The Ben Shapiro Show


Bishop Robert Barron | The Ben Shapiro Show Sunday Special Ep. 31


Summary

In this special episode, Bishop Robert Barron joins us to talk about his new book, Arguing Religion, and why he thinks Catholics should re-judaize Catholicism. He also talks about the differences between Catholic and Protestant theology, and explains why he doesn t believe in God. And he explains why God's existence is not contingent on the existence of causes, but rather, a contingent set of causes that are non-self-explanatory. Thanks to our sponsor, PolicyGenius, for sponsoring this special edition of The Sunday Special. Go check out their products and services right now! Get your quotes and apply in minutes, this instant! You can do the whole thing on your phone right now, and you can do it in minutes! Want more Sunday Specials? Check out our newsletter! Subscribe to our new weekly newsletter, The Catholic Reporter, where we cover all things Catholic, Protestant, and Millennial news and culture. Sign up for a free copy of our newest issue of the newsletter, Holy Grail: A Catholic s Guide to Christianity and the Catholic Faith. Subscribe today! Learn more about your ad choices, including which Catholic priest you can become a supporter of our new show, Holy Grail! and which Catholic church you should be a Catholic priest should be your first guest on the show! If you like the show, please consider becoming a patron! of the show and review our ad-free version of Holy Grail? Subscribe here! Thank you for listening to the show? Subscribe and subscribe to our newest episode of The Catholic Answers, Subscribe to Catholic Answers Radio, a podcast produced by the Catholic Answers! Subscribe to this podcast! Subscribe on iTunes! Enjoy this episode of Catholic Answers Only, a Catholic Lens, a publication dedicated to the Catholic Reporter? Subscribe to the podcast by Catholic Answers Media, Inc., a Catholic Answers and Catholic Answers? Subscribe on Podchaser, a magazine dedicated to The Catholic News, a new edition of the Catholic Review, by a Catholic Review? and much more! Get the latest Catholic Answers to all the Catholic News and information about religion and culture and culture, from the Catholic Criticism, from all the good stuff going on the world, including the Catholic Republic, your choice of Catholics everywhere else, from every Catholic Review and more. , from the world s best vids, including a Catholic News Agency, including The Catholic Review. Catholic News Service,


Transcript

00:00:00.000 I want to re-Judaize Catholicism.
00:00:04.000 In many parts of the Protestant movement, there's a desire to de-Judaize the operation.
00:00:08.000 Catholicism lifts it up.
00:00:10.000 It doesn't want to leave it behind.
00:00:12.000 Christ is the yes to all the promises made to Israel.
00:00:14.000 Here we are on the Sunday special with Bishop Robert Barron, author of Arguing Religion We're going to get to all things Catholic Church related, religion related, life, afterlife, God, death.
00:00:33.000 It'll be some deep stuff.
00:00:34.000 But first, let's talk about the fact you're going to plot.
00:00:36.000 So life insurance is deeply unfun to talk about because most people don't like to think about dying.
00:00:40.000 They definitely don't like thinking about insurance because these are two topics no one likes, death and insurance.
00:00:44.000 But actually having life insurance feels great.
00:00:46.000 Getting that peace of mind doesn't need to be complicated.
00:00:48.000 Policy Genius is an easy way to get life insurance.
00:00:50.000 In minutes, you can compare quotes from top insurers to find the coverage you need at a price you can afford.
00:00:55.000 From there, you can apply online, and the unbiased advisors at Policy Genius will handle all the red tape, leaving you free to do the things you actually enjoy, like philosophical discussions about religion and the afterlife.
00:01:05.000 PolicyGenius doesn't just make life insurance easy.
00:01:07.000 Whether you're shopping for disability insurance to protect your income or homeowner's insurance or auto insurance, they can help you get covered fast.
00:01:13.000 If you've been intimidated or frustrated by insurance in the past, give PolicyGenius a try.
00:01:17.000 Just go to PolicyGenius.com right now.
00:01:20.000 Get your quotes and apply in minutes.
00:01:21.000 You can do the whole thing on your phone right now, this instant.
00:01:24.000 PolicyGenius, it's the easy way to compare and buy life insurance.
00:01:26.000 Be a responsible human.
00:01:28.000 Don't leave your family bereft so they can't pay for your coffin.
00:01:30.000 They have to bury you in a pauper's grave.
00:01:32.000 Go check out PolicyGenius right now, the easy way to compare and buy life insurance.
00:01:36.000 Well, Bishop Barron, thank you so much for joining the program.
00:01:38.000 I really appreciate it.
00:01:39.000 My pleasure to be with you.
00:01:40.000 I have to say that I've gotten an enormous number of requests for you to come on the show, particularly in the aftermath of an interview we did a couple of weeks ago with Pastor John MacArthur, and I'll have some questions about differences between Catholic and Protestant theology in just a minute.
00:01:53.000 Let's start off with a personal question.
00:01:55.000 How did you decide to enter the priesthood?
00:01:56.000 Was this something where, as a child, you thought, this is what I'm going to be doing?
00:01:59.000 Not really.
00:02:00.000 When I was a little kid, I came from a Catholic family, went to Mass on Sunday, but I wasn't all that interested in religion.
00:02:05.000 I wanted to be a baseball player, so I was a Cub fan from Chicago.
00:02:09.000 I wanted to be a shortstop for the Cubs until I was about 14.
00:02:12.000 And when I was 14, I'm in high school religion class, and one of the professors taught us one of Thomas Aquinas' arguments for God's existence.
00:02:20.000 And I'm sure no other kid in the room was the least bit affected by it, but for some reason, it affected me.
00:02:26.000 I went home, went to the library, back in the day when we actually went to libraries and got books out, and I got Mortimer Adler's, you know, The Great Book Series, and I found the one on Thomas Aquinas, and then read that section understanding almost none of it.
00:02:40.000 But it started me, honestly, on a path I never left.
00:02:43.000 It just sort of set my mind on fire.
00:02:45.000 And the priesthood came, you know, further down the pike, but it started then when I was 14.
00:02:49.000 And baseball is still an interest of mine, but I realized I was going down a different path then.
00:02:57.000 That's really fascinating because when you speak with a lot of religious leaders, they tend to come from the perspective that they got into religion specifically through the Bible.
00:03:04.000 And Aquinas' proofs of God's existence are really non-biblical in nature.
00:03:09.000 I mean, they're natural law-based more than anything else.
00:03:11.000 I mean, this is really what you argue in your book, Arguing Religion, is that that's where people should start.
00:03:15.000 Maybe you can discuss a little bit what's your favorite Thomistic proof of God's existence and why you think it's convincing.
00:03:20.000 The one I heard probably as a kid was the proof of motion, so the first argument of Aquinas.
00:03:25.000 But the one I developed in the book actually is not specifically Aquinas.
00:03:28.000 It's more an amalgam of his three.
00:03:30.000 I would call it the argument from contingency.
00:03:33.000 Namely, the world that we experience is a contingent world.
00:03:35.000 It's non-self-explanatory.
00:03:37.000 So it exists, but not necessarily.
00:03:40.000 It exists through an amalgam of causes.
00:03:43.000 They themselves are non-self-explanatory, so we have to go further in our quest for the sufficient explanation.
00:03:49.000 That can't go on indefinitely.
00:03:51.000 We have to come finally to some principle, some reality, which fulfills the conditions of everything else, but itself does not have any conditions to be filled.
00:04:01.000 The actus purus, Aquinas calls it, right?
00:04:03.000 Pure act or pure energy.
00:04:05.000 That which exists through itself.
00:04:07.000 So, in various ways, Proofs 1, 2, and 3 in Aquinas are versions of that argument.
00:04:12.000 And I think most people intuitively sense it.
00:04:16.000 So, you know, there's this massive consensus gentium across the ages that God exists.
00:04:21.000 I mean, the vast majority of people across human history have held that God exists.
00:04:24.000 Now, they can't formulate arguments in a strictly philosophical way, but they sense it, it seems to me.
00:04:31.000 They sense the even essence of this world, and therefore the need for an ultimate ground, you know?
00:04:36.000 So I think that proof makes explicit what a lot of people implicitly intuit about the reality of God.
00:04:43.000 So in your book you talk a little bit about the probably largest kind of pushback to that specific argument, which is the idea of sort of base matter, that there is no God, that at the very root, the only real cause is just the matter itself.
00:04:57.000 How do you respond to sort of the Bertrand Russell base facts argument?
