Ben Shapiro delivers a blistering monologue at the World Economic Forum in Davos, where the elite are gathering to discuss how they will rule the world and take control of the political system, and why they should be allowed to do so. Ben Shapiro is a conservative commentator, bestselling author, and host of the podcast "The Ben Shapiro Show" on the Fox News Channel. He is a regular contributor to the Financial Times, CNN, and the New York Times, and is one of the most influential people in American politics. He's also a frequent contributor on CNN and the Wall Street Journal, and a frequent guest on Fox News and NPR. He's been featured on CNN, CBS, NPR, and NPR, among other media outlets, and has been a regular guest on the Tonight Show, CBS Radio, CBS Evening News, and NBC's "Meet the Press." He is the author of several books, including "The Devil Next Door" and "Davos: An American in a Third World World," and he's a regular on CNN's Hard Knocks and CNN's "Hard Knocks." The Dark Side Of" and The FiveThirtyEight. His latest book, "The Dark Side of Politics" is out now, and it's out on Amazon Prime Video, wherever you get your copy of the show. Subscribe to his new novel "The Mindhunter" on Audible. Learn more about him and his new book "The Idiot's Guide to America's Most Powerful People." and his upcoming movie, "American Idiot." Watch out for him on HBO's "The Handmaids Guide to the White House" on HBO and CBS Radio's "America's Most Influential Person." Subscribe and comment on the show on his new podcast, "How to Think Like a Billionaire." The Mindhunter," out now! Subscribe on Apple Podcasts and on Podchaser, wherever else he is listening to podcasts are listening to the greatest things happening in the world. And don't forget to subscribe to his podcast on social media? or share it! and share it on your thoughts on the socialsays you're listening to him on the podcast? and he'll be spreading the word about what he's most influential to you on the world's most powerful people are talking about it on the internet, and how he's listening to it on his podcast, too on his socials and more!
00:00:00.000Davos' World Economic Forum begins as Klaus Schwab informs the world that the future will be built by him and his friends, Joe Biden frets that he can't unite America while AOC promotes conspiracy theories, and Bill Maher speaks truth about trans issues.
00:01:03.000My limited talk tech 6 gigs of data, just 30 bucks a month, or you can get unlimited data with a hotspot and still Save a fortune over the big guys.
00:01:10.000Go to puretalk.com, select a plan, enter promo code SHAPIRO.
00:01:13.000Save 50% off your very first month of coverage.
00:01:16.000You can literally be switched over to Pure Talk service in less than 10 minutes.
00:01:54.000They believe that they ought to run the world, they ought to have power to control your life, and they ought to have that power because they're so good at what they do.
00:03:01.000They have been attempted in a great variety of societies.
00:03:05.000And then over time, we have evolved into what we are in terms of the systems that we occupy.
00:03:11.000That doesn't mean that we can't help change those systems or progress those systems.
00:03:14.000But one of the great sort of chimeras, one of the great Mirages of politics is the idea that the crazy idea you have in your head is better than whatever has evolved over time.
00:03:26.000Because whatever has evolved over time, very often, not always, very often, those things have evolved for a reason.
00:03:33.000They are a form of tried and tested wisdom.
00:03:36.000The supposed rational idea in your own head, that's never been tried anywhere.
00:03:39.000And so, you actually have to make a very compelling case as to why what was ought to be overthrown in favor of the grand idea that you have concocted inside your own brain.
00:03:47.000This is the point that Michael Oakeshott makes when he talks about rationalism.
00:03:50.000We as human beings have a tendency to do things, not because they're rational, but because they're the way that we have been taught, or because they're the way that society has imprinted us, or the way evolution has changed us.
00:04:00.000Because of that, We tend to act in a certain way and then we make up excuses in our own mind for why we do the things that we do.
00:04:06.000There's a point that Jonathan Haidt has made also with regard to his work in the field of psychology.
00:04:11.000Very often, the reasons we do things have nothing to do with the actual reasons that we do things.
00:04:16.000In fact, they've done experiments with people who have had forms of brain damage.
00:04:20.000What they will do is that their brain will be telling them to perform a particular act and they won't know why they're performing a particular act.
00:04:29.000And then when people are asked, they will immediately shift into trying to explain in a rational way why they are doing what they're doing.
00:04:35.000They'll just randomly pick up a pen and they'll look down, they'll realize the pen is in their hand and they won't know why there's a pen in their hand.
00:04:40.000And so they'll be asked, why do you have a pen in your hand?
00:04:42.000Then they'll make up a giant excuse as to why they have a pen in their hand and try to convince themselves, basically, that this is why things work the way they do.
00:04:49.000Well, this is the way that elitists think.
00:04:52.000They think that the systems that have evolved all over the world differently in different places, that all of those systems basically ought to be overthrown by them and by their friends because they have high IQ.
00:05:01.000And I've sat in rooms with people who are like this, who believe that because they are very smart and because they are very good at what they do, because they have risen through the ranks, gone to the best schools, because they got the best grades, because they earn a lot of money, because they do all of these things, they ought to be able to change the systems at will.
00:05:15.000Not by looking at the things that already exist and then figuring out where we can tinker to make them better, but instead by completely remaking the system to make it fairer and more just.
00:05:24.000All of these ideas, of course, coming again directly out of their own brain.
00:05:27.000Their idea of fairness and justice is not generally a well-accepted societal idea of what fairness and justice constitutes.
00:05:33.000It is instead their own generalized feeling about what society should look like and they will shape society according to those predilections.
00:05:40.000And they will do so in the name of you.
00:05:42.000They will say that you are the ones who want this.
00:05:44.000This is why, for example, you have Klaus Schwab, who is the head of the World Economic Forum, talking about why people like Klaus Schwab should basically run things.
00:05:54.000So he said yesterday, in what has to count as one of the creepiest clips I've ever seen at the World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab said, the future is being built by us.
00:06:04.000He also said this with a very thick Germanic accent, which makes it really weird and creepy.
00:06:52.000And this explains, because we run major corporations and because we run governments, how we will be able to change the world to make it a great, better place for you.
00:07:02.000This is backed by his general feeling about how systems of economics should work.
00:07:08.000Already coming up more from Klaus Schwab.
00:07:41.000Bowl & Branch uses the highest quality threads on planet Earth.
00:07:44.000For a superior softness and a better night's sleep, these are sheets made with threads so luxuriously are beloved by three United States presidents.
00:08:16.000Back in 2020, October 2020, he wrote an entire piece, Klaus Traub, titled, A Better Economy Is Possible, But We Need to Reimagine Capitalism to Do It.
