The Ben Shapiro Show - November 10, 2026


Debunking Every Single Article of The Hegseth Impeachment

Trump Just Entered the 'F*** It' Stage. Enter Stephen Miller.

Episode Stats


Length

11 minutes

Words per minute

193.36

Word count

2,214

Sentence count

182

Harmful content

Toxicity

16

sentences flagged

Hate speech

4

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcripts from "The Ben Shapiro Show" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. Explore them interactively here.
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Representative Thomas Massey, who is on his way out, remember that he was defeated in a primary in Kentucky because he decided to run on the issue of Israel in a district that has 500 total Jews.
00:00:10.000 Representative Massey, on his way out, he needs some strange new respect.
00:00:14.000 He must have it.
00:00:15.000 He must have it. 0.98
00:00:15.000 And so, in order to grab a few headlines as the door hits him in the ass, he has now introduced articles of impeachment against Pete Hegseth, the Secretary of Defense. 0.98
00:00:26.000 Here is Representative Thomas Massey making sure to grandstand one last time. 0.95
00:00:32.000 The form of the resolution is as follows.
00:00:36.000 Impeaching Peter Bryan Hegseth, Secretary of Defense, for high crimes and misdemeanors.
00:00:42.000 Resolved that Peter Bryan Hegseth, Secretary of Defense, also referred to as Secretary of War by the administration, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors, and that the following articles of impeachment be exhibited to the United States Senate.
00:01:01.000 Okay, now this is actually a reintroduction of articles he filed back in September before the recess.
00:01:05.000 But now, because the Republicans did so poorly in the election, he feels like this is a great way of attacking the administration.
00:01:11.000 Now, it's kind of fascinating here, he doesn't go right at Trump because he understands that if he tried to impeach Trump, then the Republican Party would stand up and say no.
00:01:19.000 So, what he's trying to do is draw away a few sort of rogue Republicans to his side to build on his nascent anti-Republican movement.
00:01:27.000 Again, I said this before the election: there is a wing of the Republican Party that wanted to watch things crash and burn so they could pick up the pieces.
00:01:34.000 Many of them openly campaigned for this.
00:01:34.000 That was the goal.
00:01:36.000 It is not as though they were rooting for Republicans and then Republicans lost.
00:01:39.000 They were rooting hard against the Republicans and were overjoyed when Republicans did poorly last week.
00:01:44.000 And somehow those people are going to be credited with what?
00:01:47.000 Republican resurgence here?
00:01:48.000 Okay, anyway.
00:01:49.000 Thomas Massey, he filed these articles.
00:01:52.000 These articles are nonsensical.
00:01:54.000 They are nonsensical.
00:01:55.000 There is no crime alleged.
00:01:57.000 Remember, impeachment is for high crimes and misdemeanors.
00:01:59.000 There's not a misdemeanor alleged.
00:02:01.000 There's not a hate crime alleged.
00:02:02.000 There is no crime alleged.
00:02:03.000 It's a bunch of stuff he doesn't like. 0.59
00:02:05.000 So, Article 1 here is starting the Iran war without authorization.
00:02:10.000 Now, you may note that actually the person who authorized military action was the President of the United States.
00:02:15.000 This should be directed against the President.
00:02:17.000 But because Thomas Massey is still scared of the President, he is going after Pete Hegseth.
00:02:22.000 He says that because Joe Kent said there was no imminent threat, there must not have been an imminent threat. 0.93
00:02:27.000 Now, again, this is silly.
00:02:28.000 The President has constitutional authority to order kinetic action without a declaration of war or congressional authorization.
00:02:34.000 It happens literally all the time.
00:02:35.000 I know there are a lot of people who are saying, what about the congressional declaration of war?
00:02:41.000 The last time Congress officially declared war, like really not an authorization to use military force, like a full scale declaration of war, was World War II.
00:02:48.000 We've had a few conflicts since then.
00:02:51.000 Imminence, by the way, under the law, does not require a threat within hours or days.
00:02:55.000 It's sort of vague. 0.90
00:02:57.000 And Joe Kent is a ridiculous figure who has discredited himself a thousand times over. 0.96
00:03:02.000 So, Article I, nonsense. 0.66
00:03:04.000 Article II is defying a congressional order to withdraw from Iran.
00:03:07.000 So, on June 23rd, Congress passed a resolution to remove forces.
00:03:11.000 From Iran.
00:03:12.000 Massey claims that hostilities continued on June 26th.
00:03:16.000 Number one, concurrent resolutions, which is what happened here.
00:03:20.000 The House and the Senate voted at the same time, and the president was not given the power of veto.
00:03:25.000 It does not fulfill the bicameralism and presentment provisions of the Constitution.
00:03:28.000 Plus, let's be real about this.
00:03:30.000 I know that everyone forgot about this.