00:05:00.000 You know, a lot of people would say, look, I buy the argument.
00:05:03.000 There's got to be some sort of, you know, final ground for the existence of things or some ultimate cause.
00:05:09.000 The problem is what the proof uncovers is not just a first cause in a long series.
00:05:14.000 It uncovers that which is properly unconditioned in its reality.
00:05:18.000 So that which exists entirely through the power of its own essence.
00:05:22.000 That means something which by its very nature is unlimited in being, because there's no condition that's set for it.
00:05:29.000 When you say matter, you're saying being at the opposite end of that spectrum.
00:05:34.000 Matter is entirely malleable, it's entirely full of potentiality.
00:05:39.000 It's the opposite of octus purus or the unconditioned.
00:05:43.000 So the one thing this reality can't be is material.
00:05:47.000 Which is why people like Aquinas and many others would say the first mover, the uncaused cause, is not a body of any kind, not material.
00:05:54.000 So it's a facile answer but it can't correspond to what that proof actually uncovers, the unconditioned reality.
00:06:02.000 You talk a lot in your book, Arguing Religion, about skepticism and why you think that skepticism is unwarranted in many cases.
00:06:11.000 Maybe you can talk about the limits of skepticism, because we think that all of Western civilization, or at least the post-Enlightenment civilization, is built on the idea of being skeptical.
00:06:18.000 But when it comes to religion, obviously skepticism has been used to tear down religion.
00:06:23.000 Yeah, I mean, in its modern form.
00:06:24.000 I mean, go right back to Augustine and his battle against what he called the academics, you know.
00:06:29.000 See, follow or assume, Augustine says, if I make a mistake, I am.
00:06:34.000 Descartes' cogito ergo sum is just a riff on that.
00:06:37.000 I mean, he learned it from Augustine.
00:06:39.000 If I'm making a mistake about absolutely everything, at least I know I am.
00:06:43.000 So, Augustine uses that to refute a radical skepticism.
00:06:47.000 Anyone that engages in rational discourse is not a radical skeptic.
00:06:51.000 I mean, anyone that engages in what we're doing now, some kind of conversation, is appealing implicitly or explicitly to some objective standard of truth.
00:07:00.000 Of moral goodness, you know?
00:07:02.000 So a complete radical skepticism is just incoherent.
00:07:06.000 It can be used as a tool, you know, as a kind of provisional tool to move the mind along, but you can't accept as a worldview a radical skepticism.
00:07:15.000 It's more post-modernity, I think, that moves in that direction of a, you know, kind of dismantling of all the epistemic and moral systems.
00:07:23.000 You can't finally do that and have something like a rational discourse.
00:07:26.000 Okay, so when it comes to skepticism, you talk again in the book about skepticism, and your chief response to people who are skeptical about religion is that there are perfectly rational reasons to believe, particularly in God.
00:07:37.000 And you use the Thomistic proofs, as we were discussing, which are non-revelatory in nature.
00:07:42.000 They're basic rational—trying to reason from the nature of the world to what that world is about.
00:07:48.000 But it seems to me that most of the people who are skeptical of religion are not actually skeptical of God, per se.
00:07:52.000 They actually like the idea of God, in essence.
00:07:55.000 How do you get from that to the Bible?
00:07:57.000 How do you get from that to Revelation, which obviously makes a lot more stringent claims that have to be tried against reason and very often are found wanting?
00:08:06.000 The miraculous, in many cases.
00:08:07.000 Well, I'll say a couple of things.
00:08:08.000 I mean, one is that Aquinas is basing that approach on the Bible in a way.
00:08:12.000 I mean, because the heavens proclaim the glory of God, the Bible says, or Paul, you know, from the visible things of this world, we can move to the invisible things of God.
00:08:19.000 So within the Bible itself, there's a kind of warrant for what we call natural theology or philosophical proof.
00:08:25.000 But yeah, I'd say this, Aquinas refers to his famous arguments as a type of monoductio, Latin for leading by the hand.
00:08:33.000 The way you take a little child, like, come on, let me help you, let me show you, you know, how to walk.
00:08:38.000 So the philosophical arguments can lead someone who, let's say, is totally outside the realm of the religious, to the point where they might be able to accept what's given in Revelation.
00:08:48.000 To accept the revelation of the Bible might be too much for someone, especially today, who's completely outside the ambit of religion.
00:08:54.000 But the arguments might awaken the mind sufficiently, or give a sufficient warrant to say, yeah, I'll take a look at the Bible.
00:09:03.000 I use the example of getting to know a person, right?
00:09:07.000 So I'm meeting you for the first time today.
00:09:09.000 But I did, you know, a fair amount of looking into your background.
00:09:12.000 I've seen videos you've done, etc.
00:09:14.000 I came to my own conclusions about, you know, watching you in action and reading about you.
00:09:18.000 Now I'm meeting you for the first time.
00:09:20.000 I'm learning more about you on my own terms.
00:09:23.000 So I'm using my mind to learn different things about you.
00:09:26.000 I mean, let's say over many years, then we became friends and I came to know you more and more.
00:09:31.000 At a certain point, you would tell me something about yourself.
00:09:36.000 If our friendship deepens sufficiently, that I would never have guessed or known independently of that.
00:09:42.000 At which point, I'd have to make an act of faith.
00:09:44.000 I'd have to say, yeah, I believe that.
00:09:48.000 I can't prove it.
00:09:48.000 I can't know it directly.
00:09:50.000 Now, it's consistent with everything else I've learned about you.
00:09:53.000 It's not some egregious claim, right?
00:09:57.000 But finally, I've got to say, yeah, I believe Him.
00:10:02.000 I've come to trust Him.
00:10:04.000 I think that's the analogy for reason in relation to faith.
00:10:07.000 When it comes to God, you can discover an awful lot of things through the mind, by looking at the world and reasoning about it, and lots of our great thinkers have done that.
00:10:16.000 That can lead me into the forecourt of the temple, if you want.
00:10:20.000 But at a certain point, Our great tradition claims that God speaks.
00:10:25.000 We don't mean that literally, but I mean that God has revealed something about his own heart that we couldn't have guessed on the basis of reason.
00:10:34.000 I have to say, okay, I believe or not.
00:10:37.000 I have to say, I accept that or not.
00:10:39.000 But reason can predispose me to that point of acceptance.
00:10:44.000 That's how the Catholic Church sort of does it, the play of faith and reason.
00:10:49.000 Moving into the forecourt of the Gentiles is not a bad place to be, because it predisposes you to the point of the act of faith.
00:10:57.000 But you need more than reason.
00:10:59.000 I mean, philosophical reason would not be sufficient for someone seeking real communion with God.
00:11:04.000 So, why not?
00:11:06.000 I mean, this is the argument, obviously, that Aquinas asks about.
00:11:08.000 He says, why, in addition to natural law, do you actually need a Bible?
00:11:12.000 Why do you need Revelation?
00:11:13.000 So, what's the answer to that for you?
00:11:15.000 Why is it that we can't just, given all of the premises of a universe created by an intelligent being with a plan and with kindness and goodness, why do we need a set of commandments?
00:11:26.000 Why do we need Or in the Christian view, a savior to come down and change the nature of the world itself.
00:11:33.000 Well, in answer to the first question, Aquinas and our tradition would tend to say the Ten Commandments correspond roughly to the first principles of the natural law.
00:11:40.000 And so in a way... Yeah, Maimonides says the same in ours.
00:11:42.000 Yeah, and so in a way, that's true.
00:11:44.000 There's an overlap between the two.
00:11:46.000 See, I would just now speak as a Christian and say, there's no way on the basis of philosophical arguments that I can ever know That God loves me to the point of giving his own self as a gift to me.
00:12:00.000 That God died that I might come into union with him.
00:12:04.000 I mean, there's no way I could learn that through philosophical argumentation.
00:12:09.000 That God is love, I mean the great central Christian claim, which is a Trinitarian claim, right?
00:12:15.000 If God is love, There's lover, beloved, and shared love within the very nature of God.
00:12:20.000 How do we know that?
00:12:21.000 Well, the first Christians knew it from the cross of Jesus, you know?
00:12:25.000 That God so loved the world, He sent His only Son into our dysfunction, drawing now the Son back to the Father in the Holy Spirit to save us.
00:12:34.000 I can't guess at that.
00:12:34.000 There's no argument for that.
00:12:37.000 It's congruent with the God who's the unconditioned act of being itself and all of that.
