Was the Constitution America's First Coup? | Ryan Turnipseed | 6⧸2⧸23
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 11 minutes
Words per Minute
172.80994
Summary
Ryan Turnipseed joins me to talk about the founding of the United States, the Articles of Confederation, and why the Constitution was not the first document that governed the country after the end of the Revolutionary War, but rather a temporary document that served as a stopgap.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
We hope you're enjoying your Air Canada flight.
00:00:10.720
Fast-free Wi-Fi means I can make dinner reservations before we land.
00:00:25.260
Wi-Fi available to Airplane members on Equipped Flight.
00:00:33.200
I've got a great stream with a great guest that I think you're really going to enjoy.
00:00:37.840
So, I know a lot of you have heard the history.
00:00:40.660
Of course, we all know it from our high school classes, right?
00:00:45.080
There were these high taxes, a tyrannical king.
00:00:47.960
The United States fought back, won its independence.
00:00:50.820
And then it jumped directly into the founding document, the Constitution,
00:00:55.520
which separated powers and made sure that the government would never consolidate
00:00:59.140
into some kind of overbearing total state, right?
00:01:05.100
There was an entire period where the Constitution did not rule our country,
00:01:08.780
where we had another document, the Articles of Confederation,
00:01:12.280
and there was a whole different rebellion that took place inside the United States
00:01:21.140
We're going to go ahead and get to that important back history that many people are not aware of.
00:01:26.020
But before we do that, let me introduce you to my guest today.
00:01:30.580
He is one of the smartest guys when it comes to history,
00:01:33.360
and he is here to help me unspool this whole thing.
00:01:42.300
Also, very happy to be back here again and talking about history and not other subjects.
00:01:54.600
that I knew I wanted to go ahead and dive into this with you.
00:01:58.060
So, we're going to be talking, of course, about the Constitution
00:02:05.020
whether it was actually a coup against the existing government of the United States,
00:02:12.320
So, like I said, many of you might already be familiar,
00:02:15.700
but I think even more of you might be surprised to find out
00:02:18.240
that the Constitution was not our first document.
00:02:21.880
It was not the first document that governed the United States.
00:02:24.980
The Constitution, of course, is the Constitution of 1790,
00:02:28.120
but the American Revolutionary War is over in 81 or 83,
00:02:34.660
And so, there's a whole period between the time of the end of the Revolutionary War
00:02:41.560
where we are ruled by another document called the Articles of Confederation.
00:02:52.420
How did it significantly differ from, say, our current understanding of the Constitution?
00:03:00.800
and then you'll get a different answer for each different historian you'll ask.
00:03:03.820
But there's a – the way that I would usually view it,
00:03:07.320
if you look at the development of the East Coast colonies,
00:03:11.720
by the time they're first settled to the Revolutionary War,
00:03:17.760
They have different classes that people would organize into socially and economically,
00:03:24.220
So, the North was very separate from the South,
00:03:26.560
which would later develop in our history come the Civil War.
00:03:30.980
And different states were much larger or much smaller,
00:03:33.740
depending on their charter or their official borders.
00:03:36.620
If you were going to unify these separate entities into a country
00:03:44.700
you're going to have to have either the world's greatest negotiator
00:03:57.880
But what we ended up having was a confederal document,
00:04:03.000
which some people would say that the more nationalistic northern elements
00:04:11.820
You know, you would take those Articles of Confederation
00:04:14.680
that had a sort of federal advisory committee, if you will.
00:04:20.160
So, there was sort of like a central government.
00:04:26.180
You had delegates from each of the different territories
00:04:28.140
that would go to represent their constituents or their state
00:04:36.000
But ultimate and actual power was on each of the state governments
00:04:42.820
So, nationalistic elements could have seen this
00:04:49.040
and then progressively amended as time goes on.
00:04:55.220
liberal or anti-nationalist or colonial elements, if you will,
00:05:00.420
hearkening back to the more colonial style of governance,
00:05:03.100
would have viewed this as a more ideal document
00:05:06.420
because each of these large states in the South and the Mid-Atlantic
00:05:10.280
did not have to be beholden to some extra governing body
00:05:15.080
that would look closer to a British imperial government,
00:05:19.580
You know, Virginia could do its own thing inside Virginia
00:05:24.260
without having to take into account Massachusetts
00:05:27.460
or any of the other northern, more nationalistic states.