00:08:25.000By reimagining capitalism, he means that he should be able to pick and choose winners and losers, and he should be able to dictate the rules of the game to everybody else.
00:08:33.000See, the thing about capitalism, as F.A.
00:08:34.000Hayek, who's probably the greatest expositor of capitalism in human history, as F.A.
00:08:39.000Hayek wrote, capitalism is not a system that was quote-unquote designed.
00:08:43.000Capitalism is a system that arose over the course of centuries.
00:08:46.000To allow people to keep the fruits of their own labors and then freely trade the fruits of their own labors.
00:08:53.000It's not something that people got in the back room and they're like, how do we benefit a small cadre of society?
00:08:57.000That's how Marxists think of capitalism.
00:08:59.000They think of a bunch of old white people smoking cigars in the back room, figuring out how they keep their own property, and then they came up with the system called free markets.
00:09:07.000In the same way that racial Marxists like Ibram X. Kendi think that free speech was a concoction by old white men in order to protect their own political prerogatives.
00:09:17.000Free speech evolved through centuries of Western discourse based on battling and a generalized assumption, correct, that if you didn't have the ability to speak freely or to dissent, that it would eventually dissolve into internecine warfare, like full-scale hundred years warfare, thirty years warfare, right?
00:09:38.000When it comes to markets, same sort of thing.
00:09:39.000Over the course of centuries, there's a basic understanding that comes to be that we are better off allowing people to keep the fruits of their own labor and to freely alienate, to trade the fruits of their own labor with one another.
00:09:50.000That's not something that somebody came up with in a backroom.
00:09:56.000They noticed a thing that was going on and then they provided a rationalistic basis for the thing that was going on that actually did match what was going on in the real world.
00:10:04.000But Klaus Schwab thinks that he should be able to design systems.
00:10:07.000People who think they should be able to design systems are the last people who should be in charge of anything because typically speaking, The world is not a computer.
00:10:15.000And the attempt to design systems for people, top-down, in centralized fashion, is not only a failure, it typically ends with tyrannical failure.
00:10:23.000So here's what Klaus Schwab writes, and I'm talking about this because, again, Davos is happening right now, and these are the rules of the world community that are going to be set and have a major impact on how all of us live.
00:10:33.000Klaus Schwab wrote this back in October of 2020.
00:10:35.000In the immediate months that followed the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the world as we knew it was turned upside down.
00:10:40.000Like most people, I was constrained to observing the situation from inside my home and the World Economic Forum's empty offices, and I relied on video calls to know how others were doing.
00:10:48.000Since those early moments of the crisis, it has been hard to be optimistic about the prospect of a brighter global future.
00:10:53.000The only immediate upside, perhaps, was the drop in greenhouse gas emissions, which brought slight temporary relief to the planet's atmosphere.
00:10:58.000It shouldn't have come as a surprise that many started to wonder, will governments, businesses, and other influential stakeholders truly change their ways for the better after this?
00:11:06.000Or will we go back to business as usual?
00:11:08.000Now, this language of stakeholders is a proxy for me and my friends.
00:11:13.000Because normally, if you're the head of a corporation, you're answerable to creating a profit margin for the people who own shares in your company, which is good.
00:11:21.000It gives you a metric of success, as Milton Friedman suggested.
00:11:24.000Shareholder capitalism is the idea that you, as a company, need to take the interests of the people who actually own the company, the shareholders, into account, and then maximize your pursuit of making goods and services that people want to buy at the highest available profit margin, and this is your mission.
00:11:39.000Stakeholder capitalism is something else.
00:11:41.000Stakeholder capitalism is the idea that boards of directors should basically ignore their own shareholders in favor of people who don't have skin in the game, in favor of people who don't own stock, who aren't going to pay the price.
00:11:50.000Those people, you're supposed to make policy on their behalf.
00:11:53.000So now, you are not answerable to your own shareholders, you're answerable to the world at large, which really means you're answerable to nobody because the world at large can't vote you out of position as the CEO of a major corporation.
00:12:05.000So when you say stakeholder, what you really mean is appointed king by nobody.
00:12:09.000But you get to claim that you're acting in everybody's interest.
00:12:11.000You're a benevolent dictator without answerability to your own shareholders, because after all, you're taking into account stakeholders beyond your own shareholders.
00:12:20.000He said, it's true, there are no easy ways out of this vicious cycle, even though the mechanisms to do so lie at our fingertips.
00:12:25.000Every day we invent new technologies that could make our lives and the planet's health better.
00:12:29.000Free markets, trade and competition create so much wealth that in theory they could make everyone better off if there was the will to do so.
00:12:35.000But this is not the reality we live in today.
00:12:37.000And so one of the great dangers of the elitists, the people at Davos and company, is they always make it seem, always, that because they are high IQ, they have all the solutions.
00:12:46.000And if they have all the solutions, the only thing that separates us from utopia is the will to power!
00:12:52.000If you just had the will, if the American people, if the people of the globe, more broadly, could just access that will, then we could change the situation and utopia would arise.
00:13:00.000It's not a question of us not being able to do the things that we claim that we're able to do.
00:13:05.000It's not a question of the experts ever being wrong.
00:13:06.000It's always a question of just the willpower.
00:13:08.000And we see this in everything from COVID-19 policy...
00:13:11.000to economic policy, to international warfare, when it comes to the great geniuses in the room.
00:13:17.000Their solutions generally fail because they are not in consonance with human nature or how people actually work.
00:13:23.000And then, when they fail, you get blamed because it was just that the will wasn't there, guys.
00:13:27.000If we had just tried harder, we could have fixed everything.
00:13:30.000So instead of Klaus Schwab saying, listen, free markets, trade and competition are creating an enormous amount of wealth, maybe those things which are inherently decentralized, free trade is inherently decentralized, Free markets, inherently decentralized, right?
00:13:54.000It has created more wealth than any system in human history, and it has evolved to affect more and more in the globe in extraordinarily positive ways.
00:14:01.000Instead of saying maybe if we gave up more control, things would get better for everybody, it's if we could only harness The power of the 1.21 gigawatts of the global economy, and then channel it into the flux capacitor, everything would be fine.
00:14:13.000And all it takes to make all of that happen is just ze vir.
00:14:16.000If we only had ze vir, then that would make things happen.
00:15:00.000Having a consistent nighttime routine is really important because, you know, having a great day, it really relies on you having a pretty good night's sleep.