00:12:41.000 There's no way I would have guessed at that.
00:12:43.000 I couldn't come to that on my own.
00:12:45.000 That was revealed.
00:12:47.000 And then from the depth of my heart, I say yes to that.
00:12:50.000 I accept that revelation is true.
00:12:53.000 And the same is true, I think, within Judaism as well, you know.
00:12:56.000 But that's the play between faith and reason.
00:12:59.000 I've never been at home, I love Kierkegaard, but I've never been at home with the leap of faith thing.
00:13:04.000 Because especially the way it's used today, as though it's simply this wild leap into the dark.
00:13:08.000 No, it's not that.
00:13:10.000 We've been brought to a certain point by our minds, but then from that perspective, from that point, we're able to make this act of loving acceptance more easily.
00:13:22.000 But no, we can't reduce it to reason, or you'd never guess that, that God is love to the point of death.
00:13:27.000 I think there are serious questions to be asked about whether reason alone can bring you to the point of Even beyond the Ten Commandments, how far reason can get you?
00:13:36.000 Because there are limitations to the moral societies that have been created by human beings.
00:13:41.000 And if it were really true that we could create a moral society under any circumstances simply by the act of reason alone, human beings all over the world have been capable of reason.
00:13:48.000 And yet, the goodness that we've seen in terms of rights and prosperity, all of this only arises in the context of one civilization with one specific history.
00:13:58.000 Well, that's of course a very interesting thing.
00:14:00.000 I'm thinking, too, though, in the Christian context, of the love of one's enemies.
00:14:03.000 That's not an entirely rational principle.
00:14:05.000 I mean, that's something that's, we'd say, the result of a supernatural grace.
00:14:10.000 See, you can really love your enemy, that you will the good of your enemy for your enemy's sake.
00:14:17.000 So, not that it were down to your benefit, but you love—that's, again, acquaintance—to will the good of the other as other, even your enemy.
00:14:24.000 That's not a rational thing to do.
00:14:26.000 You won't find that in Aristotle.
00:14:27.000 You won't find that in the great Kantian system, for example.
00:14:31.000 But you find it at the heart of the gospel because it's predicated upon grace, the love of God that goes all the way to the limits of God-forsakenness, that God loves us, his enemies.
00:14:44.000 For our own sake.
00:14:45.000 If we're capable of that, it's because of grace operating in us.
00:14:49.000 Not just because of our own musing or our own, you know, will to excel.
00:14:55.000 That's the result of pure gift, you know?
00:15:00.000 So all of that belongs to the properly theological dimension of Christian thought and behavior.
00:15:05.000 So in a second, I want to ask you some very awkward questions about differences between our two religions and how we live together in peace and harmony.
00:15:12.000 But first, let's talk about how you're going to sleep better.
00:15:15.000 So I know you are riveted by this conversation, as am I, but at some point tonight, you're going to have to go to sleep.
00:15:19.000 And when you do, the question is, why would you buy a generic mattress built for somebody else?
00:15:23.000 Helix Sleep has built a sleep quiz that takes two minutes to complete.
00:15:26.000 They use the answers to match your body type and sleep preferences to the perfect mattress, whether you're a side sleeper or a hot sleeper, whether you like a plush or a firm bed.
00:15:32.000 With Helix, there's no more guessing and no more confusion.
00:15:35.000 Just go to helixsleep.com slash bed and guest, because I have a guest.
00:15:38.000 Take their two-minute sleep quiz.
00:15:39.000 They will match you to a mattress that will give you the best sleep of your life.
00:15:43.000 My wife and I have a Helix Sleep mattress.
00:15:44.000 It is fantastic.
00:15:45.000 We went onto the Helix Sleep website.
00:15:47.000 We did the 2-minute sleep quiz.
00:15:48.000 It came in the mail.
00:15:49.000 We unwrapped it and inflated it in front of us.
00:15:50.000 We tossed it on the bed frame.
00:15:51.000 We were good to go.
00:15:52.000 It's so comfortable, I got one for my sister for her wedding as well.
00:15:55.000 For couples, Helix can even split that mattress down the middle, providing individual support needs and feel preferences for each side.
00:16:01.000 They also have a 10-year warranty.
00:16:02.000 You get to try it out for 100 nights risk-free.
00:16:04.000 So what exactly are you waiting for?
00:16:05.000 Right now, Helix is offering up to $125 off all mattress orders.
00:16:09.000 Again, up to $125 off at helixsleep.com slash bengest.
00:16:13.000 That is helixsleep.com slash bengest for $125 off your mattress order.
00:16:17.000 Helixsleep.com slash bengest.
00:16:20.000 Okay, so I promised awkward questions, and so there shall be.
00:16:22.000 So let's start with the most awkward of the awkward questions.
00:16:24.000 I don't really care about this question particularly much, but I get this question a lot, which is As a Jew, how does it feel that there are other religions that don't think you're getting into heaven?
00:16:33.000 So let me ask you, what's the Catholic view on who gets into heaven and who doesn't?
00:16:36.000 I feel like I lead a pretty good life, a very religiously based life in which I try to keep not just the Ten Commandments, but a solid 603 other commandments as well.
00:16:45.000 And I spend an awful lot of my time promulgating what I would consider to be Judeo-Christian virtues, particularly in Western societies.
00:16:51.000 So what's the Catholic view of me?
00:16:53.000 Am I basically screwed here?
00:16:54.000 No.
00:16:55.000 The Catholic view, go back to the Second Vatican Council, says it very clearly.
00:16:58.000 I mean, Christ is the privileged route to salvation.
00:17:01.000 God so loved the world that he gave his only son that we might find eternal life.
00:17:04.000 So that's the privileged route.
00:17:05.000 However, Vatican II clearly teaches that someone outside the explicit Christian faith can be saved.
00:17:12.000 Now, they're saved through the grace of Christ, indirectly received.
00:17:15.000 So, I mean, the grace is coming from Christ, but it might be received according to your conscience.
00:17:19.000 So, if you're following your conscience sincerely, or in your case, you're following the commandments of the law sincerely, yeah, you can be saved.
00:17:27.000 Now, that doesn't conduce to a complete relativism.
00:17:29.000 We still would say the privileged route and the route that God has offered to humanity is the route of his Son.
00:17:36.000 But no, you can be saved.
00:17:38.000 Even Vatican II says an atheist of goodwill can be saved because in following his conscience, if he does, John Henry Newman said the conscience is the aboriginal vicar of Christ in the soul.
00:17:50.000 It's a very interesting characterization that it is, in fact, the voice of Christ.
00:17:54.000 If he's the Logos made flesh, Right?
00:17:57.000 He's the divine mind or reason made flesh, that when I follow my conscience, I'm following him, whether I know it explicitly or not.
00:18:04.000 So even the atheist, Vatican II teaches, of goodwill can be saved.
00:18:08.000 So is Catholicism acts-based or faith-based?
00:18:10.000 Because this has been sort of the traditional distinction between Judaism, for example, and Christianity, is Judaism is a very acts-based religion, where it's all about what you do in this life and that No, I would say it's love-based.
00:18:20.000 God is love.
00:18:21.000 God so loved the world, he sent his only son.
00:18:22.000 that are more based on you believe in the truth, the way, and the life, and now you're in.
00:18:26.000 Where does Catholicism actually stand, or is that division too stark?
00:18:30.000 No, I would say it's love-based.
00:18:32.000 God is love.
00:18:33.000 God so loved the world, he sent his only son.
00:18:35.000 We're being drawn into the divine love.
00:18:38.000 Now, do we have to accept that love as an act of faith?
00:18:41.000 Of course.
00:18:42.000 Right?
00:18:43.000 So God makes this great offer in Christ.
00:18:46.000 Is it accepted in faith?
00:18:47.000 Yeah.
00:18:47.000 Aquinas says faith is the door of the spiritual life.
00:18:50.000 Without faith, you can't get into the spiritual life.
00:18:52.000 That means a trust in the divine love.
00:18:55.000 Now, having made that great fundamental act, are you now called upon to be fully engaged—mind, will, passion, body, everything—in response to that love, a love awakening love in you?
00:19:09.000 Yes.
00:19:10.000 So we'd use the language of cooperation with grace, that grace comes first, accepted in faith.
00:19:16.000 Luther was right to that extent.
00:19:18.000 If Luther had said, gratia prima, we'd be fine.
00:19:21.000 Grace first.