00:03:31.000 Hostilities have not been in a state of active military conflict since approximately June, April.
00:03:40.000 If you go all the way back, there have been a couple of sporadic strikes, but like full scale warfare basically ended with the ceasefire in April.
00:03:46.000 And then the MOU collapsed in June, and then it just turned back into blockade.
00:03:51.000 A blockade is not an authorization of war, it doesn't require a congressional authorization of war.
00:03:57.000 Article 3 is the 60 day war powers clock.
00:04:01.000 So, President Trump sent Congress a war powers notification March 2nd.
00:04:04.000 It expired May 1st, and there was no extension of it.
00:04:06.000 But, number one, the War Powers Act violates the president's executive authority.
00:04:10.000 It has never really gone all the way up to the Supreme Court level, but that's what would happen.
00:04:15.000 The idea that the Congress can claw back the president's executive authority under the Constitution is wrong.
00:04:20.000 And again, ongoing military operations does not mean war.
00:04:25.000 There are ongoing military operations for the United States all around the globe.
00:04:28.000 That doesn't mean they're in violations of the War Powers Act.
00:04:32.000 We'll get to more on this in just a second.
00:04:33.000 First, let's talk about protecting your private property.
00:04:36.000 So, you tend to think, well, you know, the way that somebody gets robbed is you're in your house or not home.
00:04:41.000 Somebody breaks in, they go through your safe, they take your stuff.
00:04:43.000 But it turns out that your most valuable asset is almost undoubtedly your home itself.
00:04:49.000 Now, nobody's going to like jack that up and then just take it on a truck somewhere.
00:04:52.000 But what they can do is they can participate in what's called home title theft.
00:04:56.000 Basically, they go down to the local property office.
00:04:59.000 And then they mess around with your documents and then they use those documents to access the value of your home.
00:05:03.000 They'll borrow against it.
00:05:04.000 And this is why I use Home Title Lock.
00:05:06.000 Home Title Lock monitors your property title 24 seven and sends you urgent alerts about changes.
00:05:11.000 If you become a victim, their restoration experts will spend up to a million dollars restoring your title.
00:05:15.000 Head on over to HometitleLock.com.
00:05:16.000 Use promo code BEN to get a free title history report plus a free trial of million dollar triple lock protection.
00:05:22.000 Again, that's HometitleLock.com.
00:05:24.000 Promo code BEN.
00:05:25.000 Check your title before somebody else tries to rewrite who owns it.
00:05:28.000 That asset, well, it means a lot to you and Home Title Lock will help protect it.
00:05:32.000 Check them out right now.
00:05:33.000 HometitleLock.com.
00:05:34.000 Use promo code BEN and get a free title history report and that free trial of million dollar triple lock protection.
00:05:40.000 Article 4 is an accusation that Pete Hegseth basically is responsible for the hit on the Manab Elementary School in Iran, in which 156 were killed, mostly children.
00:05:53.000 And Thomas Massey is trying to claim it wasn't an accident, that this was basically because Pete Hegseth fired his judge advocate generals, like the lawyers in the military, saying things like maximum lethality, not tepid legality.
00:06:05.000 And restricting the Pentagon press score.
00:06:07.000 Again, this is just nonsense.
00:06:09.000 Accidental strikes on civilian targets are not impeachable.
00:06:13.000 That is just a normal feature of war, unfortunately.
00:06:15.000 We wish that war were totally antiseptic.
00:06:17.000 Obviously, we wish that no one innocent were ever killed.
00:06:19.000 That is not the way war works.
00:06:21.000 There is zero evidence of a systemic policy to strike school children in Iran on purpose without military target value.
00:06:27.000 So it's just nonsense.
00:06:28.000 Okay, Article 5, we're going through Massey's stuff here because, again, Democrats are probably going to try this again in January or February.
00:06:35.000 Article 5.
00:06:37.000 Is an accusation that there were extrajudicial drug boat strikes, right?
00:06:41.000 That some 243 people were killed in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific in strikes on drug boats.
00:06:46.000 Now, again, the government argues we're in armed conflict with foreign terrorist organizations.
00:06:51.000 And Hegseth is going to argue correctly that he relied on military lawyers.
00:06:55.000 Now, what Massey and others are claiming is there was one report that Hegseth basically said you should blow these people away when they're in the water already, double tap them, right? 0.97
00:07:04.000 That there's a drug boat, you hit the drug boat, there are a bunch of people in the water, and now you kill them.
00:07:07.000 There's no evidence of a direct kill order from Hegseth of people who are.
00:07:11.000 Or to combat, meaning that they were out of combat because they were floating in the water.
00:07:14.000 Okay, so that one again, nonsense.
00:07:16.000 Article six, retaliation against Mark Kelly.
00:07:18.000 So you remember that Mark Kelly, the senator from Arizona, basically told the troops to refuse illegal orders.