00:15:55.000According to Klaus Schwab, technological advances often take place in a monopolized economy and are used to prioritize one company's profits over societal progress.
00:16:05.000Well, I mean, the way that you develop technologies is through the profit margin.
00:16:09.000They do not get built absent the profit margin.
00:16:12.000Either that or they are built by states, which then tend to use them in ways that benefit only the state and nobody else.
00:16:17.000The same economic system that created so much prosperity in the golden age of American capitalism in the 50s and 60s is now creating inequality and climate change.
00:16:28.000It's an absurd contention because he's correct that the same economic system that created all that prosperity in the 50s and 60s exists today.
00:16:34.000It's created all the prosperity today.
00:16:35.000Also, we lifted literally half the world's population was in pure abject poverty in 1980 and is not today because of those systems that he didn't control.
00:16:45.000He says, the same political system that enabled our global progress and democracy after World War II now contributes to societal discord and discontent.
00:16:52.000And so we have to change things, of course.
00:16:55.000He says that if you look at how we did COVID-19, man, we did great.
00:17:02.000He said there was strong cooperation between governments and businesses to secure the funds needed for vaccine development and distribution.
00:17:07.000OK, that was an emergency situation in which the government basically said, try a vaccine.
00:17:12.000If it fails, we'll still pay for it because we need to get through this.
00:17:47.000Most people, including business leaders, investors, and community leaders have a similar attitude about their role in the world and the lives of others.
00:17:53.000Most people want to do good and believe that doing so will ultimately benefit everyone, including a company's shareholders.
00:17:58.000But what's missing in recent decades is a clear compass to guide those in leading positions in our society and economy.
00:18:05.000And so what we need is to move away from that.
00:18:08.000We need a more virtuous capitalist system.
00:18:11.000We need stakeholder capitalism metrics, non-financial metrics, disclosures that will be added to companies' annual reporting, making it possible to measure their progress over time.
00:18:20.000Doing so requires answering questions like, what is the gender pay gap inside companies?
00:18:25.000How many people of diverse backgrounds were hired and promoted?
00:18:27.000What progress has the company made toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions?
00:18:30.000How much did the company pay in taxes globally and per jurisdiction?
00:18:33.000What did the company do to hire and train employees?
00:18:39.000We have to create utopia because we are the powerful nonsense.
00:18:42.000Instead of just letting the market shake things out because it turns out that the collective knowledge of human beings is far wider and broader and deeper than the individual knowledge of centralized decision makers.
00:18:51.000Instead of acknowledging that, Klaus Schwab is doubling down on the idea that the geniuses ought to be in control.
00:18:56.000And very often this is what happens at places like the World Economic Forum.
00:19:00.000Davos is centered on the theme this year of history at a turning point, government policies, and business strategies.
00:19:05.000A variety of issues will be tackled according to Fox Business, including the COVID-19 pandemic, global conflict, economic uncertainty, and climate change.
00:19:13.000Climate Envoy John Kerry, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen are expected to deliver remarks at the five-day event.
00:19:25.000The war in Ukraine and the resulting tragedy calls for global moral action, says Gail Markovits and Beatrice DiCaro of the World Economic Forum.
00:19:31.000Leaders will address urgent humanitarian and security challenges as they simultaneously advance long-standing economic, environmental, and societal priorities.
00:19:39.000Whose priorities will those be, precisely?
00:19:44.000But who votes for the priorities of the World Economic Forum, exactly?
00:19:48.000Who decides what those priorities should be?
00:19:49.000They say, sort of at Woodrow Wilson once said that the Constitution was completely defunct, it was useless, and what you needed at the heart of the American experiment was a big man, a man who could capture all of the inherent will of the American people, bring all the will of the American people to the forefront, and that was best epitomized by the President of the United States, a central, powerful figure.
00:20:10.000And this is what you see over at the World Economic Forum.
00:20:12.000This is what the future will be built by them.
00:20:16.000The people who are talking about building our future scare the living hell out of me, and they should scare the living hell out of you.
00:20:20.000For example, yesterday at Davos, the Australian e-safety commissioner, Inman Grant, said that, you know, it's time for us to globally recalibrate what free speech means.
00:20:29.000Again, notice this is not a broadening of freedom.
00:20:32.000It's a narrowing of freedom so that elites like Inman Grant, elitists like Inman Grant, can decide what you ought to be able to say.
00:20:40.000We are finding ourselves in a place where we have increasing polarization everywhere.
00:20:47.000And everything feels binary when it doesn't need to be.
00:20:50.000So I think we're going to have to think about a recalibration of a whole range of human rights that are playing out online.
00:20:55.000You know, from freedom of speech to the freedom to be free from online violence.
00:21:02.000Or the right of data protection to the right to child dignity.
00:21:08.000Okay, what's she saying right there with all of these very wise people sitting there?
00:21:11.000I mean, literally King Solomon is sitting right next to her.
00:21:14.000People who are sitting there, nodding along.
00:21:17.000When you speak with a lot of people who believe themselves to be high IQ, in control, and they say, we ought to recalibrate things like free speech.
00:21:24.000No one gave you the power to recalibrate free speech.
00:21:27.000The fact that you're talking about doing this on an international stage with a lot of people who disagree about the limits of free speech should be a clue that this is scary stuff.
00:21:36.000Whenever you have these international institutions that get together, There's a famous line from a Leon Uris book in which he says that international law is that which the virtuous studiously ignore and the evil just ditch.
00:21:50.000That's basically the idea, is that the virtuous refuse to enforce it, international law, because enforcing it actually requires cost and the evil simply ignore.
00:21:59.000But what international law really does is it sets a backdrop against which all global conversation is now supposed to happen.
00:22:04.000That's really what these international institutions are about.
00:22:07.000Because again, all this has to be implemented top down in these countries by separate governments.
00:22:12.000But the goal is to reshift the Overton window in terms of what is acceptable and what we should all be striving for.
00:22:18.000And that's why these international convocations are really quite frightening in the way they address these issues.
00:22:23.000And we should be a little frightened of them.
00:22:26.000Alrighty, in just one second, we are going to get to the London School of Economics writing about what the WHO is doing in terms of this pandemic treaty.
00:22:33.000First, you're spending a lot of money on gas right now, like a lot of money.
00:22:35.000I filled up the tank the other day and it cost me like well over $100.
00:22:38.000It's just crazy, which is one reason why I'm using that free Upside app.
00:23:48.000Over at the London School of Economics, from a wide variety of sources, Makey Voss, Claire Wenham, Mark Eccleston-Turner, Bianca Dettering, March 30, 2022, a new pandemic treaty, what the World Health Organization needs to do next.