00:19:22.000 That's true at any time you're relating to God.
00:19:24.000 If you're saying, I'm going to do it.
00:19:26.000 I'm on my way to climb the holy mountain.
00:19:28.000 Well, then you're on the wrong path.
00:19:30.000 Just by definition.
00:19:32.000 So of course it begins with grace.
00:19:33.000 But then God, who's not competitive with us, He wants us fully alive.
00:19:39.000 And so God invites us now to respond, body and soul, everything we've got, in love to the love that He's offered us.
00:19:47.000 So I'd put it that way.
00:19:48.000 It's grace and then cooperation with grace, which manifests itself in a life of love.
00:19:53.000 And that's what salvation consists in.
00:19:56.000 See, one thing too, Ben, think of it this way.
00:19:59.000 What gets me to heaven?
00:20:01.000 Well, what is heaven?
00:20:03.000 Paul says, you know, the three things at last—faith, hope, and love.
00:20:06.000 But the greatest of these is love.
00:20:08.000 Because in heaven, faith fades away.
00:20:10.000 I don't need faith anymore.
00:20:11.000 I'm seeing.
00:20:12.000 In heaven, hope fades away.
00:20:14.000 Who needs to hope?
00:20:14.000 You got it.
00:20:16.000 But love endures, because love is what heaven is.
00:20:18.000 So if you say, well, I don't care about love.
00:20:20.000 It's just pure faith.
00:20:22.000 Well, what are you going to do all day in heaven?
00:20:25.000 That's what heaven is, is the act of love.
00:20:28.000 So it begins here below, as we cooperate with grace.
00:20:31.000 I'd say that's the Catholic way of looking at it.
00:20:34.000 So how do you square that with the sort of modern perception of what love is?
00:20:38.000 So many people in Western society believe that love is essentially tolerance.
00:20:41.000 Whatever my friend wants to do, I'm on their side, I'm with them, I have to boost their self-esteem.
00:20:46.000 And that's the ultimate love.
00:20:48.000 If I were to Yeah.
00:20:49.000 Yeah, I mean, tolerance is the great modern virtue.
00:20:51.000 So you might say that, you know, diversity is what we accept and therefore tolerance is the great virtue.
00:20:55.000 But see, tolerance would not really be a Christian virtue.
00:20:57.000 view on the over-application of tolerance in your book.
00:21:00.000 Yeah, I mean, tolerance is the great modern virtue.
00:21:02.000 You might say that diversity is what we accept, and therefore tolerance is the great virtue.
00:21:07.000 But see, tolerance would not really be a Christian virtue.
00:21:10.000 Love is the virtue.
00:21:11.000 Now, it can include what we mean by tolerance.
00:21:16.000 But the trouble is this.
00:21:16.000 See, love means willing the good of the other.
00:21:21.000 That might take the form, as it does, for example, in the great prophets, of calling somebody out and saying, look, what you're doing is repugnant to God's will.
00:21:31.000 That's willing your good.
00:21:32.000 That's not coming down hard on you.
00:21:34.000 That's willing what's best for you.
00:21:37.000 So that tough love, sure, that's a face of love.
00:21:41.000 So if you prioritize tolerance, you're marginalizing what belongs at the very heart of the matter, which is the willing of the good of the other.
00:21:49.000 That's the virtue we want.
00:21:50.000 Do you think that religion, mainline religion, whether Catholic, Protestant or Jewish, is having trouble specifically because people are mistaking one for the other?
00:21:58.000 I can see it in my Jewish community, right?
00:21:59.000 I mean, I can see that the Orthodox are growing.
00:22:01.000 We continue to grow as a sect of Judaism and, as I would say, the most authentic sect of Judaism that actually cares about the words of the Torah.
00:22:08.000 It's growing.
00:22:10.000 Kids tend to stay involved, but other sects of Judaism tend to fade away over time.
00:22:14.000 But that's not stopping the Jewish community from thinking, OK, the way I'm going to get these kids who are disenchanted back into the synagogues is with guitar and pizza and parties.
00:22:23.000 We went down that road in the Catholic Church.
00:22:24.000 I grew up in that time after Vatican II, you know, and it rather massively didn't work.
00:22:30.000 No, I think, as the great spiritual masters, they all know this.
00:22:33.000 I mean, Dostoevsky famously saying, you know, real love is a harsh and dreadful thing.
00:22:37.000 So real love is not this sort of bland, you know, namby-pamby, anything goes, you know, I'm okay, you're okay.
00:22:43.000 On the contrary, real love wants the good of the other, and so it makes demands.
00:22:50.000 It upsets people very often, the real thing.
00:22:53.000 So it's not sentimental.
00:22:54.000 We've hyper-sentimentalized a lot of religious language and that's caused huge problems.
00:23:01.000 There's something kind of spare and bracing about the Aquinas language of willing the good of the other.
00:23:08.000 And that can take a softer form if you want, it can take a harder form depending on the circumstances.
00:23:13.000 But the focus is always on the other, as other.
00:23:16.000 It's like when the Lord says, you know, to love your enemies, as I was saying.
00:23:20.000 That's the great test of love, because if it's your enemy, it's not someone who's going to pay you back.
00:23:24.000 So if I'm kind to you, that you might be kind to me.
00:23:27.000 Well, that's not love, right?
00:23:28.000 That's an indirect egotism.
00:23:30.000 I will give you a party that you might give me a party in return.
00:23:34.000 That's why in the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus says exactly that.
00:23:37.000 Don't give a party for those who can repay you, right?
00:23:40.000 Don't loan to those who can pay you back with interest.
00:23:43.000 That's not the point.
00:23:44.000 The point is to be good to those that can't return the favor.
00:23:50.000 That's tough stuff, both for you and often for the other person.
00:23:54.000 And right, the modern tolerance is kind of a vague simulacrum of that.
00:23:58.000 I want to ask you some basic kind of Catholic doctrinal questions because I think we in the general public who aren't Catholic have some basic views about Catholicism that are likely wrong but well accepted.
00:24:09.000 So papal infallibility, can you just define that?
00:24:11.000 How far does the Pope's infallibility go?
00:24:13.000 Do I have to take everything if I'm a Catholic that he says at face value?
00:24:16.000 Is some of it political interpretation?
00:24:18.000 What is the vicar of Christ and what is just him saying things?
00:24:23.000 It's very narrowly defined.
00:24:24.000 That's the important thing within Catholic ecclesiology, the theology of the Church.
00:24:28.000 When the Pope speaks, we say, ex cathedra, from the chair, in the formal manner, on matters of faith and morals, for the sake of the entire Church.
00:24:37.000 He's speaking infallibly.
00:24:39.000 It's happened precisely twice.
00:24:42.000 Since the thing was declared formally.
00:24:44.000 So this is a very, very rare thing.
00:24:46.000 We speak about the infallibility of the ordinary magisterium.
00:24:50.000 Now that means the bishops in union with the Pope teaching on a key matter of faith and morals in general consensus around the world.
00:24:57.000 We recognize that as an infallibility of this ordinary teaching of the Church.
00:25:02.000 But the Pope himself, it's on such rare occasion, Now, the Pope does deliver himself of formal teachings like encyclicals, which have to be taken with tremendous seriousness.
00:25:12.000 But might a Catholic, you know, quarrel here and there with something in an encyclical?
00:25:15.000 Sure.
00:25:16.000 It's not an infallible statement.
00:25:18.000 Much less certain prudential judgments of a pope.
00:25:21.000 A pope might make a judgment, a prudential determination about a policy within the church, or a political judgment.
00:25:29.000 Is one obliged to accept that?
00:25:30.000 No.
00:25:31.000 I mean, we approach the pope always in an attitude of deep respect.
00:25:34.000 He's a successor of Peter.
00:25:36.000 He's the vicar of Christ.
00:25:37.000 He's the guarantor of our unity.
00:25:38.000 So the pope is always treated with enormous respect.
00:25:41.000 But the infallibility is a very, very narrowly defined No, that's not Catholic teaching.
00:25:55.000 And what's Catholic teaching as far as how doctrine develops?
00:25:57.000 So over the course of centuries, where's the limitations?
00:26:00.000 Because what we see in the Orthodox Jewish community, and we're seeing this now, is in Orthodox Judaism we have this idea of the oral law, which is the interpretation of the text of the Torah, and this continues over centuries, and it leaves open the possibility, if you're not careful, of people People straying from the text so far that they are actually contravening the text.
