The Ben Shapiro Show - CIVIL WAR: Red America vs. Blue America; Plus... Fmr. PM Liz Truss Stops By

00:00:00.000 All righty, folks.

00:00:01.000 So I'm not live today, but a few weeks ago, I sat down with Liz Truss, the former Prime Minister of the UK, who was unfairly maligned by the media, treated as though she had done something terrible by talking about the necessity for tax cuts and regulatory cuts in Great Britain.

00:00:15.000 We sat down to talk about the essentially invasion of the West by people who really, really hate the West.

00:00:20.000 It's a pressing issue for not just Europeans, but for Americans.

00:00:24.000 Here's what it sounded like.

00:00:25.000 Well, Liz Truss, former Prime Minister of Great Britain, thanks so much for taking the time.

00:00:29.000 Really appreciate it.

00:00:30.000 Great to be here.

00:00:31.000 So why don't we start with what went wrong in Great Britain?

00:00:33.000 Kirstarmer is now the Prime Minister of Great Britain, to the shock and despair of many of us.

00:00:38.000 How exactly did that come about?

00:00:40.000 Because you had Conservative dominance for a period of time.

00:00:42.000 It appeared the Conservative Party moved in basically a leftward direction.

00:00:48.000 There was heavy emphasis on things like Green New Deal type things that you would see in the United States, an unwillingness to revise any of the sort of bad fiscal bargains of the past.

00:00:59.000 How do you arrive at a point in British politics where Kirst Armour and the Labour Party are dominant?

00:01:04.000 And you have a rising Reform Party with Nigel Farage and the Tory Party, which had been dominant for well over a decade here, now seems to be sort of fading.

00:01:12.000 I think a lot of Britain's problems go back many, many years.

00:01:17.000 And we've always had a problem with our bureaucracy and the power of the administrative state in Britain.

00:01:22.000 But Tony Blair made it a whole lot worse in 1997.

00:01:26.000 He gave more powers to the Bank of England.

00:01:28.000 He outsourced huge powers to the Human Rights Act, to the judiciary.

00:01:33.000 He made the judiciary unaccountable.

00:01:35.000 So what happened under Blair is a massive shift to the left.

00:01:39.000 And all of these institutions, whether it's the police, the judiciary, they've been captured by left-wing ideology.

00:01:44.000 So you see the promotion essentially of Islamism, of the net zero zealotry, of things like pro-transgender extremism.

00:01:55.000 This is all now baked into British institutions.

00:01:58.000 And the problem for the Conservatives is rather than saying we're going to reverse all that stuff, they said, we're the heir to Blair.

00:02:06.000 We want to copy him.

00:02:08.000 We want to triangulate.

00:02:09.000 And we didn't take the steps necessary to get control back in the hands of parliament and actually do the things the public wanted, like controlling immigration, like having cheap energy and all of those policies.

00:02:26.000 And I spent 10 years as a government minister struggling against the bureaucracy, but all the time I felt like I was swimming against the tide because they had so much power in the system.

00:02:37.000 And this is ultimately why I ran to be prime minister in 2022.

00:02:40.000 I wanted to take on the orthodoxy, the net zero orthodoxy, the Keynesian orthodoxy, the mass migration orthodoxy. 0.98

00:02:48.000 But what I discovered was when I tried to do a package of essentially keeping taxes low, getting on with fracking, controlling government spending, I just faced the most massive barrage.

00:03:01.000 And it wasn't just the bureaucrats.

00:03:03.000 It was some people in the Conservative Party that I would call conservatives in name only.

00:03:08.000 But it was also the whole international, you know, Davos elite.

00:03:12.000 The IMF intervened.

00:03:13.000 Even Joe Biden criticized my policies.

00:03:16.000 And what I found out was just how powerful in Britain the system is.

00:03:20.000 And what we've had is we've had for many years a failing system.

00:03:24.000 Tony Blair made it a lot worse.

00:03:27.000 He took the levers out of the hands of politicians.

00:03:30.000 We failed to turn it round as conservatives.

00:03:32.000 And the British public hate it.

00:03:35.000 That's why they voted Brexit in 2016.

00:03:37.000 They wanted things to change in our country.

00:03:39.000 They voted again in 2019 for Boris Johnson because he said the things would change.

00:03:45.000 And they voted again for Kirst Armer, which was a kind of last ditch attempt.

00:03:50.000 But the problem is the same people are still in charge of whoever you vote for.

00:03:54.000 You've still got the same governor of the Bank of England.

00:03:56.000 You've still got the same people running the Home Office.

00:03:59.000 You've still got the same people in the police force.

00:04:01.000 You've still got the judges that are unaccountable making these crazy decisions, like locking up people for posting on X. That is what is going on in our country.

00:04:09.000 And frankly, I think in 2029, which is when the next election is going to be, people will vote for change and they may well vote for Nigel Farage.

00:04:21.000 But if he doesn't deal with the bureaucracy, if he doesn't reverse those laws that Tony Blair put in, he is not going to be able To deliver change either, because I've seen it on the front line.

00:04:34.000 You know, you cannot deliver massive system change with people who are against you and people who want to undermine you.

00:04:41.000 And they don't just want to undermine me.

00:04:42.000 They want to undermine Western civilization.

00:04:45.000 That is what we're talking about.

00:04:46.000 And I think this is what Trump has learnt from his first administration: you've got to actually take on the Harvards of this world. 0.98

00:04:54.000 You know, you've got to take on the State Department.

00:04:56.000 You've got to take on the Congressional Budget Office.

00:05:00.000 All of these people that make up the system are part of the problem.

00:05:04.000 I mean, I think that your example is such a telling one because when you came into the office when you became Prime Minister, essentially you were trying to push forward a package of deregulation and tax cuts.

00:05:14.000 And this ended the financial world, apparently.

00:05:16.000 Everyone went nuts.

00:05:17.000 The Bank of England suggested that the entire country would no longer be credit worthy.

00:05:21.000 And that sort of bizarre reaction can only be explained by a desire to maintain the status quo because all of those budgetary issues still exist under Kirstarmer.

00:05:33.000 It's not as though the spending has dramatically decreased under Kirstarma.