00:24:00.000Well, some would say that the World Health Organization needs to be disbanded and that you need an actual League of Democracies to enforce its will when it comes to information sharing.
00:24:11.000And they literally had one job, to stop a global pandemic.
00:24:14.000Not only did they fail to stop that, they also provided cover for the world's most evil government at this point, the Chinese government, which engages in vast human rights privations, which steals technology, steals intellectual property, massively expands its military footprint, subjects a billion people to abject tyranny.
00:24:33.000And the WHO just bent over backwards for those people, and lied on their behalf.
00:24:37.000But the WHO now wants to draw some new international rules.
00:24:40.000Now, those international rules, it's not clear how quote-unquote binding they're going to be.
00:24:45.000Because when it comes to international treaties, typically the way that it works in American domestic law, there are two types of international agreements.
00:24:50.000There's executive agreements, and then you have treaties.
00:24:52.000Treaties are how all international agreements are theoretically supposed to be done.
00:24:56.000If you read the Treaty Clause of the United States Constitution, typically what you're supposed to do is submit to the Senate for two-thirds approval, any treaty that you sign with a foreign country.
00:25:05.000However, of late, I mean by the last 50 years or so, what instead you have is presidents who just adopt executive agreements.
00:25:12.000And then the idea is that we are going to have congressional legislation with a simple majority vote that is called enabling legislation that basically just crams down the treaty provisions on the American domestic political scenes.
00:25:23.000You no longer have to get two-thirds approval, now 50 plus one will do it.
00:25:27.000But even putting aside the advice and consent of the Senate, even putting aside the enabling legislation that is necessary to effectuate international law on the domestic stage, even if you put all of that aside, what you end up with with these international agreements is a moral suasion, right?
00:26:19.000It never gets adopted as American law.
00:26:21.000But then it is used as the basis for American policy anyway.
00:26:25.000Or they'll adopt an executive agreement like the Iran agreement, and it becomes the basis for American foreign policy without ever having been approved by the Senate, for example.
00:26:32.000That sort of stuff is pretty, pretty common in American law, unfortunately.
00:26:36.000So when we talk about a WHO pandemic treaty, understand that when people say things like, correctly, like this thing is not self-effectuating, it would require enabling legislation in order to go forward.
00:26:48.000It is also true that it will serve as the basis for all discussion.
00:26:52.000As the basis for all commitment keeping for the next 10, 15, 20 years.
00:26:57.000So what exactly will be in this thing?
00:26:59.000According to the London School of Economics, a draft text is expected August 1, 2022.
00:27:03.000To get there, a member state-led transparent, inclusive, and fair procedure is necessary with full participation of all member states with meaningful inclusion of non-state actors.
00:27:13.000The treaty is expected to be modeled as a framework convention, complemented by additional instruments like protocols, guidelines, or standards for adoption by governance bodies created through the treaty.
00:27:22.000This approach allows parties to reach consensus on high-level legally binding principles and commitments within the initial convention, i.e.
00:27:27.000the meaning of equity or solidarity in a health emergency, and states that parties give a commitment to act in solidarity during such an emergency Followed by agreements adding detailed commitments regarding operationalizing these commitments, i.e.
00:27:38.000a protocol regarding pathogen sharing or one on equitable access to vaccines, etc.
00:27:42.000So, for example, one of the things that they're now considering under the WHO is that we have to tranche out, let's say we create a vaccine here in the United States, we have to tranche that out in equitable fashion around the globe.
00:27:50.000Well, if you're an American citizen, the first thing you should be thinking is, wait, hold up, if we develop a vaccine, shouldn't we get first crack at it?
00:27:57.000Let's say it takes all of the vaccine in order to inoculate our population.
00:28:05.000Now, that doesn't mean that we shouldn't help out other countries.
00:28:08.000And there may be situations in which it is vital that we help out other countries.
00:28:10.000But why should we be treaty-bound to do that?
00:28:13.000Shouldn't that be a case-by-case, let's analyze the situation thing?
00:28:17.000Instead, the idea is that we are going to pre-write into a code that is not fully adopted into American law, but serves as the basis for all discussion.
00:28:25.000And you're going to have future Democratic presidents, presumably, who are going to cite this as a rationale for doing these sorts of things unilaterally, because foreign policy very rarely gets done via legislation anymore.
00:28:34.000It mostly gets done The executive branch action.
00:28:36.000They'll sign an agreement that's non-binding and then they will say that they are bound by the agreement that is non-binding.
00:28:41.000That is what usually happens in cases like this.
00:28:46.000According to the London School of Economics, the thematic wishes include anchoring the treaty in human rights, addressing the principles of the right to health, equity, solidarity, transparency, trust, and accountability.
00:28:56.000Now if that all sounds incredibly vague to you, that's because it is incredibly vague.
00:29:00.000But those are just buzzwords that will then be used in order to cram down things that Americans may not like on Americans.
00:29:05.000Using a One Health approach for pandemic prevention and early detection, stronger health systems information and reporting mechanisms, including a better use of digital technology for data collection and sharing, a reform of the WHO alarm mechanism, investments in health system strengthening, increased financing for pandemic preparedness and response.
00:29:25.000So much is being touted for inclusion that achieving it all seems unlikely.
00:29:29.000But there will be consensus on things like vaccine distribution.
00:29:33.000Now, there again, there's some people who are going overboard on this and saying, well, you know, we haven't even read what this document looks like, that this is going to be the basis for some sort of grand kind of lockdown crackdown, basically.
00:29:44.000There'll be an international agreement where, in violation of American law, a president just decides, internationally, we're now going to lockdown.
00:29:49.000That would still require the president to make an independent decision to lockdown.
00:29:52.000It's not like an international body, free of the president of the United States, could say, everybody's locking down, and the president goes, well, you know, I'm trumped.
00:29:59.000I mean, there's an international... But!
00:30:37.000You guys are scaremongering about all of this.
00:30:39.000Anytime you have international leaders get together and say that they're going to create an international treaty and that it's not fully enforcing, it's not self-enforcing, but it is setting a set of standards that we all ought to aim toward, understand that as the predicate to action.
00:30:59.000WHO's agenda is public, open and transparent.
00:31:05.000WHO stands strongly for individual rights.
00:31:08.000We passionately support everyone's right to health and we will do everything we can to ensure that the right is realized.
00:31:17.000Okay, um, well, no, you don't support that, which is why the WHO again covered for the Chinese government.