00:26:18.000 I assume that you've had some similar problems in Catholicism itself as well.
00:26:23.000 So how is interpretation limited in sort of Catholic doctrine?
00:26:26.000 Yeah, I go back to John Henry Newman there, who says that ideas don't exist on the pages of books, but in the play of lively minds, he says.
00:26:34.000 So you and I talking right now, it's an example of an idea is developing, it's unfolding.
00:26:40.000 So Newman says the way the seed grows into the great tree, My preferred one from Newman is the way a river begins very small but then it deepens and broadens and takes in all kinds of influences as it moves through space and time.
00:26:53.000 And so like the idea of the Incarnation, as Saint Peter took it in, As St.
00:27:01.000 Paul articulated it, now as Chrysostom articulates it, as Jerome articulates it, as Augustine and Aquinas and so on, that's the river deepening and broadening over space and time.
00:27:12.000 Now, to your point, because ideas develop, they can corrupt.
00:27:18.000 So it can be the case that you've deviated from the essential meaning of an idea.
00:27:22.000 That's where the authority of the church comes in.
00:27:25.000 So we're not just a debating society.
00:27:27.000 That's a danger across the ages, but especially today, is to turn the church into a debating society.
00:27:33.000 So let's all just get together and we have this open-ended conversation and we never decide anything.
00:27:38.000 No, the danger of corruption there is extremely high.
00:27:41.000 So the church, through its bishops and through the Pope, ultimately, It's like an umpiring voice.
00:27:46.000 I might use the baseball analogy.
00:27:49.000 The play is going on, there's a bang-bang play at second base, and the call is made, right?
00:27:54.000 You're out.
00:27:55.000 And people might dispute it, you know, you're crazy, you didn't see it right.
00:27:58.000 But if we allow that to go on, that dispute, the game just unravels, right?
00:28:02.000 The game ends.
00:28:03.000 So real baseball people like umpires.
00:28:06.000 Even though we boo when they come on the field, but a real baseball person likes the umpire.
00:28:10.000 Thank God, thank God the umpire's there to say, no, look man, you're out, okay?
00:28:13.000 I know, you don't like it, but off the field and the game goes on.
00:28:17.000 See, and that's the right rhythm.
00:28:19.000 The game of theology is this play of lively minds.
00:28:22.000 Good.
00:28:23.000 Theologians and people talking and arguing and back and forth and the thing developing.
00:28:27.000 But occasionally, And if you over-umpire, like over-referee a basketball game, that wrecks the game too, right?
00:28:33.000 Call on every little thing.
00:28:35.000 So occasionally, the church would intervene to say, nope, nope, nope, that's not it.
00:28:39.000 That's too far.
00:28:40.000 That's a unraveling of the idea.
00:28:43.000 Now, play ball.
00:28:44.000 Off you go.
00:28:44.000 So this raises another question, which is, if the church is the umpire, The critique that's been made, particularly by Protestants, Pastor John MacArthur sat in the chair that you're sitting in just a few weeks ago, and his argument was basically that by the 15th century, the Church had become more of an obstacle than a middleman, less a conduit to the truth of the Bible, and more of an obstacle to people understanding the truth of the Bible.
00:29:07.000 Has there ever been a time when you think the Catholic Church has done that, or has the Catholic Church always served its purpose of being sort of the middleman between God and the normal Christian?
00:29:16.000 Well, you know, I'd say a couple of things.
00:29:17.000 One is the principle Ecclesia Semper Reformanda, right?
00:29:20.000 The church must always be reformed.
00:29:22.000 That's a Catholic principle.
00:29:23.000 That's an ancient patristic principle.
00:29:26.000 So when Luther picks that up as a great reformer, that's a Catholic principle.
00:29:30.000 Of course, the church is always to be reformed.
00:29:33.000 The church, you know, in its particular expressions and the particular people that play these roles can, you know, can go off-beam sometimes.
00:29:43.000 However, I don't want the umpire off the field because then the play is going to unravel.
00:29:50.000 And I would dare say, you know, I say it with great affection for all my Protestant friends and for Protestantism, but the 30,000 denominations of Protestantism is not a good reflection of Jesus' great prayer that they might be one.
00:30:04.000 One of the guarantors of unity is precisely this umpiring voice of the Church.
00:30:09.000 I'd furthermore say this.
00:30:12.000 Would you pick up Hamlet and hand it to a kid and say, off you go, just read it, you'll be fine, you'll understand it?
00:30:19.000 No, I mean, we surround Hamlet with this complex interpretive apparatus and a tradition of reception.
00:30:27.000 And we help someone read that complex text through that interpretive lens.
00:30:33.000 That's why I think it's borderline irresponsible just to pick up the Bible to say, now, off you go, read it.
00:30:39.000 When it comes to the unity of the Church, an argument could be made, and it has been made by folks like Sam Harris, for example, that the unity of the Church is what led to theocracy for hundreds of years.
00:30:47.000 That basically, between the fall of the Roman Empire and the Peace of Westphalia, you have Catholic dominance across the continent of Europe, and that results in a certain level of intellectual stagnation, he would argue.
00:30:59.000 It results in A hidebound attempt to victimize people of other religions.
00:31:07.000 How does Catholicism make room for other religions in the absence of Protestantism, for example?
00:31:13.000 I mean, is the rise of Protestantism seen by Catholicism as a bad thing in the sense that it does all the things that you've talked about before, or does it provide room for the flourishing of more than one type of religion and a certain level of diversity that's good for the conversation?
00:31:28.000 Yeah, you're raising a complex set of questions there.
00:31:30.000 I mean, to the degree that modernity as we know it politically emerged out of Protestantism, which I think it did in many ways, many important ways, the Church has found an awful lot of good within modernity and doesn't advocate now, certainly, this kind of alter-throne relationship sort of thing.
00:31:45.000 We don't advocate, you know, taking over the government and the Church running political affairs.
00:31:51.000 There's a legitimate independence, a legitimate To that degree, I think it embraces very much the modern sense of pluralism and a certain separation between the church's preoccupation and that of politics.
00:32:08.000 So we have no quarrel with that.
00:32:10.000 You can go back to history and say, well, it was done differently a long time ago.
00:32:15.000 I think to that degree, we'd embrace a lot of those modern reforms.
00:32:19.000 Okay, so I want to ask you in just a second about contrasting various popes over the past, the course of my lifetime, I'm not that old, so only three, but I'll ask you to compare and contrast in just a second.
00:32:29.000 First, let's talk about your investing.
00:32:31.000 So Robinhood is an investing app.
00:32:32.000 It lets you buy and sell stocks, ETFs, options, cryptos, all commission-free.
00:32:36.000 They strive to make financial services work for everybody, not just for wealthy folks.
00:32:39.000 It's a non-intimidating way for stock market newcomers to invest for the first time.
00:32:43.000 With confidence.
00:32:44.000 It's simple and intuitive.
00:32:44.000 A bunch of folks at the office use it.
00:32:46.000 It is clearly designed.
00:32:47.000 The data are presented in an easy-to-digest way.
00:32:50.000 Other brokerages charge up to $10 for every trade, so you lose maybe the entire profit margin on a trade.
00:32:54.000 But Robinhood doesn't charge commission fees.
00:32:56.000 You trade the stocks, and you keep all your profits.
00:32:58.000 It's got easy-to-understand charts, market data.
00:32:59.000 You place a trade in just four taps on your smartphone.
00:33:02.000 And the Robinhood web platform lets you use stock collections, like 100 Most Popular, in sectors like entertainment and social media, and curated categories like female CEOs, analyst ratings, and buy-hold-sell for every stock.
00:33:12.000 Learn how to invest as you build your portfolio.
00:33:14.000 Discover new stocks and track favorite companies with personalized news feeds, custom notifications for price movements, all sorts of great stuff.
00:33:20.000 Robinhood right now is giving listeners a free stock like Apple, Ford, or Sprint to help build your portfolio.
00:33:25.000 Sign up right now at benshapiro.robinhood.com.
00:33:29.000 That's benshapiro.robinhood.com.
00:33:30.000 It's a fantastic app.
00:33:32.000 It'll help you learn to trade better.
00:33:33.000 Go check it out, benshapiro.robinhood.com.
00:33:36.000 So when last we left our subject, I was going to ask you about the three popes of the last 25 years, 30 years.
00:33:44.000 So Pope John Paul II, Pope Benedict, and Pope Francis.
