The Ben Shapiro Show - August 22, 2026


Biggest Health Care Myths Busted


Episode Stats


Length

32 minutes

Words per minute

194.17

Word count

6,343

Sentence count

401


Transcript

Transcripts from "The Ben Shapiro Show" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. Explore them interactively here.
00:00:00.000 I bring you good news today.
00:00:02.000 The United States healthcare system is actually doing a great job taking care of the American people with innovation.
00:00:08.000 Big Pharma is not, in fact, evil.
00:00:10.000 I know you're mad already that I'm saying that, but that's because, again, facts, not feelings.
00:00:15.000 And we need some facts about healthcare.
00:00:17.000 Again, there are problems with healthcare.
00:00:18.000 All that's true, but America needs some facts right now.
00:00:21.000 Of course, it's true.
00:00:22.000 Our healthcare system has lots of flaws, but not for the reasons you think.
00:00:25.000 Here is a hint.
00:00:26.000 Capitalism, corporate greed, these are not the problem.
00:00:29.000 When it comes to innovation, they are actually the solution.
00:00:32.000 And the point of the spear on the anti capitalist movement in the United States is our healthcare system.
00:00:38.000 Medicare for all is the claim.
00:00:39.000 It's terrible.
00:00:40.000 And let's be real.
00:00:41.000 We all hate having to deal with the healthcare system because you're never going to be in a hospital on your best day.
00:00:47.000 You're never going to be dealing with doctors and insurance companies on your best day.
00:00:50.000 It's the worst part of your life, always, because health problems are the worst part of anybody's life.
00:00:53.000 And let's be clear our healthcare system has real problems.
00:00:57.000 A huge percentage of our spend is on administration and bureaucracy and regulatory compliance, like one third of the total cost.
00:01:04.000 Medical malpractice eats up enormous sums of money.
00:01:08.000 But we should be clear about something.
00:01:10.000 America's healthcare system is by far the most innovative healthcare system on planet Earth.
00:01:16.000 We hold up the healthcare system for the rest of the world.
00:01:18.000 For literally the rest, just as our economy is the basis for the rest of the global economy, our healthcare system is also the basis for the rest of the global healthcare system.
00:01:26.000 Why?
00:01:27.000 Well, because at root, medical care is about supply.
00:01:31.000 What are the new treatments?
00:01:32.000 What are the new innovations?
00:01:34.000 The reason people live longer is because we come up with better solutions to very old problems.
00:01:38.000 Who is coming up with those solutions?
00:01:40.000 Well, this brings us to Moderna's huge breakthrough announcement yesterday.
00:01:44.000 Now, Moderna's kind of a fascinating story as a company, right?
00:01:46.000 They're around for years and years and years and years.
00:01:48.000 And they did the mRNA vaccine, which, of course, was extremely controversial.
00:01:53.000 Some people claim that it cut death rates for people who are obese and old, but was not great for people who are younger and obviously not appropriate for kids.
00:02:00.000 I tend to think that's what the data shows.
00:02:02.000 Other people are just very anti Moderna and anti mRNA vaccines generally.
00:02:06.000 There's only one problem innovation.
00:02:08.000 Comes in many forms.
00:02:09.000 And it turns out that, as the Wall Street Journal reported yesterday, an experimental mRNA vaccine has succeeded in preventing cancer from coming back or spreading in a study of high risk melanoma patients.
00:02:22.000 Moderna and its partner Merck said Wednesday, paving the way for a potentially life extending treatment for the thousands of people diagnosed with the deadly skin cancer each year.
00:02:31.000 Moderna shares more than doubled Wednesday.
00:02:33.000 Merck's stock hit an all time high.
00:02:35.000 And the positive results rippled through the drug industry as investors saw potential for more future blockbusters.
00:02:40.000 This is the second major oncology breakthrough in recent months after a different drug succeeded in extending the lives of people with pancreatic cancer, a notoriously lethal disease.
00:02:48.000 So, every day, pretty much every day, we are coming up with extraordinary medical innovations here in the United States.
00:02:57.000 The big pharma companies that people like to rip on, the ones that are keeping your parents and your grandparents alive and creating new treatments so that you will live longer, we rip on those each and every day because people don't understand how exactly the medical innovation industry works.
00:03:10.000 They don't get it.
00:03:12.000 But it is not a coincidence that the vast majority of medical innovation, serious medical innovation, happens in the United States.
00:03:17.000 And again, these treatments are coming online pretty much every day.
00:03:22.000 The question of how long you will live is a matter of you just biding time until the medical industry solves your problems.
00:03:27.000 That is the reality.
00:03:29.000 Fox yesterday was reporting on a Parkinson's patient whose tremor is vanishing with a new ultrasound treatment.