00:05:36.000 It's increased.

00:05:37.000 Or as though they're bending the cost curve on the National Health Service or something.

00:05:40.000 They're not touching any of the underlying dramatic drivers of Britain's national debt and slow growth.

00:05:46.000 But the minute you say, let's try to unleash the economy through tax cuts and deregulation, they're like, oh, oh my gosh, you've now created a gap between government revenues and government expenditures.

00:05:54.000 And that gap is unsustainable.

00:05:56.000 It was unsustainable before.

00:05:57.000 It's unsustainable now.

00:05:58.000 You were just trying to actually change the system to actually get some growth and dynamism in the system, from what I understand.

00:06:05.000 That is right.

00:06:06.000 And in fact, after the fact, the Bank of England admitted that two-thirds of the rise in bond prices was down to their failure to regulate the pension industry.

00:06:16.000 So they successfully blamed what was a market jump on me, although they subsequently admitted that it's their fault.

00:06:24.000 But nobody in the mainstream media in Britain wants to report that.

00:06:28.000 And in fact, only today, Keir Starmer is attacking Nigel Farage, saying he would implement the same economic policies as me.

00:06:36.000 So they use me as a kind of bogeyman of what happens when you cut taxes.

00:06:42.000 But of course, my tax cuts weren't allowed to stand.

00:06:46.000 So the policy was never even tried.

00:06:49.000 What happened was that some relatively small changes in taxes, plus unleashing the supply side, as you're talking about, like getting on with fracking, were essentially blocked by the economic establishment.

00:07:04.000 And they didn't just like, they didn't just dislike my policies.

00:07:08.000 They also disliked the fact that I wanted to make the decisions rather than them making the decisions.

00:07:14.000 And this is what I'm saying about Keir Starmer.

00:07:16.000 Keir Starmer is not coming up with these policies.

00:07:18.000 These policies are being designed by the Treasury and the Bank of England.

00:07:22.000 And he is going along with what the bureaucracy want to do.

00:07:27.000 And because I challenged them, they went for me and they smeared me and they lied about me.

00:07:35.000 And as you rightly say, the taxes were risen, were increased after I left office.

00:07:40.000 What happened?

00:07:41.000 The revenues didn't come in.

00:07:43.000 Because surprise, surprise, businesses left Britain, millionaires left Britain.

00:07:48.000 People decided not to work the extra hours because the taxes were so high.

00:07:52.000 So there's an even bigger gap.

00:07:53.000 So if my policies had remained in place, there would be a smaller gap between revenue and expenditure because it would have encouraged activity.

00:08:02.000 And this is what Ronald Reagan understood.

00:08:04.000 This is what Donald Trump understands.

00:08:06.000 But the fact is we have a very powerful orthodoxy that's not just in Britain.

00:08:10.000 It's also there in the Congressional Budget Office that refused to score Trump's tax cuts.

00:08:16.000 It's there in the IMF who provide the commentary.

00:08:19.000 It's there in Davos.

00:08:21.000 So we are fighting against a massive leftist machine.

00:08:26.000 And all of these issues are connected because they believe migration is a good thing for the economy.

00:08:31.000 So they won't let politicians cut migration.

00:08:34.000 They believe that net zero is good for the economy.

00:08:36.000 Do you remember when Mark Carney was saying that we're going to get all these green jobs and net zero is going to power the economy?

00:08:42.000 No, it's not.

00:08:43.000 The British economy is on its knees.

00:08:45.000 But what has Mark Carney been rewarded with?

00:08:48.000 The prime ministership of Canada.

00:08:50.000 So you have all these people circulating, sharing bad ideas, undermining the West.

00:08:56.000 And yet there's just a circuit of those people getting promoted Into ever, ever higher positions.

00:09:03.000 Feeling overwhelmed by the back taxes?

00:09:04.000 Well, you're not alone.

00:09:05.000 Maybe you missed that April deadline or your financial records are still all over the place.

00:09:08.000 Whatever the situation, don't put it off any longer.

00:09:11.000 The IRS isn't getting any friendlier and those penalties, well, they pile up really quickly.

00:09:15.000 We're talking 5% every month.

00:09:16.000 You don't file, maxing out at 25%.

00:09:18.000 And that adds up quickly.

00:09:20.000 Here's the thing.

00:09:21.000 You don't have to handle this alone.

00:09:22.000 Tax Network USA specializes in exactly these situations.

00:09:25.000 They've worked with thousands of Americans, employees, small business owners, people who haven't filed in years.

00:09:30.000 Messy books, they've literally seen it all and they know how to sort it out.

00:09:33.000 What sets them apart is their direct access to IRS programs that most people don't even know exist.

00:09:37.000 Plus, they have expert negotiators who actually know how to get results.

00:09:40.000 They'll start with a free consultation to assess your situation.

00:09:43.000 If you qualify, they may be able to reduce or even eliminate what you owe.

00:09:46.000 More importantly, they can protect you from the really scary stuff like wage garnishments and bank levies.

00:09:50.000 The bottom line, don't wait for that next IRS letter to show up in your mailbox.

00:09:53.000 The sooner you act, the more options you will have.

00:09:55.000 Call 800-9581000 or visit tnusa.com/slash shapiro to talk to a real expert at Tax Network USA.

00:10:02.000 Take the pressure off let Tax Network USA handle your tax issues.

00:10:07.000 This kind of sad history of Great Britain over the course of the last several decades, and it really is a sad history because as somebody who loves British history, as somebody who loves the Anglo-American tradition, the decline of Britain, not just from an empire, but toward a sort of second-rateness, just generally, is truly a tragedy in world history because of the amount of good that the British Empire was capable of spreading and the amount of good that it did historically.

00:10:33.000 I mean, I know that there are a lot of people out there who want to rip on the British Empire and British imperialism, but let's be real.

00:10:37.000 It was the British Empire that ended world slavery.

00:10:39.000 It was the British Empire that brought capitalism and free markets to huge swaths of the globe.

00:10:43.000 It was the British Empire that guaranteed freedom of the seas.

00:10:45.000 There wouldn't be the United States, Australia, or Canada without the British Empire.

