On today's show, we're joined by Mark Hemingway to discuss the new details in the Hunter Biden laptop scandal, and the censorship that went on behind-the-scenes as a result of the release of the leaked documents.
00:02:03.040And then so much has happened since then, it seems like an entirely different story at this point.
00:02:08.500It seems like we're going to be getting more.
00:02:10.120So we'll probably be talking about this for a while, but I guess we should start at the beginning with, with the first drop and kind of Matt Taibbi's original thread and kind of all the revelations that came out with that.
00:02:25.520So we're looking at these files and this is the release that, that Elon had promised to kind of unmasking the bias at Twitter and all the different things that go on behind the scenes to put the thumb on the sales or the scales of different political networks, different political messages.
00:02:44.760But it also revealed specifically kind of the meddling that went on and the censorship that went on around the 2020 election and the Hunter Biden laptop story.
00:02:55.180So I think in some ways, a lot of this was stuff we already know, but what are the big revelations that came out around the censorship with Hunter Biden?
00:03:03.160Well, this is, this is key to understand, and Taibbi is quite clear about this.
00:03:08.640He says that, you know, by the 2020 election, requests for intervention to remove tweets, et cetera, from different political actors had become quote unquote routine.
00:03:22.600Um, um, and a lot of the reason why that's so important to understand is because a lot of the, you know, attempts to dismiss this have centered around the idea that, you know, Taibbi provided like one or two examples of this happening.
00:03:37.880Um, and in some cases, you know, the, the one examples he provided was there was this situation where the Biden campaign email emailed in and like, yes, we'd like the following tweets removed.
00:03:46.920And the response from Twitter was literally one word.
00:04:13.660No one is asking about, um, the fact that they, they, they're concerned about these naked pictures being out there would kind of suggest that the information come from laptop was valid to begin with.
00:04:24.860Um, or there was the issue, which is to say that, you know, Hunter Biden's sex life, you know, it will, you know, you know, this is just an attempt for people to talk about Hunter Biden's sex life.
00:04:34.600And that's what the laptop's really all about.
00:04:36.480Well, first of all, no, it was all, it's always first and foremost about the relationship of corruption between Hunter Biden and Joe Biden.
00:04:43.300I mean, Hunter Biden was making deals with shady Russian, Ukrainian oligarchs and Joe Biden was meeting with them at fancy Georgetown restaurants.
00:04:50.540And this is all spelled out in emails and stuff that have come off the laptop.
00:04:53.740Um, you know, in addition to the deals with China and things like that.
00:04:56.600So the corruption is, is problem number one, but even if you wanted to focus in on the sex life garbage, um, the fact of the matter is, is that Hunter Biden's sex life was, you know, a matter of public corruption and criminal concern.
00:05:08.260Um, you know, the laptop provides lots of evidence that he was cavorting with Russian hookers or hookers that were, um, basically being trafficked by Russians.
00:05:16.600And remember, you know, how much crap we endured for years about how, um, Putin had compromise on Donald Trump.
00:05:23.160You know, we learned a whole new word because of this, um, because he was cavorting with Russian hookers in Moscow.
00:05:28.180Right. So the fact that Hunter Biden is, you know, running around with a bunch of Russian hookers, oh, well, that's not a national security concern at all.
00:05:35.180Um, I mean, it's only, only when Donald Trump allegedly does it, nevermind, we get proof that Hunter did it.
00:05:41.080Then you get into the fact that he was, you know, transporting, you know, multiple hookers across state lines, which is literal sex trafficking crime.
00:05:46.640Then we come out with the fact there's a video from his laptop where he is trying to get this obviously distraught escort on camera saying that she, that he didn't hurt her.
00:05:56.920All right. I mean, this is like just unbelievably, like scary, disturbing stuff.
00:06:01.720So fine. If you want to make it about a hundred Biden sex life, let's make it about a hundred Biden sex life, a hundred Biden sex life, still national security concern, still, still a national concerning concern, still a criminal concern.
00:06:12.480And still, you know, something that, you know, progressive liberals that, you know, claim to care about the welfare of women should give a damn about.
00:06:19.980Yeah. So even if we're just focusing on the things that they were talking about, still plenty to be, you know, very aware of.
00:06:27.260And I think it's interesting because like you pointed out so many people, this was the rush, right?
00:06:32.280This was the storyline. As soon as this started coming out, we got this gaslighting of, well, this is just a social media company doing its job, right?
00:06:40.420They're just removing revenge porn of, of Hunter Biden from the internet.
00:06:44.180They're just taking care of, you know, removing something, you know, someone's child from the internet who's exposing himself.
00:06:51.100You know, it's, it's an adult who's doing so under, like you said, under, you know, criminal conditions and exposing, you know, serious secrets of the United States government or exposing the, the corruption linked to these things during those acts.
00:07:05.420But on top of this, you know, even if there was nothing there, which obviously there is because at every turn, these people are moving, you know, they're colluding to shut this down.
00:07:15.680Even if there's nothing there, the coverup is the crime in this case, right?
00:07:19.980It's, it's the very clear message from Tybee's thread that even though they knew that this information wasn't from a hack and wasn't, um, false, it was all, it was not misinformation.
00:07:32.320They still actively moved to cover it up under the, the sites, you know, hacked information policy.
00:07:40.000Well, then that's the other thing that the Tybee's thread makes clear.
00:07:43.480And actually this isn't, this is also a key component of the, the second part of the Twitter files that Barry Weiss released last night in, in, in several cases, you have a situation here where Twitter is making up policy on the fly.
00:07:55.680They're bending, stretching, twisting, wholly inventing new policies that they didn't have to justify going out and censoring people that they didn't like or censoring political news that they thought was, you know, counter to their particular interests or their particular concerns.
00:08:11.640Frankly, frankly, not as a company, but it has like progressives who were running the company.
00:08:16.720Um, and, and that's, I think a key thing to understand here.
00:08:19.140I mean, you know, um, uh, Mark Andreessen, the, the venture cap, the billionaire venture capitalist out of, um, um, out of Silicon Valley, who's, you know, a fairly interesting tweeter and seems to be, um, one of the, one of these people along with Elon and Peter Thiel, um, coming out of Silicon Valley that is, you know, sort of questioning official narratives as it were, tweeted something really interesting.
00:08:41.640Last night, he just tweeted in response to the files.
00:08:44.020All he said was there was no algorithm.
00:08:46.540I mean, and that's what it looks like.
00:08:48.100It looks like a bunch of, you know, you know, you know, 30 something progressives who live in San Francisco, um, using Twitter as their pet to try and control elections and to try and to stifle, um, public debate in a way they think will benefit, um, themselves politically.
00:09:04.880And again, it's not even like they were like financially profiting off of this and Twitter's been a disaster as a company, you know, financially.
00:09:11.520And they were literally just using this as a tool to like, you know, weaponize public opinion in such a way that it would advance certain liberal progressive objectives.
00:09:19.600Um, and, and that's, what's really sort of terrifying about what's going on here.
00:09:23.780And you see this time and time again about the rot of these institutions, you know, um, what is it, David Burge, the Iowa Hawk has that famous saying about, you know, um, you know, I can't remember exactly how it goes.
00:09:34.280But it's about, yeah, liberals, you know, hollow out these institutions and they, they wear them like a skin suit, you know, um, but the problem is, is the more that you politicize an institution, the less you, I mean, so the less institution that that power is able to wield because they've become perceived, perceived as overtly political, as opposed to having the credibility and authority on the subject matter that gave them, um, the, the power that they had to begin with.