00:07:24.000 But it could be read as though he was telling them to just refuse orders altogether.
00:07:28.000 And the Pentagon threatened to court martial him and order a review.
00:07:32.000 Now again, it can certainly be construed that Kelly was telling people to defy orders.
00:07:37.000 When it says illegal orders, it all depends on Mark Kelly's definition of illegal.
00:07:41.000 Also, administrative proceedings are not corporal punishment.
00:07:43.000 Okay, Article 7 in these impeachment articles seizing Maduro.
00:07:48.000 The argument is that Operation Absolute Resolve on January 3rd, 2026, used special operators to strike Caracas and capture Maduro and his wife.
00:07:56.000 And he says the Congress should be in charge, but this was an arrest operation.
00:07:59.000 The president has substantial authority to conduct law enforcement operations at home and also abroad.
00:08:05.000 And also, we should point out at this point that, again, if he doesn't like it, he should take it up with the president.
00:08:10.000 The defense secretary is just performing his function.
00:08:13.000 Article 8, same thing.
00:08:15.000 It's the campaign in Yemen.
00:08:17.000 There are some 1,100 strikes over 52 days this past March because.
00:08:20.000 The Yemeni Houthis were attacking shipping in the Babylonian Strait.
00:08:25.000 And so he is claiming that Congress wasn't notified.
00:08:28.000 Again, these were strikes on Yemen's offensive war making capacity.
00:08:31.000 And if you want it, if you don't like it, you can take it up with Trump.
00:08:33.000 But again, not one of these charges actually alleges a crime under the U.S. Code.
00:08:37.000 Forget high crimes or misdemeanors.
00:08:39.000 None of this is an actual statutory crime at all, like at all.
00:08:43.000 Whatever the impeachment charges brought against President Trump last time around or the last two times around, this is somehow substantially weaker than either of those, and both of those were weak.
00:08:52.000 Here was Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth responding.
00:08:56.000 Do you have enough Republican support to defeat impeachment articles this week?
00:09:00.000 Oh, we're not worried about that.
00:09:03.000 I'll tell you this actually, I hope all of you will join us.
00:09:06.000 We're going to do a press conference tomorrow morning at the Pentagon on that very topic.
00:09:09.000 So I'll save my remarks there.
00:09:10.000 I hope you'll all come voted for bear with your questions.
00:09:13.000 Can I ask?
00:09:16.000 Okay, and indeed, Pete Hegseth then did oppress her alongside President Trump.
00:09:21.000 And he said, yeah, we've seen this routine before.
00:09:25.000 You see, we've seen this show before.
00:09:28.000 They impeached President Trump over a perfect phone call.
00:09:31.000 They impeached him again in his final week in office.
00:09:34.000 Both times they failed.
00:09:36.000 Both times he came back stronger.
00:09:39.000 And the American people sent him back to the White House.
00:09:42.000 Now they're trying a third time, this time against a member of his cabinet.
00:09:48.000 They will fail again.
00:09:50.000 And if standing with President Trump puts me in that company, I'll take that company every day of the week.
00:09:58.000 And the president then himself came out and went after Thomas Massey.
00:10:02.000 Here he was yesterday.
00:10:05.000 Did you watch Senator Thomas Massey lay out his articles of impeachment this afternoon?
00:10:09.000 No, I don't watch Massey. 0.99
00:10:10.000 Look, Massey's a loser. 0.97
00:10:13.000 He shouldn't be taking up the time of Congress or the Senate or anything that he's doing. 1.00
00:10:20.000 The guy's a stone-called loser. 0.98
00:10:22.000 He's a Republican, always he would vote against. 0.98
00:10:26.000 We could come up with the best bill.
00:10:28.000 We could come up with, and he would always vote against.
00:10:31.000 There's something wrong with him.
00:10:33.000 And I said, Look, I've got to challenge him.
00:10:35.000 And I challenged him, and he lost in a landslide.
00:10:40.000 Okay, well, let's be real about this.
00:10:41.000 What exactly is Thomas Massey doing? 0.99
00:10:43.000 Again, he's an attention whore. 0.99
00:10:45.000 So, literally on November 6th, he tweeted out Republicans hit a wall because they kissed the wall. 1.00
00:10:51.000 Again, this is the kind of nonsense Massey traffics in. 0.75
00:10:54.000 His entire theory of politics is that everything he doesn't like has been manipulated by Israel and the Jews. 0.89
00:11:00.000 That was what he ran his campaign on in Kentucky, and then he lost. 0.96
00:11:03.000 And of course, you'll recall that he tried to launch his horseshoe party with Joe Kent and Tucker Carlson and Marjorie Taylor Greene back in August.
00:11:10.000 This is all part of the same effort, which is to undermine America's foreign policy and to undermine the president.
00:11:15.000 That is his entire goal.
00:11:16.000 That is what he wants to do.
00:11:17.000 What an amazing video you just watched.
00:11:19.000 Wasn't that amazing?
00:11:20.000 Well, you know, if you think so, head on over to dailywire.comslash subscribe to watch the full show ad free or check out this crazy story here.