00:33:47.000 As a Jew, I get to criticize Popes however much I want, which is great for me, but my perception has been that Pope John Paul II, obviously a historic figure in many ways, particularly in his anti-communism, Pope Benedict A traditionalist, one of the great religious thinkers of our time, and I've been highly critical of Pope Francis, who's been perceived by the media as much more progressive on politics, much more focused on issues like global warming than, for example, abortion.
00:34:10.000 Do you think that that is a mislabel of Pope Francis's actual legacy, or do you think that the media are doing a responsible job in covering what exactly Pope Francis is doing?
00:34:19.000 Yeah, I mean, every pope has a specific emphasis.
00:34:23.000 I mean, so John Paul coming out of his great struggle with communism, and that massively influences his social thinking.
00:34:29.000 Benedict, I think, coming out of his European cultural background and wanting very much to re-evangelize Europe.
00:34:35.000 I would say that's maybe key to him.
00:34:37.000 Francis coming out of his Latin American, specifically Argentinian, background.
00:34:41.000 You know, I think a certain suspicion probably of American capitalism is in the Pope's, you know, thinking in his intellectual wheelhouse.
00:34:50.000 He's a prophetic type voice, so he's critical.
00:34:54.000 He does what the prophets often do.
00:34:55.000 He criticizes what he takes to be all these excesses within the capitalist system.
00:35:01.000 He's not so much a constructive thinker there.
00:35:03.000 Like, what's he proposing as the way forward?
00:35:06.000 He's, you know, in the sort of Jeremiah mode, I think, of putting his finger on excesses.
00:35:12.000 Now, read John Paul II on the market economy, for example.
00:35:15.000 He's a great advocate of it.
00:35:16.000 In Centesimus Annus, you know, he says the church advocates the market.
00:35:20.000 He prefers to call it that rather than capitalism.
00:35:22.000 But, very clearly says A market circumscribed morally, circumscribed legally, a market that is not simply open to the free play of buying and selling, etc.
00:35:37.000 So I think Francis picks up on that side of it.
00:35:40.000 Maybe without the balance you found typically in a John Paul, but that's also typical of the prophets.
00:35:45.000 They tend to be a little over the top.
00:35:48.000 That's how I read Francis.
00:35:49.000 What do you think of the critique that's been made by a lot of folks that he's a devotee of liberation theology?
00:35:53.000 No, I think that's almost demonstrably false, because at a certain point in his development, I mean, he knew the liberation theology movement and turned against it.
00:36:02.000 It's more of a populism, I would say.
00:36:03.000 It was not the embrace of the Marxist option.
00:36:06.000 He was very influenced by a Frenchman called Gaston Fossard, who was a mid-century French Jesuit, sharply critical of Marx and of Marxism.
00:36:16.000 And so, I think Bergoglio consciously departs from liberation theology.
00:36:21.000 He opts for a different path.
00:36:23.000 It's more of a populism.
00:36:25.000 It's an embrace of popular piety.
00:36:28.000 It's an embrace of kind of the people.
00:36:30.000 Now, not in the Marxist sense of the term, but more in this Latin American sense.
00:36:35.000 So, I think he's demonstrably not with liberation theology.
00:36:38.000 Well, the media have been, obviously, very pro-Pope Francis, much more than they were, obviously, with Benedict or with John Paul II for most of his life.
00:36:47.000 As he approached his death, obviously, they became much more pro, because this is typical in how the media treat people who they perceive to not agree with them politically.
00:36:56.000 The focus on the Catholic Church more broadly, beyond Pope Francis, by the media, has been almost entirely, in the past couple of decades, on the number of sex scandals.
00:37:04.000 What do you think is the best way for the Church to deal with sex scandals?
00:37:06.000 How serious is the problem?
00:37:08.000 Do you think that the media are basically picking on the Church as opposed to other institutions in society that have had similar problems?
00:37:13.000 Well, there's something true to that.
00:37:15.000 And I'm always reluctant, you know, to lead, as I'm doing right now, to lead with that, looking defensive.
00:37:20.000 But I think that's certainly fair to say.
00:37:22.000 That this problem is a universal human problem.
00:37:24.000 You can find it in almost every institution, every society.
00:37:29.000 I would say in God's providence that it was brought to light so dramatically in the church to force, you know, to bring it to the world's attention.
00:37:38.000 And it's part of what the church is bearing.
00:37:40.000 A legitimate punishment, I would say.
00:37:43.000 But for the sake of the world, that what we've had to wrestle with, I think, now is benefiting other institutions.
00:37:49.000 But it is fair to say that the problem is much wider than Catholicism.
00:37:54.000 One stat that I think is very interesting is across the board and across the decades, you look at the numbers, and when they're presented in kind of a raw form, you say, how, you know, horrific.
00:38:02.000 And of course, one act of child sex abuse is horrific.
00:38:06.000 But when you look at the numbers, they almost always correspond roughly to the national average of about 4%.
00:38:13.000 You look at men across society, roughly 4% engage in this behavior.
00:38:19.000 That's almost how it breaks down across the board within the Catholic Church.
00:38:23.000 So in that sense, too, it's unfair to say it's a uniquely Catholic problem.
00:38:27.000 Having said all that, I think it is important that it's being brought to light precisely in that framework so that we can bring healing to it and maybe deeper instruction than to other institutions as well.
00:38:41.000 I don't think the media is picking on the church in this measure.
00:38:46.000 Thank God for the media.
00:38:48.000 You know, that revealed the thing when the church, to be frank, was not as willing or able to deal with it.
00:38:55.000 Thank God, in a way, for the Boston Globe that brought this thing to light.
00:38:59.000 So, I don't really quarrel with that, you know.
00:39:01.000 I think, just as in the Old Testament, God using Cyrus.
00:39:05.000 I mean, God can use even enemies of Israel to affect Israel in a positive way.
00:39:10.000 Did God use enemies of the church, in a way, to help the church?
00:39:15.000 Yeah, I think so.
00:39:16.000 What do you make of the schism that seems to have been breaking out inside the Catholic Church at the upper echelons over the handling of the sex abuse crisis by the Vatican, for example?
00:39:25.000 I'm very hopeful of the February meeting coming up, when the Pope is gathering the presidents of all the Bishops' Conferences from around the world.
00:39:32.000 I'm very hopeful that will make some important moves.
00:39:36.000 I'll confess to being disappointed.
00:39:38.000 As a member of the Bishops' Conference, last November we gathered and we wanted very much to vote on some very specific measures.
00:39:45.000 Protocols that would address this issue.
00:39:47.000 And the Vatican asked us to pause.
00:39:49.000 They didn't say, you know, it's over, don't do it.
00:39:51.000 They said, pause.
00:39:52.000 Could you wait till February?
00:39:54.000 I'll confess to being disappointed, along with most of my colleagues, I think.
00:39:58.000 Might there be good reasons for that?
00:40:00.000 Yeah.
00:40:01.000 They didn't give us the reasons why we're to pause.
00:40:04.000 It could be the Vatican wants a singular, universal protocol.
00:40:10.000 Didn't want us operating independently.
00:40:13.000 There might be some canonical considerations.
00:40:16.000 What we're proposing might have been out of step with canon law.
00:40:19.000 That's why I'm hopeful the February meeting will take some very specific steps.
00:40:26.000 So I wouldn't speak of SISM.
00:40:29.000 Everybody in the church wants to address this thing at the level of protocols and the level of deeper conversion.
00:40:36.000 We're debating, I think, how best to do the first one.
00:40:38.000 What do you make of the critique that comes up every time one of these sex abuse cases comes up where folks basically suggest that the problem is chastity within the priesthood, that we should allow priests to get married?
00:40:47.000 No, you're talking about celibacy, because chastity is the problem.
00:40:50.000 I agree.
00:40:52.000 It's lack of fidelity, it's lack of following biblical sexual ethics.
00:40:55.000 That is the fundamental problem.
00:40:57.000 It's not celibacy, and that's demonstrably the case.
00:40:59.000 That's been shown across the decades, that celibacy is not the cause of this problem.
00:41:06.000 At the moral level, it's a deep infidelity.
00:41:09.000 It's a failure to live up to our own teaching.
00:41:13.000 Our teaching is eminently clear on the score.
00:41:17.000 So it's priests, sadly, tragically, not living up to the teaching of the Church.
00:41:21.000 But no, I certainly wouldn't blame it on celibate priesthood.
00:41:25.000 The overwhelming majority of child sex offenders are not celibates, so I wouldn't correlate it to celibacy.
00:41:32.000 And to get into even more controversial territory, obviously the Church has come under significant fire for its perspective on homosexuality.
00:41:38.000 I always find this puzzling since this has legitimately not changed neither Judaic or Christian theology for a solid several millennia at this point.
00:41:44.000 But nonetheless, it is raised every single time and it seems to be raised every time there's a scandal inside the Church where folks suggest that many in the hierarchy of the Church itself suggest that there are a disproportionate number of homosexual Yeah, I mean, there's never been really good or definitive studies on that issue of, you know, number of homosexuals in the priesthood.
00:42:12.000 I mean, it'd be very hard to determine that on statistical grounds.
00:42:15.000 That the majority of cases of sexual misconduct have been male-on-male sexual violence, that's true.
00:42:23.000 And I think that's certainly worth looking at.
00:42:25.000 To your first point, Yes, the consensus gentium across millennia, across the cultures has been, you know, that sex belongs within marriage between a man and a woman who are faithful to each other and open to life.
00:42:40.000 I mean, that was the standard consensus.
00:42:42.000 That most human beings tend to fall away from that ideal, sure.
00:42:46.000 I mean, that's always been the case.
00:42:48.000 But that that's the ideal?
00:42:50.000 Almost everybody up until really a handful of years ago accepted that.
00:42:55.000 Which is why it is rather an act of hubris, you know, to say like, how in the world could you hold this?
00:43:00.000 I mean, everyone has held this view.
00:43:03.000 And there are good reasons grounded in the natural law, I'd say, you know, for that perspective.
00:43:08.000 That people fall away from it?
00:43:09.000 Sure, they always have.
00:43:11.000 That even people within the Church are falling away from it.
00:43:13.000 Tragically, yeah.
00:43:15.000 But that shouldn't compel us to change the teaching.
00:43:17.000 So what exactly is the Church holding on abortion as well?
00:43:20.000 So obviously abortion is another area where the Catholic Church has come under significant fire.
00:43:24.000 Again, this has always been Catholic Church policy, but it does not matter.
00:43:27.000 The media, every time the Pope expresses that he is pro-life, seem to react with shock and horror as though something new has happened.
00:43:32.000 Yeah, and that's a good point that Pope Francis has been very strong on the pro-life issue.
00:43:36.000 The direct taking of an innocent life is prohibited.
00:43:40.000 I mean, that's a fundamental, I would say, THE fundamental principle of the natural law.
00:43:45.000 All the other principles are derived from it.
00:43:47.000 The direct killing of the innocent is always prohibited.
00:43:50.000 It's intrinsically evil, to use our language, intrinsice malum.
00:43:54.000 In other words, no motive or circumstance could ever obviate the truth of that.
00:43:59.000 If that goes, Everything goes, it seems to me.
00:44:02.000 Now, you know, I came of age at a time in the Catholic Church when the proportionalist approach was very popular.
00:44:08.000 In fact, it was being taught to a lot of us.
00:44:10.000 Namely that, well, you know, things aren't intrinsically evil.
00:44:13.000 You look at the good and bad consequences of an act, and you kind of add them up, and if there's a proportion between them, you know, then make up your mind.
00:44:22.000 The trouble with that is, at the end of the day, I mean, anything can be justified.
00:44:27.000 And if you can justify the direct killing of the innocent, it seems to me the whole moral program falls apart.
00:44:32.000 And that is why the Church has taken such a strong stance against abortion, because it's such a clear instance of the violation of that principle.
00:44:40.000 So no, no, we stand with it.
00:44:42.000 We have and we will.
00:44:43.000 So to sort of finish up the hot-button political section of this particular interview, I would be remiss if I didn't ask about the Catholic Church's decision to recognize the Catholic Church in China, which is obviously being cracked down on in severe fashion and basically run in many ways by the Chinese government.
00:44:57.000 Do you think that's a good decision or a bad decision?
00:44:59.000 You know, I'm going to sort of hold off on answering only because I don't know enough about what's on the ground there.
00:45:04.000 I'll tell you what my instincts are.
00:45:06.000 My instincts are to respect the so-called underground church that has lived in dire circumstances, often under great persecution.
00:45:14.000 But I want to be careful because I really don't know What's on the ground in detail?
00:45:19.000 I don't know what was animating or motivating the Vatican decision there.
00:45:23.000 My instincts are with the underground church.
00:45:28.000 But I wouldn't want to say much more about it because I don't claim to know enough about what's on the ground.
00:45:32.000 So I discussed this with Pastor John MacArthur.
00:45:34.000 What do you think are the significant philosophical differences, put aside sort of the story differences where we accept the first half of the book and not the second half, between Judaism and Catholicism?
00:45:43.000 So, aside from Jesus and the acceptance of Jesus, where do you think there are real significant philosophical differentiations?
00:45:48.000 Well, that's a big aside though.
00:45:51.000 That's the heart of the matter.
00:45:51.000 But let me say this first, though, about Judaism and Catholicism.
00:45:55.000 One thing I feel really strongly about is it's the re-Judaizing of Catholicism that is evangelically so important.
00:46:03.000 Precisely when you divorce Catholicism from Judaism, you get these distortions of Jesus so common today.
00:46:09.000 Jesus as teacher of timeless spiritual truths, Jesus as guru, Jesus as Gnostic master.
00:46:19.000 Jesus is, as Paul said, the yes to all the promises made to Israel.
00:46:24.000 Jesus is the climax to the story of Israel.
00:46:27.000 Therefore, not to know Israel is not to know Jesus.
00:46:31.000 Not to know Torah and covenant and temple and prophecy is not to know Jesus.
00:46:37.000 The very fact, I'll tell you here, this is an interesting thing.
00:46:39.000 So, when a Protestant minister comes out to preside at the liturgy, he'll wear either a business suit or he'll wear his doctor robes.
00:46:47.000 Because the heart of the matter is teaching, right?
00:46:49.000 The pulpit you're going to teach if you're a doctor or a teacher.
00:46:52.000 When I come out, especially as a bishop who's a kind of a high priest in the Catholic thing, I come out in the robes of a temple priest, including the mitre of a temple official.
00:47:02.000 I use incense.
00:47:04.000 There's an altar.
00:47:05.000 A sacrifice takes place.
00:47:07.000 The Catholic Mass is unintelligible apart from the temple, apart from Jewish worship.
00:47:13.000 And so, to re-Judaize the operation is the key to evangelism.
00:47:19.000 Because the good news that Paul has, and Peter, and James, and John, is not some Gnostic insight.
00:47:27.000 It's not some change of consciousness.
00:47:29.000 The good news is, you know the promises made to Israel?
00:47:32.000 God has said yes to all of them.
00:47:34.000 Do you know the great story of Israel?
00:47:36.000 It's from creation, to the fall, to the formation of the people, and Torah, Temple, and prophecy.
00:47:40.000 You know that great story?
00:47:41.000 It's reached its fulfillment in Jesus.
00:47:43.000 That's why Paul goes into the synagogues first.
00:47:46.000 So when he comes into Corinth, or he comes into Athens, or wherever he goes, his first move, of course, is to the Jews, because they'll get the story he's talking about.
00:47:56.000 Talking to Gentiles is a far more complicated business if you're an evangelist.
00:48:00.000 Because the story of Jesus won't make sense apart from Judaism.
00:48:04.000 So there I want to insist upon this deep congruence.
00:48:09.000 And it does have philosophical overtones.
00:48:11.000 The belief in the one God.
00:48:12.000 Hear, O Israel, the Lord your God is God alone.
00:48:16.000 That is of enormous philosophical significance.
00:48:19.000 And I would say, it's one more, is what's your name?
00:48:23.000 Moses is asking the Lord, what should I tell him?
00:48:26.000 I am who I am.
00:48:27.000 Aquinas reads that, of course, as the one in whom essence and existence coincide.
00:48:31.000 He's being asked, which god are you?
00:48:34.000 There are a lot of gods.
00:48:36.000 Which instance of deity are you?
00:48:38.000 And then the great answer is, that's the wrong question.
00:48:41.000 That's the wrong way of thinking about the Creator God of Israel.
00:48:45.000 I am who I am.
00:48:46.000 My manner of being is being itself, not this particular instance of being.
00:48:52.000 So that's of enormous philosophical importance coming up out of Israel, into the church, and then finally into its own philosophical thinking.