00:09:59.860Um, and, you know, um, uh, obviously Silicon Valley and social media companies are no different.
00:10:05.480Yeah, I think it's really interesting because as somebody who has talked a lot about kind of the cathedral and the, the disorganized, the, the, um, decentralized kind of network of these different organizations that move the same direction consistently.
00:10:20.700But maybe don't have a direct, you know, top down, uh, you know, organ that's telling them this is exactly what's going to happen.
00:10:27.760These, these files are really revealing, right?
00:10:30.480Because we can see, like you said, it's an abuse of a lot of the things that progressives like to use to hide their power.
00:10:37.880So on one hand, you have kind of this, uh, these procedures that are set up and they're supposed to provide kind of this bureaucratic oligarchic diffusion of responsibility, right?
00:10:48.920No individual makes the particular decision, but kind of, there's a group think.
00:10:54.660And once that group think starts and snowballs, it kind of takes over.
00:10:59.500So what we see with the Biden laptop is once, uh, one or two people have suggested that we're going to go ahead and move forward and censor this out of an abundance of caution, multiple people kind of in this email chain, in this different chain of events, kind of stand up and say, Hey, isn't this a violation of the first amendment?
00:11:20.800But those people kind of get snowballed and it's made very explicit in the, in the Twitter files that the, the big concern was, like you said, not that this is violating any policy that existed or anything like that.
00:11:34.280The major concern was, we don't want this to turn into Hillary email server 2.0, right?
00:11:39.840The purpose of this is explicitly to manipulate the election and make sure that a big story does not wreck the democratic candidate right before Trump's election again.
00:11:53.560And it's, and in the whole time, they're just using these policies that they've turned into kind of a malleable shield to try to prevent any kind of responsibility from landing on an individual person for those actions.
00:12:04.860And I just want to point out again that, you know, Hillary server was an actual crime, you know, I mean, this is the thing, you know, if they're, they're acting nakedly politically.
00:12:14.580It'd be one thing if they're saying, you know, well, we don't want this to turn into some story that turned out not to be true that everybody went with.
00:12:20.360No, the substance of the Hillary Clinton stuff was an actual legitimate concern to voters.
00:12:27.660It got, and frankly, if anything, she got off easy because of it.
00:12:30.660You know, I mean, remember James Comey, you stood up and he had that press conference.
00:12:33.920He spent the entire press conference discussing about how, why it was so awful and criminal what she did.
00:12:38.380And oh, by the way, you know, for the sake of, you know, not tearing apart the nation's social fabric, we're not going to do a damn thing about it.
00:12:44.940And of course, you know, and then again, it just speaks to the whole thing that's driving everyone crazy about this is the double standards.
00:12:50.300I mean, they're going after Donald Trump right now for criminal charges for what again, violating top secret, you know, document stuff.
00:12:56.780I mean, wasn't that the issue at the heart of the Hillary Clinton thing?
00:13:00.060Again, you know, there are two things here.
00:13:02.800You know, one is the, as you point out, you know, the one is it just on one hand acting, you know, nakedly political and hypocritical about all of this.
00:13:11.540And then the second concern is that they're, you know, to the extent that they even begin to justify this with any sort of like remote policy, they're doing something that is very, very new and fundamentally very un-American.
00:13:23.060They're using this concept, this completely amorphous concept of harm, right, to justify everything that they do.
00:13:31.640You know, the idea is that somehow if they let misinformation out in the world, that they're directly responsible for the consequences of other people's decisions.
00:13:42.380That is not how America has traditionally operated in these situations.
00:13:46.580You know, we have trusted people and our citizens to, you know, go out there and get the right information and go out and make decisions accordingly.
00:13:52.880Because very often there are situations where when you impose top-down dictates on how to handle a situation, whether it's COVID, whether it's how to vote, whether it's any of these other things, you end up forcing people into things and doing things that are actually harmful to them.
00:14:07.900I mean, there's all kinds of situations here where like, yes, you know, maybe COVID was a serious problem for elderly people or people that had underlying health conditions that put them at high risk.
00:14:16.160It was not at all a problem for children.
00:14:19.100And yet all of these top-down dictates went around and, you know, harmed children for the sake of protecting a much smaller population of vulnerable people.
00:14:26.240And that's just no way to run a country.
00:14:29.920That's, you know, no way to, you know, look at how to make decisions.
00:14:34.100And yet we are constantly creating these engines of decision-making in this country that take away the kind of autonomy that will allow people to make the best decisions that would actually protect themselves from harm in the guise of that someone else knows better than you how to protect yourself from harm.
00:14:51.700And it's just, you know, an appalling way to do things.
00:15:00.980A lot of events have happened between the first drop and the second drop.
00:15:04.940So we'll break down a few of these things because they're all really important.
00:15:07.780So the thing that kind of happened, the major event that happened between the first and the second distribution, because they were supposed to come pretty close together.
00:15:14.440Originally, it sounded like, right, we got the Taibbi drop on Friday and it sounded like we were supposed to get Weiss on maybe Monday or something.
00:15:21.580But, you know, the story kept getting pushed further and further back and everyone's wondering why.
00:15:26.000And then we discover that these files were actually being vetted by an attorney at Twitter.
00:15:33.400And that attorney also happens to be someone who worked at the FBI and was directly involved, as I understand it, in like the Russiagate investigation.
00:15:43.740And so one of the main things that a lot of people pointed out from Taibbi's drop and Taibbi himself said in the thread was, hey, it's weird.
00:15:51.000We don't have the smoking gun from the FBI, like from direct contact with the government.
00:15:56.760We just know the government from other revelations, like with Facebook and such, was meeting with these people on a regular basis and was, which should be chilling enough, but was meeting with these people on a regular basis talking about the possibility of hacks and disinformation.
00:16:10.800But we don't have like a direct communication.
00:16:12.760We'll come to find out all of this information is actually being strained through an attorney who had direct connections with the FBI and with these corruption investigations that specifically targeted Donald Trump.
00:16:23.900Yeah, James Baker, you know, he was also an attorney at the FBI and was involved in a number of other of the FBI's controversial episodes leading up to his, you know, departure, you know, partly because of his involvement in those things.
00:16:40.060Now, on one hand, you might just say, look, being an attorney, the FBI is by, you know, whether you like it or not, is going to be force you into a bunch of situations where you're going to be dealing with sort of controversial, you know, missteps sort of the FBI has has done.
00:16:53.900But on the other hand, you know, I, you know, came out last last night, I saw Andy Ngo was tweeting about the fact that Twitter had another guy working there, a guy named Jeff Carlton, who previously worked for the FBI and CIA.
00:17:09.200And, you know, at some point, you know, you have to ask what's going on here.
00:17:14.060I mean, I imagine there's more than a few of these people floating around Silicon Valley.
00:17:17.080I mean, I don't want to sound like too paranoid or conspiratorial, but have you ever heard the phrase sheep dipped?
00:17:24.060My father, my father was a retired Marine colonel, right?
00:17:27.960My dad spent a year working for the CIA in Laos before Vietnam broke out in the early 1960s.
00:17:33.000And what they were doing at the time was they were providing, you know, military aid to Laos in order to, you know, keep the conflict from, you know, in check or whatever it was building up in Vietnam.
00:17:43.360And what they were doing is they were taking a lot of young Marine officers to do military training and other things they did for the Laotian army and working for the CIA.
00:17:50.620But since we were not supposed to be in Laos and there were all these public assurances that we weren't getting involved in Southeast Asia leading up to Vietnam, what the CIA was doing was taking all these Marines or, you know, other people and taking them off books for a year or whatever.