00:03:34.000 Like we're coming up with new treatments.
00:03:36.000 When I say we, I mean these companies, right?
00:03:38.000 People with actual medical knowledge doing experimentation and innovation.
00:03:43.000 One million Americans are living with Parkinson's disease, but a newly expanded treatment is changing the game.
00:03:50.000 Doctors are now using ultrasound tech to target some of the most debilitating symptoms.
00:03:56.000 There is one man who lived with a severe tremor for years, and after undergoing this treatment, the shaking was gone within minutes, and no surgery was even required.
00:04:07.000 That patient, Air Force veteran Bud Level, and his doctor, Dr. Bavia Shah, join us now.
00:04:15.000 The way this works is that there are multiple ultrasound transducers all around the skull, and they each send their own ultrasound beam that crosses the skull onto a specific point in the brain, and that's where you get the maximum energy deposition.
00:04:29.000 While we're doing this procedure, we can use the low energy ultrasound waves and then go examine the patient and make sure that their symptoms are getting better and that they're not having any side effects.
00:04:40.000 Okay, this is called magic.
00:04:41.000 Okay, this is magic.
00:04:42.000 When science is sufficiently good at solving problems, it becomes indistinguishable from magic.
00:04:46.000 This is sort of an Arthur C. Clarke paraphrase.
00:04:49.000 That's a reality.
00:04:51.000 AI is going to have a massive impact on how you and your parents and your grandparents live.
00:04:56.000 According to the Wall Street Journal, patients and families are turning to AI to help pinpoint conditions.
00:05:00.000 By the way, I've done this myself, it's unbelievable.
00:05:02.000 Its differential diagnosis is very often better than what doctors can do, not because doctors are ignorant, but because doctors are limited by what they can instantaneously recall.
00:05:12.000 AI is especially adept at flagging potential rare and hard to diagnose diseases because doctors often are trying to diagnose based on the probability, right?
00:05:19.000 You come in with a set of symptoms, 95% probability.
00:05:22.000 It is not this thing.
00:05:23.000 They focus on the 95% probability, but it may be in the other 5%, right?
00:05:29.000 In a study published last year in a Journal of American Medicine, Journal.
00:05:34.000 Researchers took 90 complex rare disease cases that had already been solved and tested AI chatbots' abilities to suggest the right diagnosis.
00:05:42.000 The two chatbots doubled the probability of getting it right.
00:05:47.000 Again, AI is extraordinary at this because it has infinite memory, essentially.
00:05:52.000 Now, how does all this happen?
00:05:53.000 You don't want to kill the golden goose, right?
00:05:55.000 This is magic.
00:05:56.000 And let's be real about this.
00:05:57.000 Again, the United States is by far the disproportionate provider of all medical innovation on planet Earth.
00:06:04.000 By far, it is not close.
00:06:06.000 The U.S. conducts According to the FDA, 35% of all global clinical trials, we command over 50% of early phase trials involving high risk therapeutics.
00:06:16.000 We take all the risks.
00:06:18.000 Other countries' pharma developments are subsidized by American research.
00:06:23.000 When it comes to major medical innovations, there's a study a few years back looking at 27 major medical innovations.
00:06:29.000 20 of them were developed in the United States.
00:06:33.000 55% of global biopharmaceutical research and development investments happen in the United States.
00:06:40.000 Why?
00:06:40.000 Well, because we invest extraordinary amounts of capital, extraordinary amounts of capital in RD.
00:06:46.000 Every year, the United States, our markets, we invest $180 to $200 billion into RD in the medical field, including corporate pharma, federal grants, venture capital, MA, and corporate ventures.
00:06:59.000 And it costs that amount of money to develop new drugs.
00:07:01.000 Why?
00:07:01.000 Well, because most new drugs fail.
00:07:04.000 It is not that every new drug that is successful costs a billion dollars to develop, it's that if you're Merck, You develop five drugs.
00:07:11.000 Maybe one of them makes it all the way through FDA approval, and the other four fail out.
00:07:14.000 But you have to spend money on all of them until they fail out.
00:07:18.000 And so the trial failure rate, the trial error rate is really high, right?
00:07:22.000 You have a huge fail rate, but that means you need extraordinary amounts of capital.
00:07:26.000 And guess what?
00:07:27.000 America's magic.
00:07:28.000 We have gigantic pools of capital.
00:07:29.000 This is why when people talk about the stock market, how does it help me?
00:07:32.000 The answer is those gigantic pools of capital drive the innovative risks that lead to actual innovation.
00:07:39.000 That's the reality.
00:07:43.000 And this is a point that Jeff Bezos made not long ago that the thing that really distinguishes the United States from other countries is not just our tax structure, because other countries have tax structures.
