new piece of technology, which is like, when you hear people's like,
00:36:40.960
well, you know, why don't we just all use, uh, you know, uh, a new weapon system or a new
00:36:47.060
rifle on the battlefield, uh, chambered in something heavier or something different than
00:36:51.480
like five, five, six or, or, or, or, you know, seven, six, two, and you have to really look
00:36:57.380
Well, it's not just that you can't put that rifle in the battlefield, you can, but now
00:37:02.160
you're talking about an entirely new supply chain of logistics to get ammunition and replacement
00:37:07.620
parts and oil and every other little widget that you need to support that rifle.
00:37:14.080
And that's like a really relatively easy piece of equipment to interchange compared to some
00:37:20.260
larger pieces of equipment with much more complex supply chains.
00:37:24.300
So we, we have this really bad habit when the American military of coming up with this cool
00:37:29.080
new toy, but then not always, um, recognizing everything behind it required in order to support
00:37:39.620
So one thing I wanted to get to, and we've, we've kind of, uh, talked around the edges of it,
00:37:45.740
but I want to go ahead and, and, uh, address it head on here.
00:37:48.820
Uh, you know, technology in many ways is supposed to stand in for these, the disability to the
00:37:55.820
Um, that that's what a lot of people, I think we're all kind of in agreement erroneously
00:37:59.980
believe is possible, but I think this is something that especially the American military is kind
00:38:07.160
And I think one of the reasons is that kind of the, the current regime has, well, you know,
00:38:12.660
let's be honest, purged, uh, especially with kind of their VAX mandates, which are now gone,
00:38:20.680
They, they sent the message and they were very effective in their targeting.
00:38:24.820
Uh, they, they've removed a large percentage of people who they don't think fit their political,
00:38:32.120
Uh, they, they've eliminated a large section of kind of the historically central part of
00:38:38.800
the American military, specifically when it comes to combat arms, they don't want kids
00:38:45.140
Uh, and they're, they're pretty clear, I think about that by the targeting of their political
00:38:50.960
And because of that, that means that they're relying on very different populations to be
00:38:59.220
And I think, you know, the, from the way that they've changed their standards, you know, the
00:39:04.760
way that they've changed, uh, different admission, uh, you know, and, and now that we look at the
00:39:09.540
kind of recruitment numbers and the impact that it's had, I think in many ways, they're planning
00:39:15.160
on making up for the lack of effectiveness of new troops with a technological, uh, aid,
00:39:23.480
Like, well, we don't have to have hard charging infantry guys because at the end of the day,
00:39:29.660
And so it's okay for us to kind of purge populations that might have been the core of our frontline
00:39:36.160
guys, you know, our rough and ready guys, because at the end of the day, we can always backfill
00:39:40.760
that with a bunch of, you know, kind of woke drone pilots or something.
00:39:44.500
And I was wondering what you guys thought about kind of the shift in the military, uh, the
00:39:50.080
shift on their recruiting, their shift on, you know, the, their politics inside and how
00:39:54.420
that interacts with what they, I think is this, this idea that they can just rely on technology
00:40:02.560
Yeah, I, you know, this is, it's something that keeps me up.
00:40:06.200
It, it, it frustrates me a lot to watch this happen because I think you're exactly right.
00:40:10.260
I think they're taking a, we're going through that, that, that cycle where you're getting
00:40:14.860
these, these managerial types that are, are driving our military, like our policy on, on
00:40:21.220
training, on how we get, on how we get soldiers, what we do with them on the battlefield.
00:40:26.260
I mean, they're, it's infecting every part of the, every aspect of the military and it's
00:40:30.640
having, and what it's going to do that I don't think gets enough attention is it's going
00:40:36.200
to corrupt, it's going to corrupt the military in a very personal way, in an intimate way
00:40:41.780
between soldier and soldier, between their teams, their platoons.
00:40:45.380
It's going to, it's go, it's going to drive a dagger into the heart of the kind of cohesion
00:40:52.840
that you have to have, that the kind of truly meritorious, um, the, the merit that kind of
00:41:00.980
that ethos of merit and of sacrifice and those kinds of, and they're more ancient in origin.
00:41:06.880
I would say those are very important to holding a team together in difficult times and having
00:41:13.480
them do a mission that is, you know, every, every part of your, every part of your psyche
00:41:21.220
You're having to overcome a lot, not only yourself, but you're having to build a team.
00:41:25.700
You're having to build like a, a true functional unit that can perform in these kinds of conditions.
00:41:31.640
If you, if you drive this middle management corporate gobbledygook that, that throws off
00:41:39.040
that, that really fragile balance that you need for good leaders to be able to lead men
00:41:45.080
in, in battle, you're, you're going to have serious problems and it's not just going to
00:41:52.880
This is going to permeate throughout the whole force.
00:41:57.520
I don't think it gets enough attention, but it's like, we, we've seen this in the past where
00:42:02.100
this sense of corruption that takes place, that spreads in the military, you know, we've
00:42:08.260
That's a good example of this is that there was a, the, you know, when, when our, when our
00:42:15.320
And I think this relates back to technology because you could, you could really up your body
00:42:19.240
count with all sorts of, you know, with air cover with, you could, you could, you could,
00:42:25.220
you could, if you were able to engage the enemy directly with superior firepower, you
00:42:30.960
And then if, as long as you reported back the body count to hire, and then they broadcasted
00:42:35.900
that as evidence that you were winning, you know, this was how the war started to proceed.
00:42:40.160
So not only do you rely too heavily on body count, which is not a good metric for winning
00:42:45.640
a war, but number two, then you're also encouraging people to lie.
00:42:50.180
You're encouraging a sense of dishonesty that there is a level of honesty and integrity
00:42:54.780
you have to have in these kinds of conditions at the very least with the people that you're
00:42:59.380
When you start driving these other, these, these things that we have now in corporate
00:43:03.540
America, you know, when you start pushing the diversity agenda, when you start, you know,
00:43:07.400
you're throwing off this balance, this cohesion, this sense of integrity that you have to have
00:43:13.180
And I really think that this like type of corruption, it's hard to measure.
00:43:17.100
It's hard to really understand unless you've been in it, but by throwing that off, it will
00:43:26.040
You know, it's, it's, it's all once, once you make it to, to, you know, O3 or above, like
00:43:35.340
you're, you're so metrics driven and whether or not you're considered successful, um, where,
00:43:41.300
you know, have you, have you met the metrics for number of soldiers trained?
00:43:46.720
Um, did X amount of soldiers, uh, score this well on this, um, on this shooting range event?
00:43:54.060
Did all your soldiers, um, attend these six training events that they were required to attend
00:43:59.960
to include, you know, like your, uh, suicide prevention, regardless of the effectiveness
00:44:10.960
Did they attend their, um, you know, did they go to their medical appointments?
00:44:16.420
You've checked all of these blocks and you've spent this amount of money by these metrics.
00:44:22.280
We now deem you worthy to become an O4 or a major in the army because you've, you've checked
00:44:27.900
all of these blocks and you've gone to school and you've done all of these things.
00:44:31.820
And never once has anyone looked at maybe not subjectively by their peers or very rarely.
00:44:38.480
And, uh, as long as you've met those metrics, you're going to get to the next level of promote.
00:44:43.840
You're going to be promoted really without any sort of, you know, subjective views.
00:44:48.840
Like, is this an effective leader, which is, can be a nebulous question, which is why they
00:44:56.200
They just look at the numbers, but that numbers alone, which I'm not saying you shouldn't have
00:45:04.260
Cause I think it keeps, it shows you the rails or the left and right limits of what you need
00:45:09.740
to be doing, but to only be judged solely on these metrics, which is what most people are,
00:45:14.900
um, is a disservice to, uh, to the military community and the people that you're leading.
00:45:21.760
And I think that's a lot of, that's the very corporate America, um, uh, aspect of the U S
00:45:28.080
military that I find really, you know, really disappointing.
00:45:33.780
This, this is fascinating because I hadn't even considered this, but yeah, that makes so much
00:45:38.340
The, we talk about this a lot on this channel, you know, the, the quantification, the need
00:45:46.100
for everything to fit on the spreadsheet, the need for everything to be itemized and, and
00:45:55.920
Everything has to be put into the same mold, everything you need to be able to apply the
00:46:00.640
No one can actually make decisions because everything needs to be able to be justified
00:46:06.900
through kind of this managerial corporate type system.
00:46:10.340
And of course that's deleterious to all kinds of human endeavors because there's so much that
00:46:15.360
isn't caught in between, but this is particularly true in a military sense, because like your
00:46:20.900
ability to like properly prepare a slideshow or check off a number of boxes or fit as a corporate
00:46:27.740
widget, um, is not a reflection of your ability to lead men in combat.
00:46:32.760
Like these, this is a skill that has all kinds of intangibles, things that no person can, you
00:46:43.080
And by trying to manage the entire military in this way, by trying to make it fit into this
00:46:49.440
professional managerial mold, you necessarily destroy all kinds of things.
00:46:55.840
You crush out, uh, ingenuity, you crush out dynamic leadership, you crush out, uh, certitude,
00:47:03.180
the kinds of things that matter on the battlefield.
00:47:05.080
You don't want someone to just always have to check down the force org chart or, you know,
00:47:10.760
go to the best practices list in the middle of a firefight.
00:47:18.140
You have people who all kinds of things that you just cannot put together on some kind of
00:47:25.520
And that, yeah, that's, that's an absolutely corrosive thing to do to, uh, the combat effectiveness
00:47:33.020
So what it's done to the officer core is it's a, it's, we've talked about, it's the rush towards
00:47:40.440
If you are a mediocre officer, you will never fail.
00:47:43.620
You may not be very successful, but you're always going to check the next block.
00:47:47.980
You're going to get your promotion and you're going to get your retirement, assuming something,
00:47:55.500
So if you tow the middle path, you will have a safe, effective career.
00:48:01.360
If you choose to innovate, if you choose to change, or if you choose to be different in
00:48:08.340
some way, a different style of leadership than what's written down on paper, if you're
00:48:13.040
successful, you may get away with it for a while.
00:48:15.800
But the first time you fail and you will fail because everyone does, but the first time
00:48:20.440
you fail and you weren't following the defined path, they're going to yank you and they're
00:48:25.680
going to sideline you or they're going to kick you out.
00:48:29.860
That's, that's been my experience as well, is that you, you have this, you have situations
00:48:34.740
where you're dealing with, especially in the last 20 years, you're dealing with an enemy
00:48:41.280
Uh, they're able to exploit your weaknesses and vulnerabilities.
00:48:45.260
And what ends up happening is that you, you will have types that are very innovative.
00:48:53.980
There's, there's, there's a very human component here that gets lost, but it's, I want to win.
00:49:02.720
And what ends up happening is that these, these types, these innovative types are viewed
00:49:08.260
in a very similar way that you, you see in complex systems, maybe in the corporate environment
00:49:13.080
or maybe over in the public bureaucracy, but it's an immediate signifier of a problem.
00:49:19.700
It's somebody that everybody watches more closely.
00:49:21.880
And when they mess up or if they have to, because when you're innovating, you have to, you have
00:49:28.760
And what it does is it ends up putting a target on your back.
00:49:32.900
And what I worry about too, in the sense of what, when we talk about these like diversity
00:49:37.160
and inclusion initiatives you know, the, the kind of the, the pushing the, the transgender
00:49:42.900
agenda in to the military, we're finding that very mediocre piss poor leaders are able to
00:49:54.140
And that there are, that they are, they're able to make up for their mediocrity by signaling
00:49:59.720
allegiance to an agenda that the regime is now, you know, endorsed.
00:50:06.460
I don't know if civilians noticed it as much, but you might jump on Twitter and notice that
00:50:10.140
so many people in the military that have, you know, they use their face and name and everything
00:50:13.560
that they, that they just, you know, are constantly celebrating these, these, you know, new diversity
00:50:19.800
initiatives or transgenderism or whatever it is.
00:50:22.540
Now that's not reflective of most, most soldiers, sailors, Marine and airmen at all, not even
00:50:30.860
And part of this is it's the same corruption that you see in other complex systems.
00:50:35.880
It's just playing out in the military where mediocrity, not being a team player, maybe not,
00:50:41.900
you know, all the things, these old martial virtues, people that lack those tend to rally behind
00:50:47.740
these causes because it allows them to accelerate their careers or jump through some of the same
00:50:53.860
barriers that we all have to deal with in the military, because they're able to kind of use
00:50:57.980
like a cheat code and move through some of those same things.
00:51:01.440
And what that does is it might, it might accelerate your career.
00:51:08.720
You can see it on social media, but what that does to the regular soldier, what it does to
00:51:12.880
junior officers is it starts to break the trust and confidence down.
00:51:18.860
It starts to signify that we're not in this to win anything.
00:51:23.120
We're, we're really strictly operating just like you would a large corporation or a bureaucracy.
00:51:30.360
It's when you, especially when you see like those sergeants major, or you see those, you
00:51:36.360
know, you see the 07s or the 08s, the general officers touting, you know, so the, the, the
00:51:44.700
And you know that this man who, or, or woman who's been in the military for, you know, 30
00:51:52.660
years or 25 years, didn't have any of these opinions when they first joined the military
00:51:58.200
and they're only doing it to advance their careers.
00:52:01.400
And it's just like, ah, dude, you're just, you, you, and you see them with the young
00:52:06.820
And my first thought was like, God, you're just such a trash human being.
00:52:11.320
That you're willing to sell out all your beliefs just to make sure you make it 30 years and
00:52:16.260
you pull your, you know, what it would be 75% retirement.
00:52:20.820
And it's just like, I'm just like, dude, I, I, I hate everything about what you represent.
00:52:26.340
Are you telling me that Mark Milley wasn't worried about white rage 20 years ago?
00:52:30.500
Yeah, that's the thing that always kills me is like, dude, you, you, you really going
00:52:36.000
to sit there as, you know, as a old white man and tell me that you've always held these
00:52:46.000
Well, and that's, you know, that's something that happened to me in early on in my career
00:52:49.220
as I was being trained by these, I, I had the, I mean, it was tough and it was difficult.
00:52:54.640
I would never want to do it again, but many of the cadre and folks that were training me
00:52:58.140
early on in my career were guys who had just come back from some of the roughest years
00:53:04.780
I mean, these guys were really like, they were tied, tried and true, you know, battle
00:53:11.560
And they, they kind of, they gave me a, a good start, I would say.
00:53:16.480
But, you know, what was interesting is all those guys who had all that incredible
00:53:19.780
institutional knowledge and experience, they were quickly pushed out.
00:53:23.480
And they were, a lot of them were sidelined, their career stalled.
00:53:28.700
And you, you start to see this throughout the global war on terror where, you know, the,
00:53:33.380
the, the types that really have what it, they really have the experience necessary to train
00:53:39.500
good soldiers and help us to win some of these conflicts that we're engaged in.
00:53:44.260
They don't make it very far and they get sidelined very quick.
00:53:47.760
They turned into some crusty, salty individuals with, with, uh, well-earned and very strong
00:53:55.340
opinions about conflict and the nature of conflict.
00:53:59.160
And then to be coming back to the, to, to the schoolhouse and being told by somebody who
00:54:04.280
never went there in the first place that actually the lessons you're teaching them are a bit
00:54:15.240
You didn't go through what I went through and I'm not going to lie to these young soldiers,
00:54:19.520
uh, about what the realities of what they're going to face are because I'm setting them
00:54:26.380
And yet, and you see that, that where you have this, you, you know, it's been interesting
00:54:30.680
because we talk a lot about this, like managerial, you know, the managerial regime and, you
00:54:35.220
know, managerial revolution, but, you know, we're, we're kind of seeing this a lot more
00:54:39.160
visibly in the U S military over the past 20 years where you're seeing, even though there
00:54:43.820
were, there were this same problem existed, pre-existed the global war on terror, but it,
00:54:49.380
it really started to seize the institution in a way that I just don't think it's, it's,
00:54:57.900
And where you have middle management and you have the political considerations are now shaping
00:55:04.580
the, the way that we train, the way that we even conduct the wars themselves.
00:55:10.100
And I mean, by the end of it, I think every soldier I knew, we've all, we all knew what
00:55:18.020
I, you know, I don't know if that was a secret to any of us, right?
00:55:22.020
We, it was just a matter of time and it all comes back to the same.
00:55:26.300
You cannot, you cannot replace leadership with a manager.
00:55:30.860
You can't manage a war, you know, and this is, this is something that I think all these
00:55:36.100
trends that we're talking about and technology drives this.
00:55:38.860
It makes us feel very confident that we, all we need to do is get the right tool and then
00:55:43.340
manage it and we'll, we'll be able to produce the results we want.
00:55:49.160
I think that I, you know, I, if we're going, I think you're totally right.
00:55:53.020
When you brought this up about how we've gone through these phases before, we're going
00:55:57.000
to learn the hard way and there's going to be a lot of good people that are going to
00:55:59.900
get killed, but it's going to have to drive a major change and it's going to be returning
00:56:04.020
back to this, you know, the, those existential realities we talked about on re wrapping
00:56:10.940
our arms around human nature once again and understanding like what it is to make violence
00:56:18.240
I just, I hope that we can do that quickly rather than slowly because a lot of good people
00:56:30.640
It's unfortunate that we're, what's going to happen is we will only find these effective
00:56:36.220
leaders after we've burned through the ineffective ones, which means people will die.
00:56:40.940
And that's just, that's the fact that's, that's what it really comes down to when we don't
00:56:46.100
maintain the warrior ethos in between major conflicts.
00:56:51.780
We pay for it on the battlefield in the first six months to the year in young men's deaths.
00:57:04.180
And the thing that really struck me again, just reading Machiavelli just hundreds of years
00:57:08.660
ago in a very different world, but having the exact same problems, right?
00:57:16.860
It's a cycle that it seems like, you know, civilizations go through.
00:57:20.140
It's a lesson that we have to keep learning over and over again.
00:57:22.780
And you hate to see your civilization have to pay that cost because as you both pointed out,
00:57:31.820
And it's a, it's a terrible thing, but it might be unfortunately the only thing that,
00:57:36.160
that wake people's up to the reality that technology will never supersede the importance
00:57:41.840
of, of kind of brave men who are willing to defend a country and all the other virtues
00:57:50.180
And it's a, it's a horrible lesson to have to learn, but I think you guys are probably
00:57:57.000
And I think the, the, the government solution is that that's just the price we're going to
00:58:10.140
And so therefore, you know, when it happens again, everyone's going to throw their arms up
00:58:14.480
and claim, Oh, Oh, Oh, what putiful fools we were, but really you always knew you were
00:58:21.260
just going to pay that price in American lives because you really don't care.
00:58:27.080
Unfortunately, I think that that's probably exactly correct.
00:58:30.180
All right, guys, well, we have stacked up a large amount of super chats, so we probably
00:58:34.200
have to get started here if we want to make it out of here at a reasonable time.
00:58:38.620
So let's go ahead and move over here before we do.
00:58:41.580
Actually, uh, Lafayette's got, uh, uh, stuff he does Lafayette.
00:58:46.140
Can you, uh, tell people where to find your work, your writing, everything else you're
00:58:57.000
And then I also run a sub stack called ruins of Corotomon.
00:59:02.860
I've got some analysis on, uh, apocalypse now coming out shortly.
00:59:07.160
So sorry for all those who've been waiting, but yeah, you can find me over there.
00:59:15.480
So, uh, Jimmy Bones here for 499 have told, uh, Lee personally, but a reminder, uh, reminder
00:59:23.580
Lee has done more than he knows for the, uh, global war on terror generation as we reconcile
00:59:33.020
So kind words from Jimmy Bones for Lafayette Lee, which I think are probably very well
00:59:41.720
I, I just, you know, a lot of us out there, I just say that we've all been in the same
00:59:47.560
We've, but we were part of something and I think there's a lot more to learn from it
00:59:55.620
Uh, I think this can be the beginning of something better.
01:00:05.340
I now think Elon Musk should start his own, uh, professional military corporation, uh,
01:00:11.200
to draw talent away from military and make USG even more dependent on him.
01:00:16.780
Uh, you know, goose that private army for the Twitter CEO.
01:00:21.180
He can, he can start stealing the best and brightest for Elon land.
01:00:27.840
Um, yeah, a, a, a giant privatized, uh, a paramilitary.
01:00:31.740
Um, that's at the behest of a single individual would lead to some very interesting situations.
01:00:41.160
At some point you have to ask that equilibrium point about when, you know, depending on how
01:00:48.560
The U S military is brought to you by McDonald's.
01:00:53.220
Uh, glow in the dark, uh, for $10 here to be fair, Afghanistan could have been a win,
01:00:58.020
but, uh, too many were using it for money laundering and no one actually had a plan other than
01:01:06.520
I mean, I know both of you guys probably have quite a few thoughts on that, but, you know,
01:01:11.180
what do you think about, uh, the, the loss of military, military missions and effectiveness,
01:01:18.140
as opposed to individual interests when it comes to, you know, or ideological interests,
01:01:24.880
you know, we're spreading democracy or capitalism, not we're not that, Hey, we're here because
01:01:28.760
we protect Americans and this is what it takes.
01:01:33.040
Um, are you asking how we could have won Afghanistan?
01:01:36.780
Just, just more kind of the, the, the thought about this approach of, uh, the justification
01:01:43.040
for these things being, we're here to, we're, we're in Afghanistan for the liberty and the,
01:01:49.060
and the free market and the, the, the right of Afghans to vote in elections, as opposed
01:01:53.400
to we go to war because it's for American and America's interests.
01:01:56.900
We get in, we solve that problem that we get out.
01:02:02.380
No, I, I, I don't either, but I think that's kind of what the question is.
01:02:10.860
Um, you know, I'm, I'm not an Afghanistan hand, but I would just say that my experience,
01:02:18.780
I would say that if we had an actual mission, um, which it, it continually evolved while
01:02:25.040
we were over there, but if we had started out with the original mission and that we
01:02:28.160
called it a day after that mission had been accomplished, you could call that a win.
01:02:32.080
And I, but I think that, I think that the powers that be were never really intending just
01:02:38.140
So I do think that was possible to win in that respect, but you're, I think he's exactly
01:02:44.560
Like when it comes to building a nation, you can't build a nation in a place that there
01:02:52.260
You could do it the Roman way or you could do it the, the, the Alexander way, right?
01:02:58.860
You send, you train soldiers, you learn the language, you really learn the languages, you
01:03:05.700
send them over there for 10 plus years at a time, or you intermarry them.
01:03:11.200
I mean, I mean, we're talking way outside the box here, right?
01:03:13.900
This is none of this is going to be happening in today's world, but you, you literally, you,
01:03:18.840
you blend the two cultures together, you, you have your soldiers intermarry into, into
01:03:26.540
the culture and you, you have kind of what Alexander did in Egypt and a lot of other places
01:03:31.380
where we're basically the, the two cultures became one.
01:03:34.220
And now you look at the, the legacy left behind by Alexander and you have all this Hellenic
01:03:39.520
influence and all of these other places outside of Greece or you do it the Roman way where
01:03:44.340
you just burn everything to the ground and salt the earth and, and call it a win.
01:03:48.520
So you could, you can integrate in Afghanistan or you can annihilate in Afghanistan, but that's
01:03:57.880
Those are the only real ways you win any conflict is you integrate the two cultures together
01:04:02.880
together and you, you come up with something new or you just burn it all to the ground
01:04:11.080
If you, if you're going to do imperialism, then do imperialism, but don't just don't
01:04:17.020
Like doing, if we're going to be imperialist, let's just, you know, call it what it is and
01:04:21.220
be imperialist, but don't, don't do this soft imperialism where we, where, you know, we burn
01:04:26.440
through billions of dollars and, and, you know, and tens of thousands of lives.
01:04:31.960
Uh, and then at the end of the day, we have nothing for it.
01:04:34.800
Like if we're going to be imperial, let's be imperial or let's not be imperial.
01:04:38.560
I'm not saying we should be, I'm saying either, you know, for lack of a better term, shit
01:04:46.500
You gotta, gotta pick one or the other sitting around and trying to be the kinder, gentler
01:04:50.840
Uh, so the lauriest here for 10 Bounds, uh, how's your British accent?
01:04:57.960
I will not attempt to read this in, in a British accent, but, oh, it's, uh, oh, it's Tommy.
01:05:03.580
This and Tommy that, and chuck him out the, uh, out the brute.
01:05:07.180
Uh, but he's a hero of his country when the guns begin to shoot.
01:05:12.420
If Kipling were alive, he might not even say that.
01:05:23.880
Uh, you know, I, I've been posting a lot about this on the timeline recently, just dealing
01:05:28.840
with Vietnam and how I see a lot of similarities to today, but, you know, these are, these conflicts
01:05:35.140
There's been this real bifurcation between our social and professional elites and then kind
01:05:40.860
of the rest of us, many of us come from in the military.
01:05:43.540
There you'll find, you know, there are definite exceptions to this and great soldiers that
01:05:47.200
come from, uh, you know, more elite backgrounds, but most people come from that middle to lower
01:05:54.140
And it's, it's just interesting that we have been living through decades of what I would
01:06:02.360
Uh, and then we do all the heavy lifting in these, in these conflicts and it's always
01:06:11.960
I'd have nothing new under the sun, but Kipling nailed it then.
01:06:16.940
I, I really, really like Kipling and his works.
01:06:21.620
And, um, yeah, it's, this is, this is also one of kind of my favorite quotes from Kipling.
01:06:28.260
Kipling, I'm also, uh, quite a big fan of, of A.E.
01:06:32.240
Hausman, um, who is, uh, was he a contemporary of Kipling?
01:06:37.240
Uh, I think he was, he was more of a, um, he was more of a scholar than a poet, but he
01:06:42.760
released some poetry that was, uh, very much, uh, I would, I would call it, I would call
01:06:49.640
it like good veteran poetry because it's, it's grim, but, but also patriotic, but, but,
01:07:00.620
But, uh, yeah, all these, all these turn of the century, English poets and scholars are
01:07:05.660
usually what I turn to when I, when I look to, uh, my, um, my, my poetry and my quotes
01:07:13.480
Cause I think they had it spot on being in that time period in the, in the waning of
01:07:20.840
the British empire where it was attempting to, uh, continue it's in, you know, it's imperial
01:07:28.020
legacy, but it was, it was slowing down and living in what, you know, we could argue is
01:07:34.360
kind of the waning of the American empire in a lot of ways.
01:07:37.040
Um, those same poets and, and scholars, what they talk about really rings true to me.
01:07:48.900
And he says they have no, uh, plan to help grunts after combat more, uh, other than more
01:07:55.800
So they don't rebel or something anti-establishment.
01:07:59.980
And yeah, I think that's something that, uh, both Ostrakhan and Lafayette have, have both
01:08:07.040
Of understanding and, and getting people back on their feet and surrounding them with
01:08:12.300
And instead, like you said, just, just that dependence to keep, to kind of quiet people
01:08:16.640
and shove them in a corner rather than deal with any of those issues of people coming
01:08:23.380
Something that's interesting about that too, is that I think I found it really, it shocked
01:08:28.180
me that, you know, our current administration would paint with such a broad brush and pretty
01:08:34.320
much a lump, but many global war on terror veterans and identify them as terrorists and,
01:08:41.280
you know, subversive and all these other things that we've seen.
01:08:44.100
It, to me, it's kind of a risky move in this, you know, in this strange place that we're in
01:08:49.600
to take this population of people who've kind of been disenfranchised in some way.
01:08:53.420
And then instead of trying to scoop them up and pull them back into the regime, they're
01:09:00.220
trying to push them out and marginalize them even more.
01:09:03.520
You know, that's a large population of people that have, you know, interesting skill sets
01:09:07.760
and, uh, have a deep loyalty to the country to try to create that separation.
01:09:12.180
So I didn't think it was a very wise move, but I could be wrong.
01:09:22.240
Our military is in the same mindset as Germans when it came to tech, bigger tanks mean more
01:09:31.220
This is, uh, this is Wes, uh, over idealization of tech as a solution and our money dominance allowed
01:09:38.600
I mean, sure, if, if, if you've got that kind of money dominance, if you've got that kind
01:09:42.940
of material wealth, then the tendency is to kind of think you can always outspend and out
01:09:50.460
But I think as, as both of these gentlemen, again, have pointed out, uh, the Afghans didn't
01:09:55.640
need to develop a whole lot of new technology to kind of outlast a, uh, American leadership
01:10:02.240
that was far more focused on technology and, and their own political ends as opposed to
01:10:08.580
actually winning combat and having effective, uh, units and, and fighting a war effectively.
01:10:15.020
This is all just like weapon engineers fever dream of sending, you know, soldiers into
01:10:22.800
They just, they, they liked the anime when they were growing up and like, no, we can do
01:10:29.380
I like the idea that, uh, that all of our foreign policy is driven by weebs in, uh, in
01:10:37.020
A bunch of, a bunch of nerds coming up with cool widgets in the dark room somewhere thinking
01:10:43.440
Some of it is, uh, you know, there are some cool, it's funny though, you know, most, most
01:10:48.000
of the effective tools that we ran into were, were battlefield innovations.
01:10:57.740
They, they put them on the front of, of vehicles.
01:11:00.340
Um, it was a, it was, uh, it wasn't called a rhino.
01:11:07.380
So part of the way that the enemy would detect when to launch, um, when to launch their weapons
01:11:16.640
And there was like, it was like sensors that they would use to like know when to launch the,
01:11:22.620
And the solution to it was to basically just create a box in front of the vehicle with
01:11:27.440
like spark plugs or heat plugs in it to mirror, uh, to, to, to, to mirror the, uh, the heat
01:11:32.960
signature of the vehicle so that it would go off too quickly or would go off ahead of
01:11:37.140
And that was just something that somebody came up with, you know, in a, um, you know, in
01:11:41.780
a tent somewhere is like, well, fine, if the, if they're dealing, that's kind of like
01:11:44.860
the, the back and forth of battlefield technology development where some of the most effective
01:11:50.380
innovations were actually just made by somebody who was already on the battlefield and like,
01:11:57.200
Like, uh, in world war two, when the Germans started putting up piano wire in between or
01:12:02.720
wire between trees, uh, in order to like when vehicles rolled by or when they rolled by in
01:12:09.660
And the solution was just a piece of metal placed on the end of the, or in front of the
01:12:14.300
jeep, uh, with, with a little wire cutter, uh, uh, notch so that when they did run through
01:12:20.080
the forest and there was wire between the trees, it would just catch on that notch and
01:12:24.900
And that was something that they just basically came up with on the fly and started welding
01:12:30.020
So I'm not saying that's a replacement for military technology development, but a lot of
01:12:36.080
the most effective tools are just built around the pieces of equipment that we already had.
01:12:42.620
That kind of flows into his next point glow in the dark.
01:12:46.320
We waste money on toys, which you need men to win a fight.
01:12:49.780
The more complex a toy is, the harder it is to maintain.
01:12:54.480
And that kind of, you know, speaks to what you're talking about.
01:12:56.420
Those battlefield innovations are often very practical things created by people who are getting,
01:13:02.700
you know, have direct experience and not by those, you know, sitting at the
01:13:05.740
defense contractor working out the most complicated way to kind of deploy a weapon system here.
01:13:13.860
Just one joke about NASA spending all that money and all that technology to create a pen
01:13:27.320
Charby Zhu, I guess, would be the right way to say that for $10.
01:13:31.480
If China were to engage in large-scale war, the casualties will be devastating on society
01:13:39.380
What are the demographic problems the U.S. may face in a similar situation?
01:13:43.020
That's a really interesting question, actually.
01:13:45.100
You know, the very few nations have really thought, there are a lot of nations, China is
01:13:50.820
one of them, running into very interesting demographic problems at this point.
01:13:54.720
Modernity seems to be perhaps the great filter when it comes to this in a lot of ways.
01:14:01.100
But one thing people haven't thought about, I think, is the near-peer conflict and its
01:14:08.480
Because, of course, we know, you know, many of European towns and like France and stuff
01:14:13.280
between World War I and World War II, basically, they just died because they lost all of two
01:14:19.240
generations' worth of young men through those conflicts.
01:14:24.360
I'm not sure what the answer to this is, but that is an interesting thing to contemplate.
01:14:28.200
You know, if we did have a near-peer conflict and you have all these countries that are already
01:14:32.180
currently undergoing a bit of a demographic crisis when it comes to childbirth and that
01:14:37.500
kind of thing, what would, you know, how would a war affect that or how would war be affected
01:14:42.460
Yeah, I think one of the things that a lot of folks sleep on is that China does have a
01:14:48.100
demographic looming on the horizon for various reasons.
01:14:57.840
And I think it's just going to get worse from here on out.
01:15:00.880
So I think that throws a real problem towards China.
01:15:05.360
But I do think in the United States, and I've seen this being floated, I think that there's
01:15:10.280
been a lot of talk about using, you know, recent arrival, like immigrant, you know, immigrant
01:15:20.080
And I think that that would be, I think that that would not only create a major strain on
01:15:25.540
U.S. society and the social fabric, but it would really change the way in which we confront
01:15:32.780
So I think either way, if we had to go to a near-peer conflict, I think the demographic
01:15:37.700
question for both us and our enemies would be, you know, a really important consideration.
01:15:54.640
Knowing what you know now, would any of you fight for the regime, i.e. against Russia and
01:16:01.380
China, I guess it would matter a whole lot on kind of the circumstances around that.
01:16:09.340
Both of you gentlemen are kind of out of the service now, but what would you, maybe a better
01:16:14.000
way to say this is, what would you advise to young men considering service, knowing what
01:16:20.120
you know now and the possibility of a conflict with one of these adversaries?
01:16:25.180
Um, for me, I would, I get this question all the time.
01:16:41.920
I think either answer would get a lot of hate, but I'm, I'm just be honest with you.
01:16:45.840
Um, I, I am definitely salty about some things, uh, mostly pertaining to the way in which,
01:16:51.660
you know, knowing that good people were killed for no reason that, you know, people I knew
01:16:58.440
A lot of this abstract stuff kind of, I mean, it matters, you know, I've read the Afghanistan
01:17:05.280
Um, but at the end of the day, what really hits hard to me is that, that, that, that near
01:17:10.920
Um, and then when I think about my own sons, you know, do I want my sons to serve?
01:17:18.960
I would never change it for anything in the world.
01:17:23.240
I don't, you know, and I, I know that, you know, there's good and bad that come along
01:17:27.020
It was not a cakewalk, but I am grateful for that experience.
01:17:31.040
It made me into the man I am today in a very good way.
01:17:34.200
And I can see the value that it brings to people on an individual level.
01:17:39.500
So that said, when someone says they're going to join the military, I don't, you know, I,
01:17:45.300
I can't tell them that they shouldn't, you know, I understand the, the need that many
01:17:51.180
young men feel to go prove themselves, to go be tested, to go on an adventure, to do
01:17:56.240
something, you know, that's difficult to learn those skills.
01:18:02.180
Unfortunately, we can't really trust our regime right now.
01:18:05.480
And we haven't really been able to for a very long time, but then if I were to, if I were
01:18:10.540
to, to go and tell somebody, no, I would really have to be telling myself that same thing years
01:18:21.580
Obviously, like if we were attacked, I would probably find myself right back to the, in
01:18:27.040
the same place with or without those reservations.
01:18:32.420
You know, my, my ancestry goes back to 1605 in this, in this, you know, in this land.
01:18:37.800
And, you know, my ancestors have fought in every conflict.
01:18:41.140
It's something that's really deeply, it's, it's a powerful thing to me as an individual.
01:18:49.520
I don't, I don't look down on people who have too many reservations with the way things
01:18:54.520
Uh, but I also don't look down on people who want to go and sign up, but that said, just
01:19:02.680
Uh, you're an adult, you're a big person, you go forward and you, you have your reasons
01:19:07.640
and you take the good and the bad that come along with that.
01:19:14.820
It's, it's hard not to love a young man or woman who's, who's willing to step forward
01:19:21.480
and put on the uniform, you know, even that's, that's so, it's so primal to me.
01:19:30.740
It's a, it's such a, it's such a, a scary thing to do to say that I don't know what's
01:19:38.760
going to happen, but I'm going to do this and, and I'm going to, to, to take on these
01:19:46.600
responsibilities now we can look back on it later in life and say, oh, well, I wish this
01:19:56.480
And Oron, as you well know that my military career did not end the way I wanted it to.
01:20:02.240
Um, but I would have a very hard time not wanting to be there for a young man or woman who says
01:20:12.280
they want to serve and doing everything in my power to, to, to help them.
01:20:17.740
And at the end of the day, soldiers don't get to choose the conflicts of which they serve
01:20:23.120
And just because maybe personally, I got a raw deal would not make me want to discourage
01:20:32.320
somebody from, from having that adventure and having that experience.
01:20:36.980
Cause objectively, if you look at my military career, uh, you would say this was maybe not
01:20:44.340
a good thing to go do because it took a lot from me.
01:20:47.520
And I also didn't get to finish it how I wanted to.
01:20:49.760
Um, but at the end of the day, my personal experience is not necessarily what, uh, another
01:20:56.620
person is going to experience and to, to dissuade somebody from, from having that opportunity,
01:21:06.180
Um, because there's so few people left who still want to.
01:21:10.720
And so at the end of the day, I, I never, I never cared.
01:21:15.440
It was, it was always the, the ones I was in charge of.
01:21:18.140
And especially the young ones that I, I would go above and beyond for, because that's the
01:21:26.160
It was, it was the young, it was the young men and women, the young soldiers, because
01:21:29.300
they're, they're looking to you to, to be, you know, not just their leader, but to, in
01:21:34.820
a lot of ways, you're, you're the replacement mother and father, as, as we've discussed before.
01:21:38.940
It's like, I talked to you one time or on, and, and I, and you said, I was really frustrated
01:21:44.060
because I was like, God, all of my soldiers just complaining constantly about me.
01:21:49.240
And, and they're just, they're, they just give me acres of crap.
01:21:52.600
And like, nobody, nobody, you know, everyone looks at me like they know better.
01:21:57.320
But then as soon as something bad happens or the shit hits the fan, they all run to me
01:22:05.780
And I says, I didn't understand it at the time or on, and you were telling me, it's like,
01:22:09.880
why is it that only when things are bad or only when things are critical that they can
01:22:15.240
then rush to me and listen to whatever I say and they trust my judgment.
01:22:18.660
And you look at me, it's like, yeah, you're, you're dad.
01:22:22.300
And so, um, it kind of clicked after that where it's like, oh yeah, I, I feel I'm still young,
01:22:30.920
but you know, in a way like, like the title of the book, I've become the old breed and now
01:22:36.420
I'm no longer the young soldier, even though I was not old by a civilian standard, by a military
01:22:44.540
And, um, regardless of what's above you to, to discourage somebody from,
01:22:52.280
joining or, or for me to say it wasn't worth it is for me to say, it wasn't worth it to me
01:22:57.880
invest in these young people's lives, regardless of the outcome.
01:23:03.080
Um, you know, this is, this is getting a little deep here and you may, um, you, you, um, I'm
01:23:11.000
sorry, uh, Lafayette, you may have had a similar experience to me, but I'm going deep.
01:23:18.020
Uh, when did you have to go through Sears school?
01:23:22.620
It was never, it was never about them hurting me that, that made it that, that was hard
01:23:35.160
It's, it's when, it's when they, the, the way that I learned that I was really could get
01:23:42.720
And that's the way I, that's what I learned about my time there.
01:23:46.620
And I think it was a really good lesson to learn was that it was never about my pain and
01:23:51.240
It was about protecting those that I was in charge of.
01:23:55.140
And that was, that's a really, in a really kind of grim way, I learned that, but that's
01:24:00.340
what really clicked with me there is like, it's never, it was never about me.
01:24:04.780
It was always about the people that I was supposed to take care of.
01:24:14.060
And you'll never get that experience anywhere else.
01:24:16.680
You will never get that experience in a civilian world or corporate America where somebody else,
01:24:23.620
multiple people put, you know, their ultimate trust in you.
01:24:27.660
And to, to, to go against that or, or to say that's not worth it is to say, for me, it's
01:24:38.720
No, do you mind if I jump in on that real quick?
01:24:42.940
I love what you said, because I think I don't want to speak for you.
01:24:46.040
I imagine that you'd probably have the same experience in some way.
01:24:49.400
Cause everyone I talked to who was involved in the last 20 years would say this is that
01:24:53.820
there comes a time when you peek behind the curtain, you realize that it's just not what
01:24:58.340
you thought it was, but it's the people that you're with that you realize that you even
01:25:05.060
knowing everything that you come to know about what you're doing, why you're doing it, uh,
01:25:13.140
You know, you lose people that you care about for no good reason sometimes, but at the end
01:25:17.940
of the day, you end up doing it for the people that you're with and you couldn't ever let
01:25:21.600
them down no matter what, no matter what it was.
01:25:24.820
And you know, some people will look down on that and that that's fine.
01:25:31.460
And I don't think that, you know, on a, I'm looking forward, I don't think we can get out
01:25:36.620
of this mess and secure something for ourselves and for the people that we live around, the
01:25:42.220
If we don't have that backbone that we got in that kind of experience, there are many people
01:25:49.120
You saw behind the curtain, you saw it wasn't what you thought you, it wasn't what you signed
01:25:54.820
You realized that you were not, it was not what you thought, but the people you were
01:25:59.200
with and what you were, what you were gaining along the way mattered.
01:26:05.020
It was probably the most real thing that, that you experienced during your entire time.
01:26:09.460
And to me, I don't think we can move anywhere to a good place without that.
01:26:17.620
And for those guys who didn't make it back, you know, if that sacrifice or the people that
01:26:22.320
we lost, whether you can say it was needless or meaningless or whatever, the end of the
01:26:27.060
day, like I look at that and I say, I have a gift of life.