00:10:48.000 Well, I like to say you're our greatest invention.

00:10:50.000 Yeah, exactly.

00:10:51.000 We were pretty good if we don't screw it up, right?

00:10:53.000 As Franklin likes to say.

00:10:54.000 But it was 1695 that the free press was invented in Britain.

00:10:59.000 That was before the United States of America was established.

00:11:03.000 We came up with these things, Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights.

00:11:06.000 I find it utterly shameful that those ancient liberties, which have promoted so much freedom around the world, including, I think, the jewel in the crown, the United States of America, have become completely bastardized in Britain.

00:11:20.000 I mean, imagine people being arrested and jailed for a post on X. But this is what is happening.

00:11:27.000 It's typically a post on X that is deemed anti-Islamic because the post-on X will be against a terrorist march in the middle of London or something.

00:11:35.000 I mean, it really is a literally somebody was arrested the other day for mocking a terrorist who had been bombed as part of the page of mocking a terrorist.

00:11:48.000 They were arrested.

00:11:49.000 I mean, how in a, and this is not policies that any parliament has passed.

00:11:54.000 These are policies that have been come up with by so-called independent bodies.

00:11:58.000 So they're not legitimate.

00:12:00.000 They don't have the authority of the electorate, but they are being imposed on the British people.

00:12:06.000 The whole concept of a non-crime hate incident, which sounds completely Orwellian, no politician came up with that.

00:12:12.000 That was invented by the College of Policing, which is a body that is completely unaccountable.

00:12:18.000 And we just live, we now live in a kind of Orwellian state in Britain where lots of people are worried about what they say.

00:12:25.000 And this is the whole purpose.

00:12:27.000 The whole purpose is to cover up what's going on in our country because people know there are massive issues with the grooming gangs, of young girls being of the authorities not being held to account for that.

00:12:39.000 They know that our economy is in decline.

00:12:41.000 They can see steel works closing down because of the environmental policies.

00:12:46.000 They can see businesses not being able to start up.

00:12:49.000 And the authorities and the establishment don't want people really to know how bad it is.

00:12:54.000 And that is why they're going for suppressing, distorting, using the mainstream media to try and cover up this stuff.

00:13:02.000 And it won't work.

00:13:03.000 It won't work.

00:13:04.000 There will be, and there is a brewing rebellion against this.

00:13:08.000 There really is.

00:13:09.000 And the Lucy Connolly case, people are now coming out and saying she needs to be freed.

00:13:15.000 She needs to be less out of jail. 1.00

00:13:17.000 So when you look at sort of the current political dynamics in Great Britain and you look at the Labour Party, which – and their policies are bad, so I assume that they are going to – I mean, they are just the Democrats.

00:13:29.000 They are the same as Biden, Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton.

00:13:32.000 That is what they are.

00:13:33.000 Right.

00:13:34.000 There is a support base for them.

00:13:36.000 It's people that work in the public sector.

00:13:38.000 It's woke people.

00:13:38.000 You know, There is a support base for them, but it's not the majority of the country.

00:13:43.000 And then if you look at the other side of the aisle, do you think that the Tories are capable of reconstituting themselves?

00:13:48.000 Obviously, they've gotten some new leadership.

00:13:50.000 I think it's very difficult because I think there are far too many Conservative MPs that are Conservative in name only and don't want to take on the establishment.

00:13:58.000 They don't want to leave the European Convention on Human Rights.

00:14:01.000 They don't want to challenge the judiciary.

00:14:03.000 They don't want to challenge the Bank of England.

00:14:05.000 And I think unless they are prepared to do that and say, we got it wrong for 14 years, we got it wrong because we didn't deal with these institutions that have become corrupted.

00:14:16.000 You know, they are corrupted.

00:14:18.000 If you look at one of the chief constables recently said they weren't going to police some activities by Islamicist terrorists because they were dealing with the local community.

00:14:31.000 I mean, it's astonishing.

00:14:33.000 These institutions have been corrupted.

00:14:35.000 They need to be brought under parliamentary control.

00:14:39.000 And the Conservative Party isn't saying that at the moment.

00:14:41.000 What should be done about immigration policy?

00:14:43.000 Obviously, this is sort of the elephant in the room that's really not the elephant in the room because everybody in Britain is talking about it.

00:14:49.000 Everybody is talking about it.

00:14:51.000 You've got to leave the human, you've got to repeal the Human Rights Act. 0.97

00:14:54.000 You've got to change the judiciary so they're actually accountable.

00:14:57.000 At the moment, we have a Supreme Court that was only invented in 2005.

00:15:02.000 You know, we had a thousand years of the Lord Chancellor who was a democratically appointed individual deciding who the senior judges were.

00:15:10.000 Tony Blair changed all that.

00:15:11.000 He created a Supreme Court.

00:15:13.000 It's not accountable.

00:15:15.000 You've got to change all that.

00:15:16.000 You've got to make sure you've got a proper judiciary making proper decisions.

00:15:19.000 You've got to get rid of these human rights excuses for allowing to stay in the country because that is what is going on at the moment. 0.97

00:15:27.000 And you just have to say no to more immigration. 0.61

00:15:34.000 And that means taking on the Treasury and the Bank of England because those are the people pursuing the high migration policies. 0.99

00:15:40.000 Because they're saying the only way we're going to keep Britain afloat is not by Britons having more children, which is obviously what we should be doing, it's actually by importing more migrants. 1.00

00:15:50.000 And those people have to be taken on.

00:15:52.000 So that is what has to happen.

00:15:54.000 It is kind of amazing how for well over 20 years, there's been open talk in Britain about how multiculturalism has failed.

00:15:59.000 I remember when David Cower was saying this: he was saying that multiculturalism was not a success.

00:16:03.000 And yet, the importation of migrants from third world countries who hate the West just continued.

00:16:08.000 This is all part of the absurd idea.

00:16:11.000 That's the way you balance the books.

00:16:14.000 And that's driven by the Treasury, the Bank of England, all of their sort of people in the media.

00:16:20.000 They're saying if you cut migration, the British economy will go bust.

00:16:24.000 I've got news for them.

00:16:25.000 The British economy is going bust anyway.