00:07:54.000 The thing that distinguishes the United States is our gigantic pools of liquidity.
00:07:58.000 What's really going on with all this dynamism in this country compared to what we see around elsewhere in the world?
00:08:05.000 And there are a bunch of reasons for that, but the biggest one, eight of ten points there, is that.
00:08:11.000 We have better risk capital.
00:08:14.000 It's not the banking system.
00:08:15.000 We have a good banking system, but so does Europe.
00:08:18.000 What's different here is that you can raise $50 million of seed capital to do something that only has a 10% chance of working.
00:08:31.000 That's crazy.
00:08:35.000 But the people who are giving you that seed capital know that their expected value is still positive in many cases, or they're at least gambling that that's true.
00:08:45.000 That risk capital system that we have in this country is turning out to be very hard for other countries to duplicate.
00:08:52.000 Again, this is a really important point.
00:08:55.000 The reason we innovate here is because we have a capitalist system.
00:08:59.000 Other systems that don't reward in the same way and that don't have gigantic pools of liquidity don't do this kind of research.
00:09:05.000 They don't.
00:09:07.000 And foreign governments are living off the back of this.
00:09:09.000 And we'll get to that in a minute.
00:09:10.000 This is the real reason you are paying too much for drugs, is because foreign governments are basically unionizing against American drug manufacturers.
00:09:17.000 And we'll get to that.
00:09:17.000 That's a thing that the administration really should do something about.
00:09:21.000 But when you hear from people on the left and some on the right, we need to completely remake our entire health care, Medicare for all.
00:09:28.000 We need a nationalized single payer.
00:09:30.000 Understand the thing that raises America's life expectancy.
00:09:34.000 And by the way, global life expectancy is the innovation of the American health care system.
00:09:39.000 That is the thing.
00:09:40.000 So if you kill the golden goose, everybody dies early.
00:09:43.000 It's more on this in a moment.
00:09:44.000 First, there's a point every night when I am officially done.
00:09:46.000 The show is done, the emails are done, the kids are asleep.
00:09:48.000 Nobody needs anything from me for at least the next six hours.
00:09:52.000 And getting into bed at that moment is great.
00:09:54.000 But getting into a comfortable bed makes it so much better.
00:09:57.000 This is so true.
00:09:58.000 I get in bed, I pull up my Bull and Branch blankets, and I am so happy.
00:10:02.000 It's like the best point in the day right before you go to sleep.
00:10:05.000 Everybody's doing well, everybody's cool, and you're about to get a good night's sleep.
00:10:08.000 That's what Bull and Branch gets right.
00:10:10.000 Their sheets are made from 100% organic cotton and woven for airflow.
00:10:13.000 So they're naturally breathable without synthetic cooling technology or chemical treatments.
00:10:17.000 94% of Bull and Branch customers say their sheets get softer with every single wash.
00:10:21.000 That's unusual because most things you own slowly get worse.
00:10:24.000 These apparently get better.
00:10:25.000 Once you upgrade the sheets and maybe add the pillows, comforter, or waffle blanket, the entire bed feels different.
00:10:30.000 I'm a big fan of the waffle blanket, by the way.
00:10:31.000 It's a very simple luxury.
00:10:33.000 At the end of a very long day, you get into bed and you think, this was a good decision.
00:10:36.000 Sleep cooler this summer with Bowl and Branch.
00:10:38.000 Get 15% off your first order plus free shipping at bullandbranch.comslash Ben with code BEN.
00:10:43.000 That's BOLLANDBRANCH.comslash Ben, code BEN to unlock 15% off.
00:10:50.000 So, in order for us to actually diagnose what's wrong with our medical system, we should be at least Accurate about what's wrong with our medical system and what's right.
00:10:57.000 So, here are a lot of myths about the American medical system.
00:11:00.000 I'm going to myth bust a few of these myths so that we actually know what we're looking at and what we ought to fix.
00:11:04.000 Because otherwise, what you end up with is the idiocy of Medicare for all, where you can't see the doctor you want, where you can't get the medical care that you want, where somebody else decides that for you.
00:11:14.000 So, myth number one, and you hear this all the time our life expectancy is lower because of our health care system here in the United States.
00:11:21.000 This is wrong.
00:11:22.000 It is wrong for two particular reasons.
00:11:25.000 One, it isn't really lower because you're comparing apples to oranges.
00:11:28.000 And second, If it is lower, it is not due to our healthcare system.
00:11:31.000 It's due to other factors.
00:11:33.000 Okay, so when you compare to life expectancy, you have to compare apples to apples, not apples to cucumbers.