00:18:03.200Like if my dad had died somehow during that year, he was working in Laos, you know, his death would have been officially disavowed as an act of the U.S. government or anything like that.
00:18:11.160But that didn't. But as it happens, my dad was basically on the payroll of the Marine Corps with, you know, promotions and all the other stuff happening the entire time.
00:18:18.160And then, you know, after a year of working with the CIA, they just reintegrated him back in the Marine Corps and he did this.
00:18:23.120Now, this happens a lot with intelligence agencies.
00:18:25.060I mean, you know, was James Baker and this guy, Jeff Carleton, were they literally working directly for the FBI and the CIA all along, even as they were, you know, collecting a paycheck for from Twitter, which I presume was handsome.
00:18:40.380So, you know, I don't think these are, you know, paranoid questions to ask.
00:18:43.500I mean, I think responsible journalists would, you know, be asking about the involvement of these things in that and, you know, what Twitter's, you know, specific interaction with the government was.
00:18:51.180Was there a First Amendment violation? And it's just absolutely, incredibly appalling hackery that all of these journalists are just like, oh, well, you know, this is old news.
00:19:00.220This is a nothing burger. This is just about, you know, people, you know, Republicans thinking they have a constitutional right to see Hunter Biden naked on and on and on.
00:19:08.820When the reality is, is that, I mean, I don't even know what to say.
00:19:12.760I mean, you can't get a more clear cut case of, you know, flashing, you know, neon sign, klaxons going off, government possibly being involved directly in, you know, horrifying First Amendment violations than what we're seeing here.
00:19:25.960And it begs and begs to be, you know, dug into. Do we have like, you know, definitive proof of like our worst fears just yet?
00:19:32.420No. But, you know, there's there's, you know, so much smoke here that, you know, we're we're choking.
00:19:37.740You know, so we should probably go and find the source of that fire and put it out, shouldn't we?
00:19:41.560When does fast grocery delivery through Instacart matter most?
00:19:45.760When your famous grainy mustard potato salad isn't so famous without the grainy mustard.
00:19:50.600When the barbecue's lit, but there's nothing to grill.
00:19:53.280When the in-laws decide that, actually, they will stay for dinner.
00:19:57.000Instacart has all your groceries covered this summer.
00:19:59.620So download the app and get delivery in as fast as 60 minutes.
00:20:03.200Plus, enjoy $0 delivery fees on your first three orders.
00:20:06.900Service fees exclusions and terms apply.
00:20:09.200Instacart. Groceries that over-deliver.
00:20:12.440Yeah, but the problem is, you know, 95% of the press corps wants all this, right?
00:20:18.640This is their vision of speech, right?
00:20:21.620Like, like, sorry, but they don't give a crap about the First Amendment or free speech.
00:20:25.880What they want is a information distribution apparatus in which their values filter every bit of this.
00:20:33.560And they are more than fine with the FBI or the CIA, you know, even if this isn't direct.
00:20:40.000Like, even if these people didn't explicitly get sent into these positions by intelligence agencies, the fact that, like, their position within those intelligence agencies qualifies them professionally, provides them the essential credentials and connections to get placement reliably in these positions means that their interests, the interests of those agencies will constantly be mingled with those of private corporations, right?
00:21:05.360Like this this rotating door of the public private partnership between intelligence agencies, social media and all this kind of stuff.
00:21:14.080So if if what qualifies you to sit on a trust and safety council is time investigating people in the FBI or operations in the CIA, then you're never going to be able to kind of untangle the interests of these institutions.
00:21:30.000And of course, I was saying all the stuff I was saying about this specifically as an indictment of the press.
00:21:34.860I mean, you got to remember, we're less than 20 years from the outbreak of the Iraq war where, you know, every journalistic institution, you know, with the exception of maybe a few missteps, but the New York Times or something was screaming bloody murder about, you know, the intelligence apparatus manipulating evidence to march the United States in the war, right?
00:21:53.740And there was a decades long history going back to the 60s of the media being deeply, deeply skeptical of the FBI and, you know, counter terror, you know, domestic terror operations, you know, and, you know, we had the church hearings in the 70s dealing with the FBI and the CIA's abuses and all this stuff.
00:22:12.180And it was like, it was taken for granted when I was coming up that if anything, the media was too paranoid about what was going on in the national security state.
00:22:19.860Now, they have, I can't even begin to tell you, the opposite problem is so much worse than that.
00:22:27.120You know, I would so much rather have a press that is, you know, too unfair to the FBI and CIA, however necessary some of their national security functions might be, than a press that just never asks any questions whatsoever.
00:22:41.840And we've now been through, like, several issues here where we have, you know, you know, Russiagate, the impeachment, first impeachment of Donald Trump, the Mueller investigation, and now this, where all of a sudden the FBI and the CIA have become national heroes.
00:22:59.360And don't you dare question for a second about whether they're manipulating anyone.
00:23:03.320And the reality of it is just simply that in the last 20 years, what's happened is that liberals have amassed enough power in corporate boardrooms and, you know, all of the, and the government itself, that they now feel that they're in control.
00:23:17.500So, therefore, these tools went from being things that were abusing constitutional rights to things that can actively be manipulated to abuse the constitutional rights of people they don't like.
00:23:29.100And that's, and we shouldn't be, we should be very clear-eyed about where we are in this country right now.
00:23:34.260Yeah, so this is a really interesting problem because we know that these institutions are far more interested in, say, going after parents who disagree with gender ideology and protests at school board meetings or arresting pro-life protesters than they are at, you know, any kind of actual police work, any actual protection of the nation.
00:23:58.260We see at the same time, this network of intelligence agencies and federal law enforcement that is clearly willing to go after the political enemies of the Biden administration, also willing to take an active role in the manipulation of elections through their own prosecute prosecutorial actions and through their involvement with social media and other actors.
00:24:22.280And so that really begs the question, what, what is to be done here?
00:24:26.500Like, I hear a lot of people in the Republican Party telling us that about candidate equality, right?
00:24:34.140Like, we have to get back to very straight-laced, buttoned-down, serious candidates, the kind of candidates that talk about, you know, tax code and, you know, talk about, you know, the marginal tax rates, all that stuff.
00:24:48.940And they, we have to stop electing people who might talk about, I don't know, reforming the FBI or completely demolishing the FBI and starting out with something new.
00:25:00.800Is there anyone willing to take this kind of problem on?
00:25:04.680Well, that's a really good question right now.
00:25:06.660I mean, I think there are some legitimate candidate equality issues to be discussed, you know, from what we saw in the midterms, right?
00:25:12.540But on the other hand, you know, if you look at who is in the Republican Senate currently, you know, we just had 12 Republican senators vote for this marriage bill.
00:25:24.280And, you know, to be clear, I mean, I think that, you know, gay marriage is here to stay, whether people like it or not.
00:25:31.760And it was never in danger of going anywhere.
00:25:33.440But what we had 12 Republican senators do is go out and basically sign away the constitutional rights of a lot of people who are being attacked over religious liberty concerns.
00:25:43.260And I look at that and I say, I got 12 Republican senators in the, in the, there in the, that voted for this, that they don't give a damn about the first amendment or people being persecuted by their government.
00:25:54.420That's a candidate quality problem, isn't it?
00:25:56.560And then you look at like, oh, well, we need, just need to run more respectable straight-laced people.
00:26:00.480Does anyone remember the 2012 campaign?
00:26:02.500We literally ran Mitt freaking Romney for crying out loud.
00:26:06.300And he was literally portrayed in the press as a racist, gay-bullying, dog-abusing felon.