00:31:22.000Meanwhile, the WHO Director General, he also said we are building an overarching global legal framework.
00:31:27.000So again, if you're not building anything, why do you say you're building something?
00:31:30.000We need adequate and efficient financing domestically and internationally.
00:31:36.000We need a stronger and sustainably financed WHO at the center of the global health security architecture.
00:31:43.000And I will return to this in a few moments.
00:31:48.000Again, when all these folks get together, very rarely something good happens.
00:31:52.000And meanwhile, speaking of wealth redistribution over at Davos, Oxfam spoke to the international charity, and they said it was time for a global wealth tax to support the less fortunate.
00:32:04.000According to Oxfam executive director Gabrielle Boucher, quote, billionaires are arriving in Davos to celebrate an incredible surge in their fortunes.
00:32:09.000The pandemic and now the steep increase in food and energy prices have simply been put a bonanza for them.
00:32:15.000Well, I mean, that's weird because most of the people who are heavily invested in the stock market took a massive hit over the course of the last couple of months.
00:32:21.000Meanwhile, decades of progress on extreme poverty are now in reverse.
00:32:24.000Millions of people are facing impossible rises in the cost of simply staying alive.
00:32:27.000Oxfam called for a one-off solidarity tax on billionaire's pandemic windfall to support people facing soaring prices, as well as to fund a fair and sustainable recovery from the pandemic.
00:32:36.000Again, centralized government being called for by Oxfam.
00:32:42.000This is what it means when you have all of these elitists get together in a room.
00:32:46.000And unfortunately, this is what you get when you have elitists on the American stage.
00:32:52.000The generalized mechanism by which the left wishes to effectuate its policy in the United States looks somewhat similar to the international mechanisms that are being afforded by people like Klaus Schwab or like the head of WHO.
00:33:02.000The idea is give us all the power And then all that separates us from Utopia is the will to do what is necessary.
00:33:09.000Why won't everyone get out of our way?
00:33:27.000And with unification, unifamity, And what he meant by that, I said at the time.
00:33:32.000It's unclear whether by unity he means, we have a few things we agree on and then we agree to disagree on many things, or if he meant, shut up and do what I say.
00:33:39.000It is now increasingly clear that Joe Biden means, shut up and do what I say.
00:33:43.000And then he is surprised when people don't like the things that he says because many of them are stupid or bad or their policies do not achieve what they seek to achieve.
00:34:04.000Stamps.com allows you to mail and ship and get access to exclusive discounts and great rates on shipping from USPS and UPS.
00:34:10.000It's an easy way to keep more money in your pocket.
00:34:12.000Stamps.com will save you time, money, and stress.
00:34:14.000For more than 20 years, Stamps.com has been indispensable for over 1 million businesses.
00:34:19.000Stamps.com gives you access to all the post office and UPS shipping services you need, right from your computer.
00:34:24.000And you can get discounts you can't find anywhere else, like up to 30% off USPS rates and 86% off UPS.
00:34:29.000No matter what business you are in, Stamps.com can help you save on shipping.
00:34:33.000Whether you're an office sending invoices, or an Etsy shop sending your products, or a warehouse shipping out truckloads of orders, Stamps.com is the mailing and shipping solution for you.
00:34:46.000Start mailing and shipping with Stamps.com today.
00:34:48.000Keep more money in your pocket every day.
00:34:50.000Sign up with promo code SHAPIRO for a special offer that includes a four-week trial, plus free postage and digital scale, no long-term commitments, no contracts.
00:34:56.000Just head on over to Stamps.com, click that microphone at the top of the page, enter code SHAPIRO.
00:35:00.000Well, as you know by now, The event of the summer, backstage live at the Ryman.
00:35:04.000We are back, better than ever, June 29th at the historic Ryman Auditorium in Nashville, Tennessee.
00:35:10.000Due to historic demand, we've opened up some more tickets to the event, so there's still time to get in on the fun and watch your favorite DailyWire host, you know, me, live and unfiltered.
00:37:14.000And when people don't give me what I want, I get very, very upset.
00:37:17.000So, I think the leading indicator of this is how Joe Biden thinking comes from a column by Thomas Friedman, who is one of the worst columnists in America and has been for several decades at this point.
00:37:28.000Basically, Thomas Friedman's formula in every column is, I went to an exotic place.
00:37:32.000Someone put me up at a hotel and I talked to the cab driver.
00:39:04.000For all you knuckleheads on Fox who say that Biden can't put two sentences together, here's a newsflash.
00:39:08.000He just put NATO together, Europe together, the whole Western alliance together, stretching from Canada up to Finland, all the way to Japan, to help Ukraine protect its fledgling democracy from Vladimir Putin's fascist assault.
00:39:19.000In doing so, he has enabled Ukraine to inflict significant losses on Russia's invading... Okay, can I just point out that Joe Biden brought up the rear on every one of these issues for, like, several weeks here?
00:39:27.000I mean, I'm... I actually like what he's done on Ukraine for the most part, but to pretend that he is the one who mobilized, like, Japan and Britain is silly.
00:39:35.000And Finland is applying for NATO membership because they border Russia, you idiot!
00:39:39.000But you did have a tuna salad sandwich with the President of the United States, and then you watched him poop in his Depends or something.
00:39:45.000It has been the best performance of alliance management and consolidation since another president, whom I covered and admired, who is also said to be incapable of putting two sentences together, George H.W.
00:40:36.000He may not be able to reunite America, but this is The key, right?
00:40:39.000So Thomas Friedman is where it comes down to the Build Back Better agenda, the Klaus Schwab, it's all the same.
00:40:43.000It's a bunch of elitists who think they ought to control your life.
00:40:46.000And if you refuse to acquiesce to this control, this means that you are an evil bad censor who just doesn't wish to access the willpower that will allow us to reach unicorn farting energy utopia.
00:40:57.000It's you, not him, not you, not the doddering old fool in the White House who literally every day says something, his own White House comms shop has to then walk back.
00:41:09.000It's not that he inherited a vaccine and he inherited an economy on the upswing and he inherited peace in the Middle East and then he blew all of it.
00:41:20.000Stop being mean to the old man and let him drink his insure in peace while he unites America and the West.
00:41:25.000He is in fact a godlike figure, Joe Biden.
00:41:28.000According to Thomas Friedman, who knows, because he had a tuna sandwich at the White House with a chocolate milkshake.
00:41:34.000Quote, it's clearly his priority above any Build Back Better provision.
00:41:37.000And he knows that's why he was elected.