00:11:39.000 You can't take an American population that is racially diverse, fat, has higher rates of drug abuse, suicide, and murder, and measures death itself differently, and then compare it to a population like, say, Switzerland, that is racially homogenous, diets completely differently, doesn't drug or suicide or murder, and measures infant mortality differently.
00:11:58.000 You can't do that.
00:12:00.000 Okay, so take a look, for example, at the average racial life expectancy breakdown in the United States, right?
00:12:07.000 Because we actually have some data about who lives long in the United States.
00:12:11.000 And what you find is that there's pretty significant striation in life expectancy in the United States.
00:12:15.000 So if you're an Asian American in the United States, then you are likely to live the average life expectancy for Asians in the United States, for Asian Americans, about 85 years.
00:12:25.000 Okay.
00:12:27.000 Well, here is the thing if you compare the Asian American life expectancy to, say, the Japanese life expectancy, it turns out it's the same.
00:12:37.000 So if you're going to compare American life expectancy to Japanese life expectancy, that's stupid.
00:12:42.000 You should actually compare Japanese life expectancy to, say, Japanese living in American life expectancy, right?
00:12:48.000 You're keeping all the factors equivalent except for the healthcare system and lifestyle.
00:12:53.000 And what it turns out is it's kind of the same.
00:12:56.000 How about Hispanics in the United States?
00:12:58.000 Life expectancy in the United States for Hispanics at last time of measurement was about 81.
00:13:03.000 Well, the life expectancy for Mexicans is 75.
00:13:07.000 For Mexican Americans, it's like 78 to 80.
00:13:09.000 So you actually live slightly longer if you're a Mexican American than if you are a Mexican, for example.
00:13:15.000 If you're white in the United States, your life expectancy average about 78, black 74, Native American 70.
00:13:21.000 Now, again, the problem is the confound, because I can name you half a dozen countries that are majority black that have lower life expectancies than black Americans.
00:13:30.000 So if you are going to actually compare population groups, you have to pick population groups that are similar in genetic makeup, for example, because that has an impact on health.
00:13:39.000 And there are certain health conditions that are just diagnosed differently based on race, such as sickle cell anemia, most famously.
00:13:47.000 So, again, keep all of the confounds out and you will get a better statistical examination.
00:13:52.000 Then you have to look at the reasons for death in the United States.
00:13:54.000 Because if you're going to blame the healthcare system, what you don't want to do is blame the healthcare system for people shooting each other when they're 20, which brings down the life expectancy.
00:14:03.000 So, one of the things that you see here is Peterson KFF, the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Global Burden of Disease Data.
00:14:11.000 They put together this chart.
00:14:13.000 And what it shows is deaths per 100,000 population aged 15 to 49, the United States versus comparable countries.
00:14:19.000 So, what you see is Ours was higher than comparable countries, but it was trending in a similar direction, like down, deaths per 100,000 population.
00:14:28.000 And then we kind of stagnated around 1985, and we didn't really keep going down.
00:14:33.000 And everybody else kept going down.
00:14:36.000 Why?
00:14:36.000 Well, it turns out we have a lot of deaths that are attributable to, for example, drugs.
00:14:43.000 We have a lot of deaths that are attributable to heart disease, a huge number of heart disease deaths, which is diet based, a huge number of murders in the United States, and a huge number of car accidents in the United States.
00:14:54.000 And when you remove all of those confounds, it turns out our death rates decline pretty markedly.
00:14:58.000 We also measure deaths differently than the Europeans do when it comes to infant mortality.
00:15:03.000 So, for example, in the United States, when a baby is born, no matter how preemie, we consider that baby a life.
00:15:09.000 And then if that baby dies in, say, the first week of preemiedom, that is now a death.
00:15:13.000 Now, it has a major impact on your life expectancy stats, even with small numbers.
00:15:17.000 Because if you have a person who dies at age zero and a person who dies at age 100, the average life expectancy is now 50.
00:15:25.000 The UK, and you just don't measure the premium as a life, then your average life expectancy is 100, right?
00:15:32.000 Because the zero went away.
00:15:33.000 That's how math works.
00:15:35.000 There are studies by the National Bureau of Economic Research that indicate that differences in data reporting alone make up roughly 30% of the statistical mortality gap between the US and certain European nations.
00:15:45.000 So, the point that I'm making here is there are a lot of reasons for the statistical life expectancy gap between us and other countries, but you have to compare apples to apples, and also you have to do the measurements the same way.
00:15:55.000 Okay, myth number two we spend too much on healthcare fundamentally because our system is broken.
00:16:02.000 And now, again, there are serious problems in our system, mainly.
00:16:05.000 The problem of administration and bureaucracy.
00:16:07.000 If we had no administration and no bureaucracy, we reduced our costs by probably one third.
