The Auron MacIntyre Show - September 23, 2024


What Broke Libertarianism? | Guest: Jeffrey Tucker | 9⧸23⧸24


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 14 minutes

Words per Minute

173.87

Word Count

12,880

Sentence Count

640

Misogynist Sentences

13

Hate Speech Sentences

19


Summary

Jeffrey Tucker of the Brownstone Institute joins me to talk about his piece, "What Broke Libertarianism?" and why so many in the libertarian movement remain silent about the current crisis in the face of massive government encroachment.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 We hope you're enjoying your Air Canada flight.
00:00:02.320 Rocky's Vacation, here we come.
00:00:05.060 Whoa, is this economy?
00:00:07.180 Free beer, wine, and snacks.
00:00:09.620 Sweet!
00:00:10.720 Fast-free Wi-Fi means I can make dinner reservations before we land.
00:00:14.760 And with live TV, I'm not missing the game.
00:00:17.800 It's kind of like, I'm already on vacation.
00:00:20.980 Nice!
00:00:22.240 On behalf of Air Canada, nice travels.
00:00:25.260 Wi-Fi available to Airplane members on Equipped Flight.
00:00:27.200 Sponsored by Bell. Conditions apply.
00:00:28.720 CRCanada.com.
00:00:30.160 Hey everybody, how's it going?
00:00:32.080 Thanks for joining me this afternoon.
00:00:33.880 I've got a great stream with a great guest that I think you're really going to enjoy.
00:00:38.260 So, like a lot of people, the pandemic hit me pretty hard.
00:00:42.600 My political beliefs were shattered.
00:00:44.780 You know, somebody coming from a conservative background,
00:00:47.320 I looked at everything and said,
00:00:49.020 Bill of Rights, separation of powers.
00:00:50.960 How could this be happening in the United States?
00:00:53.120 But for people who are libertarian,
00:00:55.020 it's even more shocking that this could continue.
00:00:57.680 And that so many people in the libertarian movement stayed silent.
00:01:01.620 My guest had a great piece about this recently,
00:01:04.640 and I wanted to have him on to talk about this.
00:01:07.240 Jeffrey Tucker is the president of the Brownstone Institute.
00:01:10.160 If you've seen libertarians talk about anything anywhere,
00:01:12.640 I'm sure you've seen Jeffrey talking about it.
00:01:15.280 Thank you for joining me today, man.
00:01:17.060 Sure.
00:01:17.500 Hey, and thank you for reading my article,
00:01:19.960 which is called What Broke Libertarianism?
00:01:21.920 And it's a huge article.
00:01:25.220 I'm very happy for you to ask me about any particulars within it.
00:01:28.860 It covers a lot of territory, really,
00:01:31.440 from 1955 all the way to the present and many, many topics.
00:01:36.040 I'm not sure what's most interesting to your readers,
00:01:40.020 but what I do find, first of all, thanks again.
00:01:43.080 Thank you for noticing the piece.
00:01:45.280 I had a prediction before filing it
00:01:48.420 that it would not have any impact at all.
00:01:51.760 And that's for two reasons.
00:01:53.120 One is that it's too comprehensive
00:01:55.920 and libertarians are deeply embarrassed
00:01:57.760 about what happened during COVID.
00:01:59.860 And peace, I think, is actually quite persuasive,
00:02:04.020 very compelling.
00:02:06.340 So they weren't interested in amplifying it.
00:02:11.300 So there's that.
00:02:13.060 The other thing is that nobody really cares.
00:02:16.140 Which is, which sort of makes my point.
00:02:20.840 But that, yeah, that is the most stunning part about it, right,
00:02:23.120 is we are sitting in the aftermath of this
00:02:25.280 and, you know, we're listening to the two major party candidates
00:02:28.720 talking about what should be important to the United States
00:02:32.800 and no one is talking about the lockdowns.
00:02:36.620 No one is talking about the incredible encroachment
00:02:39.040 of the government during this time,
00:02:41.540 partially because Trump's a part of it,
00:02:43.380 because the Democrats, of course, championed it
00:02:45.320 and believed with it.
00:02:46.420 And this would be the moment that you would think
00:02:48.220 that, of course, the libertarians would step up
00:02:50.280 and say, we can fill this gap.
00:02:52.760 There's one obvious glaring issue
00:02:54.160 that is not being addressed.
00:02:55.280 And what a powerful moment for a party
00:02:57.440 that is supposed to be focused on liberty
00:02:59.340 and a small government to really address this.
00:03:01.940 And that's one of the reasons
00:03:03.200 I found your piece so compelling,
00:03:04.920 because it's one of the few libertarian outlets
00:03:08.580 I've seen that are really willing
00:03:09.540 to even address this point at this point.
00:03:11.760 It was strange, too, when the lockdowns happened,
00:03:14.180 because I thought, oh, now here's the long-awaited
00:03:17.060 libertarian moment.
00:03:17.920 Of course, like everything else,
00:03:19.040 the truth was upside down.
00:03:20.680 It killed what was left of libertarianism,
00:03:23.020 if there was anything left.
00:03:24.200 And then probably there wasn't anything left, actually.
00:03:26.300 Which is, so they just didn't respond.
00:03:29.320 And so then libertarianism as a cultural force
00:03:31.800 just faded into nothingness.
00:03:35.300 The Libertarian Party was running a candidate in 2020.
00:03:39.460 She said absolutely nothing about the topic.
00:03:43.020 All the major organizations just urged their memberships
00:03:46.060 to stay home, stay safe.
00:03:49.980 Others were getting pandemic planning largesse
00:03:54.300 via FTX, which is by itself just a sort of a scandal.
00:04:00.080 And others, you know, had been acculturated
00:04:02.440 to this kind of, you know,
00:04:03.660 this sort of careers professionalism,
00:04:05.540 which was that this is too dangerous a topic.
00:04:09.060 And we're just not going to address,
00:04:10.580 we'll wait till it's safe outside
00:04:12.720 and then address it.
00:04:15.220 So there were some libertarian venues
00:04:17.360 that, you know, eventually condemned lockdowns
00:04:20.020 and masking and forced jabs.
00:04:22.520 But only after it became safe to do so.
00:04:27.020 But, you know, the time to intervene
00:04:28.860 and speak out is in the midst of it.
00:04:31.960 But this all began really March 8th, 2020
00:04:35.440 with incredibly with a forced shutdown
00:04:40.140 of a conference called South by Southwest
00:04:42.560 in Austin, Texas,
00:04:43.580 which, you know, had a couple hundred thousand people
00:04:46.220 coming with contracts for hotels, plane flights,
00:04:50.380 exhibitor spaces and, you know, talent
00:04:52.540 and all sorts of things.
00:04:54.520 And the mayor of Austin,
00:04:55.940 about whom we've heard nothing since,
00:04:58.780 just on his own authority,
00:05:00.480 shut down the entire event.
00:05:03.020 I only found out over the weekend
00:05:04.520 that now Southwest is operating
00:05:07.240 mostly from a big contract from the Pentagon.
00:05:10.380 So I have very,
00:05:12.620 I need to look into that a little bit further.
00:05:14.580 But that was designed as a kind of first,
00:05:19.780 you know, it's like a foretaste.
00:05:20.920 Like this is coming to your neighborhood.
00:05:23.240 When that happened on March 8th,
00:05:25.040 and by the way,
00:05:26.040 I had been writing about pandemic planning
00:05:27.780 for 15 years
00:05:28.640 and I knew that lockdowns were possible.
00:05:30.480 I didn't believe that would actually happen,
00:05:32.320 but I knew they were possible.
00:05:34.340 So when that happened on March 8th,
00:05:35.840 my first thought was there are going to be lawsuits
00:05:38.060 for 10 years following this
00:05:40.060 and there's going to be mass outrage
00:05:41.800 and all the libertarians are going to decry
00:05:45.220 the imposition on commerce,
00:05:47.620 on freedom of travel,
00:05:49.140 on contract,
00:05:51.720 you know,
00:05:51.940 abuse of executive authority,
00:05:54.040 this vicious attack on free enterprise
00:05:55.840 and so on.
00:05:56.320 And I wrote a big article about it
00:05:57.620 and I was the only one.
00:05:59.580 It was complete silence.
00:06:01.000 I couldn't believe it.
00:06:02.320 And, you know,
00:06:02.840 that took us through a full week.
00:06:05.920 And then, you know,
00:06:06.900 then on the 12th of March,
00:06:10.400 well, I guess four days later,
00:06:12.240 Trump, you know,
00:06:13.260 just said,
00:06:13.560 oh, you can't fly,
00:06:14.240 by the way,
00:06:14.600 you can't fly to or from Europe now.
00:06:16.520 Everybody,
00:06:17.000 all American citizens have to come home
00:06:18.820 or be stuck abroad.
00:06:20.100 And you can't fly to Australia and New Zealand.
00:06:22.420 Australia and New Zealand
00:06:23.160 can't come here either.
00:06:25.240 And that,
00:06:26.280 then on the 13th
00:06:27.140 was the emergency declaration.
00:06:29.420 And then,
00:06:30.740 then they had two days
00:06:32.280 to prepare for the big
00:06:33.340 press conference on March 16th.
00:06:35.540 That was a Monday,
00:06:36.720 you know,
00:06:36.920 at which Fauci
00:06:37.780 and Scarf Lady
00:06:39.780 and Trump
00:06:40.440 all told everybody to stay home,
00:06:42.100 stay safe.
00:06:43.100 Don't go to bars.
00:06:43.880 Don't go to restaurants.
00:06:44.720 Your churches are closed
00:06:45.640 and so on.
00:06:46.460 And then,
00:06:47.120 you know,
00:06:47.380 the rest is history.
00:06:48.180 It was the ultimate kind of triangulation
00:06:49.720 because Trump did it.
00:06:51.180 He green-lined it.
00:06:52.540 We don't know.
00:06:53.640 And even to this day,
00:06:54.800 we don't entirely know
00:06:55.940 who got to him
00:06:56.920 or how or why it happened.
00:06:59.060 And he's never addressed it
00:07:00.780 directly,
00:07:02.540 apart from saying
00:07:03.220 he did a great job.
00:07:05.860 And so that wrapped
00:07:07.440 in all the Republicans.
00:07:08.600 It was triangulation.
00:07:10.280 And you know what I mean
00:07:11.060 when I say triangulation.
00:07:12.360 Like,
00:07:12.540 this is the way
00:07:13.340 the American ruling class
00:07:14.400 prefers to do things.
00:07:16.520 They like to get,
00:07:17.620 you know,
00:07:19.480 get the counterintuitive thing
00:07:21.480 done by the person
00:07:22.860 you least likely to expect it
00:07:24.600 because otherwise
00:07:25.100 you rally up the partisans,
00:07:27.440 right?
00:07:28.080 Right, absolutely.
00:07:28.740 So in the case of,
00:07:30.180 you know,
00:07:30.540 telecommunications,
00:07:32.540 trucking deregulation
00:07:33.940 and energy deregulation,
00:07:36.460 it was the Carter administration
00:07:37.360 that did it.
00:07:38.440 You know,
00:07:38.680 in the case of
00:07:39.720 the India,
00:07:40.180 the gold standard
00:07:40.900 and the opening to China,
00:07:42.820 it was Nixon who did it.
00:07:45.000 You know,
00:07:45.220 in the case of detente
00:07:46.240 and the mutual agreement
00:07:50.420 to get rid of nuclear weapons,
00:07:51.760 it was Reagan who did it.
00:07:53.720 So this is how it,
00:07:55.900 oh,
00:07:56.080 in the case of welfare reform,
00:07:58.080 it was Clinton who did it,
00:07:59.400 right?
00:07:59.660 So otherwise,
00:08:01.240 you just,
00:08:01.700 you rally up the base too much
00:08:03.700 and you risk your big agenda.
00:08:06.000 So you really want to triangulate
00:08:07.640 for anything that really matters.
00:08:09.880 Well,
00:08:10.360 the thing,
00:08:10.560 the thing I really like about your piece
00:08:12.820 is it touches not just on the pandemic,
00:08:14.740 but several other pillars of libertarianism
00:08:17.180 that have fallen under
00:08:18.680 kind of attack here recently.
00:08:20.780 So I want to,
00:08:21.880 you know,
00:08:22.760 hit the pandemic,
00:08:23.340 but also hit all of these.
00:08:24.520 But before we get to all that,
00:08:25.740 guys,
00:08:26.020 let me tell you a little bit
00:08:26.920 about today's sponsor.
00:08:28.200 After more than 235 years,
00:08:30.180 the radical left is saying
00:08:31.180 that we need saving
00:08:32.300 from the constitution
00:08:33.360 and they're starting
00:08:34.100 by working to end
00:08:35.080 the independence
00:08:35.660 of the Supreme Court.
00:08:36.860 They want to create
00:08:37.440 their own supermajority
00:08:38.580 by packing the court
00:08:39.440 with enough handpicked justices
00:08:40.780 to get the outcome
00:08:41.500 that they want.
00:08:42.560 Even President Biden
00:08:43.380 has gotten into the act
00:08:44.300 by making reforming the court
00:08:45.660 one of his final priorities
00:08:47.080 before he leaves office.
00:08:48.800 But don't be fooled,
00:08:49.980 their end game
00:08:50.580 really is to pack the court.
00:08:52.380 First Liberty
00:08:52.940 calls this assault
00:08:54.040 on the court
00:08:54.680 what it really is,
00:08:55.940 a Supreme Court coup.
00:08:57.180 These extremists
00:08:58.340 want to eliminate
00:08:59.060 the court's conservative majority
00:09:00.600 by packing the Supreme Court
00:09:02.080 with their own
00:09:02.860 handpicked justices
00:09:04.080 to get the outcome
00:09:05.020 that they want.
00:09:06.200 And the frightening thing
00:09:07.000 is that come January,
00:09:08.760 their plan could become
00:09:09.880 our nation's reality.
00:09:11.460 Simple majority votes
00:09:12.460 in the House
00:09:12.960 and the Senate
00:09:13.560 combined with
00:09:14.200 the president's signature
00:09:15.120 could turn their plan
00:09:16.440 to pack the court
00:09:17.180 into law.
00:09:18.140 But right now,
00:09:18.860 if we unite our voices
00:09:19.960 and if we take action together,
00:09:21.780 we can put a stop
00:09:22.540 to the radical left's plan
00:09:23.620 to take control
00:09:24.340 of the Supreme Court.
00:09:25.700 The future of the court
00:09:26.920 of preserving
00:09:27.660 an independent judiciary
00:09:28.660 is literally in our hands.
00:09:31.140 And that's why
00:09:31.600 First Liberty
00:09:32.120 is taking action
00:09:33.140 and we need you to join.
00:09:35.260 With more than
00:09:35.900 one million patriots
00:09:37.020 like you standing
00:09:37.960 for the Supreme Court,
00:09:39.260 we can safeguard
00:09:39.960 the independence
00:09:40.640 of the judiciary
00:09:41.660 just as the Founding Fathers
00:09:43.080 intended.
00:09:44.000 And by saying no
00:09:45.020 to the leftist
00:09:45.740 Supreme Court coup,
00:09:47.000 we can secure
00:09:47.660 the blessings of liberty
00:09:48.620 and protect the future
00:09:49.600 of our constitutional rights
00:09:51.060 for our children
00:09:52.020 and grandchildren.
00:09:53.000 Go to
00:09:53.520 SupremeCourtCoup.com
00:09:55.460 slash Oren.
00:09:56.720 That's
00:09:56.980 SupremeCourtCoup.com
00:09:58.980 slash Oren
00:09:59.980 to learn how you can help
00:10:01.480 stop the radical left's
00:10:02.660 takeover
00:10:03.080 of the Supreme Court.
00:10:05.420 So Jeffrey,
00:10:06.280 as you were explaining there,
00:10:07.640 there was really
00:10:08.160 this pincer move
00:10:09.260 because Trump
00:10:10.320 is the sitting president
00:10:11.300 when this occurs
00:10:12.280 and he seems
00:10:13.960 to be moving along.
00:10:15.340 It's an emergency.
00:10:16.420 Everyone is recognizing
00:10:17.920 the kind of rising panic
00:10:19.560 that is being
00:10:20.360 brought to the forefront,
00:10:21.840 particularly by the media
00:10:23.140 and as all government
00:10:24.520 officials inevitably do,
00:10:26.380 he feels like
00:10:26.860 he must do something.
00:10:28.160 And of course,
00:10:28.920 on top of this,
00:10:30.140 the left is always
00:10:31.100 pushing this,
00:10:31.960 you're an anti-science guy,
00:10:33.880 you're against
00:10:34.520 all these institutions
00:10:35.640 because you hate
00:10:36.700 learning and knowledge
00:10:38.040 and all this kind of stuff.
00:10:39.280 And so there's this
00:10:39.920 extra level of pressure
00:10:41.320 for a Republican candidate
00:10:42.740 to feel like
00:10:43.780 they're effective,
00:10:44.600 that they're listening
00:10:45.120 to the experts,
00:10:45.920 that they're taking action
00:10:47.340 in accordance with
00:10:48.520 some kind of scientific
00:10:49.540 understanding of the situation.