00:16:27.000 It's happening anyway.

00:16:29.000 If you look at the rates of bonds, the bomb price, it's much higher than when I was in office now.

00:16:34.000 But nobody is creating a fuss about it because they've all bought into this model.

00:16:40.000 They've all bought into the idea that net zero is going to give you more jobs, that migration is going to make everybody richer.

00:16:47.000 That's obviously not true, but nobody wants to admit that they've got the last 40 years of policy so deeply wrong.

00:16:56.000 And this is why the establishment is fighting back so viciously and fought back so viciously against what I said, because it would force them into a massive rethink.

00:17:05.000 And it's the same.

00:17:06.000 You can see the same thing going on in the United States with the attacks on Donald Trump's economic policies because people don't want to admit that they got it so badly wrong.

00:17:16.000 One of the things that just keeps occurring to me every time I look at the news from Britain is something that is true of the United States also, and maybe the West more generally, just an incredible shyness about championing what Britain is and what it historically has been.

00:17:29.000 And so what comes to mind here is when Britain hosted the Olympics and there was an entire display about the NHS, a gigantic display of like dancing syringes and such for the National Health Service.

00:17:38.000 It's like, this is the country that brought the world, the Magna Carta, as you mentioned, free speech, parliament.

00:17:44.000 These are all concepts that built the modern world, all of it.

00:17:48.000 And what they chose to celebrate was a giant welfare system that has many women giving birth in hallways. 0.75

00:17:55.000 And it's like, what was the trade here?

00:17:57.000 And can there be a restoration of a true pride in what Great Britain was and should be in the middle of this bizarre sort of melange of multiculturalism which has taken over London? 0.94

00:18:08.000 The views expressed in the Olympic ceremony are not the views of the average Britain.

00:18:14.000 The problem is we have an elite that hates Britain and they have done for some time.

00:18:19.000 And that is, you know, the history of people like Jeremy Corbyn, Kier Starmer.

00:18:24.000 They want to help the human rights of anybody who doesn't live in Britain, but they're very reticent about actually defending our own interests.

00:18:32.000 And we need to be much more, we need to galvanize the people who are patriots in our country.

00:18:42.000 But they have been neglected.

00:18:44.000 They generally don't live in London.

00:18:46.000 They live in small towns.

00:18:48.000 They live in rural areas.

00:18:50.000 They don't have much of a voice.

00:18:52.000 And what is happening is the elite are trying to suppress those voices.

00:18:56.000 So we need a media revolution like you've had in the United States with things like the Daily Wild, you know, with Jay Rogan, all of that actually gets the message across about what people are actually thinking about what's actually going on in our country.

00:19:10.000 That has to be the start of changing because I know people in Britain do want change.

00:19:15.000 They voted for Brexit, even though the establishment told them it would be a disaster and it would be terrible for the British economy and no one would ever speak to us again.

00:19:25.000 They voted for it because they want change.

00:19:28.000 The problem has been that when politicians get into office, they get captured by this establishment bureaucracy.

00:19:36.000 And I know because I tried to go against it that you get pretty harshly punished if you go for it.

00:19:42.000 So what we've got to do is we've got to learn from Trump.

00:19:44.000 You know, he had the experience in his first term of having people in his administration that were disloyal.

00:19:50.000 He had a media that was actively hostile.

00:19:54.000 And what's happened in between is Project 2025 was built up, alternative media was built up to give the Trump campaign more momentum.

00:20:05.000 And when he got into office, he had a plan of what to do.

00:20:08.000 That is exactly what needs to happen in Britain.

00:20:10.000 And to be honest, the leadership is one part of it.

00:20:14.000 And we can talk for hours about whether it should be reform or the Conservatives or a combination of the two.

00:20:19.000 But there's a hell of a lot of other stuff that needs to happen in our country so that the voices of normal Brits are actually driving the country's policy rather than the Davos elite.

00:20:32.000 I mean, Keir Starmer was famously asked, which do you prefer, Westminster or the World Economic Forum?

00:20:39.000 And he chose the World Economic Forum.

00:20:41.000 I thought it was the most revelatory interview he's ever given because he just said it.

00:20:47.000 He said it.

00:20:48.000 He literally is batting for the Davos elite.

00:20:51.000 And that is not what the people of Britain want.

00:20:53.000 So you mentioned before that question that obviously is coming up a lot right now: the Conservative Party versus the Reform Party.

00:20:58.000 What is the future of the right in Britain?

00:21:00.000 Is the Reform Party just sort of cannibalizing a chunk of the Conservative Party, or are the two parties together going to be more than the sum of their parts?

00:21:09.000 What do you make of that question?

00:21:12.000 If you were of the right in Britain, where should you be putting your eggs?

00:21:14.000 Where should you be putting your pressure?

00:21:16.000 Where should you put your vote?

00:21:17.000 What's interesting about reform is they are winning areas from Labour now.

00:21:20.000 So the traditional working class areas, people that are patriots, people who believe in Britain, are thoroughly annoyed with Keir Starmer.

00:21:30.000 So they are voting and supporting the Reform Party.

00:21:33.000 So it's a different electoral coalition, just like in America, the way that Trump was able to rin over bits of the Rust Belt.

00:21:40.000 The same thing is happening with reform in Britain.

00:21:43.000 And Boris Johnson, to some extent, won those people over.

00:21:47.000 But the problem is, once he got into office, the Conservatives didn't deliver the policies because so many Conservative MPs are part of the establishment.

00:21:57.000 They don't want to be unpopular at dinner parties.

00:21:59.000 They don't want to upset their friends who work in the big corporations or the Bank of England or are human rights lawyers.

00:22:05.000 So they don't want to fight.

00:22:07.000 And I think that the winning coalition has to be people in Britain who are prepared to take on that establishment.

00:22:15.000 I think there's an open question about whether Nigel Farage is actually prepared to do that or, you know, does he just become another David Cameron who goes into office promising all sorts of things and doesn't deliver it.

00:22:28.000 But the big message I want To get across to the British public, is we have a problem not just with politicians, but with the deep state, with the administrative state, with our establishment.