00:16:11.000 If we reduce medical malpractice problems, we reduce our costs.
00:16:15.000 But here is a fascinating chart.
00:16:16.000 This is a chart, and it shows healthcare spending versus GDP per capita 2024 from our world in data.
00:16:23.000 And again, this data comes from a variety of sources, including the WHO, OECD, IMF, and World Bank.
00:16:29.000 What do you see?
00:16:30.000 Basically, what you see in this chart is a straight line correlation between health expenditure per capita and GDP per capita.
00:16:38.000 In other words, How much you spend as a country on health is highly correlated to how much you make.
00:16:46.000 Now, there are certain outliers that spend less than that line would suggest Singapore, Brunei, Saudi Arabia.
00:16:55.000 There are a few that are sort of under the line, but this is a pretty, pretty obvious correlation.
00:17:02.000 So here's the thing we're a very rich country, and we spend a lot of money on our healthcare, and we predominantly spend a lot of money on our upper end healthcare.
00:17:10.000 That's really where we spend our money.
00:17:12.000 We're an older country, so we spend a lot of money on our old people.
00:17:15.000 If you look at the actual stats in the United States, our health expenditures are $22,356 per person on people over the age of 65 in 2020.
00:17:26.000 That is five times per person what we spend on kids and 2.5 what we spend on working age people, right?
00:17:32.000 Because as you get toward the end of your life, you have more health problems.
00:17:35.000 And we expend extraordinary amounts of money in the United States to keep people alive for small amounts of time.
00:17:42.000 And we all have a grandmother who had to spend an enormous amount of time in a hospital before she passed away.
00:17:46.000 That's very, very normal.
00:17:48.000 And when that happens, you're spending a lot of money to marginally increase lifespan.
00:17:53.000 That's just the way that it works in Western countries.
00:17:57.000 17% of the population in the United States in 2020 was 65 plus, but it accounted for 37% of all spending in the healthcare industry in 2020.
00:18:08.000 And a huge percentage of that spending is happening via Medicare and Medicaid.
00:18:13.000 The largest share of healthcare spending is the federal government.
00:18:16.000 So, the idea that we need more federal government interventionism in a healthcare system and this will lower costs again, 31% of all healthcare spending in 2024 was sponsored by the federal government.
00:18:27.000 Okay, but where are we really spending a lot of money?
00:18:30.000 Some of the areas where we disproportionately spend money on, for example, cancer care, which is why we have a lot of innovation in that space because there's a huge market in the United States for, for example, cancer treatments, which is why the United States has some of the best cancer survival rates of anywhere on planet Earth.
00:18:45.000 According to the OECD, we consistently rank among global leaders in five year cancer survival rates for major adult cancers.
00:18:53.000 And that is, by the way, despite high screening rates, meaning we screen really carefully when it comes to cancer in the United States.
00:18:58.000 So we identify a lot of cancer and then we treat it really, really well.
00:19:01.000 We're really good at it.
00:19:02.000 If you're in the UK, there's a reason rich people in the UK or Canada come to the United States if they've got cancer.
00:19:07.000 They're not going to wait in line and die because their nationalized healthcare system is not doing a good job of it.
00:19:13.000 So, for example, prostate cancer survivability is 98% in the United States, it's about 85% in the EU.
00:19:19.000 Melanoma survivability is 94% in the United States.
00:19:22.000 These are five year survival rates, 86% in the EU.
00:19:25.000 Breast cancer survivability, 91% in the United States, 85% in the EU.
00:19:32.000 Virtually all major cancers, we are statistically significantly higher in terms of survivability than other countries.
00:19:38.000 This is what, again, this is white pilling because I think it's important to know what is wrong and what we're doing wrong, what we can fix.
00:19:43.000 I mean, Tulsi Gabbard was talking about this literally today.
00:19:46.000 Her husband was diagnosed with severe cancer, and she made an announcement today that his treatment is going well.
00:19:52.000 We talked with our doctors and said, okay, what are our options?
00:19:55.000 One is a very invasive surgery to remove the bottom part.
00:20:00.000 Part of Abraham's sacrum and his tailbone, and the other option was radiation.
00:20:05.000 So, we scheduled the surgery as quickly as we could.
00:20:09.000 A few weeks after the surgery was done, the pathologists and the doctors said that they are confident that they were able to cut out all of the cancerous bone and tissue.
00:20:19.000 So, here we are now, almost three months after, and he started a very rigorous physical therapy program.
00:20:27.000 He gets frustrated a lot because he wants to be able to make progress.
00:20:31.000 Faster and sometimes he's pushed a little bit too far, but overall, Abraham is progressing very well.