00:41:39.000A majority of Americans worried that the country was coming apart at the seams and that this old war horse called Biden, with his bipartisan instincts, was the best person to knit us back together.
00:41:48.000It's the reason he decided to run in the first place, because he knows that without some basic unity of purpose and willingness to compromise, nothing else is possible.
00:42:07.000Like, since he was 30 years old and in the United States Senate?
00:42:10.000He literally entered the United States Senate when he was too young to enter the United States Senate.
00:42:13.000So yeah, I'm pretty sure it's not that, Tom.
00:42:15.000Anyway, he says, with every passing day, with every mass shooting, every racist dog whistle, every defund the police initiative, every nation-sundering Supreme Court ruling, every speaker run off a campus, every claim of election fraud, I wonder if he can bring us back together.
00:42:35.000I'm talking about our ability to transfer power peacefully and legitimately, an ability we have demonstrated since our founding.
00:42:41.000It is one thing to elect Donald Trump and pro-Trump candidates who want to restrict immigration, ban abortion, slash corporate taxes, pump more oil, curb sex education in schools, and liberate citizens from mask mandates in a pandemic.
00:42:50.000Those are policies where there can be legitimate disagreement, which is the stuff of politics.
00:42:53.000Okay, we can stop right there for a second because it is important to note that on every one of those issues, people who disagree with Thomas Friedman have been demonized as Hellspawn.
00:43:02.000If you are a pro-life person in this country, you have been demonized as a person who wants to murder women by the mainstream left.
00:43:08.000If you are a person who does not want sex education about gender theory taught to kindergartners, you have been labeled a homophobe and a bigot.
00:43:17.000If you are a person in this country who said that mask mandates and lockdowns post-vaccination were bad, you have been labeled as someone who wanted to kill grandma and your own child.
00:43:27.000There is going to be a winter Of death for people who disagreed with Joe Biden on these issues.
00:43:45.000He says, ally leaders have privately said to Biden, as he and his team have revived the Western Alliance from the splintered pieces that Trump left it in.
00:43:55.000Biden can't answer that question because we, capital W, capital E, we cannot answer that question.
00:44:01.000Biden is not blameless in this dilemma, nor is the Democratic Party, particularly as far left wing.
00:44:06.000Under pressure to revive the economy facing big-ticket demands from the far-left, Biden pursued expansive spending for too long.
00:44:11.000House Democrats also sullied one of Biden's most important bipartisan achievements, making it hostage to other excessive spending demands.
00:44:17.000The far-left saddled Biden and every Democratic candidate with radical motions, like defund the police.
00:44:21.000To defeat Trumpism, we need only, say, 10% of Republicans to abandon their party and join with a central-left Biden, which is what he was elected to be and still is at heart.
00:44:29.000But we may not be able to get even 1% of Republicans to shift.
00:44:32.000If far-left Democrats are seen as the party's defining feature, that is why I left my lunch with the president with a full stomach, but a heavy heart.
00:44:38.000I love the fact that he repeats that twice in the same column.
00:44:49.000And this, unfortunately, Is what many Democrats at this point, I don't think mainstream people who voted for Democrats believe this.
00:44:55.000I think many of them are willing to live with their neighbors.
00:44:58.000But the mainstream Democratic Party increasingly does not believe that.
00:45:01.000They believe that people who disagree with them are threats to the world order.
00:45:04.000They're the people who are stopping the ascension of utopia.
00:45:08.000They are preventing all of us from living a better life.
00:45:11.000And if only they would shut up and do what we want, then everything would be better.
00:45:16.000Which is why they have to be demonized.
00:45:17.000It's why we have to lie about what they back.
00:45:20.000It's why we have to pretend that they're trying to suborn the vote.
00:45:23.000It's why we have to pretend that they are racist, sexist, bigot, homophobes for doubting things like illegal immigration or wondering why it is that we should teach that boys are not boys and girls are not girls and everybody can be pansexual.
00:45:35.000Those people have to be treated as the worst among us.
00:45:39.000That is the only way that we can achieve true unity.
00:45:41.000Because in the end, when the elitists are scorned, they must have their revenge.
00:45:45.000Either you have to shut up, or they have to stop claiming that they have the will of the people behind them.
00:45:49.000So you can guess which one of those they support.
00:45:52.000Okay, so a perfect example of the elitists is the irrepressibly imbecilic Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez.
00:45:59.000She truly is a whirlwind of stupidity.
00:46:03.000This human being, Who is, in fact, an elitist.
00:46:06.000And I say an elitist not because, again, I don't consider being wealthy to be a referendum on your moral value.
00:46:13.000I don't think that if you're poor, you're a good person, or if you're rich, you're a bad person.
00:46:16.000Likewise, I do not believe that if you're rich, you're a good person, if you're poor, you're a bad person.
00:46:19.000I think there are good and bad people in every income class.
00:46:22.000I also think there are elitists in every income class, meaning there are people who believe that they ought to control your life in every mode and fashion, from the top down, And they ought to do so because they are smarter and better equipped and fairer and better people than you.
00:46:35.000And those people exist at every class.
00:46:39.000It happens to be rich people in Davos, but it also happens to be not so rich people, like AOC, who believes that because she has a misbegotten degree in economics from Boston University, they should revoke that degree immediately because that sucker apparently you can get in any, with every five Cracker Jack box tops or something.
00:46:56.000It comes along with a secret Red Rider decoder ring.
00:46:59.000It's that degree from Boston University in econ.
00:47:01.000If AOC can have it, man, this is a great country.
00:47:04.000Everyone can have a degree in economics from Boston University, apparently.
00:47:06.000So AOC, she did another one of her Instagram live streams, which, by the way, is now the job of our congresspeople.
00:47:12.000Congress, as Yuval Levin has pointed out, it's no longer a place for the deliberative consideration of legislation.
00:47:19.000It is now a platform for people to get more famous and raise a lot of money for themselves and become personas.
00:47:24.000So, Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez, whose main job consists of co-sponsoring legislation that will never pass, and crying in photo ops, and also doing Instagram Lives.
00:47:48.000And I think that there are a lot of people on the left who oppose me on taxes.
00:47:51.000They're not part of a global conspiracy.
00:47:52.000I think there are a lot of people in this country who oppose me on a lot of social issues, ranging from abortion to same-sex marriage.
00:47:58.000I don't think they are part of a giant conspiracy.
00:48:00.000I think there are people who can largely good faith disagree with me on these issues, which is why I believe in localism.