00:22:40.000 And those are the people who also need to be challenged and, you know, a lot of those institutions need to be dismantled because they're simply not working for Britain.

00:22:51.000 And what I think has happened over the last 10 years is people are now become skeptical of the police.

00:22:56.000 They've become skeptical of the judiciary.

00:22:59.000 They've become skeptical because they can see that justice isn't being done.

00:23:03.000 And that's a very dangerous position for a country to be in.

00:23:05.000 I mean, this does raise a broader sort of European question that we're seeing repeated in a wide variety of countries, which is a party that's to the right of kind of the normie right party that starts to gain an enormous amount of sway, AFD in Germany or national rally in France.

00:23:19.000 And then moves that are made by sort of the establishment parties to bar those and even cross the aisle to the far left rather than trying to make any concessions to that right.

00:23:28.000 Where does the Conservative Party in Britain lie along that spectrum?

00:23:31.000 I don't think that's so true in Britain because I think the danger is that reform become part of the establishment.

00:23:40.000 That's the British way is to infiltrate and to sort of try and smooth things over. 0.92

00:23:46.000 And any incoming prime minister, the civil service will say, oh, yes, prime minister, we will get straight to it.

00:23:53.000 We will action everything you say.

00:23:55.000 And what you find out is they haven't actioned it.

00:23:57.000 And a week later, nothing's happened.

00:23:59.000 So the British approach, I mean, you've probably seen yes, minister, and yes, prime minister, is more manipulative than an outright ban.

00:24:07.000 So I don't think we'd see an outright ban of reform.

00:24:09.000 I think the danger is that these issues that have plagued Britain, certainly since the 1990s, but even way far back.

00:24:19.000 It goes right back to the 1850s of North Trevelyan, where the permanent bureaucracy was invented.

00:24:25.000 These issues that have plagued our country for over a century need to be dealt with.

00:24:30.000 And that's the discussion that I want to see the Conservative Party and the Reform Party having.

00:24:35.000 They need to get serious about what the problem is in our country.

00:24:38.000 Otherwise, we're not going to fix it.

00:24:39.000 And Donald Trump, by talking about the deep state, by talking about the swamp, he started explaining to people what was actually going wrong.

00:24:48.000 And that discussion hasn't really happened yet in Britain, partly because we have an incredibly supine media that just feed off leaks from the bureaucracy.

00:24:57.000 You know, that's where they get all their information from.

00:24:59.000 And they're completely part of the cabal.

00:25:03.000 So what's next for you personally?

00:25:05.000 Obviously, you've been out of government for a little while.

00:25:08.000 What do you want to do next?

00:25:10.000 Well, I'm still very committed to getting the change we need in Britain.

00:25:15.000 I believe the media is absolutely key.

00:25:18.000 So I'm working on a new free speech media network to try and bring the type of energy that you're bringing in the United States to the UK and Europe.

00:25:28.000 I think that's incredibly important.

00:25:30.000 I think it's important we work with other conservative, other patriots across Europe and America.

00:25:37.000 That's why I'm here at CPAC, because we all face the same battle against what is a very powerful international network, you know, the Davos elite, the EU, all of these organizations.

00:25:50.000 We even found out that USAID was funding Tony Blair.

00:25:55.000 You know, they were funding the Tony Blair Institute.

00:25:57.000 So, you know, they've been funding a lot of the Soros activity.

00:26:00.000 So I think it's, I'm interested in how we work together to take these forces on.

00:26:08.000 People that believe in free speech, that believe in sovereignty, that believe in the family, that believe in patriotism.

00:26:14.000 That's where the future lies.

00:26:15.000 And that's what I'm working on.

00:26:17.000 Well, Liz Trust, thank you so much for stopping by.

00:26:19.000 It's been wonderful.

00:26:19.000 It's great to see you.

00:26:21.000 I always assumed that restless sleep was inevitable.

00:26:23.000 Night after night, tossing, turning, waking up with that aching back.

00:26:26.000 I convinced myself that's how sleep was supposed to be.

00:26:27.000 And honestly, when I'm on the road, like I am right now, I got to say, I don't sleep as well.

00:26:31.000 Why?

00:26:31.000 Well, because at home, I have Helix sleep and it transformed my sleep quality because they made a mattress just for me.

00:26:37.000 At my house, I easily fall asleep in minutes.

00:26:40.000 Even when, you know, the family and the news, they would normally keep me awake.

00:26:43.000 I'm out like a light on that mattress.

00:26:45.000 What makes Helix different is they don't just sell you a random mattress.

00:26:48.000 They actually match you with the perfect mattress for your body and sleep style.

00:26:51.000 Whether you're a side sleeper, back sleeper, or somewhere in between, they've got you covered.

00:26:54.000 They make it so simple to get your best night's sleep every night.

00:26:56.000 All you have to do is take their sleep quiz and get matched with a custom mattress based on your body type and sleep preferences.

00:27:01.000 Trust me, when you find the right match, you'll wonder how you ever slept on anything else.

00:27:05.000 Again, I got that firm but breathable mattress.

00:27:07.000 That's precisely what I need to make sure that my sleep quality is what it needs to be.

00:27:11.000 Right now, Helix is offering an incredible deal.

00:27:13.000 Visit helixleep.com slash men, get 27% off-site-wide.

00:27:16.000 That's helixleap.com/slash men for 27% off-site-wide.

00:27:20.000 Make sure you enter our show name after checkout so they know we sent you again.

00:27:22.000 Visit helixleep.com/slash men for this exclusive offer.

00:27:25.000 Okay, meanwhile, the controversy around gerrymandering continues over in Texas where Republicans are looking to change the congressional districts, pick up a couple of seats.

00:27:34.000 In fact, there are new reports that are out right now that Republicans may nationwide look to pick up many more seats than that.

00:27:39.000 And there's a reason for that.

00:27:41.000 I asked our friends over at Comet, which is the new web browser from Perplexity, our sponsors, how many Democratic congresspeople are there in states that Donald Trump won in the 2024 election?

00:27:50.000 How many Republican congresspeople are there in states Kamala Harris won in the 2024 election? 0.82

00:27:55.000 And the answer is pretty astonishing, actually.