00:20:37.000 Again, when you rip on the system, recognize at least what the system does and what it is and what it's good for.
00:20:43.000 And one of the reasons we spend a lot of money here is because other countries, because they're nationalized, they will reject people for treatments based on cost benchmarks, right?
00:20:50.000 It costs too much, so we can't pay for it.
00:20:53.000 In the United States, insurers are legally mandated to cover broad categories of drugs.
00:20:59.000 Okay, which brings us to the fourth big myth.
00:21:02.000 That healthcare in the United States is wildly unequal.
00:21:03.000 Now, that's not a myth because it's totally untrue.
00:21:06.000 Obviously, if you're rich, you're going to get better healthcare than if you're poor.
00:21:08.000 This is true literally everywhere on earth except areas where everyone gets crappy healthcare.
00:21:13.000 We can be equal in our poverty or unequal in our prosperity.
00:21:16.000 That is the way this works.
00:21:18.000 And innovation, right?
00:21:19.000 The things that are luxurious, all innovation, all of it starts off as a luxury for rich people and then it becomes a necessity.
00:21:26.000 This is true for everything in your life except for like basic, basic, basic nutrition.
00:21:30.000 And if you go back far enough, it's probably true of basic nutrition as well.
00:21:35.000 If the cell phone you carry in your pocket was a luxury, I use this example a lot because it's obvious.
00:21:40.000 If you go back and you watch like old movies from the 1950s, the guy who was like the richest dude you ever saw was a dude who had a phone in his car.
00:21:47.000 That dude was like the wealthiest person ever.
00:21:50.000 If you had a phone on a beach, you were Gordon Gecko in Wall Street walking around with a shoebox to your head.
00:21:54.000 And that's because he was the richest guy in America.
00:21:57.000 And now you have a phone that is significantly more powerful than any device that put man on the moon in your pocket.
00:22:04.000 Everyone, including people who are poor in the United States.
00:22:06.000 Innovation starts off as a luxury and then it becomes a necessity.
00:22:09.000 So, great example of this yesterday.
00:22:11.000 So, Bill Ackman, the investor extraordinaire, who, contrary to some opinions, actually is a very smart person, very much smarter than many of the people who critique him politically.
00:22:21.000 In any case, Bill Ackman, his daughter Lucy, when she was 26, had a brain hemorrhage.
00:22:28.000 And like a very serious brain hemorrhage.
00:22:31.000 It was February 6th of this year.
00:22:33.000 She was found unconscious on the floor of her apartment.
00:22:37.000 She had had a brain hemorrhage around 9 a.m. earlier that day.
00:22:39.000 They only knew of that because of the aura ring that she was wearing at the time.
00:22:44.000 And she was basically unfamiliar.
00:22:47.000 She was not operated on for something like 19 hours, which is rare.
00:22:51.000 Typically, if you have a brain hemorrhage and you're found unconscious, if you're outside the five hour mark, basically they give you up.
00:22:59.000 Okay, well, yesterday, Ackman wheeled his daughter out of Mount Sinai.
00:23:03.000 Here's what that looked like.
00:23:20.000 So, Ackman put up a post explaining what happened.
00:23:23.000 He said by about 2 30 a.m., with the results from a CAT scan, Lucy's doctors had determined she had a massive brain hemorrhage and would need an emergency hemicraniectomy, which is basically drilling a hole in your head to release the pressure on her brain and remove the blood from the hemorrhage.
00:23:36.000 The surgery to save Lucy's life began around 3 15 a.m. and finished around 5 30 a.m.
00:23:39.000 It was successful.
00:23:40.000 I learned later that the standard of care is not to do the surgery to save a patient with a large brain bleed if more than five hours have passed since the hemorrhage.
00:23:47.000 Even when the surgery is done, I was told the likely outcome for the patient is a few months in a nursing home and death from pneumonia.
00:23:53.000 And he said, Let's see what can be accomplished if we give her the best care possible and we invest unlimited resources to restore her to life.
00:24:00.000 He said, Lucy began in a bad place.
00:24:01.000 She was in a coma for several weeks and then awoke, not being able to breathe on her own, unable to walk, see, or speak.
00:24:06.000 Over the last six months, she has recovered her cognition.
00:24:08.000 She understands everything, including her circumstance, is able to walk 100 or more steps at a time with assistance, is making progress with sounds, vowels, and consonants and the beginnings of speech, but she remains unable to see.
00:24:18.000 Lucy's vision and other faculties may require some form of brain computer interface.
00:24:23.000 Work that is underway at Neuralink, Precision Neuroscience, Science. Synchron nudge and other companies in the space.
00:24:28.000 Okay, now all of the Marxists in the audience go, How could, see, if it were my daughter, she would have died.