00:10:51.500 Of course,
00:10:52.100 that ends up being bunk
00:10:53.080 because they lie
00:10:54.200 about all the science,
00:10:55.160 they distort everything,
00:10:56.120 they take everything
00:10:57.520 that Trump says
00:10:58.280 and turn him into an enemy
00:10:59.600 anyway,
00:11:00.100 even though he's going along
00:11:01.100 with so much of this
00:11:02.500 that they turn him
00:11:03.160 into an enemy.
00:11:04.440 But because he's backing this,
00:11:06.180 you see a lot of
00:11:07.240 the conservatives go along.
00:11:08.760 And this is very confusing
00:11:10.100 to me because,
00:11:10.940 you know,
00:11:11.100 there's a couple of
00:11:12.040 fire breaks
00:11:13.220 that you hope
00:11:13.820 really stand in the way
00:11:14.920 of this kind of tyranny.
00:11:16.380 But for me,
00:11:17.040 I thought at least
00:11:18.200 conservatives would
00:11:19.560 buck at the religious stuff,
00:11:21.660 right?
00:11:21.880 We're shutting down
00:11:22.660 your churches.
00:11:23.700 If there's one thing
00:11:24.700 you're supposed to care about
00:11:26.020 as some kind of
00:11:27.220 religious conservative,
00:11:28.600 it's this freedom.
00:11:30.400 And there's just,
00:11:31.600 you know,
00:11:31.860 no interest,
00:11:32.600 no action taken,
00:11:33.500 no significant pushback.
00:11:35.500 I imagine it's a libertarian,
00:11:37.860 you know,
00:11:38.280 slightly different,
00:11:39.340 but you're coming
00:11:40.020 from a similar place
00:11:40.940 of just watching
00:11:41.940 so many of the people.
00:11:42.900 And you point this out
00:11:43.580 in your piece,
00:11:44.500 how much the fact
00:11:45.520 that libertarianism
00:11:47.100 had these established voices,
00:11:49.040 had almost an industry
00:11:50.240 built around it,
00:11:51.520 a libertarian ink,
00:11:52.940 if you will,
00:11:53.900 it had a very similar
00:11:55.120 situation where
00:11:56.600 no one can say too much
00:11:57.960 because they can't get
00:11:58.620 censored off of YouTube.
00:11:59.500 It's important to make sure
00:12:00.260 the dollars keep flowing.
00:12:01.420 You have to be,
00:12:02.580 just be very careful
00:12:03.480 about the things that you say.
00:12:04.760 And so everyone
00:12:05.380 just kind of freezes in place
00:12:06.660 in hopes no one notices
00:12:07.680 that in the moment
00:12:08.680 they're supposed
00:12:09.080 to be standing tall,
00:12:10.280 they didn't say a word.
00:12:13.260 Yeah, your point
00:12:14.540 about YouTube is funny
00:12:16.200 because it's a little bit
00:12:18.200 of a window
00:12:18.640 into the careerism, right?
00:12:19.940 You make libertarianism
00:12:21.040 your career
00:12:21.600 and suddenly you have
00:12:22.400 to preserve your career
00:12:23.200 more than anything else.
00:12:25.020 And there's a social element,
00:12:26.580 especially if you're in D.C.,
00:12:27.700 you know,
00:12:27.920 you don't want to risk
00:12:30.340 your social networks
00:12:32.380 and libertarians
00:12:34.220 for decades,
00:12:35.840 you know,
00:12:36.060 have always valorized
00:12:38.180 success in the mainstream media
00:12:39.940 as the success
00:12:42.260 of their agenda.
00:12:43.120 So the goal
00:12:43.640 was always to get
00:12:44.420 a New York Times op-ed
00:12:45.440 or, you know,
00:12:46.020 be friends
00:12:46.460 with the Washington Post
00:12:47.360 or, you know,
00:12:49.160 hang out with,
00:12:49.880 you know,
00:12:50.340 top executives
00:12:51.100 of the IMF
00:12:51.800 or whatever.
00:12:52.200 but it was clear
00:12:55.100 after March 2020
00:12:56.660 what the priorities
00:12:57.720 of the regime were
00:13:00.000 and no libertarian
00:13:02.100 wanted to go against them
00:13:03.420 for fear of risking
00:13:05.100 their influence,
00:13:06.500 you know,
00:13:07.320 and their career.
00:13:08.540 And they're all
00:13:08.940 top-down organizations
00:13:10.080 and the word came down
00:13:11.020 very, very quickly
00:13:11.780 from all the top heads
00:13:13.760 of these organizations.
00:13:15.040 Don't disagree
00:13:16.600 with the scientific,
00:13:18.000 as I say,
00:13:18.540 the scientific consensus
00:13:19.620 on this
00:13:20.180 and set this one out.
00:13:21.260 Or my other favorite one
00:13:22.740 was libertarians
00:13:25.600 have a lot of,
00:13:28.320 you know,
00:13:28.640 they seem to have
00:13:29.760 theoretical certainty
00:13:31.920 on all sorts of topics.
00:13:33.960 I mean,
00:13:34.100 there's hardly anybody
00:13:34.880 more dogmatic,
00:13:36.600 but they don't know
00:13:39.320 a whole lot
00:13:39.960 about specific industries
00:13:42.240 or histories
00:13:43.040 or anything like that.
00:13:43.820 And they certainly
00:13:44.160 didn't know anything
00:13:44.720 about infectious disease.
00:13:46.360 So you take a guy
00:13:48.060 like Walter Block
00:13:48.800 who claims to be
00:13:49.780 this anarchist,
00:13:51.180 immediately published
00:13:52.380 an article going,
00:13:53.100 well, you know,
00:13:53.740 giving somebody the flu
00:13:55.060 would be a form of aggression.
00:13:56.860 We're against aggression.
00:13:58.280 We're about
00:13:58.880 the non-aggression principle.
00:14:00.000 And if you're against
00:14:00.520 the non-aggression principle,
00:14:02.360 that means really
00:14:03.820 if you sneeze on somebody
00:14:04.900 and give them a disease,
00:14:05.900 that's kind of a,
00:14:06.680 that's a tort,
00:14:07.640 you know,
00:14:07.840 that's probably a crime
00:14:09.540 and probably you should be jailed,
00:14:10.940 you know.
00:14:11.880 And then later
00:14:12.820 he called for the death penalty
00:14:14.380 for people that
00:14:15.420 refuse the vaccine.
00:14:17.340 So this is just,
00:14:18.760 this blocks out
00:14:19.260 a pretty rough run recently,
00:14:20.960 especially with the showdown
00:14:22.080 with Hopper, right?
00:14:22.820 Like this is pretty,
00:14:23.860 pretty amazing failure.
00:14:25.300 But it began a long time.
00:14:26.700 And then it turned out,
00:14:27.800 you know,
00:14:28.040 you look at his past,
00:14:29.540 you know,
00:14:29.840 it turns out he's been
00:14:30.800 a long time cheerleader
00:14:32.600 for the,
00:14:33.220 for the jailing,
00:14:34.960 30 year solitary confinement
00:14:37.100 for so-called typhoid Mary.
00:14:39.680 You know,
00:14:40.160 he was this Irish immigrant
00:14:41.320 crook
00:14:41.820 who was scapegoated
00:14:42.580 for typhoid in New York,
00:14:43.980 even though thousands
00:14:44.660 of people had it
00:14:45.480 and thousands of people spread it.
00:14:46.480 And it was just an infectious disease
00:14:47.720 like any other
00:14:48.360 that became endemic over time.
00:14:50.080 There was nothing
00:14:50.500 that jailed her,
00:14:51.540 you know.
00:14:53.540 And by the way,
00:14:54.300 she quite often tested negative
00:14:55.720 and positive.
00:14:56.600 And the state wanted
00:14:57.380 to tear out her gallbladder
00:14:58.660 and she refused.
00:15:00.320 So,
00:15:00.740 you know,
00:15:01.020 they put her,
00:15:01.520 they put her in solitary confinement
00:15:02.820 for 30 years
00:15:03.420 because she,
00:15:04.940 because she wanted to,
00:15:05.980 you know,
00:15:06.200 keep cooking,
00:15:07.060 you know,
00:15:07.220 just wanted to be a chef.
00:15:08.660 And Walter Block's like,
00:15:09.540 oh,
00:15:09.620 that's exactly right.
00:15:10.680 That's how you have to do
00:15:11.440 with infectious disease.
00:15:12.680 You know,
00:15:12.820 this is an anarchist talking.
00:15:15.140 So,
00:15:15.700 there's a great deal
00:15:16.920 of ignorance
00:15:17.660 within,
00:15:18.460 even with high,
00:15:20.500 within high theoretical circles
00:15:23.020 of,
00:15:23.560 among the gurus
00:15:24.680 of libertarianism
00:15:25.600 about what they should do
00:15:28.120 and think
00:15:28.980 about the subject
00:15:30.180 of infectious disease.
00:15:31.340 As if,
00:15:33.220 you know,
00:15:33.620 humanity just dealt
00:15:34.900 with infectious disease
00:15:35.900 for the very first time
00:15:36.820 in March 2020
00:15:37.600 and it hadn't been around
00:15:38.700 for a million years
00:15:39.380 previously.
00:15:39.840 you know,
00:15:40.480 previously.
00:15:41.360 So,
00:15:41.920 I mean,
00:15:42.340 the,
00:15:42.520 the ignorance
00:15:43.200 was astounding.
00:15:44.280 Oh,
00:15:44.560 here's the other thing
00:15:45.340 that frustrated me.
00:15:46.060 All it would have taken
00:15:47.120 is for any one
00:15:47.980 of these guru bird brains
00:15:50.000 to have downloaded,
00:15:51.200 you know,
00:15:51.560 virology for dummies
00:15:52.700 from Amazon
00:15:53.280 and spend an evening,
00:15:55.420 you know,
00:15:56.120 discovering,
00:15:56.860 you know,
00:15:57.120 the trade-off
00:15:57.600 between prevalence
00:15:59.080 and severity
00:16:00.260 subject to latency
00:16:01.220 and other basic concepts
00:16:02.560 or natural immunity,
00:16:04.180 for example.
00:16:04.940 It's not always the case
00:16:06.380 that exposure
00:16:06.920 to infectious disease
00:16:07.860 is a negative externality.
00:16:09.260 It could be a positive
00:16:10.080 externality,
00:16:10.780 for God's sake.
00:16:12.020 The other thing
00:16:13.040 that you see,
00:16:14.680 you saw being thrown around
00:16:15.960 in these high theoretical circles
00:16:17.840 was the,
00:16:18.820 the principle of,
00:16:22.120 you know,
00:16:22.480 of the so-called
00:16:23.900 precautionary principle.
00:16:25.080 Well,
00:16:25.340 we don't know what it is.
00:16:27.240 We don't know exactly
00:16:28.640 what this disease is.
00:16:29.920 So,
00:16:30.240 therefore,
00:16:31.140 we need to immediately
00:16:32.520 impose totalitarianism
00:16:34.020 just in case it's bad.
00:16:36.480 Well,
00:16:37.040 but the precautionary principle
00:16:38.100 actually applies
00:16:39.280 the other direction.
00:16:39.940 You don't want to impose
00:16:40.720 totalitarianism
00:16:41.920 unless you know for sure
00:16:44.380 what it is you're doing
00:16:45.700 and even then,
00:16:46.480 probably not.
00:16:47.380 But nonetheless,
00:16:48.680 I mean,
00:16:48.860 they kept invoking
00:16:49.540 all these high theoretical ideas
00:16:51.120 to justify their acquiescence
00:16:52.920 to,
00:16:53.380 you know,
00:16:53.720 regime narratives
00:16:54.680 and priorities,
00:16:55.260 even though they were
00:16:55.880 obviously fake
00:16:56.800 for anybody who wanted
00:16:57.540 to spend 10 minutes
00:16:58.640 reading the literature,
00:17:00.120 but they can't even do that.
00:17:01.500 Isn't this a dangerous,
00:17:04.120 so,
00:17:04.580 you know,
00:17:04.840 one of the things
00:17:05.520 that I harp on
00:17:06.480 and I'm sure,
00:17:07.780 you know,
00:17:08.140 you having laid out
00:17:09.500 this article,
00:17:10.020 you're very aware of
00:17:11.200 is the obsession
00:17:12.940 with ideology itself
00:17:14.320 and the fact that
00:17:16.340 so few libertarians,
00:17:18.080 you know,
00:17:18.180 this is one of the reasons
00:17:18.740 I like Hoppe
00:17:19.380 because he's familiar
00:17:20.760 with the juvenile,
00:17:21.740 he's,
00:17:22.120 you know,
00:17:22.640 he pulls extensively,
00:17:24.100 so he has an accurate
00:17:25.400 understanding of power.
00:17:26.780 He has a metaphysics
00:17:27.520 of power
00:17:28.000 that just is not present
00:17:29.660 in,
00:17:30.120 in,
00:17:30.500 in popular libertarian
00:17:32.580 understanding.
00:17:32.720 You need to say
00:17:33.200 that he reads books.
00:17:34.520 That's a fascinating point.
00:17:36.700 It does help.
00:17:38.260 It's,
00:17:38.800 you can get more
00:17:39.560 from books than memes
00:17:40.480 actually,
00:17:40.920 as it turns out.
00:17:41.840 It,
00:17:42.040 it turns out,
00:17:42.940 but,
00:17:43.100 but,
00:17:43.240 but what I mean there
00:17:44.660 is that,
00:17:45.800 you know,
00:17:46.160 when power came knocking,
00:17:47.580 it turns out
00:17:48.560 that disembodied.
00:17:50.200 When I found out
00:17:51.220 my friend got a great deal
00:17:52.600 on a designer dress
00:17:53.440 from Winners,
00:17:54.240 I started wondering,
00:17:55.880 is every fabulous item
00:17:57.420 I see from Winners?
00:17:59.020 Like that woman over there
00:18:00.300 with the Italian leather handbag.
00:18:01.960 Is that from Winners?
00:18:03.160 Ooh,
00:18:03.780 or that beautiful silk skirt.
00:18:05.700 Did she pay full price?
00:18:06.920 Or those suede sneakers?
00:18:08.500 Or that luggage?
00:18:09.580 Or that trench?
00:18:10.720 Those jeans?
00:18:11.420 That jacket?
00:18:12.160 Those heels?
00:18:13.020 Is anyone paying full price
00:18:14.740 for anything?
00:18:15.980 Stop wondering.
00:18:17.260 Start winning.
00:18:18.180 Winners.
00:18:18.760 Find fabulous for less.
00:18:22.700 Ideology just did not,
00:18:24.460 was not sufficient.
00:18:25.840 And,
00:18:25.920 and,
00:18:26.220 and I think that that is,
00:18:27.420 something that is,
00:18:28.780 is kind of critical
00:18:29.600 to the libertarian axis
00:18:31.820 of organization
00:18:32.620 because so much of it
00:18:34.120 is invested in the idea
00:18:35.280 that a shared ideology
00:18:37.340 is critical.
00:18:38.600 You know,
00:18:38.780 you yourself point out
00:18:39.640 repeatedly that just,
00:18:41.100 so much of the libertarian
00:18:42.580 commentary
00:18:43.000 is just unfamiliar
00:18:44.040 with a large amount
00:18:45.120 of the body of,
00:18:46.140 of what's been laid out there.
00:18:47.760 But even then,
00:18:48.740 it feels like there,
00:18:49.660 there's just,
00:18:50.300 there's something missing
00:18:51.360 inside a certain aspect,
00:18:53.540 at least of some
00:18:54.340 libertarian analysis
00:18:55.360 that just ignores
00:18:56.660 power and social organization
00:18:59.020 and just goes directly
00:19:00.580 to this,
00:19:01.220 well,
00:19:01.480 at least we all agree,
00:19:02.680 believe in freedom.
00:19:03.520 And it just seems like that,
00:19:04.980 you know,
00:19:05.340 that falls apart so quickly
00:19:06.800 when actual power
00:19:08.180 comes knocking.
00:19:09.300 Well,
00:19:09.400 you're right to isolate this.
00:19:10.540 And I recommend your book
00:19:11.460 highly to,
00:19:12.080 to anyone or everyone
00:19:13.260 to understand
00:19:13.880 the way power works.
00:19:16.360 It's not the case
00:19:17.280 that power is always
00:19:18.200 the FBI knocking
00:19:19.560 on your door
00:19:20.160 and telling you
00:19:23.160 to stop smoking pot
00:19:23.980 or whatever the thing
00:19:24.600 is the libertarians imagine.
00:19:26.120 I mean,
00:19:26.340 power takes many forms
00:19:28.620 and it's,
00:19:30.040 it quite often
00:19:30.900 when it,
00:19:31.340 when it becomes totalitarian,
00:19:32.740 it means it involves
00:19:33.440 the totality of society,
00:19:34.800 meaning media,
00:19:36.020 all levels of government.
00:19:37.180 You've got your red guard,
00:19:38.120 the equivalent of the red guard
00:19:39.140 as your neighbor.
00:19:40.300 And so,
00:19:40.700 you know,
00:19:41.220 totalitarianism is,
00:19:42.820 is all inclusive.