00:05:35.400
If you were wanting to look at, like, historical continuity,
00:05:38.740
it much more closely reflects how each of these colonies developed.
00:05:44.160
So, if you were to go back to the early 1700s, late 1690s,
00:05:50.320
and propose the idea that each of the British colonies
00:05:53.680
in the east coast of North America outside of Canada
00:05:56.600
would be in one entity, it would be absolutely insane.
00:06:02.120
which looked more feudal in their establishment.
00:06:05.500
It was quite famously, their founding constitution
00:06:08.740
was written by John Locke to enshrine a very rigid aristocracy.
00:06:18.520
compared to the mid-Atlantic or southern aristocracies.
00:06:21.980
You had the famous Virginia planter aristocracy
00:06:25.080
that would produce our anti-federalist elements
00:06:30.220
which I'm sure we'll get into in some capacity.
00:06:32.960
This Articles of Confederation sort of kept these differences
00:06:42.500
under sort of like a defense treaty, if you will.
00:06:57.640
Yeah, I think it's essential for people to understand
00:06:59.620
that this dysfunction, like you're talking about,
00:07:09.580
that was going to create a large or powerful country.
00:07:25.620
Yes, George Washington's technically your first president,
00:07:43.780
There's no court that can decide between borders
00:07:59.520
on travelers from other states into your state.
00:08:06.280
they could actually put specific restrictions on them
00:08:13.660
And so when we're looking at the Art of the Confederation,
00:08:19.020
It is a very loose joining of these different states,
00:08:26.040
again, under kind of this mutual defense treaty,
00:08:31.320
with a particular identity, a particular purpose.
00:08:38.520
That has a lot of advantages to some people today.
00:08:49.620
For instance, the government could technically raise an army,
00:08:52.800
but it didn't really have a funding mechanism for that army.
00:08:59.320
It also didn't have the ability to print money on a national scale.
00:09:03.540
And so that meant that the United States could not pay its collective debts
00:09:16.740
Each state was responsible for a portion of the war debt.
00:09:21.500
And that's kind of where we start running into Shays' Rebellion, right?
00:09:25.200
That these states become desperate to pay off much of this war debt.
00:09:30.200
And many of these states, Massachusetts is the one we'll be focusing on
00:09:35.380
But they start levying excessive taxes against their population.
00:09:41.720
In some cases, way more than they ever paid under the British.
00:09:44.680
So I saw some estimates between three and five times more taxes
00:09:48.300
to the state government to pay off this war debt
00:09:52.780
to pay off the debt for the French and Indian War.
00:10:01.320
As we mentioned, there was a very famous rebellion
00:10:05.100
Another very pertinent factor was that there was a,
00:10:09.220
what modern historiography would call a depression,
00:10:15.960
where you had some very questionable monetary policies
00:10:20.740
coming from the Bank of North America, if I recall correctly,
00:10:27.700
They employed people like Thomas Paine and all these other types
00:10:30.640
that we would know now and that a lot of the colonists knew
00:10:37.320
Most people with sound economics would know that if you have an inflationary regime,
00:10:42.600
it is not going to treat your farmers, your planters, your artisans well,
00:10:48.280
They're the last people that get this new money.
00:10:50.140
They are going to get the worst, the short end of the stick.
00:10:53.780
The people that get the money first, like the industrialists,
00:10:56.860
whatever cronies were tied to the Bank of North America,
00:11:04.680
And this really sort of outlines that you have two power classes
00:11:08.980
that have arisen in this post-revolutionary government
00:11:14.860
You had planters, artisans, farmers, these, I don't want to say lower class people
00:11:29.720
which would be the more northern sort of statesmen and politicians,
00:11:34.600
industrialists, merchants that would tend to comprise
00:11:37.780
a more nationalistic faction for various different reasons,
00:11:41.040
which you can kind of see why you would want to rank them higher class
00:11:46.460
So with this nationalist faction that was arising
00:11:52.800
industrialists did not like the fact that for each of the different governments,
00:11:57.740
you could have a different regulation on commerce,
00:12:02.180
You would have to lobby for different protections
00:12:06.220
It would be much more convenient, much more profitable
00:12:12.020
if there was just one trade zone comprising all of the colonies
00:12:23.460
And these industrials would be in league with the statesmen
00:12:26.060
and politicians of the north, which we mentioned earlier,
00:12:28.760
tended to be from more smaller nationalistic states,
00:12:31.400
which favored a stronger centralized government
00:12:35.300
as opposed to the more southern and mid-Atlantic anti-federalist states,
00:12:40.900
also had a very good relationship with the pulpits,
00:12:54.280
that really start to divide themselves after this depression
00:13:03.060
One was sort of being hurt for the benefit of the other,
00:13:07.360
which would lead us very neatly into a reaction to all of this
00:13:15.920
we're seeing the emergence of kind of this divide
00:13:24.000
which is this divide between the urban and the rural, right?
00:13:32.740
we have those who make their money in the cities
00:13:45.960
because you've been listening to my managerial elite theory videos,
00:13:50.600
that's because this is a function of capital as well,
00:13:54.920
as much as that's going to make some people angry.
00:13:57.200
And so this is the centralization and the unification,
00:14:01.780
the standardization benefits a particular class,
00:14:11.740
And the farmers have a much different interest.
00:14:16.360
The rural populations have a much different interest,
00:14:19.520
and they don't want to see this happen the same way.
00:14:22.300
Now, on top of the fact that they're already paying taxes,
00:14:31.880
They came back after years of not being able to work their farms
00:14:50.760
they also received the lowest benefits of new money
00:15:00.900
to go fight against taxation without representation,
00:15:05.240
these people who are forcing us to lose our livelihoods.
00:15:07.820
And now I'm paying three, five times more taxes
00:15:48.520
very unlikely to have gold and silver at hand anyway
00:16:02.980
because barter is still very heavily used at this time
00:16:06.700
because, again, there's not a standardized currency.
00:16:09.180
And so they are even further behind the eight ball
00:16:11.280
when it comes to trying to pay these things off.
00:16:15.660
well, you know, we just fought a war over this.
00:16:26.100
so they wouldn't have said the First Amendment,
00:16:28.620
of asking for redress of grievances through protest.
00:16:45.180
So if the government wanted to seize the farms,
00:16:49.440
And, of course, when these guys are protesting,
00:17:01.040
for just what was the situation like at the time
00:17:22.900
which is an absolutely gigantic number for the time.
00:17:37.140
This tax collection fell onto the state governments,
00:18:12.460
had greatly expanded their productive capacities
00:18:17.900
which meant that a lot of these state expenditures
00:18:26.480
were going to protect these overbloated industries
00:18:42.420
especially after they had been fighting for so long.
00:19:29.040
because that's a great erosion of a legitimacy,
00:19:31.860
which every state, every social organization relies upon
00:19:45.340
mostly from the western parts of Massachusetts,
00:20:05.120
Now, the government obviously is getting scared here.
00:20:14.120
but they know this is probably not a great thing.
00:20:16.480
But funny enough, we have some disagreements here.
00:20:27.620
that there's a rebellion inside the United States.
00:20:31.520
but this is where his quote about the tree of liberty
00:21:11.640
Sam Adams will talk a little bit more eventually
00:48:55.840
weren't going to defend themselves properly the
00:48:59.920
this and so we needed a strong central authority
00:49:13.600
state governments were competent and uh weren't
00:49:23.840
sort of popular history is a complete lie um there
00:49:26.580
is no really legitimate way that this was established
00:49:28.900
and i'm i'm sure we're about to get into that it
00:49:33.440
english liberal style where people are standing on
00:49:37.960
centralized government yeah i mean you know we i
00:49:41.380
believe under the articles of confederation you
00:49:43.640
needed a super majority to do basically anything and you
00:49:46.860
needed a a unanimous vote uh to actually you know change the
00:49:51.900
articles into anything else of course that's not what
00:49:54.480
happened at all uh and so uh actually to this day uh you
00:49:58.100
know funny side thing if you hear people who go through the
00:50:00.740
sovereign citizen uh movement uh who taught you know
00:50:04.060
they're the ones who are like uh you can't actually you know
00:50:06.760
pull me over and give me a speeding ticket because i'm a
00:50:10.720
they're referencing the uh article the fact that the
00:50:12.940
articles of confederation were never legally abandoned they
00:50:15.760
were they were uh so that they see themselves as still being
00:50:18.820
governed by the articles of confederation which are the
00:50:21.560
true still legitimate uh constitution of the united states
00:50:28.080
the 1790 uh constitution obviously that never stops anything that
00:50:32.500
doesn't help them at all but uh they usually end up just getting
00:50:35.000
beaten up by the cops but it is always funny if you're
00:50:37.220
wondering where they got that idea it's because they
00:50:39.340
they believe that the constitution is entirely invalid and that
00:50:42.840
they're still they're referencing the fact that they still
00:50:44.940
live under the articles of confederation but yeah i mean i guess we
00:50:48.940
could get into the the constitution itself i wasn't going to spend
00:50:52.260
uh too much time on that other than kind of giving the backstory of
00:50:55.640
uh that the main thing i wanted to kind of get to is the constitution then
00:50:59.640
brings us uh into a situation where the government
00:51:05.400
uh in the whiskey rebellion right so the the very uh power that they had
00:51:10.240
wanted to acquire uh they kind of immediately apply when it
00:51:13.720
comes to the whiskey rebellion right and this is the only things i really
00:51:17.060
have to add on the constitution itself besides what you just mentioned where
00:51:20.200
um before it was ratified they used the constitution's method of ratification
00:51:24.440
to make it the legitimate authority they just ignored the articles of
00:51:28.440
confederation altogether um so uh that's that's what always gets me with
00:51:32.800
staunch constitutionalists trying to pretend like this was uh a very judicial
00:51:36.720
and uh natural evolution of common law and whatever else it's
00:51:40.180
it's not um but um something that you see that's very interesting
00:51:44.520
and uh if you uh um albert j knock has a very good uh chapter on this
00:51:50.480
um in our enemy the state is the book um basically
00:51:53.900
after a little while of going through what we've just discussed through his own
00:51:58.080
lens um he talks about the different uh uh the different positions in the new
00:52:05.800
government and uh how they relate to the convention
00:52:08.640
um because once again this convention was not a it was not official
00:52:12.400
um you can if it was any other country um the americans would look at this as a
00:52:17.500
coup d'etat is the best way that i can put this um
00:52:20.280
if this had happened in any other country where
00:52:22.540
uh famous statesmen businessmen merchants and clerics all got together
00:52:27.080
in secret because what they were doing was illegitimate and established a new
00:52:32.620
um most historians would say this is a coup d'etat um i mean they just kind of
00:52:39.320
right and this is this is something interesting george washington was supposed
00:52:43.560
to be like the leader of that convention or the chairman if you will
00:52:46.780
um if you look at all the different um i'll see if i can find specifics but
00:52:51.660
i i encourage people to look on a look at this uh work on their own from albert j
00:52:55.520
knock um basically all major positions in the new government
00:52:59.980
came from delegates at this constitutional convention
00:53:03.740
um i think it's like two-thirds of the new senators
00:53:06.860
were present at the convention same thing with the majority of the new house of
00:53:11.000
representatives uh the major uh departments within the executive branch
00:53:15.600
were i think like three-fourths of them were staffed by uh
00:53:18.780
um people that were present at this convention george washington as we just
00:53:25.040
this is for all intents and purposes a coup by uh these nationalistic interests
00:53:30.140
these business clerical media and uh statesman interests
00:53:37.280
um so this is what we're looking at which means that whenever we see
00:53:43.980
pop up immediately afterwards we can kind of already predict the results but i
00:53:50.580
yeah i mean again we don't have to get heavily into it because i wanted to get
00:53:54.280
to the question of kind of our uh our uh stream as well but i guess you kind
00:54:02.000
it's fine uh but uh eye on the ball that's important
00:54:05.280
uh but yeah i just wanted to kind of point out that the whiskey rebellion happens
00:54:11.600
the ability of the central government particularly now
00:54:16.200
uh the uh you know the new federal government and uh it's kind of more
00:54:20.640
business uh you know industrialist urban interests
00:54:24.180
uh able to kind of uh extract a large amount of funding
00:54:28.120
from rural people who tended to uh kind of you know either consolidate
00:54:33.000
their uh their uh extra crop into whiskey or uh move rum production up from uh from
00:54:40.760
other areas and so this ends up being something that is immediately in the favor of the north
00:54:45.080
immediately in favor of the urban elite and maybe immediately in favor of the very people
00:54:48.920
who just wrote this coup uh that is now imposing a new tax uh to kind of farm these people
00:54:54.440
who they kind of just uh hoodwinked out of the articles of confederation uh but they have
00:55:00.760
successfully centralized enough power for george washington to personally like lead a force out
00:55:06.000
uh and kind of put down uh the whiskey rebellion before anything significant comes of it
00:55:11.100
right exactly and uh this sort of uh crackdown after the centralization just just to quickly go
00:55:18.540
over this so that we can get to the uh the question that we were uh discussing um you can also see this
00:55:25.180
hasty and almost malicious centralization with the passage of the bill of rights because they were
00:55:30.780
sort of promised at the convention to get some states to go along with it um and the major uh nationalistic
00:55:38.140
or federalist uh proponents were just hoping it would quietly be forgotten um the reason that they
00:55:43.100
were so quickly passed wasn't necessarily because of some strong commitment to ideals by the federalists
00:55:48.220
and the pursuit of uh and the pursuit of uh limited um governmental uh authority and restraint upon its
00:55:54.300
powers though that could definitely be there um you also saw them try to force all these uh
00:56:00.380
amendments in the new constitution through so that there was not a uh a development of people
00:56:06.220
questioning the authority and legitimacy of the constitution and trying to change it further
00:56:11.420
so whenever you see amendments one through ten just get passed almost uh at lightning speed it's not
00:56:17.340
because everyone just agreed this is a great idea in fact most nationalistic elements didn't like the
00:56:22.220
fact that there is a bill of rights um it was a concession that they gave and they're passing it
00:56:27.500
quickly to make sure that these uh anti-federalist forces one get satiated to the point where they don't
00:56:32.380
care anymore and two don't question the very structure of what they're working with here
00:56:36.700
you've already invested yourself in the process right so you've already and once you've already
00:56:41.500
done look you already got these things you already it works you know you made this happen you know
00:56:45.420
don't you want to see these things through and now that you're part of this you know you've
00:56:48.620
you've basically already conceded the legitimacy of the process and now you're just dickering over the
00:56:54.860
details right and there's no room um for them to start saying well uh you know if we need these bill
00:57:01.580
of rights why wasn't it just in the first document or anything else because all their demands are
00:57:06.140
nominally being met um at least as they were interpreted by the nationalistic faction so uh
00:57:12.140
it's a very uh the whiskey rebellion combined with the bill of rights that were quickly added on
00:57:17.740
uh it really just kind of shows how one how expert this uh this constitutional adoption was um there
00:57:26.460
have been many governments in the americas that tried to do something similar and
00:57:31.020
dissolved almost immediately or descended into some sort of chaos uh this was a very expertly done
00:57:36.780
uh centralization of power um but to comment on the moral efficacy of it after you just fought a uh
00:57:43.820
a war of independence against the centralization of power without having some sort of representation
00:57:49.100
and uh you had just uh the country had just been taken over by nationalists or uh federalists
00:57:55.420