00:24:34.000 Right, but the whole point of this story is the treatment that Ackman and his family are putting his daughter through and are developing these treatments are going to become standard of care over time because this is what happens in free markets.
00:24:49.000 When rich people do a thing and it turns out that thing is innovative and creative and good, it bleeds down to the rest of the population.
00:24:57.000 And Ackman is trying to accelerate that with charitable works.
00:24:59.000 Again, he's supposed to be the bad guy.
00:25:01.000 Ackman is supposed to be the bad guy.
00:25:02.000 Schmucks sitting in cabins selling you Indian man nicotine are the good guys.
00:25:05.000 Bill Ackman, who is launching a $400 million brain research institute, is the bad guy.
00:25:15.000 In any case, Ackman announced yesterday that Pershing Square Foundation has acquired almost 700,000 square feet of real estate on the Upper West Side.
00:25:23.000 They're founding the Ackman Oxman Institute to conduct brain research, rehabilitation, recovery, and longevity.
00:25:30.000 He put out a post saying the AOI will be a nonprofit, but will have highly commercial instincts.
00:25:35.000 It will have its own venture funding.
00:25:36.000 It will work to develop innovations to create companies that will see it assist and spin out to ensure technologies, treatments, techniques, and drugs get to patients as promptly as possible.
00:25:44.000 He's again, the best way to incentivize bringing down cost and increasing innovative capacity is the profit margin.
00:25:50.000 It's great.
00:25:51.000 Hey, so why do I say all of this?
00:25:52.000 Because we are now in the midst, throughout American life, of throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
00:25:59.000 We are now in the midst of saying we have problems with how the health insurance system works, up to and including maybe we should shoot healthcare executives.
00:26:07.000 And also, the solution to that is Medicare for all, single payer government run healthcare.
00:26:11.000 Okay, understand you are destroying the golden goose.
00:26:13.000 The reason, by the way, that Americans pay disproportionate prices for their drugs is because of the Medicare for all systems in other countries.
00:26:20.000 When we talk about the president, I've said, as you know, I'm not a fan of tariffs as a general economic policy, but as a form of leverage, I'm in favor.
00:26:28.000 One area where we should be leveraging the living hell out of other countries, other countries collectively bargain using their nationalized healthcare system with our drug providers.
00:26:36.000 They go to Merck, for example, and they say, We are only willing, as the single payer national health system in Britain, to pay X dollars for this drug.
00:26:45.000 And X dollars is a lot lower than the market price.
00:26:48.000 So either you take it or you leave it.
00:26:49.000 And so what does Merck do?
00:26:51.000 Merck turns around and says, Okay, fine, we'll take your price, but we're going to upcharge everybody in the United States to compensate for the fact that we are delivering to you at a bare profit or at a loss.
00:27:00.000 So that's unfair.
00:27:03.000 What we should do is we should mandate that all of those drugs can only be exported to countries like Great Britain if Great Britain is willing to pay the American market price, because that brings down the price for everybody.
00:27:17.000 More customers means more competition, which means that you're going to get higher production.
00:27:25.000 Price discrimination means that basically we pay a different price than Britain pays.
00:27:29.000 That should not be the case.
00:27:29.000 We should all be paying the same price.
00:27:31.000 Our price will be lower, their price will be slightly higher.
00:27:33.000 That is the way this works.
00:27:35.000 That will spur more competition and more innovation, by the way.
00:27:38.000 We can do that by threatening to punish the British government.
00:27:40.000 We ought to do that.
00:27:41.000 That's a real thing we ought to be doing.
00:27:45.000 But here in the United States, again, the call for Medicare for All is a call to destroy this entire system, including the innovation that makes it possible.
00:27:52.000 The giant pools of capital.
00:27:53.000 Remember, when you hear people who are yelling at Wall Street and saying, Those pools of capital, why are we taxing those pools of capital differently than we would tax earnings?
00:28:01.000 The answer is we are trying to incentivize the creation of pools of capital because that's what creates the innovation.
00:28:07.000 That's what creates the better products, goods, and services.
00:28:09.000 That's what creates the jobs.
00:28:11.000 Beyond that, obviously, when you invest in the stock market, that's money that you already paid income tax on.
00:28:15.000 So why are we taxing you twice based on the gain from the stock market?
00:28:20.000 In any case, you can see the idiocy of all of this thanks to the DSA.
00:28:23.000 So, Florida Senate, Democratic Senate, Democratic Socialist of America candidate Angie Nixon, who is a nut job.
00:28:30.000 Again, the DSA apparently just recruits from the psych ward.
00:28:33.000 She says, We're already paying for Medicare for all right now, which, I mean, is kind of true in one sense, in the sense that we pay for emergency care for a lot of people who don't have insurance and we pay for Medicaid.