00:27:57.000 There are 67 Democratic House members in states that Donald Trump won.

00:28:01.000 There are 39 Republican House members in states Kamala Harris won, which means that theoretically, if everybody were to gerrymander to the maximum extent possible, like do a Massachusetts, where in Massachusetts, literally all nine congressional districts are Democrat.

00:28:16.000 That means that Republicans would pick up, by my math, 28 seats in the House if everybody purely gerrymandered along state control lines.

00:28:26.000 Meaning, California gerrymandered out all the Republican seats, Texas gerrymandered out all the Democratic seats.

00:28:31.000 So you can see why Republicans are looking to do what they are doing.

00:28:34.000 They're saying that they are underrepresented in Congress, and that's kind of true by the electoral map. 1.00

00:28:40.000 That also happens to be true thanks to the terrible 2020 census.

00:28:44.000 We've talked about this before.

00:28:45.000 The 2020 census radically undercounted populations in several Republican-leaning states, notably Florida, Texas, Arkansas, Mississippi, and Tennessee.

00:28:54.000 Again, our sponsors at Comet point out Florida was undercounted by about three quarters of a million people.

00:29:01.000 That's a seat in the Electoral College.

00:29:03.000 Texas was undercounted by roughly 548,000 to 560,000 people, resulting in the state missing out on at least one additional seat beyond the two that it did receive.

00:29:13.000 So the sort of best supported estimate is that Republican states should have picked up at least three Electoral College votes in the last election cycle that they did not.

00:29:22.000 So Republicans are looking at the map and saying, yeah, we are wildly undercounted.

00:29:26.000 And so you can see why, according to Jake Sherman over at Punch Bowl News, House Republicans are now aiming to pick up a dozen or more House seats in an unprecedented Donald Trump-backed redistricting drive, looking to head off a Democratic wave in the 2026 midterms and cement the president's power.

00:29:40.000 So Republicans are looking at a possibility of three additional House seats in Florida, five seats in Texas, one in Missouri, one in Indiana, two or three in Ohio.

00:29:51.000 In Ohio, they have to do a redistricting anyway because state law mandates a redraw ahead of 2026.

00:29:57.000 Also, the Supreme Court has a high-profile Louisiana redistricting case that they have yet to rule upon.

00:30:04.000 So what does that mean?

00:30:05.000 I mean, that is a lot of seats.

00:30:07.000 That is a lot of seats.

00:30:08.000 So if you add all that up, you're talking about an addition of 12 to 13 Republican seats right off the bat, which could be enough to preserve Congress for them.

00:30:17.000 Now, again, you can see why Republicans would obviously want to do this.

00:30:21.000 Right now, Republicans have the power to do it.

00:30:24.000 And, you know, midterm elections typically go badly for the party in power.

00:30:28.000 Here, for example, was Harry Enton on Friday explaining that right now, the congressional generic ballot is looking pretty good for the Democrats.

00:30:36.000 It seems as though their enthusiasm is up.

00:30:38.000 And again, that is not unusual when you have the president of the United States of one party and he controls Congress.

00:30:45.000 It is quite unusual in American politics for that party to do better in the midterm elections rather than worse.

00:30:51.000 Here is Harry Enton explaining.

00:30:53.000 So, you know, we're talking about warning signs for the Republican Party, and I will just say, uh-oh, for them.

00:30:58.000 That is the phrase of the day.

00:31:00.000 Uh-oh.

00:31:01.000 Democrats leading the generic congressional ballot.

00:31:03.000 And you can see their lead is expanding.

00:31:05.000 It's becoming bigger.

00:31:06.000 Look at this in spring.

00:31:07.000 CNBC, it was two.

00:31:08.000 Now it's five.

00:31:09.000 How about Ipsos?

00:31:10.000 It was one for the Democrats. 0.94

00:31:11.000 Now it's four.

00:31:11.000 How about the Wall Street Journal?

00:31:12.000 It was one.

00:31:13.000 And now it is three.

00:31:14.000 So now the average lead here is four, which is up from just about a point.

00:31:18.000 That's about a three-point move on average in the Democrats' direction.

00:31:22.000 And of course, K-Paul, when this is coming amidst the fights over redistricting, I think there are going to be a lot of people wondering: wait a minute, are Republicans wanting to change the Lines because they are losing, which they absolutely are on the generic congressional ballot.

00:31:34.000 At this point, Democrats are winning, Republicans are losing, and maybe they're trying to change the lines in order to give themselves a little bit more wiggle room, given what we're seeing a clear Democratic momentum on the generic congressional ballot.

00:31:46.000 So you can see why they are doing what they're doing.

00:31:47.000 Democrats, of course, are freaking out about it, as well, they should.

00:31:51.000 According to Punch Bull, Democrats are scrambling to counter this redistricting offensive, primarily with a hasty attempt to amend California's Constitution.

00:31:59.000 But Democrats can't come close to matching the potential GOP gains in red states, where Trump has those enviable approval ratings and compliant legislatures looking to do his bidding.

00:32:07.000 So the chair of the DCCC, Susan Delbeni, said, quote, Republicans are running scared.

00:32:11.000 They know they can't win on the issues, so they are resorting to rigging the system in a desperate scheme to save their minuscule majority.

00:32:18.000 Democrats everywhere are prepared to fight back using every tool at our disposal.

00:32:21.000 We refuse to play by a different set of rules while Republicans cave to Trump's demands to light the rule book on fire. 0.94

00:32:25.000 Now, again, that part is ridiculous. 0.59

00:32:28.000 Democrats, if they had the power, would in fact light the rule book on fire.

00:32:32.000 Kathy Hochul in New York, who's been complaining about Republican redistricting in Texas, again, called an early redistricting in New York just within the last couple of years.

00:32:41.000 So it's not as though if Democrats gain the power, they're not going to actually use that power.

00:32:47.000 Now, Punchball points out that a lot of moderates in swing districts are going to get squeezed out of office.

00:32:53.000 And this is sort of the longer downstream effect of what is happening right here, which is that blue states, if they get bluer, more Republicans will move out.

00:33:01.000 Red states, as they get redder, more Democrats will move out.