uh who were trying to centralize power and take as much uh representation away from these interests
00:58:01.820
uh that were opposed to them uh obviously is not i don't think it would take a uh a strong christian
00:58:09.180
to say that this is immoral um they had basically lied their way through a revolution in order to advance
00:58:14.460
their interests and now they had taken over the country and uh they started to erode away the uh the unique
00:58:21.020
peculiarities of these state governments uh which is something that you'll see throughout american
00:58:25.420
history the earlier back the farther back you go um the more distinct each state looks north carolina
00:58:33.020
and south carolina are different from each other quite extremely and very much different from massachusetts
00:58:38.620
rhode island and connecticut but after you get to like the 1890s or so they've conglomerated into this
00:58:44.540
sort of power block because they have to under the new centralized government it really destroys these uh
00:58:49.580
local identities um which might also be another moral mark against them but that's a something
00:58:54.860
for another time just to sort of add on to what we were discussing here oh 10th amendment you were
00:59:00.140
always a lie uh but yeah so uh now i want to get to the question of the stream you know was the
00:59:05.980
constitution america's first coup now you already kind of said if we saw this in any other uh nation
00:59:11.900
we would say yes so i guess the question i want to go beyond that though and i think this is where
00:59:16.140
it gets interesting but kind of the political theory and power analysis was this inevitable
00:59:23.340
was this centralization of power inevitable because it's really entry easy for us now looking at what
00:59:29.420
has become a global empire um and say you know uh yeah we should have just stuck with the articles
00:59:35.100
of confederation because uh then you know each state could have done its own thing and there never
00:59:40.300
would have been this centralization and there never would have been this like you know drive for
00:59:44.140
conquest and you know we we wouldn't we wouldn't currently be ruled by you know uh the pride mafia
00:59:50.300
you know and dod you know you know a thing that's going on now but um you know if they hadn't done this
00:59:58.940
then it would have been 13 weak uh countries that would have been constantly interacting with larger
01:00:07.020
european empires uh who were very prevalent uh in the area at the time and would would there
01:00:14.300
eventually have been a situation where america basically as smaller states would have just fallen
01:00:19.900
under the influence of other powers not been able to defend itself not be able to kind of assert its own
01:00:26.220
dominance uh or you know kind of kind of what do you think the fallout would be had this not happened
01:00:32.300
right so uh before we get into the the what if there's a great historical irony here because as
01:00:37.420
you mentioned if we had kept the uh articles of confederation it's not very likely that we would
01:00:42.140
have expanded as much as we did um because you you had the uh northwestern treaties and whatever else
01:00:49.020
that had uh uh pre-existed the constitution so we had already expanded quite a lot but there's not
01:00:55.260
really much of a mechanism or a way to go past that if this is your goal um which was definitely the
01:01:01.980
goal of the more anti-nationalistic anti-federalists is they they uh because their interests their ideals
01:01:08.700
and their political philosophy were always looking for some form of expansion um you could see this live
01:01:13.420
on into the uh what would eventually become the democratic party into the 1850s which would explain
01:01:20.060
your mexican-american war why it was started by or regardless of who started why it was prosecuted by
01:01:26.620
uh a democratic president under the guise of manifest destinies because this is what that political
01:01:31.580
philosophy leads to ironically they were supporting a mechanism early on and their uh their progenitors
01:01:38.300
the anti-federalists that would not really have allowed that right and same thing on the opposite end the
01:01:43.900
federalist nationalistic faction uh would collapse after the war of 1812 basically um and re-coalesce
01:01:51.660
eventually in the whig government which quite famously was very isolationist uh very sort of
01:01:56.620
developmental very non-manifest destiny uh in their uh political philosophies uh so these people that
01:02:04.220
wanted a stronger state government which would allow for this expansion by the more uh by the more
01:02:10.060
anti-nationalistic anti-federalist elements uh they they both were kind of supporting the opposite
01:02:16.380
mechanism to achieve what they wanted just purely from a power analysis now um if you were to have
01:02:21.900
kept the articles of confederation um we have seen weaker confederacies survive in more dangerous
01:02:29.100
geopolitical positions um the swiss confederation is quite honestly a miracle in the same way that the
01:02:34.460
formation of uh germany is a unified entity is a miracle on the historical scale um and it's uh
01:02:40.780
mostly due to the fact that these private mercenary armies that as we just discussed even some of the
01:02:45.820
state governments would use to put down their dissenters uh tended to be much more professional
01:02:50.700
much more uh well-equipped uh much better uh than any sort of centralized army was at the time
01:02:56.860
and this could only really be argued to be reversed by the napoleonic wars which was still just a
01:03:01.980
european uh phenomenon for the vast majority of it um i i would say therefore that the articles of
01:03:08.540
confederation would have survived it would just probably be a much smaller country with much less
01:03:13.820
influence uh definitely with a much less geopolitical influence um i would also say um that on the local
01:03:22.860
scale you would probably be dealing with a much more divided uh country given that it stays together it
01:03:29.660
could always just split apart after a while that was one of the concerns one of the concerns by the
01:03:34.140
nationalistic faction was that it would uh the uh union would just split apart um provided it doesn't
01:03:41.180
um it is very possible that you could see a much more tyrannical local level uh uh government from
01:03:48.540
most of these state governments than we see today so instead of having one um very rainbow colored uh state
01:03:55.820
department or whatever else uh trying very weakly to exert itself over all 50 states uh very poorly
01:04:04.380
while meeting local resistance in the uh in the limited ways that we still allow that um it's very
01:04:09.820
possible that you could see one extremely rainbow colored like northeastern block of the country and
01:04:15.740
one very non-rainbow colored southern block of the country or whatever else um some people may desire
01:04:21.100
that um it's uh it does leave up to question what about the people in the northeast who would have
01:04:26.620
opposed that most of these people in western massachusetts are probably not the uh uh the uh
01:04:33.180
heritage stock and the uh philosophers that would lead to that rainbow revolution that we see in our
01:04:38.780
country today uh they would probably find more commonality with the uh uh with the red staters that we
01:04:45.580
would have today um if you could if you could imagine it that way of these people leading down
01:04:50.540
the line to these ideas and different governments that we see right now um most of these people in
01:04:55.100
western massachusetts the whiskey rebellion types uh despite the fact that they were under uh more
01:05:00.460
nationalistic regimes that would have given enough time solidified their control almost absolutely if
01:05:07.020
they wanted to um they probably would not have desired this so they would either be stamped out
01:05:12.380
brushed out or they would have to go along with it it's a very uh uh it's a it's a bleak outlook for
01:05:20.060
anyone that's stuck under these localized tyrannies uh so it's really a question today uh which is more
01:05:26.540
desirable a country where half of it is potentially more free but the other half is just left to rot or
01:05:33.980
what we have today where everyone kind of goes along with this together uh you don't have as much uh local
01:05:39.420
self-determination um but what you do have is a much weaker central authority just due to the scale
01:05:45.260
of the whole thing it's much easier for us to organize now under this government and oppose a central
01:05:50.380
authority all the way in washington dc trying to exert its influence over what's effectively a foreign
01:05:55.660
population in the red states uh than it would be uh for one small localized resistance in like
01:06:02.700
uh massachusetts trying to oppose a much more well-armed and organized state government uh with
01:06:09.500
little to no help from the outside so those are your two uh uh the two things you can pick from there
01:06:14.860
i don't honestly know which one i'd uh i'd accept i kind of uh i feel like the way the uh present
01:06:20.860
situation in which we find ourselves today um is more favorable to a cause that is supportive of liberty and
01:06:26.940
tradition uh just from the simple fact that uh your centralizers of the of the state the centralized
01:06:33.420
federal state um are incompetent and they have really extended their reach probably farther than
01:06:40.140
what they can effectively administer yeah it's always difficult kind of speculating on those uh
01:06:46.140
counterfactuals you know those those hypotheticals but i do i think those are all excellent points
01:06:51.420
and i really do think that it's important for people to realize that either way we would have
01:06:58.620
faced kind of the issue of centralization and globalization um those forces would not have simply