00:26:14.300And these were literally all storylines that were eagerly promulgated by the media.
00:26:18.740I mean, the Washington Post ran like, what, a cover story?
00:26:21.260It was like 4,000 words about how Mitt Romney allegedly bullied a young gay guy when he was a teenager and his, like, family disavowed the whole thing and the guy was no longer alive.
00:26:29.980I mean, it was just absolutely bananas what they got away with.
00:26:32.720But I think part of the problem here, and again, this is why the freak out of Twitter is going so, is the freak out of the Twitter files is so pronounced right now among the journalistic class, even if it hasn't broken through the mainstream in a lot of ways yet.
00:26:46.580And it's simply this, which is that this system of control doesn't work if you have, it doesn't work unless you have a completely asymmetric media information system, right?
00:26:57.800The other day, or like a day or two ago, I tweeted something about firebombing crisis pregnancy centers.
00:27:03.820You know, these are the Christian groups that go out and they try and help women who are pregnant that don't want to abort their children.
00:27:10.180And abortion activists have been targeting them.
00:27:12.720And I tweeted, you know, something about firebombing crisis pregnancy centers.
00:27:16.280I got a retort from a liberal doctor in Portland, Oregon, and said, post one link to a story where crisis pregnancy centers have been firebombed.
00:27:24.840A crisis pregnancy center in Gresham, Oregon, the adjacent city to Portland where this guy lives, was firebombed.
00:27:30.600You know, I mean, this is just absolutely insane, but I have no trouble believing that this guy, and look, even people on the right are victims of this new media environment where we all get siloed off into their own thing.
00:27:41.380But it's so much more powerful when you still have these legacy media institutions that sort of set the tone, and, you know, even the gatekeepers, these social media companies are allowed to come in and intervene with these things.
00:27:53.320And the reality is, is that, you know, I, you know, as a right-of-center guy, I want to know what a liberal thinks.
00:27:57.880I can turn on the television for about 30 seconds and get a pretty good idea of what the conventional wisdom is on a given topic.
00:28:05.240If a liberal wants to know what, you know, conservatives think about things, you know, are they going out and subscribing to Claremont Review of Books?
00:28:13.640And, you know, on one hand, it's horrifying that we got to this place.
00:28:17.900On the other hand, it's also kind of a strategic advantage.
00:28:20.200We're seeing this situation here where I think a lot of these progressives that are controlling these institutions so tightly are getting completely blindsided by these stories that keep popping up, like the Twitter files or whatever.
00:28:32.020Like, it was obvious this was happening all along, you know.
00:28:34.720At some point, you know, it was only natural that some details about this were going to come out.
00:28:39.320And, you know, they run around like their hair's on fire trying to stick their fingers in their ears and making noises, pretending like they're not hearing anything.
00:28:46.340So we just need to find a way to sort of, you know, keep pressure.
00:28:52.020I mean, I feel like basically most major media institutions in this country need to be raised and the earth salted where they stood.
00:28:59.080But, you know, until we completely break that hierarchy.
00:29:02.200And the good news is I think that, you know, new media in a lot of ways, you know, shows like this, you know, streaming, getting some large streaming programs on different platforms and things like that.
00:29:12.840You know, other influential people popping up through the Internet and these technologies are threatening to that.
00:29:20.260You know, I've been on Tim Poole's show.
00:29:28.760Cable news numbers, you know, on a bad day, but it's still in the ballpark, you know.
00:29:32.860And, you know, believe me, cable news companies are seeing this happen and they're getting nervous.
00:29:36.960And the progressives that really want to control these media institutions, you know, are very nervous that these tools are going like YouTube and Twitter are going to allow people to rise to the ranks and speak the truth.
00:29:52.040And that's why they're trying to assert so much control from the top down.
00:29:56.060Well, that's a great transition into our second batch here because we've touched on it a little bit, but we didn't actually get directly into the substance of Barry Weiss's Twitter file drop.
00:30:05.180So what we learned from Barry Weiss's Twitter file drop is something that I think, again, everyone who's really had an account on Twitter and run afoul of the system knew, but the Twitter vehemently denied, you know, point blank on many different occasions that they do shadow ban to each other people.
00:30:35.180And we see that there are these tags placed on major accounts, people like Liz of TikTok, people like Dan Bongino, people like Charlie Kirk.
00:30:45.140And these tags specifically label those accounts as they cannot be amplified.
00:30:51.620They're completely, in some cases, like Dan, but, you know, they're completely removed from search options.
00:30:55.960You can't find the tweets if you, even if you specifically are trying to hunt them down.
00:31:00.420And so we know, again, it's something that anyone, if you have ever used Twitter with a decent sized account and you can immediately feel your engagement just drop like a stone.
00:31:11.720Like you'll do, you'll just have been chugging along, lots of retweets, lots of follows, and then just dead out of nowhere.
00:31:19.820You're not crazy, but we never had the smoking gun.
00:31:22.560And now with the, you know, release information from Weiss, we know this is something that Twitter does regularly and it does in a particularly biased direction.
00:31:31.320Yeah, no, it was really, you know, frightening.
00:31:34.540So they posted these, you know, screenshots of sort of the command center they had where, of, you know, an individual Twitter account where, as you pointed out, they could, you know, tag these things so the accounts are restricted in various certain ways.
00:31:46.880And, you know, again, it was really just astonishing to see the media reaction to this.
00:31:51.680It was like, so, you know, we all knew that they were doing this.
00:31:54.000Well, yeah, the thing is that we all did know, but we didn't know the specifics of it.
00:31:58.160The other thing is that, you know, we still don't have a good, you know, clue of this based on Weiss's reporting, which, you know, strongly suggests this.
00:32:05.580And obviously, you know, you know, we're not blind, but, you know, it would be good to get some sort of accounting to figure out, like, how this was being, you know, enacted, you know, was the right disproportionately affected by this, to what degree, et cetera, et cetera.
00:32:18.840These are things that actual journalists would, like, want to know.
00:32:21.980Instead, you saw these, like, most incredible things.
00:32:24.300Like, so, again, they post this screenshot, and off to the side where they're showing all the visibility filters they're putting on people and stuff like that, had a list for, like, what was going on in the account.
00:32:33.480And the list one said that said direct messages.
00:32:35.700And all these people were looking at that and pointing this out and saying, wait, do Twitter employees have access to direct messages?
00:32:41.820Because, you know, one of the things Elon has talked a lot about since he has taken over is, you know, integrating signal technology and having encrypted direct messages on Twitter, which I think would be welcome.
00:32:51.880But, you know, a lot of people were sort of, you know, worried about this.
00:32:54.240And I saw this one journalist who, oh, my gosh, was the Philadelphia Inquirer?
00:33:11.280Like, wait, so you're worried about Barry Weiss and Matt Taibbi having access to direct messages as opposed to, like, every employee of Twitter since God knows when?
00:33:20.840I mean, it really tells you where their priorities are on this stuff.
00:33:24.840I mean, their priorities are making sure their enemies don't know what they're doing, not about, you know, enforcing any sort of, like, decent standards for free speech or, you know, basic fairness or justice.
00:33:35.880Yeah, it's Abraham Gutman who, you know, says, I can't, you know, do these people, yes or no, could get a straightforward answer?
00:33:43.260Do they have access to our DMs as if that's the, you know, that's the essential problem here, right?
00:33:48.680Not the clear and abuse and corruption, but the fact that, you know, the people who are being – and this is my great – that's what I love about this stuff.
00:33:56.660It's journalists crying about sources, right?
00:33:59.420Like, oh, how can journalists be acquiring sources to do news stories, you know?
00:34:03.960It's just all these people who are so precious about the importance of the media and the value of the free press and, you know, the essential job of journalists going out here and just screaming at their top of lungs.
00:34:18.180How could you possibly give access to journalists so that they can do essential news stories is just ridiculous?
00:34:24.520And like you said, the amazing thing that has been, again, the gaslighting of people just saying, oh, of course, we always knew this.
00:34:31.720We always acknowledged that these people were being banned, you know, shadow banned.
00:34:35.280And on top of that, you know, this is a good thing, and it's a good thing it's been happening the whole time.
00:34:39.840Except you can find, you know, you just delve, you know, a year back into any of these people's Twitter histories, and you can find them saying, oh, you know, conservatives playing the victim, you know, pretending.
00:34:49.400You know, they're obviously mocking people who are being censored the entire time and lying to them and saying, oh, this isn't happening.
00:35:15.120In fact, last night I tweeted something defective.
00:35:19.040The response to the Twitter files with Barry Weiss's drop is going to move from there's nothing here to these people deserve to be censored.
00:35:26.300And that's exactly what happened in the Ted Lieu tweet is like the classic example of that.
00:35:30.460I mean, he specifically said it's worse than that because he didn't just say, oh, conservatives deserve to be censored for what they were saying.
00:35:35.740He said, well, you know, conservatives were wrong and said that COVID was invented and they should have been censored for all their COVID stuff.
00:35:52.780It was the Stanford, you know, doctor who was on the forefront of saying a lot of the, you know, and he wasn't denying COVID one bit.
00:35:59.700He was mostly protesting against its handling of children and a lot of the public policy that was being crafted based on, you know, sort of ridiculous risk assessments.
00:36:12.080This is not, you know, like some chump.
00:36:14.040And yet he got vociferously censored, even though he was right on damn near everything he said in retrospect, precisely because he was going against the official narrative, not because he did anything wrong that was irresponsible.
00:36:28.780And that is what's really the story here, you know, it's not even about, at the end of the day, about left versus right.
00:36:37.040It's about official narratives and control.
00:36:41.280And that's, that's, that's, that's what should really scare people.
00:36:44.340And that's the reason why the left should, shouldn't take this stuff for granted.
00:36:47.200And again, you know, Matt Taibbi is not, you know, a right winger.
00:36:51.420I mean, you know, you can say that, you know, as much as you want, he's just a guy who, you know, I mean, frankly, I hated the guy for a long time because I thought he was, you know, arrogant and mean and everything else.
00:37:00.080And frankly, he was, I mean, I think he's matured over the years, but it's also true that he stayed entirely consistent on this sort of like, you know, old school left-wing free speech principles, old school left-wing skepticism of the national security state.
00:37:11.600And he's paying a price for being consistent, essentially the same with Glenn Greenwald, you know, same thing with Barry Weiss.
00:37:18.120She's, you know, you know, she's a, a lesbian.
00:37:21.040I mean, she's no one's conventional idea of a right winger.
00:37:23.820She's gone out of her way to distance herself from a lot of that stuff.
00:37:26.700And there's nothing you can do to convince these people that the people that are out there, you know, trying to be honest and dig in to what's going on here.
00:37:39.120Well, and that's the thing is you're right.
00:37:40.920I think these people were specifically chosen because of kind of their middle of the road status, right?
00:37:46.380Like the fact that they, none of them are flame, flame throwing, you know, right wingers.
00:37:51.600They're, they're all kind of these people who have established a career and are, you know, center left in orientation in general, but, but have built up this following.
00:38:01.880And that's been a big, you know, cry from these people too, is it's, oh, it's all these substack journalists, right?
00:38:06.660It's all these, it's all these bloggers, you know, no credibility here, even though people like Weiss have been, you know, printed in absolutely massive major, you know, mainstream publications.
00:38:17.300But that's the thing that I think a lot of moderate liberals and kind of the classical liberal crowd needs to get through their head, right?
00:38:25.060Like, I know some of them already know this, but it's something that they need to learn in general.
00:38:28.960Their moderation will not save them, right?
00:38:31.200Like if you're doing it out of principle, then good on you, but if you're there holding on because you think that, you know, oh, well, just, you know, saying I'm not on the right or saying that I'm, you know, I'm consistent on these things is going to protect me.
00:38:44.500There's not, they're going to come for you again, you know, by all means, hold your principle if that's the motivation, but don't think that's going to provide you any kind of shield against these people.
00:38:52.540Because like you're saying, we saw a regular manipulation of and banning of people, even if they explicitly were sharing things that were true or things that didn't violate policy.
00:39:04.980They explicitly said, okay, Libs of TikTok is not directly violating our policy on hate speech or targeting or whatever, but we don't care, right?
00:39:13.640Like, because the things that the Libs of TikTok account is sharing is casting a community in a bad light because they are doing bad things and because they are doing it repeatedly and simply showing their behavior will naturally reveal a pattern, that's enough.
00:39:30.500Even if it doesn't violate the policy, we don't care.
00:39:32.480We're going to actively take steps to take this person out.
00:39:37.040I mean, they were literally reposting what other people were voluntarily posting on the internet.
00:39:41.560And, you know, that was a problem, you know, but I mean, like, what does that say that they feel like that's the thing that needs controlling?
00:39:51.340It feels like there are certain issues that they feel they can't openly debate because they're going to lose.
00:39:57.180You know, if we actually have an honest and fair discussion about, you know, quote, unquote, gender affirming care for, you know, underage kids, they're going to lose that debate.
00:40:08.880They've already lost it in several European countries, for instance, you know, more or less.
00:40:14.500And so there's this, you know, just sort of panic about this sort of thing.
00:40:19.800And it really speaks to, like, where they're coming from.
00:40:22.300They know that the public is not with them, and therefore free speech is something to be feared.
00:40:27.860Because if we actually have robust public debates about this, they're going to, you know, lose, the power they have is going to be eroded.
00:40:34.780And, you know, it can't get more clear than that, if that's the case.
00:40:40.820I mean, if they're actually trying to silence public debate on issues like, you know, important medical issues like, you know, hormone therapy for teenagers or COVID, then, you know, we're never going to arrive at the right decisions, you know, democratically.
00:40:54.340It's always going to cause all kinds of, like, tension and unrest.
00:40:59.560And then that's the other thing that I don't get is they think that by squelching dissenting voices that they're somehow going to go away.
00:41:05.640I mean, particularly in this news environment where there actually are lots of options, you know, in and off the Internet or other things to get the word out more so than ever before.
00:41:14.100No, it's just going to make a lot of those fringe people more and more powerful.
00:41:18.920In some cases, you genuinely don't want that.
00:41:21.440I mean, I do think you've seen a resurgence in a few cases of some aspects of white supremacy and other things like that, because it's been so suppressed on the Internet and other things like that, that, you know, it makes people think that there must be something there because they suppress all these other, you know, perfectly valid things.
00:41:37.460And the fact that there's no interest in having, you know, I think to some extent, maybe we even need some sort of authoritative gatekeeping, but it's impossible to have it in this environment where everyone is running around with their hair on fire and motivated by political ideology and this sort of thing.
00:41:53.960Yeah, I think a lot of ways those people are more useful to that community than they are at hindrance.
00:42:00.740I think they love the Richard Spencers.
00:42:04.160I think that gives the, I think that gives the journalists and the left-wing NGO complex far more power.
00:42:11.280I mean, Jake Tapper interviewed Richard Spencer on air and CNN for crying out loud.
00:42:14.740Yeah, it's got, got itself a contributor contract.
00:42:16.040You're terribly concerned about platforming these people, except when it gets your ratings.
00:42:21.580I think if they didn't exist, they would need to invent them.
00:42:23.620And I think in some cases they do, but we can go to that.
00:42:25.940But yeah, I wanted to touch on the debate aspect that you were talking about, because I think this is nothing new, right?
00:42:36.700Like, I think the reason the liberals think they can get away with this, the kind of kind of progressive Egregore thinks they can get away with this, is that they've done this so many times in the past, right?
00:42:46.780Like, you smothered the debate, you make sure that the frog doesn't notice that the water's boiling, and then when kind of the inevitable result comes, you've already had control of public opinion so long that you just say, oh, it's no big deal.
00:42:59.920Like, we saw this again with things like gay marriage.
00:43:03.040You look at, you know, the Obama position when he was running, and that is now an untenable position that would get you fired from any mainstream job now, right?
00:43:13.260And there, it was not that there was some organic movement of public opinion that occurred.
00:43:19.040They just used civil rights law, and they used court decisions to circumvent democratic will.
00:43:25.260They got rid of, you know, you had things like Proposition 8 in California, even, you know, extremely liberal states that still were capable of passing.
00:43:32.420But it didn't matter, because they didn't care about democracy, and they didn't care about having debate.
00:43:37.400They cared about pushing agenda forward and smothering the issue, making it impossible to actually have any kind of popular will be exercised on it.
00:43:45.820And then once they had the feta complete, then we can be like, oh, no, this is what everybody believes now, because they have to, because there's a commissar with a gun pointed at their employment at every moment who says, if you don't get on board with this, then you're toast.
00:43:58.240Oh, look, public opinion has shifted on this issue.
00:44:33.980Yeah, he demonstrates that basically they've been running this civil rights law game plan since the 1950s, weaponizing people's concern over civil rights that actually advance a lot of things around the margins that were actually quite authoritarian.
00:44:45.440And, you know, of course, that starts with civil rights in the 50s.
00:44:50.560And that's how we ended up with Donald Trump, essentially, is this thesis.
00:44:54.320It's really well written, and I highly recommend it.
00:44:57.240But, yeah, I mean, part of this, you're right.
00:45:01.560I mean, sure, part of this is about suppressing speech.
00:45:04.980But also a large part of it is also about, you know, intentionally making people feel powerless, you know, making them feel like they have to accept a double standard and like it.
00:45:13.880And they know full well what they're doing.
00:45:16.540And, you know, they don't want to confront what that says about themselves.
00:45:26.660If you were to go up to Vijaya Gad or what the woman who was the lawyer was in charge of a lot of these policies or Yola Roth and people that were, you know, most responsible for these, you know, shadow banning whatever policies at Twitter.
00:45:38.480And you were to confront these people like, look, here's what you did and here's why it's wrong.
00:45:42.580I mean, it'd be like showing a golden retriever a card trick.
00:45:47.160They are incapable of, you know, understanding that they might be in error because of, you know, this sort of, you know, utopian progressive ideology that they, you know, have bought into hook, line and sinker.
00:46:03.420And you combine that with this sort of technocratic, you know, utopianism that, you know, Silicon Valley has been promising for decades or whatever.
00:46:14.020Not only do they believe that, you know, total justice is possible, but they have the tools to do it and they're the people that can enforce this.
00:46:21.940And that's, you know, just sort of terrifying.
00:46:23.760It's like the old C.S. Lewis quote about how it's better to live under robber barons because their cruelty can be satiated.
00:46:29.600What, you know, when you live under omnipotent, busybodies, you know, they'll torture you without end because they think they're doing it for your own good.
00:46:37.420And that's, you know, basically where we've arrived.
00:46:40.200Basically, everyone controlling all these major levels of power, all these institutions, whether it's the media, whether it is the federal bureaucracy, whether it is academia.
00:46:48.360All these institutions are run by people that think that they know, you know, what is in your best interest and that they are in a position to force you to accept the fate that they have mapped out for you.
00:47:00.960And I don't know what the response to that is, other than we've got to be a lot more forceful.
00:47:09.000You know, don't confuse that necessarily with violence, but we've got to make things a lot more painful for these people that want to do this.
00:47:16.600I mean, much more painful than we've been willing to do thus far.
00:47:20.060And, you know, I don't want to sit here and, like, be the guy calling for revolution or whatever, but, like, it's the only way out that I can see.
00:47:26.500And these people have to be made to suffer as a result of the consequences of their own unjust actions.
00:47:33.100Yeah, I think, did you catch, by chance, Sam Harris's kind of appearance on Trigonometry, where he talked about covering the cover-up of the Joe Biden laptop or the Hunter Biden laptop?
00:47:47.320I try and avoid him whenever possible, but I seem to recall there was something where he said it was, like, no big deal.
00:47:54.140But even, you know, even if it was true or something like that.
00:47:57.160Yeah, I understand why you would ignore it.
00:47:59.880But I think in this particular case, it's well worth, if you just want to catch, like, the 15 minutes, it's a really fascinating stare to, you can look directly into the progressive mindset.
00:48:09.300It's really, it's one of those things where you just need to do the game film so you can understand your opponents here.
00:48:15.800They're, like, the, like, the theory of mind going on, because he specifically says, you know, the hosts who kind of, they have this classical liberal free speech.
00:48:26.020We got to, you know, they're left wing, essentially, but we've got to reveal all this stuff.
00:48:31.820And Sam Harris is kind of talking to them, and they're like, well, Sam, you know, clearly, if this story was valid, we shouldn't be running, or we shouldn't be suppressing it, right?
00:48:39.940Like, even if you are against Trump, like us, or whatever, like, you should still allow this.
00:48:45.160And Sam Harris is like, I don't care if Hunter Biden had the body, the corpses of dead children in his basement.
00:48:52.640No, you should, like, defeating Trump was way more important.
00:48:56.040And it is the job of basically good and decent progressives to mold the public opinion and control the information that goes out to the public so the wrong people don't get in charge, right?
00:49:09.780And I think that's what you're talking about, where you talk about kind of the, you know, that these people, they truly believe in the holiness of their cause.
00:49:19.900And when you explain to them that what they're doing is a scandal or wrong or a violation of principles, they're just going to stare at you like you've lost your mind.
00:49:27.000Because, of course, the highest possible principle is the retention of power by progressive forces, because allowing, you know, the right to have any control at any moment will basically just return you to, you know, the handmaid's tale, it'll be the end of, you know, it'll be the, you know, the return of slavery, you know, it'll be the apocalypse if conservatives are in control for 10 minutes.
00:49:49.160And so there's no reason that you shouldn't do absolutely everything, that you're not morally justified to every turn to completely violate any of these, like, common social fabric, you know, principles.
00:50:00.180Because at the end of the day, the most important thing is the retention of power to make sure you control these people and keep them from destroying progressive utopia.
00:50:07.120I, I, what you said in terms of describing how these people view things is almost more comforting than I think what is actually going on.
00:50:17.680Which is to say that if there is some sort of higher value that they subscribe to where they're knowingly suppressing things just to, you know, uphold that higher value, that is something that is almost rational, if that makes sense.
00:50:36.560Like, to have a belief system one way or the other.
00:50:40.320And, you know, you can sort of recognize that and try and address it and counter it.
00:50:44.080So, what's going on in the country right now, particularly with the media apparatus and how it feeds this mindset is this insane sort of like feedback loop.
00:51:00.360So, in China, there's this weird phenomenon known as internal reference publications, right?
00:51:04.660Which is to say that the Chinese communist government officials pump out so much propaganda that is fed to ordinary Chinese people that if ordinary Chinese officials were to rely on what they read in the newspapers and whatever was put out for the popular masses,
00:51:21.680they would make bad decisions because they're not actually publishing the facts and the leaders know it.
00:51:27.200So, in China, they have these things called internal reference publications where the party in power, people that are the party members, they get actual facts in newspapers that are reported to them and them only, right?
00:51:38.280So, they can take these facts and then they can go about making rational decisions while they continue to deceive the public.
00:51:44.080That would be roughly analogous to the vision that you just described.
00:51:48.320We don't have that distinction in this country, right?
00:51:50.640So, we have a situation here where we have a national security state that goes out and makes a bunch of outlandish BS, feeds it to the media, which reports it uncritically,
00:52:00.220and then proceeds to dig in on, like, every conceivable level of this, you know, pile of manure to come up with, you know, more manure that they think supports the pre-existing pile of manure that they can add to.
00:52:13.140And you end up with this insane feedback loop where they end up believing crazier and crazier things at every turn.
00:52:17.860So, the reality is, is that they end up with this sort of, like, self-sustaining feedback loop where every new development is filtered through this prism of how does this confirm what I already suspected about Orange Man bad or, you know, whatever the villain du jour is, right?
00:52:34.400So, literally, like, these people are losing the kind of critical faculties and, you know, basic, you know, sets of facts that would allow them to distinguish truth from fact in this sort of situation.
00:52:46.600And the only way that you can begin to have a sense of what is true and what is not is to be someone who doesn't, you know, on some level fundamentally subscribe to this, you know, higher value or whatever.
00:53:00.060Otherwise, you're just sort of, like, completely lost in this, like, you know, insane matrix where, you know, every decision leads you back to, you know, the starting point.
00:53:10.540And that's really, I think, where we're at.
00:53:15.540No, I think you're right for the most part.
00:53:17.740I think at some point we kind of had the Walter Lippman public opinion guided popular sovereignty version of this where there was, you know, that they were aware of what they were pumping out and what they were feeding people.
00:53:32.620But today they are so deep into their own Kool-Aid that you do just have this, like, accelerationism, but for progressive propaganda that, yeah, I think that's an excellent point.
00:53:44.380Well, the one thing I think that all this does reveal, and I hope this is a lesson that maybe the right takes away for this, conservatives take away from this, is that the biggest victories come with the capture and exposing of institutions, not by, like, getting two more congressmen or Senate race done.
00:54:05.700And not to say that elections don't matter, but understanding that, like, the GOP is, like, you know, probably not going to get you out of this one and the far more useful actions are doing things.
00:54:19.500And I understand, like, Elon Musk is the richest person in the world, so it's not like that's a that's a plan of action for the average person.
00:54:24.880But at least it shows you, like, what is necessary to kind of truly break this stranglehold, even if Elon isn't, like, the perfect guy, like, what he's doing is having a far more important impact on the political situation in the United States probably than the Republicans have had in quite a long time.
00:54:43.800No, that's that's exactly accurate. And I don't think that a lot of people on the left quite understand that, which is to say that the reason why you ended up with Trump is there were I talked to so many people in 2016 that were literally of a mindset that I think Donald Trump's crazy.
00:55:01.860I don't like lots of things he's doing and saying, but the reality is, is that he poses a threat to those people. And I know those people are bad. I'm literally like, I'm rolling the dice with Donald Trump.
00:55:12.800And I know that it's, you know, he's, you know, could be a bad guy in several ways. But I know those people are bad. I know what they've been doing for decades to me and my, you know, way of life.
00:55:22.840You know, and, you know, whether it's exporting my job or, you know, or, you know, shutting down my, you know, church, or whatever it is, or, you know, targeting my church with lawsuits or whatever it is.
00:55:33.600So I'm going to do, you know, it was the last act of a desperate man, like, literally, the only way that, you know, populist populism is a resurgent. The reason why populism is resurging around the globe right now is simply because the ballot box is like literally the only avenue that people feel they have left to register dissent.
00:55:51.880So the reality is, I think, you know, to get a healthier society, as you point out, I mean, I think it's shown that, you know, voting Donald Trump, you know, getting control of the Senate, you know, isn't going to be the thing that, you know, saves us in the long run.
00:56:05.980I mean, we're going to have to build some more institutions. We're going to have to expose the institutions that exist. We're going to have to roll up our sleeves and do a lot of that sort of hard work instead of being sort of so passive about it.
00:56:18.320And, you know, that's, that's a difficult message for people to hear, you know, you're going to have to do the work, as progressives like to say, right?
00:56:25.160But that's the reality. You're, you're going to have to, you know, be engaged in some kind of, you know, probably progressive term resistance. You're going to have to, you know, build your own institutions. You're going to have to reject a lot of this quite affirmatively, not just ignore it.
00:56:43.380Well, Mark, I appreciate you joining me. We have a few super chats. Do you have time to hang out and answer a few?
00:56:49.320Okay, great. So let's see here. We've got the Laureus here for five pounds. Thank you very much. The end of a century of manipulation, i.e. the end of manipulative elites inspired by Edward Bernays leading the masses through controlled media.
00:57:06.220Well, Laureus, I think we're going to see this continue for a while. I mean, remember, this is not new. A lot of people learn about like yellow journalism and the Spanish American war. And then we're just like, oh, I guess that just went away. And that, you know, that's not a thing anymore.
00:57:23.140But I think as long as mass communication and popular sovereignty are two forces that are interacting, you're always going to have political manipulation. And so what does that look like? How does that change in the end? Is there can can the cathedral or whatever the deep state, whatever, can that ever have a different message than it has now? Or do things have to fundamentally change in different ways? I'm not sure.
00:57:46.180I'm not sure what that kind of looks like at the end. But I do know that, again, as long as your legitimating system is popular sovereignty, and you have mass communication, you're never going to separate kind of the interaction and the need for elites to kind of manipulate those things.
00:58:01.260Yeah, I think that's basically right. Speaking of interesting lefties, I don't know if you're familiar with Batya Ungar Sargon and her book, Bad News. It's one of the best pieces of media criticism that's been written in years. And basically, the thesis of the book is she basically explains the history of American journalism as a vehicle for manipulating class warfare, essentially. And it's really a fascinating book.
00:58:31.260And that that really goes through a lot of this. But I think obviously, if you look at like history of the history of journalism in America, at least, you see these periods where, yeah, there were always manipulative elites in the news business. And that's just the nature of the beasts. It's fundamentally human society. But there were definitely periods where things were more in balance than they have been now. Or, you know, say, when they were around the 10th and the turn of the century, and at the height of turn of the 20th century, the height of yellow journalism, etc.
00:59:00.640So you go in and out of these periods or whatever. And I think a stable society is dependent on being able to, you know, course correct when, you know, inevitably, you stray off into excesses. And I would say, you know, I don't know, maybe I'm just being paranoid. You know, certainly I didn't live through the 60s.
00:59:18.080You know, I didn't live through the civil war or anything like that. But I would say America has been pretty darn good at, you know, course correcting, even a great sacrifice throughout its history.
00:59:31.200The question is now, with a whole new kind of control that exists in an entirely new digital realm, that's this mass psychological experiment that's heretofore unprecedented, whether or not we're going to have the gumption and fortitude to find the ways necessary to push back against this new form of manipulative elite manipulation is really the question right now.
00:59:58.980Yeah, I mean, I guess there's a there's a deeper discussion to have there about how we course corrected, I would say that in a lot of ways, our course corrections, we're usually pushing the problem down the line.
01:00:09.980More than anything else, but but that's a that's perhaps its own podcast all to itself.
01:00:17.980Yeah. But, but I think you're right that it's, we've never had this level of ability to deliver mass propaganda this way.
01:00:30.780And that fundamentally alters the relationship with leaders and the lead.
01:00:36.460And the question is, is really, like you said, will we have the ability, will we have the fortitude to find a way to forge a new way or to control that or to provide enough perspective or freedom or whatever the the admixture is that kind of allows popular sovereignty and mass media to interact?
01:00:57.620Or will that require kind of a reform or removal of one of those two aspects, because I, I am interested, this seems to be a recurring theme, no matter where we're at, whether you see, you know, the Nazi Germany or you see, you know, the Soviet Union or you see American mass media.
01:01:17.620Even though these are very different systems at the end of the day, centralized mass communication and kind of this in this kind of managerial leviathan seems to be a key part of like modern governance.
01:01:30.620And I don't know if those things can be separated.
01:01:32.620I don't know what would separate them.
01:01:37.620I think the sort of managerial elite problem, which is something that the left has just weirdly stopped caring about.
01:01:43.620Like they took this scream bloody murder about inequality in terms of things like wealth, right?
01:01:48.620Well, look, I don't give a damn with Jeff Bezos makes $100 billion and built a disgustingly opulent 20,000 square foot house in the suburbs of Seattle.
01:01:58.620When Jeff Bezos buys one of the nation's largest newspaper and that nation's largest newspaper hires someone like Taylor Lorenz, who's a hack that goes around basically harassing people and who's obviously mentally unstable and no one does anything about it.
01:02:11.620Well, then I care what Jeff Bezos is doing to me and how he reports on the issues that fundamentally affect my life.
01:02:17.620And that's that's the real issue here.
01:02:20.620And it's really just sort of like fascinating how easy some the percentage of the left is able to be bought off.
01:02:29.620I mean, you know, Bill Gates throws all this money at all these progressive causes and like no one cares how many trips he took on Epstein's plane.
01:02:37.620It's really just appalling that no one actually cares about the conduct of or the like the unequal distribution of power.
01:02:46.620So, you know, as as based on wealth, as opposed to just the wealth itself.
01:02:51.620And I think that is especially true in the media sphere where so much when I was in college studying journalism, God help me.
01:03:03.620I don't know if it's still taught in journalism schools by this famous journalist called Ben Bagdikian.
01:03:09.620And I forget what the title of the book is, but it's all about media consolidation.
01:03:13.620And it's all about what a warning it was that, you know, the all of the media has been controlled by, you know, seven or eight corporations.
01:03:20.620And this was like 30 years ago when it was written.
01:03:22.620And, you know, I mean, I feel like that was these were like standard issue concerns that just no one cares about anymore.
01:03:30.620And by the way, that was a big progressive concern back then.
01:03:33.620All the righty people were like, oh, you know, you know, the free market is the engine for liberty and blah, blah, blah.
01:03:39.620You know, who cares what these big corporations are doing?
01:03:41.620And the leftists, the ones who are screaming bloody murder about it.
01:03:43.620Now it's like the roles have been completely reversed and has everything to do with who's being persecuted and who's being not.
01:03:49.620I mean, I still think the principle applies equally across both situations.
01:03:53.620You know, it's just bad to have, you know, a group of people, no matter what their ideology is, concentrating too much power.
01:03:59.620Well, I think you might find very interesting.
01:04:01.620Sam Francis makes a really interesting argument about this in Leviathan and Its Enemies.
01:04:06.620He says that the reason that it looked like at first progressives and the managerial elite would be at odds is that the progressive movement had misunderstood the ends of
01:04:18.620managerial elites. Basically, they misunderstood the relationship between each other.
01:04:23.620They had the same ends. They were both looking to kind of arrive at the same place.
01:04:29.620But basically, the managers understood that they needed to kind of boil the frog slowly.
01:04:34.620They needed to do the process through time.
01:04:37.620They couldn't bleed the bourgeoisie dry.
01:04:39.620They couldn't slaughter them. They needed to bleed them dry.
01:04:41.620And so they had the same goal of kind of eliminating bourgeoisie capitalism and moving things in a different direction.
01:04:48.620But because the progressives wanted to go at warp speed and the managers wanted to go at a manageable speed, they looked like they were at odds.
01:04:56.620And the progressive movement identified them as an enemy.
01:04:59.620But over time, as the managers have moved things closer and closer to the kind of fulfillment of the progressive agenda, they have merged and worked together more fluidly now because they kind of see that this is an end goal that they can achieve through kind of the managerial process.
01:05:16.620You know, it maybe doesn't hold up in every aspect, but I think it's pretty fascinating case to be made in that direction.
01:05:22.620Yeah, I've been meaning to read that book a long time. But yeah, that sounds exactly right.
01:05:25.620Yeah, I will warn you, it's like 700 pages and it desperately needed an editor.
01:05:30.620Like they could probably cut 150 pages out of there because he repeats pretty often.
01:05:33.620But I've seen it enough to know that there's a reason why I haven't read it yet.
01:05:37.620You could make sure to beat, you know, you can you can defend your home with it.
01:05:42.620You know, so, yeah, that's understood.
01:05:44.620We need like a new right CliffsNotes or something like this.
01:05:47.620Yeah, well, that's kind of what I'm trying to do with the channel and lucrative opportunity there for you.
01:05:50.620Yeah, if anybody wants to, you know, roll through the through all the back catalog, you've got some of that there.
01:05:56.620All right, so we got another one here from Slasher from $5 Canadian.
01:06:52.620In this case, it was pretty directly Orwellian.
01:06:54.620You know, a lot of people would say, well, Twitter would have disclosed this previously.
01:06:58.620And then you look at what they disclosed and the headline on these pieces, these things on the website would be like, we do not shadow ban.
01:07:04.620And then you read like the second paragraph and they have this definition of shadow banning.
01:07:08.620It was like so narrow and weird. It was unrecognizable.
01:07:11.620Like, you know, no one defined shadow banning that narrowly shadow banning was always just understood to be like the general algorithmic suppression of someone.
01:07:21.620Not like this very specific circumstance that Twitter was defining it as.
01:07:25.620And never mind that the whole idea of literally saying we do not shadow ban in and of itself was so, you know, Orwellian has to be, you know, overtly dishonest.
01:07:36.620They knew what they were doing and there's no reason they get to be let off the hook for that.
01:08:09.620And I do a lot of good work over there.
01:08:11.620My colleagues at RealClearInvestigations.com do tons of great work.
01:08:14.620So if you, you know, we've, in fact, we've done a lot of the major work on uncovering stuff in Russia collusion.
01:08:21.620And, yeah, you know, always make sure you're checking out RealClear Investigations.
01:08:26.620They're, you know, one of the few outlets, you know, I think that are left with any integrity that are doing that kind of investigative work.
01:08:32.620Excellent. All right, guys, we'll make sure that you check all of that out.
01:08:37.620If this is your first time here, make sure you're subscribing.
01:08:40.620I've got everything coming out on podcast platforms now.
01:08:45.620So if you're someone who enjoys listening to this stuff like at the gym or while you're mowing the lawn or playing a video game or whatever, make sure that you check out the Blaze platforms.
01:08:55.620I've got the links for the different, you know, iTunes and all that stuff that I went ahead and put on the YouTube channel so you can follow those links to make sure you subscribe over there.
01:09:05.620And once again, great talking to you. We'll see you next time.