00:33:03.000 And so the continuing sort of voting with their feet will continue.

00:33:07.000 You will see red states get redder.

00:33:08.000 You'll see population movements.

00:33:10.000 You will see the gigantic culture gap that has emerged in American life continue to grow and grow.

00:33:17.000 And that is why, you know, silly sort of cultural stories that don't seem to matter very much, they actually kind of matter a lot because most people now engage the world in emotional and meme-driven ways.

00:33:30.000 There's a fascinating set of charts from a columnist named John Bern Murdoch, who works for the Financial Times, in which he looks at young adults and how their personalities have been changing over the course of the last few years.

00:33:43.000 And a large part of that is due to social media and due to memory and due to the fact that they are spending less time with people who they disagree with in common contexts.

00:33:53.000 Polarization and siloing actually does have a pretty significant effect, as it turns out.

00:33:58.000 See, it used to be that if you'd go to a church or a synagogue or anywhere else, common social situation with somebody who you disagreed with politically, but you recognized that they were a decent human being and you could get along, that made for a better social fabric.

00:34:11.000 Well, then we lost trust in one another and our institutions, and now we're siloing.

00:34:16.000 So what does that mean?

00:34:17.000 It's only going to get worse from here.

00:34:18.000 I mean, it's a real problem.

00:34:20.000 That doesn't mean Republicans shouldn't gerrymander or that this isn't the natural consequence of what is happening.

00:34:24.000 But if you are predicting the future, the polarization is likely to get significantly worse before it gets better at this point.

00:34:30.000 According to these charts put together by Bern Murdoch, if you look at young adults' personalities, like actual personalities, there is a massive change in different personality traits by age group.

00:34:45.000 So for example, conscientiousness, which is basically your willingness to take responsibility for your own actions, dutifully doing the thing you're supposed to do.

00:34:55.000 That has declined among people age 60 plus from maybe 55% of people down to about 50% of people.

00:35:04.000 For people age 40 to 59, it's declined from just above 50% to just above 40%.

00:35:08.000 For people who are age 16 to 39, it has declined from 45% in 2016 to below 30% in 2025, which is disastrous.

00:35:20.000 Conscientiousness is a good thing.

00:35:22.000 Conscientiousness dictates whether you are going to actually be a productive member of society and it's diving in America right now.

00:35:32.000 You don't feel responsible for other people and you barely feel responsible for yourself.

00:35:35.000 Neuroticism, which is essentially kind of a worried aspect of mind.

00:35:42.000 Jordan Peterson talks about this a lot.

00:35:44.000 Neuroticism being a sort of predictor of stress levels, high stress, exploding, particularly among young people.

00:35:51.000 People 60 plus, basically where they were in 2016.

00:35:55.000 People who are between 40 and 59 have increased slightly.

00:36:00.000 People who are age 16 to 39 exploded. 0.99

00:36:02.000 Neuroticism went from 60% in 2016 to over 70% today.

00:36:08.000 Agreeableness, meaning do you get along with other people or try to get along with other people?

00:36:13.000 People age 60, pretty steady.

00:36:15.000 People who are age 40 to 59, agreeableness has declined by about 8% to 10 percentage points.

00:36:22.000 Again, people 16 to 39, it has dropped off a cliff, went from the mid-40s all the way down to the mid-30s.

00:36:28.000 So people are less agreeable, more neurotic, and significantly less conscientious if they are young.

00:36:34.000 And meanwhile, for all groups, extraversion has gone down, meaning people are just not associating with one another.

00:36:38.000 They're not talking with one another.

00:36:40.000 So that is leading to some pretty terrible behavior as well, like sociopathic behavior that is then treated as normalized by the internet.

00:36:50.000 And that cuts in, I think, a bunch of different ways, like really a lot of different ways. 0.79

00:36:55.000 In one way, it means that sort of traditional American normalcy is treated as totally crazy because the neurotics treat it as nuts.

00:37:01.000 A good example being Sidney Sweeney Gate.

00:37:04.000 Sweeney Gate is now entering week three, which is totally insane.

00:37:08.000 It is just a jeans ad with an attractive woman wearing a low-cut gene jacket, essentially.

00:37:15.000 And this blew up the internet.

00:37:16.000 Why?

00:37:17.000 Because agreeableness down.

00:37:20.000 Because neuroticism, up.

00:37:23.000 Those would be the reasons.

00:37:25.000 And apparently, the expectation in the media is that American Eagle, which is the company that did the ad, is supposed to cave to all of the neuroticism.

00:37:34.000 Good for American Eagle.

00:37:35.000 They are not.

00:37:36.000 I guess the disagreeableness goes both ways.

00:37:40.000 American Eagle said on Instagram that the ad campaign, quote, is and always was about the jeans, her genes, her story.

00:37:45.000 We'll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence their way.

00:37:50.000 Great jeans look good on everyone.

00:37:52.000 And this, of course, is ticking off some of the usual sort of politically correct sources.

00:37:56.000 Nathan Miller, founder and CEO of the crisis management firm Miller Inc., said, quote, the corporate comm script is you apologize when you offend people.

00:38:03.000 Now they do the cost-benefit analysis and realize if you do apologize, it's not going to placate the critics and will also promote further ire from those that initially applauded the campaign.

00:38:13.000 Miller says you're seeing a lot of brands trying to distance themselves from what was previously described as woke culture.

00:38:17.000 They believe there's a market for those who don't abide by the cultural norms that were previously enforced.

00:38:21.000 And that's a good thing, right?

00:38:22.000 Again, that is a good thing that they're not abiding by those norms, but there have been no replacement norms.

00:38:26.000 There's been no reversion to traditional norms.

00:38:28.000 Instead, what you are getting is memory on all sides.

00:38:31.000 So you're getting the meme of the idea that Sidney Sweeney is a Nazi or that people who like her ad or think she's pretty are Nazis.

00:38:39.000 And then on the right, you are getting what is clearly meme material and is funny, but is also kind of sociopathic behavior.

00:38:47.000 I mean, both those things can be true.

00:38:49.000 So, for example, big controversy has now broken out over WNBA games where people are throwing toys on the court.