00:49:00.000 But I want to re-Judaize Catholicism.
00:49:04.000 Because the thing is, in many parts of the Protestant movement, there's a desire to de-Judaize the operation, right?
00:49:11.000 That we've overcome that and we've kind of left that behind.
00:49:14.000 Catholicism lifts it up.
00:49:16.000 It doesn't want to leave it behind.
00:49:18.000 That's why the permanence of the covenant made to Israel is so important to us.
00:49:22.000 This covenant's not been violated.
00:49:24.000 God can't say no to the great covenant he made.
00:49:27.000 It has permanent validity.
00:49:28.000 And that's important for our theology, for our liturgy.
00:49:31.000 I was just going to ask you about that, because for a long time a dominant strain of Catholic thought was replacement theology, the idea that the Jews had sort of been left behind and that the new covenant had been made with the folks who followed the new church.
00:49:43.000 Where does that stand right now?
00:49:44.000 I mean, what does the Catholic Church think of the idea that the Jews have sort of been superseded in history?
00:49:48.000 Yeah, we're against supersessionism.
00:49:50.000 Go back to Paul's line.
00:49:51.000 That's the one to me that sums it up.
00:49:53.000 Christ is the yes to all the promises made to Israel.
00:49:56.000 So you won't understand him apart from Israel.
00:49:58.000 He's the fulfillment of Israel.
00:50:00.000 We've been grafted onto the branch of Israel.
00:50:04.000 All of that.
00:50:05.000 That's not supersessionism.
00:50:07.000 It's a fulfillment theology.
00:50:08.000 It's a fulfillment of the covenant theology.
00:50:11.000 But the covenant made to Israel remains a valid covenant for that reason.
00:50:15.000 It's been brought to its fruition.
00:50:18.000 So that's why I'm not going to simply reduce it and say, well, there's no difference, because I'm an evangelist.
00:50:25.000 I mean, I'm a Christian evangelist.
00:50:26.000 I want everyone to know the good news, the Evangelion about Jesus.
00:50:31.000 But it's Jesus, the Jew, who's the incarnation not of just any old God.
00:50:35.000 He's the incarnation of the God of Israel.
00:50:36.000 He's the God that spoke to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and to Moses.
00:50:40.000 That's the one I'm talking about.
00:50:42.000 And he became incarnate in Jesus.
00:50:45.000 So you can't make sense of him apart from Judaism.
00:50:48.000 So one of the things that, as an Orthodox Jew, I often feel when I speak to people who are either Catholic or Protestant, people who, again, believe in the validity of the Old Testament but also believe in the validity of the New Testament, is that one of the ways in which differentiation is made is by saying that certain things were lacking in Judaism that are now present in Christianity that had to be fulfilled by Jesus, that without Jesus, these things could not have been fulfilled.
00:51:10.000 And I guess that is the question that I'm asking is, where do you see those things?
00:51:13.000 Because very often I hear that man is a sinful creature and that we need Jesus in order to take on our sins because otherwise we couldn't live in the world, basically.
00:51:24.000 Or that Judaism is not forgiving enough, or not loving enough, or not in favor of atonement enough.
00:51:30.000 And I think as a Jew who prays three times a day for atonement, has a full day devoted to atonement on Yom Kippur, has a full month before that devoted to atoning in preparation for the atonement on Yom Kippur, with all of this stuff, I get the feeling sometimes as a Jew that one of the ways the Christians differentiate from Judaism is by miscasting the nature of Judaism.
00:51:48.000 That's why I'm asking for some specificity.
00:51:50.000 Here's what I would say.
00:51:52.000 All the institutions of Israel—Torah, Temple, Covenant, Prophecy—their purpose is to bring divinity and humanity together, I would say.
00:52:01.000 So, Zion, the temple, Yahweh's dwelling place, the tribes go up and they commune through sacrifice, you know, with the Lord.
00:52:10.000 It's the place of encounter.
00:52:11.000 The law is meant to bring us into conformity with the will of God.
00:52:14.000 Yahweh speaks His will.
00:52:16.000 Our wills are off kilter, but they come together, ideally, through the Torah.
00:52:19.000 The prophets, God speaking, as it were, through them, and they're trying to draw us back to Torah and temple, etc.
00:52:26.000 Covenant, you know, all of it is meant to bring them together.
00:52:29.000 What's at the heart of Christianity is that divinity and humanity have met now perfectly in these two natures.
00:52:39.000 I'm purposely kind of Greekifying the language now, but it's all Jewish talk.
00:52:44.000 Translated for Greeks at the time, but it's all Jewish talk.
00:52:48.000 I want Yahweh and his people, Yahweh and Israel, have now met in such a perfect union that I can speak of it as a hypostatic union, as a union of person.
00:52:59.000 The hypostatic union of two natures, divine and human, in one divine person, that's who Jesus is.
00:53:05.000 That's what I mean when I say he's the fulfillment of the temple, the fulfillment of the Torah, the fulfillment of prophecy.
00:53:12.000 What they want has happened now fully in him.
00:53:18.000 That's why the great scene of the Roman soldier piercing the side of the crucified Jesus, out comes blood and water.
00:53:23.000 The blood of the Eucharist, the water of baptism is one way to read it.
00:53:27.000 But the other way is the fulfillment of Ezekiel.
00:53:30.000 At the time of the renewal of the temple, When the Shakina of Yahweh comes back, what will come forth from the side of the Temple but water, life-giving water, for the renewal of the world?
00:53:40.000 And so, these first-century Jews, looking at Mashiach Yeshua, are saying, look, there it is!
00:53:48.000 In this great act of sacrifice on the cross, now read in Temple language, Divinity and humanity have met.
00:53:54.000 The Atonement's been effected.
00:53:56.000 The Covenant's been fulfilled.
00:53:59.000 And the sign of it is the coming forth of water from the side of the renewed temple.
00:54:05.000 Now, all of it's dependent upon the resurrection.
00:54:07.000 If Jesus Christ had died on the cross and stayed in his grave, none of this would make a lick of sense.
00:54:12.000 Everything I'm saying would be a lot of hooey, and Christianity would just be a waste of time.
00:54:17.000 What got it off the ground was the resurrection of Jesus from the dead, which is what convinced these first century Jews.
00:54:24.000 And I think, you know, like Rabbi Shaul, studying at the feet of Gamaliel, who knew everything I've been talking about, and a thousand things more, when he met the risen Jesus, That's what he got.
00:54:34.000 And it took him a while.
00:54:35.000 It goes off to Arabia we hear.
00:54:37.000 Paul goes off to Arabia.
00:54:38.000 Where did he go?
00:54:39.000 I don't know.
00:54:39.000 No one knows where he went.
00:54:40.000 But he went away.
00:54:41.000 Then he's in Tarsus for a number of years.
00:54:43.000 What's he doing?
00:54:44.000 I think he's trying to piece it together.
00:54:46.000 He's trying to piece it together how the promises made to Israel have now been fulfilled in this most unexpected way through a crucified Messiah who's risen from the dead.
00:54:56.000 But when he figured it out, out he comes to Corinth and Philippi and finally Rome to announce this new Mashiach, you know?
00:55:06.000 So it's a deeply Jewish movement that makes sense only in that context.
00:55:12.000 When you abstract from it, you undermine its evangelical power.
00:55:16.000 I'm going to ask you in one second, one final question.
00:55:18.000 I'm going to ask you specifically about Jordan Peterson and biblical movements without the Bible per se, without the divinity of the Bible per se.
00:55:26.000 But to hear the answer from Bishop Barron, you first must be a subscriber.
00:55:29.000 To subscribe, go to dailywire.com.
00:55:30.000 Click subscribe to watch the rest of the show there.
00:55:33.000 Bishop Barron, thanks so much for coming.
00:55:34.000 It really has been a pleasure having you.
00:55:35.000 I've really enjoyed it.
00:55:37.000 Thanks so much for the time.
00:55:37.000 God bless you.
00:55:38.000 God bless you.
00:55:47.000 Executive producer Jeremy Boring.
00:55:49.000 Associate producer Mathis Glover.
00:55:51.000 Edited by Alex Zingaro.
00:55:52.000 Audio is mixed by Dylan Case.
00:55:54.000 Hair and makeup is by Jeswa Alvera.
00:55:56.000 And title graphics by Cynthia Angulo.
00:55:58.000 The Ben Shapiro Show Sunday Special is a Daily Wire Forward Publishing production.