00:48:06.000It's why I believe in the sort of Montesquieu idea that people should live differently in different parts of the country.
00:48:11.000But if you are Alexander Ocasio-Cortez, you don't believe that.
00:48:14.000You believe that everyone who opposes you is motivated by the worst instincts among humanity, and also that these worst instincts have been organized and weaponized by people who are extremely wealthy.
00:48:25.000Because what you're about to hear from AOC right here is a full-fledged conspiracy theory.
00:48:29.000You hear a lot about the right's conspiracism.
00:48:31.000And there is conspiracism on the right, no doubt.
00:48:33.000But the conspiracism that is promoted by AOC here, and just taken for granted, nobody even comments on this, is truly wild.
00:48:41.000This is right after the Buffalo, New York shootings.
00:48:59.000So AOC decides that she's going to describe how the Buffalo, New York shooter is not an isolated incident, though statistically he is an isolated incident.
00:49:07.000Doesn't diminish the evil to point out that statistically speaking, this is an isolated incident in a country of 330 million people.
00:49:13.000She says it's not an isolated incident.
00:49:15.000This person's ideology is apparently, according to AOC, not rare.
00:49:18.000Not only is it not rare, it's well-organized and well-funded.
00:49:21.000So there is an attempt, presumably according to AOC, at actual genocide against black people, well-funded and well-organized by the right wing, including people, ironically, like me and Candace Owens, a Jew and a black person.
00:50:42.000So it is fascinating to hear people call for unity on the left while simultaneously feeding the alligator that is the AOCs of the world.
00:50:49.000But there is something in common, which again is the will to power, the real will to power, which is you give us the power and we will then do whatever we want to you.
00:50:55.000We will restructure the entire world system.
00:50:59.000Now the problem is that Democrats, the left globally, they're running up against the fact that people are not into this sort of stuff.
00:51:05.000They're running up desperately against the fact that people have begun to buck this because, as it turns out, people sort of want to rule their own lives.
00:51:12.000And so all of the propaganda efforts are just falling apart.
00:51:15.000And they can continue lying to you about how they are doing you a service by doing what they are doing, but nobody believes them any longer.
00:51:21.000And increasingly, Americans are not being distracted by ancillary issues.
00:51:25.000Issues that may be important, but they're not willing to continue to sign a blank check for politicians to do what they please while undermining their own well-being.
00:51:34.000Perfect example of this is what is currently happening in Ukraine.
00:51:36.000So I'm a big backer of the United States supporting Ukraine with heavy military weaponry.
00:51:40.000I think it depletes Russian forces, which is good.
00:51:43.000I think that it prevents Russia from becoming more aggressive on its own borders.
00:51:45.000I think it acts as a signal to China that we will prevent them from doing the same with Taiwan.
00:52:11.000And that's not the American people not being sympathetic.
00:52:14.000The American people are overwhelmingly sympathetic to the Ukrainian military efforts against the Russians.
00:52:19.000What it means is that they want the government to walk and chew gum at the same time.
00:52:22.000You want to support the Ukrainians, that's fine.
00:52:24.000But we also aren't going to simply allow you to use what's happening in Ukraine as an excuse for your own bad governance, which is exactly what the Biden administration is doing.
00:52:32.000According to a new AP poll, Americans are now less supportive of punishing Russia for launching its invasion of Ukraine if it comes at the expense of the U.S.
00:52:38.000economy, a sign of rising anxiety over inflation and other challenges, according to a new poll.
00:52:43.000sanctions has not faltered, the balance of opinion on prioritizing sanctions over the economy has shifted, according to the poll from the AP.
00:52:51.000adults say the nation's bigger priority should be sanctioning Russia as effectively as possible.
00:52:54.000Slightly more, 51%, say it should be limiting damage to the United States economy.
00:52:59.000In April, those figures were reversed.
00:53:01.000In March, shortly after Russia attacked Ukraine, a clear majority said the bigger priority should be sanctioning Russia as effectively as possible.
00:53:06.000In other words, the American people aren't willing to hear Joe Biden use Ukraine as an excuse for his bad economic policy.
00:53:12.000If they believe that Joe Biden was doing the best he could for the economy, and wasn't just blaming Vladimir Putin for everything bad, they might be more willing to countenance the idea of sending billions of dollars to Ukraine.
00:53:21.000But when the billions... I mean, that's Joe Biden's fault.
00:53:23.000When Joe Biden says, we have to spend billions of dollars in Ukraine and sanction the Russians, and yes, it will hurt the American economy, and that's really what's costing us this.
00:53:30.000What's really harming the American economy is not what's going on in Russia and Ukraine, which is fractional compared to what Joe Biden and the Federal Reserve have done to the United States economy.
00:53:38.000But if you connect those two issues, you can't then turn around and expect the American people not to connect those two issues.
00:53:43.000So meanwhile, you got Joe Biden out there saying, you know, his policies are going to continue to grow the economy.
00:53:58.000But in the meantime, it seems to me the best thing I can do, in addition to try to get the Middle Eastern countries, including OPEC, to raise their production of oil and move along that route, is to see to it that we continue to grow our economy, create jobs.
00:54:21.000But he won't get out of the way because, again, he is the one in control.
00:54:24.000I mean, he's literally saying out loud that while we are having massive gas costs that are impoverishing American families to the tune of sometimes hundreds of dollars per month, that, you know, it's just the middle of a transition.
00:54:36.000It's just an incredible transition on gasoline.
00:54:41.000We're going through an incredible transition.
00:54:44.000That is taking place, that God willing, when it's over, we'll be stronger and the world will be stronger and less reliant on fossil fuels when this is over.
00:54:54.000Oh, we're transitioning to electric energy.
00:54:58.000Joe, again, the idea, if only you guys had the willpower, he would get us out of all of this.
00:55:03.000Meanwhile, when it turns out that he's created the crisis, it's still not his fault.
00:55:06.000So, the FDA, under Joe Biden, not only shut down a plant that so far is not real evidence, produced the bacteria that led to the death of a couple of kids in Michigan, they shut down one of the big formula plants in the United States, and then they didn't alleviate any of the any of the formula shortages by allowing the shipping of formula from Europe, right, by getting rid of FDA regulations. Instead, now Joe Biden is doing like emergency flights of formula, quote. This is him tweeting. Folks, I'm excited to
00:55:36.000tell you that the first flight from Operation Fly Formula is loaded up with more than 70,000 pounds of infant formula about to land in Indiana, our team is working around the clock to get safe formula to everyone So first of all, I don't know who named Operation Fly Formula, but it sounds gross.