01:26:31.740
I have that experience that is invaluable to me.
01:26:39.080
Knowing everything I know, like the way things are going, the way our social fabric is, the
01:26:43.520
way our country is trending, the kind of leaders, the piss poor leaders we have, that can't be
01:26:52.780
And to agreed and to basically say that all of my experiences shouldn't have happened or it would
01:27:01.960
have been better if it didn't, or you get those people who never served to sort of collect their
01:27:07.800
tongues as like, oh, all these people died needlessly.
01:27:11.120
It's like, you know, I never saw you pick up a rifle and get out there.
01:27:14.300
How clever you were to, you know, live, eat, breathe and die under my protection and then have the
01:27:20.980
audacity to, to judge in the manner in which I, in the manner in which we gave it to you.
01:27:38.840
And so mostly I just say, I never really engaged those people in conversation because they, they
01:27:46.880
were never really looking to have an actual conversation.
01:27:49.500
They were just looking to validate an opinion of which they already had, but you know, I
01:27:57.800
I did it for the people who I was responsible for and my friends, because my friends were
01:28:05.140
My friends were in Afghanistan and I didn't do it because of, you know, any sort of at the
01:28:11.020
end, even after I peeked behind the curtain, I never did it for any high-minded idealism for,
01:28:17.900
It was just that, no, we're in a bad situation and I want to get my boys home as best I can.
01:28:24.580
And I'm going to do everything I can to get them there so they can go back home and complain
01:28:29.800
about paying taxes and, you know, and about girlfriends cheating on them and, and their
01:28:35.040
parents complaining that they're not doing exactly what they should be doing in life.
01:28:38.460
Because that's my job is to get them back home in as best mental and physical shape as
01:28:45.180
possible to go back and live their lives as they choose to live them.
01:28:49.060
They could stay in the military or they could get out of the military, but it's my, my right
01:28:55.280
and burden to bring them home in one piece as best I can.
01:28:59.100
And that's all that I really cared about at the end.
01:29:01.080
And there were other officers and other soldiers who probably were a little more gung-ho than
01:29:07.540
And they, they probably earned a few more medals than I, I know they did.
01:29:11.020
They, one of them had a high school named after him.
01:29:14.240
But he was also a really hard charging dude who put his men at more risk.
01:29:20.980
Um, looking back on it in the grand scheme of things, you know, objectively can say he probably
01:29:25.860
wasn't justified, but at the time, you know, I understand he wasn't a bad leader by any
01:29:31.740
He was just a more direct leader who was willing to, to engage, uh, uh, you know, the enemy
01:29:38.700
and, and, and, you know, send his men into more high risk scenarios than maybe I was.
01:29:43.960
Uh, I was usually the guy who was just like, listen, we got all this love, this kind of dovetails
01:29:49.480
We've got all this lovely technology, you know, let's let, let's let them, you know, uh, let's
01:29:54.940
let them use an aircraft on them, or we can call for fires or something like that.
01:29:59.240
We don't necessarily have to engage them directly.
01:30:01.800
Um, you know, we probably won't win as many awards and we won't have as many cool stories,
01:30:05.840
but ultimately, you know, let the mortar men take care of it or let the pilots take care
01:30:10.520
Um, and I guess that's, that was always my mantra or that was always what my code, my personal
01:30:21.720
Let's do the mission, but once you're out there, like, like Lafayette said, we, we knew
01:30:26.580
it was not going to be, and it's, it was never going to be a winnable situation.
01:30:30.640
So why put my boys at more risk than is required than, you know, to check the block?
01:30:36.380
Uh, if I know at the end of the day, the mission, we're, we're not going to, we're not going
01:30:42.640
Let's just survive it and get them home as best I can.
01:30:45.820
And that was, you know, I can say that now that I'm out, but it was more about getting
01:30:55.360
I think that's, that's, that's, that's love at the end of the day.
01:30:57.780
And, and, you know, that's a great quote, you know, a true soldier doesn't fight for
01:31:02.120
what he hates in front of them, but what he loves behind him.
01:31:05.680
And I, I loved my, my soldiers and I wanted them to get home.
01:31:10.940
Well, Roosevelt, it's a very complex issue, but I think you got a very thorough answer.
01:31:21.020
Uh, glow in the dark here says, uh, we, uh, we abstracted being an effective soldier or
01:31:26.500
military away from reality and placed it with spreadsheets, uh, Vietnam style.
01:31:31.440
And yeah, that was, that was a really good point by Ostracan again, something I hadn't thought
01:31:35.440
enough about, but of course is absolutely true.
01:31:38.260
And it's had a big impact on, uh, the battlefield.
01:31:41.620
It sounds like, uh, glow in the dark here again for $2.
01:31:48.220
When, uh, yeah, I don't, I don't think that is an option.
01:32:01.160
Uh, we're going, Sylvia and Russia is going more American.
01:32:08.620
I guess it would depend on the context of kind of how you look at that question.
01:32:12.500
Um, Russia is certainly in a very different conflict.
01:32:19.500
You could spend a lot of, a lot of time talking about that.
01:32:22.980
And many people have, um, but, uh, we do appreciate that, uh, glow in the dark.
01:32:27.840
All right, guys, I think we got to all of these.
01:32:30.900
Just, let me just double check real quick to make sure we didn't miss anyone, but I think
01:32:48.020
Well, thank you so much for joining, uh, me, both, uh, Oshkhan and Lafayette Lee.
01:32:53.860
Make sure you're checking out all of Lafayette's work.
01:32:58.820
Make sure you're checking out his stuff there and want to say thank you to everyone for
01:33:04.100
We had a lot of questions, a lot of really good audience questions, obviously, uh, some,
01:33:15.380
If it's your first time here, of course, really appreciate a subscription to the channel.
01:33:19.640
And if you want to listen to this in just, you know, the audio format, you just want
01:33:23.400
a podcast, do remember you can get this on all your major podcast platforms.
01:33:28.720
If you do do go over to iTunes or Spotify or something like that, just make sure to leave
01:33:35.660
It helps get everybody the word out to everyone.