01:07:05.820
not existed if it was not for the kind of unification of the united states as or more centralization
01:07:12.060
of power under the constitution uh so is the constitution a coup yeah kind of um yeah pretty much but uh
01:07:19.900
you know didn't necessarily make uh the country for the worse uh as as ryan pointed out there are
01:07:25.500
many ways it could have gone uh of course all of that is speculation at this point uh but it is a fun
01:07:31.820
thing to to kind of think about and to keep in mind as we kind of look at the situation that we have here
01:07:36.860
all right guys well i think we got to everything i wanted to hit uh before we start to head out here
01:07:42.540
uh ryan is there anywhere you want people to look any work that you have coming up anything you want
01:07:47.340
uh people to look at youtube you know twitter any of that um so i do have a twitter account there's
01:07:52.700
quite a few uh other developments that have been happening there in other spheres of life than u.s
01:07:57.180
history uh at turnip merchant uh and it's also the uh screen name that pops up is ryan turnip seed
01:08:03.820
which is uh the name that you should see here uh find me there i have a pinned thread if you want to
01:08:08.540
catch up on some of that uh some of those other developments um that have been happening in the more
01:08:13.820
religious sphere of life um and then i have a youtube channel also under ryan turnip seed uh we
01:08:19.820
are i used to have a weekly saturday morning stream uh that had uh that i've since discontinued it'll
01:08:26.220
probably be restarting very soon uh once i get back from some of the summer travel that i have to do
01:08:31.900
uh it focuses on religion uh social policy politics and whatever else uh that catches my interest and the
01:08:39.660
interest of my guests uh so you can go find that there's a pretty good back catalog if you enjoyed
01:08:44.860
kind of what aaron and i were discussing today um very much along those lines um and then another few
01:08:51.260
another couple of things is that i have a couple of articles out on mises.org and lrc uh which you can
01:08:58.060
find uh which if you are interested in american history my most recent article for mises.org
01:09:03.420
uh is on the myth of an isolationist foreign policy in the united states uh detailing some
01:09:08.860
of the forgotten interventions that we had before world war one and in the interwar period so if you
01:09:14.540
like uh looking at historical myths uh trying to get american history straight from what actually
01:09:20.140
happened i have a couple of articles over there now uh which you can by all means go and read and
01:09:25.900
i believe that's all that i have at this point in time well ryan's also a member of the old gory club
01:09:31.260
right sorry yeah i have so many things to chill now the uh the old glory club um is a great
01:09:38.380
collection of friends uh if you have been paying attention to our on for any point in time you will
01:09:42.460
see some familiar faces over at the old glory club it is a group of uh of heritage americans uh fighting
01:09:49.660
for uh their interests at least in the intellectual sphere at this point in time uh with more plans
01:09:54.940
going forward uh there is a great catalog at old glory club dot substack uh dot com um and you can
01:10:02.780
find everything there from the uh chronicling uh forgotten history of the united states just for the
01:10:08.700
sake of chronicling it uh to examining some of the great social issues that are present in our time
01:10:14.700
like the trans movement uh like the uh some of the issues facing veterans uh you can find uh comments
01:10:21.580
on the religion of anti-fascism that we have all had to face uh from me charlemagne if i remember
01:10:27.420
correctly also has an article on that over there um it's really just a great uh confederation of our
01:10:33.820
uh good content producers over there thank you for remembering that it would have completely slipped my
01:10:38.620
mind would you say it's a confederation of articles yes yes a confederation of articles uh
01:10:44.060
perfect way to describe it i just couldn't let that go sorry i know it's terrible but you can't set
01:10:49.580
a pun up like that uh it's there's just no other option once you lay it out there all right guys
01:10:53.740
well we're gonna go ahead and wrap this up of course make sure you're checking out all of
01:10:57.900
ryan's work and if this is your first time here please make sure that you go ahead and subscribe and
01:11:03.260
if you'd like to get these broadcasts as podcasts of course you can go ahead and go to your favorite
01:11:08.060
podcast platform and subscribe to the oran mcintyre show when you do make sure that you go ahead and
01:11:13.580
click on those you know ratings leave a review that really helps with all the algorithm magic all right guys
01:11:19.420
we're gonna get going but thanks everybody for coming by and as always i'll talk to you next time