00:55:56.000I'm not interested in my kid having fly formula.
00:55:58.000But in any case, 70,000 pounds of formula is like one day supply of formula.
00:56:05.000But now you have Kamala Harris, who's saying that it's all their top priority.
00:56:09.000It's all their top, you know, they're solving all your problems, guys.
00:56:12.000You're just too ungrateful to acknowledge it.
00:56:15.000I know this is a scary situation for our parents and the caregivers who are taking care of these babies.
00:56:24.000Our administration is working around the clock to ensure that there is enough safe baby formula available for all who need it and it is truly one of our highest priorities.
00:56:38.000It is one of their highest priorities.
00:57:04.000We should give her more power, probably.
00:57:06.000You know, when we talk about our children, I know for this group, we all believe that when we talk about the children of the community, they are the children of the community.
00:57:24.000Which brings us to perhaps the biggest issue facing the Democrats electorally in the next few years, and that is that they have decided, when you're an elitist, when you're a full-scale elitist, and you believe you should rule things top-down, that means trumping all of the intervening institutions.
00:57:36.000When you believe that you are the great godsend, that you have the keys to unlock human prosperity and fairness and justice, all the intervening institutions that have their own visions of what that should look like have to go away.
00:57:48.000That includes the family, that includes local schooling, that includes your religious community, that includes your state.
00:58:03.000I really believe that this is going to be the death of the modern Democratic Party if they continue along these lines.
00:58:08.000Because it is one thing to say to people, you need to give us more power and we'll solve your economic problems.
00:58:12.000Increasingly, people don't like the sound of that.
00:58:14.000But the thing that people have never liked the sound of is, we need to train your kids in a bunch of radical genderized nonsense because we, the elitists, Understand that true human happiness lies only and solely in the fulfillment of the sexual impulse which will broaden out to include all human beings, screwing all other human beings, and identifying as everything up to and including fictional characters and cats.
00:58:58.000So Bill Maher on his show last week, he pointed out that the trans agenda to experiment on kids and to teach your kindergartners that they can be members of the opposite sex.
00:59:07.000The answer can't always be that anyone from a marginalized community is automatically right, trump card, mic drop, end of discussion.
00:59:24.000The answer can't always be that anyone from a marginalized community is automatically right.
00:59:29.000Trump card, mic drop, end of discussion.
00:59:32.000Because we're literally experimenting on children.
00:59:35.000Maybe that's why Sweden and Finland have stopped giving puberty blockers to kids.
00:59:40.000Because we just don't know much about the long-term effects.
00:59:43.000Although common sense should tell you that when you reverse the course of raging hormones, there's going to be problems.
00:59:51.000We do know it hinders the development of bone density, which is kind of important if you like having a skeleton.
00:59:59.000I mean, Bill Maher is saying this stuff.
01:00:01.000Again, you're elitist, you can continue preaching what you're preaching, economically, socially, it ain't gonna hold.
01:00:06.000He continued along these lines, he got a little more graphic.
01:00:09.000If this spike in trans children is all natural, why is it regional?
01:00:15.000Either Ohio is shaming them or California is creating them.
01:00:19.000If we can't admit that in certain enclaves there is some level of trendiness to the idea of being anything other than straight, then this is not a serious science-based discussion.
01:00:30.000It's a blow being struck in the culture wars using children as cannon fodder.
01:00:35.000I don't understand parents who won't let their nine-year-old walk to the corner without a helmet, an EpiPen, and a GPS tracker.
01:00:45.000And God forbid their lips touch dairy.
01:01:43.000And that was really heartwarming that the kids just got it.
01:01:48.000But my favorite reaction, and it sums me up so well, I feel like, is I was in a new classroom and I took off my mask to blow my nose and I just hear a kid loudly whisper, oh, she's a boy.
01:02:08.000These are three-year-olds that this person is talking about.
01:02:10.000Most people are bucking against this, which is why you are seeing, as you should, major American companies, which have kind of, in covert fashion, backed this agenda because they've been told by the elitists, they are the elitists, right?
01:02:22.000Stakeholder capitalism, that's the only reason State Farm is endorsing gender theory, okay?
01:02:27.000Because they, the stakeholders, like Klaus Schwab talks about, the stakeholders, the elitists in our society, they've decided they get to reshape society through the will to power.
01:02:35.000And so now people are saying no, and now they're backing off, as they should if they are smart.
01:02:40.000According to the Washington Examiner, the insurance company State Farm is discontinuing its support for the controversial Gender Cool project amid backlash following reports the company was donating books about transgender issues targeted at five-year-olds to schools.
01:02:53.000State Farm's support of a philanthropic program, Gender Cool, has been the subject of news and customer inquiries the company said in a statement.
01:02:59.000This program that included books about gender identity was intended to promote inclusivity.
01:03:03.000Conversations about gender and identity should happen at home with parents.
01:03:06.000We don't support required curriculum in schools on these topics.
01:03:09.000We support organizations providing resources for parents to have these conversations.
01:03:12.000We no longer support the program allowing for distribution of books in schools.
01:03:15.000We'll continue to explore how we can support organizations that provide tools and resources that align with our commitment to diversity and inclusion, which of course are the priorities of Klaus Schwab.
01:03:24.000He talks about them openly when it comes to stakeholder capitalism.
01:03:56.000It's because you decided that you were in control of systems that you didn't create and didn't control, and now you want control of them, and the people of America- And by the way, all over the world are saying no.
01:04:04.000That's likely to have some deleterious effects, because when you seize control of good systems, and then you attempt to twist the systems, sometimes the opposition takes the form not just to you, but of the entire system, and that's a problem.
01:04:14.000When you pervert the system, when you say, what we're doing is stakeholder capitalism, then people say, we're not just going to oppose stakeholder capitalism, we're going to oppose capitalism broad read.
01:04:24.000But the attempt to wrest power away from the people who say that they ought to control you, the people who say that they ought to build the future, that is not misbegotten.
01:04:35.000It is very, it is widely appropriate at this point.
01:04:38.000In fact, it's beyond the point where it became appropriate.
01:04:52.000The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Bradford Carrington, Executive Producer Jeremy Boren, Supervising Producer Mathis Glover, Production Manager Pavel Lydowsky, Associate Producer Savannah Dominguez-Morris, Editor Adam Sajevitz, Audio Mixer Mike Coromina, Hair and Makeup Artist in Wardrobe Fabiola Christina, Production Coordinator Jessica Kranz.
01:05:17.000The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire production.