00:19:44.060 It's all around you.
00:19:45.460 And,
00:19:46.000 and it takes,
00:19:46.780 like a lot,
00:19:47.420 a lot of libertarians
00:19:48.220 couldn't even figure out
00:19:49.260 whether and to what extent
00:19:50.400 it was an exercise of power
00:19:51.780 for your boss
00:19:52.460 to come to you and say,
00:19:53.180 I want you to get a vaccine
00:19:54.160 or you're going to get fired.
00:19:55.300 They're like,
00:19:55.620 well,
00:19:56.420 I don't know.
00:19:57.940 You can always get another job,
00:19:59.060 right?
00:20:00.240 You know,
00:20:00.480 isn't that an exercise
00:20:01.300 of private enterprise?
00:20:02.180 You know,
00:20:02.300 forget the fact
00:20:03.000 that these vaccines
00:20:04.340 never had any,
00:20:05.340 they're all indemnified
00:20:06.240 against harm.
00:20:06.860 So who's going to be responsible
00:20:07.860 if you get,
00:20:08.380 if you die from it?
00:20:09.180 You know,
00:20:09.660 that's a serious question.
00:20:12.320 This is not,
00:20:13.000 this is not private,
00:20:14.380 private property rights.
00:20:15.740 So you're right.
00:20:16.600 Libertarians have a very,
00:20:17.940 childish understanding
00:20:20.280 of what power is.
00:20:22.200 Whereas in fact,
00:20:23.340 it always unfolds
00:20:25.000 in this sort of
00:20:25.640 multidimensional way,
00:20:28.580 you know,
00:20:28.840 that involves large corporations
00:20:30.320 for sure,
00:20:32.320 big media,
00:20:33.780 you know,
00:20:34.060 in this case,
00:20:34.920 big tech,
00:20:35.540 the doctors,
00:20:36.500 you know,
00:20:36.680 I've described,
00:20:37.560 I don't know
00:20:37.920 if you've read my article
00:20:39.080 about this,
00:20:39.560 but I described power
00:20:40.680 as taking,
00:20:41.880 there's three big levels
00:20:43.000 of the state.
00:20:43.740 There's the deep state,
00:20:44.660 which we think of
00:20:45.400 as being the intelligence agencies,
00:20:46.740 which we don't have any access.
00:20:49.340 The middle state,
00:20:49.940 which is the civilian bureaucracies,
00:20:52.160 Department of Labor,
00:20:52.860 Department of Agriculture,
00:20:54.040 and all the things
00:20:54.580 you think of
00:20:55.200 as being the bureaucracy.
00:20:56.240 And then you've got
00:20:56.820 the shallow state,
00:20:57.600 which is the consumer-facing voice
00:20:59.940 for the middle state
00:21:00.720 and the deep state,
00:21:01.500 which is,
00:21:02.080 you know,
00:21:03.080 the retailers,
00:21:04.880 your doctor,
00:21:06.260 the CBS,
00:21:07.440 you know,
00:21:07.620 it's Amazon,
00:21:08.280 it's Netflix,
00:21:12.060 and so on.
00:21:12.540 So that's the shallow state.
00:21:14.620 And libertarians
00:21:15.600 have no conception
00:21:17.860 of the complexity
00:21:18.640 of power,
00:21:20.560 even though,
00:21:21.920 as you point out
00:21:22.760 in your book,
00:21:23.120 it's been rising up
00:21:24.000 for 100 years,
00:21:25.200 you know,
00:21:26.400 and it's all around us.
00:21:27.520 And we've seen
00:21:28.280 the exercise
00:21:28.940 of this,
00:21:30.200 precisely this kind
00:21:31.160 of power
00:21:31.620 throughout the course
00:21:33.800 of the 20th century.
00:21:34.680 Well,
00:21:36.220 like I said,
00:21:36.700 what I appreciated
00:21:37.320 about your article
00:21:38.260 is it's certainly
00:21:39.180 focused heavily
00:21:40.200 on the pandemic itself,
00:21:41.460 but it also touched
00:21:42.600 on three big issues
00:21:44.680 that I feel like
00:21:46.180 libertarianism
00:21:47.280 in general
00:21:48.260 has not addressed
00:21:49.220 and you had the courage
00:21:49.920 to kind of face those.
00:21:51.300 And so I want to dive
00:21:52.520 into each one
00:21:53.180 of those pillars
00:21:53.680 because I think
00:21:54.700 you were willing
00:21:55.500 to address those
00:21:56.120 in a way
00:21:56.400 that we don't normally see.
00:21:57.660 But before we get to that,
00:21:58.480 guys,
00:21:59.100 let me tell you
00:21:59.780 a little bit
00:22:00.220 about Magic Spoon.
00:22:01.120 Hey, guys,
00:22:01.640 as a kid,
00:22:02.220 we all loved eating cereal,
00:22:03.840 but as adults,
00:22:04.680 we don't want
00:22:05.280 all the sugar
00:22:05.920 that those cereals
00:22:06.760 come with
00:22:07.440 and most cereals
00:22:08.440 don't give you
00:22:09.020 the protein
00:22:09.520 that you need.
00:22:10.720 That's why I'm glad
00:22:11.680 I found Magic Spoon.
00:22:13.240 It's like a nostalgic,
00:22:14.540 delicious cereal
00:22:15.340 that tastes
00:22:16.160 like my childhood favorites,
00:22:17.760 but without the sugar
00:22:18.760 and with a ton of protein.
00:22:20.480 And if you're already
00:22:21.300 a Magic Spoon fan,
00:22:22.460 then I've got great news.
00:22:24.100 Magic Spoon has turned
00:22:25.100 their super popular cereal
00:22:26.640 into high-protein treats
00:22:28.280 that are light,
00:22:29.360 crispy,
00:22:29.740 and taste just like
00:22:30.780 those classic
00:22:31.640 crunchy cereal bars.
00:22:33.280 They're great after,
00:22:34.240 Jim's snack.
00:22:35.220 They're full of protein.
00:22:36.360 They're already
00:22:36.920 one of my favorite things
00:22:37.840 to grab on the go.
00:22:38.760 Every serving of
00:22:39.520 Magic Spoon cereal
00:22:40.320 has 13 grams of protein,
00:22:42.320 zero grams of sugar,
00:22:43.360 and four grams of net carbs,
00:22:44.980 so you can feel good
00:22:45.960 about what you're eating.
00:22:47.160 They've got flavors
00:22:47.840 like fruity and cocoa,
00:22:49.180 but peanut butter
00:22:49.660 is my favorite.
00:22:50.560 Magic Spoon's brand new treats
00:22:52.120 are crispy,
00:22:53.000 crunchy,
00:22:53.620 airy,
00:22:54.020 and an easy way
00:22:54.960 to get 11 grams
00:22:55.780 of protein on the go.
00:22:57.200 And for the first time ever,
00:22:58.520 Magic Spoon treats
00:22:59.260 are available in grocery stores
00:23:00.740 with delicious flavors
00:23:02.000 like marshmallow
00:23:02.860 and chocolate peanut butter.
00:23:04.340 So go ahead
00:23:04.760 and get $5 off
00:23:05.800 your next order
00:23:06.620 at magicspoon.com
00:23:08.400 slash Oren
00:23:09.440 or look for Magic Spoon
00:23:10.920 in your nearest grocery store.
00:23:12.660 That's magicspoon.com
00:23:14.440 slash Oren
00:23:15.320 for $5 off.
00:23:17.900 So one of the things
00:23:19.120 that you address
00:23:19.920 and you point out
00:23:21.100 that much of the populist energy
00:23:22.980 behind Trump itself
00:23:24.380 brings a lot of opposition
00:23:26.380 to what are many
00:23:27.920 classically libertarian points,
00:23:29.740 and obviously the Democrats
00:23:30.720 are even worse
00:23:31.600 on these issues.
00:23:32.660 So many libertarians
00:23:33.960 finding no real home
00:23:35.980 in much of the mainstream
00:23:37.800 at the moment,
00:23:38.540 which is nothing new.
00:23:40.740 But the free trade issue
00:23:43.680 is one that has gotten
00:23:45.060 a lot of attention
00:23:45.880 for a couple of reasons.
00:23:48.280 Obviously,
00:23:49.280 a lot of people
00:23:49.960 are looking at the jobs
00:23:51.860 that have been hollowed out.
00:23:53.300 The creative destruction
00:23:54.240 has not panned out
00:23:55.220 to the benefit
00:23:56.080 of most of America,
00:23:57.680 especially middle America,
00:23:58.740 the way that they were promised.
00:24:00.720 When we look at what happened
00:24:01.880 with the pandemic,
00:24:02.880 we quickly realize that,
00:24:04.460 oh, we don't make
00:24:05.140 a lot of things
00:24:05.760 like antibiotics
00:24:06.560 or critical medical equipment,
00:24:08.300 and the people
00:24:08.940 who do make them
00:24:09.660 are now kind of enemies
00:24:11.900 who maybe were involved
00:24:13.820 in creating this,
00:24:14.600 though maybe we created it
00:24:15.580 over there,
00:24:16.020 but whatever.
00:24:16.680 The point being,
00:24:18.040 the possibility
00:24:19.140 of hostile powers
00:24:19.940 being in control
00:24:20.920 of your supply chain
00:24:21.920 became very clear.
00:24:23.260 And finally,
00:24:24.860 the danger really
00:24:26.740 of this reliance,
00:24:27.680 I think particularly
00:24:29.300 of kind of this
00:24:30.020 new pager attack
00:24:31.160 that happened
00:24:32.140 with Israel
00:24:32.960 versus Hamas terrorists,
00:24:35.740 a lot of people,
00:24:36.960 some people praising this,
00:24:38.700 some people shocked at it.
00:24:39.900 The point being,
00:24:40.740 when you think about
00:24:41.280 the security of supply lines
00:24:42.880 and how easily
00:24:43.680 the infiltration
00:24:44.360 of a supply line
00:24:45.280 can become a vector
00:24:47.220 for attack,
00:24:48.780 when you're not assuming
00:24:49.700 that kind of all actors
00:24:51.080 and international exchanges
00:24:54.060 are in goodwill
00:24:55.420 and going to be acting
00:24:56.460 on these principles
00:24:57.180 of kind of laissez-faire economics,
00:24:59.820 you end up in a scenario
00:25:00.680 where a lot of people
00:25:01.380 recognize that
00:25:02.380 the shift in free trade
00:25:04.540 may have been
00:25:05.880 more of a trade-off
00:25:07.500 than they had been willing to,
00:25:08.600 especially when it comes
00:25:09.320 to things like national security.
00:25:11.260 So you addressed this
00:25:12.220 a little bit in the article.
00:25:13.440 Could you talk a little bit
00:25:14.120 on that
00:25:14.520 and kind of how that locks in
00:25:16.360 with the libertarian worldview
00:25:17.440 as you understand it?
00:25:18.520 Right after the trade,
00:25:20.220 the decoupling with China
00:25:22.100 had begun
00:25:22.580 before the lockdowns
00:25:23.620 and then immediately
00:25:24.300 following the lockdowns,
00:25:25.380 Jared Kushner went into
00:25:26.400 Trump's office and said,
00:25:27.660 we've got a problem.
00:25:28.840 We don't have enough swabs.
00:25:30.020 We don't have enough masks.
00:25:31.720 We don't have enough
00:25:32.640 of anything really.
00:25:34.280 So we need to get on the phone
00:25:35.880 with Xi Jinping.
00:25:37.140 And so here's the phone.
00:25:38.600 And so they had a conversation
00:25:40.040 and trade with China
00:25:40.940 immediately started.
00:25:42.200 And next thing you know,
00:25:43.740 America is walking around
00:25:45.720 with Chinese-made cloth
00:25:47.280 on their faces
00:25:47.900 and their nose
00:25:49.280 were being swabbed
00:25:50.080 with Chinese-made swabs.
00:25:51.680 And so suddenly China
00:25:52.780 was all over us
00:25:54.580 all over again.
00:25:56.000 So, yeah.
00:25:58.700 So that was,
00:26:00.200 I've hardly seen anybody
00:26:01.880 talk about this,
00:26:02.680 but it restarted
00:26:03.340 the U.S.-China trade relationship,
00:26:05.420 which might have been
00:26:06.340 the whole point
00:26:07.960 or at least one of the points.
00:26:10.280 But, you know,
00:26:11.020 there's other profound things.
00:26:13.220 I think that libertarians
00:26:14.460 have not noticed
00:26:15.320 or if we have noticed
00:26:16.360 that we've just dismissed it
00:26:17.500 as you say,
00:26:18.200 creative destruction.
00:26:19.980 Hey, their wages are cheaper.
00:26:21.980 The world is opening up.
00:26:23.040 Of course,
00:26:23.420 we had to let go
00:26:24.300 of making tools,
00:26:26.740 making furniture,
00:26:27.580 making textiles,
00:26:28.640 making steel,
00:26:30.720 and making clocks,
00:26:32.420 and making pianos,
00:26:33.220 and making, well,
00:26:34.160 basically everything
00:26:35.120 except debt.
00:26:35.840 And I think that there
00:26:41.380 has been a rise
00:26:42.360 of a populist movement
00:26:43.360 that's just said,
00:26:44.280 look, this is too much.
00:26:46.540 We have infrastructure
00:26:48.200 all over the country
00:26:49.260 that's not being used.
00:26:50.480 Our cities have been
00:26:51.300 hollowed out.
00:26:52.380 We have talents.
00:26:53.520 We used to have talents.
00:26:54.460 We used to have skills
00:26:55.020 that are not being deployed.
00:26:55.940 Something's broken here.
00:26:57.780 And the point I was trying
00:26:58.800 to make in the article,
00:26:59.560 and it's a little bit
00:27:00.140 of a complicated point,
00:27:01.820 back when that generation
00:27:03.220 and the post-World War II
00:27:06.360 generation,
00:27:06.900 which was raised up
00:27:07.760 in a lot of smooth
00:27:08.840 hollows in 1932.
00:27:10.420 They swore that after the war
00:27:11.460 they would start free trade up.
00:27:13.540 And in 1946,
00:27:14.700 we got the first glimpses
00:27:16.880 of the GATT Treaty,
00:27:17.880 which prioritized globalism
00:27:20.260 and global trade
00:27:21.040 with zero tariffs.
00:27:23.180 But as part of that,
00:27:24.460 they relied very heavily,
00:27:25.540 and my friend Gottfried Hobbler
00:27:26.720 was the main theorist,
00:27:27.640 who very heavily
00:27:28.220 on the thing called
00:27:28.960 the price-species
00:27:30.640 flow mechanism.
00:27:35.000 And this is way too much
00:27:37.940 in the weeds for this.
00:27:38.780 I urge anybody
00:27:39.500 to read the article.
00:27:40.520 But the idea is that
00:27:41.200 the monetary system
00:27:42.140 would balance out
00:27:43.600 the accounts between nations
00:27:45.580 so that importers
00:27:46.680 would become exporters
00:27:47.500 and exporters
00:27:48.000 would become importers
00:27:48.800 and nobody would lose
00:27:49.640 their industries,
00:27:50.360 but they all benefit
00:27:51.080 from trading with each other.
00:27:53.440 And that relationship
00:27:55.360 had been explained
00:27:57.320 very well
00:27:58.060 all the way back
00:27:59.320 to before Adam Smith's time
00:28:02.600 in the work of David Hume,
00:28:03.780 followed up on by Bastiat,
00:28:05.720 was believed in very strongly
00:28:07.220 through all the trade theorists
00:28:09.100 of the middle of the 20th century.
00:28:10.940 It was all based on
00:28:11.880 the idea of a gold standard.
00:28:14.040 So we're all using
00:28:14.900 more or less
00:28:15.360 the same currencies,
00:28:16.540 and the currency flows
00:28:17.940 themselves
00:28:18.340 would keep the trade
00:28:19.880 from being exploitative,
00:28:22.000 creating more destruction
00:28:23.320 than creation, right?
00:28:25.000 So the creation-destruction idea
00:28:27.640 was tied in
00:28:28.740 with the price-PC flow mechanism
00:28:30.380 so that, you know,
00:28:32.000 as you created,
00:28:32.780 you also destroyed,
00:28:33.660 and as you destroyed,
00:28:34.400 you also created.
00:28:35.280 And it wasn't fundamentally
00:28:36.620 disruptive of the social order.
00:28:38.200 Well, after Nixon
00:28:41.200 pulled us off
00:28:42.380 the gold standard,
00:28:43.440 the U.S. became
00:28:44.080 the world reserve currency
00:28:48.360 and fiat dollars,
00:28:49.460 and it meant forever
00:28:50.460 that other foreign nations
00:28:51.820 would forever
00:28:52.420 accumulate debt.
00:28:53.620 And the mechanism
00:28:56.540 would stop working.
00:28:58.220 So you can look
00:28:59.200 at the trade deficits
00:29:00.280 and see that it's just
00:29:01.460 bleeding an increasing amount
00:29:04.280 of red over time,
00:29:06.000 over decades and decades
00:29:07.340 and decades,
00:29:07.980 until finally,
00:29:09.300 with Trump,
00:29:10.640 people woke up
00:29:11.260 and said,
00:29:11.500 what the hell?
00:29:12.520 You know,
00:29:12.700 are we really,
00:29:13.260 can we really live this way?
00:29:14.840 Not having any industries
00:29:16.320 except,
00:29:16.980 you know,
00:29:18.740 medicine
00:29:19.740 and finance?
00:29:24.340 And that's it?
00:29:25.480 I mean,
00:29:25.760 is this the way
00:29:27.360 a country is supposed to work?
00:29:28.380 Is this the way
00:29:28.620 trade is supposed to work?
00:29:29.460 And Trump said no.
00:29:30.700 Now,
00:29:30.940 I don't think his solutions
00:29:31.880 to this are very good,
00:29:33.660 but to deny
00:29:34.980 that there's a problem
00:29:36.060 is,
00:29:36.520 to my mind,
00:29:38.700 completely crazy.
00:29:39.380 And keep in mind
00:29:40.340 that what this meant was
00:29:41.700 that other foreign central banks
00:29:44.100 could forever accumulate
00:29:45.300 dollar reserves,
00:29:46.060 as has happened in Japan
00:29:47.340 and happened in China,
00:29:48.720 which they use
00:29:50.620 as the capital basis
00:29:51.740 for the expansion
00:29:52.620 of their own industries
00:29:54.000 that would directly compete
00:29:55.160 with the U.S.
00:29:55.720 And they can do this
00:29:56.460 with impunity
00:29:57.740 forever.
00:30:00.600 And China's restarted
00:30:01.700 this again recently.
00:30:02.960 You know,
00:30:03.100 they're targeting
00:30:03.680 all of our new
00:30:04.720 green energy industries
00:30:06.100 and they're going
00:30:06.820 to wipe us out.
00:30:07.840 So as soon as the U.S.
00:30:08.840 starts up and kicks off
00:30:09.880 a new industry,
00:30:11.040 China, you know,
00:30:11.580 pulls out a pair
00:30:12.320 of binoculars
00:30:12.920 and sees what's going on
00:30:14.320 and then redirects
00:30:15.980 its lending patterns
00:30:18.180 to those very industries
00:30:19.860 where they,
00:30:20.580 you know,
00:30:20.860 can deploy labor
00:30:24.380 pennies on the dollar
00:30:25.640 that we can
00:30:26.400 and do a better job
00:30:27.660 and immediately undercut
00:30:28.900 the U.S. in trade
00:30:30.520 and destroy
00:30:31.120 our industries again.
00:30:32.520 You can say,
00:30:32.940 oh, that doesn't matter.
00:30:33.600 It's free trade.
00:30:33.940 It's not free trade.
00:30:34.920 That's my point.
00:30:35.580 It's not free trade.
00:30:36.340 It's not free trade
00:30:37.100 because the price
00:30:38.000 specie flow mechanism
00:30:39.840 is not working.
00:30:42.060 Trump happened
00:30:42.660 to notice this
00:30:43.480 and libertarians
00:30:44.160 just stood in denial.
00:30:45.400 But what it did
00:30:46.240 was it undermined
00:30:47.480 the 70-year regime
00:30:49.780 of free trade,
00:30:50.620 which is really
00:30:51.380 the only great
00:30:53.060 neoliberal accomplishment
00:30:54.380 following World War II.
00:30:56.040 So that pillar
00:30:56.880 of, you know,
00:30:58.520 the libertarian ideology
00:30:59.800 just got wiped out
00:31:02.060 to the point
00:31:03.180 that nobody believes
00:31:03.920 in it anymore.
00:31:04.480 Well, and I think
00:31:05.840 that feeds directly
00:31:07.040 into the second issue
00:31:08.700 you address,
00:31:09.460 which is the border question.
00:31:11.320 But before we get to that,
00:31:12.380 let me tell you guys
00:31:13.060 a little bit about
00:31:13.960 job stacking.
00:31:14.500 Hey guys,
00:31:14.620 let me tell you
00:31:15.000 about today's
00:31:15.740 sponsored job stacking.
00:31:17.680 More paychecks,
00:31:18.680 less hustle,
00:31:19.380 working from home.
00:31:20.240 That's what job stacking
00:31:21.240 is all about.
00:31:22.160 If you're a remote
00:31:22.860 or hybrid worker
00:31:23.600 looking to maximize
00:31:24.360 your earning potential,
00:31:25.780 then consider joining
00:31:26.520 the Job Stacking
00:31:27.280 Mentorship Program.
00:31:28.480 The program is designed
00:31:29.360 by Ralph Halza,
00:31:30.280 the creator of Job Stacking,
00:31:31.820 to help you successfully
00:31:32.780 implement a strategy
00:31:33.680 that will allow you
00:31:34.420 to collect multiple paychecks
00:31:35.840 from different jobs
00:31:36.940 without burning out
00:31:37.940 or getting caught
00:31:38.820 by employers.
00:31:40.080 Job stacking has already
00:31:41.120 helped many people
00:31:42.200 double or even triple
00:31:43.260 their incomes.
00:31:44.220 Luke Hill,
00:31:44.680 a financial analyst
00:31:45.560 living in the UK,
00:31:46.560 has used job stacking
00:31:47.640 to stack three different jobs
00:31:49.040 and went from making
00:31:49.640 $5K a month
00:31:50.620 to $15K a month.
00:31:52.120 But job stacking
00:31:52.780 isn't just about
00:31:53.560 increasing incomes.
00:31:55.020 It's also about
00:31:55.660 helping our guys
00:31:56.580 gain more independence
00:31:57.700 by no longer
00:31:58.580 being a slave to debt
00:31:59.780 or a single employer
00:32:01.020 who hates their values.
00:32:02.260 Andrew Gustafsson,
00:32:03.820 a credit analyst
00:32:04.620 from Australia,
00:32:05.320 is now stacking
00:32:06.400 four salaries
00:32:07.300 which he has used
00:32:08.060 to pay off
00:32:08.560 his personal
00:32:09.100 and student debt
00:32:10.480 and buy a home
00:32:11.520 for his family.
00:32:12.580 If you don't currently
00:32:13.160 have a remote job,
00:32:14.480 no worries.
00:32:15.380 The program is also
00:32:16.320 designed to help you
00:32:17.300 land remote jobs
00:32:18.380 so that you can go ahead
00:32:19.480 and get started.
00:32:20.540 So if you want to
00:32:21.140 double your income
00:32:22.040 and stop relying
00:32:22.800 on a single paycheck
00:32:23.840 from a woke employer,
00:32:25.640 go to
00:32:25.980 JobStacking.com
00:32:27.760 slash start now.
00:32:29.320 That's JobStacking.com
00:32:31.580 slash start now
00:32:32.700 and book a call
00:32:33.700 with Rolf today.
00:32:36.060 So the second issue
00:32:38.000 that you address
00:32:39.220 in the, you know,
00:32:40.640 kind of the three
00:32:41.300 that pillars of
00:32:42.320 or three critical elements
00:32:44.200 of libertarianism
00:32:44.920 that have kind of
00:32:45.340 come under assault
00:32:46.700 is the border question.
00:32:48.720 And I think both
00:32:49.580 the free trade
00:32:50.700 and border question
00:32:51.820 share a similar problem
00:32:55.940 for many libertarians,
00:32:57.480 which is that
00:32:58.300 both of them
00:32:59.540 as libertarians
00:33:00.300 are currently
00:33:00.760 addressing them
00:33:01.320 or at least some
00:33:01.880 there are some libertarians
00:33:03.120 that are, I think,
00:33:04.320 giving better answers
00:33:05.160 to this.
00:33:06.240 But, you know,
00:33:07.480 they're both ignoring
00:33:08.740 the issue of peoples, right?
00:33:11.300 And the fact that
00:33:12.640 so many libertarians
00:33:14.940 basically assumed
00:33:17.060 that the price mechanisms,
00:33:19.520 that currency,
00:33:20.580 that all the things
00:33:21.720 that should be balancing
00:33:22.960 in a system
00:33:23.700 of global trade
00:33:24.580 would do so
00:33:25.720 was because they didn't
00:33:27.160 really think
00:33:28.500 that ultimately
00:33:29.100 people would put thumbs
00:33:30.180 on the scale
00:33:31.320 to really favor
00:33:32.360 their industry,
00:33:33.400 their people,
00:33:34.200 to prioritize
00:33:34.920 specific industries
00:33:35.940 that are necessary
00:33:36.700 for their national security,
00:33:38.020 their way of life.
00:33:39.340 Same thing
00:33:39.880 when it comes to open borders.
00:33:41.140 This idea that
00:33:42.220 human capital
00:33:43.000 was just another form
00:33:44.160 of capital
00:33:44.600 that could flow.
00:33:45.780 You know,
00:33:45.960 liquid capital
00:33:46.480 is the best kind
00:33:47.360 and this is going
00:33:47.880 to create more creation,
00:33:49.420 more production,
00:33:50.200 more efficiency.
00:33:51.400 But what we found
00:33:52.360 is that actually
00:33:53.120 there's a severe cost
00:33:54.840 to this,
00:33:55.300 that people aren't
00:33:56.040 interchangeable,
00:33:56.980 that they're not widgets,
00:33:57.940 that's not just fungible
00:33:59.360 and that it matters
00:34:00.920 to a country,
00:34:02.740 to a nation
00:34:03.260 what people are inside of it.
00:34:05.320 And so the idea
00:34:06.420 that a worker
00:34:07.080 could just come
00:34:08.000 and do their job
00:34:09.340 and fill in labor needs
00:34:11.960 in the market
00:34:12.700 and then they would
00:34:13.460 just return back
00:34:14.220 or whatever,
00:34:14.860 that simply did not work.
00:34:16.240 And especially
00:34:16.580 as you point out
00:34:17.200 in the piece
00:34:17.560 in conjunction
00:34:18.100 with the welfare state,
00:34:19.860 whether libertarians
00:34:21.180 like it or not,
00:34:21.760 that's a reality
00:34:22.640 of many modern
00:34:24.300 Western liberal democracies
00:34:25.760 particularly,
00:34:26.880 that meant
00:34:27.640 that there was
00:34:28.060 just this inability
00:34:29.220 to confront the issue
00:34:30.840 when it came
00:34:31.500 to many libertarians
00:34:33.060 who still want
00:34:33.700 to advocate
00:34:34.200 for kind of
00:34:34.720 an open borders mentality.
00:34:36.520 And the thing
00:34:36.920 I would add to that
00:34:37.860 that the most devastating point
00:34:40.360 against free immigration,
00:34:42.120 which I've never seen
00:34:42.780 it's officially answered
00:34:43.460 by any libertarians
00:34:44.340 but not that they answer anything,
00:34:46.160 is the point
00:34:47.180 that demographics
00:34:48.240 would be used
00:34:49.140 to manipulate voting outcomes.
00:34:50.460 So for decades
00:34:52.420 you had libertarians
00:34:53.300 arguing one side
00:34:54.260 to say,
00:34:54.600 oh, free immigration
00:34:55.220 and other people
00:34:55.740 like Milton Friedman
00:34:56.500 and Frederick Hayek too.
00:35:00.220 Well, Hayek's critique
00:35:01.340 of free immigration
00:35:02.000 is slightly more sophisticated
00:35:03.160 but Milton Friedman
00:35:04.020 would just simply say,
00:35:04.780 well, you can't have
00:35:05.260 free immigration
00:35:05.820 if you have a welfare state
00:35:06.880 to which the typical
00:35:08.320 libertarian response
00:35:09.340 was, well,
00:35:10.740 abolish the welfare state,
00:35:11.900 theoretical problem solved,
00:35:13.000 I don't have to think
00:35:13.480 about it anymore.
00:35:14.560 Okay, that's really interesting
00:35:15.660 but
00:35:16.740 what if
00:35:22.060 your immigration system
00:35:24.300 is being used
00:35:25.020 to create
00:35:25.640 a kind of demographic
00:35:26.680 disruption
00:35:27.540 and a deeply cynical
00:35:30.100 attempt
00:35:30.860 to manipulate
00:35:31.760 political outcomes
00:35:32.880 to keep a single party
00:35:34.280 in power?
00:35:35.440 You know,
00:35:35.640 that is some wicked
00:35:36.960 policy right there
00:35:39.180 and that is
00:35:40.640 what we've seen
00:35:41.680 over the last years
00:35:43.340 and it's so aggressive
00:35:45.200 and so open now.
00:35:46.840 I mean,
00:35:47.040 Elon Musk
00:35:47.680 talks about it
00:35:48.340 all the time.
00:35:49.940 You know,
00:35:50.180 importing voters
00:35:51.560 from all over the world
00:35:52.600 to embed
00:35:53.400 in the domestic population
00:35:54.640 to make,
00:35:55.400 not because
00:35:55.980 you're sure
00:35:57.420 they're going to
00:35:58.120 always vote
00:35:58.600 for, you know,
00:35:59.500 team A
00:36:00.280 versus team B
00:36:01.320 which all you need
00:36:03.680 is a plurality
00:36:04.500 of them
00:36:04.920 with predictable
00:36:06.180 voting patterns
00:36:06.800 but just to make
00:36:08.160 voter fraud
00:36:08.640 more plausible.
00:36:10.780 Right?
00:36:10.840 So, you know,
00:36:12.640 and to manipulate
00:36:13.960 the census
00:36:14.500 and reapportion
00:36:15.540 all the representatives
00:36:17.320 which, you know,
00:36:18.460 the Democrats
00:36:18.900 figured this out
00:36:19.800 and have been
00:36:23.320 deploying this little
00:36:24.100 scheme now
00:36:24.680 for a long time
00:36:25.600 and the libertarians
00:36:28.720 just haven't
00:36:29.520 really noticed,
00:36:30.640 you know,
00:36:31.060 this problem.
00:36:31.960 Well, look,
00:36:32.440 if you're going to
00:36:32.840 live in a democracy,
00:36:34.400 okay,
00:36:34.820 we like to talk
00:36:36.200 about how we live
00:36:36.820 in a democracy
00:36:37.360 that means the people
00:36:38.100 are going to rule
00:36:38.600 themselves
00:36:39.140 or at least have
00:36:40.040 some influence
00:36:40.700 over the shape
00:36:41.240 of the regime,
00:36:42.100 well,
00:36:42.480 that means
00:36:43.180 you're going
00:36:43.880 to have a system
00:36:44.540 whereby,
00:36:45.500 you know,
00:36:45.920 some bad actors
00:36:47.000 are going to
00:36:47.540 manipulate
00:36:48.200 the demographics
00:36:49.640 of the population
00:36:50.600 towards particular
00:36:51.580 political outcomes
00:36:52.820 and that one
00:36:53.540 follows the other
00:36:54.520 unless you've got
00:36:55.320 really good actors
00:36:56.240 and high-minded
00:36:57.400 public servants
00:36:58.680 or whatever
00:36:59.960 but we don't have that.
00:37:02.020 So this kind
00:37:02.580 of manipulation
00:37:03.180 has been going
00:37:03.720 on for a very long time,
00:37:05.180 you know,
00:37:05.500 to the detriment
00:37:06.500 of liberty.
00:37:08.040 I mean,
00:37:08.280 years ago
00:37:08.840 somebody asked me
00:37:09.800 who favored
00:37:10.960 immigration restrictions
00:37:11.960 at a time
00:37:12.420 when I was all
00:37:12.880 for open borders
00:37:13.580 very naively,
00:37:14.380 he said,
00:37:14.580 do you think
00:37:15.060 that inviting
00:37:17.080 tens of millions
00:37:18.360 of immigrants
00:37:20.600 from far-flung places
00:37:21.680 all over the world,
00:37:22.900 you know,
00:37:23.220 say over the course
00:37:24.040 of a couple of years
00:37:24.920 would on net
00:37:26.340 result in greater
00:37:27.660 or less liberty
00:37:28.580 for Americans?
00:37:29.740 and I was really
00:37:31.640 stunned by the question
00:37:32.680 and instead of
00:37:33.840 dealing with it
00:37:34.320 I just like
00:37:34.980 pretended it didn't happen,
00:37:36.300 right?
00:37:36.920 But now we know,
00:37:38.440 we know exactly
00:37:39.240 and not only do we,
00:37:40.600 not only do we know
00:37:41.580 it's an accident,
00:37:44.120 we know that
00:37:45.200 they're doing this
00:37:46.080 to us on purpose,
00:37:48.100 that's the goal
00:37:49.160 and not only that,
00:37:53.360 we further know
00:37:54.420 that the higher reaches
00:37:55.840 of commercial society,
00:37:57.480 the thing we're supposed
00:37:58.220 to love,
00:37:59.200 is fully on board
00:38:00.480 with this.
00:38:02.060 Yeah, absolutely,
00:38:02.640 which goes right
00:38:03.840 into your third point
00:38:04.920 in the piece,
00:38:06.120 which is libertarians,
00:38:07.980 much like conservatives,
00:38:09.160 believe that big business
00:38:10.180 was at least
00:38:10.820 to some degree
00:38:11.460 their friend, right?
