00:21:08.740Do we feel like we understand those countries in the way we understand maybe our near peers?
00:21:15.400Do we really think that we are going to expend all the necessity of the logistics, the people, the money, the spirit, everything required to control and kind of force those nations to be what we want them to be?
00:21:31.680Because if not, then we should probably have a better idea of how to conduct our foreign policy closer to home.
00:21:39.000Again, this doesn't mean shutting down the empire, but it means caring more about maybe Central America and Canada than it does the Middle East.
00:21:48.080And we can kind of easily do that if we just start untangling ourselves, especially from alliances like Israel that kind of drive us into conflict in that area on a regular basis.
00:21:57.720If we didn't have to care about whether or not Iran was hitting Israel, we could just focus on oil reserves in someplace closer to our own home.
00:22:07.460We could focus on geopolitics and the stability of countries like Mexico, where we actually should be exerting far more influence.
00:22:18.000I would be way more in favor of military strikes on Mexican cartels and boots on the ground there than I would in Iran, because at least I can directly understand how that benefits the United States.
00:22:31.300I can understand that, yeah, even if it's an imperial move, technically we're going into another country, I can understand that country's on our border.
00:22:38.920It's got so much more importance to me personally, and I think largely to people in the United States, than any given place in the Middle East.
00:22:48.720And the answer is because we've got this global empire instead of understanding ourselves as a regional or civilizational empire, a civilizational block.
00:22:56.980The other problem we have is that classically, the imperial mode is to operate in the benefit of the United States.
00:23:37.500Because of kind of our story of, you know, everyone gets a vote and everyone is equal,
00:23:42.620and these are like God-given rights to everybody in the world, we have a hard time just going into a place and ruling it for our advantage.
00:23:51.160And that's a genuine problem when it comes to empire, because if you are not willing to kind of impose that will,
00:23:58.540then it will be imposed back on you, and you're just kind of giving people the roads and the money and everything else they need,
00:24:03.900kind of coming in and control what you're doing.
00:24:05.360And that's more or less what we're seeing, because America has not had the will to rule its empire as an imperial leader.
00:24:12.380Instead, we end up in the scenario we're in now, where we're really operating the empire mainly for the advantage of others.
00:24:19.000And the argument from John and many others is to say, well, then we just start running it for us, and we start doing that.
00:25:32.000Again, I will fully acknowledge America is an empire, and it should, at some level, remain an empire.
00:25:39.080I think we just need to consider, if we might be in a Hadrian phase, if perhaps this is a good time to scale our ambitions in a way that will allow our people to flourish and our people to benefit from the empire.
00:25:54.700I don't want the United States to be operated for the benefit of its empire.
00:25:59.300I want the empire to be beneficial to the United States.
00:26:03.280I think that only happens when we have a realistic understanding of our expansion and reach.
00:26:08.140But like I said, this is not a slam on anybody.
00:26:10.560This is not me, like, challenging anyone to a duel.
00:26:12.740This is an open conversation that I want to keep having.
00:26:15.760I think it's a critical time to have it.
00:26:17.780I'm very glad that, if nothing else, the experiences we're having now are opening people up to this discussion.
00:26:23.780And I hope that I'm going to hear back from people.