00:28:46.000 But it is not true in the sense that we have not destroyed all innovation and made all care rationed.
00:28:53.000 You want Medicare for all and free universal child care and pre K. How are you suggesting taxpayers pay for that?
00:29:00.000 Yeah, for sure.
00:29:01.000 So, thank you for that question.
00:29:04.000 I have been traveling all across the state of Florida having conversations with folks.
00:29:08.000 And what is evident is that everyone wants the same things, right?
00:29:13.000 To be healthy, prosperous, and safe.
00:29:16.000 And a lot of folks, it crosses party lines as it relates to universal child care and Medicare for all.
00:29:24.000 And how do we pay for that?
00:29:26.000 Actually, Medicare for all, we're already Spending the amount we would be paying for Medicare for all right now, even while folks are still paying for co pays and deductibles and co insurance.
00:29:38.000 Okay, it is true that we're paying for a lot of things right now, but you know what's going to cost a lot more money?
00:29:42.000 Universal health care, right?
00:29:44.000 The way that she's talking about it.
00:29:46.000 I mean, listen, the DSA is happy to praise Cuba for their nationalized health care system.
00:29:50.000 They're just rewarming Michael Moore at this point.
00:29:53.000 So if we want to improve conditions for Cuba as a beacon of democracy.
00:30:01.000 I wouldn't say that.
00:30:02.000 I think that the revolution in Cuba led to an expansion of things like universal health care.
00:30:08.000 That's actually been a model that Cuba exports medical care to countries that have very poor infrastructure themselves.
00:30:17.000 There are things like that that we could have in the United States the way that it exists in Europe or in so many other countries.
00:30:25.000 But we don't have that.
00:30:26.000 These spoiled brat socialists who grew up wealthy and healthy in the United States and ripping on the system, it really is obnoxious.
00:30:31.000 And then you have bad studies that are being trotted out.
00:30:34.000 In order to suggest that Medicaid for all will be cheap, there's a new study coming out of Yale that is totally flawed and ridiculous.
00:30:40.000 They claim that Medicare for all would lower healthcare spending by 20% while expanding care to everybody.
00:30:46.000 And where are they going to identify sources of savings?
00:30:48.000 Lower pharmaceutical prices.
00:30:50.000 Okay, so when they say lower pharmaceutical prices, they mean that they're going to blackmail pharmaceutical companies into selling the drugs for lower prices, which again cuts down on the RD.
00:30:57.000 So how about fewer new drugs, if you like that?
00:31:00.000 Medicare level payments to providers.
00:31:01.000 Why would providers accept that?
00:31:03.000 Providers are rejecting Medicare and Medicaid right now because they're losing money on every Medicare and Medicaid appointment.
00:31:09.000 Including Abdul Al Sayed's wife, who refuses to take Medicare and Medicaid.
00:31:13.000 Reduced administrative overhead.
00:31:14.000 Yeah, I'm sure that it's going to reduce the administrative overhead when the government runs the system, probably.
00:31:19.000 Fewer avoidable emergency department visits and hospitalizations.
00:31:23.000 Again, when you make things quote unquote free, people access the system more.
00:31:26.000 The study is completely flawed.
00:31:28.000 It's ridiculous.
00:31:29.000 It presumes quote unquote all things being equal.
00:31:32.000 Well, why would they possibly be equal?
00:31:34.000 The only reason that Medicare payment rates right now are accepted by anyone is because they are subsidized by people with private insurance.
00:31:41.000 You're paying a higher level of private insurance because the government is paying a lower level of Medicare.
00:31:47.000 Okay, doctors are lucky to break even on Medicare and they actively lose money on Medicaid.
00:31:47.000 That is why.
00:31:54.000 So, the same way that the Europeans live fat off the prices that we pay here in America for our drugs, Medicaid patients are being subsidized by people on private insurance.
00:32:06.000 Again, if you are going to do international pharma pricing across the board, you're just destroying all of the companies that develop the new innovations.
00:32:13.000 So, again, it's all a mess.
00:32:15.000 And in the end, what will actually cost the answer is a lot of money, a lot of money, like way, way, way more.
00:32:20.000 Name the last government program that saved money.
00:32:22.000 Quick, go.
00:32:23.000 And that didn't end up increasing prices.
00:32:25.000 Quick, anytime now.
00:32:27.000 Yeah, it's not going to do that.
00:32:29.000 It's not going to do that at all.
00:32:31.000 What an amazing video you just watched.
00:32:33.000 Wasn't that amazing?
00:32:34.000 Well, you know, if you think so, head on over to dailywire.comslash subscribe to watch the full show ad free or check out this crazy story here.