00:38:12.440 Like that this was an ally,
00:38:14.440 maybe it made mistakes,
00:38:15.480 maybe it cozied up
00:38:16.700 to the state
00:38:17.260 or had monopolistic practices
00:38:18.980 that you prefer,
00:38:20.300 but ultimately
00:38:21.000 these are capitalists,
00:38:22.780 they're on the side
00:38:23.640 of this process
00:38:25.060 and so they're something
00:38:26.840 that you can rely on,
00:38:27.920 but what we found
00:38:29.060 is that actually
00:38:30.520 they're more than happy
00:38:31.660 to buddy up
00:38:33.140 with the state
00:38:34.020 to import workers
00:38:35.300 that will,
00:38:36.480 you know,
00:38:36.720 sure,
00:38:37.340 you know,
00:38:37.580 lower labor costs
00:38:38.580 in the short term,
00:38:39.540 but doing so basically
00:38:40.760 by being subsidized
00:38:42.200 by the government itself.
00:38:43.940 So yeah,
00:38:44.380 they're creating
00:38:45.460 lower labor costs,
00:38:46.920 but by basically
00:38:48.120 just expropriating
00:38:49.840 the wealth
00:38:50.840 of the middle class
00:38:51.800 and filtering it down
00:38:53.140 and filtering it down
00:38:53.160 to subsidize
00:38:54.300 these people
00:38:55.300 who are being
00:38:56.000 introduced
00:38:57.600 to the labor market
00:38:58.820 by corporations
00:38:59.620 that are totally on board
00:39:00.880 with kind of funding
00:39:01.900 this state.
00:39:02.400 And so you see
00:39:02.960 this moment
00:39:04.000 where all of these
00:39:05.060 corporations
00:39:06.280 that many conservatives
00:39:07.400 believe were
00:39:08.180 at least nominally
00:39:09.080 culturally conservative
00:39:10.420 and libertarians
00:39:11.680 believe were economically
00:39:12.800 right wing
00:39:14.000 end up,
00:39:15.000 you know,
00:39:15.440 throwing themselves
00:39:16.480 behind the woke agenda
00:39:17.840 and lockdowns
00:39:19.040 and open borders
00:39:19.820 to get them
00:39:20.360 as many new labors
00:39:21.760 as possible.
00:39:22.440 And we see this
00:39:22.960 in Ohio right now,
00:39:24.220 right?
00:39:24.420 Everyone,
00:39:24.880 the defense for so many
00:39:25.920 on the left
00:39:26.400 or Springfield is,
00:39:27.340 well,
00:39:27.420 these immigrants
00:39:27.820 are reinvigorating
00:39:28.940 the economy
00:39:29.760 of Springfield,
00:39:30.820 Ohio
00:39:31.120 with the,
00:39:32.400 you know,
00:39:32.940 EBT cards
00:39:33.740 that we're giving them
00:39:34.560 to pay for the apartments
00:39:36.500 that they're now pricing
00:39:37.660 out the local workers
00:39:39.360 and local residents with.
00:39:41.320 It's not the exception,
00:39:42.360 it's the rule.
00:39:43.180 I mean,
00:39:43.380 not as immigration
00:39:44.180 would be taking place
00:39:45.100 without such organic
00:39:46.020 welfare state.
00:39:47.840 And yeah,
00:39:49.460 in the case of big business,
00:39:51.000 we might as well
00:39:51.740 plunge into that
00:39:52.420 because I made a point
00:39:53.620 that I think is,
00:39:54.680 is that libertarians
00:39:56.060 need to understand.
00:39:57.440 In the ethos of commerce,
00:39:59.180 the customer is always right.
00:40:00.880 Okay?
00:40:01.880 And that's,
00:40:02.480 we celebrate that.
00:40:03.560 Well,
00:40:03.740 what happens
00:40:04.380 if your,
00:40:05.280 if your,
00:40:05.880 if your main customer base
00:40:07.160 is in fact the government?
00:40:09.820 Well,
00:40:10.220 the customer is also
00:40:11.080 always right.
00:40:12.120 And that's what happened
00:40:13.160 to Amazon.
00:40:13.840 It happened to Microsoft,
00:40:14.900 it happened to Amazon,
00:40:15.820 it happened to,
00:40:16.740 Facebook,
00:40:18.620 it's happened to,
00:40:19.800 to all,
00:40:20.480 all the higher reaches
00:40:21.620 of the fortune 500s.
00:40:23.080 The government's become
00:40:24.220 the,
00:40:24.760 the main supply,
00:40:26.480 purchaser of their services.
00:40:29.220 And that has changed
00:40:30.960 fundamentally political loyalties.
00:40:32.840 We're talking about tens
00:40:33.780 and billions,
00:40:34.640 hundreds of billions of dollars
00:40:35.760 flowing from taxpayers
00:40:37.100 to big business.
00:40:38.400 And,
00:40:39.020 and the loyalties
00:40:39.700 of big business
00:40:40.340 have fundamentally changed.
00:40:41.400 This is different
00:40:41.940 from the 1980s
00:40:42.900 where the Chamber of Commerce
00:40:44.380 was reliably Republican,
00:40:46.480 you know,
00:40:46.720 reliably free,
00:40:47.740 pro-free enterprise.
00:40:49.160 And now that's no longer true.
00:40:51.880 And,
00:40:52.280 and,
00:40:52.660 and I don't know,
00:40:53.560 you know,
00:40:53.820 I don't know what the answer,
00:40:54.780 why I know what the answer is,
00:40:56.140 but,
00:40:56.480 but it's,
00:40:57.320 it's,
00:40:58.460 I kind of hatched
00:41:00.340 a theoretical answer.
00:41:01.300 It's very difficult
00:41:02.200 to have an answer
00:41:02.920 in practice.
00:41:03.840 These cover,
00:41:04.420 these companies have to
00:41:05.440 stop being on the take.
00:41:06.900 And,
00:41:07.440 you know,
00:41:07.780 and people do not
00:41:08.720 understand this either.
00:41:09.600 It's corrupted even advertising.
00:41:11.720 I think I go into this
00:41:12.720 in the piece a little bit,
00:41:13.680 but,
00:41:14.000 but mostly advertising
00:41:15.980 on,
00:41:16.320 on television news at night
00:41:17.680 is,
00:41:18.200 is provided by
00:41:19.700 pharmaceutical companies,
00:41:21.600 you know,
00:41:22.560 who have fully captured
00:41:24.120 the FDA,
00:41:25.040 wiped out
00:41:25.780 and,
00:41:26.240 you know,
00:41:26.520 got them indemnified
00:41:27.740 against selling you
00:41:28.380 liability for harm,
00:41:30.100 living off taxpayer subsidies,
00:41:32.000 cooperating in royalty payments
00:41:33.840 with the NIH
00:41:35.600 as a result of the Bayh-Dole Act
00:41:37.520 in the early 1980s.
00:41:39.600 And,
00:41:40.460 as a result,
00:41:41.800 all these companies
00:41:42.480 are basically,
00:41:44.400 you know,
00:41:44.980 as I say,
00:41:45.660 members of the
00:41:46.600 shallow state machinery.
00:41:48.480 And they're the ones
00:41:49.280 that are advertising
00:41:49.920 on television,
00:41:50.760 which is why,
00:41:52.080 and the,
00:41:52.500 and all the major media
00:41:54.620 is,
00:41:55.400 is now beholden
00:41:56.840 to the pharmaceutical companies,
00:41:58.160 which means
00:41:58.560 that they're beholden
00:41:59.160 to the state.
00:42:00.800 And that's the way
00:42:01.780 the system works.
00:42:02.640 That's why when lockdowns happen,
00:42:04.040 you turn on the TV news,
00:42:05.300 they were telling you
00:42:05.940 to stay home and stay safe
00:42:07.000 and don't go to Thanksgiving dinner
00:42:09.200 and don't go to church.
00:42:10.660 And that singing
00:42:11.160 and singing glories to God
00:42:13.580 only spreads disease, right?
00:42:15.060 I mean,
00:42:15.260 that's how and why
00:42:16.540 all this happened.
00:42:17.160 And that's how power
00:42:17.880 actually works.
00:42:19.220 So big businesses
00:42:19.980 have been thoroughly corrupted.
00:42:21.080 So the old Rothbardian distinction
00:42:24.620 between power and market
00:42:25.660 that he mapped out in 1963
00:42:27.460 becomes extremely muddy,
00:42:29.380 which he began to realize
00:42:30.580 during the Vietnam War.
00:42:31.560 He was like,
00:42:31.880 wait a minute,
00:42:32.760 this whole war
00:42:33.960 is being promoted
00:42:34.680 by the private enterprise
00:42:35.840 that I used to celebrate.
00:42:37.960 You know,
00:42:38.420 that's why he moved
00:42:39.480 to the left
00:42:40.120 because he was so outraged
00:42:41.580 to see the corruption.
00:42:43.180 But that was in the late 1960s,
00:42:45.300 you know,
00:42:45.600 bump forward
00:42:46.320 all these years later.
00:42:48.160 And you've got every,
00:42:50.460 all these,
00:42:51.160 it's not just munitions,
00:42:52.440 but it's pharmaceutical companies,
00:42:54.020 it's digital tech,
00:42:55.160 it's information,
00:42:57.120 technologies
00:42:58.340 and streaming services
00:42:59.520 and everything
00:43:00.360 and everybody's been corrupted
00:43:01.860 by now
00:43:03.500 and put into this
00:43:05.340 this borg
00:43:06.260 of state power.
00:43:08.980 And it's extremely wicked.
00:43:11.840 But libertarians
00:43:13.600 have just somehow failed
00:43:15.060 to really go
00:43:16.800 take the first step
00:43:17.940 and understand
00:43:18.500 the implications of this,
00:43:20.620 which shreds,
00:43:23.160 you know,
00:43:23.500 the simple ideological paradigms
00:43:25.420 of power and market.
00:43:27.540 By the way,
00:43:28.240 I love Murray
00:43:29.300 and it's fascinating
00:43:30.060 to follow his career.
00:43:33.200 Before he died in 1993,
00:43:37.320 he began to raise
00:43:38.480 fundamental questions
00:43:39.360 about all of these issues
00:43:40.900 in an article called
00:43:42.520 Nations by Consent,
00:43:43.660 which I read at the time
00:43:45.180 and I didn't like the article.
00:43:47.360 I was kind of outraged
00:43:48.860 that he would
00:43:49.760 say all these things.
00:43:51.260 But if you go back
00:43:51.940 and read it now,
00:43:52.620 he was completely prescient
00:43:54.760 on all these issues
00:43:55.960 of immigration,
00:43:57.380 about the nature of power,
00:43:59.000 the corruption
00:43:59.460 of private enterprise,
00:44:00.640 the rise of woke ideology,
00:44:03.540 you know,
00:44:03.760 all the demographic points.
00:44:05.100 I don't think he touched on trade
00:44:06.180 because I don't think
00:44:06.720 he was quite ready
00:44:08.100 to take that one on.
00:44:09.100 But I feel sure
00:44:10.420 that if he were around today,
00:44:11.440 I would love
00:44:13.140 to have a discussion
00:44:13.940 with him
00:44:14.280 about the trade issue, too.
00:44:15.420 So he was kind of
00:44:17.580 keeping up with the times
00:44:18.600 in a way
00:44:19.140 that made him unusual
00:44:20.320 among the libertarians.
00:44:22.620 And it's interesting
00:44:23.100 because, you know,
00:44:24.560 I don't know
00:44:25.700 about all the
00:44:26.380 theoreticians out there.
00:44:28.320 I don't know
00:44:28.660 what they're addressing.
00:44:29.420 But I do know
00:44:30.740 just from my travels,
00:44:31.980 from my interactions,
00:44:32.740 that plenty of people,
00:44:34.120 you know,
00:44:34.720 carrying the libertarian banner
00:44:35.960 like Tom Woods
00:44:37.760 and Dave Smith
00:44:39.340 and others,
00:44:40.420 you know,
00:44:40.800 that I've talked about
00:44:41.300 are, you know,
00:44:42.540 they're trying to address this.
00:44:44.520 They are thinking
00:44:44.960 through these issues.
00:44:45.880 These are things
00:44:46.880 that they're trying to square.
00:44:48.120 And at the end
00:44:49.020 of this article,
00:44:50.740 you know,
00:44:51.040 you do seem
00:44:52.540 to still have hope
00:44:53.760 for libertarianism.
00:44:55.880 This is not,
00:44:56.540 even though you're
00:44:57.240 asking big questions
00:44:58.880 and important questions,
00:45:00.360 it does seem
00:45:01.020 that ultimately
00:45:02.040 you do feel like
00:45:02.900 there is a future
00:45:03.820 for libertarianism.
00:45:04.840 And I want to ask you
00:45:05.540 because, you know,
00:45:06.800 I come obviously
00:45:07.800 from a more conservative bent,
00:45:09.340 but there was this moment
00:45:10.660 and I know libertarians
00:45:11.700 hate it when I say this,
00:45:12.680 but this is just how
00:45:13.660 we saw it from the right.
00:45:14.660 So they can, you know,
00:45:15.680 if they don't like it
00:45:16.360 in the comments,
00:45:16.840 they can yell at me.
00:45:17.540 But, you know,
00:45:18.260 there was this understanding
00:45:19.400 when I was kind of
00:45:20.720 a young man
00:45:21.760 listening to guys
00:45:23.020 like Neil Bortz
00:45:23.860 and others on the radio
00:45:24.840 that the conservative movement
00:45:27.580 was going to become libertarian.
00:45:28.880 That that was the way forward,
00:45:30.200 right?
00:45:30.440 That we were going to,
00:45:31.800 we were going to keep
00:45:32.480 a little bit
00:45:32.940 of the conservative understanding,
00:45:34.540 but we were going to have
00:45:35.200 the economic openness.
00:45:37.200 Culturally,
00:45:37.680 it would be a little more
00:45:38.220 live and let live.
00:45:39.340 The government would just
00:45:40.060 get out of everything.
00:45:41.480 And that was the way forward,
00:45:42.740 right?
00:45:42.980 This was what conservatism,
00:45:45.320 what the right would look like
00:45:46.620 moving forward.
00:45:47.560 And I think you,
00:45:48.040 you're kind of addressing this
00:45:49.240 when you're talking about
00:45:49.980 the libertarian moment
00:45:51.140 and how it wasn't seized upon
00:45:52.660 and how it seemed
00:45:53.180 to come apart.
00:45:53.820 And for many of us
00:45:55.900 who had that leaning,
00:45:57.620 we kind of went down
00:45:58.380 a different direction,
00:45:59.380 right?
00:45:59.740 A lot of people call this
00:46:00.800 the neo-reactionary
00:46:02.320 ring of things.
00:46:04.540 Which I,
00:46:05.200 and I know you know this,
00:46:06.740 but I was ferociously
00:46:08.540 against this turn.
00:46:09.840 You know,
00:46:10.280 I think,
00:46:11.040 I think probably a decade ago,
00:46:13.040 you were,
00:46:13.680 you and I would have been
00:46:14.620 very much at odds.
00:46:15.800 And I,
00:46:16.100 and I wrote a book
00:46:17.040 actually about it.
00:46:17.760 It's called,
00:46:18.240 it's called
00:46:19.880 right-wing collectivism,
00:46:22.040 the other threat to liberty.
00:46:23.380 Oh,
00:46:23.560 I didn't know this.
00:46:24.240 Okay.
00:46:24.480 Yeah,
00:46:24.680 no,
00:46:25.000 I mean,
00:46:25.340 I,
00:46:25.540 so I,
00:46:26.080 you know,
00:46:26.340 and I tore into all the thinkers
00:46:28.180 you cite favorably,
00:46:29.740 not to juvenile so much,
00:46:30.880 but I went after Schmidt.
00:46:32.980 Well,
00:46:33.140 he is a libertarian.
00:46:34.260 He just,
00:46:34.620 he's just,
00:46:35.040 you know,
00:46:35.260 he's one that actually
00:46:36.040 understands power.
00:46:36.940 That's,
00:46:37.240 that's his.
00:46:38.000 I went after Schmidt.
00:46:38.780 I went after Demaestra
00:46:39.600 and you got this whole
00:46:40.360 tradition of thought.
00:46:43.840 Okay.
00:46:44.320 So,
00:46:44.760 wow,
00:46:45.160 there's a lot of things
00:46:45.760 I wanted to say about where,
00:46:46.780 so,
00:46:47.220 what I would like to see
00:46:51.400 is a plainer kind
00:46:52.840 of libertarianism
00:46:53.820 devoid of,
00:46:55.620 of rationalistic ideology.
00:46:59.280 And by I say
00:47:00.160 a plainer version,
00:47:01.720 I mean the kind
00:47:03.280 that emerged initially
00:47:04.260 in 1954
00:47:05.120 with an article
00:47:05.860 by Dean Russell
00:47:06.620 that was the very first article
00:47:08.900 in the American press
00:47:10.220 that,
00:47:10.680 that decided to revive
00:47:11.920 the word libertarianism.
00:47:13.200 And what was his point?
00:47:15.660 His point was
00:47:16.860 that before World War II
00:47:18.080 and before the New Deal,
00:47:20.980 people who thought
00:47:22.740 like he did
00:47:23.240 were against welfare,
00:47:24.280 warfare state,
00:47:25.080 they wanted,
00:47:25.660 you know,
00:47:25.880 normal lives,
00:47:26.980 normal people,
00:47:27.640 freedom.
00:47:27.960 He maps out all the points
00:47:29.540 that I think
00:47:30.040 he would agree with.
00:47:31.600 And he said,
00:47:32.520 unfortunately,
00:47:33.180 we used to call ourselves
00:47:34.260 liberals,
00:47:34.860 so now we can't do that
00:47:35.940 because that word
00:47:36.520 has been taken from us.
00:47:37.640 And there had been
00:47:38.740 a long period,
00:47:39.620 like five years,
00:47:40.520 in which everybody
00:47:41.040 was trying to figure out
00:47:41.640 what should we call ourselves,
00:47:42.960 right?
00:47:43.780 People who just champion
00:47:44.820 the rights of families
00:47:45.820 and communities
00:47:46.520 to live and thrive
00:47:47.620 on their own
00:47:48.100 and have normal lives.
00:47:49.320 It's not that complicated.
00:47:50.860 Keep your property,
00:47:52.280 you know,
00:47:52.600 have freedom of movement,
00:47:54.720 be left alone,
00:47:55.820 basically.
00:47:57.480 What should we call ourselves?
00:47:58.660 And there were all kinds
00:47:59.460 of words offered out there.
00:48:02.860 Well, you know,
00:48:03.620 I'm a conservative liberal.
00:48:05.000 I'm a liberal conservative.
00:48:06.320 I'm a, you know,
00:48:06.840 I'm a constitutionalist.
00:48:07.980 I'm a, you know.
00:48:08.620 And so this one guy,
00:48:09.580 Dean Russell,
00:48:10.020 says,
00:48:10.340 well, you know what
00:48:10.720 we really should call ourselves.
00:48:11.940 Let's just take up
00:48:13.220 the old mantle,
00:48:14.180 the old term,
00:48:15.840 which was popular
00:48:16.640 at this point
00:48:18.740 a half century ago
00:48:20.680 called libertarianism.
00:48:23.300 And he mapped out
00:48:24.020 what they believed in.
00:48:24.820 It's all the things
00:48:25.360 I just mentioned,
00:48:26.000 all the things
00:48:26.360 you would agree with.
00:48:27.760 So that's the kind of sense.
00:48:29.400 But then as the decades progressed,
00:48:31.680 suddenly we got
00:48:32.380 ever more rationalism,
00:48:34.040 you know,
00:48:34.200 ever more,
00:48:34.900 of these typologies
00:48:36.320 and these ideological constructions
00:48:40.000 and really a kind of
00:48:41.920 a strange central plan
00:48:43.780 for how we're going
00:48:44.460 to impose liberty
00:48:45.220 on the world,
00:48:46.060 including criminal codes
00:48:48.520 and God knows what else.
00:48:49.720 It was just,
00:48:50.260 it got out of hand
00:48:51.200 at some point.
00:48:52.540 But I would like
00:48:53.240 to recapture
00:48:53.780 that original understanding
00:48:54.880 of the term,
00:48:56.420 which was just
00:48:57.860 as a replacement
00:48:58.540 for liberal
00:48:59.260 as it was commonly used
00:49:02.080 before the New Deal
00:49:03.340 in the early part
00:49:04.720 of the 20th century.
00:49:06.300 So free speech,
00:49:08.340 recognize your property rights,
00:49:09.880 your freedom
00:49:10.300 to raise your family,
00:49:11.520 live and develop
00:49:13.180 within a community structure,
00:49:15.680 a spontaneously ordering society,
00:49:17.860 something not controlled
00:49:18.760 by a central plan,
00:49:19.740 that sort of thing,
00:49:20.360 which I think
00:49:20.820 you agree with entirely.
00:49:22.200 So that's the sense
00:49:23.060 of libertarianism
00:49:23.800 I'd like to personally recapture.
00:49:26.920 You know,
00:49:27.220 Peter Thiel
00:49:27.780 and obviously Hans-Hermann Hoppe
00:49:29.620 have both pointed out
00:49:30.980 that democracy
00:49:32.460 and liberty
00:49:33.240 may not be compatible.
00:49:35.520 Right.
00:49:35.860 Do you,
00:49:36.640 where do you stand on that?
00:49:37.900 Do you think
00:49:38.200 that they have a point there?
00:49:39.360 Well, I mean,
00:49:40.080 you only need to,
00:49:40.860 again,
00:49:41.560 I have to point readers
00:49:42.400 back to your book
00:49:43.000 because you take this apart
00:49:44.360 very carefully.
00:49:45.200 But if you read
00:49:46.600 The Federalist,
00:49:47.260 I mean,
00:49:47.440 these guys did not believe
00:49:48.420 in mass democracy.
00:49:49.460 That's why we have
00:49:50.020 an electoral college.
00:49:51.180 All right?
00:49:51.580 So,
00:49:52.180 and nobody these days
00:49:53.180 even knows,
00:49:53.660 why do we have
00:49:54.000 an electoral college?
00:49:54.740 Well,
00:49:54.860 because otherwise
00:49:55.820 all the urban centers
00:49:57.060 in the country
00:49:57.580 would enact
00:49:59.260 a one-party dictatorship
00:50:00.280 instantly
00:50:00.860 and wipe out,
00:50:02.440 you know,
00:50:03.000 all states' rights
00:50:04.500 and all rural areas
00:50:05.500 and all normal things
00:50:06.940 and the whole world
00:50:07.880 would look like
00:50:08.760 Times Square.
00:50:11.020 Okay?
00:50:11.360 So that's why
00:50:12.120 we have an electoral college.
00:50:13.320 That's also why
00:50:14.540 we had a bicameral Congress
00:50:16.740 where the Senate
00:50:18.040 would represent the state
00:50:19.160 and the Senate
00:50:19.980 was appointed.
00:50:20.640 and the 17th Amendment
00:50:23.140 came along
00:50:23.600 in 1913
00:50:25.060 and blasted that away.
00:50:26.320 So your book
00:50:26.920 goes through this history.
00:50:28.040 The founding fathers
00:50:28.960 were not believers
00:50:31.220 in, you know,
00:50:31.980 whatever you call
00:50:32.500 democracy as such.
00:50:34.660 What they were trying
00:50:35.960 to do
00:50:36.400 was come up
00:50:36.980 with a republic
00:50:39.880 with a federalist structure.
00:50:41.700 And it was a valiant,
00:50:45.520 I think you agree with it,
00:50:46.800 it was a valiant attempt.
00:50:48.300 It was really very beautiful.
00:50:50.160 You know,
00:50:50.340 I like the federalist papers.
00:50:51.680 I also like the
00:50:52.200 anti-federalist papers,
00:50:53.280 by the way.
00:50:53.740 I think they're pretty good too.
00:50:55.480 But the original structure
00:50:56.660 is quite wonderful
00:50:57.200 but it's been blown up
00:50:58.240 by the 16th Amendment,
00:50:59.520 by the 17th Amendment
00:51:00.640 in particular,
00:51:02.000 one,
00:51:02.260 the income tax,
00:51:02.980 the other,
00:51:03.400 the direct election,
00:51:04.380 the senators.
00:51:05.200 So if we can capture
00:51:06.340 that original,
00:51:06.940 and again,
00:51:07.660 I think this comes
00:51:08.460 from your book,
00:51:09.360 we can recapture
00:51:10.500 that original vision
00:51:11.560 Now,
00:51:12.500 if you want to call
00:51:13.140 that democracy,
00:51:14.720 you know,
00:51:15.180 in the broad sense,
00:51:16.500 meaning the people should,
00:51:18.420 the people in a nation
00:51:20.260 should have some kind
00:51:22.580 of stake
00:51:23.560 and judgmental influence
00:51:26.500 over the kind of regime
00:51:27.920 under which they live,
00:51:29.200 that to me is compatible
00:51:30.980 with the liberal vision.
00:51:32.420 And I don't see a problem
00:51:33.520 with that.
00:51:34.400 But this idea
00:51:36.040 of mob rule,
00:51:37.160 you know,
00:51:37.800 of popular vote,
00:51:40.240 of turning the Senate
00:51:43.080 into another version
00:51:43.900 of the House
00:51:44.460 or eliminating
00:51:45.420 the Electoral College
00:51:46.160 and eliminating
00:51:48.060 all those mediating
00:51:49.260 institutional structures,
00:51:51.280 that is intolerable
00:51:53.920 and a prescription
00:51:54.940 for tyranny.
00:51:55.760 No question about it.
00:51:56.740 Well,
00:51:57.720 I think the mixed
00:51:58.360 constitution ultimately
00:52:00.040 relies on awareness
00:52:02.540 of social institutions
00:52:04.880 and spheres of authority
00:52:06.140 that are non-governmental,
00:52:07.500 which, of course,
00:52:08.040 libertarians would be
00:52:09.180 huge fans of.
00:52:10.780 But it does require,
00:52:12.220 think,
00:52:12.480 a level of collectivism
00:52:13.700 that many libertarians
00:52:14.740 are uncomfortable with.
00:52:17.080 You know,
00:52:17.180 in order to oppose the state,
00:52:19.280 it's not the individual
00:52:20.520 that opposes the state.
00:52:21.720 It's other authorities.
00:52:24.880 It's rival social authorities
00:52:26.680 that oppose the state,
00:52:28.080 which is why...
00:52:28.880 Well, it's religions.
00:52:29.420 It's religions, right?
00:52:30.780 Right.
00:52:32.080 And this is an empirical point.
00:52:34.380 Look what happened
00:52:35.060 at COVID.
00:52:35.500 I mean,
00:52:35.680 who resisted
00:52:36.640 the COVID controls?
00:52:38.400 Just ask yourself
00:52:39.160 that question.
00:52:39.880 I mean,
00:52:40.020 it was the Amish,
00:52:41.480 Orthodox Jews,
00:52:43.320 traditionalist Catholics,
00:52:46.160 Mormons,
00:52:47.220 and then later
00:52:48.220 the evangelicals, right?
00:52:50.200 But the secular elites
00:52:51.960 never got around.
00:52:53.600 I mean,
00:52:53.720 they're still masked up.
00:52:56.340 So, you know,
00:52:57.900 these kinds of things
00:52:58.600 are really important.
00:52:59.380 It's also family structures,
00:53:00.960 you know,
00:53:01.140 which is why
00:53:01.780 the COVID-shattered families
00:53:04.600 that said,
00:53:05.040 oh, you know,
00:53:05.660 everybody should get vaccinated.
00:53:07.920 And that led
00:53:08.980 to a lot of divorces
00:53:10.220 and shattering relationships
00:53:12.840 between kids
00:53:13.820 and their parents.
00:53:14.540 You remember
00:53:14.800 Deborah Birx
00:53:15.600 in one press conference
00:53:16.500 said,
00:53:17.220 and now I'm going
00:53:17.960 to make a special appeal
00:53:19.540 to all the young people.
00:53:21.220 You have to help us
00:53:22.280 in this great war
00:53:23.300 against the virus.
00:53:24.660 And the young people said,
00:53:25.500 oh, finally,
00:53:26.000 I've got a mission,
00:53:26.720 you know,
00:53:27.100 screw you,
00:53:27.660 mom and dad.
00:53:30.120 Yeah,
00:53:30.520 the family is extremely important.
00:53:32.320 And libertarianism
00:53:33.780 in its 1970s iteration,
00:53:36.760 60s and 70s,
00:53:37.860 really,
00:53:38.620 never has come to term
00:53:39.760 with the meaning
00:53:40.260 of the family.
00:53:41.180 I mean,
00:53:41.400 they have no idea
00:53:42.420 what to do about kids.
00:53:43.260 There are no kids
00:53:43.780 in Rand's books.
00:53:44.840 Yeah,
00:53:45.060 that's one of my favorite points.
00:53:46.340 There's no kids
00:53:46.820 in a Ayn Rand novel.
00:53:47.520 And now we're dealing
00:53:50.580 with weird crap going on
00:53:52.700 where,
00:53:52.980 you know,
00:53:53.340 government's telling kids
00:53:55.120 to cut off their genitals,
00:53:56.260 you know,
00:53:56.520 and their parents are like,
00:53:57.740 man,
00:53:57.880 I'm not so sure
00:53:58.380 that's right thing.
00:53:59.480 And the state's intervening
00:54:00.860 on behalf
00:54:01.580 of trans rights
00:54:03.760 and taking kids away
00:54:05.360 from their pets
00:54:05.800 is really going on.
00:54:06.900 And this is all happening
00:54:07.680 very,
00:54:08.140 very fast.
00:54:08.860 All right,
00:54:09.120 what's the libertarian answer
00:54:10.100 to that?
00:54:11.900 Well,
00:54:12.320 according to the current
00:54:13.100 libertarian candidate,
00:54:14.260 it seems like he's
00:54:15.340 kind of a fan.
00:54:16.120 When he wants it funded
00:54:17.580 by the government.
00:54:19.580 But,
00:54:20.100 you know,
00:54:21.360 this kind of wacky
00:54:22.560 libertarianism
00:54:23.260 that's out there
00:54:23.900 that denies reality,
00:54:25.480 denies biological reality.
00:54:27.180 No,
00:54:28.080 it's freedom
00:54:29.440 to be able to become
00:54:30.320 a woman
00:54:30.760 or become a man.
00:54:32.180 We're going to all
00:54:32.820 become transhumanoids
00:54:34.080 and live forever.
00:54:35.640 What does that have
00:54:36.480 to do with anything?
00:54:37.400 I mean,
00:54:37.580 this is not consistent
00:54:38.900 with any plain understanding
00:54:40.420 of freedom
00:54:40.980 or liberty
00:54:41.540 that
00:54:42.900 Thomas Jefferson
00:54:46.340 would have recognized.
00:54:48.040 Well,
00:54:48.100 obviously,
00:54:48.700 like I said,
00:54:49.140 I already mentioned
00:54:49.620 a couple of guys
00:54:50.860 that I know
00:54:51.520 from inside
00:54:52.420 the libertarian movement
00:54:53.440 who are noticing
00:54:54.800 as many problems
00:54:55.660 that you're pointing out
00:54:56.560 and trying to find
00:54:57.500 a way forward.
00:54:58.760 And so,
00:54:59.100 do you think ultimately
00:55:00.040 there is a way
00:55:03.300 because this really
00:55:04.740 is the issue
00:55:05.360 and of course,
00:55:05.860 I know you're familiar
00:55:06.560 because we've talked
00:55:07.520 about the book
00:55:08.020 and I appreciate you
00:55:08.760 being so kind
00:55:09.320 about the book.
00:55:10.260 I like that.
00:55:11.160 But,
00:55:11.480 you know,
00:55:13.600 I feel like
00:55:14.840 there is simply
00:55:16.060 a problem,
00:55:16.940 as you point out
00:55:17.440 in the piece too,
00:55:18.380 of just scale.
00:55:19.300 The institutions
00:55:20.140 required to compete
00:55:21.300 politically
00:55:21.860 are the very things
00:55:23.220 that keep you
00:55:23.900 from competing
00:55:24.500 in any real sense.
00:55:25.880 You have to buy in
00:55:26.780 sufficiently into the system
00:55:28.540 in order to
00:55:30.180 actually compete
00:55:31.820 and once you've done that,
00:55:33.080 then the,
00:55:33.840 you know,
00:55:34.340 the structure of the system
00:55:35.640 compels you
00:55:36.560 towards a particular outcome.
00:55:37.920 Is there a way
00:55:38.480 that libertarians
00:55:39.280 can organize
00:55:40.420 without falling
00:55:41.400 into this trap
00:55:42.540 or is this just
00:55:43.940 a symptom
00:55:45.460 of the current system
00:55:46.340 and any ideology,
00:55:47.720 be it conservative,
00:55:48.560 liberal,
00:55:49.180 you know,
00:55:49.540 libertarian,
00:55:50.340 is going to inevitably
00:55:51.540 fall into reinforcing
00:55:53.140 the regime
00:55:53.840 if they try to play
00:55:55.100 that current game?
00:55:56.600 To be clear,
00:55:57.240 I'm really happy
00:55:57.800 to get rid of the word
00:55:58.660 and the hyper-rationalistic
00:56:02.120 ideology too.
00:56:03.100 I don't really think
00:56:03.920 it serves much purpose.
00:56:05.660 In fact,
00:56:06.220 if you look
00:56:06.820 at the structures
00:56:08.180 of libertarianism
00:56:09.160 we know it now,
00:56:10.160 there are really
00:56:10.720 three levels.
00:56:11.520 I mean,
00:56:11.660 there's academic libertarianism,
00:56:13.360 which is by and large
00:56:15.680 utterly and completely
00:56:16.720 useless
00:56:17.700 with the exception
00:56:18.860 of maybe five people
00:56:20.860 and then you've got
00:56:22.680 the professional structure
00:56:24.040 of libertarians
00:56:24.560 that live within
00:56:25.680 non-profits
00:56:26.700 and they're not just useless,
00:56:27.960 they're actually destructive.
00:56:28.880 And then you've got
00:56:31.660 the sort of grassroots
00:56:32.480 like the free state movement
00:56:33.760 and that sort of thing
00:56:34.640 and your podcasting friends
00:56:37.960 and that sort of stuff.
00:56:38.740 These people are living
00:56:39.860 within communities
00:56:40.920 and have developed
00:56:42.120 followings of their own,
00:56:43.740 of normal people
00:56:44.940 who,
00:56:46.300 on particular issues,
00:56:47.720 you know,
00:56:47.980 who are concerned
00:56:48.860 about the future
00:56:49.480 of civilization,
00:56:51.100 packed about what
00:56:52.300 to do about it.
00:56:53.020 They don't want war,
00:56:53.980 they don't want welfare,
00:56:54.920 they don't want to have
00:56:55.400 their communities invaded,
00:56:56.500 they don't want their kids
00:56:57.960 to cutting off their genitals
00:56:59.060 and so on.
00:57:00.320 And these are the people
00:57:02.180 that I think
00:57:02.860 can make a very valuable
00:57:04.260 contribution
00:57:05.000 to rebuilding
00:57:06.720 because they're rebuilding
00:57:07.680 from within their structures
00:57:08.860 or their own communities.
00:57:10.340 You see this taking place
00:57:11.700 in New Hampshire.
00:57:12.680 Yes.
00:57:13.500 All of us,
00:57:14.440 this is one of the reasons
00:57:15.040 I've continued,
00:57:16.780 after dropping off,
00:57:18.280 you know,
00:57:18.620 refusing to go
00:57:19.720 to any other libertarian events,
00:57:21.440 I still like to go
00:57:22.940 to Porkfest
00:57:23.420 because they're real families
00:57:24.900 doing real things
00:57:25.720 and, you know,
00:57:26.420 they're cattle ranchers
00:57:27.680 and soap makers
00:57:28.440 and ice cream people.
00:57:29.320 They're like normal
00:57:29.980 human beings,
00:57:31.120 you know.
00:57:31.940 These,
00:57:32.800 they're not professional
00:57:33.980 codified
00:57:35.500 Cap-El libertarians,
00:57:37.080 you know,
00:57:37.280 and those people
00:57:38.200 can make a really
00:57:39.360 powerful contribution,
00:57:41.120 I think,
00:57:41.700 to the future.
00:57:42.540 And again,
00:57:43.100 whether it's under
00:57:43.680 that name or not,
00:57:45.380 as I say,
00:57:46.160 I don't,
00:57:46.680 I'm kind of sick
00:57:47.240 of the word.
00:57:48.080 I don't even use it anymore
00:57:49.400 because nobody knows
00:57:50.940 really what it means.
00:57:52.460 It's too confusing.
00:57:53.680 It can mean anything,
00:57:54.740 essentially.
00:57:55.540 But I think,
00:57:55.980 I think those people
00:57:56.760 can,
00:57:58.220 and Tom Woods
00:57:58.760 is doing,
00:57:59.320 you know,
00:57:59.580 great work.
00:58:00.060 They're very,
00:58:00.760 they're very good
00:58:02.200 people that,
00:58:03.800 that come out
00:58:04.740 of a libertarian tradition
00:58:05.800 that are doing
00:58:06.360 mighty work.
00:58:07.940 Yeah,
00:58:08.120 Jerry.
00:58:08.460 I would say the same thing
00:58:09.720 about,
00:58:10.060 about the left
00:58:10.800 and the right.
00:58:11.460 I mean,
00:58:11.720 the Brownstone Institute
00:58:13.100 is a funny,
00:58:13.880 and I don't know
00:58:14.660 how much you follow
00:58:15.440 our work,
00:58:15.920 but it's a funny
00:58:16.520 amalgam of people
00:58:17.700 from really all over
00:58:19.180 the place
00:58:19.700 that are really concerned
00:58:21.180 about the rise
00:58:23.080 of this blob,
00:58:24.300 this beast
00:58:24.720 of the Goliath,
00:58:25.560 the head of Hegemon,
00:58:26.840 and how to preserve
00:58:27.620 privacy and liberty
00:58:29.080 and rights
00:58:30.440 and some normal
00:58:32.080 sense of life
00:58:32.880 even in the midst
00:58:34.280 of this grave crisis.
00:58:35.720 And they can come
00:58:36.500 from any,
00:58:37.200 from any direction.
00:58:38.500 I've learned a lot
00:58:39.680 from people from the left,
00:58:40.760 a lot from people
00:58:41.580 from the right.
00:58:42.840 Less so
00:58:43.480 of libertarians
00:58:44.920 simply because
00:58:45.400 they seem to know less.
00:58:47.020 But nonetheless,
00:58:48.100 I think they can be
00:58:49.260 valuable in the future.
00:58:50.160 Yeah,
00:58:51.400 I've had,
00:58:51.900 I believe it was
00:58:53.380 Jeremy Kaufman,
00:58:54.500 who's now famous
00:58:55.520 because of his FBI showdown,
00:58:57.240 but I had him on before.
00:58:59.060 You know,
00:58:59.280 he was super cool.
00:59:01.100 But,
00:59:01.300 you know,
00:59:01.540 we,
00:59:02.620 of course,
00:59:03.740 disagreed on a few things,
00:59:05.600 but we both heavily focused
00:59:07.360 on this idea
00:59:08.300 of the localism
00:59:10.080 controlling the,
00:59:11.460 you know,
00:59:11.740 the sheriff,
00:59:13.080 the local apparatus,
00:59:14.400 the county apparatus,
00:59:15.680 the state apparatus,
00:59:16.940 that great sort,
00:59:19.180 that concentrates people
00:59:20.760 of like mind
00:59:21.520 and like value
00:59:22.280 and allows them
00:59:22.980 to make meaningful connections
00:59:24.300 in the real world
00:59:25.740 and not just keep everything
00:59:27.080 wildly hypothetical
00:59:28.240 in some DC think tank,
00:59:29.740 but actually put it
00:59:30.720 into practice.
00:59:31.700 And once you put things
00:59:32.880 like that on the ground,
00:59:34.220 you quickly find
00:59:35.400 that there's a lot more
00:59:37.220 that connects you
00:59:38.160 and that you can make
00:59:38.960 a lot more
00:59:39.780 real world advancements
00:59:43.000 once you kind of strip away
00:59:44.500 all this theoretical division,
00:59:47.060 all of this abstract.
00:59:48.020 And so I'm with you
00:59:49.880 in that maybe leaving
00:59:52.580 the ideology,
00:59:54.080 understanding that
00:59:54.720 the shared value
00:59:55.480 is more important
00:59:56.240 than the specific ideology
00:59:57.720 and what advancements
00:59:59.120 are there.
00:59:59.580 And when you have
01:00:00.240 the organic community,
01:00:01.120 when you have that,
01:00:02.420 then you can say,
01:00:03.320 what are the needs
01:00:04.200 of this community?
01:00:05.440 What works for these people
01:00:06.940 that we're serving?
01:00:08.340 And,
01:00:08.600 you know,
01:00:09.260 because they have
01:00:09.880 that aligned vision
01:00:10.660 and those aligned values,
01:00:12.020 it will resemble
01:00:13.400 aspects of the ideology,
01:00:15.380 but it will be grounded
01:00:16.580 in a real existence
01:00:18.600 rather than being
01:00:19.720 something that you're
01:00:20.500 just trying to,
01:00:21.420 you know,
01:00:22.120 fund with Coke dollars
01:00:23.940 or something.
01:00:24.800 And so that's,
01:00:25.540 yeah,
01:00:25.720 I think that's a radical change.
01:00:27.440 I can tell you,
01:00:28.260 like,
01:00:28.380 I just,
01:00:28.900 I'm coming out
01:00:30.060 of a three-day retreat
01:00:31.680 that we hold
01:00:32.120 for Brownstone scholars
01:00:33.120 and fellows
01:00:33.680 that we meet in a hotel
01:00:34.960 and just discuss issues,
01:00:36.580 you know,
01:00:36.820 whether it's doctors,
01:00:37.860 it's lawyers,
01:00:38.460 scientists,
01:00:39.800 economists,
01:00:40.620 it's just,
01:00:41.260 it's interdisciplinary,
01:00:42.660 historians,
01:00:43.300 essayists,
01:00:44.260 journalists,
01:00:44.800 you know,
01:00:44.960 all kinds of people.
01:00:46.080 And we just,
01:00:46.860 there's 40 of us
01:00:47.740 that meet
01:00:48.060 and we just talk
01:00:48.800 for three days
01:00:49.380 about all these issues.
01:00:50.720 And I tell you,
01:00:51.280 there's one thing
01:00:51.660 we don't talk about
01:00:52.420 as political ideology
01:00:53.700 because it's boring.
01:00:55.160 It's just boring.
01:00:57.160 If you want to,
01:00:59.800 this analogy
01:01:01.140 will make sense
01:01:01.820 for some people,
01:01:02.560 not others,
01:01:03.100 but if you want
01:01:04.200 to think about ideology
01:01:05.360 as being like
01:01:06.600 the scales
01:01:07.200 and arpeggios
01:01:07.960 that you learn
01:01:08.880 when you're practicing piano
01:01:11.440 before you're actually
01:01:12.320 playing music,
01:01:13.800 you know,
01:01:14.700 that can be very useful,
01:01:15.780 maybe even essential.
01:01:17.100 But at some point
01:01:17.680 you have to start
01:01:18.060 playing music.
01:01:19.600 And if you had
01:01:20.380 a piano competition
01:01:21.300 where everybody got up
01:01:22.120 and started to play
01:01:23.120 scales and arpeggios,
01:01:24.180 you might think
01:01:24.640 it was ridiculous.
01:01:26.620 This is preposterous.
01:01:28.040 This isn't,
01:01:28.540 this isn't a concert.
01:01:30.120 This isn't a piano competition.
01:01:32.200 This is not even music.
01:01:33.520 This is just silliness.
01:01:34.960 Well, unfortunately,
01:01:36.340 libertarians got stuck
01:01:37.420 for decades
01:01:37.940 playing arpeggios
01:01:39.280 and scales
01:01:39.880 and never got around
01:01:41.060 to playing the music,
01:01:42.140 right?
01:01:42.880 So, you know,
01:01:43.960 to organize things,
01:01:44.940 if you want to
01:01:45.340 into a serious
01:01:46.000 intellectual life,
01:01:46.900 you have to ask yourself,
01:01:47.980 you know,
01:01:48.160 what music are you playing?
01:01:49.980 Is it beautiful?
01:01:51.360 How's it going to go together?
01:01:52.740 You know,
01:01:52.860 how's it going to present
01:01:53.600 itself to the world?
01:01:55.660 That,
01:01:56.020 it's the music
01:01:56.560 that we need to,
01:01:57.920 that should,
01:01:58.420 that will inspire us,
01:01:59.840 not scales.
01:02:01.400 I think that's well put.
01:02:02.660 That's a great place
01:02:03.280 to end it.
01:02:03.820 All right,
01:02:04.120 so we have a question
01:02:05.520 or two from the audience.
01:02:06.760 Before we get there,
01:02:07.300 Jeffrey,
01:02:07.940 where can people
01:02:08.540 find your work?
01:02:10.340 I post on Exelot.
01:02:12.740 It's my favorite
01:02:13.620 temporarily
01:02:14.820 quasi-free platform.
01:02:16.700 We'll see if it survives
01:02:18.140 a Kamala presidency.
01:02:20.740 And then otherwise,
01:02:22.460 I write for
01:02:23.580 the Epoch Times
01:02:24.240 every day,
01:02:25.300 which is a great venue.
01:02:27.160 I write there every day.
01:02:28.820 And then I write
01:02:30.140 for and organize
01:02:31.700 and edit
01:02:32.420 brownstone.org.
01:02:33.940 So my contact information
01:02:36.080 is on all those locations.
01:02:38.280 Excellent.
01:02:38.780 Guys,
01:02:39.060 make sure to read the piece.
01:02:40.060 Like I said,
01:02:40.480 we only really brushed over
01:02:42.260 some parts of it,
01:02:44.140 but I felt,
01:02:44.640 like I said,
01:02:45.140 I wanted to talk to Jeffrey
01:02:46.180 because I thought it was
01:02:46.920 so honest and in-depth
01:02:48.660 and willing to
01:02:50.360 look at issues
01:02:52.180 that you just don't see
01:02:53.280 libertarians usually,
01:02:54.320 you know,
01:02:55.040 actually address.
01:02:55.780 So I think you should
01:02:57.140 check out that
01:02:57.700 along with the rest
01:02:58.340 of his work.
01:02:59.120 Let's see here.
01:02:59.960 We've got Creeper Weirdo
01:03:01.240 says,
01:03:01.820 but John Sossel said
01:03:02.700 that libertarian candidates
01:03:03.760 want to leave you alone.
01:03:04.840 Doesn't that sound nice?
01:03:07.180 Yeah,
01:03:07.620 obviously the catchphrase,
01:03:09.300 you know,
01:03:09.780 I've got the,
01:03:10.980 one of the tweets
01:03:12.060 I've got that kind of went wide
01:03:13.240 is,
01:03:13.620 you know,
01:03:13.800 the team that wants to win
01:03:15.040 always beats the team
01:03:15.820 that wants to be left alone.
01:03:17.420 And it does feel like
01:03:18.280 that's a core,
01:03:19.220 a core problem
01:03:20.340 with libertarianism.
01:03:21.560 You have to win
01:03:22.300 before you get to be left alone.
01:03:23.580 And they often want to
01:03:24.180 skip the winning
01:03:24.720 and just be left alone.
01:03:25.780 Well,
01:03:26.000 I'm glad the libertarian
01:03:26.760 candidates want to leave you alone,
01:03:27.940 but Google doesn't want
01:03:29.680 to leave you alone
01:03:30.240 and neither does Amazon.
01:03:32.720 Neither does,
01:03:33.620 does the main,
01:03:34.500 mainstream media.
01:03:35.860 Neither do the 2.4 million
01:03:38.760 members of the middle state
01:03:40.440 and the uncountable members
01:03:41.720 of deep state employees
01:03:42.820 about which we know
01:03:43.860 absolutely nothing.
01:03:44.700 So we're surrounded
01:03:45.760 by tyrants all over,
01:03:47.640 all over the place.
01:03:49.300 And,
01:03:49.800 and,
01:03:50.280 and these,
01:03:50.920 these slogans
01:03:51.920 just are,
01:03:53.760 are,
01:03:54.140 are,
01:03:54.720 are silly.
01:03:55.780 I mean,
01:03:56.180 this is just,
01:03:57.060 this is just,
01:03:57.740 it's just,
01:03:58.380 it's cartoonish,
01:03:59.560 you know,
01:04:00.320 for a libertarian
01:04:01.280 to run around
01:04:01.820 and say,
01:04:02.040 I don't want to leave you alone.
01:04:02.880 Okay,
01:04:03.120 well,
01:04:03.400 what are you going to do
01:04:03.940 about to all the people
01:04:04.740 who don't want to leave us alone?
01:04:06.200 You know,
01:04:06.580 this is,
01:04:07.080 this is the relevant issue.
01:04:08.160 Absolutely.
01:04:09.120 James Genman says,
01:04:11.560 I'm curious about
01:04:12.440 Jeffrey's thoughts
01:04:13.100 on distributism
01:04:14.220 having been influenced,
01:04:16.180 influential in both
01:04:17.460 Austrian
01:04:18.440 and Catholic
01:04:19.940 traditions.
01:04:21.440 Interesting,
01:04:21.920 because I often wonder
01:04:22.940 what distributists
01:04:24.180 themselves believe
01:04:25.300 about distributism,
01:04:26.360 but do you have
01:04:26.800 any thoughts on that?
01:04:28.160 Well,
01:04:28.420 I will,
01:04:28.760 I'll just tell you
01:04:29.320 my own,
01:04:29.720 my own history
01:04:30.320 with distributivism
01:04:31.360 is,
01:04:31.980 or distributism,
01:04:32.960 whatever it's called,
01:04:33.560 but I read
01:04:34.200 Chesterton and Belllock
01:04:35.940 back in the old days
01:04:36.720 through Bell Estate
01:04:37.300 and all of Chesterton's work
01:04:38.400 and all this kind of stuff
01:04:39.240 and it's superficially
01:04:40.420 compelling,
01:04:42.520 but I,
01:04:43.820 I came to reject it
01:04:44.920 because they didn't seem
01:04:45.860 to have come to terms
01:04:46.980 with the implications
01:04:49.120 of the accumulation
01:04:50.580 of capital
01:04:51.980 and how essential
01:04:53.100 it is for building
01:04:54.640 a complex society
01:04:56.820 and advanced economy
01:04:57.900 and all that kind of stuff.
01:04:59.240 I will say
01:05:00.720 that I have not
01:05:02.960 revisited their works
01:05:04.300 since I've gone
01:05:06.060 through a little bit
01:05:07.040 of a shift
01:05:07.520 in my own thinking
01:05:08.340 and I've been meaning to.
01:05:10.220 I mean,
01:05:10.440 they might have
01:05:11.460 some really interesting
01:05:14.420 insights
01:05:15.000 about where we've headed.
01:05:16.800 Again,
01:05:17.220 I read this,
01:05:18.780 I read their works
01:05:19.460 back in a time
01:05:20.020 when I was convinced
01:05:21.120 that corporate capitalism
01:05:22.540 was just the greatest
01:05:24.020 thing that ever happened
01:05:24.660 to humanity.
01:05:26.140 Now,
01:05:26.740 I've got some doubts.
01:05:28.280 I've even got doubts
01:05:29.360 about what we call
01:05:30.320 progress.
01:05:35.160 I was about to say
01:05:35.940 don't quote me on that,
01:05:36.780 but I'm on an interview.
01:05:39.160 Well,
01:05:39.580 then you,
01:05:39.980 you might be slightly closer
01:05:41.160 to the neo-reaction
01:05:42.240 than we thought,
01:05:43.180 but,
01:05:43.380 you know,
01:05:44.840 well,
01:05:45.280 so,
01:05:45.640 so interestingly,
01:05:46.740 I like,
01:05:47.160 you know,
01:05:47.480 distributism's core,
01:05:49.420 you know,
01:05:49.600 there's,
01:05:50.060 there's several things,
01:05:50.800 of course,
01:05:51.040 that it talks about,
01:05:52.000 but the core thing
01:05:52.640 I take away from it
01:05:53.780 that I hope,
01:05:54.460 you know,
01:05:54.900 we can,
01:05:55.420 I don't know
01:05:55.820 if this works out
01:05:56.480 practically in theory,
01:05:58.120 but it matters,
01:05:59.740 is the shift of focus
01:06:02.000 from the economic unit
01:06:03.840 of the individual
01:06:04.840 to that of the family,
01:06:07.000 right?
01:06:07.480 Recognizing,
01:06:08.100 as we just talked about,
01:06:09.120 the importance of the family
01:06:10.360 and recognizing that
01:06:11.800 you cannot,
01:06:12.440 if you break,
01:06:13.600 if you allow capital
01:06:14.600 to break down
01:06:15.780 the family structure,
01:06:16.900 then you'll just
01:06:18.120 break down society.
01:06:19.160 And so you have to find
01:06:20.580 a way to create
01:06:22.260 capital interactions
01:06:24.240 that don't erode
01:06:26.160 the family
01:06:27.080 and that prioritize
01:06:28.040 the well-being
01:06:29.180 of the family.
01:06:30.060 I, of course,
01:06:30.980 I know somewhere,
01:06:31.880 like,
01:06:32.320 economic theory nerds
01:06:34.020 are screaming at me,
01:06:34.840 but, like,
01:06:35.580 that seems critical
01:06:37.100 if you're going to solve
01:06:38.200 the problem moving forward.
01:06:39.780 But, you know,
01:06:40.360 here's the thing,
01:06:41.860 I don't think,
01:06:43.980 capitalist ideology
01:06:45.100 has conceived
01:06:46.520 of the individual
01:06:47.440 as somehow isolated
01:06:48.760 from his community,
01:06:50.280 from his heritage,
01:06:51.440 from the family.
01:06:52.520 That's not the way
01:06:53.700 capitalism and practices
01:06:55.020 ever worked.
01:06:55.920 I remember being in,
01:06:58.080 I don't know
01:06:58.460 when it first occurred
01:06:59.460 to me,
01:06:59.720 it was so stupid
01:07:00.460 that I could be
01:07:01.060 so slow to understand this,
01:07:02.120 but I was,
01:07:02.820 I went on a balloon ride,
01:07:04.760 a hot air balloon ride
01:07:06.360 in Mexico
01:07:07.020 to fly over
01:07:07.680 the old ruins,
01:07:09.720 Tijuana ruins.
01:07:11.440 And we landed,
01:07:12.420 and I said to the guy
01:07:13.640 who spoke,
01:07:14.220 you know,
01:07:14.480 broken English,
01:07:15.120 I said,
01:07:16.020 wow,
01:07:16.580 how did you decide
01:07:17.660 to take up,
01:07:18.760 you have such
01:07:19.640 awesome skills,
01:07:21.160 it's unbelievable
01:07:22.020 how well you work
01:07:22.900 this crazy contraption
01:07:24.220 balloon with it
01:07:24.960 blasting the air
01:07:26.100 and we're flying up
01:07:27.060 in the old place
01:07:27.920 and it looks like,
01:07:29.020 I put my life
01:07:30.760 in your hands,
01:07:32.000 you're just the master
01:07:33.020 of this thing.
01:07:33.800 I said,
01:07:34.360 how did you,
01:07:35.380 such a stupid idiot
01:07:36.560 American question,
01:07:37.640 but I said,
01:07:38.020 how did you decide
01:07:39.360 to take up ballooning
01:07:40.500 as a profession?
01:07:42.940 And he said,
01:07:44.260 my father taught me.
01:07:45.980 Yeah,
01:07:46.180 my dad,
01:07:46.580 yeah.
01:07:47.060 And I said,
01:07:47.540 well,
01:07:47.800 who taught him?
01:07:48.640 He said,
01:07:48.940 his father.
01:07:49.780 I said,
01:07:49.980 well,
01:07:50.060 who taught him?
01:07:50.620 He said,
01:07:51.000 his father.
01:07:51.740 I said,
01:07:52.020 so this is like
01:07:52.440 a family business?
01:07:53.900 Yes,
01:07:54.420 my family,
01:07:55.520 we're a family of ballooners.
01:07:56.880 This is what we do.
01:07:58.380 And once you notice that,
01:08:00.460 you suddenly,
01:08:01.000 it's like,
01:08:01.260 well,
01:08:01.480 wait a minute,
01:08:02.380 how common is this?
01:08:03.980 So I was at my cobbler
01:08:04.940 the other day,
01:08:05.540 the guy repairs the shoes
01:08:06.500 and he's using equipment
01:08:07.700 from 1910
01:08:08.740 and doing a brilliant job
01:08:10.080 and he invited me back
01:08:10.920 to the shop
01:08:11.320 and showed me
01:08:11.700 how he cuts the leather
01:08:12.420 and he's a shoemaker,
01:08:13.680 just like in Grimm's fairy tales
01:08:15.180 when he was a shoemaker.
01:08:16.920 I said,
01:08:17.200 where'd you learn this?
01:08:17.960 He said,
01:08:18.100 my father.
01:08:18.540 Where'd he learn his father?
01:08:21.640 I said,
01:08:22.000 well,
01:08:22.100 who's going to succeed you?
01:08:24.320 Yeah,
01:08:24.760 I think we're just going to shut down
01:08:25.920 after I die.
01:08:26.740 That's the end.
01:08:28.560 So,
01:08:28.960 yeah,
01:08:29.340 I mean,
01:08:29.660 professions do,
01:08:31.120 they follow in the family.
01:08:33.060 That's where you learn your skills.
01:08:34.800 That's where you learn
01:08:35.740 to be a master craftsman,
01:08:37.700 you know,
01:08:38.200 and you don't break that up.
01:08:39.880 Under a natural,
01:08:41.040 organic,
01:08:41.980 developing,
01:08:42.880 free economy,
01:08:43.920 I think this would be the norm
01:08:45.740 that the sons would follow
01:08:47.500 in their father's footsteps
01:08:48.640 and the dollars would aspire
01:08:51.120 to marry people like their fathers,
01:08:53.780 you know?
01:08:54.180 I mean,
01:08:54.400 that's sort of the way things,
01:08:55.700 family becomes really
01:08:57.280 an important economic unit
01:08:58.860 in ways that individualist ideology
01:09:01.860 has emerged in the course
01:09:03.020 of the 20th century
01:09:03.980 where every new person
01:09:05.660 is just this new,
01:09:07.000 random,
01:09:07.700 you know,
01:09:08.500 free-floating flesh blob,
01:09:11.020 you know,
01:09:11.280 full of choice
01:09:11.980 and infinite possibility.
01:09:14.120 You know,
01:09:14.420 that's the 20th century idea,
01:09:16.080 but it's not the way,
01:09:17.080 it's not the way
01:09:17.700 enterprises
01:09:18.340 and commercial societies
01:09:19.960 unfolded through the centuries.
01:09:21.260 It just isn't.
01:09:22.400 Well,
01:09:22.480 it's also what lowers
01:09:23.200 time preference,
01:09:24.120 right?
01:09:24.340 Like,
01:09:24.600 you can't have low time preference
01:09:26.140 if you don't have
01:09:26.640 a continuity
01:09:27.300 of tradition,
01:09:30.140 of culture,
01:09:30.660 of history,
01:09:31.260 of belief.
01:09:32.020 If there's no reason
01:09:33.620 to plan for tomorrow
01:09:34.560 because you are all there is,
01:09:36.080 you're an atomized individual
01:09:37.700 completely connected
01:09:38.600 from a tradition,
01:09:39.460 from a heritage,
01:09:40.200 from anything,
01:09:41.280 then why?
01:09:42.620 Then why build?
01:09:43.600 Why,
01:09:43.860 you know,
01:09:44.140 why delay gratification?
01:09:45.920 Why,
01:09:46.220 you know,
01:09:46.480 and that's all society is,
01:09:48.480 is an accumulation
01:09:49.620 of delayed,
01:09:51.420 you know,
01:09:51.620 the results of,
01:09:52.380 you know,
01:09:53.340 delayed gratification,
01:09:54.460 low time preference.
01:09:55.500 Well,
01:09:55.580 and the other problem
01:09:57.060 is that if you conceive
01:09:58.180 of every generation
01:09:59.200 as a brand new
01:10:00.420 sort of,
01:10:00.900 you know,
01:10:01.320 creation,
01:10:02.540 you know,
01:10:02.740 with no history
01:10:03.800 and no real future,
01:10:06.560 you might end up
01:10:07.420 with a population
01:10:08.080 with no skills
01:10:08.840 at a whole.
01:10:09.600 Which is,
01:10:10.940 we're hurtling towards,
01:10:12.120 actually.
01:10:12.660 Right?
01:10:13.380 That's exactly
01:10:14.360 where we're headed.
01:10:15.460 We don't have shoemakers,
01:10:16.680 we don't have anything makers
01:10:17.920 anymore,
01:10:18.500 you know,
01:10:18.840 with our industries
01:10:19.940 gone now
01:10:21.200 and people spending
01:10:23.400 16 years in school
01:10:26.200 and then graduated
01:10:27.260 with a friggin'
01:10:27.960 piece of paper
01:10:28.720 and then going to
01:10:29.940 indeed.com
01:10:30.960 and uploading it,
01:10:32.020 hoping for a job.
01:10:33.600 That's,
01:10:34.300 but zero skills
01:10:35.980 at all.
01:10:36.580 The inability
01:10:37.440 to do anything,
01:10:39.820 the only skill
01:10:41.380 you have
01:10:41.680 is watching
01:10:42.100 TikTok videos,
01:10:43.880 you know,
01:10:44.200 and we think
01:10:44.740 we're going to
01:10:45.140 sustain
01:10:45.700 a prosperous society
01:10:47.160 like that?
01:10:48.400 No,
01:10:48.980 this is a calamity.
01:10:51.020 I mean,
01:10:51.200 this is a candle
01:10:52.420 burning at both ends.
01:10:53.460 I mean,
01:10:53.660 this is the end
01:10:54.460 of the world.
01:10:57.080 Well,
01:10:57.660 I'm glad
01:10:58.120 that we arrived
01:10:59.300 at a hopeful
01:11:00.380 no
01:11:01.060 now that we have
01:11:06.960 white-pilled everybody
01:11:08.080 and instilled them
01:11:08.940 with the,
01:11:09.620 you know,
01:11:09.780 but to circle back
01:11:11.240 to put a little cap
01:11:12.340 out of the end,
01:11:13.240 you know,
01:11:13.460 the projects
01:11:15.800 like the Free State Project
01:11:17.920 and those
01:11:18.640 and Ridge Runner,
01:11:20.840 you know,
01:11:21.740 conservative communities,
01:11:23.600 libertarian communities
01:11:24.260 that are focusing
01:11:25.440 people together,
01:11:26.340 sharing that,
01:11:27.480 rebuilding that continuity,
01:11:29.220 that understanding
01:11:30.520 of actually
01:11:31.200 you do need
01:11:32.040 a shared idea,
01:11:33.240 you do need
01:11:33.560 a shared community,
01:11:34.900 you know,
01:11:35.060 you can have these values,
01:11:36.480 they can be oriented
01:11:37.260 around,
01:11:37.940 you know,
01:11:38.400 this idea of perhaps
01:11:39.320 libertarianism,
01:11:40.220 but you need to have,
01:11:41.460 you know,
01:11:42.000 that community first
01:11:43.300 is what actually
01:11:44.100 creates that incentive
01:11:45.660 that I think
01:11:46.300 is something
01:11:47.380 that hopefully will,
01:11:48.580 you know,
01:11:48.700 even if some of this
01:11:49.880 burns out
01:11:50.440 and as I've predicted
01:11:51.480 in my book,
01:11:52.000 I believe a large amount
01:11:52.960 of it will,
01:11:54.260 the communities
01:11:54.900 that are forging
01:11:56.060 those bonds now
01:11:57.140 are the ones
01:11:57.840 that will,
01:11:58.460 I think,
01:11:58.900 probably have
01:11:59.540 a better time
01:12:00.040 weathering that storm
01:12:01.760 when it inevitably comes.
01:12:03.480 If civilization
01:12:04.480 can be saved,
01:12:05.300 it's only going
01:12:05.780 to be through this,
01:12:07.440 you know,
01:12:07.720 it's not going to be
01:12:08.320 through abstract ideology,
01:12:10.020 it's going to be
01:12:10.420 through human connection,
01:12:13.320 community relationships,
01:12:16.480 robust families,
01:12:19.040 and I have to say
01:12:20.900 through faith.
01:12:21.840 I mean,
01:12:22.060 I say that
01:12:23.080 as an empirical matter,
01:12:25.580 we know now
01:12:26.880 for sure
01:12:27.660 of the experience
01:12:28.700 of the last
01:12:29.080 four and a half years
01:12:29.720 that it's communities
01:12:30.380 of faith
01:12:30.820 that are willing
01:12:31.260 to resist the state.
01:12:33.140 And everybody else
01:12:34.180 is willing to sell out,
01:12:35.980 you know?
01:12:36.360 I mean,
01:12:36.580 that's just the way it is.
01:12:37.960 It's only communities
01:12:38.980 of faith that say
01:12:39.840 there's something
01:12:40.460 more important
01:12:41.560 than compliance.
01:12:43.440 It's integrity.
01:12:45.360 It's your morality.
01:12:46.720 If you want
01:12:47.180 to preserve your freedom,
01:12:48.020 you might have
01:12:48.420 to make a sacrifice
01:12:49.140 and you should be willing
01:12:50.400 to make that sacrifice
01:12:51.240 because there's something
01:12:52.180 on the other side
01:12:53.100 that will welcome you
01:12:56.220 and embrace you.
01:12:56.960 This is a hugely
01:12:58.220 important aspect
01:12:59.140 of what it means
01:13:00.640 to be courageous.
01:13:01.880 You have to have that.
01:13:02.960 I mean,
01:13:03.100 secular society
01:13:03.840 is just not courageous
01:13:05.600 in the face of tyranny.
01:13:08.960 Absolutely.
01:13:10.080 One thing
01:13:11.160 that the founders
01:13:11.840 were very clear about
01:13:12.800 is that the type
01:13:13.920 of person,
01:13:14.760 what they believed in,
01:13:16.500 what they were founded on,
01:13:17.480 that that would be critical
01:13:18.560 to the operation
01:13:19.460 of the Constitution
01:13:20.460 of the United States
01:13:22.120 as they envisioned it.
01:13:23.180 So I think
01:13:23.680 that's a great point.
01:13:25.100 All right, guys,
01:13:25.600 we're going to wrap this up,
01:13:26.720 but thank you again,
01:13:27.560 Jeffrey,
01:13:27.880 so much for coming on.
01:13:29.000 It's been a fantastic conversation
01:13:30.640 and of course,
01:13:31.540 you should be reading his article.
01:13:32.720 You should be checking out his work.
01:13:34.320 If it's your first time
01:13:34.940 on this channel,
01:13:35.660 make sure you subscribe
01:13:36.400 on YouTube.
01:13:37.360 Click the bell notification
01:13:38.680 and everything
01:13:39.200 so that you know
01:13:40.220 when we go live
01:13:41.100 and if you want to get
01:13:41.660 these broadcasts as podcasts,
01:13:43.300 make sure you subscribe
01:13:44.240 to The Orr McIntyre Show
01:13:46.180 on your favorite podcast platforms
01:13:47.760 and if you want to make sure
01:13:49.040 that in case we get censored
01:13:50.340 or kicked off,
01:13:51.120 you can still find me.
01:13:52.000 Of course,
01:13:52.380 everything is up
01:13:53.100 over at Blaze TV.
01:13:55.200 If you'd like to pick up
01:13:56.240 my book or Jeffrey's book,
01:13:57.740 I'm sure you can find
01:13:58.800 both of those
01:13:59.360 over on Amazon as well.
01:14:00.720 Thank you everybody
01:14:01.320 for watching
01:14:01.920 and as always,
01:14:02.920 I will talk to you next time.