00:38:55.000 Now, just by any normal stretch of human behavior, this is a bad thing to do.

00:38:59.000 You should not go to games and throw toys on the court.

00:39:03.000 It's obscene. 0.98

00:39:04.000 It's ridiculous. 0.95

00:39:05.000 And no matter how much you dislike WNBA, you probably shouldn't go there and throw a giant on the court, right? 1.00

00:39:10.000 I mean, like, just as a human, you probably shouldn't do it.

00:39:13.000 Is it funny?

00:39:14.000 Sure.

00:39:14.000 A lot of things are funny.

00:39:16.000 A lot of violative and transgressive behavior is funny.

00:39:18.000 It doesn't mean it's good.

00:39:20.000 Not really, but the internet culture and subculture has become so reactionary, so reactive, and so disagreeable that this thing is now like actually driving economic decision making.

00:39:32.000 There's an article in the New York Times over the weekend: WNBA's toy incidents may be linked to cryptocurrency groups' money scheme.

00:39:41.000 I mean, that reads like a fever dream.

00:39:43.000 Quote, late in the first half of a LA Sparks Indiana fever game on Tuesday night, a neon green toy thrown from the stands landed on the floor of crypto.com arena at the feet of Indiana guard Sophie Cunningham.

00:39:54.000 Simultaneously, a group of people during an audio live stream on X reveled in the moment and celebrated its potential to help boost the value of a particular meme coin, a cryptocurrency deriving from an internet meme, but traded through very real markets online.

00:40:06.000 The coin was created July 28th, the day before the first occurrence of a toy being thrown on a WNBA court.

00:40:12.000 As of Thursday, the coin's worth had nearly tripled in its first week.

00:40:17.000 Someone is tweeting there's one at the Sparks game, one person said on the stream.

00:40:20.000 That is literally the best case scenario we could possibly imagine, another replied, because the toy had fallen near Cunningham, who had previously posted a plea for spectators not to throw the objects onto the court, which was met With numerous replies of memes involving the phallic object.

00:40:33.000 The disruption in LA appeared to be part of a coordinated effort born out of conversations held in some particularly murky, often mysterious corners of internet culture, social media, and opportunistic plays in the cryptocurrency markets.

00:40:46.000 And in the normal world, all of this would be treated as psychopathic or sociopathic behavior, truly.

00:40:52.000 Like going to games and throwing toys on the court, regardless of how much you dislike the sport, would be considered, at the very least, bizarre and at the worst, kind of vile.

00:41:02.000 It could be funny.

00:41:03.000 Sure, a lot of vile behavior is funny, but it just shows a country with a robust social fabric does not have this kind of behavior, or at least it has less of this kind of behavior, because you wouldn't do this in your community, would you?

00:41:16.000 And again, I know I'm treating seriously what is a frivolous topic, but I think that we are now entering with the merger of the internet and the real world, we are now entering a time where there are no more frivolous topics.

00:41:25.000 Every frivolous topic becomes an indicative symptom of true social ills that are dividing us from one another.

00:41:33.000 Like if you can't get together and say, yeah, we probably shouldn't do that.

00:41:35.000 Or yeah, you know what?

00:41:36.000 Gene's ad with Sidney Sweeney, like who cares?

00:41:38.000 Like, that's fine.

00:41:39.000 Like, what happened to normalcy?

00:41:41.000 As normalcy disintegrates and as people take one side or the other on ridiculous meme sociopathy, what you end up with is a very, very polarized electorate.

00:41:52.000 And that's particularly true as young people age into the voting population.

00:41:57.000 You're seeing it in terms of sexual polarization between men and women.

00:42:00.000 Women are swinging wildly to the left. 0.98

00:42:01.000 Men are moving significantly more to the right.

00:42:04.000 You're seeing it in terms of political polarization where it's more about aesthetic feel than it is even about policy for a lot of these folks.

00:42:11.000 And so, you know, is it a problem?

00:42:14.000 How does it tie into gerrymandering?

00:42:15.000 I mean, it doesn't in the sense that gerrymandering has been going on since 1812 when Elbridge Gehry was first doing it.

00:42:21.000 But it does say something about the continuing social polarization of a country addicted to its phones, addicted to memes, addicted to the laws, as opposed to the things that actually build a society, namely you spending time with other human beings in a physical setting with a common goal of making your society, country, or community better.

00:42:43.000 All righty, meanwhile, speaking of this, President Trump is taking some significant action against foreign drug cartels, which actually is quite a good thing.

00:42:51.000 The New York Times reported late on Friday that President Trump has secretly signed a directive to the Pentagon to begin using military force against certain Latin American drug cartels his administration has deemed terrorist organizations, according to people familiar with the matter.

00:43:05.000 This is the most aggressive step so far in the administration's escalating campaign against the cartels, and it signals President Trump's continued willingness to use military force to carry out what has primarily been considered a law enforcement responsibility to curb the flow of fentanyl and other illegal drugs.

00:43:20.000 So apparently military officials are starting to drop options on how the military could go after those groups.

00:43:26.000 I mean, it's certainly the case that using the U.S. military to go after drug cartels south of the border that are making our border into bloody chaos, or at least were while Joe Biden was president, that going after that is just as much of a national security threat or more than going after the Houthis in Yemen, for example.

00:43:46.000 Directing the military to crack down on the illicit trade raises legal issues, including whether it would count as murder if U.S. forces acting outside of a congressionally authorized armed conflict were to kill civilians or criminal suspects who pose no imminent threat.

00:43:57.000 Nah, the answer there is no.

00:44:00.000 With that said, President Trump obviously taking a significant action to end, for example, the fentanyl crisis in the United States.

00:44:08.000 It's not as though he didn't run on this.

00:44:09.000 He did run on this.

00:44:11.000 This is what many people voted for.

00:44:12.000 Indeed, most people voted for.

00:44:15.000 All righty, folks, we have reached the end of today's show.

00:44:17.000 We'll be back here with much more on Wednesday, but stay tuned to our channel for more updates.

The Ben Shapiro Show - August 11, 2025

CIVIL WAR: Red America vs. Blue America; Plus... Fmr. PM Liz Truss Stops By

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript